Article views: 45
Download by: [Columbia University Libraries] Date: 21 July 2017, At: 08:36
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS®
2017, VOL. 47, NO. 15, 1341–1367
https://doi.org/10.1080/00397911.2017.1328066
Introduction
Naproxen, 2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)propionic acid (1), is one of the most regularly
used propionic acid derivatives for the treatment of pain, joint swelling, and symptoms
of arthritis, it is believed to work by blocking the action of cyclooxygenase (COX) involved
in the production of prostaglandins that are produced in response to injury or certain
diseases and cause pain, swelling, and inflammation. However, its use is associated with
some gastrointestinal side effects possibly caused by the free acidic group present.
Masking of this free acidic group therefore was thought to be a possible solution to this
problem.[1]
Synthesis of naproxen
Synthesis of naproxen from substituted naphthalene
The first large-scale synthesis of naproxen 1 produced 500 kg of material in 1970. Friedel–
Crafts acylation of 2-methoxynaphthalene (nerolin) 2 afforded 2-acetyl-6-
methoxynaphthalene (3), which was converted to a naphthaylacetic acid 4 by the
Willgerodt reaction. α -methylation yields the d,l-acid 5, which can be efficiently resolved
using cinchonidine[2,3] (Scheme 1).
Another process was addressed as the first naproxen manufacturing process. In which
β-naphthol was brominated in methylene chloride to produce 1,6-dibromonaphthol. The
labile bromine at 1-position was removed with bisulfate. Then the resulting product 8
was methylated with methyl chloride in water-2-propanol. BMN was converted to
Grignard reagent, then zinc chloride and ethyl bromopropionate and base to afford 1[2]
(Scheme 2).
Scheme 1.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1343
Scheme 2.
Scheme 3.
through nonselective inhibition of both cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) enzymes. The
enzymatic bioinversion of (R)-(-)-ibuprofen and other chiral 2-arylpropionic acids to the
biologically active (S)-enantiomer has been proven to be a unidirectional process produc-
ing compounds with the desired analgesic effects.[5,6] (S)-naproxen is about 28 times more
active than its (R)-isomer.[7–10] This awareness led to great synthetic efforts to obtain
optically pure compounds of this class. (S)-naproxen was prepared using kinetic resolution
of benzylic alcohols. Secondary alcohols 10 (readily prepared by Friedel–Crafts acylation,
followed by NaBH4 reduction of the corresponding aromatic ketones) were used as the
starting materials, palladium catalyzed of these (�)-alcohol 10 using (-) sparteine as a
chiral ligand in toluene at 80 °C afforded the corresponding (S)(-)-alcohols 15 in excellent
optical purity (up to 98%). Chiral (S)(-)-alcohol was then treated with PBr3 in presence of
pyridine to afford the bromo compound (R)-16 with complete inversion of configuration.
Bromo compound was then treated with NaCN in dimethyl-formamide (DMF) as solvent
to yield the corresponding (S)-cyano compound 12, again with complete inversion of
1344 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 4.
configuration at benzylic carbon atom. The cyano compound was finally hydrolyzed using
4N HCl to afford the corresponding (S)-naproxen 1 in good yield and excellent optical
purity (up to 92%)[8] (Scheme 4).
Hydroformylation of styrenes
Naproxen was found to be synthesized by catalytic asymmetric hydroformylation of
2-methoxy-6-vinylnaphthalene 17 using a rhodium catalyst with BINAPHOS ligand which
can produce an optically active aldehyde 19 which on oxidation yields (S)-naproxen 1[2]
(Scheme 5).
Scheme 5.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1345
Scheme 6.
Reactions of naproxen
The reported literatures confirm that gastrointestinal side effects of naproxen and other
aroylpropanoic acids are due to the presence of free carboxylic group in the parent drug.[11]
Therefore, the temporarily masking or manipulation of the acidic group in nonsteroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID’s) are promising means to reduce or to abolish the GI
toxicity due to the local action mechanism.[12–14]
1-Esterification
In 1999, Mahfouz et al.[15] reported that N-hydroxymethyl-succinimide (HMSI) and
N-hydroxymethylisatin (HMIS) were used as esterificating agents for naproxen 1 in
presence of ethyl chloroformate and triethylamine to afford the corresponding derivatives
22 (Scheme 7).
