Marine Works Technical Tender Package 2

Marine Works- Revetment
Technical Tender
Package 02
Al Khayyat Contracting & Trading

UrbaCon Co.‫ﺃﻭﺭﺑﺎﻛﻭﻥ ﻟﻠﻣﻘﺎﻭﻻﺕ‬
Banana Island Resort
March 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................4
2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ..................................................................6
2.1 Understanding of the Project ..........................................................6

2.2 Site photographs...........................................................................6
2.3 Project Status Update ....................................................................9
3 GENERAL SCOPE OF WORKS AND REQUIREMENTS ........................10
3.1 General Scope of Works .............................................................10

3.2 Particular Requirements................................................................11
3.2.1 Site Visit ........................................................................11
3.2.2 Tender Bid Compliance...................................................11
3.3 Responsibilities of Sub-Contractor .................................................11
3.4 Exclusions ..................................................................................14
3.5 Inspection ..................................................................................14
3.6 Related Documents ......................................................................15
4 SUBMITTALS ...................................................................................15
Appendix A: Drawings .................................................................................. A
Appendix B: Specifications ............................................................................. B
Appendix C: Bill of Quantities ........................................................................ C
Appendix D: Survey ...................................................................................... D
Appendix E: Available Geotechnical Investigation Data ..................................... E
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Project Location (from Google Earth)................................................. 4
Figure 2 - Project Close-up View (from Google Earth) ........................................ 5
Figure 3 - Photo 1 ......................................................................................... 6
Figure 4 - Photo 2 ......................................................................................... 7
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 ii
Figure 5 - Photo 3 ......................................................................................... 7
Figure 6 - Photo 4 ......................................................................................... 7
Figure 7 - Photo 5 ......................................................................................... 8
Figure 8 - Photo 6 ......................................................................................... 8
Figure 9 - Photo 7 ......................................................................................... 8
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 iii
1 INTRODUCTION
This tender package is issued on behalf of KCT, Al Khayyat Contracting & Trading
(the CONTRACTOR) to solicit bids for the Marine Works Tender Package 02 of
the Banana Island Resort (the PROJECT).
The Banana Island Marina project is located along the Qatari Eastern coastline off
Doha Bay and 3.5km due East of the New Doha International Airport. The project
location can be seen in Figure 1 and a close-up view can be seen in Figure 2.
Figure 1 - Project Location (from Google Earth)
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 4
Figure 2 - Project Close-up View (from Google Earth)
2 PROJECT BACKGROUND
2.1 Understanding of the Project

The main objective of the project is to contribute to placing Qatar on the world's
stage as a leading and world-class tourism and hospitality destination.
In that regard, KCT plan to develop a major high-end resort that will encompass
beach front villas, over-water villas, restaurants, cafes, beach clubs, dive centre,
gymnasium, pools, white sandy beaches, marina, jetties, entertainment, etc.
The Banana Island Resort is intended to be a high-end resort for relaxation,

detoxification and healthy living. The resort should meet and even surpass the
standards of similar "one island-one resort" projects that are typically found in the
Maldives and attract high numbers of visitors (holiday makers and honeymooners)
with an average stay of 8.3 nights.
2.2 Site photographs

A Site Visit was conducted by Sogreah on 29 November 2011. A photographic
record of the site visit follows.
NW tip of the island: Cobble

and boulder beach along
exposed coast of the island at
the Northern tip.
Figure 3 - Photo 1
NW tip of the island: signs of
erosion scarp.
Figure 4 - Photo 2
View of existing revetment

along the East coast of the
island. The revetment consists
of quarry rocks and has a mild
slope.
Figure 5 - Photo 3
The revetment armour rocks

are estimated to have a
grading of 0.3t - 1t.
Figure 6 - Photo 4
View of existing revetment.
Figure 7 - Photo 5
Northern coastline of the island:

Existing revetment subject to
wave attack during low tide.
Figure 8 - Photo 6
Southern tip of the island at

low tide:
Figure 9 - Photo 7
2.3 Project Status Update
The current status, as of March 2012, is outlined below:
– KCT have appointed Sogreah as the Marine Consultant for the project;
– KCT have commissioned a topographic and bathymetric survey around the

island. The bathymetric survey is included in Appendix D. A softcopy of the
survey (in CAD) has been included in this package for information.
– KCT have commissioned an extensive onshore and offshore geotechnical

investigation (GI) campaign. The associated factual report is included in
Appendices E and F.
– Sogreah have prepared the detailed design for the marine works and it is
enclosed herein in Appendix A.
– Sogreah have conducted the Environmental studies for the project.
– General earthworks have started on site.
3 GENERAL SCOPE OF WORKS AND REQUIREMENTS
3.1 General Scope of Works

The present scope of works includes but not to be limited to the following:
1) Acquisition of all necessary NOCs (permits) from the relevant statutory

Authorities.
2) Construction of new revetment on the NW shoreline of the Banana

Island including supply and placement of toe, underlayer, armour and
geotextile and sand backfill.
3) Rehabilitation of existing revetment on the N and E shoreline of the

Banana Island Development including partial removal of existing
revetment, supply and placement of toe, underlayer, armour and
geotextile and sand backfill.
4) Construction of new detached breakwater at the SE part of the Banana

Island including supply and placement of toe, underlayer and armour.
5) All temporary works required for the execution of the works including
but not limited to temporary material offloading jetty, temporary access
bunds, protection of the works during execution, etc.
6) Pre and post construction bathymetric and topographic surveys as well

as interim surveys for progress monitoring.
7) Pre and post construction water quality and sediment quality testing in
accordance to the requirements of the concerned authorities.
8) Monitoring as per the requirements of the Ministry of Environment.
9) Preparation and approval of a Construction Environmental

Management Plan (CEMP) in line with the requirements of the
concerned authorities.
The following points need to be highlighted and considered by the Tenderers when
providing their bids:
1) Tenderers are requested to price the BoQ (in Appendix C) based on

their previous experience in the region, ground investigation (included
in Appendices E and F), availability of equipment, etc.
2) The Contract Terms and Conditions of KCT have been included in this
RFP package.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 10
3) The schedule will carry a very significant weight when
evaluating the Tender Returns due to the fast track nature
of the particular project.
3.2 Particular Requirements
3.2.1 Site Visit

A site visit can be organised if requested by contacting Mr. Amine Malti, Coastal
Engineer - Sogreah on +974 33 526424 or at amine.malti@ae.arteliagroup.com
Cc: Mrs.Fairouz Mossa.Technical Assistant-UCC +974 4429 2937 f.mossa@urbacon-
intl.com
3.2.2 Tender Bid Compliance

A) The Specifications for the particular works have been detailed in Appendix B
of the Tender Documentation. The Tenders must be fully compliant with these
specifications.
B) Any exclusions/qualifications must be clearly mentioned in the Tender

Returns.
3.3 Responsibilities of Sub-Contractor

The Sub-Contractor shall be responsible for:
A) Obtaining and maintaining all permits/clearances necessary to access the

site and carry out the works safely, including compliance with the
requirements of relevant authorities and the instructions of the KCT Project
Manager.
B) The Sub-Contractor will communicate only with the Contractor. No other

external communication is authorised without notification and prior approval
from the Contractor.
C) Provision of all materials, plants and equipment, labour, consumables, site

supervision, and all necessary requirements to complete the work.
D) Maintaining the site environmental conditions throughout the work period,

including provision of discharge or disposal procedure compliant with the
requirements of relevant authorities and/or the KCT Project Manager. Utilise
existing utilities on site if and whenever possible.
E) Restoration of the fieldwork locations, where required, including reinstating

access roads and other site areas to the satisfaction of the relevant
authorities and/or the KCT Project Manager.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 11
F) Provision of adequate transportation means (from and to the site) to the KCT
Project Manager through the entire work period will not be required.
However the Sub-Contractor has to make available to the KCT Project
Manager a boat to supervise the marine operations on an as needed basis.
G) Full access and cooperation with any other third party Contractors that may
be working on the site.
H) Adherence to the KCT Project Manager 's specifications.
I) Pre and post dredging water and sediment quality testing to the requirements
of MOE.
J) Monitoring as per the requirements of MOE.
K) Compliance to relevant environmental measures identified in the approved

CEMP to be prepared by the Sub-Contractor e.g. use of scum booms, silt
curtains, bunds, etc.
L) Compilation of all required Method Statements and Health & Safety Plans.
M) Sub-Contractor to provide insurances as per the RFP.
N) Testing of materials as required by the Specifications and other tests as may

be deemed reasonable by the KCT Project Manager and submitting test
results to the KCT Project Manager as soon as they are received.
O) Ensuring that tests shall be carried out by an approved laboratory (by the
State of Qatar) at the Sub-Contractor's expense.
P) Not proceeding with ordering any materials until approval in writing has
been obtained from the KCT Project Manager.
Q) Preparing and submitting to the KCT Project Manager a fully detailed

programme which he shall update on a regular basis. The Sub-Contractor
should clearly identify any long lead items.
R) Provide sufficient staff and equipment to perform the duties in executing the
Contract.
S) The full time supervision of the whole of the works. The Sub-Contractor shall
liaise and co-ordinate with any third party Contractors or suppliers.
T) Taking all precautions to prevent the outbreak of fire and shall provide
adequate fire fighting appliances on site to the approval of the KCT Project
Manager.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 12
U) The Sub-Contractor and all persons employed by him and Sub - Contractors,
to comply with the Provisions of all Acts, Orders, Laws and Regulations
concerning the safety, health or welfare of persons working on site as per
Qatari State regulations.
V) The Sub-Contractor and all persons employed by him and Sub - Contractors,
to comply with the provisions of the safety regulations at site.
W) Ensuring accidents shall be properly documented, reported to the KCT

Project Manager immediately and assistance given by way of medical help
and transportation to hospital.
X) Removal from site of all redundant plant on completion of the works.
Y) Only modern, properly maintained equipment of the appropriate capacity

and suitability for the duty required, shall be used for the works.
Z) Protection of the works from damage by his own workmen performing

subsequent operations.
AA) Provision and maintenance of signs, red warning lamps and barricades as
necessary.
BB) Immediately prior to handing over the works the Sub-Contractor shall
thoroughly clean the whole of the works and surrounding area all to the
approval of the KCT Project Manager.
CC) Ensure that excessive noise and pollution does not occur during the execution
of the works.
DD) Provision of all necessary attendance to directly employed Sub - Contractors

and statutory authorities as may be required for the completion of the works
as instructed by the KCT Project Manager.
EE) Ensure the proper adoption of QA / QC procedures.
FF) The working areas on site are subject to the limitations imposed by the KCT
Project Manager.
GG) Supply of all lighting and power required for the works, including the work
of Sub-Sub-Contractors, including supplying, operating and maintaining
temporary switches, cables and leads. The Sub-Contractor shall pay for all
charges for the current consumed and connections.
HH) Provision of temporary aids to navigation ensuring safe marine navigation at

all times in accordance with the requirements of the concerned authorities.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 13
II) Preparation and submittal of "Shop", "Fabrication" and "As - Built"
drawings.
JJ) Sub-Contractor to ensure the existing road to the project opened recently by
KCT is intact from any damage caused by construction traffic, and to
maintain It periodically (to the KCT Project Manager Satisfaction) to ensure
its workability.
KK) Sub-Contractor has to provide periodical (bi-daily or as needed) interim

survey report to the KCT Project Manager to enable proper monitoring of
works, and to provide pre surveys and a post survey of every completed
area, along with volume calculations as required and to the satisfaction of
the KCT Project Manager.
LL) Sub-Contractor to submit program of work in accordance with the Client

requirements.
MM) The Sub-Contractor is expected to work the necessary shifts to complete the
works in accordance to agreed program, while taking into consideration the
local Statutory Authorities' requirements and limitations.
3.4 Exclusions
The following items are not required and/or will be provided by the Contractor:
A) Site offices on the Island for the Sub-Contractor will be made available by
the Contractor (Sub-Contractor to provide requirements for the approval of
the the KCT Project Manager).
B) Provision of utilities for Sub-Contractor site offices (power, water, high-speed

internet connection) via temporary services will be provided by the
Contractor.
C) Maintenance of Sub-Contractor site offices (cleaning, consumables, etc) will

be provided by the Contractor.
D) Site offices will be watertight, lockable, air conditioned if necessary and

provided with adequate lighting.
3.5 Inspection
The Sub-Contractor, including any subordinate organizations engaged by him,
shall be subject to surveillance inspection and audit by the KCT Project Manager
and the assigned Supervising Team. Inspection of works will be performed by the
KCT Project Manager while the works are in progress to verify compliance with the
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 14
specified technical and quality requirements, to observe the equipment and
procedures, and to review the program.
Inspection or audit by the KCT Project Manager and/or Supervising Team shall not
relieve the Sub-Contractor of his responsibility for complying with the requirements
of this specification.
3.6 Related Documents

The related technical documents are outlined below:
o Drawings in Appendix A.
o Specifications in Appendix B.
o BoQ in Appendix C.
o Bathymetric and Topographic Survey in Appendix D.
o Onshore Geotechnical Investigation Factual Report in Appendix E.
4 SUBMITTALS
The Sub-Contractor shall include in his Tender Return the following minimum
information:
– Detailed proposed method statement discussing proposed phasing, works by

land, works by water, HSE issues, minimisation of environmental impact (e.g.
use of silt screens, bunding, monitoring, etc), disposal methodology on land,
production/day expected, etc.
– The experience and qualifications of the Contractor in similar works (year,

location, client, scope of works, duration and value of the contract).
– The experience and qualifications of the Contractor project team.
– List of equipment to be assigned to carry out the works.
– Work schedule (this will carry a lot of weight when evaluating

the Tender Returns).
– Confirmation of compliance to the specifications included in Appendix B.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 15
APPENDIX A: DRAWINGS
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 A
NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED.
2. VERTICAL DATUM IS IN METRES AND REFERS TO

QATAR NATIONAL DATUM(QND).CHART DATUM IS
ADOPTED A:S BELOW 0.88m A:S PER ADMIRALTY
SOP UNE·- --JEDGE OF niE CHART3960.
USEABLE LAND AREA
3. BEFORE PLACING THE GEOTEXTILE ON TOP OF
APPROXIMAlE PROAL£ OF niEI--- -+------......!.!11 ---------1 THE EXISTING PROTECTION,niE SURFACE SHALL
EXIsnNG SHORE PROlECTION 1-3 TONNE ROCK BE PREPARED BY FILLING THE VOIDS BETWEEN
(PLACED ROCK) DWL +1.99 THE ROCKS WTIH QUARRYRUN.
sz MHHW +0.83 4. IN CASE OF EXISTING GEOTEXTILE UNDER THE
sz ARMOUR LAYER OF THEEXISTING SHORE
PROTECTION THE GEOTEXTILE SHOWN IN THE
LAT -0.70
sz DRAWING CAN BE REMOVED SUBJECT TO THE
APPROVAL OFniE ENGINEER.
7000
£ABED LEVEL
VARIES HAT +1.34 +2.22
APPRO MHHW+0.83 +1.71
RECLAIMED MATERIAL -2.00 1-3 TONNE ROCK
(DUMPED ROCK) MSL +0.16 +1.04
MLLW -0.40 +0.48
LAT -0.70 +0.18
(QNO) (CD)
TIDE BAR
0
--2--4 ---6 ---8 ---
10 m
SOP UNE----L--+CDGE OF niE

USEABLE LAND ARfA
5000 15000
1-3 TONNE ROCK

(PLACED ROCK) DWL + 1.9 9
sz MHHW +0.83
sz
LAT -0 .7 0
1-3 TONNE ROCK sz ENGINEER:
{DUMPED ROCK)
SOGREAH
7000 ...UNAIIIIIM
RECLAIMED MATERIAL PROJECT:
BANANA ISLAND
PROJECT
DRAWING:
SECTION SHORE PROTECTION

(SCAI.£ 1:200)
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
DATE:liiMNUGI2
-IJY :-
-BY: NoJC DATE::18NNUOI2
DATE:21NNUGI2
II II fW3
-- IIWQ8fAQI!
......-----------11 SGF 1116811 DWG MRN 013

[M(OJ'Ii' IF(OJ!fi (C(OJ[M$'1J'R .HC'IJ' (OJIM 1- J=.::::=---, M :.:::::T'IPE OI'IIOC-=-.. :::-::::::::IE -----!!;IEV!........I
NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED.

ADOPTED A:S BELOW 0.88m A:S PERADMIRALlY
CHART3960.
SOP UN
5000 I
LEE SIDE SEA SIDE
DWL +1.99
MHHW + 0.83
sz
sz HAT +1.34 +2.22
L.AT -0.70 MHHW+0.83 +1.71
sz
MSL +0.16 +1.04
p.,99.._QUARRY RUN MLLW -0.40 +0.48

® LAT -0.70
(QND)
+0.18
(CD)
TIDE BAR
SECTION 0 2 4 6 8 10m
{SCALE 1:200) ---- ---------
SCALE 1:200
ENGINEER:
SOGREAH
...UNAIIIIIM
PROJECT:
BANANA ISLAND
PROJECT
DRAWING:
DETACHED BREAKWATER
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
DATE:liiMNUGI2
-IJY :-
-IY: AN« DATE::18NNUOI2
-
.....------------11 1116811
SGF DWG II
NOTES
DATE:21NNUGI2
NOTES
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS
OTHERWISE STATED.

-N- ADOPTED A:S BELOW 0.88m A:S PERADMIRALlY
T CHART3960.
3. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS BA:SED ON QATAR NATIONAL

GRID DATUM 95(QND 95).
HAT +1.34 +2.22
393450N MHHW+0.83 +1.71

MSL +0.16 +1.04
MLLW -0.40 +0.48

LAT -0.70 +0.18
(QND) (CD)
TIDE BAR
0 20 40 60 80 100m
---------- SCAL.£ 1:2000
ENGINEER:
SOGREAH
...UNAIIIIIM
PROJECT:
BANANA ISLAND
393150 N PROJECT
SETTING OUT COORDINATES DRAWING:
REF EASTING NORTHING
SOP-01 242982.49 393316.36
DETACHED BREAKWATER
SOP-02 243065.58 393271.79
SOP-OJ 243157.10 393294.51 GENERAL LAYOUT
SOP-04 243209.69 393330.51
SOP-05 243271.91 393344.24 -IJY :- DATE:liiMNUGI2
SOP-06 243334.58 393357.10 I : NoJC DATE:liiNNUOI2
""
LLI
SOP-14 243386.82 393394.01
--
....------+-------11 1116811
SGF DWG II
DATE:2111WUGI2
NOTES
OTHERWISE STATED.

-N- ADOPTED A:S BELOW 0.88m A:S PERADMIRALlY
T CHART3960.
3. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS BA:SED ON QATAR NATIONAL

GRID DATUM 95(QND95).
HAT +1.34 +2.22

MHHW+0.8J +1.71
393900 N MSL +0.16 +1.04
MLLW -0.40 +0.48

LAT -0.70 +0.18
(QND) (CD)
TIDE BAR
0 40 80 120 16 0 200m
-- --------
SCALE 1:4000
ENGINEER:
SETTING OUT COORDINATES SOGREAH

REF EASTING NORTHING ...UNAIIIIIM
#
SOP-01 242697.94 393887.02
SOP-02 242729.10 393979.07 PROJECT:
SOP-03 242809.38 394038.26

SOP-04 242901.38 394061.13 BANANA ISLAND
SOP-05 243001.18 394054.68
SOP-06 243100.97 394048.38
PROJECT
393300 N SOP 07 243198.48 394027.20
SOP-08 243290.70 393989.77 DRAWING:
SOP-09 243348.90 393911.31

SOP-10 243387.72 393819.53 SHORE PROTECTION
SOP-11 243406.55 393721.45 GENERAL LAYOUT
SOP-12 243414.49 393621.79
SOP-13 243403.76 393524.02 -IJY :- DATE:liiMNUGI2
SOP-14 243335.86 393446.23 -BY: AN« DATE:liiNNUOI2
DATE:2111WUGI2
Lo.l Lo.l
,.,
0 0
I 1116811 II II fW3
,.,
0 ,.,
ro
0
--
SGF DWG MRN 005

IIWQ8fAQI!
NOTES
OTHERWISE STATED.
JOBIt> T'IPE01'DOC- -IE lEV
(O)'Ii' IFIDJR (C(O)[M$'1J'R .HC'IJ' (O) DMWIOCJ8CIIL£:M-

-N-
NOTES
OTHERWISE STATED.

-N- ADOPTED A:S BELOW 0.88m A:S PER ADMIRALTY
T CHART3960.
3. HORIZONTAL DATUM IS BASED ON QATAR NATIONAL

GRID DATUM 95(QND 95).
HAT +1.34 +2.22

MHHW+0.83 +1.71
393900 N MSL +0.16 +1.04
MLLW -0.40 +0.48
LAT -0.70 +0.18
(QND) (CD)
TIDE BAR
0 40 80 120 16 0 200m
-- --------
SCALE 1:4000
ENGINEER:
SOGREAH
...UNAIIIIIM
PROJECT:
BANANA ISLAND
PROJECT
393300 N
DRAWING:
GENERAL LAYOUT
DATE:liiMNUGI2
-IJY :-
-IY: NoJC DATE:liiNNUOI2
DATE:2111WUGI2
I II II fW3
IIWQ8fAQI!
SGF 1116811 DWG MRN 001

JOBIt> T'IPE01'DOC- -IE lEV
DMWIOCJIICIIL£: M-
Marine Works Technical Tender Package 1
APPENDIX B: SPECIFICATIONS
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 B
Geotextile Specification

March 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 GENERAL.........................................................................................1
2 GEOTEXTILE PROPERTIES ...................................................................2
3 MATERIAL DATA SHEET.....................................................................3
4 TESTING ..........................................................................................4
5 DELIVERY AND STORAGE .................................................................5
6 LAYING OF FILTER FABRIC.................................................................6
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 ii
1 GENERAL
This specification details the requirements for the supply and installation of
Geotextile.
The Project Drawings and Technical Documents, including Reports and

Specifications, in addition to the general and particular conditions of contract shall
be considered in conjunction with this specification.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 1
2 GEOTEXTILE PROPERTIES
Geotextile to be used as a filter beneath rock shall be a non-woven fabric
constructed by needle punching virgin staple fibres of polypropylene incorporating
a minimum of 1% by weight active carbon black. Geotextiles constructed from
fibres of more than one polymer will not be permitted.
The Geotextile being proposed shall have the following properties:
A) Permeability of Geotextile > 10 x permeability of underlying soil.
B) Pore size, O90 of Geotextile < d50 of subsoil
C) Subsoil permeability and material size shall be determined from site

investigation, either through direct measurements where available or by
adoption of figures from the following table according to the soil description.
Soil Type Filtration d50 (mm) Permeability ks (m/s)

Clayey Silt 0.02 1 x 10-9
Sandy Silt 0.10 1 x 10-7
Fine Sand 0.30 1 x 10-5
Coarse sand 0.50 1 x 10-4
Mixed sand & shingle 2.00 1 x 10-3
D) Weight >1,000 g/m2
E) Thickness > 5.0 mm
F) Tensile Strength > 30kN/m longitudinal, > 60 kN/m transverse
G) CBR puncture resistance > 5.0 kN
H) Permeability l/m2/s under 100mm head < 30
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 2
3 MATERIAL DATA SHEET

The Sub-Contractor shall submit to the KCT Project Manager for approval a sample
of the proposed Geotextile, of minimum size 300mm x 300mm, together with a
material property data sheet. The data sheet shall be substantiated by an index
and performance compliance certificate issued by an accredited Geotextile filter
fabric testing organisation e.g. the German Bundesanstalt für Wasserbau (BAW)
and shall contain the following material properties.
Test method description Test method Units QA

tolerance
Minimum mean water flow normal to the BS 6906 Part 3 l/sq. -10%
plane of the Geotextile under 100mm head m/sec.
Minimum mean coefficient of permeability BS 6906 Part 3 m/s -10%
Mean maximum pore size O90 BS 6906 Part 2 microns +10%
Mean minimum tensile strength BS EN ISO 10319 kN/m -10%
Mean minimum tensile extension BS EN ISO 10319 % -10%
Mean maximum Cone Drop perforation hole BS EN 918 mm
diameter
Mean minimum CBR puncture resistance BS EN ISO 12236 kN -10%
Mean minimum CBR puncture displacement BS EN ISO 12236 mm -10%
Mean minimum thickness under 2 kPa BS EN 964 mm -10%
Maximum thickness reduction under pressure BS EN 964 % +10%
increase from 2kPa to 200kPa
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 3
4 TESTING
The Geotextile manufacturer shall provide production test certificates at the rate of
one set of certificates per 6,000m2 delivered to site and a minimum of 1 set per
contract. Test methods employed shall be in accordance with the requirements of
BS EN or ISO and be accredited by UKAS to carry out the required tests.
Certificates relevant to a batch of Geotextile shall be furnished to the KCT Project
Manager prior to that batch of Geotextile being incorporated in the works.
Prior to incorporation in the works samples of the Geotextile shall be taken in

accordance with the requirements of ISO 9862, 1990 at the rate of one set per
20 number of rolls. Half the samples shall be retained by the Sub-Contractor and
half shall be furnished to the KCT Project Manager. Both sets of samples shall be
stored in light tight bags at ambient temperature until required for testing or
disposal at the direction of the KCT Project Manager.
The following definitions shall apply when considering test results:-
A) A 'set of test results' shall be those results derived from specimens cut from
one sample.
B) The 'mean value' for any set of test results shall be the arithmetic mean of
that set of results.
C) The 'characteristic value' is the value below which not more than 5% of the
test results may be expected to fall. This represents the value at 1.64
standard deviations below the mean value.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 4
5 DELIVERY AND STORAGE

Geotextiles shall be delivered to site in packaging which will protect the rolls from
degradation by ultra violet light. The labelling shall clearly identify the product
supplied in accordance with BS EN 30320. Geotextiles shall be protected at all
times against physical or chemical damage. Geotextiles shall be kept in the
wrappings provided by the manufacturer until required for use in the works.
During storage, Geotextile rolls shall be elevated off the ground and adequately
covered to protect them from the following: site construction damage, precipitation,
extended ultraviolet radiation including sunlight, chemicals that are strong acids or
strong bases, flames including welding sparks, temperatures in excess of 71°C,
and any other environmental condition that may damage the property values of the
Geotextile. The rolls of Geotextile shall be stored be level and stacked not more
than five rolls high and no other materials shall be stacked on top of the
Geotextiles.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 5
6 LAYING OF FILTER FABRIC

Filter fabric shall be laid on prepared surfaces in accordance with the
manufacturer’s recommendations. The Geotextile shall be laid and installed in the
positions and to the line and levels described on the drawings. Material which will
be in contact with the Geotextile shall not have protrusions which are likely to
damage the Geotextile during installation or in service. Construction plant must not
operate directly on the Geotextile. On sloping surfaces, the fabric shall be laid
with its longitudinal axis down the slope.
Filter fabric shall be laid with minimum 1000mm overlaps between adjacent
sheets/rolls unless detailed or specified otherwise. Reduction in overlap to 500mm
may be considered by the KCT Project Manager where the sublayer is firm and
above water level. The stitching of adjacent sheets in accordance with the
manufacturer’s instructions may be considered by the KCT Project Manager, as an
alternative to lapping.
The Sub-Contractor shall ensure that filter fabric is not exposed to direct sunlight for
more than one week. If, because of the nature of the work, the entire area of
Geotextile cannot be covered within one week of laying, then exposed areas shall
be rolled and protected from sunlight, or shaded by other approved means.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-003-00 6
Rockworks Specification


March 2012
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 GENERAL.........................................................................................1
1.1 Standards, Codes of Practice and References ...................................1

1.2 Referenced Specifications ..............................................................2
2 QUALITY OF ROCK AND QUARRY MATERIAL .....................................3
2.1 Rock Quality.................................................................................3

2.1.1 General ..........................................................................3
2.1.2 Rock Sources ...................................................................3
2.1.3 Rock Quarry Quality Control Plan ......................................3
2.2 Rock Grading ...............................................................................4
2.2.1 Rock Grading Class..........................................................4
2.2.2 Rock Shape Ratio .............................................................5
2.3 Testing Requirements and Quality Control ........................................5
2.3.1 Test Values ......................................................................5
2.3.2 Testing Frequency.............................................................7
2.3.3 Acceptance Procedures .....................................................8
2.3.4 Quality Control Testing .....................................................9
3 QUARRY OPERATIONS ...................................................................10
4 TRANSPORTATION AND STOCKPILING OF ROCK ............................11
4.1 Transportation of Quarry Material.................................................11

