Anda di halaman 1dari 2

BUILDING CODES

& ENERGY EFFICIENCY:


WEST VIRGINIA
Updated September 14, 2010
ECONOMIC BENEFITS

Consumers will save money well into the future by


reducing utility bills, minimizing the negative im-
pacts of fluctuations in energy supply and cost, and
conserving available energy resources. Retail and
office buildings constructed to meet the require-
ments of the IECC can be over 30 percent more
energy efficient than typical buildings not con-
structed to meet national model energy standards.

Monetary savings derived from codes increase a

B
consumer's purchasing power, and help expand
uildings account for roughly 40 percent of the
West Virginia’s economy by keeping local dollars
total energy use in the United States and 70
percent of its electricity use, representing a in the state.
significant opportunity for energy savings. Energy ef- BUILDING INDUSTRY BENEFITS
ficiency – through the adoption and enforcement of
The national model code, the 2009 IECC, offers
strong building energy codes – is the quickest, cheap-
flexibility to West Virginia builders and design pro-
est, and cleanest way to reduce energy consumption
fessionals, allowing them to optimize the cost-
and achieve a sustainable, prosperous future. For West
effectiveness of energy efficient features in their
Virginia, the next step should be the adoption of the
building products, and to satisfy the variety of con-
latest U.S. model residential and commercial energy
sumer preferences.
codes – the 2009 International Energy Conservation
Code (IECC) and ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007. The 2009 IECC also simplifies guidelines for build-
ers, providing a uniform statewide code with multi-
In February 2009, the American Recovery and Rein- ple options for compliance.
vestment Act (Recovery Act) – federal legislation ap-
propriating funds for a variety of state economic initia- Uniformity throughout West Virginia will enable
tives – allocated $3.1 billion for the U.S. Department local jurisdictions to pool limited resources and
of Energy (DOE) State Energy Program (SEP) to as- combine personnel to form county-wide, regional,
sist states with building energy efficiency efforts. As a and statewide enforcement and education programs.
condition of accepting $32.7 million1 in SEP funding,
Gov. Joe Manchin certified to DOE2 that the state UTILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS
would implement energy standards of equal or greater An energy code improves the energy efficiency per-
stringency than the latest national model codes and formance of all new buildings and reduces demand
achieve 90 percent compliance in new and renovated on power generators, therefore improving the air
residential and commercial building space by 2017. quality of local communities throughout the state.
West Virginia must now start laying the groundwork Electricity use is one of the leading generators of air
to successfully implement the building energy code pollution. Rising power demand increases emis-
plans submitted to DOE. It is in the state’s best eco- sions of sulfur dioxide, nitrous oxides and carbon
nomic interest to adopt the 2009 IECC and Stan- dioxide. Energy codes have proven to be one of the
dard 90.1-2007 statewide and begin the construction most cost-effective means for addressing these and
of a more efficient building sector. other environmental impacts.
1850 M St. NW Suite 600
Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org
A MODEL ENERGY CODE FOR WEST VIRGINIA

W
est Virginia current energy code3 is based
on the 2003 IECC. The State Fire Commis-
sion promulgated a rule4 in 2009 to adopt
the 2009 IECC (per legislative mandate5), but the Leg-
islature unexpectedly amended the rule to revert back
to the 2003 edition. This code, however, does not
achieve the energy savings of the latest national
model codes.
The 2009 IECC and Standard 90.1-2007 improve sub-
stantially upon the 2003 IECC and provide a simpler,
uniform path to benefit West Virginia households and
businesses through lower utility costs, increased com- The New River Gorge Bridge in Fayetteville, W.V.
fort, and better economic opportunity.6 (Credit – Craig Cunningham)

A limited DOE analysis of the changes from West Vir- According to some estimates, more than four-fifths of
ginia’s current residential code to the 2009 IECC re- energy expenses leave low-income communities. High
sulted in estimated energy savings hundreds of dol- energy costs deprive these communities of resources
lars per year for an average new house at recent fuel needed to generate additional economic activity.
prices.7 Another DOE analysis of the changes from the
state’s current commercial code to Standard 90.1-2007 AN UNTAPPED RESOURCE
estimates energy and cost savings of 3 to 6 percent.8 With energy prices projected to rise sharply over the
ENERGY SUPPLIES medium- and long-term, reducing West Virginia’s
energy demand will also enhance the state’s energy
West Virginia is the top coal-producing state east of security and stimulate its economy.
the Mississippi River, accounting for more than one-
tenth of U.S. total coal production and the state’s high Energy codes also offer large-scale gains. BCAP esti-
electricity production. Combined with relatively low mates that if West Virginia began implementing the
consumption in-state, West Virginia leads the nation in 2009 IECC and Standard 90.1-2007 statewide in 2011
net interstate electricity exports.9 Reducing local de- (making incremental steps toward 90 percent compli-
mand for electricity and natural gas would free up ance in 2017), it would realize substantial savings
even more of the state’s energy resources for export, over BCAP’s business-as-usual scenario:
decrease costs for consumers, and increase profits for
By 2030, $90 million in annual energy cost savings for
businesses. households & businesses, or $793 million from 2011-
HOUSEHOLD PROSPERITY 30.
By 2030, annual CO2 emissions reductions of 400,000
In 2008, West Virginia ranked 48th in the nation in per metric tons, or 4.9 million from 2011-30.
capita personal income,10 yet ranked 14th in per capita
energy expenditures.11 Energy expenses comprise an By 2030, residential sector source energy savings of 5
economic drain on low-income communities. Low- percent, representing annual savings of 4 trillion Btu.
income households typically spend 17 percent of By 2030, commercial sector source energy savings of
their total annual income on energy, compared with 8 percent, representing annual savings of 4 trillion
four percent for other households. Btu.
** NOTES ** For more information, please visit www.bcap-ocean.org
1 7
US DOE (http://www.energy.gov/westvirginia.htm) US DOE (http://www.energycodes.gov/publications/techassist/residential/
2
US DOE (http://www.energy.gov/media/3154ManchinWestVirginia.pdf) Residential_West_Virginia.pdf)
3 8
BCAP (http://bcap-ocean.org/state-country/west-virginia) US DOE (http://www.energycodes.gov/publications/techassist/commercial/
4
WV SFC (http://www.firemarshal.wv.gov/Documents/Meetings/ Commercial_West_Virginia.pdf)
9
FC_Minutes_6-29-09_Emergency_Mtg.pdf) US EIA (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_sum/html/pdf/rank_pr.pdf)
5 10
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/373) US BEA (http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/regional/spi/2009/pdf/spi0309.pdf)
6 11
BCAP (http://bcap-energy.org/node/330) US EIA (http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/states/sep_sum/html/pdf/rank_pr.pdf)

1850 M St. NW Suite 600


Washington, DC 20036
www.bcap-ocean.org

Anda mungkin juga menyukai