7 tayangan

Diunggah oleh jdav1206

- Plane Coordinate Tables, Kansas
- Bamboo Soil Foundation
- DSettlement User Manual
- @_Summary of Rubble Mound Breakwater Design Equations
- ForensicsHomeworkPg.5311-20
- Dictionary for the Turbomachinery Domain
- Fellenius - 234 Downdrag Discussion
- Rak-50 3149 Consolidation and Phi-c Reduction
- Summary of Experimental Programme
- input file for staad
- Swelling Behavior of Expansive Soils
- Slide TutorialManual3
- Mahob, Castagna (2003) AVO Polarization and Hodograms (1)
- chemistry -4 paper
- SM 2 Marks Q & A
- hydraulic
- history.pdf
- Fungos
- GIN 3004
- ACI-224

Anda di halaman 1dari 312

D-Settlement

User Manual

D-S ETTLEMENT

User Manual

Version: 16.1

Revision: 00

9 February 2016

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Deltares telephone: +31 88 335 82 73

Boussinesqweg 1 fax: +31 88 335 85 82

2629 HV Delft e-mail: info@deltares.nl

P.O. 177 www: https://www.deltares.nl

2600 MH Delft

The Netherlands

telephone: +31 88 335 81 88 telephone: +31 88 335 81 00

fax: +31 88 335 81 11 fax: +31 88 335 81 11

e-mail: sales@deltaressystems.nl e-mail: support@deltaressystems.nl

www: http://www.deltaressystems.nl www: http://www.deltaressystems.nl

All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced in any form by print, photo

print, photo copy, microfilm or any other means, without written permission from the publisher:

Deltares.

Contents

Contents

1 General Information 1

1.1 Foreword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.2 Features in standard module . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

1.2.1 Soil profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

1.2.2 Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

1.2.3 Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

1.2.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.3 Features in additional modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.3.1 Fits on settlement plate measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.3.2 Reliability analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3

1.3.3 Horizontal displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

1.4 History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

1.5 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

1.5.1 Darcy vs. Terzaghi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.5.2 NEN-Koppejan vs. NEN-Bjerrum/Isotache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7

1.6 Minimum System Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.7 Definitions and Symbols . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8

1.8 Getting Help . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

1.9 Getting Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

1.10 Deltares . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

1.11 Deltares Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

1.12 Acknowledgements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

2 Getting Started 13

2.1 Starting D-Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

2.2 Main Window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13

2.2.1 The menu bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.2.2 The icon bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2.2.3 View Input window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2.2.4 Title panel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

2.2.5 Status bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

2.3 Files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

2.4 Tips and Tricks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

2.4.1 Keyboard shortcuts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

2.4.2 Exporting figures and reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

2.4.3 Copying part of a table . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

2.4.4 Continuous display of the results in time or depth . . . . . . . . . . . 20

3 General 21

3.1 File menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

3.2 Tools menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

3.2.1 Program Options – View . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

3.2.2 Program Options – General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

3.2.3 Program Options – Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3.2.4 Program Options – Language . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3.2.5 Program Options – Modules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

3.3 Help menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

3.3.1 Error Messages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

3.3.2 Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

3.3.3 Deltares Systems Website . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

3.3.4 Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

3.3.5 About D-Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

Deltares iii

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

4 Input 27

4.1 Project menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

4.1.1 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27

4.1.2 Probabilistic Defaults . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28

4.1.3 Project Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

4.1.4 View Input File . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

4.2 Soil menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

4.2.1 Materials – Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

4.2.2 Materials – Parameters Terzaghi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

4.2.3 Materials – Parameters Darcy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37

4.2.4 Materials – Parameters Isotache . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

4.2.5 Materials – Parameters NEN-Bjerrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39

4.2.6 Materials – Parameters NEN-Koppejan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41

4.2.7 Materials – Reliability Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43

4.2.8 Materials – Horizontal Displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

4.3 Geometry menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

4.3.1 New . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

4.3.2 New Wizard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

4.3.3 Import . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

4.3.4 Import from Database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

4.3.5 Export . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

4.3.6 Export as Plaxis/DOS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

4.3.7 Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

4.3.8 Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

4.3.9 Import PL-line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

4.3.10 PL-lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

4.3.11 Phreatic Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4.3.12 Layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4.3.13 PL-lines per Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

4.3.14 Check Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

4.4 GeoObjects menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

4.4.1 Verticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

4.4.2 Vertical Drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

4.5 Water menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61

4.5.1 Water Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

4.6 Loads menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

4.6.1 Non-Uniform Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

4.6.2 Water Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

4.6.3 Other Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

4.6.3.1 Tank Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

5 Calculations 73

5.1 Calculation Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

5.1.1 Calculation Options – 1D geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73

5.1.2 Calculation Options – 2D geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74

5.2 Calculation Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

5.3 Fit for Settlement Plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

5.3.1 Fit for Settlement Plate – Measurements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

5.3.2 Fit for Settlement Plate – Materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

5.4 Start Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

5.4.1 Regular (deterministic) analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82

5.4.2 Reliability and sensitivity analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

5.4.3 Error Messages (before calculation) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

5.4.4 Warnings and Error Messages during calculation . . . . . . . . . . . 86

iv Deltares

Contents

6 View Results 89

6.1 Report Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89

6.2 Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90

6.2.1 Stresses per vertical (Terzaghi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

6.2.2 Settlements per vertical (NEN-Koppejan with Terzaghi) . . . . . . . . 92

6.2.3 Stresses, heads and settlements per vertical (Darcy) . . . . . . . . . 93

6.2.4 Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93

6.2.5 Residual Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

6.2.6 Maintain Profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

6.2.7 Warnings and errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95

6.3 Stresses in Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

6.4 Dissipations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

6.5 Time-History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98

6.5.1 Time-History – Terzaghi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98

6.5.2 Time-History – Darcy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

6.6 Depth-History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

6.6.1 Depth-History – Terzaghi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100

6.6.2 Depth-History – Darcy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

6.7 Residual Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

6.8 Settled Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

6.9 Write Settled Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

6.10 Write D-Geo Stability Input . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

6.11 Time-History (Reliability) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106

6.12 Influencing Factors (Reliability) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106

6.13 Residual Settlements (Reliability) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

7.1 Geometrical objects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

7.1.1 Geometry elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109

7.1.2 Construction elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

7.2 Assumptions and restrictions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

7.3 View Input Window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

7.3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110

7.3.2 Buttons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112

7.3.3 Legend . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114

7.4 Geometry modelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116

7.4.1 Create a new geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116

7.4.2 Set limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

7.4.3 Draw layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

7.4.4 Generate layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118

7.4.5 Add piezometric level lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

7.5 Graphical manipulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

7.5.1 Selection of elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

7.5.2 Deletion of elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

7.5.3 Using the right-hand mouse button . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

7.5.4 Dragging elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

7.6 Working With 1D Geometries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

7.6.1 Creating a 1D Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

7.6.2 Converting a 2D Geometry into a 1D Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

7.6.3 The 1D Geometry Input Window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

Deltares v

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

8.2 Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

8.2.1 Create New Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

8.2.2 Project Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129

8.3 Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

8.3.1 Layer boundaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

8.3.2 Piezometric lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131

8.3.3 Phreatic Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

8.3.4 PL-lines per Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

8.4 Soil types and properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

8.5 Layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

8.6 Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135

8.7 Verticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136

8.8 Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

8.8.1 Calculation Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

8.8.2 Calculation Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

8.8.3 Start Calculation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138

8.9 Results basic analysis (Tutorial-1a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138

8.9.1 Time-History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139

8.9.2 Depth-History . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140

8.9.3 Residual Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141

8.10 Influence of submerging (Tutorial-1b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

8.11 Comparison of consolidation models (Tutorial-1c and 1d) . . . . . . . . . . . 143

8.11.1 Terzaghi consolidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

8.11.2 Drained behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

8.12 Influence of initial overconsolidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146

9.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149

9.2 Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152

9.2.1 Importing an existing geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152

9.2.2 Importing material properties from an MGeobase database . . . . . . 153

9.3 Initial embankment design (Tutorial-2a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

9.3.1 Load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

9.3.2 Verticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

9.3.3 Calculation Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157

9.3.4 Time-History results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157

9.4 Acceleration of the consolidation process by means of vertical drains (Tutorial-

2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159

9.4.1 Vertical Drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159

9.4.2 Time-History results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

9.4.3 Stability analysis with D-Geo Stability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

9.4.4 Dissipations results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

9.5 Staged loading (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166

9.6 Temporary pre-loading by soil raise (Tutorial-2d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170

9.7 Additional enforced dewatering (Tutorial-2e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171

9.8 Horizontal Displacements (Tutorial-2f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

9.8.1 Principles of De Leeuw method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

9.8.2 Evaluation of the elasticity modulus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

9.8.3 Input for horizontal displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

9.8.4 Calculated horizontal displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176

9.9 Bandwidth Determination (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177

9.10 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184

vi Deltares

Contents

10.1 Actual loading steps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 185

10.2 Initial prediction (Tutorial-3a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 186

10.3 Settlement plate fit (Tutorial-3b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190

10.4 Band width after settlement plate fit (Tutorial-3c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195

10.5 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197

11.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199

11.2 Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201

11.2.1 Soil and Consolidation Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201

11.2.2 Project Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

11.3 Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

11.3.1 Limits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

11.3.2 Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

11.3.3 PL-line / Phreatic line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203

11.3.4 Layers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204

11.4 Method 1 for ground improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205

11.4.1 Soil properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206

11.4.2 Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206

11.4.3 Verticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209

11.4.4 Calculation Options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210

11.4.5 Results of Method 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210

11.5 Method 2 for ground improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211

11.5.1 Defining the Sand layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211

11.5.2 Modeling the soil improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212

11.5.3 Results of Method 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213

11.6 Comparison of both ground improvement methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214

11.7 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216

12.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217

12.1.1 Excavation and loading stages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218

12.1.2 Subsoil characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218

12.1.3 Drainage using sand screens and dewatering . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220

12.2 Project . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220

12.2.1 Importing an existing geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220

12.2.2 Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221

12.3 Importing material properties from a database . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221

12.4 Piezometric Levels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

12.4.1 Phreatic Line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

12.4.2 PL-lines per Layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

12.5 Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

12.5.1 Modelling the soil improvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224

12.5.2 Modelling the embankment construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225

12.6 Verticals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225

12.7 Vertical Drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226

12.8 Calculation Times . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226

12.9 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226

12.9.1 Settlements vs. time curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227

12.9.2 Residual settlements vs. time curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227

12.9.3 Excess hydraulic head vs. depth curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227

12.9.4 Effect of the enforced air underpressure (Tutorial-5b) . . . . . . . . . 228

12.9.5 Effect of dewatering (Tutorial-5c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229

Deltares vii

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

13 Loads 231

13.1 Non-uniform loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231

13.2 Trapeziform loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 231

13.3 Circular loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232

13.4 Rectangular loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233

13.5 Uniform loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233

13.6 Maintain profile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233

13.7 Submerging . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234

13.7.1 Submerging – Approximate method (Terzaghi or NEN-Koppejan) . . . 234

13.7.2 Submerging – Accurate method (Darcy + Isotache/NEN-Bjerrum) . . . 234

13.8 Water loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235

14.1 General equations for stress distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237

14.1.1 Stress increments caused by a surface point force . . . . . . . . . . 237

14.1.2 Stress increments caused by a line load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238

14.2 Stress distribution for a strip load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238

14.3 Stress distribution for a circular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239

14.4 Stress distribution for a rectangular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240

14.5 Imaginary surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241

15.1 Hydraulic head distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243

15.1.1 Piezometric level lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 243

15.1.2 Phreatic line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244

15.1.3 Stress by soil weight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244

15.2 Terzaghi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245

15.2.1 Terzaghi – General consolidation theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245

15.2.2 Terzaghi – Consolidation of multi-layered systems . . . . . . . . . . 246

15.2.3 Terzaghi – Drainage conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246

15.2.4 Terzaghi – Effective stress and pore pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . 246

15.3 Darcy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247

15.3.1 Darcy – Consolidation theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 247

15.3.2 Darcy – Drainage conditions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249

15.3.3 Darcy – Effective stress and pore pressure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249

15.3.4 Darcy – Numerical solution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249

15.4 Vertical drains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 249

15.4.1 Modified storage equation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250

15.4.2 Line-shaped vertical drains (strip/column drains) . . . . . . . . . . . 251

15.4.3 Plane-shaped vertical drains (plane flow) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252

15.5 Comparison of the consolidation models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253

16.1 NEN-Bjerrum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 255

16.1.1 NEN-Bjerrum – Idealized behavior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256

16.1.2 NEN-Bjerrum – Mathematical Formulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257

16.2 Isotache a/b/c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259

16.2.1 Isotache – Natural strain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259

16.2.2 Isotache – Creep . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260

16.3 NEN-Koppejan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262

16.3.1 NEN-Koppejan – Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262

16.3.2 NEN-Koppejan – Swelling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263

16.3.3 NEN-Koppejan – Natural strain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 264

viii Deltares

Contents

17.1 Oedometer tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265

17.1.1 Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 265

17.1.2 Simulating an oedometer test with D-settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . 265

17.2 Overconsolidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266

17.3 NEN-Bjerrum parameter determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 266

17.4 Isotache parameters determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268

17.5 NEN-Koppejan parameter determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 270

17.5.1 Primary and secular compression coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . 270

17.5.2 Primary and Secondary swelling coefficients . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271

17.6 NEN-Bjerrum parameters from Koppejan parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271

17.6.1 For a single load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271

17.6.2 From oedometer test results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 271

17.7 Isotache a/b/c parameter conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 272

17.7.1 Linear NEN-Bjerrum parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 273

17.7.2 Linear NEN-Koppejan parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 274

17.7.3 Natural and linear Cam-Clay-creep parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . 274

18.1 Fit for settlement plate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 277

18.2 Reliability analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278

18.2.1 Stochastic distributions and parameters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278

18.2.2 Initial and updated parameter covariance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280

18.2.3 Sensitivity analysis with influencing factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281

18.2.4 Probabilistic methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281

18.3 Horizontal displacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282

18.3.1 Principles of De Leeuw method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282

18.3.2 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283

18.3.3 E-Modulus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 284

19 Benchmarks 285

Bibliography 287

Deltares ix

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

x Deltares

List of Figures

List of Figures

1.1 Deltares Systems website (www.deltaressystems.com) . . . . . . . . . . . . 10

1.2 Support window, Problem Description tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

1.3 Send Support E-Mail window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11

2.2 D-Settlement main window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.3 D-Settlement menu bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

2.4 D-Settlement icon bar . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15

2.5 View Input window, Input tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

2.6 View Input window, Top View tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

2.7 Selection of different parts of a table using the arrow cursor . . . . . . . . . . 20

3.2 Program Options window, View tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22

3.3 Program Options window, General tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

3.4 Program Options window, Locations tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3.5 Program Options window, Language tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3.6 Program Options window, Modules tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

3.7 Error Messages window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26

4.2 Probabilistic Defaults window, Consolidation and unit weight tab . . . . . . . 28

4.3 Probabilistic Defaults window, Compression tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

4.4 Project Properties window, Identification tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

4.5 Project Properties window, View Input tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31

4.6 Project Properties window, Stresses in Geometry tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32

4.7 Project Properties window, Settled Geometry tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33

4.8 Materials window, Database tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35

4.9 Materials window, Consolidation and unit weight tab for Terzaghi model . . . . 36

4.10 Materials window, Consolidation and unit weight tab for Darcy model . . . . . 37

4.11 Materials window, Compression tab for Isotache model . . . . . . . . . . . . 38

4.12 Materials window, Compression tab for NEN-Bjerrum model (Input as ratio) . . 40

4.13 Materials window, Compression tab for NEN-Bjerrum model (Input as index) . 41

4.14 Materials window, Compression tab for NEN-Koppejan model . . . . . . . . . 42

4.15 Materials window, Compression tab for reliability analysis . . . . . . . . . . . 43

4.16 Materials window, Horizontal displacements tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

4.17 New Wizard window, Basic Layout . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

4.18 New Wizard window, Top Layer Shape screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46

4.19 New Wizard window, Top Layer Specification screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47

4.20 New Wizard window, Material types screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48

4.21 New Wizard window, Summary screen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49

4.22 Select geometry window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50

4.23 Geometry Limits window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

4.24 Points window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51

4.25 Confirm window for deleting used points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

4.26 PL-Lines window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

4.27 Phreatic Line window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4.28 Layers window, Boundaries tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53

4.29 Layers window, Materials tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

4.30 PL-lines per Layer window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

4.31 Information window on confirmation of a valid geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

4.32 Verticals window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56

4.33 Vertical Drains window (Drain Type sub-window) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57

Deltares xi

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

4.34 Vertical Drains window, Strip and Column drains (Positioning input) . . . . . . 57

4.35 Vertical Drains window, Strip and Column drains (Drainage Schedule input) . . 58

4.36 Vertical Drains window, Sand wall (Positioning input) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60

4.37 Vertical Drains window, Sand wall (Drainage Schedule input) . . . . . . . . . 60

4.38 Water Properties window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62

4.39 Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63

4.40 Import Gamma Wet/Dry from Database window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

4.41 Generate Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64

4.42 Water Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65

4.43 Other Loads window with Trapeziform load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

4.44 Other Loads window with Circular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67

4.45 Other Loads window with Rectangular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68

4.46 Other Loads window with Uniform load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69

4.47 Other Loads window with Tank load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

4.48 Generate Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71

5.2 Calculation Options window for 2D geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75

5.3 Calculation Times window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77

5.4 Fit for Settlement Plate window, Measurements tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78

5.5 Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79

5.6 Iteration stop criteria window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80

5.7 Plate Test Calculation Progress window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

5.8 Time-History (Fit) window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

5.9 Available results after a fit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81

5.10 Start Calculation window for a regular analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83

5.11 Start Calculation window for a reliability and sensitivity analysis . . . . . . . . 84

5.12 Error Messages window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

5.13 Start Calculation window, messages pane . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

5.14 Run window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86

5.15 Start Batch Calculation window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87

5.16 D-settlement Calculation window during batch calculation . . . . . . . . . . . 87

6.2 Report window – Stresses per vertical (Terzaghi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91

6.3 Report window – Settlement per vertical (NEN-Koppejan with Terzaghi) . . . . 92

6.4 Report window, Results per Vertical section (Darcy) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93

6.5 Report window – Settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

6.6 Report window – Residual settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94

6.7 Report window – Maintain Profile Calculation Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95

6.8 Report window – Warnings and errors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95

6.9 Stresses in Geometry window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96

6.10 Dissipations window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97

6.11 Time-History window for Terzaghi consolidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98

6.12 Time-History window for Darcy consolidation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99

6.13 Depth-History window for Terzaghi consolidation model . . . . . . . . . . . . 101

6.14 Depth-History window for Darcy consolidation model . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

6.15 Residual Settlement window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103

6.16 Settled Geometry window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

6.17 Write Settled Geometry window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104

6.18 Write D-Geo Stability Input File window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

6.19 Confirm window for replacement of database values . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105

6.20 Time-History (Reliability) window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106

6.21 Influencing Factors (Reliability) window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107

xii Deltares

List of Figures

7.2 View Input window, Geometry tab (legend displayed as Layer Numbers) . . . 114

7.3 Legend, Context menu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114

7.4 View Input window, Geometry tab (legend displayed as Material Numbers) . . 115

7.5 Legend, Context menu (for legend displayed as Materials) . . . . . . . . . . 115

7.6 Color window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116

7.7 View Input window, Geometry tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116

7.8 Right Limit window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

7.9 Representation of a polyline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117

7.10 Examples of configurations of (poly)lines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118

7.11 Modification of the shape of a berm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118

7.12 Example of invalid point not connected to the left limit . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119

7.13 Selection accuracy as area around cursor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

7.14 Selection accuracy as area around cursor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

7.15 Selection accuracy as area around cursor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120

7.16 Example of deletion of a point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

7.17 Example of deletion of a geometry point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

7.18 Example of deletion of a line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121

7.19 Pop-up menu for right-hand mouse menu (Select mode) . . . . . . . . . . . 122

7.20 Layer window (Property editor of a layer) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7.21 Point window (Property editor of a point) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7.22 Boundary window (Property editor of a polyline) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7.23 Boundary window (Property editor of a line) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123

7.24 PL-line window (Property editor of a PL-line) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

7.25 Example of dragging of a point . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124

7.26 2D-1D Conversion Location window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125

7.27 1D Geometry window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126

8.2 New File window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128

8.3 View Input window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129

8.4 Project Properties window, Identification tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

8.5 Project Properties window, View Input tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130

8.6 View Input window, after input of single lines and piezometric lines . . . . . . 131

8.7 Points window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

8.8 Phreatic Line window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

8.9 PL-lines per Layer window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132

8.10 Materials window, Consolidation and unit weight tab for Clay Sandy . . . . . 133

8.11 Materials window, Compression tab for Clay Sandy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133

8.12 Layers window, Materials tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134

8.13 Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135

8.14 View Input window, Input tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136

8.15 Verticals window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136

8.16 Calculation Options window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137

8.17 Calculation Times window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138

8.18 Start Calculation window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138

8.19 Time-History window, Effective stress and Settlement at surface level . . . . . 139

8.20 Chart Data window, Surface settlement versus Time . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139

8.21 Time-History window, Excess hydraulic head at depth 3.5 m . . . . . . . . . 140

8.22 Time-History window, Effective stress in the drained pleistocene sand, gradu-

ally decreasing by submerging of the top layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140

8.23 Depth-History window, Excess head before and after unloading . . . . . . . . 141

Deltares xiii

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

8.25 Calculation Options window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

8.26 Time-History window, Surface settlement with submerging switched off (Tutorial-

1b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142

8.27 Model window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143

8.28 Time-History window, Surface settlement for Terzaghi model and no submerg-

ing (Tutorial-1c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144

8.29 Chart Data window, Surface settlement versus Time (Tutorial-1c) . . . . . . . 144

8.30 Dissipations window, Degree of consolidation versus Time in Clay Organic

layer for Terzaghi model and no submerging (Tutorial-1c) . . . . . . . . . . . 145

8.31 Time-History window, Surface Settlements using Drained layers and no sub-

merging (Tutorial-1d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145

8.32 Surface Settlements compared (no submerging) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146

8.33 Materials window with reduced OCR (Tutorial-1e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147

8.34 Time-History window, Surface settlement with reduced OCR (Tutorial-1e) . . . 147

8.35 Surface Settlements compared (no submerging) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148

8.36 Time-History window, Excess head (at depth 3.5 m) with reduced OCR (Tutorial-

1e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148

9.2 New File window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152

9.3 View Input window, Geometry tab after importing geometry . . . . . . . . . . 153

9.4 Program Options window, Locations tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153

9.5 Materials window, Database tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

9.6 Information window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154

9.7 Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155

9.8 Verticals window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156

9.9 View Input window, Input tab showing the generated verticals (Tutorial-2a) . . 156

9.10 Calculation Options window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157

9.11 Time-History window, Natural consolidation: Settlement and Effective stress

vs. Time in vertical 4 (Tutorial-2a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158

9.12 Time-History window, Natural consolidation: Excess head vs. Time in vertical

4 at RL-4.875m (Tutorial-2a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158

9.13 Time-History window, placeCityGreenfield settlement in vertical 1 (Tutorial-2a) 159

9.14 Model window, Select Vertical drains option (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . 159

9.15 Vertical Drains window (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

9.16 View Input window, Input tab (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160

9.17 Time-History window, Consolidation with vertical drains: Settlement and Ef-

fective stress vs. Time in vertical 4 (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

9.18 Time-History window, Consolidation with vertical drains: Excess head vs.

Time in vertical 4 at RL -4.875 m (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161

9.19 Write D-Geo Stability Input File window (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162

9.20 D-Geo Stability View Input window (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162

9.21 D-Geo Stability Slip Circle Definition window (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . 163

9.22 D-Geo Stability Degree of Consolidation window (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . 163

9.23 D-Geo Stability slip circle result (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

9.24 Start Calculation window (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 164

9.25 Dissipations window, Degree of consolidation vs. Time in Peat at vertical 4,

for grid distance 1 m (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

9.26 Dissipations window, Degree of consolidation vs. Time in Peat at vertical 4,

for grid distance 2 m (Tutorial-2b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 165

9.27 8-staged loading (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166

9.28 Generate Non-Uniform Loads window (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166

9.29 Non-Uniform Loads window, Final load (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 167

xiv Deltares

List of Figures

9.31 Calculation Times window (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168

9.32 Time-History window, Settlement and Effective stress vs. Time in vertical 4 for

drain distance 2 m (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168

9.33 Time-History window, Excess head vs. Time in vertical 4 at RL-4.875 m for

drain distance 2 m (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169

9.34 Residual Settlement window for drain distance 2 m (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . 169

9.35 Chart Data window (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170

9.36 Residual Settlement window for drain distance 1 m (Tutorial-2c) . . . . . . . . 170

9.37 Non-Uniform Loads window, Temporary preloading 1 m (Tutorial-2d) . . . . . 171

9.38 Residual Settlement window (Tutorial-2d) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171

9.39 Installation Beau Drain system (Tutorial-2e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172

9.40 Non-Uniform Loads window, Temporary preloading 0.5 m (Tutorial-2e) . . . . 172

9.41 Vertical Drains window, Drainage Schedule input (Tutorial-2e) . . . . . . . . . 173

9.42 Time-History window, Excess head vs. Time in vertical 4 at RL-4.875 m, with

enforced dewatering (Tutorial-2e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173

9.43 Time-History window, Effective stress vs. Time in vertical 4 at RL-4.875 m,

with enforced dewatering (Tutorial-2e) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 174

9.44 Model window (Tutorial-2f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175

9.45 Materials window (Tutorial-2f) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176

9.46 Depth-History window, Horizontal Displacements at vertical 3 (Tutorial-2f) . . . 177

9.47 Model window (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178

9.48 Probabilistic Defaults window (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179

9.49 Materials window for Clay (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180

9.50 Materials window for Peat (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 181

9.51 Materials window for Sand (Pleistocene) (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182

9.52 Calculation Times window for Bandwidth determination (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . 183

9.53 Start Calculation window for Monte Carlo reliability analysis (Tutorial-2g) . . . 183

9.54 Time-History (Reliability) window, Total settlement vs. Time with Band width

for Monte Carlo method (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184

9.55 Residual Settlement (Reliability) window (Tutorial-2g) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184

10.2 Non-Uniform Loads window, First load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 187

10.3 Non-Uniform Loads window, Last load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188

10.4 Vertical Drains window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188

10.5 Calculation Times window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189

10.6 Time-History window, Settlements and Effective stress at surface level vs.

Time for vertical 4 (Tutorial-3a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189

10.7 Model window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190

10.8 Open window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190

10.9 Fit for Settlement Plate window, Measurements tab (Tutorial-3b) . . . . . . . 191

10.10 Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab (Tutorial-3b) . . . . . . . . . . 192

10.11 Time-History (Fit) window, Initial prediction versus measurement, imperfection

0.19 m (Tutorial-3b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192

10.12 Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab, Details of the Fit Results (Tutorial-

3b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193

10.13 Iteration stop criteria window (Tutorial-3b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193

10.14 Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab, Fit factors after fit (Tutorial-3b) . 194

10.15 Time-History (Fit) window, Prediction vs. measurement after fit, imperfection

0.04 m (Tutorial-3b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194

10.16 Start Calculation window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195

10.17 Start Calculation window, Monte Carlo using fit parameters (Tutorial-3c) . . . . 196

Deltares xv

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

10.18 Time-History (Reliability) window, Total settlement vs. Time with Band width

for Monte Carlo method (Tutorial-3c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196

10.19 Residual Settlement (Reliability) window (Tutorial-3c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197

11.1 Ground improvement and embankment construction in three stages (Tutorial 4) 199

11.2 New File window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201

11.3 Model window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201

11.4 Geometry Limits window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 202

11.5 Points window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203

11.6 Pl-Lines window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 203

11.7 Phreatic line window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204

11.8 Layers window, Boundaries tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204

11.9 Layers window, Materials tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205

11.10 View Input window, Input tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205

11.11 Materials window, Compression tab for Peat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206

11.12 Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207

11.13 Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208

11.14 Generate Non-Uniform Loads window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208

11.15 View Input window, Input tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209

11.16 Verticals window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 209

11.17 Calculation Options window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210

11.18 Time-History window for vertical 1 (Tutorial-4a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 211

11.19 Non-Uniform Loads window (Tutorial-4b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212

11.20 Start Calculation window (Tutorial-4b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213

11.21 Time-History window for vertical 1 (Tutorial-4b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213

11.22 Depth-History window (Tutorial-4b) after 10000 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214

11.23 Chart Data window (vertical 1 of Tutorial-4b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215

11.24 Settlement vs. Time – Comparison between methods 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . 215

11.25 Effective stress vs. Time – Comparison between methods 1 and 2 . . . . . . 216

12.1 General view with pre-loading and sand walls (Tutorial 5) . . . . . . . . . . . 217

12.2 Geometry of the excavation and pre-loading phases (Tutorial 5) . . . . . . . . 218

12.3 Layers in the subsoil (Tutorial 5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219

12.4 IFCO system (sand walls) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220

12.5 New File window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220

12.6 View Input window, Geometry tab after importing geometry . . . . . . . . . . 221

12.7 Program Options window, Locations tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222

12.8 Materials window, Database tab . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222

12.9 PL-lines per Layer window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223

12.10 Non-Uniform Loads window, Initial state and Excavation loads . . . . . . . . 224

12.11 Non-Uniform Loads window, Fill and Embankment loads . . . . . . . . . . . 225

12.12 Vertical Drains window for Sand wall . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226

12.13 Calculation Times window . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226

12.14 Time-History window, dewatering with underpressure (Tutorial-5a) . . . . . . 227

12.15 Residual Settlement window, dewatering with underpressure (Tutorial-5a) . . . 227

12.16 Depth-History window, excess head at 10000 days (Tutorial-5a) . . . . . . . . 228

12.17 Time-History window, dewatering without underpressure (Tutorial-5b) . . . . . 229

12.18 Time-History window, no dewatering (Tutorial-5c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229

12.19 Residual Settlements window, no enforced dewatering (Tutorial-5c) . . . . . . 230

12.20 Settlement results for different cases (Tutorial-5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 230

13.2 Trapeziform load subdivided into columns . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232

13.3 Trapeziform load with a negative height . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232

xvi Deltares

List of Figures

13.5 Rectangular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233

14.2 Stress distribution under a load column . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 238

14.3 Stress distribution under a circular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239

14.4 Stress distribution under a rectangular load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240

14.5 Imaginary surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241

15.2 Theoretical and average pressure distribution between two drains . . . . . . . 250

15.3 Pressure distribution along a line-shaped drain (radial flow) . . . . . . . . . . 251

15.4 Pressure distribution along a plane-shaped drain (plane flow) . . . . . . . . . 252

16.1 NEN-Bjerrum: Idealized primary and secondary settlement during time (drained

conditions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 256

16.2 NEN-Bjerrum: Idealized primary settlement during loading (drained conditions) 256

16.3 NEN-Bjerrum: Creep rate depending on overconsolidation . . . . . . . . . . 258

16.4 Height related to linear and natural strain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259

16.5 Compressed height compression as a function of effective stress . . . . . . . 260

16.6 Creep Isotache pattern . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 260

16.7 Koppejan settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 262

17.2 Determining the common coefficient of secondary compression . . . . . . . . 267

17.3 Determining the Isotache natural secondary compression index c . . . . . . . 269

17.4 Determining Koppejan’s secondary compression index . . . . . . . . . . . . 270

18.2 Situations considered by De Leeuw method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283

18.3 Non-uniform load schematized as a uniform load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283

Deltares xvii

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

xviii Deltares

List of Tables

List of Tables

2.1 Keyboard shortcuts for D-Settlement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19

9.2 Peat properties (Tutorial 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151

9.3 Clay properties (Tutorial 2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151

17.1 Rough Isotache parameter correlation for soft soil types . . . . . . . . . . . . 269

18.1 E-modulus vs. unit weight (De Leeuw & Timmermans) . . . . . . . . . . . . 284

Deltares xix

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

xx Deltares

1 General Information

1.1 Foreword

This is the user manual for D-S ETTLEMENT, which is being developed by Deltares Systems,

a Deltares company. D-S ETTLEMENT is a dedicated tool for predicting soil settlements by ex-

ternal loading. D-S ETTLEMENT accurately and quickly determines the direct settlement, con-

solidation and creep along verticals in two-dimensional geometry. Deltares has been devel-

oping D-S ETTLEMENT since 1992. Sponsorship from the Dutch Ministry of Transport, Pub-

lic Works and Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat) and Senter/EZ (the latter through Delft

Cluster projects and the GeoSafe project) has been vital for most model development and

validation.

D-S ETTLEMENT has proved itself to be a powerful tool in the everyday engineering practice of

making settlement calculations. D-S ETTLEMENT’s graphical user interface allows both frequent

and infrequent D-S ETTLEMENT users to analyze regular settlement problems extremely quickly.

Complete functionality

D-S ETTLEMENT provides a complete functionality for determining settlements for regular two-

dimensional problems. Well-established and advanced models can be used to calculate

primary settlement/swelling, consolidation and secondary creep, with possible influence of

vertical drains. Different kinds of external loads can be applied: non-uniform, trapezoidal,

circular, rectangular, uniform and water loads. Vertical drains (strips and planes) with option-

ally enforced consolidation by temporary dewatering or vacuum consolidation can be mod-

eled. D-S ETTLEMENT creates a comprehensive tabular and graphical output with settlements,

stresses and pore pressures at the verticals that have to be defined. An automatic fit on

measured settlements can be applied, in order to determine improved estimates of the final

settlement. Finally, the bandwidth and parameter sensitivity for total and residual settlements

can be determined, including the effect of measurements.

Product integration

D-S ETTLEMENT is an integrated component of the Deltares Tools. Therefore, D-S ETTLEMENT’s

soil parameters can be directly determined from test results by using MCompress. Fur-

thermore relevant data can be exchanged with MGeobase (central project database) and

D-G EO S TABILITY (stability analysis) formerly known as MStab. MGeobase is used to cre-

ate and maintain a central project database, containing data on the measurements, geom-

etry and soil properties of several cross-sections. MGeobase can also be used to exe-

cute series of D-S ETTLEMENT analyses along a location line. Besides the exchange of in-

put data, D-S ETTLEMENT can also export the settled geometry and excess pore pressures to

D-G EO S TABILITY for stability analysis.

D-S ETTLEMENT was developed especially for geotechnical engineers. D-S ETTLEMENT’s graph-

ical interactive interface requires just a short training period for novice users. This means

that you can focus your skills directly on the input of sound geotechnical data and on the

subsequent settlement calculation.

Deltares 1 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Multiple layers

The two-dimensional soil structure can be composed of several soil layers with an arbitrary

shape and orientation. Each layer is connected to a particular soil type.

Verticals

By placing verticals in the geometry, you can define the co-ordinates for which output re-

sults will be shown. The position of the z co-ordinate is only relevant for circular or rectan-

gular loads.

Soil properties

The well-established constitutive models are based on common soil parameters for virgin

compression, unloading/reloading and secondary creep. Parameters of the different mod-

els can also be determined directly from the results of oedometer tests, using the MCom-

press program. Consolidation is either modeled by means of a consolidation coefficient or

by means of permeability per layer.

1.2.2 Loads

Subsequent loads at different times can be applied. Initial loads will not cause consolidation

or secondary creep. Stress distribution is taken into account, also in the soil weight loads.

Soil weight loads with uniform, trapezoidal and non-uniform shape of the soil cross-section

can be applied. D-S ETTLEMENT can include an additional, deformation dependent load.

This load is equal to the soil that must be added to maintain the defined top surface po-

sition. D-S ETTLEMENT can take account of the settlement-dependent weight reduction by

submerging. Embankment construction loading can be generated from simplified input, or

from imported measured surface positions.

Distributed loads

Distributed loads with a circular or rectangular base can be applied.

Water loads

Changes in pore pressure distributions at different times can be defined.

1.2.3 Models

There are three constitutive models available in D-S ETTLEMENT: NEN-Bjerrum, NEN-Koppejan

and Isotache.

NEN-Bjerrum Cr/Cc/Ca

The NEN-Bjerrum model supports today’s international de-facto standard for settlement

predictions, as contained for example in the Dutch standard NEN 6744-1:1991 (NEN,

1991b). The model uses common linear strain soil parameters (Cc , Cr , Cα ). Lin-

ear strains are referred to the undeformed state, presuming that strains are sufficiently

small. The theoretical basis of the underlying creep rate description is the isotache

model, and often associated with the name Bjerrum (1972).

Isotache a/b/c

The Isotache a/b/c model by Den Haan (1994) enhances the NEN-Bjerrum model by

using a so-called natural strain, which is referred to the deformed state. Usage of natural

strain is expected to yield more realistic settlement curves in cases with large strains.

The special natural strain parameters are furthermore more objective with respect to

the stress and strain level.

NEN-Koppejan

Compared to the NEN-Bjerrum model, the traditional NEN-Koppejan model assumes

an instantaneous contribution by primary settlement and is not capable of describing

2 of 290 Deltares

General Information

definitions and assumes that secondary settlement is stress-dependent. The user can

opt for a linear or natural strain assumption.

All three constitutive models can be combined with the Terzaghi or Darcy consolidation model.

Both consolidation models are suited for all modern drainage systems. They support different

types of vertical drains (strips, columns and screens), with optional enforced dewatering. For

both models the influence of consolidation can be combined with user-defined piezometric

levels defining the hydraulic field, optionally layer by layer and time-dependent.

Darcy

Darcy’s general storage equation can be used for accurate determination of the in-

fluence of excess pore pressures on settlements of combined soil layers. The Darcy

method calculates the excess pore pressure distributions at different time points and

derives the deformation during consolidation from the development of the true effec-

tive stress. The Darcy model in combination with the isotache models also allows for

modelling the gradual decrease of effective weight during submerging of loading and

layers.

Terzaghi

Terzaghi’s one-dimensional theoretical solution for consolidation of elastic soil can be

used to modify the drained settlement solution, in order to approximate the influence

of excess pore pressure generation (Terzaghi and Peck, 1967). The combination with

vertical drains can be considered as an extension to the Terzaghi-Barron-Carillo method

(Barron, 1948; Carillo, 1942).

1.2.4 Results

Following the analysis, D-S ETTLEMENT can display results in tabular and graphical form.

The tabular report contains an echo of the input data and both settlements and stresses

per vertical.

Settlements and stress components can be viewed graphically in time and along depth.

A dissipation design graph can be viewed, showing the degree of consolidation by uni-

form loading for each layer.

The settled geometry can be viewed or written to a geometry file.

Finally, the settled geometry and excess pore pressures for a stability analysis with the

D-G EO S TABILITY program can also be written.

Measured settlements can be imported and used by D-S ETTLEMENT to perform fits by auto-

matic scaling of material parameters. This feature enables a more accurate estimate of the

final and residual settlement.

A reliability analysis is available to determine the bandwidth and parameter sensitivity for total

and residual settlements, including the increased reliability after a preliminary settlement plate

fit.

Deltares 3 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Horizontal displacements can be calculated according to De Leeuw tables (De Leeuw, 1963)

1.4 History

D-S ETTLEMENT (formerly known as MSettle until version 8.2) has been developed by Deltares/

GeoDelft. Version 1.0 was first released in 1992 under the name of MZet. A simplified NEN-

Bjerrum calculation method with limited applicability was added in 1993. Some new features,

such as the option to save a settled geometry, were added in 1994. In 1995, the Koppejan

method was adapted to allow loads to be added at different points in time. Version 4.0 (1998)

was the first Windows version of MZet. Its name was then changed to MSettle. In 1999 a first

version of the a/b/c Isotache model was incorporated into MSettle Version 5.0.

Version 6.0 (2001) included an enhanced module for geometrical modelling, and improved

versions of the user manual and on-line Help have been released.

Version 6.7 (2002) was the first modular release of MSettle, meaning that different modules

can be purchased separately. The 6.7 version included separate 1D and 2D modules, sim-

plified input of embankment construction by load generation, several improvements to the

isotache model and its documentation, a choice between the Terzaghi and Darcy consolida-

tion models, vertical drains (only for the Darcy model), and user-controlled variation of soil

parameters in order to fit settlement plate curves.

Version 6.8 (2003) included a completely new formulation of the NEN-Bjerrum model and an

enhanced report format. The new NEN-Bjerrum model still uses the common soil parameters

Cc , Cr , Cα , but is now based on the same isotache formulation as the a/b/c/ model. The new

formulation is therefore also suited for loading stages and un-/reloading sequences, which

were not possible with the old formulation.

Version 7.1 (2004) featured the new combination of vertical drains with the Terzaghi consol-

idation model, coupled stability analysis with MStab and a new design graph for the degree

of consolidation. Furthermore the chart data behind all graphs had been made available, for

usage in spread sheets et cetera.

Version 7.3 (2006) offers an automatic settlement plate fit. It also includes the new reliability

module. Furthermore, input of temporary loading has been simplified, the plot of transient

settlements has been extended with a plot of the loading and the Material window has been

redesigned.

The settlement plate fit is now part of the Calculation menu (section 5.3). The usage of

the manual fit has been simplified, and a robust automatic fit has been added. The Use Fit

parameters option (section 5.4) is available to generate modified results from a complete

settlement analysis. Reading of measurement data is now also supported from files with

tab delimited format (TXT), or comma (;) delimited format (CSV).

An evaluation version of the Reliability module has been added (section 5.4.2). This mod-

ule offers different methods to determine the bandwidth of the predicted settlements.

A graph of loading versus time has been attached to the graph of settlement versus time

(section 6.5, section 6.5.2).

Input of temporary loading has been simplified by the introduction of an end time for non-

uniform loading (section 4.6.1).

A graph of residual settlements versus different start times has been made available (sec-

tion 6.7).

The Material window (section 4.2) was redesigned, in order to separate the parameters

4 of 290 Deltares

General Information

for the soil model from the parameters for the consolidation model. An equivalent age

indication of over-consolidation was added to the NEN-Bjerrum and Isotache models.

Version 8.2 was released in 2009. This version includes the following improvements and new

features:

The Darcy consolidation model has been strongly improved and is now the default consol-

idation model:

It is more accurate than the Terzaghi model;

It uses the same input as the Terzaghi model. This means that Darcy is now based on

excess pore pressures instead of total pore pressures, and that direct input of the consoli-

dation coefficient is allowed.

