Anda di halaman 1dari 38

G-MAX TEST REPORT

CLIENT REPORT NUMBER


FIELDTURF USA Inc. 2016-086
8088 Montview Road
Montreal, Quebec Canada
H4P 2L7 Date 06-28-2016

DESCRIPTION

An independent analysis of a synthetic turf system relative to G-max was requested by the client. The Test was
performed by a Licensed Professional Engineer at the below referenced location with ASTM certified and calibrated
equipment via Triax “A” Missile SN30-9887 1683. The Test Methods are as follows;

Method A - ASTM F 355, Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials.
ASTM F 1936-10, Standard Specification for Shock-Absorbing Properties of North American Football Field
Playing Systems as Measured on the Field, (G-max)

The particulars of this on-site analysis are described below.

TEST INFORMATION
Test Date - 6-28-16
Project Name - Gaithersburg High School – Stadium Field Time of Test - 9:25
Site address – 101 Education Blvd., Gaithersburg, MD 20877 Weather - Sunny, 85°F
Test Type - Onsite G-max Test - 10 Locations Installation Date - N/A
Field Type – Football Field (Fieldturf sand/rubber) Field Temp - 95°F Average

TEST RESULTS
The following test results indicate G-max values for ten individual locations with three separate tests performed at
each location. A table has been provided indicating the values associated with each test and a location map showing
the ten individual tests at designated and described locations. The test results reported herein reflects the
conditions of the tested field at the time and temperatures noted.

TEST CONCLUSION
The Synthetic Turf Stadium Athletic Field at Gaithersburg High School as characterized above and in the following
report has been verified to be in compliance and meets the requirements for play based on the specifications as
referenced in ASTM F1936-10 with all locations below the maximum allowable limit of 200.

Gaithersburg High School


Overall G-max = 123

APPROVED BY - RYAN TEETER, PE - LDD Sports


G-MAX TEST REPORT

Gaithersburg High School - Stadium Field


G-max Values - 06.28.2016

Test Drop 1 Drop 2 Drop 3 Gmax Infill Depth Field Temp


Location Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Average (mm) (°F)
1 125 317 135 368 139 386 137.00 41 95
2 94 214 105 254 107 262 106.00 45 95
3 113 285 125 334 127 340 126.00 45 95
4 115 296 127 347 130 359 128.50 42 95
5 117 281 127 319 127 310 127.00 43 95
6 109 279 121 325 125 335 123.00 42 95
7 128 341 141 395 104 289 122.50 45 95
8 99 234 106 259 106 251 106.00 45 95
9 105 250 119 298 121 306 120.00 44 95
10 125 364 136 418 133 401 134.50 43 95

123 Overall Average G-max

Location Specific Location Description


1 North 0yd line at center of the field
2 North Soccer Goal area at center of field
3 NW 10yd ine at the numbers
4 NW 25yd line at the hashes
5 Midfield at Centerfield
6 SE 25 yd line at the numbers
7 S center of the LAX circle
8 S Soccer Goal area at center of field
9 SW 37yd line at the numbers
10 East sideline at midfield

10

2 1 5 7 8
4 N

9
3
G-MAX TEST REPORT

Location #1 Location #2 Location #3

Location #4 Location #5 Location #6

Location #7 Location #8 Location #9

Location #10
G-MAX TEST REPORT

CLIENT REPORT NUMBER


FIELDTURF USA Inc. 2016-085
8088 Montview Road
Montreal, Quebec Canada
H4P 2L7 Date 06-28-2016

DESCRIPTION

An independent analysis of a synthetic turf relative to G-max was requested by the client. The Test was performed
by a Licensed Professional Engineer at the below referenced location with ASTM certified and calibrated equipment
via Triax “A” Missile SN30-9887 1683. The Test Methods are as follows;

Method A - ASTM F 355, Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials.
ASTM F 1936-10, Standard Specification for Shock-Absorbing Properties of North American Football Field
Playing Systems as Measured on the Field, (G-max)

The particulars of this on-site analysis are described below.

TEST INFORMATION
Test Date - 06-28-2016
Project Name - Paint Branch High School – Football Stadium Time of Test - 11:00am
Site address – 14121 Old Columbia Pike, Burtonsville, MD Weather - Sunny 85°F
Test Type - Onsite G-max Test - 10 Locations Installation Date - N/A
Field Type - Football (Sand & Rubber Infill) Field Temp - 95°F Average

TEST RESULTS
The following test results indicate G-max values for ten individual locations with three separate tests performed at
each location. A table has been provided indicating the values associated with each test and a location map showing
the ten individual tests at designated and described locations. The test results reported herein reflects the
conditions of the tested field at the time and temperatures noted.

