Anda di halaman 1dari 8

European Journal of Heart Failure (2013) 15, 995–1002

doi:10.1093/eurjhf/hft064

The epidemiology of heart failure, based on data


for 2.1 million inhabitants in Sweden
Ramin Zarrinkoub 1,2,3*, Björn Wettermark 2,4, Per Wändell 1, Märit Mejhert 5,6,
Robert Szulkin 1,7, Gunnar Ljunggren2,8, and Thomas Kahan 6,9
1
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Centre for Family Medicine, Huddinge, Sweden; 2Public Healthcare Services Committee Administration,
Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden; 3Storvreten Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm, Sweden; 4Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medicine, Unit for Clinical
Epidemiology, Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Stockholm, Sweden; 5Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; 6Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical
Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stockholm, Sweden; 7Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Stockholm, Sweden;
8
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Learning, Medical Management Centre, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Stockholm, Sweden; and 9Department of Cardiology, Danderyd
University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Received 18 December 2012; revised 22 March 2013; accepted 5 April 2013; online publish-ahead-of-print 3 May 2013

Aims The epidemiology of congestive heart failure (CHF) is likely to have changed due to changes in demography, risk factors,
diagnostic procedures, and medical care. Prevailing information is in part old, incomplete, and to some extent contradict-
ory. We determined the current prevalence, incidence, mortality, and 5-year survival rate of CHF, and possible temporal
changes in Sweden.
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Methods This was a cross-sectional study on individual patient data from an administrative health data register in the Stockholm
and results region, Sweden, comprising 2.1 million inhabitants. This contained all recorded diagnoses on all consultations in
primary and secondary care (defined as specialist outpatient care), and on all hospitalizations. Prevalence, incidence,
and mortality were estimated for the entire Swedish population, adjusted for demographic composition in 2010. The
study population consisted of 88 038 patients (51% women). The prevalence was 2.2% (both women and men), the in-
cidence was 3.8/1000 person-years (both women and men), and mortality was 3.2/1000 person-years in women and 3.0/
1000 person-years in men (P , 0.001); the 5-year survival rate was 48%. Mortality (age adjusted; hazard ratio and 95%
confidence intervals) was higher in men, 1.29, 1.24—1.34; P , 0.001. Prevalence remained essentially unchanged from
2006 to 2010, while incidence decreased by 24% (P , 0.001) and mortality by 19% (both women and men; P , 0.001).
.....................................................................................................................................................................................
Conclusions The estimated prevalence of CHF in Sweden is 2.2%, incidence 3.8/1000 person-years, and mortality 3.1/1000 person-
years. There has been a decrease in incidence and mortality from 2006 to 2010 in both women and men, with no major
change in prevalence over time.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords Epidemiology † Heart failure † Incidence † Mortality † Prevalence † Survival

abnormality of cardiac structure or function.5 However, the diagnosis


Introduction of CHF can be difficult, as symptoms and signs are not specific.5 The
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a leading cause of morbidity, hospi- epidemiology of CHF is likely to have changed during recent years
talizations, disability, and death.1,2 The prevalence and incidence in- due to changes in demography, and changes in prevalence, treatment,
crease with age, and the costs of care and treatment of CHF and control of contributing risk factors (e.g. hypertension and ischae-
constitute a considerable burden for healthcare.1,3 Thus, the direct mic heart disease).6,7 There may also be other important reasons,
costs of CHF account for  2% of the total healthcare budget in such as changes in diagnostic criteria of CHF and in the survival
many European countries.4 among prevalent cases.8 – 11
According to current recommendations, a diagnosis of CHF Recent studies suggest a prevalence of 1–3% in CHF.12,13 There is
requires typical symptoms and signs, together with evidence for an divergent information on temporal changes in the prevalence of

* Corresponding author. Karolinska Institutet, Centre for Family Medicine, Alfred Nobels Allé 12, S-141 83 Huddinge, Sweden. Tel: +46 8 524 800 00, Fax: +46 8 524 887 06,
Email: ramin.zarrinkoub@priv.sll.se
Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. & The Author 2013. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
996 R. Zarrinkoub et al.