It consumes considerable less computation time than in the previous version, and features

a significantly increased robustness. The latter means that previous numerical problems

by spatial oscillations and by negative effective stresses are practically vanished.

Deformation of drained layers is now included.

Submerging modelling has been improved in combination with the Isotache and NEN-

Bjerrum models: the effective weight of both non-uniform loads and soil layers changes

gradually during submerging, by taken into account the actual settlement instead of the

final settlement. See section 1.5.1 for a comparison between the new Darcy model and the

Terzaghi model.

Optional direct input of the Preconsolidation pressure in the Material window is available

for the Isotache and NEN-Bjerrum models (section 4.2.4, section 4.2.5), in order to model

special cases where a definition via POP or OCR is not sufficient.

Vertical drains can be limited to a certain horizontal range. Furthermore the input has been

simplified, both by introducing dedicated input for different drain types (strips, columns,

sand screens) and dewatering methods and by supplying common defaults for applicable

input parameters (section 4.4.2).

The system for error messages and warnings has been improved, as well as the messages

themselves (section 6.2.7).

Output of report and plots are now available in the English, French and Dutch languages

(section 3.2.4).

Result graphs have been extended. With the Darcy model, MSettle gives results for dif-

ferent stress components in time and along the depth. With the Terzaghi model, the

settlement-depth curve has been added (section 6.5, section 6.6).

The Reliability module (section 18.2) is upgraded from evaluation version to product ver-

sion, including full verification.

The Horizontal Displacement module (section 18.3) based on De Leeuw tables (De Leeuw,

1963) has been added.

Version 9.1 was released in 2011. The name of the program is changed to D-S ETTLEMENT.

Version 9.3 was released in 2012. This version includes the following improvements and new

features:

Calculated horizontal displacements can be found in the report.

For other calculations than NEN-Koppejan, the given pre-consolidation stress is taken into

account too.

When using Other Loads it is possible to add a storage tank (section 4.6.3).

Version 14.1 (July 2014). This version implements only the improvements on the changes in

the new licensing scheme.

Deltares 5 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Version 15.1 (April 2015). This version implements some improvements in the calculation:

The combination Water Loads and Submerging didn’t worked properly when the maxi-

mum iteration steps for submerging was more than 1. This is now fixed.

The combination Koppejan-Darcy could lead to an error (“Error occurred during compu-

tation of excess head”). This is now fixed.

In the report for combination Koppejan-Terzaghi, the primary and secondary settle-

ments per layer were not always calculated if the number of layers differed from the

number of materials. This is now fixed.

For Koppejan model, the pre-consolidation stress σp was used only when this parame-

ter was set for the Isotache model. This is now fixed.

In the Vertical Drains window, the sub-window Enforced Dewatering is renamed into

Drainage schedule

A toggle button is implemented in the View Input (Figure 2.5), to switch between same

scale for X and Y-axis and not same scale for X and Y-axis.

The Help file is no more available; clicking on the Help button will open the User Manual

in which a search by specific word can be performed.

Version 16.1 (January 2016). With this version, license(s) can be borrowed for a certain

period allowing working without connection to the licence server (see section 3.2.5 for more

information). This version also contains solved issues (for a complete list, download the Re-

lease Notes from the Download Portal of Deltares).

1.5 Limitations

When working with D-S ETTLEMENT, the following limitations apply.

During vertical displacements calculation, D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that horizontal dis-

placements are zero. The horizontal displacements from the corresponding module will

therefore not influence the vertical displacements calculation.

For Terzaghi, the submerged weight is determined on the basis of final settlements.

Furthermore, only the weight of non-uniform loads is reduced, e.g. not the weight of

uniform loads or soil layers.

For Darcy, the gradually changing submerged weight during the calculation is only cal-

culated for non-uniform loads and soil layers, but not for uniform loads.

The consolidation models do not explicitly describe horizontal flow. The horizontal flow

to drains is modelled by a leakage term.

The Terzaghi model does not calculate the actual effective pressures during consolida-

tion, but is based on an approximate adjustment of settlements from a drained solution,

see section 1.5.1.

Both options Fit for Settlement Plate and Submerging do not work in combination, for

the none-accurate Submerging method (section 1.5.1). When a plate fit is performed,

the Submerging option is not taken into account. When a normal calculation is done

using fit parameters in combination with the Submerging option, the results differ from

those displayed in the Fit for Settlement Plate chart. This limitation applies only for the

none-accurate submerging method. For the accurate method (i.e Darcy+Isotache and

6 of 290 Deltares

General Information

Darcy+Bjerrum), Submerging is taken into account during the Fit for Settlement Plate

calculation.

The Darcy model uses a step-wise accurate numerical solution of effective stress and pore

pressure at different points in time and space. The Terzaghi model uses a time-dependent

"degree of consolidation" according to the Terzaghi theory (Terzaghi and Peck, 1967), to adjust

the drained settlement solution approximately for the effect of consolidation.

The Terzaghi model has a number of limitations, compared to the Darcy model.

The settlement after completed consolidation with the Terzaghi model will always be

equal to the settlement from a drained solution, even if unloading took place shortly

after preceding loading.

For the same reason, the updated pre-consolidation stress during reloading will be

overestimated with Terzaghi if unloading took place before consolidation was finished.

The combination of layers with different consolidation coefficients and the combination

with vertical drains are also described more accurately with Darcy.

The period of consolidation with Terzaghi will be equal during loading and un/reloading,

while Darcy will show faster consolidation during un/reloading.

The influence of vertical drains and dewatering is averaged along a full layer in com-

bination with Terzaghi. This limitation is especially important for the layer in which the

vertical drain ends.

The Terzaghi model describes submerging by an initial load reduction (i.e. non–accurate

method), while the Darcy model in combination with the NEN-Bjerrum or Isotache model

takes into account the gradual character of it (i.e. accurate method).

Compared to the previous Darcy model, the Darcy model in version 8.2 consumes consider-

able less computation time than in the previous version, supports the same input as the Terza-

ghi model, features improved submerging modelling and a significantly increased robustness.

A choice for the Darcy model is since release 8.2 recommended under most circumstances,

as it combines the advantages of the Terzaghi model (fast, robust, convenient input) with

improved accuracy.

The NEN-Koppejan model has been the traditional choice in the Netherlands for many years.

The applicability of the Koppejan model is however limited, as it has not been designed

to predict unloading/reloading. The Dutch geotechnical design codes currently prescribe a

Cc /Cr /Cα method, just as other countries do. D-S ETTLEMENT’s isotache models with Cc /Cr /Cα

or a/b/c parameters are capable of modelling both incremental loading and unloading/reloading.

The other difference is that Koppejan assumes a stress dependent slope of the creep tail af-

ter virgin loading whereas the Cc /Cr /Cα model assumes that the slope after virgin loading is

stress independent.

Key concept of both isotache models is a direct relationship between overconsolidation, creep

rate and equivalent age. The only difference between these models is the usage of linear

strain for the Cc /Cr /Cα model and natural strain for the a/b/c model.

Deltares 7 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The following minimum system requirements are needed in order to run and install the Deltares

software, either from CD or by downloading from the Deltares Systems website via MS Inter-

net Explorer.

Operating systems:

Windows 2003,

Windows Vista,

Windows 7 – 32 bits

Windows 7 – 64 bits

Windows 8

Hardware specifications:

1 GHz Intel Pentium processor or equivalent

512 MB of RAM

400 MB free hard disk space

SVGA video card, 1024 × 768 pixels, High colors (16 bits)

CD-ROM drive

Microsoft Internet Explorer version 6.0 or newer (download from www.microsoft.com)

n Porosity

e0 Initial void ratio:

n0

e0 =

1 − n0

cv Vertical coefficient of consolidation, one-dimensional

σ0 Effective vertical soil pressure

σp Preconsolidation pressure (maximum vertical effective pressure experienced

in the past)

σ0 Initial vertical effective soil pressure

POP Pre-overburden pressure: P OP = σp − σ00

OCR Overconsolidation ratio:

σp

OCR =

σ00

t Time in days

H0 Vertical height of layer or oedometer sample at the start of (un)loading

ht Vertical height of layer or oedometer sample at time t after (un)loading

∆H Vertical settlement of layer or sample at time t: ∆H = ht − H0

εC Engineering vertical strain (Cauchy):

∆h

εc = h0

εH Natural vertical

strain (Hencky):

h0 − ∆h

εH = − ln = − ln (1 − εc )

h0

ε̇ Strain rate:

dε

ε̇ =

dt

Csw Primary swelling index (unloading):

dε

Csw = (1 + e0 ) with σ 0 < σp

d log σ 0

Cc Primary compression index (virgin loading):

dε

Cc = (1 + e0 ) with σ 0 > σp

d log σ 0

8 of 290 Deltares

General Information

dε

Cα =

d log t

a (Isotache) Modified natural swelling index:

Csw |εH

a=

(1 + e0 ) ln 10

b (Isotache) Modified natural compression index:

Cc |εH

b=

(1 + e0 ) ln 10

c (Isotache) Modified natural secondary compression constant:

Cα |εH

c=

ln 10

tage Initial equivalent age:

b−a

Isotache: tage = τ0 × OCR

c

CR − RR

NEN-Bjerrum: t = τ × OCR C α

age 0

τ0 Creep rate reference time

Cr (NEN-Bjerrum) Reloading/Swelling index:

Cr = Csw |εC

CR (NEN-Bjerrum) Compression ratio:

Cc |εC

CR =

1 + e0

RR (NEN-Bjerrum) Reloading/Swelling ratio:

Cr |εC

RR =

1 + e0

Cp (NEN-Koppejan) Primary compression coefficient below pre-consolidation:

(1 + e0 ) ln 10

Cp ≈ with σ 0 < σp

Csw

Cp ’ (NEN-Koppejan) Primary compression coefficient above pre-consolidation:

(1 + e0 ) ln 10

Cp0 ≈ with σ 0 > σp

Cc

Cs (NEN-Koppejan) Secular compression coefficient below pre-consolidation:

Secular compression

coefficient (Cs )

σ0 d log t

Cs = ln σ0 dε

with σ 0 < σp

Cs ’ (NEN-Koppejan)

Secular compression coefficient above pre-consolidation:

σ0 d log t

Cs0 = ln σp dε

with σ 0 > σp

Ap (NEN-Koppejan) Primary swelling coefficient:

(1 + e0 ) ln 10

Ap = with σ 0 < σ00

Csw

As (NEN-Koppejan)

0 Secondary swelling coefficient:

σ d log t

As = ln with σ 0 < σ00

σ00 dε

γ Unit weight

ϕ Water head

kh , kv Darcy permeability in horizontal and vertical direction

Ck The constant for strain dependent permeability

Kw Bulk modulus of water

Deltares 9 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

From the Help menu, choose the Manual option to open the User Manual of D-S ETTLEMENT

in PDF format. Here help on a specific topic can be found by entering a specific word in the

Find field of the PDF reader.

Deltares Systems tools are supported by Deltares. A group of 70 people in software develop-

ment ensures continuous research and development. Support is provided by the developers

and if necessary by the appropriate Deltares experts. These experts can provide consultancy

backup as well.

If problems are encountered, the first step should be to consult the online Help at

www.deltaressystems.com menu ‘Software’. Different information about the program can be

found on the left-hand side of the window (Figure 1.1):

In ‘Support - Frequently asked questions’ are listed the most frequently asked technical

questions and their answers.

In ‘Support - Known issues’ are listed the bugs of the program.

In ‘Release notes’ are listed the differences between an old and a new version.

If the solution cannot be found there, then the problem description can be e-mailed (preferred)

or faxed to the Deltares Systems Support team. When sending a problem description, please

add a full description of the working environment. To do this conveniently:

If possible, open a project that can illustrate the question.

Choose the Support option in the Help menu. The System Info tab contains all relevant

information about the system and the Deltares Systems geo-software. The Problem De-

10 of 290 Deltares

General Information

After clicking on the Send button, the Send Support E-Mail window opens, allowing sending

current file as an attachment. Marked or not the Attach current file to mail checkbox and

click OK to send it.

The problem report can either be saved to a file or sent to a printer or PC fax. The document

can be emailed to support@deltaressystems.nl or alternatively faxed to +31(0)88 335 81 11.

1.10 Deltares

Since its foundation in 1934, GeoDelft has been one of the first and most renowned geotech-

nical engineering institutes of the world. On January 1st 2008, GeoDelft has merged with WL

|Delft Hydraulics and some parts of Rijkswaterstaat and TNO into the new Deltares Institute on

delta technology. Part of Deltares’s role is still to obtain, generate and disseminate geotechni-

cal know-how. For more information on Deltares, visit the Deltares website: www.deltares.nl.

Deltares 11 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Deltares Systems is a Deltares company. The company’s objective is to convert Deltares’s

knowledge into practical geo-engineering services and software. Deltares Systems has de-

veloped a suite of software for geotechnical engineering. Besides software, Deltares Systems

is involved in providing services such as hosting online monitoring platforms, hosting on-line

delivery of site investigation, laboratory test results, etc. As part of this process Delft GeoSys-

tems is progressively connecting these services to their software. This allows for more stan-

dardized use of information, and the interpretation and comparison of results. Most software

is used as design software, following design standards. This however, does not guarantee

a design that can be executed successfully in practice, so automated back-analyses using

monitoring information are an important aspect in improving geotechnical engineering results.

Deltares Systems makes use of Deltares’s intensive engagement in R&D for GeoBrain. Geo-

Brain’s objective is to combine experience, expertise and numerical results into one forecast,

using Artificial Intelligence, Neural Networks and Bayesian Belief Networks. For more infor-

mation about Deltares GeoSystems’ geotechnical software, including download options, visit

www.deltaressystems.com or choose the Deltares Systems Website option from the Help

menu of D-S ETTLEMENT.

1.12 Acknowledgements

The former Road and Hydraulic Engineering Division (Rijkswaterstaat/DWW) of the Dutch

Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management has sponsored the first develop-

ment of D-S ETTLEMENT.

The contribution from the EZ/Senter project GeoSafe on the reliability framework and the

many contributions from the research program Delft Cluster are also gratefully acknowledged.

These contributions were crucial for developing and evaluating the present set of well-established

models.

12 of 290 Deltares

2 Getting Started

This Getting Started chapter aims to familiarize the user with the structure and user inter-

face of D-S ETTLEMENT. The Tutorial section which follows uses a selection of case studies to

introduce the program’s functions.

To start D-S ETTLEMENT, click Start on the Windows taskbar or double-click a D-S ETTLEMENT

input file that was generated during a previous session.

For a D-S ETTLEMENT installation based on floating licenses, the ModulesModules window may

appear at start-up (Figure 2.1). Check that the correct modules are selected and click OK.

When D-S ETTLEMENT is started from the Windows taskbar, the last project that was worked

on will open automatically (unless the program has been configured otherwise in the Pro-

gram Options window, reached from the Tools menu) and D-S ETTLEMENT will display the main

window (section 2.2).

When D-S ETTLEMENT is started, the main window is displayed (Figure 2.2). This window

contains a menu bar (section 2.2.1), an icon bar (section 2.2.2), a View Input window (sec-

tion 2.2.3) that displays the pre-selected or most recently accessed project, a title panel (sec-

tion 2.2.4) and a status bar (section 2.2.5). The caption of the main window of D-S ETTLEMENT

displays the program name, followed by the calculation model, the consolidation model and

the strain type. When a new file is created, the default calculation model is NEN-Bjerrum

(Linear strain), the default consolidation model is Darcy and the project name is Project1.

The first time after installation of D-S ETTLEMENT, the View Input window will be closed. Main

window

Deltares 13 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

To access the D-S ETTLEMENT menus, click the names on the menu bar.

File Standard Windows options for opening, saving and sending files as well

as several D-S ETTLEMENT options for exporting and printing active win-

dows and reports (section 3.1).

Project Options for selecting the model types, defining project properties and

viewing the input file (section 4.1).

Soil Options for defining the soil type properties (section 4.2).

Geometry Options for defining layers boundaries, soil types and piezometric lines

(section 4.3).

GeoObjects Options for defining the verticals (X co-ordinates) for which results will

be shown, the vertical drains and the pore pressure meters (section 4.4).

Water Input of water parameters (section 4.5).

Loads Input of external loads (section 4.6).

Calculation A wide range of calculation options to determine the settlements and

stresses along the verticals (chapter 5).

Results Options for displaying graphical or tabular output of the settlements and

stresses per vertical (chapter 6).

Tools Options for editing D-S ETTLEMENT program defaults (section 3.2).

Window Default Windows options for arranging the D-S ETTLEMENT windows and

choosing the active window.

Help Online Help (section 2.1).

14 of 290 Deltares

Getting Started

Use the buttons on the icon bar to quickly access frequently used functions (see below).

Open the Project Properties window. Here you can enter the project title and

other identification data, and determine the View Layout and Graph Settings for

your project.

The View Input window displays the geometry and additional D-S ETTLEMENT input of the cur-

rent project. The window has the following three tabs:

Geometry

In this view it is possible to define, inspect and modify the positions and soil types

of different layers. For more information about these general options for geometrical

modelling, see the description of the Geometry menu (section 4.3) or see section 7.4.

Input

In this view it is possible to define, inspect and modify the additional D-S ETTLEMENT spe-

cific input. For more information on the available options, see below in this paragraph.

Top View

This tab shows the lateral and the top view of the inputted project.

Deltares 15 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The panel on the left of the view contains buttons for entering data and controlling the graph-

ical view. Click on the following buttons in the Edit, Tools or Stage panel to activate the

corresponding functions:

In this mode, the left-hand mouse button can be used to graphically select a previ-

ously defined grid, load, geotextile or forbidden line. Items can then be deleted or

modified by dragging or resizing, or by clicking the right-hand mouse button and

choosing an option from the menu displayed. Pressing the Escape key will return

the user to this Select and Edit mode.

Add point(s) to boundary / PL-line

Click this button to add points to all types of lines (lines, polylines, boundary lines,

PL-lines). By adding a point to a line, the existing line is split into two new lines.

This provides more freedom when modifying the geometry.

16 of 290 Deltares

Getting Started

Click this button to add single lines. When this button is selected, the first left-hand

mouse click will add the info bar of the new line and a “rubber band” is displayed

when the mouse is moved. The second left-hand mouse click defines the end

point (and thus the final position) of the line. It is now possible to either go on

clicking start and end points to define lines, or stop adding lines by selecting one

of the other tool buttons, or by clicking the right-hand mouse button, or by pressing

the Escape key.

Add polyline(s)

Click this button to add polylines. When this button is selected, the first left-hand

mouse click adds the starting point of the new line and a “rubber band” is displayed

when the mouse is moved. A second left-hand mouse click defines the end point

(and thus the final position) of the first line in the polyline and activates the “rubber

band” for the second line in the polyline. Every subsequent left-hand mouse click

again defines a new end point of the next line in the polyline. It is possible to end

a polyline by selecting one of the other tool buttons, or by clicking the right-hand

mouse button, or by pressing the Escape key.

Add PL-line(s)

Click this button to add a piezometric level line (PL-line). Each PL-line must start

at the left limit and end at the right limit. Furthermore, each consecutive point must

have a strictly increasing X co-ordinate. Therefore, a PL-line must be defined from

left to right, starting at the left limit and ending at the right limit. To enforce this,

the program will always relocate the first point clicked (left-hand mouse button) to

the left limit by moving it horizontally to this limit. If trying to define a point to the

left of the previous point, the rubber band icon indicates that this is not possible.

Subsequently clicking on the left side of the previous point, the new point will be

added at the end of the rubber band icon instead of the position clicked.

Pan

Click this button to change the visible part of the drawing by clicking and dragging

the mouse.

Zoom in

Click this button to enlarge the drawing, and then click the part of the drawing

which is to be at the centre of the new image. Repeat if necessary.

Zoom out

Click this button, and then click on the drawing to reduce the drawing size. Repeat

if necessary.

Zoom rectangle

Click this button then click and drag a rectangle over the area to be enlarged. The

selected area will be enlarged to fit the window. Repeat if necessary.

Add vertical

Click this button to graphically define the position of a vertical.

Click this button to display a window in which it is possible to add, modify or delete

non-uniform loads per unit of area.

Add other load

Click this button to display a window in which it is possible to add, modify or delete

trapezoidal, circular, rectangular or uniform loads.

Convert geometry to 1D

Click this button to convert geometry to 1D.

Deltares 17 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Click this button, then click the first point on the View Input window and place the

cross on the second point. The distance and the slope between the two points

can be read beside the second point. To turn this option off, click the escape key.

Undo zoom

Click this button to undo the zoom. If necessary, click several times to retrace

each consecutive zoom-in step that was made.

Zoom limits

Click this button to display the complete drawing.

Click this button to use the same scale for the horizontal and vertical directions.

When selected, the program will automatically try to generate a new valid geom-

etry whenever geometry modifications require this. During generation, (poly)lines

(solid blue) are converted to boundaries (solid black), with interjacent layers. New

layers receive a default material type. Existing layers keep the materials that were

assigned to them. Invalid geometry parts are converted to construction elements.

Automatic regeneration may slow down progress during input of complex geome-

try, because validity will be checked continuously.

Redo

Click this button to redo the previous Undo action

Undo

Click this button to undo the last change(s) made to the geometry

Delete

Click this button to delete a selected element.

NOTE: This button is only available when an element is selected.

Previous stage

Click this button to view the previous stage in the sequence of loading.

Next stage

Click this button to view the next stage in the sequence of loading.

This panel situated at the bottom of the View Input window displays the project titles, as

entered on the Identification tab in the Project Properties window (section 4.1.3).

This bar situated at the bottom of the main window displays a description of the selected icon

of the icon bar (section 2.2.2).

18 of 290 Deltares

Getting Started

2.3 Files

*.sli Input file (ASCII):

Contains all specific input for D-S ETTLEMENT. After interactive generation, this file

can be reused in subsequent D-S ETTLEMENT analyses.

*.sls Setting file (ASCII):

Working file with settings data. This file doesn’t contain any information that is

relevant for the calculation, but only settings that apply to the representation of

the data, such as the grid size.

*.geo Input file (ASCII):

Contains the (deformed) geometry data that can be shared with other Deltares

Geo-programs.

*.sti Output file (ASCII):

File used by D-S ETTLEMENT for a coupled stability analysis, with deformed geom-

etry and excess pore pressures.

*.sld Dump file (ASCII):

Contains calculation results used for graphical and report output.

*.slo Obsolete file (ASCII):

Contains echo of input and tabular results.

*.err Error file (ASCII):

If there are any errors in the input, they are described in this file.

*.gef Geotechnical Exchange Format file (ASCII):

Contains measurements data. GEF file

*.slm SLM file (ASCII):

Input of settlement and surface measurements.SLM file

Use the keyboard shortcuts given in Table 2.1 to directly opening a window without selecting

the option from the bar menu.

Ctrl + N New

Ctrl + S Save

Ctrl + O Open

F12 Save As

Ctrl + C Copy Active Window to Clipboard

Ctrl + P Print Report

Ctrl + M Model

Ctrl + T Materials

Ctrl + E Verticals

F9 Start Calculation

Ctrl + R Report

All figures in D-S ETTLEMENT such as geometry and graphical output can be exported in WMF

(Windows Meta Files) format. In the File menu, select the option Export Active Window to

save the figures in a file. This file can be later imported in a Word document for example

or added as annex in a report. The option Copy Active Window to Clipboard from the File

Deltares 19 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

menu can also be used to copy directly the figure in a Word document. The report can be

entirely exported as PDF (Portable Document Format) or RTF (Rich Text Format) file. To look

at a PDF file Adobe Reader can be used. A RTF file can be opened and edited with word

processors like MS Word. Before exporting the report, a selection of the relevant parts can be

done with the option Report Selection (section 6.1).

It is possible to copy part of a table in another document, an Excel sheet for example. If the

cursor is placed on the left-hand side of a cell of the table, the cursor changes in an arrow

which points from bottom left to top right. Select a specific area by using the mouse (see

Figure 2.7a). Then, using the copy button (or ctrl+C) this area can be copied.

a) b)

c) d)

Figure 2.7: Selection of different parts of a table using the arrow cursor

To select a row, click on the cell before the row number (see Figure 2.7b). To select a column,

click on the top cell of the column (see Figure 2.7c). To select the complete table, click on the

top left cell (see Figure 2.7d).

In some tables the option Copy is also present at the left hand pane.

In the Time-History and/or Depth-History windows, by selecting the first Time or Depth step

respectively at the top of the window and using the scroll button of the mouse, graphical results

are displayed in a continuous way in time (from initial to final time) or in depth (from ground

surface to the base).

20 of 290 Deltares

3 General

This part of the manual contains a detailed description of the available menu options for input,

calculation and viewing results.

The examples in the tutorial section provide a convenient starting point for familiarization with

the program.

Besides the familiar Windows options for opening and saving files, the File menu contains a

number of options specific to D-S ETTLEMENT.

New

Select this option to display the New File window (Figure 3.1). Three choices are available

to create a new geometry:

Select New geometry to display the View Input window, showing only the geometry

Select New geometry wizard to create a new geometry faster and easier using the

wizard option (involving a step-by-step process for creating a geometry, see sec-

tion 4.3.2);

Select Import geometry to use an existing geometry.

Use this option to copy the contents of the active window to the Windows clipboard so

that they can be pasted into another application. The contents will be pasted in either text

format or Windows Meta File format.

Use this option to export the contents of the active window as a Windows Meta File (*.wmf),

a Drawing Exchange File (*.dxf) or a text file (*.txt). After clicking the Save button in the

Export to window, the Export complete window opens displaying three choices:

Open to open the file containing the exported window;

Open Folder to open the folder where the file was saved;

Close to close the Export complete window.

Export Report

This option allows the report to be exported in a different format, such as pdf or rtf.

Page Setup

This option allows definition of the way D-S ETTLEMENT plots and reports are to be printed.

The printer, paper size, orientation and margins can be defined as well as whether and

where axes are required for plots. Click Autofit to get D-S ETTLEMENT to choose the best fit

for the page.

Deltares 21 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

This option will display a print preview of the current contents of theView Input or Results

window.

This option prints the current contents of the View Input or Results window.

This option will display a print preview of the calculation report.

Print Report

This option prints the calculation report.

On the menu bar, click Tools and then choose Program Options to open the corresponding

input window. In this window, the user can optionally define their own preferences for some of

the program’s default values through the following tabs:

section 3.2.2 – General tab

section 3.2.3 – Locations tab

section 3.2.4 – Language tab

section 3.2.5 – Modules tab

Toolbar Mark this checkbox to display the icon bar (section 2.2.2) each time

D-S ETTLEMENT is started.

Status bar Mark this checkbox to display the status bar (section 2.2.5) each time

D-S ETTLEMENT is started.

Title panel Mark the checkbox to display the project titles, as entered on the Identifi-

cation tab in the Project Properties window, in a panel at the bottom of the

View Input window.

22 of 290 Deltares

General

Start-up with Click one of these toggle buttons to determine whether a project should

be opened or initiated when the program is started.

No project: Each time D-S ETTLEMENT is started, the buttons in the tool-

bar or the options in the File menu must be used to open an existing

project or to start a new one.

Last used project: Each time D-S ETTLEMENT is started, the last project

that has been worked on is opened automatically.

New project: A new project is created. The user is offered three options

at the start up of D-S ETTLEMENT: New geometry, New geometry wizard

and Import geometry.

NOTE: The Start-up with option is ignored when D-S ETTLEMENT is

started by double-clicking on an input file.

Save on The toggle buttons determine how input data is saved prior to calcula-

Calculation tion. The input data can either be saved automatically, using the same

file name each time, or a file name can be specified each time the data

is saved.

Halt on Unmark this checkbox to prevent pausing the calculation in case of

Warnings warnings.

Use Enter key Use the toggle buttons to determine the way the Enter key is used

to in the program: either as an equivalent of pressing the default button

(Windows-style) or to shift the focus to the next item in a window (for

users accustomed to the DOS version(s) of the program).

Deltares 23 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Working D-S ETTLEMENT will start up with a working directory for selection and

directory saving of files. Either choose to use the last used directory, or specify a

fixed path.

MGeobase Here it is possible to assign a database location. This database (*.gdb or

database *.mdb) can be accessed with several options in D-S ETTLEMENT to retrieve

D-S ETTLEMENT specific data from this file location.

Select the language to be used in the D-S ETTLEMENT windows and on printouts.

24 of 290 Deltares

General

language

Output Three output languages are supported: English, French and Dutch. The

language selected output language will be used in all exported reports and graphs.

For a D-S ETTLEMENT installation based on floating licenses, the Modules tab can be used to

claim a license for the particular modules that are to be used. If the Show at start of program

checkbox is marked then this window will always be shown at start-up.

For a D-S ETTLEMENT installation based on a license dongle, the Modules tab will just show the

modules that may be used.

The Vertical Drains module is only available in combination with the 2D Geometry module.

Click this button to see which modules are (at this moment) in used and

who (within the company) is using them.

Click this button to borrow the selected modules for a certain period. The

modules will be taken from the server pool and will be available on this

computer even if no connection to the license server is available. Set the

date and time for the expiration of the borrowing and press OK.

The Help menu allows access to different options.

Deltares 25 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

If errors are found in the input, no calculation can be performed. Those errors must be cor-

rected before performing a new calculation. To display details about those error messages,

select the Error Messages option from the Help menu. They are also written in the *.err file.

They will be overwritten the next time a calculation is started.

3.3.2 Manual

Select the Manual option from the Help menu to view the manual.

Select Deltares Systems Website option from the Help menu to visit the Deltares Systems

website (www.deltaressystems.com) for the latest news.

3.3.4 Support

Use the Support option from the Help menu to open the Support window in which program

errors can be registered. Refer to section 1.9 for a detailed description of this window.

Use the About option from the Help menu to display the About D-S ETTLEMENT window which

provides software information (for example the version of the software).

26 of 290 Deltares

4 Input

Before the analysis can be started, the data for layers, soil properties and loads need to be

inputted.

The Project menu can be used to set the model settings. The project preferences can be set,

the default values of the probabilistic parameters can be entered and it is possible to view the

input file.

4.1.1 Model

On the menu bar, click Project and then choose Model to open the input window. The available

options will depend on the available modules (section 3.2.5). For an overview of different

model limitations see section 1.5.

dimensional geometry can be analyzed. With the reduced capabilities

of 1D geometry the effect of uniform loading along one vertical can be

analyzed.

Calculation NEN-Bjerrum (section 16.1) uses the common parameters Cr , Cc and

model Cα and represents today’s international de-facto standard. The model

uses a linear strain assumption.

Isotache (section 16.2) is similar to the NEN-Bjerrum model, but uses

the natural strain parameters a, b, c. Natural strain can be advantageous

if large strains are expected. It makes parameters stress-objective and

prevents prediction of unphysical large deformations.

The traditional Dutch NEN-Koppejan model (section 16.3) might be a

logical choice if the model matches available historical parameters and

user experience. Koppejan parameters are traditionally determined on

a linear strain basis. The optional combination with natural strain theo-

retically requires that the parameters were also determined on the same

basis.

Deltares 27 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Consolidation section 15.3 describes the influence of excess pore pressures on settle-

model ments most accurately. The approximate Terzaghi model (section 15.2)

is applicable in cases where the influence of consolidation is limited, for

instance by application of vertical drains.

Vertical drains Selection of this option enables additional modelling of vertical drains,

with optionally enforced dewatering (section 15.4).

Reliability Selection of this option enables the determination of bandwidth in total

Analysis and residual settlement, together with the determination of parameter

sensitivity (section 18.2).

Fit for settle- Selection of this option enables the possibility to perform automatic fits

ment plate on measured settlements by parameter scaling (section 5.3). Success-

ful fits require a realistic prediction of the shape of the complete settle-

ment curve. Combination with the Isotache and Darcy models is for this

purpose most suited.

Horizontal Selection of this option enables the calculation of horizontal displace-

displacements ments according to De Leeuw tables (De Leeuw, 1963).

Input of probabilistic defaults is only required if Reliability Analysis has been selected in the

Model window (section 4.1.1). On the menu bar, click Project and then choose Probabilistic

Defaults, in order to modify the default settings for the uncertainty in soil parameters and in

the layer boundary.

Figure 4.2: Probabilistic Defaults window, Consolidation and unit weight tab

28 of 290 Deltares

Input

Materials

Coefficient of the mean value determines the default values for the standard deviation

variation of stochastic soil parameters. Click the Consolidation and unit weight

tab and the Compression tab to see all the available stochastic parame-

ters for the selected material models.

NOTE: The default values of the standard deviation for each material

can be overruled in the Materials window (section 4.2).

Distribution The Lognormal distribution will prevent values below zero. Choosing

None means that D-S ETTLEMENT will assume that this parameter is de-

terministic instead of stochastic.

Correlation co- The correlation coefficient between the primary compression coefficient

efficient with . . . and the other compression parameters. A zero value indicates com-

plete independency. Using a large nonzero value can cause numerical

problems in combination with the probabilistic solution methods.

Layer boundary

Standard devia- The standard deviation of the boundaries between the different layers, if

tion a stochastic distribution is used.

Distribution The Lognormal distribution will prevent values below zero. Choosing

None means that D-S ETTLEMENT will assume that this parameter is de-

terministic instead of stochastic.

Deltares 29 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

On the menu bar, click Project and then choose Properties to open the input window. The

Project Properties window contains four tabs which allow the settings for the current project

to be changed. Project properties

Use the Identification tab to specify the project identification data.

Titles Use Title 1 to give the calculation a unique, easily recognisable name.

Title 2 and Title 3 can be added to indicate specific characteristics of

the calculation. The three titles will be included on printed output.

Date The date entered here will be used on printouts and graphic plots for this

project. Either mark the Use current date checkbox on each printout or

enter a specific date.

Drawn by Enter the name of the user performing the calculation or generating the

printout.

Project ID Enter your project identification number.

Annex ID Specify the annex number of the printout.

Mark the checkbox Save as default to use the current settings every time D-S ETTLEMENT is

started or a new project is created.

Use the View Input tab to specify the availability of components and the layout settings of the

View Input window (section 2.2.3).

30 of 290 Deltares

Input

Display

Info bar Enable this checkbox to display the information bar at the bottom of the

View Input window.

Legend Enable this checkbox to display the legend.

Rulers Enable this checkbox to display the rulers.

Layer colors Enable this checkbox to display the layers in different colors.

Same scale for Enable this checkbox to display the x and y axis with the same scale in

x and y axis the top view.

Same scale for Enable this checkbox to display the x and z (i.e. vertical) axis with the

x and z axis same scale.

Origin Enable this checkbox to draw a circle at the origin.

Large cursor Enable this checkbox to use the large cursor instead of the small one.

Points Enable this checkbox to display the points.

Loads Enable this checkbox to display the loads.

Verticals Enable this checkbox to display the verticals.

Labels

Points Enable this checkbox to display the point labels.

Loads Enable this checkbox to display the load labels.

Verticals Enable this checkbox to display the vertical labels.

Layers Enable this checkbox to display the layer labels.

Layers

This option can only be used if the checkbox Layers has been marked. Choose how the layers

are indicated: by number, by material number or by material name. This choice determines

the layer coloring as well. If As material numbers or As material names is selected, all layers

with the same material are drawn with the same color.

Grid

Show Grid Enable this checkbox to display the grid points.

Snap to Grid Enable this checkbox to ensure that objects align to the grid automati-

cally when they are moved or positioned in a graph.

Grid Distance Enter the distance between two grid points.

Deltares 31 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Selection

Accuracy Mouse selection accuracy, define a large value for a large selection area.

Use the Stresses in Geometry tab to define the appearance of the Stresses in Geometry

results window (section 6.3).

Display

Info bar Enable this checkbox to display the information bar at the bottom of the

View Input window.

Legend Enable this checkbox to display the legend.

Rulers Enable this checkbox to display the rulers.

Layer colors Enable this checkbox to display the layers in different colors.

Same scale for Enable this checkbox to display the x and y axis with the same scale.

x and y axis

Origin Enable this checkbox to draw a circle at the origin.

Large cursor Enable this checkbox to use the large cursor instead of the small one.

Points Enable this checkbox to display the points.

Verticals Enable this checkbox to display the verticals.

Labels

Points Enable this checkbox to display the point labels.

Verticals Enable this checkbox to display the vertical labels.

Layers Enable this checkbox to display the layer labels.

Layers

This option can only be used if the checkbox Layers has been marked. Choose how the layers

are indicated: by number, by material number or by material name. This choice determines

the layer coloring as well. If As material numbers or As material names is selected, all layers

with the same material are drawn with the same color.

32 of 290 Deltares

Input

Grid

Show grid Enable this checkbox to display the grid points.

Grid distance Enter the distance between two grid points.

Use the Settled Geometry tab to set the appearance of the Settled Geometry window (sec-

tion 6.8).

Display

Infobar Enable this checkbox to display the information bar at the bottom of the

View Input window.

Legend Enable this checkbox to display the legend.

Layer colors Enable this checkbox to display the layers in different colors.

Rulers Enable this checkbox to display the rulers.

Same scale for Enable this checkbox to display the x and z axis with the same scale.

x and z axis

Origin Enable this checkbox to draw a circle at the origin.

Large cursor Enable this checkbox to use the large cursor instead of the small one.

Points Enable this checkbox to display the points.

Labels

Points Enable this checkbox to display the point labels.

Layers Enable this checkbox to display the layer labels.

Layers

When the option Layers is checked, choose how the layer are indicated: by number, by ma-

terial number or by material name. This choice determines the layer coloring as well. If you

select As material numbers or As material names, all layers with the same material are drawn

with the same color.

Grid

Deltares 33 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Grid distance Enter the distance between two grid points.

Settled geometry

Enlarged Enable this checkbox to use the enlarge factor.

Enlarge factor Enter a factor to enlarge the drawing of the settled geometry.

On the menu bar, click Project and then choose View Input File to open the Input File

window where an overview of the input data is displayed. Click on the Print Active Window

icon to print this file.

On the menu bar, click Soil and then select Materials to open an input window in which the

soil type properties can be defined. The properties can either be imported directly from an

MGeobase database (Database tab), or be inputted manually (Parameters tab):

Manual input of Terzaghi parameters (section 4.2.2);

Manual input of Darcy parameters (section 4.2.3);

Manual input of Isotache parameters (section 4.2.4);

Manual input of NEN-Bjerrum parameters (section 4.2.5);

Manual input of NEN-Koppejan parameters (section 4.2.6);

Additional input for reliability analysis (section 4.2.7);

Additional input for horizontal displacement calculation (section 4.2.8);

The Database tab in the Materials window is only available if a location of an MGeobase

database was specified in the Locations tab of the Program Options window (section 3.2.3).

Select the Database tab in the Materials window to see the available soil types. Select a

soil type, and use the Import button to import properties the soil type with associated proper-

ties.

34 of 290 Deltares

Input

If the Terzaghi consolidation model was selected in the Model window (section 4.1.1), then the

Terzaghi parameters can be specified in the Consolidation and unit weight tab of the Materials

window (Figure 4.9).

of the theoretical drained settlements using a so-called coefficient of consolidation cv . See

section 1.5.1 for a comparison with the Darcy model, and see section 15.2 for background

information.

Deltares 35 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 4.9: Materials window, Consolidation and unit weight tab for Terzaghi model

Drained Mark this checkbox to specify that the layer acts as a drained

boundary for clusters of consolidation layers.

Total unit weight The unit weight of the unsaturated soil above the user-defined

above phreatic level phreatic line.

Total unit weight The unit weight of the saturated soil below the user-defined

below phreatic level phreatic line.

Vertical consolidation Terzaghi’s well-known consolidation coefficient for flow in vertical

coefficient direction.

Ratio hor./vert. Only for vertical drainage (section 4.1.1): the ratio between the

consolidation coef. horizontal and vertical consolidation coefficients.

Note: In the previous versions of the program (version 7.3 and earlier), it was possible to

define three types of soil for Terzaghi model: Creeping, Permeable or Impervious. Creep-

ing corresponds now with a standard input. Permeable is now changed into Drained and

Impervious does not exist anymore. Impervious layers can be modelled using a very small

consolidation coefficent.

36 of 290 Deltares

Input

If the Darcy consolidation model was selected in the Model window (section 4.1.1), the Terza-

ghi parameters can be specified in the Consolidation and unit weight tab of the Materials

window (Figure 4.10).

The improved and accurate Darcy model is the preferred consolidation model since release

8.2. Darcy solves numerically the transient development of excess heads along verticals and

allows for a gradually developing effect of submerging on effective loading. The Darcy model

is able to use the same input parameters as the Terzaghi model.

Figure 4.10: Materials window, Consolidation and unit weight tab for Darcy model

Drained Mark this checkbox to specify that the layer acts as a drained

boundary for clusters of consolidation layers.

Total unit weight The unit weight of the unsaturated soil above the user-defined

above phreatic level phreatic line.

Total unit weight below The unit weight of the saturated soil below the user-defined

phreatic level phreatic line.

Storage There are three ways to define the vertical permeability kv (see

the Darcy storage Equation 15.6):

- Vertical consolidation coefficient: D-S ETTLEMENT will deduct a

strain dependent kv at each location from the vertical consolida-

tion coefficient for virgin loading, using Equation 15.8.

- Constant permeability : direct input of kv .

- Strain dependent permeability : kv is a strain dependent perme-

ability according to Equation 15.7.

Vertical consolidation The coefficient of consolidation cv for flow in vertical direction.

coefficient Cv

Deltares 37 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Permeability strain The permeability strain modulus is the ratio Ck /(1 + e0 ) where

modulus Ck is the permeability strain factor and e0 the initial void ratio.

The permeability strain modulus proves to be equal to the NEN-

Bjerrum primary consolidation parameter CR

Vertical permeability The initial value of the vertical permeability at undeformed state.

Ratio horizon- The ratio between the horizontal and vertical permeabilities, used

tal/vertical perme- by D-S ETTLEMENT for vertical drainage modelling (section 4.1.1).

ability

Ratio hor./vert. con- The ratio between the horizontal and vertical consolidation co-

solidation coef. efficient, used by D-S ETTLEMENT for vertical drainage modelling

(section 4.1.1).

If the Isotache calculation model was selected in the Model window (section 4.1.1), then

the Isotache parameters can be specified in the Compression tab of the Materials window

(Figure 4.11).