TEST CONCLUSION
The Synthetic Turf Stadium Athletic Field at Paint Branch High School (Stadium Field) as characterized above and
in the following report has been verified to be in compliance and meets the requirements for play based on the
specifications as referenced in ASTM F1936-10 with all locations below the maximum allowable limit of 200.

Paint Branch High School – Stadium Football Field


Overall G-max = 135

APPROVED BY - RYAN TEETER, PE - LDD Sports


G-MAX TEST REPORT

Paint Branch High School - Stadium Field


G-max Values - 06.28.2016

Test Drop 1 Drop 2 Drop 3 Gmax Infill Depth Field Temp


Location Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Average (mm) (°F)
1 133 398 149 482 153 505 151.00 43 95
2 112 286 122 340 121 335 121.50 48 95
3 115 327 127 384 129 392 128.00 45 95
4 128 377 143 450 145 448 144.00 47 95
5 114 316 127 379 129 388 128.00 42 95
6 105 256 122 320 124 327 123.00 44 95
7 142 357 171 604 161 511 166.00 42 95
8 115 315 125 364 126 369 125.50 43 95
9 121 345 135 408 136 412 135.50 45 95
10 115 319 126 363 128 370 127.00 47 95

135 Overall Average G-max

Location Specific Location Description


1 North goal line at center of field
2 N Goal area at center of field
3 NW area at 10yd line on the numbers
4 SW area at 25yd line on the hashes
5 Midfield at Centerfield
6 SE 25 yd line at the numbers
7 S top of yellow arc
8 S Soccer Goal area at center of field
9 SW 37yd line at the hashes
10 W sideline at midfield

2 1 5 7 8
4 9 N

10
G-MAX TEST REPORT

Location #1 Location #2 Location #3

Location #4 Location #5 Location #6

Location #7 Location #8 Location #9


Maintenance Summary Report
NAME OF FIELD/SITE: ___________________________________________________________________________
Richard Montgomery

1:00 pm
Time of Arrival: _____________________ 6:30 pm
Time of Departure: ________________________ 09/01/2015
Service Visit Date: ______________________________

Contact Name: _____________________________________________ Advanced Care


Classification of Service: ________________________________________

Phone #: ___________________________________________________ 250 Richard Montgomery Dr, Rockville, MD 20852


Site Address: __________________________________________________

Billing Address: _____________________________________________ Field Square Footage: __________________________________________

GMAX: Y _______ X
N _______ Football
Primary Sports: ___________________________________________________________________________
Jim King
Service Provider/Technicians: __________________________________________________ Dura Spine
Field Fiber Type: _______________________________
2 1/2"
Fiber Height: ________________________________________________ 2009
Install Date: ___________________________________________________
Jim King
Report Submitted by: __________________________________________ Date of Last FC Service Session: ________________________________
(If no date: Please write “NEW FC Customer”)

PRE-FIELD INSPECTION NOTES BY TECHNICIAN (FROM WALKTHROUGH):

- A lot of small debris on field (sunflower seeds, mulch, & trash)


- (11) repairs found

MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED: ■ STANDARD CARE ADVANCED CARE OTHER ________________________________

Aggressive Brushing / Leveling General Field Sweeping Anti-Microbial Spray Standard Infill Decompaction
(Not to exceed 1 inch depth)
Static Brush ■ Field Metal Magnet Sweep Anti-Static Spray
Power Static Brushing Static Drag Mat ■ Refill Infill in High Traffic Areas ■ Tier 2 Decompaction
((Rubber/Sand Infill Mix > 250lbs (Deep-Tine Decompaction)
■ Power Brush & Vac Gmax Testing = Additional Charge for Material/Labor).

■ 3-Step Deep Power Grooming ■ Power Broom ■ Total Vegetation Control Infill Cleaning / Sifting / Fiber
(Only advanced care) (Perimeter edges & specialty areas) (Perimeter edge only) Rejuvenation

Post Maintenance Field Inspection: Inlays/Seams/Field Markings FIELD INSPECTION:


11
Number of minor repairs: Pre-Service Inspection. : __________
1. Logo Analysis ■ . Infill - Consistency in Depth
Number of minor repairs: Post-Service Inspection : __________
0
Qty: # of total repairs: _____
11 Estimated # of linear feet repaired: ______
8 ■ 2. Seam Separation Analysis . Infill - Migration Analysis
Picture Submission: ■
Warranty Billable ■ 3. Perimeter Anchoring ■ . Inlaid Line Analysis
Minor inlay and/or seam repairs conducted:
Turf Replacement:

POST MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN NOTES:


- Replaced 4' white soccer line, blue "X" in center, yellow soccer penalty kick line, & hot glued (8) loose inlays
- Added rubber to both goal boxes
- Collected (2) bags of debris & a little bit of metal from field

INFILL LEVELS CHECKED PRE MAINTENANCE: INFILL LEVELS CHECKED POST MAINTENANCE:
Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE

Primary: 41 41 14 42 41 42 42 41 42 42 42 Primary: 43 42 43 44 44 43 44 43 43 44 43

Additional: 1:00 pm
Time of Day: ________________ Additional: 6:00 pm
Time of Day: ________________
Primary: The selection of test point locations will be determined by the primary sport.
Additional: Locations determined by the secondary sport.

Reviewed by FieldTurf Personnel: ________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________

Information P: (800) 724-2969 | F: (514) 340-9374 | E: fieldcare@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com


1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Test Performed By: Jeff Clise Report No.: 16-019-1


on behalf of Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

General Project Information Date of Test: 7/11/2016 (hot, sunny)


Project Name: Richard Montgomery High School Football Field
Project Address: 250 Richard Montgomery Drive, Rockville, MD 20852
Contact Name: Chamy Wijeratne, Athletic Director
Contact Phone: 301-610-8075
Contact Email: Chamara_U_Wijeratne@mcpsmd.org

Field Conditions and Description of Field on Date of Test


Field Play Configuration: Football, Soccer, Lacrosse
Field Orientation: NE, SW (End to End)
Field Surface Type: 2.5” Duraspine Manufacturer: FieldTurf Installation Date: 8/2008
Field Planarity: noted in observations

Test Infill Temperature (F.) Drop Drop Drop Average


Point Depth Air Field No. 1 No. 2 No. 3 Drop
(mm) (2 and 3)
1 37 89 139 159.32 170.31 170.35 170.33
2 35 89 130 172.55 185.81 190.73 188.27
3 36 89 152 145.83 156.95 156.39 156.67
4 35 89 151 154.23 167.56 171.25 169.41
5 32 89 145 165.20 174.59 184.32 179.46
6 38 89 125 136.26 145.60 146.55 146.08
7 37 89 130 155.46 167.23 168.34 167.79
8 38 89 120 139.90 149.41 151.80 150.61
9 28 89 147 191.21 194.05 198.84 196.45
10 41 89 155 115.45 119.66 123.23 121.45
Average GMAX Value for Entire Field 164.65
Values in Bold/Red Exceed the ASTM Maximum Allowed G-MAX of 200
ASTM Specified Drop Height: 2’ Producing an Impact Velocity 11.35 FPS ± 0.56
Test Method: ASTM F 355, Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials.
ASTM F1936-10, Standard Specification for Impact Attenuation of Turf Playing Systems as measured in the Field (G-MAX)
Test equipment calibrated February 2016.

Report Summary

Introduction:
An independent analysis of the FieldTurf synthetic playing surface, relative to gmax and general field conditions, was
requested by the client. G-MAX Testing and Field Inspections were performed on the Project Field Richard Montgomery
High School Football Field on July 11, 2016.
Ten separate locations were tested for G-MAX values. Each test location had three G-MAX tests performed in order to
obtain the average G-MAX. The tests were performed using ASTM certified and calibrated equipment, and were
performed at locations on the field as determined by the ASTM F 1936-10 Specifications. The test results reported herein
reflect the performance of the points tested at the time of testing and at the temperatures reported.

Findings/Recommendations:
No site abnormalities were found and there were no deviations from standard test procedures. All test points met the
requirement of less than 200 average G-MAX when tested except for those indicated by Bold Red and shown in the Test
Result G-Max Table.

