Anda di halaman 1dari 2

7011CAL Oral Presentation Criteria Sheet – Descriptors: PLEASE READ THESE CRITERIA AND DESCRIPTORS CAREFULLY.

Level 7 (85%+) Exceptional Level 6 (75-84%) Excellent Level 5 (65-74%) Good Level 4 (50-64%) Satisfactory Level 3 – Level 1 (<50%) Unsatisfactory
Content: understanding and The presentation The presentation The presentation The presentation demonstrates The presentation has made
development of ideas 0.40 demonstrates very demonstrates high levels of demonstrates good some understanding of use of some information
(Individual mark) comprehensive understanding and analysis understanding and analysis of concepts and analysis of the relevant to the task but
 demonstrated understanding and analysis of of the topic through the use the topic through the use of topic through the use of demonstrates lack of
understanding of the software through the use of information relevant to information relevant to the information mostly relevant to understanding of readings.
software and its of information relevant to the the task. The presentation task. The presentation clearly the task. The presentation The presentation is mainly
application task. The presentation carefully explains, explains, evaluates and successfully explains and descriptive and fails to
 identification and systematically explains, evaluates and analyses analyses software application attempts to evaluate and explain, demonstrate,
explanation of industry demonstrates, evaluates and software application and and industry reviews. Most of analyse software application evaluate and analyse
reviews analyses software application industry reviews. High level the time, it avoids merely and industry reviews. At times, software application and
 evidence of and industry reviews rather of explanation and analysis describing and summarising. it merely describes and industry reviews. Most of the
explanation, than merely describing and of appropriate information Good level of explanation and summarises. There is an time it merely describes.
demonstration, summarising. Extensive to support argument which analysis of appropriate attempt to provide an Many aspects of the task
analysis and evaluation explanation and analysis of is well-reasoned and information to support explanation and analysis of have not been addressed or
of the relevance of the appropriate information to logically developed. All argument which is mostly well- appropriate information to the presentation is vague and
software to GVT support argument which is aspects of the task have reasoned and logically support argument, although at off-topic.
communication and well-reasoned and logically been addressed to a high developed. All aspects of the times relevance of argument There is a very limited
collaboration developed. All aspects of the level. task have been addressed to a may be not clear to the attempt to demonstrate and
 logical development of task have been addressed There is a very clear reasonably high level. listener. Most aspects of the evaluate the software.
argument comprehensively. demonstration and There is a good attempt to task have been addressed to an
 selection and There is a very clear evaluation of the software. demonstrate and evaluate the acceptable level.
explanation of demonstration and software. There is a limited attempt to
appropriate evaluation of the software. demonstrate and evaluate the
information to support software.
argument
 all aspects of the task
have been addressed
 there is a clear
demonstration and
explanation of the
software.
Delivery Skills (Individual Very high level of ability to High level of ability to Good ability to sustain Pace, intonation and stress Mixed control of pace,
mark) 0.45 sustain appropriate pace, sustain appropriate pace, appropriate pace, intonation generally used well and intonation and stress.
 pronunciation and intonation and stress. Clear intonation and stress. Clear and stress. Clear presenter can be understood Keywords may be
audibility pronunciation of keywords. pronunciation of keywords. pronunciation of keywords. throughout. Mostly clear mispronounced or used
 fluency and coherence Fluent and coherent speech Fluent and coherent speech Fluent and coherent speech pronunciation of keywords. incorrectly. Poor organisation
 unobtrusive use of at all times. Excellent at all times. Excellent most of the time. Good Able to speak at length and and loose structure makes it
notes delivery skills with delivery skills with delivery skills with mostly organise ideas. May rely on hard for the listener to
 positive and confident unobtrusive use of notes, unobtrusive use of notes, unobtrusive use of notes but fillers to keep going. Overall follow. Poor delivery skills.
body language poised and confident body poised and confident body does not read from them, makes an effort to deliver Mainly reads notes or reads
 appropriate eye contact language with maintenance language with maintenance positive body language and eye effectively but needs to work information from slides
maintained of eye contact with whole of eye contact with whole contact maintained most of on a few areas. Sometimes resulting in minimal eye
audience. Consistent and audience. Consistent and the time. Some appropriate reads from notes and eye contact. Lack of interaction or
appropriate interaction and appropriate interaction and interaction and referral to contact is interrupted. Minimal
 appropriate referral to referral to slides. referral to slides. slides. Presentation is interaction and referral to referral to slides. Failure to
and interaction with Presentation is extremely Presentation is professional engaging and holds audience slides. Sometimes appears hold audience attention.
visual aids professional and engaging. and engaging. attention most of the time. uncomfortable. Audience
 ability to engage and attention lost at times.
hold interest of
audience.
