SE—Social Entrepreneurs.
There is difference in functionality of various players a (Social Entrepreneur, Business, Social Activist, Non-Profit
Foundation, Government) in creating value to the society.
o Social Entrepreneur focuses on Social impact (SROI) they create in the society. Their focus is on creating
sustainable business model with defined social outcome.
o Business – Their focus lies on market demand, Profit, Payback to Shareholder, Distribution of Profit.
o Social Activist – Their focus lies on raising the social issue. They are so absorbed in the problem that they
miss to give solution to the problem.
o Non Profit Foundation – Nonprofit organization ignores the importance of Return on Investment, rather they
believe on creating long term impact on the society.
o Government social objective is to serve people, their primary duty is providing public goods and services in
an equitable manner.
Qualities of Social Entrepreneur-- a) Risk Appetite: SE takes calculated risk, they are not very high risk takers as
perceived by society rather they analyses the system so well that they perceive risk as uncertainty’s)
b) Inner Locus of Control: They don’t take failure as indication of personal inadequacy but as an indication of gap in
their understanding c) Autonomy d) Persistence—To achieve major social impact it needs a force to drive it forward
that requires stubbornness to navigate the idea through the system.
Last Mile Delivery: Most of the initiative does not reach to the last mile. So SE tried to bridge the gap and tries to link
all the unconnected dots to provide sustainable solution to the weakest link in the society.
Social Innovation: Focus on novel solution that is efficient, effective and sustainable.
Driver for Social Change:
o Social Entrepreneurs create public value pursue new opportunities, innovate and adapt and act boldly, leverage
resource but they don’t control the process they just act as a facilitator.
Social Entrepreneur
Driver for
Social Activist
Social change
o Social Entrepreneurs always existed but in the past they were called visionaries, humanitarians, philanthropist
example Florence Nightingale, Gandhi, Martin Luther king.
Decades of Social Oppression to Woman, Dark
skinned people, the disabled, Minority groups
Why Social
like Gay, lesbian and Transgender people
change Inequitable distribution of resources in society
o
o Transition from authoritarian government to democratic government has led to increased extension of various
services like education healthcare, and communications.
Elements of Social Entrepreneurship: SE is often misunderstood as Nonprofit generating organization. In addition to
innovative not-for-profit ventures, social entrepreneurship can include social purpose business ventures, such as for-
profit community development banks, and hybrid organizations. Their focus does not lie on maximizing profit for the
external shareholder, rather on improving human and environmental well-being.
SE acts as a change agent: Social entrepreneurs are reformers and revolutionaries, but with a social mission. They
focus on fundamental changes in the way things are done in the social sector. They pounce upon the underlying causes
of problems, rather than simply treating symptoms. They seek to create systemic changes and sustainable
improvements so that irreversibility is achieved.
Approach to decipher a Social Problem by SE: Function of SE is to reform or revolutionize the pattern of
productions. It is not always necessary to come up with new ideas to solve a social problem rather old tested ideas to
solve a problem with a new source of supply of material or a new outlet of product could also be recognized as SE.
Their innovations may appear in how they structure their core programs or in how they assemble the resources and
fund their work Entrepreneurs tend. It may appear that their approach is uncertain and risky but they know how to
manage risks for themselves and for others.
Role of Markets: Markets are not the correct indicator as measure of performance for social entrepreneurs. In
particular, markets fail to capture the real value of social improvements, public goods and benefits for people who
cannot afford to pay. As a result, it is much harder to determine whether a social entrepreneur is creating sufficient
social value to justify the financial resources used in creating that social value. For instance, it is inherently difficult to
measure social value creation by reducing pollution in a given stream, or by providing companionship to the elderly,
or to provide support disable people, or to provide education to children, or to provide shelter, or to provide warm
cloth in winter to destitute. The calculations are not only hard but also contentious. Even though improvements can be
measured, it is often difficult to monetize or give a currency value to it.
Act in mission mode to create and sustain social value: Social entrepreneur acts in mission mode to solve the social
problems. The mission of social improvement is rarely superseded by private benefits (financial returns or consumption
benefits) for individuals. Making a profit, creating wealth, or serving the desires of customers may be part of the
model, but these are means to a social end, not the end in itself. Neither Profit nor customer satisfaction is the gauge of
value creation rather social impact is the gauge. Social entrepreneurs look for a long-term social return on investment.
Recognizing and relentlessly pursuing new opportunities: Successful SE engage in a process of continuous
innovation, adaptation, and learning. Success lies in persistence combined with a willingness to make adjustments as
one goes. Rather than giving up when an obstacle is encountered, entrepreneurs ask, “How can we surmount this
obstacle? How can we make this work?”. They treat failure of a project as a learning experience, not a personal
tragedy.
Resource Utilization: Quantum of social problems and degree of complexity is huge. SE acts in resource scarce
environments so they have to act wisely to get maximum utilization of the resource.
Risk Management: They take calculated risks and manage the downside, so as to reduce the harm that will result from
failure. They understand the risk tolerances of their stakeholders and use this to spread the risk to those who are better
prepared to accept it.
Identification of Problems: It is very important for SE to correctly identify the needs and values of the people they
intend to serve and the communities in which they operate. In some cases, this requires close connections with those
communities.
Strategic Fit Between Investor Value and Community Needs: Creating a fit between investor values and community
needs is an important part of the challenge, social entrepreneurs create market-like feedback mechanisms to reinforce
this accountability. They assess their progress in terms of social, financial, and managerial outcomes, commonly known
as SROI (Social Return on Investment).
Core Value of SE: It is important to look out for social impact they create by their activity. Finding ways to sustain
organizations that are not cost-effectively delivering social value is a terrible waste of energy and resources. Social
sector leaders should look for creative resource strategies that enhance their impact, rather than simply sustain their
organizations