D-S ETTLEMENT’s a/b/c Isotache model (section 16.2) is based on natural strain, and uses a

rate type formulation. This means that all inelastic compression is assumed to result from

visco-plastic creep. The model is superior in cases with large strains and is able to describe

not only virgin loading but also unloading and reloading. The objective natural parameters

can be derived simply from common oedometer tests (section 17.4), or from compression

parameters for other models (section 17.7).

pressure (σ p) dation pressure is the highest vertical stress experienced in the past.

D-S ETTLEMENT will use a vertical gradient equal to the initial stress

gradient.

38 of 290 Deltares

Input

pressure (POP) tion pressure minus the initial in-situ vertical effective stress.

Overconsolidation The Overconsolidation Ratio (OCR) is defined as the ratio of precon-

ratio (OCR) solidation pressure and in-situ vertical effective stress. The corre-

sponding equivalent age (according to Equation 16.18 page 311) is

shown in grey in the Equivalent age field. This enables to check if

the combination of the OCR value with the compression parameters

a, b, and c is realistic.

Equivalent age The equivalent age is an alternative input option for the overconsoli-

dation ratio. It expresses the required time after virgin loading, if the

overconsolidation would have been caused by ageing only. The cor-

responding OCR (according to Equation 16.18 page 311) is shown

in grey in the Overconsolidation ratio field.

Reloading/swelling The Isotache reloading/swelling constant a relates natural strain dur-

constant (a) ing recompression or swell to the change of vertical effective stress.

Primary compres- The Isotache primary compression constant b relates natural strain

sion constant (b) during virgin loading to the change of vertical effective stress.

Secondary The Isotache secondary compression constant relates natural strain

compres- to the change of time. A zero value indicates non-creeping soil.

sion constant (c)

Note: OCR, POP or Equivalent age, together with the compression parameters a, b and c,

determine the initial creep rate. See section 17.2 for background information.

If the NEN-Bjerrum calculation model was selected in the Model window (section 4.1.1), the

NEN-Bjerrum parameters can be specified in the Compression tab of the Materials window

(Figure 4.12).

The NEN-Bjerrum model (section 16.1) is based on linear strain, and uses the same rate type

formulation as the a/b/c Isotache model. The common NEN-Bjerrum soil parameters Cc , Cr

and Cα can be derived simply from oedometer tests (section 17.3). Applicability of linear

strain requires that parameters are determined at the appropriate stress level.

The NEN-Bjerrum compression parameters can either be inputted as ratios (Figure 4.12) or

as indices (Figure 4.13).

Deltares 39 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 4.12: Materials window, Compression tab for NEN-Bjerrum model (Input as ratio)

pressure (σ p) dient is equal to the initial stress gradient (section 5.1.2). The pre-

consolidation pressure is the highest vertical stress experienced

in the past.

Pre-overburden The Pre-Overburden Pressure (POP) is defined as the preconsol-

pressure (POP) idation pressure minus the initial in-situ vertical effective stress.

Overconsolidation The Overconsolidation Ratio (OCR) is defined as the ratio of pre-

ratio (OCR) consolidation pressure and in-situ vertical effective stress. Press-

ing the TAB key will show the corresponding equivalent age, ac-

cording to Equation 16.18 of page 311. This enables you to check

if the combination of the OCR value with the compression param-

eters is realistic.

Equivalent age The equivalent age is an alternative input option for the overcon-

solidation ratio. It expresses the required time after virgin loading,

if the overconsolidation would have been caused by ageing only.

Pressing the TAB key will show the corresponding OCR, accord-

ing to Equation 16.18 of page 311.

Reloading/Swelling The reloading/swelling ratio is used to calculate the primary set-

ratio (RR) tlement below preconsolidation stress. The parameter relates the

linear strain to the logarithm of stress during un-reloading.

Compression ratio The compression ratio is used to calculate the primary settlement

(CR) above preconsolidation stress. The parameter relates the linear

strain to the logarithm of stress during virgin loading.

Coefficient of The secondary compression coefficient is used to calculate the

secondary secondary (time dependent) settlement. The parameter relates

compression (Ca) the linear strain to the logarithm of time after virgin loading. A

zero value indicates non-creeping soil.

40 of 290 Deltares

Input

Figure 4.13: Materials window, Compression tab for NEN-Bjerrum model (Input as index)

Note: OCR, POP or Equivalent age together with the compression parameters determine

the initial creep rate. See section 17.2 for background information.

index (Cr) ment below preconsolidation stress. The parameter relates the void

ratio to the logarithm of stress during un-reloading.

Compression The compression index is used to calculate the primary settlement

index (Cc) above preconsolidation stress. The parameter relates the void ratio

to the logarithm of stress during virgin loading.

Coefficient of The secondary compression coefficient is used to calculate the sec-

secondary ondary (time dependent) settlement. The parameter relates the lin-

compression (Ca) ear strain to the logarithm of time after virgin loading. A zero value

indicates non-creeping soil.

Initial void ratio The initial void ratio is used by D-S ETTLEMENT to convert the com-

(e0) pression indices into the compression ratios.

If the NEN-Koppejan calculation model was selected in the Model window (section 4.1.1), the

NEN-Koppejan parameters can be specified in the Compression tab of the Materials window

(Figure 4.14).

NEN-Koppejan’s model (section 16.3) is based on separate primary (instantaneous) and sec-

ondary (creep) contributions to the settlement. The model should be used prudently in case of

load removal, because of its limitations. Another major difference with the NEN-Bjerrum model

is the assumed stress-dependency of secondary settlements. The classic NEN-Koppejan

model is based on linear strain. D-S ETTLEMENT offers an optional extension to natural strain

(section 16.3.3).

Deltares 41 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

pressure (σ p) consolidation pressure is the highest vertical stress expe-

rienced in the past. By default the stress gradient is equal

to the initial stress gradient, however the NEN-Koppejan

model allows to defined other types of distribution and up-

date of the preconsolidation stress via the Calculation Op-

tions window (section 5.1.2): constant or parallel to the ef-

fective stress and constant or update at each load-step.

Overconsolidation ratio The ratio between preconsolidation pressure and initial ver-

(OCR) tical stress

Pre-overburden The Pre-Overburden Pressure (POP) is defined as the pre-

pressure (POP) consolidation pressure minus the initial in-situ vertical ef-

fective stress.

Primary compression coeffi- The primary compression coefficient is used to calculate

cient below preconsolidation the primary settlement.

pressure (Cp)

Primary compression coeffi- The primary compression coefficient is used to calculate

cient above preconsolidation the primary settlement.

pressure (Cp’)

Secular compression coeffi- The secular compression coefficient is used to calculate

cient below preconsolidation the secondary (time dependent) settlement.

pressure (Cs)

Secular compression coeffi- The secular compression coefficient is used to calculate

cient above preconsolidation the secondary (time dependent) settlement.

pressure (Cs’)

42 of 290 Deltares

Input

Ap and As approximation us- Mark this checkbox to approximate the swelling constants

ing Cp end Cs’ Ap and As to Cp and s ’ respectively. This approximation

is reasonable if the unloading step happens when stresses

are above the preconsolidation pressure.

Primary swelling constant The primary swelling constant for unloading.

(Ap)

Secondary swelling constant The secondary swelling constant for unloading. A large

(As) value of As implies that there will be no effect of load re-

moval on creep. A large value is therefore only valid for

cases with initial unloading.

The input of reliability analysis parameters in the Materials window is only available if the

Reliability analysis checkbox in the Model window (section 4.1.1) was marked.

Unmark the Use probabilistic defaults checkbox to overrule the default values for the standard

deviation, the stochastic distribution and the correlation between soil parameters in a certain

layer as defined in the Probabilistic Defaults window (section 4.1.2). See section 18.2 for

background on reliability and sensitivity analysis.

Deltares 43 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The Horizontal displacements tab in the Materials window (Figure 4.16) is only available if the

Horizontal displacements checkbox in the Model window (section 4.1.1) was marked. The

calculation of horizontal displacements is based on De Leeuw theory (De Leeuw, 1963). For

background information, see section 18.3.

Layer behaviour The behaviour (Stiff, Elastic or Foundation) of the layer must be spec-

ified. De Leeuw theory assumes an elastic incompressible cluster of

layers based on foundation layer(s) and eventually covered with stiff

layer(s). Therefore, only the system of layers presented in the figure

below is allowed where:

Elastic and foundation layer should be present at least one time;

Stiff layer (if present) should not be positioned below elastic or foun-

dation layer

Other systems will lead to fatal error during calculation.

Elasticity (E) Enter the elastic modulus of the elastic soil layer. Mark the Use de-

fault elasticity option to use the elasticity automatically calculated by

D-S ETTLEMENT according to De Leeuw and Timmermans (based on

the dry unit weight).

44 of 290 Deltares

Input

On the menu bar, click Geometry to display the menu options. These options are explained

in the following sections.

New Wizard (section 4.3.2). Create a new geometry using a wizard.

Import (section 4.3.3). Import a (settled) geometry file in the Deltares exchange format.

Import from database (section 4.3.4). Import a geometry from an MGeobase database.

Export (section 4.3.5). Save a geometry file for exchange with other Deltares Systems

Geo-programs.

Export as Plaxis/Dos (section 4.3.6). Save a geometry file in a different format.

Limits (section 4.3.7). Set the range of the horizontal co-ordinates.

Points (section 4.3.8). Add or manipulate points.

Import PL-line (section 4.3.9). Import piezometric level lines from an existing MPL file.

PL-lines (section 4.3.10). Add or manipulate piezometric level lines.

Phreatic line (section 4.3.11). Define phreatic level lines.

Layers (section 4.3.12). Define or modify layer boundaries and corresponding soil

types.

PL-lines per layer (section 4.3.13). Select the piezometric level line at the bottom and

top of each layer.

Check geometry (section 4.3.14). Check the validity of the geometry.

4.3.1 New

Select this option to display the View Input window (Geometry tab), showing only the geom-

etry limits (with their default values) of the geometry. It is possible to now start modelling the

geometry.

However, it is possible to create a new geometry faster and easier using the Geometry Wizard.

This wizard involves a step-by-step process for creating a geometry.

To use the geometry wizard, open the Geometry menu and choose New Wizard. This option

will guide the user step-by-step through the process of creating a geometry. Using this wiz-

ard significantly reduces time and effort required to enter data. The wizard uses predefined

shapes and soil types. If more flexibility is required, the View Input window (Geometry tab)

can also be used (section 7.3) in a more general way.

Deltares 45 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

In the first screen (Basic Layout) of the New Wizard window, the basic framework of the project

can be entered. The graphic at the top of the window explains the required input. When satisfy

with the input, just click the Next button to display the next input screen.

In the second screen (Top Layer Shape) of the New Wizard window, one of nine default top-

46 of 290 Deltares

Input

layer shapes can be selected. A red frame indicates the selected shape. Click the Previous

button to return to the Basic Layout screen, or the Next button to display the next input screen

with shape-specific input data.

In the third screen (Top Layer Specification) of the New Wizard window, the sizes for the

selected top layer shape can be specified.

Deltares 47 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

In the fourth screen (Material Types) of the New Wizard window, the materials used for the

layers in the project can be specified. The number of layers was defined in the first screen

(Basic Layout). The materials that can be chosen from are predefined and given in Table 4.1.

[kN/m3 ] [kN/m3 ]

Muck 11 11

Peat 12 12

Soft Clay 14 14

Medium Clay 17 17

Stiff Clay 19 19

Loose Sand 17 19

Dense Sand 19 21

Sand 18 20

Gravel 18 20

Loam 20 20

The materials for each layer can be selected individually (using the selection boxes at the

left-hand side of the screen) or one material for each layer can be selected at once (using the

selection box at the top right of the screen). The parameters of each material can also be

reviewed.

48 of 290 Deltares

Input

The last screen (Summary) of the New Wizard window displays an overview of the data

entered in the previous wizard screens. If necessary, click Previous to go back to any screen

and change the data as required. Click Finish to confirm the input and display the geometry

in the View Input Geometry window. In this window, the geometry can be edited or completed

graphically as described in section 7.3. Of course, the Geometry menu options can also be

used for this purpose (section 4.3).

If the input contains errors, the Error Report window opens (when clicking the Finish button)

showing the list of encountered errors and giving for each of them a solution. Click Close to

close the Error Report window and use the Previous button of the New Wizard window to

change the data as required.

4.3.3 Import

This option displays a standard file dialog for selecting an existing geometry stored in a ge-

ometry file, or in an existing input file for D-S ETTLEMENT, D-G EO S TABILITY (formerly known as

MStab), D-G EO P IPELINE (formerly known as MDrill) or MSeep. For a full description of these

programs and how to obtain them, visit www.deltaressystems.com.

When selecting the geometry, it is imported into the current project, replacing the current

geometry. The imported geometry is displayed in the View Input window (Geometry tab). It

is also possible to use this option to analyze the settled geometry at different stages, as all

other input is retained.

Deltares 49 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

This option displays the Select geometry dialog for importing a geometry from an existing

MGeobase database.

Again, the imported geometry will replace the current one and will be displayed in the View

Input window (Geometry tab).

Note: This option is only available when the correct database directory has been speci-

fied using the Locations tab in the Program Options window (see section 3.2.3). For more

information on MGeobase, visit www.deltaressystems.com.

4.3.5 Export

This option displays a standard Save As dialog that enables to choose a directory and a

filename in which to save the current geometry. The file will be saved in the standard geometry

format for the Deltares tools. Files in this format can be used in a multitude of Deltares geo-

programs, such as D-G EO S TABILITY (formerly known as MStab), D-S ETTLEMENT, MSeep and

D-G EO P IPELINE (formerly known as MDrill). For a full description of these programs and how

to obtain them, visit www.deltaressystems.com.

This option displays the Save As Plaxis/DOS dialog that enables to choose a directory and a

filename in which to save the current geometry. The file will be saved using the old DOS-style

geometry format for the Deltares Systems Geo-programs. Files in this format can be used

by the finite element program Plaxis and in old DOS-based versions of Deltares Systems

Geo-programs such as D-G EO S TABILITY (DOS) and MZet (DOS).

Saving files of this type will only succeed, however, if the stringent demands imposed by the

old DOS style are satisfied:

number of layers ≤ 20

number of PL-lines ≤ 20

number of lines per boundary < 50

50 of 290 Deltares

Input

To be able to differentiate between an old DOS-style file and a normal geometry file, the file

dialog that prompts for a new file name for the old DOS-style geometry file provides a default

file name, prefixing the current name with a ‘D’.

4.3.7 Limits

Use this option to edit the geometry limits.

A limit is a vertical boundary defining the ‘end’ at either the left or right side of the geometry.

It is defined by an X co-ordinate only.

Note: A limit is the only type of element that cannot be deleted. The values entered here are

ignored if they resulted in an invalid geometry.

4.3.8 Points

Use this option to add or edit points that can be used as part of layer boundaries or PL-lines.

A point is a basic geometry element defined by its co-ordinates. Since the geometry is re-

stricted to two dimensions, it allows defining an X and Y co-ordinate only.

Note: When a point is to be deleted, D-S ETTLEMENT will check whether the point is used as

part of a PL-line or layer boundary. If so, a message will be displayed.

Deltares 51 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

When Yes is clicked, all layer boundaries and/or PL-lines using the point will also be deleted.

Every change made using this window (Figure 4.24) will only be displayed in the underlying

View Input window (Geometry tab) after closing this window using the OK button. When

this button is clicked, a validity check is performed on the geometry. Any errors encountered

during this check are displayed in a separate window. These errors must be corrected before

you can close this window using the OK button. Of course, it is always possible to close the

window using the Cancel button, but this will discard all changes.

Use this option to display the Import PL-line dialog for importing a Piezometric Level (PL) line

from an existing MPL file. Such file is made using the WATEX program of Deltares: in tab

Head-Location Plot, click on the button “Export...” and fill in a file name in the “Export Water

Pressure Line” window.

4.3.10 PL-lines

Use this option to add or edit Piezometric Level lines (PL-lines) to be used in the geometry.

A PL-line represents the pore pressures in the soil. A project can contain several PL-lines as

different soil layers can have different piezometric levels. In section 4.3.13 it is described how

different PL-lines are assigned to different layers.

In the lower left part of the window, it is possible to use the buttons to Add, Insert and Delete

PL-lines. The selection box can be used to navigate between PL-lines that have already been

defined.Use the table to add/edit the points identifying the PL-lines. It is only possible to select

points that are not attached to layer boundaries (section 4.3.12).

52 of 290 Deltares

Input

Note: It is only possible to manipulate the Point number column – that is, the co-ordinate

columns are purely for informative purposes. To manipulate the co-ordinates of the points,

select the Points option from the Geometry menu (see section 4.3.8).

Every change made using this window will only be displayed in the underlying View Input

window (Geometry tab) after closing this window using the OK button. When clicking this

button, a validity check is performed on the geometry. Any errors encountered during this

check are displayed in a separate window. These errors must be corrected before this window

can be closed using the OK button. Of course, it is always possible to close the window using

the Cancel button, but this will discard all changes.

Use this option to select the PL-line that acts as a phreatic line. The phreatic line (or ground-

water level) is used to mark the border between dry and wet soil.

Select the appropriate line number from the drop-down list and click the OK button. At least

one PL-line must be defined to be able to pick a Phreatic Line here.

4.3.12 Layers

This option enables to add or edit layers to be used in the geometry. A layer is defined by

its boundaries and its material. Use the Boundaries (seen here in Figure 4.28) to define the

boundaries for all layers by choosing the points that identify each boundary.

Deltares 53 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

On the left-hand side of the window, it is possible to add, insert, delete or select a boundary.

In the table on the right, it is possible to modify or add the points that identify the selected

boundary.

Note: It is only possible to select points that are not attached to PL-lines (section 4.3.10).

Note: It is only possible to manipulate the Point number column, because the co-ordinate

columns are purely for informative purposes. To manipulate the co-ordinates of the points,

select the Points option in the Geometry menu (see section 4.3.8).

Note: When inserting or adding a boundary, all points of the previous boundary (if this exists)

are automatically copied. By default, the material of a new layer is set equal to the material of

the existing layer just beneath it.

On the left of the screen, a list containing all defined materials (see the Materials option in

the Soil menu (section 4.2]) is displayed. On the right, a list of all defined layers together with

their assigned materials (if available) is displayed.The layers are listed from top to bottom as

displayed in the View Input window (Geometry tab).

To assign a material to a layer, first select that layer on the right of the window. Then select

the required material on the left of the window. Finally, click the Assign button.

Every change made using this window will only be displayed in the underlying View Input

window (Geometry tab) after this window is closed using the OK button. When clicking this

button, a validity check is performed on the geometry. If errors are encountered, a dialog

window asks if auto-correction should be tried. Remaining errors are reported and can be

corrected manually. The error correction is confirmed by clicking the OK button and discarded

by clicking the Cancel button.

54 of 290 Deltares

Input

Use this option to define the top and bottom PL-lines for the defined layers. The PL-lines

represent the hydrostatic heads at the boundaries of soil layers. For each soil layer, two PL-

line number can be entered – one that corresponds to the top of the soil layer, and one that

corresponds to the bottom. Therefore, different PL-lines can be defined for the top and the

bottom of each soil layer. To do this, select the appropriate PL-line at top / PL-line at bottom

field and enter the appropriate number. D-S ETTLEMENT has reserved two numbers for special

cases: 0 and 99.

The PL-lines represent the pore pressure in a soil layer. For every soil layer (except the bottom

layer), two PL-line numbers can be entered – one that corresponds to the top of the soil layer,

and one that corresponds to the bottom. For the bottom soil layer, no second PL-line number

is required. For this layer a hydrostatic increase of the pore pressure is automatically assumed

from the pore pressure at the top of the layer downwards.

0 < N < 99 The number corresponds to one of the PL-lines defined during the geom-

etry input. Capillary water pressures are not used – that is, if a negative

water pressure is calculated for a point above the phreatic line, the water

pressure in that point is defined as 0.

N=0 Each point within the layer has a water pressure equal to 0 (Define 0 for

PL-line at top of layer).

N = 99 It is possible to have a number of overlying soil layers with a non-hydrostatic

pore pressure (for example, a number of layers consisting of cohesive soil).

In this case, a large number of PL-lines would have to be calculated, one or

two for each layer. To avoid this, Deltares Geo-software is able to interpolate

across layer boundaries. For layers with a non-hydrostatic pore pressure,

99 can be entered as the PL-line number. For this layer, the interpolation

will take place between the PL-line belonging to the first soil layer above

with a real PL-line number, and the PL-line belonging to the first soil layer

below with a real PL-line number. The first and the last soil layer must

therefore always have a real PL number.

NOTE: A real PL-line number is not equal to 99.

When clicking the OK button, a validity check is performed on the geometry. Any errors

encountered during this check are reported. A dialog window enables to disregard or correct

Deltares 55 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

the errors. The error correction is confirmed by clicking the OK button and discarded by

clicking the Cancel button.

Select this option to verify the validity of the geometry. All requirements are checked. If the

geometry complies with all the requirements, a message will confirm this.

If any errors are encountered during this check, they are displayed in a separate window.

On the menu bar, click GeoObjects to display a menu containing:

Vertical drains (section 4.4.2)

4.4.1 Verticals

In the Verticals input window, the (horizontal) X co-ordinate for each vertical must be defined

or generated. D-S ETTLEMENT will calculate settlements along each of these verticals. At least

one vertical is necessary to make a calculation. The position of the (out-of-plane) Z co-

ordinate is only relevant for circular or rectangular loads. It is possible to get D-S ETTLEMENT

to automatically generate verticals in all nodes of the geometry and non-uniform loads. At

these points, verticals are required to view the settled geometry after calculation or to write

the settled geometry to a file. In addition, it is possible to generate a range of verticals with an

interval.

56 of 290 Deltares

Input

will be calculated.

Z co-ordinate Defines the place in geometry in z direction where the settlement will

be calculated. This is only relevant for circular or rectangular loads.

The z co-ordinate is equal for all verticals.

Discretisation (Only available for Darcy consolidation model, see section 4.1.1).

The total number of elements per layer (section 15.3.4).

Automatic gen- Use the toggle buttons to specify whether D-S ETTLEMENT must gen-

eration of X co- erate verticals in every geometry node or with an interval.

ordinates

First The start of the range for which verticals must be generated.

Last The end of the range for which verticals must be generated.

Interval The distance between two generated verticals.

Click on the Generate button to execute the automatic generation of

verticals.

The Vertical Drains window is only available if the corresponding option has been marked in

the Model window (section 4.1.1).

At the top left of the input window, select a strip, column or sand wall drain type (Figure 4.33).

D-S ETTLEMENT extends the one-dimensional solution of the pore pressure distribution with a

so-called leakage term. Enforced consolidation by dewatering (BeauDrain, IFCO method,

PTD) or vacuum consolidation can also be modeled. For background, see section 15.4.

Figure 4.34: Vertical Drains window, Strip and Column drains (Positioning input)

Deltares 57 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Horizontal Range Enter the left (From) and right (To) limits of the drained area. This

area is represented by a blue arrow in the View Input window (Input

tab) (section 2.2.3).

Bottom position The (vertical) Y co-ordinate of the bottom end of the vertical drain.

The Bottom Position is represented by a blue arrow in the View Input

window (Input tab) (section 2.2.3).

Center to center The actual spacing between the drains.

distance

Diameter The diameter of the Column drain.

Width The actual width of the Strip drain.

Thickness The actual thickness of the Strip drain.

Grid In the drop down menu, select the geometry of grid: Undetermined,

Rectangular or Triangular.

Figure 4.35: Vertical Drains window, Strip and Column drains (Drainage Schedule input)

Start of drainage The time t at which the drain becomes active. D-S ETTLEMENT as-

sumes that the water head in the drain equals the phreatic level (sec-

tion 4.3.11).

Phreatic level in The water head in the drain during drainage.

drain

Start of drainage The time at which the drain becomes active.

Begin time The time at which dewatering (i.e. a certain water level and air pres-

sure) starts.

End time The time at which dewatering stops. Before and after enforced de-

watering, D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that the water head in the drain

equals the phreatic level (section 4.3.11).

Underpressure The enforced underpressure pair during dewatering. Usual values for

enforced dewatering methods vary between 35 and 50 kPa (CUR).

58 of 290 Deltares

Input

Water head during The vertical level where the negative pore pressure equals the en-

dewatering forced underpressure during dewatering. In case of enforced dewa-

tering on top, this level is equal to the top level of the drain. In case

of vacuum consolidation, the level is equal to the impermeable cover

of the drainage layer, measured at the location where the underpres-

sure is applied.

NOTE: The input value is the position where the water pressure

equals the applied underpressure, and therefore not the position

where the water level equals the atmospheric pressure.

Start of drainage The time t at which the drain becomes active. D-S ETTLEMENT as-

sumes that the water head in the drain equals the phreatic level (sec-

tion 4.3.11).

Phreatic level in The water head in the drain during drainage.

drain

Time The time at which dewatering (i.e. a certain water level and air pres-

sure) is active.

Underpressure This value is zero for vertical drains without enforced underpressure.

In case of enforced dewatering or vacuum consolidation on top, it rep-

resents the enforced underpressure pair at time t. Usual values for

enforced dewatering methods vary between 35 and 50 kPa (CUR).

Water head The vertical level where the negative pore pressure equals the en-

forced underpressure during dewatering. In case of enforced dewa-

tering on top, the level is equal to the top level of the drain. In case

of vacuum consolidation, the level is equal to the impermeable cover

of the drainage layer, measured at the location where the underpres-

sure is applied.

Deltares 59 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Horizontal Range Enter the left (From) and right (To) limits of the drained area. This

area is represented by a blue arrow in the View Input window (Input

tab) (section 2.2.3).

Bottom position The vertical co-ordinate of the bottom end of the granular wall.

Center to center The centre to centre distance between the granular walls.

distance

Width The width of the granular wall.

Position of the Only for enforced dewatering: The vertical co-ordinate of the

drain pipe drainage tube at the bottom of the vertical drain zpipe .

Figure 4.37: Vertical Drains window, Sand wall (Drainage Schedule input)

Start of drainage The time t at which the drain becomes active.

Phreatic level in The water head in the drain during drainage.

drain

60 of 290 Deltares

Input

Start of drainage The time at which the drain becomes active.

Phreatic level in The water head in the drain during drainage.

drain

Begin time The time at which dewatering (i.e. a certain tube pressure and air

pressure) starts.

End time The time at which dewatering stops. Before and after enforced de-

watering, D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that the water head in the drain

equals the phreatic level (section 4.3.11).

Underpressure The enforced underpressure pair during dewatering. This value can

vary between 0 and 30 kPa, if an impermeable cover is applied on

top (CUR).

Tube pressure The water pressure ppipe in the drainage tube during dewatering. A

during dewatering common input value during enforced dewatering is 10 kPa (CUR).

Time The time at which dewatering (i.e. a certain water level and air pres-

sure) is active.

Underpressure The enforced underpressure pair at time t. This value can vary be-

tween 0 and 30 kPa, if an impermeable cover is applied on top (CUR).

Tube pressure The water pressure ppipe in the drainage tube at time t. A common

input value during enforced dewatering is 10 kPa (CUR). Without en-

forced dewatering, you must determine this pressure from the as-

sumed position of the free phreatic level in the granular wall.

On the menu bar, click Water and choose Properties to open the Water Properties window

(section 4.5.1).

Deltares 61 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

In this window, the unit weight of water can be specified.

On the menu bar, click Loads to display the following menu options:

Water Loads (section 4.6.2), to input hydraulic pore pressure changes excluding the

excess component;

Other Loads (section 4.6.3), to input loads with:

trapeziform cross-section

circular base

rectangular base

uniform cross-section

tank

Choose the Non-Uniform Loads option in the Loads menu to open an input window in which

non-uniform loads can be defined. Use the panel on the left to add loads and enter the

required parameters for each load. D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that a non-uniform load is caused

by soil self weight. Therefore, the top surface of that load must be defined. The sequence of

loading also must be defined. D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that the base of a non-uniform load

is equal to the top surface of the previous non-uniform load, in case of load increase. See

section 13.1 for background information, and see section 5.1 for related important options,

such as maintain profile, load submerging and stress distribution in loads.

62 of 290 Deltares

Input

Initial load Enable this box if the load affects only the initial stresses and if the

load does not cause any creep or consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT sets

the time of application at -1.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. The time must

correspond to the sequence of loading. For initial loads, the time is

set to -1.

Sequence of load- The sequence of loading must match the time at which the loads will

ing be applied. To change the sequence of loading, change the order of

the loads in the list by moving them up or down.

End time The time at which a temporary load is removed.

Total unit weight The unit weight of the unsaturated soil above the phreatic line. Use

above the phreatic negative values in case of unloading.

level

Total unit weight The unit weight of the saturated soil below the phreatic line. Use

below the phreatic negative values in case of unloading.

level

X co-ordinate X co-ordinate (horizontal) of points that define the surface of the load.

The X co-ordinates must be ascending. The first and last co-ordinate

must be located on the surface of the last defined load.

Y co-ordinate Y co-ordinate (vertical) of points that define the surface of the load.

The first and last co-ordinate must be located on the surface of the

last defined load.

The Input from Database button allows connecting material properties from a soil type to a

load. This button can only be clicked if a location of an MGeobase database was specified

in the Program Options window (section 3.2.3). D-S ETTLEMENT will derive the saturated and

unsaturated unit weight from the selected soil type. D-S ETTLEMENT will also derive the strength

properties from the database, when writing a D-G EO S TABILITY input file for a stability analysis

(section 6.10).

Deltares 63 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

After selecting a material from the database, D-S ETTLEMENT changes the name of the selected

uniform load into the material name. If a uniform load with this name already exists, the

name is extended with a number between parentheses (see example of Figure 4.39 where

the material Sand, clean, stiff was selected twice).The uniform load can be renamed after

importing it from the database. However, if done, D-G EO S TABILITY will not recognize the

material from an input file that was generated by D-S ETTLEMENT.

Click the Generate button to generate stepwise loading from input of the final surface position

and the position of the top at the end of each load step. The final surface position is inputted

in the Envelope Points tab and the vertical levels of the top of each intermediate load steps

are inputted in the Top of loads steps tab (see Figure 4.41).

X co-ordinate X co-ordinate (horizontal) of points that define the final load surface.

The X co-ordinates must be ascending. The first and last co-ordinate

must be located either on the initial ground surface, or on the surface

of the last defined load.

Y co-ordinate Y co-ordinate (vertical) of points that define the surface of the load.

The first and last co-ordinate must be located on either on the initial

ground surface, or on the surface of the last defined load.

64 of 290 Deltares

Input

Top of load steps The vertical levels of the top of the added soil, during subsequent

load steps.

Choose the Water Loads option in the Loads menu to open an input window in which changes

in pore pressure during time can be defined. Use the panel on the left to add water loads,

and select the active PL-lines at top and bottom of each layer. For background information on

the PL-lines, see section 15.1.1. D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that the initial PL-lines are defined

during geometry creation (section 4.3.10, section 4.3.11, section 4.3.13).

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. During one time

interval, only one water load can be specified.

Phreatic line In this field, select which PL-line will function as the phreatic line.

The phreatic line (or groundwater level) marks the border between

dry and wet soil.

NOTE: This new phreatic line will apply only on the materials, not on

the Non-Uniform Loads.

Layer D-S ETTLEMENT automatically enters the names of the layers.

PL-line at top The PL-line that corresponds with the top of the layer (see sec-

tion 4.3.10). Use number 99 to get D-S ETTLEMENT to perform an inter-

polation between adjacent layers, and use number 0 for unsaturated

soil.

PL-line at bottom The PL-line that corresponds with the bottom of the layer.

Deltares 65 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Choose the Other Loads option in the Loads menu to open an input window in which prede-

fined shapes of soil loads can be selected. Use the panel on the left to add loads, and enter

the required parameters for each load. The following shapes are available:

trapeziform cross-section;

circular base;

rectangular base;

uniform cross-section;

tank.

Trapeziform Loads

D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that trapeziform loads are caused by soil self weight. See sec-

tion 13.2 for background information.

Initial load Enable this box if the load affects only the initial stresses and if the

load should not cause any creep or consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT

sets the time of application at -1.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. For initial loads,

the time is set to -1.

Unit weight The weight of the load per m3 . For unloading, a negative value can

be entered. Zero is not allowed.

Height Height of the load. For an inverted trapezium, enter a negative

height.

xl Length of the left part of the load.

xm Length of the middle part of the load.

xr Length of the right part of the load. The total length of the (three)

parts must be greater than zero.

Xp X co-ordinate of the starting point (left side) of the load.

Yp Y co-ordinate of the starting point (left side) of the load.

66 of 290 Deltares

Input

Circular Loads

Loads with circular base may act on or in the geometry. See section 13.3 for background

information.

Initial load Enable this box if the load affects only the initial stresses and if the

load should not cause any creep or consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT

sets the time of application at -1.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. For initial loads,

the time is set to -1.

Magnitude The magnitude of the load. For unloading, a negative value can be

entered. Zero is not allowed.

Contact shape fac- The shape factor α is used to specify the shape of the contact pres-

tor sure. If α = 1, the contact pressure is constant (represents flexible

footing). If α = 0, a parabolic distribution is used with 0 kN/m2 in the

centre, and twice the magnitude at the edge (represents rigid foot-

ing). For more information, refer to Equation 13.1.

Xcp X co-ordinate of the middle point of the circle.

Ycp Y co-ordinate of the middle point of the circle.

Zcp Z co-ordinate of the middle point of the circle.

Radius The radius of the circle.

Deltares 67 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Rectangular Loads

loads with rectangular base may act on or in the geometry. See section 13.4 for background

information.

Initial load Enable this box if the load affects only the initial stresses and if the

load should not cause any creep or consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT

sets the time of application at -1.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. For initial loads,

time is set to -1.

Magnitude The magnitude of the load. For unloading, a negative value can be

entered. Zero is not allowed.

Contact shape fac- The shape factor α is used to specify the shape of the contact pres-

tor sure. If α = 1, the contact pressure is constant (represents flexible

footing). If α = 0, a parabolic distribution is used with 0 kN/m2 in the

centre, and three times the magnitude at the edge (represents rigid

footing).

Xcp X co-ordinate of the middle point of the rectangle.

Ycp Y co-ordinate of the middle point of the rectangle.

Zcp Z co-ordinate of the middle point of the rectangle.

xwidth The dimension of the rectangle in x direction. It must be greater than

zero.

zwidth The dimension of the rectangle in z direction. It must be greater than

zero.

68 of 290 Deltares

Input

Uniform Loads

D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that uniform loads are caused by soil self weight. See section 13.5

for background information. The input can be done manually or by automatic generation from

measured surface positions.

Initial load Enable this box if the load affects only the initial stresses and if the

load should not cause any creep or consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT

sets the time of application at -1.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. For initial loads,

the time is set to -1.

Unit weight The weight of the load per m3 . For unloading, a negative value can

be entered. Zero is not allowed.

Height (H) Height of the load, relative to Yapplication .

Yapplication Y co-ordinate of the level of application.

Storage tank with circular base can be inputted in D-S ETTLEMENT.

Deltares 69 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Initial load Enable this box if the load affects only the initial stresses and if the

load should not cause any creep or consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT

sets the time of application at -1.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied. For initial loads,

the time is set to -1.

Wall load The magnitude of the load induced by the weight of the material in

which the tank is made.

Contact shape fac- The shape factor α is used to specify the shape of the contact pres-

tor sure. If α = 1, the contact pressure is constant (represents flexible

footing). If α = 0, a parabolic distribution is used with 0 kN/m2 in the

centre, and twice the magnitude at the edge (represents rigid foot-

ing).

Xcp X co-ordinate of the middle point of the circle.

Ycp Y co-ordinate of the middle point of the circle.

Zcp Z co-ordinate of the middle point of the circle.

Internal Radius The internal radius of the tank.

Wall Thickness The wall thickness of the tank.

Internal load The magnitude of the load induced by the weight of the material

stored in the tank.

Click the Generate button uniform to generate uniform loads from imported (SLM or GEF file)

or manually specified surface positions. See Figure 4.48.

70 of 290 Deltares

Input

Start Yapplication Vertical co-ordinate of the level of application of the first load.

Browse Select a file with measured surface positions (GEF or SLM) to gen-

erate the loading table automatically.

Time The number of days before the load will be applied.

Top New surface position.

Unit weight The weight of the load per m3 .

Deltares 71 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

72 of 290 Deltares

5 Calculations

On the menu bar, click Calculation to display the following menu options:

Times (section 5.2) to define time points for tabular output of remaining settlements.

Fit for Settlement Plate (section 5.3), to perform a fit on measured settlements.

Start (section 5.4), to start a regular or a reliability analysis.

Batch Calculation (section 10.5), successive calculations for different input files.

In this window, a wide range of specific calculation options can be modified depending on the

geometry dimension and the calculation model:

Input fields for 2D geometry (section 5.1.2).

If a 1D dimension option was selected in the Model window (section 5.1.2), the Calculation

Options window contained only few input fields which depend on the calculation model.

Dispersion condi- (This parameter is required only for Terzaghi consolidation model).

tions layer bound- Use this option to influence the drainage length of the soil layers.

aries Drainage can be introduced by selecting a drained bottom or top

layer boundary. The selected drainage method will be summarised in

the tabular report. For background information on Terzaghi drainage

conditions, see section 15.2.3.

Stress distribution Distribution of the stresses in the underground can be calculated ac-

Soil cording to Buisman or Boussinesq. Boussinesq can be applied only

for the trapeziform and non-uniform loads. For other kind of loads,

Buisman will be used. For background information, see section 14.1.

End of settlement Enter the number of days after which the transient settlement is ex-

calculation pected to have ended.

NOTE: Consolidation is only included in the time-settlement curves

and not in the individually reported final settlements.

Deltares 73 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Creep rate The value of the reference time τ 0 for the creep part. In practice, this

reference time value can be interpreted as the ratio between 1 day and the unit of

time in the calculation. This means that a large value should be used

when simulating short term settlements, with time steps smaller than

1 day, like in oedometer tests.

NOTE: A value other than 1 day requires consistent input of all other

time-dependent values (section 17.1.2).

Preconsolidation This parameter is required only for the NEN-Koppejan model.

pressure within a Choose between a Constant and a Variable preconsolidation pres-

layer sure in the layers.

When variable (default), the input value is applied to the middle of

the layer. Within the layer, the gradient of the preconsolidation pres-

sure is equal to the gradient of the initial vertical effective stress. In

this case, the Pre Overburden Pressure equals the difference be-

tween the preconsolidation pressure and the vertical effective stress

at middle of the layer (section 17.2).

There are two additional options available for updating the precon-

solidation stress:

Correction at every time step (default). Adjustments will be per-

formed after each load step. Terzaghi assumes that excess pore

pressures are dissipated before a new load step starts. This is cer-

tainly not the case for small time increments between load steps.

Correction at time=0 [days]. All preconsolidation stresses are ad-

justed to the maximum of the initial value or the corresponding effec-

tive stress.

Output of settle- Enable this checkbox to get D-S ETTLEMENT to plot green lines in the

ments Time-History window (at the surface level) in case of multiple load

steps. These green lines indicate the predicted settlement that would

occur if no further load steps were applied.

74 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

See section 5.1.1 for a description of the general input fields that are shared with a 1D geom-

etry. 2D Geometry

Stress distribution When this option is chosen, D-S ETTLEMENT will incorporate the ef-

in loads fect of stress distribution inside non-uniform loads. D-S ETTLEMENT

will divide the load in columns (see the Load column width option

described below) and then divide each column into pieces with a

height of approximately one meter.

Maintain profile Enable this checkbox to get D-S ETTLEMENT to add a special su-

perelevation load. This load will keep the top surface at the de-

fined level during deformation analysis. See section 13.6 for back-

ground information.

Material name This is the name of the special superelevation load that is added

to the geometry using the Add Superelevation option in the Write

Settled Geometry window. This option can be accessed through

the Results menu.

Time Enter the number of days before the superelevation load will be

applied. The superelevation load has to be applied as a last load

step. If the pointer is located at the input field, a hint will indicate

the current last load step.

Total unit weight The unit weight of the unsaturated superelevation load above the

above phreatic level water level.

Total unit weight The unit weight of the saturated superelevation load below the

below phreatic level water level.

Deltares 75 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Imaginary surface When this checkbox is enabled, a so-called imaginary surface can

be defined to model the stress distribution in the case of an initially

non-horizontal surface. D-S ETTLEMENT will calculate the spatial

stress distribution in the layers below this surface, caused by the

weight of the initial layers above the surface. When you do this,

you must also select the layer whose top acts as the imaginary

surface. For background information, see section 14.5.

Submerging Enable this checkbox to take submerging of non-uniform soil

weight loads (section 4.6.1) into account in your calculations. The

option is switched on by default. D-S ETTLEMENT takes submerging

into account approximately, by a once-off modification of the self

weight of non-uniform loads, based on the final settlements. See

section 13.7.1 for background information. With Darcy in combi-

nation with the NEN-Bjerrum or Isotache model, D-S ETTLEMENT

will gradually adapt the effective weight of layers and non-uniform

loads in time, as function of the actual settlement. See sec-

tion 13.7.2 for background information.

Load column width D-S ETTLEMENT can subdivide trapeziform loads or non-uniform

loads into columns (section 14.2). The default value for the width

of these columns is one meter, but it is possible to change these

defaults. A small width will increase the accuracy, while a large

width will increase the calculation speed.

Iteration stop criteria – The Maintain Profile iteration will stop when the difference in the

Maintain Profile calculated final settlements between two iterations becomes less

than the specified value.

Iteration stop criteria – The Submerging iteration will stop when the difference in settle-

Submerging ments between the iterations becomes less than the specified

value.With Terzaghi or NEN-Koppejan (i.e. approximate submerg-

ing model), iteration is performed on the final settlements.With

Darcy in combination with the NEN-Bjerrum or Isotache model

(i.e. accurate submerging model), iterations may occur within time

steps, in case of large increments.

Minimum settlement When submerging is used, the increment of the settlement is yet

for submerging unknown. An estimate of the settlement is made by means of an

iterative procedure. The iteration is stopped if the settlement is

less than the given value.

Maximum iteration Only for Darcy in combination with the NEN-Bjerrum or Isotache

steps for submerging model (i.e. accurate submerging model): the maximum number

of submerging iterations within a step. A value of 1 means no

iterative correction per step. The iteration is stopped after this

fixed number of iterations.

76 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

The Calculation Times window allows input of time points at which D-S ETTLEMENT will calculate

tabular output of total and residual settlements and graphical output of residual settlement.

See section 6.2.5.

