Basics 4
Definition 4
Epidemiology 4
Aetiology 4
Pathophysiology 4
Prevention 5
Primary prevention 5
Secondary prevention 5
Diagnosis 6
Case history 6
Step-by-step diagnostic approach 6
Risk factors 7
History & examination factors 8
Diagnostic tests 9
Differential diagnosis 10
Diagnostic criteria 11
Treatment 12
Follow up 32
Recommendations 32
Complications 32
Prognosis 32
Guidelines 33
Diagnostic guidelines 33
Treatment guidelines 33
Evidence scores 34
References 36
Images 40
Disclaimer 42
Summary
◊ Defined as elevated BP (usually systolic BP >210 mmHg and diastolic BP >130 mmHg) with rapid decompensation
of vital organ function.
◊ If the clinical suspicion is high, treatment should be initiated immediately without waiting for further tests.
◊ BP must be lowered over minutes to hours with parenteral medications in an intensive care setting. Oral
medications should be given shortly thereafter to permit weaning from parenteral agents.
◊ The initial goal of therapy is to reduce mean arterial BP by no more than 25% (within minutes to 1 hour), then,
if stable, to 160 mmHg systolic and 100-110 mmHg diastolic within the next 2 to 6 hours. Exceptions to this
general rule are patients with intracranial pathology and patients with aortic dissection. Excessive falls in pressure
that may precipitate renal, cerebral, or coronary ischaemia should be avoided.
Definition
Hypertensive emergency is elevated BP (usually systolic BP >210 mmHg and diastolic BP >130 mmHg) with rapid
BASICS
deterioration of vital organ function, resulting in symptoms such as encephalopathy, retinopathy, myocardial ischaemia,
or renal failure. The absolute value of the BP is not as vital as the presence of acute end-organ damage.
Epidemiology
The worldwide prevalence of hypertension is around 26%, totalling 1 billion people.[1] Of these, 1% to 2% will suffer a
hypertensive crisis in their lifetime.[2] [3]
Men may be more likely than women to suffer a hypertensive emergency. Hypertensive emergency is also more common
in older patients and in black people.[4] [5] [6]
In the US, 30% of people suffer from hypertension;[7] [8] lack of insurance or a primary care doctor and non-adherence
to treatment all predispose toward development of hypertensive emergency.[9] [10]
As populations age globally, the prevalence of hypertension and therefore hypertensive emergency is expected to
increase.[1]
Aetiology
There are many causes of hypertensive emergency. By far the most common cause is essential hypertension that is
either undiagnosed or inadequately treated.[4] The next most common cause is secondary to renal disease, such as renal
artery stenosis, acute glomerulonephritis, collagen-vascular diseases, or kidney transplantation.[11] [12]Pregnancy-related
eclampsia is also an important cause of hypertensive emergency. Other rarer causes include hyperaldosteronism and
conditions leading to excess circulating catecholamines (e.g., phaeochromocytoma, sympathomimetic drug intake,
autonomic dysfunction after spinal cord injury, or inadvertent drug or food interactions with monoamine oxidase
inhibitors).[13]
Pathophysiology
The factors that lead to the development of hypertensive emergency are poorly understood. A rise in systemic vascular
resistance initiates the cycle. The subsequent increase in BP generates mechanical stress and endothelial injury leading
to increased permeability, activation of the coagulation cascade and platelets, and deposition of fibrin. These processes
result in ischaemia and the release of additional vasoactive mediators, generating ongoing injury. Volume depletion
caused by pressure natriuresis and activation of the renin-angiotensin system often leads to further vasoconstriction.
Systemic vasoconstriction leads to decreased blood flow to vital organs and the subsequent organ injury that is the
hallmark of hypertensive emergency. Neurological injury may manifest as retinopathy, papilloedema, encephalopathy,
stroke, seizures, or coma. Cardiac injury may manifest as chest pains or SOB, signifying impending or actual MI, aortic
dissection, or left ventricular failure with pulmonary oedema. Renal failure may manifest as oliguria and azotaemia.[6]
[13] [14] [15]
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
4 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Prevention
Primary prevention
The mainstay of primary prevention is appropriate screening and treatment of essential hypertension.
Secondary prevention
Major lifestyle modifications shown to lower BP include the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) eating plan,
dietary sodium reduction, weight reduction in overweight patients, physical activity, and moderation of alcohol
consumption.[46] [47]
PREVENTION
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
5
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Diagnosis
Case history
Case history #1
A 50-year-old black man with a history of untreated hypertension presents to the emergency department with
substernal chest pressure. His symptoms started 1 day prior. The pain was initially intermittent in nature but has
become constant and radiates to his jaw and left shoulder. He also complains of dizziness and some SOB. Apart from
a history of hypertension diagnosed 1 year ago, the patient denies any past medical history. He is not taking any
antihypertensive medications. The patient denies smoking, or alcohol or drug use. Family history is unremarkable.
His BP is 230/130 mmHg with otherwise normal vital signs and no other significant findings. ECG shows diffuse T-wave
inversion and ST depression in lateral leads. Laboratory testing is significant for elevated troponin, signalling MI.
Other presentations
Other ways in which hypertensive emergency can present include neurological symptoms (e.g., stroke, encephalopathy),
chest pain signifying cardiac conditions other than infarction or ischaemia (e.g., aortic dissection, pulmonary oedema),
or nephrological symptoms (e.g., decreased or absent urine output).
