FHS 1100
Mark Jarvis
Cooperation v. Competition
QUESTION:
Based on your knowledge of American culture and child development, respond to BOTH of the
following: sets of questions:
1. Is competition over-emphasized in American Society? Why? What are the advantages of such a
competitive attitude? What are the disadvantages?
2. Identify situations that you have observed in which competition has actually interfered with people
achieving a goal. Is competition emphasized in children? What recommendations would you make to
parents regarding their child's participation in soccer, baseball, etc.?
ANSWER:
In many aspects of American culture, competition is king. It seems that no matter where we go,
there is always another instance of being competitive or proving oneself to their fellow peers. On the
freeway, we race to pass each other if a car slows us down. We worship different sports teams and
boast how well ours is doing this season. In school, we praise and acknowledge those who do well
academically, and especially those who play sports and take us to the top bracket. At home, we compete
with our siblings to be better, faster, and stronger than they are. We compete for job titles, school
admittance, and who has the hottest significant other. Competition is engrained in the very fabric of our
society, making it impossible to ignore or not participate in. This massive emphasis of competition
within our culture might stem from the ravenous desire to succeed. It seems that this desire is an
instinctual force that makes us want to constantly improve and be better than those around us, thus
improving survival chances. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, though it could lead to bad consequences.
For example, this can push one to stretch farther in education to become more competent and able. The
drive to succeed and be better than others can have negative side affects too. For example, most if not
all schools in America use achievement tests to determine the academic standing of their students.
These tests usually focus on science, math, and reading skills (Don Kauchak, 2017, p. 143). If a student
isn’t proficient in any of these fields, they may be deemed stupid, unable, or unintelligent. This could
cause them to become self-conscious or depressed. If a student bases their worth solely on the scores
they receive in school, they could develop anxiety and depression. Many younger students don’t have
the resilience necessary to overcome such stressors and will be unable to face adversity (Berger, 2016,
p. 285). Another problem that these tests and standards create is cumulative stress. With such a great
emphasis on test scores and grades across the board, the stress that students face throughout each
school year builds. This can cause severe and pathological depression and anxiety (Berger, 2016, p. 286).
What these tests don’t take into consideration is multiple intelligences (Berger, 2016, p. 268). Some
people may be more intelligent in linguistics, but not math. Others may be able to comprehend music
easily, but have a harder time comprehending spatial differences. As we learn to accept the different
talents and abilities of others, we can avoid the social and psychological pressures caused by
I can recall one instance where competition hindered another from achieving their goals. My
sister once loved to sing and decided to pursue that talent in high school. The high school that we
attended had a very rigorous choral program, and the competition was known throughout the
community as being intense and demanding. Even though my sister had a legitimate talent for singing,
she ultimately decided to not try out for the advanced choir position due to the competition. She had a
preconceived notion that she couldn’t make it because the other students were also very talented and
were, in her words, “more likely to get into the class” than she was. Today, competition among children
is one of the most prevalent and bitter. We put our children into dance, music, sports, and even math
programs that encourage the best of the kids. This can put unnecessary pressures on them, often as
parents push them harder and harder to do more and more. A child might soon come to believe that
their value is based on their performance. If they fail, then they are failures and worthless. The
psychological damage that this can do could last for a lifetime. Instead of pushing their children to
unrealistic expectations, parents should focus on the journey of a sport or extracurricular activity, not
the end goal of winning. They might, for example, say, “You must have practiced very hard to do so well
in your performance.” In the event of a failure, the parent might say “I bet with even more practice you
can become better at making goals.” This doesn’t put pressure on the kids or their self-worth, but still
encourages improvement and goal setting. It focuses on the intrinsic values of growth, learning, and
improvement rather than the extrinsic values of reward, winning, and being the best. Having a cultural
shift like this is important, since children will see how families and others act and will ultimately pass
that behavior on to the next generation (Berger, 2016, p. 283). We can combat this negative behavior by
teaching our kids a better way, one that doesn’t include an unrealistic connection between self-worth
and achievement.
References
Berger, K. S. (2016). Invitation to the Life Span. New York: Worth Publishers.