NO.

DC-17-00183

ORIGIN RELEASING, L.L.C., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT

Plaintiff, g

vs. g DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

HANNOVER HOUSE, INC, g

Defendant. g
116T“ JUDICIAL DISTRICT

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE AND

SUMMARY JUDGIVIENT EVIDENCE

On this day came for consideration Plaintiff’s Objections t0 Defendant’s

Response and Summary Judgment Evidence (the “Objections”). The Court, after

consideration ofthe Objections, pleadings and arguments ofcounsel, orders as follows:

Cite Objection Raised Ruling

p
Para. 1 Plaintiff s objection t0 the Response as evidence is:
“USTAINED2N
Wmu-...w Wwwww-v"!

OVERRULED
Para. 2 Plaintiff s objection t0
not properly pleaded is
Defendant asserting defense

<w SUSTAINED

\4

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S Page 1

RESPONSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE

Para. 4(a) Plaintiffs objection t0 the AffidaVItcontalmfigMSUSTAINED W
statements not within the Affiant’ s personaI~ IIIIIIIIIIII

knowledge 1s OVERRULED

contammg SUSTAINED
/'

Para. 4(b) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit AAAA

'“ ‘ ”‘

conclusory statements is

OVERRULED

Para. 4(c) Plaintifi’sobjectionto the Affidavit failing tolay the SUSTAINED \

proper predicate for a business records affidavit is

OVERRULED

Para. 4(d) Plaintiff“ s objection to the Affidavit contalmgg SUSTAINED \3

“““““““““““““““““““““““““““““
statements that are hearsay ls

OVERRULED

Para. 4(e) Plaintiff s best evidence objection is r VSUSTAINEUJMB

OVERRULED
Ix

Para. 5(a) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit containing SUSTAINED

w /
conclusory statements is

OVERRULED
1‘

Para. S(b) Plaintiff’s obJection t0 the Affidavit contautmg SUSTAINED“

statements that are hearsay Is

OVERRULED
\

Para. 5(0) Plaintiff” s best evidence objection is 2 SUSTAINED ,

OVERRULED

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBIECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S Page 2

RESPONSE SUMlVIARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE
Para. S(d) Plaintiff’s

statements
knowledge
objection t0 the Affidavit containing
not
ls
within the Affiant’ s personal
‘
v
SUSTAINED

OVERRULED
__.‘\

''''
‘

Para. S(e) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit contalmn’g §USTAINED

irrelevant statements 1s
OVERRULED

Para. 6(a) Plaintiff’s objection to the Affidavit containingL’é/SUSTAINED‘”I A

W ‘ ‘ ’
"

conclusory statements is

OVERRULED

Para. 6(b) Plaintiff’s objection to the Affidavit contammg SUSTAINED

”" "‘
irrelevant statements 1s
OVERRULED
//-
‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘
w\
objection to the Affidavit contaimug“ SUSTAINED
Para. 7(a) Plaintiff’s

conclusory statements is
'~—‘---—-— mW """"""""""""""
W
4/;

OVERRULED

Para. 7(b) Plaintiff s objection t0 the Affidavit contai11111g SUSTAINED

statements that are hearsay ls

OVERRULED
......

\
Para. 7(0) Plaintiff’s best evidence objection is a 11111
SUSTAINED /

OVERRULED

Para. 7(d) Plaintiff’s objection to the Affidavit containihgfly SUSTAINED a

~

statements not within the Affiant’s personal

knowledge is OVERRULED

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S Page 3

RESPONSE SUMIVIARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE

Para. 7(6) Plaintiff’s objection to the Affidavit containfi SUSTAINED
wwwwwwwwwwwww
irrelevant statements is
OVERRULED

Para. 8 (a) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit contalmng SUSTAINE/Dy

irrelevant statements is
OVERRULED

Para. 8 (b) Plaintiff‘s objection to the Affidavit containmg SUSTAIIiE/D/J

(W """"""""""""""""""""""

conclusory statements is

OVERRULED

Para. 8 (c) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affiant attempting tg'F’SNUSIéI/EEDM)

Mwwwww
testify as an expelt is

OVERRULED

”
Para. 9(a) Plaintiff’ s best evidence objection is
\
SUSTAINED

OVERRULED

Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit containi& SUSTAINED /’

Para. 9(b)
""""""""""""
conclusory statements is

OVERRULED

Para. 10(a) Plaintiff’s best evidence objection is QSLJWSW /

OVERRULED
1

Para. 10(b) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit containing SUSTAINE

statements not within the Affiant s personal
knowledge 1s OVERRULED

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S Page 4

RESPONSE SUMNIARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE
Para. 10(0) Plaintiff‘s objection t0 the Affidavit contalnmg SUSTAINED
"""""""""""

statements that are hearsay 1s

OVERRULED

Plaintiff‘s objection t0 the Affidavit containingngUSTAINED

Para. 10(d)
conclusory statements is
NM'MMM :
OVERRULED

Para. 10(6) Plaintiffs objection t0 the Affiant attempting to 'V‘SUSTAINED M

testify as an expert is

OVERRULED

/
Para. 11(a) Plaintiff’s

statements that are hearsay is

L
objection t0 the Affidavit c0ntaini11g*""§bSTAINED

OVERRULED

Para. 11(b) Plaintiff’s best evidence objection is \SUSTAINEDX /

OVERRULED

Para. 12(a) Plaintiff’s objection t0 the Affidavit containing SUST’XINEQ/Q

statements not within the Affiant’s perschi‘w/
knowledge is OVERRULED

kw
V
Para. 12(b) Plaintiff” s objection t0 the Affidavit containing"MéUSEAINEQfl/
statements that are hearsay is

OVERRULED

/‘
Para. 12(0) Plaintiff‘s best evidence objection is
K SUSTAINED
OVERRULED

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBIECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S Page 5

RESPONSE SUMMARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent any other Objection is

sustained, the document and/or paragraph specified shall not constitute competent

summary judgment evidence upon which the Court may rely t0 grant 0r deny summary

judgment.

flfS’K ink
SIGNEDthis 2 day oflufléczms.

UDGE PRESIDING

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S Page 6

RESPONSE SUMlVIARY JUDGMENT EVIDENCE