History
Any prior history of hypertension and previous treatment should be identified.
• Neurological compromise; for example, blurry vision, dizziness, loss of sensation, or loss of movement
DIAGNOSIS
• Cardiac compromise; for example, chest pain or pressure, SOB, orthopnoea, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea,
or oedema
When appropriate, use of street drugs, particularly sympathomimetics (cocaine, amphetamines, phenylpropanolamine,
phencyclidine, ecstasy, LSD) should be investigated.
Physical examination
An appropriately sized cuff should be used for BP readings. The cuff bladder should encircle at least 80% of the upper
arm. The arm should also be supported at heart level during recordings. Using too large a cuff results in an
underestimation of BP; conversely, too small a cuff will lead to overestimation.
BP readings should be taken from both arms and readings repeated after 5 minutes to confirm. If there is a more than
20 mmHg pressure difference between arms, aortic dissection should be considered.
A fundoscopic examination should be performed, looking for the presence of arteriolar spasm, retinal oedema, retinal
haemorrhages, retinal exudates, papilloedema, or engorged retinal veins. [Fig-1] [Fig-2] [Fig-3]
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
6 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Diagnosis
A rapid bedside neurological examination is also required, including testing cranial nerve function, motor strength,
gross sensory function, and gait.
Cardiopulmonary status should be assessed, examining in particular for the presence of new murmurs, additional
heart sounds, jugular venous distension, rales, and lower extremity oedema.
Laboratory evaluation
Baseline blood and urine samples must be collected prior to administration of treatment. Laboratory evaluation should
include the following:
• Plasma renin activity and aldosterone levels, if primary aldosteronism is suspected (e.g., in patients with diastolic
hypertension with persistent hypokalaemia and metabolic alkalosis)
• Plasma renin activity before and 1 hour after 25-mg captopril is administered if renovascular hypertension is
suspected. Renovascular hypertension should be suspected in patients with severe hypertension who have
abdominal bruits and/or unexplained renal deterioration with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor
treatment, although the clinical presentation is variable
• Spot urine or plasma-free metanephrine levels if phaeochromocytoma is suspected (e.g., in patients with
hypertension and palpitations, headaches and/or diaphoresis although clinical presentation is very variable).
Further investigation
DIAGNOSIS
CXR and ECG are obtained. If aortic dissection is considered, an urgent thoracic CT scan with contrast or a
transoesophageal echocardiogram should also be obtained.
If ischaemic stroke or intracranial haemorrhage is suspected (e.g., in patients with focal neurological defects) urgent
non-contrast CT scan (NCCT) of the head and/or an MRI are done, depending on local availability.
Risk factors
Strong
inadequately treated hypertension
• A history of inadequately treated hypertension is commonly seen.[5] [9] [10]
• In the US, lack of medical insurance or access to a primary care doctor have been shown to predispose to hypertensive
emergency.[10]
Weak
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
7
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Diagnosis
older age
• Older age predisposes to hypertensive emergency.[4] [5] [6]
black ethnicity
• Black people are predisposed to hypertensive emergency, compared with white people.[4] [5] [6]
male gender
• Men may be more likely than women to suffer a hypertensive emergency.[4] [5] [6]
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
8 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Diagnosis
abnormal neurological examination (common)
• Abnormal findings in cranial nerve function, motor strength, gross sensory function, and gait can frequently result
from hypertensive crisis.
Diagnostic tests
1st test to order
Test Result
FBC with smear may reveal schistocytes (red
cell fragments) indicating the
• Microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia (MAHA) may occur in patients with
presence of haemolysis
hypertensive emergency and increases the risk of developing acute renal
failure.[17]
blood chemistry may reveal elevated creatinine
• Renal failure as manifested by elevated creatinine may be the only sign of
hypertensive emergency.
urinalysis with microscopy may reveal presence of red
cells and protein
• Renal failure as manifested by haematuria and proteinuria may be the only sign
of hypertensive emergency.
electrocardiogram may reveal evidence of
• If ECG is abnormal, troponin levels are tested to rule out ongoing ischaemia or ischaemia or infarct such as ST-
or T-wave changes
infarction.
• If ECG is normal, aortic dissection should be considered as an explanation for
chest pain.
CXR may reveal evidence of
pulmonary oedema indicating
• CXR is useful to assess for pulmonary oedema, LVH, and aortic dissection.
• Note, however, that a CXR has low sensitivity in detection of aortic dissection left ventricular failure or
widened mediastinum
(56% in type B and 63% in type A).[18] If aortic dissection is suspected, an
indicating possible aortic
DIAGNOSIS
urgent CT scan with contrast should be ordered.
dissection
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
9
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Diagnosis
Test Result
thoracic CT scan with contrast evidence of 2 separate aortic
• This test should be ordered only if aortic dissection is suspected, given the risk lumens with dividing intimal
flap in aortic dissection
of contrast-induced nephropathy, especially in the presence of possible
underlying renal abnormality.
• The sensitivity and specificity of standard CT for the diagnosis of aortic
dissection is around 90% and 95%, respectively.
