Objectives:
Data collection and the composition of that data into analyzable data
Since we have had suboptimal results with our device, we decided to map out the
magnetic field of the device Gamma and a natural magnet. We did this by taping sheets of graph
paper together and placing the magnetic source in the middle of the sheet. Then we took small
compasses and laid them around the magnetic source, writing the direction of the compass on the
paper. We did this for device Gamma and the natural magnet. After we were done mapping the
field we took the magnetic field sensor and measured the magnitude of the field at various
points. From this mapping we found that the optimal placement of the magnetic field source is
We also found out that our device Gamma and natural magnet have surface magnetic
fields that are larger than the range of the Vernier magnetic field sensor. Thus we looked into
purchasing another, more powerful magnetic field sensor. However, these proved to be too
MAGNETIC ANIMAL REPELLENT LAB NOTEBOOK 4
expensive and we realized that we only need to know the magnitude of the field two to five
There is also new research into how birds actually go about sensing magnetic fields.
Their access to magneto-reception stems from a protein located in their eyes called Cry4. Cry4 is
also a protein which helps to regulate a bird’s circadian rhythm. Scientist studied the Zebra finch
which have three proteins that regulate circadian rhythm located in the eye: Cry1, Cry2, and
Cry4. Cry1 and Cry2 fluctuate throughout the day, as expected, but Cry4 remains constant
suggesting it has an additional usage. It was later determined that many other bird had constant
levels of Cry4, even non-migratory ones. Those which did migrate had elevated levels overall
but interestingly non-migratory bird, like chicken, still have Cry4 in their eyes. Though this does
not necessarily affect how we are approaching our project, it does change our perspective on how
During testing, we found that the types of birds that come to the bird feeder are most
likely: Carolina Wren and various types of sparrows. For testing we decided to go with the
natural magnet, seeing as the magnitude of its magnetic field was similar to device Gamma’s.
Fig 3. This is how we mounted the natural magnet, underneath the bird feeder with tape.
The bird food was filled up to two inches when the magnet was placed as shown in the
picture. After two days past the bird food went down half way, indicating that a constant
magnetic field did not scare the birds away. The magnet was set up so that the birds are as close
Future Goals
After testing the Gamma device and the natural magnet, we determined that we need
more data on the birds behavior. We may want to make another device that has an oscillating
magnetic field, because we think the constant magnetic field is not as distracting enough.
Therefore, we will conduct a couple more trials in the hopes to yield more positive results which
will support our hypothesis. During this testing we plan to record the bird’s interaction with the
device. After all of our data collection is complete, we will compile all of our research into a
presentable format, of which we will present at the Symposium. Along with this we will also
References
Gabbatiss, Josh., 7 Apr. 2018, “Substance That Gives Birds Mysterious Power to See Earth's
power-earths-magnetic-field-scientists-discovery-magnetoreception-lund-university-
oldenburg-a8293891.html.
Loss, S. R., Will, T., & Marra, P. P. (2014). Refining Estimates of Bird Collision and
Electrocution Mortality at Power Lines in the United States. Retrieved October 24, 2017,
from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4081594/
Staff Feb. 7, 2005 From the print edition Print Share Subscribe Donate Now. (2005, February
07). High Country News. Retrieved October 24, 2017, from
http://www.hcn.org/issues/291/15268
Patent US5884426 - Magnetic device for repelling birds. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2017,
from https://www.google.com/patents/US5884426ht