Copyright © 2017 by the Cato Institute, the Fraser Institute, and the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom.
All rights reserved.
Cato Institute
1000 Massachusetts Ave., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001
United States of America
www.cato.org
Fraser Institute
4th Floor, 1770 Burrard Street
Vancouver BC,
Canada V6J 3G7
www.fraserinstitute.org
Acknowledgments.....................................................................................................................................................1
Foreword.................................................................................................................................................................. 3
Executive Summary.................................................................................................................................................. 5
Findings .................................................................................................................................................................19
Country Profiles..................................................................................................................................................... 57
Notes...................................................................................................................................................................386
W
e would like to thank a number report, James Gwartney, Robert Lawson, and Joshua Hall.
of individuals and organizations All of them laid the groundwork for this report and gen-
that made this third edition of erously contributed their time and advice to its creation.
the Human Freedom Index—copub- Our Russian colleague Andrei Illarionov was an enthusi-
lished by the Fraser Institute, the astic and active proponent of this project, and his insights
Liberales Institut at the Friedrich Naumann Foundation helped shape the content and structure of the index. We
for Freedom, and the Cato Institute—possible. thank him for helping to initiate this research and for con-
Fred McMahon of the Fraser Institute once again tinuing to be a valuable source of input and advice.
served as an assiduous project editor, whose expertise Our research assistant, Guillermina Sutter Schneider,
and careful eye improved the quality of the report. His deserves special thanks for spending untold amounts of
work on the topic of freedom and his management of many time helping to compile, organize, and check data and for
of the scholarly seminars that led up to this publication contacting data sources when necessary. Thanks also to
played a key role in the creation of the index. We thank Erin Partin, who provided research assistance.
him for his collegiality, discipline, and valuable insights. Finally, we would like to acknowledge the generous
We are grateful also to Annett Witte and Steffen contribution of the Lotte & John Hecht Memorial Foun-
Hentrich at the Liberales Institut for their support, and dation for supporting this project and the sponsors of—
to their colleague Detmar Doering, former director at the and numerous scholars who participated in—the semi-
Institut and an early and active champion of this project. nars out of which this index arose: the first, in Atlanta,
Our index builds on the work of the Fraser Institute’s sponsored by Liberty Fund; three in Potsdam, sponsored
economic freedom project; thus we owe a debt of grati- by the Liberales Institut; and one in Washington, D.C.,
tude to Michael Walker, the Institute’s former executive sponsored by the Cato Institute.
director and initiator of that research program, and to
the authors of the annual Economic Freedom of the World —Ian Vásquez and Tanja Porčnik
F O R E Wo R D
F
reedom seems to be under attack in major means using data for 2015 for the 2017 report in order for
nations around the world. all the sources to be available.
Journalists and opposition leaders are The index is also innovative in that it is the first to
killed in Russia; the Chinese Communist develop a broad measure of freedom. Previously, separate
Party stifles dissent on the mainland while indexes had measured economic freedom and personal
threatening the rule of law in Hong Kong;1 tens of thou- freedom, though both are essential to overall freedom.
sands are arrested in Turkey on dubious grounds after a Many indexes of freedom are also incomplete in that
failed coup; Venezuela descends into desperation and they do not take into account elements essential to free-
suppression—the list could go on. dom and its protection. This importantly includes the
Populism has been on the rise in Europe, North rule of law and safety and security.
America, and parts of Asia and Latin America. Populism If individuals are not protected by the law and treated
threatens freedom by pitting “us” against “them” and, equally under it, governments and powerful cliques can
when successful, by often suppressing the freedom of attack the freedom of the poor and weak. Safety and
“them” as well as undermining the rule of law, the essen- security are also essential to freedom. If it is not safe
tial guardian of freedom. to walk down the street, to express yourself, to attend
Even once hopeful developments turn bad. The a meeting, and so on, freedom is diminished. Yet many
apparent triumph of democracy in Myanmar has been measures of freedom do not count these elements.
followed by the suppression and bloody expulsion of the Sadly, this index bears out the common perception
Rohingya. The Arab Spring has descended into horrid that freedom is under threat. Overall levels of freedom
violence in Syria, the Republic of Yemen, and Libya, and have fallen since 2008, a fall that continued between 2014
increased repression in Egypt. and 2015.
Not all the news is unfortunate. I write this from One of the great advantages of this index is the granu-
Tunis, Tunisia, where I am meeting with some of the larity it provides. Within economic and personal free-
leaders who saved this nation from either a descent into dom, the index examines 12 different areas: rule of law;
violence or a return to an Egypt-like repression. security and safety; freedom of movement; freedom of
Populism seems to have been checked, though hardly religion; association, assembly, and civil society; expres-
eliminated, in Europe, and several Latin American na- sion and information; identity and relationships; size
tions have turned away from populism—Argentina being of government; legal system and property rights; sound
the prime example, though populist threats loom in money;2 freedom to trade; and regulation.
Brazil and Mexico. Only three areas have shown an increase in freedom
This is why the Human Freedom Index is so important. since 2008—namely, sound money, freedom to trade, and
The conflicting data and noise can muddy the signal. This regulation, the latter two with relatively small gains. The
index attempts to organize the data objectively and thus big losers are rule of law; movement; association, assem-
mute the noise and clarify the signal. bly, and civil society; and expression and information.
It uses only third-party data to avoid imposing the bi- (See Figure 6.)
ases of the authors. Of course, any data source likely has Similarly, freedom declined between 2008 and
biases, but by using 79 data streams from a multitude of 2015 in most regions of the world, particularly Eastern
sources, the index gains a broader perspective that is not Europe, Central Asia, and the Middle East and North
beholden to a single point of view. Unfortunately, this also Africa. While losses in regions that have seen a decline
in freedom are typically larger than gains in regions that improvement; employment; and so on. The Human
have seen increases, East Asia, sub-Saharan Africa, and Freedom Index permits similar studies of the impact of
South Asia all had significant advances. (See Figure 7.) overall freedom.
The index also allows study of the relationship between The Human Freedom Index serves as an invaluable tool
freedom and other factors, such as per capita gross domes- for tracking freedom with granularity, both conceptually
tic product. The Economic Freedom of the World index has and geographically, and for enabling researchers to inves-
been used in hundreds of empirical, peer-reviewed studies tigate whether freedom promotes good or bad outcomes.
to examine the relationship between it and such outcomes My compliments to Ian Vásquez and Tanja Porčnik.
as prosperity; reduced poverty; longer lives; improved
educational levels, particularly for females; environmental —Fred McMahon, Fraser Institute
Notes
1. “Truth, Justice and the Chinese Way: China Is Threatening 2. This category might strike some as odd, but high levels of
the Rule of Law in Hong Kong,” The Economist, August 24, 2017, inflation, for example, erode property rights, security, and the
https://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21727069-britains- rule of law. These developments undermine freedom, as extreme
silence-deafening-china-threatening-rule-law-hong-kong. examples such as Zimbabwe and Venezuela demonstrate.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
T
he Human Freedom Index (HFI) presents The HFI is the most comprehensive freedom index so
a broad measure of human freedom, far created for a globally meaningful set of countries. The
understood as the absence of coercive HFI covers 159 countries for 2015, the most recent year for
constraint. This third annual index uses which sufficient data are available. The index ranks coun-
79 distinct indicators of personal and tries beginning in 2008, the earliest year for which a robust
economic freedom in the following areas: enough index could be produced.
• Rule of Law On a scale of 0 to 10, where 10 represents more free-
• Security and Safety dom, the average human freedom rating for 159 countries
• Movement in 2015 was 6.93. Among countries included in this report,
• Religion the level of freedom decreased slightly (−0.05) compared
• Association, Assembly, and Civil Society with 2014, with 61 countries increasing their ratings and 97
• Expression and Information decreasing. Since 2008, the level of global freedom has also
• Identity and Relationships decreased slightly (−0.12), with about half of the countries
• Size of Government in the index increasing their ratings and half decreasing.
• Legal System and Property Rights The top 10 jurisdictions in order were Switzerland,
• Access to Sound Money Hong Kong, New Zealand, Ireland, Australia, Finland,
• Freedom to Trade Internationally Norway, Denmark, and, tied at 9th place, the Netherlands,
• Regulation of Credit, Labor, and Business and the United Kingdom. Selected countries rank as
6
“
Freedom
plays an
important
follows: Canada (11), Sweden (13), Germany
(16), the United States (17), Japan (27),
South Korea (29), France (33), Italy (35),
Chile (37), South Africa (68), Mexico (73),
Northern Europe, Eastern Europe and
Southern Europe) and North America
and are least protected in the Middle
East and North Africa, South Asia, and
role in Indonesia (78), Turkey (84), Kenya (89), sub-Saharan Africa.
Malaysia (97), India (102), United Arab Countries in the top quartile of free-
human
”
Emirates (116), Russia (126), China (130), dom enjoy a significantly higher average per
well-being. Nigeria (133), Pakistan (141), Zimbabwe capita income ($38,871) than those in other
(146), Saudi Arabia (149), Iran (154), Egypt quartiles; the average per capita income in
(155), Venezuela (158), and Syria (159). the least-free quartile is $10,346.
Out of 17 regions, the highest levels The HFI also finds a strong relationship
of freedom are in Western Europe, Northern between human freedom and democracy.
Europe, and North America (Canada Hong Kong is an outlier in this regard.
and the United States). The lowest lev- The findings in the HFI suggest that
els are in the Middle East and North freedom plays an important role in human
Africa, Eastern Europe (Moldova, Russia, well-being, and they offer opportunities
and Ukraine), South Asia, and sub-Saharan for further research into the complex ways
Africa. Women-specific freedoms, as mea- in which freedom influences, and can be
sured by seven indicators in the index, are influenced by, political regimes, economic
strongest in five European regions (Central development, and the whole range of indica-
Europe and the Baltics, Western Europe, tors of human well-being.
“
On Our Third Annual Report a work in progress. It is published with sat-
This third annual report presents a broad isfaction but also with humility. We believe The contest
measure of human freedom around the world. that we have constructed a Human Freedom between
It builds upon a multiyear program of research Index that provides a solid foundation for the
and discussions held in Europe and North ensuing work of refinement and recalibra-
liberty
America that involved scholars from many tion in the face of new data sources and new and power
disciplines and countries. It uses, adapts, and understanding as time passes. In that spirit, has been
evolves the methodologies that emerged from we welcome feedback, which may be appropri-
ongoing for
”
the decades-long work of the Fraser Institute ate in further consideration of the data found
to define and measure economic freedom with in the index and published in this volume. millennia.
the Economic Freedom of the World index.1 The
economic freedom project has demonstrated Defining and Measuring
the power of such measurement to increase Freedom
understanding about the concept of freedom The contest between liberty and power has
and its contribution to human well-being. been ongoing for millennia. For just as long,
A central purpose of this report is to paint it has inspired competing conceptions of free-
a broad but reasonably accurate picture of dom. Plato and Hobbes, for example, thought
the extent of overall freedom in the world. that extensive or absolutist rule over society
A larger purpose is to more carefully explore was compatible with their definition of free-
what we mean by freedom and to better under- dom because in their view it would prevent
stand its relationship to any number of other society from descending into violence or
social and economic phenomena. This re- chaos, which they considered more detrimen-
search could also help us more objectively tal to freedom than a powerful state. Others,
observe the ways in which various freedoms— such as the 6th-century BCE Chinese philoso-
be they economic or civil, for example—inter- pher Lao-tzu and the 16th-century Spanish
act with one another. We hope that this index scholastics, expressed and developed ideas
will become a resource for scholars, policy- consistent with the view of the father of
makers, and interested laypeople alike and modern political philosophy, John Locke, that
that its value will increase as it is annually up- freedom implies that an individual not “be
dated, thus allowing us to observe numerous subject to the arbitrary Will of another, but
relationships through time. freely follow his own.”3
The Human Freedom Index casts a wide net This index follows that latter tradition,
in an attempt to capture as broad a set of free- which in the past several hundred years has
doms as could be clearly identified and mea- shaped the modern, liberal world. Freedom
sured. Some freedoms that could be clearly in our usage is a social concept that recog-
identified, such as the freedom to use drugs, nizes the dignity of individuals and is defined
could not be included because internationally by the absence of coercive constraint.4 (That
comparable data could not be found. In other contrasts with a mechanistic concept whereby
cases, data and clarity could be achieved for anything that limits a person’s ability to do
too few countries to satisfy the goal of making what she wants—be it a natural, physical barri-
a global index. The index in this report is the er or another person who happens to be stand-
most comprehensive freedom index ever cre- ing in her way—is considered an infringement
ated for a globally meaningful set of countries. on her freedom.) Freedom thus implies that
That said, we and the authors of the other individuals have the right to lead their lives
preliminary papers and indexes that have con- as they wish as long as they respect the equal
tributed to the creation of this index2 recog- rights of others.