CHF.2,14,15 Reports on the incidence of CHF and possible temporal The investigation conforms to the principles outlined in the Declar-
changes provide contradictory results but suggest an incidence of ation of Helsinki. The regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm
1 –4/1000 person-years.1,9,16,17 Although the 5-year mortality rate approved the study. All data were extracted electronically and obtained
for patients with CHF remains high, most studies suggest a decrease in anonymous and non-identifiable form.
in mortality in recent years.9,16,17
In Sweden, the prevalence of CHF has been estimated to be Statistical methods
2.5%,18,19 and CHF was recorded as the cause of death in 3.4% of Data are presented as mean values + SD, where appropriate. Differ-
women and 2.4% of men.18 Mortality data from Sweden suggest a ences between groups were assessed by the Student’s t-test or the
mortality rate of 30–36% within 1 year following discharge from hos- Mann– Whitney test for continuous variables, as appropriate, and the
pital.20 However, these data are based on studies conducted x2 test for categorical variables. Crude prevalence (in December
. 20 years ago. Current and reliable information on CHF epidemi- 2010), incidence, and mortality for 2010 were calculated by dividing
the number of patients by the total number of inhabitants (i.e.
ology including patients from primary, secondary, and hospital care
2 056 173) in Stockholm County on December 2010. No consideration
is sparse.
was made for migration to and from the region. A Poisson regression
The developments of electronic medical records and administra- model adjusting for age (fit as a quadratic term) was used to evaluate
tive databases have facilitated epidemiological studies.21 Sweden trend changes in prevalence, incidence, and mortality between 2006
has a long tradition of research on high quality health registries and 2010.The demographic composition in 2006 was used as reference.
with almost complete reporting.22 – 24 Thus, the aims of this study Life table curves according to Kaplan – Meier were calculated and com-
were to determine the current prevalence, incidence, mortality, pared using log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression
and 5-year survival rate of CHF in Sweden and their possible tem- was used to account for age, gender, and co-morbidity. For comparison,
poral changes from 2006 to 2010. the 5-year survival trends in the entire Swedish population were taken
from Statistics Sweden.25 A probability (P) ,0.05 was considered signifi-
cant. Data management was performed in MS Access (Microsoft Corpor-
ation, Redmond, WA, USA) and statistical analyses in STATA version 11
Methods (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).

