Annual Report FY 2016-2017 MRP Final ADA Compliant 1.1

City of San José
Stormwater Management
Annual Report 2016-2017
Santa Clara Valley

Urban Runoff
Pollution Prevention Program
Cover Pictures
First Row:
1) ESD staff conducting C.3 O&M inspection of a stormwater treatment bioretention area
with a property manager.
Second Row:
1) One of three HDS unit installations on Sonora Avenue.
2) Native plant, Beard Tongue, in the Nature’s Inspiration Gardens. Plant markers are used
throughout the demonstration gardens to identify native plants.
Third Row
1) ESD staff educating San Jose Giants fans about watershed protection.
2) City of San José street sweeper providing early morning sweeping of main arterials.
3) Independence High School student, trained in the Biologists in Classrooms curriculum,

uses the Envrioscape model to teach Summerdale Elementary students about
watershed protection.
City of San José
Stormwater Management
Annual Report 2016-2017
September 2017
Acknowledgements
This report was prepared by the City of San José

Environmental Services Department
Watershed Protection Division
Stormwater Management Section
In partnership with:
Environmental Services Department: Environmental Enforcement Section
Environmental Services Department: Integrated Waste Management Division
Environmental Services Department: Municipal Water System
Department of Parks, Recreation, & Neighborhood Services
Department of Planning, Building & Code Enforcement
Department of Public Works
Department of Transportation
This page is intentionally left blank.
Table of Contents
Section Page
Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... i-1

Section 1 – Permittee Information .......................................................................................................................................... 1-1
Section 2 – Provision C.2 Municipal Operations................................................................................................................. 2-1
Section 3 – Provision C.3 New Development and Redevelopment ............................................................................ 3-1
Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls .............................................................................. 4-1
Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination .......................................................................... 5-1
Section 6 – Provision C.6 Construction Site Controls ......................................................................................................... 6-1
Section 7 – Provision C.7 Public Information and Outreach .......................................................................................... 7-1
Section 8 - Provision C.8 Water Quality Monitoring........................................................................................................... 8-1
Section 9 – Provision C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Controls ....................................................................................................... 9-1
Section 10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction ..........................................................................................................10-1
Section 11 – Provision C.11 Mercury Controls ...................................................................................................................11-1
Section 12 – Provision C.12 PCBs Controls .........................................................................................................................12-1
Section 13 – Provision C.13 Copper Controls....................................................................................................................13-1
Section 14 – Provision C.14 PBDE, Legacy Pesticides and Selenium Controls .........................................................14-1
Section 15 – Provision C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges .................................................15-1
Glossary ........................................................................................................................................................................................G-1
Appendix ...................................................................................................................................................................................... A-1
Executive Summary
The City is required to submit an Annual Report to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality
Control Board (Water Board) documenting compliance with the Municipal Regional Stormwater
NPDES Permit (MRP) for stormwater discharge through the City’s storm sewer system to waters of
the United States. The Report includes sections for each applicable Permit provision and follows
the annual reporting format developed by the Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies
Association (BASMAA) and approved by the Regional Water Board’s Executive Officer. Each
section is comprised of data and narrative to demonstrate the progress and accomplishments
related to each permit element throughout the reporting year.
Although the City also contributes to activities undertaken by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff
Pollution Prevention Program (Program) and BASMAA, this report primarily includes detailed
information for activities that were performed solely by the City. Program and BASMAA reports are
included by reference.
The following provides an overview of the past year’s progress toward addressing each Permit
provision.
C.2 Municipal Operations
Outdoor vehicle and equipment wash area that is plumbed to the sanitary sewer system.
During this reporting year, efforts under this provision focused on appropriate Best Management
Practices (BMPs) to control and reduce non-stormwater and polluted stormwater discharges to
storm drains and waterways during operation, inspection, and routine repair, as well as
maintenance of municipal facilities and infrastructure.
The City provides staff with regular training to ensure that appropriate stormwater BMPs are
employed during applicable municipal operations and maintenance activities. BMP training was
provided for 243 municipal staff from March through May 2017. BMPs are implemented during
common operation and maintenance activities to protect storm inlets, catch basins, and nearby
waterways.
i-1
The City also provided technical assistance to municipal staff through the Environmental Services
Department intranet site, which includes links to the California Stormwater Quality Association
Handbook for Municipal Operations and the BASMAA Blueprint for a Clean Bay and Pollution
Prevention Training Program for Surface Cleaners.
The City cleans its stormwater pump station wet wells annually as part of its maintenance
program removing an average of 100 cubic yards of debris per year.
Approximately 380 cubic yards of debris were removed during the City’s annual cleaning of over
31,000 storm drain inlets in the City street right of way.
C.3 New and Redevelopment
San José’s implementation of Permit Provision C.3

continued to focus on the Low Impact
Development (LID) stormwater management
requirements. The City worked with developers to
ensure projects complied with LID requirements by
utilizing tools such as the C.3 Project Data Form, the
Special Projects Worksheets, and C.3-related online
webpages. Continued outreach and training for
City staff and private engineering firms has aided
compliance with LID Permit requirements.
Additionally, staff developed an interdepartmental
C.3 Development Review Standard Operating
Procedure to improve coordination among
departments and ensure stormwater control plan
reviews are comprehensive and complete.
Development activity decreased in FY 16-17 with

the approval of 58 C.3 “Regulated Projects”. The
City approved development permits for 54 new
private-development and four public-sector
development projects that complied with the
Permit by implementing onsite stormwater
ESD staff reviews plans for a GI project before treatment measures. By comparison, 82 C.3
construction begins.
Regulated Projects were approved in FY 15-16, four
of which were public projects.
As part of its Stormwater Treatment Measure Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Inspection
Program, the City inspected 59 C.3 regulated project sites out of a total of 288 project sites during
FY 16-17 to ensure the proper maintenance and function of onsite stormwater treatment systems.
By comparison, the City inspected 76 C.3 regulated project sites in FY 15-16 under the O&M
Inspection Program.
At approximately half of the sites inspected, all installed stormwater treatment systems were found
to be in good working order. Staff worked with the property managers to ensure actions were
taken to correct any issues found at the remaining sites inspected under the O&M Inspection
Program. The City also verified proper installation of 313 newly installed stormwater treatment
systems under its Stormwater Treatment Systems Installation Verification Program.
i-2
The City has been awarded roughly four million dollars to partially fund three Green Street Pilot
Projects. The Martha Gardens Green Alleys Pilot Project was completed in August 2015 and
celebrated in October 2015 with the introduction of a green infrastructure project web site,
corresponding fact sheets, and a ribbon cutting block party to raise awareness of LID. The
remaining two projects, the Park Avenue Green Street Pilot Project and San José’s Chynoweth
Avenue Green Street Demonstration Project are scheduled to finish construction by November
2017. The City was previously awarded a grant for a green street project along Ocala Avenue but
had to cancel it due to rising construction costs which exceeded available City funding and
making the project infeasible.
Additionally, the City implemented requirements from the Green Infrastructure MRP provision by
preparing and approving, prior to June 30, 2017, a Green Infrastructure Plan Framework
(Framework) that describes specific tasks and timeframes for development of the Green
Infrastructure Plan due to be completed by September 2019. The City Council approved the
Framework on May 23, 2017. Also, the City evaluated proposed capital improvement projects for
the potential inclusion of green infrastructure and participated in trainings on green infrastructure
implementation.
C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls
The goal of the Industrial and Commercial Inspection program is to protect the storm sewer system
from polluted discharges originating from commercial and industrial facilities. The program
includes more than 7,700 businesses in its inspection inventory and provides educational materials
to business operators describing best management practices to prevent stormwater pollution at
their facilities. The City’s Business Inspection Plan is designed to target inspector resources at
facilities with a higher potential to contribute pollutants to stormwater. This prioritization considers
the type of business and the compliance history of a facility in establishing inspection frequency.
More than 4,500 inspections were conducted in FY 16-17 for 2,798 facilities. City inspectors
documented an increase from last year in the percentage of facilities that were in violation.
Inspectors found and documented 56 actual discharge violations and 2,035 potential discharge
violations. Additionally, the rate of correcting identified violations within 10 business days (or in an
otherwise timely manner) was approximately 93%.
C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
The City actively participated in the Program’s Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE)
Ad Hoc Task Group (IDDE AHTG) on multiple projects. The group meets regularly to share
information, discuss issues, and coordinate communication. For example, this year the IDDE
AHTG organized inspector training, created new outreach materials, and updated BMP
brochures.
The City responded to 452 complaints in FY 16-17. Approximately 96% of violations were
corrected in a timely manner. Complaints in residential and commercial areas continue to be
the vast majority of the cases the City investigates.
i-3
The City promoted both phone and online options for registering complaints during outreach
events and through its inspection programs in addition to its inlet marking program which
displays its hotline.
C.6 Construction Site Control
San José continued to implement a robust construction inspection program in FY 16-17. City staff
from Public Works and Environmental Services completed 1,876 inspections at 189 project sites in
FY16-17 (compared to 1,352 inspections at 143 sites in FY 15-16). These inspections documented
649 violations that resulted in 477 enforcement actions being issued.
Out of the 649 violations, 97% were corrected within 10 days or otherwise considered timely.
Inspectors were able to achieve compliance predominantly through Level 1 (Correction Notices
and Verbal Warnings) enforcement.
Consistent with the previous year, sediment control and good site management were the most
common BMP violation categories. Inadequate BMPs in those two categories made up 94% of the
violations issued.
San José’s inspection program staff also attended a half-day construction site inspection training
workshop conducted by the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program, which
covered regulatory requirements and construction site BMP inspections.
Stockpile covered at construction site.
C.7 Public Information and Outreach
The City has a robust public information and outreach program to deliver stormwater pollution
prevention and watershed protection messages to diverse audiences. Community outreach and
opportunities for participation in water quality protection activities are critical elements for
encouraging the public behavior changes needed to manage stormwater quality. They also help
foster responsible behavior and respect for the environment in future generations of San José
residents.
i-4
The City collaborates with other local and regional agencies and community organizations to
reach residents of all ages and interests. The City offers multilingual literature and information at
events that appeal to its diverse population.
Public education highlights for FY 16-17

include: hosting cleanup locations at two
countywide creek cleanup events;
promoting stormwater messages at
community events; and organizing
trainings on Integrated Pest Management
(IPM) and urban runoff reduction topics for
professional and residential gardeners.
School-aged youth are a critical audience

for outreach and education directed at
sustained behavior changes and
watershed protection. The City continues
to engage in multiple programs
connecting students, teachers,
administrators, and school communities
Volunteer, Ryan Chen, assists IPM program through raptor with watershed education and green
habitat enhancement for an Eagle Scout project. practices.
The City also actively supports and participates in

Program- and Bay Area-wide media relations and
outreach addressing topics such as IPM, mercury,
household hazardous waste, and trash. The City
supports strategy and material development for the
countywide Watershed Watch campaign.
Partnering in Program and Bay Area-wide efforts
enables the City to deliver consistent pollution
prevention messages more effectively, frequently,
and economically. In FY 2016-17, the City continued
its partnership with Major League Soccer’s San Jose
Earthquakes to produce outreach messages that
increase awareness and encourage behaviors that
help reduce waste, prevent pollution, and conserve
water. Approximately 300,000 fans were exposed to
the environmental messages this season. In 2017, the
City entered into a one-season partnership with the
San José Giants, a Class A affiliate of the San
Francisco Giants, which provides an opportunity to
reach approximately 5,000 fans at each game with
environmental messages. In addition to in-person
outreach, the partnership will allow ESD to add
permanent environmental messaging throughout
the stadium for the term of the agreement. ESD staff educates a San Jose Giants fan about
watershed protection on Earth day.
i-5
C.8 Water Quality Monitoring
Most monitoring activities required in the stormwater permit are implemented either regionally,
through BASMAA, or county-wide through the Program. However, the City participates directly in
local and regional monitoring activities to ensure the collection of high quality monitoring data
that helps inform management actions. This includes City staff’s participation in various
committees, workgroups, and strategy teams
for the San Francisco Bay Regional Monitoring
Program (RMP) for Trace Substances; the
BASMAA Monitoring and Pollutants of
Concern Committee (MPC); the BASMAAA
Regional Monitoring Coalition (RMC); and the
Program’s Monitoring Ad Hoc Task Group and
monitoring projects.
This year, City staff actively participated in

planning and review activities for the RMP,
serving on the Steering Committee; Technical
Review Committee; Sources, Pathways and
Loadings workgroup; and the Emerging
Contaminant workgroup. Through this
participation, the City helped develop work
products and prioritize information needs for
Regional monitoring projects.
In FY 16-17, the City reviewed and provided ESD staff retrieve and deploy instruments for measuring
comment on RMP study reports and RMP water quality in Alviso Slough.
Update drafts. Financial support for the RMP is
a requirement of both the stormwater and wastewater NPDES permits, and the City has met this
obligation since the RMP’s inception.
City staff also participated directly in the BASMAA Monitoring and POC Committee, which
coordinates stormwater monitoring and POC activities region-wide. Staff aided planning and
implementation of multiple components of regional monitoring program including participating
on RMC field crews for Creek Status Monitoring, coordinating and reviewing aspects of the BMP
Effectiveness Study, and collaborating with the Program to implement the Upper Penitencia Creek
Stressor/Source Identification Study. City staff also collaborated with the Santa Clara Valley Water
District (SCVWD) to implement continued wet season monitoring in Guadalupe River and Coyote
Creek through the fall of 2016.
C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control
The Pesticides Toxicity Control provisions aim to prevent impairment of urban streams by pesticide-
related toxicity. These include requirements to adopt and implement an Integrated Pest
Management (IPM) policy, train staff, require contractors to implement IPM, and provide public
outreach, among others. San José has incorporated IPM techniques into City operations for many
years. The City’s IPM Policy (formally part of the Pollution Prevention Policy), requires the use of IPM
in municipal operations to facilitate reducing, phasing out, and ultimately eliminating the use of
pesticides that impair surface waters.
i-6
During the reporting year, San José continued to apply proven and innovative IPM techniques to
address municipal pest problems. Techniques piloted in previous years include grazing for weed
control; replacing diseased or insect-infested plants with more site-appropriate, pest resistant
species; using dormant oil for sycamore scale and anthracnose control; treating grub-infested turf
with biological insect controls; mulching for weed control; power washing moth cocoons from
trees; applying compost and compost tea; and installing barn owl boxes for rodent population
control. Staff also ensured external vendor compliance with the City’s IPM policy and SOPs and
BMPs through a series of meetings which reviewed the IPM policy and expectations, and solicited
input on a new data entry system to improve record keeping and analysis of chemical
applications and alternative methods used.
The Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Services Department’s (PRNS) Parks Division’s Chemical
Advisory Board (CAB) continues to evaluate new methods for reducing pesticide use, and
provides IPM training to staff. In November 2016,
PRNS introduced a pilot program in several Park
Maintenance Districts to control rodent
populations using carbon monoxide smoke.
PRNS staff reported encouraging preliminary
results, successfully treating 853 burrows. Staff
increased the use of other IPM methods,
including wood chip mulch for weed
suppression in bare areas; non-toxic methods
for rodent control; and equipment
demonstration for turf maintenance and
compost applications. Additionally, staff
worked to understand turf grubs and related
damage issues more thoroughly via a life cycle
investigation and less-toxic product timing and
effectiveness comparison study.
City staff partnered with BASMAA and the San

Francisco Estuary Partnership in the “IPM Focus
on Multi-Unit Housing” pilot project, funded by
the California Department of Pesticide
Regulation. The program developed outreach
materials, provided IPM trainings to building Permeable hardscape materials installation
mangers, owners, and tenants, and provided demonstration for residents in the
Nature’s Inspiration Gardens.
comprehensive IPM services. Pesticide
reduction statistics for the project are pending
report approval by DPR.
The City’s use of pesticides that threaten water quality remains very low. No Organophosphates
or Carbamates were used in FY 16-17. There was a slight increase in the use of Fipronil from 15-16
to 16-17. The rise could be explained by increased ant populations due to high rainfall. Pyrethrin
use was higher due to a new insect control application at Police Department horse stables,
however the potential for stormwater or runoff contact was minimal since application occurred
inside covered, well-maintained stalls. No Beta-Cyfluthrin was used, other pyrethroid applications
decreased. A small amount of chlorantraniliprole was reported for the first-time due to a one-time
use in a pilot comparison study of turf grub product effectiveness. Nearly all the active ingredients
of concern were applied indoors and/or in the form of baits that normally do not contact
stormwater.
i-7
San José also participates in regional collaborative efforts to provide educational outreach to
residential and commercial pesticide users and pesticide retailers. Our Water, Our World and the
Program’s Watershed Watch campaign continued to increase target audiences’ awareness of
the benefits of less toxic pest management techniques. Watershed Watch continued facilitating
the Santa Clara Valley Advanced Green Gardener Training program. City staff also provided a
presentation on City IPM practices to 122 professional pesticide applicators and 40 residents.
C.10 Trash Load Reduction
The Clean Waterways, Healthy City: Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan and Assessment
Strategy (Long-Term Plan), originally submitted to the Water Board on February 15, 2014, and since
updated, serves as a roadmap to help San José achieve the C.10 trash load reduction
requirements and the vision of Clean Waterways, Healthy City. By reducing trash and reviving the
health of San José urban creeks, the City will improve the appeal of creek open space for
residents. Any vision of vibrant and healthy communities in San José must include revitalized
waterways that support a healthier lifestyle for our City.
As of July 1, 2017, the City attained 79.2% trash load reduction, exceeding the mandatory 70%
goal, through implementation of a robust set of trash control measures. In FY 16-17 alone, the City
made remarkable progress increasing its trash load reduction from the 53.5% trash reported last
year. This progress is largely due to the installation of additional large trash capture systems, along
with continued implementation of a comprehensive Direct Discharge Program, additional creek
and shoreline cleanups, jurisdictional-wide source control actions, and other measures.
The City installed a total of 11 public Hydrodynamic

Separator (HDS) systems in FY 16-17, increasing its inventory
to a total of 21 systems. Careful planning, coordination,
and oversight of these projects amongst several City
departments, consultants and contractors contributed to
the successful installation of these complex systems. Within
the region, San José has installed some of the largest HDS
systems at the deepest depths. Construction contracts are
scheduled to be awarded in FY 17-18 to install six or seven
more systems. The Environmental Services Department will
continue to work closely with the departments of Public
Works and Transportation on the design, construction, and
maintenance of these devices in operation. There are also
103 Connector Pipe Screens (CPS) systems. Collectively,
these HDS and CPS systems treat 8,223 acres, exceeding
the permit requirement of 895 acres. The City is claiming
36% trash load reduction for full trash capture systems.
Programs aimed at reducing the population of homeless

individuals living along the City’s network of urban creeks
Contractors install screen of a HDS are an ongoing part of San José’s trash load reduction
device at North 33rd Street and Melody progress. The City submitted a Direct Discharge Trash
Lane.
Control Program (DDTCP) for approval by the Water Board
Executive Officer on February 1, 2016 and subsequently
submitted a supplemental plan on May 27, 2016 based on feedback from Water Board staff. The
City received Water Board approval of the DDTCP and to claim a trash load reduction off-set of
i-8
up to 15% for trash removed through DDTCP cleanups. The four phase DDTCP coordinates
elements that address the direct discharge of trash from homeless individuals living adjacent to
creeks. Efforts are currently concentrated in three focus zones and three project areas to maximize
effectiveness and progress, though they are also deployed along the entire stretches of City
waterways as available. The Program coordinates efforts with three other departments and
external partner organizations to conduct outreach to homeless individuals, dismantle
encampment structures, remove residual trash from creeks, and patrol to prevent establishment
of new encampments. In FY 16-17, this partnership cleared 6,697cubic yards of trash from creeks.
The City is claiming a 15% trash load reduction offset for DDTCP cleanups.
The MRP allows permittees to offset part of its trash load

percent reduction requirement by conducting additional
creek and shoreline cleanups at least twice per year. Creek
and shoreline cleanups in FY 16-17 by City departments, non-
profit agencies, and community groups totaled 1,735 cubic
yards of trash. Downtown Streets Team (DST) continued to
clean San José waterways five days a week, concentrating on
the DDTCP focus zones. In FY 16-17, DST removed a total of
1,631 cubic yards of trash, of which 1,285 cubic yards came
from sites cleaned at least twice. In addition to this City
supported program, San José has benefited from volunteer
and partner cleanup initiatives that have removed an
additional 450 cubic yards of trash, from sites cleaned twice.
The City is claiming a 10% offset for additional creek cleanups.
San José cleaned all of its required 32 creek hot spots at least
once in FY 16-17 to a level of “no visible impact” from trash,
removing 157 cubic yards of trash. City staff has observed that
the volume of trash removed from a hot spot is highly variable
from year-to-year and that a generalized trend cannot be
discerned across the 32 hot spot locations.
The City continued to implement and assess the EPS Foam

Food Container Ordinance that became effective for all food Volunteers from Intel at a South Bay
Clean Creeks Coalition Cleanup
service establishments January 1, 2015 and the Single-Use
along Guadalupe River.
Carryout Bag Ban ordinance that became effective January 1,
2012. Creek and river litter surveys have shown a 69% reduction in the number of bags found in
storm drain inlets and a 78% reduction in the number of bags found in creeks. Since full
implementation of the Foam Food Container Ordinance, most restaurants have successfully
transitioned away from using foam food ware to alternative products. Staff has responded to
about 80 complaints of non-compliance and continues to provide education and enforcement
to food service establishments. The City estimates an approximate 73% reduction in the amount
of EPS food service ware in stormwater. San José is claiming a 10% trash load reduction credit for
its jurisdiction-wide source control programs.
To assess environmental outcomes associated with control measures other than full capture
devices, visual on-land trash assessments were conducted according to guidelines in section
C.10.b.ii.b using a standard protocol developed by BASMAA member agencies. Analysis of the
assessments completed during FY 16-17 yielded an 8.2% trash load reduction. The assessment
results may reflect the impacts of the City’s other trash control actions including street sweeping
and a new Illegal Dumping Program. The City sweeps approximately 5,000 curb miles at a
frequency of one to two times per month. The City added a net 3.44 curb miles to street sweeping
i-9
routes in FY 16-17 but did not increase “No Parking” signage for street sweeping parking
enforcement. The City continues to work with BASMAA to assess the effectiveness of additional
street sweeping enhancements. In FY 16-17, the City launched a new Illegal Dumping Rapid
Response Team (IDRRT). The IDRRT responds to service requests and cleans up illegally dumped
items within approximately five days of receiving a report. In FY 16-17, the team removed
approximately 173 cubic yards of illegally dumped materials each week. Since illegal dumping
can include loose garbage, these efforts reduce potential discharges of trash to the storm sewer
system. In addition to these efforts, the City now collects three large items from single-family homes
at no charge, with an unlimited number of pickups. (Also, in December 2016, CalTrans finalized an
agreement with Santa Clara County to partner with San Jose Conservation Corps to remove trash
from State right of way properties and freeways.)
In FY 16-17, the City reconfigured its Trash Management Areas (TMAs) in an effort to simplify efforts
to implement trash control measures. The number of TMAs in San José has been condensed from
over 50 TMAs to 13 TMAs while treating the same area. Staff has updated the Long-Term Trash
Reduction Plan and Assessment Strategy to reflect these changes. See Appendix 10-3.
The 79.2% trash load reduction achieved to date reflects a combination of approaches to address
and revive the health of the City’s urban creeks. The City intends to maintain focus on
implementing control measures to ensure compliance with future MRP trash reduction targets.
C.11 Mercury Controls and C.12 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Controls
Mercury and PCBs are pollutants with a tendency to adhere to particles and accumulate in fish
tissues. Their urban sources also often co-occur on the landscape. Due to these similarities, regional
permit provisions for the control of mercury and PCBs in stormwater are nearly identical.
The City has continued its efforts to reduce or eliminate potential mercury discharges from
municipal operations by purchasing low mercury content fluorescent lamps, and properly
recycling spent lamps. Additionally, the City partners with the Almaden Quicksilver Mining Museum
(AQMM) distribute mercury disposal and HHW brochures and communicate to visitors the
importance of proper disposal of mercury-containing devices. The museum is visited annually by
approximately 900 3rd and 4th grade students from local schools in addition to the general public.
The San José Environmental Innovation Center (EIC) offers much-needed services with economic
and environmental benefits that extend countywide. One of these is a permanent Household
Hazardous Waste (HHW) Drop-off Facility run by the County of Santa Clara. This provides San José
and countywide residents with a convenient facility to dispose of their waste safely by
appointment. The City continues to support the Santa Clara County Household and Small Business
Hazardous Waste Program to provide fluorescent lamp recycling services to residents.
The City also continued to support the San Francisco Bay Regional Monitoring Program (RMP),
which has worked collaboratively with the BASMAA Regional Monitoring Coalition on projects to
understand sources and loadings of mercury and PCBs, and to reduce risk to people who may
eat San Francisco Bay fish containing these chemicals. The City is an active participant in regional
efforts to understand and control stormwater inputs of both mercury and PCBs to the Bay. Staff
participated on the BASMAA Monitoring and Pollutants of Concern Committee and Clean
Watersheds for a Clean Bay (CW4CB) workgroups. The EPA-funded CW4CB project implemented
multiple provisions under C.11 and C.12, such as on-land investigations and abatement,
enhanced sediment management, and evaluation of on-site stormwater treatment via retrofit.
i-10
Many of the efforts under CW4CB occurred within San José with support from staff. This year, City
staff facilitated sampling in various old industrial areas in the City with the intention of finding high
opportunity areas for capturing these pollutants. As a result of previous similar sampling and
investigation, a known location at the end of Leo Avenue was referred to the Water Board for
further action. The City continues its commitment to working with the Water Board and
stakeholders toward achieving TMDLs efficiently and cost effectively.
C.13 Copper Controls
Brake dust has long been known to be a major source of copper to the environment and
stormwater. AB 346 became law in July 2010 and effectively phases out copper in brake pads
sold in California. The City continues to address other sources of copper through prohibition of the
discharge of pool and spa water containing copper algicides, and wash water from copper
architectural features.
The City incorporates copper pollution prevention into its industrial inspection program. A fact
sheet regarding rooftop sources of copper pollution continues to be available for distribution to
targeted industrial facilities. The City continues to include businesses with SIC codes identified as
having a higher potential to contribute copper to stormwater in its annual inspection plan. All of
these business types are subject to the State’s General Industrial Permit, and all new businesses
within this group are inspected within one year of inception. On February 14, 2017, inspectors
attended an annual training at which industrial and architectural sources of copper were
addressed. The brochure “Requirements for Copper Roofs and Other Architectural Copper” which
includes BMPs for preventing prohibited discharges to storm drains is also available for distribution
where discharges from cleaning or treating copper architectural features may occur.
The City of San José’s municipal code includes legal authority to address prohibited discharges to
the City’s MS4. Utilizing the industrial and commercial inspection program and IDDE program, the
City uses a combination of education and enforcement to achieve compliance. The City provides
BMP information to its residential and commercial constituents on various actions they can take
to reduce or eliminate the exposure and discharge of copper from their activities. Materials were
distributed during inspections, at the City’s planning and permitting offices, at outreach events,
and available through the City’s website.
C.14 City of Pacifica and San Mateo County Fecal Indicator Bacteria Controls
This provision only applies to the City of Pacifica and San Mateo County Permittees and does not
apply to the City of San José.
C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges
Some non-stormwater discharges are either not harmful or can be made so with simple best
management practices. These few discharge types are exempted or conditionally exempted
from the stormwater permit’s general discharge prohibitions. Through a variety of outreach
activities, the City encouraged residents to protect water quality by washing their cars over
landscaped areas, or at establishments where the wash water is recycled. The City’s water use
i-11
rules which remain in place regardless of water supply conditions encourage water conservation
and prohibit practices that lead to over watering and runoff. Additionally, the City continues to
promote water-wise landscape irrigation and sustainable gardening techniques in partnership
with the Guadalupe River Park Conservancy, SCVURPPP, the Santa Clara Valley Water District,
Hands on Bay Area, and the Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency.
Conclusion
The City of San José is a leader in promoting innovative proactive environmental policies and
continues to strive to meet or exceed its regulatory obligations. The City is committed to managing
and protecting stormwater quality and actively participates in local and regional efforts designed
to leverage the most value for its resources and citizens. San José will continue to focus resources
to protect water quality for the benefit of our citizens, businesses, and future generations
Outreach to Google volunteers at demonstration gardens.
i-12
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.1 – Permittee Information
Permittee Name: San José
Section 1 – Permittee Information

SECTION I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Background Information
Permittee Name: City of San José
Population: 1,042,094
NPDES Permit No.: CAS612008
Order Number: R2-2015-0049
Reporting Time Period (month/year): July 2016 through June 2017
Name of the Responsible Authority: Napp Fukuda Title: Deputy Director
Mailing Address: 200 East Santa Clara Street, 7 th Floor
City: San José Zip Code: 95113 County: Santa Clara
Telephone Number: (408) 793-5353 Fax Number: (408) 271-1930
E-mail Address: napp.fukuda@sanjoseca.gov
Name of the Designated Stormwater Sharon Newton Title: Environmental Services Program Manager
Management Program Contact (if
different from above):
Department: Environmental Services
Mailing Address: 200 East Santa Clara Street, 7 th Floor
City: San José Zip Code: 95113 County: Santa Clara
Telephone Number: (408) 793-5351 Fax Number: (408) 271-1930
E-mail Address: sharon.newton@sanjoseca.gov
1-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.1 – Permittee Information
1-2
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.2 – Municipal Operations
Section 2 - Provision C.2 Reporting Municipal Operations
Program Highlights and Evaluation

Highlight/summarize activities for reporting year:
Summary:
The City trains staff regularly to ensure that appropriate stormwater protection BMPs are employed during applicable municipal operations and
maintenance activities. BMP training was provided for 243 municipal staff from March through May 2017 covering street repair and
maintenance, sidewalk and plaza maintenance, park maintenance, stormwater pump station maintenance, bridge and structure
maintenance, graffiti removal, and corporation yard operations. The training focused on deployment of practical and effective stormwater
BMPs during common operation and maintenance activities to protect inlets and waterways.
The City’s Environmental Services Department provides on-going technical assistance to municipal staff, including making information readily
available on the City’s intranet with links to the California Stormwater Quality Association Handbook for Municipal Operations, the Bay Area
Stormwater Management Agencies Association’s (BASMAA) Blueprint for a Clean Bay, and the BASMAA Pollution Prevention Training Program for
Surface Cleaners. City staff also participate directly on the Program’s Municipal Operations Ad Hoc Task Group and the BASMAA Municipal
Operations Committee.
C.2.a. ►Street and Road Repair and Maintenance
Place a Y in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were implemented. If not applicable, type NA in the box and provide an
explanation in the comments section below. Place an N in the boxes next to activities where applicable BMPs were not implemented for one or
more of these activities during the reporting fiscal year, then in the comments section below provide an explanation of when BMPs were not
implemented and the corrective actions taken.
Control of debris and waste materials during road and parking lot installation, repaving or repair maintenance activities from polluting
Y
stormwater
Control of concrete slurry and wastewater, asphalt, pavement cutting, and other street and road maintenance materials and wastewater
Y
from discharging to storm drains from work sites.
Sweeping and/or vacuuming and other dry methods to remove debris, concrete, or sediment residues from work sites upon completion of
Y
work.
Comments:
N/A
2-1
C.2.b. ►Sidewalk/Plaza Maintenance and Pavement Washing

Control of wash water from pavement washing, mobile cleaning, pressure wash operations at parking lots, garages, trash areas, gas station
Y
fueling areas, and sidewalk and plaza cleaning activities from polluting stormwater
Y Implementation of the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program BMPs
Comments:
N/A
C.2.c. ►Bridge and Structure Maintenance and Graffiti Removal

Y Control of discharges from bridge and structural maintenance activities directly over water or into storm drains
Y Control of discharges from graffiti removal activities
Y Proper disposal for wastes generated from bridge and structure maintenance and graffiti removal activities
Y Implementation of the BASMAA Mobile Surface Cleaner Program BMPs for graffiti removal
Employee training on proper capture and disposal methods for wastes generated from bridge and structural maintenance and graffiti
Y
removal activities.
Contract specifications requiring proper capture and disposal methods for wastes generated from bridge and structural maintenance and
Y
graffiti removal activities.
Comments:
N/A
2-2
C.2.e. ►Rural Public Works Construction and Maintenance

Does your municipality own/maintain rural1 roads: X Yes No
If your answer is No then skip to C.2.f.
Y Control of road-related erosion and sediment transport from road design, construction, maintenance, and repairs in rural areas
Y (1) Identification and prioritization of rural road maintenance based on soil erosion potential, slope steepness, and stream habitat resources
NA(2) No impact to creek functions including migratory fish passage during construction of roads and culverts
Y(1) Inspection of rural roads for structural integrity and prevention of impact on water quality
Maintenance of rural roads adjacent to streams and riparian habitat to reduce erosion, replace damaging shotgun culverts and excessive
Y(1)(2)
erosion
Re-grading of unpaved rural roads to slope outward where consistent with road engineering safety standards, and installation of water
Y(3)
bars as appropriate
Inclusion of measures to reduce erosion, provide fish passage, and maintain natural stream geomorphology when replacing culverts or
N/A(3)
design of new culverts or bridge crossings
Comments including listing increased maintenance in priority areas:
(1) Rural road inspection, maintenance, and repair within the City’s rural parks system focuses on high traffic areas and those roads with the
highest potential for erosion. The maintenance activities and BMPs for high traffic areas within the City’s rural parks are based on soil erosion
potential, slope steepness, historical knowledge of previous erosion areas, and proximity to riparian habitat.
(2) The City did not perform any construction on its rural roads or repair or replace culverts within its rural parks system in FY 16-17. No new culverts
or bridge crossings were designed in FY 16-17.
(3) Re-grading of unpaved rural roads within the City’s rural parks did not include outward slopes due to safety issues. Due to resource limitations,
the City did not have the opportunity to evaluate the appropriateness of installation of water bars. The City did not install water bars on any of its
unpaved rural roads within the City’s rural parks.
1Rural means any watershed or portion thereof that is developed with large lot home-sites, such as one acre or larger, or with primarily agricultural, grazing or open
space uses.
2-3
C.2.f. ►Corporation Yard BMP Implementation

Place an X in the boxes below that apply to your corporations yard(s):
We do not have a corporation yard
Our corporation yard is a filed NOI facility and regulated by the California State Industrial Stormwater NPDES General Permit: Mineta San José
X
International Airport, 1701 Airport Boulevard, Suite B-1130, San José, CA 95110
X We have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Corporation Yard(s)
Place an X in the boxes below next to implemented SWPPP BMPs to indicate that these BMPs were implemented in applicable instances. If not
applicable, type NA in the box. If one or more of the BMPs were not adequately implemented during the reporting fiscal year then indicate so and
explain in the comments section below:
X Control of pollutant discharges to storm drains such as wash waters from cleaning vehicles and equipment
Routine inspection prior to the rainy seasons of corporation yard(s) to ensure non-stormwater discharges have not entered the storm drain
X
system
X Containment of all vehicle and equipment wash areas through plumbing to sanitary or another collection method
Use of dry cleanup methods when cleaning debris and spills from corporation yard(s) or collection of all wash water and disposing of wash
X
water to sanitary or other location where it does not impact surface or groundwater when wet cleanup methods are used
X Cover and/or berm outdoor storage areas containing waste pollutants
Comments:
In FY16-17, corporation yard inspections were conducted before the beginning of the wet season. In general, all the corporation yards were in
good order and BMPs were implemented in the majority of areas with site specific activities. Some minor BMP deficiencies were observed and they
are noted in the inspection table below. Follow-up inspections were conducted to ensure all deficiencies were corrected.
If you have a corporation yard(s) that is not an NOI facility, complete the following table for inspection results for your corporation yard(s) or attach
a summary including the following information:
2-4
Date and Description of

Corp Yard Activities w/ site- Inspection Follow-up and/or Corrective
Corporation Yard Name specific SWPPP BMPs Date2 Inspection Findings/Results Actions
Central Service Yard Central Service Yard 9/15/2016 This yard is the largest of all the City’s The spill log sheets were
1661 Senter Road areas/activities with specific corporation yards at 21.3 acres. All storm posted on 9/29/16. Inlet
San José, CA 95112 BMPs: aboveground storage drains onsite were inspected. No non- protection was replaced on
tanks; outdoor storage areas; stormwater discharges were observed 9/29/16 and 10/21/16. The
wash rack area; parking lots during the inspection. The SWPPP was second inlet protection was
and impervious surfaces; available onsite. Some minor issues were delayed because additional
Building A; Building B; Building observed during the inspection, including materials needed to be
C; Buildings D and D4; missing spill log sheets from two buildings; ordered. The hoses had shut-
Building E; Building F (Fleet two storm drain inlets needed the inlet off valves installed on
Maintenance Shop, Police protection replaced/refreshed; two hoses 9/29/16. The drip pans for the
Build-up Shop); Building G needed shut-off valves; and porta-potties porta-potties were on order
(Alternate Work Program, needed containment trays. from the vendor and were
Landscaping, Mowing,); delivered and installed on
scrap metal recycling; 10/3/2016 as confirmed by
hazardous waste. photo documentation.
2 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.
2-5

Mabury Service Yard Mabury Service Yard 9/8/2016 Mabury Yard is a 6.98 acre facility. The The spill-kit was immediately
1404 Mabury Road areas/activities with specific SWPPP was available onsite. All storm drains restocked during the
San José, CA 95133 BMPs: wash rack area; onsite were inspected. No non-stormwater inspection on 9/8/16. The
parking lots and impervious discharges were observed during the pooled waste-water in the
surfaces; fuel dispensing inspection. Some issues observed during the bermed area was pumped
area, underground and inspection were improper storage of out to the sanitary sewer on
aboveground storage tanks fluorescent light tubes; pooled waste-water 9/15/2016. The fluorescent
and generators; outdoor in the bermed area; spill-kit supplies lacking; light tubes were removed
storage areas, debris transfer and some storm inlets missing proper inlet and all inlet protection was
area, material storage protection. replaced. Confirmed
bunkers, and central business corrections were made
district transfer area; metal during a follow-up inspection
scrap recycling; buildings, on 9/19/16.
transportation administration,
vehicle maintenance and
fuel pump station,
warehouse; storage
containers and sheds;
hazardous waste.
2-6

Municipal Police Municipal Police Garage 9/12/2016 Good housekeeping practices were Copy of spill log template
Garage areas/activities with specific observed and the SWPPP was available was sent to Equipment
825 North San Pedro BMPs: parking and onsite. All storm drains onsite were Maintenance Supervisor on
Street impervious surfaces; scrap inspected. No non-stormwater discharges 9/22/16.
San José, CA 95110 metal recycling; storage were observed. The only issue was the
tanks and generators; fuel Vehicle Maintenance Garage did not have
station; wash rack; Buildings an up-to-date spill log. The site was
A and B; Vehicle informed that even though they have not
Maintenance Building and had any recordable spills, they must still
Parking Area; hazardous have the log available.
waste.
South Service Yard South Service Yard 9/14/2016 The SWPPP was available onsite. No non- Follow-up inspection
4420 Monterey Road areas/activities with specific stormwater discharges were observed. A conducted on 9/24/2016.
San José, CA 95111 BMPs: outdoor storage areas; mobile response spill kit was maintained at Inlet protection was
wash racks; parking lots and this location. Broken inlet protection at the replaced at the storm drain
impervious surfaces; fuel vehicle wash pad area was observed. near wash pad. Storm drains
dispensing area and Storm drains #17 and #18 needed to be #17 and #18 were marked
underground and marked with “No Dumping Flows to Bay”. with “No Dumping Flows to
aboveground storage tanks; Some minor leaks under City Bay” signage. Drip pans
debris transfer area, material equipment/vehicles were also observed. were under the
storage bunker, and scrap vehicles/equipment.
metal bin; Buildings 1,2,3, and
4; covered storage areas;
hazardous waste.
2-7

West Service Yard West Service Yard 9/6/2016 No non-stormwater discharges were The SWPPP was printed out
5050 Williams Road areas/activities with specific observed. Two minor issues were observed and placed in a binder in
San José, CA 95129 BMPs: Parking lots and during inspection. The SWPPP binder was the office on 9/14/2016. The
impervious surfaces; clean not available in the main office. The inlet inlet protection was
material storage bunkers; near the wash bay and two inlets near the refreshed/replaced on
scrap metal recycling; debris driveway needed inlet protection to be 9/14/2016.
transfer area, oversized refreshed/replaced.
rubbish; fueling station and
aboveground storage tanks;
wash rack; Buildings 1 (main
office), 2 (vehicle
maintenance); covered
storage; parks material
storage shed; storage cages;
carport; hazardous waste.
2-8
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.3 – New Development and Redevelopment
Section 3 - Provision C.3 Reporting New Development and Redevelopment
C.3.b.iv.(1) ► Regulated Projects Approved Prior to C.3

Requirements
(For FY 2016-17 Annual Report only) Does your agency have any Regulated Projects Yes No
that were approved with no Provision C.3 stormwater treatment requirements under a
X
previous MS4 permit and that did not begin construction by January 1, 2016 (i.e., that
are subject to Provision C.3.b.i.(2)?
If yes, complete attached Table C.3.b.iv.(1).
C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting

Fill in attached table C.3.b.iv.(2) or attach your own table including the same information.
Summary
Fifty-eight (58) C.3 Regulated Projects were approved this year. This is a decrease from eighty-two (82) approved in FY 15-16. Four (4) of the FY 16-
17 C.3 Regulated Projects approved are public projects. The remaining fifty-four (54) are private projects comprised of six (6) residential, forty (40)
non-residential (commercial, educational, or industrial), and eight (8) mixed-use projects. Seven (7) private projects were required to provide
Hydromodification Management Controls, which consisted of six (6) underground vault/structures and one (1) bioretention area with outlet
controls that were all sized using the Bay Area Hydrology Model (BAHM).
Just over half of the Regulated Projects directed runoff to vegetated areas and just over two-thirds of the projects had self-treating areas and
covered parking. Just under two-thirds of the projects used the following source control measures: water efficient irrigation systems, beneficial
landscaping, storm drain stenciling, or covered dumpster enclosures, which were then connected to the sanitary sewer. Bioretention areas were
included in forty-nine (49) out of the fifty-eight (58) projects and eleven (11) of the projects used Media Filter Systems as a treatment control
measure (Special Projects).
The City took several steps to improve and enhance the C.3 review and reporting process. The City completed the update of its
interdepartmental C.3 Development Review Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) document. The SOP provides clear guidance on staff roles
and responsibilities for meeting C.3 requirements during the development review process. Additionally, City departments, including Public Works,
Transportation, Planning, and Environmental Services, sent staff to a SCVURPPP workshop on June 7 and 13, 2017 that focused on preparing and
reviewing stormwater control plans, interpreting C.3 data, understanding stormwater treatment measure sizing and design, and reporting C.3
requirements. The City also revamped and published two resource webpages that discuss the importance of implementing LID, how to meet C.3
requirements, and prepare acceptable stormwater control plans. The webpages include application forms, worksheets, and new City standard
details and specifications for stormwater treatment measures.
3-1
C.3.e.iv. ►Alternative or In-Lieu Compliance with Provision C.3.c.

Is your agency choosing to require 100% LID treatment onsite for all Regulated Projects Yes No
x
and not allow alternative compliance under Provision C.3.e.?
Comments (optional):
C.3.e.v ► Special Projects Reporting

1. In FY 2016-17, has your agency received, but not yet granted final discretionary Yes No
approval of, a development permit application for a project that has been identified
x
as a potential Special Project based on criteria listed in MRP Provision C.3.e.ii(2) for any
of the three categories of Special Projects (Categories A, B or C)?
2. In FY 2016-17, has your agency granted final discretionary approval to a Special Yes No
x
Project? If yes, include the project in both the C.3.b.iv.(2) Table, and the C.3.e.v. Table.
If you answered “Yes” to either question,
1) Complete Table C.3.e.v.
2) Attach narrative discussion of 100% LID Feasibility or Infeasibility for each project.
C.3.h.v.(2) ► Reporting Newly Installed Stormwater Treatment

Systems and HM Controls (Optional)
On an annual basis, before the wet season, provide a list of newly installed (installed within the reporting year) stormwater treatment systems and
HM controls to the local mosquito and vector control agency and the Water Board. The list shall include the facility locations and a description
of the stormwater treatment measures and HM controls installed.
The City of San José will submit a separate table for the newly installed stormwater treatment systems for FY16-17 in September 2017.
3-2
C.3.h.v.(3)(a) –(c) and (f) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment

Systems Operation and Maintenance Verification Inspection
Program Reporting
Site Inspections Data Number/Percentage
Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) in your agency’s database 288
or tabular format at the end of the previous fiscal year (FY15-16)
Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) in your agency’s database 337
or tabular format at the end of the reporting period (FY 16-17)
Total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) for which O&M verification 59
inspections were conducted during the reporting period (FY 16-17)
Percentage of the total number of Regulated Projects (including offsite projects, and Regional Projects) 20%6
inspected during the reporting period (FY 16-17)
6Based on the number of Regulated Projects in the database or tabular format at the end of the previous fiscal year (FY 15-16), per MRP Provision
C.3.h.ii.(6)(b).
3-3
C.3.h.v.(3)(d)-(e) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment Systems

Operation and Maintenance Verification Inspection Program
Reporting
Provide a discussion of the inspection findings for the year and any common problems encountered with various types of treatment systems
and/or HM controls. This discussion should include a general comparison to the inspection findings from the previous year.
Summary:
The City met the requirement to inspect an average of 20%, but no less than 15%, of the total number of C.3 regulated project sites. In FY 16-17,
staff inspected a total of 59 sites out of 288 from the previous fiscal year total which equates to 20%. Stormwater treatment systems at
approximately half of the sites inspected were maintained and in good working order. The most common deficiencies were related to
inadequate or missing vegetation in landscape-based treatment systems and inadequate maintenance of media filter systems.
In FY 16-17, bioretention cells, swales, and media filter systems comprised the majority of the stormwater treatment systems inspected under the
Stormwater Treatment Measure Operation and Maintenance Inspection Program. The most common problems observed with bioretention cells
and swales were associated with inadequate vegetation coverage, invasive/nuisance vegetation, and accumulated trash/debris. The most
common issues associated with media filter systems were missing maintenance records and excessive accumulation of pollutants/sediment. This
is in comparison to FY 15-16, where inadequate vegetation coverage and invasive/nuisance vegetation in swales were the most common issues.
Inspectors required responsible parties to replace dead vegetation, remove invasive/nuisance vegetation, ensure vegetation is properly
irrigated, remove trash/debris, and maintain media filter systems. Inspectors also provided maintenance guidance materials, when needed.
The City also verified the proper installation of 313 newly installed stormwater treatment systems at 51 C.3 regulated project sites under the
Stormwater Treatment Measure Installation Verification Program in FY 16-17. City staff worked closely with the developers to ensure the proper
installation of stormwater treatment systems during all stages of the installation process.
Provide a discussion of the effectiveness of the O&M Program and any proposed changes to improve the O&M Program (e.g., changes in
prioritization plan or frequency of O&M inspections, other changes to improve effectiveness program).
Summary:
The overall goal of the City’s Stormwater Treatment Measure O&M Inspection Program is to ensure the proper installation and on-going operation
and maintenance of stormwater treatment systems. San José staff has been effective at accomplishing this goal by ensuring both minor and
significant problems identified during O&M inspections are corrected, educating the responsible party of maintenance requirements, and
providing outreach material such as plant guidance for bioretention facilities, maintenance information, and manufacturers’ recommended
maintenance procedures for vault-based treatment systems.
In FY 16-17, the total number of C.3 regulated sites in the O&M Inspection Program grew from 288 sites to 337 sites. City staff continued the
transition from the spreadsheet-based tracking system to the Electronic Enforcement Data Management System (EEDMS). By completing the
3-4
transition to EEDMS, staff will be able to better track the progress and site information of the increasing inventory of C.3 regulated projects and
associated stormwater treatment systems more effectively, and reduce potential for transcription errors.
In addition, City staff across several departments worked together to develop new interdepartmental Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for
the Post-Construction Stormwater Treatment Control Measure, Pervious Pavement System, and Hydromodification Management Control Initial
Installation Inspection Program. The new procedures outlined in the SOP will go into effect in FY 17-18. The SOP outlines key steps in data
management and tracking of Regulated Project Sites, Stormwater Treatment Control Measures (TCMs), Permeable Pavement Systems (PPSs), and
Hydromodification (HM) Controls. Multiple checks, controls, and redundancies were incorporated into the data management and tracking
processes to ensure information is accurate, comprehensive, and consistently available throughout the entire installation process for TCMs, PPSs,
and HM Controls at Regulated Project sites.
In FY16-17, the Stormwater Treatment Measure Operation and Maintenance Inspection Program ERP was revised and a new ERP was developed
for the C.3 Installation Verification Program to meet the new MRP requirements. The O&M Inspection Program continued to make improvements
to the inspection forms, and a pre-inspection report was developed to better track enforcement history at each site that has had a previous
O&M inspection. In addition, inspection staff continued to educate property managers and owners on O&M requirements for stormwater
treatment systems. Inspection staff also informed property owners and managers of maintenance requirements on inspection reports along with
a list of all installed stormwater treatment systems on their site.
C.3.h.v.(4)► Enforcement Response Plan

(For FY 2016-17 Annual Report only) Has your agency completed an Enforcement Yes No
Response Plan for all O&M inspections of stormwater treatment measures by July 1, X
2017?
If No, provide schedule for completion:
C.3.i. ►Required Site Design Measures for Small Projects and

Detached Single Family Home Projects
On an annual basis, discuss the implementation of the requirements of Provision C.3.i, including ordinance revisions, permit conditions,
development of standard specifications and/or guidance materials, and staff training.
Summary:
The City’s Municipal Code (Tile 20: Zoning) (https://library.municode.com/ca/san_jose/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT20ZO) and City
Council Policy 6-29: Post Construction Urban Runoff Management (https://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3891) require small
projects and detached single family home projects to implement at least one of the site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i. Additionally, Title
17 (Buildings and Construction – Title 17.72.530) of the Municipal Code requires ministerial single-family home projects (projects not subject to
Planning permits), to direct all roof runoff to landscaped areas, or implement one of the other site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i.
3-5
BASMAA prepared standard specifications in four fact sheets regarding the site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i, as a resource for Co-
permittees. The four fact sheets are included as part of a handout display wall of Planning, Building, and Environmental Serv ices outreach
documentation.
BASMAA prepared standard specifications in four fact sheets regarding the site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i, as a resource for
Permittees. The City has modified local ordinances/policies/procedures and forms/checklists to require all applicable projects approved after
December 1, 2012 to implement at least one of the site design measures listed in Provision C.3.i.
C.3.j.i.(5).(a) ► Green Infrastructure Framework or Work Plan

(For FY 2016-17 Annual Report only) Was your agency’s Green Infrastructure Yes, approval No
Framework or Work Plan approved by the agency’s governing body, mayor, city X documentation
manager, or county manager by June 30, 2017? attached
If Yes, describe approval process and documentation: The Green Infrastructure Framework was presented by staff to the City’s Transportation
and Environment Committee, a City Council Subcommittee, on May 1, 2017. The committee approved the framework at the May 1 meeting
and forwarded it to the full City Council with the recommendation that City Council approve and authorize the submittal of the Green
Infrastructure Framework in conformance with the Stormwater Permit requirements.
On May 23, 2017 staff presented the Green Infrastructure Framework to the City Council. Following the presentation, the Council voted and
unanimously approved the Green Infrastructure Framework and authorized the submittal in conformance with the Stormwater Permit
requirements.
C.3.j.i.(5)(d) ► Green Infrastructure Outreach

On an annual basis, provide a summary of your agency’s outreach and education efforts pertaining to Green Infrastructure planning and
implementation.
Summary:
Please refer to the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a summary of outreach efforts implemented by the Program.
City staff from Public Works, Transportation, Planning, PRNS, and Environmental Services departments attended a SCVURPPP training on April 19,
2017 entitled “Green Infrastructure Design and Implementation”. The training provided an overview of green infrastructure requirements, design
and maintenance considerations, and project case studies. In addition, ESD staff presented on the Green Infrastructure Plan Framework to the
Transportation and Environment Committee and City Council. The presentations described impacts of stormwater, regulatory requirements, what
green infrastructure is, and the benefits and challenges of implementing it, and outlined the Green Infrastructure Plan Framework.
Please refer to the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a summary of outreach efforts implemented by the Program.
3-6
C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Early Implementation of Green Infrastructure

Projects
On an annual basis, submit a list of green infrastructure projects, public and private, that are already planned for implementation during the
permit term and infrastructure projects planned for implementation during the permit term that have potential for green infrastructure measures.
Include the following information:
• A summary of planning or implementation status for each public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated
Project as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii. (see C.3.j.ii.(2) Table B - Planned Green Infrastructure Projects).
• A summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the
maximum extent practicable during the permit term. For any public infrastructure project where implementation of green infrastructure
measures is not practicable, submit a brief description of the project and the reasons green infrastructure measures were impracticable
to implement (see C.3.j.ii.(2) Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green Infrastructure).
Background Information:
Describe how this provision is being implemented by your agency, including the process used by your agency to identify projects with potential
for green infrastructure, if applicable.
The City uses the BASMAA “Guidance for Identifying Green Infrastructure Potential in Municipal Capital Improvement Program Projects” (May 6,
2016) for guidance on identifying and reviewing potential green infrastructure projects.
Summary of Planning or Implementation Status of Identified Projects:

See attached Tables C.3.j.ii.(2)-A and C.3.j.ii.(2)-B for the required information, and any additional notes provided here (optional).
C.3.j.iii.(2) ► Participate in Processes to Promote Green

Infrastructure
On an annual basis, report on the goals and outcomes during the reporting year of work undertaken to participate in processes to promote green
infrastructure.
Please refer to the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a summary of efforts conducted to help regional, State, and federal agencies plan,
design and fund incorporation of green infrastructure measures into local infrastructure projects, including transportation projects.
C.3.j.iv.(2) ► Tracking and Reporting Progress

On an annual basis, report progress on development and implementation of methods to track and report implementation of green infrastructure
measures and provide reasonable assurance that wasteload allocations for TMDLs are being met.
Please refer to the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a summary of methods being developed to track and report implementation of green
infrastructure measures.
3-7
C.3.b.v.(1) ► Regulated Projects Reporting Table – Projects Approved During the Fiscal
Year Reporting Period
Private Regulated Projects 2016/2017
Project Project No.: Project Street Name of Phase No. Project Type9: Project Total Site Total New Total Pre- Project
Name: AD16-065 Location7: Address: Developer: 8: Commercial Watershed Area Impervious Project Status:
Lowe’s Southwest 775 Ridder Castle No 11: (Acres): Surface Impervious
Expansion corner of Park Drive Family LLC Project Description10: Coyote 0.63 Area12 (ft2): Surface Deemed
Schallenb et al. Permit Adjustment for the 23,983 Area14 (ft2): Complete
erger expansion of the existing Total Area 0 Date16:
Road and parcel currently owned of Land Total 7/16/2016
Ridder by Sandhill (formerly Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Park Drive owned by VTA) for the (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
expansion of Lowe's 0.63 Surface13 Impervious Date17:
parking lot on a 0.63 gross (ft2): Surface 7/22/2016
acre site 0 Area15 (ft2):
23,983
7 Include cross streets.

