Requirements
Manual
F E B R U A R Y 2 0 1 8
Title of the document SUPPLIER REQUIREMENTS MANUAL
Reference FAU-C-SPG-4030
Issue n° 09
Description of
Complete Rework
changes
FAU-C-SPG-4030 - Issue 8
• Issue 08 – Add CSR (Customer Specifics Requirements) in the Supplier
Requirements Manual
Cancels and replaces • Issue 07 – Change of Cover page + Change of Document Owner + Precision on
certificate (i.e ISO/TS 16949) to be delivered by accredited bodies
• Issue 06 - Modified cover sheet with group communication
Modified standard charge back administrative costs
Technological Leadership
Economic
• No corruption
• Transparency &
Fair business
practices
Buy Beyond
This requirement comes from the section 1502 1.5.8 Marking / Traceability
of the “Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Each component must be marked to permit the
Consumer Protection Act”, similar regulation is in material identification regarding recycling.
preparation in the EU and China.
• The material type mark must be in accordance
with Faurecia requirement.
Supplier has to fill the related form to ensure
compliance with this requirement. • The marking has to be in accordance with the
requirement to define traceability.
1.5.5 Set up and maintain a Sub-Supplier
Management System All components must have batch control and
in accordance with here described requirements traceability throughout all stages of production.
and including: This traceability shall be documented at least as
per IATF 16949.
• Documented evidence from the Supplier that
Sub-Suppliers quality management system is
Any sorted or reworked material must be
monitored.
traceable.
• Follow up the quality of the purchased parts
using suitable measures (including PPM quality 1.5.9 Exchanges CAD Models / Digital Media
target setting, special key characteristics The CAD versions to use will be confirmed during
follow-up. Validation plan, Control plan, Run@ the Request for Quotation. The CAD models
Rate and Process audit, PPAP and Initial will have to respect the Faurecia conception
Samples submission,...). methods.
• Faurecia reserves the right to review the process
1.5.10 Automotive product-related software
at the Sub-Supplier on its own initiative in case
or automotive products with embedded
of major problem or risk
software
The Supplier shall utilize a process for software
1.5.6 Special case of Directed Purchase
quality assurance of their products. The
components - tripartite agreements
development process should be certified to
For technical or economic reasons, Faurecia
CMMI level 3 or A-SPICE level 3.
may ask the Supplier to include components
from other Suppliers. According IATF 16949, Tier
If this process maturity level is not achieved,
1 Suppliers are accountable for their supplies,
the minimum requirements is CMM-I level 2 or
including components. A tripartite agreement
A-SPICE level 2 with commitment to a roadmap
stipulating the job-sharing between the parties
to achieve CMM-I level 3 or A-SPICE level 3.
involved will be incorporated into the supply
contract.
The Supplier shall regularly perform a software
development capability self-assessment and
1.5.7 Packaging and Logistics
provide results to Faurecia, upon request.
Parts delivery conditions need to be compliant
with the Supplier Logistic Manual (SLM) and the
agreed Logistic Part Datasheet. For more details
see SLM FAU-S-PSG-2015.
1.5.13 Containment Controlled Shipment CCS consists of two types or levels of containment:
(CCS) / Temporary Quality Wall (TQW)
• CCS level I is an additional inspection process
is a demand by Faurecia to a Supplier to put in
performed by the Supplier at the Suppliers facility
place an additional inspection process to sort for
separate from the normal production process.
non-conforming material, while implementing a
root-cause problem solving process. • CCS level II is conducted by a third party (selected
by Faurecia and paid by the Supplier), off the Sup-
pliers facility (at a facility deemed appropriate by
Faurecia), and at the Suppliers expense.
Supplier Faurecia
EOL Incoming
Supplier
Preventive Q-Wall or CCS1 CCS2 Consignment Monitoring*
warehouse
Performance
Feedback
1.5.14 Engineering Change Request (ECR) • S amples may be required for review and
Management to evaluate potential impact on Faurecia’s
The generic process of an Engineering Change manufacturing processes.
Request (ECR) is to evaluate feasibility, cost impact
• Submission for PPAP approval is mandatory
and timing. After decision, the change will be
prior to the shipment of the “new” parts (or from
kicked off through Purchase Order (PO) and new
new location) unless specifically waived.
design revision level.
