2015;32(2):897-904
ISSN 0212-1611 • CODEN NUHOEQ
S.V.R. 318
Original / Otros
Cardiovascular risk and associated factors in adolescents
Pedro Paulo do Prado Junior1, Franciane Rocha de Faria2, Eliane Rodrigues de Faria3, Sylvia do Carmo
Castro Franceschini4 and Silvia Eloiza Priore4
1
Lecturer the Department of Medicine and Nursing at the Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais. 2Lecturer the Department
of Nutrition at the Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais. 3Lecturer at the Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória,
Espírito Santo. 4Lecturer in the graduate program in Nutrition Science at the Federal University of Viçosa, Minas Gerais (Brazil).
897
Table I
Prevalence of anthropometric and clinical changes, and family history in relation to the adolescents’ gender
Gender
Risk factors Total n (%) Male Female p*
n=298 n=378
Overweight 161 (23.8) 77 (25.8) 84 (22.2) 0.27
BF excess 339 (50.1) 110 (36.9) 229 (60.6) < 0.001
BP > P90 21 (3.1) 14 (4.7) 7 (1.9) 0.03
Family History of CVD 299 (44.2) 125 (41.9) 174 (46) 0.17
Sedentary lifestyle 438 (64.8) 182 (41.6) 256 (58.4) 0.07
TC ≥ 150 mg/dL 409 (60.5) 158 (53) 251 (66.4) < 0.001
LDL ≥ 100 mg/dL 232 (34.3) 92 (30.9) 140 (37) 0.09
TG ≥ 100 mg/dL 107 (15.8) 38 (12.8) 69 (18.3) 0.05
HDL ≤ 45 mg/dL 239 (35.4) 128 (43) 111 (29.4) < 0.001
Glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL 6 (0.9) 3 (1.0) 3 (0.8) 0.76
Insulin ≥ 15 mU/mL 77 (11.7) 25 (8.4) 52 (13.8) 0.02
HOMA ≥ 3.16 79 (11.7) 27 (9.1) 52 (13.8) 0.05
* Chi-square: p < 0.05; BF: Body Fat; BP: Blood Pressure; TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; CVD: Cardiovascular Disease; LDL: Low
Density Lipoprotein; HDL: High Density Lipoprotein.
Adolescence stages
Risk Factors Total n (%) Initial Intermediate Final p*
n = 280 n = 178 n = 161
Overweight 161 (23.8) 82 (29.3) 42 (20.6) 37 (19.3) 0.01 ‡ §
BF excess 339 (50.1) 132 (47.1) 112 (54.9) 95 (49.5) 0.23
BP > P90 21 (3.1) 9 (3.2) 8 (3.9) 4 (2.1) 0.56 †
Family History of CVD 299 (44.2) 114 (40.7) 105 (51.5) 80 (41.7) 0.34
Sedentary lifestyle 438 (64.8) 154 (35.2) 150 (34.2) 134 (30.6) < 0.001 ‡ §
TC ≥ 150 mg/dL 409 (60.5) 193 (68.9) 110 (53.9) 106 (55.2) 0.001 ‡ §
LDL ≥ 100 mg/dL 232 (34.3) 125 (44.6) 49 (24) 58 (30.2) < 0.001 ‡ §
TG ≥ 100 mg/dL 107 (15.8) 50 (17.9) 31 (15.2) 26 (13.5) 0.43
HDL ≤ 45 mg/dL 239 (35.4) 95 (33.9) 73 (35.8) 71 (37) 0.78
Glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL 6 (0.9) 4 (1.4) 1 (0.5) 1 (0.5) 0.45
Insulin ≥ 15 mU/mL 77 (11.7) 37 (13.2) 23 (11.3) 17 (8.9) 0.34
HOMA ≥ 3.16 79 (11.7) 38 (13.6) 25 (12.3) 16 (8.3) 0.21
BF: Body Fat; BP: Blood Pressure; TC: Total Cholesterol; TG: Triglycerides; CVD: Cardiovascular Disease; LDL: Low Density Lipoprotein;
HDL: High Density Lipoprotein
* : Partition of chi-square with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.016; †: Fisher’s exact test; ‡: Comparison between the initial and the intermediate
stages; §: Comparison between the initial and the final stages.
