Anda di halaman 1dari 6

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY 2005;3:886 – 891

A Prospective Study of the Oral Manifestations of Crohn’s


Disease

SINEAD HARTY,* PADRAIG FLEMING,‡ MARION ROWLAND,* ELLEN CRUSHELL,*


MICHAEL MCDERMOTT,* BRENDAN DRUMM,* and BILLY BOURKE*
*Children’s Research Centre, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics, Conway Institute for Biomolecular and
Biomedical Research and Dublin Molecular Medicine Center, University College Dublin, Dublin; and ‡Dublin Dental Hospital, Trinity College
Dublin, Dublin, Ireland

Background & Aims: Recent studies suggest that the lation, they are not specific for CD.3 In contrast, a
mouth may be involved frequently in patients with number of characteristic oral lesions have been described
Crohn’s disease (CD). The aim of this study was to in patients with CD. These include swelling of the lips,
document prospectively the proportion of children with buccal mucosal swelling or cobblestoning, deep linear
oral lesions at diagnosis of CD, to describe the type of ulceration, mucosal tags, and mucogingivitis.4 –12
lesions found, and to examine the ability of gastroenter- The prevalence of oral lesions in CD has varied widely
ologists to identify correctly oral Crohn’s manifestations.
in previous studies.8,13,14 In a recent retrospective study
Methods: In a prospective 3-year study, systematic den-
performed at our centre8 we found a particularly high
tal examinations were performed on all children with
suspected inflammatory bowel disease. Each child un-
prevalence of disease-specific oral lesions in children with
derwent upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and barium fol- CD. In that study of 25 children who had been examined
low-through radiography. Results: Forty-eight of 49 chil- by a pediatric dental surgeon at the time of initial
dren with CD were examined by the dentist. Oral CD was presentation, 48% had disease-specific oral lesions. In
found in 20 patients (41.7%). Oral findings included addition, granulomas were found in 75% of 8 oral biopsy
mucogingivitis (12 patients), mucosal tags (4 patients), specimens in that study, suggesting that the mouth may
deep ulceration (4 patients), cobblestoning (3 patients), provide an important site for obtaining diagnostic tissue
lip swelling (3 patients), and pyostomatitis vegetans (1 in children with symptoms of inflammatory bowel dis-
patient). Noncaseating granulomas were found in all 8 ease (IBD).8
oral biopsy specimens from oral CD lesions (100%). Two Therefore, the aim of the present study was to docu-
patients with granulomas in oral biopsy specimens had ment prospectively the proportion of children with evi-
no granulomas found in any other biopsy specimens. dence of oral CD at initial evaluation for suspected IBD
The presence of oral manifestations was associated and to describe the spectrum of lesions found. We also
with perianal disease. In only 9 patients (45%) with oral
explored whether the presence of oral lesions correlated
CD was the mouth found to be abnormal by the consul-
with markers of disease severity at diagnosis, and if oral
tant gastroenterologists. Only nonspecific oral changes
were seen in children with ulcerative colitis and indeter- CD was associated with a particular distribution of dis-
minate colitis. Conclusions: More than one third of all ease elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition,
children presenting with CD had involvement of the we compared the results of oral examination by consul-
mouth. The ability of physicians to recognize oral lesions tant gastroenterologists in the clinic setting with formal
was poor. Expert dental evaluation may be useful during oral examination by a pediatric dental surgeon.
the investigation of patients with suspected inflamma-
tory bowel disease. Methods
Over a 3-year period between January 1999 and De-
lthough it is recognized widely that Crohn’s disease cember 2001 we prospectively recorded the oral manifestations
A (CD) can affect any site in the gastrointestinal tract
from the mouth to the anus, the recognition of oral
in children presenting with suspected CD to the gastroenter-
ology department of Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children.
lesions in patients with CD and their potential clinical
relevance has evolved only recently.1,2 Patients with CD Abbreviations used in this paper: CD, Crohn’s disease; CI, confidence
often suffer from aphthous ulceration of the oral cavity. interval; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease.
© 2005 by the American Gastroenterological Association
However, because these ulcers also occur commonly in 1542-3565/05/$30.00
patients with ulcerative colitis and in the general popu- PII: 10.1053/S1542-3565(05)00424-6
September 2005 ORAL MANIFESTATIONS OF CD 887

More than 75% of Irish children and adolescents with pedi- tients, and 20 (41.7%) patients had a normal oral
atric IBD undergo diagnostic evaluation at our institution examination.
(Irish Paediatric Surveillance unit data 1998 –1999, unpub- Of the 20 patients with oral CD changes, 12 were boys
lished data). and 8 were girls (1.5:1) compared with 13 boys and 15
Information was recorded prospectively on each patient girls in children not found to have oral CD (.86:1; P ⫽
before endoscopy including age, sex, presenting symptoms,
not significant). The mean age for all children with CD
oral symptoms, family history, and medications. Clinical
was 11.95 years (SD, 2.7 y; range, 6.6 –17.1 y). The
examination was performed on each patient and findings
including weight and height were recorded. Perianal find- mean age of children with oral CD was 11.4 years (SD,
ings were noted. Blood samples were taken for full blood 2.5 y) and without oral CD was 12.3 years (SD, 2.8 y; P
count and liver function including albumin and C-reactive ⫽ not significant). No patient was being treated specif-
protein levels. Small-bowel contrast studies were performed ically for oral lesions. Patients with oral CD were signif-
routinely after the initial assessment. The oral cavity was icantly more likely to complain of oral symptoms (odds
inspected thoroughly by 1 of the 2 consultant gastroenter- ratio, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.20 –20.01; P ⫽ .01) and most
ologists performing the endoscopy before examination by complained of more than 1 symptom (mouth ulcers in 11
the dentist and the findings were documented. For this patients, angular stomatitis in 5 patients, and cheek/lip
study, all oral examinations were performed by the same swelling in 8 patients). However, there was no difference
pediatric dental surgeon (P.F.). Dental examinations were in the duration of oral symptoms between the groups
performed in a dental chair with the use of standard light-
(mean difference, 2.9 mo; 95% CI, ⫺4.7 to 10.5). The
ing. Systematic assessment of the submandibular lymph
duration of oral symptoms ranged from 1 to 56 months
nodes, lips, labial mucosa and sulci, commissures, buccal
mucosa and sulci, gingiva, tongue, floor of mouth, and hard (mean, 4.9 mo; SD, 12.7 mo). Oral symptoms did not
and soft palate were performed and findings were recorded. precede systemic symptoms in any of the patients with
Oral biopsy specimens were taken only when clinically oral CD.
indicated. For example, when a diagnosis of CD was clear
from other findings (eg, perianal disease), an oral biopsy Manifestations of Oral Crohn’s Disease
examination was not performed. More than half the patients (n ⫽ 11) had more
All children underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy than 1 type of oral lesion (Figure 1). The most common
as well as colonoscopy. Biopsy specimens were taken from oral finding was mucogingivitis (n ⫽ 12), followed by
grossly affected tissue and from unaffected gastric and
mucosal tags (n ⫽ 4), deep ulceration (n ⫽ 4), cob-
colonic mucosa. All biopsy specimens were formalin fixed
and paraffin embedded. Serial H&E-stained 4-␮m sections
blestoning (n ⫽ 3), and lip swelling (n ⫽ 3). One patient
were examined in each case. This typically represented 18 to had pyostomatitis vegetans. Oral biopsy examinations
20 sections per biopsy specimen. When granulomas were were performed on 8 patients with oral CD. Noncaseat-
found, periodic acid-Schiff, Grocott, and Ziehl Neelsen ing granulomas were found in biopsy material from all 8
stains were performed on the specimens to rule out fungal patients (100%) undergoing oral biopsy examination.
and mycobacterial disease. Five patients had biopsy specimens taken from areas of
Data were analyzed using Epi Info (CDC, Atlanta, GA). mucogingivitis, 1 patient from a tag, 1 patient from an
Comparison between groups was made using odds ratios area of cobblestoning, and 1 patient from an ulcer. Most
and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for categoric variables of the oral biopsy specimens were taken from the buccal
and t tests for continuous variables. Statistical significance mucosa. Two patients with granulomas in oral biopsy
was set at the 5% level. specimens did not have granulomas present in multiple
biopsy specimens taken from the upper and lower gas-
Results trointestinal tract.
Over the 3-year period, 80 patients were diag-
nosed with IBD. Final diagnoses were CD in 49 (61.3%) Clinical and Laboratory Features Associated
patients, ulcerative colitis in 22 (27.5%) patients, and With Oral Crohn’s Disease
indeterminate colitis in 9 (11.3%) patients.
There was no difference in the frequency of intes-
Occurrence of Oral Crohn’s Disease tinal and systemic symptoms (Table 1) or the severity of
Forty-eight of the 49 patients with CD were laboratory markers (Table 2) between the 2 groups. The
examined by the dentist. Findings typical of oral CD site of intestinal CD was compared in those with and
were found in 20 patients (41.7%). Nonspecific gin- without oral CD. Five children were infected with Hel-
givitis (ie, gingival inflammation related to the pres- icobacter pylori. The presence or absence of Crohn’s gas-
ence of dental plaque) was found in 8 (16.7%) pa- tritis, as opposed to H pylori gastritis, could not be
888 HARTY ET AL CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY Vol. 3, No. 9

