Wound bed preparation remains a very important issue in antibacterial effects of Flaminal and Flaminal Hydro
wound healing. To promote the production of granulation were confirmed in an in vitro as well as an in vivo setting.
tissue, it is necessary to remove necrotic tissue and to con- It was also demonstrated that Flaminal and Flaminal
trol infection. Necrotic tissue may be removed using Hydro are not toxic to keratinocytes in vitro using an MTT
a hydrogel preparation. Flaminal® and Flaminal® Hydro [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bro-
(Flen Pharma, Belgium) are 2 new hydroactive colloid gel mide] test.
dressings with state antibacterial properties. These prop-
erties are attributed to an enzymatic complex in their Key words: alginates, antibacterial, hydrogel, leg ulcers,
formulation. In the study described in this report, the toxicity, wound healing
CFU/mL
After 48 Hours
® ®
Species Day 0 Flammazine DuoDERM Flaminal® Flaminal® Hydro
Gram– bacilli
E coli 1.15 × 107 0 1.0 × 107 0 0
P vulgaris 1.62 × 108 0 1.42 × 107 0 0
E aerogenes 6.58 × 107 0 5.91 × 107 0 0
P aeruginosa 1.95 × 107 0 1.6 × 107 0 0
Gram+ cocci
S epidermidis 1.50 × 108 0 1.50 × 108 0 0
S aureus 2.29 × 108 0 1.8 × 108 0 0
S pyrogenes 1.23 × 108 0 1.4 × 108 0 0
Yeasts
C albicans 8.73 × 107 0 8.21 × 107 0 0
bandages were secured. The gel was applied every When these secondary cultures were subconfluent,
2 days. Remnants of Flaminal or Flaminal Hydro the keratinocytes were used in subsequent experi-
were wiped away from the ulcer site with gauze ments. The different products to be tested were
soaked in a sterile saline solution. On day 8, the diluted 10% (weight/volume) in culture media and
ulcer area was sampled again. Antiseptics were not heated, if necessary, in a water bath at 37°C for max-
used on the wound prior to sampling. Sampling was imum 1 hour to obtain solubilization. The solutions
done as described above. were filter sterilized (pressure filtration with a 0.2
µm diameter pore filter, Nalgene, Rochester, NY) and
In Vitro Toxicity were then used as culture media for the subconfluent
keratinocytes. After 24 and 48 hours of exposure to
The culture media, fetal calf serum, and other the different products, MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-
additives used were purchased from Invitrogen 2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] tests were
(Merelbeke, Belgium) or Sigma (Bornem, Belgium). carried out as recommended by the manufacturer’s
Human keratinocytes were isolated from skin biop- instructions (Promega, Madison, WI). MTT tests are
sies obtained from healthy young donors undergoing often used to evaluate the toxicity of topically applied
elective plastic surgery (eg, breast reduction) with skin products as described by Poon and Burd11 who
prior written informed consent. The use of human studied the toxicity of topical antibacterial products
keratinocytes was approved by the Ethics Committee using this technique.
of the Ghent University Hospital. In the in vitro tests, cell cultures of 2 different donors
The resulting keratinocyte suspension was seeded were evaluated. After trypsinization of the cultures,
on a feeder layer made of irradiated 3T3 mouse the cell suspensions were diluted to 1 × 106 cells/mL.
fibroblasts and cultured at 37°C in a humidified Cell respiration was assessed by the mitochondrial-
atmosphere containing 10% CO2 as described by dependent reduction of MTT (25 µL, 5 mg/mL). Blue
Rheinwald and Green.10 At confluency, cells were formazan crystals were measured by spectrometry at
trypsinized and the resulting cell suspension was cry- 570 nm after dissolution of the crystals with stop/
opreserved in a DMSO (10%) containing medium. solubilization buffer (100 µL added). Each experi-
For this study, secondary keratinocyte cultures were ment was repeated thrice. On each occasion, 12 to
set up, using thawed cells, which were seeded on a 24 samples were analyzed for each condition of the
feeder layer as described by Rheinwald and Green.10 experiment.