4.2 Stockpiling of Quarry Material .....................................................11
5 SETTING OUT AND CONTROL OF THE WORKS ...............................12
5.1 Setting Out .................................................................................12

5.2 Rock Placement...........................................................................12
5.2.1 General ........................................................................12
5.2.2 Quality Control ..............................................................13
5.2.3 Placing of Underlayer and Core Rock ...............................14
5.2.4 Placing of Armour Layer ..................................................14
5.3 Survey Control ............................................................................15
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 ii
5.4 Tolerances..................................................................................16
5.4.1 Horizontal Tolerances .....................................................16
5.4.2 Underlayer and Core Placing Tolerances ..........................16
5.4.3 Armour Layer Vertical Tolerances .....................................16
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 - Rock Grading Classes...................................................................... 4
Table 2 - Testing Criteria................................................................................ 5
Table 3 - Frequency of Rock Testing ................................................................ 8
Table 4. Sounding Ball Diameter. ................................................................. 15
Table 5 - Armour Layer Tolerances ................................................................ 16
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 iii
1 GENERAL
This specification details the requirements for the supply of rock and construction of
rubble-mound structures in a marine environment.
The Project Drawings and Technical Documents, including Reports and

Specifications, in addition to the general and particular conditions of contract shall
be considered in conjunction with this specification.
1.1 Standards, Codes of Practice and References

The following Standards and Codes of Practice are referenced within the
Specification. All materials, workmanship and testing shall conform to the
requirements of the latest editions of the following Standards and Codes of Practice
except as explicitly varied by this specification:
– BS 6349 Maritime Structures;
– CUR/CIRIA Recommendations of Construction Industry Research and

Information Association (CIRIA) C673, “The Rock Manual”, 2008;
– CUR/CIRIA Recommendations of Construction Industry Research and

Information Association (CIRIA) C673, “ The Rock Manual”, 1991;
– ISRM International Society for Rock Mechanics. Suggested Methods for

Determining Point Load Strength, 1985;
– ASTM C 131-81 Test for Resistance to Abrasion of Small size Coarse

Aggregate by Use of Los Angles Machine;
– BS 812-111 Testing aggregates. Methods for determination of ten per cent

fines value (TFV);
– BS 812-112 Testing aggregates. Method for determination of aggregate

impact value;
– BS 812-117 Testing aggregates. Method for determination of soundness ;
– ASTM D2938 Unconfined compression strength;
– BS 1367.2 Resistance to weathering.
The design and construction shall comply with the requirements of the local
authorities.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 1
Any conflicts or inconsistencies between the specification and other contract
documents shall be brought to the attention of the Employer for resolution. If
inconsistencies exist between the requirements of this Specification and those of
contract documents, the more stringent requirements shall apply as determined by
the Employer.
1.2 Referenced Specifications

This document is to be read in conjunction with all other Project Specifications,
including but not limited to:
– Geotextile Specification.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 2
2 QUALITY OF ROCK AND QUARRY MATERIAL
2.1 Rock Quality
2.1.1 General
All rock shall be dense, of sound material and quarried from an approved source.
It shall be free from weathering, mechanical weakness and chemical
decomposition, and of such character that it will resist disintegration and erosion
by the action of air, water (fresh or seawater), wetting and drying, extremes of
temperature and impact due to wave action or any other natural or climatic
factors.
It shall be free from dirt, soil, peat, loam, clay or any organic matter and all holes
drilled for blasting purposes. It shall be capable of being handled and placed
without fracture or damage.
Quarried rock shall not contain visually observable or chemically detectable

impurities or foreign matters in such quantities that these are damaging for the
constructive application of the quarried stone or for the environment in which the
quarried stone is to be placed.
2.1.2 Rock Sources

All Armour Rock used on the Project shall be from the same source to provide an
acceptable uniform color to the finished works. Providing the rock meets or
exceeds all specified material requirements, and the rate of supply required to
satisfy programme requirements is met, rock may be obtained from either local
quarries or may be imported from other sources. There shall, however, be no
mixing of locally-obtained and imported material, without the approval of the KCT
Project Manager.
2.1.3 Rock Quarry Quality Control Plan

Prior to the agreement for the use of a proposed source, the Sub-Contractor shall
provide evidence of rock selection quality control procedures in operation at the
quarry. This evidence shall include, but not be restricted to:
– Assessments of any changes anticipated in the geology of the production

faces over the duration of the Contract likely to affect rock quality, type,
block composition or integrity;
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 3
– Evidence of the selection of a blasting pattern which minimizes the
production of latent fractures;
– Evidence of orientation of rock production faces to minimize the influence of

fractures and discontinuities;
– Length of time rock is stockpiled;
– Evidence of rejection of out-of-size and flawed materials prior to dispatch;
– Anticipated incidence of block fracture on-site, based either on controlled

drop tests, or rock breakages during transit.
2.2 Rock Grading
2.2.1 Rock Grading Class

Rock shall be supplied in the standard grading classe defined in
Table 1 with the associated limits as defined below:
– ELL (Extreme Lower Limit) - the mass below which no more than 5 per cent
passing by mass is permitted
– NLL (Nominal Lower Limit) - the mass below which no more than 10 per cent
passing 8 by mass is permitted
– NUL (Nominal Upper Limit) - the mass below which no less than 70 per cent
passing by mass is permitted
– EUL (Extreme Upper Limit) - the mass below which no less than 97 per cent
passing by mass is permitted.
Table 1 - Rock Grading Classes
Rock Grading
Class Limit Definition) Mem* (kg)
Class Designation
ELL* NLL* NUL* EUL*

Lower and
Passing Requirements <5 % <10 % >70 % >97 % Upper limits
Well graded between

1 – 500 kg 1 kg 500 kg
ELL and EUL
300 – 1000 kg 200 kg 300 kg 1000 kg 1500 kg 540 – 690
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 4
Rock Grading
Class Limit Definition) Mem* (kg)
Class Designation
ELL* NLL* NUL* EUL*

Lower and
Passing Requirements <5 % <10 % >70 % >97 % Upper limits
1000 – 3000 kg 700 kg 1000 kg 3000 kg 4500 kg 1700 – 2100
Explanations:
* as defined in CIRIA/CUR for Heavy and Light grading
2.2.2 Rock Shape Ratio

Rock in armour and under layer grades shall not contain more than 50% by weight
of stone with a length to thickness (L/d) ratio greater than 2.
Not more than 5% of the rocks shall have a length to thickness (L/d) ratio greater
than 3, where the length, L, is defined as the greatest distance between two points
on the stone and the thickness, d, as the minimum distance between two enclosing
parallel planes through which the stone can just pass.
Testing for shape ratio determination shall be undertaken on samples of at least 50

pieces taken at random from stones of mass M15 or greater.
2.3 Testing Requirements and Quality Control
2.3.1 Test Values

The Sub-Contractor shall provide detailed petrological descriptions of all rock types
and shall submit to the KCT Project Manager for acceptance, test results from the
proposed source from an independent laboratory, demonstrating compliance with
the criteria presented in Table 2. Testing to these criteria shall be carried out
throughout the Contract, at the frequencies indicated in Table 3.
Table 2 - Testing Criteria.
Testing Criteria Explanation
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 5
The stones shall have a density of not less
than 2650 kg/m3. Sampling, testing, and
reporting shall be carried out in
a) Density
accordance with Appendix 2, Section A2.6
of the "Manual on the Use of Rock in
Coastal and Shoreline Engineering",
(CIRIA/CUR, 1991).
The average water absorption shall be not
more than 2% for rocks when sampled,
b) Water Absorption
tested and reported in accordance with
Appendix 2, Section A2.7, CIRIA/CUR
(1991).
Magnesium Sulphate Soundness for
sampling testing and reporting in
accordance with BS6349-1:2000 shall be -
less than 18%.
Notwithstanding the requirement above, if
c) Resistance to Weathering the rock is basaltic, there shall be no
occurrences of Sonnenbrand effect in the
first 20 stones tested or no more than one
occurrence in the first 40 stones tested
when sampled, tested and reported in
accordance with Appendix 2, Section A2.8
of the aforementioned CIRIA/CUR
publication.
The aggregate impact value shall be less
than 30% for the standard test fraction
d) Impact Resistance
when tested in accordance with BS 812
Part 112.
The force required to produce 10% fines
e) Crushing Resistance shall not be less than 100 kN when tested
in accordance with BS 812 Part 111.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 6
Blocks shall be free from visually
observable cracks, veins, fissures, shale
layers, styolite seams, laminations, foliation
planes, cleavage planes, unit contacts or
other such flaws, which could lead to
(f) Block Integrity
breakage during loading, unloading or
placing. The Drop Test Breakage Index
shall be less than 5% when sampled, tested
and reported in accordance with Appendix
2, Section A2.11 of the aforementioned
CIRIA/CUR publication.
The loss of material using the Los Angeles
(g) Resistance to Abrasion Abrasion Test in accordance with ASTM C-
131 shall not exceed 35%.
Methylene Blue Absorption test shall be
carried out in accordance with the
(h) Methylene Blue Absorption
aforementioned CIRIA/CUR publication in
(Required for non-igneous rocks)
order to indicate the presence of
deleterious clay materials (<0.7g/100g)
Intact strength of all rock grades should
satisfy either of the following criteria:
Uniaxial compressive strength (ISRM,
1985) not less than 80 N/mm² for armour
(i) Rock Intact Strength layer and 50 N/mm2 for underlayer, or
The Franklin Point Load Index (IS50)
(ISRM) shall not be less than 3.5 N/mm²
for armour and underlayer and 2.3 N/mm²
for other rock grades
2.3.2 Testing Frequency

Testing shall be carried out regularly by the Sub-Contractor throughout the Contract
to monitor the quality of rock on samples selected by the Employer’s
Representative. The Sub-Contractor shall carry out the testing promptly and shall
report the results without delay.
The minimum frequency of testing and visual inspection required for each grade of
rock is shown on Table 3. Additional or more frequent testing may be required if
the material varies or the quarry is worked inconsistently.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 7
Table 3 - Frequency of Rock Testing
Frequency of testing for all rock (per

Rock Characteristics quarry face); not less than one set of
tests per:
Shape, visual quality inspection and

Continuous (for all rock)
gradation: Visual
Density, water absorption, and
Week or 5,000 Tonnes
resistance to weathering
Crushing resistance. Week or 5,000 Tonnes
Visual inspection of all stones for heavy

Block integrity gradings; further quality control may be
required for borderline blocks or poor integrity
Specific Gravity Week or 5,000 Tonnes
Impact Resistance Week or 5,000 Tonnes
Resistance to Abrasion Week or 5,000 Tonnes
Methylene Blue Absorption Week or 5,000 Tonnes
2.3.3 Acceptance Procedures

Prior to commencement of delivery of bulk quantities of rock to the site, the Sub-
Contractor shall:
– Provide test results by an independent laboratory on a minimum of three

separate samples to confirm that the rock complies with the specified
parameters.
– Submit to the KCT Project Manager for review and acceptance the methods
to be used to quarry, select, grade, handle, load, transport and place the
rock and the quality control procedures to be adopted at the quarry, during
delivery and on Site.
– Provide at least 3 m³ samples of each grade of rock and in addition, five

armour stones indicative of the size range within the required grading, to be
situated both at the quarry and on site, close to the area of production,
storage and point of delivery at the works. The quantity of rock in each
sample shall be sufficient to define the grading and shape. Each sample is to
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 8
allow visual comparison with the bulk deliveries and the samples shall be
kept separate and shall be clearly described by a painted signboard. Once
accepted, the samples and signboards, both at the quarry and on site, shall
remain until all rock construction is completed.
– Arrange a meeting at the quarry at which the KCT Project Manager, the Sub-
Contractor and the Quarry Managers are present to discuss and agree upon
the methods to be used, to inspect samples of the rock and to witness
gradation and weight tests on the samples.
2.3.4 Quality Control Testing

Quality control testing shall be carried out by the Sub-Contractor at the quarry,
prior to transportation to the site, in accordance with the Sub-Contractor’s
acceptable Quality Control Procedures. The results of tests, all non-conformances,
and proposed corrective actions shall be reported to the KCT Project Manager
without delay.
Rock already delivered to site, but failing to meet the acceptance criteria shall be
removed from the site immediately and disposed of at the Sub-Contractor’s
expense, unless an alternative use is agreed upon with the KCT Project Manager.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 9
3 QUARRY OPERATIONS
The Sub-Contractor shall ensure that any quarry used shall:
– Obtain whatever permissions are necessary for the exploitation of the quarry
and shall pay royalties, fees, way-leaves and the like.
– Operate the quarry in an approved manner and provide the sufficient

evidence by means of boreholes, test holes and the like to show that the
quarry contains rock of the required quality and quantity to complete the
works and shall produce a geological map based on this evidence prior to
the start of quarrying.
– Work the quarry to produce rock that meets the other clauses of the
specification in every way.
– Obtain the prior written approval from appropriate authorities, Police and
the KCT Project Manager for the use of explosives, magazine storage
arrangements and blasting procedures and shall provide safety men for the
protection of persons and property during blasting operations. He shall use
explosives only after obtaining the express written permission of the
appropriate authorities and the KCT Project Manager. Nothing contained in
the contract, nor any approval or instruction by the KCT Project Manager,
shall relieve the Sub-Contractor of any of his obligations and responsibilities
under any Statutory Acts and Regulations.
– When quarrying operations are complete, the Sub-Contractor shall leave the
quarry in a safe condition to the approval of the appropriate Authorities by,
inter alia:
1) Barring down all faces so that no loose rock remains on any face
2) Bringing down overhanging rock safely
3) Ensuring that the quarry is free draining and that no accumulation of

water can occur or in the case of a quarry below ground level,
minimizing the accumulation of water and drainage to areas approved
by the KCT Project Manager. Warning notices both in national
language and in English may be required at any concentrations of
water, which constitute a hazard.
4) Stockpiling surplus rock material to a height not greater than 3m with

stable side slopes.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 10
4 TRANSPORTATION AND STOCKPILING OF ROCK
4.1 Transportation of Quarry Material

If quarry material is transported to the site of the permanent works by the Sub-
Contractor, the Sub-Contractor shall:
– Travel along an acceptable route;
– Obtain the approval of the KCT Project Manager and the relevant Authorities
before using the route;
– Avoid damage to public or private roads and shall repair any damage that
does occur.
Trucks used to transport rock for this project shall be of a type specifically
constructed for hauling rock and shall have tail boards or scow ends. No other
mode of rock transport may be employed unless first requested of the KCT Project
Manager and the relevant authorities and if sea transportation is used, it shall be
ensured that all barges are seaworthy and have the relevant marine insurance in
place.
4.2 Stockpiling of Quarry Material

The Sub-Contractor may be permitted to stockpile rock at or near the site of the
permanent works. Separate stock piles shall be made for different grades of rock.
The stockpiles shall be formed so that they do not constitute a hazard. The Sub-
Contractor shall propose the locations, side slopes and heights and other factors
affecting safety to the KCT Project Manager for acceptance.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 11
5 SETTING OUT AND CONTROL OF THE WORKS
5.1 Setting Out

The Sub-Contractor shall be responsible for all survey marks necessary for the
setting out of the works. Marks shall be placed at suitable intervals along the rock
structure to mark the crest and profiles of the armour material.
Before placing rock, the Sub-Contractor shall submit to the KCT Project Manager
for acceptance, details of the survey methods to be adopted to ensure accurate
setting out, alignment, level and cross sectional control during construction of all
the layers of the structure.
The Sub-Contractor shall also carry out initial ground, beach and seabed survey
within the limits shown on the Drawings. The proposed co-ordinates and locations
of survey lines and cross-survey lines perpendicular to the main survey lines shall
be submitted to the KCT Project Manager for acceptance as part of the In-Survey
Method Statement. Any discrepancies between the levels shall be investigated
immediately.
5.2 Rock Placement
5.2.1 General
A rubble mound structure may comprise a number of layers of rock, toe protection,
quarry core, scour apron and/or geotextile.
The rubble mound structure shall be constructed in accordance with the

requirements detailed herein. Notwithstanding, it shall be the sole responsibility of
the Sub-Contractor to adopt construction methods and programming to ensure the
stability of the structure during construction.
Prior to placing quarry material in-situ, the Sub-Contractor shall submit detailed
method statements to the KCT Project Manager for acceptance. These method
statements shall detail the Sub-Contractor’s working methods and sequences,
proposed plant, safety measures and contingency plans for inclement weather.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 12
5.2.2 Quality Control
Test Panels
At the commencement of each new section of rock structure, the Sub-Contractor
shall construct a 10m length, designated test panel. The test panel shall
demonstrate the quality of placing of all layers including the core, scour apron,
under layer(s), armour rock and/or others as applicable, for acceptance by the
KCT Project Manager.
The standard of rock placing below water shall not be inferior to that above water.
The Sub-Contractor shall obtain approval of each layer or element prior to
commencing subsequent elements and shall make any adjustments necessary to
obtain the KCT Project Manager concurrence.
For each approved test panel, the Sub-Contractor shall record accurately for
agreement:
– The grading of each rock class used;
– The quantity (tonnes) and volume (m³) of material used in each rock class;
– In addition, for armour, the slope area covered and the number of rocks
placed.
During the progress of the Works, the Sub-Contractor may, from time to time, be
required to demonstrate that the rock placing density being achieved is in
accordance with the approved test panel for that particular section of the Works.
The visual quality achieved in test panels shall be maintained throughout the
remainder of the Works. Areas of armour rock rejected on visual quality grounds
shall be reworked until test panel quality is achieved.
Areas of placed Rock Armour that, in the opinion of the KCT Project Manager,
show an appearance distinguishably different from the agreed test panel may be
rejected.
Checking of Profiles
Before placing each layer, the Sub-Contractor shall submit for acceptance,
drawings of cross-sections through the previous layer at 10m chainage increments
to a distance of 5m beyond the as constructed toe and 2m for the other edges. For
structures like groyne roundheads, radial sections at every 15 degrees from the
centre of the roundhead shall be taken.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 13
No layer shall be covered by another layer until the profile of the former has been
accepted by the KCT Project Manager.
Notice of Survey
The Sub-Contractor shall give a minimum of 24 hours prior notice to the KCT
Project Manager and shall provide facilities for his attendance during surveys.
Cross sections shall be surveyed in an approved manner.
Chainage Markers
The Sub-Contractor shall provide and maintain chainage markers at 10m intervals
linearly along rock structures. Chainage markers should be visible from both the
land and seaward side of the structure.
5.2.3 Placing of Underlayer and Core Rock

Placing of underlayer and core rock (including scour protection material where
required) shall comply with the following requirements:
– Underlayer and core rock shall be placed to achieve a dense underlayer or

core, but shall not be compacted.
– Underlayer and core rock shall be placed carefully to avoid damage to the
surface below or to the geotextile if used.
– Underlayer and core rock shall be placed so as to achieve an even

distribution of rock sizes without concentrations of smaller rock sizes.
– Tipping of under layer rock from vehicles, or bulldozing or dumping from

hoppers or barges into final position, shall not be permitted without the prior
acceptance of the KCT Project Manager. Such permission may only be given
following placing trials.
5.2.4 Placing of Armour Layer

Placing of armour rock shall comply with the following requirements:
– Armour rock shall be individually placed to achieve a dense, fully

interlocked armoured slope so that each rock is securely held in place by its
neighbours. Placing shall commence at the toe and proceed upwards
towards the crest. Rocks shall be lowered into place individually. Rocks shall
not be placed so that they obtain their stability from frictional resistance on
one plane alone.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 14
– Tipping of armour from vehicles, or bulldozing or dumping from hoppers or
barges into final position shall not be permitted without the prior acceptance
of the KCT Project Manager. Such permission may only be given following
placing trials.
– Rock armour shall be placed to achieve a minimum “three point support”

and be stable to the lines and levels shown on the drawings. The surface of
the armoured slope shall present an angular uneven face to the sea to
achieve maximum energy dissipation of waves. Rocks shall generally be
placed with their long axes normal to the slope. The finished rock armour
shall be at least two rocks thick except where shown otherwise on the
drawings. Smaller pieces of rock shall not be used to fill interstices, or to
prop larger rocks in order to achieve the required profile.
– Armour rock broken during handling or placing shall be removed

immediately at the Sub-Contractor’s expense. Subject to the KCT Project
Manager acceptance, broken armour rock may be included in smaller rock
grades.
– Rock shall not be dropped from a height greater than 1.5m.
5.3 Survey Control

All survey work shall be undertaken by a suitably qualified surveyor acceptable to
the KCT Project Manager. Results of the surveys shall be presented on plans for
submission to the KCT Project Manager. Plans shall identify the cross section
location and the design cross section overlaid by the measured cross section. Plans
shall be signed by the surveyor prior to submission to the KCT Project Manager.
Measurements shall be carried out using a probe with a spherical end of diameter
of 0.50Dn50. For land-based survey, this will generally be connected to a staff or
EDM target: for underwater survey, it will generally be a weighted ball on the end
of a sounding chain. Soundings shall be carried out with a sounding chain with a
ball as stated in Table 4.
Table 4. Sounding Ball Diameter.
Type Ball Diameter
Core/Rock and Light Gradings 300 mm
Heavy Gradings 600 mm
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 15
Measurements of cross sections along the length of the structures shall be at 10
metres spacing. The cross section locations shall remain the same for each layer
placed. Measurements may need to be more frequent where the profile is
changing very rapidly or on tight radius curves.
Measurements shall be carried out across each section at intervals.
The underwater survey may require echo-sounding measurements as per the

directives of the Employer’s Representative.
5.4 Tolerances
The rubble mound structure shall be constructed to the lines and levels shown on
the drawings within the vertical tolerances presented in this section. Measurement
of each layer placed shall be in accordance with the “Survey Control” section of
this specification.
5.4.1 Horizontal Tolerances

The tolerance for the horizontal alignment of the axis of the rubble mound structure
shall be less than 0.5m in either direction.
5.4.2 Underlayer and Core Placing Tolerances

The vertical placing tolerances for the upper surface of the underlayer and core
rock beneath the rock armour shall be + 200 mm as compared to the design levels
detailed on the drawings. Measurements shall be taken at 10m intervals along the
length of the structure and at 1 m intervals across the measurement profile.
5.4.3 Armour Layer Vertical Tolerances
Table 5 - Armour Layer Tolerances
On Individual Design Profile with

Measurements respect to measured mean
Material placed above low +0.35 Dn50

+/- 0.3Dn50
water -0.25 Dn50
Material placed below low +0.6 Dn50

+/-0.5 Dn50
water -0.4 Dn50
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 16
Note: All tolerances refer to the actual mean profile unless stated otherwise.
Notwithstanding the tolerances tabulated above, the following shall apply to
armour layers.
The tolerances on two consecutive mean measured profiles shall not be negative.
Notwithstanding any accumulation of positive tolerances on underlying layers, the

thickness of the layer shall not be less than 80% of the normal thickness when
calculated using mean measured profiles. When an accumulation of positive
tolerances arises and is acceptable to the KCT Project Manager, the position of the
design profiles will need to be adjusted.
The Sub-Contractor shall make good any settlement during the first year following
the construction.
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-002-00 17
APPENDIX C: BILL OF QUANTITIES
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 C
KCT
Banana Island Resort, March 2012.
Marine Works Package 1 BOQ
Unit Price Total

Item Item Description Unit Qty
QAR QAR
A General Items
A.1 Mobilisation and demobilisation LS 1
A.2 Sub-Contractor's All Risk Insurance LS 1
The Sub-Contractor shall pay all fees necessary for the issue of construction
A.3 LS 1
permits and to the concerned authorities for the execution of the works.
B Preparatory Works
B.1 Pre and post construction bathymetric and topographic survey LS 1
C Construction of New Revetment - DWG-MRN-013 Section B

Supply and placement of Geotextile 2
C.1 m 3,500
Supply and placement of Quarry Run 3
C.2 m 5,800
Supply and placement of Underlayer ( 300kg - 1 tonne rock ) 3
C.3 m 9,800
Supply and random placement of Armour ( 1 - 3 tonnes rock ) 3
C.4 m 15,200
Rehabilitation of Existing Revetment - DWG-MRN-013 Section A

D
Supply and placement of Geotextile 2

D.1 m 22,900
D.2 m 18,100
Supply and placement of Underlayer ( 300kg - 1 tonne rock ) 3
D.3 m 22,500
D.4 m 46,900
E Construction of Detached Breakwater

E.1 m 51,300
E.2 m 47,400
GRAND TOTAL
NOTE: Armour placement should be random as defined in CIRIA C683
SGF11186 1
APPENDIX D: SURVEY
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 D
E242400
E242500
E242600
E242700
E242800
E242900
E243000
E243100
E243200
E243300
E243400
E243500
E243600
SurveyArea
N394300 N394300
Note:
1.QatarNationalGrid,QND95(Qatar)Datum
2.ElevationsareinmetresandreducedtoQND
GEODETICPARAMETERS
Datum Projection :QND95(Qatar)
FalseEasting :TransverseMercator
FalseNorthing :200,000Meters
CentralMeridian(CM) :300,000Meters
ScaleFactoratCM : 51°13 00" East
LatituteofOrigin :0.9999900
Semi-MajorAxis : 24°27 00" North
Semi-MinorAxis :6378388
InverseFlattening :6356911.946
BMCoordinates :297
N394200 N394200
-StationID :BNA1 -StationID :CX292
Easting :243374.066 Easting :233657.87
Northing :393640.788 Northing :392965.33
Elevation :3.378 Elevation :3.040
LEGEND:
Benchmark
HighwaterMark
LightPost
Shed
N394100 N394100
SteelPipe
TopofBreakwater
ToeofBreakwater
N394000 N394000
CLIENT:
CONSULTANT:
N393900 N393900
SURVEYCONTRACTOR:
N393800 N393800 TITLE:
Bathymetric&
TopographicSurvey
PROJECT:
BananaIsland
N393700 N393700
Name Date
Surveyedby: Chris Nov25-28,20
Approvedby: SH
Witnessedby:
REVISIONS
No. DescriptionofRevision Drawn Approv.
N393600 N393600
Hyang SH 2
1 Add+0.413mtoAllDepths&Elevations
2
OriginalSize(A0)
DrawingNo: DrawingS
Drawnby: Hyang SGSPPQ201192
ChartNo: REV_0
Checkedby: SH 0101
Scale 1:1500 Date: 24March,2012
N393500 N393500
N393400 N393400
N393300 N393300
E242400
E242500
E242600
E242700
E242800
E242900
E243000
E243100
E243200
E243300
E243400
E243500
E243600
N393200 N393200
APPENDIX E: AVAILABLE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION

DATA
SGF11168-SPC-MRN-001-00_Rev0 E
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS
BANANA ISLAND RESORT VILLAGE
STATE OF QATAR
th
REPORT : 11/5507/QA /00 26 February 2012
REPORT ISSUE STATUS
<00> 26-Feb-12 Factual Report CSA JGL PB
Issue Date Description Prepared Checked Approved
URBACON INTERNATIONAL FUGRO PENINSULAR

P.O. BOX 201184 P.O. BOX 47167
DOHA DOHA
STATE OF QATAR STATE OF QATAR
AMENDMENTS AND REVISIONS
Amendments
Date Page Description Prepared Checked Approved
and Revision
<00> 18-Jan-12 All Zone I - Factual Report CSA JGL PB
<00> 29-Jan-12 All Zone II – Factual Report CSA JGL PB
<00> 26-Feb-12 All Factual Report (Zone I, II & III) CSA JGL PB
URBANCON INTERNATIONAL
P.O. BOX 201184
Doha
State of Qatar
Attn: Mr. Hassan Abushamat
TH
Report Ref: 11/5507/QA /00 26 February 2012
PROJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS

BANANA ISLAND RESORT VILLAGE ZONE II
STATE OF QATAR
SUBJECT: FACTUAL REPORT
Dear Sir,
We have pleasure in enclosing here with two (2) digital copies and four (4) hard copies of our factual
report on the above project. Should you have any queries with regard to our report, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
We are pleased to have been of service on this occasion and look forward to further cooperation on
future projects
Yours faithfully,
FUGRO PENINSULAR
Christian S. Apondar
Geologist - Qatar
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION WORKS
BANANA ISLAND RESORT VILLAGE
STATE OF QATAR
CONTENTS PAGE
SUMMARY (i)
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 SITE DESCRIPTION 1
3 FIELD WORKS 3
4 LABORATORY TESTING 6
5 SUB-SURFACE CONDITIONS 7
6 REPORT LIMITATIONS 8
7 REFERENCES 9
PLATES
PLATE 1 LOCALITY PLAN
PLATE 2 SITE PLAN
PLATE 3 COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A FIELD RESULTS
APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
APPENDIX C CORE PHOTOGRAPHS
Report: 11/5507/QA/00
SUMMARY
A geotechnical investigation comprising ten (10) near shore geotechnical boreholes and sixteen (16)
onshore geotechnical boreholes was performed as instructed by UrbaCon International (further called
the Client), to ascertain ground conditions and provide geotechnical data needed to complete the
design and construction of Banana Island Resort Village, State of Qatar.
rd th
Fieldwork activities for the geotechnical investigation were undertaken between 3 January to 10
February, 2012, and a programme of laboratory testing was subsequently performed on representative
soil/rock samples recovered from site.
The project for soil investigation has been initially divided into three (3) Zones. Separate reports for
th th
each Zone I and Zone II was prepared and submitted on 18 and 29 January 2012, respectively. This
report is a compilation of all the Zones; comprising the below test locations.
- Zone I: onshore boreholes BH-01, 02, 03, 04, 05.

