PAGE
PAGE
A Introduction
Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A2 Products @ a Glance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A4
B Structural Design
Introduction to the Structural Design of Masonry . . . . . . . . B2 Movement (Control Joints) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B6
C Fire Design
Masonry Design for Fire Resistance (FRL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C2 Effect of Chases on Fire Rated Masonry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C4
Masonry Design for Structural Adequacy FRL . . . . . . . . . . . C2 How to Select Boral Masonry Units for
Fire Rated Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C5
Masonry Design for Integrity FRL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C3
Structural Adequacy Selection Graphs and Tables . . . . . . . . C8
Masonry Design for Insulation FRL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C4
Index to Structural Adequacy Selection Graphs . . . . . . . . . . C8
D Acoustic Design
Acoustic Performance Ratings (STC and Rw) . . . . . . . . . . . . D2 Guidelines for Optimum Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D4
FireLight (FL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E4
The information presented herein is supplied in good faith and to the best of our knowledge was accurate at the time of preparation. No responsibility can be accepted by
Boral or its staff for any errors or omissions. Users are advised to make their own determination as to the suitability of this information in relation to their particular purpose
and specific circumstances. Since the information contained in this document may be applied under conditions beyond our control, no responsibility can be accepted by us
for any loss or damage caused by any person acting or refraining from action as a result of this information.
The quickest way to find a Boral Masonry Structural, Fire or Acoustic Wall Solution.
Simply follow the FAST FIND GUIDE on the right hand side of the table.
BORAL
l)
al
W
MASONRY
e
ar
l
ry
al
BLOCK &
rd
(B
W
on
IS
oa
g
ed
N
as
BRICK
in
in
rb
FI
er
M
in
te
LL
Li
nd
Fast Find
ta
ce
PRODUCTS
as
A
o
Re
Re
Fa
Pl
W
N
NLB = Non-loadbearing
LB = Loadbearing
NLB LB NLB LB NLB LB NLB LB NLB LB a Boral
FireLight (FL) – – – – E4 – E4 – – –
Solution
1 Select your application
criteria from the top of
Standard Grey Block – – E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 – – the table
2 Go straight to the
Core Filled Block E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 E6 section letter and page
number indicated at the
intersection of product
Designer Block – – – – – – – – rows and application
columns (e.g. Section E,
Page E6 in this example)
Concrete-Basalt Brick (B) Please refer to MDG Book 2,
– – E8 E8 E8 E8 E8 E8 – – Boral Masonry Block and Brick Guide
(Rippa and Speed-E Brick)
For technical support and sales office details please refer to the outside back cover
• Core Fill Block rendered walls (mass law). Acoustic performance with
Made with recessed webs to accommodate horizontal plasterboard is better than clay because resonances
steel. Used for cantilever-design retaining walls, are dampened by its higher porosity.
basement walls and for large, loadbearing walls
• FireLight Bricks (FL)
requiring 120 or 240-minute Insulation FRLs.
FireLight is a lightweight material that has been
• Concrete-Basalt Bricks (B): developed and tested for high fire and acoustic ratings.
Speed-E Brick and Rippa Block It is ideal for plasterboard-lined and non-loadbearing
Concrete-Basalt is a denseweight, load-bearing walls in high-rise home units and wherever weight
material. The 45% basalt content of these bricks allows minimisation is critical. Acoustic tests have proven
the use of the higher Slenderness ratios in AS3700, the requirements of BCA:2007 can be met with
Table 6.1. Its Insulation FRLs are slightly higher than plasterboard-lined walls that are thinner than some
clay units. The material is slightly more dense than “deemed-to-satisfy” options.
clay so acoustic performance is slightly higher for
The Boral Masonry Structural, Fire and Acoustic guide Please note that this guide is based on products available at
(this book), provides a summary of important design the time of publication from the Boral Masonry Queensland
information for structural, fire and acoustic masonry sales region. Different products and specifications may
applications and an extensive range of fire and/or acoustic apply to Boral products sourced from other regions.
systems to cater for many design scenarios.
Additional Assistance and Information
Section B — Structural Design • Contact Details: Please refer to the outside back cover of
Section B discusses design issues relevant to the selection this publication for Boral Masonry contact details.
of Boral Masonry products for structural adequacy, based on
• Colour and Texture Variation: The supply of raw
appropriate wall design criteria.
materials can vary over time. In addition, variation can
Section C — Fire Design occur between product types and production batches. Also
please recognise the printed colours in this brochure are
Section C discusses the relevant design processes for
only a guide. Please, always ask to see a sample of your
the selection of Boral Masonry Products for fire rated
colour/texture choice before specifying or ordering.
applications. This section includes a step-by-step selection
guide and a series of selection graphs which can greatly • Terms and Conditions of Sale: For a full set of Terms
speed up the preliminary selection and comparison of and Conditions of Sale please contact your nearest Boral
suitable designs and products. Masonry sales office.
