Project: Company.

Hut For Air Package Ingersoll Rand.

MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF ANALYSIS

OF LIFT OF THE SKID AND CASSET
Discipline. No. Project.
CIVIL . IR-PT01
No. Document. Date.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002 02-JUN-18
Área. Revition
000 GENERAL AS-BUILT

Revition Description Date

C For Customer Review and / or Comments 28-ENE-18

AS-BUILT As- Built 02-JUN-18

Cuadro de firmas.

Elaborate by: Checked by: Approved:

Julio C. Perez José A. Corona José L. Pérez C.
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

ÍNDICE

1. OBJECTIVE 3

2. SCOPE 3

3. DEVELOPMENT 4

4. REFERENCES 4

5. CONSIDERATION OF ANALYSIS 4

6. CONSIDERATIONS OF ANALYSIS 6

6.1. CONSIDERATIONS OF ANALYSIS 7

6.2. IDENTIFICATION OF SKID ELEMENT GROUPS 8

6.3. MECHANICAL AND GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SKID. 9

7. LOADS APPLIED TO SKID. 10

7.1. BASIC LOADS. 10

7.2. BASIC LOADS. 14

7.3. SKID SKID GRAVITY CENTER. 16

7.4. SKID INCLINATION. 18

7.5. SKID ENTRY FILES. 19

8. SKID STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS. 21

8.1. SUMMARY OF LOADS AND COMBINATIONS. 21

8.2. REACTIONS IN THE CRANE HOOK. 22

8.3. MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS. 23

8.4. RELATIONSHIP OF EFFORTS IN ELEMENTS. 24

9. DESIGN OF EARS OF LIFTING. 26

9.1. CABLE REVIEW. 26

P á g i n a 2 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

9.2. REVISION OF EARS OF LIFTING. 27

10. CONSIDERATIONS OF THE SKID 2 ANALYSIS 30

10.1. CONSIDERATIONS OF THE SKID 2 ANALYSIS 31

10.2. IDENTIFICATION OF ELEMENTS GROUPS OF SKID 2 32

10.3. SKID 2 MECHANICAL AND GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SKID 2 33

11. LOADS APPLIED TO SKID 2 34

11.1. BASIC LOADS. 34

11.2. CARGAS BASICAS. SKID 2 38

11.3. CENTER OF GRAVITY OF SKID 2 40

11.4. INCLINATION OF SKID 2 42

11.5. SKID 2 ENTRY FILES 43

12. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SKID 2 45

12.1. SKID 2 SUMMARY OF LOADS AND COMBINATIONS. 45

12.2. REACTIONS IN THE CRANE HOOK. SKID 2 46

12.3. MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS. SKID 2 47

12.4. RELATIONSHIP OF EFFORTS IN ELEMENTS. SKID 2 48

13. DISEÑO DE OREJAS DE IZAJE. SKID 2 51

13.1. CHECK OF CABLES. SKID 2 51

13.2. REVISION OF EARS OF LIFTING. SKID 2 52

14. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS 55

P á g i n a 3 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

1. OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present analysis is to know the behavior of the Skid for the "Instrument Air
Compressor Skate" during the lifting maneuver, which is expressed through efforts and displacements
to ensure that said behavior is in the acceptable ranges for the regulations used, as well as the design
of the rigging system

2. SCOPE

The scope of this document focuses on showing the considerations during the vertical lift analysis of
the Skid for its placement in its final site, as well as clearly showing the results obtained from said
analysis, including technical information that allows to properly interpret the results of the analysis. this
analysis.

3. DEVELOPMENT

The lifting analysis of the structural Skid of the "Instrument Air Compressor Skate" was carried out as
described in this document, and is based on the specifications and standards, technical requirements,
criteria and the analyzes to be performed.

4. REFERENCES
.
The applicable technical information (standards, design codes and manuals) that has been used for
the analysis and design of the Skid, is the one indicated below.

No. TYPE DENOMINATION DESCRIPTION

1 Carga, Amarre, Transporte e Instalación de Plataformas Costa

Code NRF-041-PEMEX-2007
Afuera
2 Code AISC ASD 9TH Edition Manual of Steel Construction Allowable Stress Design
API RP 2A WSD, 21TH Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and
3 Code Ed. ERRATA AND Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Working Stress
SUPLEMENT 1, 2 Y 3. Desing, American Petroleum Institute.
4 Code AWS D1.1/D1.1M:2010 Structural Welding Code-Steel, American Welding Society.
Manual de Construcción en Acero – Diseño por Esfuerzos
5 Manual IMCA 5ta Ed. Permisibles, Instituto Mexicano de la Construcción en Acero,
A.C.
6 Code NRF-137-PEMEX-2012 Diseño de Estructuras de Acero.
Table 1 Applicable Technical Information

P á g i n a 4 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

5. CONSIDERATION OF ANALYSIS

The present analysis of hoisting has been done according to the following considerations:

1. The dimensions and geometry are in correspondence with the planes IR-PT01-CI-
DRG-002 REV_0, corresponding to the structural arrangement of the skid (dimensions
and weights).

