Once a patient has been resuscitated, efforts are then made to improve
wound healing in order to prevent scarring and contractures. Contractures
Abstract lead to a loss of function, poor cosmetic outcome, reduced quality of life
In this article we discuss the different surgical approaches to burn scar (QOL), pain and psychological consequences (3,4). Function is determined
contractures. Burn scar contractures can lead to a poor functional and cosmetic by the range of movement (ROM) at a joint. Therefore the most important
outcome as well as possible psychological consequences. We describe the contracture sites are the joints of the upper limb, neck, mouth, trunk and
benefits and complications of the different modalities of treatment. By the knees. These contractures can impair the patient’s ability to move, to dress, to
end of this article the core trainee should be able to describe the different eat or drink and perform fine skills. Contractures of the neck, axilla and hand
types of management options for preventing and treating burn contractures. are shown in figures 1-4.
Case Report
A 7 year old male presented to hospital with a 2% burn over his right
elbow due to a scald from boiling water. No first aid was applied when
the injury happened 2 hours previously. The burn was mixed in depth but
examination revealed the wound did not blanch, was not painful and was
pale in appearance indicating a dermal burn. In the following days a split
skin graft was performed along with the application of a splint. With active
physiotherapy over the course of 6 months, the range of movement was
normal with minimal scarring.
Introduction
Burns constitute the second highest incidence of trauma related deaths
globally, second to vehicular trauma (1). Within the U.K 250,000 burn injuries Figure 1: A thick linear contracture band
occur each year in which 1000 people are admitted to hospital and 300 of the neck and peri-orbital contractures.
patients die (2).
The most common mechanism of injuries are scald and flame burns,
accounting for 45% and 20% of burn injuries respectively. Flame burns
usually result in an increased depth of burn. Chemical and electrical burns are
less prevalent (<10%) (2).
Table 1.
Schneider et al. concluded the importance of therapeutic positioning and Other forms of therapy include: application of silicone gel, wearing pressure
intensive therapy intervention. The study of 985 patients concluded that garments and the use of a laser to reduce scars. Such methods are
38.7% of patients developed a contracture at hospital discharge. The shoulder controversial as there is a plethora of literature which supports or refutes the
was the most common joint to undergo contracture (38%), followed by the effectiveness of each of these treatments.
elbow (34%) and the knee (22%) (14).
Surgical Options
Following a burn injury over the surface of a joint, splintage should be used to
place a joint in a position which will later allow a patient to maintain essential • Local Surgical Procedures
function e.g. eating, drinking, going to the toilet. There are a wide range of The Z-plasty is a commonly used local procedure for contracture release and
splints which stretch the skin and maintain positions of function (12, 15, 17). mainly used for bowstring contractures (11,12). The Z-plasty borrows skin
Burns to the flexor surface of the skin increase the risk of contracture as the from adjacent tissue sites to divide and lengthens the contracture band. As
flexor muscles are stronger than the extensors. Full co-operation is essential there is shortening within the transverse axis, there may be little room for
for reducing long term pain, providing a greater range of movement and further shortening with a z-plasty. A multiple z-plasty may be preferred as
reducing the requirement for further surgery. theoretically this reduces transverse shortening. The z-plasty should only
really be used when there is ample laxity of the surrounding tissue and not
Physiotherapy is important to prevent scar formation and limit contractures. in diffuse contractures.
Celis et al. showed that patients receiving additional, supportive physiotherapy
required less surgery for burn contractures than a group receiving basic The Y-V plasty (figure 5) is relatively simple to perform and is recommended
support (16). Adequate analgesia alongside patient education is a priority for linear bands. In comparison to the Z-plasty, the Y-V plasty does not require
as patients must move their affected joints despite perceived pain (14, 17). undermining, which reduces the risk of distal tip necrosis. Contractures can be
lengthened by 100%, whereas with a 60 degree Z-plasty, length is increased
by 75%. The Y-V plasty can also be repeated adjacently which is used when
there is a broad sheet of contracture. Patients are able to mobilise earlier
post-operatively than if the Z-plasty was chosen. Other techniques include,
the double reverse V-Y plasty and the W-plasty (11,12) (figure 6).
There are difficulties with the use of a free flap. A free flap is limited by the
amount of skin taken from a donor site. This donor site would require a SSG
which could potentiate contracture. Dissection of recipient vessels to connect to
the flap is difficult due to the distortion of tissue from the scar. Free flaps require
tissue to be imported which is of a different colour, bulk and texture (11). This
Figure 6. The W plasty. is can be overcome with the use of skin expanders however there are risks of
infection, skin ischaemia or leakage (11). In addition, the areas where tissue
expansion can be limited, particularly if the surrounding area is burnt.