1 B
Queensland Book 1 B
AS3700, Clause 4.6.1 requires walls to have an adequate or two thirds the sum or thicknesses of the two
degree of ‘Robustness’. Robustness is a minimum design leaves, whichever is greater, in metres
requirement, and may be overridden by Fire, Wind, Snow, or in diaphragm wall construction, the overall
Earthquake, Live and Dead Load requirements. thickness of the wall, in metres
In robustness calculations, there are height, length, and kt = a thickness coefficient, values as given in AS3700
panel action formulae. By reworking the standard formulae Table 7.2 (see the end of this section)
provided and inserting known data, it is possible to
determine whether a chosen design and Boral masonry Cv,Ch = robustness coefficient, values as given in AS3700
product will provide adequate robustness. Should the initial Table 4.2 (see end of this section) for edge restraints
product/design chosen not provide a suitable solution, then a at top, bottom and vertical sides (either separately
thicker Boral masonry product more suited to the application or in combination)
should be evaluated, or alternatively, add extra restraints Lr = the clear length of the wall between vertical
or reinforcement. lateral supports, in metres; or
The following section is laid out with AS3700 formulae and = for a wall without a vertical support at one end or
explanation in the left hand column, while worked examples at a control joint or for walls containing openings,
can be found in the adjacent right hand column. the length to that unsupported end or control joint
or edge of opening, in metres.
Wall with Restraint at End or Ends Aim: To determine the Maximum Length
Formula 4.6.2 (3) is for walls spanning horizontally [i.e. of a Wall with Restraint at End or
restrained end(s)]. Walls that have one or both ends Ends
laterally restrained and Criteria: Wall thickness tr = 110mm
L
Ch Example 1: If wall is restrained along one end, then
tr
Ch = 12
i.e. L tr x Ch L 0.11 x 12
L 1.320m
Where Ch is obtained from AS3700 Table 4.2. (Refer to
Example 2: If wall is restrained along both ends, then
Page B5)
Ch = 36
H L 0.11 x 36
= no limit
tr L 3.960m
NOTE: If the wall exceeds the permitted length, then a
NOTE: This means that although the wall height is not thicker wall is required or formula 4.6.2 (4) governs and
limited by its thickness, the wall length is limited. Stair H will be limited. (See below).
wells and chimneys work to this formula.
Wall with Restraint at Top and End or Ends Aim: To determine the Maximum Height of
Formula 4.6.2 (4) is for walls spanning vertically and a Wall with Restraint at Top and End
horizontally (i.e. with restraint along the top and one or or Ends
two ends) and length L tr x Ch. Criteria: Wall thickness tr = 110mm
Where Ch is obtained from AS3700 Table 4.2. (Refer to Wall length = 2m
Page B5) Example 1: If wall supports a slab, then Cv = 36, and
Formula (4) is: H Ch if restrained along one end, then Ch = 12
Cv +
tr Lr — Chtr
SUPPORT
Table B2 (Extract from AS3700 : Table 7.2) The Km factor is 1.4 for M3 mortar on solid and cored units
Thickness Coefficient (kt) for Walls Stiffened by Monolithically and is 1.6 for the face shells of hollow units. For the richer
Engaged Piers
M4 mortar it is 1.5 (Table 3.1).
Pier Spacing/Pier Width Thickness Coefficient (kt)
(Refer to Note 1) Pier Thickness Ratio (twp/t) The Kh factor is 1 for 76mm high units with 10mm mortar
1 2 3 beds and is 1.3 for 190mm units with 10mm mortar beds.
6 1.0 1.4 2.0
8 1.0 1.3 1.7 In other words, a wall of 190mm high units is 30% stronger
10 1.0 1.2 1.4 than a wall of 76mm high units of the same ƒ’uc.
15 1.0 1.1 1.2
20 or more 1.0 1.0 1.0
NOTES: 1. Pier spacing is taken as the distance between centrelines of piers. Bending
2. Linear interpolation may be used.
Characteristic Flexural Tensile Strength is ƒ’mt.
twp t
Masonry is good in compression but poor in tension. Mortar
Wall Leaf joint strength is generally zero or 0.2MPa for loads from wind,
Pier Width earthquake etc. Higher bending forces may require masonry
Pier Spacing to be partially reinforced.
Movement
Durability In general, concrete units contract as they cure while clay
Masonry designed for ‘Durability’ is deemed to satisfy when units will expand. They both expand as they take up water
it meets the requirements of AS3700 Section 5, which and contract as they dry. They both expand as they get hot
details what areas require Exposure, General Purpose and and contract as they cool.
Protected grades. Assessment of these grades is defined in
AS/NZS4456.10 Resistance to Salt Attack. Curing Movement in Concrete Units
AS/NZS4456.12 gives methods for determining coefficients
AS3700 defines the usage of each of these grades as: of curing contraction and coefficients of drying contraction
Protected Grade (PRO) for concrete units.
Elements above the damp-proof course in non-marine exterior Drying Contraction
environments. Elements above the damp-proof course in other The drying contraction test on masonry units is an indication
exterior environments, with a waterproof coating, properly of their maximum amount of movement from totally saturated
flashed junctions with other building elements and a top to ambient dry. A typical result is 0.5mm/m but can be as high
covering (roof or coping) protecting the masonry. as 1mm/m for lightweight units that are more absorptive. For
General Purpose Grade (GP) example, a drying contraction of 0.5mm/m, in an 8m panel
Suitable for use in an external wall excluding severe marine of masonry, has the potential to shrink 4mm from saturated
environment. condition to dry.
Salt attack is the most common durability problem. The salt The Australian Masonry Manual recommends control joints
in salt water is in solution. It can be absorbed into masonry at 8m centres for concrete units, 6m centres for lightweight
or at least, its mortar joints. When the water evaporates, it (<1600kg/m3) units and at potential points of cracking such
migrates towards the outside face taking the salt with it until as at openings and at steps in the masonry.
the amount of water left is saturated. It can no longer hold all
The Concrete Masonry Association of Australia Design
the salt in solution and salt crystals begin to form.