• Newer imaging techniques such as helical CT approach 100% sensitivity and
specificity.[19] [20]
• Transoesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and MRI are comparable to helical
CT and more sensitive than standard CT.[20] [21]
• CT scan may be recommended as the initial test of choice but this is
institutionally variable and TEE may be substituted if available in a timely fashion.
transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) evidence of 2 separate aortic
lumens with dividing intimal
• May substitute for CT if available in a timely fashion. More sensitive than
flap in aortic dissection
standard CT and comparable with helical CT.[20] [21]
plasma renin activity and aldosterone level in primary hyperaldosteronism,
renin activity will be decreased
• This test is an indirect measure of the activity of renin through measurement
and aldosterone levels
of the rate of production of angiotensin I, which increases as a result of renin
increased; in secondary
stimulation. Aldosterone levels are usually measured at the same time. High
hyperaldosteronism, both renin
plasma renin activity suggests hypertension from the vasoconstrictive effects
activity and aldosterone levels
of angiotensin. Requires renal vein catheterisation and so needs formal consent
will be increased
from the patient.
single-dose captopril challenge may reveal decrease in renin
plasma activity in response to
• May be useful where renovascular hypertension is suspected, particularly in
captopril
patients who have not received previous medical therapy.
• Baseline plasma renin activity is measured and the patient is then given 25 to
50 mg of captopril; measurement of plasma renin activity is repeated 60
minutes later.
• Test sensitivity is excellent but specificity is poor. Further testing with renal
DIAGNOSIS
Differential diagnosis
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
10 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Diagnosis
Diagnostic criteria
Clinical criteria
Elevated BP in the presence of acute or rapidly deteriorating end-organ damage (e.g., neurological, cardiac, or renal
compromise) based on historical or clinical criteria (physical examination, laboratory tests, or imaging), posing an immediate
threat to life, is sufficient for diagnosis of hypertensive emergency.[3]
DIAGNOSIS
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
11
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Appropriate facilities
Patients with hypertensive emergencies should be admitted to an ICU for continuous monitoring of BP and parenteral
administration of appropriate therapeutic agent(s).[23] Other supportive measures that may be required include
intracranial pressure monitoring (in rare cases of increased intracranial pressure), intubation (in case of respiratory
distress), or dialysis (in case of renal failure).
Rate of BP reduction
The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High
Blood Pressure[23] states the initial goal of therapy in hypertensive emergencies is to reduce mean arterial BP by no
more than 25% (within minutes to 1 hour), then, if stable, to 160 mmHg systolic and 100-110 mmHg diastolic within
the next 2 to 6 hours.
Excessive falls in pressure that may precipitate renal, cerebral, or coronary ischaemia should be avoided. For this
reason, short-acting nifedipine is no longer considered acceptable in the initial treatment of hypertensive emergencies
or urgency.
If the initial level of reduced BP is well tolerated and the patient is clinically stable, further gradual reductions towards
a normal BP can be implemented over the next 24 to 48 hours.
• Patients with an ischaemic stroke, as there is no clear evidence from clinical trials to support the use of immediate
antihypertensive treatment
• Patients with aortic dissection, who should have their systolic BP lowered to less than 100 mmHg if tolerated
• Patients in whom BP needs to be lowered to enable the use of thrombolytic agents, in which case the target
systolic BP is under 185 mmHg and diastolic BP under 110 mmHg.
Accelerated hypertension (also known as malignant hypertension) is severe hypertension occurring with retinopathy
of grade III (flame haemorrhages, dot and blot haemorrhages, hard and soft exudates) or grade IV (papilloedema).
Hypertensive encephalopathy encompasses the transient neurological symptoms that occur with malignant
hypertension, which are usually reversed by prompt treatment and lowering of BP.
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
12 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
In the management of intracerebral haemorrhage, the ideal level of a patient's BP should be based on individual
factors including: baseline BP, presumed cause of haemorrhage, age, elevated intracranial pressure, and interval since
onset.
While elevated BP could in theory increase the risk of ongoing bleeding from ruptured small arteries and arterioles,
the relationship between BP, intracranial pressure, and volume of haemorrhage is complex and not yet fully understood.
The rationale for lowering BP is to minimise further haemorrhage - for example, from a ruptured aneurysm or
arteriovenous malformation. However, in primary intracerebral haemorrhage, when a specific vasculopathy is not
apparent, the risk from a mildly elevated BP may be lower, so aggressive reduction of BP must be balanced against
the possible risk of inducing cerebral ischaemia in other brain areas.[24] [25]
In cases of intracranial haemorrhage, target mean arterial pressure (MAP) is 130 mmHg, with a goal of maintaining a
cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) above 70 mmHg. Avoid BP dropping to below 110 mmHg.
The first-line treatment is labetalol.[13] [14] [15] 1[C]Evidence If patients do not have evidence of raised intracranial
pressure, a second-line treatment choice is nitroprusside.[13] [14] 2[C]Evidence However, if raised intracranial
pressure is present or suspected, nitroprusside is contraindicated and another agent should be used. Nitroprusside
decreases cerebral blood flow while increasing intracranial pressure, effects that are particularly disadvantageous in
patients with hypertensive encephalopathy or following a stroke.[26] [27] [28] It should also be avoided in patients
with renal or hepatic insufficiency. Nicardipine is another second-line agent which can be used. One RCT found that
intravenous nicardipine significantly increased the proportion of people who reached physician-specified target range
systolic BP within 30 minutes compared with intravenous labetalol.[29] Nicardipine is especially useful in the presence
of cardiac disease due to coronary vasodilatory effects.
