The relationship between genetically modified crops and cancer has been bitterly debated
in the scientific community for years. The debate increased after Gilles-Éric Séralini released a
controversial study on the issue. After his report was met with public backlash, the study
retracted, scientists began to take more interest in the issue. The data gathered by several leading
scientists supports a general consensus regarding genetically modified crops and cancer. The
general consensus is that the standards surrounding genetically modified crops should be re-
Many scientific studies have chosen to focus on the allergenicity of genetically modified
crops, considering that a more pressing concern than the link to cancer. Molecular Profiles: A
New Tool to Substantiate Serum Banks for Evaluation of Potential Allergenicity of GMO found,
in 2008, that genetically modified crops are no more allergenic than other foods. However, there
is an extra danger when combining two different plant genomes. It is possible that a normally
safe plant to consume could be combined with a plant that would trigger an allergic reaction in
the consumer. A more recent study from 2017, Case Studies on Genetically Modified Organisms
(GMOs): Potential Risk Scenarios and Associated Health Indicators, focused on determining the
effect of consuming genetically modified crops. The goal of the study was to determine if it was
safe to grow and sell genetically modified crops and animal feed. The researchers found that
there were no allergic reactions found in GM feed in comparison to non GM feed. The
researchers also discovered that sowing GM crops results in more sellable produce because they
aren’t susceptible to fungal toxins or insects, and they will not affect the consumer anymore than
non-GM foods.
One recent study, Impact on Environment, Ecosystem, Diversity and Health from
Culturing and Using GMOs as Feed and Food, found genetically modified crops to have long
term effects on consumers, which is a concern. Although the study confirmed that GM crops are
not toxic enough to harm the human body, the current toxicity assessment should be revised to
account for long-term effects not taken into account by the current protocol. The study also
elaborated upon the 2008 research paper, Edible Safety Requirements and Assessment Standards
for Agricultural Genetically Modified Organisms, which found that the original assessment that
genetically modified crops pose no recognizable threat was correct, but updating edible safety
Overall, these primary sources add to the secondary research by providing proven
scientific claims to the theories. A more definite conclusion can be made on the safety of
genetically modified crops in regards to causing cancer because of these studies. It appears that
all of the researchers agreed that genetically modified crops were not any more likely to cause
cancer than any organic or non-genetically modified crop. However, further research is necessary
Works Cited
“Impact on Environment, Ecosystem, Diversity and Health from Culturing and Using GMOs as
Feed and Food.” Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics, Elsevier, 20 June 2017.
“RETRACTED: Long Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant
19 Sept. 2012.
“Molecular Profiles: A New Tool to Substantiate Serum Banks for Evaluation of Potential
2008.
“Case Studies on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs): Potential Risk Scenarios and
30 Aug. 2017.
“Edible Safety Requirements and Assessment Standards for Agricultural Genetically Modified