Short Notes K11

phys. s t a t . s o l . (b) 78, K11 (1976)

Subject classification: 8 and 18
Paisii Hilendarskii University, Plovdiv
Numerical Computations on a Rigorously Solvable Model
BY
G . I. GEORGIEV and S. G . GOCHEVA

Some basic spectral and thermodynamical characteristics of the rigorously

solvable model with the Hamiltonian 20 were considered in the fourth part of the
+
paper (1). By means of the F e r m i creation and annihilation operators a and a
k k'
we have written

2 0
=
k
(aLak - i) z(k), C(k) = H - I >m

L. cos j k
j =1 J
Here we present new numerical computations on some quantities of the system (1).
I. The temperature behaviour (STT = 0.01) of the magnetic susceptibility x / N
j
and the specific heat C/N a t L. = p , p = 0 . 1 (i. e. a t ?(k) =
2 J
1 - p 1
=H - + - ) for five values of the magnetic field strength H =
2 2 1,5
Z(1-2pcosk + p )

=H 0.1, H H i0.05, H = 0.1111, is shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 , re-

=
3 3
2,4 3
spectively . N denotes the spin number in the system, we assume I = 1; H c o r r e -
3
sponds t o the point of phase transition (ppt) of the second kind about the field a t T = 0 .
It i s easily seen that the low- and high-temperature behaviour of x / N and
C/N, shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, completely corresponds to the analytical results
in the fourth part of (1).

P
t4
A 3

0 at 02 a3 ab a a1 02 a3 a4 5
T- T-
Fig. 1 Fig. 2
K12 physica status solidi (b) 78

Table 1

a) p = 0.1;H = 0.0111 0.0611 0.1111 0.1611 0.2111

T
Xmax
1 0.03 I 0.02 I 0.00 I 0.08 0.12

’3.53 <3.53 PPt 1.44 1.08

‘,ax
0.03 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.09
T~ max
0.37
rnax
1 0.5 0.00 >1 1.33
Tx max/T c max
b) p = 0.105;H = 0.0173 0.0673 0.1173 0.1673 0.2173

0.13

1.05

T~ max

rnax I
0.03

0.32 I
0.05

0.27 1 0.07
0.28
c-I 0.08
0.33
0.10

0.37

TXmax’TC max
1 I 0.4 I 0.00
I >1
>l
1.30

C) p = 0.2;H = 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500

0.04 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.19

3max
1.49 1.81 PPt 0.77 0.65
Lax

T~ max
0.10 0.12 0.14
__ ~
0.15 0.16 1
0.29 0.28 0.30 0.32
‘max
/T 0.4 0.17 0.00 0.93
Txmax cmax

11. From our numerical results, partially used in section I. we give in Table 1
to within 0.01 the following quantities: the temperatures T and T at
Xmax C max’
which the susceptibility and the specific heat reach their maximum values
max
x
and Cmax, and their ratio.
 Short Notes K13

F r o m the numerical data in Table l,, and some

other numerical results not mentioned in this note,
mark the following correlations :
decreases with H increase in the para- n/2
- TXmax
magnetic region, after the ppt H and T
X max increase -ol
simultaneously; the behaviour of x (H),however, 05 10 15
max kcr ~ *
is the opposite one; Fig. 3

- T~ max increases monotonously with H , however

(H) has a relative minimum in the paramagnetic region, after which it increa-
max
ses simultaneously with H;
- evidently, TXmaxlTC max has an absolute minimum in the ppt.
At equal distances about H from both sides of the ppt we observe the following
correlations :

- TXmax
increases simultaneously with p, while x max(H) decreases;
- T~ max increases simultaneously with p;
- T~max/T c max decreases when p increases.
Obviously, when p increases, the convergence velocity of the infinite s e r i e s
in c(k) d e c r e a s e s , and (as it should be expected) the typical behaviour of the func-
tions x(T) and C(T)is manifested weaker.
1111. It is easy to obtain the correlation function

The numerical computations of the function (2) a t 1 = 1, 2 , and 10 a r e shown graphi-

cally in Fig. 3.
The programs are written in algorithmic F o r t r a n , the computations are made
-5
to within 1 0 .

References
(1)G. GEORGIEV, N . MILEV, and S. GOCHEVA, phys. s t a t . sol. (b) 70, 275 (1975).

(Received September 16, 1976)