In the next year, Rautio et al.[16] found that various novel morpholinyl 24a,b and
methylpiperazinylacyloxyalkyl 24c,f esters of 2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)propionic acid
were synthesized and evaluated in vitro for topical drug delivery as potential prodrugs
of naproxen 1. Compounds 24a–f were prepared by coupling the corresponding naproxen
hydroxyalkyl ester 23 with the morpholinyl or (4-methyl-1-piperzinyl)acyl acid in the
presence of dicyclohexylcarbodiimide and DMAP in dry dichloromethane (DCM) as
follows (Scheme 8).
Moreover, in 2006, Ranatunge et al.[17] reported that esterification of naproxen 1 with
tert-butylbromoacetate in the presence of NaHCO3 in DMF at room temperature furnished
the tert-butyl ester derivative 25 (Scheme 9).
In the next year, Metwally et al.[18] found that naproxen 1 was esterified with different
alcohols in presence of sulfuric acid to afford the corresponding esters 26 (Scheme 10).
Additionally, in 2010, Kumar et al.[19] reported that naproxen 1 was reacted with
2-phenylethanol 27 and its derivatives, in presence of oxalyl chloride, in DCM to yield
the corresponding ester derivatives 28 (Scheme 11).
Scheme 7.
1346 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 8.
Scheme 9.
Scheme 10.
2-Amidation of naproxen
In 2002, Levit et al.[20] reported that naproxen amino acid amide derivatives 30 were
prepared upon reaction of the acid chloride of naproxen 29 (prepared through treatment
of naproxen with thionyl chloride) with some amino acid esters (Scheme 12).
Scheme 11.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1347
Scheme 12.
Khalifa et al.[21,22] found that naproxenoyl chloride 29 was proven to be a good synthons
for different highly biologically active compounds. Thus, propionamide derivatives 31 were
prepared through interaction of naproxenoyl chloride with some amino benzoic acids and
sulfa drug (Scheme 13).
Additionally, in 2014, Fernandes et al.[23] found that a series of novel substituted
2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)-N-phenylpropanamides (33) have been synthesized upon
refluxing 2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)propanoic acid (1) with different substituted
anilines 32 in the presence of pyridine and silicon tetrachloride as coupling reagent
(Scheme 14).
Recently, Ammar et al.[24] and Fayed et al.[25] were found that the reaction of the acid
chloride of naproxen 29 with 2-aminopyridine derivatives in refluxing dioxane containing
a catalytic amount of triethylamine furnish 2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)-N-(pyridine-yl)
propan-amide 34. Also, treatment of the acid chloride 29 with each of 2-or 3-aminopyri-
dine in refluxing dioxane containing a catalytic amount of triethylamine afforded the
respective pyridinecarboxamides 35a,b (Scheme 15).
Scheme 13.
Scheme 14.
1348 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 15.
Hydrazinolysis of naproxen
In 2007, Amir et al.[26] found that 2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl)propanoic acid hydrazide 36
was prepared in two consequence steps by esterification of naproxen 1 with boiling ethanol
containing a catalytic amount of concentrated H2SO4 followed by treatment of the
resulting ester 26b with hydrazine hydrate in refluxing absolute ethanol (Scheme 16).
Furthermore, in 2015, Mohamed et al.[27] reported that 2-hydroxy-N′-[2-(6-
methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)propanoyl]benzohydrazide 38 was prepared when a mixture of
equimolar quantities of naproxenoyl chloride 29 and salicylic acid hydrazide 37 was
refluxed for 2 h in THF. Also, they found that 2-(4-isobutylphenyl)propionicacid-N′-[2-
(6-methoxy-naphthalen-2-yl)propionyl]hydrazide (40) was prepared by the reaction of
the acid chloride 29 and ibuprofen acid hydrazide 39 was refluxed in THF (Scheme 17).
Scheme 16.
Scheme 17.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1349
Scheme 18.
Scheme 19.
Additionally they reported that the interaction of the hydrazide derivative 36 with ben-
zene-1,3-dicarbonyl dichloride 41 in THF produced the corresponding N′1,N′3-bis{(2-[2-
(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)propanoyl]hydra-zinecarbonyl}-benzene (42)[27] (Scheme 18).
Furthermore, in 2015, Tok et al.[28] reported that naproxen-based acylhyrazone deriva-
tives 36 were synthesized using both conventional and microwave-assisted method 50, 100,
200, and 300 W for 2 min starting with the hydrazide derivative 43 (Scheme 19).
Scheme 20.
Scheme 21.
Scheme 22.
Scheme 23.
Scheme 24.
1352 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 25.
Scheme 26.
Scheme 27.
1354 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 28.
Scheme 29.
Scheme 30.
1356 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 31.
