INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY:
The Indian Automobile Industry has got a tremendous market potential. With the growth of
population and change in their pattern of life style as a result of urbanization, there has been a
rapid increase in demand for automobiles among Indians. The growing demand for cars,
together with the increasing number of manufacturers due to the liberalized policy of the
government, has resulted in the increasing competition among the manufacturers. This, in
turn, has necessitated the diversification of their activities synchronizing with the concept of
modern technology. Above all, it has also been realized that the major strategy of
withstanding the stiff competition is not only to retain the old customers but also to attract the
new customers through provision of quality of goods and services.
Hence, in recent times, provision of better and quality products to customers has become one
of the focal points in the service agenda of manufacturers due to the realization that it is only
the quality of the products provided that could help the manufacturers to attract more and
more of customers in a competitive marketing environment.
Fornell, 1992- discussed that customer satisfaction will be influenced if the demand and
supply are different. Satisfaction will be low when the customer demand is heterogeneous
and the supply is homogeneous. To retain customer, switching barrier and customer
satisfaction are the two basic forms which need to be fulfilled.
Rajan, Vijaya (2005) in their study mentioned that easier and faster mobility of
people and goods across the region, countries and continents is a cherished yeatning
of mankind. The automobile industry, particularly the light commercial vehicle
segment potential for facilitating this mobility with reference to both passengers and
freight movement is enormous. Wheels of development across the globe would have
to be powered by this industry.
Dr.V.K.Kaushik and Neeraj Kaushik [south west haryana] in their study on brand
preference and recommendations on various cars. Hyundai and maruthi dominates
this market region. Consumers in this region are influenced by friends, family, and
relatives rather than by dealer and sales persons. Consumers are happy with its
performance, quality, dealer networks, after sales services provided and they are ready
to recommend it to others also. Brand name, fuel efficiency and price were found to
be primary determinant for buying cars in this region.
Chidambram Etal (2004) in his opinion the consumer given more importance to fuel
efficiency than other factors. They believe that the brand name tells them something
about products quality, utility, technology and them he likes. The consumers satisfied
with their cars for high fuel efficiency, good quality, technology durability and
reasonable price.
(Novikova, 2009; Angelova and Zekiri, 2011) It cannot be denied that a satisfied
consumer has a tendency to buy more than a less satisfied one. In a highly competitive
market, customer satisfaction is, indeed, a crucial key that builds strong and long-term
relationships between the customers and the firm. The measure of customer
satisfaction, therefore, has become a vital concern for many companies and services
providers to achieve such success
Kassem (1989) has opined that service companies can ill afford to neglect customer
service quality issues. In the past, quality was the prerogative of manufacturing sector.
However, in the modern day fiercely competitive service sector, quality of services
has become as important (if not more) as quality of goods.
Pyanne and Ballantyne (1991) have observed that satisfied banking customers
initially become friends of the bank, then they become supporters and finally
advocates. Thus, the starting point of any relationship marketing endeavour of any
bank should be to leave no stone unturned in satisfying customers to a desired extent.
This, in turn, is possible if and only if the bank is keeping a ‘service quality’ focus.
Rust and Zoharik (1993) have developed a mathematical model for assessing the
value that any bank could attach to different elements of customer satisfaction. They
have suggested that banks may adopt their model to get the best result of their
endeavour leading to customer satisfaction.
Keavency (1995) has noticed that factors such as core service failure, service
encounter failure and inappropriate pricing as most important factors contributing to
‘Customer Switch’ in banking industry. The author has recommended following ways
to avoid customer churn.
Yavas et al., (1997) in their study have revealed a positive relationship between
customers’ satisfaction through service quality and their long term commitment to the
bank. Further, the relationship between service quality and complaint behaviour of the
customers, was found to be negative. Better the quality, lower will be the number of
complaints received from the customers and vice-versa.
Sarkar and Das (1997) have compared the productivity of public, private and foreign
banks operating in Indian and have observed that public sector banks are lagging way
behind the other banks on this front.
Seal (1998) has asserted that marketing endeavors of banking players should be
directed towards maximization of trust amongst all stakeholders. He further advocated
for pursuance of ‘System delivery Approach’ of marketing.
Sarkar et al., (1998) have observed that foreign banks operating in India are more
productive followed by Indian private and public sector banks. One of the prominent
reasons behind such a difference is that foreign banks, to a greater extent and Indian
private banks, to a lesser extent have confined their operations to metropolitan and
other big and lucrative places.
Leonard (1991) has opined that investment in employees in banking sector leads to
better service quality, which in turn leads to better customer retention. This assertion
is based in the fact that employees of the banks are inseparable to customers. A direct
interaction between them demands that employees are possessing adequate skills to
interact with customers. Such skills add to the service quality and go a long way in
preventing customers’ churn.
Pyanne and Ballantyne (1991) have observed that satisfied banking customers
initially become friends of the bank, then they become supporters and finally
advocates. Thus, the starting point of any relationship marketing endeavour of any
bank should be to leave no stone unturned in satisfying customers to a desired extent.
This, in turn, is possible if and only if the bank is keeping a ‘service quality’ focus.
Rust and Zoharik (1993) have developed a mathematical model for assessing the
value that any bank could attach to different elements of customer satisfaction. They
have suggested that banks may adopt their model to get the best result of their
endeavour leading to customer satisfaction.
Keavency (1995) has noticed that factors such as core service failure, service
encounter failure and inappropriate pricing as most important factors contributing to
‘Customer Switch’ in banking industry.
Seal (1998) has asserted that marketing endeavors of banking players should be
directed towards maximization of trust amongst all stakeholders. He further advocated
for pursuance of ‘System delivery Approach’ of marketing.