8 If a project is being constructed in phases, indicate the phase number and use a separate row entry for each phase. If not, e nter “NA”.
9 Project Type is the type of development (i.e., new and/or redevelopment).
10 Example descriptions of development are: 5-story office building, residential with 160 single-family homes with five 4-story buildings to contain 200 condominiums, 100
unit 2-story shopping mall, mixed-use retail and residential development (apartments), industrial warehouse.
11 State the watershed(s) in which the Regulated Project is located. Optional but recommended: Also state the downstream watershed(s).
12 All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing pervious surface.
13 All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing impervious surface.
14 For redevelopment projects, state the pre-project impervious surface area.

15 For redevelopment projects, state the post-project impervious surface area.
16 For private projects, state project application deemed complete date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance
date.
17 For private projects, state project application final discretionary approval date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit
issuance date.
3-8
Site Design Measures 18: Source Control Measures19: Treatment Control Operation & Maintenance Hydraulic Sizing Criteria 22: HM Controls Required2324:
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, trees Beneficial landscaping, Measures20: Responsibility 3: Combination Flow and No
planted adjacent to impervious areas maintenance (sweeping, Mechanism21: Volume Design In Red Area
cleaning, etc.) On Site: Property Owner
Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
No
Off Site: HM Method: N/A
N/A Alternative Compliance
Measures:
N/A
Project Project No.: Project Street Name of Phase No.: Project Type: Project Total Site Total New Total Pre- Project
Name: CP14-056 Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Arco Mt. Vista Southeast 3010 Mt. Villa Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
corner of S Vista Drive Developers Project Description: 0.66 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
White and Conditional Use Permit for 3,316 Area (ft2): Complete
Road and Investment the construction of a new Total Area 9,813 Date:
Mt Vista LLC 2,600 square foot of Land Total 6/28/2017
Drive convenience store with a Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
new fuel island canopy and (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
site improvements on a 0.66 0.46 Surface Impervious Date:
gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 6/28/2017
7,394 Area (ft2):
10,710
Site Design Measures: Source Control Measures: Treatment Control Operation & Maintenance Hydraulic Sizing Criteria: HM Controls Required:
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Storm drain system Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
treating areas stenciling, covered Property Owner In Green Area But < 1 Acre
dumpster area drain to On Site: Alternative Certification:
sanitary sewer, proper cover Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A
for fueling areas, beneficial
landscaping, water efficient Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
irrigation system N/A Measures:
N/A
18 List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other
vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks, walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc.
19 List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape
irrigation systems; etc.

20 List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., flow through planter, bioretention facility,
infiltration basin, etc.).

21 List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., O&M agreement with private landowner; O&M agreement with homeowners’ association; O&M by public entity, etc.) that have
been or will be used to assign responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction stormwater treatment systems.
22 See Provision C.3.d.i. “Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteri a. Enter the corresponding provision number of
the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b., 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3).
23 If HM control is not required, state why not.
24 If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of
device(s) or method(s) used, such as detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention basin, or in-stream control)
3-9
McDonalds Northeaste 898 South McDonalds Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Bascom rly corner Bascom Project Description: 0.72 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Avenue of South Avenue Conditional Use Permit to 1,928 Area (ft2): Complete
Bascom allow the construction of a Total Area 23,880 Date:
Avenue new 4,276-square foot of Land Total 11/18/2015
and public eating establishment Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Fruitdale (McDonald’s) with a drive- (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Avenue through on a 0.72 gross 0.72 Surface Impervious Date:
acre site. (ft2): Surface 11/18/2015
23,880 Area (ft2): (Not
25,808 reported in
FY 15-16)
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Storm drain system Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
treating areas stenciling, covered Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
dumpster area drain to On Site:
sanitary sewer Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
No
Measures:
N/A
Shell Meridian Southeast 1610 AU Energy Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
corner of Meridian LLC Project Description: 0.40 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Meridian Avenue Conditional Use Permit to 4,334 Area (ft2): Complete
Avenue allow the construction of a Total Area 14,125 Date:
and new 24-hour gas station, of Land Total 5/15/2017
Hamilton canopy, with a 2,215- Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Avenue square foot convenience (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
store, 1,013-square foot 0.40 Surface Impervious Date:
basement, 1,121-square (ft2): Surface 5/24/2017
foot drive-through self- 14,125 Area (ft2):
service carwash tunnel, 18,459
and new pump canopy
and four fuel dispensers on
a 0.40 gross acre site.
Directed runoff to vegetated areas Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
connect interior parking Property Owner Volume Design In Green Area But <1 acre
structures to sanitary sewer, On Site:
covered dumpster area Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
drain to sanitary sewer, No
proper cover for fueling Off Site: HM Method: N/A
areas N/A Alternative Compliance
Measures:
N/A
3-10
Name: CP15-040 Location: Address: Developer: No Educational Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Kiddie Southwest 16601 Almaden Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Academy corner of Almaden 16001 Project Description: 0.80 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Almaden Expressway Conditional Use Permit to 23,600 Area (ft2): Complete
Expresswa allow a new 10,625-square Total Area 0 Date:
y and foot daycare facility with of Land Total 9/28/2016
Redmond up to 168 students on an Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Avenue approximately 0.80 gross (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
acre site. 0.80 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 9/28/2016
0 Area (ft2):
23,600
Self-retaining areas, directed runoff to Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetated areas water efficient irrigation Property Owner In Red Area
system, covered dumpster On Site: Alternative Certification:
area drain to sanitary sewer Bioretention, Planter Box No HM Controls Used: N/A
Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A
Chevron Northeast 875 Blossom Stantec Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Blossom Hill corner of Hill Road Architecture Project Description: 0.79 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Blossom Hill Inc. Conditional Use Permit to 1,865 Area (ft2): Complete
Road and construct a 2,744-square Total Area 26,048 Date:
Santa foot sales building, of Land Total 10/12/2016
Teresa including canopy, four fuel Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Boulevard dispensers, three (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
underground fuel tanks, 0.79 Surface Impervious Date:
and overall site (ft2): Surface 10/12/2016
improvements for a total of 23,786 Area (ft2):
2,945 square feet. 25,651
Self-retaining areas Storm drain system Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
stenciling, covered Property Owner In Red Area
dumpster area drain to On Site: Alternative Certification:
sanitary sewer Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A
3-11
Name: CP16-014 Location: Address: Developer: No Residential Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Connections: Easterly 278 North Affirmed Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Villas on the side of 2nd Street Housing Project Description: 0.35 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Park North 2nd Group Permit to allow the 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Transitionary Street construction of a six-story, Total Area 15,464 Date:
Housing approxima Residential Service Facility of Land Total 5/11/2016
tely 130 for the formerly homeless, Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
feet comprised of 78 studio (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
southerly apartments, a two- 0.35 Surface Impervious Date:
of West bedroom manager's (ft2): Surface 1/10/2017
Julian apartment, five-bed interim 13,308 Area (ft2):
Street housing section, first and 13,308
second floor social service
and community spaces,
sixth floor outdoor deck and
garden area, and street
level garage with 12
parking spaces on a 0.35
gross acre site.
Covered parking, directed runoff to Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetated areas, minimized surface parking covered dumpster area Property Owner In Red Area
areas drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
storm drain system stenciling Media Filter System (MFS), No HM Controls Used: N/A
Planter Box (project is a
qualifying Category C Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
Special Project) Measures:
N/A
Off Site:
N/A
3-12
Name: CP16-026 Location: Address: Developer: No Residential Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Holden of San Northeaste 4606 Erik Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Jose rly corner Almaden Schoennau Project Description: 3.55 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
of Expressway er Conditional Use Permit to 43,090 Area (ft2): Complete
Almaden allow the construction of a Total Area 115.296 Date:
Expresswa 200-unit, four-story senior of Land Total 7/8/2016
y and assisted living building on a Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Branham 3.55 gross acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Lane 2.47 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 12/14/2016
31,556 Area (ft2):
74.646
Self-treating areas, self-retaining areas, Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
protected riparian areas, protected existing storm drain stenciling, Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
trees/vegetation/soils, preserved open space maintenance (sweeping, On Site:
cleaning, etc.) Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
No
Measures:
N/A
Oakmont Easterly 0 San Felipe Oakmont Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Residential side of San Road Senior Living Project Description: 4.50 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Care Facility Felipe Conditional Use Permit to 106,430 Area (ft2): Complete
Road allow the construction of a Total Area 15,202 Date:
approxima 91,714 square foot, 94-unit of Land Total 7/14/2016
tely 360 Residential Care Facility on Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
feet a 4.50 gross acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
northerly 4.40 Surface Impervious Date:
of Fowler (ft2): Surface 4/26/2017
Road 13,890 Area (ft2):
120,320
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. Yes
minimized surface parking areas covered dumpster area Property Owner
drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used:
maintenance (sweeping, Bioretention No Underground/Vault
cleaning, etc.) Structure
Off Site: Alternative Compliance
N/A Measures: HM Method: BAHM
N/A
3-13
Name: CP16-045 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Carnelian Western 1107 San Jose Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Groundwater terminus of Carnelian Water Project Description: 4.82 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Station Carnelian Court Company Conditional Use Permit to 53,276 Area (ft2): Complete
Court allow the construction of Total Area 303 Date:
water wells, disinfection of Land Total 2/21/2017
building, two motor control Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
centers, AC pavement, and (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
a treatment sump to treat 4.82 Surface Impervious Date:
groundwater blow-off on a (ft2): Surface 5/24/2017
4.82 gross acre site. 100 Area (ft2):
53,376
Directed runoff to vegetated areas Dry sweeping of the site, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2:1 impervious to pervious No
maintenance (sweeping, Property Owner In Red Area
cleaning, etc.) On Site: Alternative Certification:
Self-retaining area No HM Controls Used: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A
Enzo Drive Northwest 0 Enzo Drive Green River Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Psychiatric side of Manageme Project Description: 5.17 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Hospital Enzo Drive nt Conditional Use Permit to 176,049 Area (ft2): Complete
and Eden allow a new up to 80,000 Total Area 0 Date:
Park Place square foot, 120-bed of Land Total 3/15/2017
behavioral/psychiatric Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
hospital on 5.17 gross acre (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
site. 4.00 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 3/22/2017
0 Area (ft2):
176,049
Minimized surface parking areas, protected Beneficial landscaping, dry Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. Yes
riparian areas, self-treating areas sweeping of the site Property Owner
On Site: Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used:
Bioretention No Bioretention with outlet
control
N/A Measures: HM Method: BAHM
N/A
3-14
Name: CP17-009 Location: Address: Developer: No Mixed-Use Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Quetzal Northwest 1695 Alum Resources Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Gardens corner of Rock for Project Description: 0.74 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Mixed-Use Alum Rock Avenue Community Conditional Use Permit to 3,765 Area (ft2): Complete
Ave and Developme allow the mixed-use project Total Area 26,036 Date:
North King nt of 12,175 square feet of Land Total 6/14/2017
Road commercial space and 71 Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
affordable residential units (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
on a 0.74 gross acre site. 0.74 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 6/14/2017
26,036 Area (ft2):
29,801
Covered parking, directed runoff to Storm drain system Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetates areas, self-treating areas stenciling Property Owner In Red Area
On Site: Alternative Certification:
Bioretention, Planter Box, No HM Controls Used: N/A
Media Filter System (MFS)
(project is a qualifying Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
Category B Special Measures:
Project) N/A
Off Site:
N/A
Name: H13-048 Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Hampton/Holi Northeast 2116 North Jayvant Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
day Inn side of the 1St Street Shah Project Description: 3.91 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
intersectio Site Development Permit to 0 Area (ft2): Complete
n of Karina construct two hotels Total Area 166,287 Date:
Court and totaling approximately of Land Total 7/1/2016
North 1st 182,577 square feet with Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Street 290 guest rooms with a 50 (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
percent parking reduction 3.91 Surface Impervious Date:
on a 3.91 gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 8/3/2016
136,664 Area (ft2):
136,664
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, trees Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
planted adjacent to impervious areas drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
maintenance (sweeping, On Site:
No
Measures:
N/A
3-15
Holiday Inn Located 2660 Holiday Inn Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Montgomery approxima Monterey Express Project Description: 1.70 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
tely 600 Road A Site Development Permit 12,115 Area (ft2): Complete
feet to allow the construction of Total Area 27,691 Date:
northwest a 81-room four story hotel of Land Total 7/13/2016
of the and a below grade parking Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
corner of garage on an (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Monterey approximately 1.70 gross 0.85 Surface Impervious Date:
Road and acre site. (ft2): Surface 7/13/2016
Umbarger 23,163 Area (ft2):
Road 35,278
Covered parking, self-treating areas Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner In Green Area But < 1 acre
beneficial landscaping On Site: Alternative Certification:
Bioretention, Planter Box No HM Controls Used: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A
Name: H15-044 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Lohr Winery Between 1980 South Dinapoli Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
South 7th 7th Street Company Project Description: 10.11 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Street and Site Development Permit to 17,840 Area (ft2): Complete
South 10th allow repaving and Total Area 394,345 Date:
Street, restriping of parking spaces of Land Total 6/1/2016
approxima and drive aisle construction Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
tely 1,750 on an existing industrial (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
feet south property on 10.11 gross 0.43 Surface Impervious Date:
of Phelan acre site. (ft2): Surface 7/13/2016
Avenue 0 Area (ft2):
17,840
Directed runoff to vegetated areas Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
cleaning, etc.) proper cover Property Owner In Red Area
for fueling areas On Site: Alternative Certification:
Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A
3-16
Name: H15-047 Location: Address: Developer: No Mixed-Use Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Gateway Northeast 455 South Core Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Tower Mixed- corner of 1st Street Residential Project Description: 0.50 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Use South LLC Site Development Permit to 9,895 Area (ft2): Complete
Market allow construction of a 25- Total Area 18,958 Date:
Street and story building with up to 300 of Land Total 1/19/2016
East residential units and 5,000 Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
William square feet of commercial (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Street space on an approximately 0.50 Surface Impervious Date:
0.50 gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 12/6/2016
12,088 Area (ft2):
21,983
Covered parking, directed runoff to Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetated areas drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner In Red Area
beneficial landscaping, On Site: Planter Box, Media Alternative Certification:
water efficient irrigation Filter System (MFS) (project No HM Controls Used: N/A
system is a qualifying Category B
Special Project) Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
Measures:
Off Site: N/A
N/A
Satellite North side 2121 Satellite Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Healthcare of Alexian Alexian Healthcare Project Description: 1.81 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Medical Drive, Drive Construction of an 1,880 Area (ft2): Complete
Office approxima approximately 30,000 Total Area 66,762 Date:
tely 310 square foot medical office of Land Total 8/17/2016
feet building. Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
easterly of (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Jose 1.81 Surface Impervious Date:
Figueres (ft2): Surface 8/17/2016
Avenue 46,334 Area (ft2):
48,214
Self-retaining areas, self-treating areas Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
covered dumpster area Property Owner In Red Area
drain to sanitary sewer On Site: Alternative Certification:

N/A Measures:
N/A
3-17
Senter and Senter 0 Senter August Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Alma Mini Road Road Ventures, Project Description: 4.16 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Storage between LLC Site Development Permit to 154,448 Area (ft2): Complete
East Alma allow the construction of a Total Area 4,275 Date:
Avenue self storage facility of Land Total 2/17/2017
and including an office, a Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Phelan caretaker unit, and 14 self (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Avenue storage buildings totaling 4.16 Surface Impervious Date:
91,885 square feet with on- (ft2): Surface 3/15/2017
site parking on a 4.16 gross 4,275 Area (ft2):
acre site. 158,723
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, media Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
filtration system, trees planted adjacent to water efficient irrigation Property Owner In Red Area
impervious areas, minimized surface parking system, maintenance On Site: Alternative Certification:
areas (sweeping, cleaning, etc.), Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A
covered dumpster area
drain to sanitary sewer Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A Measures:
N/A
3901 North 1st West side 3901 North SKS Partners Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Parking Lot of North 1st Street Project Description: 4.30 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Upgrades 1st Street, Building 3 Site Development Permit to 12,605 Area (ft2): Complete
approxima allow a new patio area, Total Area 19,560 Date:
tely 1200 new parking lot upgrades of Land Total 6/15/2016
feet including new parking stalls, Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
southerly drive aisles, and landscape (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
of Vista improvements, on a 4.30 0.48 Surface Impervious Date:
Montana gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 6/15/2016
682 Area (ft2): (Not
13,287 reported in
FY 15-16)
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, Beneficial landscaping Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
protected existing treees/vegetation/soil Property Owner In Purple Area

N/A Measures:
N/A
3-18
Jack in the Southwest 2122 Mckee PM Design Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Box McKee corner of Road Group Project Description: 1.12 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
McKee Site Development Permit to 740 Area (ft2): Complete
Road and allow architectural changes Total Area 26,687 Date:
Jose and landscape of Land Total 9/14/2016
Figueres modifications for a Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Avenue proposed fast food (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
restaurant, Jack in the Box, 0.67 Surface Impervious Date:
on a 1.12 gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 9/14/2016
13,111 Area (ft2):
13,851
Self-treating areas, directed runoff to Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetated areas drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner In Red Area
maintenance (sweeping, On Site: Alternative Certification:
cleaning, etc.) Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A
Stevens Southeast 2850 Villa San Tomas (Acres): Surface Impervious
Creek corner of Stevens Developers Project Description: 0.54 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Boutique Stevens Creek & Site Development Permit to 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Hotel Creek Boulevard Investments, allow the construction of a Total Area 21,788 Date:
Boulevard LLC 10-story hotel with 175 guest of Land Total 12/7/2016
and South rooms on a 0.54 gross acre Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Clover site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Avenue 0.54 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 12/7/2016
23,125 Area (ft2):
23,125
Covered parking, minimized surface parking Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
areas, directed runoff to vegetated areas cleaning, etc.), connect Property Owner Volume Design In Purple Area
interior parking structures to On Site:
sanitary sewer, covered Bioretention, Media Filter Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
dumpster area drain to System (MFS) (project is a No
sanitary sewer qualifying Category C HM Method: N/A
Special Project) Alternative Compliance
Measures:
Off Site: N/A
N/A
3-19
Piercy Road Easterly 514 Piercy RNO Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Research and side of Road Properties Project Description: 2.45 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Development Hellyer Site Development Permit to 76,870 Area (ft2): Complete
Avenue allow the construction of Total Area 93,678 Date:
approxima 37,956 square foot research of Land Total 6/28/2017
tely 1,820 and development facility Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
feet on a 2.45 gross acre site (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
southerly 2.45 Surface Impervious Date:
of Piercy (ft2): Surface 6/28/2017
Road 16,808 Area (ft2):
93,678
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, trees Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and Yes
planted adjacent to impervious areas drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner Volume Design
beneficial landscaping On Site: HM Controls Used:
Bioretention, Planter Box Alternative Certification: Underground
No Vault/Structure
Off Site:
N/A Alternative Compliance HM Method: BAHM
Measures:
N/A
333 West San North side 333 West WSD Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Fernando of West San Project Description: 2.53 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Mixed-Use San Fernando Site Development Permit to 12,104 Area (ft2): Complete
Fernando Street allow the construction of a Total Area 97,872 Date:
Street, 18-story building with up to of Land Total 11/9/2016
approxima 698,460 square feet of Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
tely 370 office and retail on a 2.53 (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
feet gross acre site. 2.53 Surface Impervious Date:
westerly of (ft2): Surface 11/9/2016
Almaden 96,854 Area (ft2):
Boulevard 108,958
Covered parking Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
storm drain system Property Owner In Red Area
stenciling, maintenance On Site: Alternative Certification:
(sweeping, cleaning, etc.), Planter Box, Bioretention, No HM Controls Used: N/A
covered dumpster area Media Filter System (MFS)
drain to sanitary sewer (project is a qualifying Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
Category C Special Measures:
Project) N/A
Off Site:
N/A
3-20
Lenfest Road Easterly 684 Lenfest Lars Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Warehouse side of Road Andersen & Project Description: 2.73 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Addition and Lenfest Associate Site Development Permit to 3,036 Area (ft2): Complete
Improvement Road allow a second floor Total Area 17,781 Date:
s approxima addition of approximately of Land Total 8/5/2016
tely 260 85,386 square feet within an Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
feet existing industrial (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
southerly warehouse building, for a 0.54 Surface Impervious Date:
of Mabury total of 170,772 square feet, (ft2): Surface 9/7/2016
Road for the purpose of public 12,000 Area (ft2):
self storage use, and 15,036
associated exterior façade
changes, site improvements
and landscape
modifications, with removal
of eight ordinance-size
trees, on a 2.73 gross acre
site.
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Dry sweeping of the site Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
treating areas Property Owner In Red Area

N/A Measures:
N/A
3-21
Great Oaks Northeast 449 Blossom Eaton Hall Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
corner of Hill Road Achitechtur Project Description: 0.51 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Blossom Hill e Site Development Permit to 1,175 Area (ft2): Complete
Road and allow the construction of a Total Area 20,789 Date:
Snell 7,970 foot commercial of Land Total 5/31/2017
Avenue building on 0.51 gross acres Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
0.51 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 5/31/2017
16,224 Area (ft2):
17,399
Trees planted adjacent to impervious areas, Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
self-retaining areas, self-treating areas, covered dumpster area Property Owner In Red Area
directed runoff to vegetated areas drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
maintenance (sweeping, Planter Box No HM Controls Used: N/A
cleaning, etc.), storm drain
system stenciling Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A Measures:
N/A
SuperMicro Southwest 750 Ridder Super Micro Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
erly corner Park Drive Computer Project Description: 10.16 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
of Ridder Site Development Permit to 102,428 Area (ft2): Complete
Park Drive allow the construction of a Total Area 308,503 Date:
and 209,320-square foot light of Land Total 10/26/2016
Schallenb manufacturing and Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
erger warehouse building with (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Road associated at-grade 10.16 Surface Impervious Date:
parking and improvements (ft2): Surface 10/26/2016
on a 10.16 gross acre site. 246,576 Area (ft2):
349,004
Self-retaining areas, directed runoff to Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
vegetated areas cleaning, etc.) Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
On Site:
No
Measures:
N/A
3-22
Silver Creek North of 5880 Hellyer AG Key, LLC Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Valley Self Silver Avenue Project Description: 5.09 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Storage Creek Site Development Permit to 86,891 Area (ft2): Complete
Valley allow the construction of Total Area 2,868 Date:
Road, two, four-story self storage of Land Total 5/3/2017
approxima facilities totaling 159,670 Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
tely 210 square feet on a 5.09 gross (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
feet north acre site. 2.72 Surface Impervious Date:
of Hellyer (ft2): Surface 5/3/2017
Avenue 2,868 Area (ft2):
89,759
Self-treating areas, minimized surface parking Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and Yes
areas, trees planted adjacent to impervious maintenance (sweeping, Property Owner Volume Design
areas, preserved open space cleaning, etc.), covered On Site: HM Controls Used:
dumpster area drain to Bioretention Alternative Certification: Underground
sanitary sewer, storm drain No Vault/Structure
system stenciling Off Site:
Measures:
N/A
Name: H16-036 Location: Address: Developer: No Mixed-Use Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
The Graduate Southwest 80 East San AMCAL Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Mixed-Use corner of Carlos Multi- Project Description: 1.46 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
South Street Housing, Inc. Site Development Permit to 23,297 Area (ft2): Complete
Second construct a 19-story mixed- Total Area 58,610 Date:
Street and use development with 260 of Land Total 11/4/2016
East San multi-family residences and Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Carlos 14,800 square feet of (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Street commercial uses on a 1.46 1.46 Surface Impervious Date:
24,902 Area (ft2):
48,199
Covered parking, directed runoff to Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetated areas, minimized surface parking connect interior parking Property Owner In Red Area
areas structures to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
proper cover for loading Planter Box, Bioretention, No HM Controls Used: N/A
dock Media Filter System (MFS)
(project is a qualifying Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
Category C Special Measures:
Project) N/A
Off Site:
N/A
3-23
Race Smart Southeast 320 Race Terry Pries Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
and Final corner of Street Project Description: 2.04 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
West San Site Development Permit to 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Carlos allow construction of a new Total Area 88,750 Date:
Street and 29,575 square foot of Land Total 6/28/2017
Race commercial building on an Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Street approximately 2.04 gross (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
acre lot. 2.04 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 6/28/2017
79,446 Area (ft2):
79,446
Decreased the amount of impervious Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
surface, created new pervious areas, drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
directed runoff to vegetated areas, trees water efficient irrigation On Site:
planted adjacent to impervious areas, self- system, maintenance Bioretention, Planter Box Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
treating areas, self-retaining areas, (sweeping, cleaning, etc.), No
storm drain system stenciling Off Site: HM Method: N/A
Measures:
N/A
Name: HA05-051-01 Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Almaden Northwest 99 Almaden KBS Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Drive Aisle corner of Boulevard Project Description: 3.58 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Almaden Site Development Permit 16,872 Area (ft2): Complete
Boulevard Amendment to allow the Total Area 109,130 Date:
and West installation of a drive aisle of Land Total 8/31/2016
San and eight loading spaces Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Fernando for customer drop-off and (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Street pick up and improvement 1.12 Surface Impervious Date:
of two outdoor amenity (ft2): Surface 8/31/2016
spaces. 11,741 Area (ft2):
28,613
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Storm drain stenciling Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
retaining areas Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
On Site:
No
Measures:
N/A
3-24
Name: HA07-035-01 Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
North First Southeast 4000 North North First SJ Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Street corner of 1St Sreet LP Project Description: 16.90 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Campus North First Site Development Permit 34,899 Area (ft2): Complete
Street, and Amendment to add an Total Area 163,641 Date:
Headquart additional 49,384 square of Land Total 3/29/2017
ers Drive feet to four existing Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
buildings that are part of a (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
larger industrial office 5.44 Surface Impervious Date:
campus on a 16.90 gross- (ft2): Surface 3/29/2017
acre site. 109,195 Area (ft2):
144,094
Protected existing trees/vegetation/soil, Water efficient irrigation Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
created new pervious areas, directed runoff system, maintenance Property Owner In Purple Area
to vegetated areas, trees planted adjacent (sweeping, cleaning, etc.), On Site: Alternative Certification:
to impervious areas dry sweeping of the site, Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A
beneficial landscaping
N/A Measures:
N/A
Name: HA15-022-01 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Edenville Northeast 6402 Santa Pacific Gas Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Service corner of Teresa & Electric Project Description: 21.20 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Center Santa Boulevard Site Development Permit 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Teresa Amendment to allow Total Area 519,410 Date:
Boulevard landscape modifications to of Land Total 6/28/2016
and Miyuki a previously approved Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Drive project on a 21.20 gross (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
acre site. 19.20 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 7/27/2016
445,230 Area (ft2):
445,230
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Dry sweeping of the site Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
treating areas Property Owner In Green Area >1 Acre But
On Site: Alternative Certification: Does Not Increase
Bioretention No Impervious Surface
Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Controls Used: N/A

N/A Measures:
N/A HM Method: N/A
3-25
Name: HA16-013-01 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
River Northwest 353 West Arc Tec Inc Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Corporation erly corner Julian Street Project Description: 14.41 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Center III of West Site Development Permit to 37,264 Area (ft2): Complete
Julian allow the construction of a Total Area 439,390 Date:
Street and six-story 191,397 square foot of Land Total 12/7/2016
California commercial office building Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
87 including new parking (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Highway configuration, landscaping, 2.75 Surface Impervious Date:
and amenity space on a (ft2): Surface 12/7/2016
14.41 gross acre site. 43,978 Area (ft2):
81,242
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
retaining areas, self-treating areas cleaning, etc.), storm drain Property Owner In Red Area
system stenciling On Site: Alternative Certification:

N/A Measures:
N/A
Project Name: Project No.: Project Street Name of Phase No.: Project Type: Project Total Site Total New Total Pre- Project
Oakmead HA92-054-04 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Business Park Northwest 110 West Studio G Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
erly corner Tasman Architects, Project Description: 24.34 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
of West Drive Inc. Site Development Permit 17,101 Area (ft2): Complete
Tasman Amendment to allow Total Area 26,118 Date:
Drive and interior and exterior tenant of Land Total 11/30/2016
West Rio improvements, including Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Robles architectural modifications, (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
and landscaping 0.94 Surface Impervious Date:
improvements on a 24.34 (ft2): Surface 11/30/2016
gross acre site. 8,191 Area (ft2):
25,292
Trees planted adjacent to impervious areas, Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
decreased the amount of impervious surface, cleaning, etc.), beneficial Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
self-retaining areas landscaping On Site:
No
Measures:
N/A
3-26
Name: PD11-024 Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Almaden Southeast 14540 Arcadia Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Ranch corner of Almaden Developme Project Description: 44.30 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Marketplace Almaden Road nt Planned Development 1,429,768 Area (ft2): Complete
Expresswa Company Permit to allow for the Total Area 2,000 Date:
y and development of up to of Land Total 6/1/2012
Chynowet 400,000 square feet of Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
h Avenue commercial uses and (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
modifications to a 44.30 Surface Impervious Date:
previously approved (ft2): Surface 6/1/2012
roadway network, on a 2,000 Area (ft2): (Not
43.30 gross acre site. 1,431,768 reported in
FY 11-12)
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, self- Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. Yes
treating areas, protected riparian areas, drain to sanitary sewer,
trees planted adjacent to impervious areas maintenance (sweeping, On Site: On Site: Property Owner Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used:
cleaning, etc.), water Bioretention No Detention Basin
efficient irrigation system, Off Site: The City shall
storm drain system stenciling Off Site: maintain all TCMs in Alternative Compliance HM Method: BAHM
Bioretention comformance with Section Measures:
20.95.120 of the Zoning N/A
Ordinance.
Stevens Southwest 2223 E.A. Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Creek and erly corner Business Davidovits & Project Description: 0.64 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
South of Stevens Circle Co. Planned Development 4,043 Area (ft2): Complete
Bascom Creek Permit to allow the Total Area 23,559 Date:
Commercial Boulevard construction of one single- of Land Total 10/25/2016
and South story commercial building Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Bascom with a total of (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Avenue approximately 8,300 square 0.64 Surface Impervious Date:
feet of commercial/retail (ft2): Surface 12/6/2016
space on a 0.64 gross acre 20,718 Area (ft2):
site. 24,761
Self-treating areas Connect interior parking Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
structures to sanitary sewer, Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
dry sweeping of the site, On Site:
covered dumpster area Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
drain to sanitary sewer No
Measures:
N/A
3-27
Name: PD15-026 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
eBay South Northwest 2025 eBay Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Campus corner of Hamilton Project Description: 24.60 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
East Avenue Planned Development 9,466 Area (ft2): Complete
Hamilton Permit to allow the 16,490 Date:
Avenue construction of an Total Area 10/15/16
and Leigh approximately 20,000 of Land Total Total Post-
Avenue square foot assembly Disturbed Replaced Project Approval
building and 3,550 square (Acres): Impervious Impervious Date:
foot metal space frame 0.66 Surface Surface 10/27/16
with canopy on a 24.60 (ft2): Area (ft2): (Not
gross acre site at an existing 16,490 25,956 reported in
R&D campus. FY 15-16)
Site Design Measures: Direct runoff into Source Control Measures: Treatment Control Operation & Maintenance Hydraulic Sizing Criteria: HM Controls Required:
Created new pervious areas, protected Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 1B: Volume, 80% or More No
existing trees/vegetation/soil, preserved maintenance (sweeping, Property Owner Capture In Green Area But < 1 acre
open space cleaning, etc.), water On Site:
efficient irrigation system Infiltration Trench Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
N/A
Measures:
N/A
Name: PD15-039 Location: Address: Developer: No Residential Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Almaden East of 6082 DAL Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Expressway Almaden Almaden Properties Project Description: 1.81 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Residential Expresswa Expressway Planned Development 8,594 Area (ft2): Complete
y, 1,320 Permit to construct eight Total Area 19,792 Date:
feet south detached single-family of Land Total 8/10/2016
of Winfield residences on a 1.81 gross Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Boulevard acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
(ft2): Surface 8/10/2016
18,849 Area (ft2):
27,443
Self-retaining areas, covered parking, self- Beneficial landscaping Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
treating HOA
On Site: Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
Bioretention No
HM Method: N/A
N/A Measures:
N/A
3-28
Name: PD15-044 Location: Address: Developer: No Mixed-Use Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Sparta Mixed- Northeaste 525 East Horizon Real Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Use rly corner Santa Clara Properties Project Description: 0.63 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
of East Street Holding LLC Planned Development 15,225 Area (ft2): Complete
Santa Permit to allow the Total Area 26,105 Date:
Clara construction of 86 multi- of Land Total 9/20/2016
Street and family residential units, 269 Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
North 11th bedrooms and 11,530 (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Street square feet of commercial 0.63 Surface Impervious Date:
space in a seven story (ft2): Surface 9/20/2016
building located on a 0.63 11,745 Area (ft2):
gross acre site. 26,970
Covered parking, created new pervious Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
areas, directed runoff to vegetated areas, covered dumpster area Property Owner In Red Area
minimized surface parking areas drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
sanitary sewer connection Bioretention, Media Filter No HM Controls Used: N/A
for swimming pool, spa or System (MFS) (project is a
fountain qualifying Category B Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A
Off Site:
N/A
Oak Knoll II Western 4973 San BWS, Inc. Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
terminus of Felipe Road Project Description: 3.40 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Clara Planned Development 11,742 Area (ft2): Complete
Smith Permit to the construction Total Area 29,720 Date:
Place of 13 single-family of Land Total 9/28/2016
detached homes on a 3.40 Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
gross acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
(ft2): Surface 9/28/2016
29,720 Area (ft2):
41,462
Protected existing trees/vegetation/soil, Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and In Green Area But < 1 acre
preserved open space, directed runoff to cleaning, etc.), water Property Owner Volume Design
vegetated areas, self-retaining areas efficient irrigation system On Site: HM Controls Used: N/A
Bioretention Alternative Certification:
No HM Method: N/A
Off Site:
Measures:
N/A
3-29
Volar Mixed- East side of 350 South Winchester San Tomas (Acres): Surface Impervious
Use at 350 S. Winchester Plaza LLC Project Description: 0.89 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
South Winchester Boulevard Planned Development 1,295 Area (ft2): Complete
Winchester Boulevard, Permit to allow up to 307 Total Area 36,936 Date:
approxima units and up to 52,167 of Land Total 6/13/2017
tely 590 square foot commercial Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
feet and office uses on a 0.89 (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
southerly gross acre site. 0.89 Surface Impervious Date:
of Stevens (ft2): Surface 6/13/2017
Creek 36,936 Area (ft2):
Boulevard 38,231
Covered parking, Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
drain to sanitary sewer, HOA In Purple Area
connect interior parking On Site: Alternative Certification:
structures to sanitary sewer, Media Filter System (MFS) No HM Controls Used: N/A
maintenance (sweeping, (project is a qualifying
cleaning, etc.), storm drain Category B Special Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
system stenciling Project) Measures:
N/A
Off Site:
N/A
Bay 101 Southeast 1740 North Bumb & Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Phase II corner of 1st Street Associates/F Project Description: 16.60 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
North 1st lea Market Planned Development 14,020 Area (ft2): Complete
Street and Inc. Permit to allow the Total Area 553,480 Date:
Matrix construction of a nine-story, of Land Total 12/7/2016
Boulevard 234,192-square foot office Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
building and seven-story (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
parking garage, a on a 14.80 Surface Impervious Date:
16.60 gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 12/7/2016
520,217 Area (ft2):
534,237
Covered parking, self-retaining areas Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
cleaning, etc.), connect Volume Design In Red Area
interior parking structures to On Site: On Site: Property Owner
sanitary sewer Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
Off Site: The City shall No
Off Site: maintain all TCMs in HM Method: N/A
Bioretention comformance with Section Alternative Compliance
20.95.120 of the Zoning Measures:
Ordinance. N/A
3-30
Canyon Southside 5667 Silver Canyon Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Creek of Silver Creek Creek Plaza, Project Description: 3.95 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Commercial Creek Valley Road LP Planned Development to 11,896 Area (ft2): Complete
Center Valley allow the construction of an Total Area 33,650 Date:
Road, approximately 8,377 square of Land Total 7/20/2016
approxima foot office and retail use in Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
tely 320 an existing commercial (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
feet shopping center on a 3.95 0.90 Surface Impervious Date:
southeast gross acre site. (ft2): Surface 7/20/2016
of 22,119 Area (ft2):
Beaumont 34,015
Canyon
Drive (5601
- 5667
Silver
Creek
Valley
Road)
Self-retaining areas, self-treating areas Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
drain to sanitary sewer, dry Property Owner In Green Area But < 1 acre
sweeping of the site On Site: Alternative Certification:

N/A Measures:
N/A
3-31
Residence Inn East of the 656 Devang Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
and Fairfield northerly America Shah, Silicon Project Description: 6.73 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Inn and Suites terminus of Center Valley Club Planned Development 179,379 Area (ft2): Complete
America Court Permit to allow the Total Area 0 Date:
Center construction of a four-story, of Land Total 9/21/2016
Court 261 room hotel (164, 112 sq. Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
ft. ), and 238-space surface (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
parking lot on a 6.73 gross 6.73 Surface Impervious Date:
acre site. (ft2): Surface 9/21/2016
0 Area (ft2):
179,379
Protected riparian areas, trees planted Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
adjacent to impervious areas, protected covered dumpster area Property Owner In Purple Area
existing trees/vegetation/soil, created new drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
pervious areas maintenance (sweeping, Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A
cleaning, etc.), sanitary
sewer connection for Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
swimming pool, spa or N/A Measures:
fountain N/A
Winchester East side of 780 South HDS Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Commercial South Winchester Constructio Project Description: 1.16 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Mini Storage Winchester Boulevard n Planned Development 25,284 Area (ft2): Complete
Boulevard, Corporation Permit to allow the Total Area 40,056 Date:
approxima construction of a four-story of Land Total 11/9/2016
tely 180 building with approximately Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
feet north 10,809 square feet of (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
of commercial/retail space, 1.16 Surface Impervious Date:
Magliocco 84,000 square feet of mini (ft2): Surface 11/9/2016
Drive storage use, and two on- 20,221 Area (ft2):
site resident caretaker units 45,505
on an approximately 1.16
gross acre site.
Self-retaining areas, covered parking Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
maintenance (sweeping, On Site:
No
Measures:
N/A
3-32
Santana Row Southerly 0 Olsen Federal San Tomas (Acres): Surface Impervious
Lot 9 side of Drive Realty Project Description: 3.97 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Olsen Planned Development 126,175 Area (ft2): Complete
Drive Permit to allow the Total Area 171,290 Date:
construction of an eight- of Land Total 11/9/2016
story commercial use Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
building with ground floor (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
retail, office spaces, one 4.33 Surface Impervious Date:
level of below grade (ft2): Surface 11/9/2016
parking under building, and 32,720 Area (ft2):
five-story parking structure, 158,895
for a total of 1,267 parking
spaces on a 3.97 gross acre
site.
Created new pervious areas, covered Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
parking, minimized surface parking areas, drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner Volume Design In Purple Area
created new pervious areas, self-treating connect interior parking On Site:
areas, self-retaining structures to sanitary sewer, Bioretention, Planter Box Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
proper cover for loading No
dock, maintenance Off Site: HM Method: N/A
(sweeping, cleaning, etc.) N/A Alternative Compliance
Measures:
N/A
North Capitol Southwest 641 North City Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Residential corner of Capitol Ventures Project Description: 10.69 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
North Avenue Planned Development 354,044 Area (ft2): Complete
Capitol Permit to allow up to 188 Total Area 16,189 Date:
Avenue residential units and a of Land Total 11/7/2016
and minimum of 108,000 square Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Gimelli feet of commercial space (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Way on a 10.69 gross acre site. 10.69 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 1/10/2017
12,027 Area (ft2):
366,071
Covered parking, self-retaining areas, self- Storm drain system Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and Yes
treating areas stenciling, beneficial Property Owner Volume Design
landscaping On Site: HM Controls Used:
Bioretention Alternative Certification: Underground
No Vault/Structure
Off Site:
Measures:
N/A
3-33
7th & Empire West 535 North Landforge, Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Apartments corner of 7th Street Inc. Project Description: 1.25 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
North7th Planned Development 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Street and Permit to allow the Total Area 52,855 Date:
Empire construction of 97 multi- of Land Total 9/16/2016
Street family attached single- Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
family residences on a 1.25 (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
gross acre site. 1.25 Surface Impervious Date:
(ft2): Surface 4/11/2017
36,812 Area (ft2):
36,812
Covered parking, self-treating areas Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
connect interior parking Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
structures to sanitary sewer, On Site: Planter Box, Media
proper cover for loading Filter System (MFS) (project Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
dock is a qualifying Category C No
Special Project) HM Method: N/A
Alternative Compliance
Off Site: Measures:
N/A N/A
Name: PD16-035 Location: Address: Developer: No Educational Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Downtown Southeast 1402 Downtown Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
College corner of Monterey College Project Description: 3.76 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Prepatory Monterey Road Prepatory Planned Development 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Improvement Highway Permit to establish custom Total Area 72,370 Date:
s and East vehicle and parking of Land Total 6/13/2017
Alma requirement for an existing Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Avenue school, to re-design the (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
parking lot, driveways, and 1.73 Surface Impervious Date:
outdoor recreation space (ft2): Surface 6/13/2017
on a 3.38 gross acre site 58,222 Area (ft2):
58,222
Protected existing trees/vegetation/soil, Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
decreased the amount of impervious water efficient irrigation Property Owner Volume Design, In Red Area
surface, directed runoff to vegetated areas, system, storm drain system On Site: 1B: Volume, 80% or More
created new pervious areas, directed runoff stenciling, covered Bioretention, Infiltration Capture HM Controls Used: N/A
to rain barrels dumpster area drain to Trench
sanitary sewer, Alternative Certification: HM Method: N/A
maintenance (sweeping, Off Site: No
cleaning, etc.) N/A
Alternative Compliance
Measures:
N/A
3-34
Name: PD16-037 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
South King West side 2905 South Hunter Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Mini of South King Road Properties Project Description: 9.74 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Warehouse King Road, Planned Development 353,085 Area (ft2): Complete
approxima Permit to allow the Total Area 21,230 Date:
tely 840 construction of seven mini of Land Total 3/15/2017
feet north storage/mini warehouse Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
of Aborn buildings and four light (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Road industrial buildings on 9.74 9.74 Surface Impervious Date:
21,230 Area (ft2):
374,315
Self-retaining areas, directed runoff to Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and Yes
vegetated areas, trees planted adjacent to covered dumpster area Property Owner Volume Design
impervious areas drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: HM Controls Used:
maintenance (sweeping, Bioretention Alternative Certification: Underground
cleaning, etc.) No Vault/Structure
Off Site:
Measures:
N/A
Cottle In-N- Northeast 5550 Cottle In-N-Out Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Out Burgers corner of Road Burgers Project Description: 17.50 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Cottle Planned Development 50,662 Area (ft2): Complete
Road and Permit to allow a 3867 fast Total Area 16,603 Date:
Poughkee food restaurant with drive of Land Total 6/27/2017
psie Road through use on 17.50 gross Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
(ft2): Surface 6/27/2017
405 Area (ft2):
51,067
Self-treating areas, directed runoff to Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
vegetated areas, trees planted adjacent to covered dumpster area Property Owner In Red Area
impervious areas, protected existing drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
trees/vegetation/soil water efficient irrigation Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A
system, storm drain system
stenciling, Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A Measures:
N/A
3-35
Name: PDA02-055- Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Good 03 Northwest 2425 Kimley Horn Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Samaratan corner of Samaritan Project Description: 13.17 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Hospital Samaritan Drive Planned Development 2,641 Area (ft2): Complete
Expansion Drive and Permit Amendment to allow Total Area 17,967 Date:
and Samaritan the extension of the of Land Total 6/1/2016
Improvement Place ambulance canopy and Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
s screen walls for mechanical (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
equipment and to 0.50 Surface Impervious Date:
construct ADA upgrades to (ft2): Surface 6/1/2016
a parking lot at an existing 16,501 Area (ft2): (Not
hospital (Good Samaritan) 19,142 reported in
on a 13.17 gross acre site. FY 15-16)
Protected existing trees/vegetation/soils. Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 1B: Volume, 80% or More No
Preserved open space, created new water efficient irrigation Property Owner Capture In Green Area But >1 acre
pervious areas, trees planted adjacent to system, storm drain system On Site: Infiltration Trench,
impervious areas stenciling, maintenance Hydrodynamic Separator Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
(sweeping, cleaning, etc.) (as pretreatment in No
addition to infiltration HM Method: N/A
trench) Alternative Compliance
Measures:
Off Site: LID Treatment provided for
N/A adjacent parking and
driveway areas
Name: SP15-004 Location: Address: Developer: No Commercial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Our Lady of Northeast 389 East Our Lady of Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
La Vang corner of Santa Clara La Vang Project Description: 2.77 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
North Street Parish Special Use Permit to allow 29,720 Area (ft2): Complete
Ninth the construction of an Total Area 104,430 Date:
Street and approximately 20,000- of Land Total 11/9/2016
East Santa square foot church/religious Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Clara assembly building, two-story (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Street parking structure, an 1.96 Surface Impervious Date:
approximately 15,000- (ft2): Surface 11/9/2016
square foot multi-purpose 74,130 Area (ft2):
building, expansion of an 103,850
existing private school, an
off-site parking
arrangement, on a 2.77
gross acre site.
Covered parking, self-retaining areas, self- Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
treating areas maintenance (sweeping, Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
cleaning, etc.), storm drain On Site:
system stenciling Bioretention, Planter Box Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
No
Measures:
N/A
3-36
Name: SP15-031 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Equinix West side 0 San Equinix Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
of Via del Ignacio Project Description: 18.00 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Oro Avenue Special Use Permit to allow 573,092 Area (ft2): Complete
between the construction of three Total Area 16,100 Date:
San data center buildings of Land Total 1/25/2017
Ignacio totaling 579,000 square feet Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Avenue on 18.00 gross acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
and Great 18.00 Surface Impervious Date:
Oaks (ft2): Surface 1/25/2017
Boulevard 16,100 Area (ft2):
589,192
Self-retaining areas Maintenance (sweeping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and Yes
cleaning, etc.), storm drain Property Owner Volume Design
system stenciling, covered On Site: HM Controls Used:
dumpster area drain to Bioretention Alternative Certification: Underground
sanitary sewer, water No Vault/Structure
efficient irrigation system Off Site:
Measures:
N/A
3-37
Name: SP16-021 Location: Address: Developer: No Mixed-Use Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Greyhound Southeast 70 South KT Properties Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Station corner of Almaden Project Description: 1.63 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Mixed-Use Post Street Avenue Special Use Permit to allow 43,129 Area (ft2): Complete
and South the construction of 781 Total Area 70,807 Date:
Almaden residential units with 20,000 of Land Total 5/24/2017
Avenue square feet of ground floor Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
retail in two high rise towers (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
with 23 to 24 stories 1.63 Surface Impervious Date:
including four levels of (ft2): Surface 5/24/2017
below-grade parking on a 22,598 Area (ft2):
1.63 gross acre site. 65,727
Directed runoff to vegetated areas, Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
minimized surface parking areas, covered drain to sanitary sewer, HOA In Red Area
parking, trees planted adjacent to water efficient irrigation On Site: Alternative Certification:
impervious areas system, maintenance Planter Box, Media Filter No HM Controls Used: N/A
(sweeping, cleaning, etc.), System (MFS) (project is a
storm drain system stenciling qualifying Category B Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A
Off Site:
N/A
3-38
Name: T16-051 Location: Address: Developer: No Residential Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Bournemouth Northwest 3581 DAL Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Residential corner of Bournemout Properties, Project Description: 1.04 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Bournemo h Drive Inc. Special Use Permit to 15,968 Area (ft2): Complete
uth Drive facilitate the development Total Area 9,242 Date:
and of up to five detached of Land Total 5/17/2017
Chemise single-family residences on Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Drive a 1.04 gross acre site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
(ft2): Surface 5/17/2017
4,642 Area (ft2):
20,610
Directed runoff to vegetated areas Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
storm drain system stenciling Property Owner In Green Area But < 1 acre

N/A Measures:
N/A
Name: SP17-001 Location: Address: Developer: No Industrial Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
AT&T Dado Westerly 0 Junction AT&T Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
terminus of Avenue Project Description: 3.29 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Dado Special Use Permit to allow 121,908 Area (ft2): Complete
Street and a new 27,719 square foot Total Area 0 Date:
Junction field operations center for of Land Total 6/14/2017
Avenue AT&T on a 3.29 gross acre Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
site. (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
(ft2): Surface 6/14/2017
0 Area (ft2):
121,908
Created new pervious areas, directed runoff Covered dumpster area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
to vegetated areas, trees planted adjacent drain to sanitary sewer, Property Owner In Red Area
to impervious areas, self-retaining areas proper cover for loading On Site: Alternative Certification:
dock, beneficial Bioretention No HM Controls Used: N/A
landscaping, water efficient
irrigation system Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A Measures:
N/A
3-39
Name: SP17-004 Location: Address: Developer: No Educational Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Foundation Northerly 14271 Story Foundation Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
for Hispanic side of Road for Hispanic Project Description: 10.67 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Education Story Road Education Special Use Permit to allow 13,430 Area (ft2): Complete
Campus approxima the construction of Total Area 29,978 Date:
Improvement tely 430 approximately 6,720 square of Land Total 6/21/2017
s feet feet of portable classrooms Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
westerly of to serve up to 1,300 (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Roehampt students as well as site 1.70 Surface Impervious Date:
on Avenue alterations, and an (ft2): Surface 6/21/2017
alternative parking 27,541 Area (ft2):
arrangement. 40,971
Preserved open space, trees planted Beneficial landscaping, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
adjacent to impervious areas, created new water efficient irrigation Property Owner Volume Design In Red Area
pervious areas, directed runoff to vegetated system, maintenance On Site:
areas (sweeping, cleaning, etc.), Bioretention Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
storm drain system stenciling No
Measures:
N/A
Name: SP17-009 Location: Address: Developer: No Mixed-Use Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
SJSC Towers Northwest 39 North 5th SJSC Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Mixed-Use erly corner Street Properties Project Description: 1.40 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
of East LLC Site Development Permit to 11,387 Area (ft2): Complete
Santa allow the construction of Total Area 41,253 Date:
Clara two 28-story towers to of Land Total 3/15/2017
Street and include 298 condominium Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
N. 5th units and 312 apartment (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
Street units (610 total units) with 1.40 Surface Impervious Date:
three levels of unground (ft2): Surface 3/15/2017
parking and four levels of 41,253 Area (ft2):
above ground parking with 52,640
14,381 square feet of
ground floor retail on an
approximately 1.40 gross
acre site.
Covered parking Water efficient irrigation Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
system, covered dumpster HOA In Red Area
area drain to sanitary sewer, On Site: Alternative Certification:
beneficial landscaping Planter Box, Media Filter No HM Controls Used: N/A
System (MFS) (project is a
qualifying Category B Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
N/A
Off Site:
N/A
3-40
Public Regulated Projects 2016/2017

Project Project No.: Project Street Name of Phase No. 26: Project Type27: Project Total Site Total New Total Pre- Project
Name: 3-18851 Location25: Address: Developer: No Public Watershed Area (Acres): Impervious Project Status:
Apple Calvert N/A Apple, Inc. 29: San 3.24 Surface Impervious
Campus Drive and Project Description28: Tomas Area (ft2)30: Surface Area Deemed
Expansion – Stevens Widening of Calvert Drive Total Area of 13,088 (ft2)32: Complete
Calvert Drive Creek as an offsite traffic Land 127,111 Date34:
Widening Boulevard mitigation required under Disturbed Total 1/26/2016
the Environmental Impact (Acres): Replaced Total Post-
Report for the Apple 2.62 Impervious Project Approval
Campus expansion Surface Impervious Date35:
located in the City of (ft2) 31: Surface Area 1/26/2016
Cupertino. 0 (ft2)33: (Not
140,199 reported in
FY 15-16)
25 Include cross streets.

