1
mentality of the area has shifted from being community minded to entertainment minded; this
shift has become the downfall of the town. While some still focus on the community, the
entertainment mindset has caused most
in the community to disregard the
safety of others. This ultimately ends in
atrocities such as burglaries, excessive
drinking of alcohol (especially
underage), sexual assaults, and many
other tragic occurrences.
In California, the drunkest rated city is Chico. Similarly, in New Jersey, New Mexico, and South
Carolina, the drunkest rated cities are Ocean City, Santa Fe, and Hilton Head, respectively. Based
on this trend of major cities being rated the drunkest in their state, you would assume that
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, or Harrisburg would be labeled as the drunkest. Instead, State College
is rated the drunkest city in all of Pennsylvania.
More than 20% of State College adults labeled themselves as “heavy” or “binge” drinkers, and
almost 30% of the city’s deaths are alcohol-related. Because of this, State College experiences a
high concern for safety, especially in the downtown area near campus. Alcohol is only one
driving force for increased crime in the Centre County area, though. Violent burglaries that are
non alcohol related are also apparent among residents. In fact, every inhabitant has a 1 in 59
chance of being the victim of property crime.
Feeling Unsafe in the Community
Being home to the largest school in the state, the State College metropolitan area has 24.1
percent of its residents enrolled in college or graduate school. Although the university town has
been recognized as a great place to live, the presence of the university creates a unique
challenge for the community i.e. safety. On and off-campus events often draw a large number of
people to participate in this so-called “college life” and socializing culture, such as football
games, late night greek life parties, and tailgates, which result in risky behaviors, break-ins,
vandalism, assaults, and violence.
Penn State has been frequently voted as one of the top 10 ‘party schools’ in the whole nation.
2
We all remember the tragedy that happened approximately a year ago at one of the fraternities
at Penn State. Timothy Piazza died as a result of hazing at the ‘Beta Theta Pi’ fraternity on
February 4, 2017. That happened because of
us, and because we, the so-called community
was not careful enough. The jury’s report in
the wake of his drinking death said that Penn
State officials ignored the dangers from
excessive drinking and the other
consequences, and, the inaction of the
officials allowed the inhumane and criminal
acts to take place.
According to the Penn State crime log, the
number of reported on-campus sexual assaults went up in 2016, continuing a trend of growth
since 2010. Since February 2014, 73 ‘timely-warning’ notifications have been sent out to Penn
State students and university employees
regarding sexual assault on campus. Not only
criminals, but many times, the victims are
drugged and under the influence of alcohol, are
not sober enough to make the right decisions,
which leads to these type of incidents. Even
after the presence of strict laws in the state of
P.A. associated with sexual assault, there have
been a plethora of related incidents taking
place on campus.
These alcohol-related incidents prove to have
an adverse effect not only to an individual or
two, but the whole community, which is, the whole nation. For example, in 2010, alcohol misuse
cost the United States $249.00 billion. It is also said that people happen to exhibit violent
behaviors attributed to alcohol. 88,000 Americans die from consuming alcohol. Not only this,
there have been cases about drunk-driving and abusing children.
3
This deliberation guide offers three approaches that might be considered to address some of the
issues we face right now and foster a safer environment to live in. We have designed this
particular framework to encourage deliberation, and to avoid any sort of divisive debate. This
issue guide also highlights the drawbacks of each of the three approaches and aims to help the
community address the tradeoffs associated with the respective options.
● Approach One suggests that enforcing stricter laws, policies and creating accountable
systems in the community are helpful in altering the adverse effects of alcohol
consumption and other alcohol-related incidents.
● Approach Two demonstrates the impact of early education on college-aged students in
order to prevent them from over-consuming alcohol and underage drinking habits.
● Approach Three proposes that safety within the community can be ensured by
community building and planning events that can help people interact, bring neighbors
together, and have stronger relationships to create long-term changes.
Through the structured conversation along with detailed analysis of the three different options,
we will explore which approach(es) seem more viable to each of us. Our opinions might differ at
various points, but we need to foster the deliberation peacefully, without leading to any sort of
debates, and respect everyone’s perspective in order to come to community-benefitting
decisions as a group.
4
Approaches
I. Law Enforcement
General Idea: Using law enforcement to generate awareness of possibly disruptive and
self-destructive behaviors and their consequences in the community, while also maintaining
order through stricter consequences for violations.
Some would argue that the Police Department is too harsh in our community. In recent times,
there has been much dispute over the law enforcement in our country. Although according to a
Gallup poll conducted in 2016, respect for police was higher than it had been in years. This
particular poll said that three in four americans have “a great deal” of respect for their local law
enforcement officials. Respect for police is a totally different topic, but, in the example of State
College, the way college students view the police has a large impact on the order of the
community.
State College has a Police Department dedicated to keeping its community safe. As of now, State
College has two police departments patrolling. They work together to try and ensure the safest
possible environment to students and the members of the community. There is much ambiguity
on the exact consequences for a public complaint, alcohol related, or other offences.
Some things to consider:
● Are consequences for alcohol related offences in the State College area
consistent in all cases?
● Are consequences the same for a University Police enforced offence as they
would be for a township or city police offence?
Despite the efforts of local law enforcement, there is only so much they can do. In recent years,
Beaver Avenue has been the target for many crowd disturbances requiring horses, mace, and
other officials to be called in. Most recently being the Eagles Super Bowl win, where authorities
were able to contain things fairly quickly after they got out of hand.
However, it is important to remember that it is not the sole responsibility of the State College
police to maintain order. It is also important that Penn State University and the Police
Department continue to work together to keep order and enforce laws and policies.
5
In order to change destructive behavior, there must be change, simply because in order to create
change, there must be adjustments to current policies and the creation of stricter punishment.
However, it is also important to remember the importance of connecting with and humanizing
the very people trying to enforce these laws and policies.
WHAT CAN BE DONE POTENTIAL DRAWBACKS
Harsher Punishment for Violations- ● Hostility- Students and residents may begin
Offenders should be given a harsher penalty and to feel punishments are too harsh and could
harsher sentences for more serious crimes result in a further divide between court
systems, police, students, and residents.
6
II. Early Education
General Idea: This approach looks at early education for elementary, middle school, and high school
students and its importance in providing both a knowledge base and social environment necessary for
future success. The impact of early education covers a broad spectrum including not only drugs and
violence, but also the mental health, physical health and the communal experiences schools provide to
better prepare students for future success. The perspective of early education in providing a safer and
friendlier environment is an immersive collaboration that requires a willingness to make a change from
all levels of society. The different aspects behind Early Education can be separated into, but are not
limited to the following categories.
Alcohol
In 2015, the National Survey on Drug Use and Health reported that 20% of youth aged 12 to 20 years
drink alcohol and 13% reported binge drinking in the past 30 days. These statistics demonstrate that it
is crucial to begin discussing the effects of alcohol early on and highlight the potential dangers both
physically and psychologically. In order to reduce underage drinking, education is the key to discussing
ways in which to build a safe community. According to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism, they recommend that parents talk “early and often, in developmentally appropriate ways,
with children and teens about your concerns—and theirs—regarding alcohol. Adolescents who know
their parents’ opinions about youth drinking are more likely to fall in line with their expectations.”
Mental health
Mental health is a vital and an ever growing prevalent issue in the modern society. By definition, Mental
Health covers the social psychological and emotional aspects of everyday life. The ability to foster a
strong support system early on is critical in fostering the maturity and tenacity necessary to handle the
stress of everyday. For many, the development of mental health starts with the foundation of peers,
parents and teachers provided by a Early Education. Those with better mental health are more likely to
lead happier lifestyles with logic and confidence.
7
and physically) can be ingrained in children from an early age. This allows children the ability to view
morality and logical decisions involving safety not only as a conscious decision, but also an intrinsic
reflex they can be equipped with going into the community.
What can be done about this?
1. Schools lay the foundation for children's development, so by integrating an improved program,
students would have the tools necessary to have long term success. This would not simply include
having a quick presentation on the negative consequences of drugs, alcohol, or violence, but rather
a thorough interactive discussion from a variety of people in the community, such as the police,
drug addiction centers, and real-people who tell their stories about the impact of drugs, alcohol, or
violence on their life.
2. Oftentimes lecturing and informing students at a young age may not have as much as an impact
without actual application and constant emphasis (from parents, community and peers). Peer
pressure is a major factor on substance abuse, mental stability and safety in general.
3. In addition to the schools integrating a new program, parents could also be informed on how to
discuss these topics with their children. Since, parents have a significant impact on their children's
decision-making habits, talking to their child early would enable create a safe environment.
ASSOCIATED PROS POTENTIAL DRAWBACKS
● Create a safer community in Happy ● Implementing the new program in schools would require
Valley funding, from the government so taxes would need to be
● Children would be informed about the raised
effects of their decisions and actions ● Kids may still continue to avoid the guidance from
● Prevention of the first step is crucial. authorities
Doing drugs even once can ● Teachers would need more curriculum planning
biologically spiral children and teens techniques to present the information about drugs,
out of control. alcohol, and mental health.
● Behaviors such as depression, drug ● Uncertainty over whether or not a curriculum is truly
addictions, or excessive drinking impactful.
would reduce as students graduate ● The difficulty of complete immersion of children proves a
from high school and move to the gigantic goal that requires cooperation of multiple levels
college scene within the community (parents, other children, police,
● Parents and children could easily government etc).
voice their concerns and questions, ● While a majority of state college students attend Penn
and develop ways to honestly engage State, the university community is oftentimes temporary
in a safe environment at school, at and constantly changing and thus difficult to be
home, and in the community. addressed with education.
8
III. Community
General Idea: Promoting community bonding and coming up with programs that could possibly
make college students more attentive towards the problems that the community faces.
There is an extremely strained relationship between the State College residents and the Penn
State students. Some residents of State College report dissatisfaction over students’ apparent
lack of respect for property (i.e stealing, breaking and entering in, etc.) and claim that alcohol
consumption has been a bad influence on their children. The students in return feel that the
residents vilify Greek Life and parties and that they are unfairly blamed for most of the crime and
disruptions committed in State College.
● Have a casual social event with residents and ● Having a monthly meeting places a
students of the community in one neighborhood so constraint on both State College
that students will get to know their neighbors better residents and students. People should
by getting a better sense of the age-range and be willing to allocate a certain amount
families living in their street/neighborhood. of time every month to meet with their
community.
● Have a University requirement stipulating that ● Adding additional rules to rushing may
community service must be a part of rushing. This will cause backlash from frats, sororities,
better the community, instill a strong sense of respect and students because it could be
in pledges, stress the importance of giving back, and considered as an alteration to their
deter people from rushing who aren’t rules for the community’s benefits.
community-minded.
● Residents and students have regular meetings where ● Again, this may cause a constraint for
issues are discussed and problems are resolved. That both, residents and students, as it may
way, both parties will have a calm environment to get in the way of personal plans.
talk and even get to know each other.
● Make an actual class that counts as credits where ● If this course counts as credits, it will
students and residents are required to interact by be hard to grade based upon the
doing community service activities together. satisfaction of both parties. Therefore,
a fair grading practice must be
installed before launching this as a
course.
9
1. We propose implementing a “town meeting” like format in which students and Greek Life
Institutions as well as members of the community meet to discuss and improve upcoming
events and strengthen their relationship. Conversation could be monitored by Tim King,
President of the Office of Community Engagement in State College. Executive Members
of Fraternities and Sororities as well as designated residents would be required to write
and share a brief with their fellow brothers and community members about what was
discussed and what issues were resolved during the meeting.
2. We also propose a requirement for all Greek Life Institutions and students to instruct
their pledges to fulfill a community service requirement before being allowed to pledge.
This action would reinforce the importance of giving back and respecting the members of
their fellow community.
3. Our third proposal is to have regular meetings where everyone can socialize and discuss
their problems. Since frats, sororities, and students may have created a negative
impression on town members, socializing will be key for the residents and students to
come to a happy medium.
4. The last proposal is to create a class where students and residents get together and
perform community service tasks to help them socialize as well as better the community.
Conducting these tasks will foster a better awareness in of the amount of clean-up
required and both students and residents will be able to converse more comfortably.
Both students and members of the community would all receive a direct benefit from this
interaction as the aim of this approach is to provide a fair balance between the non-Greek-Life
community and the students. Communication is essential to building a stronger community, and
our approach seeks to do just that. Members of the State College community and Greek Life
Institutions may be a bit disgruntled at having to talk things out in the first place. With time and
increased comfortability, we believe this awkwardness will dissipate and the community will
ultimately form a balance system that will be beneficial to both groups. In addition to this,
community members as well as students may have to be more open-minded when
understanding each other’s opinions on Greek Life, parties, and other acts that may have risked
safety or caused a disturbance to the downtown community.
10
Works Cited
Abuse, National Institute on Drug. “Understanding Drug Use and Addiction.” NIDA, Aug. 2016,
www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/understanding-drug-use-addiction.
Admin. “Learning theory: neuroplasticity and your amazing brain.” ExamTime, 5 Nov. 2015,
www.goconqr.com/en/examtime/blog/learning-theory-neuroplasticity-one-amazing-brain-power/.
“AIER.” Best College Destinations Offer Diversity, Access, and City Lifestyles, 17 Dec. 2017,
www.aier.org/research/best-college-destinations-offer-diversity-access-and-city-lifestyles.
Comen, Samuel Stebbins and Evan. "Alcohol abuse: The drunkest city in every state." USA Today, Gannett
Satellite Information Network, 26 Dec. 2017,
www.usatoday.com/story/money/2017/11/21/alcohol-abuse-drunkest-city-every-state/884359001/.
Ibrahim, John O'Brien Ahlaam. “Ask a Cop, Get beyond 'Protect and Serve'.” KUOW News and Information,
kuow.org/post/ask-cop-get-beyond-protect-and-serve.
Min Xian For the CDT. “Penn State Reported Sexual Assault Numbers Climbed in 2016.” Centredaily, Centre Daily
Times, www.centredaily.com/news/local/education/penn-state/article126870614.html.
McCarthy, Justin.. “Americans’ Respect for Police Surges”. Gallup News. 24 Oct. 2016,
http://news.gallup.com/poll/196610/americans-respect-police-surges.aspx
Nova Recovery Center . “Peer Pressure and Drug Abuse: How Strong is the Link?” Nova Recovery Center Near
Austin Texas, 6 Sept. 2016, novarecoverycenter.com/addiction/peer-pressure-and-drug-abuse-2/.
“Parenting to Prevent Childhood Alcohol Use.” National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Feb. 2017,
pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/adolescentflyer/adolflyer.htm.
“Rankings.” Penn State University, 14 Feb. 2018, www.psu.edu/this-is-penn-state/rankings
“Right-to-Know/Open Records.” State College.Pennsylvania.
http://www.statecollegepa.us/1160/Right-to-Know-Open-Records
“State College, PA - State College Ranked Third-Best College Town for Students -.” StateCollege.com,
www.statecollege.com/news/local-news/state-college-ranked-thirdbest-college-town-for-students,143
0679/.
State College Rated 'Drunkest City' in Pennsylvania by USA Today.
www.collegian.psu.edu/news/borough/article_61805598-cfa4-11e7-b174-47031d7a4231.html.
“State College.” State College Crime Rates and Statistics - NeighborhoodScout,
www.neighborhoodscout.com/pa/state-college/crime.
“The 10 Best Things to Do in Pennsylvania - 2018 (with Photos).” TripAdvisor,
www.tripadvisor.com/Attractions-g28959-Activities-Pennsylvania.html#ATTRACTION_SORT_WRAPPER.
Thompson, Charles. “Penn State trustees split over proposed special meeting on university's position in NCAA
sanctions case.” PennLive.com, 10 Dec. 2014,
www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2014/12/penn_state_trustees_split_over.html.
“Timely Warnings.” Burglary | Timely Warnings, timely-warnings.police.psu.edu/university-park/305.
11
12