0.6
0.39 §
0.4 0.28 §
0.2
0
control Intrasite Purilon Flaminal Flaminal Hydro Isobetadine
24 h 48 h
Fig. 1 MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] test: Optical density at 570 nm reflecting the metabolic
activity for cultures incubated with control medium, Intrasite®, Purilon®, Flaminal®, Flaminal® Hydro, and Isobetadine® for 24 hours and
48 hours. P values versus control at 24 hours and 48 hours, respectively: Instrasite®, P = .008 (s), P = .2 (ns); Purilon®, P = .08 (ns), P = .002
(s); Faminal®, P = .051 (ns), P = .004 (s); Flaminal® Hydro, P = .051 (ns), P = .13 (ns); Isobetadine®, P < .001 (s), P < .001 (s). P < .5 was
accepted as the threshold of statistical significance. Statistical significance of treated samples versus control samples is indicated by §.
After 48 hours of incubation of the keratinocytes enzymatic complex present in these hydrogels.8 The
with the different products, 3 products exhibited a same antimicrobial effects were observed at higher
significantly different optical density (P < .01) when temperatures. The presence of organic material in
compared to the controls. For the cultures incubated the in vivo situation does not seem to weaken the
with Flaminal, a modest increase of the optical den- antimicrobial effect.
sity was observed. A limited reduction in metabolic Schultz et al described that organisms such as
activity was observed with Purilon. For Isobetadine, Staphylococci or Streptococci are difficult to eradicate
an important decrease of the metabolic activity was without systemic antibiotics.14 The results from this
observed (approximately 70% decrease). study showed that in 6 out of 7 patients those species
could not be removed with the Flaminal or Flaminal
DISCUSSION Hydro treatments.
Furthermore, hydrogels with alginates such as
Chronic wounds are almost always contaminated Flaminal and Flaminal Hydro permit the topical to
with microorganisms. In wound management, it is gellate and demonstrate autolytic debridement. In a
very important to distinguish between wound conta- small clinical study, the use of these hydrogels resulted
mination, wound colonization, and wound infection. in a surface and a volume reduction of wounds com-
In this context, the number and kind of microorgan- pared with controls.8
isms present, their virulence, and host resistance are In our study, an MTT test was used to evaluate the
important parameters.4,12,13 Small numbers of micro- toxicity profile of the new hydrogels. We were unable
organisms present in wound exudate and on the sur- to demonstrate major cytotoxicity in the keratinocytes,
face of chronic wounds do not necessarily delay treated with the hydrogels without antibacterial
wound healing. In contrast with this, a count of 105 to activity. The results of the MTT test of keratinocytes
106 microbial cells per mm2 of wound surface or per cultured with Flaminal and Flaminal Hydro were
gram of tissue is reported to correlate with a critical bac- comparable to the control samples, suggesting the
terial colonization inside the wound. This may hinder absence of cytotoxic effects. However, our findings
wound healing by local toxin release and by eliciting an are consistent with reports of the cytotoxic effects
inflammatory reaction.9,13 It is therefore important to of iodine-containing products.3,15,16 We must hasten
keep the number of bacteria to minimal levels. to add that the observed in vitro cytotoxicity of
In this study, Flaminal and Flaminal Hydro iodine-containing products does not necessarily
demonstrated antimicrobial effects, both in vitro and mean that these products also impede the wound-
in vivo. The effects are considered to be due to the healing process in vivo.16,17 On the contrary, the use of
the same antiseptic products in a clinical setting has 5. Moreno-Arias Ga, Izento-Menezes Cm, Carrasco Ma Camps-
proven to be beneficial for the wound-healing process.18 Fresneda A. Second intention healing after Mohs micrographic
surgery. JEADV 2000;14:159-65.