2. The lifting of the skid will be done with the help of a space bar, for this, the modeling of
said bar is necessary

3. The basic loads considered in the analysis are the Skid's own weight, load of
equipment and dead load; the load combinations include the contingency factors
corresponding to the lift.

4. It has been considered an hoisting system consisting of four cables "Ø steel cables
connected to the lifting points in the structure in its lower part, and in its upper part
connected to a lifting bar. The lifting bar is attached to the hook of the crane (Board
0000 of the model) by two cables of 1 ¼ "Ø.

5. The node corresponding to the hook of the crane has been modeled as a simple
support, restricting its displacements in (X, Y, Z) (111000).

6. The lifting cables have been modeled as tubular elements that take only axial tension
load.

7. Lifting ears have not been included in the model since they will be designed
independently by means of spreadsheets.

P á g i n a 5 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

6. CONSIDERATIONS OF ANALYSIS

The geometry of the model used for the structural revision is shown by means of the hoisting
Analysis, referring to the Skid. Initially, the general arrangement of the skid, the number of joints, the
group labels on the structural members, and finally the mechanical properties of the sections used are
presented.

ARREGEMENT
OF IZAJE

SKID
ESTRUCTURAL

P á g i n a 6 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 1 General of the Skid for the Instrument Air Compressor Skate.

6.1. CONSIDERATIONS OF ANALYSIS

This section shows the identification of the nodes that make up the structural model of the Skid and
the hoisting arrangement.

P á g i n a 7 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 2 Isometric Structural Model and lifting arrangement

6.2. IDENTIFICATION OF SKID ELEMENT GROUPS

P á g i n a 8 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

This section shows the identification of the groups of elements of the structural model of the Skid and
the lifting arrangement.

Fig. 3 Isometric of the Structural Model and lifting arrangement

P á g i n a 9 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

6.3. MECHANICAL AND GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SKID.

Below is a list of the geometric and mechanical properties of the groups that make up the Skid's
structural model.

Fig 4 Properties of materials

P á g i n a 10 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

7. LOADS APPLIED TO SKID.

Below is a list of the geometric and mechanical properties of the groups that make up the Skid's
structural model.

7.1. BASIC LOADS.

The basic loads included in this analysis are shown below, first the schematics of each basic load
condition are presented and then a global summary.

P á g i n a 11 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig 5 Own Weight (Load Condition No. 1).

Fig. 6 Load of Equipment (Load Condition No. 2).

P á g i n a 12 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 7 Dead Load (Condition of Load No.3 Pipe and accessories).

P á g i n a 13 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 7 Dead Load (Load Condition No.4).

P á g i n a 14 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

The following table shows the gravitational loads without contingency factors which are applied.

MAGNITUDE
No. CONCEPT DESCRIPTION
(Ton)

1 Estructural Load 0.251

load of equipment 1.2

Loading of pipes and accessories 1.848

2 Dead Load
Dead Load 0.342

Total 3.641

Table 2Table of Basic Loads

7.2. BASIC LOADS.

Below are the factors and load combinations to be applied in the present analysis, the load factors
used were obtained according to the provisions of NRF-041-PEMEX-2007.

SUMMARY OF BASIC LOADS

Detail of the weight of the structure Contingency Factor Total weight
1.- Own weight 251.000 5% 263.550
2.- Equipment Load 1200.000 15% 1380.000
3.- Loading of pipes and accessories 1848.150 10% 2032.965
4.- Dead weight 342.000 5% 359.100
Estimated Weight of the Structure (Kg) 3641.150 4035.615
Estimated Weight of the Structure (Tn) 3.641 4.036
Table 3 Basic Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 15 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Contingency Factor for Structure (FCE) = 1.05

Equipment Weight Contingency Factor (FCQ) = 1.15
Factor for estimating the weight of rigs (FPA) = 1.07
Dynamic Amplification Factor (FAD) = 1.30
Asymmetric Load Factor (FCA) = 1.53

Scroll revision factor (Static Load on the Hook) CEG = FCE * FPA = 1.124
Scroll review factor (Static Load on the Hook) "Equipment" CEG = FCQ * FPA = 1.231
Stress revision factor in secondary elements (Dynamic Load on the Hook)CDG = CEG *
1.461
FAD =
Factor for stress revision in secondary elements (Dynamic Load on the Hook)
1.600
"Equipment"CDG = CEG * FAD =
Factor for revision of stresses in lifting points (Load in the Izaje Points)CDI = FCE * FAD *
2.091
FCA =
Factor for revision of stresses in lifting points (Load in the Izaje Points) "Equipment"CDI =
2.290
FCQ * FAD * FCA =

Below is a table with all the load combinations that have been included in the present analysis.

Basic Loads Factor

Combination Description
1 2 3 4
CEG Displacement Review 1.124 1.124 1.177 1.124
CDG Review of Efforts - Secondary Elements 1.236 1.236 1.295 1.236
CDI Review of Efforts - Izaje Points 1.733 1.733 1.815 1.733
Table 4 Basic Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 16 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

7.3. SKID SKID GRAVITY CENTER.

In this section we present a diagram in which the general arrangement of the lifting system can be
seen, referring to the center of gravity of the structure and the position of the hook of the crane.

The coordinates of the center of gravity are also displayed.

 X= 0.9685 m
 Y= 0.101 m
 Z= 0.9079 m

Fig. 7 Location Plant of the Gravity Center.

P á g i n a 17 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 8 Elevation View of the Locking Arrangement.

P á g i n a 18 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

P á g i n a 19 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

7.4. SKID INCLINATION.

For standard lifting situations, the inclination of the object to be hoisted must not exceed 2% in both
longitudinal and transverse directions. The inclination must be verified once the geometry of the lifting
arrangement is defined and the position of the C.o.G.

So the displacement of C.o.G. horizontal allowed (ecog) to maintain the inclination within this 2% will
be then.

Below are the calculations of the inclination of the structure during the lifting maneuver, in the
longitudinal (X axis) and transverse (Y axis), however, in the analysis the hook has been placed in the
position of the coordinates X & Y of the load center, so the theoretical slope is zero, as described
below
Coordinates (m)
Point
X Y Z

Gancho Hook 0.9685 3.700 3.700

Grav Center. 0.9685 0.100 0.9079

Distances (m)
X Y Z
0.000 2.700 0

Inclination Percentage Grados

Longitudinal
0.00% 0.0 °

Transversal 0.00% 0.0 °

Eventually, the installer of the Superstructure should verify the actual inclination of the structure based
on the rigging arrangement that will be used.

P á g i n a 20 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

7.5. SKID ENTRY FILES.

For standard lifting situations, the inclination of the object to be hoisted must not exceed 2% in both
longitudinal and transverse directions. The inclination must be verified once the geometry of the lifting
arrangement is defined and the position of the C.o.G.

Below is the input file of the structural model of the Skid.

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 18/04/18
JOB NAME 01
JOB CLIENT INGERSOL RAND
JOB NO 01
JOB REV 0
ENGINEER NAME JJRN
CHECKER NAME JACV
APPROVED NAME JLP
CHECKER DATE 18/04/18
APPROVED DATE 18/04/18
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER MTON
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 0 1.85; 3 1.993 0 0; 4 1.993 0 1.85; 5 0 0 0.925; 6 1.993 0 0.925;
7 0.526 0 0; 8 0.526 0 1.85; 9 0.526 0 0.925; 10 1.391 0 0; 11 1.391 0 1.85;
12 1.391 0 0.925; 13 0.263 0 0; 14 0.263 0 1.85; 15 1.692 0 0; 16 1.692 0 1.85;
17 0.526 0 1.131; 18 1.391 0 1.131; 19 0.526 0 0.42; 20 1.391 0 0.42;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 13; 2 3 6; 3 1 5; 4 2 14; 5 5 2; 6 6 4; 7 5 9; 8 7 10; 9 8 11; 10 9 12;
11 7 19; 12 9 17; 13 10 15; 14 11 16; 15 12 6; 16 10 20; 17 12 18; 18 13 7;
19 14 8; 20 15 3; 21 16 4; 22 17 8; 23 18 11; 24 19 9; 25 20 12;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC STEEL
E 2.03889e+007
POISSON 0.3
DENSITY 7.83337
ALPHA 6.5e-006
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
1 3 5 7 8 10 TO 13 15 TO 18 20 22 TO 25 TABLE ST W8X13
2 4 6 9 14 19 21 TABLE ST C8X11

P á g i n a 21 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

CONSTANTS
BETA 180 MEMB 4 9 14 19 21
MATERIAL STEEL ALL
PRINT CG
SUPPORTS
13 TO 16 PINNED
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE CARGA MUERTA
SELFWEIGHT Y -1
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE SECADORES
JOINT LOAD
17 TO 20 FY -0.6
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE TUBERIAS Y CHAROLAS
MEMBER LOAD
1 TO 25 UNI GY -0.1
1 TO 25 UNI GY -0.17
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE CARGA MUERTA ADICIONAL
MEMBER LOAD
1 TO 25 UNI GY -0.5
LOAD COMB 13 CEG
1 1.124 2 1.124 3 1.177 4 1.124
LOAD COMB 14 CDG
1 1.236 2 1.236 4 1.236 3 1.295
LOAD COMB 15 CDI
1 1.733 2 1.733 3 1.815 4 1.733
PDELTA 2 ANALYSIS
PARAMETER 1
CODE AISC
CHECK CODE ALL
PARAMETER 2
CODE AISC
STEEL MEMBER TAKE OFF ALL
FINISH

P á g i n a 22 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

8. SKID STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS.

In this section we present the most relevant results (at the level of displacements and stresses in
elements) obtained in the Lien Analysis of the "Instrument Air Compressor Skate", these results
represent the conditions in which the structure will be found at the moment of be hoisted

8.1. SUMMARY OF LOADS AND COMBINATIONS.

Below are the summaries of basic loads and load combinations applied to the "Instrument Air
Compressor Skate".