26 If a project is being constructed in phases, indicate the phase number and use a separate row entry for each phase. If not, enter “NA”.
27 Project Type is the type of development (i.e., new and/or redevelopment).
28 Example descriptions of development are: 5-story office building, residential with 160 single-family homes with five 4-story buildings to contain 200 condominiums, 100 unit 2-story shopping mall, mixed-use
retail and residential development (apartments), industrial warehouse.

29 State the watershed(s) in which the Regulated Project is located. Optional but recommended: Also state the downstream watershed(s).
30 All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing pervious surface.
31 All impervious surfaces added to any area of the site that was previously existing impervious surface.
32 For redevelopment projects, state the pre-project impervious surface area.
33 For redevelopment projects, state the post-project impervious surface area.
34 For private projects, state project application deemed complete date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance date.
35 For private projects, state project application final discretionary approval date. If the project did not go through discretionary review, report the building permit issuance date.
3-41
Site Design Measures 36: Source Control Measures37: Treatment Control Operation & Maintenance Hydraulic Sizing Criteria 40: HM Controls Required44/45:
Directed runoff to vegetated areas Beneficial landscaping, Measures38: Responsibility 3: Combination Flow and No
water efficient irrigation Mechanism39: Volume Design In Purple Area
systems, maintenance On Site: The City shall maintain all
(pavement sweeping, Bioretention Basin TCMs in comformance Alternative Certification41: HM Controls Used: N/A
cleaning, etc.), storm drain with Section 20.95.120 of No
stenciling Off Site: the Zoning Ordinance. HM Method: N/A
Measures42/43:
LID Treatment provided for
existing "in-lieu" roadway
equivalent to the new
impervious area within the
project site
Name: 6095 Location: Address: Developer: No Public Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
6095-Alviso Intersectio 1130 City of San Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Storm Pump n of Catherine José Project Description: 0.39 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Station Catherine St. This project entails the 13,985 Area (ft2): Complete
Street and construction of a new 110 Total Area 0 Date:
Gold cubic feet per second of Land Total 9/26/2017
Street (CFS) storm pump station Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
that will help alleviate the (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
community of Alviso from a 0.39 Surface Impervious Date:
100-year flood event. (ft2): Surface 9/26/2017
0 Area (ft2):
13,985
36 List site design measures approved for the project. Examples include: minimize impervious surfaces; conserve natural areas, including existing trees or other vegetation, and soils; construct sidewalks,
walkways, and/or patios with permeable surfaces, etc.
37 List source control measures approved for the project. Examples include: properly designed trash storage areas; storm drain stenciling or signage; efficient landscape irrigation systems; etc.
38 List all approved stormwater treatment system(s) to be installed onsite or at a joint stormwater treatment facility (e.g., fl ow through planter, bioretention facility, infiltration basin, etc.).
39 List the legal mechanism(s) (e.g., O&M agreement with private landowner; O&M agreement with homeowners’ association; O&M by public entity, etc.) that have been or will be used to assign
responsibility for the maintenance of the post-construction stormwater treatment systems.

40 See Provision C.3.d.i. “Numeric Sizing Criteria for Stormwater Treatment Systems” for list of hydraulic sizing design criteria. Enter the corresponding provision number of the appropriate criterion (i.e., 1.a., 1.b.,
2.a., 2.b., 2.c., or 3).

41 Note whether a third party was used to certify the project design complies with Provision C.3.d.
42 For Alternative Compliance at an offsite location in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(1), on a separate page, give a discussion of the alternative compliance site including the information specified in
Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(i) for the offsite project.

43 For Alternative Compliance by paying in-lieu fees in accordance with Provision C.3.e.i.(2), on a separate page, provide the information specified in Provision C.3.b.v.(1)(m)(ii) for the Regional Project.
44 If HM control is not required, state why not.
45 If HM control is required, state control method used (e.g., method to design and size device(s) or method(s) used to meet the HM Standard, and description of device(s) or method(s) used, such as
detention basin(s), biodetention unit(s), regional detention basin, or in-stream control).
3-42
Directed runoff to vegetated areas Storm drain stenciling, water Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
efficient irrigation system, The City shall maintain all Volume Design In Purple Area
beneficial landscaping On Site: TCMs in comformance with
Bioretention Section 20.95.120 of the Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
Zoning Ordinance. No
Measures:
No
Name: 7620 Location: Address: Developer: No Public Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Arcadia Between 2208 City of San Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Softball Quimby Quimby José Project Description: 14.41 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Facility Rd, Capitol Road Construction of four softball 165,221 Area (ft2): Complete
Expresswa fields with night use field Total Area 3,176 Date:
y, and lighting and other park of Land Total 4/21/2017
Chopin amenities. Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Avenue (Acres): Impervious Project
14.29 Surface Impervious Approval
(ft2): Surface Date:
3,176 Area (ft2): 4/21/2017
168,397
Self-treating areas, self-retaining areas Trash enclosure area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
draining to sewer, efficient The City shall maintain all Volume Design In Red Area
irrigation On Site: TCMs in comformance with
Bioretention Section 20.95.120 of the Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
Zoning Ordinance. No
Measures:
No
Project Project No.: Project Street Name of Phase No: Project Type: Project Total Site Total New Total Pre- Project
Name: 8036 Location: Address: Developer: 2 Public Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Del Monte Auzerais 830 Auzerais City of San Guadalupe (Acres): Surface Impervious
Park- Phase 2 Avenue Avenue José Project Description: 3.53 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
and Sunol Redevelop existing 0 Area (ft2): Complete
Street commercial property Total Area 153,713 Date:
(warehouse) to an artificial of Land Total 12/6/2016
turf City Park. Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
(Acres): Impervious Project Approval
(ft2): Surface 12/6/2016
144,090 Area (ft2):
144,090
3-43
Minimized impervious surface areas, directed Trash enclosure area Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 3: Combination Flow and No
runoff from impervious areas to landscape draining to sewer, beneficial The City shall maintain all Volume Design In Red Area
areas landscaping, water efficient On Site: TCMs in comformance with
irrigation systems, Bioretention Section 20.95.120 of the Alternative Certification: HM Controls Used: N/A
maintenance (pavement Zoning Ordinance. No
sweeping, cleaning, etc.), Off Site: HM Method: N/A
storm drain stenciling N/A Alternative Compliance
Measures:
No
Name: 8135 Location: Address: Developer: 1 Public Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
31st St and South 31st N/A City of San Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Alum Rock Street José Project Description: 0.88 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Park between Construction of a 10,975 Area (ft2): Complete
Alum Rock youth and tot lot, nature Total Area 0 Date:
Avenue play area, plaza area, of Land Total Total Post- 9/26/16
and and other amenities. Disturbed Replaced Project
East San (Acres): Impervious Impervious Approval
Antonio 0.88 Surface Surface Date:
Street, and (ft2): Area (ft2): 9/26/16
east of 0 10,975
Highway
101
Preserve open space and natural Beneficial landscaping, use Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2:1 impervious to pervious No
drainage patterns, create new pervious of water efficient The City shall maintain all In Red Area
landscaping areas, direct runoff from irrigation systems, storm On Site: TCMs in comformance with Alternative Certification:
sidewalks, patios to landscaped areas, plant drain labeling Self-retaining area Section 20.95.120 of the No HM Controls Used: N/A
trees adjacent to and in parking Zoning Ordinance.
areas and adjacent to other impervious Off Site: Alternative Compliance HM Method: N/A
areas, self-treating areas N/A Measures:
No
Name: CPMS 7187 Location: Address: Developer: No Public Watershed: Area Impervious Project Status:
Lake White 2305 South City of San Coyote (Acres): Surface Impervious
Cunningham Road and White Road José Project Description: 6.80 Area (ft2): Surface Deemed
Bike Park Tully Road Construction of a new BMX 26,000 Area (ft2): Complete
bike park with natural soil Total Area 0 Date:
features and pre- of Land Total 11/12/15
manufactured features. Disturbed Replaced Total Post-
Bike park to be located in (Acres): Impervious Project Approval
an existing park next to the 6.80 Surface Impervious Date:
Lake Cunningham Skate (ft2): Surface 11/12/15
Park. 0 Area (ft2): (Not
26,000 reported in
FY 15-16)
3-44
Conserve natural areas, construct Efficient irrigation system, Measures: Responsibility Mechanism: 2C: Flow, i=0.2 inch/hr. No
permeable surfaces, minimize impervious storm drain stenciling The City shall maintain all In Green Area, But <1Acre
surfaces, self-treating areas On Site: TCMs in comformance with Alternative Certification:
Bioretention Section 20.95.120 of the No HM Controls Used: N/A
Zoning Ordinance.
N/A Measures:
No
3-45
C.3.e.v.Special Projects Reporting Table

Reporting Period – July 1 2016 - June 30, 2017
Project Permi Address Applica Status47 Description48 Site Dens Den Special LID List of List of Non-LID
Name ttee tion Total ity sity Project Treatme LID Stormwater
& No. Submitt Acrea DU/ FAR Category49 nt Stormw Treatment
al ge Acre Reductio ater Systems52
Date46 n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e50 Systems
51
South City 605 South 5/11/15 Pending Site 0.29 N/A N/A Category Category N/A Media Filtration
Second of San Second (revised Development AC A: Yes A:100% System (100%):
Street José Street plans Permit to Location: CONTECH Media
Holiday dated construct a Within Category Filtration System
Inn 12/20/16 101,688 square Neighborho B: 0% media filter,
Express ) foot, 91 room, od Business which is certified
Hotel six-story hotel District Category by the
File No. with ground Site C: 0% Washington State
H15- level retail on a Coverage: Department of
021 0.29 acre site. 100% Ecology
Parking: No Technical
at-grade Assessment
surface Protocol -
parking. Ecology (TAPE)
Program.
Category B: See narrative.
N/A
Category
C: N/A
46 Date that a planning application for the Special Project was submitted.
47 Indicate whether final discretionary approval is still pending or has been granted, and provide the date or version of the project plans upon which reporting is based.
48 Type of project (commercial, mixed-use, residential), number of floors, number of units, type of parking, and other relevant information.
49 For each applicable Special Project Category, list the specific criteria applied to determine applicability. For each non-applicable Special Project Category, indicate n/a.
50 For each applicable Special Project Category, state the maximum total LID Treatment Reduction Credit available. For Category C Special Projects also list the individual Location, Density, and Minimized
Surface Parking Credits available.
51 List all LID stormwater treatment systems proposed. For each type, indicate the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Special Project’s drainage area.
52 List all non-LID stormwater treatment systems proposed. For each type of non-LID treatment system, indicate: (1) the percentage of the total amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d. for the Speci al
Project's drainage area, and (2) whether the treatment system either meets minimum design criteria published by a government agency or received certification issued by a government agency, and
reference the applicable criteria or certification.
3-46
Project Permi Address Applica Status Description Site Dens Den Special LID List of List of Non-LID
& No. Submitt Acrea DU/ FAR Category nt Stormw Treatment
al Date ge Acre Reductio ater Systems
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
740 City 740 West 5/19/15 Pending Planned 1.05 N/A 2:1 Category Category Bioreten Media Filtration
West of San San Carlos (initial Development AC FAR A: N/A A: 0% tion System (56%):
San José Street plans Permit to allow (41%) Media filtration
Carlos dated construction for Category B: Category Tree model not
Mixed- 5/19/15) a 7-story 95 N/A B: 0% Intercep specified on
Use multi-family tor revised plans.
File No. residential Category Category Credit Prior to approval,
PD15- building with C: Yes C: 80% (3%). the project
022/PD 2,735 square Location: Location: See applicant must
C14- feet of Within ¼ 50% narrativ specify a media
032 commercial on mile of Density: e. filtration system
a 1.05 gross acre transit hub. 10% model that meets
site. Density: 2:1 Parking: minimum design
FAR 20% criteria or has
Parking: No received
at-grade appropriate
surface certification. See
parking narrative.
3-47
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Sparta City 525 East 9/11/15 Approv Planned 0.63 136 N/A Category Category The Media Filtration
Mixed- of San Santa Clara ed Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% project System (100%):
Use José Street (approv Permit to allow C will Kristar Perk Filter,
File No. ed plans the construction Category B: Category provide which is certified
PD15- dated of 86 multi-family Yes B: 100% pretreat by the
044 9/20/16) residential units, Location: ment Washington State
269 bedrooms Within Category with Department of
and 11,530 Downtown C: 0% bioreten Ecology
square feet of Core. tion Technical
commercial and Density: 136 areas Assessment
office space in a DU/AC (30%) Protocol -
seven-story Site Ecology (TAPE)
building located Coverage: Program. See
on a 0.63 gross 96% narrative.
acre site. Parking: No
at-grade
surface
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-48
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Gatew City 455 South 9/28/15 Approv Site 0.50 600 N/A Category Category The Media Filtration
ay of San 1st Street ed Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% project System (100%):
Tower José (approv Permit to allow C propose CONTECH Media
Mixed- ed plans construction of a Category B: Category s to Filtration System
Use dated 25-story building Yes B: 100% provide media filter,
File No. 12/6/16) with up to 300 Location: pretreat which is certified
H15- residential units Within Category ment by the
047 and 5,000 Downtown C: 0% with Washington State
square feet of Core. flow- Department of
commercial Density: 600 through Ecology
space on a 0.50 DU/AC planters Technical
gross acre site. Site (53%). Assessment
Coverage: See Protocol -
96% narrativ Ecology (TAPE)
Parking: No e. Program. See
at-grade narrative.
surface
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-49
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Race City 250 Grand 9/29/15 Pending Planned 2.81 28 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
Street of San Avenue (initial Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (79%):
Housin José plans Permit to allow C planters Media filtration
g dated the construction Category B: Category (21%) model not
File No. 9/29/15) of 80 multi-family N/A B: 0% specified on
PD15- residential units revised plans.
047 and 12,000 Category Category Prior to approval,
square feet of C: Yes C: 45 % the project
commercial Location: Location: applicant must
space on a 2.81 Within PDA. 25% specify a media
gross acre site. Density: 28 Density: filtration system
DU/AC 0% model that meets
Parking: No Parking: minimum design
at-grade 20% criteria or has
surface received
parking. appropriate
certification. See
narrative.
3-50
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
SJSC City 39 North 5th 12/22/15 Approv Site 1.40 435 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
Towers of San Street ed Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (39%):
Mixed- José (approv Permit to allow C planters Kristar Perk Filter,
Use ed plans the construction Category B: Category (61%) which is certified
File No. dated of two 28-story Yes B: 100% by the
SP17- 3/15/17) towers to Location: Washington State
009 include 298 Within Category Department of
condominium Downtown C: 0% Ecology
units and 312 Core. Technical
apartment units Density: 438 Assessment
(610 total units) DU/AC Protocol -
with three levels Site Ecology (TAPE)
of underground Coverage: Program. See
parking and four 98% narrative.
levels of above Parking: No
ground parking at-grade
with 14,381 surface
square feet of parking.
ground floor
retail on a 1.40 Category
gross acre site. C: N/A
3-51
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Stevens City 2850 2/29/16 Approv Site 0.54 N/A 4:1 Category Category Bioreten Media Filtration
Creek of San Stevens ed Development AC FAR A: N/A A: 0% tion System (65%):
Boutiqu José Creek (approv Permit to allow (35%) CONTECH
e Hotel Boulevard ed plans the construction Category B: Category StormFilter
File No. dated of a 10-story N/A B: 0% PhosphoSorb
H16- 12/7/16) hotel with 175 System media
010 guest rooms on Category Category filter, which is
a 0.54 gross acre C: Yes C: 65% certified by the
site. Location: Location: Washington State
Within PDA 25% Department of
Density: 4:1 Density: Ecology
FAR 20% Technical
Site Parking: Assessment
Parking: No 20% Protocol -
at-grade Ecology (TAPE)
surface Program.
parking. See narrative.
3-52
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Rail City 200 Ryland 4/5/16 Pending Site 10.63 44 N/A Category Category Bioreten Media Filtration
Yard of San Street (initial Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% tion System (27%)
Place José plans Permit to allow C (54%) Kristar Perk Filter,
File No. dated the construction Category B: Category Self- which is certified
H16- 4/5/16) of one five-story N/A B: 0% treating by the
017 (226,885 sq. ft.) (14%) Washington State
commercial Category Category Self- Department of
building and C: Yes C: 55% retainin Ecology
three five-story Location: Location: g (5%) Technical
residential Within 1/2 25% Assessment
buildings (476 mile of Density: Protocol -
residential units transit hub 10% Ecology (TAPE)
total) on top of Density: 44 Parking: Program. See
a two-level DU/AC 20% narrative.
above-grade Parking: No
parking podium at-grade
on a 10.63 gross surface
acre site. parking
3-53
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Conne City 278 North 4/11/16 Approv Permit to allow 0.35 236 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
ctions: of San 2nd Street ed the construction AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (76%)
Villas José (approv of a six-story, C planters Kristar Perk Filter,
on the ed plans Residential Category B: Category (24%) which is certified
Park dated Service Facility N/A B: 0% by the
Transiti 1/10/17) on a 0.35 gross Washington State
onary acre site. Category Category Department of
Housin C: Yes C: 100% Ecology
g Location: Location: Technical
File No. Within 1/4 50% Assessment
CP16- mile of Density: Protocol -
014 transit hub 30% Ecology (TAPE)
Density: Parking: Program. See
236 DU/AC 20% narrative.
Parking: No
at-grade
surface
parking
3-54
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
333 City 333 West 4/27/16 Approv Site 2.53 N/A 6:1 Category Category Bioreten Media Filtration
West of San San ed Development AC FAR A: N/A A: 0% tion (8%) System (47%)
San José Fernando (approv Permit to allow Flow- CONTECH Media
Fernan Street ed plans the construction Category B: Category through Filtration System
do dated of an 18-story N/A B: 0% planters media filter,
Mixed- 11/9/16) building with up (45%) which is certified
Use to 700,000 Category Category by the
File No. square feet of C: Yes C: 100% Washington State
H16- office and retail Location: Location: Department of
018 use on a 2.53 Within 1/4 50% Ecology
gross acre site. mile of Density: Technical
transit hub 30% Assessment
Density: 6:1 Parking: Protocol -
FAR 20% Ecology (TAPE)
Parking: No Program. See
at-grade narrative.
surface
parking
3-55
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Volar City 350 South 6/23/16 Approv Planned 0.89 N/A 11:1 Category Category N/A Media Filtration
Mixed- of San Winchester ed Development AC FAR A: N/A A: 0% System (100%):
Use at José Boulevard (Approv Permit to allow Kristar Perk Filter,
350 ed plans up to 307 units Category B: Category which is certified
South dated and up to 52,167 Yes B: 100% by the
Winche 6/13/17) square foot Location: Washington State
ster commercial and Within Category Department of
File No. office uses on a Neighborho C: 0% Ecology
PD15- 0.89 gross acre od Business Technical
059 site District Assessment
Density: Protocol -
11:1 FAR Ecology (TAPE)
Site Program.
Coverage:
92%
Parking: No
at-grade
surface
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-56
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
San City 402 West 5/12/17 Pending Major Permit 8.99 36 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
José of San Santa Clara (initial Adjustment for AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (60%):
Water José Street plans minor C planters Kristar Perk Filter,
Comp dated modifications of Category B: Category (24%) which is certified
any/De 5/12/17) a mixed-use N/A B: 0% Self- by the
lmas development for treating Washington State
Avenu office/retail and Category Category (1%) Department of
e up to 325 multi- C: Yes C: 80% Ecology
Mixed- family attached Location: Location: Technical
Use residences on a Within 1/4 50% Assessment
File 8.99 gross acre mile of Density: Protocol -
No. site. transit hub 10% Ecology (TAPE)
AD17- Density: 36 Parking: Program. Tree
535 DU/AC 20% Filter (15%):
Parking: No Filterra System,
at-grade which is certified
surface by the
parking. Washington State
Department of
Ecology
Technical
Assessment
Protocol -
Ecology (TAPE)
Program.
3-57
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Museu City 180 Park 6/30/16 Pending Site 2.54 120 N/A Category Category Bioreten Media Filtration
m of San Avenue (revised Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% tion (4%) System (96%):
Place José plans Permit to allow C Kristar FloGard
Mixed- dated construction of a Category B: Category Perk Filter Media
Use 3/14/17) 24-story mixed- N/A B: 0% Filter, which is
File No. use high rise on certified by the
SP17- a 2.54 gross acre Category Category Washington State
031 site. C: Yes C: 100% Department of
Location: Location: Ecology
Within 1/4 50% Technical
mile of Density: Assessment
transit hub 30% Protocol -
Density: 120 Parking: Ecology (TAPE)
DU/AC 20% Program. See
Parking: No narrative.
at-grade
surface
parking
3-58
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
7th City 535 North 11/21/16 Approv Planned 1.25 77 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
and of San 7th Street ed Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (57%)
Empire José (approv Permit to C planters Kristar Perk Filter,
Apartm ed plans construct 97 Category B: Category (10%) which is certified
ents dated multi-family N/A B: 0% Self- by the
File No. 4/11/17) residences and treating Washington State
PD16- up to 1,000 Category Category (33%) Department of
026 square feet of C: Yes C: 65% Ecology
commercial Location: Location: Technical
space on a 1.25 Within PDA 25% Assessment
gross acre site. Density: 77 Density: Protocol -
DU/AC 20% Ecology (TAPE)
Parking: No Parking: Program. See
at-grade 20% narrative.
surface
parking
3-59
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Greyho City 70 South 4/11/16 Approv Special Use 1.82 389 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
und of San Almaden (deeme ed Permit to allow AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (69%)
Station José Avenue da (approv the construction C planters CONTECH
Mixed- Special ed plans of 708 residential Category B: Category (31%) StormFilter
Use Project dated units with 13,974 Yes B: 100% PhosphoSorb
File No. on 5/23/17) square feet of Location: System media
SP16- 9/15/16) ground floor Within Category filter, which is
021 retail in two (2) Downtown C: 0% certified by the
high rise towers Core Washington State
with 23 to 24 Density: 389 Department of
stories on a 1.82 DU/AC Ecology
gross acre site. Site Technical
Coverage: Assessment
95% Protocol -
Parking: No Ecology (TAPE)
at-grade Program.
surface See narrative.
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-60
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Block 3 City Southerly 9/13/16 Pending Site 1.33 295 N/A Category Category Flow- Mechanical
Mixed- of San side of (revised Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through Filtration System
Use José South 3rd plans Permit to allow C planter (65%): Kristar Perk
File No. Street dated the construction Category B: Category (35%) Filter, which is
H16- approximat 3/22/17 of a 24-story, N/A B: 0% certified by the
033 ely 410 feet mixed-use tower Washington State
easterly of with ground floor Category Category Department of
East San retail (approx. C: Yes C: 90% Ecology
Fernando 7,144 square Location: Location: Technical
Street feet) and 393 Within ¼ 50% Assessment
residential units mile of Density: Protocol -
on a 1.33 gross transit hub. 30% Ecology (TAPE)
acre site. Density: 295 Parking: Program. See
DU/AC 10% narrative.
Parking:
<10% at-
grade
surface
parking
3-61
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
750 City South side 9/27/16 Pending Planned 0.41 136 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
West of San of West San (revised Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% Through System (71%):
San José Carlos plans Permit to allow C Planters CONTECH
Carlos Street, dated the construction Category B: Category (29%) StormFilter ZPG
Apartm approximat 6/29/17) of a seven-story, N/A B: 0% media filter,
ents ely 500 feet 56 residential which is certified
File No. east of unit building with Category Category by the
PD16- Sunol Street two-stories of at C: Yes C: 75% Washington State
031 grade parking Location: Location: Department of
on a 0.41 gross Within 1/2 25% Ecology
acre site. mile of Density: Technical
transit hub. 30% Assessment
Density: 136 Parking: Protocol -
DU/AC 20% Ecology (TAPE)
Parking: No Program.
at-grade See narrative.
surface
parking
3-62
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
The City 80 East San 10/4/16 Approv Site 1.46 178 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
Gradu of San Carlos ed Development to AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (30%):
ate José Street (approv allow a 19-story C planters Kristar Perk Filter,
Mixed- ed plans student housing Category B: Category (38%) which is certified
Use dated with 260 units N/A B: 0% Bioreten by the
File No. 3/22/17) and 14,800 tion Washington State
H16- square foot retail Category Category (26%) Department of
036 on 1.46 gross C: Yes C: 80% Self- Ecology
acre site. Location: Location: Treating Technical
Within 50% (6%) Assessment
1/4mile of Density: Protocol -
transit hub. 30% Ecology (TAPE)
Density: 178 Parking: Program. See
DU/AC 0% narrative.
3-63
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Fourth City 439 South 1/19/17 Pending Site 0.51 198 N/A Category Category N/A Media Filtration
Street of San 4th Street (initial Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% System (100%):
Metro José plans Permit to allow C CONTECH Media
Station- dated the construction Category B: Category Filtration System
Mixed 1/18/17) of an 11-story Yes B: 100% media filter,
Use mixed use Location: which is certified
File No. building Within Category by the
H17- consisting of 101 Downtown C: 0% Washington State
004 residential units, Core. Department of
4,305 square Density: 198 Ecology
feet of DU/AC Technical
commercial use, Site Assessment
and 7,261 Coverage: Protocol -
square feet of 99% Ecology (TAPE)
office space on Parking: No Program.
a 0.51 gross acre at-grade See narrative.
site. surface
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-64
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Garde City 3896 2/6/17 Pending Planned 16.70 52 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
n of San Stevens (initial Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% through System (45%):
City/Sa José Creek plans Permit to allow C planters Kristar Perk Filter,
ratoga Boulevard dated the construction Category B: Category (21%) which is certified
Creek 2/6/17) of 460,000 N/A B: 0% Self- by the
Mixed- square feet of treating Washington State
Use commercial Category Category (34%) Department of
File No. office, up to C: Yes C: 55% Ecology
PD17- 15,000 square Location: Location: Technical
002 feet of retail, up Within PDA 25% Assessment
to 871 residential Density: 52 Density: Protocol -
units, a 2.50- DU/AC 20% Ecology (TAPE)
acre park, and Parking: Parking: Program. See
outdoor uses on <10% at- 10% narrative.
a 16.70 gross grade
acre site. surface
parking
3-65
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Quetza City 1695 Alum 2/7/17 Approv Conditional Use 0.74 95 N/A Category Category Bioreteni Media Filtration
l of San Rock ed Permit to allow AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% on (30%) System (59%):
Garde José Avenue (approv the mixed-use C Flow- CONTECH
ns ed plans project of 12,175 Category B: Category Through Stormwater
Mixed- dated square feet Yes B: 75% Planters Management
Use 6/14/17) commercial Location: (5%) StormFilter media
File No. space and 71 Within Category Self- filter, which is
CP17- affordable Neighborho C: 0% Retainin certified by the
009 residential units od Business g (2%) Washington State
on a 0.74 gross District Self- Department of
acre site. Density: 95 Treating Ecology
DU/AC (4%) Technical
Site Assessment
Coverage: Protocol -
94% Ecology (TAPE)
Parking: No Program.
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-66
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Stevens City 4360 4/25/17 Pending Planned 10.20 48 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
Creek of San Stevens (initial Development to AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% Through System (34%)
Prome José Creek plans construct a 6- C Planters Kristar Perk Filter
nade Boulevard dated story office Category B: Category (38%) and Baysaver
Mixed- 4/25/17) building, a 6- N/A B: 0% Self- Bayfilter which
Use story parking Treating are certified by
File No. garage, a 7- Category Category (28%) the Washington
PD17- story mixed use C: Yes C: 45% State Department
014 building Location: Location: of Ecology
containing Within PDA 25% Technical
10,000 square Density: 48 Density: Assessment
feet of ground DU/AC 10% Protocol -
floor Parking: Parking: Ecology (TAPE)
commercial and <10% 10% Program.
up to 236 surface
residential units, parking
and a 7-story
residential
building
containing up to
263 residential
units on a 10.20
gross acre site.
3-67
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Aviato City 199 Basset 5/17/17 Pending Special Use 0.82 370 N/A Category Category Flow- Media Filtration
Mixed- of San Street (initial Permit to allow AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% Through System (27%)
Use José plans the construction C Planters CONTECH
File No. dated of 304 residential Category B: Category (71%) StormFilter
SP17- 5/17/17) units in an 18- Yes B: 100% Self- PhosphoSorb
023 story building Location: Treating System media
and 10,146 Within Category (2%) filter, which is
square feet of Downtown C: 0% certified by the
retail on a 0.82 Core. Washington State
gross acre site. Density: 370 Department of
DU/AC Ecology
Site Technical
Coverage: Assessment
93% Protocol -
Parking: No Ecology (TAPE)
at-grade Program.
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-68
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
West City 5696 5/18/17 Pending Site 0.42 N/A 3:1 Category Category Bioreten Media Filtration
San of San Stevens (initial Development AC FAR A: N/A A: 0% tion System (12%)
Jose José Creek plans Permit to allow (88%) CONTECH
Marriot Boulevard dated the construction Category B: Category Stormwater
Hotel 5/18/17) of a 132-room N/A B: 0% Management
File No. hotel on a 0.42 StormFilter media
H17- gross acre site. Category Category filter, which is
023 C: Yes C: 55% certified by the
Location: Location: Washington State
Within PDA 25% Department of
Density: 3.7 Density: Ecology
FAR 10% Technical
Parking: No Parking: Assessment
at-grade 20% Protocol -
surface Ecology (TAPE)
parking Program.
See narrative.
3-69
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
27 City 27 South 1st 6/4/17 Pending Site 0.57 600 N/A Category Category N/A Media Filtration
West of San Street (initial Development AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% System (100%):
Mixed- José plans Permit to allow C Media filtration
Use dated the construction Category B: Category model not
File No. 6/4/17) of a 22-story Yes B: 100% specified on
H17- mixed-use Location: revised plans.
027 building Within Category Prior to approval,
consisting of 342 Downtown C: 0% the project
residential units Core. applicant must
and 17,628 Density: 600 specify a media
square feet of DU/AC filtration system
commercial and Site model that meets
office uses on a Coverage: minimum design
0.57 gross acre 97%. criteria or has
site Parking: No received
at-grade appropriate
surface certification. See
parking. narrative.
Category
C: N/A
3-70
n Credit Treatme
Availabl nt
e Systems
Roosev City 21 North 21st 6/26/17 Pending Special Use 0.47 170 N/A Category Category Tree Media Filtration
elt Park of San Street (initial Permit to allow AC DU/A A: N/A A: 0% Intercep System (94%):
Apartm José plans the construction C tor Media filtration
ents dated of a new eight- Category B: Category Credit model not
File No. 6/26/17) story affordable Yes B: 100% (6%). specified on
SP17- housing Location: See revised plans.
027 development Within Category narrativ Prior to approval,
with 80 dwelling Neighborho C: 0% e. the project
units, 10,192 od Business applicant must
square feet of District. specify a media
commercial uses Density: 170 filtration system
on a 0.47 gross DU/AC model that meets
acre site. Site minimum design
Coverage: criteria or has
88%. received
Parking: No appropriate
at-grade certification. See
surface narrative.
parking.
Category
C: N/A
3-71
C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table A - Public Projects Reviewed for Green

Infrastructure
Project Name and Project Description Status54 GI Description of GI Measures
Location53 Included?55 Considered and/or Proposed
or Why GI is Impracticable to Implement56
Los Arboles School Storm Installation of approximately Design phase No Bioretention cells were considered but
Sewer Relocation project 1,200 linear feet of storm deemed infeasible. There is limited space and
main and manholes. easement conflicts for bioretention locations
using the existing grade. The project is a point
repair for storm drain infrastructure and will not
alter street grade.
Magnolia Avenue Storm Replacement of curb and Beginning planning No Determined to be maintenance only.
Drainage Improvements gutter and a limited number and design phase
of driveways.
Bailey Avenue Storm Sewer Installation of approximately Beginning planning TBD Bioretention cells and/or pervious
Improvements 700 linear feet of 15-inch RCP and design phase pavement/pavers will be considered.
storm main, storm laterals,
two manholes and three
inlets.
Tully Road – San Jose Vision Provide roadway safety Beginning planning TBD Bioretention cells and/or pervious
Zero Priority Safety Corridor improvements such as and design phase pavement/pavers will be considered.
median islands, bike lane
buffers, traffic signals and
crosswalks.
West San Carlos Urban Retrofit to be a complete Beginning planning TBD Bioretention cells were incorporated into
Village Streetscape street by enhancing and design phase conceptual designs and will be considered
Improvements multimodal operations and throughout the design process of the project.
safety, improving ADA
compliance, and
incorporating street trees,
landscaping, and green
infrastructure.
53 List each public project that is going through your agency’s process for identifying projects with green infrastructure potential.
54 Indicate status of project, such as: beginning design, under design (or X% design), projected completion date, completed final design date, etc.
55 Enter “Yes” if project will include GI measures, “No” if GI measures are impracticable to implement, or “TBD” if this has not yet been determined.
56 Provide a summary of how each public infrastructure project with green infrastructure potential will include green infrastructure measures to the maximum extent
practicable during the permit term. If review of the project indicates that implementation of green infrastructure measures i s not practicable, provide the reasons why
green infrastructure measures are impracticable to implement.
3-72
C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Table B - Planned and/or Completed Green

Infrastructure Projects
Project Name and Project Description Planning or Green Infrastructure Measures Included
Location57 Implementation Status
Park Avenue: Green Replace existing asphalt Under Construction The project will include bioretention rain gardens and
Avenue Pilot Project: Park surfaces, construct permeable pavers.
Ave. between University bioretention rain gardens,
Ave. and Sunol St. and install permeable
medians and bulb-outs in
conjunction with a traffic
safety multi-modal project.
Ocala Avenue Green Construct bioretention areas Cancelled This project was grant funded but cannot proceed
Street Project: Ocala to treat and infiltrate urban because it was determined that construction costs
Avenue between Capitol runoff in conjunction with a would exceed the grant and match amounts. Plans
Expressway and Daytona traffic safety multi-modal were developed and can potentially be used to
Avenue. project. implement the project at a later date.
Chynoweth Avenue Green Construct linear and bulb- Under Construction The project will include bioretention cells and porous
Street Project: Chynoweth out bioretention cells along a asphalt.
Ave. between Snell Ave. newly designated parking
and Colony Crest Dr. area for the adjacent county
park. Construct a median
with trees as a traffic calming
measure.
Martha Gardens Alleys Retrofit degraded pavement Beginning planning and The project will drain replaced concrete pavement
Project – Housing and in urban alleyways lacking design phase and existing adjacent structures to a center strip of
Urban Development drainage and storm drain permeable pavers and underlying infiltration trench.
Grant: Specific alleyway infrastructure.
locations to be
determined.
List each planned (and expected to be funded) public and private green infrastructure project that is not also a Regulated Pr oject as defined in Provision C.3.b.ii.
57
Note that funding for green infrastructure components may be anticipated but is not guaranteed to be available or sufficient.
3-73
3-74
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.4 – Industrial and Commercial Site Controls
Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls

Summary:
Regional Collaboration
The City actively participated in the Program’s Industrial and Commercial Ad Hoc Task Group (IND AHTG) on multiple projects. The IND AHTG
worked on developing methods for controlling mobile sources of stormwater pollution, handling fire sprinkler testing water, and discussed
upcoming changes to the General Industrial Permit. The IND AHTG also planned and held a Countywide Inspector training workshop which
included training on IND requirements and inspection techniques.
Facility Inspections
In FY 16-17, the City inspected a large number of facilities to ensure that adequate stormwater protection measures are being employed. The
City’s Business Inspection Plan targets inspector resources at facilities with a higher potential to contribute pollutants to stormwater. Table
C.4.d.iii(1)(a) provides summary information on the City’s IND inspection program including total number of facilities inspected, total number of
violations issued, and percent of violations resolved within 10 business days (or otherwise timely manner). The City initially assigned 3,085 facilities
for inspection in FY 16-17 and completed inspections for 2,798 facilities. Inspectors found and documented 56 actual discharge violations and
2,035 potential discharge violations at 1,029 facilities. The rate of correcting identified violations within 10 business days or in an otherwise timely
manner was approximately 93%. The City returns to inspect all facilities found with violations until all violations are satisfactorily corrected, no
matter how long it takes a facility to achieve compliance. In FY 16-17, a total of 4,541 inspections were conducted, which is a 4% increase from
FY 15-16.
Annual Training
The City places great value in providing needed training for its Environmental Inspectors. The City actively participated with the IND AHTG to
develop the Inspector Training Workshop to cover IND issues, requirements, and techniques. The City will continue to train its staff in FY 17-18 and
beyond, and will work with SCVURPPP and BASMAA on pertinent regional inspector training.
C.4.b.iii ► Potential Facilities List

List below or attach your list of industrial and commercial facilities in your Inspection Plan to inspect that could reasonably be considered to
cause or contribute to pollution of stormwater runoff.
There are a total of 7,788 facilities subject to inspection in San José. A complete list of these facilities (Appendix 4-1: Potential Facilities List),
including their location and type, is available on the City’s Environmental Services Department Stormwater Management Reports website at
http://www.sanJoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=160.
4-1
C.4.d.iii.(2)(a) & (c) ►Facility Inspections

Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information. Indicate your reporting methodology below.
Permittee reports multiple discrete potential and actual discharges as one enforcement action.
X Permittee reports the total number of discrete potential and actual discharges on each site.
Number Percent
Total number of inspections conducted (C.4.d.iii.(2)(a)) 4,541
Number of enforcement actions or discreet number of potential and actual discharges 2,091
Violations Enforcement actions or discreet number of potential and actual discharges resolved within 10 1,945 93%
working days or otherwise deemed resolved in a longer but still timely manner (C.4.d.iii.(2)(c))
Comments:
The number of violations equals the number of discrete issues identified at facilities. The number of sites inspected in violation equals the number
of facilities inspected in the reporting year that had at least one discrete violation documented. 1,029 of the 2,798 facilities inspected in FY 16-17
were in violation.
The City stresses timely resolution of violations, and continues to inspect all facilities found with violations until all violations are satisfactorily
corrected, no matter how long it takes a facility to achieve compliance. The majority of violations not corrected in a timely manner received
escalated enforcement actions as well as education to encourage the facility to comply. City inspectors document the rationale for each
violation that is not corrected in a timely manner. Summarized below are the reasons given for violations that were not corrected in a timely
manner in FY 16-17 (i.e. a breakdown of the approximately 7% of violations resolved in more than 10 working days):
3.68% - due to responsible party not taking any action within 10 business days.
1.29% - due to scheduling conflict between inspectors and facility managers
1.20% - due to the corrective action being incomplete or insufficient
0.57% - due to responsible party waiting for parts/ contractor/ permits
0.24% - due to delays involving working with property managers
4-2
C.4.d.iii.(2)(b) ►Frequency and Type of Enforcement

Conducted
Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information.
Enforcement Action Number of Enforcement Actions Taken
(as listed in ERP)58
Level 1 Correction Notice 806
Level 2 Official Warning Notice (OWN) 300
Level 3 Referral to Administrative Citation (ACR) 154
Level 3 Referral to Compliance Meeting (CMR) 1
Level 4 Administrative Citation (AC) 48
Level 4 Compliance Meeting (CM) 1
Total 1,310
Comments: Referral to Administrative Citations (ACRs) and Referral to Compliance Meetings
(CMRs) were previously counted as Official Warning Notices (OWNs) for reporting purposes as
such referrals were made by issuing a second OWN in the field. Starting FY 13-14, these
enforcement actions are being counted separately. To compare OWN counts with previous
years, use the sum of OWNs, ACRs, and CMRs.
Agencies to list specific enforcement actions as defined in their ERPs.

58
4-3
C.4.d.iii.(2)(d) ► Frequency of Potential and Actual Non-stormwater Discharges by Business

Category
Fill out the following table or attach a summary of the following information.
Number of Actual Number of Potential
Business Category59 Discharges Discharges
a) Facilities subject to the General Industrial Stormwater Permit 1 253
b) Vehicle salvage yards 1 14
c) Metals & other recycled materials collection facilities; waste transfer facilities 0 0
d) Vehicle mechanical repair, maintenance, fueling, cleaning 11 371
e) Building trades central facilities/yards; corporation yards 2 117
f) Nurseries and greenhouses 0 2
g) Building material retailer and storage 3 45
h) Plastic manufacturers 0 0
i) Other 0 7
j) Food service 34 997
k) Dry cleaners 0 7
l) Miscellaneous 4 222
Comments: Category i (“Other”) includes facilities designated by the Permittee or Water Board to have a reasonable potential to contribute
pollution of stormwater runoff. For SCVURPPP permittees, this includes but is not limited to: amusement parks, chemical and allied products,
storage, and veterinarians/animal services with outdoor pens. Category l (“Miscellaneous”) includes facilities that were inspected in FY 16-17 but
are not included in any of the other business categories and would not normally receive an inspection. These facilities were inspected because
either 1) they were incorrectly included in one of the other business categories when imported into the City’s database; 2) a violation was
identified at the facility during an IDDE complaint investigation in a previous year; or 3) a violation was identified at the facility during an IND
inspection (based on a different business category) in a previous year.
List your Program’s standard business categories.

