ON
SUBMITTED BY
AJAY KUMAR
PGDM/08-10/03
SUBMITTED TO
FACULTY- IILM-CMS
INDEX
Objective/ Aim
Project details
Conclusion
Objective/ Aim
The main objective of this project is to analyze the market share of each
Project details
Innovation
One of its kind integrated approach to the Global Digital Media Business
Usefulness
The creation of its Digital Media Exchange offers the industry, a secure digital
distribution capability across multiple media platforms. This ensures that
content producers can have an integrated content delivery and aggregation
platform that repackages content for all media formats. This platform will
benefit a range of users including producers, creative agencies, production
and post production houses, animation, gaming firms, visual media firms,
news channels, cinemas, banking institutions, and distribution agencies.
Technology
Market Impact
The move will also pave the way for over 16,000 cinema screens across the
country to potentially offer high quality international viewing experience for
consumers in India. Addressing critical areas of operations for media
organizations, Airtel through its Teleport services would offer content
gathering, distribution services to television channels. This would also include
complete content management services such as playout, archival, collocation
and storage. Besides, Airtel will also offer content producers- an integrated
content delivery and aggregation platform that can repackage content for all
formats.
Being both content and access agnostic, Airtel’s Digital Media Business will
open up the market opportunity for the Indian media and entertainment
industry that is estimated to grow from Rs. 611 bn to Rs.929 bn at 11% CAGR
over 2009-2013.
Innovation
Offers free 2 Mbps speed upgrade for all broadband customers viewing
matches on YouTube. Airtel Broadband has also introduced a social media
game ‘Fastest Fifty’ to engage with the community on Orkut where
customers will be able to predict outcomes, compete against each other and
win exciting prizes.
Usefulness
The excitement of cricket on YouTube has exploded with 6.9 mn views being
generated in just last 4 days and Airtel Broadband has enabled its entire user
base to experience TV quality videos without buffering on
www.youtube.com/ipl. This association is helping open up a new video
streaming experience for Airtel Broadband customers.
Technology
Airtel has constantly strived to innovate and deliver high quality products to
its broadband customers. As the leading private broadband player in the
country, Airtel delivers its broadband service to customers through a fibre
backbone of Carrier Ethernet Network with last mile delivery on copper using
ADSL2+ technology.
Market Impact
Innovation
Idea Cellular brings Cricket at fingertips for the experts of the game as well
as novice, men & women, old and the young, and everybody else who uses a
mobile phone.
Usefulness
The new format of the Game will allow millions of mobile users in India to
participate in this unique campaign. Idea Brand Ambassador Abhishek
Bachchan along with other celebrities and cricketers will appear on TV, in
this campaign.
Innovation
3G networking is still in its infancy in India and given the sheer geographical
size of the nation it will be difficult to provide universal coverage, ultimately
because doing so would not be financially viable. However, in many areas 3G
is becoming available due to public demand and since India is one of the
fastest growing global markets for mobile internet connectivity, this is no
surprise. Full 3G has only been available for a couple of years, but now it is
possible for new and existing customers within India to pick up a compatible
SIM card and mobile phone from a number of different leading network
providers. Before we look at which providers offer the best 3G connectivity, it
is sensible to explain about 3G technology and how it works.
In order to receive a 3G service you will need a mobile phone coupled with a
3G ready SIM card, both of which should be supplied by a network provider of
your choice. On important thing to bear in mind in relation to 3G is that in
most cases using 3G networks will drain the battery on your phone faster than
if you were using older networking technology. This is because the data
upstream and downstream is faster and the service is higher quality, which
requires a bit more power. You will usually loose a couple of hours in
potential talk time as a result and if you surf the internet regularly you will
run your battery down even quicker, but these are minor sacrifices when you
consider the improvements offered by 3G.
