Sammy Quiroz
Mrs. Reid
English I Honors
5 May 2015
Love has existed since the beginning of mankind and can often be a driving force behind
many people’s actions or decisions. There are hundreds of accounts of people performing parlous
tasks for love. The power of love is undeniable and can drive us to do irrational and ridiculous
things; some of these ridiculous actions can turn into fatal mistakes. A monumental tale of tragic
love is presented in Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Romeo and Juliet. The story is set in Verona
during the Elizabethan era; it is a tale of two children of rival families, Romeo and Juliet, that fall
in love. The lovers work hard to secrete their relationship from their families. After the death of
Tybalt, a Capulet, Romeo is banished. Juliet and Friar Laurence then come up with a plan to
reunite the lovers. There are communication errors regarding a message that should have been
delivered to Romeo, and both the lovers end their own lives. Many factors contributed to the
unnecessary deaths of Romeo and Juliet. Almost all of the characters make decisions in the final
three acts that can be linked to the deaths of the lovers. Because of this, it is often difficult to
agree on who was in fact at fault. Out of all these accused, one is clearly more responsible than
the rest. While Romeo and Juliet could be held responsible for their own deaths, the hatred
between the Montague and Capulet houses is ultimately at fault because it drove the lovers to
Juliet and Romeo were predestined to an untimely end the moment they first kissed at the
Capulet dinner party. The two fell in love, unknowing that they were of rival households. It is not
until after the encounter of the lovers that Juliet tells her nurse, “Go ask his name.—If he be
marrièd, my grave is like to be my wedding bed” (Shakespeare 1.5.36-37). This quote shows
how the lovers did not act prudently during their first meeting. The two did not even think to ask
the other’s name, much less take their futures into account. This was their first mistake. Another
conflict for the lovers was when Romeo killed Tybalt as a way to avenge the death of his beloved
friend, Mercutio. In doing this, Romeo is ordered into banishment. Although these were all
conflicts caused by Romeo or Juliet, their relationship would not have been a secret if it were not
for the societal non acceptance between the Montague and Capulet families. An example of
tension between the families is presented in the introductory scene of the play. Sampson and
Gregory are in the the streets of Verona when they are approached by members of the Montague
household. Sampson immediately wants to fight saying, “My naked weapon is out. Quarrel! I
will back thee” (Shakespeare 1.1.33-34). This quote is the first example of animosity between
the Montague and Capulet households. If the families were not intolerant of one another, Romeo
and Juliet would not have had to keep their relationship a secret, and their marriage would not
Even though society in Verona at this time was ultimately the cause of death for Romeo
and Juliet, some might argue otherwise. It might be said that Romeo and Juliet committed
suicide, and that it was no one’s fault but their own. In the end, they were the ones that killed
themselves. In the last act of the play, Romeo and Juliet both take their own lives. Romeo is the
first to die saying, “Here’s to my love! O true apothecary! Thy drugs are quick. Thus with a kiss
Quiroz 3
I die” (Shakespeare 5.3.119-120). Thirty minutes later, Juliet follows suit, “This is thy sheath;
there rust, and let me die” (Shakespeare 5.3.170). The lovers would not have been driven to their
tragic deaths if they had not been forced to conceal their marriage. If the marriage had been
public, Lord Capulet would not have arranged the marriage between Juliet and Count Paris; he
would have known she was already wedded to Romeo. The arranged marriage between Juliet
and Count Paris was the motive for her to seek advice from the Friar. If the marriage had not
been arranged, Juliet never would have taken the poison to make her appear dead. If the marriage
between Romeo and Juliet had been socially acceptable within Verona, Romeo and Juliet would
The hatred between the families is evident following the first meeting of Romeo and
Juliet. After Romeo leaves the party and Juliet asks her nurse who he was she replies, “His name
is Romeo, and a Montague, the only son of your great enemy” (Shakespeare 1.4.138-139). This
is one of many examples of abhorrence between the Montague and Capulet houses. Another
example of detestation is presented before the play has begun, “From ancient grudge break new
mutiny, where civil blood makes civil hands unclean” (Prologue.3-4). The grudge between the
families is ancient. Romeo and Juliet likely can not remember a time when their families were
not rivals. This ancient grudge between the two families of Verona will, in the fullness of time,
Although many could blame Romeo and Juliet for ending their own lives, the societal
hatred between the Montague and Capulet houses eventually led Romeo and Juliet to their
deaths. If the families were accepting of their relationship, they would not have had to hide their
marriage and the star-crossed lovers would have lived. It is known that the familiar hatred of the
Quiroz 4
Montague and Capulet houses dissolves after the deaths of their children. If the families had not
been so intolerant of one another during the lives of Romeo and Juliet, the two could have lived
Works Cited
Shakespeare, William, Louis B. Wright, and Virginia A. LaMar. The Tragedy of Romeo and