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
2

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Project Name: Richard Montgomery High School Football Field Report No.: 16-019-1
Date of Test: 7/11/2016

Test Point Location Diagram (Football Field)


Sideline D (Baseball Fields)

5 10
(School) End A 1 2 9 End B (Tennis Court)

4 7

3
6
Sideline C (Grass Field)
Test No. Test Point Location Description
1 End Zone A 6’From Goal Line Along Center Line of Field
2 End Zone A Goal Line at Center of Field
3 End A 10 Yard Line at Numbers Along Sideline C
4 End A 25 Yard Line at the Hash Marks Along Sideline C
5 50 Yard Line at Center of Field
6 50 Yard Line at Side Line C
7 End B 35 Yard Line at the Hash Marks Along Sideline C
8 End B 25 Yard Line at the Numbers Along Sideline D
9 End B 12 Yard Line Center of Field
10 End Zone B 6’ From Back of End Zone Along Center Line of Field
*All test point locations are in accordance with ASTM specifications, but performed in sequence determined by tester.

Contact Discussions
Field Use: Football, Soccer, Lacrosse Frequency of Use: Heavy, Daily
Maintenance Schedule: Clean 2xyr, Groom 3xyr – King Sports Maintenance Equipment: Unknown
Turf Condition (Standing, Starting to Lay Over, Laying Over, Excess Fiber Wear, Inlays)
Goal Area: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber Wear Creases/Penalty Kick: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber
Wear
Center Field: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber Wear Logo/Colored Areas: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber
Wear
Sidelines: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber Wear Inlays: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber Wear
Access Points to Field: Laying Over, Matted Down, Excess Fiber Wear
General
Field Accessibility: Multiple Field Security: 6’ Fence
Sporting Event Accessories and Maintenance Equipment Storage: Off Field

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
3

Observations/Recommendations: This field is laying over, matted down, the fibers are shedding and are showing signs of
excess fiber wear (especially in high wear areas – creases, penalty kicks, front of goals, center of field, etc.). The inlay lines are heavily
worn, more so than the green body of the field, and are brittle and breaking off. The field appears to receive a tremendous amount of
play. The field has had several repairs made to it (see photos). There were several “plugs” missing from field at area of soccer goals.
Also, additional infill is needed at creases, center of field, and at corner kick areas. I contacted King Sports and had them come out to
repair plugs and add infill to high wear areas. There are invasive grasses encroaching along the edges of the field that need to be
sprayed with Round-Up. There are also signs of slight planarity changes at several of the high wear areas (center of field, creases, and
penalty kick lines). They are not significant at this time, however, should be monitored. The shedding fiber, especially the inlays, need
to be monitored closely to see if the condition worsens. Continue annual GMAX testing to ensure proper performance of field. This
field is approaching the 8 year warranty period, I would make plans for replacement in the near future.

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
4

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Impact Test Data Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS Date of Test: 7/11/2016
(Acceleration Time Curve) Report No.: 16-019-1 Test Performed By: Jeff Clise

Test Point No. 1 Test Point No.1 Test Point No.1


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 2 Test Point No. 2 Test Point No. 2


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 3 Test Point No. 3 Test Point No. 3


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 4 Test Point No. 4 Test Point No. 4


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 5 Test Point No. 5 Test Point No. 5


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 6 Test Point No. 6 Test Point No. 6


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 7 Test Point No. 7 Test Point No. 7


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 8 Test Point No. 8 Test Point No. 8


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 9 Test Point No. 9 Test Point No. 9


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Test Point No. 10 Test Point No. 10 Test Point No. 10


Drop Point No. 1 Drop Point No. 2 Drop Point No. 3

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
5

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Test Point Location Photographs

Project Name: Richard Montgomery High School Football Field


Date of Test: 7/11/2016
Report No.: 16-019-1

Test No. 1

Test No. 2 Test No. 3 Test No. 4

Test No. 5 Test No. 6 Test No. 7

Test No. 8 Test No. 9 Test No. 10

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
6

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
7

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
8

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
9

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
10

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
11

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
12

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
13

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
14

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
15

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
16

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
17

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
18

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc.

G-MAX Test and Field Inspection Report

Location Photographs
Project Name: Richard Montgomery HS FB Field Date of Test: 7/11/16 Report No.: 16-019-1

Athletic Field Consultants, Inc. ∙ P. O. Box 323, Queenstown, MD 21658 ∙ athleticfieldconsultantsinc@gmail.com


Jeff Clise (301) 908-3526
G-MAX TEST REPORT

CLIENT REPORT NUMBER


FIELDTURF USA Inc. 2016-088
8088 Montview Road
Montreal, Quebec Canada
H4P 2L7 Date 06-30-2016

DESCRIPTION

An independent analysis of a synthetic turf relative to G-max was requested by the client. The Test was performed
by a Licensed Professional Engineer at the below referenced location with ASTM certified and calibrated equipment
via Triax “A” Missile SN30-9887 1683. The Test Methods are as follows;

Method A - ASTM F 355, Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials.
ASTM F 1936-10, Standard Specification for Shock-Absorbing Properties of North American Football Field
Playing Systems as Measured on the Field, (G-max)

The particulars of this on-site analysis are described below.