- Zone II: nearshore boreholes MBH-13, 14, 15, 16, 17.
- Zone III: was divided on two (2) areas.
Onshore locations: BH- 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 23, 24, 25, 26
Nearshore Locations: MBH-18, 19, 20, 21, 22.
Generally, the ground investigation revealed a consistent lithology over the nearshore boreholes with a
“layer cake” lithology. The upper part of the lithology is represented by marine sand, approximately
1.00m thick. It is represented by a poorly graded, silty/clayey fine to medium grain SAND. Immediately
below the Marine Sand deposits, a thick formation of moderately weathered, weak, porous
CALCARENITE (Caprock) was identified in the boreholes, with approximate thickness of 1.50m.
The rock unit follows, being generally represented by a moderately to highly weathered, moderately
weak to weak fine grained LIMESTONE, partially dolomotized, with pockets of light greenish grey
attapulgite clay, close to medium spaced fractures.
The factual field and laboratory data are presented herein.
Report Ref: 11/5507/QA/ 00 Page i

1 INTRODUCTION
Fugro Peninsular (Fugro) was commissioned by UrbaCon International to carry out a

geotechnical investigation to ascertain ground conditions to provide geotechnical data, civil
engineering aspect on the construction of the Banana Island Resort Village, State of Qatar.
The geotechnical investigation was carried out by Fugro Peninsular, the Qatar branch of Fugro
rd
Middle East, based on Purchase Order (Order No. UCC/PT/3564/BIRV) dated December 3 ,
2011.
rd th
Fieldwork activities were undertaken between 3 January to 10 February, 2012. A
programme of laboratory testing was subsequently performed on representative soil/rock
samples recovered from site.
The site location is indicated on the locality plan, Plate 1. Borehole locations are indicated on
the site plan, Plates 2.1 to 2.3.
This report is a factual account of the fieldworks and laboratory testing carried out for the entire
Banana Island project.
2 SITE DESCRIPTION
As shown on the locality plan, Plate 1, the Banana Island is located on the eastern coast of
Qatar approximately 9 kilometres east of Doha city and 3km north-eastern side of the existing
New Doha International Airport.
Detailed borehole locations are presented on the site plan, Plates 2.1 to Plates 2.3.
2.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY
The Qatar peninsula is geologically part of the Arabian Gulf Basin which has accumulated
sediments with little interruption and has been influenced in only a minor way by tectonic
activity, since the Paleozoic Period. The thicknesses of sediments overlying basement rocks in
Qatar are estimated to be over 10 km. The recent post Cretaceous geological succession of
Qatar can be summarized as a rhythmical sequence of shallow water marine limestone along
with occasional shale and evaporates. The latter two are representing accumulations of
material from nearby landmasses and precipitation of anhydrite and gypsum in still shallow
basins. Occasional interruptions to sedimentation have occurred producing unconformities.
The geological structure of Qatar can be summarised as comprising a central arch, the axis of
which runs south to north through the centre of the country from Al-Shahaniyah to Al Majidah.
The dome then flattens only to re-emerge offshore to form the North Dome, which has gained
Report Ref: 11/5507/QA/ 00 Page 1

importance as a trap for a considerable volume of natural gas resources.
The uplift has probably been triggered both by migration of deep-seated salt deposits along
with the tectonic movement associated with mountain building elsewhere in the Gulf margins-
Zagros (Iran) and the Omani Mountains.
The Tertiary sedimentation started with a marine transgression in the Paleocene (Umm Er
Radhuma Formation, not exposed in Qatar). Later, shallow marine to sabkha conditions
prevailed until the end of the Eocene; a carbonate-evaporite sequence (Rus and Dammam
Formation) was deposited during this period. A sea regression at the end of the Eocene is
marked by a widespread unconformity, causing the absence of Upper Eocene and Oligocene
deposits over most of the area.
The formations exposed in the present day Qatar peninsula are represented by Rus and
Dammam Formations, part of the Hasa Group together with Umm Er Radhuma Formation.
Vertically, upward in the stratigraphic sequence, the Middle Eocene Dammam Formation is
succeeded by the Miocene Dam Formation and Pliocene to Late Miocene Hofuf Formation
(Nasir et al. 2003).
2.1.1 Dammam Formation

The eustatic sea-level indicates a gradually falling sea level from the base to the top of the
Dammam Formation. Consequently, it is possible that only a relatively small part of the
Arabian Shield was exposed, at least at the beginning of the depositional sequence.
The wide eastern shelf of the Plate was covered by the Dammam Formation (limestone and
dolomite, marl and shale) that reach about 30m thick. The base of the Dammam represents an
open-marine environment, whereas the upper part indicates a shallow-marine environment
and a siliciclastic influence from the west (Ziegler, 2001).
According to Cavalier (1970), the Dammam Formation has been divided into several members
as:
1. Midra Shale – compact clayey calcilutite
2. Dukhan Limestone – strong limestone
3. Simsima Limestone – dolomitic limestone
4. Abarug Limestone – marly dolomitic limestone
2.1.1.1 Simsima Limestone

This member is represented by a highly recrystallized chalky limestone. At the bottom (over a
5.0m maximum thickness) it locally includes marls and even thin stringers of attapulgite
shales.

Although the Simsima Limestone forms much of the land surface, its detailed stratigraphy and
lithology are not well known, since exposures giving a complete cross-section does not exist.
A general description of the Simsima however, as described by Cavalier (1970) and others
would be a fine to medium grained off-white to pale brown and buff, poorly bedded, chalky
crystalline calcareous limestone and dolomitic limestone with numerous voids and irregular
joints often filled with weaker siltstone. Thin layers of pale green or red brown attapulgitic clays
are occasionally present. Chert bands occur throughout the Simsima but are particularly
notable near to the base and at the top.
The upper layers of the Simsima Limestone tend to be highly weathered to the extent that the
Limestone forms gravel and cobbles within the silt, sand or marl matrix.
The Simsima Limestone is known to be up to 20m thick, the thickest development being in the
extreme north of the peninsula, particularly away from the central arch. It is believed that a
restricted thickness of Simsima Limestone has been deposited over the Central, Simsima
Arches and Dukhan Anticline.
The upper Abarug Limestone as well as the lower terms (Midra Shale and Dukhan Limestone)
will not be treated in this report as no lithologies from these sedimentary sequences were
identified on site.
3 FIELD WORKS
The full programme of subsurface investigation includes the following scope of work:
• Sixteen (16) onshore geotechnical boreholes advanced to maximum depth of 18.0m

below existing ground level.
• Ten (10) near shore geotechnical boreholes advanced to maximum depth of 16.0m
below existing seabed level and include.
ƒ Standard penetration tests (SPTs) with split spoon sampling.
ƒ Continuous coring in rock.
• Five (5) variable head permeability tests
All the works were performed by experienced Fugro geotechnical personnel under the
supervision of an experienced geotechnical engineer and a full time drilling supervisor. The
works were performed in general accordance with the “British Standard BS 5930: Code of
Practice for Site Investigations”.
The field activity locations are indicated on Plates 2.1 to 2.3 relative to the proposed site
layout. Field test results were presented in Appendix A. The presentation of field results is

preceded by a “symbol legend for geotechnical logs” and a “summary of soil and rock
definitions”, on Plates A1.1 to A1.3, and A2 respectively.
3.1 NEARSHORE GEOTECHNICAL DRILLING PLANT
The field works was executed using three major equipment such as; Self Elevating Platform
(SEP) named as “Rock Giant”, Edeco T30 and Fugro Tender Boat.
The Rock Giant is a four-legged drilling platform with deck space measuring 9 x 7m. It has a
minimum operational water depth of about 0.8m depending on deck load and a maximum
working water depth of around 17m depending on prevailing weather conditions and seabed
soil/rock conditions. Once on location the working platform was elevated out of the sea water
surface to give an air gap of approximately 1m above high tide level plus expected maximum
wave.
The Fugro Tender Boat was used for towing/shifting and positioning the Rock Giant, also on
standby for emergency purposes and for crew and equipment transport.
The Edeco T30 is a rotary drill rig type mounted on the deck of the Rock Giant. It is capable of
drilling in excess of 100m with ‘H’ type core barrels (i.e. 76mm nominal core diameter).
Rotation speeds are variable between approximately 50 and 800 rpm. Load is applied to the
drill-string by means of hydraulic cylinders, which ensures that the operator has an excellent
degree of control over the rate of penetration of the bit.
3.2 ONSHORE GEOTECHNICAL DRILLING PLANT
Drilling of geotechnical boreholes was performed using track-mounted Boart Longyear Rotary
drilling rig. The boreholes were advanced through soil deposits using rotary boring equipment
and methods. In the underlying rocks rotary coring equipment and techniques were used to
advance the boreholes.
3.3 SURVEYING OF TEST LOCATIONS
The Rock Giant was towed to the borehole locations using Fugro Tender Boat. The Rock
Giant was positioned at borehole locations using a hand-held Global Positioning System or
known as GPS using the proposed coordinates provided by UrbaCon Company. Generally,
the boreholes were drilled within 3m radius of the proposed coordinates. Seabed elevations
were measured using a weighted tape and reduced to Chart Datum (CD) using a predicted tide
for the site area. The coordinates are relative to Qatar National Grid (QNG) system and the
reduce levels are related to Chart Datum (CD).
The “as drilled” coordinates and seabed elevations are given on the individual borehole logs in

Appendix A and summarised on Plate 3.
3.4 EXPLORATORY BOREHOLES
A total of sixteen (16) onshore boreholes were drilled to a maximum 18.0m below existing
ground level and ten (10) nearshore boreholes were drilled to maximum depth of 16.0m below
seabed level.
The boreholes were advanced through overlying soil strata using rotary boring equipment and
techniques, while rotary coring equipment was used to advance through rocks.
Standard Penetration Tests (SPTs) were conducted within the soil layers in order to estimate
the relative densities and obtain samples for classification purposes.
SPTs were conducted in accordance with ASTM D1586-99, “Standard Test Methods for
Penetration test and Split-Barrel Sampling of Soils”. The test involved driving a 50mm external
diameter thick walled tube (split spoon sampler) into the bottom of the borehole with
successive blows of a 63.5kg hammer falling freely through 760mm. The sampler was driven
through 3 intervals of 150mm and the number of blows required to penetrate each interval was
recorded. The initial 150mm interval or 50 blows, whichever first reached, was intended to
ensure “seating” of the sampler such that it penetrated beyond the zone of influence of any soil
disturbance at the base of the borehole.
The aggregate number of blows to drive the sampler over the final 300mm was termed the “N”
value and considered indicative of the soil’s in-situ relative density. Where a penetration of
300mm was not achieved due to the density or degree of cementation of the deposits
encountered, the number of blows and distance driven were recorded on the borehole logs.
Where rock head was determined by refusal of SPT, the boreholes were advanced through
rock strata using rotary coring equipment and techniques.
Rotary coring in rock was carried out using double tube, PQ rotary core barrel, fitted with
impregnated drilling bits, producing nominal core diameter of 82mm. In highly fractured rock
the core runs were generally shorter than 0.5 m in order to optimise core recovery. In the more
competent rock core runs were continued to a maximum of 1.5 m. During coring water was
used as the flushing medium and care was taken to adjust the water pressure to obtain the
optimum core recovery. Where necessary guargum (a natural starch) polymer based was
added to the flush water to aid in core recovery, particularly in poorly indurate rocks.
Whenever low total recovery was detected (usually below 30%), the borehole continued with
SPT tests. However, the transition from coring to SPTs was established by the site engineer
based on his drilling experience and rock description.

Core samples were carefully transferred from the core barrel to purpose-built wooden core
boxes. Consecutive core runs were separated within the core boxes with labelled core spacers
and then wrapped in clear plastic to preserve moisture for possible laboratory testing.
The samples were transported to Fugro’s laboratory in Doha for logging and sampling.
Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing to assist with sample descriptions
and determination of engineering properties of the soils and rocks. The cores were
photographed and copies of these are presented in Appendix C of this report.
Borehole logs are included in Appendix A, Plates A4.1.1 to A4.26.1.
3.5 VARIABLE HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST
Variable head permeability tests were performed in accordance with the relevant procedures of
British Standard BS 5930. The test was performed as falling head test in the open hole, at a
depth prior defined by Fugro. Filling of borehole with water was done by means of pumps
attached to the drilling rig. Infilling was maintained for a period of several minutes in order to
properly develop the cone of pressure around the borehole. Upon completion, the downward
water level was monitored over time as it equalises again with the ambient groundwater level.
Monitoring was performed by manual reading by means of dip meters.
The in-situ permeability of the soil layer at the base of the casing (i.e. at the intake) was
estimated, from the test results, using the semi-empirical methods of Hvorslev as outlined by
BS 5930. “Intake factors” are calculated according to the relevant BS 5930 guidelines
corresponding to the schematic boundary conditions inferred.
A summary of variable head test is provided in Table 1 below:
Table 1 Summary on variable head tests results

Testing Interval (mbg) Permeability Value
Borehole Id
Top Bottom (m/sec)
BH-07 7.50 8.00 2.9E-04
BH-08 10.50 11.00 3.8E-04
BH-09 10.50 11.00 9.4E-05
BH-10 7.50 8.00 6.0E-04
BH-12 8.00 8.50 2.6E-04
4 LABORATORY TESTING
A programme of laboratory testing was performed on selected soil samples obtained during
the fieldwork. Details of the tests undertaken and quantities are given below in Table 2.
Laboratory testing has been performed in accordance with relevant BS and ASTM procedures.

Table 2 - Summary of Laboratory Tests Performed
Type of Test Test Specification Quantity
Particle Size Distribution BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 9.2 35
BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 4.6, 5.3,

Atterberg Limits 8
AMD 9027-96
Particle Density BS 1377: Part 2: 1990, Clause 8.4 21
Moisture Content BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 3.2 132
BS 1377: Part 3: 1990 Clause 3, 5.3, 5.3,

Chemical Analysis 17
7.2, 9.5
Carbonite Content BS 1377: Part 3: 1990 Clause 6.3 11
Unconfined Compressive Strength

ASTM D2938-95 (re-approved 2002) 37
(without measurement of E-modulus)
Unconfined Compressive Strength (with
ASTM D2938-95 & D3148-96 18
measurement of E-modulus)
Point Load Index ASTM D5731-95 44
Test results have been used to assist in the classification and determination of relevant
physical and mechanical properties of soil samples. Laboratory test results are presented in
Appendix B. Detailed results are preceded by a summary on Plates B1.1 to B1.6.
5 SUB-SURFACE CONDITIONS
The subsurface profile encountered is illustrated diagrammatically with a graphic log cross-
section presentation in Appendix A, on Plates A3.1 to A3.4. Full details of the strata
encountered are given on the Borehole logs in Appendix A, on Plates A4.1.1 to A4.26.2.
Generally, the subsurface condition is represented by a relatively constant thickness of

granular deposits (approx. 1.00m thick), made up of loose, poorly graded, very silty/clayey,
gravely medium grain SAND. In MBH-14 and MBH-15 location, a unit of slightly sandy to
sandy SILT/CLAY was encountered from seabed level to 1.0m depth. This unit was also
identified at MBH-16 between Sand layer at 4.8m and Calcarenite at 5.3m below seabed level.
Immediately below the soil deposits, a formation of moderately weathered, weak, porous
CALCARENITE (Caprock) was identified in the boreholes, with approximate thickness of 1.8m.
Below the Calcarenite formation, a layer of the Simsima Limestone was identified in all the
boreholes down to the explored depth.
The rock sequence represented by the geological formation Simsima Limestone was generally
divided into two sub-units:

1) A moderately weathered unit, represented by a fine grained LIMESTONE, locally
dolomitize. The unit presents variability in strength from weak to moderately strong.
2) A highly weathered and decomposed horizon, represented mainly by a very weak and
extremely weak fine grained LIMESTONE, recovered mostly as very silty/clayey, sandy
GRAVEL.
Essentially, the Simsima Limestone possesses a bimodal nature comprising hard re-
crystallized predominantly calcareous (occasionally dolomitic) “original” limestone and a
variable percentage of secondary attapulgitic mudstone / clay / siltstone and crystalline
gypsum. The engineering properties of the limestone are largely influenced by:
1. The relatively percentage of original limestone to secondary material and

2. The degree of cementation of the secondary material. Where the rock comprises a
high percentage of weakly cemented secondary attapulgite, the whole rock mass is
generally more fractured and considerably weaker in terms of the bearing capacity of
the strata.
The variation in the quality of the limestone can be significant over relatively small lateral or
vertical distances with different strengths of limestone. It is also important to note that
wetting/saturation of the rock mass causes significant reductions in the rock mass strength as
the secondary attapulgitic clay becomes highly plastic upon wetting. This phenomenon is
particularly important in the zones where the rock mass comprises a relatively high percentage
of secondary attapulgite (>50%).
Simsima Limestone might also be represented by a change of facies from the crystalline
dolomitic limestone into a lighter cream and light brown limestone with many yellowish brown
stains. The less crystalline nature of this zone suggests that it has not undergone to a
diagenetic process to the same degree as the overlying Limestone. This zone generally tends
to be more competent in-situ i.e. less broken and less brittle.
No cavities were identified during soil investigations. However, cavities are known to
exist/develop within the Simsima Limestone unit.
6 REPORT LIMITATIONS
The borehole logs and related information depict subsurface conditions only at the specific
locations and times where sampling was conducted. Any lines designating the changes
between soil and / or rock layers represent approximate boundaries. The transition between
deposits / strata may be gradual, or may occur between recovered samples.
This report presents the factual field and laboratory data carried out for the Banana Island
Resort Village, State of Qatar.

7 REFERENCES
ASTM – American Society for the Testing of Materials
British Standards Institution, BS 1377:1990, “Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering
Purposes”.
British Standards Institution, BS 5930:1999, “Code of Practice for Site Investigations”.
Cagatay, M. Namik “Palygorskite in the Eocene rocks of the Dammam Dome, Saudi Arabia”.
Clays and minerals, Vol.38 No.3, 299-307
Cavalier C., Salatt Abdullah, Heuze Yves, “Geological description of Qatar Peninsula
(explanations of the 1/100,000 geological maps of Qatar). Bureau de recherché geologiques et
minieres, Government of Qatar, Department of Petroleum Affairs, 1970
Clark, A.R. and Walker, B.F.: “A proposed scheme for the classification and nomenclature for
use in the engineering description of Middle Eastern sedimentary rocks”, Geotechnique,
Volume XXVII, No. 1, March 1977.
Dill et Al, “Sedimentary facies, mineralogy, and geochemistry of the sulphate-bearing Miocene
Dam Formation in Qatar. Sedimentary Geology, 174/1-2, 63-96, 2005.
Jacques LeBlanc, “A Fossil Hunting Guide To the Tertiary Formations of Qatar, Middle East”,
March 2008
Nasir, S., Hamad Al-Saad, Addul Razak Al-Sayigh, Abdul Rahman Al-Harthy, “Ferricretes
of the Early Tertiary Dammam Formation in the Dukhan Area, Western Qatar: mineralogy,
geochemistry and environment of deposition”, Qatar J. Science, 23, 55-70.
Ziegler, Martin A., “Late Permian to Holocene Paleofacies Evolution of the Arabian Plate and
its Hydrocarbon Occurrences”, GeoArabia, Vol.6, No.3

PLATES
LOCALITY PLAN PLATE 1

SITE PLAN PLATES 2.1 TO 2.3
COORDINATES AND ELEVATIONS PLATE 3
Banana Island
SITE: Geotechnical Investigation for Banana Island TITLE: Location Plan

Resort Village
State of Qatar
JOB REF : 11-5507-QA
DATE: 16-Feb-12 CLIENT: Urbacon Co. PLATE No: 1

SITE: Geotechnical Investigation for Banana Island TITLE: Banana Island
Geotechnical Boreholes Resort Village Zone I
State of Qatar
DATE: 16-Feb-12 CLIENT: Urbacon Co. PLATE No: 2.1

Marine Geotechnical Boreholes (MBH) Resort Village Zone II
State of Qatar
DATE: 29-Jan-12 CLIENT: Urbacon Co. PLATE No: 2.2

Marine Geotechnical Boreholes (MBH) Resort Village Zone III
State of Qatar
Onshore Geotechnical Boreholes (BH)
DATE: 16-Feb-12 CLIENT: Urbacon Co. PLATE No: 2.3

ONSHORE GEOTECHNICAL BOREHOLES
EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION DEPTH COMMENTS

BH ID (mQNG) (mQNG) (mQNHG) (mbgl)
BH-01 242,811 393,938 3.82 15

BH-02 242,890 393,997 4.26 19
BH-03 242,864 393,899 1.37 16
BH-04 242,994 394,050 2.36 16
BH-05 243127 393974 1.39 15
BH-06 243179 393978 2.28 17
BH-07 243197 394015 1.80 17
BH-08 243328 393897 3.94 18
BH-09 243277 393848 1.62 17
BH-10 243383 393799 1.69 15
BH-11 243388 393695 2.85 16
BH-12 243330 393582 1.74 17
BH-23 243359 393483 17 Coordinates was taken by Handheld GPS
OFFSHORE GEOTECHNICAL BOREHOLES
EASTING NORTHING ELEVATION DEPTH COMMENTS

BH ID (mQNG) (mQNG) (mCD) (mbgl)
MBH-13 243,108 393,360 -4.99 10

MBH-14 243,240 393,360 -4.67 10
MBH-15 243,139 393,462 -4.80 16
MBH-16 243,304 393,436 -1.35 10
MBH-17 243242 393592 -4.32 16
MBH-18 242946 393880 -1.35 15
MBH-19 242881 393794 -4.58 10
MBH-20 242797 393819 -4.45 15
MBH-21 242694 393879 -4.40 15
MBH-22 242853 394077 -0.60 15.2
SITE: Geotechnical Investigfor Banana Island TITLE: Coordinates and Elevation

Resort Village
State of Qatar
DATE: 15-Feb-12 CLIENT: Urbacon Co. PLATE No: 3

APPENDIX A
FIELD RESULTS
LEGEND FOR BOREHOLE LOGS PLATES A1.1 TO A1.3

SOIL/ROCK STRENGTH DEFINITIONS PLATE A2
CROSS SECTIONS PLATES A3.1 TO A3.4
BOREHOLE LOGS PLATES A4.1.1 TO A4.26.2
FALLING HEAD PERMEABILITY TEST PLATES A5.1.1 TO A5.5.2
SYMBOL LEGEND FOR GEOTECHNICAL LOGS
SOIL TYPI!S:
MADE GROUND High plasticity

SILT
BOULDERS & COBBLES Low plasticity
Poorly graded High plasticity

GRAVEL< CLAY
Well graded Low plasticity
Poorly graded PEAT/ ORGANIC CLAY

SAND
Well graded
Composite S<lll types: Signified by combined symbols;eg. Slity SAND

D .
X
.
AdditionalSecondary Terms: Shelly Gypsiterous
ROCK TYPES:
Sedimentary: Igneous:
CLAYSTONE! Carb. CLAYSTONEI Coarse Grained
MUDSTONE CALCILUTITE
Carb. SILTSTONEI Medium Grani ed

SILTSTONE CALCISILTITE
Carb. SANDSTONE!
SANDSTONE CALCARENITE Fine Grained
Carb. CONGLOMATEl EE:E:j3

CONGLOMERATE
CALCIRUDITE l:!±i±H Metamorphic:
BRECCIA CORAL Coarse Grained
I ESTONE
LM Medium Grained
Evaporite:
CHALK GYPSUM/ HALITE Fine Grained
SAMPLI! TYPI!S:
Bulk!
disturbed
Shelby/
undisturbed
I Standard
Penetration
Test (SPT)
No Recovery
(SPT)
f/l
I!.J Rock Core U
- .......
SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (Based on BS5930) --·
GRAIN SIZE CLASSIFICATION
CLASS GRAIN SIZE CONSTITUENT TERMINOLOGY

(mm) Primary
Constituent Secondary Constituents
occasional with some with many

>200 BOULDERS (<5%) (!).20%) (20-50%)
occasional with some with many
60-200 COBBLES (!).20%)
(<5%) (20-50%)
COARSE SOILS
20-60 coarse slightly gravelly gravelly very gravelly
(min. 65% >0.06mm) 6-20 medium GRAVEL (<5% with SAND) (!).20% with SAND) (>20% with SAND)
2-6 fine (<35% coarse with fine soil)1 (35-65% coarse with fine soi01 (>65% 00811!8 v.ith fine soil)a,b
0.6-2 coarse slightly sandy sandy very sandy

0.2-0.6 medium SAND (<5% v.ith GRAVEL) (<35% (!).20% with GRAVEL) (>20% with GRAVEL) (>65%
8
0.06-0.2 fine coarse with fine soil)8 (35-65% coarse with fine soi0 coarse v.ith fine soil)a,b
FINE SOILS SILT slightly silty silty very silty

<0.06 CLAY slightly clayey clayey very clayey
(min. 35% <0.06mm) (<5%) (!).20%) (2()..35%) c
slightly organic organic very organic

ORGANIC fibrous PEAT (1.¢%) (!).10%) (>10%)
8
Notes: %coarse = combined sand & gravel: constituent term depends on dominant coarse fraction (eg sandy if sand > gravel)
b Or described as primarily coarse soil,depending on assessment of engineering behaviour
c Or described as primarily fine soil,depending on assessment of engineering behaviour
PLASTICITY CHART FOR CLASSIFICATION OF FINE SOILS

M SILT (M-soil)- below A-line)
C CLAY -above A-line M and C may be combined as F, FINE SOIL
U Upper plasticity range
Jw., 1
70 lntarmedlata H h varlhlgh Extrem'iv high
@ ,,....
60
50
I I
I
NOTE:The letter 0 is added to the
symbol of any malarial
containing a significant
proportionof organic ma1t11r
eg.MHO
I
---
+- @
--
,
@)
I
,,,
-
,,,,
,,
,,
......
@
I --
-
- - ,,,, --- --
,,
I -
@ «. ,,
...s,,' -
, t-," ,,
@ I ,,., @
20
-
,, ,,,, -- -
10
6
0
0
I ,,.,
------------' ®
10 20
ML
30 40 50
8
I
60 70
I
80 90 100 110 120
Liquid Limit(%)
SECONDARY DESCRIPTIVE TERMS

