Stockton University
Spring 2018
2
Abstract
Land use change evaluations were conducted for Middlesex County and Monroe
Township. Both of these regions showed significant changes in land use between the years of
1986 and 2012. Land use was broken down into six categories agriculture, barren land, forests,
urban land, water and wetland. These six categories where the primary area of focus when
observing for land change. To determine the amount of land use change that occurred at these
two sites we download data from various online sources that met our date range and interpreted
the datasets in ArcMap. Water and urbanization had the highest positive net change for the two
locations. Water being the most significantly impacting change in Middlesex County establishing
a positive net change of +41207.93 acres. Meanwhile Monroe Township accounted for more
than half of all of Middlesex County agricultural land use loss with a total agricultural land use
negative net change of -8194.34 acres. To further examine land use change in Monroe Township
digital othoquads were reviewed to see if any visual changes could be noticed. To no surprise we
seen and proved what our data was stating which was an overall positive change in urban land
use with an alarming amount of new developments established between the years of 1995 and
2015 which mostly likely account for the negative agricultural land use change that you could
see as well from the digital orthoquads. The information gathered can be very useful in the
Table of Contents
I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………...2
II. Introduction………………………………………………………………….4
III. Objectives…………………………………………………………………....5
IV. Methods……………………………………………………………………...6-8
VI. Discussion……………………………………………………………………14
VII. Conclusion…………………………………………………………………...15
VIII. References…………………………………………………………………...16
IX. Appendix…………………………………………………………………….17
4
Introduction
Middlesex county is located in the northern-central part of New Jersey, USA. It is the
second most populated county in NJ with a population density of about 831,300 residents (1).
The county has topography that is typical to New Jersey which consists of a largely flat
landscape with elevation ranges from sea level to 300 feet. Middlesex county is made up of 25
unique municipalities which are a mix of small towns, urban centers and rural communities. The
square miles. In this study we reviewed we reviewed the two locations in depth to determine the
land use changes, if any, that has taken place between 1986 and 2010. To determine this much
information was gathered from online sources and then later interpreted in ArcMap. In ArcMap
we primarily focused on 5 particular land uses which are urban land, agricultural land, forests,
wetland, and land that is used for water. What was primarily observed and recorded from the
data was the acreage used by each land use type. We made observations from 5 sets of data that
was spread between the years of 1986 and 2010. Oppon the review of this data many alarming
conclusions were discovered. Enough evidence to back up that there in fact has been a significant
amount of change between the two locations when evaluating the totals for acreage in each land
Objectives
● To understand the land use changes in specific New Jersey counties over times.
● To determine and interpret the changes in land use in Middlesex county and Monroe
Township focusing on 5 primary categories; rural land, agricultural land, forests, wetland
and water.
● To evaluate and express large data files from online sources ranging between the years of
1986 and 2012 in a more consolidated and efficient manner using ArcMap and Excel.
● To be able to determine and interpret land use changes in local neighborhood with the use
of data within the range of 1995 and 2015 in a more efficient manner using ArcMap.
Compared the downloaded data to examine land use changes over time.
6
Methods
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection provided all of the data
required to complete the tasks that were given for Middlesex County. The land use data for the
year 1986 was separated by counties. The rest of the land use datasets were separated by
watershed management areas. The watershed management areas that were required for years
● Millstone (10)
● Monmouth (12)
On the other hand, in the year 2012, the land uses were grouped in terms of subbasins as
opposed to watershed management areas. The subbasin areas that were need for 2012 are as
follows:
● Raritan
● Sandy Hook-Staten Island
Once the data for each watershed management area, for the required years, was
downloaded and imported into ArcMAP, there were several steps that had to be made before one
is able to look at the maps and able to come to conclusions. The next step required using the
geoprocessing tool known as “merge” on the 4 data files for the watershed management areas.
Once the four areas are merged together you have to use another geoprocessing tool known as
“clip” to change the extent in which the data reaches. If you were to place a outline of Middlesex
county over the data that is geographically represented on our maps, you will see that there is
more data than just Middlesex county. By placing a digital outline of Middlesex county in
ArcMAP with the merged watershed management areas, you can clip the excess information out
7
of the data files with the ‘clip’ tool mentioned earlier. The end result is a file that contains all of
the land use data for Middlesex county. To display the different land uses one must go into the
symbology tab, which is located in the files properties. Once there, you are able to activate the
different land uses and display them geographically by selecting the correct values in under the
“categories” field. You also have to make sure you change the colors for each land use code.
Once the different land use codes are displayed in colors, it is much easier to visually see
the changes that have occured in Middlesex county over the past two decades. We used a
program called “Snipping Tool” to take screen captures of MIddlesex county, year by year.