Task Fulfilment (Group Evidence of comprehensive Evidence of high levels of Evidence of preparation and Evidence of some preparation Little evidence of preparation
mark) 0.05 and thorough preparation preparation and teamwork. teamwork. Presentation is and teamwork although better and teamwork. Presentation
 evidence of teamwork and teamwork. Presentation Presentation is well- organised. Presentation is preparation would have may appear to have been
in preparation of is extremely well-organised. organised. Presentation is shared equally among group improved this grade. developed by individual
presentation Presentation is shared shared equally among members and the overall Presentation is mostly group members rather than
 presentation well- equally among group group members and the presentation is within the time organised. Presentation is as team effort. Lack of
organised with clear members and the overall overall presentation is limit. Presentation slides are mostly shared equally among teamwork results in lack of
introduction and presentation is within the within the time limit. submitted by the required group members and the overall organisation. Presentation
conclusion time limit. Presentation slides Presentation slides are deadline. The presentation is presentation is within the time time is not shared equally
 equal share of time are submitted by the required submitted by the required professional ie high limit. Presentation slides are and the overall presentation
 time limit observed deadline. The presentation is deadline. The presentation workplace standard.. submitted by the required is not within the time limit.
 submission of slides extremely professional ie is extremely professional ie deadline. ie y high workplace Failure to submit
within required very high workplace very high workplace standard. presentation slides by
timeframe standard. standard.. required deadline. The
presentation lacks
professionalism ie does not
meet workplace standard.
Use of Technology (Group PowerPoint slides are PowerPoint slides are PowerPoint slides are prepared PowerPoint slides are prepared PowerPoint slides are not
mark) 0.10 prepared to an extremely prepared to a high to a good standard, are mostly to a good standard, are mostly always visually appropriate
 PowerPoint slides are high standard, are visually standard, are visually visually appropriate and visually appropriate and and evidence a lack of
visually appropriate appropriate and appropriate and professional. Mostly effective professional. Some effective professionalism and
and professional professional. professional. Effective navigation of slides by navigation of slides by preparation. Navigation of
including slide Extremely effective navigation of slides by presenters. Slides use headings presenters. This could have slides is poor and affects
numbering navigation of slides by presenters. Slides use and sub-headings been improved with better fluency of overall
 effective navigation of presenters. Slides use headings and sub-headings appropriately. Slides are preparation. Slides use presentation. Headings and
slides headings and sub-headings appropriately. Slides are numbered but may have a few headings and sub-headings sub-headings are missing or
 use of appropriate appropriately. Slides are numbered and error free. minor errors. These could be mostly appropriately. Slides are used inappropriately. . Slides
headings and sub- numbered and error free. Slides include appropriate corrected with more careful numbered. Errors on slides are are not numbered. Errors on
headings Slides include appropriate citation. A comprehensive editing. Slides include sometimes intrusive. These slides are frequent and
 slides are numbered citation. A comprehensive reference list that follows appropriate citation. A could be corrected with much evidence a lack of careful
 slides are error free reference list that follows appropriate style comprehensive reference list more careful editing. Slides editing. Citation on slides
(accurate spelling, appropriate style convention convention is provided with that follows appropriate style include some appropriate may be missing. Reference
charts referenced is provided with very few a few minor errors. convention is provided.with citation. A reference list that list may be provided but fails
appropriately) errors evident. either a few minor errors or follows appropriate style to follow appropriate style
 appropriate citation on one major error. convention is provided with convention with incomplete
slides and bibliographic with most information needed or inaccurate formatting.
references provided in given with either a few minor Does not provide a reference
APA6 formatting errors or two major errors. list or ref list has many major
errors.
i. All OPs will be recorded to allow for later review by tutor ii. To gain a mark reflecting a Level 4,5,6,7, all criteria must be clearly met at the described standard.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai