Title of project: The Politics of Coming Out: Race, Family, and Does It Still Matter?
Body of Proposal
Part 1: Aims
I will explore the decision-making process behind coming out about one’s sexuality and
how race, as a key form of identity, plays a role in assessing the risks and benefits of
publicly navigating sexuality in heteronormative American society. Numerous
considerations go into making the decision to come out, but I will focus specifically on the
reactions of loved ones and the importance of preserving familial dynamics among
communities of color, specifically Black communities. I incorporate race to explore how
racial identity and cultural assumptions about sexuality further impact coming-out as
sexuality may introduce additional distress to an already complicated American minority
experience. I aim to question the general moral imperative of “coming-out”—
understanding when and why coming out became morally incumbent upon LGBTQ people.
Contemporary relevance of coming out is informed by the meaning the decision may hold
for those who do and those who choose not to, its meaning for those on the receiving end
of the announcement, and whether it is political and a form of subversive resistance. This
project will explore these topics in an effort to better understand how racially-based
considerations of culture and family amplify and agitate the decision-making process.
This second phase will involve personally speaking with people at the University and in
the Richmond area in set focus groups to identify differences in individual and culturally
collective perceptions and experiences involving sex and gender, sexuality and
orientation, and expression and identity across the spectra of race and gender. I will speak
to LGBTQ individuals in two separate groups who racially identify as either Black or
white about their personal experiences of coming out and its impact on their familial
relationships. In conducting these conversational interviews, I am looking for
commonalities as well as instances of difference in perceptions of sexuality and
experiences in deciding to, or not to, come out between the two racial groups; similarities
and differences across lines of gender both intra- and interracially; and if either, or both,
subgroups identify generational difference among their respective families and cultural
communities as a stressor to consider when coming out.
Interactions with both focus groups will be open-ended with few set questions to
hopefully establish a safe-space to foster honest and healthy discussion amongst peers. I
will begin with the questions of:
How do you identify on the sexuality spectrum and for how long have you
identified that way?
Are you out, and if so, to which groups in your personal and professional
networks?
How did/does your family factor into your decision to come out, or to not come
out?
How did/does your racial and/or cultural community play a role in your decision
to come out, or to not come out?
Other guiding questions to either supplement or redirect the discussion if necessary are:
What additional factors did you consider when making your decision?
Is it more or less difficult to be white/Black and LGBTQ than it is to be
Black/white and LGBTQ?
Does the Black community tend to have specific views on sexuality and the
expression of sex and gender?
How does your family view the LGBTQ community and is there a considerable
difference in opinion across lines of gender and age?
Do you think that the experience of coming out in your racial community differs
for men and women within that community?
The outcome of this research project will be a written paper and a presentation at the Arts
and Sciences Symposium in the spring followed by a question-and-answer style
discussion about the content presented.
Watson, Elwood. “The Black Church, The Black Community And The Politics Of
Homophobia.” The Huffington Post, TheHuffingtonPost.com, 9 Jan. 2017,
www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-black-church-the-black-community-and-the-
politics_us_5873278be4b08052400ee40d.