Akhil Jaiswal, Akhil Praveen, ASP Gautam, Amal Jyothis V, Amit Kamboj, Anand Kumar, Anurag Singh T
B. Tech. Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Space Science and Technology
I. INTRODUCTION
An axial fan is a type of a compressor that increases the
pressure of the air flowing through it [1]. The blades of the
axial-flow fans force air to move parallel to the shaft about
which the blades rotate. In other words, the flow is axially in Figure 2. Schematic of Single Stage Axial Flow Fan
and axially out, linearly, hence the name. 1. Fan Motor 2. Fan Blade
3. Stator Vanes 4. Pitot Probe
5. Air Flow Duct 6. Pressure Tappings
By comparison, a centrifugal or radial flow fan moves air
perpendicular to the axis of rotation. Axial flow fans are better
suited for low-resistance, high-flow applications, whereas II. EXPERIMENT
centrifugal flow fans apply to high-pressure resistance, low- The experiment was done on a typical centrifugal blower set up
flow conditions. at L002 Thermal lab at IIST. The set up mainly of a pump, a
motor and test rig. Test Rig consists of a single stage axial flow
Axial flow fans, while incapable of developing high pressures, fan. At both upstream and downstream of the fan, holes are
they are well suitable for handling large volumes of air at provided with suitable mounting attachments to enable probe to
relatively low pressures. In general, they are low in cost and traverse in a radial direction. A straight probe is provided for
possess good efficiency, most have a large hub and can have this purpose. At the inlet duct, a standard Pitot-Static probe is
blades of airfoil shape. provided to measure the flow rate through the fan.
Depending on the operation range of the static pressure, A multi-limb manometer is provided to measure the following:
medium to high, the hub diameter can vary from 30 to 80% of static pressure at the hub and tip at the 4 stations, the static and
the blade outside diameter. dynamic pressure of the straight probe, and the Pitot-Static
probe. An energy meter is used to measure the input power. A
The hub/tip ratio is defined as non-contact type tachometer is provided to measure the fan rpm
directly.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axial_fan_design
Graph 3 Head Vs Flow Rate [2] http://eeref.engr.oregonstate.edu/@api/deki/files/841/=Axial_Fan.png
[3] Dr. Rajesh S, Dr. Deepu M, IIST Lab Hand Out
[4] http://www.nyb.com/Catalog/Letters/EL-03.pdf
APPENDIX I
Specifications Single Stage Axial Flow Fan Test Rig:
Overall dimensions of Test Rig:
Length = 1.6 m
Width = 1 m
Height = 1.5 m
Maximum Pressure developed by the fan = 80 mm of WG
Maximum flow delivered = 2.3 m3/sec
Technical specifications of the fan:
Fan Blades - 8 off air foil section
Inlet guide vanes (IGV) - 8 off flat plate section
Outlet guide vanes (OGV) - 8 off pelage section
Load vanes - 8 off flat plate section
Motor:
Graph 4. Efficieny Vs Flow Rate Power - 5 HP
Speed range - 0 to 2800 rpm
VII. RESULT
The air flow rate was varied from 1.96 to 2.41 m3/s.
Correspondingly, the graph of total head, fan speed and input APPENDIX II
has been obtained. The total head varied from 24 cm to 38 cm
while the power varied from 1071W to 2232 W. The efficiency Table 3. Calculated Values for all Readings
varied from 40%- 44% and peak in efficiency is achieved at a
flow rate of 1.968 m3/s at around 2000 rpm. Time
Sl
no Fan for 10 Static Fan
VIII. CONCLUSION Flow Fan Input
. Speed Rev of Pressure Head output Efficiency
Rate power
It can be inferred that as flow rate is increased then the fan Energy across fan Power
speed increases linearly and input power increases with the disc
cube of flow rate [4]. The efficiency has a maximum value of
maximum to 44% in the range of fan speeds at which the tests N(rpm) t(s) h(m of water) Q(m3/s) Pi(kW) Po(kW) η(%)
are done. Unlike standard test results referred from the internet 1 1955 16.8 0.0245 1.96826 1.07142857 0.473061 44.15239718
where efficiency increases and then decreases, in this
experiment, it keeps on decreasing monotonically in contrast to 2 2048 14.5 0.0265 2.037342 1.24223602 0.529638 42.63583697
standard results. One reason for such an occurrence may be that 3 2149 12.8 0.028 2.168917 1.4084507 0.595758 42.29881977
we might be doing the test beyond the point of maximum
4 2250 11.1 0.03 2.231797 1.62895928 0.656818 40.32131518
efficiency rpm. This is also supported by the increase in
pressure head with flow rate in this experiment unlike standard 5 2349 9.7 0.0335 2.35252 1.85185185 0.773121 41.74850938
performance test results where pressure head increases only in 6 2457 8.1 0.0385 2.410616 2.23325062 0.910454 40.76808602
the region of surge where efficiency starts decreasing.