GRADING well graded,poorly graded, uniformly graded,gap graded
PLASTICITY low, medium, high,very high, extremely high (re: Plasticity Chart)
PARTICLE SHAPE/ ANGULARITY angular,subangular,subrounded, rounded,flat, elongated
COLOUR Based on overall impression,with emphasis on descriptive consistency
Plate: A1.2
-
mn
,_
(")
CD 1/) II ::1
(/)
-· 0
a
(")
cO
03
CD CD
q-;;c
CD 0
::;, n INCREASING GRAIN SIZE OF PARTICULATE DEPOSITS ------------i I m
a.o
CD S"
CD !:!;
0
crO+ "'
=r
0.002mm 0.06mm 2mm 60mm 0
:I ,.
z
rbonate UD (carb. cia_ arbonaSIL_ _Carbonate_SAND_-+ arbonate GRAVE!:_ ----190 n-t
...
:!!::
< -m
fJ 0
a. z Clayey carbonate MUD Siliceous Carbonate Siliceous Carbonate Siliceous Carbonate !I n
A
(Jol
01
CD
a
-C<
Dro+mn
0
a A
"'01
(Carbonate clay)
-------+-------- ------- ---------

SILT SAND GRAVEL
=-
li::
"J
0
CD
3
3
(II
CD
():!!::
""C
(/)
Calcareous CLAY Calcareous Silica SILT I Calcareous Silica SAND I Calcareous Silica GRAVEL
: !!
I I ::!!
CD a. 1/)
-n
--
::;,
I I
CD
a.
I
"' 0
I <>
r=
---CLAY-- i-- SilicSILT---- Silica- AND-i-- SilicaGRAVEL-- ---llO f!i
LCILUTITE(corb. udstonCALCISILTITE_jCarb.Siltstone) CARENITE (Calc. Sondst4CALCIRUDITE rb.c 1 r:_precc 0
fJ li::
:E
90 z
:E 0
(Jol
01
!!. 0.01
CD ;;c
i
n Clayey CALCILUTITE I Siliceous CALCISILTITE I Siliceous CALCARENITE I Siliceous CALCIRUDITE I
OJ
01
I 0
CD
3
CD
a
r+
(II
-<"r-.l
1
......
g
"
:a
Ei -------+-------- ------- ---------
-t
.=m..
Calcareous SANDSTONE Calcareous CONGLOMERATE E
::;,
OJ 1:
li:: CD Calcareous CLAYSTONE Calcareous SILTSTONE
r"
" "C a. li:: II
a "'""C
a - 0
=i t- CLAYsTONE- -1--SiLTSTONE-- t- -5,b.ND5i:ONE-_ 1coNGLoMERATEorBRECciA

10 z
a.o
:r :z:
::;
=
s- m
li::
., a CD r+Q.r-,) Fin e grained LIME STONE 1 u etrital L IM IU N t. n
C D ( )=
c -·
(/)::;, 0
0 CD •
..... 01
------ - --- - ---+ -- - - - - --190 0
:i" cO CD ' I
0 ...... Fine grained Fine grained z
ceo3 0 Siliceous Detrital Conglomeratic LIMESTONE iit
g -CD<_
" ""
z Argilaceous LIMESTONE
-
CD CD
cO 1D 0 Siliceous LIMESTONE LIMESTONE z
fJ q-o . -t
v -·c ........ g
c0""C
li:: -------+-------- ------- --------- ';1.
OJ
]3
.,0
CD CD c ;;c
::;,
01 O:;,a. 0 Calcareous CLAYSTONE Calcareous SILTSTONE I Calcareous SANDSTONE Calcareous CONGLOMERATE
(/)
(")
:!!:: q!:!:
" "C
a ;;c CD
" -CLAYSTONE-- i-- SILTST ONE---- -SANDSTONE-- CONGLOMERATE-o;:-BRECC
10
CD I
n
-< > 3-<V
g,....
r+ (II (/)
'<" r + .....
iii"
w oo
Ill: :;, 0
CD
a.
q-ce
li::
.a ()
(/)
J!
;.. "J
C ure applies in this section
-----
R
Y
-----
S
T
.
-----
A
L
-----
L
I
-----
N
E
-----
L
-1 I
M
E
C
S
o
T
n
O
v
N
e
E
n
ti
o
o
r
n
a
M
l
A
m
R
e
B
t
L
a
E
m
o
r
- p
h
- i
c
- n
o
- m
e
- n
c
- l
a
- t
FUGRO PENINSULAR
SOIL AND ROCK STRENGTH DEFINITIONS
SANDS CLAYS (2) (3)

Angle of Shearing Angle of Undrained
Resistance Shearing Description “N” Value Description shear
Resistance
Uniform Mixed (4) (3) (1) (2) strength
Grain Size Grain Size kN/m2
(Densities in Mg/m3)
<2 <2 Very soft < 12
29° Very Loose 2–4 2–4 Soft 12 – 25
Loose 5–9 4–8 Firm 25 – 50

29° - 34° 35° - 50° 29° - 30°
(1.4 – 1.9) (1.6 – 2.0)
8 – 15 Stiff 50 – 100
Medium Dense 10 – 30 15 – 30 Very stiff 100 – 200
Hard > 200
30° - 35° > 30
32° - 40° 38° - 46° 35° - 40° Dense 30 – 49
(1.7 – 2.1) (1.8 – 2.1)
40° Very dense > 50
REFERENCES: (1) Engineering Geological Mapping: QJEG 1972, Vol. 5, No. 2

(2) Terzaghi & Peck: Principles of Soil Mechanics
(3) CIRIA 143: SPT Method and use
(4) Hoek & Bray: The Stability of Rock Slopes
(5) Schmertmann: Guidelines for Cone Penetration Test U.S. Dept. of Transport,
1975
GRANULAR SOILS – Relative (BS 5930 :1999) COHSIVE SOILS – Consistency (BS 5930 : 1999)
For fine content >40%
No. of Blows N (SPT) Relative Density Consistency of Clay Undrained Shear Strength
Classification Cu (kN/m2)
0–4 Very loose Very soft Less than 20
5–9 Loose Soft 20 to 40
10 – 29 Medium dense Firm 40 to 75
30 – 49 Dense Stiff 75 to 150
>50 Very dense Very Stiff 150 to 300
Very stiff to hard 150 to >300
ROCK STRENGTH CLASSIFICATION (BS 5930 : 1981)

Term Field definition Compressive Strength
(MN/m2)
Extremely strong Rocks ring on hammer blows > 200
Very strong Core chipped only by heavy hammer blows 100 - 199
Strong Broken by heavy hammer blows 50 - 99
Moderately strong Broken by light hammer blows 12.0 - 49
Moderately weak Thin slabs or edges broken by heavy hand pressure 5 - 12.0
Weak Can be crumbled by heavy hand pressure 1.25 - 4.75
Very weak Crumbles easily in hand < 1.25
CORE LOGGING TERMS

T.C.R – Total Core Recovery : Core recovered expressed as a percentage of length drilled
S.C.R – Solid Core Recovery : Length of core recovered as solid full diameter core pieces expressed as a
percentage of length drilled
R.Q.D – Rock Quality Designation : Length of core recovered in lengths greater than 100 mm expressed as a percentage
of length drilled
Plate A2
6 6
BH-02 (%) (MPa) (MPa)

RQD UCS IS50
4 BH-01 (%) (MPa) (MPa)
4
RQD UCS IS50
BH-04 (%) (MPa) (MPa)

RQD UCS IS50
2 2
BH-05 RQD UCS IS50
(%) (MPa) (MPa)
0 0
MAG
MAG
MAG
-2 -2
MAG
Elevation (m QNHD)
-4 -4
CPR
-6 -6
3.53
CPR
CPR
5.78
CPR
4.20
2.24 3.37
-8 -8
4.15
Library:FUGRO-LIB-2009B.GLB, Report Template:A3(LANDSCAPE) BHLOG+LAB (AGS), File:11-5507-QA.GPJ Produced by gINT 8.2.002 on 15/02/2012 11:40:28
0.51
WSL
2.46
-10 -10
WSL
WSL
0.83
WSL
-12 -12
1.73
0.41
-14 -14
-16 -16
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Calcarenite
boulders
E 242795 mQNG Gravel with sand Gravel SAND with gravel
N 393944 mQNG with Limestone with siltstone pockets
SL - Simsima Limestone RUS - Rus Formation
Project: Geotechnical Investigation - Banana Island Resort Village
FUGRO PENINSULAR
Location: Banana Island, Qatar
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: W to E Cross Section Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.1
6 6
Gravel with sand & silt

Distance Along MAG - ALL - E24319
Baseline (m) Made Dukhan 3
N39398
Ground Limesto
3
Silty SAND ne
with gravel MSD -
Marine MSH -
Deposit Midra
s Shale
WSL - KL -
Weathere Khor
d Limest
Simsima one
Limeston
e

FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: W to E Cross Section Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.1
0 0
MBH-16 (%) (MPa) (MPa)

RQD UCS IS50
-2 -2
MBH-17 RQD UCS IS
MSD
50
-4 -4
(%) (MPa) (MPa) RQD UCS IS50
RQD UCS IS
(MPa) (MPa) RQD UCS IS50
MBH-15 (%) 50
(MPa) (MPa)
MBH-14 (%)
MSD
MSI
MSI
MSD
-6 4.48 -6
CPR
3.95
MSI
CPR
2.38
CPR
2.49
CPR
CPR
0.82 2.76
-8 -8
6.69
Elevation (m CD)
5.43
7.00
WSL
-10 -10
WSL
0.72
WSL
2.97
-12 3.85 -12
4.77
0.20
0.40
WSL
WSL
-14 -14
2.68
-16 -16
-18 -18
0.50
0.30 3.23
-20 -20
-22 -22
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Silty SAND Calcarenite BSI Silt Sandy SILT BSI Silty SAND
E 243307 mQNG Sand with gravel Distance
N 393589 mQNG Along
Baseline
Limestone with siltstone pockets
FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: NE to SW Cross Section Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.2
0 0
(m) E243153
MAG - Made Ground ALL -
Dukhan N393274
MSD - Marine Limeston
Deposits e
WSL - Weathered MSH -
Simsima Limestone Midra
Shale
KL -
Khor
Limesto
ne

FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: NE to SW Cross Section Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.2
BH-08 (%) (MPa) (MPa)
RQD UCS IS50 4
4
BH-11 (%) (MPa) (MPa)
RQD UCS IS50
2 BH-07 (%) (MPa) (MPa) BH-10 RQD UCS IS50

(%) (MPa) (MPa)
BH-12 (%) (MPa) (MPa) 2
RQD UCS IS50 RQD UCS IS50
0 0
MAG
MAG
MAG
-2 -2
MAG
MAG
Elevation (m QNHD)
-4 -4
MSI
-6 -6
MSD
1.46
3.34 15.60
CPR
1.99
0.64 0.28
CPR
2.31
-8 0.66 1.82 1.99 -8
CPR
CPR
3.06
CPR
2.86
0.58
1.24 0.30
1.15 0.66
1.23
-10 -10
WSL
WSL
WSL
WSL
4.66
-12 -12
WSL
0.83
-14 -14
0.20
-16 -16
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
E 243183 mQNG Distance Along Baseline (m) MAG - Made Ground ALL - Dukhan Limestone E243352
N 394040 mQNG N393517
MSD - Marine Deposits MSH - Midra Shale
Limestone
Gravel with SAND with Silty SAND Gravel with
FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: N to S Cross Secton Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.3
BSI Sand Calcarenite with siltstone Sandy SILT
sand & silt
pockets
gravel with gravel sand WSL - Weathered Simsima Limestone KL - Khor Limestone

FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: N to S Cross Secton Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.3
0 0
MBH-22 RQD UCS IS
(%) (MPa) (MPa)
50

RQD UCS IS50
-2 -2
MSD
MSD
MBH-21 (%) (MPa) (MPa) MBH-20 50
-4
-4 RQD UCS IS50 RQD IS50
UCS (MPa)
(%) (MPa) MBH-19 RQD UCS IS
(%) (MPa) (MPa)
MSI
MSD
MSD
MSI
2.89
CPR
CPR
4.78
-6 15.18 -6
CPR
4.11 9.78
CPR
CPR
12.17
0.50
1.88
0.39
-8 -8
Elevation (m CD)
0.12
WSL
WSL
-10 -10
WSL
1.86
WSL
0.92
0.54
-12 -12
WSL
-14 -14
SL
30.37
0.13
-16 -16
SL
10.06
1.48
SL
1.74
-18 -18
-20 -20
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300
BSI Sand Sandy SILT with
Calcarenite Sandy SILT SAND with gravel
E 242681 mQNG siltstone with gravel
N 393874 mQNG pockets
Limestone
FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: SW to NE Cross Section Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.4
Silty SAND
with gravel Distance Along Baseline (m) MAG - ALL - E24297
Made Dukhan 3
N39394
Ground Limesto
5
ne
MSD -
Marine MSH -
Deposit Midra
s Shale
WSL - KL -
Weathere Khor
d Limesto
Simsima ne
Limeston
e

FUGRO PENINSULAR
State of Qatar
Client: URBACON
Date: Plate No.:
Cross-Section: SW to NE Cross Section Job No.: 11-5507-QA
15/02/2012 A3.4
FUGRO PENINSULAR Borehole: BH-01
State of Qatar
Equipment: Boart Longyear Observed Groundwater Levels: Start Date: 03/01/2012 Coordinates:
Method: Wash Boring & Rotary Coring Min (mbg): Max (mbg): Bore Diameter (mm): E 242811 mQNG N 393938 mQNG
Fluid Flush:Water & Guargum Driller: Kishor Giri Core Diameter (mm): 83 Elevation: 3.82 mQNHD
Borehole Progress Sample Rock Core Quality Discontinuities Test Results Physical Properties
Geological
GraphicDepth Sample Sample/ Test Type & Silt Moisture Content
Unit
Casing Water Symbol (m) Strata Description No. Records Em UCS PL K Sand
Date Depth Depth Flush Depth TCR SCR RQD FI Description Gravel Plastic Limit
(m) (m) % (m) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (m/sec) 0 50 100 Liquid Limit
03/01/2012 0.00 - 2.80m : Medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, sandy, angular to 0.00
sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
10,*/15,*,11,* 0.50
03/01/2012 1.5
S2 N=26 0.95
05/01/2012 1
8,*/12,*,14,* 1.50 5
S3 N=26 1.95
2
11,*/22,*,28,* 2.50
1.02 S4
N=50/150mm 2.80 Non intact core
Library:FUGRO-LIB-2009B.GLB, Report Template:0 - BHLOG + COMPLETE LAB, File:11-5507-QA.GPJ Produced by gINT 8.2.002 on 16/02/2012 14:11:40
3 2.80 - 9.30m : Dark grey and light brown, angular to sub-angular fragments of
LIMESTONE , recovered as cobbles and boulders.
0% C1 45 10 10
3.80
4
FILL MATERIALS
0% C2 60 0 0
4.80
0% 5 C3 70 10 0
5.30
0% C4 50 0 0
6 N/I
6.30
0% C5 60 0 0
7
7.30
0% C6 100 0 0
7.80
8
0% C7 40 0 0
8.80
0% 9 C8 80 0 0
-5.48
9.30
CAPROCK
9.30 - 10.00m : Medium dense, light grey, well-graded, medium to coarse grain 5,*/10,*,11,*
SAND with angular to sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.
S5 N=21 9.75
-6.18
10
Remarks: mbg : Meters below grade Project: Geotechnical Investigation - Banana Island Logged by:
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.1.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
10.00 - 15.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, weak, fine grained S6 25,*/50,*,*,* 10.00 0-90 degrees, induced 29
LIMESTONE with recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. N=50/0mm fractures, undulating, rough, 3.53
70% C9 90 90 90 5 planar
8
11 4.20
11.00 Non intact core
WEATHERED SIMSIMA LIMESTONE
0% C10 47 10 10
12
12.50
0% 13 C11 50 0 0 N/I
13.50
0% C12 100 0 0
14 14.00
0% C13 55 10 10
05/01/2012 10.5 -11.18
15
Borehole Terminated at 15.00m Depth
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.1.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Method: Wash Boring & Rotary Coring Min (mbg): 1.2 Max (mbg): 1.2 Bore Diameter (mm): E 242890 mQNG N 393997 mQNG
Geological
Unit
06/01/2012 0.00 - 4.00m : Dense, light brown, well-graded, sandy, coarse grain limestone 0.00
GRAVEL. B1
0.50
7,*/15,*,17,* 0.50
S2 N=32 0.95
1
6,*/14,*,17,* 1.50 15
S3 N=31 1.95
2
10,*/12,*,15,* 2.50
S4 N=27 2.95
13,*/20,*,30,* 3.50
S5 N=50 3.95
0.26
4 4.00 Non intact core
4.00 - 7.00m : Dark grey to light brown, angular to sub-angular fragments of 70 0 0
0%
LIMESTONE, recovered as cobbles and boulders. C1
FILL MATERIALS
4.50
0% 5 C2 40 0 0
5.50 N/I
0% C3 80 0 0
6 6.00
0% C4 50 0 0
-2.74
7 5,*/9,*,12,* 7.00 22
7.00 - 10.00m : Medium dense, light brown, medium to coarse grain SAND and S6
limestone GRAVEL. N=21 7.45
06/01/2012 7.0
07/01/2012 8 6,*/10,*,11,* 8.00
S7 N=21 8.45
9 5,*/9,*,8,* 9.00
S8 N=17 9.45
-5.74
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.2.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
10.00 - 12.50m : Medium dense to dense, light grey, poorly graded, gravelly, 6,*/7,*,8,* 10.00 15
medium grain SAND.
S9 N=15 10.45
CAPROCK
11 10,*/18,*,32,* 11.00
S10 N=50 11.45
... 11.50 - 12.50m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak 11.50 Non intact core
CALCARENITE
50% 12 C5 35 20 20 N/I
8
-8.24 4.15
12.50 - 16.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, 60% of moderately 12.50 Non intact core
0% C6 50 0 0
weak, fine grained LIMESTONE with 40% of light greenish grey attapulgite clay
13 matrix, recovered as non intatc core. 13.00

0% C7 60 0 0
13.50
0% 14 C8 30 0 0
N/I
14.50
0% C9 60 0 0
15 15.00
0% C10 70 0 0
07/01/2012 15.0 1.20 -11.74
08/01/2012 16 16.00 Non intact core
16.00 - 19.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, weak, fine grained
LIMESTONE with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite clay, with close to
50% medium spaced fractures. C11 60 0 0 N/I
17 17.00 0-80 degrees, induced

50% C12 80 20 20 fractures, undulating, rough,
17.50 8.3 planar
50% C13 100 57 57
18
50% C14 87 0 0 N/I
08/01/2012 15.0 1.20 -14.74
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Location: Banana Island, Qatar Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.2.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
08/01/2012 0.00 - 6.25m : Medium dense, light brown, well-graded, silty/clayey, very sandy, 0.00
limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
7,*/8,*,10,* 0.50
S2 N=18 0.95
1
7,*/6,*,6,* 1.50
S3 N=12 1.95
2
5,*/4,*,5,* 2.50
S4 N=9 2.95
FILL MATERIALS
4,*/4,*,5,* 3.50
S5 N=9 3.95
4
4,*/6,*,5,* 4.50
S6 N=11 4.95
5
3,*/4,*,4,* 5.50
S7 N=8 5.95
6
-4.88
08/01/2012 5.5 6.25 - 7.00m : Medium dense, light brown, silty/clayey, very sandy, fine grained
09/01/2012 limestone GRAVEL. 5,*/7,*,8,* 6.50 20
S8 N=15 6.95
-5.63 31 51
7
7.00 - 8.50m : Medium dense, light grey, poorly graded, medium grain SAND
with angular to sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.
10,*/9,*,9,* 7.50
S9 N=18 7.95
CAPROCK
8
-7.13
8.50 - 9.55m : Moderately weathered, light grey, weak, porous CALCARENITE. S10 25,*/50,*,*,* 8.50 0-70 degrees, induced
N=50/0mm 100 47 47 5.9 fractures, undulating, rough,
40% 9 C1 planar 16
5124 8.43
-8.18 9.35 Non intact core
C2 60 5 0 N/I
40%
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.3.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
9.50 - 16.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak, fine grained C2 60 5 0 Non intact core
LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized, with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite ( As previous sheet )
10.35
clay, with close to medium spaced fractures.(As previous sheet)
0% C3 77 31 15
11 11.00
N/I
0% C4 70 0 0
12 12.00
0% C5 80 20 20
9
12.50 0-80 degrees, induced 0.63
fractures, undulating, rough,
0% 13 C6 60 15 15 10 planar

0% C7 100 0 0 N/I
14 14.00 0-70 degrees, induced 7
fractures, undulating, rough, 5.63
0% C8 100 40 40 planar
15 15.00
10
0% C9 100 60 60
14
09/01/2012 9.0 0.90 -14.63 6.82
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.3.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Fluid Flush:Seawater & Guargum Driller: Kishor Giri Core Diameter (mm): 83 Elevation: 2.36 mQNHD
Geological
Unit
10/01/2012 0.00 - 2.25m : Medium dense, light brown, pooly graded, slightly silty/clayey, 0.00
medium grain SAND and GRAVEL. B1
0.50
6,*/9,*,11,* 0.50
S2 N=20 0.95
1
7,*/9,*,14,* 1.50 18
S3 N=23 1.95
2
0.11
2.25 - 8.00m : Medium dense to loose, off-white, well-graded, slightly silty/clayey,
medium to coarse grain SAND with angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. 13,*/10,*,9,* 2.50
S4 N=19 2.95
3
FILL MATERIALS
6,*/4,*,5,* 3.50 16
S5 N=9 3.95
4
7,*/7,*,6,* 4.50
S6 N=13 4.95
5
7,*/6,*,5,* 5.50
S7 N=11 5.95
6
6,*/6,*,8,* 6.50
S8 N=14 6.95
7
8,*/9,*,9,* 7.50 16
S9 N=18 7.95
-5.64
8
8.00 - 8.80m : Dense, light grey, well-graded, medium to coarse grain SAND with
angular to sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.
8.50
-6.44 S10 22,*/50,*,*,* 8.80
CAPROCK
N=50/300mm 8.80 0-70 degrees, induced

9 8.80 - 9.90m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak, porous
CALCARENITE with close spaced fractures. fractures, undulating, rough,
60% C1 60 20 20 6.4 planar
-7.54 9.80 80 60 60
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.4.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
60% 9.90 - 16.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak to weak, fine C2 10.3 0-70 degrees, induced 2.24
29
grained LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized, with pockets of light greenish grey C2 10.30 fractures, undulating, rough,
attapulgite clay, with close to medium spaced fractures.(As previous sheet) planar
100 90 90 ( As previous sheet )
60% C3
11 25
767 2.46
11.30 10.3
0% 12 C4 100 33 20
12.80 0-60 degrees, induced 10

13 0.83
planar
0% C5 93 27 27
14
14.30 12.5 18
0% C6 100 57 57 1.73
15 15.00
0% C7 80 30 30
10/01/2012 12.0 -13.64
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.4.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
11/01/2012 0.00 - 3.00m : Medium dense, light brown, well-graded, slightly silty/clayey, 0.00
SAND with limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
4,*/4,*,5,* 0.50
S2 N=9 0.95
1
3,*/4,*,6,* 1.50
S3 N=10 1.95
2
... 2.50 - 2.95m : No recovery. 5,*/4,*,6,* 2.50

S4 N=10 2.95
-1.61
3
3.00 - 6.50m : Medium dense to loose, light brown, well-graded, very silty/clayey,
FILL MATERIALS
sandy, medium to coarse grain limestone GRAVEL.

4,*/5,*,6,* 3.50 24
S5 N=11 3.95
4
4,*/4,*,7,* 4.50
S6 N=11 4.95
5
... 5.50 - 5.95m : No recovery. 3,*/2,*,4,* 5.50

S7 N=6 5.95
6
-5.11
6.50 - 7.50m : Loose, light grey, well-graded, silty/clayey, SAND with calcarenite 3,*/3,*,5,* 6.50
GRAVEL.
S8 N=8 6.95
7
-6.11
7.50 - 9.10m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak to weak 18,*/40,*,10,* 7.50
CALCARENITE.
S9 N=50 7.95
8
CAPROCK

60% C1 90 85 85 4 planar
9 -7.71 9.00 0-80 degrees, induced 30

9.10 - 15.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light brown becoming off-white, fractures, undulating, rough, 1385 3.37
40% of weak, fine grained LIMESTONE clasts with 60% of light brown to light C2 100 80 80 6.7 planar
60% greenish grey attapulgite clay matrix, with close spaced fractures to non intact
core. 23
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.5.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
... 9.10 - 10.40m : Off-white, moderately weak, fine grained LIMESTONE with 0.51
C2 100 80 80 6.7
11/01/2012 9.0 medium spaced fractures.
13/01/2012 9.10 - 15.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light brown becoming off-white, 10.50 Non intact core
40% of weak, fine grained LIMESTONE clasts with 60% of light brown to light
60% 11 greenish grey attapulgite clay matrix, with close spaced fractures to non intact C3 50 0 0
core.(As previous sheet)
11.50
60% C4 100 0 0
12 12.00
N/I
0% C5 54 0 0
13
13.30
0% C6 86 0 0
0% C7 90 30 30 15 planar
13/01/2012 9.0 0.20 -13.61

15
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.5.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
13/01/2012 0.00 - 5.00m : Loose to medium dense, light brown, well-graded, gravelly SAND 0.00
with shells. B1
0.50
4,*/5,*,6,* 0.50
S2 N=11 0.95
1
5,*/5,*,7,* 1.50
S3 N=12 1.95
2
4,*/5,*,7,* 2.50
S4 N=12 2.95
3,*/4,*,3,* 3.50
S5 N=7 3.95
FILL MATERIALS
4
13/01/2012 4.0
17/01/2012 2.05 4,*/5,*,8,* 4.50
S6 N=13 4.95
-2.72
5
5.00 - 9.00m : Medium dense to dense, light grey, poorly graded, sandy, angular
to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
3,*/4,*,4,* 5.50
S7 N=8 5.95
6
4,*/4,*,6,* 6.50
S8 N=10 6.95
7
4,*/5,*,6,* 7.50
S9 N=11 7.95
8
22,*/47,*,3,* 8.50
S10 N=50 8.95
-6.72 27
9 9.00 0-80 degrees, induced 0.90
9.00 - 11.00m : Moderately weathered, light brown, weak CALCARENITE.
CAPROCK
fractures, undulating, rough, 32

0% C1 100 90 90 6 planar 1.92
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.6.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
32
9.00 - 11.00m : Moderately weathered, light brown, weak CALCARENITE.(As 10.00 0-80 degrees, induced 2.31
CAPROCK
previous sheet) fractures, undulating, rough,

planar
0% C2 100 73 73 6 ( As previous sheet )
-8.72
11
11.00 - 17.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, moderately weak,
fine grained LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized, with pockets of light greenish 6
grey attapulgite clay, with clsoe to medium spaced fractures. 11.50 0-80 degrees, induced 3.00
12 planar
0% C3 93 53 53 6.7
9
1425 5.30
0% C4 90 0 0 N/I

