ISSUE: 20180323- Re: Why criminal charges ought to be laid against the rorters-thiefs, etc & the constitution

As a CONSTITUTIONALIST my concern is the true meaning and application of the constitution.

If a person defrauds an employer and repays monies then nevertheless such a person can be
sentenced to many years in imprisonment. I view Daniel Andrews and his cohorts should face the
legal consequences as like anyone else. Indeed, using more than $1 million to seek to avoid a
Victorian Ombudsman investigation to me underlines they were trying to pervert the course of
justice. On 15 July 2016 I warned all politicians specifically about securing Bourke Street Mall
to avoid a vehicle to be used (for mass murder) and repeated the same. Not a single politicians
bothered to act upon this. And well it is a matter of record that subsequently on 20 January 2016
there were 6 innocent persons killed. And well with the rorting/theft of public monies the same
again. I warned on 4 June 2014 some 5 months prior to the Victorian election about
using/misusing public moneys for electoral purposes. It was again ignored by Daniel Andrews.
Because it involved more than 1 person it became in my view a CONSPIRACY. And using
public monies to prevent a non-government issue also ought to be addressed. After all the
Australian Labor Party is not a government but a political entity and so seeking to prevent an
investigation against the ALP was not a government issue but a political party issue and never
should have been at the taxpayer’s expense. As such I view this was another more than $1
million scam to pay for the legal cost. Anyhow my quoted correspondence below should indicate
there is a lot more to it.
And every member of any Parliament should consider this!
QUOTE 22-3-2018 CORRESPONDENCE to the Victorian Ombudsman
Victorian Ombudsman 22-3-2018
Email: ombudvic@ombudsman.vic.gov.au
Level 2, 570 Bourke Street, Melbourne VIC 3000
AND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

Ref: 20180322-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Re SUBMISSION to Victorian Ombudsman -Re Victorian election issues-
follow up

COMPLAINT & SUBMISSION

Madam,
I on 17 May 2017 emailed to you my complaint submission regarding the November
2014 Victorian election which including quoting correspondence was an 85 complaint &
submission.
Will the Victorian Ombudsman recommend that those violating electoral laws misusing
public monies are charged?
The document can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/348615829/20170517-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-Re-SUBMISSION-to-
Ombudsman-Victoria-Re-Victorian-Election-Issues

I also then expressed my concerns that as I understand it email communication is intercepted by

a 3rd party.
QUOTE

p1 23-3-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
 I have concerns that while the Victorian Ombudsman website shows Email:
ombudvic@ombudsman.vic.gov.au it turns out that the real email address is
“ua.vog.civ.namsdubmo@civdubmo” it means that Whistle-blowers who rely upon confidential
submissions to the Victorian Ombudsman may have unintended their confidential communication intercepted
by perhaps Government of the Day officials. In my view the Victorian Ombudsman must not only be
impartial and trustworthy but be seem to be impartial and trustworthy and this I view is now in question. In
my view there is absolutely no justification to use a hidden alternative email address not open to the views of
those making perhaps confidential submissions.
END QUOTE

I on 21-3-2018 PUBLISHED:
When an election is stolen by inappropriate/unlawful conduct then this denies
democracy and those involved should I view face years of imprisonment. Not just
paying after caught with the hand in the till. Where is the legal accountability?

This document can be downloaded from:

https://www.scribd.com/document/374499303/20180321-PRESS-RELEASE-Mr-G-H-Schorel-
Hlavka-O-W-B-ISSUE-Re-I-Wonder-Did-the-Victorian-Ombudsman-Do-a-Cover-Up-Re-2014-
Vic-Election-Etc-the-C
In my view the Victorian Ombudsman appears to have done a cover up as after all considering
that I outlines that I on 6-4-2014 I forwarded to the then Premier Mr Napthine with a copy also
to Mr Daniel Andres regarding the issue of misuse of public monies for electoral purposes,
http://ag.ca.gov/ethics/accessible/misuse.php Ethics Orientation for State Officials Misuse of
Public Funds which was on pages 2 and 3 of my 17-5-2017 complaint-submission to you. As
such I find it amazing that you provided the Government reportedly weeks ago with a draft of
your report where you had not conveyed to me about what if anything you did regarding my
complaint/submission.
It should be clear that not only on 4 Jun 2014 Mr Daniel Andrews knew or could have known
about misuse of public monies for electoral purposes was unlawful but since then he received
other correspondences quoting the same Authority.
I last year wrote to your office about what I viewed was a failure in the Ombudsman report
investigation regarding the unlawful killing of Mr Carl Williams. I provided extensive details as
to my limited investigation and in it exposing that the police had concealed relevant details from
the Ombudsman also.
Will the Victorian Ombudsman cooperate or become part of a cover-up to some extent?
The document can be downloaded from:
https://www.scribd.com/document/349678049/20170529-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Victorian-Ombudsman

