# MARKETBEAT
Cushman & Wakefield Research
Q2 2016
CONTENTS
03
15
49
44
SECTION 2
SECTION 1 COMMERCIAL REAL SECTION 3 SECTION 4
OUTLOOK ESTATE APPENDIX OUR TEAM
Major economic trends of Macroeconomic and analytic Major indicators of Moscow Information about Cushman &
current period, market review review of various commercial commercial real estate market, Wakefield in Russia, Research
and forecast real estate market sectors standard commercial lease department contact details
terms
OUTLOOK
RUSSIAN STATE, BUSINESS AND
POPULATION IS NOW FEELING THE SOLID
GROUND. HOWEVER STIMULUS WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR ECONOMY TO RECOVER.
MACRO FORECAST
CPI
Forecast of the macro indicators for 2016 was improved, 7.6% 5.7% 5.2% 4.6%
suggesting that economy is now close to its lowest.
However there was a slight downgrade of 2016 INTEREST RATE
household consumption forecast. 2016 2017 2018 2019
MACRO SUMMARY
For the first time in recent years economists upgraded In Q1 major industries were suffering from recession.
their forecasts within recent review cycle. Oxford Only financial sector and mining were growing more
economics pushed GDP up by 0.9pp, while Ministry of than 1%. Education lost over 4%. Processing and trade
-1.5%
Economics symbolically improved by 0.1pp. are also in the red zone.
This means that consensus view on Russian economy Hopefully in Q2 we will see better picture.
becomes more positive. However no one expects swift
recovery.
GDP growth outlook
for 2016 GDP GROWTH OUTLOOK GDP STRUCTURE
According to Oxford
5,2%
4,5% 4,3%
Economics 3,4%
2,2%
-0.2%
1,8%
1,3%
0,6% 0,8% 1,8% 1,8%
1,1%
-0,2%
-1,5%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 F2016 F2017 F2018 F2019
#MARKETBEAT | Q2 2016 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD RESEARCH DEPARTMENT | 5
Source: Rosstat, the Ministry of Economics, Oxford Economics
MACROREVIEW | CAPITAL MARKETS | OFFICES | RETAIL | WAREHOUSES
SUMMARY | CONSUMER MARKET | CORPORATE| CURRENCY
CONSUMER MARKET
CONSUMER DEMAND
-17,2%
10% Unlike 2009 when bigger cities were more
resilient to the consumption drop, this time
6,5%
7,1% consumer market in mega cities collapsed,
5% 6,3%
while smaller cities and rural areas were more
In 2015 3,9%
3,3% stable.
2,7% 2,6%
1,1% One of the reasons of such vulnerability of
Retail lost in Moscow 0%
bigger Russian cities is the higher mortgage
-2,7%
penetration. Significant shares (sometimes over
-5,1% Disposable income |
-5% Раcполагаемые доходы 60%) of household budgets are locked in
-10%
mortgage payments. As the result even slight
Moscow retail trade | Оборот -10,0%
decrease in household income leads to severe
-10% розничной торговли по drop in consumption.
Москве Mortgage is growing and this means that even
Total retail trade | Оборот in case of growing income, people will prefer to
In 2015 -15% розничной торговли по РФ
invest in apartments rather than increase
Retail lost in Russia discretionary consumption.
-20%
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 F2016 F2017 F2018 F2019
CREDIT MARKET
39%
Non-bank loans are booming. While banks became more Decrease of the housing prices along with state mortgage
careful with risky borrowers, non bank loans are growing support program improved the affordability of dwellings.
at over 30% a year and reached 69 bn Rub in 2015 . Citizens view current situation as window of
opportunities to improve their living conditions.
Share of mortgage
On the other hand increase of the volumes of the long
In total debt term liabilities will create pressure on the consumer
spending and retail sector.
CONSUMER CREDITS IN RUSSIA
189
Consumer debt growth | Рост потребительского 25 000 9%
5,0% кредитования
Mortgage growth | Рост ипотечного 20 000
4,0% кредитования 8%
15 000
3,0% 7%
10 000
11-14
05-16
01-14
03-14
05-14
07-14
09-14
01-15
03-15
05-15
07-15
09-15
11-15
01-16
03-16
DEBT 0,0%
-5 000
4%
-10 000
03-15
06-13
09-13
12-13
03-14
06-14
09-14
12-14
06-15
09-15
12-15
03-16
-1,0% 3%
-15 000 Personal savings, bn RUR | Накопления,
05-14
07-15
01-14
03-14
07-14
09-14
11-14
01-15
03-15
05-15
09-15
11-15
01-16
03-16
05-16
млрд. руб.