nize that the global characterization of the Isaiah Berlin best elucidated this notion
state of human freedom published here is of freedom, commonly known as negative
12
“
liberty.5 In the simplest terms, negative lib- included in this index, democracy or political
Economic erty means noninterference by others. Berlin freedom is not. Political freedom is impor-
freedom contrasts that type of liberty with positive lib- tant, but it does not mean democracy alone
erty, which requires the removal of constraints or unrestrained democracy. It is ideally some
is not just that impede one’s personal improvement or combination of the division of power, limited
inherently the fulfillment of his potential as the indi- government, decentralization, and structural
valuable, vidual understands it. When positive liberty, characteristics designed to control the powers
however, is imposed by others, it undermines of the majority. For example, countries such
it also as Canada and the United States have demo-
negative liberty since individuals naturally
empowers have conflicting views on whether and how to cratic elections and constitutional constraint
individuals achieve self-improvement. As in the case of as well as separation of powers and decentral-
to exercise the totalitarian systems of the 20th century, ization. The United Kingdom has checks and
this discrepancy allows rulers to ignore the balances and other limits on power, but it has
other
”
wishes of people and commit torture and oth- no written constitution. The issue of how po-
freedoms. er atrocities in the name of some higher form litical freedom can best be determined and
of freedom. Berlin further warned, as did F. A. which of its forms is most consistent with
Hayek, against the common tendency to call personal, economic, and civil freedom is a
other good things—think of income or hous- major area of ongoing research. This report
ing, for example—“freedom,” since this merely does not address that topic directly. However,
causes confusion.6 it is hoped that the data provided here will
Negative liberty “comes in only one flavor— assist researchers as they seek to determine the
the lack of constraint imposed on the individu- political structure most consistent with politi-
al,”7 whereas positive freedom is far more likely cal freedom and the sustainability of personal,
to mean different things to different people economic, and civil freedom. In that spirit,
and thus cannot be measured independent of we look at the relationship between human
the goals that conflicting ideologies or groups freedom and democracy in the final section
might identify with freedom. of this report.8
This index is thus an attempt to measure We use the following criteria to select data
the extent to which the negative rights of for the index: the data come from credible ex-
individuals are respected in the country ob- ternal sources and, for the sake of objectivity,
served. By negative rights, we mean freedom are not generated by us; the index is transpar-
from interference—predominantly by govern- ent on methodology and sources; and the re-
ment—in people’s right to choose to do, say, port covers as large a number of countries over
or think anything they want, provided that it as long a time period as is possible given the
does not infringe on the rights of others to do data available. As previously noted, we gener-
likewise. These rights protect freedoms such ally measure official restrictions on freedom,
as freedom of religion, freedom of speech, although some measures capture social or
freedom of assembly, sexual freedom, eco- nonofficial violations of liberty (e.g., violence
nomic freedom, and so on. Some of the rights or conflict measures).
that individuals legitimately claim depend par- This index fills a gap in the literature by ex-
tially or wholly on action by government to be amining overall freedom, including economic
realized. The right to personal security is the and other human freedoms. Existing econom-
most important, but security in one’s property ic freedom indexes examine only the former,
rights and the rule of law also require govern- of course. Similarly, other surveys of freedom
ment action. focus on subsets of freedom that exclude eco-
While aspects of liberty associated with nomic freedom. Yet all these freedoms are
democracy and political freedom—freedom of crucial. In fact, early systemic writings on
speech, assembly, public demonstration—are freedom in the Enlightenment often focused
13
“
on economic liberalism, or what we would restrict liberty or attempt to centralize power.
identify with economic freedom, as an intrin- As such, economic freedom is not just inher- Where
sic part of overall freedom. This index, thus, ently valuable, it also empowers individuals economic
for the first time develops a broad measure of to exercise other freedoms. Thus, the weight-
human freedom rather than select aspects of ing reflects how economic freedom interacts
freedom is
it. We combine economic freedom measures with other freedoms. This point is illustrated limited, the
from the Economic Freedom of the World index by a remark of Hayek’s: “A complete mo- government
with measures of what we call personal free- nopoly of employment . . . would possess un-
doms. Our definition of economic freedom is limited powers of coercion. As Leon Trotsky
or powerful
that of James Gwartney, Robert Lawson, and discovered: ‘In a country where the sole em- cliques
Walter Block: “Individuals have economic ployer is the state, opposition means death possess
freedom when property they acquire without by slow starvation. The old principle, who great
”
the use of force, fraud, or theft is protected does not work shall not eat, has been
from physical invasions by others and they are replaced by a new one: who does not obey
control.
free to use, exchange, or give their property as shall not eat.’”11
long as their actions do not violate the iden- That is an extreme case, but it illustrates
tical rights of others.”9 Economic freedom the broader point that where economic free-
thus exists when there is voluntary exchange, dom is limited, the government or powerful
competition, personal choice, and protection cliques possess great control over where you
of persons and their property. work, how much you are paid, whether you are
One of the biggest challenges in construct- able to find employment in the formal econ-
ing any index is the organization and weight- omy (with many attendant benefits), whether
ing of the variables. Our guiding principle is you get a promotion, where you live (and
that the structure should be simple and trans- whether you are subsidized), what kind of job
parent. All the data that we use in the index you have, whether you are able to adequately
are available and their organization clearly feed and clothe your family, and so on. In the
presented. This means that other researchers absence of economic freedom, the powers-
may restructure the index to their own prefer- that-be have many tools of coercion to block
ences. We believe the structure and weighting other freedoms. These tools of coercion fade
system we have chosen (after long discussions as people gain the power to make their own
with our advisory group), if not perfect for ev- economic decisions.
eryone, makes sense and is consistent with the We therefore equally weigh economic free-
literature on freedom.10 dom because of its central importance in daily
The economic freedom subindex receives life and because it enables other freedoms.
half the weight in the overall index, while This weighting, like any weighting in any in-
safety and security and other personal free- dex, will not be perfect, but we believe it is a
doms that make up the personal freedom good approximation of how people live their
subindex receive the remaining weight. We lives and of the relation between economic
weigh economic and all personal freedoms in and other freedoms.
our index equally for two reasons. First, eco- We use 2015 as the latest year in our index
nomic activities, arguably, predominate in the because it is the most recent year for which
everyday lives of most people as they seek, at sufficient data are available. For the personal
a minimum, to survive and to otherwise im- freedom subindex, we use 37 variables cover-
prove their welfare. Thus, the strong weighting ing 141 countries for the year 2008. The index
for economic freedom reflects how we live our covers an increasing number of countries for
lives. Second, economic freedom decreases subsequent years. For the year 2015, we use
the dependence of individuals on government 37 variables covering 159 countries. In select-
or other potential forces in society that would ing the countries, we have limited ourselves to
14
“
those that are presented in the Economic Free- might domineer over him?) but
Without dom of the World report. In selecting time peri- a liberty to dispose, and order as
security or ods, we use 2008 as the earliest year for which he lists, his person, actions, pos-
we are able to produce a robust enough index sessions, and his whole property,
the rule within the allowance of those laws
(many indexes of civil or other liberties are
of law, relatively new for a large number of countries). under which he is, and therein not
liberty is In the personal freedom index, we have to be subject to the arbitrary will of
two equally weighted parts. The first is legal another, but freely follow his own.12
degraded protection and security, made up of Rule of
or even Law and Security and Safety. The other half A security state may increase or appear to
meaning-
”
of the personal freedom index is made up of increase some aspects of safety, but it would
less. specific personal freedoms: Movement; Reli- curtail freedoms by empowering the state to
gion; Association, Assembly, and Civil Society; violate rights. Thus, legal security and specific
Expression and Information; and Identity and personal freedoms are both necessary condi-
Relationships. tions for high levels of personal freedom. We
This, too, we believe, provides an advance believe the equal weighting provides a reason-
over other freedom indexes, which fail to ac- able approximation of this interaction.
count for the interaction between the rule of The index is derived from a total of 79 dis-
law and security on the one hand and specific tinct indicators (37 from the personal freedom
freedoms on the other. Without the rule of subindex and 42 from the economic freedom
law and security, specific freedoms cannot, in subindex) covering 159 countries. (Table 1
a practical sense, be lived out. The rule of law outlines the categories and the components
and security are essential to provide reason- in each category of the personal freedom and
able assurance that life is protected. Security economic freedom subindexes.) Each indica-
and safety are fundamental for survival and tor is rated on a 0–10 scale, with 10 represent-
for the exercise of a vast array of freedoms. ing the most freedom. We average the main
The rule of law, by providing predictable or- components in each category to produce a
der and reducing arbitrary conduct by the rating for each of the categories. To produce a
authorities, further facilitates an environ- final rating on the personal freedom subindex,
ment in which freedoms are safeguarded. we average the Rule of Law and the Security
Without security or the rule of law, liberty is and Safety categories and average that rating
degraded or even meaningless. The most fa- with the average of the remaining categories
mous expression of this idea is perhaps found in the subindex. In the economic freedom
in Locke, who conceptualized the rule of law subindex, we have five equally weighted parts:
and security as a unified bundle, just as we do: Size of Government, Legal System and Prop-
erty Rights, Sound Money, Freedom to Trade
The end of law is not to abolish or Internationally, and Regulation. To produce
restrain, but to preserve and enlarge the Human Freedom Index, we average the final
freedom: for in all the states of cre- country ratings of the economic and personal
ated beings capable of laws, “where freedom subindexes.
there is no law, there is no freedom;”
for liberty is to be free from restraint What the index measures
and violence from others; which The HFI measures economic freedoms
cannot be where there is not law: such as the freedom to trade or to use sound
but freedom is not, as we are told, money, and it captures the degree to which
“a liberty for every man to do what people are free to enjoy the major freedoms
he lists:” (for who could be free, often referred to as civil liberties—freedom of
when every other man’s humour speech, religion, association and assembly—
15
Note: Area 2 (Legal System and Property Rights) ratings in economic freedom are adjusted to reflect inequalities in the
legal treatment of women. For the adjustment factor, see Chapter 2 in James Gwartney et al., Economic Freedom of the
World: 2017 Annual Report (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2017) and Rosemarie Fike, “Adjusting for Gender Disparity in
Economic Freedom and Why It Matters,” in Gwartney et al, Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report.
16
“
in the countries in the survey. In addition, it Bank’s Governance Indicators.
The rule of law includes indicators on rule of law, crime and It should be noted that the Economic Free-
is an essential violence, freedom of movement, and legal dis- dom of the World index includes nine compo-
crimination against same-sex relationships. nents in the area of “Legal System and Property
condition of We also include nine variables pertaining to Rights” that seek to measure “how effectively
freedom that women-specific freedoms that are found in the protective functions of government are
protects various categories of the index. performed.” Thus, the rule of law measures in-
We would have liked to include other im- cluded in the personal freedom subindex add
the portant indicators, such as those quantifying to those in the economic freedom subindex.
individual drug and alcohol prohibition, but we found The first component rates what we have
from coercion no reliable data sources that conformed to our termed procedural justice. It is composed
”
by others. methodological principles. What follows is a of the average of three indicators measuring
brief description and justification of the data “the right to life and security” of a person,
we use in the personal freedom subindex, as “due process of law and rights of the accused,”
well as a summary of the economic freedom and “freedom from arbitrary interference
indicators that make up the rest of the Human with privacy.” The first of those indicators
Freedom Index. refers to violations by the police or govern-
ment when conducting an arrest or a search,
Rule of Law for example.15 The second indicator refers
The rule of law is an essential condition to such issues as the extent to which police
of freedom that protects the individual from or the authorities respect the presumption
coercion by others. John Locke’s emphasis of innocence, arrest people on genuine and
on the importance of law in securing and en- formally declared charges, treat suspects
larging freedom, cited previously, is an early humanely in custody, provide the accused full
formulation of that concept. A society ruled access to evidence, and the like. The third
“by law, not men” implies that laws apply to indicator refers to such violations as govern-
everybody, including the authorities; that ments wiretapping private communications
they be publicly known and understood; and without judicial authorization.
that they limit the arbitrary decisions of rul- The second component rates civil justice
ers. To further increase the scope of individual on such issues as whether it is free of discrimi-
freedom and reduce potential rule by personal nation, corruption, and improper government
will, Hayek proposed that laws be general and influence. It also measures the extent to which
abstract; that is, that they be ignorant of par- alternative dispute resolution mechanisms are
ticular cases and “not single out any particular accessible, impartial, and effective. The third
persons or group of persons.”13 The stated at- component measures the criminal justice sys-
tributes also provide a social order that allows tem on such issues as its impartiality, its level
people to more easily pursue their individual of corruption, and the degree to which im-
ends. Individual freedom is therefore depen- proper government influence is present.
dent on the rule of law, a broad concept that By including the Rule of Law category, the
encompasses due process; equal treatment un- index more fully captures the extent to which
der the law; accountability of government of- people are exposed to abuse by the authori-
ficials; and notions of fairness, predictability, ties, and therefore it provides a measure of
and justice. whether and by how much one is “subject to
We use indicators from the World Justice another man’s will,”16 to use Hayek’s expres-
Project’s Rule of Law Index that are consistent sion. The indicators we use not only rate the
with our definition of freedom.14 We con- degree to which the rule of law may be under-
struct Rule of Law ratings for countries not mined, but they also measure negative rights.
included in the WJP index using the World Like safety and security, explained next, the
17
“
rule of law concept included here significantly The second component measures disap-
expands the scope of freedom by limiting co- pearances, conflict, and terrorism. It is made Governments
ercion from a diversity of potential sources, up of a number of variables. The first measures that restrict
including the most powerful entities or indi- politically motivated disappearances. The
viduals in society, and thus encourages other following two indicators—violent conflicts and
people’s
freedoms to flourish. internally organized conflicts—measure the movement
extent to which war or armed conflict with greatly limit
Security and Safety internal or external aggressors impinges on
The rights to life and safety from physical personal freedom in observed countries. The
the scope
of overall
”
aggression have long been recognized as fun- violent conflicts variable reflects battle-related
damental to liberty. Violence of any kind, ex- deaths per capita. For the level of internally liberty.
cept in self-defense or in the administration of organized conflict, we use a “qualitative assess-
justice, reduces personal freedom and, in the ment of the intensity of conflicts within” each
case of violence that results in death, elimi- country used by the Institute for Economics
nates it altogether. In societies with low levels and Peace’s Global Peace Index but derived by
of personal safety and physical security from the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU). The
harm, it is difficult to exercise other freedoms, next two indicators rate the level of fatalities
or even to survive. Like the rule of law, security and injuries resulting from terrorism. Those
and safety are thus important in safeguard- figures, from the University of Maryland’s
ing overall freedom. (Indeed, the provision Global Terrorism Database, include deaths
of domestic and national security is a service and injuries of both perpetrators and victims.
that most classical liberals consider a proper The next component rates women’s secu-
function of government.) Unlike the Rule of rity. It is made up of three main variables. The
Law category, which concerns rules that seek first measures the prevalence of female genital
to reduce coercion, the Security and Safety mutilation among the population of women
category measures actual crimes committed. in a given country. The next indicator refers
It attempts to measure the degree to which to the number of missing women in a country,
people who have not violated the equal rights typically due to sex-selective abortions and in-
of others are physically assaulted, kidnapped, fanticide of females. The final variable in this
or killed, or their physical integrity or safety is component measures whether when it comes
otherwise violated. Because security is neces- to inheritance the legal system favors males as
sary to fully exercise the whole array of free- compared to widows and daughters. Favoring
doms, we give this category equal weight to males is an infringement on the liberty of par-
the Rule of Law category, and both together ents and on the daughters to whom they might
are weighed equally with the rest of the per- otherwise choose to bequeath their assets.
sonal freedom index. The practice is a reality that in many countries
Whether perpetrated by ordinary criminals, subordinates women to the power of men, of-
governments, organized gangs, political groups, ten putting them in economically precarious
or individuals following tradition, crime and or physically vulnerable situations.
physical transgressions reduce personal free-
dom in any society. The first component Movement
measures the homicide rate. Here we ignore The freedom to travel is a basic human
optimal-level-of-crime considerations or, as right and essential to a free society. Govern-
with the Rule of Law category, any account of ments that restrict people’s movement greatly
the use of public resources to provide a public limit the scope of overall liberty because those
good intended to enhance freedom but that limits severely reduce the ability of people to
by its nature (taxation) represents a reduction engage in a wide range of peaceful activities of
in freedom.17 their choosing. The first two indicators in this
18
“
The freedom
to associate
and assemble
category rate the freedom of domestic move-
ment and the freedom to leave the country,
respectively. The third component, women’s
movement, measures the extent to which
women can “move freely outside of the house.”
expression, the press, and use of the internet.