59
4-4
C.4.d.iii.(2)(e) ►Non-Filers
List below or attach a list of the facilities required to have coverage under the Industrial General Permit but have not filed for coverage:
There are a total of 141 facilities inspected in FY 16-17 that may need to file an NOI based solely on their SIC code or based on their SIC code and
equipment maintenance/cleaning activities. A complete list of these facilities (Appendix 4-2: Facilities Requiring Coverage under IGP but Have
Not Filed), including their location and SIC code, is available on the City’s Environmental Services Department Stormwater Management Reports
website at http://www.sanJoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=160.
C.4.e.iii ►Staff Training Summary

No. of Percent of
Industrial/ Industrial/ Percent of
Commercial Commercial No. of IDDE IDDE
Site Site Inspectors Inspectors
Training Inspectors in Inspectors in in in
Training Name Dates Topics Covered Attendance Attendance Attendance Attendance
SCVURPPP 5/10/2017 Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention, 19 95% 7 100%
IND/IDDE Inspection Procedures,
Training Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination,
Roundtable
Appropriate BMPs to be used at different
industrial and commercial facilities,
Mobile Businesses
Comments:
SCVURPPP IND/IDDE Workshop was held on May 10, 2017. The Workshop agenda and attendance list are available on the webpage
http://www.scvurppp-w2k.com/workshops.shtml.
4-5
4-6
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.5 – Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination
Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

Provide background information, highlights, trends, etc.
Summary:
The City screens its storm sewer collection system for illicit discharges and connections in conjunction with its existing outfall inspection and
maintenance program. This includes screening of City-identified key major outfalls that drain industrial areas. In FY 16-17, a total of 444 outfalls
were screened, of which 40 were identified as key major outfalls. No illegal dumping or illicit connection incidents were reported during the
screening.
Regional Collaboration
The City actively participated in the Program’s Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Ad Hoc Task Group (IDDE AHTG) on multiple
projects. The group meets regularly to share and discuss issues. Eight construction related BMPs such as home remodeling and painting that
were updated in FY 15-16 were translated to Vietnamese and finalized for use in FY 16-17. The group continues to update the countywide
mobile business inventory and mail the BMP brochure and letter to new businesses as well as share enforcement actions taken against mobile
businesses that cross jurisdictions. A complete summary of countywide and regional activities is included in the SCVURPPP FY 16-17 Annual
Report.
The City also worked with the IND/IDDE AHTG to develop the Annual IND/IDDE Training held this year on May 10, 2017. Inspectors also attended
Hazwoper Refresher and various safety and IDDE internal training.
IDDE Complaint Response Evaluation

The City responded to 452 complaint calls in FY 16-17. The City makes every effort to respond to complaints on the same day they are received,
with the goal of no later than 5 business days. The percentage of violations corrected in a timely manner is around 96%. Complaints in
residential and commercial areas continue to be the vast majority of the cases the City investigates. The categories with the highest number of
complaints were: grey water, sanitary spills or leaks, and vehicle or equipment leaking.
To make it easier to file a complaint, the City accepts illegal stormwater discharge complaints via the City’s stormwater internet site at http://ca-
sanjose.civicplus.com/FormCenter/Environment-13/Storm-Drain-Discharge-Complaint-Form-71. Complaints received are entered into the
database and responded to by inspectors. The City continues to promote both phone and online means of registering complaints through
existing outreach and training programs. Additionally, the City’s illegal dumping hotline number (408-945-3000) is prominently displayed on
almost all inlet “no dumping” markers.
5-1
C.5.c.iii ►Complaint and Spill Response Phone Number

Summary of any changes made during FY 16-17:
No Change
C.5.d.iii.(1), (2), (3) ►Spill and Discharge Complaint Tracking

Spill and Discharge Complaint Tracking (fill out the following table or include an attachment of the following information)
Number Percentage
Discharges reported (C.5.d.iii.(1)) 452
Discharges reaching storm drains and/or receiving waters (C.5.d.iii.(2)) 168 43%
Discharges resolved in a timely manner (C.5.d.iii.(3)) 345 96%
Comments:
The City of San José tracks all complaints as individual cases. Of the 452 complaints received and completed in the fiscal year, 65 reported
complaints could not be found upon field inspection or were not stormwater pollutant related. Of the remaining 387 complaints, including both
actual and potential discharges, 168 (or 43%) had discharges that had reached the storm drains and/or receiving waters. Of the 358
documented violations (it is possible for one discharge case to have multiple violations) 345 (or 96%) were resolved in a timely manner. Of the 13
violations that were not resolved in a timely manner, 11 were escalated in enforcement and 2 were granted limited time extensions, all resulting
in compliance. There were also discharges reported where no responsible party could be identified. In such cases, clean up, if necessary, was
completed by the City and education/BMPs were provided to all parties involved.
5-2
C.5.e.iii.(1) ►Control of Mobile Sources

(a) Provide your agency’s minimum standards and BMPs for various types of mobile businesses (C.5.e.iii.(1)(a)))
The City of San José educates and enforces the standards and BMPs described in the “Mobile Businesses - Best Management Practices”
brochure developed by the SCVURPPP IND/IDDE AHTG in May 2012 for the following mobile business categories: automobile washers/detailers,
power washers, carpet cleaners, steam cleaners, and pet care services. The Mobile Businesses BMP brochure is included in the Program Annual
Report. The City of San José distributed 18 of the Mobile Business BMP brochures during FY 16-17. The Mobile Business BMP brochure encourages
businesses to become a BASMAA Recognized Mobile Cleaner and follow the BASMAA BMPs available on the website: http://basmaa.org. The
City also provides lists of newly identified mobile businesses to SCVURPPP Program staff, who then mail a transmittal letter along with the Mobile
Business BMP brochure to the businesses. The Mobile Cleaner Businesses BMP brochure is posted on the Program’s Watershed Watch website
under resources for businesses: http://www.mywatershedwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/mobilecleanertrifoldFINAL1.pdf.
In FY 16-17 a PowerPoint (PPT), Best Management Practices for Mobile Businesses, was developed and posted to the City’s website
http://www.sanjoseca.gov/ArchiveCenter/ViewFile/Item/3185. The PPT provides all water-using mobile businesses with BMPs and resources for
training (i.e., BASMAA Recognized Mobile Cleaner), how to properly discharge wastewater to the sanitary sewer, etc.
(b) Provide your agency’s enforcement strategy for mobile businesses (C.5.e.iii.(1)(b)
In the City of San José, mobile businesses improperly discharging wash water to the storm drain system are identified through IDDE complaint
investigations; routine IND program facility inspections; and field observations by Environmental Inspectors. Mobile business Identification,
enforcement, and tracking occur through the City’s IDDE and the IND inspection programs. If a mobile business is identified during an IDDE
investigation, the business is added to the City’s Environmental Enforcement database. All violations and enforcement actions taken against
the mobile businesses are tracked in our database, and a facility IND inspection is scheduled in the following fiscal year if the mobile business is
based in the City of San José. The enforcement actions Environmental Inspectors may take are detailed in our IDDE Enforcement Response Plan
(ERP).
Due to the unique nature of mobile businesses, it can be difficult to track enforcement of a single business across jurisdictions. The current
strategy is for agencies to share information on mobile business enforcement actions at the SCVURPPP IND/IDDE AHTG meetings. All identified
mobile businesses with a base of operations in the City of San José are added to the IND inspection inventory. The bases of operations for
mobile businesses are inspected at a standard frequency consistent with the IND Business Inspection Plan (BIP). Actual or potential discharges
at the bases of operations are addressed like any commercial/industrial site according to the IND Enforcement Response Plan (ERP). Efforts are
made to ensure mobile activities of the business are reviewed and discussed during the IND inspections, and recommendations and BMPs
specific to mobile businesses are distributed during the IND inspection. New mobile businesses are added to the SCVURPPP mobile business
inventory list and enforcements are discussed during SCVURPPP IND/IDDE AHTG meetings.
5-3
(c) Provide a list and summary of the specific outreach events and education conducted by your agency to the different types of mobile
businesses operating within your jurisdiction (C.5.e.iii.(1)(c)
The Program maintains a regional inventory of mobile businesses in the standard BMP categories listed in the “Mobile Businesses – Best
Management Practices” brochure. As inspectors provide new businesses to Program staff, the BMP brochure and transmittal letter are mailed to
the business. The Mobile Cleaner Businesses BMP brochure is posted on the Program’s Watershed Watch website under resources for businesses:
http://www.mywatershedwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/mobilecleanertrifoldFINAL1.pdf.”
In San José, mobile business outreach and education is primarily done on an individual basis. Mobile business BMPs and outreach materials are
distributed during routine IND inspections; IDDE response calls; and event planning meetings between event organizers and the Office of
Cultural Affairs, and/or the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Services. In FY 16-17, the City hosted hundreds of indoor and
outdoor events. Mobile businesses are frequently vendors at these events. Stormwater protection BMPs were provided to all event coordinators
for distribution to all vendors. Materials are accessible at http://www.sanjoseculture.org/index.aspx?NID=4202, including the Additional
stormwater requirements are listed in the Special Events Guidelines - Outdoor Special Events in the City of San José
(http://www.sanjoseculture.org/DocumentCenter/View/25725).
A complete list of these events is available as a standalone document, Appendix 5-1: C.5.e.iii.(1) (c) List of Events with Possible Mobile Businesses,
on the City’s Environmental Services Department Stormwater Annual Reports web site at http://www.sanjoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=160
5-4
(d) Provide number of inspections conducted at mobile businesses and/or job sites in 2016-2017 30
(C.5.e.iii.(1)(d):
(e) Discuss enforcement actions taken against mobile businesses in 2016-2017 (C.5.e.iii.(1)(e)
Enforcement actions are typically taken in response to a complaint or illicit discharge through our IDDE Program. Enforcement actions are
tracked in the City’s spill and discharge complaint tracking system required by MRP C.5.d.ii. In FY 16-17, there were 10 complaints involving
mobile businesses. A total of 25 inspections were required, which resulted in 9 violations with 14 enforcement actions taken against the mobile
businesses. 19 BMPs were also distributed. No actual or potential discharges were found during the 5 IND inspections conducted at the base of
operations for mobile businesses.
(f) List below or attach the list of mobile businesses operating within your agency’s jurisdiction (C.5.e.iii.(1)(f))
In 2014 the Program compiled an inventory of mobile businesses located in Santa Clara County by reviewing business licenses, yellow page
searches and online business searches. The inventory includes automobile washers/detailers, power washers, carpet cleaners, steam cleaners,
and pet care services. The inventory is periodically updated with mobile businesses stormwater inspectors observe during routine field activities
and IDDE investigations. The inventory is made available to all SCVURPPP Co-permittees on the SCVURPPP members only webpage. The
inventory currently includes 178 mobile businesses. The inventory will be included in the Program’s Annual Report. A complete list of these mobile
businesses is also available on the City’s Environmental Services Department Stormwater Management Reports website at
(g) Provide a list and summary of the county-wide or regional activities conducted, including sharing of mobile business inventories, BMP
requirements, enforcement action information, and education (C.5.e.iii.(1)(g))
See C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination section of the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for description of activities at the countywide
or regional level.
5-5
5-6
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.6 – Construction Site Controls
Section 6 – Provision C.6 Construction Site Controls
C.6.e.iii.3.a, b, c,d ►Site/Inspection Totals

Number of active Hillside Number of High Priority Number of sites disturbing ≥ 1 acre Total number of storm water runoff quality
Sites (sites disturbing < 1 Sites (sites disturbing < 1 of soil inspections conducted (include only Hillside Sites,
acre of soil requiring acre of soil requiring storm (C.6.e.iii.3.b) High Priority Sites and sites disturbing 1 acre or
storm water runoff quality water runoff quality more)
inspection) (C.6.e.iii.3.a) inspection) (C.6.e.iii. 3.c) (C.6.e.iii. 3.d)
# # # #
This is the total number of This is the total number of This is the total number of SITES that This is the total number of inspections conducted
SITES considered Hillside SITES considered high disturb one or more acres of soil at hillside sites, high priority sites and at sites
Projects based on criteria priority, which triggers a and are inspected monthly during disturbing one or more acres of soil. Do not list
submitted in FY2015-2016 requirement for monthly the rainy season. inspections that are conducted at sites that are
Annual Report, which inspection during the rainy not within these two categories.
triggers a requirement for season. Please see MRP 119
monthly inspection during for discussion of what sites 1,876
the rainy season. are considered high
priority sites. Sites
15 disturbing less than one
acre of soil that are not
considered high priority by
the Permittee should not
be reported here.
35
Comments:
In addition to the construction site categories listed above, the City of San José also inspects sites that are under demolition if they have the
potential to be classified under one of the construction categories listed above once construction begins. These demolition sites are assigned an
“unknown” disturbed area in the City’s database until the area disturbed is identified in the grading permit. In FY 16-17, the City conducted 104
inspections at 20 sites with “unknown” disturbed areas, which brings the total number of sites inspected under the C.6 inspection program to 189
sites in FY 16-17.
6-1
C.6.e.iii.3.e ►Construction Related Storm Water Enforcement

Actions
Enforcement Action Number Enforcement Actions Issued
(as listed in ERP)60
Level 1 61 Correction Notice/Verbal Warning 189
Level 2 Official Warning Notice/Notice of Unsatisfactory Conditions and/or 153
Referral to Environmental Services
Level 3 Administrative Citation Referral/Compliance Meeting Referral 85
Level 4 Penalty Application/Administrative Citation/Compliance Meeting 50
Total 477
Comments:
None.
C.6.e.iii.3.f, ►Illicit Discharges

Number
Number of illicit discharges, actual and those inferred through evidence at hillside sites, high priority sites and sites that 38
disturb 1 acre or more of land (C.6.e.iii. 3.f)
C.6.e.iii.3.g ► Corrective Actions

Indicate your reporting methodology below.
Permittee reports multiple discrete potential and actual discharges as one enforcement action.
X Permittee reports the total number of discrete potential and actual discharges on each site.
Number
Enforcement actions or discrete potential and actual discharges fully corrected within 10 business days after 631
violations are discovered or otherwise considered corrected in a timely period (C.6.e.iii. .3.g)
Total number of enforcement actions or discrete potential and actual discharges for the reporting year 649
Comments:
Agencies should list the specific enforcement actions as defined in their ERPs.
60
For example, Enforcement Level 1 may be Verbal Warning.

61
6-2
In FY16-17, there were a total of 649 violations at 189 sites, of which, 97% (631), were fully corrected within 10 business days. There were 18
violations at ten construction sites that were not resolved within 10 business days due to the responsible party’s failure to complete all required
remedial actions by the required due date. Of the 18 violations that were not resolved within 10 business days, 16 violations received escalated
enforcement and compliance was achieved. In accordance with the City’s Enforcement Response Plan, rationale was documented in the
database for the two violations that were not resolved within 10 business days and did not receive escalated enforcement. Compliance was
ultimately achieved for these two violations.
In San José, the total number of violations equals the number of discrete potential and actual discharges identified at construction sites that
result in an enforcement action. It does not equal the number of enforcement actions because 1) a single enforcement action may be issued
to address multiple violations and 2) a site may be issued a second (or multiple) enforcement action(s) progressively to achieve compliance.
C.6.e.iii.(4) ►Evaluation of Inspection Data

Describe your evaluation of the tracking data and data summaries and provide information on the evaluation results (e.g., data trends, typical
BMP performance issues, comparisons to previous years, etc.).
Description:
The City experienced the third straight year of increase in the number of construction sites inspected under the Provision C.6 Construction
Inspection Program. The number of construction sites and construction inspections completed in FY 16-17 increased 32% and 39%, respectively,
from FY 15-16 (FY 16-17: 1,876 inspections at 189 project sites; FY 15-16: 1,352 inspections at 143 sites). Although the number of violations (649) in
FY 16-17 increased 48% from the previous fiscal year (440), the percentage of inspections with violations in FY 16-17 (649/1,876, or 35%) remained
fairly consistent from the previous fiscal year (440/1352, or 33%). The use of Level 4 enforcement actions, relative to the total number of
enforcement actions, to achieve compliance increased slightly from 9% in FY 15-16 to 11% in FY 16-17. The number of violations and Level 4
enforcement actions from year to year can be affected by many variables. In FY 16-17, the Bay Area experienced heavy rainfall, and many
contractors working at construction sites in San José during FY 16-17 were from outside the Bay Area or from out-of-state; these contractors were
not familiar with the requirements of Provision C.6 of the MRP and/or the Construction General Permit. Ninety-seven percent (631/649) of all
violations were corrected within 10 business days or otherwise considered timely.
Consistent with previous years, sediment control and good site management were the most common BMP violation categories. Inadequate
BMPs in those two categories made up 94% of the violations issued.
6-3
C.6.e.iii.(4) ►Evaluation of Inspection Program Effectiveness

Describe what appear to be your program’s strengths and weaknesses, and identify needed improvements, including education and outreach.
Description:
In FY 16-17, San José continued to implement a thorough, year-round, construction inspection program. Inspection staff completed 1,876
inspections. There was an increase in the number of inspections in FY16-17 which may be attributed to the continued improvements in the
economy, as more development occurs and more construction sites are added to the inspection inventory. The large number of violations
demonstrates the inspection staff’s ability to identify potential and actual discharges and document violations during inspections in
accordance with the City’s Enforcement Response Plan.
City staff continued to work closely with SCVURPPP in FY16-17 to ensure compliance with provision C.6. In addition, during FY 16-17, City staff
updated several construction BMPs and translated eight BMPs into Vietnamese. By updating construction BMP brochures and translating them
for Vietnamese speakers, City staff will be able to convey construction BMPs and MRP requirements to a wider audience more effectively.
Inspection program staff attended a half-day construction site inspection training workshop in January 2017. The training covered MRP
regulatory requirements, construction site BMP inspections, and local case studies. Attendees included inspection staff, supervisors, and other
staff that have a primary role in the City’s construction stormwater inspection program. Attendance for the construction workshop increased
significantly from the previous year with forty-two inspectors attending in FY16-17 compared to seventeen inspectors in FY15-16. In FY16-17, the
Environmental Services Department and Public Works Supervisors worked closely together to identify all inspector positions that would directly
benefit from attending the annual construction workshops and to ensure they received notification for all upcoming construction trainings. The
Environmental Services Department provided additional training to construction inspection groups that covered C.6 requirements, described
the City’s internal process for data tracking and coordination, and common construction site issues. As in previous years, San José was also an
active participant in the BASMAAA Development Committee.
6-4
C.6.f.iii ►Staff Training Summary

No. of
Inspectors in
Training Name Training Dates Topics Covered Attendance
C.3 & C.6 Training for Construction Inspection 1/18/2017 • Intro/Background on MRP/Provision C.6 22
Staff • Specific requirements under C.6
• Conducting construction inspections for C.6
compliance and common issues observed
during construction inspections: stockpiles,
wet season BMPs, dewatering operations,
entrance/exit, protecting C.3 TCMs during
construction, ensuring sites follow SWPPP
and/or Erosion Control Plan
• Coordination and enforcement escalation
SCVURPPP Stormwater Inspections Workshop: 1/23/2017 & • Regulatory refresher of MRP requirements for 42
Construction Sites & C.3 Stormwater Controls 1/27/2017 construction site inspections
• Two case studies of construction site MRP
compliance issues
• Group exercise for determining proper BMPs
for Erosion Control Plan
6-5
6-6
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.7 Public Information and Outreach
Section 7 – Provision C.7. Public Information and Outreach
C.7.b.i.1 ►Outreach Campaign

Summarize outreach campaign. Include details such as messages, creative developed, and outreach media used. The detailed outreach
campaign report may be included as an attachment. If outreach campaign is being done by participation in a countywide or regional
program, refer to the separate countywide or regional Annual Report.
Summary:
Christmas in the Park Environmental Alley
The City of San José Environmental Services Department shared environmentally friendly holiday messages at Christmas in the Park, San José’s
signature holiday event. As an event sponsor, San José’s messages were showcased via displays, signage, stage announcements, and online
presence throughout the month-long event to more than 500,000 visitors from across the Bay Area. This year, San José’s “Environmental Exhibits,”
featured two displays that showed Santa’s elves and children from around the world taking simple steps to save resources and reduce waste to
get on “Santa’s Good List.” The stormwater messages featured throughout the event included litter, proper pet waste disposal, repairing
automotive leaks/proper motor oil recycling, green cleaning products, and proper household hazardous waste disposal.
Earthquakes Partnership
The Environmental Services Department completed its first three-year partnership with the San José Earthquakes (2014-16) and extended it for
another three years (2017-19). The partnership aims to raise awareness and encourage environmental behaviors that will help reduce waste,
prevent pollution, and conserve water and energy. The Earthquakes home games at the new AVAYA stadium reach 18,000 fans who are 36
percent Hispanic, 64 percent male, and 56 percent Santa Clara County residents. Through the City’s partnership with the Earthquakes, over
300,000 fans will be exposed to the environmental messages in one season via verbal announcements, visual LED boards and signage, green
stadium signage, and outreach booths. The partnership provides use of the Earthquakes brand and player endorsements, increased cost-
savings, and value-added outreach opportunities with the Earthquakes and ESD’s other public agency partners. As family-friendly role models
and key community leaders, the Earthquakes players’ local celebrity status garners recognition and credibility among fans and the general
public. The San José Earthquakes partnership achieved more than 5 million impressions through mass media campaigns in English and Spanish
languages in 2016.
In addition to in-stadium advertisements, ESD ran a seven-month long marketing campaign with bus advertisements, web and social media
advertisements, and game day advertisements throughout Avaya Stadium that included stormwater messages. Stormwater messages covered
the following topics:
• San José’s Junk Pickup service
• Household Hazardous Waste
• Impacts of single-use items on the environment and encouragement of source reduction through reusable water bottles
7-1
• Impacts of litter and pollution in our waterways and encourage proper disposal
San José Mayor Sam Liccardo’s #BeautifySJ Campaign
Mayor Sam Liccardo launched #BeautifySJ in his 2017 State of the City speech to rally residents to reclaim their public spaces and empower the
community to aesthetically demonstrate their pride in our City. In addition to the many ways that residents can help beautify San José, City Hall
engaged a number of new policy decisions and opportunities that make San José more attractive:
• Launched a partnership with the San Jose Conservation Corps and CalTrans.
• Expanded a free residential junk pickup service.
• Boosted enforcement on illegal dumping.
• Led nearly weekly neighborhood cleanups across the City.
San José Giants Partnership

In April 2017, ESD entered a one season (April through September) partnership with the San José Giants, a Class A baseball team affiliate of the
San Francisco Giants, to raise awareness and encourage environmental behaviors that reduce waste and prevent pollution. San José Giants
games are family-friendly outings that provide fun and entertainment to both kids and adults. Each game provides ESD with an opportunity to
reach approximately 5,000 fans with environmental messages. In addition to in-person outreach, the partnership will allow ESD to add
permanent environmental messaging throughout the stadium while an agreement is reached each season.
The 2016 partnership included five games for the City to attend and provide public education to Giants fans, including one “Full Park Packer”
on Earth Day which included 5,000 tickets for ESD to distribute to residents; a billboard in the outfield promoting the City’s expanded large item
collection program; and an ESD panel in the Giants’ season pocket schedule.
San Jose Sharks Partnership
The Environmental Services Department (ESD) entered a new, three-year partnership with the San Jose Sharks, a professional ice hockey team,
to raise awareness and encourage environmental behaviors that reduce waste and prevent pollution. The Sharks home games at the SAP
Center reach 17,321 fans who are 58 percent female, 57 percent white, and 54 percent Santa Clara County residents. Though San José’s first
year partnership with the Sharks, over 655,00 fans were exposed to the environmental messaged in one season via verbal announcements,
visual LED boards, game day radio announcements, and outreach booths. The partnership provides use of the Sharks brand and player
endorsements and outreach opportunities with the Sharks and ESD’s other public agency partners. As family-friendly role models and key
community leaders, the Sharks players’ local celebrity status garners recognition and credibility among fans and general public. During the
2016-17 season, ESD launched an English language mass media campaign staring Sharks players that garnered more than 2.8 million
impressions.
In 2016-17 season, stormwater messages were disseminated during the four-month marketing campaign through web and social media
advertisements and game day ads throughout SAP Center. Stormwater messages covered the following topics:
• Inform about the City of San José/s Junk Pickup service to build program awareness in March 2017.
• Hazardous waste and its proper disposal in October and November 2016.
• Impacts of litter and pollution in waterways and encourage proper disposal in March 2017.
7-2
Media Relations
Topic and Content of Pitch Medium Date of Publication
San José Wins Award for Innovative Efforts to News Release September 14, 2016
Prevent Bay Pollution
“The San José-Santa Clara Regional

Wastewater Facility and City of San José
received an award today for its collaborative
and multi-faceted approach for preventing
pollution in San Francisco Bay.”
San José’s Chynoweth Avenue to get road Mercury News article to which ESD October 26, 2016
diet, rain gardens contributed
“The end of Chynoweth Avenue near Martial
Cottle Park in Almaden Valley is poised for a
major $2.25 million makeover next year that
includes a road diet.”
San José Wins Award for Innovative Tactics to News Release December 5, 2016
Combat Illegal Dumping
“San José will lead Bay Area in reducing trash
and investing in green infrastructure”
Social Media
ESD raised additional awareness for stormwater management and protection through social media. Photo posts with helpful tips pertaining to
litter, volunteering, household hazardous waste, car washes, integrated pest management, green infrastructure, and general watershed
protection education were posted on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. A total of 185 interactive and educational posts were placed on
Twitter, Facebook and Instagram, and approximately 2,141 engagements (people who clicked on a post) were made via Facebook, and 1,669
through Twitter.
The following separate reports developed by SCVURPPP summarize countywide efforts conducted during FY 16-17:
• FY 16-17 Watershed Watch Campaign Annual Campaign Report
• FY 16-17 Watershed Watch Partner Report
• FY 16-17 Watershed Watch Web Statistics Report
These reports are included within the C.7 Public Information and Outreach section of the SCVURPPP FY 16-17 Annual Report.
7-3
C.7.c. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Education

No change in point of contact.
C.7.d ►Public Outreach and Citizen Involvement Events
Describe general approach to event selection. Provide a list of outreach materials and giveaways distributed.
Use the following table for reporting and evaluating public outreach events
The City takes a strategic approach to event selection based on family-friendly community events, TMA’s, targeted audience (i.e., 18-25 Latino
male adults for litter messaging), collaborative campaign efforts, etc. The following outreach materials and giveaways are available in our
outreach tool kit: Clean Cars, Clean Creeks, Discount Card (i.e., car wash discounts), Draining Pools and Spas, Keep Your Home Safe (HHW),
Seafood Watch Flyer, Wastewater Paths, You’re the Solution to Water Pollution, How Trash Gets Into Creeks, 10 Most Wanted Bugs, Grow It
Guide, Less Toxic Products, Nature’s Inspiration Gardens, Self-Guided Tour Brochure, Pests Bugging You, Your One-Stop Shop to Sustainable
Landscape Resources (Bay Area EcoGardens Postcard), Flyswatters, Watershed Watch drawstring bags, and Clean Creeks Healthy
Communities reusable bags and T-shirts.
During FY 16-17, ESD participated in 20 community outreach events and distributed approximately 5,590 outreach materials and more than
1,935 giveaways (including Watershed Watch and Watershed Warrior reusable bags and T-shirts, fly swatters, buttons, etc.).
Event Details Description (messages, audience) Evaluation of Effectiveness

BAWSCA Landscape Workshops located at the In partnership with the Bay Area Water 56 residents attended eight BAWSCA
Guadalupe Gardens Courtyard, Nature’s Supply and Conservation Agency sustainable landscaping workshops. Staff
Inspiration Gardens, and Fire Station #15 (BAWSCA), SJ hosted a series of workshops distributed 149 outreach materials to
offering instruction and information about participants.
10/8/16 - Sheet Mulching techniques and practices to create and
10/29/16 - Irrigation Repair and Installation maintain water efficient and sustainable
11/5/16 - Permeable Hardscape Maintenance landscapes. Workshops encourage
environmentally-friendly gardening
12/17/16 - Sheet Mulching
methods and train attendees on sheet
3/18/17 - Irrigation Drip Conversion and mulching, permeable hardscape options
Installation and designs, irrigation systems and water
4/1/17 - Native, Drought Tolerant and Pollinator conservation, and drought tolerant CA
Friendly Plants native plants.
5/6/17 - Native and Drought Tolerant Plants and
Pruning
5/13/17 - Permeable Hardscape Alternatives-
Perk Grout (Permeable Concrete)
Local Event/Community Workshops
7-4

Healthy Buildings Fall Cleanup Day Provided a free cleanup day for Healthy Increased effectiveness of pest prevention
110 Round Table Dr., San José CA Building Pilot Program participants to concepts through clutter removal, de-
remove unwanted clutter from their homes greasing, and pest exclusion practices to
to help reduce pest habitat and related reduce sources of asthmagens such as
November 12, 2016
uses of harmful pesticides such as fipronil cockroach frass and rodent droppings/urine.
and pyrethroids in and around multi-family Seven of the nine units across two buildings
Municipal Event homes. participated in the event and a total of 15
outreach pieces were distributed during the
event.
Let’s Do Lunch! Let’s Do Lunch is a Pop-Up Project where ESD presented the Watershed Warrior, the
San José, City Hall Plaza City of San José employees enjoy lunch out bean bag toss game, and a photo back drop
in the City Hall Plaza with co-workers and for photo sessions and posting on social media
September 16, 2016 friends while listening to live music, play an using #keepSJclean. Approximately 300
activity, and learn about City services. outreach pieces were distributed to
Municipal Event employees.
National Night Out National Night Out is an annual crime and An estimated 200 residents visited the booth
Emma Prusch Farm Park drug prevention event sponsored by the and were most interested in water
Southside Community Center National Association of Town Watch. ESD’s conservation and how to keep their
Starbird Community Center bean bag toss and Watershed Warrior were community clean and safe. Approximately
popular means of engaging residents 688 materials were distributed. Children were
August 2, 2016 about proper trash disposal and the effects enthusiastic about the bean bag game.
of litter.
Local Events
NASA Outreach Engagement The Alum Rock School District partnered More than 300 Arbuckle community members
Arbuckle Elementary School Community with NASA on a “Caring for The Earth and visited booths and were most interested in the
Environment” event. Both organizations Watershed Warrior coloring handout and
May 24, 2017 provided Arbuckle neighborhood residents buttons. The Watershed Warrior engaged
with an opportunity to engage in activities participants with the bean bag toss game and
Local Event and ask questions of science professionals photo booth.
on what they can do to help care for the
environment.
7-5

Question Quest, Children’s Discovery Museum A Week of Investigating Your World is a Approximately 425 outreach materials and
week to foster excitement about science giveaways were distributed to children and
April 13, 2017 and exploration, to remember that science parents. Kids were particularly interested in the
is more about asking questions than bean bag game, the Pest vs. Pal coloring
Local Event knowing answers, and to inspire a love of booklets, and fly swatters.
our amazing world. During this week-long
celebration, community partners join with
Children’s Discovery Museum to help bring
science to life for visitors though interactive
table exhibits or other experiences.
Safe and Green Halloween A Halloween themed children’s event Approximately 150 community members
McKinley Elementary School focused on promoting health, safety, and visited the Watershed Warrior, played the
the environment to the children of McKinley bean bag game, and learned that
and Olinder Elementary Schools. stormwater is not treated and flows to storm
October 21, 2016
drains, creeks and the Bay, and that their
everyday actions can have a negative
Local Event
impact on storm drains and water quality.
Participants received information about creek
cleanups and how to properly dispose of
household hazardous waste.
San José Earthquakes Games and Campaign, Environmental Services completed a three- ESD participated in five outreach events at
Avaya Stadium year partnership (2014-16) and renewed it Avaya Stadium. During the three events
for an additional three years (2017-2019), staffed by WSP, approximately 340 fans
8/5/16 with the San José Earthquakes, a Major received information on large item collection,
9/10/16 League Soccer team, to raise awareness contact information for curbside collection of
3/4/17 and encourage environmental behaviors large items, “You’re the Solution to Water
that will help reduce waste, prevent Pollution” (brochure), “Keep Your Home Safe”
pollution, and conserve energy and water. (HHW flyer), “Watershed Watch Discount
Local Event Earthquakes home games reach 18,000 Card”, etc. 200 Watershed Watch (drawstring
fans who are: 36 percent Hispanic, 64 bags) were provided to kids and adults who
percent male, and 56 percent Santa Clara participated in the bean bag toss game. The
County residents. Watershed Warrior attended one of the
events.
Additionally, 288,000 fans heard stadium
announcements, read messages on LED signs,
and received a Matchday Magazine that
encouraged them to pick up litter, schedule
HHW and large pick-up appointments, and
use reusable water bottles.
7-6

San José Giants Games ESD celebrated Earth Day with the San José ESD staff interacted with an estimated 200
San José Giants Stadium Giants (SJ Giants) by hosting an visitors. Most were drawn to the bean bag
environmental fair during a morning game. game, or interested in volunteer opportunities,
Several environmental groups provided car washes, and general watershed
April 20, 2017 (Earth Day Education Day)
information to t+-he community on waste protection messages. Staff distributed
reduction and recycling, household approximately 475 outreach materials and
hazardous waste and stormwater pollution giveaways to the attendees. 1,500 residents
Local Event prevention. ESD publicized the new free attended the ball game.
large item pick up service available to San
José residents.
San José State University Earth Day Resource An Earth Day Festival for students on the Approximately 75 event attendees visited the
Fair San José State University campus. ESD booth and were most interested in volunteer
San José State University hosted an information table with pollution opportunities, car washes, HHW, IPM, and
prevention information and volunteer general watershed protection. Staff distributed
April 21, 2016 opportunities, including information on more than 130 pieces of outreach materials.
Great American Litter Pick Up. Students enjoyed the Watershed Warrior
Local Event photo booth and uploaded their photo to
social media using #keepSJclean.
State of the City Address Resource Fair This resource fair provided local residents Approximately 100 residents visited the booth
Silver Creek High School and organizations with information and gathered information on litter cleanups
pertaining to youth jobs, City services, local and general watershed awareness. Residents
February 10, 2017 resources, and City employment. WSP staff received a Watershed Watch discount card
provided information on litter, proper for discounted car washes and oil changes,
Local Event disposal of household hazardous materials, information about the City’s large item pickup,
and general pollution prevention. and a drawstring (reusable) bag. City staff
distributed approximately 300 outreach
materials and giveaways.
7-7

Youth Science Institute, 30th Annual Wildlife The Wildlife Festival is an annual event for A little over 1,000 attendees participated in
Festival, Alum Rock Park the Youth Science Institute (YSI), a non- the 31st anniversary event. Visitors to the
profit organization whose mission is to booth were most interested in information on
October 2, 2016 encourage youth to explore science sustainable gardening, IPM, and general
through hands-on learning. It is a free family watershed protection. Staff distributed more
event that also features live animals to than 265 outreach materials and giveaways to
Local Event
meet and touch, children's crafts, face residents.
painting, presentations from local animal
organizations, tabling opportunities, and
educational fun! The location in Alum Rock
Park helps to highlight the focus on wildlife
and the effects of our culture on wildlife.
Adopt-A-Park and Adopt-A-Trail The Volunteer Management Unit in the During FY 16-17, Adopt-A-Park volunteers
Year-Round Department of Parks, Recreation and donated over 12,000 hours of service as they
Citywide Neighborhood Services continues to picked up trash, swept sidewalks and gutters,
engage and execute valuable programs as well as worked on landscaping tasks at their
which focus on a healthy environment in all favorite parks. Volunteer civic groups,
200+ city parks. Volunteers are an essential corporate employee volunteers, faith-based
and substantial asset in the City of San José. organizations and active teens also came out
to help. With 162 “One Day Volunteer Events”,
almost 5,000 volunteers enhanced the look
and feel of City parks while also making them
safer and cleaner. Overall, the Volunteer
Management Unit produced volunteer
services valued at $691,654.
7-8
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
Anti-Litter Program The purpose of the Anti-Litter Program (ALP) In FY 16-17, the ALP attended over 65
Year-Round is to beautify San José by preventing litter outreach and community engagement
Citywide through education, coordinating events which included resources fairs and
community litter clean up events and community events. Additionally, the ALP also
managing community involvement through proactively engaged businesses and
volunteerism. ALP provides free cleanup neighborhood associations, schools, churches
supplies to volunteers, designates litter hot and youth groups. ALP participation at these
spots for adoption, and hosts special events focused on raising awareness of the
cleanup events. impact of litter in our neighborhoods and
parks in addition to recruiting volunteers. The
ALP outreach strategy focused on promoting
the Great American Litter Pick Up Event,
working with Council Offices to promote litter
clean ups and coordinating and clean up
events in areas most impacted by litter. ALP
volunteers and one-day service groups
contributed over 47,956 hours and collected
over 20,318 bags of trash.
Barn Owl Nest Box Monitoring Program The student outreach and education Program improvements assisted in fledging 72
Year Round components of the program began in owlets over the breeding season, an 800%
Spring 2015. To date, 33 Wildlife Biology increase in the number of rodents consumed
City-wide
course students from Evergreen Valley annually as compared to the previous year.
College and five members of the public The rodent consumption rate translates into
have received training on standard the equivalent of avoiding approximately
operating procedures related to Integrated 1,870 pounds of toxic bait to manage
Pest Management principles and methods nuisance rodent populations. Currently, 49
and related impacts to water quality. owlets have fledged since December 2016,
Additionally, staff presented program results and several second clutches indicate that the
to approximately 40 professionals at the P3S program will fledge approximately 14 more by
Conference in Santa Rosa, CA in February the end of the breeding season.
2017.
California Coastal Cleanup Day California Coastal Cleanup Up Day is a 1,883 volunteers, a 3% increase from last year,
September 17, 2016 three-hour event where volunteers pick up cleaned up 43 sites throughout the county.
Multiple sites in San José litter from beaches, lakes, rivers, and creeks. Approximately 55,010 pounds of trash and
City staff hosted 2 of the 18 clean-up sites in 6,442 pounds of recyclables were removed
San José. from 60.75 miles of creek.
7-9

Great American Litter Pick Up A three-hour litter cleanup event where 13,959 volunteers participated in the cleanup,
April 22, 2017 volunteers remove trash from neighborhood an increase of 46% from last year. Volunteers
City-Wide streets, parks, public spaces, and specific collected over of 1,0600 bags of trash in under
locations identified in each City Council three hours.
District as chronic litter hot spots. Volunteers
were organized at 39 locations city-wide.
National River Cleanup Day National River Cleanup Day is a three-hour 1,251 volunteers, cleaned up 48 sites
May 20, 2017 event where volunteers pick up litter from throughout the county. 33,408 pounds of trash
lakes, rivers, and creeks. City staff hosted 1 and 3,086 pounds of recyclables were
of the 23 cleanup sites in San José. removed from 64.8 miles of creek.
Multiple sites in San José
San José Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring City–trained citizen volunteers collect water City staff encourages citizen monitoring
Program quality readings of dissolved oxygen, through the San José Volunteer Water Quality
Year-Round temperature, turbidity, and pH using World Monitoring Program. This program trains
Water Monitoring Challenge kits, and take citizens of all ages to collect water quality
City-wide
standardized observations of water body readings and water body observations at 55
conditions, and weather. permitted locations throughout the City.
C.7.e. ►Watershed Stewardship Collaborative Efforts

Summarize watershed stewardship collaborative efforts and/or refer to a regional report that provides details. Describe the level of effort and
support given (e.g., funding only, active participation etc.). State efforts undertaken and the results of these efforts. If this activity is done
regionally refer to a regional report.
Evaluate effectiveness by describing the following:

• Efforts undertaken
• Major accomplishments
Summary:
During FY 16-17, the Program actively supported the Santa Clara Basin Watershed Initiative, including the Land Use Subgroup, and the Santa
Clara Valley Zero Litter Initiative. Information on these efforts is included within the C.7 Public Information and Outreach section of the Program’s
FY 16-17 Annual Report.
Watershed Management Initiative, Zero Litter Initiative

The Zero Litter Initiative (ZLI) Steering Committee continues to meet monthly. This fiscal year focused on two main efforts:
• Coordination with Caltrans: ZLI participants in collaboration with Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) continued coordination meeting
with Caltrans on trash issues, including Adopt-A-Highway and on on/off ramps, homeless encampments, and the possibility of using
highway message boards for anti-litter. A subgroup of ZLI participants is working on developing a proposal for the message boards, and
CalTrans staff is reviewing one suggestion. CalTrans message board guidelines, including need for safety-related content, were
reviewed to develop the proposal.
7-10
• Trash Information Sharing Webinars: Began development of a webinar on the litter and water pollution impacts of cigarettes, including
topics and speaker list. The webinar is being planned for fall 2017.
Bay Area Eco Gardens

Bay Area Residents are encouraged to adopt sustainable landscaping practices, including reducing yard trimming waste through composting,
and various practices that reduce the need for chemical fertilizers and pesticides. ESD, in collaboration with the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff
Pollution Prevention Program (SCVURPPP) and the Solid Waste Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), launched
http://www.bayareaecogardens.org/ in November 2013. The site is currently being updated and migrated to Square Space, but will still include
a Water Calculator, plant lists, sustainable gardening fact sheets, example garden designs, supporting resources, and a calendar for local
hands-on sustainable landscaping workshops and events. The water calculator and fact sheets explain how to design, set, and manage
irrigation and controllers to prevent waste. New features include a blog post for related news and opportunities for involvement, a list of self-tour
demonstration sites for the public, and additional video links and trainings on sustainable landscaping methods and techniques. The group
continues to explore ideas for creating additional outreach messages to brand items such as seed packets and/or plant stakes in addition to
posting site related material on a variety of social media platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.
Grant Programs and Community Partnerships

City staff worked closely with Ecology Action to select public sites appropriate for participation in the turf conversion component of the
WaterLink Grant funded by the Department of Water Resources and the SCVWD. An official agreement was initiated between Ecology Action
and Independence High School (IHS) for inclusion in the program. The IHS site will serve as a large-scale example of sustainable landscaping
options available to residents in the neighborhood. ESD staff hopes to leverage existing environmental education program relationships with IHS
Biology Department teaching staff to help maintain these areas as living classrooms and demonstration sites.
IPM Hands-on Opportunities

The City hosted three independent educational events with City staff, citizen volunteers, and church groups. Topics included less-toxic pest
management options on 7/12/2016, Permeable hardscape maintenance and pathway repair on 11/22/2016, and permeable hardscape
installation methods and techniques on 6/21/2017. Additionally, the City is co-hosting a high school student volunteer for the summer to conduct
pollinator monitoring surveys in three gardens throughout the Guadalupe River Park.
7-11
C.7.f. ►School-Age Children Outreach

Summarize school-age children outreach programs implemented. A detailed report may be included as an attachment.
Use the following table for reporting school-age children outreach efforts.
Number of
Students/Teachers
Program Details Focus & Short Description reached Evaluation of Effectiveness
Biologists in Classrooms A collaboration between 37 IHS "student In 2017, BIC staff made programmatic
(BIC) Independence High School (IHS) teachers" changes to unit structure, and curriculum
March 27 – May 3, 2017 Teaching Academy and Creeks 1 IHS teacher; 270 content most notably: Created field trip to
Come to Class (CCC). Participating elementary learners augment curriculum: Watershed &
9th Grade Schools: 8 elementary Stormwater Infrastructure Tour: On March 29,
and Grades 3-5 Independence High School (Teaching teachers 2017 IHS students were introduced to their
Academy Biology Class), St. John local creek (Upper Penitencia) and
Vianney School (3rd, 4th, and 5th community garden, toured the
grades), and Summerdale Elementary Environmental Innovation Center’s green
(4th grade, and 4th-5th combo class). infrastructure and water-conserving
features, and visited Rincon II Pump Station
High School students learn to teach adjacent the Guadalupe River.
watershed protection subjects to Provided all IHS students take-home
grade school students with supervision Watershed Watcher T-shirts and backpacks,
of teachers and ESD staff. which they wore during assemblies.
Provided all grade school classrooms How
Trash Gets Into Creeks posters, and students
with take-home Watershed Watcher
backpacks and outreach buttons.
High School students participate in pre-
and post-project written evaluations to
assess their knowledge of subject matter
and vocational goals. Grade school
students were verbally “quizzed” on main
topics at the end of each presentation
through interactive games, or participated
in post-program written evaluations
(identical to the HS students). Most students
understand runoff flows to the Bay
untreated and protection of the watershed
begins with their day-to-day choices and
activities. Most students verbally promise ESD
staff to pick up trash at home and school.
7-12
Number of
Students/Teachers
Program Details Focus & Short Description reached Evaluation of Effectiveness
Creeks Come to Class Classroom presentation and activities 7 presentations Students in CCC are verbally “quizzed” on
(CCC) led by park rangers to teach water 379 students main topics at the end of each presentation
Grades K -5 awareness and pollution prevention. 13 teachers through interactive games. Most students
understand runoff flows to the Bay
3 schools and 5
untreated and protection of the watershed
teachers were new
begins with their day-to-day choices and
program
activities. Most students verbally promise ESD
participants.
Staff to pick up trash at home and school.
San José Go Green Schools Environmental Services Department Number of students The Go Green Schools program provided
Program program to foster environmental impacted not 653 recycling containers to 23 local schools.
Grades K-12 stewardship and recycling at schools tracked
in a parent and community-driven
process based on the Go Green
Initiative. Go Green staff connect K-12
schools in San José with free recycling
supplies and other green resources,
encouraging them to take up Go
Green initiative at whatever level they
choose.
Water Festival The Water Festival is an educational 280 fifth grade Four schools participated in the Water
Guadalupe River Parks festival hosted by the Guadalupe students Festival. Students were provided with pre-
Conservancy River Park Conservancy designed to and post-tests to evaluate their knowledge
Grade 5 celebrate our local watershed. The schools that of the watershed.
Classes rotate through a series of participated were:
activities intended to increase the Burbank, Franklin, 87% of student attendees who took both the
awareness and importance of water and River Glen pre- and post-test had a higher percentage
and promote stewardship of water as Elementary Schools of correct answers on the post-test
a resource. City staff led a game K-8. All are located
called "Pollution Soup" to teach the in San José.
sources and impacts of stormwater
pollution.
7-13
7-14
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.8 Water Quality Monitoring
Section 8 - Provision C.8 Water Quality Monitoring
C.8 ►Water Quality Monitoring

State below if information is reported in a separate regional report. Municipalities can also describe below any Water Quality Monitoring
activities in which they participate directly, e.g. participation in RMP workgroups, fieldwork within their jurisdictions, etc.
Summary: Most monitoring activities required in the stormwater permit are implemented at either the regional level through the Bay Area
Stormwater Agencies Association (BASMAA), or the county-wide level through the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention
Program (Program). However, the City also participates directly in local and regional monitoring activities. This includes participation in
numerous committees, workgroups, and strategy teams for the San Francisco Bay Regional Monitoring Program for Trace Substances (RMP);
the BASMAA Monitoring and Pollutants of Concern (POC) Committee; the BASMAAA Regional Monitoring Coalition (RMC); and the Program’s
Monitoring and Pollutants of Concern Ad Hoc Task Groups and monitoring projects.
Regional Participation
City staff participates directly in Regional and Countywide water quality monitoring efforts. This year, City staff actively participated in planning
and review activities for the RMP, serving on the Steering Committee, Technical Review Committee; Sources, Pathways, and Loadings
workgroup, and the Emerging Contaminant workgroup. The City also participated in several strategic work groups for RMP priority pollutant
studies, including the Selenium Strategy Team, and Sport Fish Strategy Team, which examines PCBs and mercury concentrations in fish tissues,
and scoping workshops for upcoming microplastics studies. Through this participation, the City helped to develop work products and prioritize
information needs for Regional monitoring projects. In FY 16-17, the City reviewed and provided comment on RMP study reports, including
several on microplastics. Financial support for the RMP is a requirement of both the stormwater and wastewater NPDES permits, and the City
has met this obligation since the RMP’s inception.
City staff participated directly in the BASMAA Monitoring and POC Committee, which coordinates stormwater monitoring requirements region-
wide. City staff also participated directly with Program field crews when Regional Monitoring Coalition (RMC) stations were located within or
directly influencing San José creeks. For additional information, please see the Urban Creeks Monitoring Report, Water Quality Monitoring; Water
Year 2016.
Local Monitoring
City staff participates directly in the Program’s Monitoring and Pollutants of Concern Ad Hoc Task Group, which plans and prioritizes local
monitoring projects in Santa Clara County. City staff provided review and comment on the Urban Creeks Monitoring Report: Water Quality
Monitoring Water Year 2016 (UCMR), submitted to the Water Board on March 15, 2017. Staff aided planning and implementation of multiple
components of the UCMR: specifically Creek Status Monitoring, and Stressor/Source Identification efforts, detailed below.
City staff collaborated with the Program to fulfill Creek Status Monitoring requirements for Spring Bioassessments in Water Year 2016. In FY 16-17,
City staff provided comment and review on the Creek Status Monitoring Report, Water Year 2016 (Oct 2015 – September 2016). For additional
information, please see Appendix A of the Urban Creeks Monitoring Report, Water Quality Monitoring; Water Year 2016.
8-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.8 Water Quality Monitoring
City staff worked with the Program to plan and implement the Upper Penitencia Creek Stressor/Source Identification Study (SSID) in Water Year
2016. In FY 16-17, City staff provided comment and review on the Upper Penitencia Stressor/Source Identification Project report, found in
Appendix C of the Water 2016 Urban Creeks Monitoring Report.
City staff continued to monitor first flush water quality and conduct post-storm field observations in FY 16-17 in the Guadalupe River. City staff
collected continuous water quality measurements of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and conductivity at one location along the Guadalupe
River (Alviso Slough) from 09/08/16 – 10/25/16*, and periodic discrete water quality readings of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, and
conductivity at 4 locations (Gold St., Alviso, Pond A6, Confluence with Coyote Creek) from 09/08/16 – 12/15/16. Visual surveys for fish kills and/or
water quality impacts were conducted within one business day of rainstorms delivering ¼” or more of precipitation.
8-2
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.9 – Pesticides Toxicity Controls
Section 9 – Provision C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Controls
C.9.a. ►Implement IPM Policy or Ordinance

Is your municipality implementing its IPM Policy/Ordinance and Standard Operating Procedures?
X Yes No
If no, explain:
Overall, pesticide use in the City of San José remains very low. Nearly all reportable active ingredients were applied in a way that did not expose
them to potential for runoff or limited the potential for that exposure. Most of the reported use was indoors and/or in the form of contained baits.
Totals in the following table reflects all uses of these chemicals regardless of application location or method. Except for pyrethrin, use of all
reportable active ingredient types decreased in FY 16-17 compared to FY 15-16. The increase in pyrethrin was attributed to use within the covered
confines of the San José Police Mounted Unit stables to control flies. The stables are very well maintained, and likelihood of runoff or track out is
very low. Alternatives are being considered for the coming year.
Trends in Quantities and Types of Pesticide Active Ingredients Used62
Pesticide Category and Specific Pesticide Active Ingredient Amount63 (lbs)

Used FY 15-16 FY 16-17 FY 17-18 FY 18-19 FY 19-20 FY 20-21
Organophosphates
Active Ingredient Chlorpyrifos None None
Active Ingredient Diazinon None None
Active Ingredient Malathion None None
Pyrethroids2 0.47888 1.51468
Beta-Cyfluthrin 0.00525 None
Deltamethrin 0.00682 0.00252
Permethrin 0.46230 0.16723
Prallethrin 0.00263 0.00075
Pyrethrins 0.00188 1.34418
Carbamates
Active Ingredient Carbaryl None None
Includes all municipal structural and landscape pesticide usage by employees and contractors.
62
Weight or volume of the active ingredient. The list of active ingredients in the pyrethroids class includes: metofluthrin, bifenthrin, cyfluthrin, beta-cyfluthrin,
63
cypermethrin, deltamethrin, esfenvalerate, lambdacyhalothrin, and permethrin.
9-1
Active Ingredient Aldicarb None None

Fipronil 0.10098 0.07912
Indoxacarb Reporting 0.04989
not required
in FY 15-16
Diuron Reporting None
not required
in FY 15-16
Diamides Reporting None
not required
in FY 15-16
Active Ingredient Chlorantraniliprole 0.00143
Active Ingredient Cyantraniliprole None
IPM Tactics and Strategies used:
• Removed invasive weeds and plants using cultural and mechanical methods, and spoke with contractors and municipal staff about new
report requirements for Diuron and other active ingredients of concern to water quality, resulting in alternative product selection and
increased awareness about herbicide resistance.
• Used non-chemical weed control strategies such as mulching, permeable grout in urbanite and flagstone pathways, and reduced irrigation
schedules.
• Used nest boxes to recruit Barn owls to 12 parks and 2 community gardens to help control small rodent populations naturally.
• Used goats and sheep for weed and invasive plant control in sensitive and fire prone areas.
• Implemented pilot program to evaluate effectiveness of carbon monoxide smoke as a ground squirrel and rodent population control
method. See Appendix, Section 9 for preliminary program results.
• Implemented a pilot program to evaluate the effectiveness of new bioinseciticides to control turf grass grubs against the industry standard
chemical controls. See details below in section C.9.b.
• Expanded sustainable landscape retrofit efforts to two City Fire Stations with potential to serve as sustainable landscaping showcases and
venues for workshops.
• Invested in improvements to public demonstration plots in the Guadalupe River Park and Gardens Courtyard Gardens which serve as living
classrooms for municipal and public IPM and irrigation workshops.
9-2
C.9.b ►Train Municipal Employees

Enter the number of employees that applied or used pesticides (including herbicides) within the scope of their duties this reporting
122
year.
Enter the number of these employees who received training on your IPM policy and IPM standard operating procedures within this
122
reporting year.
Enter the percentage of municipal employees who apply pesticides who have received training in the IPM policy and IPM standard
100%
operating procedures within this reporting year.
Type of Training:
ESD staff trained 122 municipal staff on the City’s IPM Policy, Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs), and Best Management Practices (BMPs)
which are available to staff on the City’s intranet site. During FY 16-17, PRNS staff also obtained training outside the City. Training was focused on
non-chemical strategies such as manual weed removal, mulching, and use of organic compost for turf fertilization. In partnership with the
University of California Cooperative Extension, the Chemical Advisory Board (CAB) evaluated the effectiveness of traditional grub management
chemical product, Acelepryn G vs. the newly available bioinesecticide grubGone!® against the target pest organisms: Cyclocehala hirta
(Western Masked Chafer), Ataenius spretulus (Black Turfgrass Ataenius), and Phyllophaga spp. (June Beetles) in Fowler Creek Park. The pilot tests
were responsible for the total amount of Cholranitraniliprole reported in the table in C.9.a. The report is available upon request. The CAB trained
PRNS staff on the following:
• Proactive Management of Scarab Beetle Larvae (White Grubs) in Municipal Turf Areas
• Modes of Action of Commonly Used Herbicides and Pesticides
• Weed Management: Chemical and Non-Chemical Alternatives
9-3
C.9.c ►Require Contractors to Implement IPM

Did your municipality contract with any pesticide service provider in the reporting year, for either Yes No
X
landscaping or structural pest control?
If yes, did your municipality evaluate the contractor’s list of pesticides and amounts of active ingredients Yes No
X
used?
If your municipality contracted with any pesticide service provider, briefly describe how contractor compliance with IPM Policy/Ordinance and
SOPs was monitored
In response to the Water Board’s evaluation of the C.9 section of the City’s 2015-16 Annual Report submittal, City of San José staff have and
continue to review contractors’ pesticide applications, target pests, and IPM practices monthly. Contractors continue to report pesticide
application data and IPM strategies used through an improved data entry form. This streamlines the process of ensuring throughout the year
that contractors are implementing IPM in accordance with the City’s IPM policy and their contract language.
This year City staff also conducted in-person meetings with all contractors and vendors regarding the City’s IPM and Pollution Prevention policies
and encouraged contractors to provide feedback on development of an online reporting system to further streamline record keeping and data
analysis. ESD staff reviewed contractor’s pesticide inventory lists, and worked closely with them to select appropriate alternative practices or
products to ensure adherence to the City’s IPM policy. The SOPs and BMPs that help implement the City’s IPM Policy were updated and
provided. A requirement to adhere to the IPM policy has been included as standard contract language for many years, and more recently
inserted into the contract bidding process to ensure awareness of the IPM policy expectations up front.
If your agency did not evaluate the contractor’s list of pesticides and amounts of active ingredients used, provide an explanation.
C.9.d ►Interface with County Agricultural Commissioners

Did your municipality communicate with the County Agricultural Commissioner to: (a) get input and assistance on Yes No
urban pest management practices and use of pesticides or (b) inform them of water quality issues related to x
pesticides?
If yes, summarize the communication. If no, explain.
See Section 9 of the SCVURPPP FY 16-17 Annual Report for summary of communication with the Santa Clara County Agricultural Commissioner
Did your municipality report any observed or citizen-reported violations of pesticide regulations (e.g., illegal handling Yes No
and applications of pesticides) associated with stormwater management, particularly the California Department of
x
Pesticide Regulation (DPR) surface water protection regulations for outdoor, nonagricultural use of pyrethroid
pesticides by any person performing pest control for hire?
If yes, provide a summary of improper pesticide usage reported to the County Agricultural Commissioner and follow-up actions taken to correct
any violations. A separate report can be attached as your summary.
9-4
C.9.e.ii (1) ►Public Outreach: Point of Purchase

Provide a summary of public outreach at point of purchase, and any measurable awareness and behavior changes resulting from outreach
(here or in a separate report); OR reference a report of a regional effort for public outreach in which your agency participates.
Summary:
The following separate reports developed by SCVURPPP and BASMAA summarize point of purchase outreach efforts conducted during FY 16-17:
• FY 16-17 Store Employee Training Report (SCVURPPP)
• FY 16-17 Store Employee Training Evaluation Summary (SCVURPPP)
• FY 16-17 Store Employee Training Status Table (SCVURPPP)
• FY 16-17 List of Stores in the IPM Store Partnership Program (SCVURPPP)
• FY 16-17 BASMAA “Our Water, Our World” (OWOW) Report (BASMAA)
C.9.e.ii (2) ►Public Outreach: Pest Control Contracting

Outreach
Provide a summary of outreach to residents who use or contract for structural pest control and landscape professionals); AND/OR reference a
report of a regional effort for outreach to residents who hire pest control and landscape professionals in which your agency participates.
Summary:
City staff participated directly in the BASMAA “IPM Focus on Multi-unit Housing” project funded by DPR. The goals of the program were to
reduce human exposure to pyrethroids and fipronil by reducing their use in and around multi-unit buildings, and increasing IPM services supply
and demand.
A selection of activities in which City staff participated includes:
• Recruited participants
• Developed IPM Tool Kits
• Helped create multilingual informational materials
• Coordinated communication, inspections, and treatment
• Helped identify areas for health clinic outreach
• Contributed to an online training module for pest management professionals on IPM in multi-unit buildings
The project concluded in February 2017. A final report will be available in FY 17-18.
See Section 7 and Section 9 of the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a summary of outreach to residents and businesses that use or hire
structural pest control and landscape professional. In addition, see the FY 16-17 Watershed Watch Campaign Final Report, included within
Section 7 of the Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report.
9-5
C.9.e.ii.(3) ►Public Outreach: Pest Control Operators

Provide a summary of public outreach to pest control operators and landscapers and reduced pesticide use (here or in a separate report);
AND/OR reference a report of a regional effort for outreach to pest control operators and landscapers in which your agency participates.
Summary:
As noted above in C9.e.ii (2), an online training module for PMP CE units was created with the help of University of California Agriculture and
Natural Resources staff, which focuses on providing accreditation for understanding and implementing IPM in multi-unit buildings through
certifications with EcoWise, Green Pro, and Green Shield.
See the C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control section of Program’s FY 16-17 Annual Report for a summary of outreach to pest control operators and
landscapers to reduce pesticide use. In addition, see the following separate reports, included within Section 7 and Section 9 of the Program’s FY
16-17 Annual Report, for additional details on outreach to pest control operators:
• FY 16-17 Watershed Watch Campaign Final Report
• FY 16-17 Green Gardener Training Report
C.9.f ►Track and Participate in Relevant Regulatory Processes

Summarize participation efforts, information submitted, and how regulatory actions were affected; AND/OR reference a regional report that
summarizes regional participation efforts, information submitted, and how regulatory actions were affected.
Summary:
During FY 16-17, The City participated in regulatory processes related to pesticides through contributions to the Program, BASMAA and CASQA.
For additional information, see the Regional Report submitted by BASMAA on behalf of all MRP Permittees.
9-6
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.10 – Trash Load Reduction
Section 10 - Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction
C.10.a.i ► Trash Load Reduction Summary

For population-based Permittees, provide the overall trash reduction percentage achieved to-date within the jurisdictional area of your
municipality that generates problematic trash levels (i.e., Very High, High or Moderate trash generation). Base the reduction percentage on the
information presented in C.10.b i-iv and C.10.e.i-ii. Provide a discussion of the calculation used to produce the reduction percentage, including
whether the 70% mandatory trash load reduction deadline was attained. If not attained, attach and include reference to a Plan to comply with
the deadline in a timely manner, which should include the Permittee’s plan and schedule to install full capture systems/devices.
Trash Load Reductions
Percent Trash Reduction in All Trash Management Areas (TMAs) due to Trash Full Capture Systems (as reported C.10.b.i) 36%
Percent Trash Reduction in all TMAs due to Control Measures Other than Trash Full Capture Systems (as reported in C.10.b.ii) 64 8.2%
Percent Trash Reduction due to Jurisdictional-wide Source Control Actions (as reported in C.10.b.iv)1 10.0%
Subtotal for Above Actions 54.2%
Trash Offsets (Optional)

Offset Associated with Additional Creek and Shoreline Cleanups (as reported in C.10.e.i) 10.0%
Offset Associated with Direct Trash Discharges (as reported in C.10.e.ii) 15.0%
Total (Jurisdictional-wide) % Trash Load Reduction in FY 16-17 79.2%

Discussion of Trash Load Reduction Calculation and Attainment of the 70% Mandatory Deadline: The City attained and reported 53% trash load
reduction (including trash offsets) in its FY 15-16 Annual Report). Because the City did not achieve the non-mandatory performance guideline of
60% by July 1, 2016, a Trash Action Plan was prepared and submitted to the Water Board to document the description and schedule of
additional trash load reduction control actions that would be implemented to attain and exceed the required 70% reduction by July 1, 2017.
During FY 16-17, the City implemented robust trash control measures, such as installing 11 large trash capture systems, to exceed the mandatory
70% trash load reduction requirement. The total (jurisdiction-wide) percent trash load reduction in FY 16-17 is 79.2%.
64 See Appendix 10-1 for changes between 2009 and FY 16-17 in trash generation by TMA as a result of full capture systems and other measures.
10-1
C.10.a.iii ► Mandatory Trash Full Capture Systems

Provide the following:
1) Total number and types of full capture systems (publicly and privately-owned) installed prior to FY 16-17, during FY 16-17, and to-date,
including inlet-based and large flow-through or end-of-pipe systems, and qualifying low impact development (LID) required by permit
provision C.3.
2) Total land area (acres) treated by full capture systems for population-based Permittees and total number of systems for non-population
based Permittees compared to the total required by the permit.
Areas Treated
Type of System # of Systems
(Acres)*
Installed Prior to FY 16-17

Connector Pipe Screens (Public) 103 128
Hydrodynamic Separators (Public) 10 2,276
Installed in FY 16-17
Hydrodynamic Separators (Public) 11 5,819
Total for all Systems Installed To-date 124 8,223
Treatment Acreage Required by Permit (Population-based Permittees) 895
Total # of Systems Required by Permit (Non-population-based Permittees) N/A
*Areas treated include 425 acres of non-jurisdictional public K-12 school, college and university areas that are treated by full trash capture systems.
10-2
C.10.b.i ► Trash Reduction - Full Capture Systems

1) Jurisdictional-wide trash reduction in FY 16-17 attributable to trash full capture systems implemented in each TMA;
2) The total number of full capture systems installed to-date in your jurisdiction;
3) The percentage of systems in FY 16-17 that exhibited significant plugged/blinded screens or were >50% full when inspected or maintained;
4) A narrative summary of any maintenance issues and the corrective actions taken to avoid future full capture system performance issues;
and
5) A certification that each full capture system is operated and maintained to meet the full capture system requirements in the permit.
Total # of Full % of Systems Exhibiting

Jurisdiction-wide
TMA Capture Plugged/Blinded Screens Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions
Reduction (%)
Systems or >50% full in FY 16-17
1 34.8% 65 21HDS N/A66 1. Hydrodynamic Separator (HDS) Maintenance under C.10:
29 CPS
This year, with the continued expansion of the number of
Hydrodynamic Separator (HDS) systems throughout San
José, the City focused on the collection of data for each
system to better understand the maintenance needed to
ensure system operability. Beginning in October 2016, the
City began inspecting all nine installed HDS systems
monthly. Monthly inspections of the remaining 12 units
began as construction was completed. Monthly
inspections of HDS units will continue through October 2017,
after which time the schedule may be modified based on
data analysis.
New Full Trash Capture (FTC) maintenance requirements

were included in the 2015 MRP. After discussion with
Contech about design and maintenance specifications of
their HDS units, Water Board Staff acknowledged the MRP’s
50% threshold was intended to apply to smaller inlet-based
trash capture devices (e.g., CPS units) and not large trash
capture devices such as HDS units. Subsequently, the City
consulted with Contech, to clarify maintenance guidelines
for HDS units. Contech’s standard draft recommendation is
65 For the purposes of demonstrating trash load reductions in FY 16-17, the City is not claiming reductions associated with CPS units installed in inlets due to the
challenges associated with maintaining these devices during the fiscal year. As described, the City is currently evaluating the maintenance frequencies necessary and
if maintenance is adequately performed, the City may choose to claim trash load reductions in future years.
66 See text under “Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions” for explanation.
10-3

Jurisdiction-wide
Reduction (%)
that maintenance should occur when the level of trash
and/or sediment has reached the top of the separation
slab (100% full sump) or if the level of floatable debris
becomes two feet thick. However, this recommendation is
based on smaller HDS units, as opposed to the larger
systems being installed in San José. Contech is analyzing
the system maintenance recommendations and will be
updating them this year.
During the monthly inspections, observations of floating

debris was noted, and few events indicated devices had
plugged or blinded screens or were overflowing. Systems
were, or are scheduled, to be cleaned to ensure proper
operation.
Based on the aforementioned inspection data collected to

date, along with a draft of the manufacturer’s
recommendations, the City is developing device-specific
maintenance guidelines for the installed HDS systems.
Individual inspection and maintenance plans for the first
nine units will be completed by October 2017. Draft
inspection and maintenance plans for the additional 12
systems will be developed based on data from the nine
systems, but will be updated to be device specific as
needed. Inspections of all systems will occur twice a year
at a minimum, as required.
Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions:

Unusually high rainfall and unprecedented flooding
presented the primary significant challenge for
maintenance crews last winter season. Emergency storm
response activities diverted staff resources away from HDS
maintenance activities through mid-May. Excessive water
in the HDS units, high-water levels in the receiving creeks, a
high ground water table, and saturated soil conditions also
delayed cleaning operations.
The depth of the HDS units presented another challenge for
maintenance crews. Five of the nine units are greater than
10-4

Jurisdiction-wide
Reduction (%)
23 feet deep. With these depths, the vacuum truck’s
suction power diminishes, thus increasing the time required
to empty the sump. Illegal dumping also hindered cleaning
of the HDS units. At one location, heavy materials such as
blankets, shovels, wires, wood planks, and a vacuum
cleaner were found inside the unit. In response to these
issues, crews invented new tools, modified existing tools,
and are investigating installation of locking manhole
covers. As mentioned above, the City is also working with
Contech to partner on developing appropriate
maintenance procedures and an associated training
program.
In addition, lessons learned will be incorporated into the

planning and design of future devices. Staff will investigate
if other types of devices will be more practical to maintain.
See Section 2 (below) for CPS summary of maintenance

issues and corrective actions of units located in TMA 1.
2 0.0% N/A N/A

3 0.0% N/A N/A
0.0% 67 74 CPS 48% 2. CPS (Connector Pipe Screen) Maintenance:
4 This year, the City focused its efforts on the installation and
study of larger HDS systems. As such, further expansion or
study of these smaller FTC units did not occur.
5
CPS units are cleaned annually before the storm season.
Since all units are located in trash management areas with
high or very high trash generation rates, inspections are
67 See text under “Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions” for explanation.
10-5

Jurisdiction-wide
Reduction (%)
conducted twice a year, once after the annual cleaning
event and once after the storm season ends.
6
During August and September 2016, DOT inspected and
cleaned all CPS units. In October, the City’s contractor
inspected all CPS units for damage and conducted repairs
7 as needed.
After the winter storms, DOT conducted a second round of

inspections from March through May 2017.
8 In FY 16-17, 47 units were plugged/blinded or found to be

greater than 50 percent full.
Summary of Maintenance Issues and Corrective Actions

The torrential rainfall this winter contributed to many CPS
9
units exceeding the 50% full threshold and/or exhibiting
plugged or blinded screens. CPS maintenance was
delayed due to DOT staff being diverted to conduct
emergency response work resulting from heavy rain and
10 flooding. The City will maintain all units by October 15, 2017.
In FY 17-18, the City will continue to assess the efficacy of

CPS units as a long-term solution to capture trash and, as
needed, adjust its CPS inspection schedule to conduct
11
quarterly inspections and ensure compliance with MRP
maintenance requirements. The City will evaluate current
resources and pursue additional resources, if needed, to
12
ensure adequate CPS inspection and cleaning. Standard
operating procedures will be updated accordingly.
13 0.0% N/A N/A
Total 36.0%*
Certification Statement: The City certifies that each of the installed full trash capture treatment systems have been operated and maintained to
meet full trash capture system requirements.
* The total % reduction from full capture includes 1.2% reduction associated with full capture systems treating 425 acres of non -jurisdictional public K-12 school,
college and university areas that are generating moderate, high, or very high levels of trash.
10-6
C.10.b.ii ► Trash Reduction – Other Trash Management Actions (PART A)

Provide a summary of trash control actions other than full capture systems or jurisdictional source controls that were implemented within each TMA,
including the types of actions, levels and areal extent of implementation, and whether actions are new, including initiation date.
TMA Summary of Trash Control Actions Other than Full Capture Systems
• TMA 1 includes all areas treated by Large Full Trash Capture systems (Hydrodynamic Separators) or areas planned for treatment
1
by 2020.
• Adopt-A-Park: Continue to recruit and train residents and corporate entities to participate in the Adopt-A-Park Program.
Through the Program, participants assist in the general care and maintenance of neighborhood and regional parks and open
spaces in San José including litter removal.
• Anti-Litter Program: In FY 14-15, the City’s Anti-Litter Program focused its work plan on increasing community volunteerism and
coordinating more neighborhood litter pickups. In FY 15-16, 5,044 volunteers participated in one-time service projects such as
the Great American Litter Pick-Up and collected a total of 8,576 bags of trash. The program currently monitors litter “hot spots”
throughout the City. These locations require regular and extensive cleanup efforts to combat trash and illegal dumping.
• Public Litter Cans: Installation of additional public litter cans. Locations were determined through comparison of trash
generation rates and land use, as well as pedestrian and vehicle traffic. The majority of these cans were installed in high and
moderate trash generation areas.
• Solid Waste Inspection Program: In 2012, the City initiated a new solid waste inspection program. The inspectors continue to
target areas where garbage service has been cancelled to ensure refuse is not accumulating, alert businesses to issues with the
management of the debris bins and waste storage areas, and provide information on the City’s garbage and recycling
programs and the San José Municipal Code. Inspectors also report illegal dumping and other concerns observed while in the
2 field.
• Place-Based Neighborhoods Program: In 2012, the Housing Department initiated the Place-Based Neighborhoods program to
create clean, safe, and engaged neighborhoods in three areas of the City. The Code Enforcement Division of the City’s
Department of Planning, Building and Code Enforcement participated in blight reduction efforts as part of this program, and a
contractor, Downtown Streets Team, cleaned up litter and dumping. This program has ended.
• Business Intelligence Data Tracking System: In 2012, City’s Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Department (PRNS)
implemented an activity data tracking system called Business Intelligence (BI). Through BI, PRNS tracks trash collection activities
and trash collection quantities. This information was utilized to support the City’s trash generation and collection information.
• Homeless Response Team: In FY 15-16, the City received ongoing funding for a Homeless Response Team, led by the Housing
Department. The team includes outreach workers which offer social services and housing to homeless individuals, and
maintenance staff that dismantle encampments and remove trash and debris from creeks and other areas throughout the City.
• Watershed Protection Team Patrols: In 2013, San José Park Rangers’ Watershed Protection Team, started patrolling waterways to
reduce illegal encampment activity and issuing criminal citations to individuals for illegal activity that results in waterway
degradation. Rangers and PRNS maintenance staff also conduct and supervise volunteer on-land and creek cleanup activity
along City trails and waterways.
10-7
• Downtown San José Property Based Improvement District: Supported the successful establishment of the Downtown San José
Property Based Improvement District (PBID). The Downtown PBID, among its enhanced services, incorporates sidewalk
sweeping, litter pickup, and maintenance of public litter cans at least once per week in retail/wholesale and commercial
areas.
• Illegal Dumping Rapid Response Team: The FY 16-17 Adopted Operating Budget included funding for a new Illegal Dumping
Rapid Response Team (IDRRT) in ESD. The IDRRT responds to service requests and cleans up illegally dumped items within
approximately five days. The IDRRT also conducts proactive sweeps in various neighborhoods citywide where illegal dumping
occurs frequently. The City is removing significantly more illegally dumped material from City property and right-of-ways than in
previous years. In FY 16-17, the team removed approximately 173 cubic yards (15 tons) of illegally dumped materials each
week.
• Adopt-A-Park Program (See write up in TMA 2)
• Anti-Litter Program (See write up in TMA 2)
• Installation of public litter cans (See write up in TMA 2)
• Solid Waste Inspection Program (See write up in TMA 2)
• Place-Based Neighborhood program (See write up in TMA 2)
3
• Business Intelligence Data Tracking System through PRNS (See write up in TMA 2)
• Homeless Response Team (See write up in TMA 2)
• Watershed Protection Team patrols (See write up in TMA 2)
• Illegal Dumping Rapid Response Team (See write up in TMA 2)
• Added 0.3 Curb Miles (CM) of Residential Street Sweeping to Senter Road.
4
5 • Place-Based Neighborhood program (See write up in TMA 2)
10-8
• Clean Streets Pilot: In FY 15-16, the City piloted a targeted education and outreach campaign with the Story Road Business
Association, called the “Clean Streets Pilot,” to prevent and clean up trash and litter in the business district. The City contracted
with Downtown Streets Team to clean two designated areas along Story Road to help meet the project goal of no litter
remaining for more than 24 hours. Sixty-nine businesses displayed campaign posters and tent cards with the campaign
messaging, “Score! A Clean Neighborhood. Put Litter in the Trash Can.” Spanish and English campaign posters were also placed
in 26 bus stop shelter panels from April through June 2016. DST removed trash daily in two designated areas along Story Road to
help meet the project goal of no litter remaining for more than 24 hours. DST collected 223 cubic yards of litter from January to
June 2016. In addition, 34 public litter cans were installed along a 2.9 mile stretch of Story Road.
• Added 0.2 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Pleasant Lake Lane and 0.1 CM to Country Tree Court.
6
• Added 0.8 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Toyon Avenue, 0.1 CM to Summerpark Court, 0.3 CM to Sierra Road, 2.1 CM to
Piedmont Road
• Property Based Improvement District (See write up in TMA 2)
7 • Place-Based Neighborhood program (See write up in TMA 2)
• Added 0.2 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Idaho Street.
8
10-9
• Added 0.5 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Payne Avenue.

9
• Added 0.3 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Ewer Drive and Whispering Willow Place, 0.1 CM to La Crescent Place and
Sapa Court, 0.4 CM to La Crescent Loop, and 1.5 CM to Willow Street.
10 • Homeless Response Team (See write up in TMA 2)
• Added 0.2 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Phinney Way, Macias Lane, Queensbridge Way, and Golf Creek Drive, 0.1 CM
to Appley Way, Blossom Dale Drive, De Soto Drive, Larissa Oaks Place, Lynn Avenue, and Macias Court, 0.3 CM to Pramukhs
Way and Butterfly Drive, 0.5 CM to Rimrock Drive, and 0.6 CM to Almaden Road and Blossom Valley Drive.
• Place-Based Neighborhood program (See write up in TMA 2)
11 • Business Intelligence Data Tracking System through PRNS (See write up in TMA 2)
• Added 0.1 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Carls Court, 0.05 CM to Pear Blossom Court and Guava Blossom Court, 0.04 CM
to Heaven Valley Court.
10-10

• The City began conducting a pilot project utilizing automatic retractable screens (ARS) in FY 13-14. The pilot includes
approximately 100 inlets. The targeted neighborhood is adjacent to a large retail mall and has high and medium trash
12 generation areas. Parking restrictions and enforcement were already in place for street sweeping throughout the proposed
pilot area.
• Added 0.2 CM of Residential Street Sweeping to Cerro Crest Drive, Daryl View Court, Long Valley Terrace, and Vista Point Court,
0.1 CM to Clear Vista Court, Crestridge Court, Crestridge Lane, Gravina Court, Jonathan Rachelle Court, Lago De Bracciano
Street, and Long Valley Court, 0.3 CM to Goldenspur Loop, Jennifer Daisy Drive, John Sorci Drive, Turturici Court, and Windcliff
Lane, 0.5 CM to Longhill Court, and 0.6 CM to Gravina Loop and Turturici Way.

13 • Business Intelligence Data Tracking System through PRNS (See write up in TMA 2)
10-11
C.10.b.ii ► Trash Reduction – Other Trash Management Actions (PART B)

1) A summary of the on-land visual assessments in each TMA (or control measure area), including the street miles or acres available for
assessment (i.e., those associated with VH, H, or M trash generation areas not treated by full capture systems), the street miles or acres
assessed, the percent of available street miles or acres assessed, and the average number of assessments conducted per site within the TMA;
and
2) Percent jurisdictional-wide trash reduction in FY 16-17 attributable to trash management actions other than full capture systems implemented
in each TMA.
Summary of On-land Visual Assessments

TMA ID Total Street Miles68 or
% of Applicable Street Jurisdictional-wide
or (as applicable) Acres Available for Street Miles or Acres Ave. # of Assessments
Miles or Acres Reduction (%)
Control Measure Area Assessment Assessed Conducted at Each Site
Assessed
1 62.5 0.0 0.0% 0.0 0.0%
2 29.4 4.2 14.4% 2.7 0.8%
3 17.0 2.3 13.2% 2.3 1.0%
4 28.4 3.7 13.1% 1.8 0.0%
5 44.1 4.1 9.3% 1.3 0.0%
6 10.6 1.6 15.0% 2 0.5%
7 23.9 3.2 13.5% 2.6 0.0%
8 20.5 2.6 12.8% 2.5 2.5%
9 24.8 2.9 11.6% 2.8 1.1%
10 13.7 1.4 10.3% 2.3 1.8%
11 17.9 2.3 13.0% 2.9 0.5%
12 12.3 1.0 8.2% 2.8 0.0%
13 5.1 0.8 15.3% 2.8 0.0%
Total 30.1 9.7% 2.3 8.2%
68 Linear feet are defined as the street length and do not include street median curbs.
10-12
C.10.b.iv ► Trash Reduction – Source Controls

Provide a description of each jurisdictional-wide trash source control action implemented to-date. For each control action, identify the trash
reduction evaluation method(s) used to demonstrate on-going reductions, summarize the results of the evaluation(s), and estimate the associated
reduction of trash within your jurisdictional area. Note: There is a maximum of 10% total credit for source controls.
Source Summary Description & Summary of Evaluation/Enforcement %

Control Dominant Trash Sources and Types Evaluation/Enforcement Method(s)
Results To-date Reduction
Action Targeted
Single-Use Control Measure Description: The City’s The City has assessed the Single-Use According to the BASMAA “San 5.6%
Carryout Francisco Bay Area Stormwater Trash
Single-Use Carryout Bag Ordinance Carryout Bag Ordinance through a
Bag Generation Rates” report finalized on
Ordinance
(available at http://www.sanJosé variety of metrics. Creek and river
ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/23916) surveys have targeted measuring June 20, 2014, single use carry out bags
took effect on January 1, 2012. The visual improvements. Surveys at retail were estimated to contribute about 8%
ordinance applies to all grocery and locations have provided insight into of the total litter loading to local
retail stores located within or doing consumer behavior change in receiving waters by municipal
business within the City limits. It prohibits response to the ordinance. The City stormwater.
single-use plastic bags and allows for also conducts random surveys of Since Single-Use Carryout Bag
the sale of recycled content paper stores to determine retailer Ordinance implementation, positive
bags for a minimum price. compliance rates. impacts have been documented in
Enforcement is conducted through a In addition to evaluation methods creek, neighborhood, and storm drain
complaint-based program which conducted by the City, the City conditions:
entails contacting and/or conducting participated in a countywide study in • In creek and river litter surveys single-
field inspections of businesses upon FY 15-16 to characterize trash in full use plastic bags have shown a 78%
receipt of complaints through email or capture systems. The study reduction from 9.2% of total litter pre-
phone. conducted by SCVURPPP was ban to 2.0% of total litter post-ban.
intended to assist Santa Clara Valley • Visual surveys conducted in FY 16-17
Dominant Trash Sources and Types: at retail locations indicate a 90%
Permittees in determining the current
Pedestrian Litter, Vehicles, & reduction in the average use of
levels of litter-prone items (i.e., single-
Inadequate Container Management; single-use bags, and an increase in
use bags and EPS food ware) in
Single-Use Carryout Bags reusable bag usage from 3.1% pre-
stormwater and evaluate whether
these levels have changed since ordinance to 47% post-ordinance.
ordinances prohibiting the Visual surveys are conducted on a
distribution of these items were put semi-annual basis and this data will
into effect. continue to be incorporated on an
on-going basis.
For additional details on the study
• Field observations were conducted
design and methods, see the
by Watershed Enforcement staff in
SCVURPPP FY 15-16 Annual Report:
May and June of 2017 at 85 retail
http://www.scvurppp-
businesses. None of the businesses
w2k.com/pdfs/1516/SCVURPPP_2015-
were providing single use plastic
10-13

Action Targeted
16_MRP_AR.pdf – Section 10 Trash carry out bags, as also observed in
Controls. 2015 and 2016. Most of the
businesses, 85%, were supplying a
compliant carry out bag, with 47%
supplying paper bags and 38%
supplying thick reusable compliant
bags.
• Pre- and post-ordinance
characterization of trash in full trash
capture systems in the City (via the
SCVURPPP Study) determined that
69% fewer single-use bags were
observed in stormwater after the
ordinance went into effect. For
additional details on results of the
study, see the SCVURPPP FY 15-16
Annual Report:
http://www.scvurppp-
16_MRP_AR.pdf – Section 10 Trash
Controls.
Based on the results of these
studies/surveys and the associated
multiple lines of evidence, the City
estimates an approximate 70%
reduction in the number of single-use
bags in stormwater, which equates to a
6% (i.e., 70% x 8%) reduction of trash
discharged from the City’s stormwater
conveyance system.
Foam Control Measure Description: In May The City monitors the prevalence of According to the BASMAA “San 4.4%
Food Francisco Bay Area Stormwater Trash
2010, the City adopted an foam cups and containers at creek
Container Generation Rates” report finalized June
administrative policy prohibiting food cleanups and will continue to gather
(EPS)
vendors from distributing polystyrene this data to try to ascertain 20, 2014, EPS food service ware was
Ordinance
foam food and beverage ware at ordinance effectiveness. estimated to contribute about 6% of the
large events on City-owned property.
10-14

Action Targeted
This policy prohibited the use of On January 1, 2015, the second total litter loading to local receiving
polystyrene foam food ware at large phase of the ordinance was waters by municipal stormwater.
(1,000+ people in attendance) events implemented and the City began
Since the adoption of the Foam Food
including festivals, concerts, or fairs working with restaurants that were
Container Ordinance, positive impacts
held on City streets. reported to be out of compliance
have been documented in
with the ordinance through an
On April 24, 2012 City Council neighborhoods and storm drain
outreach and education based
approved an amendment to the City’s conditions:
approach. Ordinance enforcement
Environmental Preferable Procurement • Since full implementation of the
is through a complaint-based
(EPP) Policy (http://www.sanJosé ordinance, staff has responded to
program which entails contacting
ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3862) about 80 complaints of non-
and/or conducting field inspections
to provide guidelines for the prohibition compliance and continue to provide
of businesses upon receipt of
on the purchase of expanded education and enforcement to food
complaints through email or phone.
polystyrene (EPS) foam food ware. The service establishments. In FY 16-17,
new policy incorporates prohibitions on On September 5, 2015, the City enforcement action was taken on 54
purchases of EPS foam food ware into Council adopted a schedule of fines food vendors remaining out of
the City’s established EPP policy. The through Resolution No. 77163 which compliance during routine FOG
EPP policy language covers all City included a fine of up to $500 which inspections.
facilities and the use of City funds could be levied on restaurants for
• The City’s EPS Ordinance
regarding the purchase of food service non-compliance. Beginning in
enforcement program conducted
ware containers and take-out food December 2015, ordinance
stratified, randomly selected field
packaged in containers made from enforcement was integrated into the
surveys in June 2017. Surveys were
EPS such as cups, plates, and bowls. Fats, Oil, and Grease (FOG) Control
conducted to assess whether food
Inspection Program. In June
On September 10, 2013 the San José service establishments (FSEs) were
2016, the City streamlined the
City Council adopted a Foam Food generally aware of and complying
municipal code through Resolution
Container Ordinance. The ordinance with the EPS Ordinance. Of the 297
No. 29746 by removing older,
(http://sanJosé FSEs observed, 82% were using
outdated language and adding a
ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/31718 , compliant food containers, up from
$500 administrative citation for
which prohibits the distribution of foam 79% in 2016. However, only 55% FSEs
violations. To date, no citations have
food ware products, took effect were aware of the ordinance, the
been issued.
January 1, 2014 for multi-state same percentage observed in 2016.
restaurants and January 1, 2015 for all In addition to evaluation methods These results indicate additional
remaining food vendors in San José. conducted by the City, the City outreach would likely increase
participated in a countywide study in ordinance compliance.
Dominant Trash Sources and Types: FY 15-16 to characterize trash in full • In FY 16-17, the City drafted an EPS
Pedestrian Litter, Vehicles, and
capture systems. The study Outreach Plan to increase
conducted by SCVURPPP was awareness of the ban via targeted
intended to assist Santa Clara Valley mass outreach. Outreach tactics will
10-15

Action Targeted
Permittees in determining the current focus on mobile and street food
levels of litter-prone items (i.e., single- vendors and non-multi-state
use bags and EPS food ware) in restaurants identified in a June 2016
stormwater and evaluate whether compliance survey, with mass
these levels have changed since outreach to all food service
ordinances prohibiting the establishments. Tactics included
distribution of these items were put webpage updates, letter to food
into effect. For additional details on service establishments, social media
the study design and methods, see posts, knock and talks and
the SCVURPPP FY 15-16 Annual presentations.
Report: http://www.scvurppp- • Pre- and post-ordinance
w2k.com/pdfs/1516/SCVURPPP_2015- characterization of trash in full trash
16_MRP_AR.pdf – Section 10 Trash capture systems in the City (via the
Controls. SCVURPPP Study) determined that
73% less EPS food service ware was
observed in stormwater after the
ordinance went into effect. For
additional details on results of the
study, see the SCVURPPP FY 15-16
Annual Report: http://www.scvurppp-
16_MRP_AR.pdf– Section 10 Trash
Controls.
Based on the results of these
studies/surveys and the associated
multiple lines of evidence, the City
estimates an approximate 73%
reduction in the amount of EPS food
service ware in stormwater, which
equates to a 4.4% (i.e., 73% x 6%)
reduction of trash discharged from the
City’s stormwater conveyance system.
10-16
C.10.c ► Trash Hot Spot Cleanups

Provide the FY 16-17 cleanup date and volume of trash removed during each MRP-required Trash Hot Spot cleanup during each fiscal year
listed. Indicate whether the site was a new site in FY 16-17.
New Site in FY 16-17 Volume of Trash Removed (cubic yards)

Trash Hot Spot FY 16-17 Cleanup
(Y/N) Date(s) FY 2012-13 FY 2013-14 FY 2014-15 FY 2015-16 FY 2016-17
SJC01
N 1.0 0.3 1.6 * *
Penitencia Creek at Piedmont Rd.
SJC01a
Coyote Creek u/s and d/s of E. N 7/6/2016 * * * 8.3 6.2
Brokaw Rd.
SJC02
N 6/8/2016 8.2 * 5.5 5.0 1.9
Coyote Creek/Watson Park u/s 101
SJC02a
Thompson Creek downstream of N * 3.5 * * *
Quimby Rd.
SJC03
Coyote Creek/Watson Park d/s N 6/15/2016 8.6 * 6.2 6.1 3.1
confluence
SJC03a
Upper Silver Creek at Silver Creek N * 0.9 * * *
Linear Park
SJC04
Lower Silver Creek, at east end of N 1.2 1.1 1.4 * *
Plata Arroyo Park
SJC04a
N 7/6/2016 * * * 16.7 4.3
Coyote Creek u/s of Ridder Park Dr.
SJC05
N 1.5 1.9 1.7 * *
Lower Silver Creek at Call de Plata
SJC05a
Coyote Creek d/s of Old Oakland N 6/29/2016 * * * 14.1 11.0
Rd.
SJC06 N 2.0 4.7 1.5 * *
10-17

Thompson Creek at Quimby Creek
confluence
SJC06a
Coyote Creek u/s of Old Oakland N 6/22/2016 * * * 27.6 17.7
Rd. (Corie Ct.)
SJC07
Coyote Creek d/s of Santa Clara N 6/1/2016 10.0 * 14.9 4.5 4.1
St.
SJC07a
Guadalupe River at Old Almaden N * 3.4 * * *
Rd.
SJC08
Coyote Creek d/s of 300' Santa N 6/1/2016 3.1 2.2 4.8 4.7 4.3
Clara St.
SJC09
N 3.1 4.1 1.4 * *
Coyote Creek u/s William St.
SJC09a
Coyote Creek u/s of SJC06a at N 8/3/2016 * * * 6.2 15.8
Corie Ct
SJC10
Coyote Creek, u/s and d/s of Story N 7/20/2016 2.6 * * 5.4 4.2
Rd. bridge
SJC10a
Thompson Creek, at Keaton Loop N * 3.2 4.6 * *
u/s and d/s pedestrian bridge
SJC11
N 2.5 3.8 1.7 * *
Coyote Creek at Kelley Park
SJC11a
Coyote Creek at Watson N 6/15/2016 * * * 5.8 8.1
Park/Mabury d/s of 101
SJC12
N 9/21/2016 7.6 6.2 8.1 7.0 6.0
Coyote Creek at Phelan/Roberts
SJC13 N 9/17/2016 14.3 5.4 12.7 4.5 7.1
10-18

Coyote Creek/Singleton
SJC14a
N 10/5/2016 2.7 4.1 1.4 * 4.8
Guadalupe River u/s of Skyport Dr.
SJC14b
Coyote Creek d/s of SJC 10 at N 7/20/2016 * * * 3.0 2.7
Story Rd.
SJC15
Guadalupe River d/s of W. N 8/24/2016 5.5 9.1 4.0 4.9 2.8
Hedding St.
SJC16
N 9/14/2016 3.1 1.4 1.4 4.0 0.4
Guadalupe River u/s 880
SJC17a
Coyote Creek at Wool Creek, N * * * 6.8 *
behind Shirakawa Elementary
School
SJC17
Guadalupe River north of Coleman N 3.4 1.5 1.7 * *
Ave. at flood channel pedestrian
bridge
SJC18
N 8/24/2016 6.0 6.2 4.2 0.7 3.6
Guadalupe River 300' u/s W. Taylor
SJC19 Coyote Creek u/s and d/s
N 5/25/2016 * * * 51.0 10.6
of Tully Rd.
SJC19
Guadalupe River downstream of N 7.7 3.4 0.5 * *
W. Taylor St.
SJC20a
Coyote Creek u/s and d/s of N 8/17/2016 * * * 3.0 5.9
Umbarger Rd.
SJC20
Guadalupe River north of W. Taylor N 1.5 1.4 0.3 * *
St. at flood channel pedestrian
bridge
10-19

SJC21
Guadalupe River downstream of N 3.2 7.8 1.7 * *
W. Hedding St.
SJC21a
Coyote Creek u/s and d/s of N 8/27/2016 * * * 16.4 3.2
Capitol Expwy.
SJC22
Guadalupe River d/s Coleman N 9/7/2016 5.0 2.7 1.3 2.3 0.7
Ave.
SJC23
Los Gatos Creek d/s W. Santa N 8/10/2016 6.8 1.8 5.9 7.1 1.5
Clara St.
SJC24
Guadalupe River confluence Los N 8/10/2016 4.4 1.4 1.5 17.5 1.8
Gatos Creek at Arena Green
SJC25a
N 2.95 4.15 0.3
Guadalupe River d/s of Skyport Dr.
SJC25b
Coyote Creek u/s of SJC13 at N 8/31/2016 * * * 11.0 6.1
Singleton Rd.
SJC26
Guadalupe River at W. San Carlos N 7/27/2016 3.0 1.7 2.6 2.5 1.0
d/s to Park Ave.
SJC27
10/24/201
Guadalupe River at Woz Way u/s N 2.3 2.8 4.0 3.6 2.0
6
280
SJC28
Guadalupe River next to CDM, u/s N 7/13/2016 4.2 1.8 6.1 1.3 1.0
and d/s of pedestrian bridge
SJC29
N 7/13/2016 1.8 2.2 4.2 2.2 4.3
Guadalupe River at Woz Way d/s
SJC30 Guadalupe u/s and d/s W.
N 5/18/2016 7.0 3.5 12.1 8.2 6.5
Virginia
10-20

SJC31
Guadalupe u/s and d/s W. Alma N 10/5/2016 6.5 4.2 18.0 7.6 3.5
Ave.
SJC32
New Chicago Marsh, Spreckles N 9/28/2016 11.4 5.3 18.9 1.4 0.5
Ave.
* Indicates a site that was not cleaned during the year(s) due to safety issues.
10-21
C.10.d ►Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan

Provide descriptions of significant revisions made to your Long-term Trash Load Reduction Plan submitted to the Water Board in February 2014.
Describe significant changes made to primary or secondary trash management areas (TMA), baseline trash generation maps, control measures, or
time schedules identified in your plan. Indicate whether your baseline trash generation map was revised and if so what information was collected
to support the revision. If your baseline trash generation map was revised, attach it to your Annual Report.
Associated
Description of Significant Revision
TMA
Revisions Made in FY 13-14
Update of trash generation rates from moderate to low for areas in north San José based on visual assessments and local
knowledge. This area includes the ‘clean tech’ area roughly bordered by Tasman Drive, Junction Avenue, Brokaw Avenue, and X
Guadalupe River as well as a mobile home park.
Update of trash generation rate from moderate to low for the Kaiser San José campus in south San José based on visual O
observations.
Update of trash generation rate from moderate to low for light industrial area north of Silver Creek Valley Road surrounding P
Hellyer Avenue based on visual assessments.
Update of trash generation rate from moderate to low for Hitachi campus (gated, secured private property). N
Update of secondary designations for TMA 1, which includes downtown San José. Previously the secondary divisions were
based on geography (west, east, and central). Downtown parcels are now subdivided based on trash control measure 1
implementation. Parcels that are part of the downtown Property Based Improvement District that are serviced by Groundwerx,
provides enhanced trash control services, are designated by the ‘1P’ subdivision. Remaining parcels in the larger business
improvement district remain as TMA 1.
Update of trash generation rate from moderate to low for Alum Rock Park in the east foothills of San José based on local A
knowledge.
Modification of trash generation categories based on preliminary results of on land assessments. 9
Modification of trash generation categories based on preliminary results of on land assessments. 13
Modification of trash generation categories based on preliminary results of on land assessments. T
In FY 14-15, the City conducted a preliminary analysis of trash generation in all TMAs that was originally depicted on Trash
Generation Maps included in the City’s Long-Term Trash Load Reduction Plan using a combination of local knowledge and field
observations. Google Street View applications and On-land Visual Assessments were used to reevaluate baseline trash
All TMAs
generation. Trash generation categories were reclassified for areas where information indicated that errors had occurred during
initial/preliminary trash generation category assignments. Reclassifications to trash generation categories were used for the
purposes of calculating baseline (2009) trash generation included in this report (i.e., as an input parameter to the formula used
to calculate load reductions reported in section C.10.d). Additional reclassifications may occur in FY 15-16, as a result of the
10-22
Associated
Description of Significant Revision
TMA
City’s efforts to make the Baseline Trash Generation Map as accurate as possible. The City’s final map will be submitted
consistent with the schedule included in the reissued MRP, tentatively set for adoption in late 2015.
Also, after programming portions of three TMAs, the programmed areas were split off and renamed as separate TMAs. TMAs 8ST
and 8W are subareas of the City’s business districts where public litter cans were added. A third TMA, 8 SR Pilot, was created to
evaluate the results of a business engagement pilot that commenced in FY 14-15 and will be completed in FY 15-16. The
addition of these 3 new areas raised the total number of TMAs in San José from 47 to 50.
In FY 15-16, consistent with all MRP Permittees, all public K-12 schools, college and university parcels were made non-
jurisdictional on the City’s baseline trash generation maps. Under California Government Code Sections 4450 through 4461, the
construction, modification, or alternation of facilities and/or structures on these parcels are under the jurisdiction of the
B
California Division of State Architect and not the City. The public right-of-way (e.g., streets and sidewalks) surrounding these
parcels remain as jurisdictional on the City’s baseline trash generation maps. Revised maps that incorporate these revisions are
included in City’s supplement to its Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan and Assessment Strategy.
The City identified programming options for all remaining TMAs. All TMAs
In FY 16-17, the City reconfigured its TMAs to simplify efforts to implement trash control measures. The number of TMAs in San José
has been condensed from over 50 TMAs to 13 TMAs. The new TMAs are included in the Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan and All TMAs
Assessment Strategy, 2017 Update in Appendix 10-3.
10-23
C.10.e. ► Trash Reduction Offsets (Optional)

Provide a summary description of each offset program implemented, the volume of trash removed, and the offset claimed in FY 16-17. Also, for
additional creek and shoreline cleanups, describe the number and frequency of cleanups conducted, and the locations and cleanup dates.
For direct discharge control programs approved by the Water Board Executive Officer, also describe the results of the assessments conducted
in receiving waters to demonstrate the effectiveness of the control program. Include an Appendix that provides the calculations and data used
to determine the trash reduction offset.
Volume of Trash (CY) Offset
Offset Program Summary Description of Actions and Assessment Results Removed/Controlled (% Jurisdiction-
in FY 16-17 wide Reduction)
In addition to cleanup of the 32 required hot spots, the City removed 1,735 cubic 1,735 10%
Additional
yards (151 tons) of trash from waterways in FY 16-17 through the combined
Creek and
Shoreline
efforts of partner organizations including Downtown Streets Team (DST), South
Cleanups Bay Clean Creeks Coalition (SBCCC), and Keep Coyote Creek Beautiful (KCCB).
(Max 10% Offset) The locations, dates, and volumes of trash removed are detailed in the table in
Appendix 10-4.
The City continued its partnership with DST to conduct creek cleanups and serve
homeless persons or persons at risk of homelessness. In FY 16-17, DST focused their
cleanup efforts along the City’s Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Focus
Zones, which includes reaches of Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River, and Los
Gatos Creek. DST coordinated with the City’s Homeless Response Team to
conduct cleanups after encampment abatements took place. In FY 16-17, DST
removed 1,631 cubic yards (129 tons) of trash and debris from San José’s creeks,
of which 1,285 cubic yards (111 tons) was attributed from sites cleaned at least
twice, (these totals did not contribute to the Direct Discharge offset credit). DST
housed 11 and employed 12 individuals from the creek cleanup crew.
In FY 16-17, The City received a $50,000 grant from the Cities of Service Bay Area
Impact Volunteer Program to fund South Bay Clean Creeks Coalition. The
organization implemented its Team 222 Model to recruit volunteers and conduct
creek cleanups along the Guadalupe River. Two-hour cleanups were
conducted on the second Saturday of every other month. More than 280
volunteers cleaned 2.5 miles of the Guadalupe River and removed 127 cubic
yards (11 tons) of trash.
Furthermore, in FY 16-17, KCCB and SBCCC conducted a total of 49 cleanups

where 2,474 volunteers removed 525 cubic yards (46 tons) of trash from San
José’s creeks (this includes the 11 tons collected through SBCCC’s Cities of
10-24

Service Grant). Of this total, 450 cubic yards (39 tons) was attributed from sites
cleaned twice.
Using the formula provided in section C.10.e.i, the total volume of trash
removed, 1,735 cubic yards (151 tons), yields a 34.2% trash load reduction offset.
The permit includes a ten percent maximum offset cap, so the City will claim
only 10%.
The City submitted its Direct Discharge Trash Control Program for approval by the 6,697 15%
Direct Trash Water Board Executive Officer on February 1, 2016. A supplement to the plan
Discharge was subsequently submitted on May 27, 2016. Approval to claim up to fifteen
Controls
percent offset credit was received on August 3, 2016.
(Max 15% Offset)
The City has invested significant resources to develop and implement a

comprehensive program to address homelessness and the associated
environmental, safety, health, and legal issues created by a large homeless
population. The four phase Direct Discharge Trash Control Program coordinates
elements that address the direct deposit of trash from homeless individuals living
adjacent to creeks. These efforts are concentrated in three focus zones and
three project areas, to maximize effectiveness and progress, though program
elements are also deployed as available along the entire stretches of the major
San José waterways.
In FY 16-17, 6,697 cubic yards (581 tons) of trash was removed by the combined
efforts of the Homeless Response Team (HRT) and the Watershed Protection
Team (WPT) which represent Phases two and four of the program. The locations,
dates, and volumes of trash removed and maps depicting progress are included
in Appendix 10-5.
During the Program’s first year of implementation, the City experienced several
challenges and learned valuable lessons relating to data collection, monitoring,
field safety, and interdepartmental coordination. Moreover, the City and its
partners recognize and continue to address issues such as the diverse
circumstance of the homeless population and the lack of resources to prevent
re-encampment. Despite these challenges, staff has confidence that this
program helps marry the City's trash reduction requirements with the City's goal
to end homelessness. Thus far, the City has seen success with aligning
10-25

departmental goals, ensuring all departments are invested in the program, and
developing standard operating procedures for field safety.
Moving forward, the City plans to focus on enforcement and bolster its
partnerships with organizations such as Downtown Streets Team, Keep Coyote
Creek Beautiful, and South Bay Clean Creeks Coalition. The City has made
recommendations on the required performance metrics that will help measure
the success of the program. See Appendix 10-6 for more information.
Using the formula provided in section C.10.e.i, the total volume removed, 6,697
cubic yards (581 tons), yields a 132% trash load reduction offset. The permit
allows a 15% maximum offset cap, so the City will claim only 15%.
10-26
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.11 – Mercury Controls
Section 11 - Provision C.11 Mercury Controls
C.11.a ► Implement Control Measures to Achieve Mercury Load Reductions

C.11.b ► Assess Mercury Load Reductions from Stormwater
The City is a direct, active participant in regional efforts to understand and control stormwater inputs of mercury and PCBs to the Bay. This year
the City participated on the BASMAA Monitoring and Pollutants of Concern Committee and Clean Watersheds for a Clean Bay (CW4CB)
workgroups. The EPA-funded CW4CB project has supported implementation of multiple provisions under C.11 and C.12 of the previous MRP,
including on-land investigations and abatement, enhanced sediment management, and evaluation of on-site stormwater treatment via retrofit.
Many of the efforts under CW4CB have been carried out at least partially within San José. Businesses in the Leo Avenue drainage area were
included in a sediment source ID project; a hydrodynamic separator installed mainly to capture trash was tested for its performance for capturing
mercury and PCB-containing sediment; and San José also participated in a region-wide study of the effectiveness of enhanced street sweeping
for the control of PCBs and mercury.
This year, City stormwater industrial inspection staff participated in source identification efforts within additional San José Watershed
Management Areas by facilitating additional inspections and sampling. Potential source properties identified through this process will be
evaluated for possible abatement and referral to the Water Board.
See the Program’s FY 2016-17 Annual Report for:
• Documentation of mercury control measures implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area for which load reductions will be reported
and the associated management areas;
• A description of how the BASMAA Interim Accounting Methodology69 was used to calculate the mercury load reduced by each control
measure implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area and the calculation results (i.e., the estimated mercury load reduced by each
control measure); and
• Supporting data and information necessary to substantiate the load reduction estimates.
C.11.c ► Plan and Implement Green Infrastructure to Reduce Mercury Loads

If the regional or countywide mercury load reductions required by this sub-provision via Green Infrastructure by
the end of the permit term are not met, will Permittees in your county use the default population-based method X Yes No
to calculate the portion of the countywide load reduction required of each Permittee?
69BASMAA 2017. Interim Accounting Methodology for TMDL Loads Reduced, Version 1.0. Prepared for BASMAA by Geosyntec Consultants and EOA,
Inc., September 19, 2016.
11-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.11 – Mercury Controls
C.11.e ► Implement a Risk Reduction Program

A summary of Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the C.11 Mercury Controls section of the Program’s FY
2016-17 Annual Report and/or a BASMAA regional report.
11-2
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.12 – PCBs Controls
Section 12 - Provision C.12 PCBs Controls
C.12.a ► Implement Control Measures to Achieve PCBs Load Reductions

C.12.b ► Assess PCBs Load Reductions from Stormwater
The City is a direct, active participant in regional efforts to understand and control stormwater inputs of mercury and PCBs to the Bay. This year
the City participated on the BASMAA Monitoring and Pollutants of Concern Committee and Clean Watersheds for a Clean Bay (CW4CB)
workgroups. The EPA-funded CW4CB project has supported implementation of multiple provisions under C.11 and C.12, including on-land
investigations and abatement, enhanced sediment management, and evaluation of on-site stormwater treatment via retrofit. Many of the
efforts under CW4CB have been carried out at least partially within San José. Businesses in the Leo Avenue drainage area were included in a
sediment source ID project; a hydrodynamic separator installed mainly to capture trash was tested for its performance for capturing mercury
and PCB-containing sediment; and San José also participated in a region-wide study of the effectiveness of enhanced street sweeping for the
control of PCBs and mercury. As a result of last year’s sediment source ID efforts, the Water Board issued Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR) a Clean
Water Act section 13267 letter requiring additional PCB information through soil sampling on its right of way and in the City’s right of way in the
Leo Avenue cul-de-sac. City staff coordinated with the Water Board and UPRR to facilitate sampling in the public right of way. This year, City
stormwater inspection staff also participated in source identification activities within additional San José Watershed Management Areas by
facilitating inspection and sampling. These potential source properties will be evaluated for abatement opportunities and referral to the Water
Board if necessary.
See the Program’s FY 2016-17 Annual Report for:
• More detailed documentation of PCBs management areas and control measures implemented in San José for which load reductions
will be reported;
• A description of how the BASMAA Interim Accounting Methodology70 was used to calculate the PCBs load reduced by each control
measure implemented in our agency’s jurisdictional area and the calculation results (i.e., the estimated PCBs load reduced by each
control measure); and
• Supporting data and information necessary to substantiate the load reduction estimates.
If the regional and countywide PCBs load reductions required by C.12.a are not met, will Permittees in your
county use the default population-based method to calculate the portion of the countywide load reduction X Yes No
required of each Permittee?
70BASMAA 2017. Interim Accounting Methodology for TMDL Loads Reduced, Version 1.0. Prepared for BASMAA by Geosyntec Consultants and EOA,
Inc., September 19, 2016.
12-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.12 – PCBs Controls
C.12.f ►Manage PCB-Containing Materials and Wastes During

Building Demolition Activities So That PCBs Do Not Enter Municipal
Storm Drains
A summary of Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision is included in the C.12 PCBs Controls section of Program’s FY 2016-17
Annual Report and/or a BASMAA regional report.
Does your agency plan to seek exemption from this requirement? Yes X No
C.12.g.►Fate and Transport Study of PCBs: Urban Runoff Impact on

San Francisco Bay Margins
A summary of Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision are included in the C.12 PCBs Controls section of the Program’s FY
2016-17 Annual Report and/or a BASMAA regional report.
C.12.h ►Implement a Risk Reduction Program
A summary of Program and regional accomplishments for this sub-provision is included in the C.12 PCBs Controls section of the Program’s FY 2016-
17 Annual Report and/or a BASMAA regional report.
12-2
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.13 – Copper Controls
Section 13 - Provision C.13 Copper Controls
C.13.a.iii ►Manage Waste Generated from Cleaning and

Treating of Copper Architectural Features
Provide summaries of permitting and enforcement activities to manage waste generated from cleaning and treating of copper architectural
features, including copper roofs, during construction and post-construction.
Summary:
San José has information online for property owners on requirements and BMPs related to discharge of water used in the installation, cleaning,
treating or washing of architectural copper (http://stormwater.sanjoseca.gov/planning/stormwater//documents/CuroofBMPs_final2.pdf).
Additionally, in FY 12-13 the City modified Title 17 (Buildings and Construction – Title 17.72.530) of the Municipal Code to require all new single-
family homes including those with architectural copper to direct all roof runoff to landscaped areas unless technically infeasible.
The City of San José’s Stormwater Construction Inspection Program conducts monthly inspection at construction sites according to C.6
requirements. Sites are not allowed to discharge waste water to the MS4. Any violation identified during stormwater construction inspection are
subject to enforcement action according to the C.6 ERP. Construction sites not included in the Construction Inspection Program and post-
construction are covered through the IDDE program following the C.5 ERP. In FY 16-17, there was no violation relating to the cleaning and
treating of copper architectural features identified through the Construction Program and the IDDE Program.
C.13.b.iii ►Manage Discharges from Pools, Spas, and Fountains

that Contain Copper-Based Chemicals
Provide summaries of any enforcement activities related to copper-containing discharges from pools, spas, and fountains.
Summary:
The City of San José utilizes the industrial and commercial inspection program and IDDE program for enforcement. During FY 16-17, the City
received 7 complaints relating to discharges to the City’s MS4 from a pool, spa, or fountain. 1 Correction Notice, 1 Official Warning Notice, and 5
Administrative Citation Referrals were issued with one escalated to an Administrative Citation. Enforcement actions were taken according to the
IDDE ERP and responsible parties were educated and given relevant BMPs.
In FY 16-17, there were no enforcement actions related to copper-containing discharges from pools, spas, and fountains during an IND
Inspection.
13-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.13 – Copper Controls
C.13.c.iii ►Industrial Sources Copper Reduction Results

Based upon inspection activities conducted under Provision C.4, highlight copper reduction results achieved among the facilities identified as
potential users or sources of copper, facilities inspected, and BMPs addressed.
Summary:
The City previously reviewed and identified by SIC (Standard Industrial Classification) code, businesses likely to use copper or have sources of
copper, and added these facilities to the City’s Business Inspection Inventory. A fact sheet regarding rooftop sources of copper pollution and the
SCVURPPP “Requirements for Copper Roofs and Other Architectural Copper” is available for distribution to select facilities. The City also
continued to implement its “NOI Filers” project which is aimed to increase awareness among industrial facilities of their obligations under the
State’s General Industrial Activities Stormwater Permit (GIASP) by providing them with BMPs and information alerting them to the requirements.
On February 14, 2017 the City’s Commercial/Industrial Stormwater Inspection Group (IND) attended a training event on industrial copper sources
and pollution prevention. The training reviewed industry types with elevated levels of copper, typical sources of copper pollution at facilities,
effects of copper on the environment, and typical BMPs to reduce copper in stormwater such as source control, sweeping, and filtration. The
City continues to include businesses with SIC codes identified as having a higher potential to contribute copper to stormwater in its annual
inspection plan. All of these business types are subject to the General Permit, and all new businesses within this group are inspected within one
year.
13-2
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.14 – PBDE, Legacy Pesticides and Selenium Controls
Section 14 – Provision C.14 PBDE, Legacy Pesticides and Selenium Controls
Note: There are no reporting requirements in the FY 16-17 Annual Report for Section C.14.
SECTION I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
14-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.14 – PBDE, Legacy Pesticides and Selenium Controls
14-2
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges
Section 15 -Provision C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges
C.15.b.vi.(2) ► Irrigation Water, Landscape Irrigation, and Lawn

or Garden Watering
Provide implementation summaries of the required BMPs to promote measures that minimize runoff and pollutant loading from excess irrigation.
Generally the categories are:
• Promote conservation programs
• Promote outreach for less toxic pest control and landscape management
• Promote use of drought tolerant and native vegetation
• Promote outreach messages to encourage appropriate watering/irrigation practices
• Implement Illicit Discharge Enforcement Response Plan for ongoing, large volume landscape irrigation runoff.
Summary:
The City, Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), and San José water service providers requested residents and businesses reduce water use
by 30% during the drought. San José and Santa Clara County residents exceeded the State’s goal of 20% and reduced its use by 27%. Between
January and December 2016, San José residents continued to save a total of 25%. Beginning March 2017, the mandatory call for 20% reduction
in water ended; however, residents were encouraged to continue following the San José Municipal Code conservation rules and local water
service provider’s recommendations to make conservation a way of life. Between January and May 2017, San José city-wide water use savings
remains above the State target, at 25%. The City sponsored or participated in many conservation programs and outreach events, and
incorporates education and enforcement for ongoing large volume landscape irrigation runoff in its Illicit Discharge Enforcement Response Plan.
Conservation Programs:
Landscape Conversion
The San José Municipal Water System collaborates with the SCVWD to offer landscape rebates of up to $2000 to businesses and
residents who replace turf with drought tolerant landscaping. The District also offers rebates on irrigation upgrades. This year, City staff
also worked closely with Ecology Action and the SCVWD to select public sites appropriate for participation in the turf conversion
component of the WaterLink Grant available through the Department of Water Resources. A site at Independence High School (IHS)
was selected and will serve as a large-scale example of sustainable landscaping for residents in the neighborhood.
Waterwise House Calls

Muni Water residents can access a free indoor water use audit toolkit offered through the Water District. Residents use the toolkit to
assess their water use and look for leaks. Once they have completed the toolkit, they can receive the recommended water savings
devices from the District at no cost.
Watersmart
Muni Water residents can access a free indoor water use audit toolkit offered through the SCVWD. Residents use the toolkit to assess
their water use and look for leaks. Once they have completed the toolkit, they can receive the recommended water savings devices
from the District at no cost.
15-1
South Bay Green Gardens Website (Formerly Bay Area Ecogardens)

San José is an active member of the multi-agency work group of the Santa Clara County Recycling and Waste Commission Technical
Advisory Committee. The Committee pools resources to create and maintain a website with sustainable landscaping resources specific
to Santa Clara County. ESD staff contribute through site content development, maintenance, and technical support. The new site
(www.southbaygreengardens.org) is undergoing changes and a migration to Square Space, but will still include water conservation
tools such as a Water Calculator, irrigation fact sheets, sustainable garden design examples, supporting resources, and a calendar for
local hands-on sustainable landscaping workshops and events. New features include a blog post for related news and opportunities for
involvement, a list of self-tour demonstration sites for the public, and additional video links and trainings on sustainable landscaping
methods and techniques.
Less-toxic Pest Control and Landscape Management Outreach:

IPM Workshops
In partnership with the Bay Area Water Supply Water Conservation Agency, the City hosted eight IPM and water conservation
workshops at the Guadalupe Gardens Courtyard, the Nature’s Inspiration Gardens, and Fire Station #15. ESD also hosted three in-house
IPM and water conservation workshops at sites around the City. Staff distributed 164 environmental educational materials to 81
participants. Additionally, two large corporate group events were held with Samsung and Google, which were hosted in conjunction
with Hands-On Bay Area and the Guadalupe River Parks Conservancy. These events resulted in additional environmental outreach and
education to 285 volunteers.
Outreach Messages to Encourage Appropriate Watering/Irrigation Practices:

The following outreach was conducted announcing a new water conservation target of 20 Percent starting July 1, 2016. This target is
reduced from a previously set 30 percent target. Outreach also promoted:
• Water when it’s coolest, before 10 a.m. or after 8 p.m. when using a hand-held hose with automatic shut-off nozzle or drip irrigation
system.
• If using a sprinkler system, watering hours are the same, but there are designated days:
o Odd numbered addresses may water on Mondays, Thursdays, and Saturdays
o Even numbered addresses may water on Tuesdays, Fridays, and Sundays
• Never let water flow into gutters or streets
• Sweep sidewalks and driveways instead of hosing off with water
The above information was publicized through the following outreach:

• Issued a news release to local media outlets
• Distributed a newsletter article to City Council offices to use in their constituent communications, as well as sent to subscribers of
environmental notify-me messages.
• Posted an announcement on NextDoor, the community social media site to all San José residents
• Posted information with links on the City of San José homepage, and Environmental Services hot topics.
15-2
• Promoted water conservation messages at San José’s Christmas in the Park with a display along the Environmental Alley, stage and
public address announcements, and social media posts.
The San José community conserved 25 percent of its water use, above the 20 percent goal set by City Council in July 2016. By April 2017,
the state ended the drought emergency due to water conservation efforts and plentiful winter rain and snow. In March 2017, San José
City Council had already ended the citywide water shortage, however municipal code rules still remain in effect regardless of whether
in a drought (Chapter 15.10 of the Municipal Code). A press release was issued announcing the end of water saving targets for San
José. The following rules related to watering and irrigation practices are still in effect:
• Watering hours are before 10 a.m. and after 8 p.m., unless using a bucket or hose with shut-off nozzle
• Sprinklers cannot run more than 15 minutes per station per day
• No excessive water runoff
• Leaking or broken water pipes, and irrigation systems must be fixed within five working days
• No cleaning vehicles with a hose without a shutoff nozzle
• Commercial car washes must use water recycling equipment, a bucket and hand washing, or a hose with shut-off nozzle
In addition, water conservation messages were included in Christmas in the Park’s Environmental Alley displays, stage and PA
announcements, and posts on social media.
15-3
15-4
FY 2016 - 2017 Annual Report Glossary
Glossary
AC Acre
ACB Arterials, Commercials, and Bike Routes Street Sweeping
AHTG Ad-Hoc Task Group
ALP Anti-Litter Program
ARS Automatic Retractable Screen
AQMM Almaden Quicksilver Mining Museum
BASMAA Bay Area Stormwater Management Agency Association
BAWSCA Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency
BI Business Intelligence
BMP Best Management Practice
BYOB Bring Your Own Bag
CAB Chemical Advisory Board
CAI County Agricultural Inspector
CASQA California Stormwater Quality Association
CCAG Creek Connections Action Group
CCHC Clean Creeks, Healthy Communities
CBD Central Business District Street Sweeping
CDS Continuous Deflective Separator
CFD Community Facilities District
CM Curb Mile(s)
CPS Connector Pipe Screen
CRRA California Resource Recovery Association
DMA Drainage Management Area
DOT City of San José Department of Transportation
DPR Department of Pesticide Regulation
DST Downtown Streets Team
DU/AC Dwelling Units per Acre
EEDMS Electronic Enforcement Data Management System
EIC San José Environmental Innovation Center
EPA U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
G-1
EPPP Environmental Preferable Procurement Policy
EPS Expanded Polystyrene
ERP Enforcement Response Plan
ESD City of San José Environmental Services Department
FAR Floor Area Ratio
FB Facebook
Ft2 Square feet
FOG Fats, Oils, and Grease
FY Fiscal Year
H High Trash Generation
HDS Hydrodynamic Separator
HHW Household Hazardous Waste
HM Hydromodification Management
HOA Home Owner’s Association
HRT Homelessness Response Team
IDDE Illegal Discharge Detection and Elimination
IG Instagram
IPM Integrated Pest Management
L Low Trash Generation
LID Low Impact Development
M Moderate Trash Generation
MRP Municipal Regional Permit
NA Neighborhood Association
NBD Neighborhood Business District Street Sweeping
NOI Notice of Intent
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
O&M Operation and Maintenance
OWOW Our Water Our World
PBID Property Based Improvement District
PLC Public Litter Can
POC Pollutants of Concern
G-2
PRNS City of San José Department of Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Services
Program, The Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program
RSS Residential Street Sweeping Program
SCP Stormwater Control Plan
SCVURPPP Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program (the Program)
SCVWD Santa Clara Valley Water District
SDS Safety Data Sheets
SJSU San Jose State University
SOP Standard Operating Procedure
SPU PRNS Special Parks Unit
TAC Technical Advisory Committee
TCM Treatment Control Measure
TMA Trash Management Area(s)
TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load
VH Very High Trash Generation
VTA Valley Transit Authority
WMI Watershed Management Initiative (see SCBWMI)
WPT PRNS Watershed Protection Team
WSP Watershed Protection Division of ESD
WW Watershed Warrior
ZLI Santa Clara County Zero Litter Initiative
G-3
G-4
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report Appendix
Appendix
Section 3 – Provision C.3 New Development and Redevelopment
Appendix 3.1: C.3.e.v Special Projects
Section 4 – Provision C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls

Appendix 4.1: C.4.b.iii. Potential Facilities List
Appendix 4.2: C.4.d.iii.(2)(e) Facilities Requiring Coverage Under ICP but Have Not Filed
Section 5 – Provision C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

Appendix 5.1: C.5.c.iii Complaint and Spill Response Website Screenshot
Appendix 5.1: C.5.e.iii.(1)(c) List of Events with Possible Mobile Businesses
Appendix 5.1: C.5.e.iii.(1)(f)List of Countywide Mobile Businesses
Section 10 – Provision C.10 Trash Load Reduction

Appendix 10.1: C.10.f.i Changes between 2009 and FY 16-17 in Trash Generation by TMA as a result of
Full Capture Systems and Other Measures
Appendix 10.2: C.10.a.iii Installed and Planned Hydrodynamic Separator Systems
Appendix 10.3: C.10.f.i Clean Waterways, Healthy City: Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan and Assessment
Strategy 2017 Update
Appendix 10.4: C.10.f.viii Additional Creek and Shoreline Calculation and Cleanups
Appendix 10.5: C.10.f.ix Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Calculation and Cleanups
Appendix 10.6: C.10.e.ii Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Progress Report
Appendix 10.7: C.10.f.ii Baseline Trash Generation Maps
A-1
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report Appendix
A-2
FY 2016 - 2017 Annual Report Appendix 3.1
Provision C.3.e.v Special Projects
A-3
A-4
SOUTH SECOND STREET HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS (H15-021)
1. Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite LID Treatment
The current proposal of the project (based on revised plans dated 12/20/2016) was reviewed to
evaluate the possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was not
possible to treat the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented
below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The square-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist of
a new six-story, 91-room hotel on a 0.29 gross acre site. The hotel will have two levels of
covered parking, one below-grade and the other on the ground floor. The proposed building
footprints will occupy approximately 100% of the entire site. Areas of the site not covered by
the building will include a sixth-floor roof garden. The building will have a flat roof that will drain
entirely to a media filtration system.
The site consists of one DMA which accounts for 100% of the site and flows to a media filtration
system.
b. Self-Treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. As currently designed,
approximately 100% of the site will be covered by the hotel building and there will be no at-
grade self-treating or self-retaining areas due to the reduced setbacks.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. As currently designed, 100% of the site is
proposed to drain to a non-LID media filtration system.
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. As currently designed, the building’s roof and the sixth-floor
roof garden will drain to a media filtration system. The entire project site’s lot area will be
covered by permanent building structures and includes an underground and ground-floor
parking garage with associated ramps that preclude 100% LID treatment. Accessibility and
commercial frontage areas at the street level adds further space constraints for the installation
of LID treatment systems. Other space restrictions of the project site include mechanical
equipment (i.e. HVAC) for the hotel units and the building design that lacks an open podium
amenity structure, which can provide space for LID treatment of roof areas. As currently
designed, the project is utilizing all of its 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
2. Off-Site LID Treatment
Off-site LID treatment will not be used because the project proponent has not proposed to use another
site within the Guadalupe River watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site biotreatment
facilities to treat runoff for this project. A regional LID stormwater mitigation program is not available at
this time for the project to use in-lieu C.3 compliance.
A-5
740 WEST SAN CARLOS MIXED-USE (PD15-022/PDC14-032)
The current project proposal (initial plans dated 5/19/2015) was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of
providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat
approximately 44% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are
presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The primarily triangular-shaped project site is generally flat and
will consist of a single seven-story building with 95 apartment units on a 1.05 gross acre site.
Approximately 2,735 square feet of commercial area will be located on the ground-level.
There will be a two-story, above-grade parking garage within the interior of the first two levels
of the building. Areas of the site not covered by the building structure will include one podium-
level interior open common area on the second-floor with social and recreational areas and
at-grade pedestrian sidewalks and landscaping. Roof areas and the second-floor podium
common areas will be treated by both bioretention areas and a media filtration system, while
ground-floor frontage walkways will be treated by interceptor tree credits.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into six DMAs. Three of the DMAs, which
account for approximately 41% of the site, flow to bioretention areas. One of the DMAs, which
accounts for approximately 56% of the site, drains to a media filtration system. The remaining
two DMAs, which account for approximately 3% of the site, are treated through interceptor
tree credits.
impervious surface will be reduced by incorporating several areas of at-grade landscaping
that will all provide self-treatment. Approximately 44% of the site is proposed to drain to
bioretention areas and interceptor tree credits.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. As currently designed, approximately 41% of the
site is proposed to drain to LID treatment features (bioretention areas).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. Several areas of the building roof and the second-floor
podium will be treated by a media filtration system. Due to the density of the project, reduced
setbacks, public sidewalk, the parking garage under the podium, and infrastructure some
drainage areas cannot be treated using LID. The building footprint will occupy almost 79% of
the entire site, providing further space constraints for LID treatment systems. Insufficient
landscaping and technical constraints related to the density of the project preclude the use of
100% LID. As currently designed, the project is utilizing approximately 56% of its available 80%
LID treatment reduction credits.
A-6
SPARTA MIXED-USE (PD15-044)

The project (approved plans dated 9/20/2016) was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing
100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to pretreat approximately 30%
of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The L-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist of a
seven-story building with 86 multi-family dwelling units and 11,530 square feet of retail and
office space on a 0.63 gross acre site. The project will include two levels of above-grade
parking (under podium). The proposed building footprints will occupy approximately 90% of
the entire site. There will be residential courtyard amenity areas with containerized plantings
located on the third, fifth, and sixth floors of the podium structure, all surrounded on four sides
by the building. Other areas of the site not covered by the building structures include a second
floor bioretention area, ground-level walkways containing street trees and containerized
landscaping. The entire site will drain to a media filtration system. Roof drainage will be
collected and directed to three bioretention areas located on second and third floor common
areas for additional pretreatment.
The SCP will divide the site into four DMAs. Three of the DMAs, which account for
approximately 30% of the site, flow to bioretention areas prior to draining to the media filtration
system. The remaining DMA, which accounts for approximately 70% of the site, flows directly to
the media filtration system.
b. Self-Treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Impervious surface will be
reduced by incorporating three bioretention areas on the second and third floors and
courtyard landscaping on four levels of the building that will provide some self-treatment.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. Approximately 30% of the site will drain to
bioretention areas prior to non-LID treatment.
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The project will treat the entire site with a media filtration
system, but will provide pretreatment with bioretention areas. The bioretention areas will
provide roof area pretreatment and will be located on the second and third floor courtyards.
The fifth and sixth floor courtyards will be constructed with a wood framework that can only
support portable tree planters which will sit atop the floor level. If the building type were
changed to a concrete design for the purposes of LID treatment, the project would have
become financially infeasible. Installing LID treatment systems on the ground floor peripheries
of the project site’s building frontage would conflict with underground collection systems,
doorway landings, pedestrian pathways, and could cause structural problems due to the close
proximity of the building wall footings. The project’s large building footprint, lack of adequate
and available open space, and financial constraints preclude the project from providing 100%
LID treatment. The project is utilizing all of its 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-7
GATEWAY TOWER MIXED-USE (H15-047)
100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to pretreat approximately 53%
of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The irregularly-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist
of a single 25-story tower with up to 300 residential units and 5,000 square feet of ground-floor
commercial space on a 0.50 acre-site. There will be three levels of below-grade parking
throughout the tower footprint and four levels of covered parking (below the podium) located
only at the northern section of the property. The first floor also includes amenities, such as a San
José history exhibit, mailing and package rooms, a leasing office, and a lobby. The proposed
building footprint will occupy approximately 96% of the site. There will be outdoor patio decks
on the sixth and 24th floors. The entire site will drain to a media filtration system. Roof drainage
will be directed to raised, flow-through planter boxes on the sixth-floor outdoor common area
for additional pretreatment.
The SCP will divide the site into five DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which account for approximately
53% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes prior to draining to the media filtration
system. The remaining three DMAs, which account for approximately 47% of the site, flow
directly to the media filtration system.
b. Self-Treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Impervious surface will be
reduced by incorporating containerized landscaping on the sixth and 24th floor patio decks,
providing some self-treatment. Approximately 53% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas
will drain to flow-through planter boxes located on the sixth-floor patio deck.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. Approximately 53% of the site is proposed to
drain to flow-through planter boxes prior to non-LID treatment.
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The project will treat the entire site with a media filtration
system, but will provide pretreatment with flow-through planter boxes in feasible locations. The
flow-through planter boxes will be placed on the level six patio deck to accommodate roof
runoff from the levels above. However, the patio level landscaping will be level with the
podium, and therefore, cannot accommodate the required soil medium depth, due to
required ceiling heights in the level below. Also, portions of the top-level roof will not have
enough vertical change in elevation to drain via gravity to raised planters, when taking into
account minimum ceiling clearance and the narrow, elongated overall shape of the building.
Technical constraints such as limited areas for landscaping, internal roof drain minimum slope
requirements, and gravity pipe flow distances preclude the use of 100% LID features. The
project is utilizing all of its 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-8
RACE STREET HOUSING (PD15-047)
The City has deemed this project application incomplete (based on initial plans dated 9/29/2015). The
City’s Special Projects Worksheet and Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite and Offsite LID Treatment
Narrative were not included with the project submittal and will need to be submitted for review. The
project was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this
review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 21% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID
treatment. Although the applicant’s Special Projects Worksheet claims LID reduction credits of up to
80%, the City has determined that the project only qualifies for 45% of the credits. The revised plans will
be reviewed to confirm that the project is not treating runoff with non-LID facilities above the allowed
amount of LID reduction credit. The findings of this review are presented below.
a single large podium structure with one level of above-grade covered parking (under the
podium). The project will include 80 residential condominium units and approximately 12,000
square feet of commercial area on a 2.81 gross acre site. The proposed building footprint will
occupy approximately 58% of the entire site. Areas of the site not covered by the building
structure will include a podium-level interior open courtyard with pedestrian walkways,
recreation areas, raised planters, and synthetic lawn located above the parking garage.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into three DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which
account for approximately 21% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. The third DMA
drains to a media filtration system and accounts for approximately 79% of the site.
e. Self-Treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. The current plans
demonstrate that impervious surface areas will be reduced by incorporating several areas of
containerized landscaping on the exposed podium courtyard and ground-level plantings that
will also provide some self-treatment. Approximately 21% of the site’s runoff from roof areas will
drain to flow-through planter boxes.
b. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. As currently designed, 21% of the site will drain to
LID treatment facilities (flow-through planter boxes).
c. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The City’s 30-Day Review letter to the project applicant has
required submittal of the Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite and Offsite LID Treatment Narrative.
Prior to granting project approval with the proposed LID Treatment reduction credits the City
will first establish infeasibility of treating100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d
for the project’s drainage areas with LID treatment measures.
A-9
SJSC TOWERS MIXED-USE (SP17-009)
The project (approved plans dated 3/15/2017; converted from project number H15-062) was reviewed
to evaluate the possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was
possible to treat approximately 61% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this
review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The square-shaped project site is generally flat and will include
two 28-story towers with stepped-down flat roof designs connected by a podium common
amenities area on the fifth floor. One tower will have 298 condominium units and the other will
include 312 apartment units and ground-level retail and office space. A parking structure will sit
under the podium level, extending four levels above-grade and three levels below. Areas of
the site not covered by the building structures will include rooftop amenities such as outdoor
seating, pool, and spa areas. Additional areas not covered by the building structures include a
podium level terrace and at-grade pedestrian walkways.
The SCP will divide the site into three DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which account for approximately
61% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. The remaining DMA, which accounts for
approximately 39% of the site, flows to a media filtration system.
b. Self-Treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Impervious surface areas
will be reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized landscaping on the at-grade
frontage areas, podium level courtyards, and rooftop amenities that will provide some self-
treatment. Approximately 61% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas will drain to flow-
through planter boxes.
drain to LID treatment features (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. Approximately 61% of the site’s entire roof runoff will drain below
to raised flow-through planter boxes located on the fifth-floor podium deck. However, the runoff from
the podium deck level cannot be treated with LID. There will be insufficient depth due to the parking
level below. Moreover, there will be no landscaping proposed on the ground floor to treat the
podium deck hardscapes. The building frontages on the ground floor adjacent to the podium deck
hardscapes will have limited space for treatment due to retail storefront seating areas, doorway
landings, walkways necessary for access, and the underground garage. The project is utilizing 39% of
its 100% LID reduction credit.
A-10
STEVENS CREEK BOUTIQUE HOTEL (H16-010)
100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat 35% of the C.3.d
amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The primarily square-shaped project site is generally flat and will
consist of a 10-story, 175-room hotel with a ground-level restaurant, lounge, and administrative
office areas, all on a 0.54 gross acre site. The hotel will have four levels of above-grade
covered parking (above the ground floor and under the podium). Areas of the site not
covered by the building structures include a podium level courtyard on the fifth floor and
ground-level driveways and walkways. Courtyard areas and a majority of the building’s flat
roof drain to a media filtration system, while at-grade impervious driveways, walkways, and
partial roof areas will be conveyed to a bioretention area.
The SCP will divide the site into two DMAs. One of the DMAs, which accounts for 35% of the site,
drains to a bioretention area. The remaining DMA, will drain to a media filtration system and
accounts for 65% of the site.
b. Self-Treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Impervious surface areas
will be reduced by incorporating several areas of decorative landscape on the exposed
podium courtyard that will also provide some self-treatment. A bioretention area on the
ground floor will treat 35% of the site’s building roof areas and ground floor hardscape runoff.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. The project site will drain 35% of its runoff to LID a
treatment feature and facility (bioretention area).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. Courtyard areas and a majority of the building’s flat roof
drain to a media filtration system. Limited space, landscaping areas, costs, structural load
restrictions, and additional technical constraints preclude the project from providing 100% LID
treatment. The fifth-floor podium-level landscape cannot be used to meet the C.3.d. sizing
requirement due to unavailable vertical space for sufficient soil medium depth. Incorporating
LID treatment on the fifth-floor would also require cost-prohibitive measures, such as additional
structural support to account for the added weight of stormwater, plumbing for sub drainage,
and additional water proofing. Since the project site has limited landscape, treatment of
hardscape on the fifth-floor podium level is limited to the bioretention area on the ground floor
driveway. The project is utilizing all of its 65% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-11
RAIL YARD PLACE (H16-017)
current project proposal was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The
results of this review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 73% of the C.3.d amount of
runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
consist of one five-story building with 226,885 square feet of commercial space and three five-
story residential buildings with up to 476 units, all on a 10.63 gross acre site. The project will
include two levels of above-grade parking on the ground floor (under podium). The proposed
building footprint will occupy approximately 41% of the entire site. There will be plaza and
courtyard with landscaping, walkways, and pedestrian amenities on the podium structure
between each building and a riverfront park adjacent to the Guadalupe River. Other areas of
the site not covered by the building structures include roadways, driveways, and a bridge that
connects the buildings to the other side of the Guadalupe River. Plaza areas, courtyards,
driveways, and walkways drain to media filtration systems, while roof areas and other
courtyards and walkways will be conveyed to bioretention areas.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into 14 DMAs. Seven DMAs, which account
for approximately 54% of the site, flow to bioretention areas. Four DMAs, which account for
approximately 27% of the project site, drain to media filtration systems. One DMA, which
accounts for 14% of the project site, will be landscaping that will provide self-treatment. The
two remaining DMAs, which account for 5% of the project site, drain to self-retaining pervious
concrete areas.
b. Self-treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. As currently designed, 54%
of the site’s runoff from roof areas, courtyards, and walkways drain to bioretention areas.
Approximately 14% of the site is designated as landscaping that will provide self-treatment,
while 5% of the project site’s runoff drains to self-retaining pervious concrete areas.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. As currently designed, 54% of the site will drain to
LID treatment features and facilities (bioretention areas).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The City’s 30-Day Review letter to the project applicant has
will first establish infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in Provision C.3.d
A-12
CONNECTIONS: VILLAS ON THE PARK TRANSITIONARY HOUSING (CP16-014)
a six-story studio apartment-style building, totaling 84 dwelling units on a 0.35 gross acre site.
The project will include one level of above-grade parking on the ground floor (under podium).
There will be outdoor residential courtyard amenity areas for residents located on the second
floor of the podium structure that will be surrounded on four sides by the building and a
southerly corner located roof deck on the sixth floor. Other areas of the site not covered by the
building structure include required pedestrian access paths, landscaping, and an additional
outdoor courtyard located at the building frontage. Partial areas of the combined stepped
down, flat roofs and all at-grade impervious areas will drain to a media filtration system, while
the remaining roof areas will be treated by flow-through planter boxes on the second-floor
podium and the sixth-floor sky deck.
The SCP will divide the site into three DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which account for approximately
24% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. The remaining DMA, which accounts for
76% of the site, flows to a media filtration system.
b. Self-treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Impervious surface will be
reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized landscaping on the exposed podium
courtyard, sixth floor sky deck, and ground-level plantings that will also provide some self-
treatment. Approximately 24% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas will drain to flow-
drain to LID treatment features and facilities (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The DMAs draining to a media filtration system include roof
areas and ground-level required doorway landings and pedestrian access paths of travel to
the entrances near the rear of the site. The podium courtyard and roof deck will not have
enough space to accommodate LID treatment systems to treat the entire roof area. The
ground floor front entrance courtyard will be covered by the building roof, making LID
treatment infeasible in the area. The rest of the landscape located at the rear and sides of the
building will be used for other mechanical fixtures and the site’s retaining wall. There would not
be sufficient space to add C.3.d. sized LID treatment. Technical constraints and the project’s
72% building footprint preclude the use of100% LID treatment. The project is utilizing 76% of its
available 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-13
333 WEST SAN FERNANDO MIXED-USE (H16-018)
The project (approved plans dated 11/9//2016) was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The irregular-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist of
an 18-story building with approximately 700,000 square feet of office and retail space on a 2.53
gross acre site. The project will include five levels of above-grade interior parking and another
five levels of subgrade parking. There will be landscaping on courtyard, balcony, and terrace
areas for occupants located on the sixth, eighth, ninth, 10th, 13th, 14th , 16th, 17th , and 18th floors
scattered on each corner of the building. Other areas of the site not covered by the building
structures include the 19th floor roof area, the building frontage retail outdoor areas, landscape
tree planting buffers on the eastern edge of the property line, and a 20-foot wide water line
easement area (set by the San Jose Water Company) that runs along the entire length of the
westerly property line. The at-grade driveways, building frontage courtyards, easement areas,
balcony areas, and partial roof areas drain to two media filtration systems. The remaining
ground floor hardscaped areas and roof areas will drain to a bioretention area and flow-
through planter boxes on the sixth, eighth, and 13th floor balconies.
The SCP will divide the site into seven DMAs. Four of the DMAs, which account for
approximately 45% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. Two DMAs, which account
for 47% of the site, drain to media filtration systems. The remaining DMA, which accounts for 8%
of the site, flows to a bioretention area.
b. Self-treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Impervious surface areas
will be reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized landscaping on the exposed
podium courtyard, balcony, and terraces and ground-level plantings that will also provide
some self-treatment. Approximately 53% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas and
ground floor hardscape will drain to flow-through planter boxes and a bioretention area.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. Approximately 53% of the site will drain to LID
treatment features and facilities (flow-through planter boxes and a bioretention area).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The two DMAs that will drain to media filtration systems
include at-grade driveways, building frontage courtyards, easements, balconies, and partial
roof areas. The driveways wrapping the easterly areas of the building will be next to an existing
row of trees that will remain and limit the space to accommodate C.3.d LID treatment sizing.
Balcony areas located on the same eastern portion of the driveway also have LID treatment
space constraints as the driveway. The building footprint will occupy approximately 83% of the
entire site, which creates ground floor space constraints. For example, since the at-grade
courtyards on the project site will abut retail storefronts, LID would conflict with the gathering
areas. Moreover, the doorways and pathways to the retail frontage limits the appropriate
sizing of LID treatment systems to treat any stormwater being directed to them. Further site
space constraints due to the underground garage areas provide vertical limitations to meeting
C.3.d. sizing requirements. A 20-foot-wide water line easement area located along the entire
westerly portion of the building, and required setbacks from adjacent properties also preclude
the project from using 100% LID treatment on the ground floor. The project is utilizing 47% of its
A-14
VOLAR MIXED-USE AT 350 SOUTH WINCHESTER BOULEVARD (PD15-059)
100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was not possible to treat the C.3.d amount
of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a single 25-story high density mixed-use building with 307 apartment units and 52,167 square
feet of commercial and office space on a 0.89 gross acre site. The building footprint will
occupy approximately 92% of the entire site with parking located in a four-level, below-grade
garage under the building. Areas of the site not covered by the building structure will include
terraces throughout the second and third floors, private balconies throughout the height of the
building, rooftop common areas for social and recreational use, at-grade pedestrian
sidewalks, and landscaping.
The SCP consists of one DMA which accounts for 100% of the site and flows to a media filtration
system.
will be reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized landscaping on the ground
floor frontage area, third floor common areas, and the rooftop garden that will provide some
self-treatment.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. The entire site will drain to a non-LID media
filtration system.
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. Building roof areas, terraces throughout the second and
third floors, private balconies throughout the height of the building, rooftop common areas for
social and recreational use, at-grade pedestrian sidewalks, and landscaping will all drain to a
media filtration system. The lack of overall available space for stormwater treatment measures
precludes the project from providing 100% LID treatment. The landscape located on the
ground floor would not be able to accommodate the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID
treatment. Most of the ground floor will be used for an accessible path of travel from the public
street to the entrances near the rear of the site, such as the small public plaza and small patio
areas, doorway landings, a driveway entrance, and an underground garage. A majority of the
landscaping on the second and third floor terraces are intended to be used by the private
residential tenants and would not have adequate space to accommodate the C.3.d amount
of roof runoff for treatment. This leaves a small portion of available open space on the third-
floor common areas, which will be used to place garage vents and other necessary
mechanical fixtures. The project building will have limited and well-defined roof area uses that
prevent the use of LID measures. The roof area is designed to be a mezzanine for restaurant
use and includes a required amount of seating arrangements. The addition of flow-through
planter boxes would inhibit the required seating areas and the corresponding accessible paths
of travel. The project is utilizing all of its available 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-15
SAN JOSE WATER COMPANY/DELMAS AVENUE MIXED-USE (AD17-535)
The project (initial plans dated 5/12/2017 and previously approved under PD15-061 dated 5/24/2016)
was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review
showed that it was possible to treat 25% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings
of this review are presented below.
include three disconnected podium structure buildings on a 8.99 gross acre site. The first
building, separated from the other two buildings by Delmas Avenue, will have 325 multi-family
residential units with ground floor leasing and amenity areas and up to 2,751 square feet of
retail space. The other two buildings will be used for office space and up to 36,672 square feet
of retail space. The multi-family building will have two levels of below-grade parking and one
level of above-grade parking while the office buildings will have four levels of below-grade
parking. Areas not covered by the building structures will be comprised of plazas, courtyards,
walkways, driveways, and a public street. A majority of the roof, sidewalk, and podium deck
areas will drain to media filtration systems, a public street will drain to tree filters, and remaining
building roof areas and plaza hardscapes will drain to flow-through planter boxes.
The SCP divides the site into 14 DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which account for approximately 24%
of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. Five DMAs that account for approximately 60%
of the site drain to media filtration systems, while four DMAs flow to tree filter systems and make
up for 15% of the project site. One DMA accounting for 1% of the project site will be self-
treating.
will be reduced by incorporating turf block and landscape along Los Gatos Creek and the
Guadalupe River setbacks. Approximately 1% of the project site will be self-treating.
Approximately 24% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas and plaza hardscapes will drain
to flow-through planter boxes.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. Approximately 24% of the site will drain to LID
treatment features and facilities (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The nine DMAs draining to tree filters and media filtration
systems include roof, sidewalk, and podium deck areas. Required ceiling height constraints
due to the underground garage areas below almost the entire project site would increase the
depth of the first level parking garage if LID systems were to be installed. Moreover, providing
LID treatment would cause an economic constraint due to excavation costs and increase in
expenses already being spent on dewatering the high groundwater table below the project
site. Required setbacks, walkway areas, plaza amenities, and tenant circulation designed to
meet high quality pedestrian standards also preclude the project from using 100% LID
treatment. The project is utilizing approximately 75% of its available 80% LID treatment
reduction credits.
A-16
MUSEUM PLACE MIXED-USE (SP17-031)
The current proposal of the project (based on revised plans dated 3/14/2017; converted from project
number H16-024) was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results
of this review showed that it was possible to treat 4% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment.
The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The irregular-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist of
a single 24-story high mixed-use building with 306 residential units, a 187-room hotel, 213,275
square feet of office space, up to 19,158 square feet of retail space, and 53,185 square feet of
Tech Museum expansion on a 2.54 gross acre site. Parking will be in a three-level, below-grade
garage under the building. Areas of the site not covered by the building structure will include
10 outdoor terraces on floors two through six, an at-grade paseo that divides the project site
and adjacent properties, at-grade pedestrian sidewalks, and building frontage landscaping.
The building roof areas, outdoor terraces, and a majority of the at-grade paseo will drain to
media filtration systems, while a small portion of the at-grade paseo will drain to a bioretention
area.
As currently designed, the SCP divides the site into four DMAs. Three of the DMAs, which
account for approximately 96% of the site, flow to media filtration systems. The remaining DMA,
which accounts for 4% of the project site will flow to a bioretention area.
b. Self-treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. As currently designed,
impervious surface areas will be reduced by incorporating several areas of landscaping on the
ground floor paseo and frontage areas and containerized landscaping on the outdoor
terraces. Approximately 4% of the site’s runoff from the westerly portion of the ground floor
paseo hardscape will drain to a bioretention area.
site will drain to LID treatment features and facilities (bioretention area).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. As currently designed, the building roof areas, outdoor
terraces, and a majority of the at-grade paseo will drain to media filtration systems. A majority
of the site will be occupied by the building or an underground parking garage. An existing
fiber optic/telecommunication utility line runs along the entire southwesterly property line,
further restricting space for ground-floor LID treatment since the easement does not allow for
any structures. Most of the paseo falls above the underground garage, which will function as
an Emergency Vehicle Access area. The floors under the 10 outdoor terraces are museum
spaces that need to be free from columns. Therefore, wide beams will be installed to provide
the structural support necessary between the terrace and the floors below. The size of the
beams, however, relate directly to the load amount they can support. Increasing the weight
load for LID treatment on the terraces translates to increased beam depth, which would
compromise the clearing heights of the museum space below the terraces. The project is
currently utilizing 96% of its available 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-17
7TH AND EMPIRE APARTMENTS (PD16-026)
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The triangular-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist
of 97 multi-family residences and up to 1,000 square feet of commercial space on a 1.25 gross
acre site. Areas of the site not covered by the building structures will include a ground floor
courtyard, second floor podium-level courtyard, fourth floor lounge, roof deck, pool deck
areas, ground-floor building frontages, walkways, and narrow setbacks. Partial roof runoff will
be treated by flow-through planter boxes, a majority of ground-floor hardscapes will be self-
treating permeable pavers, while the remaining roof areas and podium-level courtyards will
drain to a media filtration system.
The SCP divides the site into seven DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which account for approximately
10% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. Four of the DMAs, which account for 33%
of the site, consist of self-treating permeable pavers and landscape. The remaining DMA,
which accounts for approximately 57% of the site, flows to a media filtration system.
reduced by making approximately 33% of the site at-grade self-treating permeable pavers
and landscaping. Approximately 10% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas will drain to
flow-through planter boxes.
drain to LID treatment features and facilities (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. A majority of the project’s roof areas and podium-level
courtyards will drain to a media filtration system. Approximately 67% of the project site will be
covered by building structures, providing some space constraints. Several open space areas
throughout the site are intended for public activation spaces, such as programmed seating,
art, and gathering areas. Areas that will be treated by media filtration systems are primarily
building areas that run along the lot line and internal podium structures. The podium levels
themselves will also have space constraints due to walkways, amenity spaces, and doorway
landings. Although there will be available spaces for treatment of roof areas on the podium
level, the structural components of the floor cannot accommodate the weight added by the
planters and the runoff it would receive. Areas along the street frontage courtyards will be
limited to retail use with doorway landings, seating, and gathering spaces. Areas along the
rear walkway cannot treat roof runoff due to the roof draining in the opposite direction. The
project is utilizing 57% of its available 65% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-18
GREYHOUND STATION MIXED-USE (SP16-021)
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The irregular-shaped project site is generally flat and will include
two high-rise towers with stepped-down flat roof designs connected by a podium-level
common amenities area on the third floor. The first building will be a 23-story residential tower
with 293 condominium units and 13,974 square feet of ground-level retail. The second building
will be a 24-story residential tower with 415 condominium units. The towers will be on top of a
parking structure that extends two levels above-grade and three levels below. Areas of the site
not covered by the building structures will include the podium-level common amenities area
and private balconies and decks throughout the extent of the tower. Additional areas not
covered by the building structures include the at-grade tower frontage and pedestrian
walkways. Portions of the combined stepped down flat roofs, at-grade impervious walkways,
and third-floor podium courtyard will drain to media filtration systems, while the remaining roof
areas and the third-floor podium amenity deck will drain to flow-through planter boxes.
The SCP divides the site into nine DMAs. Six of the DMAs, which account for approximately 31%
of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. The remaining three DMAs, which account for
approximately 69% of the site, flow to media filtration systems.
reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized landscaping on the at-grade
frontage, podium level courtyards, and private amenities that will provide some self-treatment.
Approximately 31% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas will drain to flow-through planter
boxes.
drain to LID treatment facilities (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. Partial areas of the tower roofs, at-grade impervious walkways,
and the third-floor podium courtyard will drain to media filtration systems. The project will have 95%
coverage of the entire site by permanent structures that limit the space available to install LID
treatment systems on the ground floor for roof and third-floor podium courtyard runoff. Parking below
the third-floor podium courtyard limits LID treatment on the podium-level itself since the depth would
obstruct parking spaces and traffic below. The north tower sits along the lot line of the project site and
any space available for LID treatment would be blocked by doorway landings and retail frontage
gathering spaces. The five-foot impervious ground-level walkway located south of the southern tower
will be limited to a maintenance access walkway. LID treatment on the walkway would obstruct
maintenance staff operations. Moreover, LID treatment, such as permeable pavers on the
maintenance access walkway could negatively bring structural integrity problems of the building’s
foundation. The project is utilizing 69% of its available 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-19
BLOCK 3 MIXED-USE (H16-033)
The project (revised plans dated 3/22/2017) was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing 100%
LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 35% of the
C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The rectangular-shaped project site is generally flat and will
consist of a single 24-story tower with up to 393 residential units and 7,144 square feet of
commercial space on the ground floor. There will be five and a half levels of above-grade
parking throughout the tower footprint. The first floor also includes amenities, mailing and
package rooms, a leasing office, and a lobby. Areas of the site not covered by building
structures will include building frontages with landscaping, an uncovered parking area on the
fifth-floor, and two outdoor terraces on the fifth and 17 th floors. The entire site, except for the
fifth-floor uncovered parking area will drain to media filtration systems. The fifth-floor uncovered
parking area will be treated by a flow-through planter box.
As currently designed, the SCP divides the site into three DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which
account for approximately 65% of the site, drain to media filtration systems. The remaining
DMA, which accounts for approximately 35% of the site, drains to a flow-through planter box.
impervious surface areas will be reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized
landscaping on the at-grade frontage areas and outdoor terraces that will provide some self-
treatment. Approximately 35% of the site’s runoff from the fifth-floor uncovered parking areas
will drain to a flow-through planter box.
site is proposed to drain to an LID treatment facility (flow-through planter box).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID Building frontages, ground-floor walkways, and two outdoor
terraces on the fifth and 17th floors will drain to media filtration systems. Since the proposed
building footprint will occupy approximately 87% of the site, the project has space constraints
that limit the installation of LID treatment. The building frontages and ground-floor walkways
require minimum widths for accessible pedestrian paths and drive aisles for vehicles that LID
treatment measures would conflict with if they were installed for treatment of both ground-
floor hardscape and roof runoff. Utility conflicts such as PG&E transformers, multiple backflow
prevention devices, fire pump rooms, and water tanks also restrict the project from providing
more LID treatment within the building footprint. The project is utilizing 65% of its available 90%
LID treatment reduction credits.
A-20
750 WEST SAN CARLOS APARTMENTS (PD16-031)
The current proposal of the project (revised plans dated 6/29/2017) was reviewed to evaluate the
possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat
29% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The primarily rectangular-shaped project site is generally flat and
will consist of a single seven-story building with 56 apartment units on a 0.41 gross acre site.
There will be a two-story, above-grade parking garage within the interior of the first two levels
of the building. Areas of the site not covered by the building structure will include at-grade
pedestrian sidewalks with landscaping, ground floor rear and frontage gardens, and a
seventh-floor sky terrace. Portions of the roof, seventh-floor sky terrace, and all at-grade
hardscapes will drain to a media filtration system, while the remaining roof areas and the
seventh-floor sky terrace podium amenity deck will drain to flow-through planter boxes.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into four DMAs. Three of the DMAs, which
account for approximately 29% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. The remaining
DMA, which accounts for approximately 71% of the site, drains to a media filtration system.
impervious surface will be reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized
landscaping adjacent to the building and on the sky terrace that will all provide some self-
treatment. Approximately 29% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas and ground floor
hardscape will drain to flow-through planter boxes.
site is proposed to drain to LID treatment features (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. As currently designed, portions of roof, the seventh-floor sky
terrace, and all the at-grade hardscapes will drain to media filtration systems. The project’s
long, narrow shape and its 82% coverage of permanent structures limit the space available for
C.3.d-sized LID treatment of roof areas and the seventh-floor sky deck. Installation of LID
treatment on the seventh-floor sky deck to treat roof areas would create structural integrity
challenges and consequential economic hardship to the applicant. The project is utilizing 71%
of its available 75% LID treatment reduction credits.
A-21
THE GRADUATE MIXED-USE (H16-036)
100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 70% of
the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a 19-story L-shaped tower with 14,800 square feet of retail and 260 residential units. Attached
will be a three-story garage with one level below-grade and three levels of above-grade
parking. Areas of the site not covered by the building structure will be comprised of second
and third floor vegetated loading dock rooftops, a podium level recreational area on the
fourth-floor podium level, sidewalks, and an at-grade uncovered parking garage driveway
area. Residential open space designed for recreation and social gatherings will be located
above the three-story garage, on the fourth-floor podium level. The proposed building footprint
will occupy approximately 70% of the entire site. A portion of the building roof, recreational
areas, and parking garage roof drainage will drain to a bioretention area and raised flow-
through planter boxes. The remainder of the 19-story tower roof area and uncovered parking
garage driveway areas will be directed to a media filtration system.
The SCP will divide the site into seven DMAs. Three of the DMAs, which account for
approximately 38% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. One DMA, which accounts
for 26% of the site, drains to a bioretention area. One DMA, which accounts for approximately
30% of the site, drains to a media filtration system. The remaining DMAs, which account for
approximately 6% of the site, are self-treating.
b. Self-treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. Approximately 6% of the
site will be self-treating areas that will include podium-level landscaping and vegetated
rooftops on the loading docks. Approximately 64% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas
and fourth floor podium level hardscape will drain to a bioretention area and flow-through
planter boxes.
drain to LID treatment features and facilities (bioretention area and flow-through planter
boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The roof of the 19-story tower and uncovered parking
garage driveway will be directed to a media filtration system. The combined elevation and
spacing gap between the residential tower and the fourth-floor podium level prohibits the
project from making a functional storm drain plumbing connection. Moreover, the second and
third floor loading dock rooftops could not convert proposed planters into LID treatment
because of structural load limitations of collecting roof runoff from the residential tower. The
exposed parking garage driveway is surrounded by the parking garage itself, building walls,
and mechanical equipment, and therefore, is isolated from any landscaping for LID treatment.
Technical constraints related to the elevation, space, and structural integrity of required utilities
and LID treatment sizing, including insufficient landscaping constraints on the parking garage
and pedestrian walkways preclude the use of 100% LID. The project is utilizing 30% of its
site within the Guadalupe River watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site LID treatment
A-22
FOURTH STREET METRO STATION MIXED-USE (H17-004)
The City has deemed this project application incomplete (based on revised plans dated 1/18/2017).
The City’s Special Projects Worksheet and Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite and Offsite LID Treatment
results of this review showed that it was not possible to treat the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID
treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The L-shaped project site is generally flat and will consist of a
single eleven-story building with 101 apartment units on a 0.51 gross acre site. Approximately
4,305 square feet of commercial area will be located on the ground-level and approximately
7,261 square feet of office space on the second floor. There will be two levels of covered
parking, one located below-grade and the other on the ground floor. The proposed building
footprint will occupy almost 100% of the entire site. Areas of the site not covered by the
building structure will include walkways along the building’s side and rear peripheries and third
and 11th floor communally accessible patios and pool areas.
As currently designed, the site consists of one DMA which accounts for 100% of the site and
flows to a media filtration system.
impervious surface will be reduced by incorporating and several areas of landscaping that will
all provide some self-treatment on the third and eleventh floors.
proposed to drain to a non-LID media filtration system.
A-23
GARDEN CITY/SARATOGA CREEK MIXED-USE (PD17-002)
a. On-Site Drainage Conditions. The primarily triangular-shaped project site is generally flat and
will consist of two residential buildings, two office buildings, and a garage building on a 16.7
gross acre site. The first seven-story residential building will have 15,000 square feet of retail
space on the ground floor with seven levels of parking, one below-grade and six above-grade.
The second eight-story residential building will include four levels of parking, one below-grade
and three above-grade. Both residential buildings amount to 871 total dwelling units. The office
buildings will both be five stories high, while the abutting parking garage intended for office
tenants will be seven stories above-grade. A public park will divide the site into two by
residential and office use areas. There will be terraces and courtyards landscaping with
walkways and pedestrian amenities on the podium structure within the residential buildings,
between each building, and on the public park. Other areas of the site not covered by the
building structures include surface parking located on the top level of the office parking
garage. Several building roof areas and a small driveway will drain to media filtration systems,
while walkways will be permeable and the remaining roof areas will be conveyed to flow-
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into 45 DMAs. Seven DMAs, which account
for approximately 45% of the project site, drain to media filtration systems. Eight DMAs, which
account for 34% of the project site, will have landscaping and permeable pavers that will
provide self-treatment. The remaining thirty DMAs, which account for approximately 21% of the
site, drain to flow-through planter boxes.
of the site’s runoff from roof areas drain to flow-through planter boxes. Approximately 34% of
the site is designated as landscaping and permeable pavers that will provide self-treatment.
A-24
QUETZAL GARDENS MIXED-USE (CP17-009)
100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 41% of
the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
a six-story building with 71 affordable residential units with 12,175 square feet of commercial
space on the ground floor. The project will include two levels of above-grade parking (under
podium). The proposed building footprints will occupy approximately 95% of the entire site.
There will be residential courtyard amenity areas with planters located on the third floor of the
podium structure, all surrounded on four sides by the building. Other areas of the site not
covered by the building structures include a roof deck amenity with containerized planters
and at-grade flow-through planter boxes, a bioretention area, walkways, street trees, and
containerized landscaping. Several building roof, podium walkway, and at-grade hardscape
areas will drain to media filtration systems. The remaining roof areas will be conveyed to flow-
through planter boxes and a bioretention area, while the rest of the ground-level walkways will
be permeable pavers.
The SCP will divide the site into seven DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which account for
approximately 5% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. Two DMAs, which account
for approximately 59% of the site, drain to media filtration systems. One DMA, which accounts
for approximately 30% of the site, drains to a bioretention area. One DMA, which accounts for
2% of the site, drains to self-retaining permeable pavers. The remaining DMA, which accounts
for 4% of the site, consists of self-treating permeable pavers and landscaping.
site will consist of self-retaining and self-treating permeable pavers. Impervious surfaces will also
be reduced by incorporating several areas of containerized landscaping on the exposed roof
deck, podium courtyard, and ground-level areas that will provide some self-treatment.
Approximately 35% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas will drain to flow-through planter
boxes and a bioretention area.
c. Maximizing Flow to LID Features and Facilities. The project site will drain 35% of its runoff to LID
treatment facilities (flow-through planter boxes and a bioretention area).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The two DMAs draining to the media filtration systems
include roof, podium walkway, and at-grade hardscape areas. Planned and required
hardscapes, furniture, and landscaping preclude the project from providing LID treatment of
roof areas on the third-floor podium and treatment of the podium itself due to structural weight
capacity issues and space constraints in the podium courtyard. Further space constraints, such
as ground-floor doorway landings along King Street limit the available area for LID treatment of
roof areas and podium hardscapes. The project is utilizing approximately 59% of its available
75% LID treatment reduction credits.
site within the Coyote Creek watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site biotreatment facilities to
treat runoff for this project. A regional LID stormwater mitigation program is not available at this time for
the project to use in-lieu C.3 compliance.
A-25
STEVEN’S CREEK PROMENADE MIXED-USE (PD17-014)
will consist of a six-story office building, a six-story garage building, a seven-story mixed-use
building with 236 residential units and 10,000 square feet of retail, and a seven-story residential
building with 263 dwelling units on a 10.2 gross acre site. The garage building will have six levels
of parking, one below-grade and five above-grade. The mixed-use building will have three
levels of parking, one below-grade and two above-grade. The residential building will include
three levels of parking, one below-grade and three above-grade. Both buildings with
residential uses amount to 499 total dwelling units. There will be terraces and courtyards with
landscaping, walkways, and pedestrian amenities between each building and on the podium
structures of the office, mixed-use, and residential buildings. Other areas of the site not
covered by the building structures include surface parking located on top level of the parking
garage building and driveway areas along each end of the site. Two buildings and a driveway
will drain to media filtration systems, while the remaining buildings and driveway drain to flow-
through planter boxes. The walkways and courtyards throughout the project site will be self-
treating permeable pavers.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into 16 DMAs. Nine DMAs, which account for
approximately 38% of the project site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. Two DMAs, which
account for 34% of the project site, drain to media filtration systems. The remaining two DMAs
will be self-treating permeable pavers, which account for approximately 28% of the site.
of the site’s runoff from roof areas drain to flow-through planter boxes. Approximately 28% of
the site is designated as self-treating permeable pavers.
site within the San Tomas Aquino watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site biotreatment
A-26
AVIATO MIXED-USE (SP17-023)
The project (initial plans dated 5/17/2017) was reviewed to evaluate the possibility of providing 100%
LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 73% of the
C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
will consist of an 18-story building over 10,146 square feet of retail with up to 304 residential units
and five levels of parking, four levels below-grade and one level above-grade. Areas of the
site not covered by the building structure will be comprised of at-grade walkways, private and
communal terraces on the second, third, and fifth floors, a pool deck on the 17 th floor, and
private balconies from levels three through 18. The proposed building footprint will occupy
approximately 93% of the entire site. A portion of the building roof will be directed to flow-
through planter boxes. The remainder of the building roof areas, including the terraces, pool
deck, and balconies will be directed to media filtration systems.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into five DMAs. Two of the DMAs, which
account for approximately 71% of the site, drain to flow-through planter boxes. Two DMAs,
which accounts for 27% of the site, drain to media filtration systems. The remaining DMA, which
accounts for approximately 2% of the site, consists of landscaping that will provide self-
treatment.
site will have landscaping on the second, third, and fifth floor terraces that will provide some
self-treatment. Approximately 71% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas and fourth floor
podium level hardscape will drain to flow-through planter boxes.
site is proposed to drain to LID treatment features and facilities (flow-through planter boxes).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. A majority of the project roof areas, including the terraces,
pool deck, and balconies will be directed to media filtration systems. The building’s proximity to
the property line and the locations of the terrace and pool amenities on the second, third, and
fifth floors limit the available space for LID treatment facilities on the ground floor. Moreover,
possible locations for LID treatment facilities are already being occupied by flow-through
planter boxes that will treat portions of the building’s roof. The balcony areas from floors three
through 18 cannot drain to LID treatment since the landscaping on the second floor are
separated by a walkway. Technical constraints related to the space and location of LID
treatment, including insufficient landscaping preclude the use of 100% LID. The project is
utilizing approximately 27% of its available 100% LID treatment reduction credits.
site within the Guadalupe River watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site LID treatment
A-27
WEST SAN JOSE MARRIOT HOTEL (H17-023)
The current project proposal (based on initial plans dated 5/18/2017) was reviewed to evaluate the
possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The City has deemed this application incomplete since the
submittal of the Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite and Offsite LID Treatment Narrative did not adequately
establish the infeasibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was
possible to treat 88% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are
presented below.
consist of a six-story, 132-room hotel with a ground-level restaurant, lounge, and administrative
office areas on a 0.42 gross acre site. The hotel will have three levels of below-grade parking.
Areas of the site not covered by the building structures include at-grade driveways, walkways,
and a communal courtyard. A small portion of the exposed driveway and walkway will drain
to a media filtration system, while the courtyard, remaining walkways, and the entire building’s
roof areas will be conveyed to a bioretention area.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into two DMAs. One of the DMAs, which
accounts for approximately 88% of the site, drains to a bioretention area. The other DMA,
drains to a media filtration system and accounts for approximately 12% of the site.
b. Self-treating and Self-Retaining Areas and LID Treatment Measures. As currently designed, the
current plans demonstrate that impervious surface areas will be reduced by incorporating
several areas of ground-level decorative landscaping around the walkways that will also
provide some self-treatment. Approximately 88% of the site’s runoff from building roof areas
and ground floor hardscape will drain to a bioretention area.
site is proposed to drain to an LID treatment feature and facility (bioretention area).
d. Constraints to Providing On-site LID. The City’s 30-Day Review letter to the project applicant
has required submittal of the Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite and Offsite LID Treatment
Narrative. Prior to granting project approval with the proposed LID Treatment reduction credits
the City will first establish infeasibility of treating 100% of the amount of runoff identified in
Provision C.3.d for the project’s drainage areas with LID treatment measures.
site within the San Tomas Aquino Creek watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site biotreatment
A-28
27 WEST MIXED-USE (H17-027)
The current proposal of the project (initial plans dated 6/4/2017) was reviewed to evaluate the
possibility of providing 100% LID treatment. The results of this review showed that it was not possible to
treat the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
will consist of a single 22-story high density mixed-use building with 342 residential units and
approximately 17,628 square feet of commercial and office uses on a 0.57 gross acre site. The
proposed building footprint will occupy approximately 97% of the entire site with three levels of
parking, one below-grade and two above-grade. Areas of the site not covered by the
building structure will include an outdoor terrace on the third-floor and private balconies
around the perimeter of the building ranging from the fifth-floor to the 22nd-floor. The entire
project site will drain to a media filtration system.
The site consists of one DMA which accounts for 100% of the site and flows to a media filtration
system.
landscaping on the third-floor terrace, and the rooftop garden that will provide some self-
treatment.
proposed to drain to a media filtration system.
A-29
ROOSEVELT PARK APARTMENTS (SP17-027)
The City has deemed this project application incomplete (initial plans dated 6/26/2017). The City’s
Special Projects Worksheet and Feasibility/Infeasibility of Onsite and Offsite LID Treatment Narrative
were not included with the project submittal and will need to be submitted for review. The results of this
review showed that it was possible to treat approximately 6% of the C.3.d amount of runoff with LID
treatment. The findings of this review are presented below.
will consist of a single eight-story mixed-use building with 80 residential units and 10,192 square
feet of commercial space on a 0.47 gross acre site. The proposed building footprint will
occupy approximately 88% of the entire site with two levels of parking, one below-grade and
one above-grade. Areas of the site not covered by the building structure will include outdoor
courtyards on the second and eighth floors, a communal terrace on the eighth floor, and
walkways that wrap around half of the building. A majority of the project site runoff (roof,
courtyards, and terrace) will drain to a media filtration system. The second-floor courtyard will
partially be treated by interceptor tree credits.
As currently designed, the SCP will divide the site into two DMAs. One of the DMAs, which
accounts for approximately 94% of the site, drains to a media filtration system. The remaining
DMA will be treated through 10 interceptor tree credits and accounts for approximately 6% of
the site.
landscaping on the outdoor courtyards on the second and eighth floors and a communal
terrace on the eighth floor that will provide some self-treatment. Approximately 6% of the site
will be treated through 10 interceptor tree credits.
proposed to drain to a media filtration system. There are no LID features and facilities currently
proposed.
site within the Coyote Creek watershed to accommodate in perpetuity off-site biotreatment facilities to
treat runoff for this project. A regional LID stormwater mitigation program is not available at this time for
the project to use in-lieu C.3 compliance.
A-30
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report Appendix 4.1 and 4.2
Provision C.4.b.iii. Potential Facilities List

