The stereochemical outcome of this experiment indicates that the mechanism involves stereospecific cis hydrometallation of the unsaturated substrate
followed by stereospecific reductive elimination from the resulting alkenyl (or alkyl) hydrido species.
cyclohexene 0.92
Conjugated dienes are reduced slower than isolated alkenes.
1,3-cyclooctadiene 0.75
C 2H5 C2H5
0.71
Internal and branched alkenes (alkynes) are hydrogenated
C 2H5 0.69 slower than terminal alkenes (alkynes). These differences are
C 3H7 C3H7 rationalized in terms of steric effects on olefin interaction
0.54 with the catalyst and have been used to effect selective
C3H7 alkene hydrogenations in polyene compounds.
0.17
C 3H7 Candlin Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 1968 (46) 60.
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -142- Week of October 15, 2002
Wilkinson: diastereoselectivity
Ph3P PPh3
Rh(I)
Ph3P Cl
1 mol% H Me
H2 (1 atm.), benzene/EtOH, rt R = H : 73% endo
R = Me : 92% endo
Me
R R R
endo exo
Rationale for observed diastereoselectivity:
Olefin binds the catalyst from the least
sterically hindered exo face. Subsequent cis H H
hydrometallation of the exo face followed
by stereospecific reductive elimination of Ph3P H Ph3P H
the alkyl metal hydrido intermediate results Rh(III) Rh(III)
Cl PPh3 ClR PPh3
in overall cis addition of H2 to the least
sterically hindered exo face of the olefin.
vs.
Rousseau J. Mol. Cat. 1979 (5) 163.
Jardine Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1981 (28) 63.
R
Ph3P PPh3
Rh(I)
Ph3P Cl
OH OH
0.04 mol%
H 2 (6.8 atm, 100psi), benzene, 50oC
no reaction note: when Pd/C was used
a mixture of cis and trans
Ph3P PPh3 isomers resulted
Rh(I)
H
trisubstituted K+ B - Ph3P Cl
0.04 mol%
MeO MeO
H 2 (6.8 atm, 100psi), benzene, 50oC cis isomer (exclusive)
68%
N
+ +
S PCy3 PCy3
Ir(I) (PF 6- ) repeat Ir(I) (PF 6- )
S N S N cis-reductive
elimination
2.5 mol% H H
CH2Cl2, H 2 (1 atm), rt
Me Me Me
The availability of a second "open" coordination 98% 64:1
site on the catalyst now makes it possible to bind a Pd/C (EtOH), 1:5 (sterics)
ligating group on the substrate in addition to the H +
olefin. This "two-point" binding has important Py
Cy3P (PF6-)
implications on the selectivity of product formation. Ir(III)
The ability of a late metal complex to effectively
H OH
bind hard functionality (hydroxyls, ketones, etc...)
is attributed to the lewis acidic properties imparted
on the complex by the overall positive charge. Me
i-Pr Crabtree JOC 1986 (51) 2655.
Other functionalities with lewis basic sites also direct:
Esters: Ketones: Ethers
O Me O Me Me Me
CO2Me CO2Me O O
Me Me H Me Me H Me Me H
(±) 56:1 (±) 124:1 999:1
Pd/C 1.35:1 Pd/C 1.26:1 (±)
Pd/C 1:4
Amides: O Me H O
N above N
5 mol%
PCy3
OH (PF6 -) OH OH
Ir( I)
N
H H
CH2Cl2, H2 (1 atm), rt
Me Me Me
A B
Dimished yields are observed with higher catalyst loadings. This can be
rationalized on the basis that higher catalyst loadings promote the irreversible
trimerization of the coordinatively unsaturated catalysts to yield inactive triiridium
hydride bridged complexes. Such complexes have been isolated by Crabtree from
reaction mixtures of more sterically hindered olefins that did not proceed to
completion.
Ph2 (BF4-)
P
OH Rh (I) OH
P ()n= 3
MOMO MOMO
Ph2
O O
[Rh(NBD)(DIPHOS-4)]+BF4-
O O
H H H
NaH, THF
MOMO Me OSEM O H2 (800 psi), rt MOMO Me OSEM O
68%
+
PCy3
Ir(I) (PF 6-)
N Me
H H H H
Me
Me 10
[Ir(COD)(py)(PCy3)]+PF6- Me
Me O H Me
HO H2, CH2Cl2 O
O HO HO O HO
OH OH
HO HO
99% Yield,
d.r. 11:1 at C10
Barriault OL 2001 (3) 1925.