TEST INFORMATION
Test Date - 06-28-2016
Project Name – Richard Montgomery High School Time of Test - 9:00am
Site address – 250 Richard Montgomery Drive, Rockville, MD Weather - Sunny 85°F
Test Type - Onsite G-max Test - 10 Locations Installation Date - N/A
Field Type - Football (Sand & Rubber Infill) Field Temp - 95°F Average

TEST RESULTS
The following test results indicate G-max values for ten individual locations with three separate tests performed at
each location. A table has been provided indicating the values associated with each test and a location map showing
the ten individual tests at designated and described locations. The test results reported herein reflects the
conditions of the tested field at the time and temperatures noted.

TEST CONCLUSION
The Synthetic Turf Stadium Athletic Field at Richard Montgomery High School as characterized above and in the
following report has been verified to be out of compliance and does not meet the requirements for play based
on the specifications as referenced in ASTM F1936-10 with locations above the maximum allowable limit of 200.

Richard Montgomery HS – Stadium Football Field


Overall G-max = 188

APPROVED BY - RYAN TEETER, PE - LDD Sports


G-MAX TEST REPORT
Richard Montgomery HS
G-max Values - 6.28.16

Drop 1 Drop 2 Drop 3 Infill Field


Test Gmax
Depth Temp
Location Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Average
(mm) (°F)
1 214 802 226 880 225 878 225.50 32 95
2 187 664 197 727 199 733 198.00 35 95
3 160 532 174 610 174 610 174.00 40 95
4 154 509 170 603 172 613 171.00 39 95
5 175 608 186 675 185 669 185.50 32 95
6 142 455 155 526 157 537 156.00 40 95
7 238 959 253 1069 246 1024 249.50 20 95
8 201 747 214 820 211 798 212.50 34 95
9 148 482 163 565 165 576 164.00 40 95
10 139 447 148 491 149 494 148.50 42 95

188 Overall Average G-max

Location Specific Location Description


1 N Penalty Kick at center of the field
2 N Goal area at center of field
3 NW 10yd line at numbers
4 NW 25yd line at hashes
5 Midfield at Centerfield
6 SE 25 yd line at the numbers
7 S center of the LAX circle
8 S Soccer Goal area at center of field
9 SW 37yd line at the hashes
10 East sideline at midfield

10

2 1 5 7 8
4 9 N

3
G-MAX TEST REPORT

Location #1 Location #2 Location #3

Location #4 Location #5 Location #6

Location #7 Location #8 Location #9

Location #10
Maintenance Summary Report
Richard Montgomery High School
NAME OF FIELD/SITE: ___________________________________________________________________________
11:00 am
Time of Arrival: _____________________ 5:00 pm
Time of Departure: ________________________ 03/31/2016
Service Visit Date: ______________________________
Chamy
Contact Name: _____________________________________________ Advanced Care
Classification of Service: ________________________________________
(202)-390-7990
Phone #: ___________________________________________________ 250 Richard Montgomery Drive, Rockville, MD 20852
Site Address: __________________________________________________

Billing Address: _____________________________________________ 91,300 sqft


Field Square Footage: __________________________________________

GMAX: Y _______ X
N _______ Football & Soccer
Primary Sports: ___________________________________________________________________________
Jim King
Service Provider/Technicians: __________________________________________________ Dura Spine
Field Fiber Type: _______________________________
2 1/2"
Fiber Height: ________________________________________________ 2008
Install Date: ___________________________________________________
Jim King
Report Submitted by: __________________________________________ 9/1/2015
Date of Last FC Service Session: ________________________________
(If no date: Please write “NEW FC Customer”)

PRE-FIELD INSPECTION NOTES BY TECHNICIAN (FROM WALKTHROUGH):

- A lot of tree debris (twigs & leaves), sunflower seeds, & trash on field
- (8) loose inlays found
- Lacrosse goal creases running low on rubber

MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED: STANDARD CARE ■ ADVANCED CARE OTHER ________________________________

■ Aggressive Brushing / Leveling General Field Sweeping Anti-Microbial Spray ■ Standard Infill Decompaction
(Not to exceed 1 inch depth)
■ Static Brush ■ Field Metal Magnet Sweep Anti-Static Spray
■ Power Static Brushing Static Drag Mat ■ Refill Infill in High Traffic Areas Tier 2 Decompaction
((Rubber/Sand Infill Mix > 250lbs (Deep-Tine Decompaction)
■ Power Brush & Vac Gmax Testing = Additional Charge for Material/Labor).

■ 3-Step Deep Power Grooming ■ Power Broom ■ Total Vegetation Control ■ Infill Cleaning / Sifting / Fiber
(Only advanced care) (Perimeter edges & specialty areas) (Perimeter edge only) Rejuvenation

Post Maintenance Field Inspection: Inlays/Seams/Field Markings FIELD INSPECTION:


8
Number of minor repairs: Pre-Service Inspection. : __________ ■ 1. Logo Analysis ■ . Infill - Consistency in Depth
0
Number of minor repairs: Post-Service Inspection : __________
8
Qty: # of total repairs: _____ 3
Estimated # of linear feet repaired: ______ ■ 2. Seam Separation Analysis ■ . Infill - Migration Analysis
Picture Submission: ■
Warranty Billable ■ 3. Perimeter Anchoring ■ . Inlaid Line Analysis
Minor inlay and/or seam repairs conducted:
Turf Replacement:

POST MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN NOTES:


- Collected (7) bags of debris & a lot of metal from field
- Hot glued (8) loose inlays & added rubber
- Added rubber to Lacrosse creases

INFILL LEVELS CHECKED PRE MAINTENANCE: INFILL LEVELS CHECKED POST MAINTENANCE:
Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE

Primary: 42 42 41 43 43 42 42 41 42 42 42 Primary: 43 43 43 43 44 44 43 42 43 43 43

Additional: 11:00 am
Time of Day: ________________ Additional: 4:30 pm
Time of Day: ________________
Primary: The selection of test point locations will be determined by the primary sport.
Additional: Locations determined by the secondary sport.

Tiffany Boileau
Reviewed by FieldTurf Personnel: ________________________________________________________________ 4/19/2016
Date: _________________________________

Information P: (800) 724-2969 | F: (514) 340-9374 | E: fieldcare@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com


Maintenance Summary Report
Walter Johnson HS
NAME OF FIELD/SITE: ___________________________________________________________________________
9:00 am
Time of Arrival: _____________________ 3:00 pm
Time of Departure: ________________________ 03/21/2016
Service Visit Date: ______________________________
Tom Rodgers
Contact Name: _____________________________________________ Advanced Care
Classification of Service: ________________________________________
(240)-476-1720
Phone #: ___________________________________________________ 6400 Rock Spring Dr, Bethesda, MD 20814
Site Address: __________________________________________________

Billing Address: _____________________________________________ 94,058 sqft


Field Square Footage: __________________________________________

GMAX: Y _______ X
N _______ Football & Soccer
Primary Sports: ___________________________________________________________________________
Jim King
Service Provider/Technicians: __________________________________________________ Duraspine
Field Fiber Type: _______________________________
2 1/2"
Fiber Height: ________________________________________________ 4/8/2010
Install Date: ___________________________________________________
Jim King
Report Submitted by: __________________________________________ 8/22/15
Date of Last FC Service Session: ________________________________
(If no date: Please write “NEW FC Customer”)

PRE-FIELD INSPECTION NOTES BY TECHNICIAN (FROM WALKTHROUGH):

- A lot of wear in lacrosse creases


- Little bit of debris on field
- (26) loose inlays found
Lax creases low on rubber

MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED: STANDARD CARE ■ ADVANCED CARE OTHER ________________________________

■ Aggressive Brushing / Leveling General Field Sweeping Anti-Microbial Spray Standard Infill Decompaction
(Not to exceed 1 inch depth)
Static Brush ■ Field Metal Magnet Sweep Anti-Static Spray
Power Static Brushing Static Drag Mat ■ Refill Infill in High Traffic Areas ■ Tier 2 Decompaction
((Rubber/Sand Infill Mix > 250lbs (Deep-Tine Decompaction)
■ Power Brush & Vac Gmax Testing = Additional Charge for Material/Labor).

