Abstract: This study aims for examining the factors time is problem that must be faced by The Audit
which influence the successful implementation of e- Board.
audit of The Audit Board of Republic Indonesia As an effort to solve those various problems in
(BPK RI). This study employed approach of auditing, The Audit Board later develops e-Audit
information system successful model of DeLone and (electronic audit) system. The system aims to
McLean and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use facilitate The Audit Board task in auditing,
of Technology (UTAUT). Sample in this research managing, reporting and giving opinion regarding
consisted of 70 auditors in Representative Office of statement of audit for public interest (stakeholder).
The Audit Board of Republic Indonesia in East Java E-Audit system has function to synergize The Audit
province. By employing analysis tool of Partial Least Board electronic data with auditee data through a
Square, result of the study proves empirically that central data of The Audit Board . With the
system quality and facilitating condition have impact synergized data, The Audit Board can record,
towards e-audit employment then the employment of process, transfer, utilize, and monitor data from all
e-audit has impact towards benefit of e-audit system parties, in order to implement audit towards country
implementation. Information quality, service quality financial management. Started in 2011, The Audit
and social influence do not have impact towards the Board did a MoU with entities regarding the
employment of e-Audit. implementation of e-Audit and continually piloting,
which is trial, is done step by step in eight
Key words: successful model of information system, representative offices, they are Lampung, Banten,
UTAUT Special Region of Capital City of Jakarta, West Java,
East Java, South East Sulawesi, South Sulawesi, and
1. Introduction Gorontalo with several entities since 2011. E-Audit
system was expected to be implemented totally in
In order to create management of country 2015.
financial as it is mandated in established regulation According to data of e-audit system employment
of the Act No. 17 in 2003 about Financial of the per December 2015 (see Figure 1.1), most used e-
Country and the Act No.1 in 2004 about Treasury of Audit system was dominated by searching feature of
the Country, independent and opened audit towards manifest data from Garuda Indonesia airline (82.1%).
country financial management done by audit agency It is related to one of procedures from expenditure
is required. auditing that is outstation trip. Through the feature,
Manual implementation of audit done during the auditor can directly compare outstation trip done
this time depends on direct interaction between with manifest from Garuda Indonesia airline.
auditor and audit object (entity/auditee) and is Meanwhile, the employment of Ministry/Institution
occurred in the entity environment, including database and Provincial Government database as the
collected data of financial report with all kinds of part of The Audit Board auditee were still relatively
certain supported evidence. In the implementation on low, which are respectively 0.6% and 1.3%.
the field, the process of collecting data has various
obstacles which have big impact towards the whole
process of auditing. In its development, the amount
of entity functioned as country financial manager and
the amount of budget and expenditure of country
financial increase in each year. More entities which
must be audited whether in central or in provincial
but done by limited amount of auditors and in limited
Figure 2.3
UTAUT Model (Source: [28])
3. Conceptual Framework and Indonesia in East Java as the study subject. The
Hypotheses population in this study was all functional officer
auditors in the representative office of The Audit
This study used successful model developed Board of Republic Indonesia in East Java.
[6] by adding variables of social influence and Considering the experience in using e-Audit to do the
facilitating condition developed by [28]. The writer audit, only the functional officer auditors were
added variables of social influence and facilitating chosen. In this study, since the amount of population
condition because those two variables cannot be was already known, thus the writer employed total
separated from information system employment. It sampling method or census. Data from Human
can be used as far as outside environment influences Source Department (HRD) of The Audit Board of
and as far as the organization provides required Republic Indonesia in East Java until July, 30th 2016
sources (hardware, software, computer, server, stated that total amount of functional officer auditors
experts, education, and training) the information is 143 people consisted of 8 people of Senior Team
system will be used. The writer used variable of e- Head, 23 people of Junior Team Head, 67 members
Audit use because the writer wanted to study the of Senior Team, and 45 members of Junior Team.
behavior of The Audit Board of the Republic This study employed PLS in analyzing the data.