Table III
Prevalence of anthropometric and clinical changes, and family history in relation to the nutritional status of adolescents
Nutritional Status
Risk factors Total n (%) Group 01 Group 02 Group 03 p**
n= 337 n= 178 n= 161
Overweight 161 (23.8) - - 161 (100) -
BF excess 339 (50.1) - 178 (100) 161 (100) -
BP > P90 21 (3.1) 9 (2.7) 1 (0.6) 11 (6.8) 0.004 †, ‡, §
Family History of CVD 299 (44.2) 151 (44.8) 85 (47.8) 63 (39.1) 0.31
Sedentary lifestyle 438(64.8) 202 (46.1) 129 (29.5) 107 (24.4) 0.01 ¶, #
TC ≥ 150 mg/dL 409 (60.5) 189 (56.1) 121 (68) 99 (61.5) 0.03 //
LDL ≥ 100 mg/dL 232 (34.3) 100 (29.7) 63 (35.4) 69 (42.9) 0.01 ‡, §
TG ≥ 100 mg/dL 107 (15.8) 32 (9.5) 29 (16.3) 46 (28.6) < 0.001 ‡, §, //
HDL ≤ 45 mg/dL 239 (35.4) 110 (32.6) 47 (26.4) 82 (50.9) < 0.001 ‡, §, //
Glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL 6 (0.9) 2 (0.6) 1 (0.6) 3 (1.9) 0.31
Insulin ≥ 15 mU/mL 77 (11.7) 11 (3.3) 17 (9.6) 49 (30.4) < 0.001 ‡, §, //
HOMA ≥ 3.16 79 (11.7) 15 (4.5) 17 (9.6) 47 (29.2) < 0.001 ‡, §, //
Group 01 - BMI(Eutrophic) BF%(Normal); Group 02 - BMI(Eutrophic) BF% (Altered); Group 03 – BMI (Altered) BF% (Altered);
BF – Body Fat; BP – Blood Pressure; TC – Total Cholesterol; TG - Triglycerides; CVD - Cardiovascular Disease;
LDL: Low Density Lipoprotein; HDL: High Density Lipoprotein
* : Partition of chi-square with Bonferroni correction, p < 0.016; †: Fisher’s exact test;
‡ - Comparison Group 03 and Group 01; § - Comparison Group 03 and Group 02; // - Comparison Group 02 and Group 01;
¶ - Comparison Group 01 and Group 03; # - Comparison Group 01 and Group 02.
F 0.97 0.92–1.02 1.17 1.11–1.23 1.04 0.99–1.08 1.04 1.0–1.09 1.02 0.99–1.04 1.08 1.03–1.13 0.90 0.85–0.95 1.04 0.99–1.10 1.04 1.0–1.09 1.01 1.00–1.02
II 0.93 0.87–0.99 1.05 0.99–1.11 1.11 1.06–1.17 0.98 0.93–1.03 0.99 0.96–1.02 0.91 0.86–0.96 1.01 0.95–1.08 0.85 0.80–0.91 0.97 0.92–1.03 0.99 0.97–1.01
III 0.92 0.86–0.98 1.01 0.95–1.08 1.09 1.03–1.15 0.96 0.91–1.01 0.97 0.94–1.00 0.91 0.86–0.97 1.02 0.95–1.09 0.90 0.84–0.95 0.96 0.90–1.02 1.00 0.99–1.02
1.07 1.02–1.13 1.06 1.01–1.10 1.02 1.0–1.04 1.07 1.02–1.13 1.04 0.97–1.11 0.95 0.89–1.01 1.06 1.0–1.12 1.01 1.00–1.02
1.04 0.98–1.09 1.26 1.19–1.33 1.12 1.08–1.15 1.03 0.97–1.09 1.10 1.03–1.17 1.13 1.06–1.21 1.17 1.10–1.24 0.97 0.95–1.00
PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%) PR CI (95%)
adolescence stage (Table V) showed that overweight
Pressure
Blood
individuals showed changes in the number of LDL
and high triglycerides, low HDL and changes in blood
pressure values. Adolescents with excess body fat had
1
Triglycerides higher LDL and triglyceride levels and low HDL. Se-
dentary behavior and family history of CVD were not
associated with risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
Bivariate analysis between risk factors for cardiovascular diseases and the variables gender, adolescence stage and nutritional status
High
1
Discussion
High LDL
of early mortality24.
