Nama : Nyoman Surya Gunawan

NIM : 1504405025

UTS MANAJEMEN SUPLAI ENERGI LISTRIK

JAWABAN :
1. Diketahui :

No Daya Daya Mak Konstanta variabel cost

Min(MW) (MW)
a b

1 50 500 0.15 20

2 100 600 0.05 70

3 70 140 0.37 40

Fungsi variabel cost : Fn(Pn) = aPn2+bPn

Ditanya Economic Disoatch untuk beban :
a. Beban 220 +25 MW
b. Beban 500 + 25 MW
c. Beban 980 + 25 MW
Jawab :
Variabel Cost ($/h) :
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15𝑃1 2 + 20𝑃1 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05𝑃2 2 + 70𝑃2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37𝑃3 2 + 40𝑃3 ($⁄ℎ)

50 ≤ 𝑃1 ≤ 500 𝑀𝑊
100 ≤ 𝑃2 ≤ 600 𝑀𝑊
70 ≤ 𝑃3 ≤ 140 𝑀𝑊

𝐿 = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) + 𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) + 𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) + 𝜆(𝐷 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0

a. Beban 220 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 0,3𝑃1 + 20 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 0,1𝑃2 + 70 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 0,74𝑃3 + 40 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 245 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 20
𝑃1 =
0,3
𝜆 − 70
𝑃2 =
0,1
𝜆 − 40
𝑃3 =
0,74
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 245
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 20 𝜆 − 70 𝜆 − 40
+ + = 245
0,3 0,1 0,74
3,33𝜆 − 66,66 + 10𝜆 − 700 + 1,35𝜆 − 54,05 = 245
14,68𝜆 = 1065,71
1065,71
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 72,596 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
14,68
The optimal dispatch :
72,596 − 20
𝑃1 = = 175,32 𝑀𝑊
0,3
72,596 − 70
𝑃2 = = 25,96 𝑀𝑊
0,1
72,596 − 40
𝑃3 = = 44,048 𝑀𝑊
0,74
 Total Generation : 245,32 MW
Production Cost untuk D = 245 MW
Generator 1 :

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15𝑃1 2 + 20𝑃1 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15(175,32)2 + 20(175,32) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 8116,965 $⁄ℎ

Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05𝑃2 2 + 70𝑃2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05(25,96)2 + 70(25,96) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 1850,896 $⁄ℎ

Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37𝑃3 2 + 40𝑃3 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37(44,048)2 + 40(44,048) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 2479,803($⁄ℎ)
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 12.447,664 $⁄ℎ

b. Beban 500 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 0,3𝑃1 + 20 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 0,1𝑃2 + 70 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 0,74𝑃3 + 40 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 525 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 20
𝑃1 =
0,3
𝜆 − 70
𝑃2 =
0,1
 𝜆 − 40
𝑃3 =
0,74
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 525
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 20 𝜆 − 70 𝜆 − 40
+ + = 525
0,3 0,1 0,74
3,33𝜆 − 66,66 + 10𝜆 − 700 + 1,35𝜆 − 54,05 = 525
14,68𝜆 = 1345,71
1345,71
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 91,669 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
14,68
The optimal dispatch :
91,669 − 20
𝑃1 = = 238,898 𝑀𝑊
0,3
91,669 − 70
𝑃2 = = 216,69 𝑀𝑊
0,1
91,669 − 40
𝑃3 = = 69,82 𝑀𝑊
0,74
Total Generation : 525,408 MW
Production Cost untuk D = 525 MW
Generator 1 :

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15𝑃1 2 + 20𝑃1 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15(238,898)2 + 20(238,898) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 13.338,85 $⁄ℎ

Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05𝑃2 2 + 70𝑃2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05(216,69)2 + 70(216,69) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 17.516,02 $⁄ℎ

Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37𝑃3 2 + 40𝑃3 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37(69,82)2 + 40(69,82) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 4596,64($⁄ℎ)
 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 35.451,51 $⁄ℎ

c. Beban 980 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 0,3𝑃1 + 20 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 0,1𝑃2 + 70 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 0,74𝑃3 + 40 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 1005 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 20
𝑃1 =
0,3
𝜆 − 70
𝑃2 =
0,1
𝜆 − 40
𝑃3 =
0,74
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 1005
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 20 𝜆 − 70 𝜆 − 40
+ + = 1005
0,3 0,1 0,74
3,33𝜆 − 66,66 + 10𝜆 − 700 + 1,35𝜆 − 54,05 = 1005
14,68𝜆 = 1825,71
1825,71
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 124,36 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
14,68
The optimal dispatch :
124,36 − 20
𝑃1 = = 347,89 𝑀𝑊
0,3
124,36 − 70
𝑃2 = = 543,6 𝑀𝑊
0,1
 124,36 − 40
𝑃3 = = 114 𝑀𝑊
0,74
Total Generation : 1005,49 MW
Production Cost untuk D = 1005 MW
Generator 1 :

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15𝑃1 2 + 20𝑃1 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,15(347,89)2 + 20(347,89) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 25.111,97 $⁄ℎ

Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05𝑃2 2 + 70𝑃2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,05(543,6)2 + 70(543,6) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 52.827,04 $⁄ℎ
Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37𝑃3 2 + 40𝑃3 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,37(114)2 + 40(114) ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 9368,52($⁄ℎ)
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 87.307,53 $⁄ℎ
2. Diketahui :
Daya Daya Mak Variabel cost( $/h)
No
Min(MW) (MW)
1 45 300 1800 + 67.2 P1 + 0.0200 P12

2 45 350 7460 + 64.3 P2 + 0.0825 P22

3 50 450 3600 + 67.5 P3 + 0.0225 P32

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2𝑃1 + 0,0200𝑃1 2 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3𝑃2 + 0,0825𝑃2 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5𝑃3 + 0,0225𝑃3 2 ($⁄ℎ)

45 ≤ 𝑃1 ≤ 300 𝑀𝑊
45 ≤ 𝑃2 ≤ 350 𝑀𝑊
50 ≤ 𝑃3 ≤ 450 𝑀𝑊

Ditanya : Economic Dispatch dengan variasi beban : 175, 1025, 1125 MW

Jawaban :
𝐿 = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) + 𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) + 𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) + 𝜆(𝐷 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0

a. Beban 150 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 67,2 + 0,040𝑃1 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 64,3 + 0,165𝑃2 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 67,5 + 0,045𝑃3 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 175 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 67,2
𝑃1 =
0,040
 𝜆 − 64,3
𝑃2 =
0,165
𝜆 − 67,5
𝑃3 =
0,045
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 175
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 67,2 𝜆 − 64,3 𝜆 − 67,5
+ + = 175
0,040 0,165 0,045
25𝜆 − 1680 + 6,06𝜆 − 389,7 + 22,2𝜆 − 1500 = 175
53,26𝜆 = 3769,7
3744,7
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 70,309 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
53,26
The optimal dispatch :
70,309 − 67,2
𝑃1 = = 77,725 𝑀𝑊
0,040
70,309 − 64,3
𝑃2 = = 36,418 𝑀𝑊
0,165
70,309 − 67,5
𝑃3 = = 62,42 𝑀𝑊
0,045
Total Generation : 176,585 MW
Production Cost untuk D = 175 MW
Generator 1 :

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2𝑃1 + 0,0200𝑃1 2 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2(77,725) + 0,0200(77,725)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 7143,943 $⁄ℎ

Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3𝑃2 + 0,0825𝑃2 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3(36,418) + 0,0825(36,418)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 9911,09 $⁄ℎ
 Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5𝑃3 + 0,0225𝑃3 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5(62,42) + 0,0225(62,42)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 17901,022($⁄ℎ)
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 15.956,055 $⁄ℎ = 16.000 $/ℎ

b. Beban 1000 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 67,2 + 0,040𝑃1 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 64,3 + 0,165𝑃2 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 67,5 + 0,045𝑃3 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 1025 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 67,2
𝑃1 =
0,040
𝜆 − 64,3
𝑃2 =
0,165
𝜆 − 67,5
𝑃3 =
0,045
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 1025
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 67,2 𝜆 − 64,3 𝜆 − 67,5
+ + = 1025
0,040 0,165 0,045
25𝜆 − 1680 + 6,06𝜆 − 389,7 + 22,2𝜆 − 1500 = 1025
53,26𝜆 = 4594,7
4594,7
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 86,269 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
53,26
 The optimal dispatch :
86,269 − 67,2
𝑃1 = = 476,731 𝑀𝑊
0,040
86,269 − 64,3
𝑃2 = = 133,145 𝑀𝑊
0,165
86,269 − 67,5
𝑃3 = = 417,08 𝑀𝑊
0,045
Total Generation : 1026,956 MW
Production Cost untuk D = 1025 MW
Generator 1 :

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2𝑃1 + 0,0200𝑃1 2 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2(476,731) + 0,0200(476,731)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 38.381,772 $⁄ℎ

Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3𝑃2 + 0,0825𝑃2 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3(133,145) + 0,0825(133,145)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 17.483,759 $⁄ℎ

Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5𝑃3 + 0,0225𝑃3 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5(417,08) + 0,0225(417,08)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 35.667,070($⁄ℎ)
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 91.532,601 $⁄ℎ = 16.000 $/ℎ

c. Beban 1100 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 67,2 + 0,040𝑃1 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 64,3 + 0,165𝑃2 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 67,5 + 0,045𝑃3 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
 𝜕𝐿
= 1125 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 67,2
𝑃1 =
0,040
𝜆 − 64,3
𝑃2 =
0,165
𝜆 − 67,5
𝑃3 =
0,045
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 1125
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 67,2 𝜆 − 64,3 𝜆 − 67,5
+ + = 1125
0,040 0,165 0,045
25𝜆 − 1680 + 6,06𝜆 − 389,7 + 22,2𝜆 − 1500 = 1125
53,26𝜆 = 4694,7
4694,7
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 88,146 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
53,26

The optimal dispatch :

88,146 − 67,2
𝑃1 = = 523,670 𝑀𝑊
0,040
88,146 − 64,3
𝑃2 = = 144,521 𝑀𝑊
0,165
88,146 − 67,5
𝑃3 = = 458,8 𝑀𝑊
0,045
Total Generation : 1126,991 MW
Production Cost untuk D = 1125 MW
Generator 1 :

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2𝑃1 + 0,0200𝑃1 2 ($⁄ℎ)

𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1800 + 67,2(523,670) + 0,0200(523,670)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 42.475,243 $⁄ℎ
Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3𝑃2 + 0,0825𝑃2 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 7460 + 64,3(144,521) + 0,0825(144,521)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 18.475,826 $⁄ℎ

Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5𝑃3 + 0,0225𝑃3 2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 3600 + 67,5(458,8) + 0,0225(458,8)2 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 39.305,192($⁄ℎ)
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑑𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐶𝑜𝑠𝑡 = 100.256,261 $⁄ℎ = 100.000 $/ℎ
3. Diketahui :
Konstanta variabel cost
Daya Daya Mak
No
Min(MW) (MW) a b c

1 150 600 0.00128 6.48 459

2 100 400 0.00194 7.85 310

3 50 200 0.00482 7.97 78

Fungsi variabel cost : Fn(Pn) = aPn2+bPn + c

Ditanya Economic Disoatch untuk beban :

a. Beban 500 +25 MW
b. Beban 900 + 25 MW
c. Beban 1200 + 25 MW
Jawab :
Variabel Cost ($/h) :
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,00128𝑃1 2 + 6,48𝑃1 + 459 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,00194𝑃2 2 + 7,85𝑃2 + 310 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,00482𝑃3 2 + 7,97𝑃3 + 78 ($⁄ℎ)