The region of greater Stockholm, Sweden, comprised . 2.1 million inha-


bitants in 2010. The administrative health data register of this region
(Vårdanalysdatabasen, VAL; Stockholm regional healthcare data ware- Results
house) contains all consultations in primary and secondary care
(defined as specialist outpatient care), and all hospitalizations. Data for Prevalence
primary care are available from 2003, and for secondary care and hospi- In all, 88 038 patients (51% women) were found with a diagnosis of
talization from 1993. The International Classification of Diseases Version CHF. The crude prevalence of CHF in 2010 was 1.8%, similar in
10 (ICD-10) diagnostic coding system has been used in Sweden since women and men. After adjustment for demographic composition,
1997. the estimated prevalence in Sweden was 2.2%. The mean age for
The study population of this cross-sectional investigation included all
the prevalent patients in 2010 (n ¼ 36 420) was 77 + 13 years
patients in the Stockholm region who were recorded with a primary or
(women 80 + 12 years, men 74 + 13 years; P , 0.001). More than
secondary diagnosis of CHF (ICD-10 code I50) on at least one consult-
ation in primary care (from 2003 to 2010), secondary care (from 1997
90% of the patients were 60 years or older. The prevalence among
to 2010), or during hospitalization (from 1997 to 2010). Patients never men exceeded that among women for all age groups, except
living in Stockholm during the study period and patients with an invalid those ≥ 100 years of age (Figure 1). Characteristics for prevalent
Swedish person identity number were excluded. patients in 2010 and in 2006 are summarized in Table 1. The propor-
We identified co-morbid conditions for prevalent patients in 2010 by tion of all consultations or hospitalizations, by different care provi-
searching recorded diagnoses for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ders, for the prevalent patients in 2010 is shown in Figure 2. Of
(COPD) (J40– J44), cerebrovascular disease (I60– I64, I67.8, I67.9, G45 – note, 17% of the patients only attended primary care.
G46), diabetes (E10 – E14), atrial fibrillation/flutter (I48.9), hypertension The prevalence of CHF between 2006 and 2010 showed a weak
(I10 – I15), and ischaemic heart disease (I20– I25) in primary care (from decreasing temporal trend in women (P ¼ 0.044) but did not
2003 to 2010), secondary care, and hospitals (from 1997 to 2010).
change in men (P ¼ 0.25) (Table 2, Figure 3).
Results are given as crude values for the Stockholm region and as esti-
mated values for the entire Swedish population, adjusted for the demo-
graphic composition in 2010. To assess temporal changes in prevalence Incidence
and incidence, equal length run-in periods were applied for data on sec- The crude incidence in 2010 was 3.1/1000 person-years, similar in
ondary care and hospital care in order to obtain comparable cohorts. For women and men. After adjustment for demographic composition,
data from primary care, however, applying equal length run-in periods the estimated incidence in Sweden was 3.7/1000 person-years in
would introduce bias in the calculations because of the short period of
women and 3.9/1000 person-years in men (P , 0.001). The mean
historical data (i.e. from 2003 to 2010). The date for onset of CHF was
age by the first recorded diagnosis of CHF for the incident patients
defined as the first occasion with a recorded diagnosis of CHF by any
of the healthcare providers. Five-year survival was calculated for all inci- in 2010 was 77 + 13 years (women 80 + 12 years, men 74 + 13
dent cases between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2010, and all-cause years; P , 0.001). There was a decreasing temporal trend by 0.9/
mortality was used for the calculations. Patients who had moved out of 1000 person-years in absolute terms (i.e. a relative 24% decrease,
the region during this time period, and all who were alive on 31 Decem- P , 0.001) between 2006 and 2010 (Table 3, Figure 3). This trend
ber 2010 were censored. was not different between women and men.
The epidemiology of heart failure in Sweden 997

Figure 1 The solid line represents the number of patients with congestive heart failure according to age group. The prevalence according to age
group is presented for women (open bars) and men (filled bars).

Table 1 Characteristics of prevalent patients with congestive heart failure in 2006 and 2010

2006 2010
.................................... ....................................
Women Men P-value Women Men P-value
...............................................................................................................................................................................
Number 18 231 16 731 18 542 17 878
Age, years 81 + 12 74 + 13 ,0.001 80 + 12 74 + 13 ,0.001
Age of onset, years 77 + 12 70 + 13 ,0.001 76 + 13 70 + 13 ,0.001
Duration of CHF, years 4.0 + 2.9 4.1 + 2.9 4.5 + 3.4 4.7 + 3.5
Concomitant disease, %
Hypertension 67 65 ,0.001 73 69 ,0.001
Ischaemic heart disease 54 64 ,0.001 47 56 ,0.001
Atrial fibrillation/flutter 49 54 ,0.001 43 48 ,0.001
Diabetes mellitus 27 33 ,0.001 24 30 ,0.001
Cerebrovascular disease 28 28 21 22 0.017
COPD 22 23 20 18

Mean values + SD or proportions, as appropriate. P denotes a significant difference between women and men.
CHF, congestive heart failure; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Mortality and survival person-years, respectively, P , 0.001). The mean age for death
The crude all-cause mortality in 2010 was 2.5/1000 person-years, for the CHF patients in 2010 was 85 + 10 years (women 87 +
higher in women than in men (2.7 and 2.3/1000 person-years, re- 9 years, men 83 + 10 years, P , 0.001). Mortality decreased by
spectively, P , 0.001). After adjustment for demographic compos- 0.5/1000 person-years in absolute terms (i.e. a 19% relative de-
ition, the estimated mortality in Sweden was 3.1/1000 crease; P , 0.001) between 2006 and 2010, in both women and
person-years, higher in women than in men (3.2 and 3.0/1000 men (Table 4, Figure 3).
998 R. Zarrinkoub et al.