-2,0%
Total Debt, bn RUB | Задолженность, млрд.
руб.
-3,0%
#MARKETBEAT | Q2 2016 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD RESEARCH DEPARTMENT | 7
CREDITS
DEBT IS SHRINKING
Corporate debt is diminishing since beginning of 2016. Construction sector is still suffering from bad
This mainly happens because of the decrease of the ruble debts. The share of the overdue debts in
value in foreign currency loans. construction had stabilized at 18%, still about 3
-3.2%
However decrease of the Central Bank key rate by 0.5 pp times higher than across economy in general.
in June may help facilitate credit market.
26%
25%
25 000
15%
23 000 20%
21 000 10%
15%
01.01.16
01.01.14
05.01.14
07.01.14
09.01.14
11.01.14
01.01.15
03.01.15
05.01.15
07.01.15
09.01.15
11.01.15
03.01.16
05.01.16
Jul-14
Sep-14
Nov-14
Jul-15
Sep-15
Nov-15
May-14
May-15
May-16
Jan-14
Jan-15
Mar-15
Jan-16
Mar-14
Mar-16
FX Corporate debt (bn RUR) | Валютные кредиты, млрд.руб
RUB Corporate debt (bn RUR) | Рублевые кредиты, млрд.руб % of overdue debt | Общая доля просроченных кредитов, %
Overdue debt in construction | Просроченные кредиты на строительство
Share of FX debt | Доля валютных кредитов
#MARKETBEAT | Q2 2016 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD RESEARCH DEPARTMENT | 8
MACROREVIEW | CAPITAL MARKETS | OFFICES | RETAIL | WAREHOUSES
2015 2016
2.8 2.5
US$ bn US$ bn
CAPITAL 2016
3.5
MARKETS
US$ bn
OFFICES
Q1 2016 Q2 2016
10.50% 10.50%
In H1 2016, the total volume invested in the Russian
SHOPPING CENTERS
commercial real estate was US$ 2.5 bn. We expect US$
3.5 bn of investments by the end of 2016. Q1 2016 Q2 2016
11.00% 11.00%
WAREHOUSES
Q1 2016 Q2 2016
12.75% 12.75%
CAPITALIZATION RATES
10.5%
institutional investors to compare real estate markets the key rate, taking into consideration the inflation risks.
across the world. Our estimation of the capitalization
rates is kept at the same level during two quarters.
CAPITALIZATION RATE
CAPITALIZATION RATES CBR KEY RATE, CBR REFINANCING RATE
FOR OFFICES
16% 18%
14% 16%
10.5%
12% 14%
12%
10%
10%
8%
8%
6%
CBR KEY RATE 6%
4% 4%
11,00%
10,00%
13,00%
17,00%
11,00%
11,00%
10,50%
2% 2%
8,75%
7,75%
8,00%
8,25%
8,25%
0% 0%
Q1 Q2 Q1 Q2
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
OFFICES SHOPPING CENTERS WAREHOUSES CBR REFINANCING RATE CBR KEY RATE
INVESTMENT VOLUMES
3.5
8000 commercial real estate was just US$ 173 mn. The
amount became an eleven year anti-record. At the
7000 same time, US$ 2.5 bn were invested in H1 2016.
6000 Regardless the investment fail of the past quarter we
believe big on-going deals to be closed in 2016 and
5000
US$ bn do not revise our 2016 forecast expecting US$ 3.5 bn
4000 by the end of the year.
2016 FORECAST
3000
2000
1000
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
OFFICE RETAIL INDUSTRIAL OTHER FORECAST
INVESTMENT STRUCTURE
The share of foreign investments in the Russian commercial real estate in H1 2016 was just 5%.
CASH FLOWS
43
RUSSIA
companies made the lion share of all the
investments– US$ 1.66 bn ( US$ 1.31 bn – for their
own needs). The potential increase of vacancy rate in
shopping centers affects the investment
HOTEL
attractiveness of retail objects . As a result there were
US$ mn almost no investments in retail segment in H1 2016.