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -150- Week of October 15, 2002
+ + H +
Ph 2 Ph2 Ph 2
In the absence of olefin substrate, no P S P S P
Rh(I) H2 k1 Rh(I)
further uptake of H 2 can be Rh (I)
detected. The only species observed P S P H P
by NMR is the cationic, Ph 2 Ph 2 k-1 Ph 2
S
4-coordinate solvated species.
only species
observed by NMR
H +
+ +
Treatment of the monodentate
PPh3 PPh3 S PPh 3
catalyst with H 2 resulted in detection S k1 Rh (III)
Rh(I) H2 Rh (I)
of the Rh(III)-dihydride complex. P h3P H
PPh3 Ph3P S
k-1
S
only species
observed by NMR
Halpern JACS 1977 (99) 8055. Schrock & Osborn JACS 1976 (98) 2135.
The Trans Effect:
To explain the difference in reactivities towards H2 of the catalysts, Halpern invokes the trans effect. The trans effect is defined as the
labilization of ligands trans to certain other ligands. The trans effect often arises when a ligand shares an orbital with another ligand of strong
σ-bonding character. Because phosphine forms a strong σ bond with Rh, trans Rh-H bonds formed will be weak because the orbital is not as
available for bonding to H. In the case of the bidentate complex, cis addition of H2 requires that one hydride share an orbital with a phosphine.
Since both hydride and phosphine are strong σ-bonding ligands, the dihydride adduct, once formed, is highly unstable and thus rapidly reverts
back via reductive elimination to the solvated 4-coordinate species. In the case of the monodentate phosphine complex, a H2 adduct can form
where neither H ligand is trans to a phosphine.
Classic example of the trans effect: synthesis of "cis-platinum" a chemotherapeutic agent
2- - 2+ +
Cl NH3 Cl Cl NH3 NH3 Cl Cl
Cl Cl NH3 (II) H 3N H 3N H 3N
Pt(II) Pt(II) Pt Pt(II) Cl Pt(II) Cl Pt(II)
Cl Cl Cl NH3 Cl NH3 H 3N NH3 H 3N NH3 Cl NH3
Cl has a stronger "trans only the cis Cl has a stronger "trans only the trans
influence" than NH3 isomer is formed influence" than NH3 isomer is formed
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -152- Week of October 15, 2002
Asymmetric Hydrogenation
A bidentate, C2 symmetric version of the cationic Schrock-Osborn catalyst affords extraordinarily high levels of
enantioselectivity in the hydrogenation of achiral enamides. This was the first demonstration that a chiral
transition metal complex could effectively transfer chirality to a non-chiral substrate with selectivities that rival
those observed in enzymes. Recall that this led to the 1st commericalized asymmetric process using a chiral
transition metal complex: Monsanto Process for the industrial production of L-DOPA (see Structure and
Bonding, pg. 4)
+ +
MeO
PPh3 P
(PF 6- ) Rh(I) (PF 6-)
Rh(I)
PPh 3 P
DIPAMP (common name for
OMe this bidentate chiral phosphine
ligand)
Schrock-Osborn catalyst CO2H
CO2H
i-PrOH, H 2 (1 atm), rt NHAc
NHAc >99% yield
Knowles JACS 1975 (97) 2567. 93% ee
A variety of bidentate chiral phosphines have since been synthesized and used to effect the hydrogenation of aromatic enamides (important substrates for the efficient
generation of amino acids):
H
PPh2 PPh2 PPh2
O PPh2 NMe2
Fe PPh2
PPh2 O PPh2
PPh2
PPh2 PPh2
H
Chiraphos (99% ee) SKEWPHOS (92% ee) NORPHOS (95% ee) DIOP (85% ee) BPPFA (93% ee)
R We'll see these ligands again effecting asymmetry in
a wide assortment of mechanistically unrelated metal
P PPh 2 catalyzed reactions with prochiral substrates.
PPh2 H
R H PCy2 "Privileged ligand class": ligands that communicate
R Fe PPh2 asymmetry effectively with a transition state
PPh2 PPh 2 localized at the metal center, irrespective of the
P nature of the transition state.
PPh2 E.N. Jacobsen;
R personal communication
BINAP (100% ee) DuPHOS (99% ee) BICP (97% ee) JOSIPHOS (96% ee) E. N. Jacobsen. Chem 153 notes. Spring 2001.
For review on DuPhos: Burk Acc. Chem. Res. 2000 (33) 363.
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -153- Week of October 15, 2002
(R) CO2Et
CO2H
H2 (1 atm), 25oC, MeOH NHAc
NHAc
N-acetyl-(R)-phenylalanine
>95% ee
+ +
(ClO4-) (ClO4-)
CO 2Me CH3 H 3C MeO2 C NH
HN
P P olefin bound
Rh(I) Rh(I) to Rh via its
H 3C P O Ph si-face
Ph O P CH3
olefin bound
to Rh via its
re-face
(ClO4-)
CO 2Me CH3
HN
P
Rh(I)
Ph O P CH3
olefin bound
to Rh via its
re-face
NHAc NHAc
N-acetyl-(R)-phenylalanine
>95% ee
RuCl2(PPh3) 2 cat.