The 5-year survival rate from the first recorded diagnosis was 48% survival adjusted for age was related to pre-existing co-morbidity, as
(45% in women and 51% in men; P , 0.05). These values are lower illustrated in Figure 4.
than for the age-matched entire Swedish population (Table 5). The
risk of death for any reason after a recorded diagnosis of CHF was
lower in men than in women (hazard ratio and 95% confidence inter-
val 0.95, 0.92– 0.99; P ¼ 0.012). However, when age was accounted Discussion
for, the risk was higher in men than in women: 1.29, 1.24 –1.34,
The crude prevalence of CHF in Stockholm was 1.8%. The preva-
P , 0.001. This higher risk also remainded unchanged after adjust-
lence was estimated to be 2.2% in Sweden in 2010 after adjustment
ment for co-morbidities (data not shown).
for demographic composition. The prevalence appeared essentially
unchanged from 2006 to 2010. Earlier studies of community-based
cohorts suggest an increased prevalence of CHF, but the rate of in-
Co-morbidities crease has become slower over time.14 Indeed, as CHF mostly
Hypertension was the most common cardiovascular co-morbidity, affects elderly people and in view of the fact that the population in
followed by ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation/flutter, diabetes western countries is ageing, the prevalence of CHF is likely to in-
mellitus, cerebrovascular disease, and COPD (Table 1). The 5-year crease. On the other hand, the improved control of risk factors
such as hypertension and ischaemic heart disease has probably
resulted in a lower incidence of CHF, which together with improved
survival has maintained the prevalence rates unchanged.6,26
However, our results do not provide information on the possible
contribution of various factors to these findings.27 Contributing
factors to this trend deserve further study.
The crude incidence of CHF in 2010 in this study was 3.1/1000. The
incidence was estimated to be 3.7/1000 in Sweden in 2010 after ad-
justment for demographic composition. There was a 0.9/1000 abso-
lute decrease (i.e. a relative 24% decrease, P , 0.001) from 2006 to
2010 in both women and men. Although earlier studies predicted
an increase of CHF incidence due to an ageing population and
improved survival in ischaemic heart disease,28 more recent data
suggest that improved survival in acute coronary syndromes is not
a major contributor to the incidence of CHF.15 The Olmsted
County Study reported no change in CHF incidence between 1979
and 2000.9 However, our results support observations from the Fra-
Figure 2 The proportions of all 36 420 prevalent patients with mingham Heart Study, where the incidence of CHF in women
congestive heart failure in 2010, who had attended primary care declined by 30 –40% from 1950 to 1999, whereas the incidence in
(2003 – 2010), secondary care (defined as specialist outpatient men remained unchanged. Improved treatment and control of risk
care; 1997 – 2010), or had been hospitalized (1997 – 2010). factors may have contributed to the reduction in CHF incidence sug-
gested by our results.

Table 2 The age-adjusted prevalence of congestive heart failure, by age and gender

Age 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ......................
Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Total Crude
...............................................................................................................................................................................
40–49 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.2
50–59 0.5 1.1 0.5 1.1 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.9 0.9
60–69 1.6 3.6 1.5 3.4 1.5 3.3 1.5 3.1 1.4 3.1 2.3 2.6
70–79 6.4 10.0 6.4 9.6 6.2 9.2 6.0 8.7 5.80 8.2 6.9 7.5
80–89 17.93 21.4 17.9 21.2 18.3 21.5 18.2 21.6 18.2 21.6 19.5 18.8
≥90 33.0 36.9 32.7 34.3 30.9 32.7 31.8 33.0 29.4 30.3 29.7 34.4
Total 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.7 1.8

