Baylee Warner
22 December 2017
The United States has the highest amount of citizens in the prison system compared to
other countries, and the numbers continue to rise. Many of the convicts currently in the system
are repeat offenders, making prison workers speculate how to help nudge convicts down a
law-abiding path so as to keep ex-convicts out of the prison system. Erisman and Contardo
explained in 2005 that a vast majority of the convicts who will be liberated will either make the
choice to continue their life of crime or they will change and become law-abiding citizens (para.
in Scott 148).
The common factor between many of U.S. convicts is that they have limited education
with many not having a high school diploma or equivalent of that. There is an overpopulation of
the poor, less educated community in the prisons. In fact, nearly half of the prisoners said that
they made 800 dollars or less the month before they got arrested (Erisman et.al. 2). Hollisa
Alewine said that more than 25 percent of prisoners have not gotten their diploma at the time
As of late a good education is necessary for the ability to find a career. Without access
to well-paying jobs, and the lack of education are often led to a life of crime for the shortage of
experience and their criminal background. Martin Maximino wrote that many convicts that have
Warner 2
been recently released have a hard time reintegrating into society and struggle finding a new job
to be able to support themselves. Edward-Willey and Chivers wrote in 2005, “Research strongly
suggests that correctional education is a key component of reentering into society” (qtd. in Scott
150). As Scott quoted, education in prisons is a key factor in guiding convicts stay out of prisons
in the future.
After World War Ⅱ the Pell Grant came into effect giving veterans money to be able to
attain a college education. Not only was that grant available to veterans but also convicts. In the
late 1990’s the Pell Grant was taken out of effect which took much of the funding for
correctional education out. Since then State and Federal prisons have had a debate on whether or
not to fund education in prisons. Education in correctional facilities is worth the cost because it
decreases recidivism by giving convicts a way to learn how to avoid conflict and a grounding in
The main level of concern for education in prisons is the cost of the whole operation to be
able to take place. With such excessive amounts of convicts in the system and more coming
everyday the budget for the state and federal prisons are becoming tighter. Data from Fine et al.
explained, that a year of a convict in prison is the same as a year of going to college” (para. in
Palmer 165). The problem with that fact is that if the convicts get an education it would increase
the cost of the prisoners while in prison by a substantial amount. Wendy Erisman wrote of how
in the long run educating convicts while incarcerated will cost less:
The cost to the state of Texas for providing two years of postsecondary education
to the cohort of prisoners who earned associate’s degrees in 2003-04 was less than
$2.6 million, while the savings to taxpayers for each year the 66 additional
Warner 3
three years, the savings from not incarcerating those 66 people would exceed the
costs of educating the entire cohort of prisoners who earned associate’s degrees in
According to this study in Texas while educating prisoners does cost quite a bit, after a course of
several years, the cost will end up less because the recidivism rate greatly depreciates in
correlation with education. “[P]rison education programs are cost effective, with a $1
investment in prison education reducing incarceration costs by $4 to $5 during the first three
John Esperian wrote in 2010 that it is more beneficial for states to dedicate the money for
according to Esperian, recidivism is when ex-convicts rebound to their life of crime and are
arrested again (320). In fact, many researches have revealed evidence that education is one of
the best ways to decrease recidivism (see figure 1). An Education Newspaper report in 2009
wrote that those who earned an associate degree were 70 percent less likely to recidivate; those
with a GED were 25 percent less likely and those with a certificate were 14.6 percent less likely
(Esperian 324). Thus showing that the more education a convict acquires the less likely they are
to be arrested again.