Manual permits 16m spacing for bond beams and for panels
The salt crystals then take up space, sometimes more than the with horizontal and vertical reinforcement.
texture of the masonry will allow. The crystal then ‘pops’ a piece
Spacing should be measured around corners, not from
of the outer surface off to make room and salt attack begins.
corners. Ideally, the control joint is located near the corner,
Walls below damp course also require greater durability. concealed behind a down pipe.
Even if they are well away from the coast, they may be
External control joints should be finished with a flexible
subjected to acidic or alkaline soils. In any case, moisture
sealant.
in the ground is absorbed into the masonry, creating an
Control joints create a ‘free end’ in terms of ‘robustness’ R-value of Insulation to be Added to Wall Types
and FRLs for structural adequacy, so their positioning is for Required Total R-value
critical to the overall design of the structure.
Class 2, 3, 4 and 9c Class 5 to 9b
In portal frame construction, the control joint is positioned at Wall
Type Zones 1, 2, 3 and 5 Zones 1, 2, 3 and 5
a column so that both ends can be tied to the column flanges.
A 1.0 1.4
The mason and renderer must keep the control joint clean,
B 0.7 1.1
otherwise, bridging mortar or render will induce cracks from C 0.9 1.3
those points as the masonry moves. If ties are used over
control joints, they must be sleeved to allow movement. Masonry R-values without air films added (BCA:2007, Vol
1, Specification J1.5, Figure 2, Notes) are:
Adding extra cement to mortar or render causes more
shrinkage. Lightweight units are only 5MPa, so are susceptible 90mm hollow (10.01) = 0.09
to cracking if laid in rich mortar or rendered with a cement- 110mm bricks = 0.12
rich mix. 140mm hollow (15.01) = 0.15
190mm hollow (20.01) = 0.20
Internal Control Joints
The Australian Masonry Manual specifies the spacing 10mm render adds 0.02
of internal control joints for concrete units at 12m A wall mass 220kg/m2 is defined in BCA Volume 2 as:
maximum.
Two leaves of 90mm concrete masonry or...
In Zone 5, the wall above, with bond beam and some core-
filling achieves the 220kg/m2 requirement (see below).
Without the 220kg/m2 wall mass, insulation with an R-value
0.9 is required to reach a Total R-Value of 1.4.
NOTES
Vertical Vertical
Vc = Shear capacity (kN)
Bars Vc Mc Bars Vc Mc
Mc = Moment capacity (kNm)
N12 5.1 2.6 N12 12.5 9.3
N16 6.3 2.6 N16 13.7 16.0 Mortar type, M3
Block characteristic compressive strength,
ƒ’ uc = 15MPa
Horizontal Grout compressive strength,
ƒ’ c = 20MPa
Bars Vc Mc
N12 5.1 2.0
Cut on-site Cement content min. (Grout) = 300kg/m3
N16 6.3 2.9
100
Horizontal
300
15.12 Bars Vc Mc
N12 10.2 4.0
70 N16 12.6 4.7
15.12
70
Moment and Shear Capacities for Series 200 Blocks (190mm leaf)
Vertical Vertical
Bars Vc Mc Bars Vc Mc
N12 7.9 3.6 N12 6.4 2.9
N16 10.2 3.6 N16 7.6 3.6
N20 13.1 3.6 N20 9.1 3.6
Horizontal Horizontal
Bars Vc Mc Bars Vc Mc
100 100 N12 6.4 2.9
N12 8.2 4.0
N16 9.3 6.9 N16 7.6 5.0
N20 10.6 9.9 N20 9.1 6.5
20.12 20.12
129 (N12 bars)
127 (N16 bars) 95
125 (N20 bars)
Vertical Vertical
Bars Vc Mc Bars Vc Mc
N12 17.9 18.0 N12 16.4 9.5
N16 20.2 30.2 N16 17.6 16.6
N20 23.1 32.2 N20 19.0 24.4
20.20 or 20.20 or
20.01 cut 20.01 cut
on-site on-site
Horizontal Horizontal
300 300
Bars Vc Mc Bars Vc Mc
N12 16.4 8.0 N12 12.9 5.7
N16 18.6 13.4 N16 15.2 9.5
N20 21.3 17.2 N20 18.1 9.9
20.12 20.12
129 (Y12 bars)
127 (Y16 bars) 95
125 (Y20 bars)
• Reinforcement — AS1302 :
Ground level
1982 Steel Reinforcing Bars for Concrete.
Base Type 2
• Concrete Blocks — AS4455 :
1997 Concrete Masonry Units. Foundation
• The use of H blocks above the first course. These blocks Impermeable
layer sloping
are easier to fill with grout which provides the required to drain
continuous protection to the reinforcement. If rebated flush- Drain
ended blocks are used in lieu of H blocks, they should be
laid with alternate courses inverted to provide grout cover
to horizontal reinforcement, which should be supported
20mm clear of the webs of flush-ended blocks.
• The filling of all cores with grout, whether reinforced Vertical layer of
granular material
or not. This is essential to bond and protect horizontal
reinforcement, to provide a full barrier against water
penetration and to give maximum weight for stability.
Backfill Drainage
It is essential that steps be taken to prevent the backfill behind
the wall from becoming saturated. These steps should include:
Fig B4 — Continuous Drainage Within the Backfill
Sealing Backfill Surface Walls with Base Type 1
To prevent saturation of backfill by surface run-off, the
surface of the backfill should be sealed by covering it with Care must be taken to ensure that clay and silt do not
a compacted layer of low permeability material. The surface infiltrate the drainage material or agricultural pipe. The use
should be sloped towards an open drain. of a geofabric envelope around the gravel and/or a geofabric
Continuous Drainage Within the Backfill sock over the pipe will assist.