The Fit for settlement plate option in the Calculation menu is available only if it has been se-

lected previously in the Model window (section 4.1.1).Choose this option to improve the match

between predicted and measured settlements, by manual or automatic scaling of soil proper-

ties. A close fit will improve the continued prediction of final and residual settlements. Usage

is only possible after full input of geometry (section 4.3, section 4.4), material properties (sec-

tion 4.2), loading (section 4.6) and calculation options (section 5.1). Fit for D-S ETTLEMENT per-

forms the automatic fit by means of an iterative weighted least squares procedure, which min-

imizes both the difference between measurement and prediction, and the difference between

the original and the adapted value of the parameters. During each iteration, D-S ETTLEMENT

linearises the influence of parameter modifications, by first determining the settlement varia-

tions caused by very small parameter changes. See section 18.1 for background.The Fit for

Settlement plate window contains two tabs:

The Measurements tab, for definition of the measured settlements (section 5.3.1)

The Materials tab, for execution of the fit of the prediction on measurements (sec-

tion 5.3.2)

The Measurements tab of the Fit for Settlement Plate input window enables the selection of

the file with measured settlements and the optional input of a shift in the time or the settlement.

Deltares 77 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Vertical Select the vertical where the settlement plate was measured.

Selection of the file containing pairs of time and measured settle-

ment. You can use the self describing Geotechnical Exchange for-

mat (GEF)GEF file, the tab delimited format (TXT), or the comma (;)

delimited format (CSV). D-S ETTLEMENT will neglect all lines in the de-

limited format files before the first line with numbers. D-S ETTLEMENT

also supports the old SLM file format, for compatibility reasons.

Clear measurement data.

Start date Optional input of the start date (not for GEF).

Start time Optional input of the start time (not for GEF).

Shift Apply a shift to the time and/or the settlement. Select the Show

measurements shifted time in table and the Show shifted settlement in table in order

to show the shifted values that D-S ETTLEMENT will use.

Date The date of measurement. Not used by D-S ETTLEMENT.

Time The original time of measurement, relative to the start date and start

time.

Shifted time The shifted time of measurement, as used by D-S ETTLEMENT.

Settlement The original measured settlement.

Shifted settlement The shifted measured settlements, as used by D-S ETTLEMENT.

Weight An influencing factor for automatic fitting. You can use large values

for certain parts of the curve (for example the creep tail) to ensure

that this part is fitted most closely.

78 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

The Materials tab of the Fit for Settlement Plate window enables the execution of a fit of the

prediction on the measured settlements, at a certain position in a certain vertical.

Plate positioned on Select the layer which top defines the vertical location of the settle-

top of ment plate. By default the top layer is selected.

Selection of m Select the soil types for which you allow scaling of soil parameters.

aterial By default all layers are selected.

Fit factors Select the parameters for which you allow scaling by hand or by au-

tomatic fitting. By default all scaling parameters are selected.

NOTE: The scaling factors for un/reloading and secondary compres-

sion are not applied to the parameters themselves, but to the ratio

of that parameter with the parameter for primary virgin compression

(b, CR, 1/Cp ’). Increasing the parameters for primary virgin com-

pression will therefore yield more settlement in all parts of the curve.

Increasing the two ratios will yield a separate increase in respec-

tively the primary settlement during un/reloading and the secondary

(creep) settlement.

Increasing the preconsolidation stress (POP, OCR) will reduce the

settlements at low loading levels. Increasing the permeabilities or

consolidation coefficients will speed up the settlement process, by

reducing the consolidation period.

Deltares 79 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Click this button to change the default stop criteria for the iteration

process during automatic fitting (Figure 5.6). Besides the maximum

number of iterations, you can also define the target value for the co-

efficient of determination. Finally you can specify the minimally re-

quired improvement of this coefficient during a single iteration (itera-

tion accuracy).

Click this button to perform automatic fitting by iterations. If the match

after a single fit is not yet satisfactory, you can click the button again

for continued iterations. A progress window indicates the goodness

of fit during the iteration process (Figure 5.7). This information is also

displayed in the main window.

Current In case of fitting by hand: enter the scaling factors.

In case of automatic fitting: the calculated scaling factors of the last

iteration will be displayed.

Previous The scaling factors at the start of the last fit.

Weight An influencing factor for automatic fitting. A low value means that the

corresponding scaling factor can change easily during the iteration

process. Use a high value when the initial parameter values or ra-

tios are considered reliable and a low value when these values are

considered uncertain. The default values are usually sufficient.

Click this button to reset all weights to their defaults.

Show the graph and data of the fit that is based on the Current factor

values. See Figure 5.8. Afterwards, this graph is also available from

the Result menu (Figure 5.9). See also the Note at the end of this

paragraph.

Coefficient of The correlation factor for the last fit. A value close to 1 indicates a

determination good match between measurement and prediction.

Imperfection An average value for the differences between all measurements and

predictions, in meter. A value close to 0 indicates a good match

between measurement and prediction.

Ratio primary– The ratio between the primary settlement and the secondary settle-

secondary ment (due to creep).

settlement

80 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

Note: Right click in the Time-History graph and select the View Data option to view all chart

data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

After a fit, the Results menu will show all the available results for the selected vertical, using

the scaled parameters (Figure 5.9).

Note: To apply the scaled parameters to all verticals and to generate other types of calcula-

tion results, select the Use fit parameters option in the Start Calculation window (section 5.4).

Note: The Fit for Settlement Plate option does not work in combination with Submerging for

Deltares 81 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

the non-accurate submerging method (i.e. Terzaghi or/and NEN-Koppejan). When a plate fit

is performed, the submerging option is not taken into account. When a normal calculation

is done using fit parameters in combination with the submerge option, the results differ from

those shown when clicking the Show Current button (??). This is only for the none-accurate

submerging method. For the accurate method (i.e Darcy+Isotache and Darcy+Bjerrum), sub-

merging is taken into account during the Fit calculation.

To start the actual calculation, choose the Start option in the Calculation menu.

The Options button allows to chose the calculation options (if not already

done) by opening the Calculation Options window (section 5.1).

When the calculation is started, D-S ETTLEMENT will first check if the input

contains any (fatal) errors. If the input contains errors, they are reported in

the Error Messages window (section 5.4.3) and they must be corrected. If

the input contains no errors, the calculation will start.

D-S ETTLEMENT can also generate (non-fatal) warning messages if the in-

put is unrealistic or can be improved. Choose either to Close the Start

Calculation window without performing a calculation and change the input

according to the warning messages or to Continue the calculation without

taking into account the warning messages. In this case, the warning mes-

sages will be also printed in the Report (section 6.2.7). Unmark the Halt on

Warnings checkbox in the Program Options window (section 3.2.2), in case

you want D-S ETTLEMENT to proceed after warnings without pausing.

The screen displays a progress overview. The calculation can be aborted

by clicking the Abort button. Therefore, no results in the Results menu will

be available.

a reliability and sensitivity analysis (section 5.4.2).

82 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

Use fit Select this option to use the previously determined scaling factors from

parameters a settlement plate fit for the settlement prediction along all verticals (sec-

tion 5.3).

NOTE: The selected Vertical must be the same as the vertical used in the

Fit for Settlement Plate window (section 5.3) otherwise the calculation will

be a regular calculation without scaling factors. Moreover, the Show Cur-

rent in the Fit for Settlement Plate window (section 5.3) puts the scaling

factors only on the materials that are selected, while the regular calcula-

tion with option Use fit parameters selected puts the scaling factors on all

materials. Therefore results can differ when comparing both calculations.

Add Perform a dissipation calculation for a unit load along a selected vertical,

dissipation before starting the actual calculation. D-S ETTLEMENT will use the results of

calculation this calculation for the dissipation graph (section 6.4), and for the export of

a D-G EO S TABILITY file (section 6.10).

The selection list shows all available verticals by number and by horizontal

co-ordinate.

The Start Calculation window contains special options for reliability and sensitivity analysis,

when the Reliability option in the Model window is selected (section 4.1.1).

Deltares 83 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 5.11: Start Calculation window for a reliability and sensitivity analysis

See section 5.4.1 for a description of the options that are shared with a regular (deterministic)

analysis. The description of the additional options for a reliability and sensitivity analysis

follows hereafter. See section 18.2 for background information.

84 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

- Deterministic: a regular deterministic settlement analysis along all

verticals, based on fixed mean values of the parameters.

- FOSM (First Order Second Moment): Quick and approximate de-

termination of the bandwidth and the influencing factors (parameter

sensitivity) for the total settlements along one vertical. The determi-

nation is executed at user defined time points and at the time points

of measurements. Calculation time will increase with an increasing

number of stochastic parameters.

- FORM (First Order Reliability Method). Iterative determination of

the reliability index, bandwidth and influencing factors for the resid-

ual settlement along one vertical. A separate FORM analysis is per-

formed for each residual settlement that starts from each different

user defined time point. Calculation time will increase with an in-

creasing number of stochastic parameters, user defined time points

and iterations. Furthermore, the FORM method is only conditionally

stable.

- Monte Carlo (recommended). Determination of the bandwidth for

the total settlements along one vertical, and also of the reliability in-

dex and bandwidth for the residual settlements, by repetitive execu-

tion of settlement analyses (sampling). Each sample is executed with

random parameter values, derived from the stochastic distributions.

Calculation time will increase with the number of samples. Accurate

Monte Carlo analysis requires a large number of samples, if many

stochastic parameters are involved.

Use fit parameters Select this option to:

Use the previously determined scaling factors from a settlement plate

fit for the settlement analysis in all verticals (section 5.3) to determine

updated mean values of the settlement. Automatically introduce cor-

relations between the different stochastic parameters via Bayesian

updating, based on the influence of the parameters on the predicted

settlement at the times of measurement, and based on the input

value of the imperfection. The updated correlations will usually yield

a reduction of the calculated bandwidth in the total and residual set-

tlements.

Vertical Select the vertical for the reliability analysis.

Allowed residual For FORM and Monte Carlo methods, the allowed residual settle-

settlement ment represented in the Residual Settlements (Reliability) window

(section 6.13).

Imperfection In case the Use Fit option is selected, this value represents the com-

bined inaccuracy in the measurements and in the prediction model.

A larger value implies less influence of the measurements on the

Bayesian update of the correlations between uncertain parameters.

Maximum number The number of samples that the Monte Carlo method will use.

of samples

Maximum number The maximum number of iterations for the FORM method.

of iterations

width and the influencing factors for the total settlement at the times

of measurement.

Deltares 85 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

If errors are found in the input, no calculation can be performed and D-S ETTLEMENT opens

the Error Messages window displaying more details about the error(s). Those errors must be

corrected before performing a new calculation. To keep the messages, they must be printed

because they will be overwritten the next time a calculation is started.

Warnings and fatal errors might be displayed in the messages pane (Figure 5.13) at the bottom

of the Start Calculation window (section 5.4), after clicking the Start button. These messages

are also available in the report. The calculation will be paused or stopped. Fatal errors need

to be corrected before the analysis can be executed. Warnings can be discarded, by clicking

Continue. A pause after warnings can be prevented, by unselecting the Halt on Warnings

checkbox in the Program Options window (section 3.2.2).

D-S ETTLEMENT offers the possibility to perform calculations in batch which means successive

calculations for different input files. This can be useful for time consuming calculations (prob-

abilistic calculations for example). To do so, D-S ETTLEMENT program must be started from the

Run window by specifying its location followed by ‘/b’, as shown in Figure 5.14.

Then the Start Batch Calculation window opens where the location of the files must be speci-

fied (Figure 5.15).

86 of 290 Deltares

Calculations

D-S ETTLEMENT will run the specified files successively. The calculation progress can be viewed

at the top of the D-S ETTLEMENT Calculation window (Figure 5.16).

Deltares 87 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

88 of 290 Deltares

6 View Results

On the menu bar, click Results to display the following menu options:

Report Selection (section 6.1) , to select the content of the tabular report.

Report (section 6.2), to view a tabular report with selected content.

Stresses in Geometry (section 6.3), to graphically view the initial or final stress per

vertical.

Dissipations (section 6.4), to view the degree of consolidation per layer as a function of

time.

Time-History Curves for Terzaghi (section 6.5.1) or Darcy (section 6.5.2) to view graphs

of data versus time per vertical.

Depth-History Curves for Terzaghi (section 6.6.1) or Darcy (section 6.6.2) to view graphs

of data along verticals.

Residual Settlement (section 6.7) to view a graph of the residual settlement starting

from different time points.

Settled Geometry (section 6.8), to graphically view the settled geometry within the orig-

inal geometry.

Write Settled Geometry (section 6.9), to write the settled geometry to a new geometry

file.

Write D-G EO S TABILITY Input (section 6.10), to write a D-G EO S TABILITY input with de-

grees of consolidation and with settled geometry.

A special Fit for Settlement Plate analysis or Reliability analysis will yield the applicable

results for just one vertical.

Finally, the following special results are available after a reliability analysis:

Time-History (Reliability) (section 6.11), to view the total settlements together with the

bandwidth, for the FOSM and the Monte Carlo method.

Influencing factors(Reliability) (section 6.12), to view the relative sensitivity of the total

settlements (FOSM method) or the residual settlements (FORM method) to variations

of uncertain parameters.

Residual Settlement (Reliability) (section 6.13), to view the residual settlement with

bandwidth and reliability index, for the FORM and the Monte Carlo method.

On the menu bar, click Results and then choose Report Selection to open the Report Selec-

tion window (Figure 6.1) where the report content can be selected.

Deltares 89 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

6.2 Report

On the menu bar, click Results and then choose Report to view a window displaying a table

of the most recent analysis results.

Click the Print button to print the report or use the Export Report option from the File

menu, in order to export the report in RTF, PDF, or HTML format.

The content depends on the report selection (section 6.1). It can consist of:

General section.

Program name and version, update, company name, license and copy number.

Title of the problem.

Names of the files used.

Echo of the input.

Stresses per vertical for Terzaghi model (section 6.2.1) in the case of a long report.

Settlements per vertical for the Terzaghi model (section 6.2.2) in the case of a long

report.

Stresses and settlements per vertical for the Darcy model (section 6.2.3) in the case of

a long report.

Settlements (section 6.2.4) and remaining settlements (section 6.2.5).

Maintain profile (section 6.2.6) if the Maintain Profile option was used.

90 of 290 Deltares

View Results

Those four buttons enable the user to zoom in, to zoom out, to zoom

the full page or to zoom the page width.

Those four buttons enable the user to browse through the report by

respectively moving to first page, moving to previous page, moving

to next page or moving to last page.

Another way of quickly browsing through the report is by entering a

page number in the input field on the toolbar and pressing the Enter

key.

In case of Terzaghi consolidation model, a stress table will be available for each selected

vertical for initial and final states.

Initial Stress:

- S-total [kN/m2 ] Initial total stress.

- S-water [kN/m2 ] Initial water pressure (hydrostatic and excess overpressure and

underpressure).

- S-eff. [kN/m2 ] Initial effective stress.

Deltares 91 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Final Stress:

- S-total [kN/m2 ] Final total stress.

- S-water [kN/m2 ] Final water pressure.

- S-eff. [kN/m2 ] Final effective stress.

In case of NEN-Koppejan calculation model combined with Terzaghi consolidation model, two

tables are printed for each selected vertical, as shown in Figure 6.3.

Figure 6.3: Report window – Settlement per vertical (NEN-Koppejan with Terzaghi)

Depth

- From [m] Y co-ordinate at the top of the layer.

- To [m] Y co-ordinate at the bottom of the layer.

Swelling

- Primary [m] Primary swelling.

- Secondary [m] Secondary swelling.

Settlement b. Sp (= settlement before preconsolidation stress)

- Primary [m] Primary settlement.

- Secondary 10 days [m] Secondary settlement after 10 days.

Settlement a. Sp (= settlement after preconsolidation stress)

- Primary [m] Primary settlement.

- Secondary 10 days [m] Secondary settlement after 10 days.

Total settlement (100% cons.)

- Primary [m] Primary settlement.

- Secondary 10 days [m] Secondary settlement after 10 days.

- After 10000 days [m] Secondary settlement after 10000 days.

Percentage of original layer [%] Percentage of the settlement relative to the original

height layer height.

Note: The settlements displayed in these tables are based on 100% consolidation.

92 of 290 Deltares

View Results

A table with stresses and settlements is displayed in the report for selected verticals.

Effective stress [kPa] Effective soil stress.

Hydraulic head [m] Full hydraulic head.

Loading [kPa] Top loading subjected to stress distribution.

Settlement [m] Settlement.

6.2.4 Settlements

In the Settlements section of the Report window, a short table displays the total settlement at

the end of the calculation for each vertical.

Deltares 93 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The Residual Times section of the Report window gives the output of the settlement for each

vertical at all times that were specified in the Calculation Times window (section 5.2). Be-

sides the settlement itself, the value of the remainder of the final settlement, and the reached

percentage of the final settlement are also given.

If the Maintain Profile option was used, the Maintain Profile Calculation Results section of the

Report window displays:

the original amount of soil of each load as defined in the Non-Uniform Loads window;

the extra amount of soil to be added to maintain the original profile.

94 of 290 Deltares

View Results

Finally, if (non-fatal) warning/error messages were generated during the calculation and dis-

played in the Start Calculation window (section 5.4.4), they can be found in this section of the

report.

Deltares 95 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Choose the Stresses in Geometry option in the Results menu to display the initial or final

stress per vertical drawn in the geometry. The blue part represents the water pressure and

the dark green part represents the additional effective stress. Use the Stresses in Geometry

tab in the Project Properties menuto change visibility settings. This window can also be

displayed by clicking the right-mouse button anywhere in the drawing and then choosing View

Preferences from the pop-up menu.

6.4 Dissipations

This option is available only if the Add dissipation calculation option in the Start Calculation

window was selected (section 5.4). Choose the Dissipations option in the Results menu

to display a graph of the average degree of consolidation versus the time, for a selected

layer.This graph can be used in combination with a stability analysis to estimate the allowed

loading speed.

96 of 290 Deltares

View Results

On the right hand side of the window, D-S ETTLEMENT shows a graphical representation of the

soil profile along the vertical.A layer name can be select from the drop down list to see the

results of the dissipation calculation for another layer. A new calculation must be performed

to see the dissipation results for another vertical (section 5.4).

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Dissipations graph and select the View Data

option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

Note: The effect of vertical drainage is taken care of in both consolidation models; however

the effect on the Dissipations graph is different:

For Darcy model, a unit load calculation is performed taking into account the drains. By

implication, the degree of consolidation may exceed 100 % and be different from 100 %

at the end;

For Terzaghi model, the leakage factor due to the drains is not directly applied in the

degree of consolidation formula but combined to the deformation formula as explained

in section 15.2.1. That’s why no effect of drains will be displayed on the Dissipations

graph.

Note: This dissipation graph can be used in combination with a stability analysis to estimate

the allowed loading speed. It is not possible to determine the effect of dissipation from each

load from the D-S ETTLEMENT calculation. That is the reason why an extra calculation is made

to determine the dissipation curves. These curves are made using an uniform load with the

magnitude of the average load on the vertical (with a minimum value). For Terzaghi this is not

strictly necessary as in that case the dissipation curve is load independent. When creating the

D-G EO S TABILITY file (section 6.10), for each load the dissipation starts at zero. When using

vertical drainage not starting at zero several calculations must be made and combined. For

example, for a calculation with start of vertical drainage at t = 21 days, including loads at t = 6,

t = 15, t = 40 and t = 60 days, the following steps should be followed:

Deltares 97 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Fist, perform a dissipation calculation, where the vertical drainage starts at time t = 0.

This graph can be used for the loads applied after the beginning of the vertical drainage

(i.e. loads at t = 40 and t = 60 days).

For loads applied before the beginning of the vertical drainage, a dissipation calculation

must be performed for each time:

Using the example, for the load applied at t = 6 days, a dissipation calculation

For the load applied at t = 15 days, a dissipation calculation must be performed

Writing the D-G EO S TABILITY file (section 6.10) must be done carefully, keeping an eye on

the times. The end time should always be the wished time minus the time of application.

The settled D-G EO S TABILITY geometry is found from the base D-S ETTLEMENT calcula-

tion.

Finally, the different adapted percentages should be combined in a D-G EO S TABILITY

calculation.

6.5 Time-History

Choose the Time-History option in the Results menu to open the Time-History window. De-

pending on the selected consolidation model, the displayed window will be different:

Refer to section 6.5.2 for Darcy consolidation model.

For Terzaghi consolidation, the Time-History window displays graphs of the settlement and

total loading versus time as shown in Figure 6.11.

Click with the right hand mouse button inside the graph, in order to view and copy the chart

data.

98 of 290 Deltares

View Results

Fix Settlement Axis Enable this checkbox to fix the range of the vertical axis of the graph

of settlement whatever the selected time step.

Click this button to switch from logarithmic to linear scale or vice

versa.

Vertical Type the vertical number that must be displayed or click the arrow-up

and arrow-down keys to scroll through the available verticals.

Depth Select a depth from the drop-down list. When typing the first digit

of a desired depth, the next available depth starting with that digit is

displayed. Use the arrow-down keys to scroll through the available

depths.

At surface level, D-S ETTLEMENT will plot also green lines in case of multiple load steps. These

green lines indicate the predicted settlement that would occur if no further load steps were

applied.

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Time-History graph and select the View Data

option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

For the Darcy model, the Time-History window displays graphs of settlements and stresses

in time per vertical at a particular depth as shown in Figure 6.12.

Stress Enable this checkbox to display in the top chart one of the six stress

types available.

Click this button to display the effective stress in the top chart.

Deltares 99 of 290

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Click this button to display the hydraulic head in the top chart.

Click this button to display the excess hydraulic head in the top chart.

Click this button to display the pore pressure in the top chart.

Click this button to display the excess pore pressure in the top chart.

Deformation Enable this checkbox to display the graph of settlement in time in the

bottom chart.

Fix Settlement Axis Enable this checkbox to fix the range of the vertical axis of the graph

of settlement whatever the selected time step.

Vertical Type the vertical number that must be displayed or click the arrow-up

and arrow-down keys to scroll through the available verticals.

Click this button to switch from logarithmic to linear scale or vice

versa.

Depth Select a depth from the drop-down list. When typing the first digit

of a desired depth, the next available depth starting with that digit is

displayed. Use the arrow-down keys to scroll through the available

depths.

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Time-History graph and select the View Data

option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

6.6 Depth-History

The Depth-History window from the Results menu displays graphs of settlements and stresses

against the depth per vertical. Results displayed depend on the consolidation model:

section 6.6.1 – For Terzaghi consolidation model, graphs of settlements and initial

and/or final stresses and preconsolidation pressure versus the depth per vertical are

displayed;

section 6.6.2 – For Darcy consolidation model, graphs of settlements and stresses

against the depth per vertical at a particular time are displayed.

For the Terzaghi consolidation model, the Depth-History window displays:

Graphs of initial or/and final stresses (water, total and effective stresses) and precon-

solidation pressure versus the depth per vertical;

Graph of settlements at a particular time or horizontal displacements in depthagainst

the depth per vertical.

The preconsolidation pressure distribution (red dotted line) corresponds to the initial precon-

solidation pressure: maximum between the inputted value (section 4.2) and the initial effective

stress. It is available only for NEN-Koppejan model. Depending on the selected option for

Preconsolidation pressure within a layer in the Calculation Options window (section 5.1), the

preconsolidation pressure distribution can vary: if the Constant option was selected, it is a

vertical line but if the Variable option was selected, it is parallel to the initial effective stress.

View Results

Stress Enable this checkbox to display the initial and/or final pore pressure,

total stress and effective stress in the left-hand chart.

Deformation Enable this checkbox to display the graph of settlement in time or the

graph of horizontal displacements in depth in the right-hand chart.

Vertical Type the vertical number that must be displayed or click the arrow-up

and arrow-down keys to scroll through the available verticals.

Initial stress Enable this checkbox to display the graphs of the initial stresses (to-

tal, effective and water stresses) against the depth.

Final stress Enable this checkbox to display the graphs of the final stresses (total,

effective and water stresses) against the depth.

Time Select a time from the drop-down list to display the corresponding

Depth-Settlement graph. When typing the first digit of a desired time,

the next available time starting with that digit is displayed. Use the

arrow-down keys to scroll through the available depths.

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Depth-History graph and select the View Data

option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

For Darcy consolidation model, the Depth-History window displays graphs of settlements and

stresses against the depth per vertical at a particular time.

Stress Enable this checkbox and then click one of the buttons

to display respectively the effective stress, total stress,

hydraulic head, excess hydraulic head, pore pressure or excess pore

pressure in the left-hand chart.

Deformation Enable this checkbox to display the graph of settlement in time or the

graph of horizontal displacements in depth in the right-hand chart.

Vertical Type the vertical number that must be displayed or click the arrow-up

and arrow-down keys to scroll through the available verticals.

Time Select a time from the drop-down list. When typing the first digit

of a desired time, the next available time starting with that digit is

displayed. Use the arrow-down keys to scroll through the available

depths.

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Depth-History graph and select the View Data

option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

View Results

The Residual Settlement window shows the residual settlements until the end of calculation.

D-S ETTLEMENT presents the values for residual settlements starting from different time points.

These different points were defined in the Calculation Times window (section 5.2).

Click the button to switch from logarithmic to linear scale or vice versa.

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Residual Settlement graph and select the

View Data option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

The Settled Geometry option in the Results menu displays the settled geometry, drawn in

the original geometry. D-S ETTLEMENT can only generate a settled geometry if verticals were

defined at all geometry points that are used in either a layer boundary or a non-uniform load.

The settled geometry can be drawn with an enlarge factor that can be defined in the Settled

Geometry tab of the Project Properties window (section 4.1.3). The display settings of this

window can be modified here. To do this, either choose the Properties option in the Project

menu, or click the right-mouse button anywhere in the drawing and choose View Preferences

from the pop-up menu.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Once a calculation has been made, the settled geometry can be saved. In that way, a standard

Deltares Geo-Tools geometry file can be created.

Enable the Add non-uniform loads as layer boundaries checkbox to save the inputted non-

uniform loads as layer boundaries. This is possible if:

the non-uniform load is located above the surface.

If the calculation was performed using the Maintain Profile option (section 5.1.2), it is possible

to enable the Add Superelevation checkbox to adapt the settled geometry with a supereleva-

tion load before writing it to file.

D-S ETTLEMENT can only generate a settled geometry if verticals were defined at all geometry

points that are used in either a layer boundary or a non-uniform load.

View Results

Once a calculation has been made, D-S ETTLEMENT is able to generate a D-G EO S TABILITY

(formerly known as MStab) input file with settled geometry and with degrees of consolidation.

D-G EO S TABILITY can then perform a slope stability analysis.

The output of the degree of consolidation requires that the Add dissipation calculation option

in the Start Calculation window is enabled (section 5.4.1).

Note: D-G EO S TABILITY takes only the effect of non-uniform loads on the degree of consolida-

tion into account. The effect of other loading and the effect of underpressure in vertical drains

are not included.

The generation of a settled geometry requires the same conditions as for Write Settled Ge-

ometry (section 6.9).

Enable the Add non-uniform loads as layer boundaries checkbox to save the inputted non-

uniform loads as layer boundaries. This is possible if:

the non-uniform load is located above the surface.

If the calculation was performed using the Maintain Profile option (section 5.1.2), it is possi-

ble to enable the Add Superelevation checkbox to adapt the settled geometry with a super-

elevation load before writing it to file.

D-S ETTLEMENT will attach complete soil properties to non-uniform loads and layers, when they

are connected to a soil type in the database (section 4.2.1, section 4.6.1). While writing the

D-G EO S TABILITY input file, D-S ETTLEMENT will compare all materials and non-uniform loads

with the materials in the selected database. If a name matches with a material name in the

database, the soil properties are compared with the values in the database. If one of them

deviates, D-S ETTLEMENT prompts if you want to replace the values by the values found in the

database.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Numbers between parentheses that were added to names of uniform loads while selecting

them from the database (section 4.6.1), are removed before the material names are written to

file.

This option is available only if a reliability analysis with the FOSM or Monte Carlo method was

performed (section 5.4.2).

The Time-History (Reliability) window contains a graph of the mean value and the bandwidth

of the time dependent settlement, at the surface position of the previously selected vertical.

The bandwidth corresponds to a certain confidence interval. This interval can be viewed and

modified in the Confidence interval at the top of the window.

See section 6.5 for a description of the options that are shared with the regular Time-History

window.

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Time-History (Reliability) graph and select the

View Data option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

This option is available only if a reliability analysis with the FOSM orFORM method was

performed (section 5.4.2). The Influencing Factors (Reliability) window contains a diagram,

showing the relative sensitivity of the total settlement to variations of uncertain parameters.

Different diagrams are available for all the different times that were defined in the Calculation

Times window (section 5.2). Use the arrow-down key to scroll between the available time

points in the Time list, at the top of the Influencing factors window.

A reliability analysis with the FORM method will yield a similar diagram with influencing factors

for residual settlements. Different diagrams are available for residual settlements starting from

different time points. These points were defined in the Calculation Times window. You can

scroll between the available time points in the Time list, at the top of the Influencing factors

window.

View Results

This option is available only if a reliability analysis with the FORM or Monte Carlo method was

performed (section 5.4.2). The Residual Settlement (Reliability) window will contain a graph

of the mean value and the bandwidth of the residual settlement, together with a graph of the

reliability index (β ) D-S ETTLEMENT presents these values for residual settlements starting from

different time points. These different points were defined in the Calculation Times window

(section 5.2).

Note: Click the right hand mouse button in the Residual Settlement (Reliability) graph and

select the View Data option to view all chart data, for convenient export to spread sheets.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

7 Graphical Geometry Input

This chapter explains how to define the soil layers in a two-dimensional cross section by

drawing, using the shared Deltares Geo-Tools options for geometry modelling.

section 7.1 introduces the basic geometrical elements that can be used.

section 7.2 lists the restrictions and assumptions that the program imposes during ge-

ometry creation.

section 7.3 gives an overview of the functionality of the View Input window.

section 7.4 describes the creation and section 7.5 describes the manipulation of general

graphical geometry using the View Input window.

Besides graphical input, the geometry can also be imported or tabular forms can be used

(see section 4.3). See the MGeobase manual for a description of special features to create

cross-section geometry semi-automatically from CPT and/or boring records.

A Deltares Geo-Tools geometry can be built step-by-step through the repetitive use of sketch-

ing, geometry creation and geometry manipulation. Each step can be started by using line-

shaped construction elements (section 7.1.2) to add line drawings. After converting these

drawings to valid geometry parts, the specific geometry elements created can be manipu-

lated (section 7.1.1).

A Deltares Geo-Tools geometry can be composed from the following geometry elements:

stated earlier, the geometry is restricted to two dimensions, allowing

to define X and Y co-ordinates only.

Boundary lines A boundary line is a straight line piece between two points and is part

of a boundary.

Boundaries A boundary is a collection of connected boundary lines that forms

the continuous boundary between layers.

PL-lines A piezometric level line is a collection of connected straight line

pieces defining a continuous piezometric level.

Phreatic line This is a PL-line that acts as phreatic line. The phreatic line (or

groundwater level) is used to mark the border between saturated and

unsaturated soil.

Layers A layer is the actual soil layer. Its geometrical shape is defined by its

boundaries, and its soil type is defined by its material.

Materials A material defines the actual soil material (or soil type). It contains

the parameters belonging to the soil type, such as its unsaturated

weight and its saturated weight. A material can be connected to a

layer in order to define the soil type of the layer.

Limits A limit is a vertical boundary defining the ’end’ at either the left or

right side of the geometry. It is defined by an X co-ordinate only.

NOTE: This is the only type of element that cannot be deleted.

Adding, moving and deleting the above-mentioned elements are subject to the conditions for

a valid geometry (see section 7.2). For example, while dragging selected geometry elements,

the program can perform constant checks on the geometry validity (section 7.4.4). Invalid

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Besides the Deltares Geo-Tools geometry elements (section 7.1.1), special construction el-

ements can also beused for sketching the geometry graphically. These elements are not a

direct part of the geometry and the restrictions on editing (adding, moving, and deleting);

these elements are therefore far less rigid. The only restriction that remains is that these

elements cannot be moved and/or defined beyond the limits of the geometry.

Lines A line consists of a starting point and end point, both defined by a

left-hand mouse click in the graphic input screen.

Polylines A polyline consists of a series of connected lines, all defined by a

left-hand mouse click in the graphic input screen.

Construction elements will be displayed as solid blue lines. Valid constructions elements

are converted to geometry elements as soon as the geometry is (re-) generated. For more

information on adding lines and polylines, see section 7.4.

During geometrical modelling, the program uses the following assumptions.

A soil layer number is equal to the boundary number at the top of the layer.

The boundary with the highest number defines the soil top surface.

A material (soil type) must be defined for each layer – except for layer 0 (base). Different

layers can use the same material.

All the boundaries must start and end at the same horizontal co-ordinates.

Boundaries should not intersect, but they may coincide over a certain length.

All horizontal co-ordinates on a boundary must be ascending – that is, the equation

X [i+1] = X [i] must be valid for each following pair of X co-ordinates (vertical parts are

allowed).

PL-lines may intersect and may coincide with each other over a certain length.

PL-lines and layer boundaries may intersect.

All PL-lines must start and end at the same horizontal co-ordinate.

All X co-ordinates on a PL-line must be strictly ascending – that is, the equation

X [i+1] > X [i] must be valid for each following pair of X co-ordinates (no vertical

parts allowed).

One way for inputting geometry data is through the Geometry menu, as explained in the

Reference section (section 4.3). This section describes an other way to create and manipulate

geometry graphically using the tool buttons of the View Input window.

7.3.1 General

To use the View Input option, click the Geometry tab to activate it in the regular View Input

window or use the menu to select it.

When the Geometry tab in the View Input window is selected, it displays a graphical repre-

sentation of only the geometrical data. On the left of the window, the Edit and Tools buttons

Graphical Geometry Input

are displayed (section 7.3.2). On the right, the legend belonging to the geometry is displayed

(section 7.3.3). At the bottom of the window, the title panel and the info bar are displayed. The

title panel displays the project titles defined using the Properties option in the Project menu.

The info bar provides information (from left to right) about the current cursor position, the cur-

rent mode and the object currently selected. The legend, title panel and info bar are optional

and can be controlled using the Properties option in the Project menu (section 4.1.3).

It is possible to use three different modes when working in the Geometry tab of the View Input

window:

Select The Select mode is the default mode and enables the user to select existing

elements in the window.

Add The Add mode allows the addition of elements using one of the Add buttons.

By selecting one of these buttons, one switches to the Add mode. As long as

this mode is active, the user can add the type of element which is selected.

Zoom The Zoom mode allows the user to view the input geometry in different sizes.

By selecting one of the Zoom buttons or the Pan button, one activates the

Zoom mode. While in this mode, the user can repeat the zoom or pan actions

without reselecting the buttons.

It is possible to change modes in the following ways. When in Add or Zoom mode, it is

possible to return to the Select mode by clicking the right-hand mouse button, or by pressing

the Escape key, or by clicking the Select mode button. To activate the Add mode, select one

of the Add buttons. To activate the Zoom mode, select one of the Zoom buttons or the Pan

button.

Note: The current mode is displayed on the info bar at the bottom of the View Input window.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

7.3.2 Buttons

Select and Edit mode

In this mode, the left-hand mouse button can be used to graphically select a previ-

ously defined grid, load, geotextile or forbidden line. Items can then be deleted or

modified by dragging or resizing, or by clicking the right-hand mouse button and

choosing an option from the menu displayed. Pressing the Escape key will return

the user to this Select and Edit mode.

Add point(s) to boundary / PL-line

Click this button to add points to all types of lines (lines, polylines, boundary lines,

PL-lines). By adding a point to a line, the existing line is split into two new lines.

This provides more freedom when modifying the geometry.

Add single line(s)

Click this button to add single lines. When this button is selected, the first left-hand

mouse click will add the info bar of the new line and a “rubber band” is displayed

when the mouse is moved. The second left-hand mouse click defines the end

point (and thus the final position) of the line. It is now possible to either go on

clicking start and end points to define lines, or stop adding lines by selecting one

of the other tool buttons, or by clicking the right-hand mouse button, or by pressing

the Escape key.

Add polyline(s)

Click this button to add polylines. When this button is selected, the first left-hand

mouse click adds the starting point of the new line and a “rubber band” is displayed

when the mouse is moved. A second left-hand mouse click defines the end point

(and thus the final position) of the first line in the polyline and activates the “rubber

band” for the second line in the polyline. Every subsequent left-hand mouse click

again defines a new end point of the next line in the polyline. It is possible to end

a polyline by selecting one of the other tool buttons, or by clicking the right-hand

mouse button, or by pressing the Escape key.

Add PL-line(s)

Click this button to add a piezometric level line (PL-line). Each PL-line must start

at the left limit and end at the right limit. Furthermore, each consecutive point must

have a strictly increasing X co-ordinate. Therefore, a PL-line must be defined from

left to right, starting at the left limit and ending at the right limit. To enforce this,

the program will always relocate the first point clicked (left-hand mouse button) to

the left limit by moving it horizontally to this limit. If trying to define a point to the

left of the previous point, the rubber band icon indicates that this is not possible.

Subsequently clicking on the left side of the previous point, the new point will be

added at the end of the rubber band icon instead of the position clicked.

Pan

Click this button to change the visible part of the drawing by clicking and dragging

the mouse.

Zoom in

Click this button to enlarge the drawing, and then click the part of the drawing

which is to be at the centre of the new image. Repeat if necessary.

Zoom out

Click this button, and then click on the drawing to reduce the drawing size. Repeat

if necessary.

Zoom rectangle

Click this button then click and drag a rectangle over the area to be enlarged. The

selected area will be enlarged to fit the window. Repeat if necessary.

Add vertical

Click this button to graphically define the position of a vertical.

Graphical Geometry Input

Click this button to display a window in which it is possible to add, modify or delete

non-uniform loads per unit of area.

Add other load

Click this button to display a window in which it is possible to add, modify or delete

trapezoidal, circular, rectangular or uniform loads.

Convert geometry to 1D

Click this button to convert geometry to 1D.

Click this button, then click the first point on the View Input window and place the

cross on the second point. The distance and the slope between the two points

can be read beside the second point. To turn this option off, click the escape key.

Undo zoom

Click this button to undo the zoom. If necessary, click several times to retrace

each consecutive zoom-in step that was made.

Zoom limits

Click this button to display the complete drawing.

Click this button to use the same scale for the horizontal and vertical directions.

When selected, the program will automatically try to generate a new valid geom-

etry whenever geometry modifications require this. During generation, (poly)lines

(solid blue) are converted to boundaries (solid black), with interjacent layers. New

layers receive a default material type. Existing layers keep the materials that were

assigned to them. Invalid geometry parts are converted to construction elements.

Automatic regeneration may slow down progress during input of complex geome-

try, because validity will be checked continuously.

Redo

Click this button to redo the previous Undo action

Undo

Click this button to undo the last change(s) made to the geometry

Delete

Click this button to delete a selected element.

NOTE: This button is only available when an element is selected.

Previous stage

Click this button to view the previous stage in the sequence of loading.

Next stage

Click this button to view the next stage in the sequence of loading.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

7.3.3 Legend

At the right side of the View Input window (Figure 7.2) the legend belonging to the geometry

is shown. This legend is present only if the Legend checkbox in the View Input tab of the

Project Properties window is activated (see section 4.1.3).

Figure 7.2: View Input window, Geometry tab (legend displayed as Layer Numbers)

In the Geometry tab of the View Input window, it is possible to change the type of legend.

When a soil type box in the legend is right clicked, the menu from Figure 7.3 is displayed.

With this menu, there are three ways to display the legend of the layers:

As Layer Numbers: the legend displays one box for each layer. Each layer (and therefore

each box) is displayed in a different standard color. Next to each box, the layer number and

the material name are displayed, corresponding to the color and number of the layer in the

adjacent Geometry window (see Figure 7.2).

As Material Numbers: the legend displays one box for each material. Each material (and

therefore each box) is displayed in a different color which can be changed by the user (see

below). Next to each box, the material number and name are displayed, corresponding to

the color and number of the material in the adjacent Geometry window (see Figure 7.4).

Graphical Geometry Input

Figure 7.4: View Input window, Geometry tab (legend displayed as Material Numbers)

As Material Names: the legend displays one box for each material. Each material (and

therefore each box) is displayed in a different color which can be changed by the user (see

below). Next to each box, only the material name is displayed, corresponding to the color

and name of the material in the adjacent Geometry window (see Figure 7.1).

Unlike the standard colors used to display layers with their layer colors, it is possible to define

different colors used when displaying materials. To change the color assigned to a material,

right click the material box. The menu from Figure 7.5 is displayed.

When selecting Material Colors the Color window appears (Figure 7.6), in which the user can

pick a color or even define customized colors himself (by clicking the Define Custom Colors

button).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

There are two ways to create a new geometry without the wizard:

Open the File menu and choose New. In the New File window displayed, select New

geometry and click OK (see section 3.1).

In both cases, the Geometry tab of the View Input window is displayed (Figure 7.7) with the

default limits of the geometry (from 0 to 100 m).

Graphical Geometry Input

The first thing to do when creating new geometry is to set the model limits. This is possible by

selecting and then dragging the limits to their proper place one by one. It is also possible to

select a limit and edit its value by clicking the right-hand mouse button after selecting the limit

and then choosing the Properties option in the pop-up menu. The property window belonging

to the selected limit is displayed (Figure 7.8), enabling to define the new X co-ordinate for this

limit.

It is possible to use the Add single line(s), Add polyline(s) and Add point(s) to boundary / PL-

line buttons to draw the layout of the geometry. See below for more information on how to use

these buttons.

Each (poly)line is displayed as a solid blue line, and each point as a small black rectangle

(Figure 7.9).

The position of the different points of a (poly)line can be modified by dragging the points as

explained in section 7.5.4 or by editing the (poly)line. This is done by clicking the right-hand

mouse button after selecting the (poly)line and then choosing the Properties option in the

pop-up menu (section 7.5.3).

The underlying grid helps the user to add and edit (poly)lines. Use the Properties option in

the Project menu to adjust the grid distance and force the use of the grid by activating Snap

to grid (section 4.1.3). When this option is activated, each point is automatically positioned at

the nearest grid point.

The specified line pieces must form a continuous line along the full horizontal width of the

model. This does not mean that each line piece has to be connected exactly to its predecessor

and/or its successor. Intersecting line pieces are also allowed, as shown in the examples of

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 7.10.

Figure 7.10: Examples of configurations of (poly)lines

Configuration (1) is allowed. The different lines are connected and run from boundary to

boundary

Configuration (2) is also allowed. The different are connected. They are defined as being

connected because they intersect. The line construction runs from boundary to boundary.

Configuration (3) is illegal, as there is no connection with the left boundary.

Use this button to add extra points to lines (lines, polylines, boundary lines, PL-lines). By

adding a point to a line, the existing line is split into two new lines. This provides more freedom

when modifying the geometry.

For example, the shape of the berm of Figure 7.11 (1) needs to be modified. Two points

are added to the outer lines of the berm as shown in Figure 7.11 (2). Then, the middle

point is selected and dragged to the position that completes the new geometry as shown in

Figure 7.11 (3).

Figure 7.11: Modification of the shape of a berm

Note: When the Add point(s) to boundary / PL-line button is clicked, each left-hand mouse

click adds a new point to the nearest line until one of the other tool buttons is selected, or click

the right-hand mouse button, or press the Escape key.

Use the Automatic regeneration of geometry on/off button to start or stop the automatic

conversion of construction elements to actual boundaries and layers. Valid (poly)lines are

converted to boundaries, which are displayed as black lines. Invalid lines remain blue.

Layers are generated between valid boundaries, and default soil types are assigned.

It is possible to modify the soil type assigned to a layer by first selecting the layer and then

clicking the right-hand mouse button and choosing the Layer Properties option in the pop-

up menu to display the Layer window (see Figure 7.20 in section 7.5.3). Once a material

has been assigned to a layer, this material will continue to be associated to that layer in

Graphical Geometry Input

subsequent conversions of construction elements as long as the layer is not affected by those

conversions.

The most common cause of invalid (poly)lines is that they are not part of a continuous polyline

running from limit to limit. Sometimes, lines appear to start/end at a limit without actually being

on a limit. Figure 7.12 gives an example: on the left geometry (1), the end of the line seems

to coincide with the boundary. However, zooming in on the point (geometry (2) on the right)

reveals that it is not connected to the boundary. Therefore the geometry is considered invalid.

(1) (2)

Figure 7.12: Example of invalid point not connected to the left limit

It is possible to correct this by dragging the point to the limit while the specific area is zoomed

in or by selecting the point, clicking the right-hand mouse button, choosing the Properties

option in the pop-up menu (section 7.5.3) and making the X co-ordinate of the point equal to

the X co-ordinate of the limit.

It is possible to use the button Add PL-line(s) to add PL-lines. When adding a PL-line,

D-S ETTLEMENT imposes the limitation that the subsequent points of the PL-line have an in-

creasing X co-ordinate. Furthermore the first point of a PL-line is to be set on the left boundary

and the last point on the right boundary.

It is possible to change the position of the different points of a PL-line by dragging the points

as explained in section 7.5.4 or by editing the PL-line. This is done by selecting the PL-line,

clicking the right-hand mouse button and choosing the Properties option in the pop-up menu

(section 7.5.3).

After selecting a geometry element it is possible to manipulate it. In order to be able select a

geometry element, the select mode should be active. Then it is possible to select an element

by clicking the left-hand mouse button. To select a layer, click on the layer number, material

number or material name, depending on the option chosen in the Properties dialog in the

Project menu. When successfully selected, the element will be displayed highlighted (for

example, a point will be displayed as a large red box instead of a small black box).

Accuracy

The program draws a circular selection area around the mouse pointer. If the element falls

within this circle, it will be selected when click the left-hand mouse button is clicked (Fig-

ure 7.13).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The Selection accuracy determines the required distance between the mouse pointer and the

geometrical element for selection. It is possible to use the Properties option in the Project

menu to modify the accuracy (section 4.1.3). This is defined in percentages of the screen

size and its default value is 2%. If a larger percentage is defined, this increases the selection

area. However, if the percentage is set to a relatively high value, the accuracy required for

the selection of certain geometry items may be inaccurate. In other words, it will most likely

result in too many ‘ambiguous’ selections (see the following section), or will make it difficult to

perform an intentionally empty selection.

Ambiguous selection

A selection of geometrical elements can be ambiguous. Figure 7.14 gives an example: a user

may want to select a point, a boundary line, a boundary or a PL-line. As several elements are

in close proximity to each other, D-S ETTLEMENT does not automatically select an element.

In this case D-S ETTLEMENT requires the user to assign the element that is to be selected by

displaying a pop-up menu (Figure 7.15) with the available types of elements within the range

of the selection click. It is possible to select the element from this menu.

Clear selection

It is possible to clear a selection by clicking in an area without geometry elements in the direct

area.

Graphical Geometry Input

Click the Delete button to delete a selected element. This button is only available when an

element is selected. When a point is selected and deleted, it and all lines connected to it are

deleted as shown in Figure 7.16.

Before After

Figure 7.16: Example of deletion of a point

When a geometry point (a point used in a boundary or PL-line) is selected and deleted, the

program deletes the point and its connected boundary lines as shown in Figure 7.17. It then

inserts a new boundary that reconnects the remaining boundary lines to a new boundary.

Before After

Figure 7.17: Example of deletion of a geometry point

Deletion of a geometry element (boundary, boundary line, geometry point, PL-line) can result

in automatic regeneration of a new valid geometry, if the Automatic regeneration option is

switched on.

When a line is selected and then deleted, the line and its connecting points are deleted as

shown in Figure 7.18. In addition the layer just beneath that boundary is deleted. All other line

parts that are not part of other boundaries will be converted to construction lines.

Before After

Figure 7.18: Example of deletion of a line

When using the mouse to make geometrical manipulations, the right mouse button enables

full functionality in a pop-up menu, while the left button implies the default choice. The options

available in the pop-up menu depend on the selected geometrical element and the active

mode. Right mousse button

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

When the Select mode is active and the right-hand mouse button is clicked, the pop-up menu

of Figure 7.19 is displayed.

Figure 7.19: Pop-up menu for right-hand mouse menu (Select mode)

Properties... When this option is clicked, the property editor for the selected object

is displayed. This procedure is performed by first selecting an object

by clicking on it with the left-hand mouse button. Then clicking the

right-hand mouse button anywhere in the graphic window will display

the pop-up menu. It is possible to use the property editor to quickly

adapt the values (properties) of the selected object. Each type of

element requires its own properties and therefore its own property

editor as shown from Figure 7.21 to Figure 7.24 below.

Delete This option deletes the element that has been selected (see the com-

ments for the Delete button in section 7.5.2).

Undo This option will undo the last change(s) made to the geometry.

Redo This option will redo the previous Undo action.

View Preferences This option opens the Properties dialog in the Project menu as dis-

played in.

Statistics It is possible to use this option to view a window displaying all the

vital statistics of the input data.

NOTE: In the window construction lines are called free lines.

Layer Properties... This option is a special feature that edits the material properties of

layers. It is possible to click anywhere in a layer and directly choose

this option to edit its properties (Figure 7.20). Clicking outside the ge-

ometry layers will display the menu with the Layer Properties option

disabled, as there is no layer for which properties can be displayed.

Delete All Loose This option will delete all loose lines. Loose lines are actually con-

Lines struction lines that are not part of the boundaries or PL-lines (there-

fore, all lines displayed as solid blue lines). With this option, it is

possible to quickly erase all the “leftover bits” of loose lines that may

remain after converting lines to a geometry.

Delete All Loose This option will delete all loose points.

Points

Graphical Geometry Input

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Note: In the Boundary and PL-line properties windows, only the point’s number can be

modified, not the X and Y co-ordinates.

One way to modify elements is to drag them to other locations. To drag an element, first select

it. Once the element has been selected, it is possible to drag it by pressing and holding down

the left-hand mouse button while relocating the mouse cursor. Dragging of geometry elements

can result in automatic regeneration of geometry, if this option is switched on (section 7.4.4)

as shown in the example of Figure 7.25: when the selected point is moved upwards, a new

geometry will be created. D-S ETTLEMENT creates new layers according to this new geometry.

Before After

Figure 7.25: Example of dragging of a point

D-S ETTLEMENT is primarily intended for working with 2D geometries. However, a special input

window is available for editing 1D geometries, graphically, or by means of a table where levels,

material names and a phreatic level can be edited.

D-S ETTLEMENT will always start from a new or existing 2D geometry. Therefore, choose the

New option from the File menu to create a new empty geometry, or open an existing 2D

geometry and then convert it into a 1D geometry as explained in the paragraph below (sec-

tion 7.6.2).

Graphical Geometry Input

There are three ways of converting 2D geometry into 1D geometry.

The first one is common for new geometries. The first option is to simply change the model

from 2D from 1D. In the Project menu, open the Model dialog and select 1D for the input

option Dimension (section 4.1.1). After this option is selected, an input window opens that

allows entering the x co-ordinate of the location where the 1D geometry should be derived

from. Either enter this co-ordinate manually, or select an x co-ordinate by choosing one of the

verticals that are listed in the input window.Before the conversion takes place, D-S ETTLEMENT

prompts if the user really wants to continue.

Note: 1D geometry contains less information than a 2D geometry, and therefore conversion

nearly always implies a loss of data.

There are two other ways of converting a 2D geometry into 1D geometry. For both of them

you need to graphically indicate the location where the conversion must take place.

One way of indicating this location is by pressing the Convert geometry to 1D button in

the View Input window, and clicking the location in the graphical representation of the

geometry.

The other way is selecting a vertical by mouse and choosing the Convert geometry to

1D item from the popup menu that appears when right clicking the input window.

The 1D Geometry window enables to edit the 1D geometry, either by dragging lines by mouse,

or by editing data from a table.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Add, insert or delete layers by pressing the corresponding buttons on the left side

of the table. Top levels can be edited for all layers. For the bottom layer, the bottom level can

be edited as well. Graphically changing the data is possible by dragging layer boundaries and

the phreatic level, if present, and by splitting a layer into two layers by clicking on it after you

have pressed the Add boundary button on the toolbar.

8 Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

This first tutorial illustrates the execution of a simple settlement analysis with loading and

partial unloading. The NEN-Bjerrum soil model is used, in combination with two different

consolidation models.

layers and their properties,

non-uniform loads;

to learn how to determine the total and residual settlement of consolidating soft soil by

loading and partial unloading;

to illustrate the behaviour of the NEN-Bjerrum isotache model for loading and unloading;

to illustrate the differences between the Darcy and Terzaghi consolidation model.

For this example, the following D-S ETTLEMENT modules are needed:

2D Geometry module

Darcy module

8.1 Introduction

A soft soil site has to be prepared for further residential construction activities, by adding a

sand layer on top with a height of 1 meter. The subsoil consists of approximately 6 meters of

overconsolidated clay on stiff sand. The available time for the construction preparation stage

is 200 days. The construction activities thereafter will take 400 additional days. The maximum

value for the allowed residual settlements in the period from 600 days to 10000 days is 10 cm.

The thick layer of low permeable clay will consolidate slowly. Vertical drains are however not

allowed along the full depth, because the clay layer must keep the sand aquifer sealed. A

temporary additional loading of 1 m sand is therefore applied until 200 days, to reduce the

residual settlement.

The position of layers and loads is shown in Figure 8.1. The initial surface is located at

reference level. The phreatic level is located half a meter below the surface level. The value

of the piezometric level in the pleistocene sand layer is at the surface level.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The parameters of the three soil types are given in Table 8.1.

Organic Sandy

Saturated unit weight γsat [kN/m3 ] 20 14 16

Unsaturated unit weight γunsat [kN/m3 ] 18 14 16

Overconsolidation Ratio OCR [kPa] 1 2.69 1.66

Coefficient of consolidation cv [m2 /s] Drained 4 × 10−8 10−6

Reloading/ Swelling ratio RR = Cr /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.0001 0.03 0.0125

Compression ratio CR = Cc /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.0023 0.23 0.15

Coeff. of secondary comp. Cα [-] 0 0.02 0.007

8.2 Project

Follow the steps below to start the creation of the geometry displayed in Figure 3.1:

D-S ETTLEMENT/D-S ETTLEMENT).

2. Click File on the D-S ETTLEMENT menu bar, and choose New.

3. Select New geometry and click OK.

The View Input window will appear, with an empty initial geometry (Figure 8.3).

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

5. Enter <Tutorial-1a> as file name.

6. Click Save.

To give the project a meaningful description, follow the steps described below:

7. On the menu bar, click Project and then choose Properties to open the Project Properties

window.

8. Fill in <Tutorial 1 for D-S ETTLEMENT > and <Building site preparation> for Title 1 and Title

2 respectively in the Identification tab (Figure 8.4).

9. In the View Input tab, mark the Points checkbox of the Labels sub-window to display the

point’s number and select the option As material names of the Layers sub-window to dis-

play the name of the layers. Also mark the Snap to grid checkbox and decrease the Grid

distance from 1 m to <0.5 m> to make easier the graphical defining the layer boundaries

(Figure 8.5), see also section 8.3.

10. Click OK.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

8.3 Geometry

Layer boundaries need to be defined first. These boundaries have to run from the left to the

right geometry limits. A combined graphical and numerical input will be used, as an alternative

to fully numerical input of points and lines.

First the assignment of soil material to boundary lines must be deactivated, via the Geometry

tab of the View Input window:

11. Click the Automatic regeneration of geometry on/off button in the Tools panel on the left

hand side.

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

Then the layer boundaries are added graphically at their approximate positions:

12. Click on the Add single line(s) button in the Edit panel on the left hand side, and add

the top and bottom lines respectively at approximate positions 0 and -11 meters using

the cursor. Locate the cursor position outside the geometrical limits (the black vertical

lines) when defining the start and end point of each line by clicking, in order to enforce the

horizontal co-ordinates of these end points exactly at the geometry limits.

13. Click the Zoom limits button of the Tools panel to enlarge the drawing.

14. Add the intermediate boundaries respectively at the following approximate positions: -6,

-5.5 and then -1.5 meters, as explained in step 12.

As previously for the layer boundaries, the piezometric lines are added graphically at their

approximate positions, via the Geometry tab of the View Input window:

15. Click on the Add pl-line(s) button in the Edit panel, and add two piezometric level lines

from the left to the right respectively at the approximate positions: -0.5 and 0 meters below

surface level.

Figure 8.6: View Input window, after input of single lines and piezometric lines

16. Click the Automatic regeneration of geometry on/off button to generate soil layers be-

tween the boundaries.

17. Click Geometry on the menu bar and choose Points. Adjust the displayed approximate

vertical values of the graphically created points to their exact values (Figure 8.7).

18. Click OK to confirm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

19. Click Geometry on the menu bar, and choose Phreatic Line. Note that D-S ETTLEMENT

assumes the location of the phreatic line by default at the first defined piezometric level.

20. Click Geometry on the menu bar, and choose PL-lines per Layer.

21. Enter the PL-line numbers (1 for the phreatic line and 2 for the piezometric level in the

sand layer) at the top and the bottom of the different layers. The piezometric level will

vary linearly in the organic clay layer, due to its relatively low permeability compared to the

surrounding sandy clay layers.

22. Click OK to confirm.

See section 4.3 and chapter 7 for a detailed description of geometry input.

23. Choose Materials from the Soil menu to open the Materials window.

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

24. Select Soft Clay in the material list at the left hand of the window. Click Rename and

change Soft Clay into <Clay Organic>. Enter the soil properties according to Table 8.1.

Click the Compression tab and the Consolidation and unit weight tab to switch between

the input screens of the corresponding parameters.

25. Select Sand and mark the Drained checkbox. Enter the soil properties according to Ta-

ble 8.1.

26. Select Medium Clay and rename it into <Clay Sandy>. Enter the soil properties according

to Table 8.1. The final input for Clay Sandy is presented in Figure 8.10.

27. Delete the unused default soil types, using the button.

Figure 8.10: Materials window, Consolidation and unit weight tab for Clay Sandy

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

sumed.

Note: It is possible to import soil properties from the MGeoBase database, see section 4.2.1.

To this end MGeoBase has to be installed.

8.5 Layers

29. Choose Layers from the Geometry menu to open the Layers window.

30. Click the Materials tab and attach the added soil types to the previously generated layers,

using the button: <Clay Sandy> to layer <4> and <2>, <Clay Organic> to layer

<3> and <Sand> to layer <1>.

31. Click OK to confirm.

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

8.6 Loads

The self-weight of the added sand layer is modeled as a non-uniform load.

32. From the Loads menu, choose Non-Uniform Loads to open the input window.

33. In the Load name sub-window, click Add and rename the new load to <Sand layer>.

Enter the values for the first load as displayed in Figure 8.13.

34. Repeat this for the second load named <Temporary load>. Note that the temporary effect

of this load is modeled by input of an End time. Also note that the second load starts from

the defined position of the first load.

35. Click OK to confirm.

The defined loads are depicted in the Input tab of the View Input window (Figure 8.14). The

sequence of loading can be viewed by clicking the arrows in the Stage panel.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

8.7 Verticals

D-S ETTLEMENT determines time-dependent settlements along one or more user-defined verti-

cals. In this case (uniform loading) it is sufficient to define one vertical at the centre.

36. Choose Verticals from the GeoObjects menu to open the input window.

38. Click OK to confirm.

The defined vertical is displayed together with the defined loads in the Input tab of the View

Input window.

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

8.8 Calculation

39. Choose Options from the Calculation menu.

40. In the Calculation Options window, mark the Output of settlements by partial loading check-

box.

41. Click OK to confirm.

Tabular output of the intermediate and residual settlement in the Report, together with the

graphical output of the residual settlement, will be displayed in user defined time points only.

43. In the Calculation Times window enter the times according to Figure 8.17, using the Add

row button.

44. Click OK to confirm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The calculation can now be started.

45. Choose Start from the Calculation menu or press the function key F9.

46. Mark the checkbox Add dissipation calculation to generate dissipation graphs (average

degree of consolidation versus time) for the different layers.

47. Click Start to perform the calculation.

Results can be viewed from the Results menu, after the calculation has finished. The following

selected results will be presented hereafter:

Time-History curve (section 8.9.1). Graphs of settlement and/or different stress com-

ponents versus time.

Depth-History curve (section 8.9.2). Graphs of settlement and/or different stress com-

ponents along verticals.

Residual Settlement (section 8.9.3). Graph of remaining settlements until the end time

versus the start time of measurement.

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

8.9.1 Time-History

48. Choose the Time-History option in the Results menu. The graphs of effective stress versus

time and settlement versus time are now displayed at the surface level. The green line

indicates the virtual settlements that would occur after a certain loading stage, if no further

loading or unloading would have been applied.

Figure 8.19: Time-History window, Effective stress and Settlement at surface level

49. Click the right-hand mouse button in the Settlement graph and select View Data, to view

the numerical data in the Chart Data window (Figure 8.22). This numerical data can also be

copied for usage in for example spreadsheets. The predicted residual settlement between

600 days and 10000 days is 0.343 – 0.257 = 0.086 m.

50. Click the Excess hydraulic head icon , and change the Depth to <3.5 m>. The excess

head at the centre of the layer Clay Organic reduces quite quickly in time during the first

stage of loading, as the Darcy model automatically uses a smaller effective consolidation

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

coefficient below the preconsolidation stress, compared to the input value for virgin loading.

The effect of unloading on the excess head is clearly visible.

51. Try selecting different stress components at different depths. The development of effective

stress in the drained sand layer for example, shows the effect of the submerging of the top

layer due to settlement in time, leading to a gradually reducing effective weight.

Figure 8.22: Time-History window, Effective stress in the drained pleistocene sand, grad-

ually decreasing by submerging of the top layer

8.9.2 Depth-History

52. Choose the Depth-History option in the Results menu. Select different stress components

and browse through the stress distribution at different times by using the mouse scroll

wheel, after clicking the Depth selection box. Figure 8.23 shows for example the excess

head distribution before and directly after unloading at time is 200 days. Try also selecting

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

different stress components at different times. D-S ETTLEMENT always plots the values along

the depth at their original location. The hydrostatic pore pressure contribution at a certain

location will therefore increase by the settlement of that location.

Figure 8.23: Depth-History window, Excess head before and after unloading

53. Choose the Residual Settlement option in the Results menu. D-S ETTLEMENT will present

a graph with the settlement between a certain start time and the end time of the analysis

(10000 days).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

54. Choose Save as from the File menu, and create a copy of the input file with name <Tutorial-

1b>.

55. Choose Options from the Calculation menu, and unmark the Submerging option.

56. Click OK to confirm.

57. Start the calculation, by choosing Start from the Calculation menu and then clicking Start.

58. After the calculation has finished, choose Time History from the Results menu and view

the graph of the settlements versus time (Figure 8.26). Apparently, the submerging of the

top layer reduces the final settlement from 0.381 meters to 0.343 meters.

Figure 8.26: Time-History window, Surface settlement with submerging switched off

(Tutorial-1b)

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

To illustrate the influence of the consolidation, two other calculations are performed:

section 8.11.2 Using drained layers (Tutorial-1d).

Perform the following steps to compare the results from the Darcy model (with submerging

switch off) with the result from the approximate Terzaghi model.

59. Choose Model from the Project menu, and select the Terzaghi consolidation model. Click

OK to confirm.

60. Choose Save as from the File menu, and create a copy of the input file with name <Tutorial-

1c>.

61. Choose Calculation from the Project menu, and click Start.

62. After the calculation, select Time-History from the Results menu (Figure 8.28).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 8.28: Time-History window, Surface settlement for Terzaghi model and no sub-

merging (Tutorial-1c)

63. Click the right-hand mouse button in the Settlement graph and select View Data, to view

the numerical data in the Chart Data window (Figure 8.29). The predicted residual settle-

ment between 600 days and 10000 days is now 0.416 - 0.287 = 0.129 m.

Figure 8.29: Chart Data window, Surface settlement versus Time (Tutorial-1c)

Figure 8.26 (Tutorial-1b) and Figure 8.28 (Tutorial-1c) illustrate the differences between re-

spectively the Darcy and the Terzaghi model. Both results are presented in the same graph

in Figure 8.32. The Terzaghi solution consolidates considerably slower in the early stage

of loading and after unloading. The reason is that the Terzaghi model simply multiplies the

settlements from a drained solution with a “Degree of consolidation”. The Terzaghi model

therefore does not take into account the influence of the pore pressure development on the

effective stress and also assumes the same consolidation period during virgin loading and

during un/reloading.

To view the development of the degree of consolidation according to the Terzaghi model:

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

65. In the drop-down menu at the left top of the window, select <Clay Organic> (Figure 8.30).

Figure 8.30: Dissipations window, Degree of consolidation versus Time in Clay Organic

layer for Terzaghi model and no submerging (Tutorial-1c)

66. Choose Save as from the File menu, and create a copy of the input file with name <Tutorial-

1d>.

67. To view the drained solution, change the behavior of all layers to Drained in the Materials

window, and run another calculation. Note that the final settlements from the drained

solution are indeed exactly equal to the final settlements from the solution using Terzaghi

consolidation.

Figure 8.31: Time-History window, Surface Settlements using Drained layers and no sub-

merging (Tutorial-1d)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

A well-known characteristic of soft soil is that primary and secondary (creep) deformation

are larger after passing the initial vertical preconsolidation stress. This initial preconsolida-

tion stress is in general above the field stress, due to the overconsolidation by creep and/or

preloading in the past. Input of initial overconsolidation is usually done via either a POP

value (the difference between preconsolidation stress and field stress) or via the OCR (the

ratio between the preconsolidation stress and the field stress). Direct input of the preconsol-

idation stress is also possible. According to the isotache theory, the initial overconsolidation

Cα

ratio affects the initial creep strain rate, expressed by . The equivalent age

ln (10) tequivalent

(tequivalent ) in this expression is the theoretical soil age if the preconsolidation would have

been caused completely by (secondary) creep, after a preceding virgin loading. In the Materi-

als window, D-S ETTLEMENT will show the corresponding input value of the equivalent age after

input of OCR and vice versa.

68. Open <Tutorial-1b.sli> and save it as <Tutorial-1e> to switch back to the Darcy model

with the Submerging option still switched off.

69. Choose Materials from the Soil menu, and enter the value of <200> days for the Equiva-

lent age of both Clay Sandy and Clay Organic. After input of each age value, use the TAB

key to view the corresponding OCR value. Click OK to confirm.

Tutorial 1: Building site preparation

70. Start the calculation, by choosing Start from the Calculation menu and then clicking Start.

After the calculation has finished, choose Time History from the Results menu and view

the graph of the settlements versus time (Figure 8.34).

Figure 8.35 illustrates that the settlements are significantly increased as a result of the OCR

reduction.

Figure 8.34: Time-History window, Surface settlement with reduced OCR (Tutorial-1e)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

71. Click the Excess hydraulic head icon and change the Depth to <3.5 m> to view the

excess head versus time at a depth of -3.5 meters (Figure 8.36). Note that the excess head

now even increases slightly directly after the initial undrained response, before starting to

dissipate. The reason of this additional excess head development is the large initial creep

rate of the Clay Organic layer, in combination with its thickness and low permeability.

Figure 8.36: Time-History window, Excess head (at depth 3.5 m) with reduced OCR

(Tutorial-1e)

9 Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

This is the first tutorial in a sequence of two on the construction of a high embankment for the

Dutch A2 highway, at a viaduct crossing the N201 road nearby Vinkeveen.

This part illustrates the usage of the following D-S ETTLEMENT features for embankment design

and vertical strip drains, without and with enforced dewatering:

The automatic determination of the required total soil raise by input of the final design

level in combination with the settlement-dependent Maintain Profile load;

Input of regular vertical strip drains, to speed up the consolidation process;

The approximately allowed speed of loading, based on the required degree of consoli-

dation for achieving the minimally required stability factor;

Simplified input of loading stages at certain times, with the generate loads option;

The determination of the needed additional temporary preloading and its duration, re-

lated to the requirements on the residual settlements;

Input of enforced dewatering in combination with strip drains for the purpose of preload-

ing;

The determination of horizontal displacements according to De Leeuw theory;

The determination of bandwidth in total and residual settlements from a reliability anal-

ysis.

2D Geometry module

Darcy module

Vertical Drains module

Horizontal Deformations module

Reliability Analyses module.

9.1 Introduction

The considered embankment has been constructed for a viaduct crossing of the Dutch A2

highway with the N201 road nearby Vinkeveen. The soft subsoil consists of approximately

5.5 m of peat, with a clay layer of 0.5 m on top. The initial surface level resides at approximately

RL-1.85 m (RL = reference level) and the phreatic level resides at RL-2.2 m. The design level

of the completed embankment at the time of delivery (1000 days) is at 6 m RL. The base width

is 103 m and the top width is 32 m. See also the geometry in Figure 9.1.The totally available

embankment construction period is 840 days. The residual settlements after 900 days are not

allowed to exceed 15 cm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The soil properties for sand, peat and clay are given in respectively Table 9.1, Table 9.2 and

Table 9.3.

Available from the lab were Koppejan parameters from 21 peat tests and 3 clay tests. The

NEN-Bjerrum parameters have been derived from the Koppejan parameters for each oedome-

ter test, using the conversion formulas Equation 17.18 to Equation 17.20. The parameters for

the a/b/c isotache model were then derived from the NEN-Bjerrum parameters for each oe-

dometer test, using formulas Equation 17.21 to Equation 17.25, at the last but one stress level

in the test.

The standard deviation of the local average, which is additional input for bandwidth determi-

nation, has been estimated by Equation 9.1, assuming that 75% of the natural variance within

a layer occurs within one vertical.

s 2

1 t0.975

Slocal = + 0.25 Sstatistical (9.1)

N u0.975

where:

n Number of samples

Sstatistical Statistical standard deviation

Slocal Approximated standard deviation of the local average

t0.975 Distance t in a Student-t distribution at exceeding probability 2.5 %

u0.975 Distance u in a Standard Normal distribution at exceeding probability 2.5 %.

Note that the compressibility for reloading and swelling is relatively high compared to the com-

pressibility for virgin loading. This is because the reloading compressibility was determined in

the lab from the branch below the initial preconsolidation stress, instead of using a separate

unloading/reloading branch.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

Sat. unit weight γsat [kN/m3 ] 20

Unsat. unit weight γunsat [kN/m3 ] 17

Coefficient of consolidation cv [10−8 m2 /s] Drained

Ratio hor./vert. consolid. coeff. ch /cv [-] -

Pre-overburden pressure POP [kN/m2 ] 0

NEN-Koppejan parameters Cp [-] 109

Cp ’ [-] 109

Cs [-] 109

Cs ’ [-] 109

NEN-Bjerrum Isotache RR = Cr /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.0001

parameters CR = Cc /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.0023

(linear strain) Cα [-] 0

abc Isotache parameters a [-] 10−6

(natural strain) b [-] 10−5

c [-] 0

Statistic Local average

γsat [kN/m3 ] 10.15 0.435 0.246

γunsat [kN/m3 ] 10.15 0.435 0.246

cv [10−8 m2 /s] 30.5 29.42 16.65

ch /cv [-] 1 - -

POP [kN/m2 ] 7.88 4.50 2.55

NEN-Koppejan:

Cp [-] 13.8 4.983 2.821

Cp ’ [-] 5.95 1.483 0.840

Cs [-] 109 - -

Cs ’ [-] 43.8 2.35 6.988

NEN-Bjerrum Isotache (linear strain):

RR = Cr /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.1860 0.0558 0.0316

CR = Cc /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.409 0.074 0.0418

Cα [-] 0.0312 0.006 0.0034

abc Isotache (natural strain):

a [-] 0.08517 0.027 0.015

b [-] 0.2259 0.057 0.032

c [-] 0.02126 0.006 0.003

Statistic Local average

γsat [kN/m3 ] 13.94 0.588 0.985

γunsat [kN/m3 ] 13.94 0.588 0.985

cv [10−8 m2 /s] 2.47 2.02 3.38

ch /cv [-] 1 - -

POP [kN/m2 ] 5.12 2.05 3.44

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

NEN-Koppejan:

Cp [-] 18 4 6.71

Cp ’ [-] 10 1.5 0.8

Cs [-] 109 - -

Cs ’ [-] 54 17.4 29.2

NEN-Bjerrum Isotache (linear strain):

RR = Cr /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.132 0.03 0.05

CR = Cc /(1+e0 ) [-] 0.237 - 0.06*

Cα [-] 0.0262 0.006 0.011

abc Isotache (natural strain):

a [-] 0.05804 0.013 0.023

b [-] 0.1096 - 0.02*

c [-] 0.01363 0.0036 0.006

9.2 Project

How to define the layers geometry and soil properties has been explained already in the

previous tutorial. Use the different figures and data’s given in section 9.1 to create the geom-

etry and then proceed with (section 9.3)] for the description of the additional steps.However,

an alternative to the manual input is to import the geometry from a so-called GEO file (sec-

tion 9.2.1) and to import the soil properties from an MGeobase database (section 9.2.2).

To import the geometry from a GEO file, follow the steps below.

1. In the File menu, select New to open the New File window (Figure 9.2).

2. Select the Import geometry option and click OK.

3. In the Import Geometry From window displayed, select the GEO file named <Tutorial-

2.geo> located in the Tutorials folder where the D-S ETTLEMENT program was installed.

4. Click OK.

The predefined geometry is displayed in the Geometry tab of the View Input window (Fig-

ure 9.3). This imported geometry contains only the points, the layers boundary and the

PL-lines, not the material types and properties. They will be imported from an MGeobase

database (section 9.2.2). The View Input window shows top-down the clay and peat layer. A

drained sand layer has been added at the base, for the purpose of a coupled stability analysis.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

Figure 9.3: View Input window, Geometry tab after importing geometry

5. Click Save as in the File menu, enter <Tutorial-2a> as file name and click Save.

The parameters from Table 9.1, Table 9.2 and Table 9.3 were saved in an MGeobase database.

To import them, the location of this MGeobase database must be first specified:

6. In the Program Options window from the Tools menu, select the Locations tab.

7. Mark the Use MGeobase database checkbox and click the Browse button to specify the

location of the MGeobase database with material data.

8. In the Open project database window displayed, select the MDB file named <Tutorial-

2.mdb> located in the Tutorials folder where the D-S ETTLEMENT program was installed.

9. Click Open and then OK.

The soil properties of each material given in Table 9.1, Table 9.2 and Table 9.3 can now be

imported from this MGeobase file:

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

10. Open the Materials window from the Geometry menu and select the Database tab.

11. Select Sand (Pleistocene) in the material list of the Database tab and click the button to

import this soil type (with associated properties) in the material list of the Materials window

(Figure 9.5).

As the soil type has already been defined, D-S ETTLEMENT asks if the existing local properties

should be overwritten (Figure 9.6).

12. Click Yes to confirm and repeat it for the 2 other materials.

13. In the Parameters tab, check that the imported properties are the same as in Table 9.1,

Table 9.2 and Table 9.3.

14. Click OK.

This section will describe all additional steps to determine:

the required soil raise to arrive at the design level after settlement, using the Maintain

Profile option;

the approximately allowed speed of loading without and with vertical drains, by coupling to

a D-G EO S TABILITY (formerly known as MStab) stability analysis.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

9.3.1 Load

15. In the Open window from the File menu, select <Tutorial-2.sli> from the Tutorials directory

where the D-S ETTLEMENT program was installed.

16. Save it as <Tutorial-2a>.

17. Open the Non-Uniform Loads window from the Loads menu.

18. Click Add to add a single load <Final Load>, and then enter the embankment profile

co-ordinates, according to Figure 9.7. Also enter the unit weight above <18> and below

<20> phreatic level as well as the time of loading <1>. Click OK to confirm.

9.3.2 Verticals

19. Open the Verticals window from the GeoObjects menu.

20. Click Generate to generate verticals at all different horizontal positions of the nodes. D-S ETTLEMENT

will calculate the settlements in each of these verticals, and also use the settlements to up-

date the geometry before export to a stability analysis.

21. Click OK to confirm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The result (Figure 9.9) shows that vertical 4 is located in the centre of the embankment.

Figure 9.9: View Input window, Input tab showing the generated verticals (Tutorial-2a)

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

22. Open the Calculation Options window from the Calculation menu, and mark the Maintain

Profile checkbox. Enter day <1> as the start time for the additional load that will depend

on the final settlement. Also enter the unit weight above <18> and below <20> phreatic

level.

23. Click OK to confirm.

24. Open the Start Calculation window from the Calculation menu and click Start. D-S ETTLEMENT

will iteratively increase the load at 1 day, to arrive at an embankment top level of RL +6 m

after 10000 days.

25. Open the Time-History window from the Results menu after the calculation has finished.

26. Select Vertical number <4> at the top of the window to view the settlements and effective

stresses in vertical 4 at the subsoil surface level (Figure 9.11). The reduction of effective

stress at the subsoil surface level in time is caused by submerging. The final settlement by

the Maintain Profile load is 3.672 m at 10000 days.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 9.11: Time-History window, Natural consolidation: Settlement and Effective stress

vs. Time in vertical 4 (Tutorial-2a)

27. Click the Excess hydraulic head icon , and change the Depth to <-4.875 m> to view the

excess head development in vertical 4, at a depth of RL -4.875 m (Figure 9.12). It is clear

that drainage is required to speed up the consolidation process.

Figure 9.12: Time-History window, Natural consolidation: Excess head vs. Time in verti-

cal 4 at RL-4.875m (Tutorial-2a)

28. Finally, view the greenfield settlement in vertical 1 by selecting Vertical number <1> (Fig-

ure 9.13): approximately 0.08 m in 10000 days. Greenfield settlements are part of the

isotache concept (NEN-Bjerrum and a/b/c), and depend on the coefficient of secondary

settlement and the initial equivalent age.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

2a)

As shown in Figure 9.12, drainage is required to speed up the consolidation process.

29. Open the Save As window and save the current project as <Tutorial-2b>.

30. Open the Model window from the Project menu and select Vertical drains. Click OK to

confirm.

31. Open the Vertical Drains window from the GeoObjects menu. Note that the default drain

type is a strip, with regular dimensions and a triangular spacing of 1 m.

32. Enter a bottom position of RL -7.5 m (close to the top of the sand layer) and narrow the

initial Horizontal Range to match the two sides of the embankment base, from <0 m> to

<103 m>.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

In the Input tab of the View Input window, the horizontal range and the bottom position of the

vertical drains are displayed as blue lines (Figure 9.16).

34. Again open the Start Calculation window from the Calculation menu, and click Start.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

35. After the calculation has finished, open the Time-History window from the Results menu.

Select Vertical number <4> to view the settlements and effective stresses in vertical 4 at

the subsoil surface level (Figure 9.17). The final settlement by the Maintain Profile load is

now 3.775 m at 10000 days.

Figure 9.17: Time-History window, Consolidation with vertical drains: Settlement and Ef-

fective stress vs. Time in vertical 4 (Tutorial-2b)

36. Click the Excess hydraulic head icon and change the Depth to <-4.875 m> to view the

excess head development in vertical 4, at a depth of RL -4.875 m. The reduction of the

consolidation period by the vertical drains is clearly visible.

Figure 9.18: Time-History window, Consolidation with vertical drains: Excess head vs.

Time in vertical 4 at RL -4.875 m (Tutorial-2b)

A coupled stability analysis of the total embankment raise at 50% of the final settlement will

now be used for a quick approximation of the allowed rate of loading.

37. Open the Write D-G EO S TABILITY Input File window from the Results menu, and enter the

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

input according to Figure 9.19. Select the Add superelevation option for addition of the

special Maintain Profile load to the geometry.

38. Click OK and accept the default file name <Tutorial-2bAt50percent>.

When using D-G EO S TABILITY, this D-G EO S TABILITY input file can be opened, strength proper-

ties and grid can be added, and a stability analysis can be performed. The following steps

describe how to perform the stability with the D-G EO S TABILITY program. However, if the ac-

cess to this program is not possible, results can be directly seen in Figure 9.23.

39. Open the generated input file with D-G EO S TABILITY (Figure 9.20).

40. In the Materials window from the Soil menu, add the cohesion and friction angle values for

sand (<0>, <33>), peat (<7>, <25>) and clay (<2>, <29>).

Note: If the soil properties in the D-S ETTLEMENT calculation were derived from an MGeobase

database, then the strength properties will be already filled in the D-G EO S TABILITY input file.

41. Also add a slip circle range according to Figure 9.20 in the Slip Circle Definition window

from theDefinitions menu.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

The following step is to determine the required degree of consolidation in the Clay and Peat

layers (layer 3 and 2) after addition of the embankment (layers 4 and 5), for a stability factor

of 1.1 or more. This is done by trial and error.

42. Enter a trial value for the degree of consolidation (equal for clay and peat for simplicity

reasons) via the Degree of Consolation window from the Water menu. Note that the gen-

erated input by D-S ETTLEMENT already contains initial values, following from the calculated

heads in time. Select Start from the Calculation menu to determine the associated stability

factor.

After a few cycles, it will prove that the required stability factor is reached for a degree of con-

solidation larger than 45% (Figure 9.22) as the resulting stability factor is 1.11 (Figure 9.23).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

As a rule of thumb, the minimum period for stable staged construction to the final height is

twice the period needed for sufficient stability at 50% settlement after a one-off raise. Dur-

ing the previous step was shown that the stability in this case is sufficiently large at a 45%

degree of consolidation. D-S ETTLEMENT offers a convenient design graph of the degree of

consolidation versus time, to find the associated time period.

43. Mark the Add dissipation calculation checkbox in the Start Calculation window and select

Vertical <4: 50.000 m> (Figure 9.24) and click Start to create the dissipation graph.

44. Open the Dissipations window from the Results menu and select <Peat> from the drop-

down menu (Figure 9.25).

45. Right click in the graph area (Results/Dissipations) to view the data numerically. Check

that the 45% consolidation period is about 10 days for the initial drain distance (1 m). The

total soil raise follows from the preceding Maintain Profile calculation (Figure 9.17) and

is 7.86 + 3.78 = 11.64 m (7.86 m being the height of the Final load at vertical 4, see

Figure 9.7). The approximately allowed rate of loading is therefore

0.5 × 11.64 m/10 days = 0.582 m/day.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

Figure 9.25: Dissipations window, Degree of consolidation vs. Time in Peat at vertical 4,

for grid distance 1 m (Tutorial-2b)

46. Determine the allowed rate also for other drain distances, by performing a new calculation

after altering the Center to center distance input in the Vertical Drains window (GeoObjects

menu). The allowed rate for a drain distance of 2 m is for example 0.5 × 11.64/50 = 0.116 m/day

(Figure 9.26).

Figure 9.26: Dissipations window, Degree of consolidation vs. Time in Peat at vertical 4,

for grid distance 2 m (Tutorial-2b)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

This section describes the input of staged loading and the subsequent calculation of the re-

sulting (residual) settlements, using a triangular grid of strip drains. Starting point is the input

with drains and loading as described in the previous section (section 9.4). The addition of

temporary preloading and dewatering will be discussed in the next sections.

A period of 20 weeks in combination with 8 construction stages is chosen to raise the em-

bankment to a final height of approximately 11.6 m above subsoil (Figure 9.27). This includes

the construction of a working floor with a thickness of 1 m in the first stage.

47. Open the Save As window and save the current project (with a grid distance of 2 m) as

<Tutorial-2c>.

48. Open the Non-Uniform Loads window from the Loads menu and remove the previously

defined loading using the Delete button. Then click Generate, and enter the profile and

stages according to Figure 9.28. Click OK to confirm.

49. For each of the generated loads: add a unit weight Above and Below phreatic surface of

respectively <18> and <20> and a Time of application of <0>, <14>, <35>, 56>,

<77>, <98>, <119> and <140> days from Generate load Equation 9.1 to Final load.

The input for the last loading is shown in Figure 9.29.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

The staged loading is now displayed in the Input tab of the View Input window. The Zoom

limits button in the Tools panel can be used to optimize the limits of the drawing (Figure 9.30).

50. Open the Calculation Options window from the Calculation menu, unmark the Maintain

Profile option and click OK to confirm.

51. Open the Calculation Times window from thesame menu and add a number of times for

residual stress calculation, according to Figure 9.31.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

52. Check that the drain distance is <2 m> in the Vertical Drains window and perform a first

calculation in the Start Calculation window.

53. View the development of the total settlement (Figure 9.32), the excess head at Depth

<-4.875 m> (Figure 9.33) and the residual settlement (Figure 9.34) through the Results

menu, after selecting Vertical number <4> (i.e. horizontal co-ordinate 50 m).

Figure 9.32: Time-History window, Settlement and Effective stress vs. Time in vertical 4

for drain distance 2 m (Tutorial-2c)

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

Figure 9.33: Time-History window, Excess head vs. Time in vertical 4 at RL-4.875 m for

drain distance 2 m (Tutorial-2c)

54. In the Residual Settlement window, click the right-hand mouse button and select View Data

to open the Chart Data window (Figure 9.35).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The residual settlement at 900 days is 0.298 m, while the allowed value is 0.15 m.

55. Check yourself that a drain distance of 1 m reduces the residual settlements to 0.203 m

(Figure 9.36), which is still more than allowed. Temporary preloading and/or dewatering

will therefore be required, in combination with sufficiently fast dissipation of excess pore

pressures.

Precompression by a temporary increase of effective stress will reduce residual creep settle-

ments. The Isotache models (NEN-Bjerrum, a/b/c) are capable of capturing this behavior.

56. Open the Save As window and save the current project (with a grid distance of 1 m) as

<Tutorial-2d>.

57. Open the Non-Uniform Loads window from the Loads menu and add a temporary soil raise

of 1 m from 161 to 840 days, according to Figure 9.37.

58. Perform a new calculation in the Start Calculation window.

59. After the calculation, view the development of total and residual settlements, and check that

the residual settlement for vertical 4 at 900 days is now reduced to 0.145 m (Figure 9.38).

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

Temporary preloading by enforced dewatering is an alternative for (part of the) temporary

preloading by soil raise. D-S ETTLEMENT supports different enforced dewatering methods,

including Menard consolidation, IFCOIFCO method (sand screens) and BeauDrain (strip

drains). In this case, enforced dewatering of strip drains with rectangular grid (BeauDrain)

has been combined with a small temporary soil raise of 0.5 m.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

60. Open the Save As window and save the current project as <Tutorial-2e>.

61. Modify the temporary preloading in the Non-Uniform Loads window, according to Fig-

ure 9.40, and click OK to confirm.

62. Open the Vertical Drains window via the GeoObjects menu, change the drain spacing to a

<Rectangular> grid (typical for Beau Drain), select the Simple Input option for Drainage

Schedule, add a Begin time for the pumping of <54> days, and add a End time of <438>

days. Leave the value for the underpressure to the default of <35> kPa. The value of

the Water head during dewatering should be chosen equal to the initial position of the

horizontal drains, in this case at RL <-2.2> m as shown in Figure 9.41.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

64. Verify that the residual settlement after 900 days is 0.140 m for vertical 4.

65. View the excess head versus time at vertical 4, RL-4.875 m (Figure 9.42). Note that the

excess head is reduced considerably during enforced dewatering.

Figure 9.42: Time-History window, Excess head vs. Time in vertical 4 at RL-4.875 m,

with enforced dewatering (Tutorial-2e)

66. View also the effective stress versus time at vertical 4, RL-4.875 m (Figure 9.43). Before

438 days, the effective stress increases continuously, due to still dissipating excess pore

pressures. After the end of pumping, at 438 days, the effective stress decreases with

approximately 35 kPa.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 9.43: Time-History window, Effective stress vs. Time in vertical 4 at RL-4.875 m,

with enforced dewatering (Tutorial-2e)

The construction of the embankment can cause damaging horizontal displacements for ex-

isting constructions, especially piles. De Leeuw theory implemented in D-S ETTLEMENT will be

used hereafter to estimate those horizontal displacements.

The De Leeuw method (De Leeuw, 1963) is based on the work of Van IJsseldijk (elastic soil)

and Loof (elastic soil with stiff top layer) and estimates the horizontal displacements based

on an elastic solution for a single elastic incompressible layer, characterized by the Young’s

modulus E . The method assumes that the horizontal deformations of the elastic layer are

always constrained at the bottom by a stiff foundation layer. Optionally the deformations can

also be constrained by a stiff layer at the top.

In this tutorial, the Clay and Peat layers are considered as elastic layers that will deform and

the Sand (Pleistocene) layer is the foundation layer (Loof case).

The Young’s modulus of the elastic layer can be automatically estimated by D-S ETTLEMENT

from the average unit weight γ of the soft layers according to De Leeuw & Timmermans

(section 18.3.3).

An other method, called Betuweroute method, is used in this tutorial. The E-modulus is de-

termined from the following equation:

∆σ

E = 1.25 H (9.2)

∆s

where:

∆σ is the vertical stress increase of the elastic layer, in kN/m2 ;

∆s is the settlement of the elastic layer, in m.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

To estimate the E-modulus from D-S ETTLEMENT results, vertical 4 leading to maximum set-

tlements is used: in the Depth-History window, relative final settlement of the Clay (between

NAP -1.86 m and NAP -2.15 m) and Peat (between NAP -2.15 m and NAP -7.60 m) layers (i.e.

elastic layers) is respectively 0.15 m and 3.62 m and the loading goes from -1.86 m (surface)

to 9.75 m with a unit weight of 18 kN/m3 , which leads to a modulus of:

0.15

= 505 kPa for Clay

E= 18×(9.75−(−1.86))

1.25 × (−2.15 − (−7.60)) 3.62

= 393 kPa for Peat

67. Open the Save As window and save the current project as <Tutorial-2f>.

68. Open the Model window via the Project menu, and mark the Horizontal displacements

checkbox.

69. Open the Materials window via the Soil menu, and select <Foundation> as Layer be-

haviour for Sand (Pleistocene) layer and <Elastic> for Clay and Peat layers (Figure 9.45).

For the Peat and Clay layers with an elastic behavior, enter a soil modulus of respectively

<393 kPa> and <505 kPa> (section 18.3.3).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

70. Open the Start Calculation window via the Calculation menu and click Start to start the

calculation.

71. Open the Depth-History window via the Results menu. Unmarked the Stress checkbox

and click on the Horizontal Displacement button in the Deformation field.

72. Select the different verticals to see the influence of the position.

Horizontal displacements in the stiff foundation (i.e. Sand) layer are nil as De Leeuw theory

is based on elastic solution.At the bottom of the Depth-History window, the resulting elasticity

for the vertical is displayed (average elasticity between all elastic layers).Horizontal displace-

ments are maximum and equal for verticals 3 and 5 as they are both situated at the top

level of the load (Figure 9.46). For vertical 4 situated at the middle of the loading, horizontal

displacements are almost nil because of symmetry.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

D-S ETTLEMENT’s reliability module will be used hereafter to estimate the bandwidth in total and

residual settlement, based on values for the standard deviation of soil parameters and layer

positions. D-S ETTLEMENT can either estimate standard deviations based on safe defaults for

variation coefficients, or use direct input of the standard deviation. In this case, direct input

has been applied, based on Equation 9.1.

Note: It is assumed in this case, that the thickness of the layers is large compared to the

scale of vertical variability. Averaging in vertical direction is then allowed. The input value

of the standard deviation of the local average in a vertical has been estimated from the total

variance, by assuming a ratio of 1 to 4 between the variance of the local average in a vertical

and the total variance from the lab tests.

Note: D-S ETTLEMENT supports normal and lognormal distributions. Usage of a Student-t dis-

tribution is theoretically preferred in cases with a small number of lab tests. The additional

uncertainty by small test numbers has been incorporated approximately in the standard devi-

ation of a normal or lognormal distribution, by an exaggeration factor on the total variance.

Note: D-S ETTLEMENT does not stochastically model the uncertainties following from limita-

tions of the prediction model, the uncertainties in loading and the uncertainty in soil type. The

expected bandwidth is in reality therefore presumably larger than the calculated bandwidth.

73. Open the Save As window and save the current project as <Tutorial-2g>.

74. Open the Model window via the Project menu, mark the Reliability Analysis checkbox and

unmark the Horizontal displacements checkbox.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

75. Open the Probabilistic Defaults window via the Project menu.

76. Select <Deterministic>for the Distribution of the Layer boundary and <Log normal> for

the Distribution of the other parameters. Enter <0> for the Correlation coef. with CR or

Cc in the Compression tab.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

77. Open the Materials window via the Soil menu. Unmark the Probabilistic Defaults check-

box for each soil type, and add the standard deviations and distributions, according to

Figure 9.49 to Figure 9.51.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

78. Open the Calculation Times window via the Calculation menu and add the times for band-

width determination, according to Figure 9.52.

Tutorial 2: Embankment design with vertical drains

79. Open the Start Calculation window via the Calculation menu. Monte Carlo is the preferred

method for robust determination of bandwidth in both total and residual settlements. Se-

lect Monte Carlo reliability analysis, select Vertical <4> at horizontal co-ordinate 50 for

the settlement determination, enter <0.15 m> as Allowed residual settlement, and enter

<200> as the Maximum number of samples. Unselect the Add dissipation calculation

option. Click Start to start the Monte Carlo sampling.

Figure 9.53: Start Calculation window for Monte Carlo reliability analysis (Tutorial-2g)

80. After the analysis has finished, open the Time-History (Reliability) from the Results menu

to view the bandwidth results (Figure 9.54). Monte Carlo results can vary slightly from

analysis to analysis, because of the random drawing of soil parameters for the 200 sam-

ples. Using the right-hand mouse button, open the Chart Data window and check that the

total settlement after 1000 days is approximately 3.78 ± 0.60 m. Note that those values

can vary from a calculation to another due to a different sampling for each calculation.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 9.54: Time-History (Reliability) window, Total settlement vs. Time with Band width

for Monte Carlo method (Tutorial-2g)

81. Then open the Residual Settlement (Reliability) window from the Results menu (Figure 9.55)

and check that the residual settlement after 900 days is approximately 0.15 ± 0.07 m.

82. Click on the Probability of failure button and check that the failure probability (residual

settlement larger than 0.15 m) is 45%.

Note: Those values can vary from a calculation to another due to a different sampling for

each calculation. Note also that the mean final and residual settlements from a Monte Carlo

analysis are larger than results from a deterministic calculation.

9.10 Conclusion

This tutorial presents the different stages of a project leading to use vertical strip drains with

enforced dewatering in combination with temporary pre-loading in order to accelerate the

consolidation process and finally get acceptable residual settlements.

10 Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

This is the second tutorial in a sequence of two on the construction of a high embankment for

the Dutch A2 highway, at a viaduct crossing with the N201 road nearby Vinkeveen. Vertical

drains with enforced dewatering have been used to speed up the consolidation and to reduce

the residual settlement. The first part (chapter 9) already illustrated D-S ETTLEMENT’s different

features for the initial design.

to perform a settlement plate fit after input of the actual loading stages;

to perform a bandwidth determination, in order to improve the predictions and reduce

the uncertainty during the construction stage.

2D Geometry module

Darcy module

Vertical Drains module

Fit for Settlement Plate module

Reliability Analyses module

This tutorial is presented on the files Tutorial-3a.sli to Tutorial-3c.sli and is based on measure-

ment file Tutorial-3.txt.

Compared to the initial design calculation in the previous Tutorial-2f [chapter 9], a waiting

period of 100 days has been introduced after construction of the working floor and the instal-

lation of the drains, and the additional period for the soil raise to maximum height has been

extended to 264 days. The available construction period, including the construction of the

working floor, is now 940 days, and the residual settlements from 1000 days may not exceed

0.15 m.The shape of the loading must also be adapted to fit with the actual loading stages.

The 14 stages with their application time and geometry are given in Figure 10.1. The exact

co-ordinates of each loading stage are given in Table 10.1.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

[days] X=0 X= 35 X = 50 X= 67 X = 103

15 days 15 -1.9 -0.7 -0.66 -0.63 -1.83

115 days 115 -1.9 -0.4 -0.36 -0.63 -1.83

144 days 144 -1.9 0.6 0.64 0.67 -1.83

162 days 162 -1.9 0.6 0.64 1.37 -1.83

169 days 169 -1.9 0.6 2.14 2.27 -1.83

176 days 176 -1.9 2.1 2.14 2.27 -1.83

190 days 190 -1.9 3.7 3.64 2.27 -1.83

225 days 225 -1.9 5.6 5.44 5.47 -1.83

240 days 240 -1.9 5.6 5.44 7.17 -1.83

246 days 246 -1.9 7.1 7.14 7.17 -1.83

288 days 288 -1.9 8.5 8.44 8.47 -1.83

379 days 379 -1.9 10.5 10.44 10.37 -1.83

512 days 512 -1.9 10.1 10.14 10.37 -1.83

940 days 940 -1.9 9.379 9.413 9.469 -1.83

1. Open the initial input file <Tutorial-2g.sli>, containing already the input data for the subsoil,

the drains with enforced dewatering and the measured loading.

2. Open the Save As window and save it as <Tutorial-3a>.

3. In the Project Properties window, fill in <Tutorial 3 for D-S ETTLEMENT > and <Settlement

plate fit> for Title 1 and Title 2 respectively in the Identification tab.

4. In the Model window unselect the option Reliability Analysis.

5. Open the Non-Uniform Loads window from the Loads menu and delete all existing loads

using the Delete button.

6. Add a new load by clicking the Add button and rename it to <15 days>. Enter a Time

of <15> days. Enter a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level of respectively

<18> and <20> kN/m3 . Enter the co-ordinates of this first load as given in Table 10.1.

This should result in the same window as Figure 10.2.

Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

7. Then click 13 times on the Add button to input the 13 other loads. Modify the Load name,

the Time and the Y co-ordinate of those 13 loads according to Table 10.1. For the two last

loads <512 days> and <940 days> enter a negative Total unit weight above and below

phreatic level to model the removing of the load, as illustrated in Figure 10.3.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

8. Open the Vertical Drains window and increase the Start of drainage of 20 days and the

Begin and End time of enforced dewatering of 100 days to get the same window as Fig-

ure 10.4. Click OK to confirm.

9. Open the Calculation Times window and modify the times according to Figure 10.5. Click

Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

OK to confirm.

10. Press the function key F9 to open the Start Calculation window.

11. View the transient settlement and effective loading at the surface level after selecting Ver-

tical number <4> in the Time-History window from the Results menu (Figure 10.6) and

check that the predicted final settlement is 3.747 m.

Figure 10.6: Time-History window, Settlements and Effective stress at surface level vs.

Time for vertical 4 (Tutorial-3a)

12. Open the Residual Settlement window and check that the predicted residual settlement

after 1000 days for vertical 4 is about 0.14 m.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

13. Open the Save As window and save the current project as <Tutorial-3b>.

14. Open the Model window via the Project menu and mark the Fit for settlement plate check-

box (Figure 10.7).

15. Open the Fit for Settlement Plate window via the Calculation menu.

16. At the top of the window, select Vertical <4 at 50.000m>.

17. In the Measurements tab, click the File Open button and select <Tutorial-3.txt> from the

Tutorials directory where the D-S ETTLEMENT program was installed (Figure 10.15). Click

Open.

Note: The text file named Tutorial-3.txt has a simple two-column number format (times and

settlements), separated by tabs. It is possible in the input window to enter a shift in time or

settlement.

Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

The measurements are displayed in the Measurements tab of the Fit for Settlement Plate

window (Figure 10.9). Separate weights can be attached to each of the measurements. The

default weight is 1. A large weight to a certain measurement will increase its relative influence.

Figure 10.9: Fit for Settlement Plate window, Measurements tab (Tutorial-3b)

18. Select the Materials tab. This tab offers options for automatic or manual adaptation of 5

special fit parameters as shown in Figure 10.10.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 10.10: Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab (Tutorial-3b)

19. Click the Show Current button to compare the initial prediction with the actual measure-

ments as shown in the Time-History (Fit) window that opens (Figure 10.11).

Figure 10.11: Time-History (Fit) window, Initial prediction versus measurement, imperfec-

tion 0.19 m (Tutorial-3b)

In the Materials tab of the Fit for Settlement Plate window, D-S ETTLEMENT also displays a so-

called Imperfection value of 0.19 m (Figure 10.12). This is the root-mean-square deviation

between prediction and settlement.

Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

Figure 10.12: Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab, Details of the Fit Results

(Tutorial-3b)

D-S ETTLEMENT uses fit factors to multiply the following five soil parameters and ratio’s for all

layers or for user-selected layers:

cv or kv ( consolidation)

OCR or POP (preconsolidation)

CR (primary virgin compressibility)

ratio RR/CR (reloading compressibility relative to primary virgin compressibility)

ratio Cα /CR (secondary compressibility relative to primary virgin compressibility)

It is possible to manually modify those single fit factors and see the effect on the total and

residual settlements. For instance:

20. Set the multiplication factor on CR to <0.95> and click Show Current to view the predic-

tion versus the measurement.

21. Reset all fit factors to <1> in the Materials tab from the Fit for Settlement Plate window.

22. Click the Iteration button to open the Iteration stop criteria window and change the default

iteration stop criteria to the values displayed in Figure 10.13. The coefficient of determina-

tion is defined as 1 minus the division of the square of the final imperfection by the square

of the initial one. The required iteration accuracy is the minimally required improvement in

the coefficient of determination per iteration. Click OK to confirm.

23. Click Fit to start the automatic iterative modification of the fit factors.

D-S ETTLEMENT uses a robust weighted least squares procedure, which minimizes not only the

deviation between prediction and settlement, but also the deviation between the initial and

modified parameter. Separate weights can be attached to each of the fit factors. The default

weights are suited for most purposes. A large weight on a fit factor will reduce the freedom to

deviate from 1. The default weights are the largest for the two compressibility ratios, because

a local variation in primary virgin compressibility is likely to be correlated to a similar variation

in reloading and secondary compressibility.

The fit factors during the fit are displayed in the Fit for Settlement Plate window. An acceptable

match between fit and measurements by modification of soil parameters might hide that model

limitations and loading uncertainties are in reality sometimes also a major cause of deviations

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

between the initial prediction and the measurements. Therefore, a fit result can only be trusted

if the initial soil parameters were determined accurately and if the variation of the fit factors in

different cross sections is realistic compared to the natural variability in the soil parameters.

Figure 10.14: Fit for Settlement Plate window, Materials tab, Fit factors after fit (Tutorial-

3b)

24. After completion (Figure 10.14), click the Show Current button to view the final result, with

an imperfection value of 0.04 m (Figure 10.15).

Figure 10.15: Time-History (Fit) window, Prediction vs. measurement after fit, imperfec-

tion 0.04 m (Tutorial-3b)

Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

25. Open the Start Calculation window and mark the Use fit parameters checkbox (Figure 10.16).

27. Open the Time-History window from the Results menu and check that the total settlement

in vertical 4 after 10000 days is 3.484 m, identical to Figure 10.15.

28. Open the Save As window and save the current project as <Tutorial-3c>.

29. Open the Model window and mark the Reliability analysis checkbox. See section 9.9 for

the input of the stochastic soil data.

30. Open the Start Calculation window, and select the Monte Carlo analysis. Input of an Imper-

fection value is required for a reliability analysis with a preceding fit, to quantify limitations

of the model and measurement errors, preventing a perfect fit and a perfect prediction of

the remainder.

p The imperfection value resulting from the fit (0.04 m) needs to be multiplied

with (n − 5) / (n − 1) to derive the input value of 0.05 m, where n equals the number

of measurements (n = 43).

31. Click Start.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 10.17: Start Calculation window, Monte Carlo using fit parameters (Tutorial-3c)

D-S ETTLEMENT will start with an update of the parameters dependencies (correlation matrix),

followed by the actual Monte Carlo analysis with updated mean values and updated correla-

tion matrix.

32. View the resulting settlement in the Time-History (Reliability) window and check that the

final settlement at 10000 days is now approximately 3.49 ± 0.06 m (Figure 10.18).

Figure 10.18: Time-History (Reliability) window, Total settlement vs. Time with Band

width for Monte Carlo method (Tutorial-3c)

Tutorial 3: Settlement plate fit

33. Open the Residual Settlements (Reliability) window and check that the residual settlement

after 1000 days is now approximately 0.154 ± 0.079 m (Figure 10.19), with a probability

of 46.5% that the maximum of 0.15 m is exceeded.

10.5 Conclusion

This tutorial illustrates that the initial uncertainty at the design stage can be reduced sig-

nificantly during the construction stage, by using measurement data. Conditions for such

a significant reduction are however that a large number of measurements are available, in

combination with a low imperfection value (0.05 m or less).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

11 Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

This tutorial illustrates the modelling of ground improvement using two different methods. To

reduce the settlement by embankment construction, part of the original soil (peat) is first

replaced by sand.

To apply a load using different construction stages

To analyze the settlement results by comparing both methods

For this example, the following D-S ETTLEMENT modules are needed:

2D Geometry module

Darcy module

11.1 Introduction

This tutorial includes the ground improvement of part of the actual soil, and the construction

of a road embankment including several stages.

Figure 11.1: Ground improvement and embankment construction in three stages (Tutorial

4)

Ground improvement

To reduce the settlement by embankment construction, part of the original soil (clay and peat)

is first excavated and replaced by sand. There are two ways to simulate soil improvement

in D-S ETTLEMENT. Method 1 is modelling the excavated soil as initial load. This is the most

straightforward method. Drawback is that D-S ETTLEMENT will apply some unphysical load

distribution for the initial load in horizontal direction; Method 2 is modelling the sand slab as

a soil layer with reduced initial weight and additional loading. This enforces D-S ETTLEMENT

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

to calculate a proper initial stress distribution and also to calculation deformations and pore

pressures in the foundation layer.

Initial stage: the part of the soil that will be replaced is modelled as an initial non-uniform

load. The top surface of the soil layers is therefore located at the bottom of the part that

will be excavated. An imaginary surface is defined at this bottom in order to achieve a

proper initial stress distribution.

Time t = 0 days: the excavation is modelled by a reversed initial non-uniform load

(negative unit weight) and the replacement by sand is modelled by applying a non-

uniform load with the unit weight of sand.

Method 2: new soil as an initial layer (Tutorial-4b)

Initial stage: the final foundation layer is already defined in the initial geometry. This

layer has the mechanical properties of the improved soil but the density of the original

soil. In this way, proper initial stresses are created.

Time t = 0 days: Replacement is modelled by a non-uniform load, with a unit weight

equal to the difference between the sand and the original soil.

Time t = 100 days: A nil load is added to redefine the initial level for subsequent em-

bankment construction (i.e. non-uniform nil load with a top surface at the ground level).

This nil load has a zero unsaturated unit weight. The saturated unit weight is equal to

the unit weight of water, to neutralize the effect of possible submerging.

Note: Method 1 will disturb the real initial stress field due to load distribution.

Embankment

After the soil improvement, a road embankment of 10 m height is constructed including several

stages:

Time t = 500 days: second stage of the embankment construction (3 m height).

Time t = 1000 days: third stage of the embankment construction (4 m height).

For this tutorial, the a/b/c isotache model is used in combination with the Darcy consolidation

model. The a/b/c isotache model enhances the NEN-Bjerrum isotache model, by using natural

strain (based on deformed state) instead of linear strain (based on initial state). Natural strains

can be advantageous to prevent unphysical large deformations. All parameters for the a/b/c

Isotache model can be derived from common oedometer tests. The OCR (over-consolidation

ratio) is the ratio between the initial vertical preconsolidation stress and the initial field stress.

The amount of initial over-consolidation is an important value for the Isotache model, because

it defines the initial creep rate that would occur without additional loading.

Peat Sand

3

Saturated unit weight γsat [kN/m ] 15 17.5

Unsaturated unit weight γunsat [kN/m3 ] 15 20

Overconsolidation ratio OCR [-] 1.1 1.1

Coefficient of consolidation cv [m2 /s] 5 × 10−8 Drained

Reloading/Swelling constant a [-] 10−2 10−6

Primary compression constant b [-] 10−1 2 × 10−6

Secondary compression constant c [-] 5× 10−3 10−6

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

11.2 Project

To create a new file, follow the steps described below:

1. Click File and choose New on the D-S ETTLEMENT menu bar.

2. Select New geometry (Figure 11.2) to create the project geometry.

3. Click OK.

5. Enter <Tutorial-4a> as file name.

6. Click Save.

The soil and consolidation models are to be set.

7. Choose Model from the Project menu to open the Model window.

8. Select the Isotache soil model and the Darcy consolidation model in 2D geometry (Fig-

ure 11.3).

9. Click OK to confirm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

To give the project a meaningful description, follow the steps described below:

10. On the menu bar, click Project and then choose Properties to open the Project Properties

window.

11. Fill in <Tutorial 4 for D-S ETTLEMENT > and <Ground improvement> for Title 1 and Title 2

respectively in the Identification tab.

12. In the View Input tab, mark the Points checkbox of the Labels sub-window in order to

display the point’s number and select the option As material names of the Layers sub-

window in order to display the name of the layers.

13. Click OK.

11.3 Geometry

In the Geometry menu, the geometry aspects of the project can be specified.

11.3.1 Limits

The boundaries of the calculation domain must be specified.

14. Choose Limits from the Geometry menu to open the Geometry Limits window.

15. Enter a Boundary limit at left of <-100 m> instead of 0 m.

16. Click OK.

11.3.2 Points

All lines (phreatic line, piezometric line or/and boundary layer) in D-S ETTLEMENT are connected

between points. The different points are defined using theAdd row button:

17. Choose Points from the Geometry menu to open the Points window.

18. Click the Add row button to enter the first point.

19. Click the X co-ordinate of point 1 and enter <-100>.

20. Click the Y co-ordinate of point 1 and enter <0>.

21. Repeat it for the other points (2 to 10) as shown in Figure 11.5.

22. Click OK.

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

The defined points can now be seen in the View Input window. The Zoom limits button in the

Tools panel can be used to optimize the limits of the drawing.

To create the phreatic line, first a PL-line (piezometric level) must be defined:

23. Choose Pl-lines from the Geometry menu to open the Pl-Lines window.

24. Click the Add button to create PL-line number <1>.

25. Enter points number <9> and <10> in the Point number column at the right of the

window (Figure 11.6).

26. Click OK.

The defined phreatic line can now be seen in the View Input window.

Note: When at least one PL-line is defined in the Pl-Lines window, D-S ETTLEMENT automat-

ically defined PL-line number 1 to be the phreatic line, as can be seen in the Phreatic Line

window from the Geometry menu (Figure 11.7).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

11.3.4 Layers

After defining the points (section 11.3.2), the actual layers can now be defined according to

Figure 11.1.

27. On the menu bar, click Geometry and then choose Layers.

28. In the Layers window that appears, click the Add button to create boundary number <0>.

Remember that layer number 0 is never a physical layer but defines the base of the project.

29. Enter points number <7> and <8> in the Point number column at the right of the window.

30. Add boundary number <1> by clicking the Add button and enter point’s number <1>,

<2>, <3>, <4>, <5> and <6>.

31. Select the Materials tab of the Layers window to define a soil type for each layer.

On the left of the window (Figure 11.9), a list containing default available materials is displayed.

32. Assign material Peat to layer number 1 as shown in Figure 11.9 by clicking the button.

33. Click OK to confirm the input.

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

The defined layer and phreatic line can now be seen in the View Input window (Figure 11.10).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

In the Soil menu, the properties of the Peat layer given in Table 11.1 can be inputted.

34. Choose Materials from the Soil menu to open the Materials window.

35. Select Peat in the material list and enter the soil properties values of this layer as indicated

in Table 11.1 in both tabs.

36. Click OK to confirm.

11.4.2 Loads

As explained in section 11.1, the soil that has to be excavated is modeled as an initial non-

uniform load with the same unit weight as the Peat layer.

37. From the Loads menu, choose Non-Uniform Loads to open the input window.

38. In the Load name sub-window, click the Add button and rename the load with name <Initial

soil>.

39. Mark the Initial load checkbox.

40. Enter a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level of <15> (as for Peat in sec-

tion 11.4.1).

41. Enter two points using the Add row button with X co-ordinate of <-60> and <60> and

Y co-ordinate of <0> (see Figure 11.12).

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

As explained in section 11.1, at time 0 day, the excavation is modeled by simply adding a

reversed initial non-uniform load (by means of a negative unit weight) and the refilling with

sand material is modeled by applying a non-uniform load (with the same unit weight as the

sand material).

42. Click the Add button and rename the load with name <Excavation>.

43. Unmark the Initial load checkbox.

44. Enter a Time of <0 days> and a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level of

<-15>.

45. The bottom boundary of the excavation includes four points: select the second row and

use the Insert row button to insert two rows between the two existing rows. Enter co-

ordinates X of <-50> and Y of <-5> for point 2 and X of <50> and Y of <-5> for point

3 as shown in Figure 11.13 (left).

46. To model the refilling with sand material, select the load Initial soil previously defined and

click the Add button. Rename the load with name <Improvement>.

47. Unmark the Initial load checkbox and enter a Total unit weight of <17.5> and <20>

respectively above and below phreatic level. The co-ordinates don’t need to be modified as

the top boundary of the Improvement load is the same as the Initial soil load (Figure 11.13).

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

After the soil improvement, now enter the three stages of the embankment con-

struction by using the Generate button.

48. Click the Generate button at the bottom of the Non-Uniform Loads window to open the

Generate Non-Uniform Loads window.

49. In the Envelope Points tab, enter the co-ordinates of the points that define the envelope of

the road embankment, as given in Figure 11.14 to be in accordance with Figure 11.1.

50. Select the Top of load steps tab and enter the two intermediate values at <3 m> and

<6 m> (Figure 11.14).

51. Click OK to generate the loads.

52. Rename load Generated load (1) with name <Load 1> and enter a Time of <100 days>.

53. Rename load Generated load (2) with name <Load 2> and enter a Time of <500 days>.

54. Select Final load and enter a Time of <1000 days>.

55. Click OK to confirm.

The non-uniform loads are now displayed in the Input tab of the View Input window.

The Zoom limits button in the Tools panel can be used to optimize the limits of the drawing

(Figure 11.15).

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

To visualize the sequence of loading, use the Previous stage and Next stage buttons

in the Stage panel.

11.4.3 Verticals

A sufficient number of verticals must be defined to get a good impression of the settlement

distribution.

56. Choose Verticals from the GeoObjects menu to open the input window.

57. Select Interval in the Automatic generation x co-ordinates sub-window.

58. Enter a First and a Last point with X co-ordinate of respectively <0 m> and <60 m>,

and enter an Interval of <10 m>. Because of symmetry, verticals are generated only for

half part of the embankment.

59. Click the Generate button.

60. Click OK to confirm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The top surface of the soil layers is located at the bottom of the excavation (i.e. top of the Peat

layer). Therefore an imaginary surface is defined at this bottom in order to achieve a proper

initial stress distribution.

62. Mark the checkbox Output of settlements by partial loading (green lines) in order to view

in the Time-History window the settlements due to each load-step (section 11.4.5).

63. Mark the Imaginary surface checkbox.

64. Leave other options like submerging (decrease of effective load by submerging) to their

default settings.

65. Click OK to confirm.

66. Choose Start from the Calculation menu or press the function key F9.

67. Click OK to start the calculation.

68. Choose the Time-History option in the Results menu.

69. In the Time-History window displayed, inspect the results for each vertical using the scroll

arrows of the Vertical box, at the top of the window. Vertical 1 at the axis of the embank-

ment (Figure 11.18) gives the largest final settlements.

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

The second method models the sand foundation as an initial layer and uses an additional load

to add the additional weight. Therefore a new Sand layer must be introduced in the project.

70. Click Save As in the file menu and save this tutorial as <Tutorial-4b>.

71. Click Save.

72. Select Material in the Soil menu to open the Material window.

73. Select the Sand material.

74. In the Consolidation and unit weight tab, mark the Drained checkbox as indicated in Ta-

ble 11.1 for Sand but for the weight, enter the same unit weights (below and above the

phreatic level) as the Peat layer (i.e. <15>).

75. In the Compression tab, enter the soil properties as indicated in Table 11.1 for Sand.

76. Click OK.

77. On the menu bar, click Geometry and then choose Layers.

78. In the Layers window that appears, click the Add button to create boundary number <2>.

79. Enter points number <1>, <2>, <5> and <6> in the Point number column at the right

of the window.

80. In the Materials tab of the Layers window, assign the Sand material to Layer number 2

using the button.

81. Click OK to confirm the input.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

As explained in section 11.1, at time t = 0 days, the additional density due to soil improvement

is modeled as a non-uniform load (with an effective unit weight equal to the difference between

the initial Peat material and the new Sand material):

Below phreatic level: 20 - 15 + 9.81 = 14.81 kN/m3 .

82. From the Loads menu, choose Non-Uniform Loads to open the input window.

83. Delete the existing loads Initial Soil and Excavation by selecting them and clicking the

Delete button.

84. Select the Improvement load and enter unit weights equal to the additional density: <2.5 kN/m3 >

above and <14.81 kN/m3 > below the phreatic level.

85. In the co-ordinates table, enter the co-ordinates of the four points of the excavation bound-

ary as given in Figure 11.19 (left).

A nil load must now be added at time 100 days to redefine the initial level for subsequent

embankment construction (i.e. non-uniform nil load with a top surface at the ground level).

This nil load has a zero unsaturated unit weight and a saturated unit weight equal to the unit

weight of water, to neutralize the effect of possible submerging:

87. Rename the load with <Step to surface> and enter unit weights of <0 kN/m3 > and

<9.81 kN/m3 > respectively above and below the phreatic level.

88. In the co-ordinates table, delete points 2 and 3 using the Delete row button in order to

keep only the top surface boundary as shown in Figure 11.19 (right).

89. In the Calculation Options window, unmark the Imaginary surface checkbox.

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

90. Press the function key F9 to start the calculation.

As the Improvement load is below the ground surface, warning messages appear in the Start

Calculation window (Figure 11.20).

92. Choose the Time-History option in the Results menu.

93. In the Time-History window displayed, inspect the results for each vertical using the scroll

arrows of the Vertical box, at the top of the window. Note that vertical 1 (Figure 11.21)

gives the more important final settlements.

Practically no deformation occurs from depth 0 m to depth -5 m, because of the relatively low

compressibility of the Sand layer (from depths 0 m to -5 m). To illustrate this:

94. Select depth <0.000 m> of the Depth box and then use the scroll button of the mouse to

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

96. Select the final time <10000 days> from the drop-down menu of theTime box.

The settlement chart displayed (Figure 11.22) shows that almost no settlement occurs in the

top sand layer called Sand. Note that excess pressures are still significant at 10000 days.

To compare the settlement and loading curves of both methods, the data from D-S ETTLEMENT

graphs are exported to spread sheets:

97. In the Time-History window, click with the right hand mouse button in the graph area.

98. Select View Data.

99. In the Chart Data window displayed (Figure 11.23), select the columns with the mouse.

100. Use the Copy button to copy the data to the Windows clipboard.

Tutorial 4: Ground improvement

Using the steps described above, both chart data’s (for both methods) can be pasted in a

spreadsheet for direct comparison as shown in Figure 11.24 for settlement curve and Fig-

ure 11.25 for effective stress curve. Those figures show that both methods give approximately

the same results in vertical 1.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 11.25: Effective stress vs. Time – Comparison between methods 1 and 2

11.7 Conclusion

Two methods were demonstrated to model ground improvement with D-S ETTLEMENT. Mod-

elling of the ground improvement as an initial load is the most straightforward method. This

method will however disturb the true initial stress distributions outside the centre of the em-

bankment. Modelling of the ground improvement as an initial soil layer yields proper initial

stresses. Results from both methods at the centre of the embankment are comparable for

these embankment dimensions.

12 Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

IFCO method illustrates the modelling of sand screens in combination with enforced dewater-

ing (IFCO method) for the construction of a new Schiphol airport runway. This example has

also been described in Dutch literature Den Adel et al. (2004) and Den Adel (March 2002).

To model soil drainage by sand screens with enforced dewatering;

To model ground improvement.

For this example, the following D-S ETTLEMENT modules are needed:

2D Geometry module

Darcy module

Vertical Drains module

12.1 Introduction

A new runway at a height of about 1.2 m above ground level has to be constructed. Sand

screens with enforced dewatering (IFCO method) are used, because of the severe constraints

on building time (short) and residual settlement (small). A general view of this project is shown

in Figure 12.1.

Figure 12.1: General view with pre-loading and sand walls (Tutorial 5)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The following stages are modelled, up to and including the sand embankment construction.

At time 0 day: Excavation of the subsoil, providing space for the foundation layer, until

roughly 0.55 m below the ground level;

At time 12 days: Filling of the foundation trench with sand;

At time 19 days: Installation of sand screens and start of enforced dewatering;

At time 39 days: embankment raise to a level of 1.2 m.

The added sand has an unsaturated and a saturated unit weight of respectively 17.5 and

20 kN/m3 .

For the characterization of the subsoil, a boring is made nearby the studied location. Results

are shown in Figure 12.3.

Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

The compression related parameters of the six soft layers were determined from K0 -CRS

(constant rate of strain) tests, each with an unloading/reloading branch. This test type allows

a more accurate determination of the primary compression parameters and the preconsolida-

tion stress, compared to an oedometer test. The resulting parameters are given in Table 12.1.

Note that the POP value is very large for Dutch conditions.

cene clayey very silty mod. slight.

silty silty peaty

γunsat [kN/m3 ] 18 15.7 14.4 9.9 9.1 7.8 5.9 2.5

γsat [kN/m3 ] 20 19.5 18.7 16.0 15.5 14.4 13.3 10.5

kv;0 [10-4 - 1.3 7.2 2.7 0.6 7.0 0.53 7.9

m/d]

Ck [-] - 0.01 0.082 0.353 0.396 0.209 0.316 0.213

kh /kv [-] - 1 1 1 1 1 1 4

a [-] 10-6 0.0002 0.0031 0.0085 0.0090 0.0134 0.0143 0.0211

b [-] 2.10-6 0.0419 0.0452 0.1197 0.1795 0.1825 0.2389 0.3225

c [-] 0 0 0.0017 0.0025 0.0101 0.0109 0.0149 0.0187

POP [kPa] 0 20 91.4 35.6 63.5 47.5 85.0 151.0

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

IFCO method method is based on the combination of sand screens with enforced dewatering

during pumping. The enforced dewatering will cause temporary pre-loading by lowering of the

water table and sometimes also by creating additional under pressure via sealing.

The sand screens are constructed roughly perpendicular to the axis of the runway, with a

width of 0.25 m, a depth of 10.2 m below reference level and a distance of 3.5 m. Horizontal

drain pipes are installed inside each screen at a depth of 10.075 m below reference level. A

reduced pressure of 10 kPa is applied in the drain pipe during pumping.Moreover, the runway

is sealed from surrounding water and air pressure by means of bentonite shields and an

impermeable foil. This way, an additional air underpressure of 30 kPa is created at the top of

the trenches.

12.2 Project

How to define the layers geometry and soil properties has been explained already in the

previous tutorials. Use the different figures and data’s given in section 12.1 to create the

geometry and then proceed with section 12.5 for the description of the additional steps.

However, an alternative to the manual input is to import the geometry from a so-called GEO file

(section 12.2.1) and to import the soil properties from an MGeobase database (section 12.3).

To import the geometry from a GEO file, follow the steps below.

1. In the File menu, select New to open the New File window (Figure 12.5).

2. Select the Import geometry option and click OK.

Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

3. In the Import Geometry From window displayed, select the GEO file named <Tutorial-

5.geo> located in the Tutorials folder where the D-S ETTLEMENT program was installed.

4. Click OK.

The predefined geometry is displayed in the Geometry tab of the View Input window (Fig-

ure 12.6). This imported geometry contains only the points, the layers boundary and the

PL-lines, not the material types and properties. They will be imported from an MGeobase

database (section 12.3).

Figure 12.6: View Input window, Geometry tab after importing geometry

5. Click Save as in the File menu, enter <Tutorial-5a> as file name and click Save.

12.2.2 Model

The soil and consolidation models, as well as the use of vertical drainage are to be set.

6. In the Model window from the Project menu, select the Isotache soil model and the Darcy

consolidation model in 2D geometry and mark the Vertical drains checkbox

The layers geometry is already modelled however the material properties still need to be

defined. The parameters from Table 12.1 were saved in an MGeobase database. To import

them, the location of this MGeobase database must be first specified:

7. In the Program Options window from the Tools menu, select the Locations tab.

8. Mark the Use MGeobase database checkbox and click the Browse button to specify the

location of the MGeobase database with material data.

9. In the Open project database window displayed, select the MDB file named <Tutorial-

5.mdb> located in the Tutorials folder where the D-S ETTLEMENT program was installed.

10. Click Open and then OK.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The soil properties of each material given in Table 12.1 can now be imported from this

MGeobase file:

11. Open the Materials window from the Geometry menu and select the Database tab.

12. Select Clay moderately silty in the material list of the Database tab and click the button to

import this soil type (with associated properties) in the material list of the Materials window

(Figure 12.8).

13. As the soil type has already been defined, D-S ETTLEMENT opens an Information window

asking if the existing local properties should be overwritten. Click Yes to confirm

14. Repeat it for the 7 other materials.

Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

15. In the Parameters tab, check that the imported properties are the same as in Table 12.1.

16. Click OK.

In the Phreatic Line window from the Geometry menu, select PL-line number <2> at level

-6.5 m as phreatic line.

In this project, the piezometric level at the ground surface corresponds with the phreatic line

(i.e. PL-line number 1 at depth -6.5 m) and the piezometric level in the Pleistocene layer is at

-4.4 m (i.e. PL-line number 2). In between, a linear distribution is assumed:

17. Open the PL-lines per Layer window from the Geometry menu and note that the eight

layers are already defined with PL-line number 1 as default.

18. For layer 1 (i.e. Pleistocene), leave PL-line number <1> at both top and bottom.

19. For layer 8 (i.e. top layer), enter PL-line number <2> at the top.

20. Enter <99> in all other cells of the table to indicate a linear distribution (Figure 12.9): the

interpolation will take place between the PL-line belonging to the first soil layer above with

a real PL-line number (i.e. not equal to 99), and the PL-line belonging to the first soil layer

below with a real PL-line number.

12.5 Loads

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The soil that has to be excavated is modelled as an initial non-uniform load with the same unit

weight as the original layer (i.e. Clay very silty 1). This method is explained in detail in Tutorial

4 (section 11.1).

21. From the Loads menu, choose Non-Uniform Loads to open the input window.

22. In the Load name sub-window, click the Add button and rename the load to <Initial state>.

23. Mark the Initial load checkbox and enter a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level

of respectively <14.4> and <18.7> kN/m3 (same as for Sand clayey ).

24. Enter two points using the Add row button with X co-ordinate of <-37.5> and <37.5>

and Y co-ordinate of <-4.85>.

The excavation is modelled by simply adding a reversed initial non-uniform load at time 0, by

means of a negative unit weight:

25. Click the Add button and rename the load to <Excavation>.

26. Unmark the Initial load checkbox.

27. Enter a Time of <0 days> and a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level of

respectively <-14.4> and <-18.7> kN/m3 .

28. Enter the co-ordinates of the excavation boundary given in Figure 12.10 (left).

The filling with sand material is modelled by applying a non-uniform load (with the same unit

weight as the sand material) until the ground surface:

29. Select the previously defined load Initial state, and click the Add button. Rename the load

to <Fill>.

30. Unmark the Initial load checkbox and enter a Time of <12> days.

31. Enter a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level of respectively <17.5> and

<20> kN/m3 . The co-ordinates don’t need to be modified, as the top boundary of the Fill

load is the same as the Initial state load (Figure 12.10, right).

Figure 12.10: Non-Uniform Loads window, Initial state and Excavation loads

Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

The sand embankment construction is modelled by applying a non-uniform load with the unit

weight of sand and with the embankment profile:

33. Enter a Time of <39> days.

34. Enter a Total unit weight above and below phreatic level of respectively <17.5> and

<20> kN/m3 . The position of the foil is given in the table of co-ordinates in Figure 12.11

(left).

35. Repeat it for the last load named <Embankment> using the values of Figure 12.11 (right).

36. Click OK to confirm.

37. In the View Input window, select the Input tab to view the non-uniform loads and use the

Previous stage buttons in the Stage panel to visualize the sequence of loading.

12.6 Verticals

In this project only one calculation vertical is defined at the centre of the embankment.

38. Choose Verticals from the GeoObjects menu to open the input window.

39. Enter X co-ordinate of <0 m> and click OK to confirm.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Perform the following steps for definition of the sand screens.

40. In the GeoObjects menu, select Vertical Drains to display the corresponding window.

41. Select <Sand wall> as Drain Type and <Simple Input> of Drainage Schedule.

42. Enter the values given in Figure 12.12 .

43. Choose Times from the Calculation menu, and enter the times for calculation of residual

settlements, according to Figure 12.13.

12.9 Results

44. Press the function key F9 to start the calculation and click Start.

Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

45. Choose the Time-History option in the Results menu to view the settlements versus time

(Figure 12.14). The final settlement is 0.189 m.

46. Choose the Residual Settlement option in the Results menu to view the residual settle-

ments versus time (Figure 12.15).

47. Choose the Depth-History option in the Results menu to view the excess head along the

depth at different times, at 10000 days for example (Figure 12.16).

Note that the apparent excess head at 10000 days is not caused by loading. This difference

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

between the final and initial (user-defined) head distribution is caused by the effect of the sand

screens. D-S ETTLEMENT assumes after dewatering in the drains a hydrostatic pore pressure

distribution below the user-defined position of the phreatic level.

In case of perfect sealing at the top of the sand screens, the enforced air underpressure is

equal to 30 kPa. A second calculation is performed, using a safe value of 0 kPa.

49. In the Vertical Drains window, enter an Underpressure of <0 kPa>.

50. Start the calculation via the Calculation menu.

51. Select Time-History in the Result menu to see the settlement results of this calculation

without underpressure.

Tutorial 5: Enforced dewatering by sand screens (IFCO)

The final settlement (0.155 m) is smaller compared to the case with underpressure (0.189 m).

A last calculation is performed with dewatering turned off, to show its influence.

53. In the Vertical Drains window, turn the dewatering option off.

54. Start the calculation via the Calculation menu.

55. Select Time-History in the Result menu to see the total settlement results of this calculation

without dewatering. The final settlement (0.132 m) is smaller compared to the case with

dewatering.

56. Select Residual Settlement in the Result menu to see the residual settlement results of this

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

calculation without dewatering. Note that the residual settlement after 200 days is hardly

affected.

12.10 Conclusion

In this tutorial the IFCO method (sand screens in combination with enforced dewatering) has

been modelled. Three cases have been considered to see the influence of the enforced

dewatering on the settlements, as illustrated by Figure 12.20.

Case B: dis-functioning of the sealing (enforced air underpressure is 0 kPa);

Case C: enforced dewatering is turned off.

It can be clearly seen that the enforced dewatering increase the final settlement, in other

words reduce the residual settlements.

13 Loads

This section includes background information on the following load types:

section 13.2 – Trapeziform loads

section 13.3 – Circular loads

section 13.4 – Rectangular loads

section 13.5 – Uniform loads

section 13.6 – Maintain profile

section 13.7 – Submerging

section 13.8 – Water load

A negative load will decrease the vertical effective stresses in a vertical. A negative time can

be used to indicate that the initial load will only affect the initial effective stress.

The top of a non-uniform load is defined as a layer boundary, and the bottom is equal to

the surface level or – when more non-uniform loads have been defined – the top of an un-

derlying non-uniform load. Besides soil raise, you can also use non-uniform loads to model

excavations by defining a negative unit weight.

Non-uniform loads are subdivided into columns. The weight of these columns depends on the

phreatic level in the column.

The input of trapeziform loads consists of:

XL the length of the left part of the trapeziform load, in m;

XM the length of the middle part of the trapeziform load, in m;

XR the length of the right part of the trapeziform load, in m;

H the height of the trapeziform load, in m;

P (x, y) the starting point (left side) of the trapeziform load

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The change of stress at a point on a vertical is calculated for each column using formulas

of stress distribution of a load column. The contact pressure is assumed to be equal to the

weight of the column.

r 2

q (r) = P α + 2 (1 − α) (13.1)

R

where:

P is the magnitude of the load in kN/m2 ;

R is the radius of the circular load in m;

R is the distance in R-direction in m;

α is the shape factor to specify the shape of the contact pressure. If α = 1, the contact

pressure is constant (represents flexible footing). If α = 0, a parabolic distribution

is used with 0 kN/m2 in the centre and 2P kN/m2 at the edge (represents rigid

footing).

Loads

x 2

12 (1 − α) z 2

q (x, z) = P α+ X +Z (13.2)

X +Z Z X

where:

M (x, y, z) is the co-ordinate of the centre point;

P is the magnitude of the load, in kN/m2 ;

X is the width of the load in x-direction, in m;

Z is the width of the load in z-direction, in m;

α is the shape factor to specify the shape of the contact pressure. If α = 1, the

contact pressure is constant (represents flexible footing). If α = 0, a parabolic

distribution is used with 0 kN/m2 in the centre and 3P kN/m2 at the edge

(represents rigid footing).

A change of vertical effective stress is calculated at each point on a vertical located below the

level of application (zapp ).

∆σ = q × h (13.3)

where:

h is the height in m;

zapp is the level of application, in m.

The contact pressure is assumed to be equal to the load of a load column above.

D-S ETTLEMENT can calculate the settlement caused by a non-uniform load with a fixed position

of the top surface. When selected (section 6.2.6), the Maintain profile option will iteratively

increase the height of all the load columns of which a non-uniform load is composed. The

iterative process will start at a user-defined time, corresponding usually to the last load step,

and will stop when the average difference between the specified and calculated level of the

top surface is less than the stop criterion. Swell is neglected, which means that no soil is

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

13.7 Submerging

Two methods are implemented in D-S ETTLEMENT to take submerging into account. The appli-

cation of each method depends on the consolidation model or the soil model:

submerging of non-uniform loads of by deformation into account by an initial load re-

duction on the basis of final settlements. This method applies either if Terzaghi consol-

idation model or NEN-Koppejan soil model are selected;

section 13.7.2 – Accurate: the accurate method takes submerging of non-uniform load

and soil layers by deformation into account on the basis of the actual settlement. This

method applies for NEN-Bjerrum and Isotache in combination with Darcy.

Note: For Submerging in combinaison with Water Load (section 4.6.2), the original phreatic

line (as defined in the Phreatic Line window, see section 4.3.11) is used.

This method applies either if Terzaghi consolidation model or NEN-Koppejan soil model which

are selected which corresponds to the four following combinations:

NEN-Bjerrum soil model with Terzaghi consolidation model;

NEN-Koppejan soil model with Terzaghi consolidation model;

NEN-Koppejan soil model with Darcy consolidation model.

When soil is submerged, the effective unit weight of the (non-uniform) loads decreases:

This method determines the submerged weight of non-uniform loads on the basis of final

settlements for all load columns. Because of the deformation-dependent weight, these set-

tlements are determined iteratively. The process is stopped when the average settlement

increment in a particular iteration is less than the stop criterion.

Note: Submerging with the approximate method only works for non-uniform loads. D-S ETTLEMENT

does not take the submerging of actual soil layers into account.

If a very small stop criterion is defined and a small column width in the Calculation Options

window (section 5.1), the calculation can be very time-consuming!

This method applies with two combinations of models:

Isotache soil model with Darcy consolidation model;

When soil is submerged, the effective unit weight of the (non-uniform) loads and the soil layers

decreases:

Loads

D-S ETTLEMENT estimates the submerged weight of non-uniform loads and soil layers using an

extrapolated settlement based on a linear extrapolation of the two previous time-steps, which

writes:

s (ti−1 ) − s (ti−2 )

sextrapolate (ti ) = s (ti−1 ) + (ti−1 − ti ) (13.6)

ti−2 − ti−1

A single estimate per time step (without iterations) is usually sufficiently accurate. However,

an iteration procedure per time step can be applied in case of large settlement increments per

step. Iteration will stop when the average settlement increment in a particular iteration is less

than the stop criterion or when the maximum number of iterations is reached.

Note: The accurate method takes the submerging of actual soil layers into account oppositely

to the approximate method.

If a very small stop criterion is defined and a small column width in the Calculation Options

window (section 5.1]) the calculation can be very time-consuming!

D-S ETTLEMENT calculates the change in pore pressures due to a water load by subtracting the

effective stresses determined with the new and the previous PL-lines configuration:

0

(13.7)

where:

σi0 is the effective stress determined from the PL-lines and phreatic line inputted for

water load number i in kN/m2 ;

σ00 is the initial effective stress determined from the initial PL-lines and phreatic line (see

section 4.3.10 and section 4.3.11) in kN/m2 .

Note: For Submerging in combination with Water Load (section 4.6.2), the original phreatic

line (as defined in the Phreatic Line window, see section 4.3.11) is used.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

14 Distribution of stress by loading

Below, the following subjects are discussed:

section 14.2 – Stress distribution for a strip load

section 14.3 – Stress distribution for a circular load

section 14.4 – Stress distribution for a rectangular load

section 14.5 – Imaginary surface

The basic formula used in D-S ETTLEMENT is based on the stress distribution formula for a point

load P , where the vertical, horizontal and shear stresses increase in a point at a depth y , and

a horizontal distance from the point load of X = y × tan ϕ are calculated:

m P

σyy (y, ϕ) = cosm+2 ϕ (14.1)

2 π y2

m P

σxx (y, ϕ) = 2

sinm−1 ϕ cosm ϕ (14.2)

2 πy

m P

τxy (y, ϕ) = sin ϕ cosm+1 ϕ (14.3)

2 π y2

where:

σxx is the horizontal stress increment, in kN/m2 ;

τxy is the shear stress increment, in kN/m2 ;

P is the increment of surface load, in kN;

y is the depth, in m;

ϕ is the angle with the vertical, in ◦ .

m is a concentration index [-]. Boussinesq assumes a concentration index of 3 and

Buisman of 4.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Note: D-S ETTLEMENT automatically calculates the stress distribution according to Buisman.

Boussinesq can however be selected in the Calculation Options window (section 5.1), but only

for non-uniform and trapeziform loads.

The stress increments due to a line load q = P × H can be found by integration of the point

load P along the height H of the line load in Equation 14.1:

2Q

σyy = cos4 ϕ (14.4)

πz

2Q

σxx = cos2 ϕ sin2 ϕ (14.5)

πz

2Q

τxy = cos3 ϕ sin ϕ (14.6)

πz

for Boussinesq.

The stress increments in a point (x, y, z) due to a strip load can be found by integration of the

line load along the width 2 dx of the strip load in Equation 14.4:

For Boussinesq:

q

σyy = [(φ1 − φ2 ) + sin φ1 cos φ1 − sin φ2 cos φ2 ] (14.7)

π

q

σxx = [(ϕ1 − ϕ2 ) − sin φ1 cos φ1 + sin φ2 cos φ2 ] (14.8)

π

q 2

sin φ1 − sin2 φ2

τxy = (14.9)

π

For Buisman:

3q 1 3 3

σyy = sin φ1 − sin φ2 − sin φ1 − sin φ2 (14.10)

4 3

q

sin3 φ1 − sin3 φ2

σxx = (14.11)

4

q

cos3 φ2 − cos3 φ1

τxy = (14.12)

4

Note: Trapeziform and non-uniform loads are subdivided into load columnsLoad columns.

Distribution of stress by loading

The width of these columns and the choice of the stress distribution type (Buisman or Boussi-

nesq) can both be defined in the Calculation Options window (section 5.1).

y2

cos2 ϕ = (14.13)

y 2 + A2 + r2 − 2 r A cos α

The vertical stress increment in a point (x, y, z) due to a circular load can be found by integra-

tion in tangential and radial directions of Equation 14.1 (Buisman):

R 2π

γ y 2 r dr dα

Z Z

σyy (x, y, z) = (14.14)

0 0 π (y 2 + A2 + r2 − 2 r A cos α)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

y2

cos2 ϕ = (14.15)

y 2 + (y tan α)2 + (y tan β)2

The vertical stress increment in a point (x, y, z) due to a rectangular load can be found by

integration in x and z directions of Equation 14.1 (Buisman):

z2 x2

γ y 2 dx dz

Z Z

σyy (x, y, z) = 2 (14.16)

π y 2 + (y tan α)2 + (y tan β)2

z1 x1

where:

x1 = y × tan α1

x2 = y × tan α2

z1 = y × tan β1

z2 = y × tan β2

Distribution of stress by loading

D-S ETTLEMENT will determine the stress distribution in the layers below an imaginary surface

caused by the weight of the layers above the surface. This option must be used in the case

of an initially non-horizontal surface – for example, for an embankment. Boundary 2 in the

following figure is an example of such an imaginary surface.

The entire soil load above the imaginary surface will only affect the initial stresses. The effect

of stress distribution is taken into account. Incorporating stress distribution will result in an

increase in the initial stress in vertical v1 near the embankment, and a decrease of initial

stress in the vertical v2 below the embankment.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

15 Pore pressure

The combination of a static hydraulic pore pressure field with transient excess pore pressures

can be modeled with either the approximate Terzaghi model or with the accurate Darcy model.

The Terzaghi model uses the theoretical solution for one-dimensional consolidation to modify

directly the drained settlement solution. The Darcy model solves the transient development of

excess pressures and settlements, using Darcy’s general storage equation. Both models use

equal input (section 15.1):

The initial hydraulic head distribution from piezometric level lines at each layer boundary.

The position of the phreatic line.

The soil weight.

The coefficient of consolidation cv per layer.

Terzaghi (section 15.2) allows for quick and direct predictions of primary and secondary

settlements, including the approximate influence of consolidation.

Darcy (section 15.3) enables a more accurate prediction of the transient pore pressure

development, by stepwise solution of excess pore pressures. The Darcy model also

allows for stepwise determination of the effective stress by submerging of layers and

loads.

The influence of vertical drains on pore pressure development can be analyzed with both

models (section 15.4).

A piezometric level line (PL-line) represents the initial and transient hydraulic water head (ex-

cluded the excess component). A PL-line can be defined for the top and bottom of each soil

layer (section 4.3.10, section 4.6.2).

PL-line 2

PL-line 1

1 1

SAND

1 1

1 99

CLAY 2 99

2

SAND

2 99

2 99

CLAY2 1 99

1 2

SAND

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

D-S ETTLEMENT calculates the hydraulic pore pressure along a vertical in the following way:

The pore pressure inside a layer is calculated by linear interpolation between the pore

pressures at top and bottom.

The pore pressure at the top or bottom is equal to the vertical distance between this

point and the position of the PL-line that belongs to this layer, multiplied by the unit

weight of water.

If PL-line number 99 is specified for the top and/or bottom of any soil layer, D-S ETTLEMENT

will use at that boundary the PL-line of the nearest soil layer above or below, which has

a thickness larger than zero and a PL-line number not equal to 99. If the interpolation

point is located above the phreatic line, the pore pressure is assumed to be zero or a

capillary pressure, depending on the sign of the PL-line number.

The following options are available, therefore, for giving PL-line numbers:

Positive integer: Capillary pore pressures are not used – that is, if negative pore pres-

sures are calculated for points above the phreatic line they become

zero

Zero: All points within the layer obtain a pore pressure 0 kN/m2

99: The pore pressure depends on the first layer above and/or below the

point with a PL-line number unequal to 99.

The phreatic line (or groundwater level) is used to mark the border between dry and wet soil.

The phreatic line is treated as if it was a PL-line, and can also be used as such. The PL-line

acting as the phreatic line is determined while the geometry is being defined. If no phreatic

line is entered, then all the soil is assumed to be dry.

The total stress at depth y due to soil weight is:

γunsat (y0 − y) if y > ywater

σsoil (y, t) = (15.1)

γunsat (y0 − ywater ) + γsat (ywater − y) if y ≤ ywater

where:

γsat is the unit weight of soil below phreatic level, in kN/m3 ;

y is the vertical initial co-ordinate, in m;

y0 is the initial surface level, in m;

ywater is the preatic level, in m.

Pore pressure

15.2 Terzaghi

Terzaghi’s one-dimensional consolidation theory is characterized by the consolidation coef-

ficient. Terzaghi’s model allows quick determination of final settlements, with approximate

effect of consolidation.

Related to D-S ETTLEMENT’s implementation of the Terzaghi model, the following subjects are

discussed hereafter:

(section 15.2.2) Consolidation of multi-layered systems

(section 15.2.3) Drainage conditions

(section 15.2.4) Effective stress and pore pressure

Terzaghi’s theory on one-dimensional vertical consolidation of a homogeneous elastic layer

yields the following expression for the degree of consolidation U :

∞ 2

8 X 1 2 π cv t

U (t) = 1 − 2 exp − (2 i − 1) (15.2)

π i=1 (2 i − 1)2 4 d2

where:

d is the drainage length, in m;

t is the time, in s.

In case of vertical drains, the expression is more complex. D-S ETTLEMENT combines the de-

gree of consolidation with the predicted layer deformation under fully drained conditions:

U (t) ∆hprim (σ 0 ) + ∆hsec (σ 0 , t) for NEN-Koppejan

∆h = (15.3)

U (t) ∆hdrained (σ 0 , t) for Isotache and NEN-Bjerrum

where:

∆hprim is the primary contribution to layer deformation according to Koppejan, in m;

∆hsec is the secondary contribution to time dependent layer deformation according

to Koppejan, in m;

∆hdrained is the theoretical time dependent layer deformation under fully drained condi-

tions according to Isotache/NEN-Bjerrum, in m;

∆H is the total layer deformation with approximate influence of consolidation, in m.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

D-S ETTLEMENT considers clusters of consolidating layers, between drained layers or drained

dispersion boundaries. D-S ETTLEMENT models these multi-layered systems by introducing a

fictitious homogeneous layer with equivalent consolidation coefficient. D-S ETTLEMENT scales

the vertical co-ordinate z in layer i with the vertical consolidation coefficient cv.i . The follow-

ing cases show the expressions used, including the contributions of optional vertical drains

(section 15.4).

d2 ϕ̄ dϕ̄ cv

2

= + 2 (ϕ̄ − ϕdrain ) (15.4)

dζ dt λ

with:

zi

ζ=√

cv.i

Pn n

i=1 hi hi

X

√ = √

cv.eq i=1

cv.i

Pn n

i=1 hi hi

X

√ = √

ch.eq i=1

ch.i

where:

hi is the the thickness of layer i.

The theoretical Terzaghi solution is based on drained conditions at just one side. D-S ETTLEMENT

will halve the drainage length in case of drainage at both sides. Drainage at the boundary of

a cluster of consolidation layers can be specified via the dispersion condition at the top or

bottom of the geometry (see section 5.1.1), or via a drained property of certain soil layers

(see section 4.2.2).

D-S ETTLEMENT sets the degree of consolidation in drained layers directly to 100%.

Terzaghi determines the effective stress at time t and initial vertical position y , disregarding

excess pore pressures, using:

with:

where:

∆σload is the incremental stress due to loads (chapter 13), in kN/m2 ;

phydr is the hydraulic component of pore pressure, in kN/m2 ;

σwater is the stress due to a water level above the soil surface, in kN/m2 :

σwater (y, t) = max [(ywater (t) − ysurf ace (t)) γw ; 0]

Pore pressure

ϕhydr is the user-defined hydraulic head at time t, in m. It can either be defined in the Pl-

lines per Layer window (section 4.3.13) for the initial state or in the Water Loads

window (section 4.6.2) for a specific time.

NOTE: The influence of excess pore pressures during consolidation is therefore

neglected.

Only for post processing purposes in graphs and the report, Terzaghi will use the final position

yfinal for the calculation of the values of final pore pressure and effective stress along the depth.

Note: The Terzaghi’s model doesn’t calculate a pore pressure distribution, but applies directly

a degree of consolidation on settlements. Output of pore pressure distribution is only available

at the initial and final state, without influence of excess pore pressure. In Darcy’s model,

pore pressures are calculated at each time step by means of the storage equation given in

section 15.3.1.

15.3 Darcy

Darcy’s model can be applied to find the pore pressure development in clusters of compress-

ible (creeping) layers. Application of Darcy enables accurate 1D solution of the full hydraulic

head, and allows combination with vertical drains modelling.

Related to D-S ETTLEMENT’s implementation of the Darcy model, the following subjects are

discussed hereafter:

(section 15.3.2) Drainage conditions

(section 15.3.3) Effective stress and pore pressure

(section 15.3.4) Numerical solution

Equation of continuity

Darcy’s consolidation model is based on the Storage equation Equation 15.6.

d2 ϕ dε

ky + +L=0 (15.6)

d2 y dt

where:

ϕ is the excess hydraulic water head, defined as the total head minus the initial

head, in m;

ky is the Darcy vertical permeability, im m/day;

dε/dt is either the natural strain rate (abc) or the linear strain rate (NEN-Bjerrum, NEN-

Koppejan);

L is the leakage term by vertical drains (see section 15.4), based on the difference

between the average head and the drain head, the drain dimension and the hori-

zontal permeability.

The implemented equation is based on excess heads, and assumes full saturation below

the phreatic line, even when the calculated pore pressure becomes negative. Saturation

dependent phreatic storage and permeability changes are therefore neglected.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The initial head is user-defined using PL lines per layer, like the Terzaghi model.

The excess head will be calculated in all soil layers below a user defined phreatic level, except

drained layers. Drained layers can however deform (like the Terzaghi model).

The effect of negative pore pressures on effective stress will only be taken into account below

a user-defined position of the phreatic level (like the Terzaghi model).

The effect of settlement on the pore pressure in the soil and the head in the drain will be taken

into account.

Weight reduction by submerging will be taken into account during time integration, for both

soil layers that are initially above the phreatic level and non-uniform load above the phreatic

level.

The real permeability of soil is a function of void ratio. D-S ETTLEMENT offers therefore a strain

dependent model according to Equation 15.7.

1+e0

− ε

k = k0 × 10 Ck

(15.7)

where:

Ck

1+e0

is the permeability strain modulus;

ε is the strain;

Ck is the permeability strain factor;

e0 is the initial void ratio.

This type of strain dependency follows also from the assumption of a constant value for the

consolidation coefficient, in combination with D-S ETTLEMENT’s stress dependent compressibil-

ity models.

D-S ETTLEMENT can derive the values for the permeability strain modulus and the initial vertical

permeability at different locations from the input of a consolidation coefficient, in combination

with the compression parameters (primary consolidation parameters), the preconsolidation

stress and the overconsolidation ratio, using Equation 15.8:

CR γw × cv RR × ln OCR − ε ln 10 Ck

k= exp with CR = (15.8)

ln 10 σp CR 1 + e0

NEN-Koppejan parameters by using:

RR ∼ 1 CR ∼ 1

a∼

= = and b∼

= = (15.9)

ln 10 Cp ln 10 Cp0

The horizontal strain dependent permeability is determined from the vertical permeability via

a user-defined ratio (section 4.2.3).

Pore pressure

Darcy assumes drainage at the surface and the bottom of the geometry. Additionally, inter-

mediate drained layers can be defined between clusters of consolidating layers.

Darcy determines the effective stress at time t and current vertical position yt , including the

influence of the excess head, using:

where:

γunsat is the uit weight of soil above phreatic level, in kN/m3 ;

γsat is the unit weight of soil below phreatic level, in kN/m3 ;

y is the initial vertical initial co-ordinate, in m;

yt is the current vertical initial co-ordinate, in m;

σwater is thes stress due to a water level above the soil surface, in kN/m2 :

σwater (y, t) = max [(ywater (t) − ysurf ace (t)) γw ; 0]

ϕhydr is the user-defined hydraulic head, defined in the PL-lines per Layer window (sec-

tion 4.3.13) for the initial state;

ϕexcess is the excess head at time t, in m.

The transient pore pressure distribution is solved numerically with an automatic time stepping

scheme, using an efficiently integrated spatial Fourier interpolation along sections of the ver-

ticals. Within each time step, the settlements at the section interfaces are solved iteratively.

D-S ETTLEMENT determines the time step sizes such that a stable solution is achieved under all

practical circumstances.

Three types of vertical drains can be modeled in D-S ETTLEMENT:

Strip drains

Column drains

Sand wall

Note: The initial and final head distributions can be different when using vertical drains. The

reason is that the vertical drains contribution (section 15.4) is not included during the initial

head determination.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

In case of vertical drains, D-S ETTLEMENT solves the average head between the drains along

each vertical. D-S ETTLEMENT uses the modified storage Equation 15.12 for Darcy, and the

modified consolidation Equation 15.13 for Terzaghi. The Terzaghi solution can be considered

as an extension of the classic solutions by Barron (1948) and Carillo (1942).

+ ky 2 + ky 2

− γw =0 for Darcy model (15.12)

dt dy λ Kw dt

d2 ϕ̄ 1 dϕ̄ ϕ̄ − ϕdrain

2

= + for Terzaghi model (15.13)

dy cv dt λ2

where:

ϕdrain is the head in the drain, in m. See section 15.4.2 for line-shaped drains (strip or

column) and section 15.4.3 for plane-shaped drains (granular wall);

λ The so-called leakage length [m]. See section 15.4.2 for line-shaped drains (strip

or column) and section 15.4.3 for plane-shaped drains (granular wall);

γw is the unit weight of water, in kN/m3 ;

Kw is the bulk modulus of water, in kN/m2 ;

n is the porosity of the soil layer.

Figure 15.2: Theoretical and average pressure distribution between two drains

Pore pressure

In case of line-shaped drainage strips (i.e. Strip or Column), water will flow radially out on top

of the drains. Sometimes a combination with an enforced underpressure on top is applied, via

a drained layer with impermeable cover.

D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that ϕdrain is equal to a certain water level in the drain, with an optional

reduction by underpressure.

Pair

ϕdrain = max (z; zwater ) − (15.14)

γw

where:

zwater is the water level in the drain, in m. If underpressure is applied, this water level

is equal to the position where the underpressure is applied. Otherwise, the water

level simply equals the phreatic level;

Pair is the enforced underpressure, in kN/m2 .

2 2 2

Deq Deq 1 Deq − d2eq

2 ky Deq

λ = 2 − d2

ln − − 2

(15.15)

8 kx Deq eq deq 2 4Deq

where:

Deq is the equivalent distance between the drains depending on the position of the

calculated vertical

and the type of grid (triangular of rectangular):

D inside the drainage range

Deq = fgrid × max (2 D; 4 |x − Xlimit |) outside the drainage range

D is the actual distance between the drains, in m;

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

fgrid is the factor depending on the grid type: 1.05 for a triangular grid and 1.13 for a

rectangular grid;

Xlimit is the (horizontal) X co-ordinate of the limit of the drained area, in m;

Deq is the equivalent diameter of the drain cross-section, in m:

– For strip drain, this value is the circumferential distance of the rectangular cross

section (width × thickness) divided by π .

– For column drains, this value equals the actual diameter D of the drain cross-

section

DrainsSee Vertical drainsIn case of plane-shaped drains (trenches filled with granular mate-

rial), water will flow out via drainage tubes, located downwards in the drain. Sometimes an

additional air underpressure is enforced at the top of the drains.

D-S ETTLEMENT assumes that the negative pore pressures in the drain above the water level

are equal to the air underpressure while the head under the water level is equal the water

level minus the air underpressure.

ϕdrain = max (Y ; Ywater ) − with Ywater = Ypipe + + (15.16)

γw γw γw

where:

Ypipe is the vertical location of the drainage tube, in m;

Ppipe is the pressure in the drainage tube, in kN/m2 ;

y is the vertical location of a point on the plane-shaped drain, in m;

Pair is the enforced air underpressure at the top of the vertical drain, in kN/m2 .

Pore pressure

The leakage length for sand wall (plane flow) is equal to:

1 ky

λ2 = (Deq − w)2 (15.17)

12 kx

where:

Deq is the equivalent distance between the drains depending on the position of the

calculated

vertical and the type of grid (triangular of rectangular):

D inside the drainage range

Deq = max (2 D; 4 |x − Xlimit |) outside the drainage range

D is the actual distance between the drains, in m;

Xlimit is the (horizontal) X co-ordinate of the limit of the drained area, in m;

w is the width of the granular wall, in m.

The following table compares the Darcy model to the classic Terzaghi model.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Terzaghi Darcy

Solution method Analytical solution Combination of analytical

and numerical, using time

steps

Speed Very fast Fast

Stability Unconditional Unconditional

Final settlements accurate accurate

Time-dependent settlement approximate accurate

Settlement plate fit average accurate

Parameters Consolidation coefficient Consolidation coefficient or

permeability (the last one

optionally strain dependent)

Vertical drains Approximate Accurate

Different layers Approximate Accurate

Combination with creep Approximate Accurate

Combination with Approximate Accurate

un/reloading

Submerging Approximate Accurate

Effective stress correction Below phreatic line Below phreatic line

by pore pressure

Initial heads input Piezometric level per layer Piezometric level per layer

Drained layers Only deformation, no ex- Only deformation, no ex-

cess pore pressure cess pore pressure

Post-processing Time-settlement curve, Time-depth plots for settle-

Initial and final stage ments, heads and stresses.

stresses. For each load increment,

For each load increment, the time-settlement curves

the time-settlement curves show the full settlement that

show the full settlement that would occur without further

would occur without further loading.

loading.

Coupling to stability analysis Settled geometry, degree of Settled geometry, degree

consolidation of consolidation and tempo-

rary lowering of water table

by enforced drainage

16 Soil and strain models

D-S ETTLEMENT calculates the transient settlement of all layers along user-defined verticals,

using one of the following soil models:

The NEN-Bjerrum model is suited for cases with un- and reloading, by using a rate-type

visco-plastic isotache formulation (all plastic compression results from creep). The NEN-

Bjerrum model is based on linear strain and supports the common linear strain parameters

Cr , Cc and Cα .

Isotache (section 16.2)

The Isotache a/b/c model is suited for cases with large strains and/or un-/reloading. The

model uses a rate-type visco-plastic formulation (all plastic compression results from creep)

and is based intrinsically on natural strain. The model uses the objective natural strain

parameters a, b, c.

NEN-Koppejan (section 16.3)

The classic Dutch soil model for many years. The model makes a distinction between

primary and secondary settlement. Major differences with NEN-Bjerrum are the less real-

istic stress-dependency of the secondary creep and the poor description of un-/reloading.

Usage of Koppejan for cases with load removal is therefore not recommended.

16.1 NEN-Bjerrum

The NEN-Bjerrum model is based on the same theory as the a/b/c/ isotache model. The only

difference is that the NEN-Bjerrum model supports the common linear strain parameters Cr ,

Cc and Cα instead of the natural strain parameters a/b/c. The shared isotache formulation im-

plies that all inelastic compression results from visco-plastic creep. The NEN-Bjerrum model

therefore assumes that creep rate will reduce with increasing overconsolidation and that over-

consolidation will grow by unloading and by ageing. Bjerrum’s name is attached to this model,

because he was the first to notice that creep rate depends on both overconsolidation ratio and

age. Den Haan (1994) has developed the full mathematical formulation.

Parameters for the NEN-Bjerrum model are easily determined from common oedometer tests

(section 17.3), especially when using the Deltares Geo-Tools program MCompress.

Note: Practice proves that the methods for determination of NEN-Bjerrum parameters can

differ from laboratory to laboratory. Therefore please read the description of the expected

parameter determination method (chapter 17), in order to assure that it is compliant with the

actual parameter determination is compliant with the actual determination method.

implementation.

section 16.1.2 – Mathematical formulation

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Figure 16.1 and Figure 16.2 show that the behavior of drained soil according to the NEN-

Bjerrum model can be schematized to an idealized primary and secondary contribution, with

different stiffness below and above preconsolidation. This schematized behavior is also known

from popular textbooks, from standards like NEN 6744 (NEN, 1991b) and from recommenda-

tions like ISSMGE-ETC5 (ISSMGE/DIN, 1998).

Note: The true isotache behavior differs from the idealized behavior, especially in combina-

tion with consolidation. The final settlement after consolidation will however be the same.

Figure 16.1: NEN-Bjerrum: Idealized primary and secondary settlement during time

(drained conditions)

Figure 16.2: NEN-Bjerrum: Idealized primary settlement during loading (drained condi-

tions)

Soil and strain models

If the vertical effective stress after loading is smaller than the preconsolidation pres-

sure σp , the primary settlement contribution according to the idealized behavior can be

calculated from:

σ0

∆hprim

= RR log , σ0 < σ 0 < σp (16.1)

h0 σ0

If the vertical effective stress after loading is larger than the preconsolidation pressure

σp , the primary settlement according to the idealized behavior can be calculated from:

0

∆hprim σp σ

= RR log + CR log , σp < σ 0 (16.2)

h0 σ0 σp

If the vertical effective stress after loading is larger than the preconsolidation pressure

σp , the secondary settlement according to the idealized behavior can be calculated

from:

∆hsec t

= Cα log , σp < σ 0 (16.3)

h0 τ0

with

Cc

CR =

1 + e0

Cr

RR =

1 + e0

where:

Cc is the compression index above preconsolidation pressure;

Cα is the coefficient of secondary compression above preconsolidation pressure;

∆hprim is the primary settlement contribution of a layer, in m;

h0 is the initial layer thickness, in m;

e0 is initial void ratio.

A full description of the mathematical formulation of the NEN-Bjerrum model can directly be

derived from the a/b/c Isotache description (section 16.2), by application of the following small

strain limits:

RR Cr

a→ , RR =

ln(10) 1 + e0

CR Cc

b→ , CR = (16.4)

ln(10) 1 + e0

Cα

c→

ln(10)

The basic ingredients of the formulation are summarized below.

Strain decomposition. The total strain consists of a direct elastic contribution and a tran-

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

εC = εC C

s + εd (16.5)

σ0

εC

d = RR log (16.6)

σ00

s depends on the stress

rate, the already reached creep strain at a certain time and the current overconsolidation

ratio σp / σ 0 .

" Z t CRC−RR #

σ0 α dτ

εC

s = Cα log 1 + (16.7)

0 σp τ0

The graphical illustration in Figure 16.3 shows that creep will also grow below preconsolidation

stress (un-/reloading), but that the rate will rapidly decrease at larger values of overconsolida-

tion (stress more below preconsolidation stress).

In case of several loading and un/reloading steps, the drained solution of Equation 16.7 be-

comes:

σn0

C σp t − tn + θn

ε (t) = RR log + CR log + Cα log (16.8)

σ00 σp τ0

where the equivalent age θn is calculated as follows:

0

CRC−RR CRC−RR

σn−1 α σp α

θn = 0

· (θn−1 + tn − tn−1 ) with θ0 = τ0 × 0

σn σ1

0

σ0 + POP for POP compression

σp = σ00 × OCR for OCR compression

c

σ 0 × (t /t ) b−a for equivalent age compression

0 age 0

where:

n is the number of the load steps.

Soil and strain models

D-S ETTLEMENT’s a/b/c Isotache model is based on natural strain, and uses a rate type for-

mulation. Natural strain is referred to the deformed state. A rate formulation means that all

inelastic compression is assumed to result from visco-plastic creep. The a/b/c model might

be advantageous to the NEN-Bjerrum model if large strains are involved.

Hereafter you can find a global description of the following aspects of D-S ETTLEMENT’s Iso-

tache a/b/c implementation.

Creep (section 16.2.2)

See Den Haan (1994) for more information on the Isotache model. For a basic description

of the a/b/c parameter determination, see section 17.4. These natural strain parameters can

also be derived from linear strain parameters at given stress levels (section 17.7).

The Isotache model intrinsically uses natural strain, whereas the NEN-Bjerrum model uses

linear strain by default. Natural (or logarithmic) strain is advantageous when compressions

are large. When strains are small, the two strain measures become equivalent. The Isotache

model obtains the natural strain by defining the increment of strain relative to the present,

actual thickness, and by integrating the increments:

Z h

dh dh h

dε = − , εH = −

H

= − ln (16.9)

h h0 h h0

where:

h0 is the initial layer thickness, in m.

dh C h

dεC = − ,ε = 1 − (16.10)

h h0

is related to natural strain by:

εH = − ln 1 − εC

(16.11)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The superscripts C and H refer to Cauchy and Hencky, respectively, to whom the respective

measures of strain are ascribed. The figure above relates εC and εH to compression. εC

can numerically exceed 100%, and compressions larger than the initial layer thickness are

indeed found from conventional models – for example, by using a small initial stress and a

large stress increase. This is impossible using natural strain. Natural strain also allows a

better fit for oedometer tests, when compression is large (see the figure below).

The Isotache model assumes that the creep rate will reduce with increasing overconsolidation

and that overconsolidation can grow by unloading and by ageing. This concept is encapsu-

lated by means of creep Isotaches.

Creep Isotaches are lines of equal rate (speed, velocity) of secular (visco-plastic) strain εHS

in a plot of (natural) strain versus (natural) logarithm of vertical effective stress. These are

displayed in the figure below.

The Isotaches are all parallel with slope b−a. The Isotache a parameter determines the direct

(elastic) strain component εHd . The b and c parameters determine the secular (visco-plastic)

Soil and strain models

creep component εH

S.

dεH s

b−a= (16.12)

d ln σ 0

dεH s

c=− (16.13)

d ln (ε̇Hs )

H

dεd

a= (16.14)

d ln σ 0

εH = εHs + εd

H

(16.15)

reference creep strain rate ε̇H

s.ref .

σ0

(b − a)

ε̇H

s = ε̇H

s.ref exp ln − εH

s (16.16)

c σp

This equation assumes in fact that the secular creep rate is related to a so-called intrinsic time

τ , which is related to the common time t by an equivalent age tage .

c

ε̇H

s = , τ = t + tage (16.17)

τ

The initial equivalent age represents the theoretical age of the soil since the end of virgin

loading, if the current overconsolidation ratio would have been caused by ageing only.

b−a

tage = τ0 OCR( c ) (16.18)

The total rate of strain is the sum of the elastic and secular rates:

ε̇H = ε̇H H

s + ε̇d (16.19)

Z t 0

σ0

H σ b−a dτ

ε = a ln + c ln 1 + c (16.20)

σ00 0 σp τ0

D-S ETTLEMENT sets the reference time τ 0 by default to 1 day.

τ0 = 1 day (16.21)

During a constant stress period after virgin loading, Equation 16.20 simplifies to:

σp σ0 τ

εH (t) = a ln 0

+ b ln + c ln (16.22)

σ0 σp τ0

This equation applies to the creep tail when σ 0 has become constant, and this is the familiar

relation for one-dimensional creep, with strain depending on logarithm of time.

In case of several loading and un/reloading steps, the drained solution of Equation 16.20

becomes:

σn0

H σp t − tn + θn

ε (t) = a ln + b ln + c ln (16.23)

σ00 σp τ0

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

0

b−a

σn−1 c

θn = × (θn−1 + tn − tn−1 )

σn0

with:

b−a

σp c

θ0 = τ0 ×

σ0

0 1

σ + POP for POP compression

σ00 × OCR

0 for OCR compression

σp = c

b−a

tage

σ00 × for equivalent age compression

τ0

where:

n is the number of the load step.

16.3 NEN-Koppejan

NEN-Koppejan’s model is based on separate primary (instantaneous) and secondary (creep)

contributions to the settlement. Compared to the NEN-Bjerrum model, the NEN-Koppejan

model assumes that direct deformation under drained conditions occurs instantaneously, and

that secondary settlement is the result of superposition of separate contributions from loading

and/or unloading steps.

Hereafter can be found a short description of the following aspects of D-S ETTLEMENT’s NEN-

Koppejan implementation:

Swelling calculation (section 16.3.2)

Natural strain calculation (section 16.3.3)

See Koppejan (1948) for more information on the NEN-Koppejan model. See section 17.5 for

a basic description of the NEN-Koppejan parameter determination.

If the vertical effective stress is smaller than the preconsolidation pressure, the primary

Soil and strain models

σ0

∆hprim 1

= ln , σ0 < σ 0 < σp (16.24)

h0 Cp σ0

If the vertical effective stress is larger than the preconsolidation pressure, the primary

settlement can be calculated from:

σ0

∆hprim 1 σp 1

= ln + 0 ln , σ0 < σp < σ 0 (16.25)

h0 Cp σ0 Cp σ0

If vertical effective stress is smaller than the preconsolidation pressure, the secondary

settlement for one loading can be calculated from:

0

∆hsec 1 t σ

= log 1 + ln , σ0 < σ 0 < σp (16.26)

h0 Cs τ0 σ0

If the vertical stress is larger than the preconsolidation pressure, the secondary settle-

ment for one loading can be calculated using the following equation:

∆hsec 1 t σp

= log 1 + ln (16.27)

h0 Cs τ σ0

0

σ0

1 t

+ 0 log 1 + ln , σ0 < σp < σ 0

Cs τ0 σp

where:

Cp0 is the primary compression coefficient above preconsolidation pressure;

Cs is the secular compression coefficient below preconsolidation pressure;

Cs0 is the secular compression coefficient above preconsolidation pressure;

∆hprim is the primary settlement contribution of a layer, in m;

∆hsec is the secondary settlement contribution of a layer, in m;

h0 is the initial layer thickness, in m;

σ0 is the initial vertical effective stress, in kN/m2 ;

σp is the pre-consolidation pressure, in kN/m2 ;

t is the time, in days;

τ0 is the reference time, in days.

For NEN-Koppejan, the swelling can be formulated as:

σ0 σ0

∆hprim 1 1 t

= ln + log ln , σp < σ0 (16.28)

h0 Ap σ0 As τ0 σ0

where:

As is the secondary swelling coefficient.

Note: The As parameter will also be used in case of load removal. A large value of As

implies that there will be no effect of load removal on creep. A large value is therefore only

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

D-S ETTLEMENT’s NEN-Koppejan model uses the following equation to describe the optional

deformation reduction of each layer by natural strain:

∆hKoppejan

∆hnat = h0 1 − exp − (16.29)

h0

where:

∆hKoppejan is the original Koppejan settlement contribution, based on linear strain.

Note: Application of natural strain strictly speaking requires that soil parameters are also

determined on the basis of natural strain.

17 Determining soil parameters

In order to determine proper parameters for D-S ETTLEMENT’s soil models, the usage of the

Deltares program MCompress is recommended. MCompress can interpret results from both

oedometer tests and the modern Constant Rate of Strain tests (K0 –CRS) in order to gen-

erate consistent parameters for D-S ETTLEMENT’s models. In this paragraph, just some basic

ingredients for parameter determination are discussed, based on oedometer test results and

simplified conversion formulas.

section 17.2 – Overconsolidation

section 17.3 – NEN-Bjerrum parameters

section 17.4 – Isotache parameters

section 17.5 – Koppejan parameters

section 17.6 – Conversion of NEN-Bjerrum parameters from Koppejan parameters

section 17.7 – Conversion of Isotache parameters

An overview of important parameter definitions can be found in the first chapter of this manual

(section 1.2).

17.1.1 Description

Oedometer tests are also called ‘confined compression tests’ or ‘consolidation tests’. In these

tests, the vertical settlement ∆h of a sample with initial height H0 and initial void ratio e0 is

determined during step-wise loading, with intermediate consolidation and creep. Lateral de-

formation is prevented. It is common to double the load every 24 hours. Occasionally, unload-

ing steps are also applied. Complete information on practical oedometer test interpretation

can be found for example in the NEN 5118 standard (NEN, 1991a) (in Dutch).

The Deltares Systems software called MCompress interprets oedometer test data’s according

to NEN-Bjerrum, NEN-Koppejan and Isotache models. For more information on this software,

contact our sales department: sales@deltaressystems.nl.

D-S ETTLEMENT uses a minimum time step of 1 day by default. To simulate a short term oe-

dometer test with typical loading stages of just 1 day, a smaller unit of time can be applied by

using a trick:

Enter a multiplication factor for the Creep rate reference time in the Calculation Options

window (section 5.1.1). For example a value of 24 × 60 = 1440 for a time unit of

minutes.

Enter all input of time in the new unit:

The end of calculation time in the Calculation Options window (section 5.1.1)

The times in the measurement file, when using the Fit for Settlement Plate option

(section 5.3.1). The fit option enables you in fact to perform advanced parameter

determination.

Divide all values of permeability or consolidation coefficient in the Materials win-

Interpret time values in the results in the modified unit of time, when inspecting graphs

and reports.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

17.2 Overconsolidation

A sample can be over-consolidated, either by geological history (undisturbed) or artificially.

This overconsolidation can result from ageing and/or pre-overburden pressure. The overcon-

solidation is characterized via the preconsolidation stress σp . This value marks the transi-

tion point between the reloading branch and the virgin loading branch in the strain versus

ln(σ) diagram (Figure 17.1). Soil will behave differently below and above the preconsoli-

dation pressure.The preconsolidation stress varies however along the depth. Therefore, the

pre-consolidation stress must be transformed into a stress-independent soil parameter.The

Koppejan model can calculate the preconsolidation stress from the Over-Consolidation Ratio

(OCR), or from the gradient in the initial stress. The NEN-Bjerrum and Isotache models can

calculate the preconsolidation stress from the OCR or the pre-overburden pressure (POP).

The OCR is defined as the preconsolidation stress divided by the actual in-situ vertical

stress.

The POP is defined as the difference between the preconsolidation stress and the actual

in-situ vertical stress. This means that the gradient along the depth is equal to the gradient

of the initial stress.

See Figure 17.1 for a graphical representation. In general, OCR is considered more appropri-

ate if the preconsolidation stress results predominantly from ageing. POP (or using the same

gradient as the initial stress) is considered more appropriate if the cause is predominantly a

large overburden pressure in the past.

D-S ETTLEMENT’s NEN-Bjerrum model (section 16.1) uses parameters that correspond to to-

day’s international de-facto standard. The reloading/swelling index Cr describes the elastic

stiffness during unloading and reloading (below preconsolidation pressure). The primary com-

pression index Cc and the coefficient of secondary compression Cα describe respectively the

idealized elasto-plastic deformation and the viscous creep rate during virgin loading. All these

parameters are traditionally determined using a linear strain assumption instead of natural

strain (section 16.2.1).

Note: With regard to the NEN-Bjerrum parameter definition, please note the following impor-

tant attention points:

Determining soil parameters

Linear strain parameters are determined with reference to the initial height. However, some

standards and recommendations for interpretation of oedometer tests prescribe that pa-

rameters (especially Cα ) are determined with reference to the height before the next load-

ing step. Therefore you should always check if your parameters have been determined in

the way that D-S ETTLEMENT expects.

Linear strain parameters are not objective if strains become large. In cases with large

strains, you must therefore determine linear strain parameters from tests that use the same

initial and final stress levels as experienced in the field.

The parameters Cr and Cc are in fact related to changes in void ratio. Cα is however di-

rectly related to changes in linear strain. Please note that this definition of the Cα complies

with common practice, but differs from the original definition by Mesri (January 1973).

Assuming drained conditions, the NEN-Bjerrum model defines the idealized linear strain in-

crement by one virgin load step (above preconsolidation pressure) by the following equation.

∆h (t − tn ) Cc.n σn t − tn

= εC (t) − εC (tn ) = log + Cα.n max 0; log

h0 1 + e0 σn−1 τ0

(17.1)

where:

tn is the start time of load step n, in days;

τ0 is the reference time (1 day).

Assuming again that pore pressures are dissipated before the following load increment, Cα.n

can be determined from the tangent of the tail of the strain increment during one virgin load

step. This is illustrated in Figure 17.2.

d∆εC (tn+1 − tn ) 0

Cα.n = , σ > σp (17.2)

d log(tn+1 − tn )

The compression ratio for the virgin load step n follows by substitution of Cα.n into Equa-

tion 17.1.

CRn = = , σ > σp

1 + e0 log σn σn−1

(17.3)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

analogy.

RRn = = , σ ≤ σp (17.4)

1 + e0 σn

log σn−1

The parameter RR is preferably determined from unloading curves. Determination from load-

ing before the initial preconsolidation stress will usually result in values that are too low, be-

cause of the sample disturbance.

Hereafter is explained how Isotache natural strain parameters are determined from oedometer

test results. These parameters are: the Isotache natural primary compression index a, the

Isotache natural swelling index b and the Isotache natural secondary compression constant c.

See section 17.7 for conversion from existing soil parameters for other models. The simplified

treatment is based on the assumption that a common oedometer test is used, with doubling

of load each step, and a limited duration of each step.

Assuming drained conditions, the natural strain increment at the end of one virgin load step

(above preconsolidation pressure) can be defined approximately by equation Equation 17.5.

− εH (tn )

(17.5)

σn tn+1 −tn +tshif t.n

≈ b ln σn−1 + max 0; c ln τ0

where:

tn is the start time of load step n, in days;

τ0 is the reference time (1 day).

Note: The expression for the final natural strain increment at the end of the load step is

similar to Equation 17.1 for the NEN-Bjerrum model (section 17.3). The actual behaviour of

both the NEN-Bjerrum model and the Isotache model during the first part of the load step will

however be quite different, due to the rate type formulation.

The value of tshift determines the influence of creep from previous load steps, and can be

determined by curve fitting. For interpretation of common oedometer tests (doubling of load

each step) however, the assumption is justified that tshift is close to zero.

Assuming that pore pressures are dissipated before the following load increment, and assum-

ing tshift = 0, c can be determined from the tangent of the tail of the natural strain increment

by one virgin load increment.

d∆εH (tn+1 − tn )

cn = , σ 0 > σp (17.6)

d ln (tn+1 − tn )

This is illustrated in Figure 17.3.

Determining soil parameters

The Isotache natural compression index b for the virgin load step n follows by substitution of

cn into Equation 17.5.

∆ε (tn+1 − tn ) − cn ln (tn+1 − tn )

bn ≈ , σ 0 > σp (17.7)

ln σσn−1

n

A more refined estimate of b can be found if the reference creep rate is known (the strain rate

after one day loading at the initial preconsolidation stress). The strain increment ∆ε should

then be determined exactly at the moment where the strain rate is equal to the reference strain

rate after one day of loading.

∆ε (t − tn )

bn = , ε̇ (t − tn ) = ε̇ref (τ0 = 1 day) , σ 0 > σp (17.8)

ln σσn−1

n

The parameter a is preferably determined from unloading curves, where creep rates are low.

∆ε (tn+1 − tn ) 0

an = , σ < σp (17.9)

ln σσn−1

n

Determination of a from loading before the initial preconsolidation stress will usually result in

too low values, because of the sample disturbance.

Rough estimates of parameter values can be derived from correlation formulas. Usage of

these formulas is at own risk, as accurate parameters can only determined by soil testing.

Equation 17.10 gives a rough correlation between the b parameter and the saturated unit

weight in undeformed state.

−2.11

γsat.0

b ≈ 0.326 (17.10)

γw

Table 17.1 gives rough estimates of b/a and b/c for different soft soil types.

Table 17.1: Rough Isotache parameter correlation for soft soil types

[kN/m3 ] [-] [-]

Peat 11 7 12

Organic soft clay 12 8 13

Organic clay 14 12 20

Silty clay 16 12 25

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The NEN-Koppejan model (section 16.3) distinguishes primary and secondary settlements.

The elasto-plastic primary compression is a function of only the effective stress. The vis-

cous secondary compression (creep) is a function of both the effective stress and the time.

The values of the primary and secondary coefficients are different below and above the pre-

consolidation stress. Traditionally, NEN-Koppejan parameters are determined using a linear

strain assumption instead of natural strain (section 16.3.3). This means that applicability of

linear NEN-Koppejan parameters for soft soil is limited to stress levels in the field that are

comparable to the stress levels used for parameter determination.

To determine the compression coefficients from the measured strains in the interval between

load step n and n+1, you must first subtract the approximate settlement/swelling contributions

from all preceding load steps i =1 ,n−1.

n−1

0

X σi 1 1 t − ti

∆ε (t − tn ) = ε (t) − ln + log (17.11)

i=1

σi−1 Cprim.i Csec .i τ0

where:

tn is the start time of load step n, in days;

τ0 is the reference time (1 day).

The parameters Cprim;i and Csec;i in interval i possess either the value below or above the

preconsolidation pressure.

σ 0 ≥ σp : Cprim = Cp0 and Csec = Cs0

Each load step that passes preconsolidation must be split into one sub-step before precon-

solidation stress, and one sub-step after preconsolidation stress.If it is assumed that pore

pressures are dissipated before the following load increment, then Csec can be estimated

from the tangent of the tail of∆ε’, according to Figure 17.4 and Equation 17.12.

σn d log (tn+1 − tn )

Csec .n = ln (17.12)

σn−1 d∆ε0

Determining soil parameters

The primary compression index for the current step follows then by substitution of Csec.n into

Equation 17.11.

tn+1 − tn

log

1 ∆ε0 (tn+1 − tn ) τ0

= − (17.13)

Cprim.n σn Csec.n

ln

σn−1

Theoretically, the primary and secondary swelling indices can be determined from unload-

ing steps, analogous to determining the compression coefficients. In practice, the primary

swelling index is mostly set equal to the value of the primary compression index below pre-

consolidation, and the secondary swelling coefficient is set to a large value.

Ap = Cp and As → ∞ (17.14)

Note: As will also be used by the NEN-Koppejan model in case of load removal. A large value

of As implies that there will be no effect of load removal on creep. Therefore, the swelling part

of the Koppejan model with large As value is only valid for cases with initial unloading.

In case of single load ∆σ , conversion of existing NEN-Koppejan parameters to NEN-Bjerrum

parameters is performed easily, using the following formulas.

ln(10)

RR = (17.15)

Cp

ln(10)

CR = (17.16)

Cp0

0

1 σp 1 σ0 + ∆σ

Cα = ln + 0 ln (17.17)

Cs σ00 Cs σp

The NEN-Bjerrum parameters (RR, CR, Cα ) can be calculated from the NEN-Koppejan pa-

rameters using the results of an oedometer test (Cp , Cp ’, Cs ’) and as additional information

the preconsolidation stress σp and the stresses σi0 at the different virgin loading steps. It is

assumed that creep before preconsolidation stress can be neglected.

stress is neglected.

ln(10)

RR = (17.18)

Cp

For the calculation of Cα , the theoretical slope of the creep tail according to Cs ’ at a certain

time has been calculated for each of the virgin loading steps, and Cα is then determined from

these slopes by averaging. The creep before preconsolidation stress is again neglected. The

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

n 0

1 X σi

Cα = 0

ln (17.19)

n Cs i=1 σp

where n is the number of load steps above pre-consolidation pressure (i.e. virgin loading

steps).

The calculation of CR is most complicated, because the Cp ’ parameter has been determined

from a primary strain increment after a certain load step, after subtracting the theoretical

creep contributions caused by the preceding load steps, according to Cs ’. Simplifications

are possible by: (a) neglecting the creep before the first virgin loading step; (b) assuming a

doubling of loading after each load step; (c) assuming a duration of 1 day for each load step.

The resulting approximate conversion formula is given below.

" n

#

1 1 X

CR = ln (10) + (n + 1 − i) log (i) (17.20)

Cp0 n Cs0 i=2

Existing soil parameter collections often consist of NEN-Bjerrum and NEN-Koppejan parame-

ters, determined using a linear strain assumption. Alternatively, also Cam-Clay based param-

eters for finite element analysis might be available. The following equations show how you

can convert these parameters to natural Isotache parameters and vice versa.

The formulas were derived, by equalling the separate deformation contributions by reload-

ing to preconsolidation stress, virgin loading and creep. Equation 16.22 was used for the

Isotache model. Equation 16.1 and Equation 16.2 were used for the NEN-Bjerrum model.

Equation 16.24 and Equation 16.25 were used for the NEN-Koppejan model.

Note: Using the conversion formulas, the user should realize that settlement prediction with

linear parameters and natural parameters will only yield approximately equal settlements at

one specific stress level and at one specific time. Due to the different nature of the formula-

tions, equal settlements at any stress and any time can never be expected.

The conversion is based on the condition that the linear strain contributions are set

equal at a given effective stress σ 0 and time t.

The consolidation is finished at time t, so that the effective stress rate has become

approximately zero.

The parameters for primary swelling and primary reloading below preconsolidation stress

are equal for both the NEN-Bjerrum model and the NEN-Koppejan model.

The secondary settlement contribution in the NEN-Bjerrum and NEN-Koppejan model

for loading below preconsolidation stress is neglected.

Determining soil parameters

ln 1 − εCp

a=− (17.21)

σp

ln

σ00

−a

σp

1−

Cr σ0

RR = = 0 (17.22)

1 + e0 σp

log

σ00

ln 1 − εCp − ln 1 − εC prim

b= 0 (17.23)

σ

ln

σp

−b !

σ0

C

1 − εp 1−

Cc σp

CR = = 0 (17.24)

1 + e0 σ

log

σp

C

C t

ln 1 − εprim − ln 1 − εprim − Cα log

τ0

c= (17.25)

t

ln

τ0

−c !

t

1 − εCprim 1−

τ0

Cα = (17.26)

t

log

τ0

where:

εC

p is the primary

lineardeformation below preconsolidation:

σp

εC

p = RR log

σ00

0

εC

prim is the total primary

linear

deformation reference stress σ ):

0(at

σp σ

εCprim = RR log 0

+ CR log

σ0 σp

σ0 is the reference stress level for which the conversion is made. The stress level

used should be representative for the final stresses after embankment construc-

tion.

Cr Cc Cα

a→ , b→ , c→

ln (10) (1 + e0 ) ln (10) (1 + e0 ) ln (10)

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

The conversion of NEN-Koppejan parameters into Isotache parameters can be performed in

2 steps:

NEN-Koppejan parameters are first converted into NEN-Bjerrum parameters using equa-

tions given in section 17.6.1 for a single load or in section 17.6.2 for several load steps (i.e.

oedometer test).

Then Isotache parameters are deduced from NEN-Bjerrum parameters using equations

given above (section 17.7.1).

A Cam Clay based visco-plastic model is available in many finite element programs to describe

the two-dimensional or three-dimensional soft soil behaviour. A well-known example is the

Plaxis soft-soil-creep model. The strain based soft-soil-creep parameters are expressed in

the classic void-ratio based Cam Clay parameters using:

λ κ

λ∗ = and κ∗ = (17.27)

1 + e0 1 + e0

Cam Clay parameters relate volumetric strain to isotropic stress, whereas Isotache parame-

ters relate vertical strain to vertical stress. The optional Updated Mesh method (or Updated

Lagrange method) in finite element programs is completely equivalent with Isotache’s natural

strain method. Cam-Clay-creep parameters are in practice however often determined and

used with a linearised strain assumption.

Cam-Clay-creep parameters that were determined on a natural strain basis are hereafter

indicated by the addition (εH ), while the parameters on linear strain basis are indicated by the

addition (εC ).

The a parameter can be expressed in the soft-soil-creep parameter κ∗ , using the normally

consolidated earth pressure coefficient KN C and the Poisson’s ratio ν .

(1 + 2KNC ) σp

ln

1+ν

(1 + 2KNC ) σp − (σp − σ0 )

a = κ∗ εH 1− ν

(17.28)

σp

ln

σ0

where:

∗ C

σp

ln 1 − κ ε ln

σ0

κ∗

εH = −

σp

ln

σ0

−κ∗ (εH )

σp

1−

σ0

κ∗

εC =

σp

ln

σ0

KN C is the earth pressure coefficient in normally consolidated state (virgin loading).

Determining soil parameters

that the yield cap of the constitutive model has been constructed in such a way that the earth

pressure coefficient during virgin loading is preserved.

∗ H

dσh0

b=λ ε if = KN C (17.29)

dσv0

where:

σ0

∗

ln 1 − εp − ln 1 − εC

C

p −λ

C

ε ln

∗ H

σp

λ ε = 0

σ

ln

σp

∗

σ p

εC

p = κ εC ln

σ0 "

0 −λ∗ (εH ) #

σ

1 − εC p 1−

σp

λ∗ εC =

0

σ

ln

σp

Parameter c is directly equal to the natural soft-soil-creep parameter µ∗ (εH ), as vertical strain

equals volumetric strain under confined compression conditions.

c = µ ∗ εH

(17.30)

where:

C

C ∗ C

t

ln 1 − εprim − ln 1 − εprim − µ ε ln

∗ H

τ0

µ ε =

t

ln

τ0

σ0

∗

σ p ∗

εC

prim = κ ε C

ln + λ ε C

ln

σ0 σp

−µ∗ (εH ) !

t

1 − εC prim 1−

τ0

µ ∗ εC =

t

ln

τ0

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

18 Special Calculations

The following sections contain a short theoretical background on three special calculation

types:

Reliability analysis (section 18.2)

Horizontal displacements (section 18.3)

D-S ETTLEMENT can iteratively improve the match between measured and predicted settle-

ments in a single vertical, by using a special Weighted Least Squares (WLS) method, also

known as Maximum A-Posteriori estimate (MAP). This method will update the values of fit pa-

rameters, by minimizing not only the difference between measurements and predictions, but

also the difference between the initial value and the updated value of the fit parameters. Sepa-

rate weights to each of the differences can be attached. Such a weight determines the relative

importance of each difference. A large weight implies a more certain value of a measurement

or parameter; a small weight implies a more uncertain value.

where:

zm is the vector with measured settlements;

Wz is a diagonal matrix, containing the weights for the measurements. In a probabilistic

framework, this matrix can be considered as the inverse of the covariance matrix

of the imperfections: Wz = Cε−1 , see section 18.2. The imperfections represent

the inaccuracies in the measuring method and in the model assumptions.

X The vector with updated fit parameters. D-S ETTLEMENT uses 5 special fit parame-

ters, to scale the values of the corresponding parameters for all the different soil

layers.

x0 is the vector with initial values of the fit parameters;

Wx is a diagonal matrix, with the weights for the fit parameters. In a probabilistic frame-

work, this matrix is equal to the inverse of the covariance matrix of the fit parame-

ters: Wx = Cx−1 .

Equation 18.2 shows the iterative solution scheme, in case of a nonlinear relationship between

the fit parameters and the predicted settlements.

T −1 T

x(i+1) = x(i) + J (i) Wz−1 J (i) + Wx J (i) Wz zm − zp(i) + Wx x(0) − x(i)

(18.2)

where:

J is the Jacobian matrix, containing derivatives of zp for variations of x:

∂zp.i

Jij =

∂xj

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

D-S ETTLEMENT approximates the coefficients of J for each iteration numerically, by using small

parameter variations (perturbation method).

∆zp.i

Jij ≈ (18.3)

∆xj

T

D-S ETTLEMENT will temporary increase the diagonal terms of the matrix J (i) Wz J (i) + Wx

according to the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, whenever this is required for further conver-

gence during the iteration process.

D-S ETTLEMENT indicates the goodness of fit by a so-called imperfection and a coefficient of

determination.

r

rT r (i)

Imperfection: ε(i) = , r = zm − zp

n − 1

2

ε(i) (18.4)

Coefficient of determination: 1 − 2

(ε(0) )

The bandwidth and the parameter sensitivity for total and residual settlements in a single

vertical can be determined by using a reliability analysis. The bandwidth and sensitivity of

the settlements depend on the assumed uncertainty in the input parameters, expressed in

standard deviations. D-S ETTLEMENT can update (and thereby reduce) the initial parameter

uncertainty, by using settlement measurements. The following sections will present the basic

background on:

Initial and updated parameter covariance (section 18.2.2)

Sensitivity analysis with D-S ETTLEMENT (section 18.2.3)

The probabilistic methods in D-S ETTLEMENT (section 18.2.4).

D-S ETTLEMENT can apply a standard normal probability distribution for all stochastic (uncer-

tain) parameters and all probabilistic methods. The alternative lognormal distribution is cur-

rently only available for testing purposes. Both distribution types are characterized by a mean

µ and a standard deviation σ for a standard normal distribution.

Normal

The probability that a value x is smaller than the value xcharacteristic is for a normal distribution

expressed by:

where:

x − µ [x]

u=

σ [x]

Special Calculations

R unormal probability density:

characteristic

ΦN (ucharacteristic ) = −∞ ϕN (u) × du

ϕN (u) Standard normal probability density:

exp (−u2 /2)

ϕN (u) = √

2πσ [x]

Lognormal

If parameter y = ln(X) has a normal distribution, then parameter X has a lognormal dis-

tribution. A lognormal distribution always yields positive values. For small ratio’s between

standard deviation and mean, the two distribution types will become equivalent. The normal

and lognormal distributions are similar for small ratios between the standard deviation and the

mean. D-S ETTLEMENT uses the following two equations to calculate µ[y] and σ[y] from the

user input of µ[X] and σ[X]:

v

u 2 !

u σ [x]

σ [y] = tln 1 + (18.6)

µ [x]

(18.7)

Mean

the mean value of parameter x can be calculated straightforwardly from Equation 18.8:

n

1X

µ [x] = xi (18.8)

n i=1

where n is the number of samples.

Standard deviation

The standard deviation quantifies the initial uncertainty in a parameter. D-S ETTLEMENT sup-

plies defaults via the variation coefficient Vx :

σ [x]

Vx = (18.9)

µ [x]

The default values for the coefficient of variation are mainly based on the Dutch NEN standard

(NEN, 1991b). The input value of the standard deviation should be somewhere between the

standard deviation of a local value and the standard deviation of the mean value, depending

on the thickness of the layers and the scale of horizontal and vertical variability.

s 2

21 t

local: σtotal = (µVsys ) + +1 σstatistical (18.10)

n u

s 2

2 1 t

mean: σtotal = (µVsys ) + σstatistical (18.11)

n u

where:

n

1 X

2

σstatistical = (xi − µ)2 (18.12)

n − 1 i=1

and where:

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

samples n. The parameter becomes equal to u for large values of n.

Vsys is the coefficient of variation that quantifies the systematic uncertainty by soil

testing and by the transformation from measurements to parameters. A usual

value for soil compression parameters is 0.1.

D-S ETTLEMENT determines the bandwidth in an initial design analysis from the input values of

the parameter standard deviations. D-S ETTLEMENT stores the square values of these standard

deviations in the diagonal terms of the initial parameter covariance matrix Cx.0 .

D-S ETTLEMENT can update the mean parameter values via a fit on measured settlements (sec-

tion 18.1). If you use these updated mean values in a reliability analysis, then D-S ETTLEMENT

will apply Bayesian Updating of the parameter covariance matrix, according to Equation 18.14.

This update will introduce correlations between the different uncertain (stochastic) parame-

ters, which finally yield a reduced bandwidth for the updated mean values of the settlement

prediction.

−1

Cx.f it = JfTit Cε−1 Jf it + Cx.0

−1

, Cε = Iε2 (18.14)

The Jacobian matrix J contains the derivatives of the settlements to the different parameters

:

∂zp.i

Jij = (18.15)

∂xj

D-S ETTLEMENT approximates the coefficients of J numerically, by using small parameter vari-

ations (perturbation method). D-S ETTLEMENT updates the derivatives after a fit, by using the

updated mean values of the parameters.

The input value of the imperfection defines the diagonal covariance matrix C . This imper-

fection represents in fact the combined inaccuracy of the measurements and the prediction

model. Equation 18.14 shows that the effect of measurements on the update of the parameter

covariance will increase if the value of the imperfection becomes smaller, and if parameter

variations show more influence on the measured part of the settlement curve.

Finding a proper value for the imperfection is therefore important. One might consider using:

rT r 2

2

ε = max ,ε , r = zm − zp (18.16)

n − p measurement

where

P is the number of fit parameters

measurement is the size of the inaccuracy in the measurements

zm is the vector with measurements

zp is the vector with predictions after a fit.

Special Calculations

Influencing factors show the relative influence of uncertain parameters on total and residual

settlements at different time points. The value of the influencing factor increases if the param-

eter is more uncertain, and if the effect of parameter variation on the considered part of the

settlement curve is larger. D-S ETTLEMENT calculates the influencing factors by using:

P

2 Jkj i Cx.ji Jki

αkj =P P (18.17)

j Jkj i Cx.ji Jki

where the index k is related to the time tk and the index j is related to parameter xj .

D-S ETTLEMENT determines the initial parameter covariances from the input values of the pa-

rameter standard deviations, see Equation 18.13. D-S ETTLEMENT updates the parameter co-

variances after a fit on measurement data, see Equation 18.14. The Jacobian matrix j con-

tains the linearised derivatives of the settlements to the different parameters. D-S ETTLEMENT

updates the derivatives after a fit, by using the updated mean values of the parameters.

D-S ETTLEMENT offers a choice between three different probabilistic methods. The Monte Carlo

method is the most accurate method (level I), but also the most time-consuming. The quick

linearised FOSM method and the iterative FORM method are approximate methods (level

II) for respectively total and residual settlements. Output of influencing factors for sensitivity

analysis is only available for the FOSM and FORM methods.

This method can be selected for a quick and approximate determination of the bandwidth and

sensitivity factors for total settlements. D-S ETTLEMENT determines the standard deviation of

the settlements from the diagonal terms of the covariance matrix of the settlements.

D-S ETTLEMENT linearises the derivatives in the Jacobian matrix at the mean values of the

uncertain parameters. The derivatives are updated after a fit, by using the updated mean

values of the parameters. D-S ETTLEMENT will also update the parameter covariance matrix

after a fit, by using Equation 18.14.

Iterative First Order Reliability method (FORM) for bandwidth and sensitivity factors of resid-

ual settlements

This method can be selected for an approximate determination of the bandwidth and sensi-

tivity factors for residual settlements.This method will give the approximate probability that the

residual settlement exceeds an allowed value. The limit state function Z equals the predicted

residual settlement minus the allowed residual settlement.

F is the residual settlement starting from time t, zt is the settlement at time t and zend is the

final settlement at the end of the calculation. Each different input value for the time t will yield

a different limit state function.

All combinations of parameter values where the residual settlement equals the allowed value

are together called the Limit State Surface.

The FORM procedure determines for each limit state function the most likely parameter com-

bination on this surface (the design point), Design point by iteratively calculating the probability

of failure, using a linearisation of Z .

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Output of a FORM analysis is the standard deviation of the residual settlement in the design

point, together with the reliability index β .

Fallowed − µ [F ]

β= (18.20)

σ [F ]

where µ[F ] defines the expected mean value and σ[F ] the standard deviation of the residual

settlement. A large value of β implies a large probability that the allowed residual settlement

will not be exceeded.

Crude Monte Carlo method for bandwidth of total and residual settlements

The Monte Carlo method is based on the execution of a large number of settlement pre-

dictions, using different parameter values that are generated from the initial or updated pa-

rameter distributions. These distributions are derived from the mean value and the matrix of

covariance’s. The integration of all individual results yields the probability distribution of the

settlements.

The De Leeuw method (De Leeuw, 1963) estimates the horizontal displacements based on

an elastic solution for a single elastic incompressible layer, characterized by the Young?s

modulus E, and loaded by a uniform load with a certain width. The solution assumes that

the horizontal deformations of the elastic layer are always constrained at the bottom by a stiff

foundation layer. Optionally the deformations can also be constrained by a stiff layer at the

top.

II: elastic layer on a rigid base with a stiff layer on top.

Special Calculations

lent uniform load with a certain width as illustrated in Figure 18.3.

18.3.2 Limitations

The method has the following limitations:

As Poisson ratio ν = 0.5 is used (i.e. incompressible layer), this gives the elastic re-

sponse of the soil in an undrained situation, so in fact directly after applying the load;

additional horizontal deformations due to consolidation are not accounted for;

The thickness of the stiff top layer is not taken into account.

The horizontal distance of the considered vertical to the boundaries of the surcharge

load is limited to 6 times the thickness of the elastic layer.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

18.3.3 E-Modulus

The Young’s modulus of the elastic layer can either be directly prescribed by the user or

automatically estimated by D-S ETTLEMENT from the average unit weight γ of the soft layers.

D-S ETTLEMENT determines the average unit weight γavg of several soft layers using the follow-

ing formula:

n

P

γi × hi

i=1

γavg = (18.21)

H

where:

n is the number of elastic layers;

hi is the thickness of elastic layer i;

H is the total thickness of the elastic layers.

The elasticity modulus is then derived from the unit weight by linear interpolation in the table

below, according to De Leeuw & Timmermans.

Table 18.1: E-modulus vs. unit weight (De Leeuw & Timmermans)

γ E

[kN/m3 ] [kN/m2 ]

10 575

13 1000

18 1500

19 2800

The E-modulus can also be determined from compression parameters like Cp ’ and Cs ’, in

combination with an assumption for the Poisson’s ratio ν :

∆σ 0 (1 + ν) (1 − 2ν)

E= 0 (18.22)

1 1 σ0 + ∆σ 1−ν

0

+ 0 log (t) ln 0

Cp Cs σ

19 Benchmarks

Deltares Systems commitment to quality control and quality assurance has leaded them to

develop a formal and extensive procedure to verify the correct working of all of their geotech-

nical engineering tools. An extensive range of benchmark checks have been developed to

check the correct functioning of each tool. During product development these checks are run

on a regular basis to verify the improved product. These benchmark checks are provided in

the following sections, to allow the users to overview the checking procedure and verify for

themselves the correct functioning of D-S ETTLEMENT.

The benchmarks for Deltares Systems are subdivided into five separate groups as described

below.

Simple benchmarks for which an exact analytical result is available from literature.

Group 2 – Benchmarks from literature (approximate solution)

More complex benchmarks described in literature for which an approximate solution is

known.

Group 3 – Benchmarks from spread sheets

Benchmarks which test program features specific to D-S ETTLEMENT.

Group 4 – Benchmarks generated by D-S ETTLEMENT

Benchmarks for which the reference results are generated using D-S ETTLEMENT.

Group 5 – Benchmarks compared with other programs

Benchmarks for which the results of D-S ETTLEMENT are compared with the results of other

programs.

The number of benchmarks in group 1 will probably remain the same in the future. The reason

for this is that they are very simple, using only the most basic features of D-S ETTLEMENT.

The number of benchmarks in group 2 may grow in the future. The benchmarks in this chapter

are well documented in literature. There are no exact solutions for these available problems;

however in the literature estimated results are available. When verifying D-S ETTLEMENT, the

results should be close to the results found in the literature.

Groups 3, 4 and 5 of benchmarks will grow as new versions of D-S ETTLEMENT are released.

These benchmarks are designed in such a way that (new) features specific to D-S ETTLEMENT

can be verified. The benchmarks are kept as simple as possible so that, per benchmark, only

one specific feature is verified.

As much as software developers would wish they could, it is impossible to prove the correct-

ness of any non-trivial program. Re-calculating all the benchmarks in this report, and making

sure the results are as they should be, will prove to some degree that the program works as

it should. Nevertheless there will always be combinations of input values that will cause the

program to crash or produce wrong results. Hopefully by using the verification procedure the

number of times this occurs will be limited.

The benchmarks are all described in detail in the Verification Report available in the installa-

tion directory of the program.

The input files belonging to the benchmarks can be found on CD-ROM or can be downloaded

from our website www.deltaressystems.com.

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Bibliography

Ahlvin, R. G. and H. Ulery, 1962. “Tabulated values for determining the complete pattern of

stresses, strains, and deflections beneath a uniform circular load on a homogeneous half

space.” Highw. Res. Board, Bull Vol. 342: 1-13.

Alonso, E., 1976. “Risk Analysis of Slopes and its Application to Canadian Sensitive Clays.”

Geotechnique vol. 26, no 3.

Balkema, 1996. “Building on Soft soil.” (translation of CUR Publicatie, Construeren met Grond,

1992, in Dutch).

Barron, R. A., 1948. “Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drainwells.” Trans ASCE 113

pages 718-742.

ing.” .

Bjerrum, L., 1972. “Engineering geology of Norwegian normally consolidated marine clays as

related to settlements of buildings.” Gotechnique Vol. 17(2) Vol. 17(2): 81-118.

settlement prediction based on monitoring.” Rotterdam, Millpress Vol. 3: 1681-1684. Proc.

16th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka.

Carillo, N., 1942. “Simple two and three-dimensional cases in the theory of consolidation of

soils.” Journal of Math. Phys. Vol 21: 1-5.

CUR. “CUR publicatie 2005-1, Geforceerde consolidatie door het afpompen van water (in

Dutch).” .

De Leeuw, E. H., 1963. “Tabellen ter bepaling van horizontale spanningen en verplaatsingen

in een homogene elastische laag van eindige dikte.” Laboratorium voor Grondmechanica,

Delft (The Netherlands). SE-58-IX-b.

Settlement – Analytical solutions. Tech. rep.

Den Adel, H., March 2002. “Uitwerking K0 -CRS proef, bepaling a/b/c parameters (in Dutch).”

Delft Cluster report 01.04.02.

Den Adel, H., V. Trompille, J. B. Sellmeijer and M. Van, 2004. “Geforceerde drainage 5e

Schipholbaan (in Dutch).” Geotechniek 2004 Vol. 2: 58-64.

Den Haan, E. J., 1994. Vertical Compression of Soil. Ph.D. thesis, Delft University.

Den Haan, E. J., 2003. “Het a,b,c-isotachenmodel: hoeksteen van een nieuwe aanpak voor

zettingsberekeningen (in Dutch).” Geotechniek 2003 Vol. 4: 28-35.

Den Haan, E. J. and J. B. Sellmeijer, 2000. “Calculation of soft ground settlement with an

isotache model, Soft Ground Technology.” ASCE Geotech Special Publication nr. 112: 94-

104.

Den Haan, E. J., H. M. Van Essen, M. A. T. Visschedijk and J. Maccabiani, 2004. “Isotachen-

modellen: Help, hoe kom ik aan de parameters (in Dutch).” Geotechniek 2004 Vol. 1:

62-69.

ETC5-D1.97.” .

D-S ETTLEMENT, User Manual

Koppejan, A. W., 1948. “A formula combining the Terzaghi load compression relationship and

the Buisman secular time effect.” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Fnd. Eng. Rotterdam:

32-37.

Mesri, A. M., January 1973. “Coefficient of Secondary Compression.” Journal of Soil Mechan-

ics and Foundations Division pages 123-137.

dation properties of soil, in Dutch. Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut.

NEN, 1991b. NEN 6744-1991, Geotechnics - Calculation Method for shallow foundations (in

Dutch), Nederlands Normalisatie Instituut (Dutch Normalisation Institute).

Poulos, H. G. and E. H. Davis, 1974. Elastic Solutions for Soil and Rock Mechanics. New

York.

Sellmeijer, J. B., 2002. “Vertical Drains simulated as Leakage, Learned and Applied Soil

Mechanics out of Delft.” pages 75-80.

drains (in Dutch).” Geotechniek 2004 Vol. 4: 36-41.

PO Box 177 +31 (0)88 335 81 88

2600 MH Delft sales@deltaressystems.nl

Rotterdamseweg 185 www.deltaressystems.nl

2629 HD Delft

The Netherlands

- Plane Coordinate Tables, KansasDiunggah olehpogopogo22
- Bamboo Soil FoundationDiunggah olehMalayKumarDeb
- DSettlement User ManualDiunggah olehBluebelgian
- @_Summary of Rubble Mound Breakwater Design EquationsDiunggah olehapi-3709579
- ForensicsHomeworkPg.5311-20Diunggah olehJJMATTA123
- Dictionary for the Turbomachinery DomainDiunggah olehmarcucf
- Fellenius - 234 Downdrag DiscussionDiunggah olehgrf06
- Rak-50 3149 Consolidation and Phi-c ReductionDiunggah olehHenry Abraham
- Summary of Experimental ProgrammeDiunggah olehSougata Das
- input file for staadDiunggah olehNilay Gandhi
- Swelling Behavior of Expansive SoilsDiunggah olehGorakMethre
- Slide TutorialManual3Diunggah olehrlpr
- Mahob, Castagna (2003) AVO Polarization and Hodograms (1)Diunggah olehtuan
- chemistry -4 paperDiunggah olehtadepalli patanjali
- SM 2 Marks Q & ADiunggah olehskkpblr
- hydraulicDiunggah olehChowdhury Priodeep
- history.pdfDiunggah olehErnaneufu
- FungosDiunggah olehAnderson Misumi
- GIN 3004Diunggah olehSen Hu
- ACI-224Diunggah olehSyed Salaha
- InfiltrationDiunggah olehesteffie21
- Ci 34 34202 Friccion Negativa en PilotesDiunggah olehAlberto Zaldivar Cabanillas
- 14-MANUAIS.pdfDiunggah olehThales Liberato
- hgvgvmnvmDiunggah olehalvin hogan
- Homework_1-4_RC.pdfDiunggah olehPiseth Heng
- 21 TG JGDiunggah olehSATISH KUMAR SHARMA
- Icist Report Dtc 03 2012 Task2Diunggah olehHendra Marianto
- 2009 Practice Exam 2 With Answers HighlightedDiunggah olehTricia Lee Cairns
- Hid_chaptr 5 -Two-way SlabsDiunggah olehcandsbanda
- 3.4 CAIDiunggah olehAshley Williams

- DPileGroup-Manual.pdfDiunggah olehjdav1206
- DGeoStability-Manual.pdfDiunggah olehjdav1206
- DFoundations ManualDiunggah olehjdav1206
- DSettlement-Manual.pdfDiunggah olehjdav1206
- Relevant Aspects of the Geotechnical Design and Behavior of La Yesca Dam....Diunggah olehjdav1206
- EM 1110-2-6050 - Response Spectra and Seismic Analysis for Concrete Hydraulic Structures 1Diunggah olehPDHLibrary
- Ep 1110-2 12 Seismic Design Provisions for RccDiunggah olehjdav1206
- Unified Soil ClassDiunggah olehjdav1206
- uscDiunggah olehJesus Gonzalez
- Geotechnical Studies and Design of La_Yesca_DamDiunggah olehjdav1206
- El Cajon Dam Analysis of Behaviour During Construction and First FilingDiunggah olehjdav1206

- Erich Von Daniken Books PDFDiunggah olehPam
- Exploring SeaDiunggah olehAkira Tamashiro
- Pragmatic Project Automation How to Build, Deploy, And Monitor Java ApplicationsDiunggah olehArthur Kharyukov
- MusicMaster V5_SR6_ReleaseNotesDiunggah olehONAIR.DE
- E_Video Transmission Using USRPDiunggah olehRina Asmorowati
- e BrochureDiunggah olehPapa Sunshine
- Uday Shankar rathDiunggah olehuday shankar rath
- Presentation (1) (2)Diunggah olehabhishek
- dmreh57Diunggah olehGary Wilson
- SAP Business One B1i SSL Integration Installation (Details) – BATTLESHIPCOBRADiunggah olehAmit Kumar
- HowTo - Install Sun Solaris 10 Inside VMware Workstation 5.5Diunggah olehImraneA
- TDR impedance measurementDiunggah olehjofinjv3194
- IT SBA 2015-2016 Problem StatementDiunggah olehMaya Willims
- IRJET-A review paper on closed loop control of bldc motor using fuzzy logicDiunggah olehIRJET Journal
- conducting polymers.pdfDiunggah olehmannunit
- ExchangeDiunggah olehSanin Alagic
- M&M-DoCDiunggah olehMohd Kurnia Mohd Isa
- Fedora 14 Musicians Guide en USDiunggah olehdantonq
- Hypermesh Quality TutorialsDiunggah olehapi-3717939
- 336520 - Financial Statement Version Transport of TranslationDiunggah olehNemanja Brkić
- String BufferDiunggah olehDeepak Dewangan
- MESFETDiunggah olehhassan abousaleh
- Ban GaloreDiunggah olehShilpa Tiwari
- Developers Guide-Ise Smart Connect KNX Programmable EnDiunggah olehLedjon Behluli
- XPower_200-400-800_Digital InverterDiunggah olehPrasoon Patel
- Fibonacci number.pdfDiunggah olehFiloktitis
- Client-Server Databases.pdfDiunggah olehshylaja_p
- Modelado FISDiunggah olehtestnotification
- Speech Segmentation Algorithm Based On Fuzzy MembershipsDiunggah olehijcsis
- Howto Config Dhcp Snooping Rapier1Diunggah olehrisket01