Scheme 32.
Scheme 33.
1358 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 34.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1359
Scheme 35.
Scheme 36.
1360 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
Scheme 37.
identified as 2-(6-methoxynaphthalen-2-yl)-1-(5-phenyl-2,3-dihydropyrazol-1-yl)propan-
1-one (133).[31] (Scheme 37).
Furthermore, in the same year, Mohammad et al.[37] reported the reaction of the precur-
sor hydrazide with carbon disulfide in alkaline medium to afford 2-mercapto-5-substituted
1,3,4-oxadiazole 134. Also precursor hydrazide by reaction with cyanogen bromide and
NaHCO3 to afford 2-amino-5-substituted 1,3,4 oxadiazole 135. Compounds 134 and
135 showed marked anti-inflammatory activity compared to naproxen.
In the next year, Rautio et al.[16] reported that various morpholinyl and methylpiperaziny-
lacyloxyalkyl ester of 2-(6-methoxy2-naphthyl)-propionic acid (24) were synthesized and
evaluated in vitro for topical drug delivery as potential prodrug of naproxen. The resulting
structures showed improved topical delivery of naproxen.
Moreover, in 2002, Levit et al.[20] reported the synthesis of naproxen amide compounds
30a,b with methyl esters of amino acid derivatives which exhibit reliable anti-inflammatory
activity, while possessing less pronounced anti-inflammatory properties exhibit a some-
what lower acute toxicity.
1362 Y. A. AMMAR ET AL.
In 2006,[17] naproxen glycol amide nitrate 137 were synthesized and possessed an oral
anti-inflammatory activity equivalent to that of the conventional NSAIDS, naproxen with
a significantly less gastric damage.
Also in the next year, Metwaly et al.[18] reported the synthesis of compounds 138 and 139
by replacement of carboxyl function of naproxen by 1,2,4-triazoles 138 and 1,2,4-triazolo
[3,4-b]-1,3,4-thiadiazoles 139. All these compounds displayed more potent anti-
inflammatory activity with no or minimal ulcerogenic effects.
Moreover, in the next year, Fernandes et al.[23] reported that the amide prodrug of
naproxen compounds 33a–d showed significant anti-inflammatory activity compared to
standard drug naproxen.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1363
Furthermore, Redasani et al.[39] reported that the glyceride ester derivatives 140a and 140b
demonstrate better anti-inflammatory activity with percentage inhibition of 58 and 55% in
comparison to 51% for naproxen when studied up to 6 h.
Also, they found that sulfonamide derivatives of naproxen 31f–h possess significant
antibacterial activity against Gram-positive bacteria as S. aureus with (MIC ¼ 0.97,
31.25, 0.24 µg/ml) for compounds 31f–h, respectively, and B. subtilis (MIC ¼ 0.97, 62.5,
7.81 µg/ml) for compounds 31f–h, respectively, compared to standard drug Ampicillin
(MIC ¼ 0.06, 0.007) for S. aureus and B. subtilis, respectively.[22]
Moreover, in the same paper, they found oxazole derivatives of naproxen 60 have good
activity against Gram-positive bacteria as B. subtilis with (MIC ¼ 3.9 µg/ml) compared to
standard drug Ampicillin (MIC ¼ 0.007 µg/ml) and Gram-negative bacteria as E. coli with
(MIC ¼ 15.63 µg/ml) compared to standard drug Ciprofloxacin (MIC ¼ 1.95 µg/ml).[22]
Additionally, they reported that triazole derivative of naproxen 65 was found to have
good activity against Gram-positive bacteria as B. subtilis with (MIC ¼ 0.97 µg/ml)
compared to standard drug Ampicillin (MIC ¼ 0.007 µg/ml) and Gram-negative bacteria
as P. aeruginosa with (MIC ¼ 31.25 µg/ml) equipotent to standard drug Ciprofloxacin
(MIC ¼ 31.25 µg/ml). Concerning the fungicidal evaluation, it showed significant activity
against Aspergillus ochraceus and Candida albicans with (MIC ¼ 7.81, 31.25 µg/ml),
respectively, compared to reference drug Flucanazole with (MIC ¼ 1.95, 0.24 µg/ml).[22]
In 2014, Fernandes et al.[23] reported that carboxamide derivatives of naproxen showed good
antibacterial activity compared to the parent drug naproxen. Compounds 33a–d
were screened for their antibacterial activity against B. subtilis, S. aureus, E. coli, and