Indonesia auditors in using e-Audit system. Based on
the explanation above, the conceptual framework of
this study is depicted on the following figure. 5. The Result of the Study and Discussion
Evaluation towards 70 valid-to-be-tested
respondents was done in two stages they are
System H1 evaluating measurement model (outer model) and
Quality structural model (inner model). Measurement model
(outer model) was employed to test the validity and
the reliability of variables. Next, the test towards
Informatio structural model was done to predict the causal
n Quality H6 relation among variables or hypotheses testing [9].
Output of Algorithm can be seen on the following
H2
table.
Service E- System
Quality H Audit Benefit
Use Table 5.1 The Algorithm Result
3
Composite R Cronbachs
Variabel AVE Reliability Square Alpha Communality
Social QS 0,5351 0,8678 0 0,8250 0,5351
Influence QI 0,7048 0,9432 0 0,9295 0,7048
H
QSR 0,7097 0,8799 0 0,7954 0,7097
4
SI 0,6644 0,8876 0 0,8625 0,6644
FC 0,6247 0,8664 0 0,7993 0,6247
Facilitatin H5 SU 0,7965 0,8865 0,3150 0,7522 0,7965
g
SB 0,8289 0,9505 0,0643 0,9295 0,8289
Condition
Source: Data were processed in 2016
Note: SQ = System Quality, IQ = Information Quality,
Figure 3.1 Conceptual Framework
SVQ = Service Quality, SI = Social Influence,
FC = Facilitating Condition, SU = System Use,
H1: System Quality has positive impact towards e- SB = System Benefit.
Audit Use
H2: Information Quality has positive impact towards
5.1 The Evaluation of Outer Model
e-Audit Use.
H3: Service Quality has positive impact towards e-
Audit Use. The evaluation of outer model consists of
H4: Social Influence has positive impact towards e- variable validity and instrument reliability tests.
Audit Use.
H5: Facilitating Condition has positive impact 5.1.1 Validity Test
towards e-Audit Use.
H6: E-Audit Use has positive impact towards benefit Validity towards measurement model consists
system of e-Audit implementation. of convergent validity and discriminant validity [9].
The result of convergent validity shows that 6
4. Research Method indicators of quality system, 7 indicators of
information quality, 3 indicators of quality service, 4
This study is an empirical study with the indicators of social influence, 4 indicators of
representative office of The Audit Board of Republic facilitating condition, 2 indicators of system use, and
4 indicators of system benefit met the requirement of Table 5.2 Total Impact
convergent validity. As it is displayed on table 5.1,
Original Sample Standard Standard T-
AVE values of all indicators are > 0.5. If loading Indicator Sample Average Deviation Error Statistic
factor score is still 0.5, it is better for the writer not to SQ ->SU 0,3752 0,3964 0,1727 0,1727 2,1733
drop those indicators from their variables as long as IQ ->SU -0,0812 -0,0949 0,1483 0,1483 0,5477
their AVE scores are still > 0.5 [9]. The result of SVQ->SU 0,1660 0,1455 0,1259 0,1259 1,3181
discriminant validity, based on cross loading score, it
SI ->SU -0,0669 -0,0298 0,1276 0,1276 0,5244
shows that 30 variable indicators have higher scores
FC ->SU 0,2238 0,2161 0,1267 0,1267 1,7668
rather than other indicators and centered in related
SU ->SB 0,2536 0,2532 0,0880 0,0880 2,8818
variables. Thus, it can be concluded that the
Source: Data were processed in 2016
employed instrument met the requirement of
Note: SQ = System Quality, IQ = Information Quality,
discriminant validity. SVQ = Service Quality, SI = Social
Influence, FC = Facilitating Condition, SU
5.1.2 Reliability Test = System Use, and SB = System Benefit
features in e-Audit portal are not functioned well 5.4 Research Implication
because of late data transfer done by auditee.