The third-line treatment choice is fenoldopam, a selective peripheral dopamine-1-receptor agonist with arterial
vasodilator effects.[13] [14] [15] [30] [31] 3[C]Evidence This drug is particularly useful in patients with renal
insufficiency, where the use of nitroprusside is restricted due to the risk of thiocyanate poisoning.
If systolic BP is below 220 mmHg and diastolic BP below 120 mmHg, then it is reasonable to maintain close observation
without direct intervention to reduce BP,[32] unless:
• There is other end-organ involvement such as aortic dissection, renal failure, or acute MI
• The patient is to receive thrombolytics, in which case the target systolic BP is below 185 mmHg and diastolic
BP below 110 mmHg
• There is concurrent intracranial haemorrhage, in which case the goals are a systolic BP of between 140 and
160 mmHg and/or a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 130 mmHg with the CPP maintained above 70 mmHg.
Additionally, MAP should not be dropped to below 110 mmHg.
TREATMENT
If systolic BP is above 220 mmHg or diastolic BP is between 121 to 140 mmHg, then labetalol[13] [14] [15]
1[C]Evidence or nicardipine[13] [14] [15] [33] 4[C]Evidence should be used to achieve a 10% to 15% reduction in
24 hours.
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
13
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
If diastolic BP is above 140 mmHg, then nitroprusside[13] [14] is used to achieve a 10% to 15% reduction over 24
hours.[13] [14] [34] 2[C]Evidence
Medical therapy aims to both lower the BP and decrease the velocity of left ventricular contraction, so decreasing
aortic shear stress and minimising the tendency for propagation of the dissection.
First-line treatment choice is beta-blockers, either labetalol or esmolol, administered intravenously.[13] [14] [15] [35]
8[C]Evidence
Second-line treatment choice would be the combination of nitroprusside and beta-blockers.[13] [14] [15] [35]
8[C]Evidence Nitroprusside must be administered with a beta-blocker, as nitroprusside-induced vasodilation would
otherwise induce a compensatory tachycardia and worsen shear stress on the intimal flap.
Myocardial ischaemia/infarction
First-line treatment of hypertensive emergency complicated by myocardial ischaemia or infarction is the combination
of esmolol (a selective beta-blocker) plus glyceryl trinitrate (a peripheral vasodilator, which affects venous vessels
more than arterial).[13] [14] [15] [34] [36] 5[C]Evidence
Esmolol acts to reduce heart rate and glyceryl trinitrate acts to decrease preload and cardiac output and increases
coronary blood flow.
Second-line treatment choice would be labetalol plus glyceryl trinitrate.[13] [14] [15] [34] [36] 6[C]Evidence
Nitroprusside (a potent arterial and venous vasodilator that decreases afterload and preload) is the second-line
treatment choice in this situation.[13] [14] [34] 2[C]Evidence
If patient is not already on one, a loop diuretic should be started (e.g., furosemide).
Hyperadrenergic states
Hyperadrenergic states include:
• Phaeochromocytoma
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
14 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
If the hyperadrenergic state is due to sympathomimetic drug use, the first-line agents are benzodiazepines, and
anti-hypertensive medications are given only if the blood pressure response is inadequate. In all other clinical situations,
the first-line treatment choice is phentolamine (which acts by blocking alpha-adrenoceptors).[13] [14] [15]
9[C]Evidence The second-line treatment choice is the combination of labetalol1[C]Evidence plus nitroprusside.[13]
[14] [15] 2[C]Evidence Administration of a beta-blocker alone is contraindicated, since inhibition of
beta-adrenoceptor-induced vasodilation results in unopposed alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction and a further rise
in BP.
Eclampsia
The first-line treatment choices in this situation are hydralazine,[13] [14] [15] [37] [38] [39] 10[C]Evidence labetalol,[13]
[14] [15] [37] [39] [40] 11[C]Evidence or nicardipine.[13] [14] [15] [37] [40] [41] 12[C]Evidence
In pregnancy, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are avoided
due to potential teratogenic effects, and nitroprusside is avoided due to its potential for fetal cyanide poisoning.
A guide target in these patients is to maintain a systolic BP of 130 to 150 mmHg and a diastolic BP of 80 to 100 mmHg.
It should be noted, however, that there are no trials supporting these suggested thresholds, and treatments should
be tailored to individual patient circumstances.
In addition to the first-line treatments mentioned, it has been proposed that magnesium may be useful as an adjunctive
therapy,[13] [14] [15] [37] [42] although there is no consensus on the optimal regimen, when it should be started
and terminated, or the optimal route of administration. The drug is usually initiated at the onset of labour.
Acute ( summary )
Patient group Tx line Treatment
2nd nicardipine
3rd fenoldopam
TREATMENT
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
15
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute ( summary )
3rd fenoldopam
SBP ≤220 mmHg and DBP ≤120 1st close observation ± BP reduction
mmHg
2nd nicardipine
3rd nitroprusside
2nd nitroprusside
2nd nicardipine
hyperadrenergic state
2nd phentolamine
adjunct magnesium
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
16 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Treatment options
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
accelerated (malignant) hypertension or
hypertensive encephalopathy or
intracranial haemorrhage
Primary options
2nd nicardipine
» Nicardipine is a second-generation dihydropyridine
derivative calcium-channel blocker with high vascular
selectivity and strong cerebral and coronary
vasodilatory activity. The onset of action of IV
nicardipine is from 5 to 15 minutes, with a duration of
action of 4 to 6 hours.