The shapefile that was downloaded to display an outline of Middlesex county can also
display an outline for all municipalities within its county boundaries. If you click “select by
attributes” in ArcMAP, you are given many options but what you want to click is “MUN” =
“Monroe Township”. Once this search query is applied a blue outline around Monroe Township
will appear. You can then export the selected data, save it as a new shapefile, and then clip your
old land use file that was originally for Middlesex county with the boundaries of Monroe
8
Township. Once this is completed, for each year of data that you have downloaded, you will be
able to create screen captures similar to Figure 2. To gather information on how much acreage
was used by each different land use code, one must “Open Attribute Table”. All of the data needs
The orthoquads were very easy to download, for year 1995, I chose an area in Monroe
Township and downloaded the images for each quadrangle. I was then able to do the same for
the year 2015. When it came to placing the images into ArcMAP, all that had to be done was
dragging and dropping the files into the active data layer. I then took screen captures of these
Results
After compiling and condensing all the data for the county then determining the net
change two particular land use type really presented themselves out of all the rest. These land use
types where water and urban land showing positive net changes of +41207.93 acres and
+250964.46 acres respectively (Table 1). These two sites along with wetlands where the only
land use types that showed positive increase of the 6 land use types, though wetlands increase in
land use was not as significantly impacting to land uses change as the other two are. While urban
land use increased a more consistent positive rate, water showed a huge spike in increase
between the years of 1986 and 1995/97 boasting a positive increase of +43542.02 acres. This
increase is due to a open tidal bay addition within the time frame 1986 and 1995/97. After that
huge increase in acreage the rest of the water land use increased at a more consistent rate. The
remaining land use types which are agriculture, barren land and forests all showed a negative
9
change in land use -14817.07, -3313.02, -2828.99 respectively (Table 1). Although the net
change for urban land was 25094.46 it was not all at the cost of agricultural, barren land and
forest land use which at a combine total of the 3 land use types only add up to 20959.08. This is
still a loss of green land due to urbanization but the outcome could be worse.
Figure 1: Land use change of Middlesex county between the years of 1986 and
2012. Notice the steady increase of Urban land use and steady decrease of
Agriculture.
11
In Monroe Township it was a slightly different story than that of the overall county of
which it belongs to. Similar to Middlesex county, Monroe Township had a positive increase in
land use in the land use types of urban land, water, and wetlands. They displayed an increase of
+5021.41, +254.11, +1822.43 acres respectively (Table 2). Not the most impacting values to the
county but for a township an increase of 5021.41 is quite significant. Agriculture, barren land,
and forests showed a net loss of land of -8194.34, -391.63, -1606.52 respectively (Table 1).
Agriculture took a huge hit in this township accounting for more than half of the total
agricultural land use loss in all of Middlesex county. It is safe to say that the increase of urban
land in this area did come at the expense of green land use types in this township.
Figure 2:Land use change of Monroe Township between the years of 1986 and
1995/97. Notice the vast reduction of agriculture in this area as well as the
almost extinction of barren land form this township.
Monroe Township Orthoquads Land Use Change
14
When first observing these two figures you can immediately notice that there is an
obvious increase urban land between the two sets of data. The most urbanization occurred in the
east side of the township where you see an entire new development that was not there before
(Figure 4). Notice that the forest in the northeast portion of the orthoquads through time were
Figure 3 Figure 4
Discussion
The results for both Middlesex County and Monroe Township show a very consistent
trend, there is a significant growth in development for urban land uses. We think that this is due
to the area in which Middlesex County is located. Since the county and everything it entails is
located near New York City, it looks like the development is to help support the urban sprawl
from this high density area. There are many higher income cities located inside the township that
help support this claim, such as, New Brunswick, Edison Piscataway, and Woodbridge. The
changes in land use can be summarized by saying that while new urban areas are arising, land
uses for agriculture and barren lands are shrinking. The orthoquad of Monroe Township only
helps support this claim. You can visually see several areas that are undeveloped in Figure 3. that
look very much uninhabitable, but when you look at Figure 4. it is easy to see how these areas
have been developed to help sustain the population’s needs. When looking at the differences
from year to year in Figure 1. It is easy to see that most of the urban land use development
occurs in the central and south-western regions of the county (South Brunswick, North
Something that was not discussed in the results was the black areas located on Figure 1.
These areas represented a land use type known as Managed Wetlands. This was seen in the year
1986 exclusively, so we decided that it would be best to ignore it completely since it has changed
Conclusion
Land use change analysis for both Middlesex County and Monroe Township have been
conducted by reviewing data from 1986-2012 which was retrieved from various online sources
(References) and interpreted in detail in ArcMap. Both the sites showed negative net change for
the same land use types of urban land, water, and wetlands. Therefore they also showed
negative net change for the same land use types of agriculture, barren land, and forest. The most
significant positive and negative net change for Middlesex County and for Monroe Township
was water, urban land and agriculture, agriculture respectively. Land use change is a very
important topic to take consideration of, it should be tracked consistently. Accurate tracking of
this can help observe trends and make regional decisions, especially if it refers to designating
new land use to already designated lands. Aside from that it can also be very useful for
References
NJ Subbasin. 2015. HU8. Retrieved February 13, 2018, from
http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/digidownload/metadata/lulc12/hu8index.jpg
https://njgin.state.nj.us/NJ_NJGINExplorer/IW.jsp#
Middlesex County. (2018). Middlesex County About. Retrieved February 13, 2018, from
http://www.middlesexcountynj.gov/Pages/Main.aspx
NJDEP LU/LC Statistics Tables by County. 2002-2007 Retrieved February 12, 2018, from
http://www.nj.gov/dep/gis/digidownload/metadata/lulc07/lulc2007stattablescounty.htm
About. (2018). Monroe Township About Retrieved February 13, 2018, from
http://monroetownshipnj.org/
Monroe Facts. (2018). Monroe Township Monroe Facts. Retrieved February 13, 2018, from
http://www.monroetwp.com/monroe_facts.cfm
NJDEP Division of Land Use Regulation. (2017). Land Use Regulations and Permits. Retrieved
February 13, 2018, from
http://www.nj.gov/dep/landuse/
18
Appendix
1) Data Table for Middlesex County Land Use Change
Chart 1: Middlesex County Land Use Change 1986-2012
Chart 1: Visual representation of Table 1. Here you can really see the consistent growth
of urban land use.
Chart 2: Monroe Township Land Use Change 1986-2012
Chart 2: Visual representation of Table 2. Here you can really see not only the consistent
increase of urban land use but as well as the vast consistent deterioration of agricultural land
use type.