6
0.90
0% C5 90 40 35 planar
15 15.00
0% C6 90 15 10 10
16 16.00
0% C7 100 30 30
17/01/2012 9.0 2.15 -14.72
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.6.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
18/01/2012 0.00 - 3.25m : Medium dense, light nrown, poorly graded, slightly silty/clayey, 0.00
medium grain SAND with shells. B1
0.50
3,*/4,*,5,* 0.50
S2 N=9 0.95
1
8,*/11,*,12,* 1.50
S3 N=23 1.95
2
4,*/4,*,7,* 2.50
S4 N=11 2.95
3
-1.45
3.25 - 8.00m : Medium dense to dense, light brown becoming off-white,
FILL MATERIALS
well-graded, silty/clayey, coarse grain SAND with angular to sub-angular 11,*/9,*,9,* 3.50
limestone GRAVEL. S5 N=18 3.95
4
7,*/12,*,8,* 4.50
S6 N=20 4.95
5
11,*/9,*,7,* 5.50
S7 N=16 5.95
6
9,*/11,*,13,* 6.50
S8 N=24 6.95
7
24,*/44,*,6,* 7.50
S9 N=50 7.95
-6.20
8.00 - 10.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE.
30% C1 70 50 45 planar
CAPROCK
30
4 3.34
9 9.00
0% C2 90 90 85
30
-8.20 0.66
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.7.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
10.00 - 17.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, moderately weak, fine grained 10.00 0-70 degrees, induced
LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized, with pockets of light brown attapulgite clay, fractures, undulating, rough,
0% with close spaced fractures to non intact core. C3 80 25 20 planar
11 11.00
0% C4 70 65 20
18/01/2012 7.5
19/01/2012 1.75 12 12.00
62 13 13
0% C5 10
12.80
13 64 57 0
0% C6
10
13.50 1180 4.66
0% C7 80 60 60
14 14.00
0% C8 85 20 20
0% C9 75 0 0
16 16.00
N/I
0% C10 70 10 10
19/01/2012 7.5 1.83 -15.20
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.7.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
19/01/2012 0.00 - 4.00m : Loose to medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, medium grain 0.00
SAND. B1
0.50
4,*/4,*,5,* 0.50
S2 N=9 0.95
1
3,*/4,*,4,* 1.50
S3 N=8 1.95
2
7,*/8,*,11,* 2.50
S4 N=19 2.95
5,*/8,*,9,* 3.50
S5 N=17 3.95
-0.06
4
FILL MATERIALS
4.00 - 9.25m : Loose to medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, medium to
coarse grain SAND with angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
6,*/4,*,3,* 4.50
S6 N=7 4.95
5
19/01/2012 4.5
20/01/2012 3.80 4,*/4,*,5,* 5.50
S7 N=9 5.95
6
7,*/7,*,6,* 6.50
S8 N=13 6.95
7
8,*/6,*,5,* 7.50
S9 N=11 7.95
8
8,*/7,*,8,* 8.50
S10 N=15 8.95
9
-5.31
9.25 - 11.00m : Medium dense, light grey, well-graded, silty/clayey, SAND and
GRAVEL. 6,*/4,*,4,* 9.50 18
S11 N=8 9.95
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.8.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
MARINE SEDIMENTS Geological

GraphicDepth Sample Sample/ Test Type & Silt
Unit
Strata Description No. Records Moisture Content
Date
Casing Water
Depth Depth Flush
Symbol (m) Depth TCR SCR RQD FI Description Em UCS PL K Sand
Gravel Plastic Limit
9.25 - 11.00m : Medium dense, light grey, well-graded, silty/clayey, SAND and
GRAVEL.(As previous sheet)
23,*/49,*,1,* 10.50
S12 N=50 10.95
-7.06
11.00 - 13.50m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE. 100 60 60
0% C1 fractures, undulating, rough, 34
planar 0.64 31
11.50 2.31
0% C2 75 70 70
CAPROCK
12
3.2 31
3.06
12.50
0% 13 C3 100 100 100

30
-9.56 1180 1.15
13.50 - 18.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, 60% of moderately 13.50 Non intact core
0% C4 80 0 0
weak, fine grained LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized clast, with 40% of off-white
14 attapulgite clay matrix, recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. 14.00
0% C5 80 0 0
15 15.00
0% C6 50 0 0
N/I
16 16.00
0% C7 100 20 20
16.50
0% C8 100 0 0
17 17.00
0% C9 75 20 20
20/01/2012 10.5 3.65 -14.06
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.8.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
23/01/2012 0.00 - 3.00m : Medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, slightly silty/clayey, fine 0.00
to medium grain SAND. B1
0.50
5,*/5,*,6,* 0.50
S2 N=11 0.95
1
7,*/6,*,7,* 1.50
S3 N=13 1.95
2
5,*/6,*,7,* 2.50
S4 N=13 2.95
-1.38
3
3.00 - 8.00m : Loose to medium dense, light grey to light brown, well-graded,
medium to coarse grain SAND and GRAVEL.
4,*/4,*,4,* 3.50
S5 N=8 3.95
4
FILL MATERIALS
7,*/7,*,8,* 4.50
S6 N=15 4.95
5
4,*/3,*,2,* 5.50
S7 N=5 5.95
6
4,*/2,*,3,* 6.50
S8 N=5 6.95
7
12,*/17,*,25,* 7.50
S9 N=42 7.95
-6.38
8
8.00 - 10.00m : Medium dense, light brown, well-graded, sandy, medium to
23/01/2012 7.5 coarse grain angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
25/01/2012 1.10 5,*/12,*,17,* 8.50
S10 N=29 8.95
9
8,*/10,*,13,* 9.50 26
S11 N=23 9.95
-8.38
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.9.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
10.00 - 11.00m : Dense, light grey, well-graded, meium to coarse grain SAND
with angular to sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.
SEDIMENTS
10.50
CAPROCK MARINE
22,*/43,*,7,*
S12 N=50 10.95
-9.38
11.00 - 12.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, very weak to weak 26
CALCARENITE. fractures, undulating, rough, 1.39
60% C1 65 20 20 15 planar
-10.38
12.00 - 17.00m : Highly weathered to decomposed, light brown, 40% of weak, 80 20 20
0%
fine grained LIMESTONE clast with 60% of light yellowish brown attapulgite clay C2
matrix, recovered as non intact core to close spaced fractures. 12.50
0% 13 C3 40 10 10 N/I
31
0.04
13.50
0% C4 80 0 0
0% C5 70 20 20 10 planar
0% C6 90 0 0
16 16.00
N/I
0% C7 95 10 10
25/01/2012 10.5 1.23 -15.38
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.9.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
25/01/2012 0.00 - 5.00m : Loose to medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, medium to 0.00
coarse grain SAND. B1
0.50
3,*/4,*,5,* 0.50
S2 N=9 0.95
1
5,*/7,*,8,* 1.50
S3 N=15 1.95
2
6,*/5,*,5,* 2.50
S4 N=10 2.95
3
25/01/2012 2.5
FILL MATERIALS
26/01/2012 1.45 4,*/5,*,6,* 3.50

S5 N=11 3.95
4
3,*/3,*,4,* 4.50
S6 N=7 4.95
-3.31
5
5.00 - 7.00m : Loose, light grey to light brown, poorly graded, slightly silty/clayey
SAND.
4,*/4,*,5,* 5.50 28
S7 N=9 5.95
6
3,*/4,*,3,* 6.50
S8 N=7 6.95
-5.31
7
7.00 - 8.00m : Dense, light grey, well-graded, medium to coarse grain SAND with
angular to sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.
23,*/46,*,4,* 7.50
S9 N=50 7.95
-6.31
8.00 - 12.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, moderately weak to 30
weak CALCARENITE. fractures, undulating, rough, 1.46
60% C1 75 75 75 planar
CAPROCK
9 9.00
3 33
90 90 90 0.28
0% C2
9.50
C3 97 97 97 1293 1.82
29
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.10.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
8.00 - 12.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, moderately weak to 0-80 degrees, induced
0% fractures, undulating, rough,
weak CALCARENITE.(As previous sheet)
C3 97 97 97 planar
( As previous sheet )
CAPROCK
11 11.00
3 29
0.66 28
1.23
0% C4 87 27 27
-10.31
12 0-80 degrees, induced
12.00 - 15.00m : Highly weathered, light brown, 70% of weak, fine grained 6 fractures, undulating, rough,
LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized clast with 30% of light greenish grey

attapulgite clay matrix, recovered as non intact core. 12.50 planar
Non intact core
0% 13 C5 90 0 0
N/I
13.50
0% C6 100 0 0
0% C7 90 50 50 10 planar
26/01/2012 7.5 1.50 -13.31

15
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.10.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
25/01/2012 0.00 - 5.00m : Loose to medium dense, poorly graded, medium grain SAND with 0.00
shells. B1
0.50
4,*/5,*,6,* 0.50
S2 N=11 0.95
1
8,*/7,*,8,* 1.50
S3 N=15 1.95
2
6,*/5,*,5,* 2.50
S4 N=10 2.95
4,*/4,*,6,* 3.50
S5 N=10 3.95
FILL MATERIALS
3,*/4,*,4,* 4.50
S6 N=8 4.95
-2.15
5
5.00 - 8.00m : Loose, light grey, poorly graded, fine to medium grain SAND.
4,*/5,*,6,* 5.50
S7 N=11 5.95
6
4,*/4,*,4,* 6.50
S8 N=8 6.95
7
3,*/4,*,5,* 7.50 28
S9 N=9 7.95
-5.15
8
8.00 - 9.00m : Dense, light grey, medium to coarse grain SAND with angular to
sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.
19,*/42,*,8,* 8.50 28
S10 N=50 8.95
-6.15
9.00 - 12.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE.
CAPROCK

70% C1 90 25 25 5.3 planar
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.11.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
28
9.00 - 12.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE.(As 10.00 0-90 degrees, induced 714 1.99
previous sheet) fractures, undulating, rough,
planar
70% C2 100 100 100 ( As previous sheet )
CAPROCK
11 5.3
30
2.86 30
11.50 0.58 31
-9.15 1.24
12 Non intact core
12.00 - 16.00m : Highly weathered to decomposed, light brown, 30% of weak, 73 27 27
70%
fine grained LIMESTONE clast with 70% of light yellowish brown attapulgite clay C3
matrix, recovered as non intact core.
13 13.00
70% C4 50 10 10
14 14.00
N/I
70% C5 55 10 10
15 15.00
70% C6 50 0 0
25/01/2012 8.5 2.70 -13.15
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.11.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
28/01/2012 0.00 - 6.00m : Loose to medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, medium to 0.00
coarse grain SAND with angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
4,*/5,*,5,* 0.50
S2 N=10 0.95
1
6,*/6,*,5,* 1.50
S3 N=11 1.95
2
7,*/4,*,3,* 2.50
S4 N=7 2.95
FILL MATERIALS
5,*/4,*,4,* 3.50
S5 N=8 3.95
4
6,*/7,*,8,* 4.50
S6 N=15 4.95
5
7,*/5,*,4,* 5.50
S7 N=9 5.95
-4.26
6
6.00 - 7.00m : Medium dense, light grey, poorly graded, sandy, medium grain
GRAVEL.
7,*/7,*,5,* 6.50 29
S8 N=12 6.95
-5.26
7
7.00 - 8.50m : Firm, light grey, sandy, slightly gravelly SILT/CLAY.
MARINE SILT
5,*/5,*,3,* 7.50 45
S9 N=8 7.95 21 54
8
-6.76
8.50 - 12.00m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak to S10 25,*/50,*,*,* 8.50 0-80 degrees, induced
N=50/0mm fractures, undulating, rough, 7
moderately strong CALCARENITE, partially porous. 15.60
70% C1 100 75 75
CAPROCK
9 planar
5.7
9.50
C2 100 80 80 1.99
30
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.12.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
8.50 - 12.00m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak to 0-80 degrees, induced
70% fractures, undulating, rough,
moderately strong CALCARENITE, partially porous.(As previous sheet)
C2 100 80 80 planar
CAPROCK
29
28/01/2012 7.5 0.30
11 11.00
5.7
29/01/2012 1.40
30% C3 67 7 7
-10.26
12 Non intact core
12.00 - 17.00m : Highly weathered, light brown becoming off-white, 30% of weak,
fine grained LIMESTONE clast with 70% of light greenish grey attapulgite clay
matrix, with close to medium spaced fractures. 12.50
30% 13 C4 60 10 10
N/I
13.50
30% 14 C5 35 0 0
... 14.50 - 14.95m : Medium dense, light brown, sandy SILT/CLAY recovered as 3,*/6,*,4,* 14.50
angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
S11 N=10 14.95
fractures, undulating, rough, 88 0.83
30% C6 86 33 33 planar
16 7.3
16.00
26
30% C7 100 30 30 0.20
29/01/2012 9.0 1.50 -15.26

17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.12.2
Sheet 2 of 2
FUGRO PENINSULAR Borehole: MBH-13
State of Qatar
Equipment: Edeco T-30 Observed Groundwater Levels: Start Date: 03/01/2012 Coordinates:
Fluid Flush:Seawater & Guargum Driller: Sherin Khan Core Diameter (mm): 83 Seabed Elevation: -4.99 mCD
Geological
Unit
03/01/2012 0.00 - 0.65m : Light grey, poorly graded, silty/clayey, fine to medium grain SAND. 1,*/0,*,0,* 0.00
S1 N=0 0.45
03/01/2012 -5.64 0.50
05/01/2012
S2 2,*/50,*,*,*
0-70 degrees, induced
0.65 - 1.35m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak, porous N=50/150mm 0.65
0% 1 CALCARENITE. C1 36 29 29 4.3 fractures, undulating, rough,
-6.34 planar
1.35
CAPROCK
1.35 - 2.70m : Dense, light grey, well-graded, silty/clayey, very sandy, medium to 8,*/14,*,16,*
coarse grain GRAVEL.
S3 N=30 1.80
2
15,*/22,*,28,* 2.35
-7.69 S4 2.70
N=50/200mm
0% 2.70 - 10.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak, fine grained C2 2.70 50 0 0 0-70 degrees, induced
2.90 fractures, undulating, rough,

0% 3 LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized, with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite C3 75 25 25
clay, with close to medium spaced fractures. planar
3.30 10.7 11
6.69
0% C4 83 78 78
4
4.20 0-60 degrees, induced
0% C5 100 41 41 planar
5
5.30
9.4
0% 6 C6 96 14 14
6.70
0% 7 C7 86 14 14
planar
0% 8 C8 93 36 36
7.7
8.80
9
0% C9 75 33 33 19
259 2.68
05/01/2012 2.7 -14.99
10 Borehole Terminated at 10.00m Depth
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.13.1
Sheet 1 of 1
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
Date
Casing Water
Depth Depth Flush
06/01/2012 ... 0.00 - 0.50m : No recovery 1,*/0,*,0,* 0.00
CAPROCK MARINE SILT
0.00 - 1.00m : Light grey, slightly sandy, fine grain SILT/CLAY. S1 N=0 0.50
1,*/1,*,1,* 0.50 51
S2 N=2 0.95
-5.67 35 52
1.00 - 2.00m : Moderately weathered, light grey, weak moderately weak, porous 5
0% C1 75 65 65 6 planar
-6.67
2.00 - 9.80m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak to moderately
strong, fine grained LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized, with pockets of light fractures, undulating, rough,
0% greenish grey attapulgite clay, with close to medium spaced fractures. C2 90 90 90 planar
3 3.00 31
2.76
0% C3 90 70 70
6.7
4 4.00
6
0% C4 92 50 50 2552 5.43
5
0% C5 70 0 0 N/I
6
0% C6 80 20 20 planar
7
7.30 20
3.85
0% 8 C7 87 80 80 7.1
06/01/2012 1.0
07/01/2012 8.80
9 14
0% C8 100 20 20 0.40
07/01/2012 1.0 -14.47

Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.14.1
Sheet 1 of 1
State of Qatar
Geological
Strata Description Moisture Content
Unit
Casing Water Symbol (m) No. Records Depth TCR SCR RQD FI Em UCS PL K Sand
Date Depth Depth Flush Description Gravel Plastic Limit
07/01/2012 0.00 - 1.00m : Soft, light grey, sandy, fine grain SILT/CLAY. 1,*/0,*,0,* 0.00
MARINE SILT
S1 N=0 0.45
1,*/1,*,0,* 0.50
S2 N=1 0.95
-5.80
1.00 - 3.15m : Moderately weathered, light grey, weak, porous CALCARENITE. 90 60 60
07/01/2012
0% C1 fractures, undulating, rough, 6
08/01/2012 1.50 10 planar 3.95
0% C2 70 20 20
CAPROCK
2 3,*/2,*,1,* 2.00
... 2.00 - 2.70m : Soft to dense, poorly graded, silty/clayey, fine to medium grain S3
SAND. N=3 2.45
S4 1,*/50,*,*,* 2.70
0% 3 -7.95 N=50/150mm 2.85 67 0 0 Non intact core

C3 3.15
3.15 - 11.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak, fine grained LIMESTONE,
0% partially dolomitized, with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite clay, with C4 91 0 0
close to medium spaced fractures. 3.70
0% C5 88 0 0 N/I
4
4.10
0% C6 85 0 0
5
planar 23
0% C7 90 40 40 0.72
6
6.60
7
0% C8 100 38 33 7.1
7.80
8
0% C9 93 60 57
9
0% C10 86 0 0 N/I
08/01/2012
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.15.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
09/01/2012 3.15 - 11.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak, fine grained LIMESTONE, 10.00 No recovery
partially dolomitized, with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite clay, with
close to medium spaced fractures.(As previous sheet) C11 0 0 0 0
... 10.00 - 11.00m : No recovery.
-15.80
11 20,*/26,*,24,* 11.00
11.00 - 15.50m : Moderately weathered, light brown, weak, fine grained
LIMESTONE, with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite clay, with non intact
S5 N=50 11.45
core to close spaced fractures. 11.45 Non intact core
0% C12 82 0 0
... 11.00 - 11.45m : Very dense, well graded, sandy, coarse grain, angular to
12 sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. 12.00
N/I
0% C13 100 0 0

planar
0% C14 100 27 20
14 18
8 966 3.23
14.50
0% 15 C15 100 10 10
09/01/2012 -20.30
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.15.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
17/01/2012 0.00 - 2.00m : Dense, light brown, well-graded, medium to coarse grain SAND . 7,*/6,*,8,* 0.00
S1 N=14 0.45
1 4,*/3,*,9,* 1.00
S2 N=12 1.45
-3.35
MARINE SAND
2 4,*/5,*,5,* 2.00
2.00 - 4.75m : Medium dense, light grey, poorly graded, silty/clayey, medium S3
grain SAND. N=10 2.45
3 7,*/6,*,4,* 3.00 39
S4 N=10 3.45
4 4,*/3,*,6,* 4.00
S5 N=9 4.45
-6.10
4.75 - 5.30m : Hard, light grey, fine grain SILT/CLAY.
5 3,*/50,*,*,* 5.00 51
-6.65 S6 >>
N=50/300mm 5.30
5.30 - 7.45m : Moderately weathered, light grey, weak CALCARENITE. 0-90 degrees, induced 25 50 87
0% C1 100 94 94 planar
6
CAPROCK
6.15
9.3 28
0.82
0% C2 88 69 69
7
-8.80
7.45
7.45 - 10.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light brown, moderately weak to Non intact core
weak, fine grained LIMESTONE with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite
0% 8 clay, with close spaced fractures to non intact core. C3 55 9 9 N/I
4
7.00
... 8.55 - 9.00m : Medium dense, light brown, recovered as limestone GRAVEL. 5,*/10,*,15,* 8.55
S7 N=25 9.00
0% C4 30 0 0
9.50
N/I
0% C5 100 20 20
17/01/2012 5.3 -11.35
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.16.1
Sheet 1 of 1
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
10/01/2012 0.00 - 1.45m : Very loose, light grey, poorly graded, very silty/clayey, gravelly, 1,*/0,*,0,* 0.00
S1 N=0
MARINE SAND
medium grain SAND. 0.45
1 1,*/0,*,0,* 1.00 49
-5.77
S2 N=0 1.45 2632
1.45 - 4.00m : Moderately weathered, light grey, weak, porous CALCARENITE. 1.45 0-80 degrees, induced
0% 2 C1 80 30 30 8 planar
8
2.38
CAPROCK
... 2.45 - 2.95m : Loose, light grey, poorly graded, medium grain SAND. 1,*/0,*,1,* 2.45
S3 N=1 2.95

0% C2 86 38 29 9.5 planar
-8.32
4.00 - 6.50m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak, dolomitic
LIMESTONE, recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
0% C3 80 0 0
5 5.00
N/I
0% C4 60 0 0
5.50
0% C5 70 0 0

-10.82
6.50 planar
6.50 - 15.50m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, weak, fine grained
LIMESTONE with pockets of light greenish grey to light brown attapulgite clay,
0% 7 with close to non intact core. C7 80 20 20
15
7.50 2.97
0% C8 83 33 33
8 7.1
8.10
0% C9 85 30 30
30
9 0.20
9.10
C10 100 18 18
0%
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.17.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
10/01/2012 6.50 - 15.50m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, weak, fine grained
11/01/2012 LIMESTONE with pockets of light greenish grey to light brown attapulgite clay, 10.20 Non intact core
with close to non intact core.(As previous sheet)
0% C11 70 0 0 N/I
11
... 11.20 - 12.20m : No recovery. 11.20 No recovery
0% C12 0 0 0 0
12
... 12.20 - 12.65m : Dense, light brown, well-graded, sandy, angular to 10,*/15,*,35,* 12.20 31
sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
S4 N=50 12.65
0% 13 C13 100 0 0 N/I

100 80 80 0.50
0% 14 C14 planar
14.50
5 22
0.30
0% 15 C15 100 70 70
11/01/2012 -19.82
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.17.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
18/01/2012 0.00 - 2.75m : Medium dense, off-white, well-graded, medium grain SAND. 3,*/2,*,4,* 0.00
S1 N=6 0.45
MARINE SAND
1 7,*/5,*,8,* 1.00
S2 N=13 1.45
2 8,*/7,*,9,* 2.00
S3 N=16 2.45
-4.10
2.75 - 3.85m : Firm, light grey, sandy, fine grain SILT/CLAY.
MARINE SILT
3 2,*/3,*,4,* 3.00 50
S4 N=7 3.45
-5.20 3.70
S5 25,*/50,*,*,*
4 3.85 - 5.65m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak to moderately N=50/150mm 3.85 100 20 20
0%
strong, porous CALCARENITE. C1 fractures, undulating, rough,
4.35 planar
CAPROCK
13
0% C2 87 75 62 12.17
5
5.15
80 20 20 6.9
0%
-7.00
C3
5.65 - 15.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, 40% of moderately 5.65
6 weak, dolomicti LIMESTONE with 60% of off-white to light brown attapulgite clay
0% matric, recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. C4 82 18 18

0% 7 C5 71 0 0
7.45
0% C6 63 0 0
7.85
8
0% C7 83 0 0 N/I
18/01/2012 3.7
19/01/2012 ... 8.75 - 9.75m : No recovery 8.75
9
0% C8 0 0 0
S6 11,*/50,*,*,* 9.75
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.18.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
5.65 - 15.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, 40% of moderately N=50/300mm 10.05 Non intact core
weak, dolomicti LIMESTONE with 60% of off-white to light brown attapulgite clay
0% matric, recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.(As previous C9 32 0 0 N/I
sheet)
11 5,*/8,*,12,* 11.00 Non intact core
... 11.00 - 11.45m : Medium dense, recovered as limestone GRAVEL. S7 N=20
11.45
11.45
0% 12 C10 80 10 10
12.45 N/I
0% C11 91 0 0
13 13.00
0% C12 100 10 10
18
14 14.00 0-80 degrees, induced 0.13
0% C13 90 80 80 5 planar
16
19/01/2012 3.7 -16.35 10.06
15
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.18.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
11/01/2012 0.00 - 0.50m : Soft, light grey, sandy, gravelly SILT/CLAY. 1,*/0,*,0,* 0.00 98
S1 N=0 0.45
MARINE
-5.08
SAND
43 72
0.50 - 1.00m : Very dense, light grey, medium to coarse grain SAND and
GRAVEL. -5.58
1 1.00
1.00 - 2.25m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak, porous S2 25,*/50,*,*,*
CALCARENITE. N=50/150mm 1.15
CAPROCK

15.18
0% C1 64 32 32 4.5 planar
2
11/01/2012 -6.83
13/01/2012 2.25 - 10.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, 70% of moderately 2.25 Non intact core
0% C2 70 0 0 N/I
weak to weak, dolomitic LIMESTONE clasts with 30% of light greenish grey
attapulgite clay matrix, with closed spaced fractures. 2.75 0-60 degrees, induced 16
3 fractures, undulating, rough, 0.39

planar
0% C3 100 23 23
4 4.05
0% C4 100 18 18
5
5.15
0% C5 100 15 15 11
6 1.86
6.9
6.50
7 92 23 23
0% C6
7.80
8
0% C7 100 8 8
9 9.00
0% C8 100 10 10
13/01/2012 -14.58
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.19.1
Sheet 1 of 1
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
Date
Casing Water
Depth Depth Flush
20/01/2012 0.00 - 1.10m : Very soft, light grey, sandy SILT/CLAY. 1,*/1,*,1,* 0.00 107
S1
CAPROCKMARINE SILT
N=2 0.45 34 82
1 -5.55 1.00
1.10 - 1.70m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak S2 25,*/50,*,*,*
N=50/100mm 1.10 27
-6.15 96 71 67 5.8 planar
0% C1 4.11
10
1.70 - 8.50m : Highly weathered, light grey, 40% of weak, fine grained
2 LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized clast with 60% of light greenish grey
attapulgite clay matrix, with clcose spaced fractures to non intact core.
0% C2 94 0 0
3
3.10
0% C3 94 0 0
N/I
4 4.00
0% C4 87 7 7
5

6 planar
0% C5 93 17 17
14
7 7.00
6.7 0.54
0% C6 77 23 23
8
-12.95
8.50 - 15.00m : Moderately weathered, off white, weak to very weak, fine grained 8.50 0-80 degrees, induced
LIMESTONE with pockets of light brown attapulgite clay, with close spaced fractures, undulating, rough,
9 fractures. planar
0% C7 83 13 13 7.7
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.20.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
8.50 - 15.00m : Moderately weathered, off white, weak to very weak, fine grained 10.00 0-80 degrees, induced
LIMESTONE with pockets of light brown attapulgite clay, with close spaced fractures, undulating, rough,
0% fractures.(As previous sheet) C8 90 40 40 planar
20/01/2012
23/01/2012 11 11.00
0% C9 62 8 8
SIMSIMA LIMESTONE
12
12.30 18
7.7 510 1.48
0% C10 67 17 17
13
13.50
14
0% C11 93 13 13
23/01/2012 -19.45
15
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.20.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
23/01/2012 0.00 - 1.45m : Medium dense to dense, light grey, well-graded, slightly 2,*/8,*,10,* 0.00
S1 N=18 0.45
MARINE SAND
silty/clayey SAND with GRAVEL.
1 10,*/25,*,25,* 1.00 25
23/01/2012 1.0 -5.85
S2 N=50 1.45
25/01/2012 1.45 - 2.45m : Moderately weathered, light grey, moderately weak 1.45 0-80 degrees, induced
CAPROCK
CALCARENITE. fractures, undulating, rough,

0% 2 C1 95 30 20 10 planar
8
-6.85 0.50
2.45 - 10.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, light grey, 70% of very weak to 2.45 Non intact core
weak LIMESTONE, partially dolomitized clast, with 30% of light brown attapulgite
3 clay matrix, recovered as non intact core.