Provision C.4.d.iii.(2)(e) Facilities Scheduled for Inspection
A-31
A-32
Provision C.4.b.iii. Potential Facilities List

There are a total of 7,788 facilities subject to inspection in San José. A complete list of these facilities
(Appendix 4-1: Potential Facilities List), including their location and type, is available on the City’s
Environmental Services Department Stormwater Management Reports website at
Provision C.4.d.iii.(2)(e) Facilities Scheduled for Inspection/Facilities Requiring Coverage Under ICP but
Have Not Filed
There are a total of 141 facilities inspected in FY 16-17 that may need to file an NOI based solely on their SIC
code or based on their SIC code and equipment maintenance/cleaning activities. A complete list of
these facilities (Appendix 4-2: Facilities Requiring Coverage under IGP but Have Not Filed), including their
location and SIC code, is available on the City’s Environmental Services Department Stormwater
Management Reports website at http://www.sanJoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=160.
A-33
A-34
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report Appendix 5.1
Provision C.5.c.iii Complaint and Spill Response Website (Screenshot of Website)

Provision C.5.e.iii.(1)(c) List of Events with Possible Mobile Businesses
Provision C.5.e.iii.(1)(f) List of Countywide Mobile Businesses
A-35
A-36
Provision C-5.c.iii Complaint and Spill Response Website (Screen shot of website):
A-37
Provision C.5.e.iii.(1)(c) List of Events with Possible Mobile Businesses

The City hosted hundreds of indoor and outdoor events in FY 16-17. Many if not most of the events were
served by mobile businesses. Organizers of all events received education and outreach materials to
promote protection of storm drains from discharge.
A complete list of these events is available as a standalone document, Appendix 5-1: C.5.e.iii.(1) (c) List of
Events with Possible Mobile Businesses, on the City’s Environmental Services Department Stormwater Annual
Reports web site at http://www.sanjoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=160
Provision C.5.e.iii.(1)(f) List of Countywide Mobile Businesses

A complete list of these mobile businesses is also available on the City’s Environmental Services Department
Stormwater Management Reports website at http://www.sanJoseca.gov/Archive.aspx?AMID=160.
A-38
C.10.f.i Changes between 2009 and FY 16-17 in Trash Generation by TMA as a

Result of Full Capture Systems and Other Measures
A-39
A-40
Jurisdicti
Jurisdict Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 16-17
2009 Baseline Trash Generation Trash Generation (Acres) in FY 16-17 After on-wide
ion- After Accounting for Full Capture Jurisdictio
(Acres) Accounting for Full Capture Systems Reductio
wide Systems and Other Control Measures n-wide
n via Full
Reducti Reduction
Capture
TMA on via via Other
AND
Full Control
Other
L M H VH Total L M H VH Total Capture L M H VH Total Measures
Control
Systems (%)
Measures
(%)
(%)
1 3,236 5,018 2,800 52 11,106 8,388 2,152 562 4 11,106 34.8% 8,388 2,152 562 4 11,106 0.0% 34.8%
2 293 853 206 3 1,355 293 853 206 3 1,355 0.0% 544 608 201 3 1,355 0.8% 0.8%
3 780 801 199 25 1,804 780 801 199 25 1,804 0.0% 966 604 233 1 1,804 1.0% 1.0%
4 3,389 2,419 169 0 5,976 3,389 2,419 169 0 5,976 0.0% 4,084 1,170 705 18 5,976 0.0% 0.0%
5 1,730 1,407 426 6 3,569 1,745 1,393 425 6 3,569 0.0% 1,856 1,273 415 25 3,569 0.0% 0.0%
6 6,978 400 76 0 7,455 6,978 400 76 0 7,455 0.0% 7,046 369 40 0 7,455 0.5% 0.5%
7 1,384 918 106 1 2,409 1,385 917 106 1 2,409 0.0% 1,674 489 227 19 2,409 0.0% 0.0%
8 4,404 827 152 0 5,383 4,404 827 152 0 5,383 0.0% 4,911 449 23 0 5,383 2.5% 2.5%
9 7,413 909 196 0 8,519 7,413 909 196 0 8,519 0.0% 7,820 502 197 0 8,519 1.1% 1.1%
10 27,410 750 97 0 28,257 27,410 750 97 0 28,257 0.0% 27,776 478 4 0 28,257 1.8% 1.8%
11 4,631 715 137 1 5,484 4,631 715 137 1 5,484 0.0% 4,921 390 169 4 5,484 0.5% 0.5%
12 12,806 465 116 0 13,387 12,806 465 116 0 13,387 0.0% 13,027 173 187 0 13,387 0.0% 0.0%
13 3,423 325 1 0 3,749 3,423 325 1 0 3,749 0.0% 3,494 201 54 0 3,749 0.0% 0.0%
77,876 15,806 4,682 88 98,452 83,044 12,926 2,443 39 98,452 36.0%* 86,505 8,858 3,015 74 98,452 8.2% 44.2%*
*The total % reduction from full capture includes 34.8% from jurisdictional areas and 1.2% associated with full capture syste ms treating 425 acres of non-jurisdictional
public K-12 school, college and university areas that are generating moderate, high, or very high levels of trash.
A-41
A-42
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report
Appendix 10.2
C.10.a.iii Installed and Planned Hydrodynamic Separator Systems
A-43
FY 2016-2017 Annual Report
Appendix 10.2
A-44
A-45
A-46
C.10.f.i Clean Waterways, Healthy City: Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan and
Assessment Strategy 2017 Update
A-47
A-48
CLEAN WATERWAYS, HEALTHY CITY:
LONG-TERM TRASH LOAD REDUCTION PLAN AND

ASSESSMENT STRATEGY
2017 Update
September 30, 2017
Updated in accordance with provision Section C.10.d of NPDES Permit No. CAS612008.
A-49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS...............................................................................................................................A-50
1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................A-51
1.1 PURPOSE OF SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONG-TERM PLAN ........................................................................... A-51
1.2 THE APPROACH AND PROGRESS OF TRASH M ANAGEMENT AREA DEVELOPMENT................................... A-51
2.0 PREVIOUS LONG-TERM PLAN REVISIONS ................................................................................A-52
2.1 REVISIONS MADE IN FY 13-14 ......................................................................................................... A-52
3.0 TMA TRASH CONTROL PROGRAMMING ..................................................................................A-53
Trash Management Area 1.......................................................................................................... A-53
Trash Management Area 10 ........................................................................................................ A-88
Trash Management Area 11 ........................................................................................................ A-92
Trash Management Area 12........................................................................................................ A-97
Trash Management Area 13 ...................................................................................................... A-101
A-50
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose of Supplement to the Long-Term Plan
The City of San José (City) submitted its initial Clean Waterways, Healthy City: Long-Term
Trash Load Reduction Plan (Long-Term Plan) and Assessment Strategy on January 15, 2014 in
compliance with MRP provision C.10.c. Consistent with provision C.10 requirements, the goal
of the Long-Term Plan is to address trash problems in receiving waters by reducing the
impacts associated with trash in discharges from the City of San José’s municipal separate
storm sewer system (MS4) that are regulated by NPDES Permit requirements.
The reissued MRP (Order R2-2015-0049) was adopted by the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (Water Board) on November 19, 2015 and went into effect on January 1, 2016. The
City now presents this update to the Long-Term Plan (Supplemental) in compliance with
Provision C.10.d of the new MRP. The supplement includes:
1. Descriptions of the current level of implementation of trash control measures and the
type and extent to which new or enhanced control measures will be implemented to
achieve a target of 100% (i.e., full) trash reduction from MS4s by July 1, 2022, with
interim milestones of 70% reduction by July 1, 2017 and 80% reduction by July 1, 2019;
and
2. Projected time schedules for implementing control measures and the
assessment strategy.
The City reserves the right to update the plan and future control measures described based
on its own discretion.
1.2 The Approach and Progress of Trash Management Area

Development
Approximately one-fifth of the City’s total acreage is designated as either very high, high, or
moderate trash generating areas. These areas were originally parsed into 47 discreet Trash
Management Areas (TMAs). Since 2014, three additional TMAs were created in anticipation
of conducting pilot trash management actions bringing the total to 50 TMAs. For
comparison, the San José acreage designated as very high, high, and moderate combined
is equivalent to the entire acreage of the City and County of San Francisco.
A-51
2.0 PREVIOUS LONG-TERM PLAN REVISIONS

2.1 Revisions Made in FY 13-14
In FY 13-14, revisions were made in TMAs 1, 9, 13, A, N, O, P, T, and X.

In FY 14-15, the City conducted a preliminary analysis of trash generation in all TMAs that
were originally depicted on Trash Generation Maps included in the City’s Long-Term Trash
Load Reduction Plan using a combination of local knowledge and field observations.
Google Street View applications and On-land Visual Assessments were used to reevaluate
baseline trash generation. Trash generation categories were reclassified for areas where
information indicated that errors had occurred during initial/preliminary trash generation
category assignments. Reclassifications to trash generation categories were used for the
purposes of calculating baseline (2009) trash generation included in this report (i.e., as an
input parameter to the formula used to calculate load reductions reported under Provision
C.10.d of current or previous MRP).
Also, after programming portions of three TMAs, the programmed areas were renamed and
split into separate TMAs. TMAs 8ST and 8W were subareas of the City’s business districts where
public litter cans were added. A third TMA, 8 SR Pilot, was created to evaluate the results of a
business engagement pilot that commenced and was completed in FY 15-16. The addition
of these 3 new areas raised the total number of TMAs from 47 to 50.

In FY 15-16, consistent with all MRP Permittees, all public K-12 schools, college and university
parcels were made non-jurisdictional on the City’s baseline trash generation maps. Under
California Government Code Sections 4450 through 4461, the construction, modification, or
alternation of facilities and/or structures on these parcels are under the jurisdiction of the
California Division of State Architect and not the City. The public right-of-way (e.g., streets
and sidewalks) surrounding these parcels remain as jurisdictional on the City’s baseline trash
generation maps. Revised maps that incorporate these revisions are included in City’s
supplement to its Long-Term Trash Reduction Plan and Assessment Strategy.

In FY 16-17, the City reconfigured its TMAs in an effort to simplify efforts to track trash control
measures implemented. Additionally, the original 50 TMAs identified by the City were based
on the planned control measures identified in the City’s original LTTRP, which have changed
as documented in our subsequent annual reports. The number of TMAs in San José has now
been reduced to 13. Specific trash control measures for each of the 13 TMAs is provided in
this update.
A-52
3.0 TMA TRASH CONTROL PROGRAMMING

This section includes maps and descriptions of implemented and planned control measure
programming for each of San José’s 13 TMAs.
Trash management actions that are implemented in all TMAs include:

• Source controls:
o Single-Use Carryout Bag Ordinance
o EPS Foam Food Container Ordinance
• Environmental education partnership campaigns:
o San Jose Earthquakes
o San Jose Sharks
o San Jose Giants
• #BeautifySJ Campaign
• Industrial Stormwater Inspections
• Illegal Dumping Rapid Response Team
• Direct Discharge Trash Control Program
Trash Management Area 1

TMA 1 included areas treated by large full trash capture systems (Hydrodynamic Separator
Devices) and areas where treatment by full trash capture system treatment is planned by 2020.
The City installed a total of 11 public Hydrodynamic Separator (HDS) systems in FY 16-17,
increasing its inventory to a total of 21 systems. Construction contracts are scheduled to be
awarded in FY 17-18 to install six or seven more systems.
A-53
A-54
A-55

TMA 2 is comprised of San José Downtown and central area that is not in TMA 1 (full trash
capture). This area is generally bound by Highway 101 on the north and east, by Highway 280
on the south, by Highway 87 on the west, and by Highway 880 on the north. The area is
characterized largely by commercial and high-density residential land uses.
Includes the following former TMAs: 1, 1C, 1E, 1W, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8AR.1, 8J, 8SC, 8ST.10, A,
AE, AG, B, and W
Trash management actions implemented or planned for implementation in TMA 2 are described
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
o Recruit and train residents and corporate entities to participate in the Adopt-A-
Park Program. Through the Program, participants assist in the general care and
maintenance of neighborhood and regional parks and open spaces in San José
including litter removal.
• Post-2014:
o Continue the Adopt-A-Park Program.
Community Engagement/Public Education

• 2009 – 2014:
o Participated in the Schools/City Collaborative, a meeting of school
Superintendents in Santa Clara County, to explore and develop trash reduction
programs and projects.
o Though non-jurisdictional, because of the value of educating students who bring
anti-litter messages home the City sought opportunities to leverage other City
resources to enhance the following trash reduction activities:
▪ On-land trash cleanups, and
▪ Community engagement to educate about and address litter around
schools.
• Post-2014:
o Continue to seek and implement opportunities to educate school communities
and engage them in trash reduction activities.
o Engage local corporations and neighborhoods through public engagement
campaigns and events to raise anti-litter awareness and encourage organized
on-land and creek cleanups.
Enhanced Business Inspection

• Post-2014:
o Evaluate implementation of enhanced business inspection programs in
commercial areas to reduce trash in stormwater discharges.71
Improved Trash Bins/Container Management
71A SCVURPPP study was conducted in FY 16-17 through which performance standards for a set of enhanced
business inspection control actions were developed to meet full- or partial-trash capture equivalency. Results of
this study will be presented in the FY 17-18 report.
A-56
• Pre-MRP:
o Supported the successful establishment of the Downtown San José Property
Based Improvement District (PBID). The Downtown PBID, among its enhanced
services, incorporates sidewalk sweeping, litter pickup, and maintenance of
public area trash containers at least once per week in retail/wholesale and
commercial areas.
• 2009 – 2014:
o In 2012, the City initiated a new solid waste inspection program. Inspectors
continue to target areas where garbage service has been cancelled to ensure
refuse is not accumulating, alert businesses to issues with the management of the
debris bins and waste storage areas, and provide information on the City’s
garbage and recycling programs and the San José Municipal Code. Inspectors
also report illegal dumping and other concerns observed while in the field.
o The City coordinated with business districts to identify locations in need of public
litter cans and services to reduce trash accumulation on streets.
o Additional public litter cans were installed. Locations were determined through
comparison of trash generation rates and land use, as well as pedestrian and
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:
o Continue the enhanced services in the PBID.
o Continue inspections through the solid waste inspection program to identify and
correct issues with the management of debris bins and waste storage areas.
o Continue coordination with business districts to identify locations in need of
public litter cans and services to reduce trash accumulation on streets.
o Evaluate the feasibility of improved trash bin and container management to
identify and correct issues with the management of debris bins and waste
storage areas within parks.
storage areas within schools.
On-land Trash Cleanups

• 2009 – 2014:
o In 2012, the Housing Department initiated the Place-Based Neighborhoods
program to create clean, safe, and engaged neighborhoods in three areas of
the City. The Code Enforcement Division of the City participated in blight
reduction efforts as part of this program, and a contractor, Downtown Streets
Team, cleaned up litter and dumping. This program has ended.
o In 2012, City’s Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Services Department (PRNS)
implemented an activity data tracking system called Business Intelligence (BI).
Through BI, PRNS tracks trash collection activities and trash collection quantities.
This information was utilized to support the City’s trash generation and collection
information.
o In 2013, San José Park Rangers’ Watershed Protection Team, started patrolling
waterways to reduce illegal encampment activity and issuing criminal citations
A-57
to individuals for illegal activity that results in waterway degradation. Rangers

and PRNS maintenance staff also conduct and supervise volunteer on-land and
creek cleanup activity along City trails and waterways.
o Implemented opportunities to organize on-land cleanups activities at schools.
• Post-2014:
o Evaluate the opportunity to create new Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in
areas where the land use is predominantly commercial business through which
on-land cleanups could be coordinated within the business zone.
o Continue on-land trash cleanups; creek, channel, and shoreline cleanups; and
community engagement to manage trash within parks.
o Continue to seek and implement opportunities to partner with schools to
conduct on-land cleanups.
o The City’s Anti-Litter Program continues to engage residents and businesses in
litter cleanups. The Program monitors litter “hot spots” throughout the City. These
locations require regular and extensive cleanup efforts to combat trash.
Partial Capture Devices

• Post-2014:
o If determined that additional full trash capture treatment devices are not
practical, evaluate the installation of partial trash capture devices, such as
Automatic Retractable Screens perhaps in combination with street sweeping.
Street Sweeping
• 2009 – 2014:
o Added 6.9 curb miles (CM) of parking signage for street sweeping and
enforcement to the Virginia – Washington neighborhood.
o Added 14.4 CM of parking signage for street sweeping and enforcement to the
Olinder neighborhood.
o Added 3 CM of parking signage for street sweeping and enforcement to the
North 33rd Street neighborhood.
• Post-2014:
o Evaluate the feasibility of adding street sweeping with “No Parking” signage.
o Added 0.2 CM of Residential Street Sweeping (RSS) on South 5th Street in FY 15-
16.
A-58
A-59

Central San José area. This area is bound on the north by Highway 280. On the west, it is bound
by the Guadalupe River and Canoas Creek, which forms a natural border of primarily residential
areas (in TMA 9) to more industrial and commercial land uses in TMA 3. The border on the east
and south is defined by TMA 1 (full capture) and arterial roads.
Includes the following former TMAs: 2, 5, 6, A, AE, AG, B, I, Q, R, S and T
Revisions
• Revisions Made in FY 13-14
o Modified trash generation categories based on results of on-land visual
assessments.
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
anti-litter messages home, the City sought opportunities to leverage other City
schools.
• Post-2014:
o Continue to participate in the Schools/City Collaborative.
A-60

• Post-2014:
commercial areas to reduce trash in stormwater discharges.

• 2009 – 2014:
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:
On-Land Cleanups
• 2009 –2014:
reduction efforts as part of this program, and Downtown Streets Team volunteers
cleaned up litter and dumping. This program has ended.
information.
waterways to reduce illegal encampment activity and issuing criminal citations to
individuals for illegal activity that results in waterway degradation. Rangers and
PRNS maintenance staff also conduct and supervise volunteer on-land and creek
cleanup activity along City trails and waterways.
• Post-2014:
A-61

o Evaluate the feasibility of expanded on-land trash cleanups; creek, channel, and
shoreline cleanups; and community engagement to manage trash within parks.
o Continue to seek and implement opportunities to partner with schools to conduct
on-land cleanups.

• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• 2009 – 2014:
Virginia – Washington neighborhood.
Virginia – Spartan Keyes neighborhood.
• Post-2014:
o Added 0.3 CM of RSS to Senter Road.
A-62
A-63

Northern San José, primarily industrial area. This area is bound by Highways 87 and 101 to the
south. It is bound by Highway 237 to the north (except for an industrial area north of 237 that
remains in TMA 4). It is bound on the west by predominantly residential land use areas.
Includes the following former TMAs: A, AA, AE, AG, B, X, Y, and Z
Revisions
o Updated trash generation rates from moderate to low for areas in north San José
based on results of on-land visual assessments and local knowledge. This area
where generation rates were modified includes the ‘clean tech’ area roughly
bordered by Tasman Drive, Junction Avenue, Brokaw Avenue, and Guadalupe
River as well as a mobile home park.
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:
A-64
• 2009 – 2014:
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
A-65
Street Sweeping
• Post-2014
A-66
A-67

Eastern San José primarily residential and commercial area. This area is bound by TMA 1 (full
capture) and Highway 101 to the west, by TMAs 4 and 6 to the north, which have more industrial
and low-density residential land, and Tully Road to the south.
Includes the following former TMAs: 10, 4, 7, 8AR.1, 8AR.2, 8E, 8SR, A, AA, AB, AC, AE,
AG, and B
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
A-68
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:
o The City continued to coordinate with business districts to identify locations in
need of public litter cans and services to reduce trash accumulation on streets.
o The City developed a targeted education and enforcement campaign to work
with neighborhood business associations to prevent and clean up trash and litter
in the business districts. The City approached the Story Road Business Association
to initiate the “Clean Streets” pilot program in the in FY 15-16. The goal of this
project was to have no litter remaining for more than 24 hours during weekdays.
This program was completed in FY 15-16.

• 2009 – 2014:
reduction efforts as part of this program, and a contractor, Downtown Streets
Team, cleaned up litter and dumping. This program has ended.
information.
A-69
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• 2009 – 2014:
Lyndale neighborhood.
o Added 3 CM of parking signage for street sweeping and enforcement to the N
33rd neighborhood.
Heller neighborhood.
Mt. Pleasant / Marten North neighborhood.
• Post-2014:
o Added 0.4 CM of street sweeping on S. Capitol Avenue in FY 15-16.
o Added 0.2 CM of RSS to Pleasant Lake Lane and 0.1 CM to Country Tree Court.
A-70
A-71

North east San José primarily residential area with commercial and parks and open space land
uses as well. Defined on the west by industrial land uses (TMA 4) and on the south by TMA 5.
Includes the following former TMAs: 8B.1, 8B.2, 8B.3, 8B.4, 8B.5, 8B.6, 8B.7, A, AA, AC, AD,
AE, AG, B, and Y
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
A-72
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:
o .
A-73

• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• Post-2014:
o Added 1.4 CM of street sweeping on Automation Parkway in FY 15-16.
o Added 0.8 CM of RSS to Toyon Avenue, 0.1 CM to Summerpark Court, 0.3 CM to
Sierra Road, 2.1 CM to Piedmont Road.
A-74
A-75

North West San José. This area is bound on the east by Highway 87, on the South by TMA 1 (full
capture) and Highway 280, and on the west by Highway 880.
Includes the following former TMAs: 1, 1W, 10, 8A, 8SC, A, AE, AG, B, and G
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
commercial areas to reduce trash in stormwater discharges.72
72A SCVURPPP study is planned for FY 16-17 through which performance standards for a set of
enhanced business inspection control actions would be developed to meet full- or partial-trash
capture equivalency.
A-76

• Pre-MRP:
o Supported the successful establishment of the Downtown San José Property
Based Improvement District (PBID). The Downtown PBID, among its enhanced
services, incorporates sidewalk sweeping, litter pickup, and maintenance of
public area trash containers at least once per week in retail/wholesale and
commercial areas.
• 2009 – 2014:
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:
o Continue the enhanced services in the PBID.
storage areas within parks. Evaluate the feasibility of improved trash bin and
container management to identify and correct issues with the management of
debris bins and waste storage areas within schools.
On-Land Trash Cleanups

• 2009 - 2014:
the City. The City’s Code Enforcement Division participated in blight reduction
efforts as part of this program, and a contractor, Downtown Streets Team, cleans
up litter and dumping. This program has ended.
information.
A-77
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• Post-2014:
o Added 0.2 CM of RSS to Idaho Street.
A-78
A-79

West San José. This area is bound on the east by Highway 880 and TMA 1 (full capture). The
trash generating areas in this TMA are primarily commercial land use.
Includes the following former TMAs: 12, 14, 8DA, 8SC, 8W, A, AE, AG, B, C, D, and G
Revisions
o Updated trash generation rate from moderate to low for Alum Rock Park in the
east foothills of San José based on local knowledge.
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
A-80


• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:
vehicle traffic.

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:
A-81

o
• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• Post-2014:
o Added 0.5 CM of RSS to Payne Avenue.
A-82
A-83

South west San José. This area is bound on the south by Highway 85, on the east by Highway 87
and the primarily industrial and commercial area of TMA 3. It is bound on the north by Highway
280 and TMA 1 (full capture).
Includes the following former TMAs: 8CB.1, 8CB.2, 8CB.3, 8CB.4, 8ST.10, 8ST.11, 8WG.1,
8WG.2, 8WG.3, A, AE, AG, B, E, F, H, I, K, Q, and S
below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
A-84
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:
A-85

• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• 2009 – 2014:
Virginia – Washington neighborhood.
Cherryview neighborhood.
• Post-2014:
o Added 1.0 CM on Bird Avenue and 0.8 CM on Campbell Avenue in FY 15-16.
o Added 0.3 CM of RSS to Ewer Drive and Whispering Willow Place, 0.1 CM to La
Crescent Place and Sapa Court, 0.4 CM to La Crescent Loop, and 1.5 CM to
Willow Street.
A-86
A-87

South San José is characterized by parks and open space as well as moderate and low density
residential. Bound on the north by Highway 85.
Includes the following former TMAs: 8ST.1, 8ST.2, 8ST.3, 8ST.4, 8ST.5, 8ST.6, 8ST.7, 8ST.8, A,
AE, AG, B, J, K, N, and O
Revisions
o Updated trash generation rate from moderate to low for Hitachi campus (gated,
secured private property) based on results of on-land visual assessments.
o Updated trash generation rate from moderate to low for the Kaiser San José
campus in south San José based on results of on-land visual assessments.
Trash management actions implemented or planned for implementation in TMA 10 are

described below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
A-88
o Continue to implement enhanced business inspection programs in commercial

areas to reduce trash in stormwater discharges.

• 2009 – 2014:
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:
A-89


• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• Post-2014
o Added 0.2 CM of RSS to Phinney Way, Macias Lane, Queensbridge Way, and
Golf Creek Drive, 0.1 CM to Appley Way, Blossom Dale Drive, De Soto Drive,
Larissa Oaks Place, Lynn Avenue, and Macias Court, 0.3 CM to Pramukhs Way
and Butterfly Drive, 0.5 CM to Rimrock Drive, and 0.6 CM to Almaden Road and
Blossom Valley Drive.
o Removed 0.5 CM of RSS on McAbee Road in FY 15-16.
A-90
A-91

South central San José characterized by moderate and low density residential areas. Trash
generating areas in this TMA are primarily commercial.
Includes the following former TMAs: 13, 6, 8ST.10, 8ST.9, A, AE, AG, B, L, M, N, Q, T, and V
Revisions
assessments.
o Updated trash generation rate from moderate to low for Hitachi campus (gated,
secured private property) based on results of on-land visual assessments.

described below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
o Citywide coordination among the Environmental Services; Parks, Recreation and
Neighborhood Services; Police; and Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement
Departments to leverage anti-gang resources to control blight and litter in gang
hotspots throughout the City through community engagement and
enforcement. This program has ended.
schools.
• Post-2014:
A-92


• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:

• 2009 –2014:
reduction efforts as part of this program, and Downtown Streets Team volunteers
cleaned up litter and dumping. This program has ended.
A-93
information.
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• 2009 – 2014:
Hellyer neighborhood.
Arpeggio neighborhood.
• Post-2014:
o Added 0.4 CM of street sweeping from Monterey Highway off ramp to Blossom
Hill Rd. and 0.4 CM from Monterey Highway to Blossom Hill Rd. on ramp in FY 15-
16.
o Added 2.35 CM of street sweeping on Raleigh Road from Cottle Road to Via Del
Oro, 0.3 CM on Coronado Avenue from Cottle Road to Charlotte Drive, and 2.2
CM on Charlotte Drive from Raleigh Road to Great Oaks Parkway in FY 15-16.
o Added 1.0 CM of RSS to Ellyridge Drive, Ellyridge Court, and Fragrant Harbor
Court.
o Added 1.0 CM of ACB (Arterial, Collector, & Bike) street sweeping on Monterey
Highway to Blossom Hill Road on ramp and 0.5 CM from Blossom Hill Road off
ramp to Great Oaks Boulevard in FY 15-16.
A-94
o Added 0.6 CM of ACB street sweeping on Cottle Road to Blossom Hill Rd. on
ramp, 0.6 CM on Endicott Blvd. from Great Oaks Parkway Blossom Hill Rd., and 3.2
CM on Great Oaks Parkway from Endicott Blvd. to Las Colinas Ln. in FY 15-16.
o Added 0.1 CM of RSS to Carls Court, 0.05 CM to Pear Blossom Court and Guava
Blossom Court, 0.04 CM to Heaven Valley Court.
A-95
A-96

South east San José. Defined on the north by Tully Road and TMA 1 (full capture). It is bound on
the west by Highway 101. The area is characterized by low-density residential as well as parks
and open space land uses. The trash generating areas in this TMA (mostly near Highway 101 or
Capitol Expressway) are primarily commercial.
Includes the following former TMAs: 10, 8E, 8SR, 9, A, AB, AE, AG, B, P, and U
Revisions
assessments.
o Updated trash generation rate from moderate to low for light industrial area
north of Silver Creek Valley Road surrounding Hellyer Avenue based on results of
on-land visual assessments.

described below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
schools.
• Post-2014:
A-97

• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
vehicle traffic.
• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:
A-98

Partial-Capture Treatment Devices

• 2009 – 2014:
o The City began conducting a pilot project utilizing automatic retractable screens
(ARS) in FY 13-14. The pilot includes approximately one hundred inlets. The
targeted neighborhood is adjacent to a large retail mall and has high and
medium trash generation areas. Parking restrictions and enforcement were
already in place for street sweeping throughout the proposed pilot area.
• Post-2014
o Evaluate the effectiveness of installed ARS devices.
Street Sweeping
• 2009 – 2014:
Fairfax neighborhood.
• Post-2014:
o Added 0.2 CM of RSS to Cerro Crest Drive, Daryl View Court, Long Valley Terrace,
and Vista Point Court, 0.1 CM to Clear Vista Court, Crestridge Court, Crestridge
Lane, Gravina Court, Jonathan Rachelle Court, Lago De Bracciano Street, and
Long Valley Court, 0.3 CM to Goldenspur Loop, Jennifer Daisy Drive, John Sorci
Drive, Turturici Court, and Windcliff Lane, 0.5 CM to Longhill Court, and 0.6 CM to
Gravina Loop and Turturici Way.
A-99
A-100

North San José area adjacent to the Bay, which includes wetlands, light industrial, and low
density residential. Bound on the south by Highway 237 (except for an industrial area grouped
into TMA 4).
Includes the following former TMAs: A, AF, AG, and X
Revisions
o Updated trash generation rates from moderate to low for areas in north San José
based on results of on-land visual assessments and local knowledge. This area
where generation rates were modified includes the ‘clean tech’ area roughly
bordered by Tasman Drive, Junction Avenue, Brokaw Avenue, and Guadalupe
River as well as a mobile home park.

described below.
Adopt-A-Park
• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:

• Post-2014:

• 2009 – 2014:
• Post-2014:
A-101

• 2009 – 2014:
information.
• Post-2014:
• Post-2014:
Street Sweeping
• Post-2014
A-102
A-103
A-104
C.10.f.viii Additional Creek and Shoreline Calculation and Cleanups
A-105
A-106
Additional Creek and Shoreline Cleanups

Tons from KCCB,SBCCC,SJCC,DST 151
Cubic Yards from KCCB,SBCCC,SJCC,DST 1,735
Gallons from KCCB,SBCCC,SJCC,DST 301,105
10% CAP
3:1 (0.03) offset
1% Reduction Offset (Volume) = 8,808
% Reduction = 34.2%
Applying 10% cap, total becomes 10%
ADDITIONAL CREEK AND SHORELINE CLEANUPS FY 16-17

Sites Cleaned Twice or More
Cubic How many

Location Cleanup Date Group Total Tons
Yards times?
12/19/2016 DST 0.21 2.45

12/21/2016 DST 0.07 0.82
Coyote Creek @ 1/17/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
Roberts/Phelan
2/1/2017 DST 0.16 1.79
2/6/2017 DST 0.35 4.08
2/28/2017 DST 0.28 3.27
Coyote Creek @
SUBTOTAL 1.22 14.04 6
Roberts/Phelan
11/2/2016 DST 0.11 1.31

11/15/2017 DST 0.21 2.45
12/9/2016 DST 1.50 17.30
12/21/2016 DST 0.20 2.28
2/14/2017 DST 0.13 1.47
3/4/2017 DST 0.72 8.33
3/16/2017 DST 0.54 6.20
3/18/2017 DST 0.75 8.66
Coyote Creek @ Tully 4/11/2017 DST 0.35 4.08
4/18/2017 DST 0.21 2.45
4/20/2017 DST 1.05 12.09
4/22/2017 DST 0.60 6.86
4/15/2017 KCCB 3.00 34.57
5/12/2017 DST 1.01 11.60
5/23/2017 DST 0.28 3.27
5/26/2017 DST 0.28 3.27
6/17/2017 DST 0.92 10.62
A-107
Cubic How many

Yards times?
6/23/2017 DST 0.91 10.45

6/24/2017 DST 0.94 10.78
Coyote Creek @ Tully SUBTOTAL 13.72 158.04 19
7/5/2016 DST 0.71 8.16

7/6/2016 DST 0.04 0.49
7/11/2016 DST 0.23 2.61
7/13/2016 DST 0.06 0.65
7/18/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
7/19/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
7/22/2016 DST 0.23 2.61
7/25/2016 DST 0.09 0.98
7/27/2016 DST 0.10 1.14
8/16/2016 DST 0.26 2.94
8/20/2016 KCCB 0.24
8/20/2016 DST 0.81 9.31
8/24/2016 DST 0.06 0.65
8/27/2016 DST 0.57 6.54
8/19/2016 DST 0.37 4.25
9/1/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
Coyote Creek at Story 9/12/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
Rd./280
9/21/2016 DST 0.11 1.30
9/29/2016 DST 0.72 8.33
9/13/2016 DST 0.24 2.78
9/15/2016 DST 0.67 7.70
9/17/2016 DST 0.53 6.05
9/22/2016 DST 0.60 6.86
10/1/2016 DST 1.50 17.30
10/12/2016 DST 0.06 0.65
10/15/2016 DST 0.96 11.11
10/18/2016 DST 0.23 2.61
10/19/2016 DST 0.04 0.49
10/21/2016 DST 0.71 8.22
10/24/2016 DST 0.26 2.94
10/22/2016 DST 0.96 11.11
11/1/2016 DST 0.35 4.08
11/7/2016 DST 0.16 1.80
11/14/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
A-108
Cubic How many

Yards times?
12/5/2016 DST 0.14 1.63

12/6/2016 DST 0.13 1.47
12/7/2016 DST 0.13 1.47
12/7/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
12/12/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
12/13/2016 DST 0.16 1.80
12/14/2016 DST 0.10 1.14
12/14/2016 DST 0.20 2.28
1/3/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
1/17/2016 DST 0.17 1.96
1/24/2017 DST 0.20 2.28
1/25/2017 DST 0.13 1.47
1/30/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
1/30/2017 DST 0.55 6.37
1/31/2017 DST 0.28 3.27
2/1/2017 DST 0.06 0.65
2/6/2017 DST 0.18 2.12
2/13/2017 DST 0.13 1.47
2/14/2017 DST 0.23 2.61
2/15/2017 DST 0.31 3.59
2/15/2017 DST 0.09 0.98
2/17/2017 DST 0.31 3.59
2/27/2017 DST 0.28 3.27
2/28/2017 DST 0.68 7.84
3/7/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
3/13/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
3/20/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
3/27/2017 DST 0.07 0.82
4/3/2017 DST 0.11 1.31
4/10/2017 DST 0.43 4.90
4/17/2017 DST 0.10 1.14
5/1/2017 DST 0.09 0.98
5/8/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
5/15/2017 DST 0.14 1.63
5/22/2017 DST 0.09 0.98
Coyote Creek at Story Rd./280
SUBTOTAL 19.35 222.95 69
Total
Coyote Creek at 10/5/2016 DST 0.09 0.98

Schallenberger/Ridder
10/25/2016 DST 0.38 4.41
A-109
Cubic How many

Yards times?
10/26/2016 DST 0.13 1.47

11/3/2016 DST 1.03 11.92
11/8/2016 DST 0.30 3.43
12/1/2016 DST 0.65 7.51
12/6/2016 DST 0.84 9.63
12/16/2016 DST 1.05 12.09
1/27/2017 DST 1.30 15.03
2/3/2017 DST 1.56 17.92
2/7/2017 DST 1.23 14.21
4/13/2017 DST 0.28 3.27
5/19/2017 DST 1.18 13.56
6/2/2017 DST 0.91 10.46
6/29/2017 DST 1.18 13.56
6/30/2017 DST 1.35 15.52
Coyote Creek at
SUBTOTAL 13.45 154.97 16
Schallenberger/Ridder Total
7/9/2016 DST 0.53 6.05

7/14/2016 DST 0.60 6.86
7/15/2016 DST 0.54 6.21
7/23/2016 DST 0.26 2.94
7/30/2016 DST 0.78 8.99
8/5/2016 DST 0.53 6.05
8/11/2016 DST 0.48 5.56
9/8/2016 DST 0.67 7.68
9/16/2016 DST 0.96 11.11
9/23/2016 DST 1.16 13.40
9/30/2016 DST 1.45 16.67
Coyote Creek at Needles Dr.
10/17/2016 DST 0.26 2.94
10/29/2016 DST 0.81 9.31
11/4/2016 DST 1.08 12.41
11/5/2016 DST 0.65 7.51
11/12/2016 DST 0.68 7.84
12/3/2016 DST 1.05 12.09
12/8/2016 DST 1.11 12.74
12/10/2016 DST 0.24 2.77
12/17/2016 DST 0.68 7.84
1/6/2017 DST 0.62 7.18
1/31/2017 DST 0.78 8.98
A-110
Cubic How many

Yards times?
1/19/2017 DST 0.31 3.59

1/31/2017 DST 0.78 8.98
2/2/2017 DST 1.11 12.74
2/4/2017 DST 0.84 9.63
2/10/2017 DST 0.82 9.47
4/8/2017 DST 0.21 2.45
4/15/2017 DST 0.40 4.57
4/29/2017 DST 1.19 13.72
5/6/2017 DST 0.98 11.27
5/13/2017 DST 0.64 7.35
6/3/2017 DST 0.81 9.31
6/10/2017 DST 1.23 14.21
Coyote Creek at Needles Dr.
SUBTOTAL 25.20 290.42 34
Total
7/7/2016 DST 0.61 7.02

7/8/2016 DST 0.82 9.48
7/28/2016 DST 0.48 5.56
9/9/2016 DST 0.75 8.66
9/24/2016 DST 0.65 7.52
10/4/2016 DST 0.52 6.04
10/6/2016 DST 0.79 9.14
10/27/2016 DST 0.89 10.29
12/2/2016 DST 0.47 5.39
1/5/2017 DST 0.61 7.02
1/12/2017 DST 0.96 11.11
1/13/2017 DST 0.54 6.20
Coyote Creek at Lone Bluff 1/20/2017 DST 0.30 3.43
1/26/2017 DST 2.28 26.30
1/28/2017 DST 0.84 9.63
2/11/2017 DST 0.89 10.29
3/9/2017 DST 0.70 8.01
3/10/2017 DST 1.08 12.42
3/17/2017 DST 0.68 7.84
4/14/2017 DST 0.34 3.92
5/4/2017 DST 1.52 17.48
5/5/2017 DST 0.89 10.29
5/25/2017 DST 0.34 3.92
6/15/2017 DST 0.89 10.29
6/16/2017 DST 0.81 9.31
A-111
Cubic How many

Yards times?
Coyote Creek at Lone Bluff

SUBTOTAL 19.66 226.56 25
Total
7/1/2016 DST 0.72 8.33

7/12/2016 DST 1.13 13.07
7/16/2016 DST 0.81 9.31
7/21/2016 DST 0.91 10.45
7/30/2016 KCCB 1.43 16.48
8/6/2016 DST 0.45 5.23
8/9/2016 DST 0.62 7.19
9/6/2016 DST 0.11 1.30
10/28/2016 DST 0.44 5.06
Coyote Creek at Wool Creek
Total 11/2/2016 DST 0.11 1.30
11/10/2016 DST 0.52 6.04
11/14/2016 DST 1.08 12.42
11/15/2016 DST 0.21 2.45
12/8/2017 DST 1.11 12.74
1/19/2017 DST 0.31 3.60
2/2/2017 DST 1.11 12.74
3/11/2017 DST 1.35 15.52
4/21/2017 DST 0.96 11.11
4/27/2017 DST 0.92 10.62
SUBTOTAL 14.32 164.96 19
Total
Guadalupe River at Delmas 9/20/2016 DST 0.35 4.08

Ave.
10/20/2016 DST 0.96 11.11
Guadalupe River at Delmas
SUBTOTAL 1.32 15.19 2
Ave. Total
8/23/2016 DST 0.17 1.96

9/10/2016 SBCCC 2.25 25.93
Guadalupe River at Willow St.
Total 11/12/2016 SBCCC 2.25 25.93
1/14/2017 SBCCC 0.70 8.07
3/11/2017 SBCCC 0.75 8.64
5/13/2017 SBCCC 1.00 11.52
Guadalupe River at Willow St.
SUBTOTAL 7.12 82.04 6
Total
Guadalupe River @ u/s of 7/27/2016 SJCC 0.55 6.39

Park Ave
10/11/2016 XACTLY 0.39 4.46
A-112
Cubic How many

Yards times?
Guadalupe River @ u/s of Park

SUBTOTAL 0.94 10.84 2
Ave Total
Coyote Creek @ Singleton 1/28/2017 KCCB 3.25 37.45

Crossing
5/20/2017 CCAG/NRCD 1.06 12.21
Coyote Creek @ Singleton
SUBTOTAL 4.31 49.66 2
Crossing
7/9/2016 SBCCC 1 11.52

9/10/2016 SBCCC 1.25 14.40
Los Gatos Creek @ Auzerais 11/12/2016 SBCCC 1.75 20.16
1/4/2017 SBCCC 0.6 6.91
3/11/2017 SBCCC 1.5 17.28
Los Gatos Creek @ Auzerais SUBTOTAL 6.1 70.29 5
7/9/2016 SBCCC 1.25 14.40

9/10/2016 SBCCC 0.5 5.76
Los Gatos Creek @ Bascom 11/12/2016 SBCCC 1 11.52
1/14/2017 SBCCC 0.7 8.07
3/11/2017 SBCCC 1.5 17.28
Los Gatos Creek @ Bascom SUBTOTAL 4.95 57.04 5
1/14/2017 SBCCC 0.7 8.07

Los Gatos Creek @ Willow
Glen Trestle 4/6/2017 SBCCC 0.23 2.65
5/13/2017 SBCCC 1 11.52
Los Gatos Creek @ Willow
SUBTOTAL 1.93 22.24 3
Glen Trestle
7/9/2016 SBCCC 1 11.52

9/10/2016 SBCCC 1.25 14.40
Los Gatos Creek @ Auzerais 11/12/2016 SBCCC 1.75 20.16
1/14/2017 SBCCC 0.6 6.91
3/11/2017 SBCCC 1.5 17.28
Los Gatos Creek @ Auzerais SUBTOTAL 6.1 70.29 5
11/1/2016 KCCB 0.38 4.38

11/12/2016 SBCCC 0.5 5.76
3/11/2017 KCCB 0.24 2.77
Coyote Creek @ Olinder
School 3/11/2017 SBCCC 0.33 3.80
4/1/2017 DST 1.45 16.71
4/6/2017 DST 1.5 17.28
4/7/2017 DST 1.02 11.75
A-113
Cubic How many