1
-
-
-
PR – Poisson Regression; M - Male; F - Female;
Adolescence I 1
-
-
-
Status
mg/dL, HDL < 45 mg/dL, TG > 100 mg/dL) demons- tion of this variable as well as the insulin concentra-
trating the importance of evaluating the percentage of tions should be performed for the early evaluation of
body fat in the diagnosis of overweight and obesity and cardiovascular risk in adolescents.
its relationship with cardiovascular disease26. Obesity Another modifiable factor for cardiovascular disea-
is associated with lipid disorders and influences the in- se risk identified in this study was related to sedentary
crease of cardiovascular risk. Dyslipidemias are risk behavior, presented by 64.8% of the adolescents. High
factors for cardiovascular diseases, constituting the values of this behavior were also found in the study of
biggest factor in the development of atherosclerosis, Tenorio et al (2010)34 reaching 49.9% on weekends,
particularly with the presence of high levels of LDL29. unlike the study of Andaki (2013)17, where we found
Regarding hypertriglyceridemia in childhood and a relationship of sedentary behavior with anthropome-
adolescence, triglyceride levels between 100 and 200 tric and clinical changes especially in individuals of
mg/dL is usually related to obesity, and above 200 mg/ the first stage of adolescence.
dL, usually related to genetic changes15. Among the non-modifiable causes of cardiovascu-
The lipid profile of groups G3 and G2 were altered lar disease, we assessed the family history of CVD,
when compared to G1. It can be noted that G3 showed which was reported by 44.2% of the participants. Stu-
a higher percentage of adolescents with lower HDL va- dies show that the risk of health behavior of parents
lues when compared to G1 and G2. In this evaluation is associated with the same behavior of adolescents35.
we believe that the determining factor in this change is Our findings highlight the importance of assess-
the percentage of body fat based on BMI. These data ment and monitoring of adolescents for cardiovascular
corroborate with this study in which obese adolescents risk factors, as these can be identified at that stage of
have higher concentrations of total cholesterol, LDL life, minimizing complications for other stages of life.
and lower HDL concentrations30. Changes in habits and lifestyle are actions that should
The prevalence of blood pressure > P90 in adoles- be promoted by health professionals.
cents of Group 03 comes against the findings in the
literature relating to pressure changes with increased
BMI and body fat percentage31. Conclusion
Another finding in this study was the relationship
between nutritional status with changes in insulin and Cardiovascular risk factors have been observed in
HOMA. Similarly, a study conducted in São Paulo/ younger and younger individuals and are important
Brazil with adolescents aged 10 to 19 found no diffe- factors to identify a population at risk.
rence in glucose levels between the obese and normal In this study we could observe that the identification
weight groups32, but differences were found in insulin of risk factors in adolescents can contribute to a reduc-
levels and the HOMA index. Insulin and the HOMA tion of future cardiovascular disease. Excess of weight
index seem to be more sensitive markers in monito- and body fat was associated with biochemical changes
ring changes in carbohydrate metabolism. Considering related to cardiovascular risks. Thus it is critical that
that the HOMA index in adolescents is directly related adolescents are routinely evaluated to prevent the ag-
to the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and that gravation of biochemical and anthropometric changes,
they increase in the presence of obesity33, the evalua- since nowadays living habits such as sedentary lifes-