• After Faurecia written approval, the first delivery
• ECR can occur during both program phase and
with “new” parts must be identified
series production.
•
T he tool move plan must include the
• For each change a new PPAP submission will
requirements of a production stock if necessary
be required.
to ensure Faurecia’s Production and Service
requirements are not affected.
1.5.15 Change Request via Purchasing
Change Request (PCR) • The change has also to be communicated to
PC&L (Production Control & Logistic) in the plant
• Supplier must propose any change information
for feasibility assessment (introduction of new
(Material, Product, Process and tool changes
product in Information System, evaluation of
– transfers are also considered as a change)
all existing stock, update of Supplier Logistic
and must request approval in writing from
Agreement, schedule of last old product’s
Purchasing and all Faurecia receiving facilities
delivery, organization and reception of first
• Faurecia Purchasing and all receiving facilities delivery of new product).
must approve all changes in advance,
All Faurecia Suppliers are ranked via Panel Status • Is responsible for his own production processes
as following: • Faurecia has full design responsibility (detailed
specifications)
Fully approved Supplier for development
and production. Subcontractor
P = Panel Only class A Suppliers may be considered
within this status. • Is an extension of Faurecia manufacturing
All criteria are in accordance with our policy.
• Is responsible that the process is in compliance
In the Vendor List but not yet assessed with Faurecia specifications
I = Intermediate / or pending because of other criteria not
Investigation being fulfilled (Finance, Development…) • Executes parts in accordance with the definition
& Mandated Suppliers
file
As the final product performance is determined Advanced Supplier Quality (ASQ) manages the
during the development phase, effective APQP for external Suppliers with the support of
program management is the key to our common the Program Buyer and the D&D Product/Process
success. Faurecia’s objective is to work closely Design.
with its Suppliers through partnerships. It is
Faurecia’s intention to provide the framework Faurecia APQP contains 31 elements and is
(a common language) within the development designed to ensure that external Suppliers
phase, which will enable to develop integrate preventive quality actions into their
competitive and robust products which meet work methods.
our expectation of Quality, Cost and Delivery
through structured approach. Faurecia expects to have a Supplier project
management in line with IATF 16949 APQP
Program Management System (PMS) is the definition as minimum requirement.
Faurecia management tool used during these
phases and handled via e-PPAP.
2 Confidentiality Agreement
Proposal 3 Special Characteristics APQP
4 Technical Input Reviews Management
5 Technical Reviews
7 Master Schedule
8 Feasibility Commitment
12 Design FMEA
Product &
Process Design Review
13
Design &
Develop- 14 Prototype/Pre-Production Builds & FOTP
ment Design Verification Plan
15
PPAP
16 Drawing and Specification Freeze
2b
17 Process Flow Chart & Sub-Supplier Management
18 Process FMEA
3
23 Appearance Approval
25 Run @ Rates
Production KEY INDICATORS
Setup & Process Audit
26
Pre-
Process Capability Study 1) %-APQP Completion
Series 27 • Actual vs. Plan
28 Production Validation Plan • Actual vs. Total
29 Early Production Containment Plan
2) %-Run@Rates Qualified
30 PPAP
3) %-PPAP Approved
Transition to Series & Lessons Learned
4
31 • Full
• Interim / deviation
Launch 4) % of Key Characteristics
secured (S/R + PF4, etc.)
GR4 Incl. Pass Through
Characteristics
S/R characteristics:
X X
Triangle with 1 (or other symbol specified by the customer) marked on the drawing
S
or and/or Safety or Regulation (S/R) R (or other symbol specified by the customer)
Other special characteristics:
Triangle with 2 (or other symbol specified by the customer) marked on the drawing
for Fit, Form, Functions or Aspect
A Special Characteristic is a product characteristic (material, dimension,
performance) or a process parameter whose variation can affect:
• compliance with the regulations
• compliance with safety requirements
Special • the satisfaction of the final customer through quality reliability or durability
Characteristics of a Fit, Form and Function
• the possibility of using the product by downstream customer (mountability,
workability).
1 and 2 are considered secured via:
• Poka Yoke
• Cp/Cpk
• Process validated via Assessment
• Certificates/Validations related to Raw Materials
Records and evidences of the S/R Characteristics have to be kept for the
duration of 30 Years starting from the beginning of mass production,
or according to specific customer requirements.
The Supplier must confirm and provide evidences that the product can X
be produced according to the quality, planning requirements, with
demonstration of its ability to follow the targets (estimations, return on
experience, feedback on similar products, related action plans).
Team Feasibility
TFC needs to be signed by the Supplier and in case of remarks or comments
Commitment
it has to be formally agreed by both parties.
(TFC)
With each Engineering Change Request (ECR) and update/new TFC needs to
be agreed.
Capacity Commitment must also be given as defined in appendix
FAU-F-SPG-3110 (provided via RFQ).
Definition of the Tests required to verify that the product meets requirements and X X
Design
targets
Verification These tests are conducted either by Faurecia (if Manufacturer or sub-contractor) or by
Plan (DVP) the Supplier (Expert or Designer), with some OEM contribution.
Drawing / 1. D
rawings released by Expert/designer with Faurecia engineering approval or by X X
Specification Faurecia with Supplier Manufacturer approval
Freeze 2. D rawing approved with Feasibility Commitment update leading to Tool launch
Process X X
Failure Mode Permit to establish an action plan for the process improvements on RPN agreed level.
and Effects Special emphasis on Pass Thru Characteristics
Analysis (FMEA)
Packaging is defined in the Logistics Parts Data Sheet (LPDS) provided by Faurecia X X
and agreed by Supplier.
LPDS agreed and provided at latest for PPAP submission.
Packaging
Method Before start of production, an Agreement must be established between Faurecia and
Supplier on:
• Safety stock
• Packaging stock
Supplier Launch X
Multidisciplinary launch support team at Supplier location must be formalized.
and Resident Selected Suppliers may be required to provide Faurecia on-site representation
Support
3 steps :
X X
1. OKAY (OK) for any appearance aspect as graining, painting, etc.
Appearance 2. 1st appearance parts
Approval 3. Design approval; Graining/ Color / Aspect /, (gloss, and brightness, ...)
by End Customer
Existence of Boundaries samples & Defects library (photo book) signed-off for each
cavity
Machine, Short Term & Long Term Capability studies performed on Key Product
Characteristic (KPC) & Key Control Characteristic (KCC) - excluding subjective
X X
characteristics. Faurecia minimum requirements is shown as below but can be
different according to Customer Specific Requirements.
Process
Capability
Study
Testing based on off-tool, off final process parts which may include:
X X
• Raw material Evaluation/certification
Production • Performance tests
Validation Plan • Reliability, Durability tests
• Functional tests
• Other
Targets to protect the production launch from the first delivery. It must include a
X
Early Temporary Quality Wall after and on top of final inspection according to Faurecia
Containment requirements.
plan The duration of a Temporary Quality Wall is defined by Faurecia based on clear
criterias.
• PPAP requirements are based on the AIAG Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
X X
Manual or Customer Specific Requirements.
• The standard of Faurecia is full PPAP (level 3 per AIAG) submission unless clear
PPAP (Production Faurecia deviation agreement.
Parts Approval • PPAP Submission can be requested by Faurecia based on Customer requirements
Process) at any time without any additional cost.
• All requested documentations must be no more than one year old.
• PPAP and documentation attached must be monitored through e-PPAP platform.
• Faurecia will defined the PPAP items to be covered prior PPAP submission
•M
PM.net is a Faurecia internal tool to record
logistics concerns.
VII. QRCI
(Quick Reaction Continuous Improvement)
When purchased material does not meet • Upload the 8D document via the Faurecia
standards (e.g. quality, engineering change level, Supplier portal named GPS (Global Purchasing
adherence to test specifications, etc.), or last System)
qualified PPAP, a quality claim (QP) is emitted by • In case of non conform parts Faurecia will
Faurecia by e-mail. keep them for Supplier disposal maximum
10 working days. In case no feedback from
The Supplier is requested to: Supplier in between this time frame Faurecia
• submit to Faurecia standard 8D document will scrap them to the account of the Supplier.
using the procedure and chapters below to
S upplier is requeste d to
document the problem and prevent 10 working use Faurecia standard only
its reoccurrence days
(FAU-F-SPG-4031).
D4 D5
Root cause for Root cause for
non-detection occurrence
D3
Containment D6
Actions Corrective
Deutsch Ishikawa / 5 WHY OK D6 innerhalb 10 Tage
D6 within 10 days?
0 D1 - Problem Description: 5W+2H detection/occurrence 0 D5 - Root Causes of Occurrence 0 D6 - Permanent Countermeasures
English
Complaint Report
Product /
Facility and Customer Alert/ Part designation Start date Root Cause Corrective Action Pilot Deadline Status
Part number
QP Number
10.12.2011
Action Plan
Description (NOK/OK parts)
S/R relevant
Part manufacturing date Supplier
ppm-relevant
Is / Is not analysis Please fill in the worksheets "Ishikawa" / "5WHY"!
Risk of warranty-claims 35
30
25
Actions 2h 20
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1. Sorting
07.12.20
08.12.20
09.12.20
10.12.20
11.12.20
12.12.20
13.12.20
14.12.20
15.12.20
16.12.20
17.12.20
18.12.20
19.12.20
20.12.20
21.12.20
22.12.20
23.12.20
24.12.20
25.12.20
26.12.20
27.12.20
28.12.20
29.12.20
30.12.20
31.12.20
01.01.20
02.01.20
03.01.20
04.01.20
05.01.20
06.01.20
07.01.20
08.01.20
09.01.20
10.01.20
11.01.20
12.01.20
13.01.20
14.01.20
15.01.20
16.01.20
17.01.20
18.01.20
19.01.20
20.01.20
21.01.20
22.01.20
23.01.20
24.01.20
25.01.20
26.01.20
27.01.20
28.01.20
29.01.20
30.01.20
31.01.20
01.02.20
02.02.20
03.02.20
04.02.20
05.02.20
06.02.20
07.02.20
08.02.20
09.02.20
Faurecia 20 1980 The failure reoccured. Containment/corrective actions are not effective.
D2
FMEA, control plan, maintenance plan, workstation
Action Date / Hour implemented Clean Point Action Pilot Deadline Status
documents, audit frequency, boundary samples,
knowledge management database / product or
process standard, Lesson Learned Sheet
D7
2. Containmnent Actions
Risks on similar
FMEA S O D
RPZ / RPN = 0
Effective-
Created by: Supplier contact: Opening date: 10-Dec-11 Last update
keine 8D-Bewertung
no 8D-Evaluation 8D-Valuation [%] -100
60 working days
4.7 Escalation in case of poor Supplier The SQI (Supplier Quality Index) provides a
Performance ranking for the quality performance. It is a point-
based scoring related to the Suppliers level of
A Supplier Red List Management is in place in “nuisance” to Faurecia operations and the PFx
each Faurecia Business Group. It consists of a impact. This escalation process leads to either
monthly reviewed list of worst Suppliers. a Supplier performance review or special audit.
Purchasing
Logistics VP
(BG/Group)
LEVEL 3
Lo
gi
)
st
,…
SQ Management /
ic
/R
sK
Purchasing Director /
,S
PI
Quality Director / Logistics / CBU*
PM
s(
M
(Division)
(P
PM
Is
KP
,B
LEVEL 2 CCS2
ac
ity
request
kl
al
og
Qu
,…
Plant Quality Plant Logistics
Manager / SQA Manager / )
Series Buyer / SQ&D Series Buyer / SQ&D
LEVEL 1
CCS1
request
LEVEL 0
All Suppliers shall establish and maintain Faurecia together with our OEM customer
resources to support Faurecia warranty performs part pre-analysis and defines possible
requirements. Suppliers shall also appoint a factors, recognition of responsibility and causes
warranty engineer as a single point of contact to for customer complaints during warranty review
Faurecia for warranty support, issue tracking and meetings. This is done by examining the parts,
product improvement. reviewing dealer service comments, records and
part tags attached to each returned part.
5.3 Management Requirements / Quality
Procedures
Category 3: Responsibility of Dealer and/or The procedure shall include problem resolution,
Customer reporting of current issues, and how they are
When the Supplier investigation has determined captured for future product development.
the defect to be Dealer or Customer miss- All Lessons Learned shall be part of the 8-D report
use, Suppliers need to provide all supporting (Customer and /or Faurecia 8D & LL format)
documentation for approval of this category. A Lessons Learned database is recommended
In the event that Faurecia disagrees with a for Suppliers.
Supplier response, Faurecia will give timely
notice of its objection. Should Faurecia decline a
5.8 Techical Support
submitted response the Supplier will be asked to
amend it. A rejected Supplier response where the
Suppliers at their cost shall provide technical
parties do not agree as to content effectiveness,
expertise for the review of Service Manuals,
shall not be binding upon Faurecia. The Supplier
Service Bulletins, Service Repair Tips / Repair
shall retain the affected components until the
Catalogues, etc.
issue is resolved in a positive manner; such that
Suppliers shall assist in the development of
Faurecia customers will concur with our Suppliers
service fixes as needed for warranty issue
root cause and corrective action analysis,
resolution/closure as it pertains to products and
including supporting documentation.
services provided.
Warranty costs The Faurecia warranty claim has the following five
In the event that the Supplier delivers defective (5) basic elements, which represent the expense to
components, the Supplier shall indemnify Fau- the vehicle incurred by our OEM customer:
recia against all expenses and costs incurred by (a) Labor: The standard repair time to replace or
Faurecia. repair a failed part, based on the OEM vehicle
Faurecia reserves the right to set off its payment time guide, multiplied by the average labor rate.
obligations against any amount which might be (b) Parts: Replacement parts purchased by
owed by the Supplier, on any grounds and of any Dealerships
nature whatsoever, including amounts corre- (c) Parts Handling: Charge for administration,
sponding to penalties and quality claims. shipping and handling of defective parts.
In the event the products do not conform to the (d) Sublet: Repairs or services provided by a third
warranties granted to Faurecia, Faurecia may, company (i.e.: machine shop, paint shop, etc.)
without prejudice to Faurecia’s right to claim for
(e) Indirect Cost: Consequential Damages
damages, charge the Supplier with, and the Sup-
caused to other components as results of the
pliers undertakes to bear, all and any repair or
defective part. Consequential damages included
replacement costs reported by the OEMs.
also the cost for mobility (i.e.: loaner cars)
Faurecia shall make available to the Supplier
The foregoing elements illustrate the typical costs
the Charge-back warranty data (as provided by
related to the repair and replacement of a defec-
each customer)
tive component and are not an exhaustive list of
The warranty provisions set forth herein supple- the costs incurred with a warranty claim for which
ment the Faurecia Terms and Conditions of pur- the Supplier will be liable. Faurecia’s rights are more
chasing. The full warranties granted by Suppliers fully set forth in the Faurecia Terms and Conditions
are set forth in Terms and Conditions of Purchas- of Purchasing and this document is intended to
ing of Faurecia. supplement such Terms and Conditions.
S
Program & Purchasing
Production,
Mandatory rules
20 Rework
under control
20
the defect! 1
Safety & Regulations SCRAP or REWORK
2
Validation
2. Improved welding position and length
3. Implement systematic 3D Final Element
should be done for oven parameters 800 Lower limit
3
3 Design & Process FMEA 3 OK 1st part “product validation“
3 Design & Process
OK 1st Part
Sheet
(every start of shift & new lot) should
FMEA must evaluate be done linked with process
all S/R characteristics parameters traceability for: surface Conclusion
with RPN reduction R Responsibility & Target After correction & core hardness (upper & lower limit)
& Signature
actions completed
P Corrective Actions(s)
N
Completion Date Sev Occ Det RPN
100% OK results
• residual diameter and height correspond
& signed to boundary sample after riveting
S/R welding
1
(1st part OK) POKA-YOKE
2 1 Check Poka Yoke during OK 1st part
• part blocked unless all screws
PKY002
are tightened
1 Each weld compared to reference PARAMETER:
• fastening twice the same
POKA-YOKE
• No double
3 fastening
2 Poka Yoke checked at every start screw/nut must be declared NOK PKY002