P. aeruginosa showing good antibacterial activity compared to standard drug Ciprofloxacin.
Moreover, in 2006, Xia et al.[41] reported that the four commercial drugs, naproxen, 4-
biphenylacetic acid, brufen, and 5-fluorouracil, were tested in vitro for their inhibition on
four kinds of human cancer cells, KB, A-549, MDA, and Bell-7402. The data showed that
the inhibition rate of 4-biphenylacetic acid and naproxen on Bel-7402 cell was equivalent
with 5-fluorouracil, while their inhibition on KB cell was higher than that of 5-fluorouracil
due to their intercalating effect on DNA. In the same year, Tian et al.[42] reported the syn-
thesis of a series of six novel 5-fluorouracil derivative 142 in which naproxen was attached
to 5-FU, this compound was found to inhibit liver tumor growth in vivo.
Furthermore, in 2008, Chen et al.[43] found that hydroxamic acid derivative of naproxen
143 have a potent HDAC (histone deacetylase) inhibitor.
Additionally, in 2012, Khalifa et al.[21] reported that urea derivatives of naproxen 31 and
propanamide derivative 65 were found to have promising inhibitory activity against colon
cancer cell line HCT-116.
Conclusion
The data considered in this review clearly demonstrate the high synthetic potential of
naproxen. Many biologically active heterocyclic compounds have been obtained based
on these reagents. This suggests that naproxen can be particularly promising synthon in
combinatorial synthesis of functionalized heterocyclic compounds used in the design of
novel highly effective pharmaceuticals with a broad spectrum of bioresponses.
References
[1] Mamatha, N.; Babu, N. S.; Mukkanti, K.; Pal, S. Molbank 2011, 741, 1–4.
[2] Harrington, P.; Lodewijk, E. Org. Process Res. Dev. 1997, 1, 72–76.
[3] Harrison, I. T.; Lewis, B.; Nelson, P.; Rooks, W.; Roszkowski, A.; Tomolonis, A.; Fried, J. H.
J. Med. Chem. 1970, 13, 203–205.
[4] Noyori, R.; Murata, S.; Suzuki, M. Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3899–3910.
[5] Smith, C. R.; Rajanbabu, T. V. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 3066–3072.
[6] Caldwell, J.; Hutt, A. J.; Gigleux, S. F. Biochem. Pharma. 1988, 37, 105–114.
[7] Wang, B.; Ma, H.-Zh. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 1047–1051.
[8] Thakur, V. V.; Sudalai, A. Ind. J. Chem. 2005, 44B, 557–562.
[9] Piccolo, O.; Spreafico, F.; Visentin, G. J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52, 10–14.
[10] Alper, H.; Hamel, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 2803–2804.
[11] Husain, A. Acta Poloniae Pharma. Drug Res. 2009, 66, 513–521.
[12] Assali, M.; Zaid, A.; Abualhasan, M.; Jaradat, N.; Tarayra, R.; Hamdan, A.; Ardah, R. J. Chem.
Pharma. Res. 2014, 6, 1–4.
[13] Katritzky, A. R.; Jishkariani, D.; Narindoshvili, T. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2009, 73, 618–626.
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS® 1367
[14] Zhao, X.; Tao, X.; Wei, D. Song, Q. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 41, 1352–1358.
[15] Mahfouz, N. M.; Omar, F. A.; Abo ul-Fadl, T. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 551–562.
[16] Rautio, J.; Nevalainen, T.; Taipale, H.; Vepsalainen, J.; Gynther, J.; Laine, K. J. Med. Chem.
2000, 43, 1489–1494.
[17] Ranatunge, R. R.; Augustyniak, M. E.; Dhawan, V.; Ellis, J. L.; Garvey, D. S.; Janero, D. R.; Letts,
L. G.; Richardson, S. K.; Shumway, M. J.; Trocha, A. M.; Young, D. V.; Zemtseva, I. S. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 2589–2599.
[18] Metwally, K. A.; Yaseen, Sh. H.; Lashine, E. M.; El-Fayomi, H. M.; El-Sadek, M. E. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2007, 42, 152–160.
[19] Kumar, S.; Tyagi, D.; Gupta, A. Asian J. Pharma. Clin. Res. 2010, 3, 208–211.
[20] Levit, G. L.; Anikin, L. V.; Vikharev, Yu. B.; Demin, A. M.; Safin, V. A.; Matveeva, T. V.;
Krasnov, V. P. Pharma. Chem. J. 2002, 36, 232–236.
[21] Khalifa, M. M. A.; Ismail, M. M. F.; Eisa, S. I.; Ammar, Y. Der Pharma Chem. 2012, 4,
1552–1566.