INVESTED IN RETAIL UAE INDUSTRIAL
SEGMENT SWITZERLAND
USA
AUSTRIA
NORWAY
RETAIL
FINLAND
AMOUNT, US$
SEGMENT QUARTER PROPERTY INVESTOR
MN
960 OFFICES
OFFICES
Q1
Q1
EVOLUTION
EURASIA
TRANSNEFT
VTB
960
300
4.0
TURKEY
SLOVAKIA
SERBIA
RUSSIA
US$ bn
INVESTED IN THE ROMANIA
COMMERCIAL REAL
ESTATE OF POLAND POLAND
IN 2015 (OFFICE,
RETAIL, WAREHOUSE) HUNGARY
CZECHIA
BULGARIA
16.12
mn sq m
3
TOTAL STOCK
mn sq m
OFFICES
VACANT
OFFICES
18.7 %
VACANCY
RATE
CONSTRUCTION
Absorption
215 175
ABSORPTION IN H1 2016 VOLUME OF NEW SUPPLY
IN Q1 2015
‘000 sq m ‘000 sq m
2008 - Q1
2008 - Q2
2008 - Q3
2008 - Q4
2009 - Q1
2009 - Q2
2009 - Q3
2009 - Q4
2010 - Q1
2010 - Q2
2010 - Q3
2010 - Q4
2011 - Q1
2011 - Q2
2011 - Q3
2011 - Q4
2012 - Q1
2012 - Q2
2012 - Q3
2012 - Q4
2013 - Q1
2013 - Q2
2013 - Q3
2013 - Q4
2014 - Q1
2014 - Q2
2014 - Q3
2014 - Q4
2015 - Q1
2015 - Q2
2015 - Q3
2015 - Q4
2016 - Q1
2016 - Q2
2 500
Thousands sq m
Thousands sq m
2 000
600
500
1 500 400
300
200
1 000
100
0
500 -100
-200
-300
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 H1 Class A Class B
New Supply Absorption 2016
DEMAND
980 660
WERE EXECUTED IN H1 2016 TAKE-UP VOLUME IN H1 2016
MAJOR DEALS IN H1 2016 The total volume of leased and owner-purchased office
premises remains high. During the first half of the year 980
COMPANY AREA BUILDING CLASS / SUBMARKET deals were completed with the overall volume of around
658,000 sq m.
VTB 93,878 sq m Eurasia A / Central Approximately 30% of the demand attributes to acquisitions
Moscow 31,860 sq m OKO А / Central of entire properties and blocks in business centres.
Government For the first half of the year absorption totaled 215,000 sq m.
Servier 5,982 sq m White Gardens А / Downtown Revitalization of business activity had positive effect on
absorption as companies sought upgrades in quality and
Philip Morris 4,784 sq m Kuntsevo Plaza A / OTA efficiency via attractive rental terms.
Gazprom Inform 4,155 sq m 9 Acres В+ / OTA Limited new construction as well as stable demand resulted in
optimistic indicators of Q2 2016.
QIWI 3,871 sq m Avinyon II А / OTA
NEW SUPPLY
AVAILABILITY
Vacancy rates showed slight decrease in Q2 2016, after two While demand for offices is stable and construction activity is
years of growth. low, vacancy level is expected to decrease organically in
By the end of Q2 2016, average vacancy rate stood at 18.4%, upcoming two or three years.
analogous to that of Q2 2015. Still there are almost 3 million sq
18.7
m of vacant spaces in both class A and B properties .
Thousands sq m
IN H1 2016
30% 3 000
3
25% 27,69% 2 500
20% 2 000
15% 1 500
mn sq m 15,87%
EXISTING 10% 1 000
AVAILABILITY 5% 500
0% 0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 H1 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 H1
2016 2016
Class A Class B (B+&B-) Class A Class B (B+&B-)
Source: Cushman & Wakefield
#MARKETBEAT | Q2 2016 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD RESEARCH DEPARTMENT | 19
MACROREVIEW | CAPITAL MARKETS | OFFICES | RETAIL | WAREHOUSES
SUMMARY | ABSORPTION | DEMAND | NEW SUPPLY | AVAILABILITY | EXPOSITION | RENTAL RATES
EXPOSITION
700 16%
RENTAL RATES
DEDOLLARIZATION
Lease RUB
Discount
RENTAL RATES
In H1 2016 average rental rate in dollar equivalent was lower than in 2015. However, in Q2 2016 following healthy demand
for offices and stable exchange rate of Russian ruble, indicator showed slight improvement.
Moreover, ruble equivalents have been stable for three quarters already and also show some summer increase.
We expect that relatively constant currency exchange rate will keep rental rates at the same level in mid-term prospective.
93
Lease agreements with rents nominated in rubles or with special provisions for payment of dollar-nominated rates will be
trending in the upcoming years.