The age-adjusted prevalence of congestive heart failure (expressed as a percentage) in Stockholm, Sweden, from 2006 to 2010 for women and men, and for the total population
(for 2010 only). The demographic composition in 2006 was used as a reference for adjustment of the prevalence values. There was a weak decreasing temporal trend, calculated by
Poisson regression model, in women (P ¼ 0.044) but not in men (P ¼ 0.25).
Also shown is the crude prevalence for 2010 in Stockholm. The estimated crude prevalence for Sweden in 2010, adjusted for demographic composition, was 0.2, 0.9, 2.9, 9.7, 24.5, 38.9,
and 2.2 for age categories 40 –49 to ≥90 years and the total, respectively.
The epidemiology of heart failure in Sweden 999

Figure 3 Temporal trends in prevalence, incidence, and all-cause mortality from 2006 to 2010. The demographic composition in 2006 was used as
a reference for adjustment for all values.

Table 3 The age-adjusted incidence of congestive heart failure, by age and gender

Age 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


...................... ...................... ...................... ...................... ......................
Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Total Crude
...............................................................................................................................................................................
40– 49 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.6 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.4 0.4
50– 59 1.1 2.4 1.2 2.2 1.0 2.1 0.8 2.2 1.0 2.1 1.6 1.6
60– 69 3.5 7.0 3.4 5.8 3.1 5.7 2.9 4.8 2.3 5.2 3.7 4.2
70– 79 14.4 19.1 14.2 17.5 12.6 16.8 12.0 14.9 10.7 13.2 11.9 13.0
80– 89 35.2 43.4 34.8 41.1 35.0 42.6 34.6 39.5 31.0 38.2 33.7 32.7
≥90 57.4 71.7 52.9 62.6 49.6 60.3 51.4 56.4 42.5 51.5 45.0 52.1
Total 3.9 3.6 3.7 3.3 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.0 2.9 2.9 2.9 3.1

The age-adjusted incidence of congestive heart failure (expressed in cases/1000 person-years) in Stockholm, Sweden, from 2006 to 2010, for women and men, and for the total
population (for 2010 only). The demographic composition in 2006 was used as a reference for adjustment of the incidence values. The temporal trend for incidence, calculated by
Poisson regression model, was significant in both women (P , 0.001) and men (P , 0.001). The crude incidence of congestive heart failure (expressed in cases/1000 person-years) in
2010 is only for the total. The estimated crude incidence for Sweden in 2010, adjusted for demographic composition, was 0.4, 1.7, 4.8, 16.7, 42.6, 58.9, and 3.8 per 1000 person-years for
age categories 40 –49 to ≥90 years and the total, respectively.

We observed a crude mortality in 2010 of 2.5/1000, higher was 3.1/1000 person-years. There was an absolute 0.5/1000
in women than in men. However, women were older, and, when decrease in mortality (i.e. a 19% relative decrease; P , 0.001)
adjusted for age, mortality turned out to be higher in men, from 2006 to 2010. A decrease in mortality is in agreement with
which agrees well with previous studies.9,17 After adjustment for most previous studies.9,11,17 This may be attributable to improve-
demographic composition, the estimated mortality in Sweden ment in medical treatment in CHF.10,16 Despite similar temporal
1000 R. Zarrinkoub et al.

Table 4 The age-adjusted all-cause mortality of patients with congestive heart failure by age and gender

Age 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010


....................... ....................... ....................... ....................... .......................
Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Total Crude
...............................................................................................................................................................................
40–49 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
50–59 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.4 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3
60–69 0.9 2.3 0.9 2.0 1.0 2.0 0.8 1.5 0.8 1.7 1.2 1.2
70–79 5.7 10.4 5.5 10.1 4.7 9.3 4.4 8.3 4.5 7.8 6.1 6.7
80–89 27.6 44.7 28.3 41.3 27.5 39.0 24.7 37.6 26.4 37.6 30.7 29.7
≥90 106.6 145.6 108.2 135.6 92.2 125.7 92.6 118.3 83.1 106.5 89.7 104.0
Total 3.1 2.7 3.1 2.5 2.8 2.3 2.6 2.2 2.6 2.1 2.4 2.5