This can be achieved by placing free-draining gravel or crushed
stone to a width of approximately 300mm immediately
behind the wall with a continuous agricultural pipe located
Locate the
continuous drain
at the bottom of Free-draining
the base gravel or stone
Weepholes
between
blocks
Drain
Water Penetration
If it is considered necessary to reduce the passage of
moisture through the wall, for aesthetic or other reasons
such as aggressive groundwater, the earth face of the wall
Extra should be treated with an appropriate sealer such as water-
agricultural
pipe drain resistant render or water-resistant paint, or by tanking with
bituminous materials.
Sloping backfill
Optional or surcharge
capping
Longitudinal
reinforcement: N12 in
Sloping alternate courses
190 backfill or commencing from top
surcharge course. Omit on top of
Optional clean-out block
capping
Height
of
190mm Vertical reinforcement:
Longitudinal reinforcement: N12 @400 cts
N12 in alternate courses Longitudinal blocks
commencing from top course. reinforcement: 190
Omit on top of clean-out block N12 in
alternate
courses
Sloping commencing
140 backfill or from top 450
surcharge course. Omit H = 2200 min
on top of to 3400 lap
clean-out
block
N12 @400
Optional cts K Bars
capping
H = 1400
to 2000
H = 800 290
to 1200 N12 @400
cts
Height of
290mm
blocks V Bars
600 V Bars
450 V Bars min
min lap
X Bars X Bars X Bars
lap
Fig B9 — Construction Guidelines for Reinforced and Core Filled Retaining Walls with Base Type 1
Table B3 — Design Guidelines for Reinforced and Core Filled Retaining Walls with Base Type 1
Surcharge or
sloping backfill
(1 in 4 max.)
Optional
capping
Surcharge or
sloping backfill N16 in top course only
(1 in 4 max.) 190
Height of
Optional 190mm
capping blocks N12@400 cts
Longitudinal
reinforcement Longitudinal reinforcement:
N12@400cts. N16 in top N12@400
commencing from course only
top course. Omit on
top of clean-out 190
Surcharge or
sloping backfill course
Longitudinal 600
(1 in 4 max.) 140 min.
reinforcement
N12@400 cts. H = 2200 lap
Optional Omit on top of to 3400
capping clean-out course
Longitudinal reinforcement
2 x N12@400cts. Omit on
N12@400 cts top of clean-out course
H = 1400
to 2000 290
H = 800 N12@400 cts
K Bars
to 1200 Height of
V Bars V Bars 290mm
blocks V Bars
600
450 min.
min. lap
lap SL72 Fabric SL72 Fabric SL72 Fabric
Fig B10 — Construction Guidelines for Reinforced and Core Filled Walls with Base Type 2
Table B4 — Design Guidelines for Reinforced and Core Filled Walls with Base Type 2
190
One-course bond
beam with N12 bar
Series 200
blocks
Horizontal Note:
2700 max. reinforcement, Wall blocks and
N12 at 400 cts reinforcement as
for 'Typical Details'
Vertical
reinforcement:
N16 @400 cts, False wall
central
Floor slab
reinforcement Drained cavity
200 200
1000
290
190
140
190
Timber floor
Timber floor
One-course
bond beam using
20.20 knock-out block
with 1xN12 bar
2700 max.
Natural
soil
Note:
Series 200 Reinforcement as
blocks for ‘Typical Details’
False wall
Clean-out
course Natural
soil
Floor slab Drained cavity
reinforcement
300
300
Note:
Retaining wall shall be propped prior to
190 backfilling and remain in place for a
minimum of 7 days after placing floor slab
450
lap Vapour barrier and
sand bedding under slab
Knock-out block
saw-cut at floor
soffit level N12 at same spacing as
vertical reinforcement
Horizontal
reinforcement,
N12 at 400 cts
Free-draining gravel
Vertical
reinforcement: 'H' (2200 max.)
N12 at spacing 'S',
centrally placed
Natural soil
Ag. drain 65mØ
fall at 1:100 to
Use H blocks for outlet
sub-floor wall
section
Bars
450 lap
Clean-out course
Note:
Starter bars, Footing size and
N12 @ spacing 'S', 450 min. 600 min.
reinforcement to suit
centrally placed site conditions
1 C
Queensland Book 1 C
The Slenderness ratio (Srf) of the proposed wall is calculated NOTE:* Refer to the Structural Adequacy Selection Graphs
as per Clause 6.3.2.2. If this value is less than the maximum on pages C9 to C15 for maximum height values.
Srf in Table 6.1 [or the Srf calculated from Fire Tests and
For cavity walls, two thirds of the total thickness can be
Clause 6.3.3(b)(ii)], then the wall complies. If the Srf of
used for t, provided that BOTH leaves are restrained in the
the wall is greater than the maximum permissible, it
same positions (eg: external leaf stops at slab also). If the
is recalculated for an increased thickness and/or extra
external leaf is a veneer to the slab edge, the internal leaf
restraints.
must provide the Structural Adequacy FRL on its own.
There are 4 formulae for calculating Srf: 6.3.2.2 (1) and (2)
For reinforced masonry, the Srf of 36, from Table 6.1 may be
are the HEIGHT formulae.
used. Reinforcement can be horizontal, as bond beams when
FORMULA 1 and 2 is: avf H spanning between columns. Reinforcement can be vertical,
Srf =
t as filled cores when spanning between slabs. In either case,
reinforcement can be spaced up to 2m apart, depending on
6.3.2.2 (3) is the PANEL ACTION formula. span. This reinforcement stiffens the masonry and resists
bowing. Reinforced walls with Srf < 36 have a 240 minute
FORMULA 3 is: 0.7 avf H ah L
Srf =
t ¥ FRL for Structural Adequacy.
FORMULA 4 is: S = a L
rf h
t Masonry Design for
The actual Srf is the lesser of the resulting figures.
Integrity FRL
(The resistance to the passage of flame or gas).
Formula (1) and (2) always govern where there is no end
restraint, and often govern where walls are long, relative to It is impractical to provide test results for all possible
their height. Projects with multiple wall lengths (eg: home masonry wall designs, and therefore ‘Integrity’ must be
units) can use this formula as a ‘one size fits all’ method of proved in some other way. With masonry wall design, the
calculating the masonry thickness. most practical way to prove ‘Integrity’ is to prove ‘Structural
Adequacy’ and ‘Insulation’ equal to or better than the
Formula (3) allows a wall to exceed the height given by
‘Integrity’ requirement. (Logically, if the wall is designed to
formula (1) and (2) provided at least one end is restrained
minimise ‘bowing’ it will not crack and therefore resist the
as well as the top.
passage of flame and gas for the specified time).
Formula (4) governs the wall length, often where there is no
This method is also the best way to prove ‘integrity’
top restraint (eg: portal frame factories) and where walls are
even when a wall may not be required to comply with a
short, relative to their height (eg: a lift well or vent shaft).
‘structural adequacy’ FRL value, such as is the case with
From a suppliers perspective, it is helpful to be able to non loadbearing walls. eg: if the BCA requires an FRL
calculate the maximum height* for a given thickness of -/90/90, the wall has no actual ‘structural adequacy’
(masonry unit), requirement, but to prove integrity of 90 minutes, the wall
Srf x t must be structurally adequate for 90 minutes.
eg: H =
Avf
Integrity FRLs are increased by increasing the other two If these limits are exceeded, the masonry design thickness
FRL values to the required Integrity FRL. must be reduced by the depth of the recess.
Insulation FRLs can be increased by core filling, by adding Recesses for Services
another leaf of masonry, by rendering both sides of the
Recesses that are less than half of the masonry thickness
wall if the fire can come from either side. NOTE: Only ONE
and are less than 10,000mm2 for both sides within any 5m2
thickness of render is added to the material thickness and
of the masonry, do not have an effect on fire ratings.
that must be on the ‘cold’ side because the render on the
exposed face will drop off early in a fire). If these limits are exceeded, the masonry design thickness
must be reduced by the depth of the recess.
Boral ‘FireStop’ plasterboard on furring channels can
increase the Insulation FRL from either side. Unlike render,
the Boral FireStop and furring system does not drop off the
hot side so quickly due to the board’s fire resistance, the
mechanical fixing of the board to furring and the furring
to the wall.
Step 1 Example
Determine required wall FRL from the Building Code
of Australia (BCA).
eg: 120/60/60
The Building Code of Australia (BCA), Section C defines
Insulation
the CLASS and TYPE of building and designates the
Integrity
required Fire Resistant Level (FRL) in terms of three
Structural Adequacy
criteria. See adjacent example.
NOTE: For masonry wall design, the FRL for any given eg. If the BCA required FRL is: —/120/60
wall must comply with:
Then the chosen wall design must have an
Structural Adequacy Integrity Insulation actual FRL of: 120/120/120 or better.
Worked Example
• A 4.6m high, 6m long fire wall in 3 storey offices. BCA
specifies Class 5, Type b Construction.
In this example, the Srf for a 140mm thick wall, 4.6m high,
with lateral restraint along the top is 24.7 as per AS3700,
Formula 6.3.2.2 (2) See page C3.
SUPPORT
2. Select the appropriate page with Structural
Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
60 minutes FRL 60 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 190mm 8
7 7
6 6
5 140mm 5
4 4
110mm
190mm
100mm
3 90mm 3
2 2 140mm
110mm
100mm
1 1 90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
190mm
5 5
4 140mm 4
110mm 3
3
100mm
90mm
2 2
190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90/100mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy SUPPORT Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
90 minutes FRL 90 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 190mm 8
7 7
6 6
5 140mm 5
4 4
110mm
100mm
3 90mm 3 190mm
2 2 140mm
110mm
100mm
1 1 90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
190mm
5 5
4 140mm 4
110mm 3
3 100mm
90mm
2 2
190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90/100mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
120 minutes FRL 120 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 8
7 7
190mm
6 6
5 5
140mm
4 4
110mm
100mm
3 90mm 3
190mm
2 2 140mm
110mm
100mm
1 1 90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
190mm
5 5
4 140mm 4
110mm 3
3 100mm
90mm
2 2
190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90/100mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy SUPPORT Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
60 minutes FRL 60 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
140mm 4
4
110mm
3 3
90mm
2 2
140mm
110mm
1 1 90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
5 5
4 140mm 4
3 110mm 3
90mm
2 2
140mm
1 1 110mm
90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
90 minutes FRL 90 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
4 140mm 4
3 110mm 3
90mm
2 2
140mm
1 110mm
1 90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
5 5
4 140mm 4
3 110mm 3
90mm
2 2
140mm
1 1 110mm
90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
60 minutes FRL 60 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
190mm
4 4
140mm
3 3
110mm
90mm 2
2 190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
5 5
190mm
4 4
140mm
3 3
110mm
90mm 2
2
190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
90 minutes FRL 90 minutes FRL
Laterally supported Laterally supported
both ends and top SUPPORT both ends, top free SUPPORT
9 9
Leaf Leaf
Thickness Thickness
8 8
7 7
6 6
5 5
190mm
4 4
3 140mm 3
110mm
2 90mm 2
190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
SUPPORT
Structural Adequacy Structural Adequacy
SUPPORT
SUPPORT
7 7
6 6
Height of wall between supports (m)
Height of wall between supports (m)
5 5
190mm
4 4
3 140mm 3
110mm
2 90mm 2
190mm
140mm
1 1 110mm
90mm
0 0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Length of wall between supports (m) Length of wall between supports (m)
Walls without restraint to the ends, but with lateral restraint along their top have
maximum heights irrespective of their length as detailed in the following table. (Most
doorways and windows create free ends). SUPPORT
Material Thickness Maximum Wall Height (metres)
Structural Adequacy (FRL minutes)
60 90 120 180 240
*Governed by Robustness. Can be higher if supporting a slab. These heights can be exceeded when one or both ends are restrained as well as the top.