H2 (1 atm), benzene:ethanol, rt
quantitative
The active species was identified as the monohydride, thought to form via heterolytic cleavage of
H2, with ethanol acting as a base. The monohydride can also be prepared in 100% benzene if an
equivalent of NEt3 is added. One mole of H 2 is absorbed with respect to Ru and amine
hydrochloride is quantitatively formed. Wilkinson J. Chem. Soc. (A) 1968 3143.
H
H2 (1 eq) PPh3
RuCl2(PPh3) 3 Ph3P Ru(II) + -
Cl +HNEt3
NEt3 (1 eq), benzene RuCl(H)(PPh3)3, highly distorted
PPh3 trigonal bipyramidal. Skapski Chem.
Cl Comm. 1968 1230.
RuCl2(PPh3) 2 cat.
H2 (126 atm), base (1 eq) + fully satuturated
benzene, 40oC, 6h products
O O
Base % Conversion
NEt3 95.4
Et2NH 95.4
BuNH2 86.5
aniline 88.1
Ca2CO3 95.2
Na 2CO3 73.0
none 76.0
Tsuneda Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1973 (46) 279.
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -156- Week of October 15, 2002
Example:
Complexation of dihydrogen to the electrophilic, cationic
Ir(III) center is predominantly σ-donating in nature.
Donation of electron density from the H-H σ-bond to an
+ + empty Ir orbital leaves the H-H with a partial positive
(BF 4) - (BF4) - charge. The pendent NH2 group is thought to act as an
internal base effecting heterolytic cleavage of the acidified
dihydrogen σ-complex via deprotonation.When L = PPh3,
N NH2 N NH3+ the equilibrium lies far to the right and only the dihydride 2
L H δ+ L
is observed. When more basic alkyl phosphines are used
Ir(III) Ir(III) H (L= PBu3) the equilibrium lies to the left with the H2
H complex 1 being observed exclusively by NMR. It was
L L
H hypothesized that moving to a more basic phosphine
H
increases the electron density at the metal center. This
1 2 makes the metal a less effective σ-acceptor and attenuates
its ability to effectively acidify the dihydrogen complex.
Crabtree Chem. Commun. 1999 297.
σ-bond metathesis: the base is effectively one of the ligands on the metal
external amine base may still drive the rxn forward
by forming insoluble amine hydrochloride salts
δ−
Cl HCl
H2
RuCl2(PPh 3)3 δ+ H RuCl(PPh 3)3 RuHCl(PPh3)3
H
σ-bond metathesis
Crabtree The Organometallic Chemistry of the Transition Metals: 3rd Edition; Wiley: New York; 2001.
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -157- Week of October 15, 2002
O
Ph 2
H3CO P O H3CO HO
Ru(II)
NCOCH3 P O NCOCH3
AcO Ph 2 AcO
O O
HO
OAc (R)-1 (0.5-1 mol%) OAc
CO2H O CO2H
Ph 2
P O (S)
(II) The degree of asymmetric induction is significantly
H 3C CH3 Ru H3C CH3
O affected by the H 2 pressure in a substrate specific
P H2 (4 atm): 91% ee manner. The implication of this is that a range of H2
Ph 2
O H2 (101 atm): 50% ee pressures must be screened to achieve optimal
CO2H asymmetric induction on a substrate by substrate basis.
(S)-1 (0.5-1 mol%)
CO2H No trend was observed and no rationale for the
MeOH, H2, 15-30oC emperical observation was given.
(S)
Ph
H2 (4 atm): 48% ee
H2 (112 atm): 92% ee
O
CO 2H Ph 2
P O
Ru (II)
P O
Ph 2 H2 Heterolytic cleavage of H2
O
CO 2H RDS
H+
O O
Ph 2 Ph 2
P O P O
Ru (II) Ru (II) O
P O P O
Ph 2 Ph 2
O H
note: no oxidation
O
Ph 2 state change to the
P O metal
protonolysis Ru (II)
cis-migratory
P O
H+ Ph 2 H insertion
O
Reactions in MeOD Experiment indicates that the hydrogen α to the acid comes from H2 whereas the β-hydrogen
CO2H D H comes from MeOH. Regio- and stereospecific deuterium incorporation indicates that cis-migratory
insertion of the Ru-H is stereospecific as is cleavage of the Ru-C bond via protonolysis. The lack of
(S)-1
D incorporation into the α position indicates that the rate of H/D exchange between the Ru-H and
H2, MeOD H 3C CH3 solvent is slow.
H 3C CH3 H CO2H
Halpern JACS 1991 (113) 589.
M.C. White, Chem 153 Hydrogenation -160- Week of October 15, 2002
O
Ph 2
CH3 P O CH3 CH3 CH3
Ru (II)
O P O O O O
Ph 2
Ph NH O Ph NH Ph NH Ph NH
(S)-1
H O H2 (1 atm), MeOD H H O H H O H D H O
H D
MeO OMe OMe OMe
79:14:2