Age-adjusted all-cause mortality for women and men (expressed in cases/1000 person-years) in Stockholm, Sweden, from 2006 to 2010, and for the total population (only for 2010).
The demographic composition in 2006 was used as a reference for the adjustment of the mortality values. The temporal trend for mortality for 2006–2010 was significant in women
(P , 0.001) and in men (P , 0.001). The estimated crude mortality for Sweden in 2010, adjusted for demographic composition, was 0.0, 0.3, 1.6, 8.6, 38.7, 117.6, and 3.1 per 1000
person-years for age categories 40 –49 to ≥90 years and the total, respectively.

Table 5 Five-year survival estimates in patients with congestive heart failure, as compared with the entire Swedish
population, by age and gender

Age Women Men Total


................................................ ................................................ ................................................
Entire population Heart failure Entire population Heart failure Entire population Heart failure
...............................................................................................................................................................................
40–49 99 89 99 90 99 90
50–59 98 70 97 83 97 78
60–69 95 76 94 69 94 71
70–79 86 63 82 54 82 59
80–89 58 36 55 34 55 35
≥90 23 16 22 10 22 15
Total 95 45 95 51 95 48

Five-year survival estimates from 2006 to 2010 (expressed as a percentage) for women and men, as compared with the entire Swedish population. The numbers of patients in each age
group were 686 (40–49 years), 2009 (50 –59 years), 5039 (60 –69 years), 8648 (70 – 79 years), 13 115 (80 –89 years), and 4143 (≥90 years). Five-year survival was calculated from the
moment of the first recorded diagnosis of congestive heart failure, and by all-cause mortality. The difference in 5-year survival between patients with congestive heart failure and the
entire Swedish population was significant (P , 0.001) in all age groups, in both women and men.

trends, there are some differences to the mortality rates previously However, most patients (83%) attended secondary or hospital care,
reported. These differences are most probably due to differences suggesting that the recorded diagnosis has been confirmed by a spe-
in the selection of patients and the definitions of CHF used.29 cialist and should be reliable. Procedures and recommendations for
The results of this study are based on data from 2.1 million sub- establishing a diagnosis of CHF may have changed over the study
jects, which comprise close to a quarter of the population in period from 2006 to 2010. However, the validity of the Swedish Na-
Sweden. Data were obtained unbiased from a unique database tional Patient Register, containing the same data for secondary care
(i.e. the Stockholm regional healthcare data warehouse), which and hospitalizations in our study, is high.22 Thus, a diagnosis of CHF
contains details of almost all healthcare consumed in the Stockholm in the Swedish National Patient Register has a high validity (82%;
region and provides data from a comprehensive range of care pro- 95% if primary diagnosis), and the validity for an acute myocardial in-
viders, including primary, secondary, and hospital-based care. Thus, farction or stroke is even higher.30 – 32 Secondly, mortality was calcu-
these results are likely to be representative for all Sweden, and lated from the moment of the first recorded diagnosis of CHF, which
extend findings from older and smaller studies in an important may not always coincide with the actual onset of CHF, and hence
way.19 could have overestimated mortality. Also, we have no access to the
There are some potential limitations to our study. First, the diagno- cause of death, and mortality was calculated as all-cause mortality.
sis of CHF was obtained from patient records through the administra- Thirdly, we did not apply equally long run-in periods in our processing
tive registers and relies on the accuracy of the responsible physician. of data from primary care regarding time trends in prevalence and
The epidemiology of heart failure in Sweden 1001