Beam L/C Node Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton Mx MTon-m My MTon-m Mz MTon-m

Max Fx 17 15 CDI 12 0 -0.028 0 0 0 -1.368
Min Fx 19 15 CDI 14 0 -3.265 0 0 0 -0.536
Max Fy 18 15 CDI 13 0 3.613 0 0 0 0.536
Min Fy 13 15 CDI 15 0 -3.642 0 0 0 0.609
Max Fz 14 15 CDI 11 0 2.895 0 0 0 0.325
Min Fz 13 15 CDI 10 0 -3.224 0 0 0 -0.424
Max Mx 4 15 CDI 2 0 1.857 0 0 0 0
Min Mx 5 15 CDI 5 0 -0.571 0 0 0 -1.123
Max My 14 15 CDI 16 0 3.312 0 0 0 -0.609
Min My 13 15 CDI 15 0 -3.642 0 0 0 0.609
Max Mz 13 15 CDI 15 0 -3.642 0 0 0 0.609
Min Mz 17 15 CDI 12 0 -0.028 0 0 0 -1.368
Table 5 Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 23 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

8.2. REACTIONS IN THE CRANE HOOK.

In this section the reactions obtained in the hook of the crane are presented.

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment

Mx MTon-
Node L/C Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m My MTon-m Mz MTon-m
21 1 DEAD LOAD 0 0.45 0 -0.003 0 0
2 DRYERS 0 2.4 0 0.336 0.001 -0.235
3 PIPES AND CHARLES 0 3.612 0 -0.106 0.001 1.43
4 ADD DEAD LOAD 0 0.669 0 -0.01 0 0.011
13 CEG 0 8.208 0 0.24 0.002 1.432
14 CDG 0 9.028 0 0.263 0.003 1.575
15 CDI 0 12.656 0 0.369 0.004 2.208
Table 5 Maximum Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 24 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

8.3. MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS.

The maximum displacements that were presented during the simulation of the maneuver of the lift for
the Skid, are those described below, it should be mentioned that the combination of load valid for
displacements .

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Resultant Rotational

Node L/C X cm Y cm Z cm cm rX rad rY rad rZ rad
9 1 DEAD LOAD 0 -0.002 0 0.002 0 0 0
2 DRYERS 0 -0.031 0 0.031 0 0 0
3 PIPES AND CHARLES 0 -0.023 0 0.023 0 0 0
4 ADD DEAD LOAD 0 -0.043 0 0.043 0 0 0
13 CEG 0 -0.113 0 0.113 0 0 -0.001
14 CDG 0 -0.124 0 0.124 0 0 -0.001
15 CDI 0 -0.174 0 0.174 0 0 -0.001
Table 6 Summary Table of Maximum Displacements

Fig. 9 Deformation of the CEG Combination

P á g i n a 25 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

8.4. RELATIONSHIP OF EFFORTS IN ELEMENTS.

The following list shows the maximum stress relationships that were presented in structural elements
when simulating the lifting maneuver for the Skid.

Normalized
Ix
Be Analysis Design Actual Allowabl Ratio Ax Iz Iy
Clause L/C cm
am Property Property Ratio e Ratio (Actual/All cm2 cm4 cm4
4
owable)
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
25 W8X13 W8X13 0.504 1 0.504 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
24 W8X13 W8X13 0.466 1 0.466 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
23 W8X13 W8X13 0.491 1 0.491 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
22 W8X13 W8X13 0.462 1 0.462 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
21 C8X11 C8X11 0.301 1 0.301 AISC- H1-3 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
20 W8X13 W8X13 0.225 1 0.225 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
19 C8X11 C8X11 0.335 1 0.335 SHEAR -Y 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
18 W8X13 W8X13 0.337 1 0.337 SHEAR -Y 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
17 W8X13 W8X13 0.504 1 0.504 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
16 W8X13 W8X13 0.371 1 0.371 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
15 W8X13 W8X13 0.144 1 0.144 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
14 C8X11 C8X11 0.339 1 0.339 SHEAR -Y 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
13 W8X13 W8X13 0.34 1 0.34 SHEAR -Y 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
12 W8X13 W8X13 0.467 1 0.467 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
11 W8X13 W8X13 0.354 1 0.354 AISC- H1-3 15 24.7 1648. 113. 3.6

P á g i n a 26 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
10 W8X13 W8X13 0.195 1 0.195 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
9 C8X11 C8X11 0.213 1 0.213 AISC- H1-3 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
8 W8X13 W8X13 0.194 1 0.194 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
7 W8X13 W8X13 0.15 1 0.15 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
6 C8X11 C8X11 0.537 1 0.537 AISC- H1-3 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
5 W8X13 W8X13 0.414 1 0.414 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
4 C8X11 C8X11 0.265 1 0.265 AISC- H1-3 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
3 W8X13 W8X13 0.414 1 0.414 AISC- H1-3 15 74 276 631 25
21.7 1352. 54.5 5.0
2 C8X11 C8X11 0.537 1 0.537 AISC- H1-3 15 42 752 26 21
24.7 1648. 113. 3.6
1 W8X13 W8X13 0.207 1 0.207 SHEAR -Y 15 74 276 631 25
Table 7 Element Interaction Summary Table.