0% C2 67 0 0 N/I
4 ... 3.95 - 4.95m : No recovery 3.95 No recovery
0% C3 0 0 0 0
5 4.95
... 4.95 - 5.25m : Light brown SAND and limestone GRAVEL. S3 10,*/50,*,*,*
N=50/300mm 5.25 Non intact core
0% C4 60 0 0 N/I
6 fractures, undulating, rough,
0% C5 80 25 25 planar 0.92
10
6.75
7
0% C6 70 30 30
7.75
12.5
8
0% C7 70 10 10
8.75
9
0% C8 100 10 10
-14.40 C9 9.75 60 0 0 N/I Non intact core

10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.21.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
0% 10.00 - 15.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off white, moderately weak to Non intact core
weak, fine grained LIMESTONE with close spaced fractures to non intact core. 10.25 ( As previous sheet )
0% C10 60 0 0
10.75
N/I
0% 11 C11 57 0 0
25/01/2012 1.5
26/01/2012 11.45 0-70 degrees, induced
SIMSIMA LIMESTONE
12 planar
0% C12 87 7 7
10
13 12.95 14
1.74
0% C13 87 23 23
14

0% C14 73 0 0 N/I
26/01/2012 1.5 -19.40
15
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.21.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
26/01/2012 0.00 - 3.50m : Medium dense, light brown, medium to coarse grain SAND with 3,*/4,*,4,* 0.00
shells.
S1 N=8 0.45
1 4,*/5,*,7,* 1.00
S2 N=12 1.45
MARINE SAND
2 10,*/8,*,10,* 2.00 17
S3 N=18 2.45
3 10,*/15,*,12,* 3.00
S4 N=27 3.45
-4.10
3.50 - 4.75m : Medium dense, poorly graded, very silty silty/clayey, very gravelly
SAND.
4 3,*/9,*,6,* 4.00 38
S5 N=15 4.45 30 68
-5.35
S6 25,*/50,*,*,* 4.70 0-80 degrees, induced
CAPROCK
4.75 - 5.55m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE. 4.75 90 90 80

0% 5 N=50/50mm fractures, undulating, rough,
26
C1 6.2 973 2.89
5.25 planar
-6.15
20
5.55 - 13.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak, fine grained 0-90 degrees, induced 9.78
0% LIMESTONE with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite clay, with close C2 88 88 88 fractures, undulating, rough,
6 spaced fractures to non intact core. planar
9
5.7 1.88
6.50
0% C3 88 25 25
7
26/01/2012 4.7
27/01/2012 7.30 Non intact core
0% C4 100 0 0 N/I
planar
0% C5 92 15 15 11.5 0.12
16
9
C6 58 0 0 N/I
0%
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.22.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
5.55 - 13.00m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak, fine grained Non intact core
C6 58 0 0 N/I ( As previous sheet )
LIMESTONE with pockets of light greenish grey attapulgite clay, with close
spaced fractures to non intact core.(As previous sheet) 7,*/9,*,12,* 10.50
S7 N=21 10.95
0% C7 82 0 0 N/I
11.80 0-70 to 80-90 degrees,

12 induced fractures, undulating,
75 13 13 rough, planar
0% C8
-13.60
13 13.00
13.00 - 15.20m : Moderately weathered, off-white, moderately weak to
moderately strong, fine grained LIMESTONE with pockets of off-white attapulgite
11.8
SIMSIMA LIMESTONE
0% clay, with close spaced fractures. C9 92 50 50

14
14.20 7
30.37
0% C10 80 55 50
27/01/2012 4.7 15 -15.80
16
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.22.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Fluid Flush:Water & Guargum Driller: Kishor Giri Core Diameter (mm): 83 Elevation: mQNHD
Geological
Unit
30/01/2012 0.00 - 3.00m : Loose to medium dense, light brown, poorly graded, medium grain 0.00
SAND. B1
0.50
7,*/9,*,9,* 0.50
S2 N=18 0.95
1
6,*/7,*,8,* 1.50
S3 N=15 1.95
2
FILL MATERIALS
8,*/5,*,4,* 2.50
S4 N=9 2.95
3
3.00 - 6.00m : Loose, light brown, well-graded, slightly silty/clayey SAND with
angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.
5,*/4,*,3,* 3.50
S5 N=7 3.95
4
7,*/5,*,4,* 4.50
S6 N=9 4.95
5
5,*/5,*,4,* 5.50
S7 N=9 5.95
6
6.00 - 7.00m : Firm, light grey, sandy SILT/CLAY.
MARINE SILT
4,*/3,*,2,* 6.50 45
S8 N=5 6.95
MARINE SAND
7
7.00 - 7.80m : Very dense, well-graded, medium to coarse grain SAND with
calcarenite GRAVEL.
22,*/50,*,*,* 7.50
S9
N=50/300mm 7.80
7.80 - 10.80m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE. 0-90 degrees, induced 28
8 fractures, undulating, rough, 1.51
75% C1 100 95 95 planar
19
CAPROCK
8.80 2.7
75% 9 C2 100 100 100
9.30 23
C3 100 97 97 313 1.52
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.23.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Strata Description Moisture Content
Unit
Casing Water Symbol (m) No. Records Depth TCR SCR RQD FI Em UCS PL K Sand
Date Depth Depth Flush Description Gravel Plastic Limit
75% 0-90 degrees, induced
CAPROCK
7.80 - 10.80m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE.(As
previous sheet) 100 97 97 2.7 fractures, undulating, rough,
C3 planar 27
( As previous sheet ) 1.90
10.80 - 17.00m : Highly weathered, light brown, 40% of weak, fine grained 10.80 Non intact core
11
LIMESTONE clast with 60% of light greenish grey attapulgite clay matrix, with
50% close to non intact core. C4 67 4 0
12 12.00 N/I
40% C5 60 0 0
12.50
40% 13 C6 50 0 0
30/01/2012 7.5
31/01/2012 13.50 0-30 degrees, induced
14 14.00 planar
70% C8 80 20 20 10
3.99
15 15.00
14.3
70% C9 60 10 10
16 16.00
70% C10 70 10 10
31/01/2012 7.5
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.23.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
02/02/2012 0.00 - 8.00m : Medium dense, light brown, well-graded, medium to coarse grain 0.00
SAND with angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
4,*/7,*,7,* 0.50
S2 N=14 0.95
1
5,*/6,*,8,* 1.50
S3 N=14 1.95
2
4,*/8,*,8,* 2.50
S4 N=16 2.95
3
02/02/2012 3.0
FILL MATERIALS
06/02/2012 4,*/6,*,8,* 3.50

S5 N=14 3.95
4
7,*/6,*,7,* 4.50
S6 N=13 4.95
5
6,*/5,*,7,* 5.50
S7 N=12 5.95
6
4,*/4,*,3,* 6.50
S8 N=7 6.95
7
3,*/4,*,5,* 7.50
S9 N=9 7.95
8
8.00 - 9.80m : Loose, light grey, poorly graded, silty/clayey, fine to medium grain
MARINE SEDIMENTS
SAND with angular to sub-angular calcarenite GRAVEL.

4,*/3,*,4,* 8.50 2
S10 N=7 8.95
9
9.50
S11 8,*/50,*,*,* 9.80 27
N=50/300mm 9.80 100 94 94 6.4 0.70
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.24.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
0-80 degrees, induced 27
0% 9.80 - 12.15m : Moderately weathered, off-white, weak CALCARENITE.(As 1013 2.51
previous sheet) C1 100 94 94 fractures, undulating, rough,
planar 9
10.65 ( As previous sheet ) 1.44
29
CAPROCK
11 6.4
0% C2 73 47 47
11
12 1.17
12.15 - 17.00m : Moderately to highly weathered, off-white, 40% of moderately 12.15 Non intact core
0% C3 30 0 0
weak, fine grained LIMESTONE clast with 60% of light greenish grey attapulgite
clay matrix, recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. 12.65
0% C4 30 0 0
13
13.15
0% C5 40 5 0
14
14.15
0% C6 40 0 0
N/I
14.65
15 60 0 0
0% C7
15.65
0% C8 40 0 0
16
16.15
0% C9 59 6 0
06/02/2012 10.0 2.85
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.24.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Fluid Flush:Water & Guargum Driller: Sherin Khan Core Diameter (mm): 83 Elevation: mQNHD
Geological
Unit
07/02/2012 0.00 - 9.50m : Medium dense, light brown, well-graded, medium to coarse grain 0.00
SAND with angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
9,*/15,10,*,* 0.50
S2 N=25 0.95
1
7,*/15,12,*,* 1.50
S3 N=27 1.95
2
8,*/15,11,*,* 2.50
S4 N=26 2.95
6,*/15,10,*,* 3.50
S5 N=25 3.95
4
FILL MATERIALS
7,*/15,6,*,* 4.50
S6 N=21 4.95
5
8,*/15,6,*,* 5.50
S7 N=21 5.95
6
5,*/15,7,*,* 6.50
S8 N=22 6.95
7
5,*/15,5,*,* 7.50
S9 N=20 7.95
8
6,*/15,5,*,* 8.50
S10 N=20 8.95
9
9.50
07/02/2012 9.8 3.15 9.50 - 12.50m : Moderately weathered, light grey to dark grey, weak to S11 5,*/0,50,*,* 9.80
08/02/2012 2.90 moderately weak CALCARENITE porous. N=50/mm 9.80 78 22 17 3.7
10
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.25.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
9.50 - 12.50m : Moderately weathered, light grey to dark grey, weak to 0-80 degrees, induced
30% 78 22 17 fractures, undulating, rough,
moderately weak CALCARENITE porous.(As previous sheet) C1 23
planar 5.88
10.70 ( As previous sheet )
24
915 3.63
CAPROCK
11 26
3.7 0.52 11
30% C2 87 47 47 7.05
12
12.20
12.50 - 18.00m : Highly weathered, off-white, 60% of moderately weak, fine 70 0 0 Non intact core
30% C3
grained LIMESTONE clast with 40% of light greenish grey attapulgite clay matrix,
13 recovered as angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL.

13.20
30% C4 80 20 20 8
13.70
14
30% C5 50 0 0
14.70
30% 15 C6 60 20 20
15.20 N/I
30% C7 50 20 0
15.70
30% 16 C8 50 0 0
16.20
30% C9 60 0 0
16.70
30% 17 C10 50 0 0
17.20
30% C11 69 19 19
08/02/2012 9.8 3.00
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.25.2
Sheet 2 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
09/02/2012 0.00 - 5.25m : Medium dense, light brown, well-graded, silty/clayey to very 0.00
silty/clayey, coarse grain SAND with angular to sub-angular limestone GRAVEL. B1
0.50
7,*/15,10,*,* 0.50
S2 N=25 0.95
1
10,*/15,9,*,* 1.50
S3 N=24 1.95
2
9,*/15,11,*,* 2.50
FILL MATERIALS
S4 N=26 2.95
8,*/15,7,*,* 3.50
S5 N=22 3.95
4
6,*/15,10,*,* 4.50
S6 N=25 4.95
5
5.25 - 6.25m : Medium dense, off-white, poorly graded, silty/clayey, fine to
medium grain SAND. 4,*/15,7,*,* 5.50
S7 N=22 5.95
6
6.25 - 7.10m : Medium dense, light grey, poorly graded, silty/clayey, fine to
medium grain SAND with calcarenite GRAVEL. 5,*/15,6,*,* 6.50 33
S8 N=21 6.95
7
7.10
CAPROCK
7.10 - 8.60m : Moderately weathered, light grey, weak to moderately weak 88 75 75 0-90 degrees, induced
09/02/2012 7.1 1.25 30% C1 fractures, undulating, rough, 2846 2.22
25
24
CALCARENITE.
10/02/2012 0.50 7.50 planar 0.81 18
6 8.84
30% 8 C2 85 70 70
8.50
8.60 - 17.00m : Highly weathered, off-white, 70% of moderately weak to weak, Non intact core 3
5.54
30% 9 fine grained LIMESTONE clast with 40% of off-white attapulgite clay matrix, C3 70 20 20
recovered as angular to sub-angular GRAVEL to cobbles of LIMESTONE.
N/I
9.50
C4 60 10 10
10
Resort Village CSA
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.26.1
Sheet 1 of 2
State of Qatar
Geological
Unit
30% 8.60 - 17.00m : Highly weathered, off-white, 70% of moderately weak to weak, Non intact core
C4 60 10 10 ( As previous sheet )
fine grained LIMESTONE clast with 40% of off-white attapulgite clay matrix,
recovered as angular to sub-angular GRAVEL to cobbles of LIMESTONE.(As 10.50
30% previous sheet) C5 60 20 20
11 11.00
30% C6 50 0 0 N/I
11.50
30% C7 50 0 0
12 12.00
30% C8 50 0 0

13 planar
30% C9 80 27 13
8.7
9
14 0.52
14.00
30% C10 56 13 13

30% 15 C11 60 0 0
15.30
30% C12 92 25 8 N/I

16
16.50
30% C13 90 70 70
10/02/2012 7.1 1.50
17
18
19
20
Resort Village CSA
Checked by:
Client: URBACON
Plate No.:
Job No.: 11-5507-QA A4.26.2
Sheet 2 of 2
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST
Variable Head Permeabilty Test Results

Project Name: Banana Island Resort Village
Client: UrbaCon Co.
Project Number: 11-5507-QA
Borehole number: BH07 Tested by: CSA
Test Date: 18-Jan-12 Calculated by: JL
Depth of borehole before test: 8.0 m Checked by: KC
Depth of borehole after test: 8.0 m
Height of casing above ground level: 0.2 m
Depth of casing below ground level: 7.5 m
Casing / Borehole diameter: 0.15 m
Groundwater level: 2.40 m below GL
Elapsed time Depth to water Head Elapsed time Depth to water Head
from top casing Ratio from top casing Ratio
(min) (sec) (m) H/Ho (min) (sec) (m) H/Ho
0 0.00 1.00
5 0.70 0.73
10 0.80 0.69
15 1.00 0.61
30 1.40 0.45
45 1.85 0.27
60 2.10 0.18
2 2.48 0.03
3 2.49 0.02
4 2.50 0.02
5 2.51 0.02
10 2.53 0.01
15 2.53 0.01
20 2.53 0.01
25 2.54 0.00
30 2.54 0.00
45 2.55 0.00
60 2.55 0.00
Plate:A5.1.1
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Head Ratio H/Ho
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Elapsed time t (min)

Client: UrbaCon Co.
Borehole number: BH07
Test Date: 18-Jan-12
Depth of borehole before test: 8.0 m

Groundwater level: 2.40 m
Length of test section: 0.5 m
Length / Diameter: 3.33 m
Intake factor: (as per condition d) of Fig. 6 of BS 5930:1999) 1.64
Time factor: 37 s
Permeability by time factor: 2.9E-04 m/s
Permeability (general approach): NA m/s
Tested by: CSA Calculated by: JL Checked by: KC

Date: 18-Jan-12 Date: 06-Feb-12 Date: 06-Feb-12
Notes 1. Falling head permeability test carried out in accordance with BS 5930.
2. NA denotes "Not Applicable".
Plate A5.1.2
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST

Client: UrbaCon Co.
Borehole number: BH-08 Tested by: CSA
0 0.00 1.00
5 0.30 0.92
10 0.50 0.87
15 0.90 0.77
20 1.30 0.67
25 2.00 0.49
30 2.80 0.29
45 3.40 0.14
60 3.65 0.08
2.00 3.70 0.06
3.00 3.77 0.05
4.00 3.85 0.03
5.00 3.89 0.02
10.00 3.95 0.00
Plate:A5.2.1
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
Head Ratio H/Ho
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Client: UrbaCon Co.
Borehole number: BH-08

Length / Diameter: 3.33
Time factor: 28 s

Plate A5.2.2
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST

Client: UrbaCon Co.
0 0.00 1.00
5 0.20 0.86
10 0.35 0.76
15 0.47 0.68
20 0.53 0.63
25 0.58 0.60
30 0.65 0.55
45 0.78 0.46
60 0.85 0.41
2.00 0.92 0.37
3.00 1.07 0.26
4.00 1.15 0.21
5.00 1.17 0.19
10.00 1.22 0.16
15.00 1.27 0.12
20.00 1.30 0.10
25.00 1.30 0.10
30.00 1.32 0.09
45.00 1.32 0.09
60.00 1.32 0.09
Plate:A5.3.1
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST
1.00
Head Ratio H/Ho
0.10
0.01
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Client: UrbaCon Co.

Time factor: 114 s

Plate A5.3.2
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST

Client: UrbaCon Co.
0 0.00 1.00
5 0.45 0.74
10 0.70 0.60
15 0.90 0.49
20 1.25 0.29
25 1.40 0.20
30 1.60 0.09
45 1.70 0.03
60 1.71 0.02
2 1.72 0.02
3 1.73 0.01
4 1.73 0.01
5 1.74 0.01
10 1.74 0.01
15 1.75 0.00
20 1.75 0.00
25 1.75 0.00
30 1.75 0.00
35 1.75 0.00
45 1.75 0.00
60 1.75 0.00
Plate:A5.4.1
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
Head Ratio H/Ho
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Client: UrbaCon Co.

Time factor: 18 s

Plate A5.4.2
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST

Client: UrbaCon Co.
0 0.00 1.00
5 0.15 0.94
10 0.50 0.79
15 0.85 0.65
20 1.15 0.52
25 1.20 0.50
30 1.35 0.44
45 1.55 0.35
60 1.65 0.31
2.00 1.80 0.25
3.00 1.85 0.23
4.00 1.85 0.23
5.00 1.90 0.21
10.00 1.90 0.21
15.00 1.95 0.19
20.00 1.95 0.19
25.00 1.95 0.19
30.00 1.95 0.19
45.00 1.96 0.18
60.00 1.96 0.18
Plate:A5.5.1
FUGRO MIDDLE EAST
1.00
Head Ratio H/Ho
0.10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Client: UrbaCon Co.

Time factor: 42 s

Plate A5.2.2
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
SUMMARY OF LAB TEST RESULTS PLATES B1.1 TO B1.6

MOISTURE CONTENT PLATES B2.1 TO B2.2
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVES PLATES B3.1 TO B3.9
ATTERBERG LIMITS PLATE B4
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS PLATES B5.1 TO B.2
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH PLATES B6.1 TO B6.8

UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (WITH
PLATES B7.1 TO B7.18
MEASUREMENT OF E-MODULUS)
POINT LOAD TEST PLATES B8.1 TO B8.2
SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS
Client : URBACON
Project : Geotechnical Investigation - Banana Island Resort Village
Location : Banana Island, Qatar
Project No. : 11-5507-QA Issue Date:
Sample Density Particle Size Distribution Atterberg limits Chemical Analysis Rock Properties
Moisture Content
Specimen Base Depth (m)
Specimen Top Depth (m)
Identification
Soil Point Load index
Elastic Modulus
Particle Density
Plasticity Index
Percentage Passing
Compressive
Bulk Density
Plastic Limit
Unconfined
Liquid Limit
Dry Density
Sample Type
Strength
425μm Sieve
Sample No.
Acid Soluble Water Soluble Carbonate Content
Diametral
Silt / Clay
Gravel
Sand
Remarks
Axial
*Class
Chloride as
Chloride as
as CaCO3
Sulphate
Sulphate
as SO3
as CO2
as SO3
(mg/L)
Borehole No. pH
Cl
Cl
w Gs γd γ LL PL PI UCS EM IS/(50) IS/(50)
(%) (Mg/m³) (Mg/m³) (Mg/m³) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa) (MPa)
BH-01 S3 S 1.50 1.95 4.9 2.60 84 11 5 22 40.8 92.7
BH-01 S5 S 9.30 9.75 0.63 0.06 9.0
BH-01 C9 C 10.25 10.45 29.0 2.40 1.49 1.91 3.53
BH-01 C9 C 10.90 11.00 8.2 4.20
BH-02 S3 S 1.50 1.95 15.0 73 21 6 12
BH-02 S6 S 7.00 7.45 22.0 2.70 25 66 9
BH-02 S8 S 9.00 9.45 2.70 35.9 81.6
BH-02 S9 S 10.00 10.45 15.0 15 83 2 77
BH-02 S10 S 11.00 11.45 0.79 0.1 8.6
BH-02 C5 C 12.40 12.50 7.8 4.15
BH-03 S2 S 0.50 0.95 64 26 13
BH-03 S5 S 3.50 3.95 62 31 7
BH-03 S8 S 6.50 6.95 20.0 47 23 30 51 31 5 51 ML
BH-03 C1 C 9.15 9.35 16.0 2.10 1.95 2.27 40.8 92.8 8.43 5124
BH-03 C6 C 12.55 12.65 9.3 0.63
BH-03 C8 C 14.25 14.45 7.1 2.14 2.29 0.58 0.06 8.6 5.63
BH-03 C9 C 15.80 16.00 14.0 2.16 2.47 6.82
BH-04 S3 S 1.50 1.95 18.0 32 61 7
BH-04 S5 S 3.50 3.95 16.0 62 31 7 22
BH-04 S9 S 7.50 7.95 16.0 59 32 9 30
BH-04 C2 C 10.10 10.30 29.0 1.48 1.91 2.24
BH-04 C3 C 11.10 11.30 25.0 1.62 2.03 0.7 0.1 8.4 2.46 767
BH-04 C5 C 12.95 13.05 10.3 0.83
BH-04 C6 C 14.50 14.70 18.0 2.61 1.80 2.17 23.1 52.6 1.73
BH-05 S2 S 0.50 0.95 59 35 6
BH-05 S5 S 3.50 3.95 23.5 2.65 55 13 32
BH-05 S9 S 7.50 7.95 52 36 12 0.62 0.09 8.6
Laboratory Manager
11-5507-QA Note: Sample Type; D = small disturbed sample, U = undisturbed sample, B = bulk disturbed sample, C = core sample ; [* Atterberg Limits, N/P = Non Plastic] Plate: B1.1
Client : URBACON
Moisture Content
Identification
Elastic Modulus
Particle Density
Plasticity Index
Percentage Passing
Compressive
Bulk Density
Plastic Limit
Unconfined
Liquid Limit
Dry Density
Sample Type
Strength
425μm Sieve
Sample No.
Diametral
Silt / Clay
Gravel
Sand
Remarks
Axial
*Class
Chloride as
Chloride as
as CaCO3
Sulphate
Sulphate
as SO3
as CO2
as SO3
(mg/L)
Borehole No. pH
Cl
Cl
BH-05 C1 C 8.20 8.40 27.0 2.51 1.53 1.95 5.78
BH-05 C2 C 9.15 9.35 30.0 1.46 1.91 0.85 0.11 9.3 3.37 1385
BH-05 C2 C 9.90 10.00 22.7 0.51
BH-05 C7 C 14.30 14.40 13.6 0.41
BH-06 W1 W 2.05 2.15 23.3 2.72 7.7 WATER SAMPLE
BH-06 S5 S 3.50 3.95 36 44 30
BH-06 S8 S 6.50 6.95 93 6 1
BH-06 C1 C 9.00 9.10 27.0 0.90
BH-06 C1 C 9.40 9.60 32.0 2.45 1.41 1.86 0.72 0.09 8.9 1.92
BH-06 C2 C 10.00 10.20 32.0 1.44 1.90 2.31
BH-06 C3 C 11.50 11.60 5.9 3.00
BH-06 C3 C 12.50 12.70 8.7 2.14 2.33 5.30 1425
BH-06 C5 C 14.10 14.20 5.6 0.90
BH-07 W1 W 1.75 1.83 23.55 2.72 7.6 WATER SAMPLE
BH-07 C1 C 8.80 9.00 30.0 1.49 1.94 3.34
BH-07 C2 C 9.80 9.90 30.4 0.66
BH-07 C7 C 13.50 13.70 10.0 2.08 2.29 4.66 1180
BH-08 S11 S 9.50 9.95 18.0 50 44 6 69
BH-08 C1 C 11.40 11.50 33.8 0.64
BH-08 C2 C 11.50 11.70 31.0 2.30 1.45 1.47 0.67 0.09 8.8 2.31
BH-08 C2 C 12.30 12.50 31.0 1.90 1.93 3.06
BH-08 C3 C 13.30 13.50 30.0 1.47 1.92 1.15 1180
BH-09 S10 S 8.50 8.95 69 22 9
BH-09 S11 S 9.50 9.95 25.5 1.53 1.92
BH-09 C1 C 11.20 11.40 26.0 1.50 1.89 1.39
BH-09 C3 C 13.40 13.50 30.6 0.04
BH-09 C5 C 14.20 14.40 27.0 1.66 2.11 0.10
Laboratory Manager
Client : URBACON
Moisture Content
Identification
Elastic Modulus
Particle Density
Plasticity Index
Percentage Passing
Compressive
Bulk Density
Plastic Limit
Unconfined
Liquid Limit
Dry Density
Sample Type
Strength
425μm Sieve
Sample No.
Diametral
Silt / Clay
Gravel
Sand
Remarks
Axial
*Class
Chloride as
Chloride as
as CaCO3
Sulphate
Sulphate
as SO3
as CO2
as SO3
(mg/L)
Borehole No. pH
Cl
Cl
BH-10 S7 S 5.50 5.95 27.7 1.54 1.97
BH-10 S8 S 6.50 6.95 34 47 19
BH-10 S9 S 7.50 7.95 0.86 0.10 8.7
BH-10 C1 C 8.30 8.50 30.0 2.20 1.48 2.20 1.46
BH-10 C2 C 9.10 9.20 32.7 0.28
BH-10 C3 C 9.70 9.90 29.0 1.51 1.95 1.82 1293
BH-10 C4 C 11.10 11.20 29.4 0.66
BH-10 C4 C 11.30 11.50 28.0 1.43 1.83 1.23
BH-11 S8 S 6.50 6.95 5 88 7
BH-11 S9 S 7.50 7.95 27.9 1.52 1.94
BH-11 S10 S 8.50 8.95 28.1 2.65 1.54 1.97 0.66 0.06 8.7
BH-11 C2 C 10.00 10.20 28.0 1.52 1.95 1.99 714
BH-11 C2 C 11.30 11.50 30.0 1.49 1.94 2.86
BH-11 C3 C 11.60 11.70 29.5 0.58
BH-11 C3 C 11.80 12.00 31.0 1.43 1.88 1.24
BH-12 S8 S 6.50 6.95 28.7 1.45 1.87
BH-12 S9 S 7.50 7.95 44.5 7 55 38 54 21 33 86 CH 0.93 0.11 8.9
BH-12 C1 C 8.80 9.00 6.8 2.70 2.23 2.38 15.60
BH-12 C2 C 9.70 9.90 30.0 1.47 1.91 1.99
BH-12 C2 C 10.80 10.90 28.5 0.30
BH-12 C6 C 15.15 15.35 19.0 1.80 2.13 0.83 88
BH-12 C7 C 16.40 16.60 26.4 0.20
MBH-13 C1 C 0.95 1.35 0.54 0.08 8.8 41.8 95.0
MBH-13 S3 S 1.35 1.80 2.50 47 39 14
MBH-13 C4 C 3.50 3.70 11.0 2.05 2.28 6.69
MBH-13 C8 C 7.60 7.70 8.1 4.77
MBH-13 C9 C 9.50 9.70 19.0 2.60 1.26 2.68 2.68 259
Laboratory Manager
Client : URBACON
Moisture Content
Identification
Elastic Modulus
Particle Density
Plasticity Index
Percentage Passing
Compressive
Bulk Density
Plastic Limit
Unconfined
Liquid Limit
Dry Density
Sample Type
Strength
425μm Sieve
Sample No.
Diametral
Silt / Clay
Gravel
Sand
Remarks
Axial
*Class
Chloride as
Chloride as
as CaCO3
Sulphate
Sulphate
as SO3
as CO2
as SO3
(mg/L)
Borehole No. pH
Cl
Cl
MBH-14 S2 S 0.50 0.95 51.0 0 16 84 52 35 17 99 MH
MBH-14 C1 C 1.30 1.40 5.3 4.48
MBH-14 C3 C 3.10 3.30 31.0 1.48 1.94 42.3 96.2 2.76
MBH-14 C4 C 4.50 4.70 5.7 2.70 2.03 2.28 5.43 2552
MBH-14 C7 C 7.40 7.60 20.0 1.77 2.13 3.85
MBH-14 C8 C 9.20 9.30 13.5 0.40
MBH-15 S2 S 0.50 0.95 0 53 47
MBH-15 C1 C 1.40 1.50 5.7 3.95
MBH-15 C7 C 5.75 5.95 23.0 1.65 2.03 0.72
MBH-15 C14 C 14.15 14.35 18.0 2.53 1.81 2.14 36.8 83.6 3.23 966
MBH-16 S4 S 3.00 3.45 39.0 2.30 1.31 1.83 2 87 11 90
MBH-16 S6 S 5.00 5.30 51.0 0 21 79 87 50 37 98 MV 1.2 0.12 9.7
MBH-16 C1 C 5.50 5.70 25.0 1.37 1.72 2.49
MBH-16 C2 C 6.45 6.55 27.6 0.82
MBH-16 C3 C 8.30 8.40 4.1 7.00
MBH-17 S2 S 1.00 1.45 48.7 7 65 28 32 26 6 65 ML
MBH-17 C1 C 2.25 2.35 8.0 2.38
MBH-17 S3 S 2.45 2.95 0 96 4
MBH-17 C8 C 7.50 7.60 14.5 2.97
MBH-17 C9 C 9.00 9.10 30.2 2.65 23.2 52.8 0.20
MBH-17 S4 S 12.20 12.65 31.0 2.70 0.98 0.15 8.5
MBH-17 C14 C 13.80 14.00 21.4 0.50
MBH-17 C15 C 14.65 14.75 21.6 0.30
MBH-18 S4 S 3.00 3.45 50.0 1 64 35 98
MBH-18 C2 C 4.65 4.85 13.0 2.03 2.29 12.17
MBH-18 C13 C 14.00 14.10 17.7 0.13
MBH-18 C13 C 14.80 15.00 16.0 1.91 2.21 10.06
Laboratory Manager
Client : URBACON
Moisture Content
Identification
Elastic Modulus
Particle Density
Plasticity Index
Percentage Passing
Compressive
Bulk Density
Plastic Limit
Unconfined
Liquid Limit
Dry Density
Sample Type
Strength
425μm Sieve
Sample No.
Diametral
Silt / Clay
Gravel
Sand
Remarks
Axial
*Class
Chloride as
Chloride as
as CaCO3
Sulphate
Sulphate
as SO3
as CO2
as SO3
(mg/L)
Borehole No. pH
Cl
Cl
MBH-19 S1 S 0.00 0.45 98.0 0 42 58 72 43 29 98 MV
MBH-19 C1 C 1.45 1.65 4.5 2.34 2.44 15.18
MBH-19 C3 C 2.95 3.05 16.1 0.39
MBH-19 C5 C 5.95 6.05 10.8 1.86
MBH-20 S1 S 0.00 0.45 106.9 1.25 1.37 5 43 52 82 34 48 90 CV
MBH-20 C1 C 1.30 1.50 27.0 1.55 1.96 4.78
MBH-20 C1 C 1.70 1.90 9.8 2.04 2.24 4.11
MBH-20 C5 C 6.90 7.00 14.3 0.54
MBH-20 C10 C 12.40 12.60 18.0 1.83 2.16 1.48 510
MBH-21 S2 S 1.00 1.45 25.4 1.28 1.60
MBH-21 C1 C 2.35 2.45 7.8 0.50
MBH-21 C5 C 6.25 6.35 10.4 0.92
MBH-21 C13 C 13.05 13.15 14.1 1.74
MBH-22 S3 S 2.00 2.45 17.4 1.55 1.82
MBH-22 S5 S 4.00 4.45 38.0 35 42 23 68 30 38 CH 1.01 0.12 8.8
MBH-22 C1 C 5.00 5.25 26.0 1.49 1.89 2.89 973
MBH-22 C2 C 5.60 5.80 20.0 1.74 2.08 9.78
MBH-22 C2 C 6.30 6.40 8.6 1.88
MBH-22 C5 C 8.65 8.75 16.4 0.12
MBH-22 C10 C 14.30 14.50 6.5 2.32 2.47 30.37
BH-23 S8 S 6.50 6.95 45.0 0 56 44 99
BH-23 C1 C 8.00 8.20 28.0 1.56 1.99 1.51
BH-23 C1 C 8.60 8.80 19.0 1.61 1.92
BH-23 C3 C 9.50 9.70 23.0 1.54 1.95 1.52 313
BH-23 C3 C 10.60 10.80 27.0 1.52 1.93 1.90
BH-23 C8 C 14.60 14.70 10.4 3.99
BH-24 S10 S 8.50 8.95 2.0 7 74 19 89
Laboratory Manager
Client : URBACON
Moisture Content
Identification
Elastic Modulus
Particle Density
Plasticity Index
Percentage Passing
Compressive
Bulk Density
Plastic Limit
Unconfined
Liquid Limit
Dry Density
Sample Type
Strength
425μm Sieve
Sample No.
Diametral
Silt / Clay
Gravel
Sand
Remarks
Axial
*Class
Chloride as
Chloride as
as CaCO3
Sulphate
Sulphate
as SO3
as CO2
as SO3
(mg/L)
Borehole No. pH
Cl
Cl
BH-24 C1 C 9.80 9.90 27.3 42.2 96.0 0.70
BH-24 C1 C 10.10 10.30 27.0 1.51 1.92 2.51 1013
BH-24 C1 C 10.55 10.65 8.9 1.47 1.60
BH-24 C2 C 10.70 10.90 29.0 1.39 1.80 1.44
BH-24 C2 C 12.00 12.10 11.1 1.17
BH-25 C1 C 10.50 10.70 23.0 2.40 1.55 1.90 5.88
BH-25 C2 C 10.90 11.10 24.0 1.67 2.07 3.63 915
BH-25 C2 C 11.15 11.25 26.0 0.52
BH-25 C2 C 11.30 11.50 11.0 2.09 2.31 7.05
BH-25 C4 C 13.60 13.70 8.3 2.15 2.35
BH-26 S7 S 5.50 5.95 80 13 7
BH-26 S8 S 6.50 6.95 33.0 1.40 1.88 2 76 22 38.7 88.0
BH-26 C1 C 7.30 7.50 25.0 1.48 1.85 2.22 2846
BH-26 C2 C 7.50 7.60 24.3 0.81
BH-26 C2 C 7.70 7.90 18.0 1.74 2.06 42.1 95.6 8.84
BH-26 C3 C 8.75 8.85 3.0 5.54
BH-26 C9 C 13.90 14.00 9.4 1.86 2.03 0.52
Laboratory Manager
MOISTURE CONTENT / DENSITY OF SOIL OR ROCK
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Laboratory Information
Date of test : 09/01/12 to 10/01/12 Lab. Report No. 00253