Figure 4 Kaplan– Meier curves for 5-year survival rates, according to pre-existing co-morbidity, adjusted for age. IHD, ischaemic heart disease; AF,
atrial fibrillation/flutter; CVD, cerebrovascular disease; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

incidence. This may have underestimated the declining trends in Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH,
Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A,
prevalence and incidence slightly. Finally, we did not assess the pos-
Bax JJ, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, Dean V, Deaton C, Fagard R, Funck-Brentano C,
sible influence of the access to care and care giver organization, socio- Hasdai D, Hoes A, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, McDonagh T, Moulin C, Reiner Z,
economic factors, and differences between urban and rural areas on Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Vahanian A, Windecker S,
Bonet LA, Avraamides P, Ben Lamin HA, Brignole M, Coca A, Cowburn P,
our results. These interesting questions, and the potential relation-
Dargie H, Elliott P, Flachskampf FA, Guida GF, Hardman S, Iung B, Merkely B,
ship of drug treatment of CHF to outcome, are the subject of Mueller C, Nanas JN, Nielsen OW, Orn S, Parissis JT, Ponikowski P. ESC guidelines
further study. for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task
In conclusion, our study suggests a 2.2% prevalence, 3.8/1000 Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012
of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the
person-years incidence, and 3.1/1000 person-years mortality of Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail 2012;14:803–869.
CHF in Sweden. There is a decrease in the incidence and mortality 6. Danaei G, Finucane MM, Lin JK, Singh GM, Paciorek CJ, Cowan MJ, Farzadfar F,
of CHF in both women and men, with no major change in prevalence Stevens GA, Lim SS, Riley LM, Ezzati M. National, regional, and global trends in sys-
tolic blood pressure since 1980: aystematic analysis of health examination surveys
over time. Further studies to confirm these trends are warranted. and epidemiological studies with 786 country-years and 5.4 million participants.
Lancet 2011;377:568 – 577.
Acknowledgments 7. Shafazand M, Rosengren A, Lappas G, Swedberg K, Schaufelberger M. Decreasing
trends in the incidence of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction from
The authors acknowledge the expert statistical advice of Jamilette 1993 –2004: a study of 175,216 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction in
Miranda Tellez. All authors have read and agree to the manuscript Sweden. Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:135 –141.
as written. 8. Di Bari M, Pozzi C, Cavallini MC, Innocenti F, Baldereschi G, De Alfieri W, Antonini E,
Pini R, Masotti G, Marchionni N. The diagnosis of heart failure in the community.
Comparative validation of four sets of criteria in unselected older adults: the Icare
Dicomano Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1601 – 1608.
Funding 9. Roger VL, Weston SA, Redfield MM, Hellermann-Homan JP, Killian J, Yawn BP,
Jacobsen SJ. Trends in heart failure incidence and survival in a community-based
The Stockholm County Council Drug and Therapeutics Committee; and population. JAMA 2004;292:344 – 350.
Karolinska Institutet. 10. Jhund PS, Macintyre K, Simpson CR, Lewsey JD, Stewart S, Redpath A, Chalmers JW,
Capewell S, McMurray JJ. Long-term trends in first hospitalization for heart failure
Conflict of interest: none declared. and subsequent survival between 1986 and 2003: a population study of 5.1 million
people. Circulation 2009:119:515 –523.
11. Blackledge HM, Tomlinson J, Squire IB. Prognosis for patients newly admitted to hos-
References pital with heart failure: survival trends in 12 220 index admissions in Leicestershire
1. McMurray JJ, Stewart S. Epidemiology, aetiology, and prognosis of heart failure. Heart 1993 –2001. Heart 2003:89:615 –620.
2000;83:596 –602. 12. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM,
2. Rathi S, Deedwania PC. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure. Med Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ,
Clin North Am 2012;96:881 –890. Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM,
3. Mejhert M, Lindgren P, Schill O, Edner M, Persson H, Kahan T. Long term health care Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME,
consumption and cost expenditure in systolic heart failure. Eur J Intern Med 2013;24: Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN,
260 –265. Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB. Executive summary: heart disease and
4. Agvall B, Borgquist L, Foldevi M, Dahlström U. Cost of heart failure in Swedish stroke statistics—2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Cir-
primary healthcare. Scand J Prim Health Care 2005;23:227 –232. culation 2012;125:188 –197.
5. McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, 13. Jiang H, Ge J. Epidemiology and clinical management of cardiomyopathies and heart
Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, failure in China. Heart 2009;95:1727 –1731.
1002 R. Zarrinkoub et al.

