PROBLEM STATEMENT
Before a new type of lead-rubber bearing can be used in a large structural system, design
codes require that its hysteretic force-displacement capabilities be validated by experiment. In
a typical experimental procedure the bearing displacements will be measured for a pre-
determined combination of axial and cyclic shear forces.
In this example we demonstrate that the FRAME_3DS finite element can replicate the cyclic
shear behavior of lead-rubber bearings derived from a force-controled experiment. Analysis
procedures that incorporate nonlinear finite elements of this type are an important part of
performance-prediction for base-isolated structures.
A lead-rubber bearing is a laminated rubber bearing with a lead plug down its center, as
depicted in Figure 1.
The rubber/steel laminated bearing is designed to carry the weight of the structure and
provide post-yield elasticity. The lead core deforms plastically under shear deformations. Its
size can be selected to produce the required amount of damping.
In the design of highway bridges that must resist severe lateral loads, there are several
benefits in using lead-rubber bearings for base-isolation:
1. Lead-rubber bearing are sufficiently stiff so that vertical loads and small lateral loads
can be carried without excessive deformations occuring. Indeed, for small lateral
loads (e.g., less than 0.1g ground acceleration) base-isolated and fixed-base structures
should exhibit very similar behavior.
The size of the lead plug is proportional to the yield strength of the isolator. The post-
yielding stiffness is proportional to the rubber bearing stiffness, and increases with the
plan size of the rubber bearing and reductions in the isolator height.
During severe seismic attacks, however, the lead plug is capable of deforming through
many low-cycle plastic deformations without a loss of strength occuring.
k_1 = 10 . k_r
where k_r is the stiffness of rubber, then followed by a post yield stiffness k_2 = k_r
[2,3].
3. These devices allow a bridge to expand thermally without causing excessive forces in
the bridge structure.
4. These devices also protect a structure with period shifting and increased damping in a
single device [1].
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
In this section we will briefly outline the experimental procedure for testing a single lead-
rubber bearing in cyclic shear under compressive axial loads of 3125 kN.
Figure 2 is a plan and elevation view of the lead-rubber laminated bearing we will consider in
the analysis.
Figure 2 : Plan and Elevation of Lead-Rubber Laminated Bearing
E_lead = Ea;
G_lead = 130 MPa;
fv_lead = 10 MPa;
Kr = 1.75 kN/mm;
E_rubber = Ea;
G_rubber = Kr*iso_h/(PI/4*(r_dia*r_dia-l_dia*l_dia));
Here "E_lead" and "E_rubber" are the modulus of elasticity in the isolator's axial direction.
The stiffness of the lead and rubber in the lateral direction(s) are given by "G_lead" and
"G_rubber," respectively. "fv_lead" represents the yield stress of lead.
Test Procedure
The following test procedure will be used to assess the force-displacement capabilities of the
lead-rubber laminated bearing under combined axials loads and cyclic shear loadings:
We now consider the problem of modeling the lead-rubber isolator with the fiber element in
ALADDIN. Because the lead-rubber isolator is composed of two different materials, each
with its own shear modulus, the isolator behavior is modeled with a FIBER_3DS element.
AddNode( 1, [ 0 m, 0 m, iso_h ] );
AddNode( 2, [ 0 m, 0 m, 0 m ] );
generates a finite element mesh containing two nodes a one finite element having the attribute
label "isolator_attr".
FixNode( 2, [1,1,1,1,1,1] );
has been applied, the isolator finite element model has six d.o.f. See Figure 3.
Figure 3 : Elevation Views of Finite Element Mesh
Flexural Behavior
Figure 4 is a plan view of a lead-rubber isolator, showing the section dimensions and
positions of the fiber elements.
Figure 4 : Fiber Model of Lead-Rubber Laminated Bearing
We model the flexural behavior of the isolator by partitioning the lead and rubber sections
into quadrants -- each quadrant of the isolator is modeled with two fibers, one for the lead,
and a second for the rubber.
The fibers are positioned at the centroid of the material quadrant. The material properties are
as mentioned in the previous section.
Shear Behavior
Shear deformations in the lead and rubber are modeled with springs having equivalent shear
stiffness (i.e., G_lead and G_rubber), one for each fiber.
Figure 5 : Elevation View of Isolator with Shear Spring Fibers
For simplicity the three-dimensional behavior of the base-isolation pad will be modeled with
only one fiber finite element containing 8 fibers.
Fiber Geometry
no_fiber_type = 2;
divid_no = 4;
theta = PI/divid_no;
l_r = l_dia*sin(theta)/theta/3;
r_r = r_dia*sin(theta)/theta/3;
no_fiber = 2*divid_no;
fcoord[1][i+divid_no] = r_r*cos((2*i-1)*theta);
fcoord[2][i+divid_no] = r_r*sin((2*i-1)*theta);
farea[1][i+divid_no] = theta*(r_dia*r_dia - l_dia*l_dia)/4;
fmap[1][i+divid_no] = 2;
}
defines three matrices, "fcoord", "farea", and "fmap" which store the coordinates, equivalent
areas and material mappings for the eight fibers shown in the lower half of Figure 4.
allocates memory for a 6-by-2 array fattr, and initializes its contents with the material
properties shown in Table 2.
stiff = Stiff();
NodeLoad( 1, [ 0 kN, 0 kN, -3150 kN, 0 kN*m, 0 kN*m, 0 kN*m] );
P_old = ExternalLoad();
displ = Solve( stiff, P_old );
ElmtStateDet( displ );
stiff = Stiff();
At each step of the analysis we compute the nonlinear displacements corresponding to the
force-controlled shear loading. The Aladdin code is really quite straight forward:
no_step = 180;
for( step=1 ; step <= no_step+1 ; step=step+1 ) {
P_new = ExternalLoad();
dP = P_new - P_old;
P_old = P_new;
dp = Solve( stiff, dP );
displ = displ + dp;
ElmtStateDet( dp );
stiff = Stiff();
PR = InternalLoad( displ );
dP = P_new - PR; /* Compute unbalanced force */
}
UpdateResponse();
print
step,"\t",P_new[max_dof][1](kN),"\t",displ[max_dof][1](mm),"\n";
}
Figure 6 compares the force-displacement relationship for the FIBER_3DS element with the
experimental data generated by Robinson [2].
References
1. Priestley M.J.N., Seible F., and Calvi G.M., Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges,
John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1996.
2. Robinson W.H., Lead-Rubber Hysteretic Bearings Suitable for Protecting Structures
During Earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol 10, pp.
593-602, 1982.
3. Skinner R.I., Robinson W.H., McVerry G.H., An Introduction to Seismic Isolation,
John-Wiley and Sons, Inc, 1993.
INPUT/OUTPUT FILES