P á g i n a 27 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

9. DESIGN OF EARS OF LIFTING.

In this section the corresponding revision is made in the lifting points that involve the Skid as well as
the rigging.

The lifting cables must comply with a minimum safety factor of 4.0 and must be selected based on the
maximum tension obtained from the analysis for the CDG load combination that is 3.64 Ton

9.1. CABLE REVIEW.

P á g i n a 28 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

9.2. REVISION OF EARS OF LIFTING.

The revision of the lifting trunnions is shown below:

Consideraciones, geometría de diseño y Datos del Análisis de Izaje

GANCHO

A2

NODO 0010

NODO 0009

A1

NODO 0012

NODO 0011

NODO 0014

NODO 0013

Isométrico del arreglo general

Fig. 10 Isometric General Arrangement of Izaje
COORDENADAS (M) PUNTOS DE IZAJE
NODO X Y Z A1 = 2.700 m
P á g i n a 29 | 59
0014 -0.949 -0.674 0.000 A2 = 1.000 m
0012 -0.949 0.999 0.000 B1 = 0.949 m
0011 0.949 0.999 0.000 B2 = 0.949 m
0013 0.949 -0.674 0.000 C1 = 0.774 m
0009 0.949 0.100 2.700 C = 0.899 m
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

P á g i n a 30 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

P á g i n a 31 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

10. CONSIDERATIONS OF THE SKID 2 ANALYSIS

Next, the geometry of the model used for the structural revision is shown by means of the hoisting
Analysis, referring to the Skid. Initially, the general arrangement of the skid, the number of joints, the
group labels on the structural members, and finally the mechanical properties of the sections used are
presented.

ARRANGEMENT OF LIABILITY

SKID
ESTRUCTURAL

Fig. 1 General Isometric Skid for the Instrument Air Compressor Skate.

P á g i n a 32 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

10.1. CONSIDERATIONS OF THE SKID 2 ANALYSIS

This section shows the identification of the nodes that make up the structural model of the Skid and
the hoisting arrangement

Fig. 2 Isometric Structural Model and lifting arrangement

P á g i n a 33 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

10.2. IDENTIFICATION OF ELEMENTS GROUPS OF SKID 2

This section shows the identification of the groups of elements of the structural model of the Skid and
the lifting arrangement.

Fig. 3 Isometric of the Structural Model and lifting arrangement.

P á g i n a 34 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

10.3. SKID 2 MECHANICAL AND GEOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SKID 2

Below is a list of the geometric and mechanical properties of the groups that the Skid's structural
model.

Fig 4 Properties of materials

P á g i n a 35 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

11. LOADS APPLIED TO SKID 2

Below is a list of the geometric and mechanical properties of the groups that make up the Skid's
structural model.

11.1. BASIC LOADS.

The basic loads included in this analysis are shown below: first, the schemas of each basic load
condition are presented and then a global summary.

P á g i n a 36 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig 3 Own Weight (Load Condition No. 1).

Fig. 4 Equipment Loading (Load Condition No. 2

P á g i n a 37 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 5 Dead Load (Condition of Load No.3 Pipe and accessories).

P á g i n a 38 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 6 Dead Load (Load Condition No.4).

P á g i n a 39 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

The following table shows the gravitational loads without contingency factors which are applied

MAGNITUDE
No. CONCEPT DESCRIPTION
(Ton)

1 Estructural Load 0.382

load of equipment 2.677

Loading of pipes and accessories 1.848

2 Dead Load
Dead Load 0.342

Total 5.239

Table 2Table of Basic Loads

11.2. CARGAS BASICAS. SKID 2

Below are the factors and load combinations to be applied in the present analysis, the load factors
used were obtained according to the provisions of NRF-041-PEMEX-2007.

SUMMARY OF BASIC LOADS

Detail of the weight of the structure Contingency Factor Total weight
1.- Own weight 382.000 5% 401.100
2.- Equipment Load 2667.000 15% 3067.050
3.- Loading of pipes and accessories 1848.150 10% 2032.965
4.- Dead weight 342.000 5% 359.100
Estimated Weight of the Structure (Kg) 5239.150 5239.150 5860.215
Estimated Weight of the Structure (Tn) 5.239 5.239 5.860
Table 3 Basic Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 40 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Contingency Factor for Structure (FCE) = 1.05

Equipment Weight Contingency Factor (FCQ) = 1.15
Factor for estimating the weight of rigs (FPA) = 1.07
Dynamic Amplification Factor (FAD) = 1.30
Asymmetric Load Factor (FCA) = 1.53

Scroll revision factor (Static Load on the Hook) CEG = FCE * FPA = 1.124
Scroll review factor (Static Load on the Hook) "Equipment" CEG = FCQ * FPA = 1.231
Stress revision factor in secondary elements (Dynamic Load on the Hook)CDG = CEG *
1.461
FAD =
Factor for stress revision in secondary elements (Dynamic Load on the Hook)
1.600
"Equipment"CDG = CEG * FAD =
Factor for revision of stresses in lifting points (Load in the Izaje Points)CDI = FCE * FAD *
2.091
FCA =
Factor for revision of stresses in lifting points (Load in the Izaje Points) "Equipment"CDI =
2.290
FCQ * FAD * FCA =

Below is a table with all the load combinations that have been included in the present analysis.