Press killed refers to murders of journalists
“in retribution for, or to prevent, news cover-
age or commentary” and journalists killed on
dangerous assignments as documented by the
with peaceful Committee to Protect Journalists. Press jailed
individuals or Religion refers to the number of journalists impris-
organizations Free societies respect the right to practice oned as documented by the same source. Laws
of one’s a religion of one’s choosing. The exercise of re- and regulations that influence media content
ligion can be both a supremely private matter is an assessment by Freedom House of the
choice is an involving a person’s strongest beliefs and a so- legal environment that governments can use to
essential cial affair practiced in an organized way among “restrict the media’s ability to operate.”
part of larger groups. Restrictions on that fundamen- The next measure is a Freedom House as-
tal freedom have been the source of some of sessment of the political environment’s influ-
individual the bloodiest and most drawn-out conflicts ence on the media—namely, political pressure
freedom throughout history, and they continue to ani- over news and editorial content. It also evalu-
and a basis mate discord in numerous countries today. ates “the vibrancy of the media and the diver-
of civil We use three components in this category. sity of news available within each country”
”
The first rates the freedom to establish and op- and indicators of violence against journalists.
society. erate religious organizations. The next compo- There is some overlap of coverage among
nent relates to infringements on religious free- those components.
dom characterized by harassment and physical The next two indicators are freedom of
hostility. Not only governments but also indi- access to cable/satellite, which often includes
viduals, members of opposing religions, and foreign television, and access to foreign news-
other groups in society can perpetrate those papers. We believe that access to foreign media
violations. Last, we measure restrictions on re- sources can vastly increase the level of freedom
ligion that are of a legal or regulatory nature. in a country not only by providing individuals
with much more information than is locally
Association, Assembly, and Civil Society available but also by increasing media compe-
The freedom to associate and assemble tition and strengthening the role the media
with peaceful individuals or organizations often play as a watchdog and exponent of trans-
of one’s choice and to form or join organiza- parency in government. The last component in
tions for political, commercial, or other ends this category gauges state control over internet
is an essential part of individual freedom and access; it is an increasingly important measure
a basis of civil society. This category is made of freedom of expression as use of the internet
up of three components: freedom of asso- spreads and government efforts to control it
ciation, freedom of assembly, and freedom to become more sophisticated and frequent.
establish and operate organizations. The last
component is made up of three indicators— Identity and Relationships
political parties;18 professional organizations; Last, we measure what we broadly cat-
and educational, sporting, and cultural orga- egorize as freedoms to establish one’s own
nizations—gauging the extent to which those identity and to have intimate and familial
organizations can be established and can free- relationships with others.
ly operate once they are set up. One of the most personal decisions indi-
viduals can make regards their sexual and gen-
Expression and Information der identity. Legal gender measures the degree
This category measures a broad range of to which people are free to legally change their
freedom, including that affecting personal sex and gender.
19
”
The next component rates the freedom The inflation rate and its volatility are among
of individuals to establish same-sex relation- the indicators measured here. The fourth cat- identity.
ships. It is composed of two variables from the egory is freedom to trade internationally and
International Lesbian and Gay Association: a measures tariff rates, nontariff trade barriers,
male-to-male relationship indicator that gaug- and controls on capital movement, among
es the extent to which sexual relationships other indicators. The fifth category regards
between men are legal and a female-to-female the regulation of business, labor, and credit.
indicator that gauges the same for relation- To the extent that government restricts com-
ships between women. The last component petition in business, voluntary arrangements
measures “whether women and men have the among employers and employees, and freedom
same rights to initiate divorce.” of exchange in credit markets, economic free-
dom is reduced. Areas measured include inter-
Economic Freedom Measures est rate controls, hiring and firing regulations,
The 42 indicators that make up the eco- and licensing restrictions, among others.
nomic freedom subindex fall into five broad
categories. A complete description of the FINDINGS
economic freedom structure and index meth- Table 2 presents the ratings and rankings
odology can be found in the Fraser Institute’s of countries on the overall Human Freedom
Economic Freedom of the World annual reports. Index for 2015. It also presents the ratings of
The first category is size of government. It the countries on the personal and economic
measures taxation, government spending, and freedom subindexes.
government investment and control of enter- The top five jurisdictions in the Human
prises. An increase in those indicators reduces Freedom Index for 2015 are Switzerland, Hong
economic freedom as it crowds out individ- Kong, New Zealand, Ireland, and Australia.
ual choice. The second category regards the The bottom five, in descending order,
legal system and property rights and gauges the are Egypt, the Republic of Yemen, Libya,
“
Figure 1. Top Five and Bottom Five Countries on the Human Freedom Index
Some
15 percent
of the
world’s
population
lives in the
top quartile
of nations
Venezuela, and Syria. (See Figure 1.) Other freedom increasing from 6.74 to 6.81. Some
in the
”
selected countries are ranked as follows: the 68 countries increased their overall freedom
index. United Kingdom (9), Canada (11), Sweden ratings from 2008 to 2015, while 69 countries
(13), Germany (16), the United States (17), decreased their freedom. Some 15 percent of
Japan (27), France (33), Chile (37), South Africa the world’s population lives in the top quartile
(68), Mexico (73), Indonesia (78), Turkey (84), of nations in the index, while 44 percent
Kenya (89), India (102), Russia (126), China of the world’s population lives in the bot-
(130), and Saudi Arabia (149). tom quartile of countries that have low levels
The average human freedom rating for 159 of freedom.
countries in 2015 was 6.93, on a scale of 0 to 10, The countries that improved their level
where 10 represents more freedom. The level of human freedom most from 2014 to 2015 are
of freedom decreased slightly (−0.05) com- Sierra Leone (0.33), Iran (0.31), Botswana (0.30),
pared with 2014, with 61 countries increasing Singapore (0.29), and Suriname (0.27). (See
their ratings and 97 decreasing. (See Figure 2.) Figure 3.) Other countries that saw notable
Examined over a longer period, the average improvements were Cambodia (0.27), Israel
human freedom rating decreased by 0.12 from (0.24), Serbia (0.19), Central African Republic
2008 to 2015. But when comparing only the 141 (0.19), and Colombia (0.18). The largest deterio-
jurisdictions for which data are available from rations in freedom occurred in Burundi (−0.92),
2008 to 2015 (the HFI surveys 18 more countries Brunei Darussalam (−0.71), Cameroon (−0.64),
in 2015 than in 2008), the average human free- Venezuela (−0.61), and Tajikistan (−0.61).
dom rating decreased by 0.05, with personal Since 2008, the countries that most im-
freedom falling from 7.36 to 7.20 and economic proved their level of human freedom are
Sources: Authors’ calculations; James Gwartney et al., Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report
(Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2017).
25
“
Taiwan, Angola, Myanmar, CÔte d’Ivoire, Figure 3. Countries with Most
and Lesotho. The largest deteriorations in Improved and Deteriorated 44 percent
freedom occurred in Syria, Egypt, Venezuela,
Belize, and Greece. Other countries saw
Freedom Scores, 2014–2015 of the
notable deteriorations during this time. Rus- world’s
sia’s rating fell from 6.54 in 2008 to 6.11 in population
2015; Hungary’s rating fell from 8.06 to 7.74; lives in the
Argentina’s score dropped from 7.12 to 6.46;
and Turkey’s rating decreased from 7.25 in 2011
bottom quartile
to 6.77 in 2015. of countries
The correlation between the personal and that have
economic freedom ratings was 0.64 for 2015.
low levels of
”
(See Figure 4.) Thus, some countries ranked
consistently high in the human freedom sub- freedom.
indexes, including Switzerland, New Zealand,
and Australia, which ranked in the top 10 in
both personal and economic freedom. By
contrast, some countries that ranked high on
economic freedom saw their positions fall
significantly on the Human Freedom Index. For
example, Singapore ranked in second place in
economic freedom in 2015 but ranked 18th on
Sources: Authors’ calculations; James Gwartney et al., Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report
(Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2017).
26
“
the HFI; the United Arab Emirates ranked Figure 5. Personal Freedom and
37th in economic freedom but 116th in human Economic Freedom, 2015
Of the
freedom; and Qatar ranked 45th in economic
12 major freedom but 112th in human freedom.
categories Figure 5 shows that nations in the top quar-
that make up tile of personal freedom saw a high economic
freedom score of 7.66, compared with a score of
the index, 6.02 for bottom-quartile nations.
all but three Of the 12 major categories that make up the
have seen index, all but three have seen some deteriora-
tion since 2008. Movement, Expression and
some
Information, and Rule of Law saw the largest
deterioration decreases since 2008, while Sound Money saw
since the largest increase. (See Figure 6.)
”
2008. Regional levels of freedom vary widely.
The average ratings on the Human Freedom Sources: Authors’ calculations; James Gwartney et al.,
Index by region were highest for Western Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report
(Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2017).
Europe, followed by Northern Europe and
Sources: Authors’ calculations; James Gwartney et al., Economic Freedom of the World: 2017 Annual Report
(Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2017).
Note: We have omitted the Legal Gender indicator from the calculations used in this figure because it is the only
indicator in the HFI that appears in only one year (2015).
27
“
North America (Canada and the United free regions, Eastern Europe (−0.52) and the
States). They were lowest for sub-Saharan Middle East and North Africa (−0.46) (Figure
The regions
Africa, South Asia, Eastern Europe (Moldova, 7). The regions that had greater overall lev-
Russia, and Ukraine), and the Middle East and els of freedom also tended to exhibit higher that had
North Africa. The largest improvement in ratings in personal freedom relative to greater
freedom since 2014 occurred in Australia and economic freedom than did the less free. overall levels
Oceania (0.07), while the largest deterioration That is consistent with the findings in
occurred in Eastern Europe (−0.36). By com- Figure 5, that the countries with high levels
of freedom
parison, the largest improvement in freedom of personal freedom also have high levels of also tended
since 2008 occurred in East Asia (0.18) and economic freedom. to exhibit
South Asia (0.18), while the largest deteriora- The personal freedom subindex includes
tions in freedom occurred in the two least seven indicators that relate to women-specific
higher
ratings in
personal
Figure 7. Human Freedom Score by Region (2015) and Changes (2008–2015) freedom
relative to
economic
”
freedom.
Note: Countries that make up each region are listed in the section on regions in this report.
28
“
freedoms: female genital mutilation, miss- with declining freedom in South East Asia
Countries with ing women, equal inheritance rights, wom- (7.60), sub-Saharan Africa (6.85), South Asia
high levels of en’s freedom of movement, parental rights, (6.13), and the Middle East and North Africa
female-to-female relationships, and divorce. (4.18). Only two regions have seen a decline
personal Although they surely fall short of capturing since 2014: Central America, Mexico and the
freedom a complete measure of women’s freedoms, the Caribbean (−0.27) and the Middle East and
indicators cover a large range of important North Africa (−0.41).
also have high
information and are likely correlated with Does human freedom matter for develop-
levels of other women-specific indicators of liberty not ment? There is a strong relationship between
economic represented in cross-country data. Here we the level of freedom and income. Figure 9
”
have averaged the seven components to get shows that countries in the freest quartile enjoy
freedom. average ratings by region of women-specific significantly greater average per capita income
personal freedom.19 Following that calcula- ($38,871) than those in the other quartiles.20
tion, Figure 8 shows high levels of women- On average, the freest countries in the world
specific freedom in most regions of the world, have a much higher per capita income than
“
Figure 9. Income by Freedom those that are less free. Figure 10 shows this
Quartiles, 2015 relationship by region. These data, of course,
There is a
do not establish a means of causation or even
the direction of causation, and they are only strong
a snapshot in time. But the data suggest the relationship
need to explore the links between freedom and between the
development further and to test the contribu-
tion of freedom to prosperity and other indica-
level of
tors of human well-being as has been done in freedom
the case of policies and institutions supportive and
”
of economic freedom.