Hypothesis 3 (H3) states that service quality has In this part, the implication of done study is
positive impact towards e-Audit use. The result of explained. This research combined two information
the test in table 5.2 shows that the t statistic score is systems they are the model developed by [6] and
1.3181 (≤ 1.64), thus it can be concluded that H3 is UTAUT developed by [28] by employing variables
denied. This empirical evidence is not consistent of system quality, information quality, service
with studies of [29,19,22] but it is consistent with a quality, social influence, facilitating condition,
study result of [18]. This denied hypothesis is system use, and system benefit. Based on statistical
assumed to be occurred because auditors are required test from created hypotheses, there are implication of
to have skill to utilize e-Audit system thus helpdesk theory and implication of practice, they are.
assistance is minimalized. One form of its utilization
is by understanding TABK (Teknik Audit Berbasis 5.4.1 The Implication of Theory
Computer/Technique of Computer Assisted Audit)
by using some applications such as Arbutus, ACL, The implication of theory is related to the
Excel, etc. Considering technology development factors which have impact towards the successful
which increases everyday as well as developed system of e-Audit in The Audit Board of Republic
problems, the representative office of The Audit Indonesia. In this study, the variables taken from
Board of Republic Indonesia in East Java routinely successful model of information system developed
update the knowledge and the skill of auditors by by DeLone and McLean are: system quality,
holding routine training. information quality, service quality, system use, and
Hypothesis 4 (H4) states that social influence system benefit. The writer developed the successful
has positive impact towards e-Audit use. The result information system of [6] by adding two variables
of the test in table 5.2 shows that the t statistic score into the model taken from UTAUT model developed
is 0.5224 (≤ 1.64), thus it can be concluded that H4 is by [28] they are social influence and facilitated
denied. This empirical evidence is not consistent condition. The result of the study show that first,
with studies of [8,27,21] but it is consistent with system quality of e-Audit is one of factors which has
study result of [15]. The denied hypothesis is impact towards e-Audit system use. A system with
assumed to be occurred because e-Audit system for good quality will influence the system use. If the
auditors is not a mandatory but optional. In doing quality of e-Audit system is excellence, users will
audit, auditors are given freedom to choose audit repeat the use of e-Audit system routinely and
technique matched with the entity condition. continually. Second, facilitating condition is also one
Auditors can choose to employ e-Audit or manual of factors which can have influence towards e-Audit
way in collecting entity data. Thus, the audit is not system use. The higher rate of technique and
influences by surrounded environment, including organization support information system use means
superior and working partner, in employing e-Audit. the higher use of e-Audit system. Third, the use of
Hypothesis 5 (H5) states that facilitating the system has impact towards the e-Audit system
condition has positive impact towards e-Audit use. benefit. The use of e-Audit system can have positive
The result of the test in table 5.2 shows that t statistic impact towards individual and organization as the
score is 1.7768 (≥ 1.64), thus it can be concluded that system benefit such as increase in productivity,
H5 is accepted. The coefficient score 0.2238 shows easiness, efficiency and affectivity can be felt. Forth,
that facilitating condition has positive impact the factors of information quality, service quality,
towards e-Audit use. The result of this study is and social influence based on empirical evidence,
consistent with studies of [28,8,27] who proved that have no impact towards the e-Audit system.
there is positive relation between facilitating
condition and information system use. 5.4.2 The Implication of Practice
Hypothesis 6 (H6) states that e-Audit use
has positive impact towards the benefit of e-Audit The result of the study gives practice
implementation. The result of the test in table 5.2 implication for The Audit Board of Republic
shows that t statistic score is 2.8818 (≥ 1.64), thus it Indonesia related to e-Audit system use. The result of
can be concluded that H6 is accepted. The the study concludes that the successful
coefficient score 0.2536 shows that the e-Audit use implementation of e-Audit system is influenced by
has positive impact towards system benefit. This the quality of e-Audit system. When e-Audit system
result is consistent with studies of [2,25,27] in users feel that the quality of the used system is good,
Indonesia. The three researches give empirical the need to use the system will appear. Then, this
evidence that system use is one of determinants from study proves that facilitating condition is also one of
system benefit. factors from the successful implementation of e-
Audit system and the system use has impact towards
the e-Audit system benefit. Meanwhile the factors of 6.2 The Restrictiveness and Suggestion
information quality, service quality, and social
influence based on empirical evidence, have no This study has some restrictiveness which must
impact towards the e-Audit system. be paid attention further. The limited numbers of
The existence of e-Audit system is very respondents participated in this study was caused by
important in the development of information the study time which was coincided with the
technology since through this system the audit can be schedule of performance audit in the representative
done more easily, more efficiently, and more office of The Audit Board in East Java thus some
affectively. functional officer auditors were doing their outstation
trips. The next study is suggested to be able widening
the scope of study in central office and other
6. Conclusion and Suggestion representative offices thus more respondents can be
chosen.
6.1 Conclusion
7. References
The e-Audit system is a system developed by
The Audit Board to assist The Audit Board in doing
its main task they are auditing, managing, reporting [1] BPK-RI. 2011. Grand Desain e-Audit Menuju BPK
as well as giving opinion related to financial report to Sinergis
public interest which is the stakeholder. E-Audit
system includes combining and synergizing [2] Baridwan, Z. 2012. Analisis Keperilakuan Individu
Informasi Berbasis Teknologi. Dissertation. Faculty
electronic data of The Audit Board (e-BPK) with of Economy and Business University of Brawijaya.
electronic data of parties audited by The Audit Board Malang terhadap Implementasi Sistem Informasi
such as the state ministries, provincial governments, Akuntansi: Model Penerimaan dan Kesuksesan
state-owned companies, provincial-owned Sistem
companies, etc. Through synergizing the data, they
can be recorded, processed, utilized, and monitored [3] Coderre, D. 2005. Continuous Auditing: Implications
by The Audit Board. The data are from various for Assurance, Monitoring, and Risk Assessment
parties to be audited for managing the state financial.
Through e-Audit system, audit process can be done [4] Darono, A. 2014. Penerapan “e-Audit” dalam
Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara: Tinjauan Dualitas
more easily, more efficiently, and more affectively in Teknologi. Seminar Nasional Aplikasi Teknologi
wider scope. Informasi (SNATI) Yogyakarta. 21 Juni 2014
Based on hypothesis testing by using Partial
Least Square model and descriptive analysis of [5] DeLone, W.H., dan McLean, E.R. 1992. Information
respondents’ answers about the factors which Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent
influence the successful system of e-Audit by Variable. Information Systems Research, pp. 60-95.
employing the modified model of DeLone and
McLean and UTAUT, it can be concluded that first, [6] ____________. 2003. The DeLone and McLean
Model of Information System Success: A ten-
system quality of e-Audit is one of factors which has
Year Update. Journal of Management Information
impact towards e-Audit system use. A system with Systems, pp. 9-30
good quality will influence the system use. If the
quality of e-Audit system is excellence, users will [7] Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L. and
repeat the use of e-Audit system routinely and Kuppelwieser,V. G. 2014. Partial Least Squares
continually. Second, facilitating condition is also one Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An
of factors which can have influence towards e-Audit Emerging Tool in Business Research. Eur. Bus. Rev.,
system use. The higher rate of technique and vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 106–121
organization support information system use means
[8] Handayani.2007. Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang
the higher use of e-Audit system. Third, the use of
Mempengaruhi Minat Pemanfaatan Sistem Informasi
the system has impact towards the e-Audit system dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi (Studi Empiris
benefit. The use of e-Audit system can have positive Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Jakarta).
impact towards individual and organization as the National Symposium of Accounting X Makassar
system benefit such as increase in productivity,
easiness, efficiency and affectivity can be felt. Forth, [9] Hartono, J. 2012. Konsep dan Aplikasi Structural
the factors of information quality, service quality, Equation Modelling Berbasis Varian dalam
and social influence based on empirical evidence, Penelitian Bisnis, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: UPP STIM
have no impact towards the e-Audit system. YKPN Yogyakarta
[10] Hartoyo, A.D. 2011. Upaya Peningkatan Kinerja [22] Pushpakumara, H.M.C., Wanniarachchige, M.K.,
Pemeriksaan BPK RI Menggunakan Computer Peiris, D.S.U. and Samantha, R.L. 2014.