Test location : Fugro Peninsular, P.O.Box 47167 Doha. Report Date 18/01/12
Test method used : BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 (see note below for details)
Test method variation : None Lab. Sample No.: 12-0061
Method of preparation : as per test method clause stated below Tested by: FMG/CMB
Visual description : soil samples
Test Result
Moisture Bulk Dry Particle

Bore Hole
Sample No. Depth (m) Type Content Density Density Density
No.
% Mg/m3 Mg/m3 Mg/m3
BH-01 S3 1.50-1.95 S 4.9 - - 2.60

BH-01 C9 10.25-10.45 C 29.0 - - 2.40
BH-02 S6 7.00-7.45 S 22.0 - - 2.70
BH-02 S8 9.00-9.45 S - - - 2.70
BH-03 C1 9.15-9..35 C - - - 2.10
BH-03 C6 12.55-12.65 C 9.3 - - -
BH-04 S3 1.50-1.95 S 18.0 - - -
BH-04 C2 10.10-10.300 C 29.0 - - -
BH-04 C6 14.50-14.70 C 18.0 - - 2.61
BH-05 S5 3.50-3.95 S 23.5 - - 2.65
BH-05 C1 8.20-8.40 C - - - 2.51
BH-06 C1 9.40-9.60 C 32.0 1.9 1.4 2.45
BH-07 C2 11.50-11.70 C - - - 2.30
BH-09 S11 9.50-9.95 S 25.5 1.9 1.5 -
BH-10 S7 5.50-5.95 S 27.7 2.0 1.5 -
BH-10 C1 8.30-8.50 C 48.8 2.2 1.5 2.20
BH-11 S9 7.50-7.95 S 27.9 1.9 1.5 -
BH-11 S10 8.50-8.95 S 28.1 2.0 1.5 2.65
BH-12 S8 6.50-6.95 S 28.7 1.9 1.5 -
BH-12 C1 8.80-9.00 C - - - 2.70
MBH-13 S3 3.50-3.70 S - - - 2.50
MBH-13 C9 9.50-9.70 C 19.0 - - 2.60
MBH-14 S2 0.50-0.95 S 51.0 - - -
MBH-14 C4 4.50-4.70 C 5.7 - - 2.70
MBH-15 C14 14.15-14.35 C - - - 2.53
MBH-16 S4 3.00-3.45 S - 1.8 1.3 2.30
MBH-17 S2 1.00-1.45 S 48.7 - - -
Notes:
Moisture content : BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 3.2 (oven drying method)
Bulk density : Vol.-1, KH Head
Dry density : Vol.-1, KH Head
Particle density (SG) : BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 8.4 (large pyknometer method)
Sample Type; U = undisturbed ; D = disturbed soil
Laboratory Manager
Project No. 11-5507-QA Plate: B2.1
GEO-soil-001-A
MOISTURE CONTENT / DENSITY OF SOIL OR ROCK
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Method of preparation : as per test method clause stated below Tested by: FMG/CMB
Visual description : soil samples
Test Result
Moisture Bulk Dry Particle

Bore Hole
Sample No. Depth (m) Type Content Density Density Density
No.
% Mg/m3 Mg/m3 Mg/m3
MBH-17 C9 9.00-9.10 C - - - 2.65

MBH-17 S4 12.20-12.65 S 31.0 - - 2.70
MBH-20 S1 0.00-0.45 S 109.6 1.4 1.3 -
MBH-21 S2 1.00-1.45 S 25.4 1.6 1.3 -
MBH-22 S3 2.00-2.45 S 17.4 1.8 1.6 -
BH-23 C1 8.60-8.80 C 19.0 1.9 1.6 -
BH-24 S10 8.50-5.95 S 2.0 - - -
BH-24 C1 10.55-10.65 C 8.9 1.6 1.5 -
BH-25 C1 10.50-10.70 C 9.0 - - 2.40
BH-25 C4 13.60-13.70 C 8.3 2.4 2.2 -
BH-26 S8 6.50-6.95 S 33.0 1.9 1.4 -
BH-26 C1 7.30-7.50 C 25.0 1.9 1.5 -
BH-26 C9 13.90-14.00 C 9.4 2.0 1.9 -
Notes:
Moisture content : BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 3.2 (oven drying method)
Bulk density : Vol.-1, KH Head
Dry density : Vol.-1, KH Head
Particle density (SG) : BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 8.4 (large pyknometer method)
Sample Type; U = undisturbed ; D = disturbed soil
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-001-A
PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Date of test : 17/08/11 to 21/08/11 Lab. Report No.: 00255
Test location : FUGRO PENINSULAR, P.O.Box 47167, Doha Report Date: 18/01/12
Test method used : BS 1377: Part 2: 1990 Clause 9.2
Test method variation : None Lab Sample No. : 12-0061
Sample preparation : BS 1377: Part 1: 1990 Clause 7.3 & 7.4.5 Tested by: EBS
Pretreatment method : None
Please note the descriptive term is based on BS 5930: 1999 and is determined from particle size only, it does not differentiate between soil particles and shell fragments.
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
BS aperture size - mm
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
fine medium coarse fine medium coarse fine medium coarse
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
Borehole ID No. Depth (m) Curve Gravel Sand Silt/Clay Descriptive Term (BS 5930)
BH-01 S3-SP1 1.50 X 84% 11% 5% slightly silty/clayey, sandy, GRAVEL
BH-02 S3-SP1 1.50 O 73% 21% 6% silty/clayey, very sandy, GRAVEL
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-02 S6-SP1 7.00 X 25% 66% 9% silty/clayey, very gravelly, SAND
BH-02 S9-SP1 10.00 O 15% 83% 2% gravelly, SAND
Note : ID No represents the combination of sample and specimen number (i.e. Sample No - Specimen No)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-03 S2-SP1 0.50 X 64% 23% 13% silty/clayey, very sandy, GRAVEL
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-03 S8-SP1 6.50 X 47% 23% 30% very silty/clayey, very sandy, GRAVEL
BH-04 S3-SP1 1.50 O 32% 61% 7% silty/clayey, very gravelly, SAND
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Sample preparation : BS 1377: Part 1: 1990 Clause 7.3 & 7.4.5 Tested by: FMG / CMB
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-05 S5-SP1 3.50 O 55% 13% 32% very silty/clayey, sandy, GRAVEL
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Sample preparation : BS 1377: Part 1: 1990 Clause 7.3 & 7.4.5 Tested by: FMG / EBS
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-06 S8-SP1 6.50 X 93% 6% 1% sandy, GRAVEL
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-11 S8-SP1 6.50 X 5% 88% 7% silty/clayey, slightly gravelly, SAND
BH-12 S9-SP1 7.50 O 7% 55% 38% slightly gravelly, sandy, SILT/CLAY
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
MBH-13 S3-SP1 1.35 X 47% 39% 14% silty/clayey, very sandy, GRAVEL
MBH-14 S2-SP1 0.50 O 0% 16% 84% slightly sandy, SILT/CLAY
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
MBH-15 S2-SP1 0.50 X 0% 53% 47% sandy, SILT/CLAY
MBH-16 S4-SP1 3.00 O 2% 87% 11% silty/clayey, SAND
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
MBH-16 S6-SPS 5.00 X 0% 21% 79% slightly sandy, SILT/CLAY
MBH-17 S2-SP1 1.00 O 7% 65% 28% very silty/clayey, gravelly, SAND
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
MBH-17 S3-SP1 2.45 X 0% 96% 4% slightly silty/clayey, SAND
MBH-18 S4-SP1 3.00 O 1% 64% 35% sandy, SILT/CLAY
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
MBH-19 S1-SP1 0.00 X 0% 42% 58% sandy, SILT/CLAY
MBH-20 S1-SP1 0.00 O 5% 43% 52% slightly gravelly, sandy, SILT/CLAY
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
MBH-22 S5-SP1 4.00 X 35% 42% 23% very silty/clayey, very gravelly, SAND
BH-23 S8-SP1 6.50 O 0% 56% 44% sandy, SILT/CLAY
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Sample preparation : BS 1377: Part 1: 1990 Clause 7.3 & 7.4.5 Tested by: FMG
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
1.18
3.35
37.5
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
5
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-24 S10-SP1 8.50 X 7% 74% 19% silty/clayey, gravelly, SAND
BH-26 S7-SP1 5.50 O 80% 13% 7% silty/clayey, sandy, GRAVEL
0.063
0.150
0.212
0.300
0.425
0.600
37.5
1.18
3.35
6.3
10
14
20
28
50
63
75
2
100
90
Percentage Passing
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Silt Sand Gravel
Clay
0.002 0.006 0.02 0.06 0.2 0.6 2.0 6.0 20 60
Particle Size - mm
BH-26 S8-SP1 6.50 X 2% 76% 22% very silty/clayey, SAND
O
Laboratory Manager
GEO-soil-003-C
DETERMINATION OF SOIL ATTERBERG LIMITS
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Test method (liquid) : BS 1377:Part 2:1990 C|. 4.3 Amd 9027: 1996
Test method (plastic) : BS 1377:Part 2:1990 C|.5.3 Amd 9027: 1996
Test method (MC) : BS 1377:Part 2:1990 C|.3.2 Amd 9027: 1996 Lab. Sample No.: 12-0061
Method of preparation : see sample history column below Tested by: CMB
Visual description : soil sample
Test Result
Trial Sample Specimen Spec. Sample Natural Retained Liquid Plastic Plasticity Class
Pit No. No. Average History Moisture 425μm Limit Limit Index BS5930
No. Depth Content sieve
(m) (%) (%) (%) (%)
BH-01 S3 SP1 1.50 after wet sieving 4.9 22

BH-02 S3 SP1 1.50 after wet sieving 15 12
BH-03 S8 SP1 6.50 after wet sieving 20 51 31 26 5 ML
BH-12 S9 SP1 7.50 after wet sieving 45 86 54 21 33 CH
MBH-14 S2 SP1 0.50 after wet sieving 51 99 52 35 17 MH
MBH-16 S4 SP1 3.00 after wet sieving 39 90
MBH-16 S6 SP1 5.00 after wet sieving 51 98 87 50 37 MV
MBH-17 S2 SP1 1.00 after wet sieving 49 65 32 26 6 ML
MBH-18 S4 SP1 3.00 after wet sieving 50 98
MBH-19 S1 SP1 0.00 after wet sieving 98 98 72 43 29 MV
MBH-20 S1 SP1 0.00 after wet sieving 110 90 82 34 48 CV
MBH-22 S3 SP1 2.00 after wet sieving 38 68 30 38 CH
BH-24 S10 SP1 8.50 after wet sieving 2.0 89
Notes:
U = undisturbed sample L = Low plasticity
D = disturbed sample I = Intermediate plasticity
NP = Non-plastic H = High plasticity
M = Silt V = Very high plasticity
C = Clay E = Extremely high plasticity

Laboratory Manager
Project No. 11-5507-QA Plate: B4
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Client : URBACON
Date of test : 09/01/12 to 10/01/12 Lab. Report No. : 00252

Test location : Fugro Peninsular, P.O.Box 47167 Doha. Report Date : 18/01/12
Test method variation : Carbonate expressed calculated as CaCO3 in dry soil Lab. Sample No.: 12-0061
Tested by: JMJ / MA
Method of preparation : as per test method clause stated below

Visual description : Soil samples
Test Result
% by
Chloride (as Cl) Sulphate (as SO3) Carbonate
Bore Hole Sample Spec. Specimen mass Organic
Type < pH
No. No. No Depth acid water acid water as as Matter
2mm soluble soluble soluble soluble CO2 CaCO3
(m) % % % % % % %
BH-01 S3 1 1.50 S - - - - - - 41 93 -
BH-01 S5 1 9.30 S - - 0.63 - 0.06 9.0 - - -
BH-02 S8 1 9.00 S - - - - - - 35.9 81.6 -
BH-02 S10 1 11.00 S - - 0.79 - 0.10 8.6 - - -
BH-03 C1 1 9.15 C - - - - - - 40.8 92.8 -
BH-03 C8 1 14.25 C - - 0.58 - 0.06 8.6 - - -
BH-04 C3 1 11.10 C - - 0.70 - 0.09 8.4 - - -
BH-04 C6 1 14.50 C - - - - - - 23.1 52.6 -
BH-05 S9 1 7.50 S - - 0.62 - 0.09 8.6 - - -
BH-05 C2 1 9.15 C - - 0.85 - 0.11 9.3 - - -
BH-06 W1 1 2.05 W - - 23.30 - 2.72 7.7 - - -
BH-06 C1 2 9.40 C - - 0.72 - 0.09 8.9 - - -
BH-07 W1 1 1.75 W - - 23.55 - 2.72 7.6 - - -
BH-08 C2 1 11.50 C - - 0.67 - 0.09 8.8 - - -
BH-10 S9 1 7.50 S - - 0.86 - 0.10 8.7 - - -
BH-11 S10 1 8.50 S - - 0.66 - 0.06 8.7 - - -
BH-12 S9 1 7.50 S - - 0.93 - 0.11 8.9 - - -
MBH-13 C1 1 0.95 C - - 0.54 - 0.08 8.8 41.8 95.0 -
Notes:
Chloride content (Cl) of soil, acid soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 7.3 (% by dry mass)
Chloride content (Cl) of soil, water soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 7.2 (% 2:1 water:soil extract)
Chloride content (Cl) of groundwater : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 7.2 (g/L)
Sulphate content (SO3) of soil, acid soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 5.2 (% by dry mass)
Sulphate content (SO3) of soil, water soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 5.3 (% 2:1 water:soil extract)
Sulphate content (SO3) of groundwater : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 5.4 (g/L)
pH determination : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 9.5
Carbonate content (CO2) of soil : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 6.3 (% by dry mass)
Organic matter content of soil : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 3 (% by dry mass in fraction < 2mm)
Sample Type; D = small disturbed sample, U = undisturbed sample, C = core sample, B = bulk disturbed
sample, W = water sample
Laboratory Manager
Project No. 11-5507-QA B5.1
GEO-soil-005-A
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Client : URBACON
Date of test : 09/01/12 to 10/01/12 Lab. Report No. : 00348

Test location : Fugro Peninsular, P.O.Box 47167 Doha. Report Date : 24/01/12
Test method variation : Carbonate expressed calculated as CaCO3 in dry soil Lab. Sample No.: 12-0065
Tested by: JMJ / MA
Method of preparation : as per test method clause stated below

Visual description : Soil samples
Test Result
% by
Chloride (as Cl) Sulphate (as SO3) Carbonate
Bore Hole Sample Spec. Specimen mass Organic
Type < pH
No. No. No Depth acid water acid water as as Matter
2mm soluble soluble soluble soluble CO2 CaCO3
(m) % % % % % % %
MBH-14 C3 1 3.10 C - - - - - - 42 96 -
MBH-15 C14 1 14.15 C - - - - - - 36.8 83.6 -
MBH-16 S6 1 5.00 S - - 1.20 - 0.12 9.7 - - -
MBH-17 C9 1 9.00 C - - - - - - 23.2 52.8 -
MBH-17 S4 1 12.20 S - - 0.98 - 0.15 8.5 - - -
MBH-22 S5 1 4.00 S - - 1.01 - 0.12 8.8 - - -
BH-26 S8 1 6.50 S - - - - - - 38.7 88.0 -
BH-26 C2 2 7.70 C - - - - - - 42.1 95.6 -
Notes:
Chloride content (Cl) of soil, acid soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 7.3 (% by dry mass)
Chloride content (Cl) of soil, water soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 7.2 (% 2:1 water:soil extract)
Chloride content (Cl) of groundwater : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 7.2 (g/L)
Sulphate content (SO3) of soil, acid soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 5.2 (% by dry mass)
Sulphate content (SO3) of soil, water soluble : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 5.3 (% 2:1 water:soil extract)
Sulphate content (SO3) of groundwater : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 5.4 (g/L)
pH determination : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 9.5
Carbonate content (CO2) of soil : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 6.3 (% by dry mass)
Organic matter content of soil : BS 1377: Pt 3: 1990 Cl 3 (% by dry mass in fraction < 2mm)
Sample Type; D = small disturbed sample, U = undisturbed sample, C = core sample, B = bulk disturbed
sample, W = water sample
Laboratory Manager
Project No. 11-5507-QA B5.2
GEO-soil-005-A
UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TEST OF INTACT ROCK CORE
Page of
Client : URBACON
Date of test : 10/01/12 Lab. Report No. 00259

Tested by : KA Report Date 18/01/12
Test Location : FUGRO PENINSULAR, P.O.Box 47167, Doha
Test method used : ASTM D2938-95 FQ Sample No.: 12-0063
Test method variation : see note below
Method of preparation : ASTM D4543-01
Test Result
Source / Borehole No. BH-01 BH-03 BH-03 BH-04 BH-04

Sample No. C9 C8 C9 C2 C6
Sample Top Depth (m) 10.00 14.00 15.00 9.80 14.30
Specimen No. 1 1 1 1 1
Specimen Top Depth (m) 10.25 14.25 15.80 10.10 14.50
Straightness (Method A) mm 0.44 0.412 0.373 0.422 0.352

Flatness of Ends (Method B) mm 0.225 0.273 0.276 0.267 0.352
Perpendicularity (Method B) 0.0027 0.0033 0.0033 0.0032 0.0032
Mean length mm 100.0 119.0 102.0 121.0 120.0
Mean diameter mm 83.0 83.0 83.0 84.0 83.0
Length to diameter ratio (L/D) 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4
Moisture condition as received as received as received as received as received
Moisture content % 28 7.1 14 29 21
3
Bulk density Mg/m 1.91 2.29 2.47 1.91 2.17
3
Dry density Mg/m 1.49 2.14 2.16 1.48 1.80
Visual description / Lithology

Limestone Limestone Limestone Limestone Limestone
Location of apparent weakness plane before test
Void Inclusion of Gypsum

Crack Pocket of Silt
Pocket of Calcisiltite
Failure pattern
Sample temperature at test °C 23 23 23 23 23

Rate of loading 0.5 kN/sec 0.5 kN/sec 0.5 kN/sec 0.5 kN/sec 0.5 kN/sec
Unconfined compressive strength ( σ ) MPa 3.53 5.63 6.82 2.24 1.73
Notes: ND = Not Determined
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Tested by : KA / PLS Report Date 18/01/12
Test Result


Mean length mm 160.0 137.0 139.0 143.0 128.0
Mean diameter mm 83.0 85.0 84.0 85.0 84.0
Moisture content % 27 32 32 30 31
3
Bulk density Mg/m 1.95 1.86 1.90 1.94 1.90
3
Dry density Mg/m 1.53 1.41 1.44 1.49 1.45

Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite

Failure pattern

Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Test Result


Mean length mm 144.0 130.0 151.0 140.0 114.0
Mean diameter mm 84.0 84.0 85.0 85.0 84.0
3
Bulk density Mg/m 1.93 1.89 2.11 1.90 1.83
3
Dry density Mg/m 1.47 1.50 1.66 1.46 1.43

Calcarenite Calcarenite Limestone Calcarenite Calcarenite

Failure pattern

Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Tested by : MTC / PLS Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result
Source / Borehole No. BH-11 BH-11 BH-12 BH-12 MBH-13


Mean length mm 148.0 154.0 149.0 124.0 105.0
Mean diameter mm 84.0 85.0 85.0 85.0 85.0
Moisture content % 30 31 6.8 30 11
3
Bulk density Mg/m 1.94 1.88 2.38 1.91 2.28
3
Dry density Mg/m 1.49 1.43 2.23 1.47 2.05

Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite Limestone

Failure pattern

Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Test Result
Source / Borehole No. MBH-14 MBH-14 MBH-15 MBH-16 MBH-18


Mean length mm 102.0 106.0 133.0 131.0 153.0
Mean diameter mm 85.0 85.0 85.0 81.0 83.0
3
Bulk density Mg/m 1.94 2.13 2.03 1.72 2.29
3
Dry density Mg/m 1.48 1.77 1.65 1.37 2.03

Limestone Limestone Limestone Calcarenite Calcarenite

Failure pattern

Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Test Result
Source / Borehole No. MBH-18 MBH-19 MBH-20 MBH-20 MBH-22


Mean length mm 139.0 133.0 146.0 125.0 146.0
Mean diameter mm 82.0 83.0 82.0 82.0 84.0
Moisture content % 16 4.5 27 9.8 20
3
Bulk density Mg/m 2.21 2.44 1.96 2.24 2.08
3
Dry density Mg/m 1.91 2.34 1.55 2.04 1.74

Limestone Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite Limestone

Failure pattern

Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Tested by : JS Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result
Source / Borehole No. MBH-22 BH-23 BH-23 BH-24 BH-25


Mean length mm 142.0 131.0 130.0 124.0 119.0
Mean diameter mm 84.0 85.0 85.0 84.0 84.0
Moisture content % 6.5 28 27 29 23
3
Bulk density Mg/m 2.47 1.99 1.93 1.80 1.90
3
Dry density Mg/m 2.32 1.56 1.52 1.39 1.55

Limestone Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite Calcarenite

Failure pattern

Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page of
Client : URBACON

Tested by : SC / PLS Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result
Source / Borehole No. BH-25 BH-26

Sample No. C2 C2
Sample Top Depth (m) 10.70 7.50
Specimen No. 3 2
Specimen Top Depth (m) 11.30 7.70
Straightness (Method A) mm 0.42 0.4

Flatness of Ends (Method B) mm 292 0.33
Perpendicularity (Method B) 0.0032 0.0039
Mean length mm 135.0 139.0
Mean diameter mm 84.0 84.0
Length to diameter ratio (L/D) 1.6 1.7
Moisture condition as received as received
Moisture content % 11 18
3
Bulk density Mg/m 2.31 2.06
3
Dry density Mg/m 2.09 1.74

Calcarenite Calcarenite

Failure pattern
Sample temperature at test °C 23 23

Rate of loading 0.5 kN/sec 0.5 kN/sec
Unconfined compressive strength ( σ ) MPa 7.05 8.84
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-023-D
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Source / Bore Hole No. : BH-03

Sample No. : C1
Sample Top Depth (m) : 8.50
Specimen No. : 1.00
Speciment Depth (m) : 9.25
Visual description : LIMESTONE

Tested by : MR / PLS Report Date 18/01/12
Test Location : Fugro Peninsular, P.O.Box 47167 Doha - Qatar
Test method used : ASTM D2938-95 & D3148-96 FQ Sample No.: 12-0096
Method of preparation : The specimen was prepared to the highest standards practicable. Maximum recorded
deviations (ASTM D4543)... straightness (Method A) = 0.589mm, flatness of ends (Method B) =
0.23mm, perpendicularity (Method B) = 0.0027
Test Result
9.00 Length to diameter ratio (L/D) : 2.2

Moisture condition : as received
Moisture content : 16 %
8.00 3
Bulk density : 2.27 Mg/m
Dry density : 1.95 Mg/m3
7.00
Rate of loading : 0.50 mm/min
6.00 Temperature at test : 23 °C
Maximum axial stress : 8.43 MPa
Axial Stress (MPa)
Axial strain at failure : 0.25 %

5.00
4.00 Unconfined compressive strength ( σ ) : 8.43 MPa

Modulus of elasticity (E) : 5124 MPa
3.00
d = 84 mm
2.00 Key
Crack
1.00 Void L = 183 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40
Axial Strain (%)
initial Failure mode
Notes: N/D = Not Determined
E-Modulus determined using tangent modulus measured at 50 % of ultimate strength.
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C3
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

3
2.50 Dry density : 1.62 Mg/m3

Axial Stress (MPa)
1.50
Unconfined compressive strength ( σ ) : 2.46 MPa
1.00
d = 83 mm
Key
0.50 Crack
Void L = 178 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C2
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

3.50 Bulk density : 1.91 Mg/m3
3.00
Temperature at test : 23 °C
2.50 Maximum axial stress : 3.37 MPa
Axial Stress (MPa)
2.00
1.50
d = 84 mm
1.00
Key
Crack
0.50 Void L = 184 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C3
Specimen No. : 2.00