The continued delay in auctioning 3 G spectrum has not slowed the mobile
subscriber growth in India. The month to month growth rates are amazingly
stable and remain robust. By observing the debates on policy, planning,
finance, legal and general issues of 3 G licenses, and in an environment that
finds ways to delay any policy decisions, it is quite likely there will be a
further delay in the auctions. We have newer reason today than we had a few
weeks ago, or for last several months and years.
Subscriber growth rates being constant simply shows that the existing
operators with the already allocated spectrum have enough capacity to
maintain the robust growth, and the delay in 3 G is not causing any reduction
in loading new mobile subscribers. It’s quite a valid observation as to the
value of the existing networks having the ability to continue with the growth
in user base.
By assuming that at least 2 new entrants will come into the foray with 3 G
licenses, the already operating dozen or so networks in each region will only
get more competition for the same subscribers. The delays pretty much limit
the growth of operators in the short run, and might also allow for some
consolidation in the market place. There is no doubt that we don’t need a
dozen operators in each market. Consolidation will further improve coverage,
network quality along with better usage of spectrum. All of them benefits to
the customer, DOT and also the markets.
MTNL and BSNL have had 3 G airwaves for about a year now, and have not
made any headway in loading up 3 G subscribers. Accept making noises of 3 G
services both these operators have not benefitted by having the spectrum. It is
time to look at why MTNL and BSNL are not attracting 3 G customers, if there
is such a huge demand for the services? While the policy and other issues are
being sorted out by the powers in Delhi, the failure to lure 3 G customers by
MTNL and BSNL can be understood to develop the appropriate business and
engineering plans to develop the 3 G customer acceptance. There is a perhaps
simple reason such as services, value addition, cost, handsets, coverage, speed
and the entire regular attributes that a particular customer expects to
purchase the service, and may be at this time they do not exist in the Indian
market, or the customer simply is not ready to upgrade to the next generation
mobile services.
MTNL and BSNL can use the time left as 3 G monopolies to shore up their
advantages to develop best practices and solutions to attract customers, and
with the already established network and perhaps another year of monopoly
in the 3 G arena, they can make up for the losses in the 2 G and fixed line
networks. The government should allow them to act quickly and decisively
with 3 G planning and execution (unlike the decision making with 2 G
sourcing which is at the speed of a snail) to capture the first in market
advantages that certainly exist in the Indian mobile market.
MTNL and BSNL also will not have to pay the 3 G spectrum fees until such
time the government. This certainly helps in keeping the cash with them and
utilizing the resources for another year or so. This helps them with the
balance sheet and also leverage for some more time.
The delays are unwarranted and purely because of poor planning, and too
much tinkering by the policy makers. As of now, the proposed auctions have
so many difficulties and issues, it may be best to just scrap the whole exercise
and start fresh. The unexpected (perceived) benefits do not support the delay
in 3 G auctions and launching these services. Albeit it illogical not to take
immediate action on 3 G (while the rest of the developed markets might be
looking at 4 G and beyond), there is some truth to the benefits of the delays to
the existing networks, which have yet to recover costs of deployment.
Research shows that there is currently little integration between the services
available for the different users’ profiles. Most companies struggle with
separate fixed and mobile devices, independent infrastructures and separate
voice-mail systems. However, these companies want more integration of their
mobility services to support the growing mobile workforce with better
productivity, simplified management and save cost through an integrated
approach.
Enterprises will choose either integrate all the parts of this puzzle themselves
or outsource the challenge by picking a one-stop shop. However, even the
latter option requires that many decisions be made. Furthermore, there is a
wide range of suppliers approaching enterprises with their offerings.
Enterprises can turn to a traditional systems integrator (SI), a vendor, a
network service provider or pick the best-of-breed offering and integrate the
services themselves — or even a combination of these. For most enterprises
the migration from legacy telephony technology to an integrated collaboration
environment will normally occur in several steps. A multi-vendor
environment will initially be the norm, and system integration is a key part of
this transition.
As with the affairs of men, there is a tide in the affairs of mobile networks.
More or less once every ten years that tide comes in, bringing with it a new
technological generation.
Right now the LTE tide is turning to flood, with the technology moving from
definition to implementation. Commercial launches of LTE networks are
expected to start in 2010, with early deployments from NTT DoCoMo, Verizon
and TeliaSonera.
The introduction of LTE is provoking sharp feelings of déjà vu. Many of the
claims being made for the technology are eerily reminiscent of those made for
3G ten years ago, some of which – in particular the suggestion that higher data
speeds will enable new sources of revenue for mobile operators – are no more
likely to be true now than they proved to be then.
The issue of rollout strategy also has a certain ‘retro’ flavor. As with 3G, there
is the question of whether to go for a rapid and wide rollout so that LTE is
quickly co-extensive with the existing network, or to go for a much slower and
more targeted rollout, using LTE to provide increased data capacity in the
locations where it is most needed.
However, not all technical factors point in the same direction. LTE’s support
for legacy services such as voice telephony and SMS (or rather, the absence of
a well-defined mechanism for such support) means that it cannot yet effect a
wholesale replacement of the 3G network. The phased introduction of devices,
beginning with data-only devices, tends to support the same conclusion.
Eventually most mobile networks will almost certainly implement LTE, just as
they did 3G; only niche players with a very carefully defined strategy aimed at
low-end customers can afford to stay off the LTE bandwagon permanently.
For most operators there are few advantages to early LTE deployment
Here the only certainties are partial coverage and dual-mode operation for
some years to come, and eventual replacement of the 2G/3G network to
ensure ROI. At the same time, all intermediate steps should factor in the
eventual migration to LTE, so that investments and incremental
improvements to the network are LTE-ready.
Low ARPUs and higher costs of providing services to rural users warrant
innovative thinking and a different approach
According to a new report from Ovum, the global analyst and consulting
company, rural India presents significant growth opportunities for the mobile
industry. However, due to low ARPU and the higher cost of providing services
in rural India, operators face the challenging task of serving these areas
profitably.
While low spending power of end customers has adverse impact on adoption
and ARPU, limited electrification, a lack of backhaul and the poor state of road
connectivity make deploying and operating a wireless network in rural areas
expensive. Therefore, mobile business case in much of rural India is very
challenging.
To overcome these challenges, operators need to shift their primary focus
from increasing ARPU and penetration to maximizing total revenue and profit
from the servable rural subscribers. It can be achieved by adopting a
comprehensive rural strategy comprising service & product innovation and
operational excellence; partnering with the government, non-government
organizations and non-telecoms players; and employing local entrepreneurs.
“These levers are mutually reinforcing and can help industry players to meet
the dual objectives of increasing revenues and reducing costs”.
The industry’s success in rural India so far can be attributed to efforts in the
areas of service and product innovation, operational excellence, partnering
with non-government organizations, and employing local entrepreneurs.
“However, we believe that the industry needs to further explore partnership
opportunities with the government and non-telecom companies.
SMS and mobile Internet aside, content accounts for 5–7% of most operator
revenues, and most of this is basic services such as ringtones, logos,
wallpapers, simple games and news/information services.
“There are multiple reasons for this state of play. “Many operators have yet to
commit significant organizational focus and resources to this area. Users,
many of whom have very recently crossed the communications divide, are still
focusing their limited budgets on basic voice and SMS services.
Many emerging market operators feel very confident about their current
market position, and few are concerned about device vendors’ inroads into
content and applications through applications stores or vertically integrated
mid- to low-end services such as Nokia Life Tools.
This is the main reason that emerging market operators take a big cut of the
content revenues – around 50%, far higher than the prevailing 30% norm in
mature markets.
Ovum believes the development of a strong, balanced and effective value chain
will be one of the key factors that will shape the future of mobile content
services in emerging markets.