Basic Loads Factor

Combination Description
1 2 3 4
CEG Displacement Review 1.124 1.124 1.177 1.124
CDG Review of Efforts - Secondary Elements 1.236 1.236 1.295 1.236
CDI Review of Efforts - Izaje Points 1.733 1.733 1.815 1.733
Table 4 Basic Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 41 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

11.3. CENTER OF GRAVITY OF SKID 2

In this section we present a diagram in which the general arrangement of the lifting system can be
seen, referring to the center of gravity of the structure and the position of the hook of the crane.

The coordinates of the center of gravity are also displayed.

 X= 1.8499 m
 Y= 0.101 m
 Z= 0.9037 m

Fig. 7 Location Plant of the Gravity Center.

P á g i n a 42 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

Fig. 8 Elevation view of the Izaje Arrangement.

P á g i n a 43 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

11.4. INCLINATION OF SKID 2

For standard lifting situations, the inclination of the object to be hoisted must not exceed 2% in both
longitudinal and transverse directions. The inclination must be verified once the geometry of the lifting
arrangement is defined and the position of the C.o.G.

So the displacement of C.o.G. horizontal allowed (ecog) to maintain the inclination within this 2% will
be then.

Below are the calculations of the inclination of the structure during the lifting maneuver, in the
longitudinal (X axis) and transverse (Y axis), however, in the analysis the hook has been placed in the
position of the coordinates X & Y of the load center, so the theoretical slope is zero, as described
below.

Coordinates (m)
Point
X Y Z

Gancho Hook 1.845 3.700 3.700

Grav Center. 1.845 0.100 0.9037

Distances (m)
X Y Z
0.000 2.700 0

Inclination Percentage Grades

Longitudinal 0.00% 0.0 °

Transversal 0.00% 0.0 °

Eventually, the installer of the Superstructure should verify the actual inclination of the structure based
on the rigging arrangement that will be used.

P á g i n a 44 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

11.5. SKID 2 ENTRY FILES

For standard lifting situations, the inclination of the object to be hoisted must not exceed 2% in both
longitudinal and transverse directions. The inclination must be verified once the geometry of the lifting
arrangement is defined and the position of the C.o.G.

Below is the input file of the structural model of the Skid

STAAD SPACE
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 18/04/18
JOB NAME 02
JOB CLIENT INGERSOL RAND
JOB NO 02
JOB REV 0
ENGINEER NAME JJRN
CHECKER NAME JACV
APPROVED NAME JLP
CHECKER DATE 18/04/18
APPROVED DATE 18/04/18
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
UNIT METER MTON
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0 0 1.85; 3 3.707 0 0; 4 3.707 0 1.85; 5 0 0 0.925; 6 3.707 0 0.925;
7 0.707 0 0; 8 0.707 0 1.85; 9 0.707 0 0.925; 10 2.957 0 0; 11 2.957 0 1.85;
12 2.957 0 0.925; 13 0.263 0 0; 14 0.263 0 1.85; 15 3.406 0 0; 16 3.406 0 1.85;
17 2.085 0 0; 18 2.085 0 1.85; 19 2.085 0 0.925; 20 0.707 0 1.53;
21 2.085 0 1.53; 22 0.707 0 0.247; 23 2.085 0 0.247; 24 1.85004 3.7 0.904;
25 1.85004 2.7 0; 26 1.85004 2.7 1.85;
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 13; 2 3 6; 3 1 5; 4 2 14; 5 5 2; 6 6 4; 7 5 9; 8 7 17; 9 8 18; 10 9 19;
11 7 22; 12 9 20; 13 10 15; 14 11 16; 15 12 6; 16 10 12; 17 12 11; 18 13 7;
19 14 8; 20 15 3; 21 16 4; 22 17 10; 23 18 11; 24 19 12; 25 17 23; 26 19 21;
27 20 8; 28 21 18; 29 22 9; 30 23 19; 31 25 13; 32 25 15; 33 14 26; 34 26 16;
35 25 26; 36 24 26; 37 25 24;
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC STEEL
E 2.03889e+007
POISSON 0.3