Yards times?
4/28/2017 DST 1.53 17.63

5/11/2017 DST 1.53 17.63
6/1/2017 DST 0.72 8.30
Coyote Creek @ Olinder
SUBTOTAL 9.2 106.01 10
School
1/14/2017 SBCCC 0.6 6.91

Guadalupe River @ Lelong
3/11/2017 SBCCC 0.5 5.76
Guadalupe River @ Lelong SUBTOTAL 1.1 12.68 2
Coyote Creek @ Roosevelt 1/14/2017 SBCCC 0.33 3.80

Park
1/14/2017 KCCB 0.24 2.77
Coyote Creek @ Roosevelt
SUBTOTAL 0.57 6.57 2
Park
Sites Cleaned Twice or More

TOTAL 151 1735
TOTAL
CREEK PARTNER CLEANUPS FY 16-17

KEEP COYOTE CREEK BEAUTIFUL CLEANUPS
Date Location Cleanups Gallons CY Pounds Total tons
7/30/2016 Coyote Creek at Wool Creek Dr. 1 6200 35.72 6200 3.1
8/20/2016 Coyote Creek at Watson Park 1 480 2.77 480 0.24
8/27/2016 Coyote Creek at Wooster Ave. 1 6100 35.14 6100 3.05
9/17/2016 Coyote Creek at Yerba Buena Rd. 1 6980 40.21 6980 3.49
11/1/2016 Coyote Creek at Selma Olinder Park 1 760 4.38 760 0.38
1/14/2017 Coyote Creek at Roosevelt Park 1 480 2.77 480 0.24
1/28/2017 Coyote Creek at Capitol Expressway 1 6500 37.45 6500 3.25
3/25/2017 Coyote Creek at Roberts Ave. 1 4600 26.50 4600 2.3
4/15/2017 Coyote Creek at Tully Rd. 1 6000 34.57 6000 3
5/20/2017 Coyote Creek at La Raza Disc Golf Course 1 1000 5.76 1000 0.5
6/6/2017 Coyote Creek at Tuers Road 1 220 1.27 220 0.11
6/28/2017 Coyote Creek at Roberts Ave. 1 580 3.34 580 0.29
KCCB TOTAL 13 40,380 232.64 40,380 20.19
SOUTH BAY CLEAN CREEKS COALITION CLEANUPS

7/9/2016 Los Gatos Creek at Auzerais Ave. 1 2000 11.52 2000 1
7/9/2016 Los Gatos Creek at Bascom Ave. 1 2500 14.40 2500 1.25
7/16/2016 Los Gatos Creek at the Confluence 1 4000 23.05 4000 2
A-114
SOUTH BAY CLEAN CREEKS COALITION CLEANUPS

9/10/2016 Los Gatos Creek at Auzerais Ave. 1 2500 14.40 2500 1.25
9/10/2016 Guadalupe River at Willow St. 1 4500 25.93 4500 2.25
10/11/2016 Guadalupe River at Park Ave. 1 1000 5.76 1000 0.5
10/25/2016 Los Gatos Creek at Coe Ave. 1 200 1.15 200 0.1
10/25/2016 Los Gatos Creek at Lonus 1 800 4.61 800 0.4
11/10/2016 Ross Creek at Leigh Ave. 1 500 2.88 500 0.25
11/12/2016 Los Gatos Creek at Bascom Ave. 1 2000 11.52 2000 1
1/14/2017 Guadalupe River at Lelong St. 1 1200 6.91 1200 0.6
1/14/2017 Coyote Creek at Roosevelt Park 1 660 3.80 660 0.33
3/11/2017 Guadalupe River at Lelong St. 1 1000 5.76 1000 0.5
4/6/2017 Los Gatos Creek at Willow Glen Trestle 1 460 2.65 460 0.23
4/21/2017 Guadalupe River at Trimble Ave. 1 1700 9.79 1700 0.85
5/13/2017 Los Gatos Creek at Poplar Dr. 1 600 3.46 600 0.3
5/13/2017 Los Gatos Creek at Willow Glen Trestle 1 2000 11.52 2000 1
5/13/2017 Guadalupe River at Willow St. 1 2000 11.52 2000 1
6/8/2017 Guadalupe River at Foxworthy Ave. 1 900 5.19 900 0.45
SBCCC TOTAL 31 54,080 311.57 54,080 27.04
A-115
DOWNTOWN STREETS TEAM CLEANUPS

Jul-16 Multiple (22 Cleanups) 22 18980 109.35 18980 9.49
Aug-16 Multiple (20 Cleanups) 20 15460 89.07 15460 7.73
Sep-16 Multiple (20 Cleanups) 20 19120 110.16 19120 9.56
Oct-16 Multiple (23 Cleanups) 23 25160 144.96 25160 12.58
Nov-16 Multiple (27 Cleanups) 27 20480 117.99 20480 10.24
Dec-16 Multiple (23 Cleanups) 23 19660 113.27 19660 9.83
Jan-17 Multiple (22 Cleanups) 22 21800 125.60 21800 10.9
Feb-17 Multiple (20 Cleanups) 20 19440 112.00 19440 9.72
Mar-17 Multiple (21 Cleanups) 21 24300 140.00 24300 12.15
Apr-17 Multiple (25 Cleanups) 25 26940 155.21 26940 13.47
May-17 Multiple (24 Cleanups) 24 22920 132.05 22920 11.46
Jun-17 Multiple (26 Cleanups) 26 24800 142.88 24800 12.4
DST TOTAL 273 259,060 1492.54 259,060 129.53
CREEK PARTNER CLEANUP TOTAL

Partners Cleanups Gallons CY Pounds Total tons
KCCB/SBCCC TOTAL 44 94,460 544.22 94,460 47.23
DST/KCCB/SBCCC TOTAL 317 353,520 2036.76 353,520 176.76
A-116
C.10.f.ix Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Calculation and Cleanups
A-117
A-118
Cubic
Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Tons Yards Gallons
Homeless Response Team 452 5,206 903,650
Watershed Protection Team 129 1,491 258,770
TOTAL 581 6,697 1,162,420
15% CAP
3:1 (0.03) offset
1% Reduction Offset (Volume) = 8,808
% Reduction = 132.0%
Applying 15% cap, total becomes 15%
DIRECT DISCHARGE TRASH CONTROL PROGRAM CLEANUP TOTALS FY 16-17

HOMELESS RESPONSE TEAM (HRT) CLEANUPS
Cubic
Date Location Cleanups Gallons Yards Tons
Guadalupe River & Los Gatos

Creek - Almaden
7/7/2016 Virginia/Bascom Hamilton 3 8860 51.05 4.43
7/15/2016 Coyote Creek - Old Oakland 1 7120 41.02 3.56
7/15/2016 Coyote Creek - Ridder Park 1 7760 44.71 3.88
7/15/2016 Coyote Creek - Schallenberger 1 5600 32.26 2.8

Guadalupe River - Malone,
9/10/2016 Willow, Rose 3 6880 39.64 3.44
9/10/2016 Guadalupe River - Foxworthy 1 2260 13.02 1.13
9/24/2016 Coyote Creek - Remillard 1 2670 15.38 1.34

Coyote Creek - Roosevelt,
9/26/2016 Calhoun 2 1640 9.45 0.82
10/8/2016 Coyote Creek - Old Oakland 1 7460 42.98 3.73
10/8/2016 Coyote Creek - Brokaw 1 9460 54.50 4.73
A-119
Cubic
Coyote Creek - Corie Ct/Old
10/8/2016 Oak 2 6720 38.72 3.36
10/8/2016 Coyote Creek - Charcot/Yard 2 6080 35.03 3.04
10/26/2016 Coyote Creek - Wool Creek 1 6620 38.14 3.31
10/26/2016 Coyote Creek - Jeannie Marie 1 1160 6.68 0.58
10/26/2016 Coyote Creek - Wool Creek 1 2460 14.17 1.23

Coyote Creek - La Ragione,
11/9/2016 Roberts 2 10260 59.11 5.13
11/9/2016 Coyote Creek - Tully, Galveston 2 10200 58.77 5.1
Coyote Creek - 12th/Williams,

Remillard, Mistflower
Guadalupe River - Grant/Palm,
11/15/2016 Woz/280 5 7160 41.25 3.58
Coyote Creek - Remillard,
11/15/2016 Coyote Meadows 2 7780 44.82 3.89
11/16/2016 Los Gatos Creek - Lonus 1 7920 45.63 3.96
11/16/2016 Los Gatos Creek - Lonus 1 6520 37.56 3.26
11/17/2016 Coyote Creek - Berryessa D/S 1 9340 53.81 4.67

11/18/2016 Coyote Creek - Berryessa D/S 1 6000 34.57 3

Coyote Creek - 10th D/S
11/18/2016 Tasman 1 7160 41.25 3.58
A-120
Cubic
11/18/2016 Tasman 1 2760 15.90 1.38
11/18/2016 Tasman 1 8560 49.32 4.28
11/18/2016 Tasman 1 1460 8.41 0.73
12/6/2016 Guadalupe Creek - Almaden

D/S 1 8640 49.78 4.32
12/6/2016 Guadalupe Creek - Almaden

D/S 1 5460 31.46 2.73
12/6/2016 Coyote Creek - Remillard, Story

Rd. 2 8420 48.51 4.21
12/6/2016 Coyote Creek - Williams 1 5500 31.69 2.75
12/8/2016
Guadalupe River - Alma, Willow 2 4900 28.23 2.45
12/9/2016 Coyote Creek - Lone Bluff,

Coyote Meadows, Orvis 3 9280 53.47 4.64
Guadalupe River - 7th/Virginia,

12/9/2016 Alma/Agave Rest.,
Willow/Lelong 3 6100 35.14 3.05
12/9/2016 Guadalupe River - Almaden,

Foxworthy, Capital 3 11200 64.53 5.6
12/12/2016
Coyote Creek - Story Road 1 13580 78.24 6.79
12/12/2016
Coyote Creek - Remillard 1 3540 20.40 1.77
12/13/2016 Coyote Creek - Story Road,

Remillard 2 11020 63.49 5.51
12/14/2016
Coyote Creek - Lone Bluff 1 8680 50.01 4.34
12/14/2016 Coyote Creek - Remillard,

Williams 2 6740 38.83 3.37
12/15/2016 Coyote Creek - Wool Creek,

Needles, Rocksprings 3 10500 60.49 5.25
1/11/2017 Guadalupe River - Alma,

Willow, Lelong 3 5100 29.38 2.55
A-121
Cubic
Coyote Creek - Sunset,

1/19/2017 Remillard
Guadalupe River - Ironwood,
Foxworthy, Almaden 5 9460 54.50 4.73
1/20/2017 Guadalupe River -

Willow/Lelong 1 9140 52.66 4.57
2/1/2017 Coyote Creek - Story, Williams 2 10360 59.69 5.18

2/1/2017 Coyote Creek - Wooster 1 7080 40.79 3.54
2/2/2017 Guadalupe River - Virginia 1 7640 44.02 3.82
Coyote Creek - Wooster/101,
2/2/2017 Nottinghill 2 3300 19.01 1.65
2/2/2017 Williams 2 3100 17.86 1.55
Guadalupe River - Santa Clara,
2/3/2017 San Fernando, Virginia 3 2220 12.79 1.11
Coyote Creek - Old Oakland,
2/3/2017 Mabury 2 1980 11.41 0.99
2/7/2017 Ridder Park 2 4240 24.43 2.12
2/7/2017 Ridder Park 2 8640 49.78 4.32
2/7/2017 Ridder Park 2 9520 54.85 4.76
2/7/2017 Ridder Park 2 1060 6.11 0.53
2/8/2017 Roosevelt 2 6620 38.14 3.31
2/9/2017 Coyote Creek - Mabury 1 9780 56.35 4.89
2/9/2017 Coyote Creek - Mabury 1 2760 15.90 1.38
Coyote Creek - Galveston, Tully
2/10/2017 Rd 2 4300 24.77 2.15
A-122
Cubic
2/10/2017 Rd 2 3120 17.98 1.56
2/10/2017 Rd 2 3380 19.47 1.69
2/10/2017 Rd 2 12120 69.83 6.06
Coyote Creek - Corie Ct,
2/15/2017 Schallenberger 2 6580 37.91 3.29
2/15/2017 Coyote Creek - Remillard 1 8000 46.09 4
Coyote Creek - Corie Ct, Ridder
2/16/2017 Park 2 5880 33.88 2.94
Coyote Creek - Corie Ct, Ridder
2/16/2017 Park 2 7960 45.86 3.98
Coyote Creek - Watson, 680,

Wooster
Los Gatos Creek - Bascom
2/17/2017 Bridge, Hamilton/Bascom 4 2920 16.82 1.46
Guadalupe River - Santa

Clara/87, 280/Woz, Grant/Palm,
2/22/2017 Evans Lane 6 13900 80.08 6.95
2/22/2017 Williams 2 2900 16.71 1.45
Guadalupe River - San

Fernando, Santa Clara, St. John
2/22/2017 St. 3 8860 51.05 4.43
Guadalupe River - Palm,
2/23/2017 Autumn, Grant 3 2260 13.02 1.13
Coyote Creek - Brokaw, Ridder
2/23/2017 Park 2 9280 53.47 4.64
2/23/2017 Coyote Creek - Corrie Ct 1 1760 10.14 0.88
2/28/2017 San Fernando, Autumn 3 8340 48.05 4.17
Coyote Creek - Tully, Galveston,
3/1/2017 Remillard 3 9700 55.89 4.85
Coyote Creek - Galveston,
3/2/2017 Remillard, Tully 3 5420 31.23 2.71
3/3/2017 Coyote Creek - Tully, Galveston 2 8720 50.24 4.36
A-123
Cubic
3/13/2017 Coyote Creek - Jeanne Marie 1 2780 16.02 1.39
3/13/2017 Williams 2 12500 72.02 6.25
3/14/2017 Coyote Creek- Story Rd 1 2720 15.67 1.36
Coyote Creek - Needles,
3/14/2017 Remillard 2 2720 15.67 1.36
Guadalupe River - Coleman,
3/15/2017 Almaden 2 6920 39.87 3.46
3/15/2017 Williams 2 1560 8.99 0.78
Coyote Creek - Ridder Park,
3/16/2017 Corrie Ct. 2 5300 30.54 2.65
Los Gatos Creek - Delmas, San

3/21/2017 Carlos, Autumn, San Fernando 4 4700 27.08 2.35
Coyote Creek - Santa Clara St.

San Fernando, Remillard,
3/21/2017 Williams 4 8600 49.55 4.3
Coyote Creek - King Rd/101,

Roberts Ave
Guadalupe River - San
Carlos/Bird, Old
Almaden/Willow Glen Way
Los Gatos Creek - Bascom
3/22/2017 Bridge, Moorpark Bridge 6 9360 53.93 4.68

San Fernando, Branham,
3/23/2017 Foxworthy 4 7760 44.71 3.88
Coyote Creek - Alma, Tuers,
3/23/2017 Yerba Buena, Roosevelt 4 8200 47.24 4.1
Coyote Creek - Empire
4/4/2017 Gardens 1 10740 61.88 5.37
4/4/2017 Williams 2 8560 49.32 4.28
4/5/2017 Coyote Creek - Tully Rd 1 6800 39.18 3.4
4/5/2017 Wooster 2 8260 47.59 4.13
A-124
Cubic
Coyote Creek - Corrie
4/6/2017 Ct/Ridder Park 2 7860 45.28 3.93
Coyote Creek - Corrie
4/6/2017 Ct/Ridder Park 2 1900 10.95 0.95
4/11/2017 Coyote Creek - Brokaw 1 11920 68.68 5.96
Coyote Creek - Jeannie Marie,
4/11/2017 Remillard 2 8720 50.24 4.36
4/12/2017 Coyote Creek - Corie Ct to 880 1 8620 49.66 4.31
4/12/2017 Coyote Creek - Corie Ct to 880 1 5060 29.15 2.53

Coyote Creek - Wooster,
4/13/2017 Remillard 2 4440 25.58 2.22
Coyote Creek - Wooster,
4/13/2017 Remillard 2 9740 56.12 4.87
4/24/2017 Williams 2 10780 62.11 5.39
Coyote Creek - Corie Ct, King
4/25/2017 Rd 2 3200 18.44 1.6
Coyote Creek - Jeannie Marie,
4/26/2017 La Ragione 2 6840 39.41 3.42
Guadalupe River - Malone,

Curtner, Almaden
4/27/2017 Coyote Creek - Jeannie Marie 3 8780 50.58 4.39
5/1/2017 Coyote Creek - 17th, Santa

Clara 1 5780 33.30 2.89
5/2/2017 Coyote Creek - 17th, Santa

Clara, Phelan 2 10880 62.68 5.44
5/4/2017 Guadalupe River - 237 to

Montague 1 7220 41.60 3.61

Montague 1 7240 41.71 3.62

Montague 1 11940 68.79 5.97
5/5/2017 Guadalupe River - Montague

D/S w/b 1 2400 13.83 1.2
5/5/2017 Guadalupe River - Montague

D/S w/b 1 6240 35.95 3.12
A-125
Cubic
Guadalupe Creek - Coleman/

5/11/2017 Meridian
Coyote Creek - Lucretia 2 6120 35.26 3.06

Williams, w/b Williams 2 5580 32.15 2.79



6/14/2017
Coyote Creek - Roberts, Phelan 2 1920 11.06 0.96
6/14/2017 Coyote Creek - Tully Rd., Story

Rd. 2 3120 17.98 1.56
6/14/2017 Coyote Creek - Williams St. 1 9760 56.23 4.88
6/15/2017 Coyote Creek - Old Oakland

Rd., Ridder Park Dr. 2 2580 14.86 1.29
6/15/2017 Coyote Creek - San Antonio,

Watson Park 2 7420 42.75 3.71
6/22/2017 Coyote Creek - La Ragione 1 2100 12.10 1.05
6/22/2017 Coyote Creek - Capitol, Lone

Bluff 2 7840 45.17 3.92
6/26/2017 Coyote Creek - Remillard, Tully

Rd 2 2460 14.17 1.23
6/27/2017 Guadalupe River - Willow Glen

Way 1 1720 9.91 0.86
6/28/2017 Coyote Creek - Tully Rd u/s

Capitol 1 2860 16.48 1.43
6/28/2017 Coyote Creek - Lone Bluff 1 6700 38.60 3.35
Coyote Creek - Coyote

6/29/2017 Meadows, King Rd, Wooster
Ave. 2 7900 45.51 3.95

Williams 2 2180 12.56 1.09
Total 260 903,650 5,206 452
A-126
DIRECT DISCHARGE TRASH CONTROL PROGRAM CLEANUP TOTALS FY 16-17

PRNS Rangers (WPT) CLEANUPS
Cubic
Coyote Creek at Capitol and

7/27/2016 Tuers/ Tully Road 1 4200 24.20 2.1
7/27/2016 Tuers/ Tully Road 1 3300 19.01 1.65
Coyote Creek at Santa Clara
8/9/2016 and 19th St 1 2200 12.68 1.1
8/10/2016 Tuers 1 1100 6.34 0.55
Coyote Creek at Galveston
8/10/2016 and Summerside 1 3300 19.01 1.65
Guadalupe River at Blossom Hill
8/16/2016 Rd 1 1100 6.34 0.55
Coyote Creek at Needles and
8/23/2016 Rock Springs 1 1100 6.34 0.55
Coyote Creek at Capitol Expy
8/24/2016 and Tuers Rd 1 1100 6.34 0.55
Coyote Creek at Tuers and
8/24/2016 Umbarger 1 9000 51.85 4.5
9/7/2016 and Tuers Rd 1 2200 12.68 1.1
9/7/2016 Coyote Creek at Singleton 1 6600 38.03 3.3

9/15/2016 and Tuers Rd 1 1100 6.34 0.55
Coyote Creek at Story Rd and
9/28/2016 Senter Rd 1 3300 19.01 1.65
Los Gatos Creek at Meridian
9/28/2016 Ave. 1 3300 19.01 1.65
Coyote Creek at Capito Expy
10/12/2016 and Tuers Rd 1 10000 57.61 5
Coyote Creek at Tuers and
10/12/2016 Gassmann 1 22000 126.75 11
Coyote Creek at Galveston
10/26/2016 and Summerside 1 11000 63.38 5.5
A-127
Cubic
10/26/2016 Dr. 1 12000 69.14 6
Coyote Creek at Story Rd and
10/31/2016 Senter Rd 1 7620 43.90 3.81
11/2/2016 Coyote Creek at Tully Rd 1 7100 40.91 3.55

11/2/2016 Dr. 1 8700 50.12 4.35
Coyote Creek at Tully Rd and
11/9/2016 La Ragione Ave 1 24000 138.27 12
Coyote Creek at Phelan Ave
11/9/2016 and Roberts Ave 1 6000 34.57 3
Los Gatos Creek at Meridian
11/16/2016 Ave. 1 3200 18.44 1.6
Coyote Creek at Tully Rd and
12/14/2016 La Ragione Ave 1 6500 37.45 3.25
1/11/2017 Coyote Creek Capitol Expy. 1 24000 138.27 12
Guadalupe River San Fernando
1/22/2017 St. 1 2700 15.56 1.35
1/22/2017 Guadalupe River Park Ave. 1 2700 15.56 1.35

Los Alamitos Creek Greystone
2/13/2017 Lane 1 450 2.59 0.225
3/8/2017 Coyote Creek La Ragione Ave. 1 12000 69.14 6
3/22/2017 Coyote Creek Phelan Ave. 1 4000 23.05 2
3/22/2017 Coyote Creek Needles Dr. 1 2000 11.52 1
3/29/2017 Guadalupe River Virginia 1 900 5.19 0.45
4/12/2017 Coyote Creek Phelan Ave. 1 8000 46.09 4

4/12/2017 Coyote Creek Capitol Expy. 1 4000 23.05 2
A-128
Cubic
4/12/2017 Los Gatos Creek Stokes 1 500 2.88 0.25

Los Gatos Creek Bascom Ave.
5/3/2017 and Leigh 1 1360 7.84 0.68
Coyote Creek Phelan Ave. and

5/13/2017 Oswego Dr. 1 5400 31.11 2.7
Guadalupe River Coleman
5/24/2017 Ave. and Taylor St. 1 900 5.19 0.45
5/24/2017 St. and Park Ave. 1 9000 51.85 4.5
Guadalupe River Coleman
5/31/2017 Ave. and Taylor St. 1 3160 18.21 1.58

5/31/2017 St. and Santa Clara St. 1 3160 18.21 1.58
Coyote Creek Capitol Expy.
6/14/2017 and Tuers Rd. 1 5400 31.11 2.7
6/14/2017 Coyote Creek Tully Rd. 1 2700 15.56 1.35

Coyote Creek Jeneane Marie
6/21/2017 Cir. 1 1360 7.84 0.68
6/21/2014 Coyote Creek Story Rd. 1 4060 23.39 2.03
Total 46 258,770 1,491 129
A-129
A-130
C.10.e.ii Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Progress Report
A-131
A-132
DIRECT DISCHARGE TRASH CONTROL PROGRAM
PROGRESS REPORT
SEPTEMBER 30, 2017
S U B MI T T E D I N A C C O R D A N C E WI T H P R O V I S I O N S E C T I O N C . 1 0 . E . I I O F N P D E S P E R M I T N O .
CAS612008.
A-133
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this document is to provide an update on the City of San José’s Direct Discharge
Trash Control Program (Program) submitted to the Regional Water Quality Control Board on
February 1, 2016 and approved by the Board on August 3, 2016. This report provides an update
on the City’s implementation of the Program, including a summary of current conditions, data
collected, challenges, and lessons learned. The report will also summarize adjustments made
during the Program’s first year of implementation and present plans to improve the Program’s
ongoing monitoring plan and performance metrics.
The information collected during the Program’s first year of implementation will serve as a
baseline and allow staff to document the Program’s progress over time.
1.2 San José’s Phased Approach

The Program’s approach entails a coordinated effort of several City departments, contractors,
and community partners which constitute a systematic and comprehensive program to address
trash in waterways resulting from homeless encampment activity. The multi-step approach
includes the work of the City’s Housing Department which offers social services and housing to
homeless individuals; dismantling of encampments by the Homelessness Response Team (HRT);
removal of any remaining residual trash by volunteer groups and/or contractor staff; and finally,
patrolling by the City’s Watershed Protection Team (WPT) led by the City’s Park Rangers and
State Wildlife Wardens to prevent re-encampments along waterways (See Figure 1). The process
is cyclical, at times requiring phases to be repeated, especially when re-encampment occurs.
FIGURE 1. SAN JOSE DIRECT DISCHARGE TRASH CONTROL PROGRAM ELEMENTS
Phase 4:
Encampment
Phase 1: Phase 2: Phase 3: Prevention
Outreach to Encampment Creek Cleanup (Watershed
Encampment Dismantling Protection Team -
(City Staff, DST, Rangers,
Residents (HRT) Volunteers) Wardens,
structural
barriers)
During Phase 1, City staff and contractors, such as HomeFirst and People Assisting the Homeless
(PATH), conduct outreach to encampment residents. HomeFirst and PATH provide services,
shelter and housing opportunities to the homeless in the Downtown core and throughout the
City of San José. The objective is to provide outreach services and street base case
management and alternative housing opportunities to the homeless to reduce the number of
homeless individuals living in encampments. This phase may be repeated if re-encampments
occur.
During Phase 2, (after required noticing and property storage occur) large encampment
structures and items are removed by the City’s HRT and a construction company contractor. The
objective is to clear the site from ongoing habitations and remove the majority of the
accumulated debris. Depending on the size of the encampment, this phase may take
A-134
anywhere from hours to several days to complete and is repeated, if the area becomes re-
encamped.
During Phase 3, City staff, volunteer organizations, and/or contracted staff conduct multiple
cleanups. The objective is to remove any remaining residual trash that may not have been
collected during Phase 2. Also during this phase, appropriate locations for structural barriers may
be identified. This phase can take up to six months, repeating as long as is necessary.
During Phase 4, the WPT regularly patrols and cleans the areas in partnership with the
Department of Fish and Wildlife; depending on the location and available resources, Rangers
may patrol up to a daily basis. During this phase, structural barriers may be installed at locations
previously identified. Finally, Downtown Streets Team (DST) begins reactivation of the site with
regular sweeps of priority areas. If DST team members encounter homeless individuals as they
sweep, they engage them in peer-to-peer conversations aimed at connecting them with
services and moving them out of the area. The objective is to minimize re-encampment and
bring the site to a “maintenance level” which allows the habitat to recover. This phase is
ongoing. If re-encampment occurs, Phases 1, 2 and 3 are repeated.
2.0 FOCUS ZONE AND PROJECT AREA DESCRIPTIONS AND UPDATES

Focus Zones are comprised of stretches along Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River, and Los Gatos
Creek, currently ranging from four to twelve miles in length.
Project Areas are specific priority locations within Focus Zones. In Project Areas, more tightly
coordinated and frequent activity is deployed to clear homeless encampments, remove
residual trash, and prevent campers from reestablishing encampments in a more systematic
way.
2.1 Coyote Creek Watershed
2.1.1 Coyote Creek Focus Zone

The Coyote Creek Focus Zone (Focus Zone #1) encompasses a stretch of the creek
approximately 10.7 miles long, beginning at Capitol Expressway and proceeding downstream to
Brokaw Road (See Map 1: San José Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Map).
In FY 16-17, there was a concerted effort to implement the phased approach on Focus Zone #1
since the majority of the trash and encampment population resides there. The following
subsections will provide in depth descriptions of efforts occurring within each Project Area.
2.1.2 Coyote Creek Project Areas

Within the larger Coyote Creek Focus Zone are three Project Areas: #1 Story Road, #2
Tully/Capitol, and #3 Hazlett/880. These areas have been identified for a concentrated attention
of the Program. (See Map 1: San José Direct Discharge Trash Control Program Map).
Project Area #1: A 30.4-acre area along Coyote Creek at Story Road (See Map 2: Project Area
#1) known as “Coyote Meadows” (previously known as “the Jungle”), has received the
concentrated attention of the Program since September 2014 and reached Phase 4 in June
2015 where regular patrolling and cleanups maintain the area free of entrenched
encampments.
A community planning process has begun for Coyote Meadows to create a new open space
park, supporting permanent Phase 4 status for this area. The Coyote Meadows Coalition is
A-135
comprised of community groups and individuals focused on activating a 50-acre City-owned

parcel along Coyote Creek, which includes Project Area #1. The future Coyote Creek Trail will
run along the east side of the creek and the future Five Wounds Trail will eventually connect to
the area, opening the park to surrounding neighborhoods and trail users.
Project Area #2: A 120-acre area of undeveloped park land adjacent to the Los Lagos Golf
Course, located between Tully Road and Capitol Expressway (See Map 3: Project Area #2), also
known as the “Tea Cups”, will receive the next concerted effort to implement the Program’s
phased approach. In June 2017, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wardens
accompanied Program staff on an assessment of the Project Area, from Tully Road upstream to
Yerba Buena Road, to measure trash impact levels and encampments. Staff observed trash
levels ranging between moderate and very high and counted approximately 63 camps.
The “Tea Cups” area along Coyote Creek at Capital Expressway near Lone Bluff Park has
received concentrated attention since the inception of the WPT. This includes regular patrolling
and abatements in an effort to maintain the area free of entrenched encampments. The
Watershed Protection Team continues to provide encampment abatement, trash removal, and
disbursement services. Plans are currently being discussed regarding future use for Project Area
#2 and may include additional deterrent and patrolling efforts to permanently remove any
entrenched encampments from the area.
Discussions to plan and develop a park in Project Area #2 have continued to occur. In early
2017, the City conducted a survey to assess the community’s preferences for the future of the
Los Lagos Golf Course. Most survey respondents believe trails, open space, parks and
playgrounds should be included in the golf course’s future. Respondents also sited Coyote Creek
cleanups as one of the most important improvements the course could make. The information
provided in this survey highlights the potential for this area to reach and maintain Phase 4 of the
Program.
Project Area #3: A 66-acre park-like area adjacent to the San José Municipal Golf Course
between Highway 880 and Hazlett Way (See Map 4: Project Area #3), also known as “North San
José”, is the Program’s 3rd Project Area. While this area was not prioritized to reach Phase 4 in FY
16-17, the City conducted Phases 1-3 of the Program here. The City plans to concentrate its
efforts on Project Area #3 in FY 18-19 to progress towards Phase 4.
2.2 Guadalupe River Watershed
2.2.1 Guadalupe River North Focus Zone (Focus Zone #2)

Focus Zone #2 encompasses a stretch of the Guadalupe River approximately 11.6 miles long
between Highways 85 and 101 (See Map 1: San José Direct Discharge Trash Control Program
Map).
Housing outreach teams regularly visit encampments located along the Guadalupe River to
educate residents about housing and other social services. The City’s HRT conducts weekly
encampment abatements along the river and community groups coordinate regular cleanups
to remove residual trash left from dismantled encampments. The City’s WPT and California
Department of Fish and Wildlife Wardens also respond to calls and complaints along Guadalupe
River.
2.2.2 Los Gatos Creek Focus Zone (Focus Zone #3)

Focus Zone #3 encompasses a stretch of the Los Gatos Creek approximately 4.4 miles long from
Bascom Avenue to the confluence point with the Guadalupe River.
A-136
The City continues to implement Phases 1-3 in Focus Zone #3. Housing outreach teams visit
encampments along Los Gatos Creek to refer residents to housing and social services. The HRT
conducts encampment abatements on Los Gatos Creek as they are reported to the City, and
community groups schedule volunteer cleanups along the creek to remove trash once
encampments are dismantled. While the City’s WPT does not conduct regular patrols on Los
Gatos Creek, they do respond to calls and complaints as necessary.
3.0 MONITORING
The following subsections contain descriptions of the performance indicators that, collectively,
are intended to document the progress of the City’s Program. Table 2 below contains the list of
performance indicators and the frequency with which they were collected. Each following
subsection contains the data collected.
The data in this report covers FY16-17, however it does not include information for July 2016 since
the Program was not approved until August 2016 (staff did collect some data for July). The City
defines “Entire Waterway Stretches” as all sections of Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River, and Los
Gatos Creek that are within San José’s jurisdiction.
Performance indicators and maps in this report do not include sections of waterways where staff
was not able to conduct Program activities, reasons for which are discussed in Section 4.1.
TABLE 2. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Entire Waterway Stretches Focus Zones (including the

Project Areas)
Encampment counts Semi-annual Monthly
Encampment locations Semi-annual Monthly
(waterways)
Encampment locations (on- Monthly Monthly
land)
Number of patrols conducted N/A Monthly
Number of cleanups Annually Annually
conducted
Tons (or cubic yards) of trash Annually Annually
removed
Number of individuals Annually Monthly
referred to services
Number of violation warnings Annually Monthly
Number of citations Annually Monthly
Number of arrests Annually Monthly
A-137
3.1 Encampment Counts and Locations (Waterways and On-land)
3.1.1 Number of Encampments along Waterways

Encampment counts were calculated by aggregating data from Program staff’s monitoring
assessments, WPT Park Ranger patrol logs, the Housing outreach teams’ site visit logs, and HRT
abatement documentation.
Semi-annual totals for entire waterway stretches were calculated by aggregating the total
amount of structures logged during the month of the semi-annual surveys (December and
August). The totals are presented in Table 3 below.
Monthly totals for Focus Zones were calculated by totaling the median number of structures per
segment within the Focus Zones. These totals are presented in Table 4 below. The median was
used to address redundancy in the data since multiple teams logged structures each month.
Segments are used on the encampment location maps (See Maps 5-15) to provide clarity and
to simplify the appearance of the data. The segments used were created in partnership with the
Santa Clara Valley Water District and represent sections of creeks between access roads.
Fluctuations in monthly encampment counts for Focus Zones exist due to constraints
experienced by each department. For example, WPT Park Rangers were not able to patrol
several areas of the Focus Zones due to reports of repeated violence and staffing shortages. In
addition, weather conditions during the wet season impacted the total number of assessments
made by Program staff.
See Section 4.1 for a summary of challenges that limited Program staff from conducting their
respective phases of the Program. In addition, see encampment location maps for areas of
waterways that were unmonitored due to these challenges.
TABLE 3. ENTIRE WATERWAY STRETCHES ENCAMPMENT COUNTS - SEMI -ANNUAL
Month Number of
Encampments
December-16 79*
August-17 **
*Totals are for entire waterw ays, including the Program Focus Zones.
**Data collected in August 2017 will be included in the next report.
A-138
TABLE 4. FOCUS ZONES ENCAMPMENT COUNTS – MONTHLY
Month Number of
Encampments*
August 102
September 69
October 86
November 122
December 62
January 116
February 54
March 55
April 70
May 69
June 117
Total 922
*Program staff defines an “Encampment” as one tent or tarp.
3.1.2 Location of Encampments along Waterways

On a monthly basis, Program staff recorded encampment locations in the three Focus Zones,
which represent the most active stretches of waterways. In addition, staff recorded
encampment locations along the end-to-end full stretches of Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River,
and Los Gatos Creek twice last year. See challenges associated with creek monitoring listed in
Section 4.1.
Furthermore, data to create encampment location maps was gathered and provided by
Program staff’s monitoring assessments, the WPT’s Park Ranger patrol logs, the Housing outreach
team’s site visit logs and HRT abatement documentation.
See Maps 5-16 for monthly and semi-annual encampment waterway maps.
3.1.3 Location of On-Land Encampments

On-land encampments are counted by the Housing outreach team and HRT as each group
conducts their ongoing activities and responds to calls reporting encampment locations.
See Maps 17-27 for monthly on-land encampment maps.
3.5 Cleanup Results
Tons of trash removed from HRT and WPT cleanups is reported in Table 5 below. The City tracks
the location, date, and weight or volume of trash removed during each cleanup conducted.
TABLE 5. ENCAMPMENT CLEANUPS - ANNUAL
Entire waterway stretches Focus Zones (including the

Project Areas)
Number of cleanups 306 292
conducted
Tons of trash removed 581 544
A-139
3.6 Watershed Protection Team Park Ranger Patrols
The City’s WPT patrols areas within all three Focus Zones to deter re-encampment. Tables 6 and 7
below illustrate the level of enforcement activity conducted to deter encampments from
locating near waterways.
In FY 16-17, enforcement along waterways and Focus Zones was limited due to staff shortages,
weather conditions, and safety concerns. For example, there was an increase in criminal activity
and violent acts in Project Area #2, which temporarily suspended patrols in area between Tully
Road and Stonegate Park in September 2016. Monthly enforcement data fluctuates due to
these challenges, which are further discussed in Section 4.1.
TABLE 6. WPT ENFORCEMENT – ENTIRE WATERWAY STRETCHES - ANNUAL
Entire waterway
stretches
Number of violation warnings 489
Number of citations 138
Number of arrests 28
TABLE 7. WPT ENFORCEMENT – FOCUS ZONES (INCLUDING PROJECT AREAS) - MONTHLY
Month Number of Number of Number of Number of

patrols violation citations arrests
conducted warnings
August-16 19 57 13 1
September-16 14 33 8 4
October-16 35 96 21 4
November-16 32 60 18 2
December-16 12 29 13 4
January-17 9 30 6 2
February-17 4 11 3 0
March-17 14 33 17 2
April-17 11 19 8 2
May-17 19 46 11 4
June-17 16 44 5 2
Total 185 458 123 27
3.7 Housing Services and Outreach
The number of individuals referred to services and the number of individuals housed is reported
in Table 8 below. The monthly number of individuals referred to services is retrieved from Program
partner, HomeFirst, a City contractor that provides outreach and case management services.
HomeFirst records a referral when an unduplicated client is newly referred to services. An
unduplicated client is defined as an individual who chooses to provide their first and last name,
complete an intake, and sign a release of information rather than withhold information. The
monthly number of individuals housed is also retrieved from HomeFirst. HomeFirst records when
A-140
an individual is officially housed upon exit of their program. This metric does not take into
account individuals that were housed without HomeFirst’s services.
In FY 16-17, the City and its partners did not record where an individual was located when they
were referred to services or housed. Therefore, the City is only able to provide jurisdiction-wide
referral and housing data in this report. To improve data collection in FY 17-18, the City will work
with its partners to obtain referral and housing data according to each Focus Zone and Entire
Waterway Stretch.
The biennial homeless census collects demographic information about San José’s homeless
population and is the primary source of change in the number of homeless individuals from two
years prior. In the 2017 census, there were 643 individuals counted in encampment areas. This
represents a 17% decrease from 778 in 2015 and continues a downward trend from 2013, when
1,230 individuals were observed living in encampments.
TABLE 8. INDIVIDUALS REFERRED TO SERVICES AND/OR HOUSED - MONTHLY
Month Number of individuals Number of individuals

referred to services housed
August 50 0
September 32 1
October 57 3
November 43 0
December 44 4
January 28 5
February 13 0
March 37 4
April 43 4
May 79 4
June 36 0
Total 462 25
3.8 Trash Impact Level
Trash impact level was recorded during quarterly creek assessments conducted by ESD staff. In
the first quarter, staff graded trash impact level on a Low, Moderate, High, Very High scale
based on field experience.
See Maps 28-31 for quarterly trash impact level maps.
4.0 Challenges, Lessons Learned, and Adjustments
4.1 Challenges
In FY 16-17, staff encountered challenges that inhibited the ability to monitor sections of Coyote
Creek, Guadalupe River and Los Gatos Creek. These challenges include:
• Safety – A number of safety incidents have prohibited access to several segments of
waterways.
o Illegal campers, other individuals, and dogs off leash have threatened staff
during assessments.
A-141
o The WPT and San José Police Department have restricted staff and volunteers
from entering sections of the waterways due to criminal activity.
• Inaccessibility – Physical barriers and other restrictions limited full access to entire stretch
of waterways.
o Steep banks or heavy vegetation limit full access to some locations.
o Certain trails and service roads do not allow staff to get close enough to clearly
assess the waterway for encampments or trash impact level.
o City does not have legal access to privately owned sections of the waterways.
o Weather-related events, such as the persistent storms and flooding, limited
access to riparian corridors and delayed assessments.
• Flooding – winter storms resulted in unprecedented flooding in San José, skewing trash
impact level data.
o After the flood event on February 20, 2017, staff observed an influx of trash and
debris deposited along banks and in trees within all three of the Focus Zones.
o Until the flood, trash impact level data may have indicated gradual progress of
the program, but the recent trash deposition indicates otherwise.
• Staffing – Staffing shortages on the City’s WPT limited their capacity to patrol the City’s
waterways, as outlined in the original plan.
o Currently, the WPT has two full-time Park Rangers, one part-time Park Ranger
(working one day per week), and one Senior Park Ranger. In FY 16-17, WPT
operated at 50% capacity due to two vacancies.
4.2 Lessons Learned and Adjustments
Staff learned several lessons and made adjustments to the Program during the first year of
implementation. These lessons and adjustments are summarized below.
• Aggregating data from multiple parties can lead to redundancy in reporting.
o To adjust, staff used the median number of structures in the encampment count
data, gathered from multiple sources, to reduce the potential of counting camps
more than once.
o Staff also asked internal and external Program partners to log information into
Survey123, an app used to centralize the data collection process.
• Accessibility challenges can lead to inconsistent data collection.
o In FY 17-18, program staff will note instances where accessibility is difficult and
document areas where monitoring cannot occur. For instance, steep banks,
heavy vegetation, and inaccessible trails.
• Standard operating procedures for safety are necessary to establish appropriate
expectations for data collection.
o Staff developed standard operating procedures for field safety as concerns
become apparent. For example, staff began monitoring waterways from vehicles
when safety escorts were not available.
o Staff maintained a log with safety incidents and created a safety notification
alert system using an email listserv.
• Program success is highly dependent on interdepartmental coordination.
o Staff work with each of the departments involved to align goals and priorities.
o Department leadership is invested in the success of the Program.
A-142
o Internal and external Program partners meet monthly to discuss successes,

challenges, and potential improvements.
4.3 Planned Modifications to Tracking and Reporting
• Staff intends to make the following modifications and will amend the monitoring
frequency of performance indicators to better allocate resources.
o Quarterly assessments will provide comparable results to monthly assessments,
while also creating the bandwidth to focus on identifying and implementing
actions to address security concerns or increasing the number of staff conducting
the assessment.
o In addition, staff will collect housing metrics annually since housing is a multi-step
process that is difficult to capture on a monthly basis.
o Staff also plans to collect information within Project Areas, in addition to entire
waterway stretches and Focus Zones.
o Monitoring progress made within each Project Area would better demonstrate if
the Program’s phased approach is working.
Table 9 below contains the frequencies for monitoring and data collection planned for FY 17-18.
TABLE 9. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS FOR FY17-18
Entire Focus Project Project Project

waterway Zones Area #1 Area #2 Area #3
stretches
Encampment counts Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly
Encampment locations Quarterly Quarterly N/A N/A N/A
(waterways)
Number of patrols conducted Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Number of arrests Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Number of citations Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Number of warnings Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Number of individuals referred to Annual Annual Annual Annual Annual
services
Number of cleanups conducted Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
Tons (or cubic yards) of trash Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly Monthly
removed
Trash Impact Level Quarterly Quarterly N/A N/A N/A
5.0 SUMMARY
The City of San José developed this comprehensive, multi-year Direct Discharge Trash Control
Program to address trash along and in its major waterways resulting from homeless
encampments. The Program is designed to evolve as lessons are learned, and will continue
through the entire term of the Municipal Regional Permit Order No. R2-2015-0049, with the goal
of these major waterways becoming largely trash-free.
During the Program’s first year of implementation, the City experienced several challenges and
learned valuable lessons relating to data collection, monitoring, field safety, and
interdepartmental coordination. Staff made several adjustments included in this report to
address these challenges and is confident the planned and implemented adjustments will
contribute to safe and successful implementation of the Program.
It is difficult to identify any significant trends in the data since this is the Program’s first year of
implementation. The data presented in this report serves as baseline information to compare
A-143
with data collected in future years. As more information is collected, trends to document
progress may become more apparent. Staff plans to include a comparison of FY 16-17 to 17-18
data in the next progress report.
The Direct Discharge Trash Control Program works to jointly achieve the City's trash reduction
requirements and the City's goal to end homelessness. Thus far, the City has seen success with
aligning departmental goals and ensuring all partners are invested in the Program. The
Program’s phased approach will be effective at reducing direct discharges of trash into
waterways from homeless encampments once all phases are fully implemented in the project
areas.
A-144
GLOSSARY
DST Downtown Streets Team is a non-profit organization, contracted by the City

that collects residual trash after encampment abatements in Phase 3, and
conducts peer-to-peer outreach with encampment residents.
Entire Waterway Includes the entire length of Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River, and Los
Stretch Gatos Creek that is within San José’s jurisdiction.
ESD The Environmental Services Department is responsible for coordinating the

City’s stormwater management programs, including the Direct Discharge
Trash Control Program.
Focus Zones Stretches along Coyote Creek, Guadalupe River, and Los Gatos Creek that
represent the most heavily encamped areas and have high trash levels.
HomeFirst A City contractor that provides outreach and case management services
to homeless individuals in Phase 1.
HRT The Homeless Response Team, includes staff from the City’s Housing
Department, the Santa Clara Valley Water District, and contractors such as
Tucker Construction. The HRT is responsible for providing social services and
housing information in Phase 1 and dismantling homeless encampments in
Phase 2.
PATH People Assisting the Homeless is a City contractor that provides outreach
and case management services to homeless individuals in Phase 1.
PRNS The Department of Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood Services employs

the Watershed Protection Team’s Park Rangers.
Project Areas Specific priority locations within Focus Zones that receive a more
concentrated effort to implement the Program’s phased approach. These
areas are historically prone to entrenched encampments and very high
trash levels.
WPT The Watershed Protection Team, comprised of City Park Rangers is

responsible for patrolling and enforcing waterways to prevent
encampments in Phase 4. WPT also conducts cleanups in Phase 3.
A-145
MAP 1. SAN JOSE DIRECT DISCHARGE TRASH CONTROL PROGRAM MAP
A-146
MAP 2. SAN JOSE DIRECT DISCHARGE PROJECT AREA #1 MAP

(COYOTE MEADOWS)
A-147

(THE TEA CUPS)
A-148

(N. SAN JOSE)
A-149
MAP 5. SAN JOSE DIRECT DISCHARGE PROGRAM MONTHLY ENCAMPMENT

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS– AUGUST 2016
A-150

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – SEPTEMBER 2016
A-151

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – OCTOBER 2016
A-152

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – NOVEMBER 2016
A-153

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – DECEMBER 2016
A-154

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – JANUARY 2017
A-155

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – FEBRUARY 2017
A-156

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – MARCH 2017
A-157

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – APRIL 2017
A-158

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – MAY 2017
A-159

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – JUNE 2017
A-160
MAP 16. SAN JOSE DIRECT DISCHARGE PROGRAM SEMI-ANNUAL ENCAMPMENT

LOCATIONS ALONG WATERWAYS – DECEMBER 2016
A-161

LOCATIONS ON LAND – AUGUST 2016
A-162

LOCATIONS ON LAND – SEPTEMBER 2016
A-163

LOCATIONS ON LAND – OCTOBER 2016
A-164

LOCATIONS ON LAND – NOVEMBER 2016
A-165

LOCATIONS ON LAND – DECEMBER 2016
A-166

LOCATIONS ON LAND – JANUARY 2017
A-167

LOCATIONS ON LAND – FEBRUARY 2017
A-168

LOCATIONS ON LAND – MARCH 2017
A-169

LOCATIONS ON LAND – APRIL 2017
A-170

LOCATIONS ON LAND – MAY 2017
A-171

LOCATIONS ON LAND – JUNE 2017
A-172
MAP 28. SAN JOSE DIRECT DISCHARGE PROGRAM QUARTERLY TRASH IMPACT
LEVEL – JULY THROUGH SEPTEMBER 2016
A-173
LEVEL – OCTOBER THROUGH DECEMBER 2016
A-174
LEVEL JANUARY THROUGH MARCH 2017
A-175
LEVEL APRIL THROUGH JUNE 2017
A-176
C.10.f.iii Baseline Trash Generation Map
A-177
A-178
A-179
A-180
A-181
A-182
A-183
A-184

Annual Report FY 2016-2017 MRP Final ADA Compliant 1.1

Diunggah oleh

Informasi Dokumen

Hak Cipta

Format Tersedia

Bagikan dokumen Ini

Bagikan atau Tanam Dokumen

Opsi Berbagi

Apakah menurut Anda dokumen ini bermanfaat?

Apakah konten ini tidak pantas?

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

Annual Report FY 2016-2017 MRP Final ADA Compliant 1.1

Diunggah oleh

Hak Cipta:

Format Tersedia

City of San José

Santa Clara Valley

1) One of three HDS unit installations on Sonora Avenue.

3) Independence High School student, trained in the Biologists in Classrooms curriculum,

This report was prepared by the City of San José

Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................................... i-1

C.2 Municipal Operations

C.3 New and Redevelopment

San José’s implementation of Permit Provision C.3

Development activity decreased in FY 16-17 with

C.4 Industrial and Commercial Site Controls

C.5 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination

C.6 Construction Site Control

Stockpile covered at construction site.

C.7 Public Information and Outreach

Public education highlights for FY 16-17

School-aged youth are a critical audience

The City also actively supports and participates in

This year, City staff actively participated in

C.9 Pesticides Toxicity Control

City staff partnered with BASMAA and the San

C.10 Trash Load Reduction

The City installed a total of 11 public Hydrodynamic

Programs aimed at reducing the population of homeless

The MRP allows permittees to offset part of its trash load

The City continued to implement and assess the EPS Foam

C.11 Mercury Controls and C.12 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Controls

C.13 Copper Controls

C.15 Exempted and Conditionally Exempted Discharges

Outreach to Google volunteers at demonstration gardens.

Section 1 – Permittee Information

This page is intentionally left blank.

Section 2 - Provision C.2 Reporting Municipal Operations

Program Highlights and Evaluation

C.2.a. ►Street and Road Repair and Maintenance

C.2.b. ►Sidewalk/Plaza Maintenance and Pavement Washing

C.2.c. ►Bridge and Structure Maintenance and Graffiti Removal

C.2.e. ►Rural Public Works Construction and Maintenance

C.2.f. ►Corporation Yard BMP Implementation

Date and Description of

2 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.

Date and Description of

3 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.

Date and Description of

4 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.

Date and Description of

5 Minimum inspection frequency is once a year during September.

Section 3 - Provision C.3 Reporting New Development and Redevelopment

C.3.b.iv.(1) ► Regulated Projects Approved Prior to C.3

C.3.b.iv.(2) ►Regulated Projects Reporting

C.3.e.iv. ►Alternative or In-Lieu Compliance with Provision C.3.c.

C.3.e.v ► Special Projects Reporting

C.3.h.v.(2) ► Reporting Newly Installed Stormwater Treatment

C.3.h.v.(3)(a) –(c) and (f) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment

C.3.h.v.(3)(d)-(e) ► Installed Stormwater Treatment Systems

C.3.h.v.(4)► Enforcement Response Plan

C.3.i. ►Required Site Design Measures for Small Projects and

C.3.j.i.(5).(a) ► Green Infrastructure Framework or Work Plan

C.3.j.i.(5)(d) ► Green Infrastructure Outreach

C.3.j.ii.(2) ► Early Implementation of Green Infrastructure

Summary of Planning or Implementation Status of Identified Projects:

C.3.j.iii.(2) ► Participate in Processes to Promote Green

C.3.j.iv.(2) ► Tracking and Reporting Progress

7 Include cross streets.