Within a few months your office made known that because my complaint was more than 12
months old (claiming to be from 2o013) then it was beyond powers to investigate. This, even so
not until May 2017 I commenced to investigate and as such never did make an earlier complaint
regarding the unlawful killing of Mr Carl Williams. To me the Ombudsman merely in my view
covered up its own failure by railroading my complaint.
I take it very serious that anyone would as I view it steal an election victory by
illegal/inappropriate conduct. In my view it is essential for democracy that those who were
involved are held legally accountable.
I am well aware that to many a politician I am so to say a pain in the neck to expose their
wrongdoings but again for DEMOCRACY this needs to be done.
In a Banyule City Council election I had a dispute with Banyule City Council where Mr Anthony
Carbines then a councillor and candidate in the 2010 state election had use a council officer to
p2 23-3-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
pursue me allegedly regarding illegal conduct. However, as I explained to the council officer my
conduct was lawful. I then discovered that my pallets with election banners were dumped in my
driveway and slashed with knives. The police then investigate the matter and also the fire put on
the trailer (with election advertising) of the Liberal candidate. Banbyule City Council instead of
compensating me then pursue to have me charged for failing to fill in a candidates expense form,
even so there was no expenses incurred as I had used my old banners, but did not pursue
another former candidate not having provided an expense form. As such I view I was targeted.
Her Honour Gaynor J of the County Court of Victoria held that the constitution didn’t apply to
her. And when the people in the public gallery made comments about this absurd statement Her
Honour Gay not threatened to clear the court room if they made any further noises.
If therefore I could be dragged before the court for not filing a statement, this even so no monies
needed to be declared, then I view the failure by all those candidates (now being Members of
parliament either re-elected or new Members should have been recommended to have been
charges for filing false and misleading statements concealing the amounts that they
inappropriately had embezzled from public monies.
It appears to me that to have people signing a statement partly filled in was an organised
deliberate conduct to defraud the Consolidated Revenue Funds. Because it involved more than
one person I view this then falls under a CONSPIRACY to defraud.
I understand that not all Members of Parliament involved in this fraud provided you with
documentation relevant to the investigation and if you accept this kind of conduct from Members
of Parliament then surely you cannot expect to be credible if you demand from others
appropriate disclosure. In my view this was an elaborate fraud against the taxpayers using public
monies where those involved knew or should have known that they were involved in a
conspiracy to defraud by having part signed sheets used to make claims against the Consolidated
Revenue Funds. I can obviously check my records how often I provided Mr Daniel Andrews
with a copy of my set out http://ag.ca.gov/ethics/accessible/misuse.php Ethics Orientation for
State Officials Misuse of Public Funds, but the fact I had done so in the first place itself should
have been held against Mr Daniel Andrews.
QUOTE
Auditor General 4-9-2015
Level24, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000 comments@audit.vic.gov.au

Cc: Michelle Ainsworth michelle.ainsworth@news.com.au,

Victorian Electoral Commissioner Email: complaints@vec.vic.gov.au,
Hon. Bruce Atkinson, MLC President of the Legislative Council bruce.atkinson@parliament.vic.gov.au,
Telmo Languiller (Speaker since 23 December 2014) telmo.languiller@parliament.vic.gov.au,
Bill Shorten Bill.Shorten.MP@aph.gov.au,
Senator George Brandis senator.brandis@aph.gov.au,
George Williams george.williams@unsw.edu.au,
Mr Clive Palmer Admin@PalmerUnited.com,
Jacqui Lambie senator.ketter@aph.gov.au,
Mr Tony Abbott PM C/o josh.frydenberg.mp@aph.gov.au,
Herald Sun Andrew Bolt news@heraldsun.com.au, readerfeedback@heraldsun.com.au,
Mark Robinson mark.robinson@news.com.au, jay.clark@news.com.au
Daniel Andrews Premier Victoria daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au

Ref: 20150904-G. H .Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Victorian Auditor General-PRESS RELEASE-COMPLAINT

Sir/Madam,
END QUOTE
This document on pages 7, 8 and 9 also referred to the same Authority ab out misuse of public
funding.
Yet, nevertheless the Government of Victoria spend reportedly more than 1$1 million on seeking
to prevent the Victorian Ombudsman to investigate before the supreme Court of Victoria and the
High Court of Australia and also a reported $400,000.00 in regard of the upper house cost.

p3 23-3-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
.While a lot if not most people may hold your report to be problematic to the Victorian Labor
party to me it lacks the oomph one could have expected from a proper investigation where there
was in my view a CONSPIRACY to defraud the Consolidated Revenue Funds.
In my view charges ought to have been recommended. What we now have w is what appears to
me an arrogant premier and other members of parliament who succeeded in to steal an election
without any real punishment whatsoever. It means all Members of Parliament need to do is to
give some excuse to not be held legally accountable.
If I can be dragged before the court not to file a candidate expense form (again there was an
ongoing dispute) even so there was no monies involved then surely those who filed
false/misleading documents should be charged accordingly.
Her Honour Gaynor made clear that within the provisions of the legislation anyone can in fact
pursue charges and as such it is open to me to pursue charges against those persons who appear
to have conspired to defraud Consolidated Revenue Funds and by it so to say stole an election
Victory. In my view this uis a very serious matter as it undermines democratic elections. It now
appears that anyone who does so will get away with it.
I am also wondering why on earth you provided to the government a draft report where it was
not the government who filed the complaint. Yet, you did not reply to my complaint &
submission. Surely common decency alone would have been in place to provide me with your
response?
It ought to be obvious that where I had written about Ethics Orientation for State Officials
Misuse of Public Funds http://ag.ca.gov/ethics/accessible/misuse.php and provided Mr Daniel
Andrews with copies prior to the 1014 November State election then this was relevant to your
investigation. And to ensure that you may not railroad my submission as such I lodged this as
both a complaint & submission. It therefore was that Mr Daniel Andrews knew or could have
known from my repeated correspondences to him that one cannot use public monies (not even a
telephone call) for election purposes.
In my view it would be prudent for me to await your investigation regarding my complaint &
submission., and what, if any, recommendations you may make as to those involved in this
elaborate fraud to be charged, before I decide if I ought to pursue charges myself, or the
Victorian electoral commission and the Victorian Police and others may instead pursue
appropriate charges.
We do drag people to court for any alleged theft even if only a few dollars then I view this
gigantic fraud of public monies must not and cannot be seen to be tolerated.
As I quoted the statement of Mr Daniel Andrews from the Hansard of and my comment in my
21-3-2018 PRESS RELEASE then surely Mr Daniel Andrews and his fellow partners in crime
should learn what legal accountability is about.
As quoted below:
Again we should apply this mantra by Mr Daniel Andrews Leader of the Opposition to himself and others
(including premier Denis Napthine) and ensure that before the week is out appropriate independent
investigations are conducted in these matters so that Mr Daniel Andrews statements “If decency, fairness,
accountability, the public trust, the public good, and saying no to the abuse of the public purse were
motivations for the Premier, then he would not have waited” and “It is not a strategy about
representation; it is a strategy about apologising for rorting. That is what it is.” Must be applied as he
pursued then let he and others be used as examples.
No excuses about what he may have expected as to the holding of a by-election in Frankston but
“accountability” for what I view his “rorting’ of public monies.

QUOTE Hansard Legislative Assembly 11-6-2014 Mr ANDREWS

This is transparent, and it is central to the reason why the people of this great state have such low
regard for us as parliamentarians and politicians.
END QUOTE Hansard Legislative Assembly 11-6-2014 Mr ANDREWS

For the above I urge you to hand down a report regarding my 17-5-2017 complaint &
submission, with any recommendations as to charges against those involved in the fraudulent
conduct. And electronic search of your 21-3-2018 report did not appear to refer to my references
p4 23-3-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati
about misuse of public monies. I view a very serious failure. This, as the readers of your report
would be left unaware that Mr Daniel Andrews was warned about 5 months prior to the election!
In my view the taxpayers are entitled to be made aware why you did conceal this from your
report and why in the overwhelming information available to you there were no
recommendations for charges! In my view the misuse of about $1 million to pervert the course
of justice in addition to the reported $400,000.00 upper house cost cannot be ignored either.
In my view you have placed the Office of the Ombudsman in disrepute with your conduct which
appears to me to have been a cover up!
In my view it would be appropriate for you to resign and have an impartial Ombudsman dealing
with my 17-5-2017 complaint & submission so the general public of the State of Victoria can
witness how the Office of the Ombudsman is and can be seen to be impartial appropriate report.
This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)

MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL ®

(Our name is our motto!)

END QUOTE 22-3-2018 CORRESPONDENCE to the Victorian Ombudsman

In my view to undermine the democratic system of elections cannot be tolerated.

In my view this was a CONSPIRACY and cannot be tolerated either.
Obviously it is to me of concern that the Victorian Ombudsman was made aware that Daniel
Andrews was warned before the election about the misuse of public monies and nevertheless
went ahead with it and yet the Victorian Ombudsman concealed this from the report.

One may wonder if the same is eventuating in other states/territories.

This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL® (Our name is our motto!)

p5 23-3-2018 © G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
Email: admin@inspector-rikati.com. For further details see also my blog at Http://www.scrib.com/InspectorRikati