What is the relationship between free-
income.
dom and democracy? We use our index and
the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Democ-
racy Index to see how political freedom and
human freedom relate. The EIU defines de-
mocracy broadly and thus constructs an index
that produces a “wide” measure of democracy,
as opposed to a more limited measure of the
existence of free and fair elections. The EIU’s
Sources: Authors’ calculations; World Bank,
World Development Indicators. Democracy Index covers five areas, of which we
Note: Gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, use the following four: electoral process and
purchasing power parity (constant 2011 US$).
Countries with no GDP per capita data were omitted pluralism, functioning of government, politi-
from the calculations. cal participation, and political culture. That
“
Figure 11. Human Freedom and Democracy, 2015
There is a
strong
correlation
between
freedom
and
”
democracy.
index also measures civil liberties, but we set Kong in 2014 may in part be a late manifesta-
those elements aside because that area is in- tion of a pattern we have seen in other nonde-
cluded in our freedom index. mocracies that liberalized their economies and
There is a strong correlation of 0.81 be- subsequently liberalized their political systems
tween freedom and democracy. (See Figure 11.) as wealth and demands for political freedoms
The findings are not surprising, but they of- rose. Even so, Hong Kong is unique in that it
fer rich opportunities to empirically examine long enjoyed high levels not only of economic
a complex relationship in which the direction freedom but also of personal freedom and
of causation or support between the two vari- income without transitioning to democracy.
ables, if any, may strengthen or weaken over The territory’s close adherence to the policies
time and may be influenced by numerous other and institutions it inherited from the British,
factors, including the level of development. including the rule of law, may explain the sta-
Given the relationship between freedom bility its system has until recently displayed.
and democracy, Hong Kong’s high ranking in Clearly, the pro-democracy protests represent
our index may be somewhat unexpected. The a political agenda not acceptable to Beijing and
territory, first administered by the United are a reaction to interference and perceived in-
Kingdom as a colony and since 1997 ruled by terference by mainland China in Hong Kong’s
mainland China under its “one country, two policies and institutions, including infringe-
systems” model, has never experienced de- ments on freedom of the press and the inde-
mocracy. Hong Kong’s maintenance of a high pendence of the legal system. Hong Kong has
degree of freedom for a long period of time declined in its HFI ratings and ranking and, as
indeed makes it an outlier in our survey. The the political future of Hong Kong plays out, we
pro-democracy protests that erupted in Hong would not be surprised to see further declines.
31
“
Conclusion: Toward a Better relation works, and what are the essential con-
Appreciation of Freedom nections, and that will enable skeptics to test Since 2008,
The Human Freedom Index provides a com- their views objectively.” 21 the largest
prehensive measure of freedom for a large Indeed, the Economic Freedom of the World
number of countries around the world. Devis-
deteriorations
index has served just that purpose and more,
ing an index of this kind is a complex task, both producing an abundant literature on the link in freedom
conceptually and methodologically, because between economic freedom and phenomena occurred in
the literature does not provide clear guidance, as diverse as foreign aid, armed conflict, and Syria,
much less consensus, as to the relative impor- happiness. The Human Freedom Index has the
tance of the many different elements that make potential to do as much and looks increasingly Egypt,
up freedom or as to proper ways of measuring important at a time when the world’s leading Venezuela,
them. Reasonable people can disagree regard- market democracies struggle with economic
ing the difficult but considered decisions we problems and when hybrid forms of authori-
Belize,
and
”
have made in terms of the structure and rela- tarianism are being sold as viable alternatives
tive importance of the measures we have cho- to liberalism. Over time, this index could not Greece.
sen. We invite them to use the data presented only track specific gains and losses of freedom,
here to propose alternative weighting or struc- it could also help identify and understand what
tural approaches that seem more sensible to links may exist among the assortment of free-
them. Because of the challenges in putting to- doms and other variables. What are the rela-
gether a broad measure of human freedom, this tionships among personal freedom, economic
work in progress is certainly not the last word freedom, and democracy at different levels of
on the extent of freedom in countries around development? Are some types of freedom—
the world. But we do think this index is quite economic or personal—more conducive to
reasonable and hope it will be useful in explor- the spread and sustenance of other freedoms?
ing and demonstrating the value of individual What is the relationship between various mea-
liberty and the ways in which it correlates with sures of human well-being (including income)
other aspects of various societies. and changes in personal freedom? Under what
Even if this study confirms some of what conditions are increases or decreases in free-
we expected to observe, it is worth echoing dom likely to come about? Delving into those
Milton Friedman when he referred to the and innumerable other questions that the data
creation of the Economic Freedom of the World may help us answer will surely lead to a better
index: “What we have done is to acquire a set of understanding of the role of freedom in hu-
data that can be used to explore just how the man progress.
32
33
COUNTRIES BY REGION
34
Countries by Region
Caucasus
Armenia Azerbaijan Georgia
Central Asia
Kazakhstan Kyrgyz Republic Tajikistan
East Asia
China Hong Kong Japan Korea, Republic of
Mongolia Taiwan
Eastern Europe
Moldova Russia Ukraine
North America
Canada United States
Northern Europe
Denmark Finland Iceland Norway
Sweden
35
South America
Argentina Bolivia Brazil Chile
Colombia Ecuador Guyana Paraguay
Peru Suriname Uruguay Venezuela
South Asia
Bangladesh Bhutan India Nepal
Pakistan Sri Lanka
Southern Europe
Cyprus Greece Italy Malta
Portugal Spain
Sub-Saharan Africa
Angola Benin Botswana Burkina Faso
Burundi Cameroon Cape Verde Central African Republic
Chad Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, Republic of CÔte d'Ivoire
Ethiopia Gabon Gambia, The Ghana
Guinea Guinea-Bissau Kenya Lesotho
Liberia Madagascar Malawi Mali
Mauritania Mauritius Mozambique Namibia
Niger Nigeria Rwanda Senegal
Seychelles Sierra Leone South Africa Swaziland
Tanzania Togo Uganda Zambia
Zimbabwe
Western Europe
Austria Belgium France Germany
Ireland Luxembourg Netherlands Switzerland
United Kingdom
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
COUNTRY PROFILES
58
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.5 Movement of Capital and People 6.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 7.5
Labor Market Regulations 6.9
Identity and Relationships 8.3
Business Regulations 6.7
Legal Gender -
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 5.0
59
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 45
47 46 47
50 47
7 50
55 52 52
55
65
6
65
7.50 7.59 7.56 7.51 7.44 7.34 7.54 7.66
5 70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
60
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 5.6
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.3 Movement of Capital and People 1.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 5.2
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 5.2
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 130
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 8.5
Judicial Independence 1.8
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 2.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 2.5 Movement of Capital and People 2.0
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 8.7
Divorce 10.0
63
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 130
135
134 136
6
138 141 139
142
142
5
146
4.70 5.06 5.04 5.23 5.72 5.87 5.37 5.56 151
4 150
146
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 148
64
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 0.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 4.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 5.5
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 6.8
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
65
60 67
7 75
82
80
94
6
104
100 108
7.12 7.07 6.95 6.92 6.63 6.54 6.33 6.46 122
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
66
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 7.4
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 9.0
ARMENIA | CAUCASUS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
HUMAN FREEDOM 7.46 7.48 7.50 7.54 7.54 7.39 7.39 7.36
ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.59 7.55 7.56 7.71 7.75 7.69 7.70 7.60
PERSONAL FREEDOM 7.34 7.41 7.43 7.36 7.33 7.09 7.09 7.11
Rule of Law 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.7
Procedural Justice - - - - - - - -
Civil Justice - - - - - - - -
Criminal Justice - - - - - - - -
Security and Safety 9.6 9.4 9.6 9.3 9.3 9.0 9.0 8.9
Homicide 8.9 8.7 9.4 9.1 9.3 9.3 9.0 9.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.5
Women Security, Safety 10.0 10.0 10.0 9.2 9.2 8.3 8.3 8.3
Movement 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7 6.7
Freedom of Foreign Movement 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Freedom of Domestic Movement 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Women’s Freedom of Movement 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Religious Freedom 7.4 7.4 7.0 6.0 5.9 5.9 6.1 8.0
Freedom to Establish Religious Org. - - - 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -
Autonomy of Religious Organizations - - - 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 -
Freedom to Establish, Operate Religious Org. - - - - - - - 10.0
Harassment and Physical Hostilities 8.4 8.8 8.1 8.3 8.4 7.9 8.4 8.6
Legal and Regulatory Restrictions 6.3 6.1 6.0 5.7 5.4 5.8 6.0 5.6
Association - - - 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.2
Freedom of Association - - - 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 7.5
Assembly and Demonstration - - - 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Autonomy of Organizations - - - 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 -
Establishing Organizations - - - 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 -
Freedom to Establish and Operate Org. - - - - - - - 6.7
Expression and Information 5.7 6.7 6.8 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.2
Press Killed 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Press Jailed 6.6 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.0 3.7 3.7 3.7 3.3
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.3 3.8 3.8 4.0 4.5 4.3 4.5 4.3
Access to Cable and Satellite - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0
State Control over Internet Access - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5
Identity and Relationships 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 8.3 8.3 8.0
Legal Gender - - - - - - - 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Divorce - - - - - 5.0 5.0 5.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
50
7 50 50 50 50 50 52
60 54 54
6 70
80
7.46 7.48 7.50 7.54 7.54 7.39 7.39 7.36
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 90
68
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.5 Movement of Capital and People 3.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.4
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.6
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
5
3 4
8 5 6 6 6 5 5
10
15
7
20
8.69 8.64 8.65 8.61 8.57 8.56 8.65 8.60
6 25
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
70
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.4
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.1
Labor Market Regulations 5.7
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 7.5
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
71
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
5
8
11 11
10
13 12 12
14 15 13
7
15
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 0.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 0.5 Movement of Capital and People 3.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.0
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 7.6
Labor Market Regulations 6.4
Identity and Relationships 6.3
Business Regulations 7.0
Legal Gender 0.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 5.0
73
AZERBAIJAN | CAUCASUS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
HUMAN FREEDOM 6.33 6.20 6.27 6.09 6.13 6.04 6.12 6.10
ECONOMIC FREEDOM 6.15 6.06 5.97 6.15 6.32 6.20 6.40 6.38
PERSONAL FREEDOM 6.52 6.35 6.56 6.03 5.95 5.89 5.84 5.83
Rule of Law 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.3
Procedural Justice - - - - - - - -
Civil Justice - - - - - - - -
Criminal Justice - - - - - - - -
Security and Safety 9.5 9.6 9.6 8.7 8.7 9.0 8.8 8.8
Homicide 9.2 9.3 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.2 9.0 9.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.4 9.5 9.5 9.5 9.3 9.5 9.2 9.0
Women Security, Safety 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 8.3 8.3 8.3
Movement 6.7 5.0 6.7 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 5.0 0.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Freedom of Domestic Movement 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Women’s Freedom of Movement 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Religious Freedom 5.8 5.8 5.6 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.5 5.7
Freedom to Establish Religious Org. 7.5 7.5 7.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 -
Autonomy of Religious Organizations 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 -
Freedom to Establish, Operate Religious Org. - - - - - - - 2.5
Harassment and Physical Hostilities 8.7 8.4 8.4 7.2 7.8 7.7 7.3 8.6
Legal and Regulatory Restrictions 7.0 7.5 6.5 6.3 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.0
Association 4.2 4.2 4.2 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.1 3.3
Freedom of Association 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Assembly and Demonstration 2.5 2.5 2.5 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Autonomy of Organizations 3.3 3.3 3.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 -
Establishing Organizations 8.3 8.3 8.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 -
Freedom to Establish and Operate Org. - - - - - - - 2.5
Expression and Information 6.4 6.2 7.0 5.0 5.1 5.2 4.9 5.4
Press Killed 10.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Press Jailed 4.3 3.3 8.9 8.9 0.3 1.5 0.6 1.7
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.7 1.7 1.3 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.3
Political Pressure, Control Media 2.3 2.0 2.3 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.0 0.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 6.7 6.7 6.7 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 10.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Identity and Relationships 7.5 7.5 7.5 10.0 10.0 8.3 8.3 6.3
Legal Gender - - - - - - - 0.0
Parental Rights 5.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Divorce - - - - - 5.0 5.0 5.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
110
7 107
123
120 113
6 121 128
130 126
6.33 6.20 6.27 6.09 6.13 6.04 6.12 6.10 131 131
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 140
74
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.4
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 8.2
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
110
7 44
120 48
6 51
130 53 53
54
7.65 7.54 7.43 7.42 7.37 7.36 7.36 7.40 55 55
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 140
76
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 0.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 0.8 Movement of Capital and People 4.8
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.2
State Control over Internet Access 2.5 Credit Market Regulations 8.4
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
70
7 69
80 71
88
6 90 83
90
100
7.06 6.98 6.86 6.79 6.59 6.56 6.60 6.69 95
103 102
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 110
78
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.3 Movement of Capital and People 4.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 6.7
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 7.9
Labor Market Regulations 7.3
Identity and Relationships 3.8
Business Regulations 5.0
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 0.0
Same-Sex Relationships 5.0
Divorce 0.0
79
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 45
50
7 117
55
65
6
124 126 128 133
65 137 137
5.81 5.93 5.96 5.97 5.85 5.81 5.94 5.92 132
5 70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
80
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.4
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 6.5
State Control over Internet Access - Credit Market Regulations 6.3
Labor Market Regulations 7.0
Identity and Relationships 0.0
Business Regulations 6.2
Legal Gender -
Parental Rights -
Same-Sex Relationships 0.0
Divorce -
81
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
60 55 55
7
63
70
6
80
72
7.17 7.37 7.33 7.33 7.36 6.99 6.94 6.83 78 78
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 90
82
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 9.0 Movement of Capital and People 6.4
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.6
Labor Market Regulations 7.2
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 7.5
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
83
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
17
19 19 18
8 20
22 22 22
24
7 30
Score 0―10
Homicide 0.0
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.3
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 3.4
Women Security, Safety -
Impartial Courts 4.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.8 Movement of Capital and People 3.8
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Parental Rights -
Divorce -
85
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
72
56 75
70 61
7
75
90
6
110
7.34 7.21 6.95 7.00 6.93 6.46 6.36 6.43 121
5 112 112
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 130
86
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.0 Movement of Capital and People 2.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 6.6
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.4
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 90
95
91
6 100 103 102
97
108
5 110
111
6.44 6.47 6.37 6.56 6.39 6.64 6.70 6.61
4 120 117
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
88
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 1.3
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 7.6
State Control over Internet Access - Credit Market Regulations 7.6
Labor Market Regulations 8.7
Identity and Relationships 3.8
Business Regulations 6.6
Legal Gender 0.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 0.0
Divorce 5.0
89
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 70
72
7
74
76
6 75
78 77
6.90 6.95 6.87 78
5 80
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
90
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.8 Movement of Capital and People 6.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 4.8
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 7.6
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60 70
74 73
7
80 80 83
87
80
100
6
100
Score 0―10
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA PERSONAL FREEDOM 7.93
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 6.61
RANKING 57/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.27
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 47/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 99/159
Rule of Law 5.8 Size of Government 5.3
Procedural Justice 6.9 Government Consumption 5.7
Civil Justice 5.0 Transfers and Subsidies 5.1
Criminal Justice 5.6 Government Enterprises 4.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 6.5
Security and Safety 9.0
Homicide 9.4
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.2
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.4
Judicial Independence 3.2
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 2.8
Protection of Property Rights 3.6
Movement 6.7
Freedom of Foreign Movement 5.0 Military Interference 5.1
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.3 Movement of Capital and People 5.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.2
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.5
Labor Market Regulations 6.9
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 5.3
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
93
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 45
51
50 52
54 55
7 57 56
55 57
65 57
6
65
7.28 7.39 7.42 7.35 7.35 7.41 7.34 7.27
5 70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