• Skin Shortage
In comparison to full thickness skin grafts (FTSGs), split skin grafts (SSGs)
are easily harvested, can cover a larger area, release multiple joints and
broad sheet contractures. Unfortunately, SSGs are prone to form hypertrophic
scarring and further contracture of the wound site (1,5,11,12,14,17). If the
burn is large, a meshed split skin graft will lead to a greater degree of contract
than a sheet SSG. FTSGs have less contracture due to more dermis within the
graft. Conversely their take is dependent on a richer vascular bed (4,11). In
recent years SSGs have been incorporated with dermal templates.
A) 0 Day
B) 14 days
C) 21 days
D) 25 days
E) 30 days
References:
1. Goel, A., Shrivastava, P. Post-burn scars and scar contractures. Indian
Jouornal of Plastic Surgery 2010; 43 63-71
2. Chipp, E., Walton, J., Gorman, D.F., Moiemen N.S. A 1 year study of burn
injuries in a British Emergency Department. Burns 2008: 34; 516-520
3. Egeland, B., More, S., Buchman, S.R., Cederna, P.S. Management of Difficult
Paediatric Facial Burns: Reconstruction of Burn-Related Lower Eyelid Ectropion
and Perioral Contractures. Journal of craniofacial surgery 2008: 19; 960-969
3) What is the main disadvantage of a Z-plasty
for the treatment of a contracture band? 4. Leblebici, B., Adam, M., Bagis, S., Tarim, A.M., Noyan, T., Akman, M.N.,
Haberal, M.A. Quality of life after burn injury: the impact of joint contracture.
A) A complication is ischaemia of the tip of the wound Journal of Burn Care Research 2006: 27; 864-868
B) Poor cosmesis
C) Recontracture 5. Cohen, I.K., Diegelmann, R.F., Lindblad, W..J. (1992) Wound Healing:
D) Requires flattening through physiotherapy Biochemical and clinical aspects. W.B Saunders Company, Philidelphia
E) Z-plasty does not dissect through the contracture
band as well as a Y-V band 6. Peacock ,Jr E.E., Madden, J.W., Trier, W.C. Biological basis for the treatment
of keloids and hypertrophic scars. Southern Medical Journal 1970: 63; 755-60
4) Which is not a principle of contracture removal?
7. Giele, H., Cassel, O. (2008). Oxford specialist handbooks in surgery: Plastic
A) A free flap is preferable to a skin graft and Reconstructive Surgery. 1st Edition. Oxford University Press, New York. PP
B) The distal joint should always be released before the proximal joint
C) Important underlying structures may need to be exposed 8. Dietch, E.A., Wheelahan, T.M., Rose, M.P., Clothier, J., Cotter, J. Hypertrophic
D) Each joint should be considered separately burn scars: analysis of variables. Journal of Trauma 1983: 77;744-751
E) Function should take priority over cosmesis
9. Cubison, T., Pape, S.A., Parkhouse, N. Evidence for the link between healing
Answers time and the development of hypertrophic scars (HTS) in paediatric burns due
to scald. Burns 2006: 32;992-999
1) C
2) E
3) A
4) B
13. Book chapter: Boyd, JB. Burn Trauma. In Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.
1st edition, Cleveland: Springer, 2006: 189-206.
14. Schneider, J.C., Holavanahalli, R., Helm, P., Goldstein, R., Kowalske, K.
Contractures in burn injury: defining the problem. Journal of burn care and
research 2006: 27(4); 508-514
15. Kwan, M.W., Ha, K.W. Splinting program for patients with burnt hand.
Hand Surgery 2002: 7; 231-241
16. Celis, M.M., Suman, O.E., Huang, T.T., Yen, P., Herndon, D.N. Effect of a
supervised exercise and phyisiotherapy program on surgical interventions in
children with thermal injury. Journal of burn care and rehabilitation 2003:
24(1); 57-61 Corresponding Author
17. Procter, F. Rehabilitation of the burn patient. Indian Journal of Plastic Karl Walsh
Surgery 2010: 43; 101-113 Queen Victoria Hospital,
Holtye Road,
18. Costa, H., Soutar, D.S. The distally based posterior interosseus fasciocutaneous East Grinstead RH19 3DZ
island flap. British Journal of Plastic Surgery 1988: 41; 221-226. Email: mosc7kw2@doctors.org.uk
19. Teo, T.C., Richard, B.M. The distally based posterior interosseous
fasciocutaneous island flap reconstruction flap in reconstruction of the hand
in leprosy. Indian Journal of Leprosy 1997: 69(1); 93-100
20. Aslan, G., Tuncali, D., Cigsar, B., Barutcu, A.Y., Terzioglu, A. The propeller
flap for burn postburn elbow contractures. Burns 2006: 32(1);112-115
21. Soejima, K., Nozaki, M., Sasaki, K., Takeuchi, M., Negishi, N. Reconstruction
of burn deformity using artifical dermis combined with thin split-grafting.
Burns 1997:23; 501-504
22. Hunt, J.A., Moisidis, E., Haertsch, P. Initial experience of Integra in the
treatment of post-burn anterior cervical neck contracture. British Journal of
Plastic Surgery 2000: 53(8); 652-658