P á g i n a 45 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

DENSITY 7.83337
ALPHA 6.5e-006
DAMP 0.03
END DEFINE MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
1 3 5 7 8 10 TO 13 15 TO 18 20 22 24 TO 30 TABLE ST W8X13
2 4 6 9 14 19 21 23 TABLE ST C8X11
31 TO 34 36 37 TABLE ST PIPS12
35 TABLE ST PIPS100
CONSTANTS
BETA 180 MEMB 4 9 14 19 21 23
MATERIAL STEEL ALL
PRINT CG
SUPPORTS
13 TO 16 24 PINNED
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE CARGA MUERTA
SELFWEIGHT Y -1 LIST ALL
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE COMPRESORES
JOINT LOAD
20 TO 23 FY -0.67
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE None TITLE PESO DE TUBERIAS Y CHAROLAS
MEMBER LOAD
1 TO 30 UNI GY -0.1
1 TO 30 UNI GY -0.17
LOAD 4 LOADTYPE Dead TITLE CARGA MUERTA ADICIONAL
MEMBER LOAD
1 TO 30 UNI GY -0.5
LOAD COMB 13 CEG
1 1.124 2 1.124 3 1.177 4 1.124
LOAD COMB 14 CDG
1 1.236 2 1.236 4 1.236 3 1.295
LOAD COMB 15 CDI
1 1.733 2 1.733 3 1.815 4 1.733
PDELTA 2 ANALYSIS SMALLDELTA
PARAMETER 1
CODE AISC
CHECK CODE ALL
PARAMETER 2
CODE AISC

P á g i n a 46 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

STEEL MEMBER TAKE OFF ALL

FINISH

P á g i n a 47 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

12. STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS OF SKID 2

In this section presents the most relevant results (at the level of displacements and stresses in
elements) obtained in the Lien Analysis of the "Instrument Air Compressor Skate", these results
represent the conditions in which the structure will be found at the moment of be hoisted

12.1. SKID 2 SUMMARY OF LOADS AND COMBINATIONS.

Below are the summaries of basic loads and load combinations applied to the "Instrument Air
Compressor Skate".

Bea L/C Nod Fx Fy Fz Mx MTon- My MTon- Mz MTon-

m e Mton Mton Mton m m m
Max Fx 12 15 9 0.000 0.076 -0.000 0.000 0.000 -0.562
CDI
Min Fx 14 15 11 -0.000 2.380 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.760
CDI
Max Fy 18 15 13 0.000 3.101 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.368
CDI
Min Fy 19 15 14 -0.000 -2.976 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 -0.368
CDI
Max Fz 18 15 13 0.000 3.101 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.368
CDI
Min Fz 1 15 1 -0.000 -1.320 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 -0.000
CDI
Max 14 15 11 -0.000 2.380 0.000 0.000 -0.000 0.760
Mx CDI
Min 17 15 12 0.000 -0.386 0.000 -0.000 -0.000 -0.618
Mx CDI
Max 24 15 19 0.000 -0.935 -0.000 0.000 0.000 -1.741
My CDI
Min 1 15 13 -0.000 -1.480 -0.000 -0.000 -0.000 0.368
My CDI
Max 23 15 18 0.000 0.900 0.000 0.000 -0.000 1.775
Mz CDI
Min Mz 22 15 17 -0.000 -0.968 -0.000 -0.000 0.000 -1.868
CDI
Table 5 Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 48 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

P á g i n a 49 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

12.2. REACTIONS IN THE CRANE HOOK. SKID 2

In this section the reactions obtained in the hook of the crane are presented.

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Moment

Mx MTon-
Node L/C Fx Mton Fy Mton Fz Mton m My MTon-m Mz MTon-m
24 1 DEAD LOAD 0.000 0.588 -0.000 -0.004 -0.000 -0.000
2 DRYERS 0.000 2.680 -0.000 0.045 0.014 -15.340
3 PIPES AND CHARLES -0.000 5.500 -0.000 -0.453 -0.004 6.636
4 ADD DEAD LOAD -0.000 1.019 -0.000 -0.018 0.000 0.036
13 CEG 0.000 11.291 -0.000 -0.507 0.011 -9.391
14 CDG 0.000 12.421 -0.000 -0.558 0.012 -10.322
15 CDI 0.000 17.411 -0.000 -0.782 0.017 -14.477
Maximum Load Summary Table

P á g i n a 50 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

12.3. MAXIMUM DISPLACEMENTS. SKID 2

The maximum displacements that were presented during the simulation of the maneuver of the
lift for the Skid, are those described below, it should be mentioned that the combination of load
valid for displacements

Horizontal Vertical Horizontal Resultant Rotational

Node L/C X cm Y cm Z cm cm rX rad rY rad rZ rad
19 1 DEAD LOAD 0.000 -0.012 -0.000 0.012 0.000 -0.000 0.000
2 DRYERS 0.000 -0.135 -0.000 0.135 0.000 -0.000 0.000
3 PIPES AND CHARLES 0.000 -0.167 -0.000 0.167 0.000 -0.000 0.000
4 ADD DEAD LOAD -0.000 -0.031 -0.000 0.031 0.000 -0.000 0.000
13 CEG -0.000 -0.396 -0.000 0.396 0.000 -0.000 0.001
14 CDG -0.000 -0.435 -0.000 0.435 0.000 -0.000 0.001
15 CDI -0.000 -0.610 -0.000 0.610 0.000 -0.000 0.001
Table 6 Summary Table of Maximum Displacements

Fig. 9 Deformation of the CEG Combination.

P á g i n a 51 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

12.4. RELATIONSHIP OF EFFORTS IN ELEMENTS. SKID 2

The following list shows the maximum stress relationships that were presented in structural
elements when simulating the lifting maneuver for the Skid.

Be Analysis Design Actual Allowabl Normalize Clause L/C Ax Iz Iy Ix

am Property Property Ratio e Ratio d Ratio cm cm4 cm4 cm
(Actual/Al 2 4
lowable)
1 W8X13 W8X13 0.138 1.000 0.138 SHEAR - 15
Y 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
2 C8X11 C8X11 0.392 1.000 0.392 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
3 W8X13 W8X13 0.354 1.000 0.354 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
4 C8X11 C8X11 0.182 1.000 0.182 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
5 W8X13 W8X13 0.354 1.000 0.354 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
6 C8X11 C8X11 0.392 1.000 0.392 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
7 W8X13 W8X13 0.337 1.000 0.337 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
8 W8X13 W8X13 0.757 1.000 0.757 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
9 C8X11 C8X11 0.878 1.000 0.878 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
10 W8X13 W8X13 0.706 1.000 0.706 AISC- H1- 15

P á g i n a 52 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

3 24. 1648 113. 3.6

774 .276 631 25
11 W8X13 W8X13 0.163 1.000 0.163 SHEAR - 15
Y 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
12 W8X13 W8X13 0.209 1.000 0.209 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
13 W8X13 W8X13 0.292 1.000 0.292 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
14 C8X11 C8X11 0.376 1.000 0.376 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
15 W8X13 W8X13 0.255 1.000 0.255 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
16 W8X13 W8X13 0.228 1.000 0.228 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
17 W8X13 W8X13 0.228 1.000 0.228 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
18 W8X13 W8X13 0.350 1.000 0.350 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
19 C8X11 C8X11 0.442 1.000 0.442 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
20 W8X13 W8X13 0.136 1.000 0.136 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
21 C8X11 C8X11 0.183 1.000 0.183 AISC- H1- 15
3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
22 W8X13 W8X13 0.688 1.000 0.688 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25

P á g i n a 53 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

23 C8X11 C8X11 0.878 1.000 0.878 AISC- H1- 15

3 21. 1352 54.5 5.0
742 .752 26 21
24 W8X13 W8X13 0.642 1.000 0.642 AISC- H1- 15
3 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
25 W8X13 W8X13 0.113 1.000 0.113 SHEAR - 15
Y 24. 1648 113. 3.6
774 .276 631 25
Table 7 Element Interaction Summary Table.

P á g i n a 54 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

13. DISEÑO DE OREJAS DE IZAJE. SKID 2

this section corresponding is made in the lifting points that involve the Skid as well as the rigging.

The lifting cables must comply with a minimum safety factor of 4.0 and must be selected based on the
maximum tension obtained from the analysis for the CDG load combination that is 3.64 Ton

13.1. CHECK OF CABLES. SKID 2

P á g i n a 55 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

13.2. REVISION OF EARS OF LIFTING. SKID 2

A continuación se muestra la revisión de los muñones de izaje:

Consideraciones, geometría de diseño y Datos del Análisis de Izaje

GANCHO

A2

NODO 0010

NODO 0009

A1

NODO 0012

NODO 0011

NODO 0014

NODO 0013

Isométrico del arreglo general

Fig. 10 Isométrico de Arreglo General de Izaje.
COORDENADAS (M) PUNTOS DE IZAJE
NODO X Y Z A1 = 2.700 m
P á g i n a 56 | 59
0014 -0.949 -0.674 0.000 A2 = 1.000 m
0012 -0.949 0.999 0.000 B1 = 0.949 m
0011 0.949 0.999 0.000 B2 = 0.949 m
0013 0.949 -0.674 0.000 C1 = 0.774 m
0009 0.949 0.100 2.700 C = 0.899 m
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

P á g i n a 57 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

P á g i n a 58 | 59
 Document Name. No. Document.
IR-PT01-EL-CI-002
MEMORY OF CALCULATION OF Date.
ANALYSIS OF LIFT OF THE SKID 02-JUN-208
AND CASSET
Discipline. Revition.
CIVIL AS-BUILT

14. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS

In this section the corresponding revision is made in the lifting points that involve the Skid as well as
the rigging.

• The maximum displacements of the structure are within the allowable ones. The lateral loads that the
springs take are small, so the analysis is considered adequate.

• The lifting ears are designed with the maximum tension that is presented and the stress ratios are
less than one, so they are considered adequate.

• The diameter of the cable to be used for lifting this structure is 3/4 " with a load capacity of 24.60
Ton for the lower cables, and 1 1/4"  with a load capacity of 70.07 Ton,

• As a summary, it can be indicated that according to the results obtained from the hoisting analysis,
the structural behavior of the Skid during the lifting maneuver will be adequate in terms of efforts in
elements and displacements, as long as this maneuver is carried out with the proposed lifting system

P á g i n a 59 | 59