94
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.3 Movement of Capital and People 7.4
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 7.9
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 60 63
6 70
5 80
84
86 87
6.76 6.78 6.84 6.81 6.76 6.76 6.82 7.12 85 85 85 85
4 90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
96
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 4.2
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 5.2
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60
7
66 65
80 70 70
6 82
100 89
97 120
7.03 7.02 7.13 7.07 6.84 6.70 6.65 6.32
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
98
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 0.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.1
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 8.1
State Control over Internet Access 2.5 Credit Market Regulations 8.3
Labor Market Regulations 8.6
Identity and Relationships 2.5
Business Regulations 7.4
Legal Gender 0.0
Parental Rights -
Same-Sex Relationships 5.0
Divorce -
99
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 50
63
68
70
7
81
91 89
90
6
110
BULGARIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.26
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.39
RANKING 41/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.83
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 39/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 48/159
Rule of Law 5.2 Size of Government 7.0
Procedural Justice 5.8 Government Consumption 5.7
Civil Justice 5.7 Transfers and Subsidies 5.8
Criminal Justice 4.1 Government Enterprises 8.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 8.5
Security and Safety 9.8
Homicide 9.3
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 3.4
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 3.6
Protection of Property Rights 4.5
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 8.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.0 Movement of Capital and People 6.6
Access to Cable and Satellite 5.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 7.6
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.6
Labor Market Regulations 7.0
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 6.1
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
101
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 30
40 40 41 41
7 40 42 43 42 43
6 50
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.0 Movement of Capital and People 4.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 6.5
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 6.7
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 80
90
6 87
100 95 95 93 94
99
5 100 101
110
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.0
Access to Cable and Satellite 5.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 7.3
State Control over Internet Access 0.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.3
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 110 114
120
6 128 128
130 136
5 130
140
138 139 150
5.58 6.12 5.65 5.61 5.59 6.13 6.20 5.27
4 150
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
106
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.3 Movement of Capital and People 7.1
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.2
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 10.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 50
56
58
60
7 60
64
66
6 70
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.5 Movement of Capital and People 2.4
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 6.3
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 6.8
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 110
123
120
127 125 124
6 128 130
130 134
5
140
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.5
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.7
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
8
4 4 4
5 5 5
5 6
7
6
10
5
11
8.66 8.59 8.65 8.62 8.60 8.61 8.70 8.54
4 15
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
112
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.1
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 5.5
Women Security, Safety -
Impartial Courts 3.9
Parental Rights -
Divorce -
113
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
45
7 49 49
50
54 56
6
55 57 57
7.30 7.31 7.39 7.32 7.56 7.51
5 60
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
114
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
127
7
130
130
6 151
140
5
150
4 147 148 148 148
5.62 5.52 5.38 5.04 4.98 5.20 4.97 5.16
3 160 154
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
116
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
7
130 134
137
6 140
140 143 145
146
5 149 148
150
4
5.25 5.36 5.61 5.33 5.15 5.29 5.30 5.38
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
118
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.8 Movement of Capital and People 6.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 25
7 35 31
32
33 33 33 34
37 37
6 45
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 0.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.3 Movement of Capital and People 2.4
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 6.4
State Control over Internet Access 5.0 Credit Market Regulations 7.1
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 110
120 121
7 120
128 128
132 130
6 130 134
136
5.92 5.86 5.83 5.97 5.94 5.95 5.97 6.01
5 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
122
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 9.5
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 7.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.8
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 80
89
90 93
7
91
100 95
107
6
110
106
109
6.62 6.70 6.77 6.58 6.30 6.53 6.47 6.65
5 120 116
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
124
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
129
7
130 134
6
140
5
152 152 152
150 155
4 146 156
5.35 5.61 5.41 4.81 4.68 4.69 4.91 5.14
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
126
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
129 127
7
130
139 137
6 141 141
140 143 142
5
150
4
5.59 5.71 5.62 5.33 5.30 5.66 5.71 5.73
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
128
Score 0―10
Homicide 5.3
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 7.0
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 4.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.3 Movement of Capital and People 7.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 6.7
Divorce 10.0
129
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
30
7 38
40 40 39 40
43 41
40 46
6
50
7.84 7.82 7.69 7.92 7.89 7.81 7.90 7.89
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 60
130
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
7
110
118 117
6 120
120
5 126 126 129
130 135 133
4
5.67 5.78 5.73 5.86 5.93 6.28 6.39 6.38
3 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
132
CROATIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.48
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.02
RANKING 43/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.75
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 36/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 72/159
Rule of Law 5.8 Size of Government 4.7
Procedural Justice 6.9 Government Consumption 4.4
Civil Justice 5.3 Transfers and Subsidies 4.5
Criminal Justice 5.4 Government Enterprises 8.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 2.0
Security and Safety 9.9
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.7
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 3.5
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 2.1
Protection of Property Rights 4.7
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 8.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.2
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 9.4
Labor Market Regulations 6.1
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 6.2
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
133
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 30
7 40 44 44 43
45 45
46
6 50
CYPRUS
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.64
SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.79
RANKING 25/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.21
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 35/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 14/159
Rule of Law 6.9 Size of Government 7.2
Procedural Justice - Government Consumption 6.3
Civil Justice - Transfers and Subsidies 6.0
Criminal Justice - Government Enterprises 10.0
Homicide 9.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 6.1
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 3.8
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.5 Movement of Capital and People 6.8
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 10.0
135
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
16 13
8 20
17 25
29
24
7 30
40
8.37 8.37 8.36 8.16 7.99 7.82 8.12 8.21 34
6 40
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
136
CZECH REPUBLIC
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.96
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.46
RANKING 25/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.21
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 21/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 42/159
Rule of Law 7.6 Size of Government 5.2
Procedural Justice 8.3 Government Consumption 3.1
Civil Justice 7.3 Transfers and Subsidies 3.1
Criminal Justice 7.3 Government Enterprises 8.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 6.5
Security and Safety 9.9
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.2
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 5.7
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 3.5
Protection of Property Rights 5.9
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 10.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.0 Movement of Capital and People 6.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 8.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.8
Labor Market Regulations 8.1
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 6.4
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
137
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
21 21 21
8 20 23 24
26 25 25
7 30
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.5 Movement of Capital and People 7.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.5
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.8
Labor Market Regulations 7.8
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 7.9
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
139
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 3
8 5 4
5
6 6
7 7
7 7 7
8.70 8.58 8.64 8.61 8.54 8.60 8.64 8.56 8
6 9
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
140
Score 0―10
Homicide 3.0
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.1
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 2.5
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 2.9
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.8 Movement of Capital and People 6.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.0
Divorce 10.0
141
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
60
7
63 59
70 65
70 68
6 71 70
80
6.73 6.98 7.05 7.07 7.02 7.12 7.25 7.00
5 85
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 90
142
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.3 Movement of Capital and People 5.6
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 5.6
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.5
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 80
89 89
90
7
91
100 94 96 96
97
6 101
110
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 4.9
Judicial Independence 5.9
Women Security, Safety 2.8
Impartial Courts 4.0
Divorce 0.0
145
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
5 140 147
150
150 155
5.95 5.79 5.89 5.70 5.59 5.26 5.25 4.79
4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 160
146
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
50 53
7
56 58
60 59
62
60
67
6
70
ESTONIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 9.01
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.95
RANKING 13/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.48
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 18/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 10/159
Rule of Law 7.6 Size of Government 6.0
Procedural Justice 8.0 Government Consumption 3.6
Civil Justice 7.7 Transfers and Subsidies 6.6
Criminal Justice 7.0 Government Enterprises 7.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 7.0
Security and Safety 9.6
Homicide 8.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 7.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 7.9
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 5.7
Protection of Property Rights 7.6
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 8.3
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
10
12
8 10 13 13
17 16 16 16
7 20
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 130
7
140 135 132
6
142 142
5 143
150 145 145 146
4
5.30 5.49 5.42 5.31 5.29 5.61 5.58 5.39
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
152
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 5.0
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 8.8
State Control over Internet Access - Credit Market Regulations 9.6
Labor Market Regulations 9.0
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 7.8
Legal Gender -
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
153
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 40
50
8 48
59 59
62
60
57 68
7
70
67 79
7.49 7.32 7.11 7.19 7.15 6.89 7.01 7.18
6 80
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
154
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 9.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.1
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.8
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.4
Labor Market Regulations 5.5
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 8.4
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
155
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 3
8 5 4 4 4
7
6 6 6
7
7 7
8.66 8.58 8.65 8.67 8.62 8.56 8.62 8.58
6 9
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
156
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.4
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.4
Labor Market Regulations 5.4
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 7.3
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
157
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
21
8 20 24
27
32
7 34 33 33 33
30
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 110
116
7
120
6 122
130
5
140
134 134 134
4
138
5.88 5.94 5.79 5.80 5.73 5.77 5.81 5.52 140
3
143
150
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
160
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 90
101 100 99
7
100 104
6
110
5
120
114
4
119
6.40 6.61 6.47 6.59 6.61 6.35
3 130
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
162
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 7.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 8.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.8
GEORGIA | CAUCASUS
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
HUMAN FREEDOM 7.56 7.77 7.82 7.56 7.54 7.72 7.89 7.87
ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.57 7.41 7.50 7.64 7.75 7.83 8.02 8.01
PERSONAL FREEDOM 7.55 8.13 8.14 7.47 7.33 7.62 7.76 7.74
Rule of Law 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.3 5.3 5.7 6.0
Procedural Justice 5.3 5.3 5.3 5.3 4.9 4.9 5.4 6.1
Civil Justice 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.0 6.3 6.1
Criminal Justice 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 5.1 5.1 5.4 5.6
Security and Safety 7.6 8.6 8.5 8.1 8.1 8.3 8.5 8.5
Homicide 7.6 8.1 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.9 8.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 5.2 7.7 7.3 8.5 8.5 9.0 9.0 9.0
Women Security, Safety 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Movement 10.0 10.0 10.0 6.7 6.7 8.3 8.3 8.3
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Freedom of Domestic Movement 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Women’s Freedom of Movement 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Religious Freedom 8.7 8.7 8.6 8.7 8.9 8.8 8.7 8.5
Freedom to Establish Religious Org. - - - 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 -
Autonomy of Religious Organizations - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 -
Freedom to Establish, Operate Religious Org. - - - - - - - 10.0
Harassment and Physical Hostilities 9.6 9.3 9.7 10.0 10.0 9.7 9.6 8.4
Legal and Regulatory Restrictions 7.7 8.1 7.5 7.4 8.1 8.1 7.9 7.0
Association - - - 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2
Freedom of Association - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Assembly and Demonstration - - - 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Autonomy of Organizations - - - 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 -
Establishing Organizations - - - 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 -
Freedom to Establish and Operate Org. - - - - - - - 7.1
Expression and Information 4.5 7.1 7.5 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.4 8.3
Press Killed 0.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Press Jailed 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.3 5.0 5.3 5.7 6.0 6.0 6.0 5.7
Political Pressure, Control Media 2.8 3.5 4.5 4.8 5.0 5.3 5.0 5.0
Access to Cable and Satellite - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - - - 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
State Control over Internet Access - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Identity and Relationships 10.0 10.0 10.0 7.5 7.5 8.3 8.3 8.0
Legal Gender - - - - - - - 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Divorce - - - - - 10.0 10.0 10.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
40
40 42 42
7 43
45 44
45
49 50
6
50
7.56 7.77 7.82 7.56 7.54 7.72 7.89 7.87
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 55
164
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 7.4
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 7.6
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 6.8
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.8
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 10.0
165
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
8 10
10
13 12 12
14 13
7 20 16
19
8.33 8.38 8.36 8.48 8.44 8.45 8.51 8.45
6 30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
166
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 50
58
7
60 60 60
60
6
70
64 65
5 68
72
80
4
7.15 7.25 7.10 7.15 6.98 7.16 7.24 7.10
3 90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
168
GREECE
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.06
SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 6.36
RANKING 60/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.21
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 44/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 116/159
Rule of Law 5.9 Size of Government 3.4
Procedural Justice 7.1 Government Consumption 5.2
Civil Justice 5.7 Transfers and Subsidies 4.0
Criminal Justice 5.1 Government Enterprises 2.0
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.0
Judicial Independence 4.9
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 3.0
Divorce 5.0
169
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 30
38
8 40 42 44
45
48
50 51
7 50
60
7.94 7.85 7.72 7.70 7.58 7.48 7.45 7.21
6 60
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
170
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
59 62 62 64
66 63
60
7
80
6
100 90
7.26 7.17 7.21 6.57 6.67 7.14 7.19 7.11 107
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
172
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 1.7
Women Security, Safety 5.1
Impartial Courts 2.3
Divorce 5.0
173
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 130
138
7 140
140
6
5
143
150
4
5.77 5.53 5.60
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
174
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
128 127
7
132 121
130
125 123
6
5
133
140
135
4
5.73 5.80 5.73 5.97 5.99 6.03 6.09 6.28
3 150
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
176
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.3
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 6.7
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
63
60 66
7
88 84 87
80
6 104
100
94 118
6.69 6.81 6.71 7.10 7.03 6.73 6.39 6.53
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
178
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60 72
7 74 78
78 82
80
94
6
100
6.92 6.92 6.60 6.69 6.47 6.77 6.98 6.83 102 104
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
180
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60
7
80 71
77
6
85 81
100
95
101 102 99
6.99 6.92 6.84 6.66 6.50 6.57 6.61 6.79
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
182
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.8 Movement of Capital and People 8.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 9.5
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 10.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
10 0
9
1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1
2
7
2
9.14 9.10 9.05 9.04 9.01 8.97 9.03 8.88