Figure 1. (A) Lip swelling with fissures. (B) Cobblestone appearance of the buccal mucosa. (C) Linear ulceration deep in the mandibular vestibule.
(D) Mucosal tag on the buccal aspect of the gingiva. (E) Mucogingivitis in relation to the maxillary permanent incisors.

distinguished reliably in these patients and, therefore, Ability of Physicians to Recognize Oral
they were excluded from this analysis. Among the re- Crohn’s Disease
maining 43 children, those with oral CD were signifi-
cantly more likely to have perianal disease than those Forty-six children with CD had oral findings
without oral CD (10 of 20 [50%] compared with 4 of 23 recorded by both the pediatric gastroenterologist and
[14%]; P ⫽ .023, based on univariate analysis). How- the dentist. Agreement between the dentist and gas-
ever, other sites of disease were affected similarly in both troenterologist was poor (␬, .22; 95% CI, ⫺.06 to
groups (Table 3). .50). In 8 children without oral CD the gastroenter-
September 2005 ORAL MANIFESTATIONS OF CD 889

Table 1. Comparison of Intestinal and Systemic Manifestations Among Patients With and Without Oral CD
Oral CD Nonoral CD
(total ⫽ 20) (total ⫽ 28)

Symptoms n % n % Odds ratio 95% CI P

Loss of appetite 12 60 19 68 .71 .18–2.8 NS


Oral symptoms 14 70 9 32 4.93 1.2–20.8 0.01
Mouth ulcers 11 55 9 32 2.58 .7–9.9 NS
Angular stomatitis 5 25 4 20 2.00 .4–11.6 NS
Cheek swelling 5 25 0 0a
Vomiting 2 10 7 25 .33 .03–2.10 NS
Epigastric pain 0 0a 1 4
Abdominal pain 17 85 25 89 .68 .08–5.74 NS
Tenesmus 3 15 5 18 .81 .11–4.88 NS
Blood per rectum 14 70 15 53 2.02 .05–8.30 NS
Constipation 3 15 1 4 4.76 .34–259.2 NS
Malena 0 0a 0 0
Perirectal disease 13 65 11 39 1.18 .37–3.8 NS
Arthritis 0 0a 2 7
Clubbing 5 25 9 32 .7 .15–2.98 NS
Erythema nodosum 2 10 2 7 1.44 .1–21.48 NS
Uveitis 0 0a 0 0

NS, not significant.


aNo calculations were performed for cells with zero values.

ologist classified the mouth as abnormal, and in 11 (68.2%). Only 2 patients had abnormal oral findings,
(55%) children with oral CD the gastroenterologist comprising nonspecific gingivitis related to periodontal
failed to identify the oral CD lesions correctly. The disease in both. Of these children 1 underwent oral
presence of mucogingivitis appeared to be particularly biopsy examination that revealed the presence of acute
difficult for the nonoral expert to appreciate with only and chronic inflammation without granulomas. Simi-
4 of 12 cases correctly identified. larly, 7 of 9 patients with indeterminate colitis were
examined by the dentist. Two patients were found to
Oral Findings in Children With Ulcerative
have nonspecific gingivitis; 1 patient underwent oral
Colitis and Indeterminate Colitis
biopsy examination that revealed the presence of acute
Although this study aimed to document the oc- and chronic inflammation without granulomas.
currence of oral findings in CD, a substantial proportion
of children ultimately diagnosed with ulcerative colitis
or indeterminate colitis also were examined. Of 22 pa- Discussion
tients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis during the study In this prospective study we confirmed that chil-
period, a dental examination was performed in 15 dren with CD commonly harbor disease-specific oral

Table 2. Comparison of Clinical and Laboratory Data for Patients With and Without Oral CD
Laboratory value Oral CD, N ⫽ 20 (SD) Nonoral CD, N ⫽ 28 Mean difference 95% CI of mean difference

Hemoglobin 99.9 (34.6) 108.7 (15.6) ⫺8.8 ⫺23.7 to 6.1


Hematocrit 30.6 (11.5) 32.3 (7.8) ⫺1.7 ⫺7.3 to 3.9
MCH 21.1 (8.1) 24.3 (2.8) ⫺3.1 ⫺6.4 to .17
MCV 69.9 (17.4) 75.3 (6.4) ⫺5.4 ⫺12.6 to 1.8
Albumin 32.6 (5.3) 34.4 (6.4) ⫺1.7 ⫺5.4 to 1.8
ESR 37.1 (20.9) n ⫽ 11 36.6 (18.4) n ⫽ 15 .5 ⫺15.5 to 16.5
CRP 39.2 (35.1) n ⫽ 15 30.5 (25.5) n ⫽ 19 8.7 ⫺12.4 to 29.8
Platelets 539.9 (233.8) 543.7 (136.5) ⫺3.8 ⫺111.7 to 104.1
Duration of symptoms 12.7 (17.7) 9.7 (8.1) 2.9 ⫺4.68 to 10.54
Duration of oral 4.2 (12.6) 1.1 (5.1) 3.2 ⫺2.12 to 8.44
symptoms

NOTE. The use of ESR was replaced by CRP at our institution.


MCH, mean cell hemoglobin; MCV, mean cell volume; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein.
890 HARTY ET AL CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY Vol. 3, No. 9

Table 3. Disease Location: Comparison of Site of Disease in Children With and Without Oral Lesions Using Single Group
Comparisons
Oral CD Nonoral CD
(total ⫽ 20) (total ⫽ 23)
Site of
disease n % n % Odds ratio 95% CI P

Stomach 19 95 20 86 2.85 .25–157.35 NS


Small bowel 9 45 6 26 2.32 .54–10.24 NS
Ileum 7 35 11 48 .59 .14–2.36 NS
Colon 19 95 16 70 8.31 .87–393.89 NS
Perianal 10 50 4 17 4.75 1.0–25.35 .023

NS, not significant.

manifestations at the time of diagnosis. At more than trast, the 2 biopsy specimens from patients with ulcer-
40% the occurrence of oral CD correlates well with the ative and indeterminate colitis harbored nonspecific in-
findings of a previous retrospective study at our institu- flammatory changes without the presence of granulomas.
tion.8 In that study, 48% of 25 children had oral in- The type of mouth lesions identified in the present
volvement at the time of diagnosis of CD. The slightly study covered the spectrum of oral CD manifesta-
lower proportion of children with oral CD in the present tions.4 –11 In our previous study8 mucosal tags and labial
cohort likely is accounted for by selection bias inherent swelling were the most common oral CD findings. How-
in the retrospective design of our previous investigation. ever, in the present study mucogingivitis (Figure 1E) was
However, taken together, these studies clearly indicate the single most common manifestation. This lesion is
that the oral cavity is a useful source of diagnostic particularly difficult for physicians without oral expertise
material in children presenting with IBD. to identify accurately. When a biopsy examination was
Previously8 we have speculated as to the reasons un- performed we found areas of mucogingivitis to harbor
derlying the relatively higher prevalence of oral CD in granulomas commonly, findings that simultaneously
our population compared with other studies.4,5,13,14 Fac- support the contention that these particular lesions are
tors such as possible increased involvement of the prox- genuine disease-specific manifestations of CD and also
imal gastrointestinal tract in younger patients15 and emphasize their potential contribution toward establish-
examination at the time of diagnosis, before the institu- ing a diagnosis of CD in an individual patient.
tion of drug therapy, may have increased the relative Previous studies have pointed to an apparent associa-
numbers of children with oral CD in our population. tion between ileocolonic disease and oral CD,2– 4 and in
However, routine examination of the oral cavity by an our original retrospective cohort8 we found that inflam-
experienced dental surgeon was perhaps the major factor mation of the proximal gastrointestinal tract was more
underlying the high prevalence of oral CD findings in the common in children with oral CD. However, in the
present study. Although our pediatric gastroenterology present study, apart from an increased prevalence of oral
group have an established interest in oral CD, the ability CD in those with perianal disease, we could not show
of the physicians in this study to identify and classify that those with oral manifestations differed phenotypi-
accurately the oral CD findings was poor (␬, .22; 95% cally from children without oral CD. It is noteworthy
CI, ⫺.06 to .50). Clearly, to be useful, oral examination that in the present study histologic evidence of inflam-
in patients with IBD requires involvement of an experi- mation was found very commonly in the stomachs of
enced dentist or oral physician. children with CD, regardless of the presence or absence
The potential usefulness of oral CD findings as a of oral changes (Table 3). This finding is in keeping with
source of diagnostic material in patients with CD is data from a previous retrospective study we published
underscored by the frequency with which granulomas are that showed a very high prevalence of inflammation in
identified in these lesions. In the present study we could the gastric mucosa of children with IBD.16
not justify on ethical grounds a routine oral biopsy It has been suggested that oral CD is a Celtic disease17
examination, especially in children in whom the diagno- and it is possible that the apparent variation in preva-
sis of CD was in little doubt (eg, those with perianal lence of oral CD reflects ethnic differences in suscepti-
disease at presentation). However, when oral biopsy ex- bility to this extraintestinal manifestation of IBD. In this
amination was performed granulomas were identified in respect a recent genetic study of Irish and Scottish pa-
all 8 lesions pre-identified as those of oral CD. In con- tients with CD suggests that NOD2/CARD 15 muta-
September 2005 ORAL MANIFESTATIONS OF CD 891

tions may be less prevalent than in other Caucasian mouth: an indicator of intestinal involvement. Gut
1982;23:198 –201.
populations.18 It would be of interest to characterize 8. Pittock S, Drumm B, Fleming P, et al. The oral cavity in Crohn’s
NOD2/CARD 15 mutations in patients with oral CD to disease. J Pediatr 2001;138:767–771.
ascertain if they differ genotypically from those without 9. Field AE. Oral lesions in IBD. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2001;2:66 –72.
10. Stricker T, Braegger CP. Oral manifestations of Crohn’s disease.
oral involvement.
N Engl J Med 2000;342:1644.
In summary, we have found that oral manifestations of 11. Plauth M, Jenss H, Meyle J. Oral manifestations of Crohn’s
CD are common in children presenting with IBD and are disease. An analysis of 79 cases. J Clin Gastroenterol 1991;13:
difficult to discern by gastroenterologists in a conven- 29 –37.
12. Dupuy A, Cosnes J, Revuz J, et al. Oral Crohn disease: clinical
tional clinical setting. These lesions commonly contain characteristics and long-term follow-up of 9 cases. Arch Dermatol
granulomas and are accessible easily for diagnostic biopsy 1999;135:439 – 442.
examination. Oral examination by an experienced dental 13. Hyams JS. Extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel
disease in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 1994;19:7–21.
surgeon or oral physician can be an important adjunct to 14. Cosnes A, Dupuy A, Revuz J, et al. Longterm evolution of oral
the investigation of patients with suspected IBD. localisation of Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology 1998;114:A956.
15. Wagtmans MJ, Verspaget HW, Lamers CB, et al. Clinical aspects
of Crohn’s disease of the upper gastrointestinal tract: a compar-
References ison with distal Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 1997;92:
1. Dudeney TP, Todd IP. Crohn’s disease of the mouth. Proc R Soc 1467–1471.
Med 1969;62:1237. 16. Sharif F, McDermott M, Dillon M, et al. Focally enhanced gastritis
2. Basu MK, Asquith P. Oral manifestations of inflammatory bowel in children with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. Am J
disease. Clin Gastroenterol 1980;9:307–321. Gastroenterol 2002;97:1415–1420.
3. Greenstein AJ, Janowitz HD, Sachar DB. The extra-intestinal com- 17. Challacombe SJ. Oro-facial granulomatosis and oral Crohns dis-
plications of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis: a study of ease: are they specific diseases and do they predict systemic
700 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1976;55:401– 412. Crohns disease? Oral Dis 1997;3:127–129.
4. Basu M, Asquith P, Thompson RA, et al. Oral manifestations of 18. Bairead E, Harmon DL, Curtis AM, et al. Association of NOD2 with
Crohn’s disease. Gut 1975;16:249 –254. Crohn’s disease in a homogenous Irish population. Eur J Hum
5. Halme LMJ, Laine P, VonSmitten K. Oral findings in patients with Genet 2003;11:237–244.
active or inactive Crohn’s disease. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
1993;76:175–181.
6. Boraz RA. Oral manifestations of Crohn disease: update of the Address requests for reprints to: Billy Bourke, MD, Children’s Re-
literature and report of case. J Dent Child 1988;55:72–74. search Centre, Our Lady’s Hospital for Sick Children, Crumlin, Dublin
7. Scully C, Cochran KM, Russell RI, et al. Crohn’s disease of the 12, Ireland. e-mail: Billy.Bourke@UCD.ie; fax: (353) 1-455-5307.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai