Laura Ray
TEC 561
As technology becomes more prevalent in our schools and classrooms, the need for
teacher training relating to technology continues to grow. Teachers do not enter the profession
knowing all they need to know about content, methodology, or the technology used to support
the learning. Elina Aguilar states that “educators need more knowledge, skills, practice, and
support after they enter the profession” (2013). Teacher support can come in many forms such as
leaders. Two forms of on-campus teacher support is the mentor model and the coaching model.
The mentor relationship is one between an experienced teacher and a novice teacher
(Queensland Department of Education, 2017). A technology mentor would be a teacher who has
experience in the area of technology integration. A novice could be an experienced teacher, but
one who is new to integrating technology in the classroom. In the mentor-mentee relationship,
the teacher who is more experienced guides the novice through the new integration. For
example, if a teacher is experienced in student created website portfolios and the novice would
like to try it as well, the experienced teacher would mentor the novice, walking her through the
steps to learn how to create the website and develop lesson plans for student activities. Teachers
with experience are a great resource to their colleagues as mentors to go to for ideas and support
(Hertz, 2011).
The coaching relationship, or peer coaching, is interaction between two teachers who
collaborate and reflect in order to share successful practices, support new technology use,
problem solve, and support the other (Queensland Department of Education, 2017). In a
coaching relationship, the coach seeks to understand the goals and objectives of the teacher, and
works to help the teacher meet those goals. The technology coach is not an expert, but rather a
Coaching Models Essay 3
partner in helping the teacher meet her own integration goals. Without judgement or evaluation,
One specific method of coaching is collegial coaching. In this model, the coach meets
with the teacher before a lesson to discuss the focus of the lesson and important factors. The
coach then observes the lesson and provides feedback for the teacher. The coach and the teacher
work together to evaluate the effectiveness of the lesson and the impact on student learning
(Queensland Department of Education, 2017). This model is built on the trust between the
teacher and coach and develops over time through collaborative efforts.
While mentoring and coaching are moth models involving the collaborative efforts of two
or more teachers, the dynamic is very different. In the mentor model, the novice seeks out the
mentor because of her skill and expertise in a specific area. The mentor teaches the novice the
new skill, and the relationship is no longer needed. In the coach model, the relationship is
ongoing throughout many integrations. This ongoing process involves the teachers working as
equals to design and reflect on strategies and activities over longer periods of time.
The coach is a valuable member of the school campus. Schools with instructional
coaches have evidence of increased teacher use of data to drive instruction (Aguilar, 2013).
Since the focus of the work of the coach and teacher is to improve student learning, improved
teaching and learning takes place. The coach and teacher share in the leadership and
In the school in which I teacher and coach, some teachers also at as mentors. For
example, one teacher taught herself how to use online rubrics for grading work submitted
through Google Classroom. Other teachers wanted to try this, so the expert teacher acted as a
Coaching Models Essay 4
mentor, teaching the novices how to use this technology. The experienced teacher followed up
with the others, until the skill was put into use, and was no longer needed by the novice teachers.
a more comprehensive way. I meet with the teachers to discuss goals such as integrating a
digital drawing tool with the Kindergarten class to meet a technology standard. We plan the
integration and troubleshoot what may go wrong. I spend time observing the lesson and meeting
with the teachers to discuss the successes and struggles of the lesson. We decide if the lesson
and integration was effective, and what needs to change for next time.
There is need for both models in a school. At my own school, with a faculty of 40 in
varied grades from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade, one technology coach cannot meet the
needs of all teachers. Having the peer resource of a mentor allows for learning and integration to
continue to take place and for the needs of the new or novice teacher to be met more frequently.
Experienced teachers cannot serve solely as mentors and need to grow their own skills and
integration as well. While both positions are important to the overall technology integration
strategy of a school, I most identify with the practice of the coach. As the technology coach, I
can work with both technologically novice and technologically experienced teachers to help all
References
Aguilar, E. (2013, March 25). How coaching can impact teachers, principals, and students.
students-elena-aguilar
Hertz, M. (2011, November 14). Mentoring and coaching for effective tech integration.
mary-beth-hertz
Queensland Department of Education. (2017). Mentoring and coaching models. Retrieved from
http://education.qld.gov.au/staff/development/employee/teachers/mentoring.html