Tested by : JS Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result

Moisture content : 8.7 %
3

Axial Stress (MPa)
3.00
2.00
d = 85 mm
Key
1.00 Crack
Void L = 185 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C7
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

4.50
3
4.00

3.50
Axial Stress (MPa)
3.00 Axial strain at failure : 0.49 %
2.50
2.00 Modulus of elasticity (E) : 1180 MPa
1.50 d = 84 mm
1.00 Key
Crack
0.50 Void L = 180 mm

Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C3
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

1.20
Bulk density : 1.92 Mg/m3
1.00
Axial Stress (MPa)
0.80

0.60
d = 85 mm
0.40
Key
Crack
0.20
Void L = 175 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C3
Specimen No. : 1.00
Visual description : CALCARENITE

Test Result

1.80
3
1.60

1.40
Axial Stress (MPa)
1.00
0.60 d = 85 mm
0.40 Key
Crack
0.20 Void L = 183 mm

Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C2
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

2.00

Axial Stress (MPa)

d = 85 mm
0.50 Key
Crack
Void L = 183 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C6
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

0.80 3
0.70
Axial Stress (MPa)

0.50
0.40 Unconfined compressive strength ( σ ) : 0.83 MPa

0.30
d = 85 mm
0.20 Key
Crack
0.10 Void L = 179 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON
Source / Bore Hole No. : MBH-13

Sample No. : C3
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

3

Axial Stress (MPa)
1.50
1.00
d = 85 mm
Key
0.50 Crack
Void L = 172 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C4
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

3

Axial Stress (MPa)
3.00
2.00
d = 85 mm
Key
1.00 Crack
Void L = 171 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C14
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

3.00
2.50
Axial Stress (MPa)
2.00

1.50
d = 84 mm
1.00
Key
Crack
0.50
Void L = 169 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C10
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

1.20
Axial Stress (MPa)
0.80
0.60
d = 82 mm
0.40
Key
Crack
0.20 Void L = 183 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C1
Specimen No. : 1.00

Test Result

3.00
2.50
Axial Stress (MPa)
2.00

1.50
d = 84 mm
1.00
Key
Crack
0.50
Void L = 180 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C3
Specimen No. : 1.00

Tested by : SC / PLS Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result

3
1.40 Bulk density : 1.95 Mg/m
1.20
Axial Stress (MPa)
0.80
0.60
d = 85 mm
0.40
Key
Crack
0.20 Void L = 176 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C1
Specimen No. : 2.00

Tested by : PLS / IAN Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result

3

Axial Stress (MPa)
1.50
1.00
d = 84 mm
Key
0.50 Crack
Void L = 173 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C2
Specimen No. : 1.00

Tested by : PLS / NY Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result

3.00
Axial Stress (MPa)
2.00
1.50
d = 84 mm
1.00
Key
Crack
0.50 Void L = 176 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
Page 1 of 1
Client : URBACON

Sample No. : C1
Specimen No. : 1.00

Tested by : PLS / NY Report Date 26/02/12
Test Result

2.00

Axial Stress (MPa)

d = 84 mm
0.50 Key
Crack
Void L = 177 mm
Inclusion of Gypsum
Pocket of Silt
0.00
0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40
Axial Strain (%)
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-020-C
DETERMINATION OF THE POINT LOAD STRENGTH INDEX OF ROCK
Client : URBACON

Test location : FUGRO PENINSULAR, p.o.box:47167, Doha, Qatar Report Date 18/01/12
Test method : ASTM D5731-95
Method of preparation : see test type column below Tested by: JB
Visual description : rock samples
Test Result
Bore Sample Spec. Depth Rock Test Moisture Width Platen Failure Point Load
Hole No. No (m) Description Type Content W Separation Load Index
No. (mm) Is Is(50)
(%) (mm) D D' (kN) (Mpa) (Mpa)
BH-01 C9 1 10.95 Limestone A ⊥ 8.2 85 52 43 17.0 3.65 4.20

BH-02 C5 1 12.45 Limestone A ⊥ 7.8 85 51 47 18.0 3.54 4.15
BH-03 C6 1 12.60 Limestone A ⊥ 9.3 83 55 45 2.6 0.55 0.63
BH-04 C5 1 13.00 Limestone A ⊥ 10 83 58 53 3.9 0.70 0.83
BH-05 C2 1 9.95 Limestone A ⊥ 23 84 79 58 2.6 0.42 0.51
BH-05 C7 1 14.35 Limestone A ⊥ 14 84 88 73 2.5 0.32 0.41
BH-06 C1 1 9.05 Calcarenite A ⊥ 27 84 58 54 4.3 0.74 0.90
BH-06 C3 1 11.55 Limestone A ⊥ 5.9 85 51 47 13.0 2.56 3.00
BH-06 C5 1 14.15 Limestone A ⊥ 5.6 85 60 55 4.4 0.74 0.90
BH-09 C3 1 13.45 Limestone A ⊥ 31 85 64 60 0.2 0.03 0.04
BH-10 C4 1 11.15 Limestone A ⊥ 30 84 60 55 3.2 0.54 0.66
BH-12 C7 1 16.50 Limestone A ⊥ 26 85 60 55 0.1 0.02 0.02
MBH-13 C8 1 7.65 Limestone A ⊥ 8.1 85 55 45 20.0 4.11 4.77
MBH-14 C1 1 1.35 Limestone A ⊥ 5.3 85 62 52 21.0 3.73 4.48
MBH-14 C8 1 9.25 Limestone A ⊥ 13 85 57 42 1.6 0.35 0.40
MBH-15 C1 1 1.45 Limestone A ⊥ 5.7 85 48 43 16.0 3.44 3.95
MBH-16 C2 1 6.50 Calcarenite A ⊥ 28 82 60 55 3.9 0.68 0.82
MBH-16 C3 1 8.35 Limestone A ⊥ 4.1 84 58 53 33.0 5.82 7.00
MBH-17 C1 1 2.30 Calcarenite A ⊥ 8.0 83 69 65 13.0 1.89 2.38
MBH-17 C8 1 7.55 Limestone A ⊥ 14 84 63 58 15.0 2.42 2.97
Notes:
d = diametral
a = axial
b = block
ir = irregular
⊥ = loading perpendicular to planes of weakness
|| = loading parallel to planes of weakness
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-019-A
DETERMINATION OF THE POINT LOAD STRENGTH INDEX OF ROCK
Client : URBACON

Test location : FUGRO PENINSULAR, p.o.box:47167, Doha, Qatar Report Date 24/01/12
Test method : ASTM D5731-95
Method of preparation : see test type column below Tested by: JB
Visual description : rock samples
Test Result
Bore Sample Spec. Depth Rock Test Moisture Width Platen Failure Point Load
Hole No. No (m) Description Type Content W Separation Load Index
No. (mm) Is Is(50)
(%) (mm) D D' (kN) (Mpa) (Mpa)
MBH-17 C9 1 9.05 Limestone A ⊥ 30 83 69 62 0.1 0.02 0.02

MBH-17 C14 1 13.90 Limestone A ⊥ 21 84 69 65 0.3 0.04 0.05
MBH-17 C15 1 14.70 Limestone A ⊥ 22 84 84 78 0.2 0.02 0.03
MBH-18 C13 1 14.05 Limestone A ⊥ 18 81 57 52 0.6 0.11 0.13
MBH-19 C3 1 3.00 Limestone A ⊥ 16 82 57 52 1.8 0.33 0.39
MBH-19 C5 1 6.00 Limestone A ⊥ 11 84 51 47 8.0 1.59 1.86
MBH-20 C5 1 6.95 Limestone A ⊥ 14 82 61 56 2.6 0.44 0.54
MBH-21 C1 1 2.40 Calcarenite A ⊥ 7.8 84 61 57 2.5 0.41 0.50
MBH-21 C5 1 6.30 Limestone A ⊥ 10 83 53 48 4.0 0.79 0.92
MBH-21 C13 1 13.10 Limestone A ⊥ 14 83 57 52 8.0 1.46 1.74
MBH-22 C2 2 6.35 Limestone A ⊥ 8.6 84 59 54 9.0 1.56 1.88
MBH-22 C5 1 8.70 Limestone A ⊥ 16 84 60 56 0.6 0.10 0.12
BH-23 C8 1 14.65 Limestone A ⊥ 10 85 58 53 19.0 3.31 3.99
BH-24 C2 2 12.05 Limestone A ⊥ 11 84 58 54 5.6 0.97 1.17
BH-25 C2 2 11.20 Limestone A ⊥ 26 84 60 55 2.5 0.42 0.52
BH-26 C3 1 8.80 Calcarenite A ⊥ 3.0 83 61 56 27.0 4.56 5.54
BH-26 C9 1 13.95 Limestone A ⊥ 9.4 83 53 49 2.3 0.44 0.52
Notes:
d = diametral
a = axial
b = block
ir = irregular
⊥ = loading perpendicular to planes of weakness
|| = loading parallel to planes of weakness
Laboratory Manager
GEO-rock-019-A
APPENDIX C
CORE PHOTOGRAPHS
CORE PHOTOGRAPHS PLATES C1 TO C40

ZONE I
FUGRO PENINSULAR 8110 ...............
Core Photographs ·=========[
:11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
Pfo\eC\ l"l\\f! :MARINE GEOTECHNICAL
IN\IE$TIGATl0N WORKS _
6A.NANA ISLAND
PROJ ECT-DOHA.OATAR
Geotechni_cal,Materials
Engineers and Surveyors
\-\ ('\0: \
o;( NoI
"Dt.PTH: ?.·Cl- T o
,...........
:11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
PfO\OC\ \\\\e :MARI NE GEOTECH NICAL
\NVESTlGA'fiON WORKS -
BANANA.ISLAND
PROJeCT -DOHA . QATAR
Geotechnl.ca'"l Materials
\-\No:. \ \
... _C'_,... -,•••,
-
£>o1-·No: 2.
"Dt.PTH:1-g0-13·.91
Project No.: 11-5507-QA

Page C1
'?!Cl\ec\Cl •• '\ '\ -5507-QA

C\•en\ :\.lrbaCon Co.
'?to\eC\ \ 1\le •• NI._RI"E GEOTECHNICAL
\ :! '; :ORK$-
OJECl- OOH.A .QATAR
( ) \:
3
···
t-·
:"\ "\ -5507-QA
:\lrbaCon Co.
l"tO\eC\ \l\\e •.....RINE GEOTECHNICAL
\W.VESl\GA'T\ON WORKS
SANANA \$\.ANO
PROJE.CT-OOHA • QATAR

Page C2
:11-5507-QA
Cl•e'1' :UrbaCon Co.
flfO\ec.\ l1\\u •
• MAR\N('. GEOTECHNICAl,.
INV£$nGA.TION WORK $ _
BANANA. SLANO
PRO.JI;.CT -DOHAO
· ATAA
NO 2
£>Noo·: '2
1)SI'TH: 1·50-/6·0
Pro1ect No : 11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
:MARINE GEOTECHNICAL
MVESTIGATION WORKS -
6AN.#l.HA IS\.A.ND
PROJECT -DOHA -O.ATAR

Page C3
•.-..oo""'" -
....
ProJect No : 11-5507-QA
Chent :UrbaCon Co.

PrOject Trtle :MARINE GEOTECHNtCAt.
INVESTIGATroN WO KS
BAN'ANA tSl.AND
PROJECT -DOHAQ
· ATAR
BHNO 3
BOX NO.
Project No :11-5507-QA
: UrbaCon Co.
PrOJect T!Oe :MARINE GEOTECHNICAL
I.NVESTtGATION WORKS -
6ANAHA SLANO
PROJECT DOHA QATAR
3
2

Page C4
P•oJCCI No : 11·5507-QA
Cl•ont :UrbaCon Co.

Protecl Title •
• MARINE GEOff.:CHNtC:At.
INVESllGA,TIOfol WOfU<S
BAIIIAHA ISlAND
PROJECT-OOHA·OATAR
BHNO 3
BOX NO.
.--
P!OJI!C\ No : 11-5507..QA
:UrbaCon Co.
Pro,eet Tttle :MARlNE GEOTECtiNICAl.
INVESTIGAtlON WORKS
BANAMAl$1.ANO
PROJECT - OOHA • QATAR
BHNO

Page C5
Project No :11-5507-QA
: UrbaCon Co.
Project T\\\C : MARINE GEOTECHNICAl.
INVESTIGATION WORKS
BANANA ISLAND
PROJECl - DOHAQ
· ATAR
4
2
Project No :11-5507..QA
:UrbaCon Co.
Pro)ee\ T\l.ie : MARINE GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION WORKS
BANANA ISLANO
PROJECt-DOHA. QATAR
BOX NO.
1
DEPTH (m) }!; .O
e{.6.o.0p:.;

Page C6
PrOJeclNo ; 11-5507-QA
Cllenl ;URBACON
Project : Gootechnical
TJtle Investigation - Baruma
Island
ProJeciNo ; 11-5507-QA
Clienl : URBACON
ProJecl : Geotechnical
T1lle Investigation - Banana
Island

Page C7
ProjectNo. : 11-5507-QA
Client : URBACON
Pro1cct : Geotechnical
Title Investigation- Banana
Island

Page C8
ZONE II
.--
Pto1ecN
lo : 11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
P ro\ec\ l\\e : MARINE GEOTeCHNtCAl
INVES'lK>ATKlH W ORKS
BANANA ISlAND
PROJECT •0011/1.. QA1 AR
Geotechnl_ca!, Materials
B \-\·No: MBH·/.3
Bo·No: l
- -CIIIIIo-p.,...,
•............, c ••
:'\ '\ -5507-QA

·.UrbaCon Co.
Pt'OI;OC\ \ \\\e •• tAM\\ME GEOlE.CHNICAL
\ bel \: !-::: ORt<S-

f\OJECT-DOHAQ
. ATAR
r- .......
Proiec\ No :11-5507-QA
Cl\ent :UrbaCon Co.
PtO\eC\ T11\e •
• MARINE G OTECHNICAL
\NVESTiGATtON WORKS _
6ANANA iSLAND
PROJECT - OOt-t.A ·OATAR
\-\No : MBH-/3
Bo1- No: 3
Pro E>c\ No : 11-5507-QA I

:UrbaCon Co.
flro\ 1'1\\e :MARlNE GEOTEC:HNM:Al
\NVE.$nGA110N WORKS ...
6ANA.NA I$1..AND
PROJECT ..I)C)HA.OA'l"AR
B \-\ No=. MBH·I Y

3oi- No·: I
,
Prolett No :11-5507-QA
C\te"1 :UrbaCon Co.
PtO\et.\l\t\e •
• MAAINE GEOtECHNICAL.
\NV SllGAllON WORKS _
flANA.MA ISlAND
PA.OJEC'T - OOHA· OATAR
<6\-\ No: MBH- 14

BoNo:· ?.
t----·
Pro1ett No :11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
PfO\\ \ \\\e :MAR\NE GEOTECHNICAL
\NVEST10ATION WORKS -
8-.NA.NA ISLAND
PA.OJECT -DOHA.QATAR
<6 \-\ No.: MBH· 14

o f.. No·: 3
:11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
:MARINE GEOTECMNICAL
INVESilGA.TIOH WORKS ...
BANANA lSLANO
PROJECT - 00HA ·QATAR
BOX NO.
OEPTH {m) \.0-S·£/.,$"
,_ _
PtOI<'Cl No : 11·5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
Protect T tle :MA INECEOlECHNteAt.
INVE$T1(i.ATIOH WORKS
BANANA tSLANO
PROJECT - 00t1A.OATAR
Geotechnlcal, Materials
Pro1ec\ No : 11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
PfO\eC\ 1'!\\e :MAR\NE GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION WORI<S _
BANANA I Sl.ANO
PROJECt -DOHA.QATAR
N : 11·5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
: tAARtf Gf.OH:.C""'ICAt.
t'-'\I{$TIGATIII)N WOibt$ -
BAkAHA lA D
PROJ(CT DOHA . QATAR
PrOJeel No : 11 -5507-QA
Client :URBACON
ProJeCl : Geotechnical
Tille lnvesllgation - Banana
Island
j{p
1
Project No : 11-5507-QA
Cltent : URBACON
Pro,ect : Geotechnical
Title Investigation -Banana
Jsland
BHNO.
BOX NO. 2..

-DEPTH (m>(_qs /{)O
-
,.... ..
Pro)eclNo :11-5507-QA
:UrbaCon Co.
ProieCt Tttle : MAR NE GEOTECHNICAL
INVESTIGATION WORKS....
BANANA IS AND
PROJECT .... OQHA· QATAR
V\\J\-lf1-
-S-7 '
·.'\'\ -'5'507-QA
C\1en\ ·.\lfnaCon Co.
'l'ro\ec\ 1\\e •. "'"RI<E GE<lTECHNIC"L
\N\JEST\GA.i\OH WORKS -
6A.HAHA. \S\.AND
ROJEC"'t - OOttA. ·QATAR
: 11-5507·OA
:UrbaCon Co.
PtO}OC\ 1\\\e : MARtHE CEOTECHNtCAI..
INIIEST,GATION WORKS
BANANA ISLAND
PROJECT - DOHA . QATAR
It
SOX NO. 3
DEPTH (m) -1-,3.9>
l o : 11-5507-QA
Pro1ecN
Cllenl :UrbaCon Co.
P!O\eCl i•lle :MARINE GEOTECH NICAL
INVESTtGATION WORKS ..
SA.NANA ISLAND
PROJECT -DOHA· QATAR
BHNO
BOX NO.
ZONE III
ProrcciNo ; 11-5507-QA
Clienl ;URBACON
Pror : Geotechnical
T•lle Investigation - Banana
Island
ProreclNo. : 11-5507-QA
Chenl : URBACON
Project : Geotechnical
Title lnvostigation - Banana
Island
Cilenl : URBACON
PrOJOCI : Geotechnical
Title Investigation- Banana
ISiiind
BHNO.
0(,
Chenl :URBACON
Project :Geotechnical
T1tle l nvestigalion - Banana
Island
ProJect No : 11-5507-QA
Clienl :URBACON
PrOJecl :Geotechnical
Title Jnvestigarion - Banana
Jsrand
ProjeCt No : 11·5507 QA
Chenl :URBACON
Ptoject : GeotechnfcaJ
T1tfe Jnvostigation- Banana
Island
BHNO.
ProJeet No : 11-5507-QA
Cleru ;URBACON
Protee ; Geotechni l
TJUe lnvcscJga11on-Banana
Island
ProJ(!ciNo : 11-5507-QA
Client ;URBACON
PrOjecl :G&otechnlcaf
T1l'e Investigation- Banana
Island
ProjOclNo : 11-5507-QA
Clienl : URBACON
Pf'Ojeel : Geolochnical
T1Ue lnvcsllgatJon - Banana
lslond
Project No. : 11-5507-QA

Client : URBACON
Ptojeel : Georechnicaf
Title lnvestfgalfon - Banana
Island
/0
I
DEPTH (m )! B.OO- II.OD
Pro,ectNo : 11-5507-QA
Cl'""1 : URBACON
Tnlo fnv sligat•on - Banana
island
/0
l
DEPTH (m){ ll oo-/4.{)/)
FUGRO PENINSULAR
Core Photographs
lla==..a==...=..=.i)==[
BH NO.
BOX NO.
P«>t•"""" : 11-5507-QA
Chent : URBACON
Ptoj : Goot«chnlear
T!Ue Investigation -BanO\nil
Island
PrOJOCINo; 11-5507-QA
Clooot ; URBACON
Pro,ecr ;Geotcchrucal
TrUe lnvcstlgatton - Banana
Island
ProjeciNo. : 11-5507-QA
Cllenl : URBACON
T1lle lnvesUgaflon - Banana
Island
12
z.
Pro,ect No : 11-5507-QA
Cllenl : URBACON
TiUe Investigation - Banana
Island
12
3
DEPTH (m){!,.(}0-/lfiJ
PtOJ"CI No ; 11-5507-QA
CII(>OJ : URBACON
ProJect ;Gaotcchnlcal
T1t fnvestigallon- Ba.nat'la
lsl:md
Pr0)6CINo : 11-5507-QA
Chent : URBACON
ProJect : Geotechnfcat
flUe Jnvestfgarion- Banana
Island
23
2
DEPTH (m)/,
VO.&JI4.C4
PrOJOCl No : 11-5507-QA
Chen! :URBACON
ProJect : Geote<;hnlcaf
T1Ue lnvcstigalton- Banana
Island
PIOJO(;INO ; 11-5507-QA
C1len1 ; URBACON
Protect : Geotechnical
Tille Investigation - Banana
Island
2-1. 1
DEPTH (mtl00-1315
,
Protect No ; 11-5507-QA
Chent ; URBACON
Protect : Geotechnical
T1tle lnvesllgation - Banana
Island
. 1:d
BH NO.
. .z
DEPTH (m)'13.(!)-fl 0

Clrent
: URBACON
Pnotect ;Geotechnical
Title Investigation - Banana
Island
2 t
I
DEPTH (m)/9 0 -j
-c?tJ 3-'?Lr

Client ; URBACON
Tille I nvestigation - Banana
Island
BH NO. j[;"
2
DEPTH (m )lf.3.20·;7.sz>

CJ,ent ; URBACON
PrOJect :Geolechnical
Title Investigation - Banana
Island
2!;
3
ProJeCt No : 11-5507-QA
Chent : URBACON
ProJect :Geotechnical
TiUe Investigation - Banana
Island
2
I
DEPTH ( m )t)/O-/t S0
,...._
Pro)actNo ; 11-5507-QA
Chent ; URBACON
PrOJect : Geotechnical
Ttlle fnvestigation- Banana
Island
ProjeciNo : 11-5507-QA
Cilent : URBACON
PrOject : Gootechn/cal
T1tle Investigation- Banana
Island
26
3
DEPTH cm>V4F{o /?{J
e "'S
ProJecrNo : 11-5507-QA
Client ; URBACON
T•tle Investigation - Banana
Island
BHNO.
- BOXNO.
DEPTH (m1l!JS/3.()
2
PrOJe<:INo : 11-5507-QA
Chen! : URBACON
PfOJecl : Geotechnical
TiUe lnvestigarlon - Banana
Island
BH NO.
Mftl- 19
I
DEPTH (m)llJb-1.EfJ
,_,,._,..,
Client : URBACON
Pr ect :Goolechnlcal
ll e
Til Investigation _ Banana
tsfand
Met+19
z
DEPTH (m) !iJ-150
PrOjoclNo ; 11-5507-QA
Chent : URBACON
:Geotechnical
Investigation- Banana
Island
BH NO. MBH- lq
.3
DEPTH (m)(1.50- fO.lXJ
fPS
fl.cs.o"-·""
Project No ; 11-5507-QA
Clrent : URBACON
ProJect : Goorechnical
Tttfe lnvcsiigarion- Banana
Island
MBH-')0
.....,
. ...•\ 9 ...,,
- ------
11-550}-QJt.
M9H • 20 MBt-1-JO
90l •3
fit ..1
·001'11·
3
TO : \P ·Q(l 'PI· DEPTH (m)l 7. 00-JO.{)?
zo Jot (2012
Pror 1 No : 11-5507 QA
Cl 1 "" 1 : URBACON
Pto., 1 ; Geotechnical
HIP Investiga tion - B:mana
lsfand
MBHJO
4
DEPTH (m)(IOJXH3
,
ProJect No ; 11-5507-QA
Cl•ent ;URSACON
PrOJect : Geotechnical
Tille fnvostigarion - Banana
fsland
FUGRO PENINSULAR
Core Photographs
lla==..a==...=..=.i)==[
Prote<lNo :11-5507-QA
Cllt!nl : URBACON
Projacl :Geotochnlcal
T•tle lnvestiga t•on -Banan;)
lsl01nd
Prqoct No : 11-5507-QA
Cllenl : URBACON
PtOjed :Geolechnlcal
Title lnve$liga1ion - Banana
Island
i;
Prop<.l No ; 11-5507 QA
Cl•nl ; URBACO
T•ltc t
Projec lnves1Jga110n - Banana
:Geotechnical
Island
BH NO. MffiZI
BOX NO. L\
DEPTH {m)(f33()- f _D•,
::_ E0\-3--"--
GAD ;:::: 11-.5507-a -
c"""' :URBACON
Pro1oct : Geotechnical
• Title lnvesttgation- Bnnana
Island
MfttZ2
2
DEPTH ( m )l
730_ 1
IUI'ao"-- 1o
Pro,ectNo : 11-5507-QA
Client : URBACON
Project : Gcotechmcal
T•Ue Invest gato
i n - Banana
Island
BHNO.
FUGRO PENINSULAR
Core Photographs
lla==..a==...=..=.i)==[
Z2
Z(
DEPTH (m)Jl J0)5."6
-- t,OB

Marine Works Technical Tender Package 2

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Marine Works Technical Tender Package 2

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Marine Works- Revetment

Al Khayyat Contracting & Trading

2 PROJECT BACKGROUND ..................................................................6

2.1 Understanding of the Project ..........................................................6

3 GENERAL SCOPE OF WORKS AND REQUIREMENTS ........................10

3.1 General Scope of Works .............................................................10

Appendix A: Drawings .................................................................................. A

Appendix B: Specifications ............................................................................. B

Appendix C: Bill of Quantities ........................................................................ C

Appendix D: Survey ...................................................................................... D

Appendix E: Available Geotechnical Investigation Data ..................................... E

Figure 2 - Project Close-up View (from Google Earth) ........................................ 5

Figure 3 - Photo 1 ......................................................................................... 6

Figure 4 - Photo 2 ......................................................................................... 7

Figure 6 - Photo 4 ......................................................................................... 7

Figure 7 - Photo 5 ......................................................................................... 8

Figure 8 - Photo 6 ......................................................................................... 8

Figure 9 - Photo 7 ......................................................................................... 8

Figure 1 - Project Location (from Google Earth)

2.1 Understanding of the Project

The Banana Island Resort is intended to be a high-end resort for relaxation,

2.2 Site photographs

NW tip of the island: Cobble

View of existing revetment

The revetment armour rocks

Northern coastline of the island:

Southern tip of the island at

– KCT have commissioned a topographic and bathymetric survey around the

– KCT have commissioned an extensive onshore and offshore geotechnical

– Sogreah have conducted the Environmental studies for the project.

– General earthworks have started on site.

3.1 General Scope of Works

1) Acquisition of all necessary NOCs (permits) from the relevant statutory

2) Construction of new revetment on the NW shoreline of the Banana

3) Rehabilitation of existing revetment on the N and E shoreline of the

4) Construction of new detached breakwater at the SE part of the Banana

6) Pre and post construction bathymetric and topographic surveys as well

8) Monitoring as per the requirements of the Ministry of Environment.

9) Preparation and approval of a Construction Environmental

1) Tenderers are requested to price the BoQ (in Appendix C) based on

3.2 Particular Requirements

3.2.1 Site Visit

3.2.2 Tender Bid Compliance

B) Any exclusions/qualifications must be clearly mentioned in the Tender

3.3 Responsibilities of Sub-Contractor

A) Obtaining and maintaining all permits/clearances necessary to access the

B) The Sub-Contractor will communicate only with the Contractor. No other

C) Provision of all materials, plants and equipment, labour, consumables, site

D) Maintaining the site environmental conditions throughout the work period,

E) Restoration of the fieldwork locations, where required, including reinstating

H) Adherence to the KCT Project Manager 's specifications.

J) Monitoring as per the requirements of MOE.

K) Compliance to relevant environmental measures identified in the approved

M) Sub-Contractor to provide insurances as per the RFP.

N) Testing of materials as required by the Specifications and other tests as may

Q) Preparing and submitting to the KCT Project Manager a fully detailed

W) Ensuring accidents shall be properly documented, reported to the KCT

X) Removal from site of all redundant plant on completion of the works.

Y) Only modern, properly maintained equipment of the appropriate capacity

Z) Protection of the works from damage by his own workmen performing

DD) Provision of all necessary attendance to directly employed Sub - Contractors

EE) Ensure the proper adoption of QA / QC procedures.

HH) Provision of temporary aids to navigation ensuring safe marine navigation at

KK) Sub-Contractor has to provide periodical (bi-daily or as needed) interim