George Orwell wrote this novel in the 20th century when the Russian revolution occurred.
Orwell was an English soldier who had involved in the Spanish civil war. At that time, there
was a system called Stalinism where a person named Stalin taking over all the power in
Russia; Orwell do not agree to this controlling system. Orwell, then, tried to convince other
people to be aware of the system. Therefore, he wrote a book called Animal Farm basing on
the event that happened at that period informing ideas against the system. Animal Farm is a
story about animals trying to set themselves free from humans as they are not well treated. The
animals then trying to push Mr.Jones, the owner of the farm, out of his power. The rebellion
was led by a group of pigs with the rest of animals following their thoughts. In Animal Farm,
George Orwell reflects the Russian revolution through the characters, changes in laws, power
structures.
Orwell uses the characters in Animal Farm as representatives of the people in the
Russian revolution. In the story, pigs were the smartest among all of the animals, so they
become the leader who directs the rebellion beginning since the Old Major was still alive.
After the Old Major had died, the new leader was still a pig. Napoleon, then, substituting the
position of Old Major. Napoleon used to act fairly; however, he then turned to be a dictator
since he raises the puppies for purpose. At this point, the Old Major is representing Lenin, the
previous president of Soviet Union before Stalin (Guidorizzi, 2007), and the puppies are
considered the rest of the Soviet government. Furthermore, the main character is Napoleon. He
is considered as a representative of Stalin, the leader of the Soviet Union. Napoleon took
advantages of other animals. For example, he raises the puppies for a purpose that he would
use them to help him take over the farm. Also, as a leader, he directs other animals to do works
while he does not. Stated in the article “George Orwell’s Animal Farm Condemns
REFLECTION OF RUSSIAN REVOLUTION !2
Communism”, Stephanie Guidorizzi (2007) says “Napoleon desire all of the power for
himself and chased Snowball off the farm, an obvious reference to Stalin forcing Trotsky into
exile. Napoleon acquired complete control over Animal Farm and ultimately became
untouchable.” This shows the comparison of the Russian revolution to the story Animal Farm
as Orwell provides the action of Napoleon in a similar way to what Stalin had done during the
time of revolution. Therefore, the Russian revolution is reflected in the representation of Stalin
by Napoleon.
Besides reflecting the Russian revolution through the characters, Orwell demonstrates the
position of the characters such as leaders and workers to represent the structure of power. John
Rodden (2003) has stated in “Appreciating Animal Farm in the New Millennium” that “
Animal Farm also has stinging moral warning against the abuse of power.” In Russian
revolution, the political system used was a dictatorship. The leader of the government was
Stalin. He as the absolute power over others; therefore, he created policies called Stalinist
policies. Comparing Stalin to Animal Farm, Napoleon, as a leader of Animal Farm, is the one
who has the absolute power as everyone trusts him and no one can oppose him in any way.
Napoleon used to oppose against Snowball at the beginning as they have different ideas.
Snowball thought that building windmill would be beneficial, but Napoleon did not agree. He
thought that the animals should focus on growing weeds and hay instead as it seems to be
more important in living. As a result, he kicked Snowball out, and become the only leader on
the farm. This interprets the characteristics of dictatorship as the only person who is able to
have an idea is the leader, and the rest have to follow no matter they agree or disagree with the
leader’s idea. This could imply that the power is centralized only to the leader.
Last, Orwell illustrates changes of the political system in Russian revolution in Animal
Farm. By referring to animalism, Orwell interprets the idea of equality that the animals were
REFLECTION OF RUSSIAN REVOLUTION !3
trying to form by getting rid of human power. The animals set up the rules of seven
commandments including whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy, what ever goes upon four
legs, or has wings, is a friend, no animal shall wear clothes, no animal shall sleep in a bed, no
animal shall drink alcohol, no animal shall kill any other animal, all animals are equal.(p.
24-25). Then, they reduce the rules into “four legs good, two legs bad”. The commandments
were created to make the animals equal; however, after Napoleon becomes the leader, he
breaks the rule by allowing the pigs to come to work late and having the pigs drinking milk
and eating better food. He also claims that the pigs are the brain of the farm, so they need
more nutrient to makes their brains well function. According to the allowance and claim, the
pigs are taking benefits over other animals. Stated in the article Animal Farm at 70, “‘All
animals are equal, but some are more equal than others’ was especially effective in capturing
the hypocrisy of the Bolshevik Revolution turned into a bureau tic nightmare” said by Rossi
and Rodden (2016) infers the similarities of Animal Farm and the Russian revolution. Even
though both Napoleon and Stalin began the revolution for equalities, they still take advantages
In conclusion, Orwell wrote the story Animal Farm to replicate the Russian revolution
through characters, the structure of power, and political systems. The story Animal Farm can
be analyzed in details and compared to the Russian revolution to see the similarities. As a
leader, both Napoleon and Stalin has become in the power, which allows them to do benefits
for their own purpose. This causes the changes in the ideas of revolution as they no longer run
References
Guidorizzi, S. (2007). George Orwell's Animal Farm Condemns Communism. Social Science
Rodden, J., & Rossi, J. (2016). Animal Farm at 70. Modern Age, 58(4), 19-27.
Rodden, J. (2003). Appreciating Animal Farm in the New Millennium. Modern Age, 45(1), 67.