150 ≤ 𝑃1 ≤ 600 𝑀𝑊
100 ≤ 𝑃2 ≤ 400 𝑀𝑊
50 ≤ 𝑃3 ≤ 200 𝑀𝑊

𝐿 = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) + 𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) + 𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) + 𝜆(𝐷 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0

a. Beban 500 + 25 MW

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 0,00256𝑃1 + 6,48 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 0,00388𝑃2 + 7,85 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
 𝜕𝐿
= 0,00964𝑃3 + 7,97 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 525 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
Economic dispatch Solution :
𝜆 − 6,48
𝑃1 =
0,00256
𝜆 − 7,85
𝑃2 =
0,00388
𝜆 − 7,97
𝑃3 =
0,00964
𝑃1 + 𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 525
Substitusi :
𝜆 − 6,48 𝜆 − 7,85 𝜆 − 7,97
+ + = 525
0,00256 0,00388 0,00964
390,625𝜆 − 2531,25 + 257,73𝜆 − 2023, 19 + 103,73𝜆 − 826,76 = 525
725,085𝜆 = 5906,2
5906,2
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 8,14 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
725,085
The optimal dispatch :
8,14 − 6,48
𝑃1 = = 650, 59 𝑀𝑊
0,00256
8,14 − 7,85
𝑃2 = = 74,74 𝑀𝑊
0,00388
8,14 − 7,97
𝑃3 = = 17,63 𝑀𝑊
0,00964
Total Generation : 742, 96 MW
Generator 1 membenagkitkan daya diatas kapasitsnya,, oleh karena itu kita
menggunakan solusi infeasible :
 Dengan menggunakan persamaan Lagrange dengan syarat pada pembangkit
satu
P1 = 150 W
𝐿 = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) + 𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) + 𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) + 𝜆(𝐷 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 ) + 𝜇1 (𝑃1 −
150)= 0

Partial Derivative :
𝜕𝐿
= 0,00256𝑃1 + 6,48 − 𝜆 + 𝜇1 (𝑃1 − 150) = 0
𝜕𝑃1
𝜕𝐿
= 0,00388𝑃2 + 7,85 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃2
𝜕𝐿
= 0,00964𝑃3 + 7,97 − 𝜆 = 0
𝜕𝑃3
𝜕𝐿
= 525 − 𝑃1 − 𝑃2 − 𝑃3 = 0
𝜕𝜆
𝜕𝐿
(𝑃 − 150) = 0
𝜕𝜇1 1

Susun Kemabli Fungsi 𝜆

𝜆 − 6,48
𝜇1 = (150)
0,00256
𝜆 − 7,85
𝑃2 =
0,00388
𝜆 − 7,97
𝑃3 =
0,00964
𝑃2 + 𝑃3 = 375
𝑃1 = 150
Substitusi P2 dan P3
𝜆 − 7,85 𝜆 − 7,97
+ = 375
0,00388 0,00964
257,73𝜆 − 2023, 19 + 103,73𝜆 − 826,76 = 375
361,46𝜆 = 3224,95
 3224,95
𝜆𝑆𝑦𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑚 = = 8,92 $/𝑀𝑊ℎ
361,46
𝑃1 = 150 𝑀𝑊
8,92 − 7,85
𝑃2 = = 276 𝑀𝑊
0,00388
8,92 − 7,97
𝑃3 = = 98 𝑀𝑊
0,00964
Total pembangkitan : 524 MW
Produktion cost
Generator 1 :
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,00128𝑃1 2 + 6,48𝑃1 + 459 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 0,00128(150)2 + 6,48(150) + 459 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹1 (𝑃1 ) = 1459,8 ($⁄ℎ)

Generator 2 :
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,00194𝑃2 2 + 7,85𝑃2 + 310 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 0,00194(276)2 + 7,85(276) + 310 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹2 (𝑃2 ) = 2624,38 ($⁄ℎ)

Generator 3 :
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,00482𝑃3 2 + 7,97𝑃3 + 78 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 0,00482(98)2 + 7,97(98) + 78 ($⁄ℎ)
𝐹3 (𝑃3 ) = 905,35 ($⁄ℎ)
Total production cost : 4989,53 ($⁄ℎ)