Primary options
3rd fenoldopam
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
17
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» Fenoldopam is especially useful in renal insufficiency,
where the use of nitroprusside is restricted because of
the risk of thiocyanate poisoning.
Primary options
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
18 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
2nd nitroprusside or nicardipine
» Sodium nitroprusside acts as a potent arterial and
venous vasodilator, thereby reducing afterload and
preload. Its haemodynamic effects are to decrease
mean arterial pressure (MAP), with a modest increase
or no change in cardiac output. Onset of action:
immediate. Duration of action: 3 to 5 minutes.
Primary options
OR
» nicardipine: 5 mg/hour intravenously initially,
increase by 2.5 mg/hour increments every 15
minutes according to response, maximum 15
mg/hour
3rd fenoldopam
» Fenoldopam acts as a selective peripheral
TREATMENT
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
19
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» In cases of intracranial haemorrhage, goal mean
arterial pressure (MAP) is 130 mmHg and goal cerebral
perfusion pressure is above 70 mmHg. MAP should not
be dropped to below 110 mmHg.
Primary options
SBP ≤220 mmHg and DBP ≤120 1st close observation ± BP reduction
mmHg » Treatment of a hypertensive emergency with an
associated acute ischaemic stroke warrants greater
caution in reducing BP than with other types of
hypertensive emergency. Overly rapid or too great a
reduction of mean arterial pressure (MAP) may
decrease cerebral perfusion pressure to a level that
could theoretically worsen brain injury. The following
may be used as guidance:
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
20 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
SBP >220 mmHg or DBP 121 to 1st labetalol
140 mmHg » If the systolic BP is above 220 mmHg or the diastolic
BP is between 121 and 140 mmHg, then labetalol[13]
[14] [15] 1[C]Evidence or nicardipine[13] [14] [15]
[33] 4[C]Evidence should be used to achieve a 10%
to 15% reduction in 24 hours.
Primary options
2nd nicardipine
» If systolic BP is above 220 mmHg or diastolic BP is
between 121 and 140 mmHg, then labetalol[13] [14]
[15] 1[C]Evidence or nicardipine[13] [14] [15] [33]
4[C]Evidence should be used to achieve a 10% to 15%
reduction in 24 hours.
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
21
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» It acts as a potent arterial and venous vasodilator
thereby reducing afterload and preload. Its
haemodynamic effects are to decrease MAP, with a
modest increase or no change in cardiac output.
Primary options
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
22 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
vessels. It causes a decrease in preload and cardiac
output and increases coronary blood flow. Onset of
action: immediate. Duration of action: 3 to 5 minutes.
Primary options
3rd nitroprusside
» Sodium nitroprusside acts as a potent arterial and
venous vasodilator thereby reducing afterload and
preload. Its haemodynamic effects are to decrease
mean arterial pressure, with a modest increase or no
change in cardiac output.
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
23
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
Primary options
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
24 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» The mechanism of action of esmolol is as a selective
beta-blocker, producing a decrease in heart rate. Onset
of action: 1 to 5 minutes. Duration of action: 5 minutes.
Primary options
OR
» esmolol: 50-100 micrograms/kg/minute
intravenously
2nd nitroprusside
» Medical therapy of aortic dissection involves lowering
the BP and decreasing the velocity of left ventricular
contraction, both of which will decrease aortic shear
stress and minimise the tendency for propagation of
the dissection.
Primary options
TREATMENT
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
25
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
plus labetalol or esmolol
» Labetalol is an alpha-1-blocker and non-selective
beta-blocker that decreases systemic vascular
resistance, MAP and heart rate, and causes a decrease
or no change in cardiac output. Onset of action: 5 to
10 minutes. Duration of action: 3 to 8 hours.
Primary options
OR
» esmolol: 50-100 micrograms/kg/minute
intravenously
Primary options
2nd nicardipine
» Nicardipine is a dihydropyridine calcium-channel
blocker that increases stroke volume and has strong
TREATMENT
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
26 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
Primary options
hyperadrenergic state
Primary options
OR
» diazepam: 5 mg intravenous bolus initially,
repeated every 5-10 minutes according to
response, maximum 50 mg
2nd phentolamine
» Phentolamine acts to block alpha-adrenoceptors. Its
main haemodynamic effects are to increase heart rate
and contractility.
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
27
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» Labetalol is an alpha-1-blocker and non-selective
beta-blocker that decreases systemic vascular
resistance, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart
rate, and causes a decrease or no change in cardiac
output. Onset of action: 5 to 10 minutes. Duration of
action: 3 to 8 hours.
Primary options
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
28 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» Labetalol is an alpha-1-blocker and non-selective
beta-blocker that decreases systemic vascular
resistance, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart
rate, and causes a decrease or no change in cardiac
output. Onset of action: 5 to 10 minutes. Duration of
action: 3 to 8 hours.
