0 penilaian0% menganggap dokumen ini bermanfaat (0 suara)
13 tayangan2 halaman
1) The case involved a challenge to a Florida law that imposed higher license fees on chain stores than independently owned stores.
2) The Supreme Court upheld the higher fees for chain stores, finding the legislature could reasonably distinguish between chain and independent store operations.
3) However, the Court found the further increase in fees for stores located across county lines to be arbitrary, as there was no reasonable basis for that distinction. The case was reversed and remanded on that basis.
1) The case involved a challenge to a Florida law that imposed higher license fees on chain stores than independently owned stores.
2) The Supreme Court upheld the higher fees for chain sto…