3-Step Deep Power Grooming ■ Power Broom ■ Total Vegetation Control ■ Infill Cleaning / Sifting / Fiber
(Only advanced care) (Perimeter edges & specialty areas) (Perimeter edge only) Rejuvenation

Post Maintenance Field Inspection: Inlays/Seams/Field Markings FIELD INSPECTION:


26
Number of minor repairs: Pre-Service Inspection. : __________
1. Logo Analysis ■ . Infill - Consistency in Depth
0
Number of minor repairs: Post-Service Inspection : __________
26
Qty: # of total repairs: _____ 12
Estimated # of linear feet repaired: ______ ■ 2. Seam Separation Analysis . Infill - Migration Analysis
Picture Submission: ■
Warranty Billable ■ 3. Perimeter Anchoring ■ . Inlaid Line Analysis
Minor inlay and/or seam repairs conducted:
Turf Replacement:

POST MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN NOTES:


- (5) bags of debris and a little bit of metal collected from field
- Added rubber to lax creases & center face off area
- Hot glued (26) repairs & added rubber
- Cleaned sand from sand pit off turf

INFILL LEVELS CHECKED PRE MAINTENANCE: INFILL LEVELS CHECKED POST MAINTENANCE:
Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE

Primary: 42 41 41 41 42 43 43 42 42 43 42 Primary: 43 42 42 42 42 44 44 43 44 43 42.9

Additional: 9:00 am
Time of Day: ________________ Additional: 2:30 pm
Time of Day: ________________
Primary: The selection of test point locations will be determined by the primary sport.
Additional: Locations determined by the secondary sport.

Tiffany Boileau
Reviewed by FieldTurf Personnel: ________________________________________________________________ 3/23/2016
Date: _________________________________

Information P: (800) 724-2969 | F: (514) 340-9374 | E: fieldcare@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com


G-MAX TEST REPORT

CLIENT REPORT NUMBER


FIELDTURF USA Inc. 2016-087
8088 Montview Road
Montreal, Quebec Canada
H4P 2L7 Date 06-28-2016

DESCRIPTION

An independent analysis of a synthetic turf relative to G-max was requested by the client. The Test was performed
by a Licensed Professional Engineer at the below referenced location with ASTM certified and calibrated equipment
via Triax “A” Missile SN30-9887 1683. The Test Methods are as follows;

Method A - ASTM F 355, Test Method for Shock-Absorbing Properties of Playing Surface Systems and Materials.
ASTM F 1936-10, Standard Specification for Shock-Absorbing Properties of North American Football Field
Playing Systems as Measured on the Field, (G-max)

The particulars of this on-site analysis are described below.

TEST INFORMATION
Test Date - 06-28-2016
Project Name – Thomas S. Wootton High School Time of Test - 8:00am
Site address – 2100 Wootton Pkwy, Rockville, MD 20850 Weather - Sunny 85°F
Test Type - Onsite G-max Test - 10 Locations Installation Date - N/A
Field Type - Football (Sand & Rubber Infill) Field Temp - 95°F Average

TEST RESULTS
The following test results indicate G-max values for ten individual locations with three separate tests performed at
each location. A table has been provided indicating the values associated with each test and a location map showing
the ten individual tests at designated and described locations. The test results reported herein reflects the
conditions of the tested field at the time and temperatures noted.

TEST CONCLUSION
The Synthetic Turf Stadium Athletic Field at Thomas S. Wootton High School (Stadium Field) as characterized above
and in the following report has been verified to be in compliance and meets the requirements for play based on
the specifications as referenced in ASTM F1936-10 with all locations below the maximum allowable limit of 200.

Thomas S. Wootton HS – Stadium Football Field


Overall G-max = 153

APPROVED BY - RYAN TEETER, PE - LDD Sports


G-MAX TEST REPORT
Thomas S. Wootton HS
G-max Values - 6.28.16

Drop 1 Drop 2 Drop 3 Infill Field


Test Gmax
Depth Temp
Location Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Gmax HIC Average
(mm) (°F)
1 150 468 173 600 178 627 175.50 38 95
2 140 390 152 446 152 437 152.00 38 95
3 132 387 149 474 153 495 151.00 44 95
4 139 420 160 534 165 556 162.50 45 95
5 125 353 138 412 140 425 139.00 43 95
6 123 335 140 420 142 423 141.00 43 95
7 154 475 169 555 170 558 169.50 38 95
8 137 405 154 486 155 489 154.50 39 95
9 131 379 148 471 152 484 150.00 42 95
10 120 347 131 396 132 401 131.50 50 95

153 Overall Average G-max

Location Specific Location Description


1 S Penalty Kick at center of the field
2 S Goal area at center of field
3 SE 10yd line at numbers
4 SE 25yd line at hashes
5 Midfield at Centerfield
6 NW 25 yd line at the numbers
7 N center of the LAX circle
8 N Soccer Goal area at center of field
9 NE 37yd line at the hashes
10 East sideline at midfield

2 1 5 7 8
4 9 N

10
G-MAX TEST REPORT

Location #1 Location #2 Location #3

Location #4 Location #5 Location #6

Location #7 Location #8 Location #9

Location #10
Maintenance Summary Report
Wooton High School
NAME OF FIELD/SITE: ___________________________________________________________________________
9:00 am
Time of Arrival: _____________________ 2:30 pm
Time of Departure: ________________________ 03/18/2016
Service Visit Date: ______________________________
Chris Thompson
Contact Name: _____________________________________________ Advanced Care
Classification of Service: ________________________________________

Phone #: ___________________________________________________ 2100 Wootton Pkwy, Rockville, MD 20850


Site Address: __________________________________________________

Billing Address: _____________________________________________ Field Square Footage: __________________________________________

GMAX: Y _______ X
N _______ Football & Soccer
Primary Sports: ___________________________________________________________________________
Jim King
Service Provider/Technicians: __________________________________________________ Vertex
Field Fiber Type: _______________________________
2 1/2"
Fiber Height: ________________________________________________ Install Date: ___________________________________________________
Jim King
Report Submitted by: __________________________________________ Date of Last FC Service Session: ________________________________
(If no date: Please write “NEW FC Customer”)

PRE-FIELD INSPECTION NOTES BY TECHNICIAN (FROM WALKTHROUGH):

MAINTENANCE SERVICES PROVIDED: STANDARD CARE ■ ADVANCED CARE OTHER ________________________________

■ Aggressive Brushing / Leveling General Field Sweeping Anti-Microbial Spray Standard Infill Decompaction
(Not to exceed 1 inch depth)
Static Brush ■ Field Metal Magnet Sweep Anti-Static Spray
Power Static Brushing Static Drag Mat ■ Refill Infill in High Traffic Areas ■ Tier 2 Decompaction
((Rubber/Sand Infill Mix > 250lbs (Deep-Tine Decompaction)
■ Power Brush & Vac Gmax Testing = Additional Charge for Material/Labor).

3-Step Deep Power Grooming ■ Power Broom ■ Total Vegetation Control ■ Infill Cleaning / Sifting / Fiber
(Only advanced care) (Perimeter edges & specialty areas) (Perimeter edge only) Rejuvenation

Post Maintenance Field Inspection: Inlays/Seams/Field Markings FIELD INSPECTION:


0
Number of minor repairs: Pre-Service Inspection. : __________
1. Logo Analysis ■ . Infill - Consistency in Depth
0
Number of minor repairs: Post-Service Inspection : __________
0
Qty: # of total repairs: _____ 0
Estimated # of linear feet repaired: ______ ■ 2. Seam Separation Analysis . Infill - Migration Analysis
Picture Submission: ■
Warranty Billable ■ 3. Perimeter Anchoring ■ . Inlaid Line Analysis
Minor inlay and/or seam repairs conducted:
Turf Replacement:

POST MAINTENANCE TECHNICIAN NOTES:


- Collected (3) bags of debris and a little bit of metal from field
- Cleaned sand from around sand pit & added rubber to lacrosse goal creases
- Used leaf blower to get dirt and debris out from under 'ball stop netting'

INFILL LEVELS CHECKED PRE MAINTENANCE: INFILL LEVELS CHECKED POST MAINTENANCE:
Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE Description 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AVERAGE

Primary: 43 43 44 43 43 44 43 42 42 42 42.9 Primary: 43 44 44 44 43 43 44 43 43 44 43.5

Additional: 9:00 am
Time of Day: ________________ Additional: 2:00 pm
Time of Day: ________________
Primary: The selection of test point locations will be determined by the primary sport.
Additional: Locations determined by the secondary sport.

Reviewed by FieldTurf Personnel: ________________________________________________________________ Date: _________________________________

Information P: (800) 724-2969 | F: (514) 340-9374 | E: fieldcare@fieldturf.com | www.fieldturf.com