6 3
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
184
HUNGARY
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.19
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.30
RANKING 44/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.74
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 42/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 54/159
Rule of Law 5.9 Size of Government 5.3
Procedural Justice 6.9 Government Consumption 3.3
Civil Justice 5.2 Transfers and Subsidies 5.4
Criminal Justice 5.4 Government Enterprises 6.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 20
28
30 30
8 30 34
38 37 38
7 40 44
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 8.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 7.8
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 7.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.8 Movement of Capital and People 4.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 5.0
Divorce 10.0
187
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
20
20 25
8
26 28 27
32 31
30
7
40
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.1
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 6.9
Judicial Independence 5.5
Women Security, Safety 6.7
Impartial Courts 5.9
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.8 Movement of Capital and People 2.1
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 5.0
189
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 70
78 79
80
7
92
90
6 99
100 102 105 102
110
6.54 6.47 6.51 6.95 6.89 6.68 6.57 6.55
5 110
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
190
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.5 Movement of Capital and People 5.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 6.4
State Control over Internet Access 5.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.1
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
7 70
74 75 74 75
6 80
78 78
82 81
6.77 6.89 6.98 6.97 6.91 6.95 6.95 6.83
5 90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
192
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.4
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 6.5
Judicial Independence 4.2
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 3.7
Divorce 5.0
193
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
132
130
6
137
140
148
5 151
153 154
150 156
5.45 5.22 5.18 4.82 4.42 4.66 4.52 4.83 159
4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 160
194
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 8.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 9.0
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 6.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.5 Movement of Capital and People 8.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 10.0
195
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
4
9 9 8 8
10
8 10
12
7 20
18
8.50 8.44 8.32 8.48 8.52 8.54 8.60 8.68
6 30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
196
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.1
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 8.3
Judicial Independence 8.5
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 5.7
Divorce 10.0
197
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
30
7
39
40
6
50 46 46 46
47
7.41 7.48 7.92 7.63 7.60 7.60 7.44 7.68 50 53
5 52
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 60
198
ITALY
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.74
SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.30
RANKING 35/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.02
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 32/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 54/159
Rule of Law 6.6 Size of Government 5.4
Procedural Justice 7.6 Government Consumption 4.8
Civil Justice 5.7 Transfers and Subsidies 3.3
Criminal Justice 6.4 Government Enterprises 10.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 3.5
Security and Safety 9.9
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.7
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 4.7
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 2.3
Protection of Property Rights 5.0
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 10.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 20
31 32
8 30
35 35 34
35
37 37
7 40
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60
7 57 58 61 59
80 68 68 64
71
6
100
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.3 Movement of Capital and People 5.0
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.3
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
10 15
9
20
20 22 22
23 23
8
25
7
26 26
8.23 8.17 8.19 8.18 8.26 8.15 8.21 8.20 27
6 30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
204
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.2
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.4
Judicial Independence 6.6
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 5.4
Divorce 0.0
205
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.6
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.0
Judicial Independence 4.9
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 4.8
Divorce 10.0
207
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
Score 0―10
Homicide 7.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.7
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 6.4
Judicial Independence 5.1
Women Security, Safety 6.6
Impartial Courts 4.8
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.0 Movement of Capital and People 4.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 10.0
209
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 70
7
80 82
6
88
5
89
90 93 92 92
95
4
6.65 6.67 6.71 6.74 6.57 6.77 6.78 6.68
3 100 96
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
210
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.5 Movement of Capital and People 7.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.3
Labor Market Regulations 4.6
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 7.6
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
211
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
10 20
23
9 25
25 27
8
30 30 29
30
7
31 34
8.17 8.12 8.19 8.08 8.06 7.97 8.10 8.17
6 35
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
212
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.2
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 7.0
Judicial Independence 6.2
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 5.5
Divorce 0.0
213
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.0
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.2
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 7.5
Judicial Independence 3.8
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 3.4
Divorce 5.0
215
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
79 78
7 80
6 103 102
100
116 110
113 117
6.80 6.91 6.39 6.40 6.41 6.34 6.58 6.55
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 120
216
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.6
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 6.3
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 8.3
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 90
98
7 100
6 110
106
6.62 6.48
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
218
LATVIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.72
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.75
RANKING 24/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.23
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 33/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 17/159
Rule of Law 6.5 Size of Government 6.6
Procedural Justice - Government Consumption 5.1
Civil Justice - Transfers and Subsidies 6.9
Criminal Justice - Government Enterprises 8.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 20
22
31 30 23 24 24
8 30
39 37
7 40
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.4
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.1
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 4.4
Judicial Independence 3.4
Women Security, Safety 6.7
Impartial Courts 3.4
Divorce 0.0
221
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
75
7 80 83
91
6
100 109 108
112
6.86 6.97 6.66 6.49 6.42 6.46
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 120
222
Score 0―10
Homicide 0.0
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.4
Judicial Independence 5.9
Women Security, Safety 7.5
Impartial Courts 4.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 4.2
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Divorce 5.0
223
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 80
7
96
103
100
6
114 113 115
117 118
5
120
4
5.95 5.92 5.88 6.39 6.33 6.37 6.58 6.63 130
3 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
224
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.7
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 4.7
Women Security, Safety 6.4
Impartial Courts 4.6
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.0
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Divorce 5.0
225
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 70
7
80
6
5
90 92
4
100
6.68 6.58
3 100
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
226
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.0
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.2
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 1.0
Judicial Independence 3.4
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 2.3
Divorce 0.0
227
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
6 120
5
140
154
157 157
4.87 4.65 4.37
4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 160
228
LITHUANIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.75
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.92
RANKING 18/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.34
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 30/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 13/159
Rule of Law 6.8 Size of Government 7.2
Homicide 7.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 5.2
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 4.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.8
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 10.0
229
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
18
21 20
8 20
28 28 27
29
7 30 32
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 8.4
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 8.6
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 7.4
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 9.0 Movement of Capital and People 6.6
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.3
Divorce 10.0
231
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
12 12
8 10 14 13
16 16 16
18
7 20
MACEDONIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 7.25
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.17
RANKING 60/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.21
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 69/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 67/159
Rule of Law 5.1 Size of Government 6.2
Procedural Justice 4.6 Government Consumption 5.9
Civil Justice 5.6 Transfers and Subsidies 4.6
Criminal Justice 5.1 Government Enterprises 6.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 8.5
Security and Safety 8.6
Homicide 9.4
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.1
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.0
Judicial Independence 3.5
Women Security, Safety 7.5
Impartial Courts 3.7
Protection of Property Rights 5.1
Movement 6.7
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 5.8
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.0 Movement of Capital and People 5.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.3
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 9.6
Labor Market Regulations 7.4
Identity and Relationships 7.5
Business Regulations 7.8
Legal Gender 0.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
233
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 30
7 40
42
43
46 45
48
6 50
52
57
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.8
Legal System and Prop. Rights 2.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 2.6
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 2.7
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.3 Movement of Capital and People 5.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 5.0
235
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
7
70 67
80
6
75 81
5
100
95 93
4 102
6.49 6.65 6.53 6.72 6.93 7.02 7.05 6.79 108
3 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
236
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
73
7
80 86 84 89
6 91
93
5 89
100
4
6.72 6.81 6.77 6.99 6.68 6.49 6.67 6.66 109
3 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
238
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.0 Movement of Capital and People 5.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 8.7
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 9.6
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 90
97
99 99
101
7 100
104
104
6 110 107
109
6.42 6.54 6.54 6.62 6.50 6.54 6.57 6.61
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
240
Score 0―10
Homicide 5.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.6
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 5.4
Judicial Independence 4.5
Women Security, Safety 4.5
Impartial Courts 4.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.3 Movement of Capital and People 5.0
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 5.0
241
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
7
107
120 112
6 114
122
5 129 132 131
140
136
4
6.22 6.32 6.40 6.21 5.93 6.03 6.12 5.89
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
242
MALTA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.95
SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.70
RANKING 21/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.33
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 22/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 21/159
Rule of Law 7.1 Size of Government 5.8
Procedural Justice - Government Consumption 3.9
Civil Justice - Transfers and Subsidies 6.4
Criminal Justice - Government Enterprises 6.0
Homicide 9.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.6
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 6.1
Women Security, Safety -
Impartial Courts 4.4
Parental Rights -
Divorce -
243
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
8 10
14 15
16 18 17 17
18
21
7 20
Score 0―10
Homicide 5.9
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.3
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 8.0
Judicial Independence 3.1
Women Security, Safety 3.4
Impartial Courts 2.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 2.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 0.0
245
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
7 119
120
120
6 131 132
133
5
139
140
143 145
4
5.94 5.89 5.86 5.89 5.82 5.55 5.44 5.66
160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
246
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.9
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 6.7
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 5.9
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.5 Movement of Capital and People 7.0
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 5.0
247
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
10
8 14
18 19
7
20 23 22
6
5
30
4
31
8.22 8.05 8.21 8.31 8.35 8.22 8.08 7.88 33 39
3 40
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
248
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60
7 74 74 75 73
80 87
91 91
96
6
100
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
62 61
60 67 65 66
7
80 74
80
6 83
100
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.0 Movement of Capital and People 5.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 5.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 5.0 Regulation 7.1
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 8.1
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
48 48
51 50
52
7 50
58
61
6 60
66
MONTENEGRO
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.11
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 6.77
RANKING 51/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.44
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 43/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 85/159
Rule of Law 5.3 Size of Government 5.1
Procedural Justice - Government Consumption 5.9
Civil Justice - Transfers and Subsidies -
Criminal Justice - Government Enterprises 2.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 7.5
Security and Safety 9.2
Homicide 8.9
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 4.3
Women Security, Safety -
Impartial Courts 4.0
Protection of Property Rights 4.8
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 6.7
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.5 Movement of Capital and People 6.7
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 7.3
State Control over Internet Access - Credit Market Regulations 8.3
Labor Market Regulations 6.9
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 6.7
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights -
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce -
255
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 30
7 40 43 43
45 46 45
49 47
51
6 50
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.6
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.0
Judicial Independence 4.5
Women Security, Safety 6.7
Impartial Courts 4.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.8 Movement of Capital and People 4.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 5.0
257
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.0
Judicial Independence 3.2
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 3.0
Freedom to Est. & Operate Org. 3.8 Freedom to Own Frgn. Currency 0.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.3 Movement of Capital and People 2.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 10.0
259
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
108
7
121 122 123 122 121 122
120
6 133
5
140
4
5.89 5.85 5.80 6.19 6.20 6.24 6.51 6.23
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
260
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.0 Movement of Capital and People 1.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 5.6
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 5.9
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 130
136
7 140
140
6 144
5
150
4
152 153 151 152 151
3
4.73 5.23 4.86 4.40 4.77 5.00 5.20 5.27
160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
262
Score 0―10
Homicide 3.0
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 7.0
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 5.9
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.5 Movement of Capital and People 4.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 5.0
Divorce 10.0
263
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 50
7
60 64
6
68 67
69
5 71 71
70 73
4
80
6.99 7.03 7.04 6.94 6.95 7.09 7.11 7.02
3 80
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
264
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 5.2
Women Security, Safety 9.2
Impartial Courts 3.5
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.3 Movement of Capital and People 4.6
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
State Control over Internet Access 5.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.3
Divorce 10.0
265
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 70
80 80
80
82 74
7 87 88
90
84
6
100 94
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.8 Movement of Capital and People 7.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.2
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.1
Labor Market Regulations 7.5
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 8.1
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
267
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
9
11 12
8 10
14 13
15 15
17
7 20
6 30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
268
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.0 Movement of Capital and People 7.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 9.1
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 10.0
Labor Market Regulations 8.9
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 8.5
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
269
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
8
2 2
2
3 3 3 3 3
3
7
4
8.91 8.62 8.80 8.79 8.78 8.77 8.80 8.86 4
6 5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
270
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 40
60 60
60 65
71
7 78 75 75
80 87
6
100
Score 0―10
Homicide 8.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.4
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 5.7
Judicial Independence -
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 4.5
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 1.4
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 0.0
273
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
105 106
7
110 114
118
6
120
126 127
5
130 135
4
137
6.17 6.40 6.55 6.30 6.06 6.14 6.02 5.73
3 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
274
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.6
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 2.3
Judicial Independence 4.7
Women Security, Safety 4.8