In conclusion, the results of this pilot study
6. Palmieri TL, Greenhalgh DG. Topical treatment of pediatric
demonstrate that Flaminal and Flaminal Hydro exert
patients with burns: a practical guide. Am J Clin Dermatol 2002;
antibacterial activity in vitro and in vivo, and using 3:529-34.
the MTT test in cultured keratinocytes, toxicity was 7. Harker J. The effect of bacteria on leg ulcer healing. Br J
not observed. These are preliminary observations Community Nurs 2001;6:126-34.
that raise the need for appropriately designed clini- 8. de la Brassinne M, Thirion l, Horvat L-IL. A novel method of
cal studies to demonstrate the lack of cytotoxicity in comparing the healing properties of two hydrogels in chronic leg
vivo and to evaluate inherent properties desirable to ulcers. JEADV 2006;20:131-5.
achieve wound healing. 9. Bowler PG. Wound pathophysiology, infection and therapeutic
options. Ann Med 2002;34:419-27.
10. Rheinwald JG, Green H. Serial cultivation of strains of human
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of colonies from single
cells. Cell 1975;6:331-44.
Professor Jan Philippé gave expertise for the pre- 11. Poon VK, Burd A. In vitro cytotoxicity of silver: implication
liminary experiments with flow cytometry. Ir. Klaus for critical wound care. Burns 2004;30:140-7.
Bacher evaluated the results with the statistical 12. Dow G, Browne A, Sibbald RG. Infection in chronic wounds:
program. Financial funding was obtained from the controversies in diagnosis and treatment. Ostomy Wound Manage
Fund of the Flemish Government for Scientific 1999;45:23-40.
Innovation IWT Ms/IS/48717. 13. Ramelet AA, Perrenoud D. Bacteriology of leg ulcers. In:
Hafner J, Ramelet AA, Schmeller W, Brunner UV, editors.
Management of leg ulcers. Curr Probl Dermatol 1999;27:20-35.
REFERENCES 14. Schultz GR, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C,
Harding K, et al. Wound bed preparation: a systemic approach to
1. Machesney M, Tidman N, Waseem A, Kirby L, Leigh I. wound management. Wound Rep Reg 2003;11(Suppl):S1-28.
Activated keratinocytes in the epidermis of hypertrophic scars. 15. Balin AK, Pratt L. Dilute povidone-iodine solutions inhibit
Am J Pathol 1998;152:1133-41. human skin fibroblast growth. Dermatol Surg 2002;28:210-4.
2. Jaffe AT, Heymann WR, Lawrence N. Epidermal maturation 16. Zhou LH, Nahm WK, Badiavas E, Yufit T, Falanga V. Slow
arrest. Dermatol Surg 1999;25:900-3. release iodine preparation and wound healing: in vitro effects
3. Reimer K, Vogt PM, Broegmann B, Hauser J, Rossbach O, consistent with lack of in vivo toxicity in human chronic wounds.
Kramer A, et al. An innovative topical drug formulation for Br J Dermatol 2002;146:365-74.
wound healing and infection treatment: in vitro and in vivo inves- 17. Falanga V. Iodine containing pharmaceuticals: a reappraisal.
tigations of a povidone-iodine liposome hydrogel. Dermatology Paper presented at Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on
2000;201:235-41. Advances in Wound Management, October 1-4, 1996, Amsterdam.
4. Sibbald RG, Orsted H, Schultz GS, Coutts P, Keast D. New York: Macmillan; 1997. p. 191-4.
International Wound Bed Preparation Advisory Board; Canadian 18. Fumal I, Braham C, Paquet P, Piérard-Franchimont C, Piérard
Chronic Wound Advisory Board Preparing the wound bed 2003: GE. The beneficial toxicity paradox of antimicrobials in leg ulcer
focus on infection and inflammation. Ostomy Wound Manage healing impaired by a polymicrobial flora: a proof-of-concept
2003;49:23-51. study. Dermatology 2002;204(Suppl 1):70-4.