Assisted Audit Techniques. Institut Teknologi Determinants of Information System Success in
Bandung, Bandung Public Sector Organizations: With Special Reference
to Organizations Located in the Matara District of Sri
[11] Janson, M. A., and Subramanian, A. 1996. Lanka. Reshaping Management and Economic
Packaged software: Selection and Implementation Thinking through Integrating Eco-Friendly and
Policies. INFOR 34(2), 133-151. Ethical Practices Proceedings of the 3rd International
Conference on Management and Economics. Faculty
[12] Jogiyanto. 2007a. Model Kesuksesan Sistem of Management and Finance. University of
Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Andi. Ruhuna.Sri Lanka
[13] ___________. 2007b. Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan. [23] Radityo, D dan Zulaikha. 2007. Pengujian Model
Yogyakarta. Penerbit Andi DeLone and McLean Dalam Pengembangan
SistemInformasi Manajemen (Kajian Sebuah Kasus).
[14] Khayun, V and Ractham, P. 2011. Measuring e- SNA X. Makasar.
Excise Tax Success Factors: Applying the DeLone&
McLean Information Systems Success Model.
Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International [24] Roldan, J.L. dan Leal, A. 2003. A Validation Test of
Conference on System Sciences an Adaptation of the DeLoneand McLean’s Model
in Spanish EIS Field. Idea Group Publishing.
[15] Kim, C., Jahng, J. & Lee, J. J. 2007. An Empirical Februari 12. Available at:
Investigation Into The Utilization-Based Information business.clemson.edu/ISE/04chap.pdf.
Technology Success Model: Integrating Task-
Performance And Social Influence Perspective. [25] Saputra, R. 2012. Analisis Pengaruh Penggunaan
Journal of Information Technology, Volume 22, Sistem Informasi Pelayanan Cabang Terhadap
Issue 2, pp 152–160 Kinerja Operasional KaryawanP ada PT. TASPEN
(Persero) Cabang Palembang.STMIK GI MDP.
Palembang
[16] Liu, G., Huang, S. and Zhu, X. 2008. User
Acceptance of Internet Banking In An Uncertain [26] Sutarto, D. 2015. Analisis Pelaksanaan E-Audit Pada
and Risky Environment. The 2008 International BPK RI Perwakilan Provinsi JawaTimur.
Conference on Risk Management and Engineering Undergraduate Thesis. Faculty of Economy and
Management Business University of Brawijaya. Malang
[17] Livari, J. 2005. An Empirical Test of the DeLone [27] Sekarini, Y.A. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Minat
and McLean Model of Information System Success. Pemanfaatan Dan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi
Data Base for Advances in Information Terhadap Kinerja Individu Dengan Menggunakan
Systems.ABI/INFORM global pp.8-27. Model UTAUT (Studi Pada PT. Pertamina (Persero)
Region IV Unit Pemasaran Wilayah Jateng-
[18] Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J.H., and Aprianingsih, DIY).Thesis. Faculty of Economy and Business
A. 2015 Validating the Conceptual Model for University of Diponegoro. Semarang
Predicting Intention to Use as Part of Information
System Success Model: The Case of an Indonesian [28] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and
Government Agency Procedia Computer Science 72 Davis F. D.. 2003. User Acceptance of Information
( 2015 ) 353 – 360 Technology: Toward a Unified View, MIS Q., Vol.
27, no. 3, pp. 425–478
[19] Pérez, B.M. 2010. Validity of Delone And McLean’s
Model of Information Systems Success At The [29] Wang, Y.S and Liao, Y.W. 2008.Assessing E-
Website Level of Analysis. Dissertation. Louisiana Government Systems Success :A Validation Of The
State University E.J. Ourso College Of Business, Delone and McLean Model of Information Systems
Department of Information Systems and Decision Success.Government Information Quarterly 25
Sciences.USA (2008) 717–733
[20] Perwira, C. 2013. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi
Kesuksesan Implementasi Sistem Informasi SDM di
BPK RI. Master Thesis. Department of Electronic
Engineering and Information Technology. University
of Gadjah Mada.Yogyakarta.