Impartial Courts 3.7
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 8.4
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.5 Movement of Capital and People 4.8
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 5.0
275
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 110
115
7 119
120
6
128
5
130 133
4 137
138 139
6.04 5.90 5.89 5.66 5.55 5.72 5.82 5.92 140
3 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
276
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 9.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.8
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 10.0
Labor Market Regulations 5.3
Identity and Relationships 10.0
Business Regulations 8.1
Legal Gender 10.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
277
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 5
10 7 7
8 8 8 8
9 9
12
15
7
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 6.1
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 5.6
Divorce 0.0
279
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.9
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.3
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 4.8
Judicial Independence 4.3
Women Security, Safety 5.0
Impartial Courts 3.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 2.8 Movement of Capital and People 2.1
Access to Cable and Satellite 2.5
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 8.1
Divorce 0.0
281
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 45
47
47 48
46
7
49
49
51
6
51
53
7.44 7.44 7.34 7.36 7.56 7.57 7.68 7.65 53
5 55 54 54
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
284
Score 0―10
Homicide 5.8
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.2
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 5.1
Women Security, Safety 7.5
Impartial Courts 4.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.8 Movement of Capital and People 7.4
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Divorce 10.0
285
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 70
79
80
8 78 86
81 91
90
7
100
93
98
6.84 6.89 6.90 6.60 6.55 6.69 6.67 6.76 102
6 110
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
286
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.3
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 8.9
Judicial Independence 1.9
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 2.3
Divorce 10.0
287
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
69
70 62 71
72 72
7 70
76
6 80
88
6.89 6.73 7.02 7.03 7.11 7.05 7.00 6.95
5 90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
288
Score 0―10
Homicide 7.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 3.6
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 2.7
Divorce 10.0
289
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
47 47
49 48
52 51 51
7 70
55
6 80
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.4
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 6.5
Judicial Independence 4.6
Women Security, Safety 8.3
Impartial Courts 3.5
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 5.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 5.0 Movement of Capital and People 5.4
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.3
Divorce 5.0
291
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
60
61 63 71
7 70 66
71
6 80
81
7.11 6.98 7.23 7.15 7.10 6.83 6.80 6.97
5 90 86
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
292
POLAND
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.81
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.34
RANKING 32/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.08
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 25/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 51/159
Rule of Law 7.1 Size of Government 5.7
Procedural Justice 7.7 Government Consumption 4.8
Civil Justice 6.6 Transfers and Subsidies 5.5
Criminal Justice 6.9 Government Enterprises 7.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.3 Movement of Capital and People 5.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.6
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.8
Labor Market Regulations 7.6
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 6.5
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
293
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
21
8 20 22
26
27 28
32
7 30
34
32
7.99 8.10 8.04 8.19 8.13 8.09 8.28 8.08
6 40
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
294
PORTUGAL
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 9.09
SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.53
RANKING 22/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.31
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 15/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 34/159
Rule of Law 7.2 Size of Government 5.6
Procedural Justice 8.1 Government Consumption 5.4
Civil Justice 6.6 Transfers and Subsidies 4.5
Criminal Justice 6.7 Government Enterprises 10.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 2.5
Security and Safety 9.9
Homicide 9.6
Legal System and Prop. Rights 7.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 6.2
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 3.1
Protection of Property Rights 5.8
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 10.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
19 19
8 20 23 22
27
28
7 30
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.8
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.3
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 7.6
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 7.4
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 3.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 3.5 Movement of Capital and People 4.9
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 0.0
297
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
109
6 113 111 112
110
5
120 123
ROMANIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.66
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.72
RANKING 28/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.19
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 34/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 20/159
Rule of Law 6.3 Size of Government 7.0
Procedural Justice 6.7 Government Consumption 6.5
Civil Justice 6.5 Transfers and Subsidies 6.7
Criminal Justice 5.8 Government Enterprises 8.0
Top Marginal Tax Rate 7.0
Security and Safety 9.8
Homicide 9.4
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 4.9
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 3.2
Protection of Property Rights 4.9
Movement 10.0
Freedom of Foreign Movement 10.0 Military Interference 8.3
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 6.0 Movement of Capital and People 7.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 7.5 Regulation 7.7
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.8
Labor Market Regulations 7.1
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 6.3
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
299
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 20
29 28 28
7 30 33 34 34
38
6 40
39
7.90 8.03 8.03 7.95 7.99 8.06 8.17 8.19
5 50
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
300
Score 0―10
Homicide 5.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 6.9
Judicial Independence 3.9
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 3.7
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.5 Movement of Capital and People 4.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 2.5
Divorce 10.0
301
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 90
99 99
100 104 104
7
110
113 112
110
6
120 126
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
65
7 80 64
78
6 100 92
98
104
6.66 7.20 6.64 6.54 6.46 6.54 6.94 7.10 109 108
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
304
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.4
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.3
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 7.7
Judicial Independence 7.2
Women Security, Safety 5.0
Impartial Courts 5.9
Divorce 0.0
305
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
140
6 140
141 141
145
147
149
5
150
Score 0―10
Homicide 7.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.2
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.0
Judicial Independence 4.4
Women Security, Safety 7.5
Impartial Courts 5.5
Divorce 5.0
307
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
112
6 120
SERBIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 7.85
SOUTH EASTERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 6.75
RANKING 55/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 7.30
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 51/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 88/159
Rule of Law 4.5 Size of Government 6.4
Procedural Justice 5.6 Government Consumption 6.5
Civil Justice 4.6 Transfers and Subsidies 3.7
Criminal Justice 3.4 Government Enterprises 8.0
Homicide 9.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence 3.0
Women Security, Safety 9.2
Impartial Courts 2.8
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.8 Movement of Capital and People 4.6
Access to Cable and Satellite 7.5
Divorce 10.0
309
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 55
60 55
7 60
61
65
6 65 67
69 64 64
7.23 7.23 7.15 7.06 7.01 7.10 7.11 7.30
5 70
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
310
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 5.5
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 5.2
Women Security, Safety -
Impartial Courts 4.5
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 4.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 9.0
Parental Rights -
Divorce -
311
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 30
40
7 40
6 50 45
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
107
110
7 108
111
120
118
6
130
124 125
127
6.31 6.23 6.34 6.07 6.12 6.21 6.14 6.47 130
5 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
314
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 2.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 4.5 Movement of Capital and People 8.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.9
State Control over Internet Access 5.0 Credit Market Regulations 10.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 15
20
29 18
7 25
6 35
34
36 36
7.95 8.26 8.07 7.94 7.86 7.95 8.04 8.34 39
5 45 41
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
316
SLOVAKIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.76
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.31
RANKING 33/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.04
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 29/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 53/159
Rule of Law 6.0 Size of Government 5.5
Procedural Justice - Government Consumption 4.1
Civil Justice - Transfers and Subsidies 4.5
Criminal Justice - Government Enterprises 8.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
21
8 20
26 26
29 29
30
7 30
31 33
8.24 8.05 8.14 8.15 8.08 8.06 8.10 8.04
6 40
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
318
SLOVENIA
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 9.02
CENTRAL EUROPE & BALTICS ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.00
RANKING 36/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.01
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 17/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 73/159
Rule of Law 7.0 Size of Government 4.2
Procedural Justice 8.0 Government Consumption 4.0
Civil Justice 6.4 Transfers and Subsidies 4.9
Criminal Justice 6.6 Government Enterprises 6.0
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 30
35
36
8
39 39 39
7 40 41 41 41
44
7.83 7.87 7.73 7.87 7.89 7.84 7.99 8.01
6 45
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
320
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 60
67 68
70
7 70 74
6 80
89 81
6.68 6.73 6.79 7.06 7.00 6.95 6.93 7.07
5 90
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 88 88
322
SPAIN
Score 0―10
PERSONAL FREEDOM 8.77
SOUTHERN EUROPE ECONOMIC FREEDOM 7.51
RANKING 30/159 HUMAN FREEDOM 8.14
Ranking Ranking
PERSONAL FREEDOM 28/159 ECONOMIC FREEDOM 36/159
Rule of Law 7.0 Size of Government 5.7
Procedural Justice 8.1 Government Consumption 4.4
Civil Justice 6.5 Transfers and Subsidies 4.4
Criminal Justice 6.3 Government Enterprises 10.0
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.8
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 5.0
Women Security, Safety 9.2
Impartial Courts 4.2
Divorce 10.0
323
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
21
8 20
30
7 30
28 28 29
31
8.11 8.07 8.25 8.12 8.01 7.96 8.03 8.14 35
6 40 36
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
324
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100 104
110 115
7
121 121
120 116 116
6
128
130
135
6.03 6.11 6.59 6.37 6.23 6.24 6.20 5.91
5 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
326
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 50
56
59 58
61
7 60 64
6 70
70
7.28 7.08 7.17 7.15 7.02 7.29
5 80
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
328
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 80
91
7 100
6 120
116
124 126
6.04 5.93 5.87 6.16 6.40 6.66 131 131
5 140
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
330
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.5
Legal System and Prop. Rights 8.3
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 9.1
Women Security, Safety 10.0
Impartial Courts 7.5
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 9.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 8.8 Movement of Capital and People 6.2
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 5.0
331
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 5
8 8
10 10
8
11
14
15
7 13
15 15
8.39 8.46 8.52 8.52 8.48 8.35 8.45 8.48
6 20
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
332
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 8.6
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 10.0
Judicial Independence 9.1
Women Security, Safety 9.2
Impartial Courts 8.0
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.7 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 9.0 Movement of Capital and People 6.1
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Divorce 10.0
333
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 0
1
8 1
2 2 2 2 2
7 2
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.1
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.4
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 0.0
Judicial Independence 8.6
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 3.0
Divorce 0.0
335
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 7.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.8 Movement of Capital and People 5.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.7
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.1
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 10
18
20 23 23 25
7
26
30
38 38
6
40
49
7.47 7.90 7.94 8.17 8.14 8.16 8.21 8.34
5 50
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
338
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
6
100 91
95
102
6.91 6.60 6.66 6.64 6.98 6.37
5
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 120
118
340
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 80
7 100
93
96 99 99
100
102
110 108
6 120
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.8 Movement of Capital and People 3.5
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 7.1
State Control over Internet Access 7.5 Credit Market Regulations 9.3
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 50
58
63
68
7 70
6 90 84 86
93
7.08 7.25 7.21 6.88 6.75 6.61 6.67 6.52 99
5 110
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 105
344
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 6.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates -
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.3 Movement of Capital and People 6.9
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. - Regulation 7.5
State Control over Internet Access - Credit Market Regulations 9.5
Labor Market Regulations 6.7
Identity and Relationships 6.7
Business Regulations 6.2
Legal Gender -
Parental Rights 5.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 5.0
345
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 100
110
105 104 116
7
112
120
119
6
130
Score 0―10
Homicide 6.3
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.7
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 9.5
Judicial Independence -
Women Security, Safety 8.2
Impartial Courts 4.1
Divorce 5.0
347
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 120
122
7 130
129 129
6 140
137 135
138
140
141
5.88 5.68 5.66 5.49 5.38 5.92 5.93 6.07
5 150
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
348
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 75
80 77 77
7
81
85
84 84
6 85
90 87
6.86 6.76 6.73 6.83 6.79 6.90 6.93 6.77
5 95 93
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
350
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
124
5 128 126
140
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
6 65 61 68
64
5
75 72
82 74
6.77 6.97 7.02 7.25 7.12 7.10 7.03 6.77 84
4
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 85
354
Score 0―10
Homicide 5.3
Legal System and Prop. Rights 4.9
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 8.2
Judicial Independence 4.3
Women Security, Safety 7.5
Impartial Courts 4.4
Divorce 10.0
355
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 90
94
97 98
7 100
6 110 106
109 109
111 111
6.59 6.30 6.46 6.42 6.43 6.62 6.55 6.64
5 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
356
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 70
86
80 74
83 82
7 89 87
102
118
6
115
134
6.68 6.85 6.83 6.94 6.94 6.77 6.41 5.95 132
5 150
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
358
Score 0―10
Homicide 9.7
Legal System and Prop. Rights 6.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 8.5
Judicial Independence 7.9
Women Security, Safety 5.8
Impartial Courts 6.9
Divorce 0.0
359
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
6 90 96
5
110
105
6.79 6.44 6.68 6.22 6.24 6.36 6.32 6.39 119 116 116
4
130
121
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 124
360
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 4
6
8
5
8
7
10 9 9
8.46 8.59 8.45 8.51 8.49 8.52 8.57 8.55 10 10 10 10 10
6 12
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
362
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 8.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 7.5 Movement of Capital and People 3.7
Access to Cable and Satellite 10.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 10.0 Regulation 8.8
State Control over Internet Access 10.0 Credit Market Regulations 9.3
Labor Market Regulations 9.3
Identity and Relationships 9.3
Business Regulations 7.7
Legal Gender 7.0
Parental Rights 10.0
Same-Sex Relationships 10.0
Divorce 10.0
363
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
9 10
11
15 17
8
20
19 19 19 19
7 21
25
24
8.45 8.27 8.27 8.25 8.27 8.20 8.26 8.39
6 30
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
364
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 20
29
7 30
34
6 40 36 36 37 38
42
7.95 7.93 8.07 8.05 7.97 7.85 7.85 7.79 44
5 50
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
366
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 130
136 136
7
142
140 144
6
5
150 153
149 155
4
158
5.28 5.30 5.15 5.35 5.24 4.99 4.95 4.34
3 160
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
368
Score 0―10
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 0.0 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.8 Movement of Capital and People 2.3
Access to Cable and Satellite 5.0
Freedom of Access to Frgn. Info. 2.5 Regulation 6.7
State Control over Internet Access 5.0 Credit Market Regulations 8.9
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
8 90
100
100
7
110
106 117
6
112 123
120
125 124
6.36 6.54 6.45 6.25 6.27 6.23 6.24 6.17 120
5 130
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
370
Score 0―10
Homicide 7.3
Legal System and Prop. Rights 3.0
Disappearance, Conflict, Terrorism 0.0
Judicial Independence 2.1
Women Security, Safety 4.6
Impartial Courts 2.7
Laws and Reg. That Influence Media 1.3 Black-Market Exchange Rates 10.0
Political Pressure, Control Media 1.5 Movement of Capital and People 3.6
Access to Cable and Satellite -
Divorce 0.0
371
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 130
135
6
140
144
145
147
5 150
151
150 153
5.43 4.96 4.99 5.06 5.01 4.59 156
4 155
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
372
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 80
89
90 83 83
6
100
97
99 101
5
110
107
6.68 6.60 6.63 6.91 6.80 6.58 6.53 6.43 112
4 120
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
374
Score 0―10
Human Freedom Score over Time World Avg. Regional Avg. Human Freedom Ranking over Time
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
7 130
139
6 140
144
141 149 149 149
5 150 146
1Bii(a). Disappearances
This subcomponent is based on the CI-RIGHTS Dataset on disappearances. Countries with more disappearances
received lower ratings. A rating of 10 was assigned to countries with no disappearances. A rating of 5 was assigned to
377
countries with disappearances occurring occasionally. A rating of 0 was assigned to countries with frequently occurring
disappearances.