Mobile operators currently occupy a central role in the value chain, but few
are giving mobile content services the attention required to develop an
attractive service portfolio in order to succeed.
“Of course, there are other important factors that will play a major role in
market development “The availability of affordable mid-range devices that
enable a richer content experience is still low, but is set to rapidly improve in
the medium term, although smart phone penetration will remain relatively
low.”
Ovum’s research indicates that many operators’ strategies need more refined
customer segmentation, stronger marketing (in its broadest sense), more
effective management of the content value chain and a carefully considered
application store strategy. Operator shortcomings are understandable: mobile
content and applications require a very different mindset to selling voice and
SMS.
Amid signs of economic recovery, 2010 will be the year when mobile
operators worldwide protect their existing revenue channels while exploring
new ones. Data services will play an even more important role in 2010,
supported by an enlarged mobile messaging landscape that, in addition to
SMS, will also encompass mobile email, mobile social networking, and instant
messaging (IM). Contrary to many analysts' belief, the device platform
landscape will not consolidate, but further diversify as new platforms like
Maemo, LiMo and Android take their market share. As the battle between
operators, device manufacturers, and internet portals for value-added
services (VAS) intensifies, operators will play their strongest card - their
billing relationship with the user.
In 2010, the battle for supremacy in value-added services will intensify in the
triangle between mobile operators, device manufacturers, and internet
portals. Over the past few years, operators increasingly have come under
attack in particular from device manufacturers like Apple, RIM, and Nokia
who are massively pushing device-specific services, differentiating their
product offerings, establishing direct relationships with the end-users and
locking them into services hosted by the manufacturers.
Some industry observers have pointed towards Google's Android as the white
horse that would create an equal-level playing field, and some operators are
endorsing this allegedly open platform. However, Google, like Apple, really
wants to be the premier value-added service provider, and, not surprisingly,
Android phones by default point to Gmail for email, Google Talk for instant
messaging and (of course) to Google's search engine and application store -
again reducing the role of mobile operators to deliver the bits.
However, the war is not over yet. Operators can fight back and remain in the
driving seat for value-added services by promoting operator-hosted and
device-neutral value-added services. Their chances of winning are quite good,
in particular in emerging economies where internet services have yet to take
off in the mass market. A trump card of mobile operators is their billing
relationship with the end-user and their ability to control the pricing for
services. For example, operators can ensure success of their own email service
by offering a flat rate for accessing the operator-hosted email while charging
volume-based fees for accessing internet email, using their billing relationship
as an 'unfair' advantage.
Just a few years ago, analysts were predicting a radical consolidation among
mobile device platforms with only two or three platforms controlling the
majority of the market. Of course, these analysts were completely wrong, and
the industry has taken an entirely different direction. Now it seems that about
two to three new device platforms are introduced every year, leading to
further diversification and an increasingly heterogeneous device landscape.
Over the past few years, the industry saw the introduction of the Apple
iPhone, the Google Android platform and, more as a side note, the Palm
WebOS. In 2010, we will see a plethora of Android devices from various
manufacturers and Nokia introducing their first Maemo devices based on the
Linux operating system. Others are expected to also bet on LiMo, including
NEC, Panasonic, and Samsung who introduced the first Vodafone 360 handset
based on this Linux platform. Nokia's Symbian continues to command about
40 percent of the smartphone market, and RIM remains with their closed
proprietary platform. Windows Mobile, which once was supposed to be one of
the few remaining platforms and a main consolidator, seems to be dwarfed,
leaving Microsoft's platform with a single digit market share.
While most users in Europe, the U.S., and other 'old' markets are using their
mobile devices as a secondary access channel to internet services, and
consequently mobile operators are struggling to defend their walled gardens,
operators in emerging markets are starting to capitalize on a unique
opportunity. With the PC and fixed-line penetration remaining low, the mobile
phone penetration is soaring in emerging economies. This means that many
users in these regions will have their first contact with internet services via
their mobile phone, creating a unique opportunity for mobile operators to
establish the mobile phone as the primary access device and themselves as
the value-added service provider.