Not only does education reduce recidivism rates but also convicts have better self-esteem
and behavior. Winterfield et. al. wrote that convicts reported having more self-worth, while
Gorgol & Sponsler said that when convicts participate in the correctional education system they
Warner 4
have a better understanding of how to control their emotions and judge how to react to things in a
better manner. Because of that the prisoners have less conflicts with those around them (Palmer
165). Jon Taylor wrote in 1994, “ A survey of inmates at an Indiana prison, for example, showed
that prisoners enrolled in college classes committed 75 percent fewer infractions than the average
inmate” (Erisman et. al. 7). According to these numbers most of the convicts have improved
conducts while participating in the education. This increased behavior gives them a chance to
practice how to behave when the convicts are released into society again. Žunic ́ -Pavlovic ́ wrote
in 2004 that many professionals concur that education in prisons reduce recidivism, help convicts
find jobs outside of prison, and are less difficult with those around them (para. in Jovanić 82).
Results from a case study prove that education help the convicts feel more “empowered” when
Figure 1. The effect of education and other activities on the rate of recidivism of prisoners in
1992 (Sedgley 506).
Warner 5
Another conflict that can result from education in correctional facilities is the reason
that the convicts do not have a diploma of any kind is because they have a dreadful experience
with education in the past. A key point to get convicts to become more invested in education is
to make it their choice. There is a lot of resistance if the prisoner is forced into learning. The
convict must also face barriers of self-doubt and learn how to succeed in a classroom setting. A
way to be able to achieve this with convicts is to use andragogical methods. After a month or
two of these methods the convicts were more open and willing in the classroom setting (Alewine
11-15).
With the rigid budget for prison education and not enough teachers teaching in the
prisons there is not enough room for all of the prisoners to take part in the education system.
Esperian says that those who committed more serious crimes and are serving life long sentences
should not be qualified for the opportunity for furthering their education (331). Only the
convicts who have the chance of reentering society will be able to get an education from the
prison. Further, those who have bad behavior will not be able to take part of the system. That
way those who have a chance to change have the access to do so.
Prisoners also have friction against education while they are incarcerated because jobs
offer a microscopic amount of money while there while education does not offer money. Thus
more convicts end up going to work rather than furthering their education. In order to be able to
have more participation in the education opportunity there should also be a reward system for the
An additional worry that state and federal prisons have with correctional education is that
there is not enough resources and trained people to effectively teach the convicts. Palmer
explains that in order to get more teachers to be able to teach prisoners is a rather easy feat. All
that needs to be done is to have teachers already successful with the prisoners and have them
train the new teachers. On the other hand getting enough resources to be able to educate the
convicts is a little harder. Palmer further says that the solution to that problem is to be gather
books from libraries that are getting rid of their old books. That way the prisons will be able to
have more resources for education and it will be at no extra cost to the public through taxes
(167).
convicts does cost quite a bit, in the long run it will save taxpayers’ money because education
reduces the chance of recidivism. Not only does recidivism rates decrease but also increases
prisoner’s self-esteem and behavior. The concern over how to educate the prisoners can also be
easily fixed by training teachers how to effectively teach in the prison environment and get
Works Cited
Alewine, Hollisa S. "Andragogical Methods and Readiness for the Correctional Ged Classroom."
Journal of Correctional Education, vol. 61, no. 1, Mar. 2010, pp. 9-22. EBSCOhost.
“Education and Vocational Training in Prisons Reduces Recidivism, Improves Job Outlook.”
Correctional Education Policy. Institute for Higher Education Policy, Institute for Higher
Correctional Education, vol. 61, no. 4, Dec. 2010, pp. 316-334. EBSCOhost. Web. 12
Dec. 2017
Jovanić, Goran. "The Role of Education in the Treatment of Offenders." Support for Learning,
vol. 26, no. 2, May 2011, pp. 79-82. EBSCOhost. Web. 11 Dec. 2017
Sedgley, Norman H., et al. "Prison's Dilemma: Do Education and Jobs Programmes Affect
Recidivism?." Economica, vol. 77, no. 307, July 2010, pp. 497-517. EBSCOhost. Web.
20 Dec. 2017
Scott, Kerry J. "Corrections and Education: The Relationship between Education and