[22] Helal, M. H.; Abbas, S. Y.; Salem, M. A.; Farag, A. A.; Ammar, Y. A. Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22,
5598–5609.
[23] Fernandes, J.; Kumar, A.; Kumar, P.; Singh, S.; Meet, B.; Raju, B.; Mahaveer, J. World J. Pharm.
Pharm. Sci. 2014, 3, 2026–2034.
[24] Ammar, Y. A.; Fayed, E. A.; Bayoumi, A. H.; Saleh, M. A.; El-Araby, M. E. Am. J. PharmTech
Res. 2015, 5, 2249–3387.
[25] Fayed, E. A.; Bayoumi, A. H.; Saleh, M. A.; Ammar, Y. A. Der Pharma Chem. 2016, 8, 495–508.
[26] Amir, M.; Kumar, H.; Javed, S. A. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2007, 340, 577–585.
[27] Mohamed, S. K.; Albayati, M. R.; Abd Allahand, O. A.; El-Saghier, A. M. M. Int. J. Pharm. Sci.
Rev. Res. 2015, 31, 232–242.
[28] Tok, T. T.; Ozasik, O.; Sarig, D.; Baran, A. O. Turk. J. Chem. 2015, 39, 64–83.
[29] Ammar, Y. A.; Ghorab, M. M.; El-Sharief, A. M. Sh.; Mohamed, Sh. I. Heteroatom. Chem. 2002,
13, 199–206.
[30] Raghavendra, N. M.; Ramakrishna, K.; Sirisha, V.; Divya, P.; Raob, A. V. Med. Chem. 2013, 9,
553–559.
[31] El-sehemi, A. G.; Bondock, S.; Ammar, Y. A. Med. Chem. Res. 2014, 23, 827–838.
[32] Thabet, H. Kh.; Helal, M. H.; Salem, M. A.; Abdelaal, A. S.; Ammar, Y. A. Al-Azhar Bull. Sci. J.
2011, 22, 7–112.
[33] Salem, M. A.; Thabet, H. Kh.; Helal, M. H.; Mohamed, Y. A.; Abdelaal, A. S.; Ammar, Y. A.
Chem. Sci. J. 2011, 36.
[34] Kira, M. A.; Abdel-Rahman, M. O.; Gadalla, K. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1969, 2, 109–110.
[35] Tripathi, K. D. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
Pvt. Ltd.: New Delhi, 2004; 5th edn., p. 176.
[36] Rodrigues, M. R.; Lanzarini, C. M.; Ricci-Junior, E. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2009, 16, 12.
[37] Mohammad, A.; Antu, O.; Shah, A. Ind. J. Chem. Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem. 1999, 38,
237–239.
[38] Berk, B.; Aktay, G.; Yesilada, E.; Ertan, M. Pharmazie 2001, 56, 613–616.
[39] Redasani, V. K.; Bari, S. B. Open J. Med. Chem. 2013, 3, 87–92.
[40] Piffara, P. M.; Fernandeza, R.; Tchaikovskijr, O.; Hirabaraa, S. M.; Foladora, A.; Pintoa, G. J.;
Jakobia, S. G.; Bordona, D.; Rohna, T. V.; Fabrecioa, V. E. B.; Morettoa, K. D.; Tostaa, E.; Curib,
R.; Fernandes, L. C. Cancer Lett. 2003, 201, 139–148.
[41] Xia, W. Y.; Jin, Z.; Qi, S. X.; Jie, W. C. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 26, 1066–1072.
[42] Tian, Z. Y.; Du, G. J.; Xie, S. Q.; Zhao, J.; Gao, W. Y.; Wang, C. J. Molecule 2007, 12, 2450–2457.
[43] Chen, P. C.; Patil, V.; Guerrant, W.; Green, P.; Oyelere, A. K. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2008, 16,
4839–4853.
[44] Lejal, N.; Tarus, B.; Bouguyon, E.; Chenavas, S.; Bertho, N.; Delmas, B.; Ruigrok, R. W. H.;
Primo, C. D.; Schwoka, A. S. J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 2231–2242.
[45] Spadaro, A.; Bucolo, C.; Ronsisvalle, G.; Pappalardo, M. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2009, 1, 88–95.
[46] Estrada, M. J.; Reyes, R.; Moralesa, B. A.; Reyes, M. A.; de la Parraa, M. G.; Melasb, A.;
JanKowskib, C. K. Rev. Latinoamer. Quím 2012, 106–111.