14. Curtis LH, Whellan DJ, Hammill BG, Hernandez AF, Anstrom KJ, Shea AM, 23. Rosén M. National health data registers: a Nordic heritage to public health. Scand J
Schulman KA. Incidence and prevalence of heart failure in elderly persons, 1994– Public Health 2002;30:81–85.
2003. Arch Intern Med 2008;168:418 –424. 24. Wigertz A, Westerling R. Measures of prevalence: which healthcare registers are ap-
15. Najafi F, Dobson AJ, Hobbs M, Jamrozik K. Late-onset heart failure after myocardial plicable? Scand J Public Health 2001;29:55 –62.
infarction: trends in incidence and survival. Eur J Heart Fail 2008;10:765 –771. 25. The population in Sweden according to sex and age, Dec. 31, 2010. http://www.scb.
16. Barker WH, Mullooly JP, Getchell W. Changing incidence and survival for heart se (19 October 2012).
failure in a well-defined older population, 1970– 1974 and 1990 –1994. Circulation 26. Hellermann JP, Reeder GS, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, Killian JM, Roger VL. Longitudin-
2006;113:799 –805. al trends in the severity of acute myocardial infarction: a population study in Olmsted
17. Levy D, Kenchaiah S, Larson MG, Benjamin EJ, Kupka MJ, Ho KK, Murabito JM, county, Minnesota. Am J Epidemiol 2002;156:246 –253.
Vasan RS. Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. N 27. Levy D, Larson MG, Vasan RS, Kannel WB, Ho KK. The progression from hyperten-
Engl J Med 2002;347:1397 – 1402. sion to congestive heart failure. JAMA 1996;275:1557 – 1562.
28. Bonneux L, Barendregt JJ, Meeter K, Bonsel GJ, van der Maas PJ. Estimating clinical
18. Mejhert MP, Person H, Edner M, Kahan T. Epidemiology of heart failure in Sweden—
morbidity due to ischemic heart disease and congestive heart failure: the future
a national survey. Eur J Heart Fail 2001;3:97–103.
rise of heart failure. Am J Public Health 1994;84:20– 28.
19. Eriksson H, Svärdsudd K, Larsson B, Ohlson LO, Tibblin G, Welin L, Wilhelmsen L.
29. Mosterd A, Hoes AW. Clinical epidemiology of heart failure. Heart 2007;93:
Risk factors for heart failure in the general population: the study of men born in 1913.
1137 –1146
Eur Heart J 1989;10:647 –656.
30. Ingelsson E, Arnlöv J, Sundström J, Lind L. The validity of a diagnosis of heart failure in
20. Mejhert M, Holmgren J, Wändell P, Persson H, Edner M. Diagnostic tests, treatment
a hospital discharge register. Eur J Heart Fail 2005;7:787 –791.
and follow-up in heart failure patients–is there a gender bias in the coherence to 31. Rosén M, Alfredsson L, Hammar N, Kahan T, Spetz CL, Ysberg AS. Attack rate,
guidelines? Eur J Heart Fail 1999;1:407 – 410. mortality and case fatality for acute myocardial infarction in Sweden during 1987 –
21. Schneeweiss S, Avorn J. A review of uses of health care utilization databases for epi- 95. Results from the national AMI register in Sweden. J Intern Med 2000;248:
demiologic research on therapeutics. J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:323 –337. 159 –164.
22. Ludvigsson JF, Andersson E, Ekbom A, Feychting M, Kim JL, Reuterwall C, 32. Lindblad U, Råstam L, Ranstam J, Peterson M. Validity of register data on acute myo-
Heurgren M, Olausson PO. External review and validation of the Swedish national cardial infarction and acute stroke: the Skaraborg hypertension project. Scand J Soc
inpatient register. BMC Public Health 2011;11:450. Med 1993;21:3–9.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai