Name :
Muhammad zaki mubaroq 20160430117
Subject : Monetary Islam
“The theft of nations and Islamic bank and fiat monetary system”
Abstract
A country may be on the losing side if it pegs its national currency to a foreign
currency at the same time allows the foreign currency to be used in domestic
transactions. Why could it happen, it is because of decision by economy politic that
undergoing. The superpower denoted USA has good strategic even they give loans
with some intentions disguised like what China has been doing, which is to catch
up with USA. Jack ma (CEO of Ali Baba Group) said that it is all about strategy to
make growing in economic. Moreover, outlook by society; Islamic banking has the
working system that claimed just as the co-existence of the conventional bank,
which is make society less trust toward Islamic banks.
Introduction
1. The theft of nations
a. Currency pegging and seigniorage
The currency of oil-producing developing nation is pegged to
the currency of its more affluent and developed neighbouring country.
Both the currencies are exchangeable dollar for a dollar and also can
be used interchangeably in both countries. Pegging itself means “a
country or government's exchange rate policy whereby it attaches, or
pegs, the central bank's rate of exchange to another country's
currency. Also referred to as a fixed exchange rate or a pegged
exchange rate, a currency peg stabilizes the exchange rate between
countries. Doing so provides long-term predictability of exchange
rates for business planning and can anchor rates at advantageous
levels for large importers.” The currencies of two countries are usable
of seigniorage would accrue relatively more to the country that creates
the more money.
1
Arbitrage means the practice of profiting from the price differences between the two financial markets.
huge leveraged positions, the central bank would need large amounts
of foreign reserves to counter this. Inability to match the speculators
would cause the exchange rate to plunge as happened to the Asian
currencies.
While one may argue that it is ethically not right for speculators to
attack a currency, it is the current global monetary system that
allowed them to do so. When an exchange rate moves due to
speculative attacks or otherwise, it breaks the equilibrium among
currencies. This makes it possible for further profiteering called
arbitrage profits. Arbitrage is like finding money on the ground. An
example of currency speculation and arbitrage is given below.
Consider the ringgit when it was attacked in August 1997. The
shorting of the currency by speculators pushed the ringgit downward.
Discussion
Some nations could lose due to seigniorage and interest-based loans. The
theft of nations could occur and some action that may prevent this. The nation
can enjoy the goods and services that it wants;
Produce itself the goods and services it wants or trade with others.
The more nations produce the goods and services the more economy
growing will be, and give effect to the Gross National Product. Even
though the Gross Domestic Product is high but it does not mean that
the society do trade by own product.
Consume the savings of other nations. Importing more than exporting
this would show up in the form of trade deficits. Nations can do
import on urgently economy situation like lack of technology, deficits
and others.
Lending money at interest, do not ever borrow money at interest,
particularly in the currency of another country
As we have mentioned above, it is all about strategy. Many developed
countries lend loans to the developing countries even under developing
countries with purposes that they cannot pay off the debt, so that the developed
country can control that nation.
“In Islamic gold dinar book” has mentioned in the present interest-based fiat
monetary system, Islamic banks cannot be totally independent from interest
rate and the conventional banks. In fact, the pricing of Islamic financial
proucts is likely to be tied to the market interest rates. It is because if there
are price differences between the two then arbitrage opportunities would set
in, thereby enabling market participants to make easy profits. Arbitrage
between the two banking systems would, in turn, bring about a convergence
between the two banking systems. The convergence is no fault of the Islamic
bank but rather is a result of its co-existence with the conventional banks
because both of them are linked by fiat money interest-based system.
By attacking the currency as such, the traders make two types of profits :
1. Borrow US$1 million and exchange it into RM3.8 million ( at the new
prevailing exchange rate of RM3.80 per US dollar )
2. Exchange the RM3.8 million into S$2.533 million ( at the exchange rate
of RM1.50 per singapore dollar )
3. Exchange the S$2.533 million into US$1.5833 million ( at the exchange
rate of S$1.60 per US dollar )
4. Retrun back the loan of US$1 million, and keep the remaining
US$583,333 as arbitrage profit
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/currency-peg.asp