RUBLES VS DOLLARS
RUBLE STRENGTHENED
454 14 723
DOLLAR EQUIVALENT RUBLE EQUIVALENT
ALL A CLASS DEALS ALL DEALS IN B CLASS
IN H1 2016 IN H1 2016
US Dollars per sq m per annum Rubles per sq m per annum
37 000
Class B / Класс B
DEALS
СДЕЛОК Class A / Класс А
$1 800 Moscow office lease deals by rent and transaction date Weighted average A class rent / Среднее взвешенное значение за год, Класс А
bubble size reflects deal size
Сделки аренды на московском рынке по дате заключения Weighted average B class rent / Среднее взвешенное значение за год, класс B
и арендной ставке.
размер точки соответствует площади сделки
$1 600 ( = 10 000 sq m)
$1 400
$1 200
Rental rate, USD/sq m / Арендная ставка, долл. за кв.м.
$1 000
$800
$600
$400
$200
12 %
VACANCY RATE
(all shopping centers, Moscow)
145
RETAIL
‘000 RUB
PRIME RENTAL RATE INDICATOR
4.6
to the new market reality. Main indicators – prime rental rate
and vacancy rate are stable.
Single projects are being completed and delivered to the MN SQ M
market. Developers are more focused on the existing schemes’ TOTAL QUALITY STOCK, MOSCOW
concept optimization including area extension, new design and (Quality shopping malls, mixed-use buildings, outlets,
tenant mix. and retail parks)
CONSUMER MARKET
-1.7%
FOOTFALL CHANGE BY SHOPPING CENTRE SIZE
In comparison to Q1 2016 the situation has
improved. In Q2 2016 the lowest indicators in all
5-20 000 20-40 000 40-80 000 >80 000 shopping centre categories started to shrink the
Q2 2016 spread with the same period of the previous year
2% (e.g., from -7% to -4% in small shopping centers,
AVERAGE FOOTFALL
1% from -9% to -0,4% in mid-scale projects, etc.)
IN MOSCOW SHOPPING
CENTERS* As a result, average footfall in Moscow in Q1 2016 is
3.6% lower compared to the same period of the last
-3.6%
-0,4%
-2%
year, in Q2 2016 – 1.7% lower than in Q2 2015.
-3%
-4% As for shopping centres in St. Petersburg, in Q2 2016
the footfall is higher by 1.6% than in the same period
Q1 2016 of the last year, while in Q1 2016 the spread was -
-7%
2.5%.
-9%
AVERAGE FOOTFALL
IN MOSCOW SHOPPING Q1 2016 Q2 2016
CENTERS*
*compared to the same Source: Watcom, Cushman & Wakefield calculation
period of the last year
RETAILERS
Economy segment chains in different product categories and entertainment operators continue
leading in expansion activity.
NEW RETAILERS
Liquor stores are among the most actively growing We can also expect to see new names in this segment.
market players. By the end of 2015 Bristol liquor store New entertainment parks such as KidzMondo and Funky
chain became the market leader by sales growth - the World may enter the market in the near future.
chain opened 900 new shops in 2015. Another chain in While demand is shrinking, retail operators try to attract
the segment Krasnoe i Beloe took the 14th place in the the loyal audience experimenting with formats.
ranking (InfoLine data). Technosila announced sales increase in the shops of new
Fast-food segment also keeps growing. Yum! announced format (average check increased by 15%), KFC plans to
the plans to increase the market share significantly – open small mobile trolleys at trains station, Okey
100 new restaurants per year. Ginza project is opening a opened a hypermarket in a new format in St. Petersburg
new budget-friendly Georgian burger restaurant Moko (there are changes in zoning, navigation and design of
EXPANSION Burger. the sales area, non-food goods zone is organized in shop-
Existing entertainment chains continue the trend of in-shop format).
extending of entertainment areas in shopping centres More affordable lease terms in Moscow and regional
(for instance, trampoline centre Nevesomost’ plans at shopping centres allows regional operators to enter the
least 5 new openings in 2016). Moscow market and markets of other regions.
12%
Vacancy rate* by shopping center type:
Prime: 2-3%
Sustainable: 7-8%
Average market
vacancy rate
Opened in 2014-2016: 25-30%
Vacancy rate in sustainable shopping centres Projects constructed over the past two years that
(opened more than 2 years ago, with loyal target had high vacancy rate at the opening, are slowly
65%
audience and balanced tenant mix) hasn’t changed decreasing the vacancy level. Retailers activity dropped
significantly during past year. noticeably and exposition period increased. Preferences
Prime shopping centres (successful projects in prime that tenants receive for opening and for the initial lease
locations) show high occupancy rate consistently, period is an important driver to decrease the vacancy
though the rotation of tenants is registered. rate.
25%
OF TOTAL RETAIL
SPACE WAS
CONSTRUCTED IN
2014-2016
465
NEW CONSTRUCTION IN RUSSIA, ‘000 SQ M 226,481 Opening of the largest quality shopping centre in
Vladivostok Sedanka-City (GLA 45,000 sq m) was a
significant event on the regional real estate market.
M.Video opened the first store in the region and Kidburg
QUALITY SHOPPING children edutainment centre is planning to be located in
CENTRES IN RUSSIA the shopping center.
Shopping centres keep opening with low occupancy of
retail gallery. In Pioner SC (Barnaul) only one floor out of
four was launched with Lenta as anchor tenant. The
18.7
second floor is planned to be opened in Q3.
Developers are focusing on concept optimization – design
update, space expansion rather than new developments.
For instance, IKEA plans to increase the area of existing
mn sq m shopping centers in Moscow and regions. In St.
Petersburg, Mega Park is planned to be added to MEGA
EXISTING QUALITY Dybenko– project of improvement and landscaping of the
RETAIL SPACE IN area adjacent to the mall. ADG Group is going to carry
SHOPPING CENTRES out a redevelopment project of 39 old cinemas into
community centres in Moscow.
117
Q2 2016 – it is the largest project among announced to be
delivered in 2016. Entertainment part is widely presented in
the shopping center, including Skazkin Dom, the first
children interactive museum in Moscow, ART-Korobka
exhibition area, cinema and other facilities.
QUALITY SHOPPING
CENTRES Significant retail space delivery is expected in Q3 2016 –
such large-scale projects as Metropolis (2 phase), Okeania,
4.6
Horosho! and Kosino Park are planned for opening. These
projects will comprise half of the retail space planned for
delivery to the market in 2016 (189 000 sq m out of 360 000
sq m of space expected for opening).
In the Moscow region one of the largest shopping centres in
mn sq m the region Riga Mall (GLA 80,000 sq m ) is planned for
QUALITY RETAIL delivery to the market. OBI hypermarket has already started
SPACE IN SHOPPING operating since June, grand opening of the shopping centre
CENTRES is expected to be in Q3 2016.
The table includes all major quality projects in Moscow and Moscow The table includes all quality projects completed in H1 2016 and the largest
Region completed in H1 2016 and planned for delivery in 2016. (GLA 40,000+ sq. m ) projects announced for delivery later in 2016.
#MARKETBEAT | Q2 2016 CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD RESEARCH DEPARTMENT | 32
Riviera
#MARKETBEAT | Q2 2016
Okeaniya
Horosho!
existing
under construction
Source: http://www.interactivemaps.ru
MACROREVIEW | CAPITAL MARKETS | OFFICES | RETAIL | WAREHOUSES
SUMMARY | RETAILERS | SHOPPING CENTRES | COMMERCIAL TERMS
COMMERCIAL TERMS
145
Different types of compound rental rate remains to be Due to high vacancy rate in the newly opened shopping
the most common market practice (percentage of centres, developers try different approaches in order to
retailer’s turnover + fixed rental rate). generate consumer loyalty to the new projects and
Another option of rental payment structuring is proving new shopping experience. Among possible
consolidation – on the basis of turnover of one or two approaches there are one-time events (exhibitions,
‘000 RUB / sq m/ year years of rent (when the payment is linked to the discussion sessions etc., such as Bartenev exhibition in
percentage of retailer’s turnover) minimum indexed Kuntsevo Plaza mixed-use complex, Marketing Session
rental rate for the remaining rental period is calculated. of RCSC in Zelenopark shopping centre), and also
permanent exhibition areas and socio-cultural spaces
PRIME SHOPPING Taking into account current situation we expect no
(for example, Art-Korobka exhibition zone in Riviera
MALL INDICATOR*, significant changes in the market till the end of the year.
shopping centre, opening of a cultural and educational
MOSCOW, The market has reached the balance in the new
environment. Now adjustments take place in each single space in Okhta Mall in St. Petersburg which is currently
Q2 2016 under construction).
project individually – rental conditions can change
depending on development stage and occupancy level of Such projects do not increase rental flow because often
the project. they are hold on favorable or free terms, however they
can improve the image, increase awareness and
recognisibility of the project and create comfortable
environment for the costumers.
* Prime shopping mall indicator - base asking rental rate for a 100 sq m
gallery unit on the ground floor of prime shopping centres.
2016 Q1-2
NEW CONSTRUCTION (CLASS A AND B)
The market is still under pressure of the large amount of vacant All the factors show a temporary chilldown of the warehouse
premises. We saw no reason for decreasing trend of vacancy rate segment of the Russian real estate market in 2016.
in H1 2016. Nevertheless, the increasing take up will be a possible option for
The average rental rate broke through the 4000 RUB / sq m the market if the food retailers will follow their expansion plans
level in H1 2016 and stabilized at 3800 – 4000 RUB / sq m / in Moscow and regions.
year. Food and household goods retailers compose the main demand
We also notice the extinction of ‘buy’ and ‘rent’ activities. The H1 at the moment.
2016 take up was the lowest since 2010.
311 4 000
TAKE UP Q1-2 2016 CURRENT NET RENTAL
RATE*
4 150
4 000
4 000
3 820
3 750
3 480
3 500
3 331
3 250 3 341
3 325
3 000
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
The decrease of the construction rate and the vacancy rate is expected in 2017 only.
311
In Q2 2016, 206,000 sq m of new quality warehouse
space were delivered to the market . According to the
developers, 850,000 sq m of new supply are
1 800
expected by the end of the year 2016, which is similar
1 600
to 2015.
‘000 sq m 1 400
The vacancy rate was unchanged in Q2 2016 at the
NEW CONSTRUCTION, 1 200 level of 10%. At the same time the high developers’
Q2 2016
'000 sq m
850
800
TAKE UP, CLASSES A AND B, ‘000 sq m In Q2 2016, the total volume of closed deals in the
328
warehouse segment – both lease and sale – was
110,000 sq m. It is lower than the average amount
during the 2008 – 2015 period.
1 400 In H1 2016, the average size of closed deals was 5%
1 200 lower than in 2015 – 11,000 sq m. And the number of
‘000 sq m deals was 20% lower. The share of sale deals fell by
TAKE UP, H1 2016 1 000 24 pp from 31% in 2015 to just 7% in 2016.
800 The majority of closed deals are featured with an
600 area from 5,000 to 10,000 sq m. The warehouse
800
premises larger than 20,000 sq m get less interest
400
from potential tenants. The interest to smaller
200 premises is of the same level during the last five
0 years.
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
‘000 sq m Moscow Forecast
TAKE UP, 2016F
TAKE UP STRUCTURE, CLASSES A AND B Food and household goods retailers supported more
44%
than 40% of the total demand in H1 2016.
Tenants benefit from the current combination of
high vacancy rate and low ruble rental rates. We note
Distributor - 14.0% Distributor - 15.1% the increasing numbers of companies renegotiating
their current lease terms, consolidating their
THE SHARE OF RETAIL Logistic - 18.8% premises and moving to the higher quality ones.
Logistic - 19.5%
CHAINS IN TAKE-UP The low economic indicators of the Russian
(H1 2016)
Other - 0.0%
Other - 5.0% consumer sector will determine the behavior pattern
Producer - 24.5% of potential tenants in 2016. We believe the take up
Producer - 16.1%
will be about 40% lower than in 2015 and will not
exceed 800,000 sq m.
201
We identify a reduction of new construction in the
Russian regions, unlike the Moscow region. In 2016,
1 200 461,000 sq m will be delivered – 35% less than in
2015. Almost half of expected space will be delivered
1 000 in Saint Petersburg and Ekaterinburg areas. To
‘000 sq m
minimize their risks regional developers proposes
NEW CONSTRUCTION, 800 the ‘built-to-suit’ approach to potential tenants –
H1 2016 40% of expected space are preleased or presold.
600
Because of this strategy the vacancy rate currently
461
400 does not exceed 10% in A class warehouse segment
in the majority of the Russian regions.
200
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
‘000 sq m Actual Construction Forecast
NEW CONSTRUCTION,
2016 (FORECAST)
DEMAND. REGIONS
In H1 2016, the total area – both leased and sold – was In H1 2016, the average deal size was 6,700 sq m. – 13%
160,000 sq m that is 13% less than in H1 2015. Almost less than in H1 2015. We expect 400,000 sq m of the
one third of the area – 31% - was sold. The average deal total take up by the end of the year.
160
size decreases. At the same time the number of the deals
does not.
‘000 sq m TAKE UP STRUCTURE, CLASSES A AND B TAKE UP, CLASSES A AND B, ‘000 sq m
TAKE-UP, Q1-2 2016
Distributor - 5.8% 600
Distributor - 16.0%
400
Logistic - 23.5%
200
‘000 sq m
100
TAKE-UP, 2016 Retailer - 39.6% Retailer - 55.0%
(FORECAST) 0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016F
Regions Forecast
Q1-2 2015 Q1-2 2016
SHARE OF A CLASS
WAREHOUSE NET ASKING RATES,
CITY VACANCY RATE
PREMISES IN TOTAL ‘000 RUB/SQ M/YEAR
STOCK IN RUSSIA
61%
Moscow 61% 3.8 – 4.0 10%
St. Petersburg 15% 3.5 – 4.0 6%
Novosibirsk 4% 3.0 – 4.0 7%
Ekaterinburg 3% 3.0 – 3.6 8%
Rostov-on-Don 2% 4.0 – 4.3 13%
OF A CLASS
Krasnodar 2% 2.9 – 3.4 7%
WAREHOUSES
Kazan 1,5% 2.7 – 3.0 47%
ARE LOCATED IN
THE MOSCOW
REGION
DISTANCE TOTAL
PROJECT HIGHWAY REGION FROM AREA, DELIVERY
CITY, KM ‘000 SQ M
1.2
Mihaylovskaya sloboda Novoryazanskaya Moscow 20 70.3 Q1, Q2
Logopark Sever II Leningradskoye Moscow 30 104.9 Q2, Q3
PNK – North 39 106.5
Kashirskoye Moscow Q3, Q4
mn sq m Sheremet’evo
Industrial Park South 30 89.0
Kashirskoye Moscow Q4
NEW Gate
65 57.5
CONSTRUCTION,
Klin logistic park Leningradskoye Moscow Q4
A Plus Shushary Moscovskoye St. Petersburg 20 95.0 Q2
2016 (FORECAST) Fright Village Vorsino Kievskoye Kaluga 67 35.6 Q2
Vladivostok-port 30 28
Aviapolis Yankovskiy Vladivostok Q2
Vostochniy
A Plus Park Perm Zapadniy obhod Perm 19 26.4 Q3
Octavian Toksovskoye St. Petersburg 11 53 Q3, Q4
MOSCOW OFFICES
Stock class A, EOP '000 sq m 720 995 1 326 1 729 2 021 2 318 2 536 2 684 3 416 3 821 3 821 3 851 3 971 4 071 4 171
Stock class B (B+ and B-), EOP '000 sq m 5 297 6 509 8 277 9 158 9 781 10 167 10 515 11 227 11 838 12 132 12 195 12 272 12 282 12 382 12 482
New construction, A, '000 sq m 131 275 331 403 292 297 219 225 714 327 0 30 150 100 100
New construction, B (B+ and B-), '000 sq m 765 1 212 1 768 881 623 386 348 674 693 394 63 82 150 100 100
Vacancy rate class A 3,9% 4,8% 12,8% 23,6% 22,5% 16,8% 14,6% 17,6% 23,8% 31,1% 28,9% 26,3% 30,0% 29,5% 29,0%
Vacancy rate class B (B+ and B-) 2,7% 4,1% 6,1% 11,1% 10,4% 8,9% 9,1% 9,8% 10,8% 14,4% 16,3% 15,9% 16,0% 15,8% 15,5%
Take up class A, '000 sq m 287 487 456 183 388 638 459 361 324 427 179 66 400 300 250
Take up class B (B+ and B-), '000 sq m 863 1 024 1 237 558 911 1 224 1 398 1 205 937 872 180 233 700 800 850
Rental rates class A, USD/sq m pa $714 $934 $1 092 $729 $645 $733 $790 $867 $772 $549 $433 $502 $460 $470 $500
Rental rates class B (B+ and B-), RUB/sq m pa 14 337 16 486 20 240 16 141 12 671 13 370 14 624 17 041 18 699 17 820 14 214 15 046 15 000 15 500 16 500
Prime capitalization rate 8,25% 7,25% 12,00% 13,00% 9,00% 8,50% 8,75% 8,50% 11,00% 10,50% 10,50% 10,50% 10,50% 10,50% 9,50%
Total stock, EOP, '000 sq m 1 477 1 696 2 052 2 569 2 957 3 147 3 297 3 482 4 129 4 555 4 555 4 655 4 915 5 115 5 215
New construction, '000 sq m 369 219 356 517 388 190 150 185 647 426 0 100 360 200 100
Prime vacancy rate, EOP 0,7% 1,0% 3,0% 5,0% 2,1% 0,4% 0,5% 1,2% 1,5% 2,0% 2,5% 2,5% 3,0% 2,5% 2,0%
Prime rental rate indicator, RUB/sq m pa* 94 990 91 980 99 480 87 368 88 102 105 804 114 959 121 258 127 380 159 432 145 000 145 000 145 000 145 000 160 000
(until 201 6 nominated in USD, paid in RUB by offical ex change rate)
Prime capitalization rate 9,50% 9,00% 12,00% 13,00% 10,00% 9,25% 9,50% 9,00% 11,00% 11,00% 11,00% 11,00% 11,00% 11,00% 10,50%
Stock, class A, EOP '000 sq m 1 943 3 129 3 723 4 352 4 676 4 933 5 598 6 456 7 852 8 669 8 716 8 922 9 457 9 857 10 407
Stock, class B, EOP '000 sq m 1 789 1 978 2 060 2 109 2 157 2 264 2 317 2 409 2 688 2 690 2 690 2 690 3 060 3 100 3 145
New construction, class A, '000 sq m 863 1 186 594 629 324 257 664 858 1 396 817 47 206 788 400 550
New construction, class B, '000 sq m 126 188 82 49 48 107 53 92 279 2 0 0 62 40 45
Vacancy rate class A 2,0% 2,0% 2,0% 10,5% 8,0% 1,0% 1,0% 1,5% 7,0% 10,0% 10,0% 10,0% 11,0% 9,0% 8,0%
Vacancy rate class B 2,0% 2,0% 2,0% 5,9% 6,1% 1,5% 1,5% 2,0% 5,0% 8,0% 8,0% 8,0% 8,0% 7,0% 6,0%
Net Absorption Class A, '000 sq m 846 1 162 582 247 409 580 658 817 944 500 42 185 615 553 605
Net Absorption Class B, '000 sq m 123 185 80 -33 40 205 53 78 192 -79 0 0 341 68 73
Rental rates class A, RUB/sq m pa 3 691 3 322 3 482 3 336 3 342 3 968 4 194 4 308 4 500 4 150 4 000 4 000 3 900 4 000 4 100
Rental rates class B, RUB/sq m pa 3 284 2 989 3 109 2 859 2 795 3 821 4 039 4 148 4 000 3 800 3 700 3 700 3 600 3 700 3 800
Prime capitalization rate 10,50% 9,25% 13,00% 14,00% 10,50% 10,50% 11,50% 11,00% 13,00% 12,75% 12,75% 12,75% 12,75% 12,75% 12,25%
INVESTMENTS
TOTAL, MN US$ 4 560 5 354 5 798 2 256 3 994 7 657 7 458 8 066 4 309 2 828 2 337 173 3 500 3 000 4 000
Office, US$ mn 1 244 1 719 3 149 1 998 3 282 3 432 2 854 3 517 2 230 1 198 1 559 113
Retail, US$ mn 2 224 2 216 2 029 30 459 1 767 2 585 2 798 639 731 23 20 * Base rental rate for 100 sq m unit on the
Warehouse, US$ mn 616 723 110 81 1 080 660 1 395 363 584 202 10 ground floor of retail gallery of prime
Other, US$ mn 476 696 510 228 172 1 379 1 358 355 1 076 315 553 30 shopping mall for fashion retailer
www.interactivemaps.ru
• Moscow offices
• Shopping centers in Russia
• Warehouses
• Hotels
• Infrastructure development
RESEARCH DEPARTMENT
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD, RUSSIA
Yulia.Bogomol@cushwake.com Alexaner.Kuntsevich@cushwake.com
ANDREY VLADIMIRSKY
EVGENIYA SAFONOVA
Analyst
Junior analyst
Andrey.Vladimirsky@cushwake.com
Evgenia.Safonova@cushwake.com
The information provided in this report is intended for informational purposes only and should not be relied on by any party without further independent verification. Classifications of individual buildings are
reviewed on a continuing basis and are subject to change. The standards used in this process are consistent with those used by Moscow Research Forum and in the United States by the Society of Industrial and Office
Realtors (SIOR) and BOMA International. Reproduction of this report in whole or part is permitted only with written consent of Cushman & Wakefield. Data from this report may be cited with proper
acknowledgment given.