Subscribers in emerging markets are hungry for data services, and if carriers
carefully choose their suppliers, and price the services attractively, they can
see fast take-up rates, generate substantial revenues and prevent churn by
binding users to attractive mass market services like email and instant
messaging.
However, operators in emerging markets must make sure that the services
they select actually can be consumed by the vast majority of their subscribers,
avoid solutions which support only a small number of devices (e.g. require a
smartphone), and ensure the services are affordable for the average user. If
operators select services that support the entire device landscape, price the
services with affordable flat rates and promote the usage with SMS campaigns,
we will see emerging markets lead the mobile internet revolution with
millions of subscribers - replicating the success of SMS.
2010 will see operators diversifying revenue streams beyond what they had
typically considered to be their foremost killer applications - voice and SMS.
Across all markets, developed, as well as emerging, operators will package an
array of mobile messaging services to accommodate the needs of diverse
subscriber segments, but using a device-neutral approach.
Highly popular amongst teenagers, 1.6 billion people will use IM services by
2012 according to industry analysts. Mobile IM will emerge as an important
service addition for operators who wish to offer the full spectrum of mobile
messaging options.
Until now, handset compatibility has been the single greatest barrier to
mobile IM. An early study by Capgemini revealed that 19 percent of mobile
subscribers who were interested accessing their IM service via their mobile
phones were unable to do so because their handset did not support it.
Instant messaging and email are also largely being embedded into social
networks, so it makes perfect sense for operators to deploy mobile social
messaging services which enable users to stay in touch with their friends on
Facebook and Twitter.
Marketing Strategies of telecom companies
Airtel:-
1. Network Expansion
5. New Technology
o Value enhancement
o Cost reduction
o Mobile data
o Enterprise
o Broadband
o Selective expansion
o Shareholders returns
Reliance communication:-
1. Financial restructuring
3. Network superiority
4. Channel strength
BSNL:-
1. Pricing strategies
Market skimming
Market penetration
3. Network connectivity.
TATA Teleservices:-
1. Value to shareholders
2. Operational efficiency
3. Enterprise planning
BSNL
Hutch
Reliance communication
Airtel
Idea
• Congested network
This is a huge dampener for the eventual roll out for the rural areas who have
been left out of the ambit of telecom revolution for too long. Part of the reason
is the perceived inability to pay and part is the high cost of initial roll out of
capacity of rural areas, the telcos should focus on a long-term game. It was
Dot) was given the budgetary support. How much it pays out in the long run,
in India? Would that serve the purpose? The initial buzz is that 3 G services
would give the always-on connectivity to the mobile owners. That was said so
about the GPRS and much hoopla was raised in the market. Yet, everyone
knows about the pathetic access. The fact is that 3 G networks can carry more
voice calls than the present networks. If it is the voice network, then perhaps
carrying the top of the line blackberry’s and laptops to access the network?
The proposed merger of BSNL and MTNL is consuming a lot of ink. There have
been various suggestions floated in the media about the ways and means the
details here. BSNL should concentrate more on rural spread and better
download limits, this is pathetic for users who wish to consume bandwidth for
file sharing or extensive web surfing for any reason. According to telcos logic,
they feel that ordinary user should not get more than a few hundred MB’s.
This only exposes the socialist mindset, which forces the ordinary citizens for
looking up to these “mai baap” bosses. Come what may, the present state of
the same across their web worlds. Next time around in a web world, have a
look. It is possible that you are being looked at! Their broadband services for
home users seem to be in a limbo. Since they are planning to introduce TiVO
like functionality across India, there could be a problem in getting across the
WiFi and WiMax may soon be a reality given the fact that Dishnet has planned
to roll out its services. The grey area of security remains unanswered as of
now.