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
29
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Acute
Patient group Tx line Treatment
» Labetalol acts as an alpha-1-blocker and non-selective
beta-blocker and its haemodynamic effects include
decreasing systemic vascular resistance, mean arterial
pressure, and heart rate, accompanied by a slight
decrease or minimal change in cardiac output. Onset
of action: 5 to 10 minutes. Duration of action: 3 to 8
hours.
Primary options
OR
» labetalol: 20 mg intravenously every 10 minutes
according to response, maximum 300 mg total
dose; or 0.5 to 2 mg/minute intravenous infusion
OR
» nicardipine: 5 mg/hour intravenously initially,
increase by 2.5 mg/hour increments every 15
minutes according to response, maximum 15
mg/hour
adjunct magnesium
» There is no consensus on the optimal magnesium
regimen, when it should be started and terminated, or
route of administration.
Primary options
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
30 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Treatment
Emerging
Clevidipine
Clevidipine is a third-generation dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker that appears promising for the treatment of
hypertensive emergency.[43] It is a potent and short-acting selective arteriolar vasodilator. It has been shown to be
effective in postoperative hypertension but has not been studied in hypertensive emergency.
TREATMENT
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
31
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Follow up
Recommendations
Monitoring
FOLLOW UP
The patient should return for a follow-up visit and BP check within 1 week of discharge. During the follow-up visit, BP
should be checked by a medical professional in both arms and with the appropriate cuff size. The goal BP is below
140/90 mmHg. In patients with hypertension and diabetes or renal disease, the BP goal is below 130/80 mmHg.
Patients should return for follow-up visits once a month, or more frequently, until goal BP is achieved. Once goal BP
is achieved, patient should be monitored every 3 to 6 months (or more frequently based on comorbidities). Serum
potassium and creatinine should be measured twice a year.
Patient instructions
Patients should be reminded of the importance of taking medications as directed and not missing doses. Patients
are advised to call their doctor or an ambulance immediately if they experience any dizziness, loss of sensation or
mobility, blurred vision, chest pain, SOB, or any other relevant symptoms.
Complications
Myocardial damage and subsequent heart failure is a frequent complication and cause of death in hypertensive
emergency.[44] [45]
Permanent neurological compromise may occur after stroke, haemorrhage, or hypertensive encephalopathy and is
a frequent cause of death.[44] [45]
Renal insufficiency and failure is both a frequent cause and complication of hypertensive emergency.[44] [45]
Prognosis
Without therapy, the prognosis of hypertensive emergencies is grim, with 1-year survival rates of 10% to 20%. However,
current antihypertensive therapy has greatly improved survival, with 5-year survival rates around 70% in patients who
receive appropriate treatment. The presence of renal failure on diagnosis of hypertensive emergency increases mortality
rate.[44] [45]
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
32 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Guidelines
Diagnostic guidelines
Europe
Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a national clinical guideline
Published by: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Last published: 2007
Treatment guidelines
Europe
GUIDELINES
Summary: The main difference is that the ESC guidelines group malignant hypertension and hypertensive emergency
under different entities. Like the JNC 7, the ESC emphasises rapid but controlled management of hypertensive emergency
without specifying rates of BP decrease. The ESC also accepts the use of oral agents for malignant hypertension.
Risk estimation and the prevention of cardiovascular disease: a national clinical guideline
Published by: Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network Last published: 2007
North America
Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and
treatment of high blood pressure (JNC 7)
Published by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Last published: 2004
Africa
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
33
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Evidence scores
Evidence scores
1. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that labetalol may reduce BP in people with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
2. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that sodium nitroprusside may reduce BP in people with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
3. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that fenoldopam may reduce BP in people with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15] [30] [31]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
4. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that nicardipine may reduce BP in people with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15] [33]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
5. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that esmolol and glyceryl trinitrate may reduce BP in people with
hypertensive emergencies and myocardial injury.[13] [14] [15] [34] [36]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
6. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that labetalol and glyceryl trinitrate may reduce BP in people with
hypertensive emergencies.[13] [14] [15] [34] [36]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
7. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that glyceryl trinitrate may reduce BP in people with hypertensive
emergencies and myocardial injury.[13] [14] [15] [34] [36]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
EVIDENCE SCORES
8. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that beta-blockers may be effective in people with hypertensive
emergencies and aortic dissection.[13] [14] [15] [35]
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
34 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Evidence scores
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
9. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that phentolamine may reduce BP in people with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
10. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that hydralazine may reduce BP in pregnant women with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15] [37] [38] [39]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
11. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that labetalol may reduce BP in pregnant women with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15] [37] [39] [40]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
12. Reduction of BP: there is poor-quality evidence that nicardipine may reduce BP in pregnant women with hypertensive
emergencies.[13] [14] [15] [37] [40]
Evidence level C: Poor quality observational (cohort) studies or methodologically flawed randomized controlled
trials (RCTs) of <200 participants.
EVIDENCE SCORES
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
35
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies References
Key articles
REFERENCES
• Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke
Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary
Working Group. Stroke. 2007;38:2001-2023. Full text Abstract
• ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and
eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2002;77:67-75. Abstract
References
1. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, et al. Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet.
2005;365:217-223. Abstract
2. McRae RP Jr, Liebson PR. Hypertensive crisis. Med Clin North Am. 1986;70:749-767. Abstract
3. Martin JF, Higashiama E, Garcia E, et al. Hypertensive crisis profile. Prevalence and clinical presentation. Arq Bras
Cardiol. 2004;83:131-136. Full text Abstract
4. Hyman DJ, Pavlik VN. Characteristics of patients with uncontrolled hypertension in the United States [published
correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2002;346:544]. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:479-486. Full text Abstract
5. Bennett NM, Shea S. Hypertensive emergency: case criteria, sociodemographic profile, and previous care of 100
cases. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:636-640. Full text Abstract
6. Zampaglione B, Pascale C, Marchisio M, et al. Hypertensive urgencies and emergencies: prevalence and clinical
presentation. Hypertension. 1996;27:144-147. Full text Abstract
7. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States,
1988-2000. JAMA. 2003;290:199-200. Full text Abstract
8. Ong KL, Cheung BM, Man YB, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United
States adults 1999-2004. Hypertension. 2007;49:69-75. Full text Abstract
9. Tisdale JE, Huang MB, Borzak S, et al. Risk factors for hypertensive crisis: importance of out-patient blood pressure
control. Fam Pract. 2004;21:420-424. Full text Abstract
10. Shea S, Misra D, Ehrlich MH, et al. Predisposing factors for severe, uncontrolled hypertension in an inner-city minority
population. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:776-781. Abstract
11. Lip GY, Beevers M, Beevers G. The failure of malignant hypertension to decline: a survey of 24 years' experience in
a multiracial population in England. J Hypertens. 1994;12:1297-1305. Abstract
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
36 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies References
12. Guerin C, Gonthier R, Berthoux FC. Long-term prognosis in malignant or accelerated hypertension. Nephrol Dial
Transplant. 1988;3:33-37. Abstract
REFERENCES
13. Kaplan NM. Kaplan's clinical hypertension, 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006.
15. Marik PE, Varon J. Hypertensive crises: challenges and management [published correction appears in Chest.
2007;132:1721]. Chest. 2007;131:1949-1962. Full text Abstract
16. Fuchs FD. Study of the usefulness of optic fundi examination on patients with hypertension in a clinical setting. J
Hum Hypertens. 1995;9:547-551. Abstract
17. Van den Born BJH, Honnebier UPF, Koopmans RP, et al. Microangiopathic hemolysis and renal failure in malignant
hypertension. Hypertension. 2005;45:246-251. Full text Abstract
18. Hagan PG, Nienaber CA, Isselbacher EM, et al. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD): new
insights into an old disease. JAMA. 2000;283:897-903. Full text Abstract
19. Nienaber CA, von Kodolitsch Y, Nicolas V, et al. The diagnosis of thoracic aortic dissection by noninvasive imaging
procedures. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1-9. Full text Abstract
20. Shiga T, Wajima Z, Apfel CC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed
tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and
meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1350-1356. Full text Abstract
21. Moore AG, Eagle KA, Bruckman D, et al. Choice of computed tomography, transesophageal echocardiography,
magnetic resonance imaging, and aortography in acute aortic dissection: International Registry of Acute Aortic
Dissection (IRAD). Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:1235-1238. Abstract
22. Adams HP Jr, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke.
Stroke. 2007;38:1655-1711. Full text Abstract
23. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42:1206-1252. Full text Abstract
24. Broderick J, Connolly S, Feldmann E, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
in adults: 2007 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke
Council, High Blood Pressure Research Council, and the Quality of Care and Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary
Working Group. Stroke. 2007;38:2001-2023. Full text Abstract
25. Anderson CS, Huang Y, Wang JG, et al. Intensive blood pressure reduction in acute cerebral haemorrhage trial
(INTERACT): a randomised pilot trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:391-399. Abstract
26. Kondo T, Brock M, Bach H. Effect of intra-arterial sodium nitroprusside on intracranial pressure and cerebral
autoregulation. Japanese Heart Journal 1984;25,231-237. Abstract
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
37
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies References
27. Griswold WR, Reznik V, Mendoza SA. Nitroprusside-induced intracranial hypertension. JAMA. 1981;246:2679-2680.
Abstract
REFERENCES
28. Anile C, Zanghi F, Bracali A, et al. Sodium nitroprusside and intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir (Wien).
1981;58:203-211. Abstract
29. Peacock WF, Varon J, Baumann BM, et al. CLUE: a randomized comparative effectiveness trial of IV nicardipine versus
labetalol use in the emergency department. Crit Care. 2011;15:R157. Full text Abstract
30. Tumlin JA, Dunbar LM, Oparil S, et al. Fenoldopam, a dopamine agonist, for hypertensive emergency: a multicenter
randomized trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:653-662. Abstract
31. Devlin JW, Seta ML, Kanji S, Somerville AL. Fenoldopam versus nitroprusside for the treatment of hypertensive
emergency. Ann Pharmacother. 2004;38:755-759. Abstract
32. Bath PM, Krishnan K. Interventions for deliberately altering blood pressure in acute stroke. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev. 2014;(10):CD000039. Full text Abstract
33. Neutel JM, Smith DHG, Wallin D, et al. A comparison of intravenous nicardipine and sodium nitroprusside in the
immediate treatment of severe hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:623-628. Abstract
34. Lau J, Antman EM, Jimenez-Silva J, Kupelnick B. Cumulative meta-analysis of therapeutic trials for MI. N Engl J Med.
1992;327:248-254. Abstract
35. Erbel R, Alfonso F, Boileau C, et al. Diagnosis and management of aortic dissection. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:1642-1681.
Full text Abstract
36. Bussmann WD, Kenedi P, von Mengden HJ, et al. Comparison of nitroglycerin with nifedipine in patients with
hypertensive crisis or severe hypertension. Clin Investig. 1992;70:1085-1088. Abstract
37. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and
eclampsia. Number 33, January 2002. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2002;77:67-75. Abstract
38. Magee LA, Cham C, Waterman EJ, et al. Hydralazine for treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: meta-analysis.
BMJ. 2003;327:955-960. Full text Abstract
39. Mabie WC, Gonzalez AR, Sibai BM, et al. A comparative trial of labetalol and hydralazine in the acute management
of severe hypertension complicating pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70:328-333. Abstract
40. Elatrous S, Nouira S, Ouanes Besbes L, et al. Short-term treatment of severe hypertension of pregnancy: prospective
comparison of nicardipine and labetalol. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1281-1286. Abstract
41. Nij Bijvank SW, Duvekot JJ. Nicardipine for the treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy: a review of the
literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010;65:341-347. Abstract
42. Lucas MJ, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG. A comparison of magnesium sulfate with phenytoin for the prevention of
eclampsia. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:201-205. Full text Abstract
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
38 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies References
43. Bailey JM, Lu W, Levy JH, et al. Clevidipine: a unique agent for the critical care practitioner. Crit Care Shock. 2006;9:9-15.
44. Lip GY, Beevers M, Beevers DG. Complications and survival of 315 patients with malignant-phase hypertension. J
REFERENCES
Hypertens. 1995;13:915-924. Abstract
45. Webster J, Petrie JC, Jeffers TA, et al. Accelerated hypertension patterns or mortality and clinical factors affecting
outcome in treated patients. Q J Med. 1993;86:485-493. Abstract
46. Midgley JP, Matthew AG, Greenwood CM, et al. Effect of reduced dietary sodium on blood pressure: a meta-analysis
of randomized controlled trials. JAMA. 1996;275:1590-1597. Abstract
47. Lichtenstein AH, Appel LJ, Brands M, et al. Diet and lifestyle recommendations revision 2006: a scientific statement
from the American Heart Association Nutrition Committee. Circulation. 2006;114:82-96. Full text Abstract
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
39
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Images
Images
Figure 1: Fundus photograph of the right eye with multiple dot-blot haemorrhages typical of hypertensive retinopathy
IMAGES
Courtesy Angie Wen MD, Attending Faculty, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York
Figure 2: Fundus photograph of the left eye with multiple cotton-wool spots typical of hypertensive retinopathy
Courtesy Angie Wen MD, Attending Faculty, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
40 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Images
Figure 3: Fundus photograph of the right eye centred on the optic nerve, showing multiple cotton-wool spots and macular
exudates in a radiating star configuration around the fovea
IMAGES
Courtesy Angie Wen MD, Attending Faculty, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, New York
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
41
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Hypertensive emergencies Disclaimer
Disclaimer
This content is meant for medical professionals situated outside of the United States and Canada. The BMJ Publishing
Group Ltd ("BMJ Group") tries to ensure that the information provided is accurate and up-to-date, but we do not warrant
that it is nor do our licensors who supply certain content linked to or otherwise accessible from our content. The BMJ
Group does not advocate or endorse the use of any drug or therapy contained within nor does it diagnose patients.
Medical professionals should use their own professional judgement in using this information and caring for their patients
and the information herein should not be considered a substitute for that.
This information is not intended to cover all possible diagnosis methods, treatments, follow up, drugs and any
contraindications or side effects. In addition such standards and practices in medicine change as new data become
available, and you should consult a variety of sources. We strongly recommend that users independently verify specified
diagnosis, treatments and follow up and ensure it is appropriate for your patient within your region. In addition, with
respect to prescription medication, you are advised to check the product information sheet accompanying each drug
to verify conditions of use and identify any changes in dosage schedule or contraindications, particularly if the agent to
be administered is new, infrequently used, or has a narrow therapeutic range. You must always check that drugs referenced
are licensed for the specified use and at the specified doses in your region. This information is provided on an "as is" basis
and to the fullest extent permitted by law the BMJ Group and its licensors assume no responsibility for any aspect of
healthcare administered with the aid of this information or any other use of this information.
This PDF of the BMJ Best Practice topic is based on the web version that was last updated: Mar 13, 2017.
42 BMJ Best Practice topics are regularly updated and the most recent version of the topics can be found on bestpractice.bmj.com . Use
of this content is subject to our disclaimer. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2017. All rights reserved.
Contributors:
// Authors:
Hector Ventura, MD
Head
Section of Cardiomyopathy and Heart Transplantation, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA
DISCLOSURES: HV declares that he has no competing interests.
Madhavi T. Reddy, MD
Assistant Professor
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
DISCLOSURES: MR is employed by Merck and owns stocks in Merck, and Johnson & Johnson.
// Peer Reviewers:
Ethan Cumbler, MD
Assistant Professor
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO
DISCLOSURES: EC declares that he has no competing interests.