Source: David Cingranelli and Mikhail Filippov, CI-RIGHTS Dataset.
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), Social Institutions and Gender Index.
1Biii(c). Inheritance
This subcomponent is based on the legal code available and divided into two indicators: (1) inheritance rights of widows
and (2) inheritance rights of daughters. The final scoring of this indicator can also be driven by the actual application of the
law (or the lack thereof). A rating of 10 was assigned to countries where women have equal rights of inheritance. A rating of 5
was assigned to countries where (some) women have (some) rights of inheritance, but less than men. A rating of 0 is assigned
to countries where women have no rights of inheritance.
Source: OECD, Social Institutions and Gender Index.
2B. RELIGION
2Bi. Establishing and Operating Religious Organizations
This component is from this Institutional Profiles Database variable: “A3093: Freedom to establish and operate organiza-
tions: religious organizations. (0 = no establishment and operational independence possible; 4 = total freedom to establish
and operate.)”
Source: French Ministry of the Economy, Institutional Profiles Database.
379
preaching and other forms of religious expression, considered offensive or threatening to the majority faith? (0 = No;
1.00 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “SHI_Q_11: Were women harassed for violating religious dress codes? (0 = No; 1.00 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “SHI_Q_12: Were there incidents of hostility over proselytizing? (0 = No; 0.50 = Yes, but they fell short of physical
violence; 1.00 = Yes, and they included physical violence)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “SHI_Q_13: Were there incidents of hostility over conversions from one religion to another? (0 = No; 0.50 = Yes, but
they fell short of physical violence; 1.00 = Yes, and they included physical violence)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRX_22_blasphemy: Does any level of government penalize blasphemy? (0 = No; 1 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRX_22_apostasy: Does any level of government penalize apostasy? (0 = No; 1 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRX_22_hate speech: Does any level of government penalize hate speech? (0 = No; 1 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRX_22_criticism of religion: Does any level of government penalize criticisms or critiques of a religion or reli-
gions? 0 = No; 1 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRX_30: Are there reports of police enforcing religious norms? (0 = No; 1 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
Source: Pew Research Center, Global Restrictions on Religion.
general privileges or government access unavailable to other religious groups; 0.75 = One religious group has privileges
or government access unavailable to other religious groups, but it is not recognized as the country’s official religion;
1.00 = One religious group has privileges or government access unavailable to other religious groups, and it is recog-
nized by the national government as the official religion)” Assigned weight = 1.0.
• “GRI_Q_20_3_a: Does any level of government provide funds or other resources for religious education programs
and/or religious schools? (0 = No; 0.50 = Yes, but with no obvious favoritism to a particular group or groups; 1.00 = Yes,
and with obvious favoritism to a particular group or groups)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRI_Q_20_3_b: Does any level of government provide funds or other resources for religious property (e.g., build-
ings, upkeep, repair, or land)? (0 = No; 0.50 = Yes, but with no obvious favoritism to a particular group or groups; 1.00 =
Yes, and with obvious favoritism to a particular group or groups)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRI_Q_20_3_c: Does any level of government provide funds or other resources for religious activities other than
education or property? (0 = No; 0.50 = Yes, but with no obvious favoritism to a particular group or groups; 1.00 = Yes,
and with obvious favoritism to a particular group or groups)” Assigned weight = 0.5.
• “GRI_Q_20_4: Is religious education required in public schools? (0 = No; 0.50 = Yes, by at least some local govern-
ments; 1.00 = Yes, by the national government)” Assigned weight = 1.0.
• “GRI_Q_20_5: Does the national government defer in some way to religious authorities, texts, or doctrines on legal
issues? (0 = No; 1.00 = Yes)” Assigned weight = 1.0.
Source: Pew Research Center, Global Restrictions on Religion.
2D. EXPRESSION
2Di. Press Killed
The component measures journalists killed covering news or offering comment on public affairs in print, in photographs,
on radio, on television, or online. As such, the component includes writers, editors, publishers, producers, technicians,
photographers, camera operators, and directors of news organizations. Countries with three or more journalists killed per
100,000 population earn a rating of 0. As the number of journalists killed per 100,000 population moves toward zero, the
rating for this component moves toward 10. A 10 rating is assigned to countries with no journalists killed.
Source: Committee to Protect Journalists, Killed Census.
2E. RELATIONSHIPS
2Ei. Legal Gender
The component is based on the measures for sex/gender marker change, upon which rating intervals were constructed.
Countries with more restrictions and requirements for sex/gender marker change received lower ratings. A rating of 10
was assigned to countries with no requirements for sex/gender marker change. A rating of 7 was assigned to countries with
prohibitive medical requirements, including hormonal treatment, sterilization, and genital surgery. A rating of 0 is assigned
to countries without a possibility for sex/gender marker change.
Source: Z. Chiam et al., Trans Legal Mapping Report 2016: Recognition before the Law (Geneva: International Lesbian, Gay,
Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, 2016); Human Rights Watch, Country Profiles: Sexual Orientation and Gender
Identity.
2Eiv. Divorce
This component measures the extent to which women and men have the same rights to initiate divorce. A rating of 10
was assigned to countries where the law guarantees the same rights to initiate divorce to both women and men. A rating of
5 was assigned to countries where the law guarantees the same rights to initiate divorce to both men and women, but where
there are some customary, traditional, or religious practices that prevent or restrict some women’s ability to initiate divorce.
A rating of 0 was assigned to countries where the law does not guarantee the same rights to initiate divorce to men and
women or where women have no rights to initiate divorce at all.
Source: OECD, Social Institutions and Gender Index.
386
NOTE S
1. That work can be found in the annual Eco- “Freedom Properly Understood,” in which he
nomic Freedom of the World reports coauthored critiques Amartya Sen’s capability approach
by James Gwartney, Robert Lawson, and to defining freedom. See also Jean-Pierre
Joshua Hall (Vancouver: Fraser Institute). See Chauffour, The Power of Freedom: Uniting
also Joshua Hall and Robert Lawson, “Eco- Human Rights and Development (Washington:
nomic Freedom of the World: An Accounting Cato Institute, 2009).
of the Literature,” Contemporary Economic
Policy 32, no. 1 (2014): 1–19. 7. McMahon, Towards a Worldwide Index, p. 3.
4. See George H. Smith, The System of Liberty: 10. See McMahon, Towards a Worldwide Index.
Themes in the History of Classical Liberalism
(New York: Cambridge University Press, 11. F. A. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty
2013), especially chapter 7 (pp. 133–51), on (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1960),
“The Idea of Freedom,” and Tom G. Palmer, p. 137.
Realizing Freedom: Libertarian Theory, History,
and Practice (Washington: Cato Institute, 12. Locke, Two Treatises of Civil Government,
2009). ch. VI, para. 57.
5. Isaiah Berlin, “Two Concepts of Liberty,” in 13. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, p.
Isaiah Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford: 154.
Oxford University Press, 1969). The justi-
fication for relying on the concept of nega- 14. World Justice Project research team, WJP
tive freedom is discussed at length in Fred Rule of Law Index 2012–2013 (Washington:
McMahon, “Human Freedom from Pericles World Justice Project, 2012), WJP Rule of Law
to Measurement,” in Fred McMahon, ed., Index 2014 (Washington: World Justice Proj-
Towards a Worldwide Index of Human Freedom ect, 2014); WJP Rule of Law Index 2015 (Wash-
(Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 2012). ington: World Justice Project, 2015), and WJP
Rule of Law Index 2016 (Washington: World
6. See McMahon, “Human Freedom from Justice Project, 2016). This source provides
Pericles to Measurement,” and Palmer, Real- data for 92 countries in our index for years
izing Freedom, especially chapter 3 (pp. 23–42), 2008 and 2009, for 94 countries for the years
387
2010 and 2011, for 95 countries for the years 18. Because the source of our data on political
2012 and 2013, for 99 countries for the year parties (Institutional Profiles Database) had
2014, and for 104 countries for the year 2015. apparent problems with that data for 2015,
To derive Rule of Law ratings for the remain- the data we are using for that indicator comes
ing countries in our index, we regressed the from our previous HFI report.
WJP Rule of Law measures we constructed
with the rule of law measures from the World 19. Two of the seven variables are made up of
Bank’s Governance Indicators (which produced the average of two subvariables. Equal In-
a correlation coefficient of 0.93 using the 2012 heritance Rights is the average of inheritance
WJP report, 0.95 using the 2014 WJP report, rights of spouses and inheritance rights of
0.94 using the 2015 WJP report, and 0.92 us- daughters, and Parental Rights is the average
ing the 2016 WJP report). of parental rights in marriage and parental
rights after divorce. Thus, the overall Hu-
15. For the exact survey questions the WJP man Freedom Index includes nine indicators
used to derive these measures, see the “Meth- on women-specific freedoms, but this graph
odology” section of the WJP Rule of Law averages the seven indicators mentioned.
Index website, worldjusticeproject.org/meth-
odology. 20. The third quartile of countries by free-
dom has a slightly higher average per capita
16. Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty, p. 153. income than the second quartile as a result of
including a number of small, oil-rich countries
17. McMahon brings up the problem of “how such as Brunei (per capita income of $74,600),
restrictions on freedom that are designed to Bahrain ($44,508), United Arab Emirates
enhance freedom should be measured” in the ($65,975), and Qatar ($119,749).
brief, “Some Issues Concerning the Scope of a
Freedom Measure,” presented in a colloquium 21. Milton Friedman, foreword to Economic
in Potsdam, Germany, in June 2010, organized Freedom of the World: 1975–1995, by Gwartney et
by the Friedrich Naumann Foundation. al. (Vancouver: Fraser Institute, 1996), p. vii.
388
389
Ian Vásquez is the director of the Center for Global Liberty and Prosperity at the Cato Institute and a columnist
at El Comercio, a newspaper in Peru.
Tanja Porčnik is president and cofounder of the Visio Institute, a think tank based in Slovenia, and an adjunct
scholar of the Cato Institute. She was formerly a senior fellow at the Atlas Economic Research Foundation; a
government teaching fellow at the American Institute on Political and Economic Systems in Prague, Czech Republic
(a joint program of Georgetown University and the Fund for American Studies); and a research associate and manager
of external relations at the Cato Institute.
390
Cato Institute
The Cato Institute is a public policy research foundation dedicated to broadening the parameters of public policy
debate to allow consideration of more options that are consistent with the principles of limited government, indi-
vidual liberty, and peace. To that end, the Institute strives to achieve greater involvement of the intelligent, concerned
lay public in questions of policy and the proper role of government through an extensive program of publications and
seminars. The Institute is based in Washington, D.C.
Fraser Institute
Founded in 1974, the Fraser Institute is an independent research and educational organization with offices across
Canada and international partners in over 90 nations and territories. Our mission is to improve the quality of life for
Canadians, their families, and future generations by studying, measuring, and broadly communicating the effects of
government policies, entrepreneurship, and choice on their well-being. Our work is financed by tax-deductible con-
tributions from thousands of individuals, organizations, and foundations. In order to protect its independence, the
Institute does not accept grants from government or contracts for research.
Liberales Institut
The Liberales Institut is the think tank of the Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom, based in Potsdam,
Germany. It spreads liberal and free-market ideas through publications, the analysis of political trends, and the pro-
motion of research. It aims to promote the goal of making freedom valid for the dignity of all people and in all areas of
society, both in Germany and abroad. Its policies work toward promoting the rule of law, democracy, and the world-
wide liberalization of all markets: information, technology, goods and services, as well as currency and capital markets.
The Institute organizes conferences and workshops to stimulate an intellectual exchange among liberals around the
world.
391
Visio Institute
The Visio Institute is an independent, nonpartisan research organization based in Slovenia. Its aim is to develop
and promote public policy and institutional reform proposals to foster an open, free, developed, and just society in
Slovenia. To that end, the Visio Institute organizes events, produces publications, and appears regularly in the media.