SUPPORT
4.000 N12 Every 10th core — (2m) 140 4.000 N12 Every 10th course — (2m) 140
5.040 N16 Every 10th core — (2m) 140 5.040 N16 Every 10th course — (2m) 140
4.800 N12 Every 10th core — (2m) 190 4.800 N12 Every 10th course — (2m) 190
6.400 N16 Every 10th core — (2m) 190 6.400 N16 Every 10th course — (2m) 190
6.840 N16 Every 8th core — (1.6m) 190 6.840 N16 Every 8th course — (1.6m) 190
1 D
Queensland Book 1 D
Weighted Standardised Level Difference (Dnt,w), is lower the material, and determined by calculation from the
than the laboratory Rw. This reduction in performance average amount of sound energy absorbed over a range of
can be due to flanking paths (that is to say that noise also frequencies between 250Hz and 2000Hz.
passes through other parts of the building) or may be due
Boral Acousticell blocks have extremely high absorption
to poor detailing such as incorrect installation of pipes,
rates (90%) at low frequency. Refer to Acousticell product
power points etc.
page in this guide and the Boral Masonry Block Guide.
Structure-borne Noise and Weighted The porous surface and lightweight aggregates in lightweight
Normalised Impact Sound Pressure Level masonry give it high sound absorption values (> 50%) across
(L’n,w) all frequencies. Refer to the ‘Lightweight’ product page in
When a building element is directly, or indirectly, impacted the Fire Rated Walls section of this guide.
or vibrated then some of the energy passes through the
Sound Isolation Criteria
partition and is re-radiated as noise to the room on the other
side. This is called structure-borne noise or impact noise. From May 2004, the Building Code of Australia (BCA)
specifications for minimum levels of sound isolation have
For walls, the most common sources of structure-borne noise are: been increased. Although the new levels have not been
• Cupboard doors, fixed to party walls, being closed adopted by Queensland at the time of printing, they are
often specified for quality home units. These increased
• Kitchen appliances being used on benches touching walls specifications are:
• Plumbing fittings, particularly taps, being connected to walls • Unit to corridor or stairs Rw 50
• Light switches being turned on and off, and • Unit to unit Rw + Ctr 50
• Dishwashers, washing machines, clothes dryers etc. • Where a wet area of one unit adjoins a habitable room
touching walls in another unit, the wall construction must ‘be of a
Walls satisfy ‘impact’ or structure-borne noise isolation either by discontinuous type.’
conforming to the ‘deemed to satisfy’ provisions of the Building
Code of Australia ‘Impact Sound’ or ‘Test of Equivalence’, using Guidelines for Optimum
a single number description for impact insulation or the Opinion Performance
of a suitably qualified acoustic engineer.
To achieve the optimum performance for a wall system, the
The generally accepted test for impact is Weighted exact construction as specified including perimeter sealing must
Normalised Impact Sound Pressure Level or L’n,w. In this be adopted.
method of interpreting impact sound resistance, lower
Any variations from the systems detailed in this guide should
values represent better impact insulation.
be approved by the project acoustic consultant as it can
Another single number description used for impact is the increase or decrease the acoustical isolation of wall systems.
Impact Insulation Class or IIC. When used for walls it may be
called WIIC for laboratory testing or WFIIC for field testing. Installation
Unfortunately, as there are different test methods used to Unless careful attention to installation detail is followed,
obtain the impact rating for walls, results cannot always be significant reductions in sound isolation can occur,
directly compared. particularly with high performance walls. The following
need to be taken into account.
The larger the value of the WIIC the better the impact insulation.
Perimeter Acoustical Sealing
Noise Reduction Coefficient (NRC)
It should be noted that as the sound isolation performance
Designers of theatres, music rooms and power transformer
of a partition increases, then the control of flanking paths
enclosures etc may often choose materials which have an
becomes more critical. Consequently, the perimeter sealing
efficient sound absorption value and incorporate them
requirements for a low sound rating wall, such as Rw30,
within the building design. The level of sound absorption for
are much less than for a high sound rating wall, such
material is stated as the NRC (Noise Reduction Coefficient).
as Rw60. However, it is neither necessary, nor is it cost
This value is derived as a result of acoustic testing on
effective, to provide very high perimeter acoustic sealing
for a low rating Rw wall. The perimeter isolation for each IMPORTANT: The use of expanding foam sealants is not
leaf must be commensurate with the acoustic isolation of acceptable.
the leaf. It cannot be over emphasised, however, that for high
Reference should be made to the manufacturer to ensure
performance walls, the sealing of each leaf must be virtually
the particular type or grade of sealant is suitable for the
airtight.
purpose.
For a sealant to be effective at controlling noise passing
through gaps, it must have the following properties. Noise Flanking
It is beyond the scope of this manual to provide full details
• Good flexibility, elastic set
for control of all flanking paths. However, flanking can
• Low hardness significantly reduce the perceived isolation of a wall system
• Excellent adhesion, usually to concrete, timber, plaster and should therefore be given careful consideration.
and galvanised steel
Typical flanking paths are shown in the Fig D1.
• Minimal shrinkage (less than 5%)
• Moderate density (greater than 800kg/m3), and
• Fire rated where required (All walls required by the BCA Acoustic Performance On-Site
to be sound rated also have fire ratings)
Laboratory Test results are achieved under ideal controlled
All of the above properties must be maintained over the conditions, and estimates are calculated from known
useful life of the building, that is, greater than 20 years. performance, experience and computer simulation programs.
To repeat the performance in the field, attention to detail in
Examples of a suitable sealant include:
the design and construction of the partition and its adjoining
• Bostik Findley — Fireban One floor/ ceiling and associated structure is of prime importance.
• Boral Plasterboard Fyreflex Even the most basic principles, if ignored, can seriously
• Boral Plasterboard WR Sealant downgrade the sound insulation performance of a building
element.
• Tremco synthetic rubber acoustical sealant
• Some silicone sealants and
• Some acrylic latex sealants
Through
ceilings and the
above ceiling
cavity
Through
perimeter joints
between the wall
and floor, or the
wall and ceiling
(or underside of
the floor slab) or
wall junctions
Through back to
back cupboards
Through light
switches, or GPO's,
located in the wall,
poor sealing at
penetrations
Through floors
and the below
floor crawl
space
Noise paths
through lightweight
panel doors
Noise paths
through vents
Noise paths
through gaps
1 E
Fire and Acoustic Systems
PAGE
BOOK 1 E2
Product
Name Product Introduction
and Application Product Specific
Information Acoustic Test Results
Product Icons with
and Wall Lining System
dimensions for
Information
products available
in your region/state Product Identification
PAGE
BOOK
PAGE
BOOK
1 E4 1 E5
110
390
140mm thicknesses and in a range of standard clips were compared on the
same wall. The standard clips are much
181mm
194mm
• Tontine TSB5 insulation in cavity.
Specifications
Maximum Slenderness Ratio (Srf) Rw (Estimate or *Tested) Rw+Ctr
Unit Nº Nº Insulation (minutes) With Lining System
Product ƒ ’ uc Wt per per FRL (minutes) { | } ~ for
Code TxLxH (mm) MPa kg m2 Pallet 60 90 120 180 240 IMPACT
120.715 FL 110x230x76 3 2.6 48.5 400 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
120
12.162.01 FL 110x390x162 3 7.1 14.6 150 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
120
15.709 FL 140x190x390 3 11.6 12.5 150 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
180
Product
Specifications
Fire and Acoustic Systems
PAGE
BOOK
1 E3
When information is provided in the table, it is tabulated,
Acoustic Systems Data
under the System Headings of , , , , and .
Acoustic performance information for six of the most popular
The following Table details the wall lining and insulation
wall lining systems may be provided within the Product
information for these six systems, and provides thickness
Specification Tables on the following product pages.
information to assist wall thickness calculation.
Alternatively, you may be referred to more detailed test
Acoustic performance estimates have been calculated by
information and alternative lining systems.
Wilkinson Murray (Acoustic Consultants).
+84mm
• 1 x 13mm Boral Plasterboard daub fixed or • 28mm furring channel at 600mm centres
+77mm
• Boral Impact Clips at 1200mm centres
• Tontine TSB3 insulation in cavity
• 1 x 13mm Boral Plasterboard screw fixed • 1 x 13mm Boral Plasterboard screw fixed
• 28mm furring channel at 600mm centres • 28mm furring channel at 600mm centres
•
•
Standard Clips at 1200mm centres
Tontine TSB2 insulation in cavity
Masonry
Thickness
+98mm
•
•
Boral Impact Clips at 1200mm centres
Tontine TSB3 insulation in cavity
• 1 x 13mm Boral Plasterboard screw fixed • 1 x 13mm Boral Plasterboard screw fixed
• 28mm furring channel at 600mm centres • 64mm steel studs at 600mm centres
• Standard Clips at 1200mm centres Masonry • 20mm gap required for impact rating
Thickness
• Tontine TSB2 insulation in cavity +140mm
• Tontine TSB5 insulation in cavity
Acousti
c Estim
ate s with
these L Ratio (Srf) Rw (Estimate or *Tested) Rw+Ctr
ining System utes) With Lining System
s
) { | } ~ for
Fire and Acoustic Systems
PAGE
BOOK
1 E4
230
76
Boral FireLight bricks are manufactured
from a low-density material which
provides high fire rated performance
CONSIDERATIONS
The first 2 tests on the following
page E5 comply with the BCA:2005
2.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
110
120.715 FL
and minimum weight for non-
loadbearing applications.
110
12.162.01 FL
390
140mm thicknesses and in a range of
size formats to suit fire and/or acoustic
wall construction in brick and block
standard clips were compared on the
same wall. The standard clips are much
more economical than impact clips. Performance
coursing. The 3rd test complies with BCA, Part
intersection
This system, with the impact clip,
190
140
390
FIRE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
FireLight is a fire tested lightweight
concrete block which is unique to
also complies with the current BCA
Queensland Appendix requirement for
wet-to-dry walls.
2.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
15.709 FL
(made to order) Boral, and provides excellent fire
rating characteristics. Please refer to
the fire performance characteristics in
The 4th and 5th tests comply with
BCA, Part F5 requirements of Rw + ctr
> 50, for unit-to-unit walls requiring
of product
row and
the specification table. an impact rating (a wall separating
a wet area of one unit from a dry
area in another unit). This system
easily complies with the current BCA
Availability
• Lead time 0-2 weeks.
Queensland Appendix requirement for
all unit-to-unit walls (Rw 45 and 50).
lining system
Specifications
Unit Nº Nº
Maximum Slenderness Ratio (Srf) Rw (Estimate or *Tested) Rw+Ctr
Insulation (minutes) With Lining System
column
Product ƒ’ uc Wt per per FRL (minutes) { | } ~ for
Code TxLxH (mm) MPa kg m2 Pallet 60 90 120 180 240 IMPACT
120.715 FL 110x230x76 3 2.6 48.5 400 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
120
12.162.01 FL 110x390x162 3 7.1 14.6 150 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
120
15.709 FL 140x190x390 3 11.6 12.5 150 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
180
PAGE
BOOK 1 E4
Specifications
Maximum Slenderness Ratio (Srf) Rw (Estimate or *Tested) Rw+Ctr
Unit Nº Nº Insulation (minutes) With Lining System
Product ƒ ’ uc Wt per per FRL (minutes) for
Code TxLxH (mm) MPa kg m2 Pallet 60 90 120 180 240 IMPACT
120.715 FL 110x230x76 3 2.6 48.5 400 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
120
12.162.01 FL110x390x162 3 7.1 14.6 150 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
120
15.709 FL 140x190x390 3 11.6 12.5 150 29.0 26.9 24.9 22.2 20.3 47 52 58 56 62 50
180
PAGE
BOOK
1 E5
PAGE
BOOK 1 E6
Specifications
Maximum Slenderness Ratio (Srf) Rw (Estimate or *Tested) Rw+Ctr
Unit Insulation (minutes) With Lining System
Product ƒ ’ uc Mass FRL (minutes) for
Code Type MPa kg 60 90 120 180 240 Impact
10.01 Hollow 15 11.1 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 46 46 50 57 55 60
10.31 Solid 15 14.5 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 47 47 51 58 56 61
60
12.709 Hollow 15 13.3 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 46 46 50 57 55 60
90
15.01 Hollow 15 13.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 47 47 51 58 56 61
(no grout fill) 60
15.709 Reduced Core 15 17.8 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 50 48* 54 61* 61* 64 51
120
20.01^ Hollow 15 16.0 18.0 17.0 16.0 15.5 15.0 48 48 52 59 57 62 50
90^
15.48 Reinforced 15 12.5 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 53 51 56 63 61 66 52
and Grout Filled 120
20.48 Reinforced 15 14.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 56 55 60 67 65 69 54
and Grout Filled 240 Rw + Ctr = 50
PAGE
BOOK
1 E7
48
(-2, -7) • Bare wall. • Bare wall, 140mm thick, reduced cores.
271
140mm
PAGE
BOOK 1 E8
Series 150
Full Height Core Fill Block
Series 200
Full Height Core Fill Block
190 190
390 390
190 190
20.01 20.48
Full ‘H’ Block
Series 300
Core Fill Block
190
290 390
30.48
‘H’ Block
Fire and Acoustic Systems
PAGE
BOOK
1 E9
Specifications
Maximum Slenderness Ratio (Srf) Rw (Estimate or *Tested) Rw+Ctr
Unit Nº Insulation (minutes) With Lining System
Product ƒ ’ uc mass per FRL (minutes) for
Code TxLxH (mm) MPa kg m2 60 90 120 180 240
Impact
120.715 B 110x230x76 10 4.0 48.5 22.5 21.0 20.0 18.0 17.0 48 46 51 56 55 62 50
Standard Solid 90
120.796 B 110x230x162 10 7.1 24.3 22.5 21.0 20.0 18.0 17.0 46 46 51 55 54 61
Speed-E Cored 90
120.162.01 B 110x390x162 10 10.4 14.6 22.5 21.0 20.0 18.0 17.0 45 45* 51 55* 54 61
Rippa Block 90
Refer to Lining Systems on Page E3. Impact = Complies with BCA requirement for Impact Sound Resistance.
Additional Insulation with Lining System (10mm render both sides).
Fire and Acoustic Systems
PAGE
BOOK 1 E10
162
76 162
45
(-2, -5) • 1 x 10mm Boral Plasterboard daub fixed. • 1 x 10mm Boral Plasterboard daub fixed.
RMIT 01-070
136mm
PAGE
BOOK
1 E11
NOTES
Customer support
Queensland
1. Stock colours Colours other than stock colours are made ‘to’ order.
Not all colours displayed in this brochure are available in all states.
(Contact your nearest Boral Masonry office for your area’s stock colours.)
A surcharge applies to orders less than the set minimum quantity.
2. Brochure colours The printed colours in this Masonry Design Guide are
only a guide. Please ask to see a sample of your colour/texture before
specifying or ordering.
3. Colour and texture variation The supply of raw materials can vary
over time. In addition, variation can occur between product types and
production batches.
5. For a full set of Terms and Conditions of Sale please contact your
nearest Boral Masonry sales office.
Orders, product samples and sales enquiries Other regional sales offices