The target population was textile, Electronics, Automobiles and steel mills from all the major cities of
Pakistan. A questionnaire was given to each organization included in the sample to be filled by one
respondent from each organization’s production department or procurement department.
The sampling frame was consisted of 300 firms of textile, electronics, automobiles and steel mills in
Pakistan.
The study used stratified random sampling. The target population was divided into strata. The strata are
necessary because the target population is heterogeneous in nature. The strata consisted of rolling mills,
food and beverage firms and textile manufacturing firms. Respondents were randomly selected from the
three strata and each respondent selected was issued with a questionnaire. Stratified random technique
was chosen because it gives each member of the population an equal chance of being selected and it thus
reduces biasness in the selection of cases to be included in the sample. Since the units selected for inclusion
within the sample are chosen using probabilistic methods, stratified random sampling allows us to make
statistical conclusions from the data collected that will be considered to be valid.
A Sample size of 90 manufacturing was used. The sample size was computed using Nassiuma Formula;
Where n is the sample size, N is the population, C is the coefficient of variation (0.4) and e is the margin of
error (0.05). A confidence level of 95% was used.
Manufacturing organizations Population Sample size
Textile mills 210 60
Steel mills 36 13
Automobile industry 20 11
Electronics industry 24 6
Total 300 90
4. ANALYSIS
4.1 Inventory Management Techniques
Respondents were asked to indicate the inventory management technique used in their organization.
Inventory Management Technique Frequency Percentage%
Economic Order Quantity 30 41.09%
Action Level Methods 12 16.43%
Just-in-Time 21 28.76%
Periodic Review Technique 10 13.69%
Total 73 100%
4.2 Inventory management techniques and their contribution to the performance of production department
Respondents were asked to rate inventory management techniques based on their contribution to the performance of
the production department.
8.21% rated economic order quantity as poor, 9.58% rated it as fair, 12.32 % rated it as good, and 52.05% rated it as
very good while 17.8% rated it as excellence. It is evident that most respondents rated economic order quantity as
very good.
15.06% rated economic order quantity as poor, 36.98% rated it as fair, 8.21 % rated it as good, and 21.91% rated it
as very good while 17.80% rated it as excellence. It is evident that most respondents rated economic order quantity
as fair.
4.2.3 Just-in-Time:
6.84% rated economic order quantity as poor, 8.21% rated it as fair, 13.69 % rated it as good, and 24.65%
rated it as very good while 46.57% rated it as excellence. It is evident that most respondents rated economic
order quantity as excellent.
4.2.4 Periodic Review Technique:
53.42% rated economic order quantity as poor, 13.69% rated it as fair, 15.06% rated it as good, and
10.95% rated it as very good while 6.84% rated it as excellence. It is evident that most respondents rated
economic order quantity as poor.
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent
Economic Order Quantity Action Level Method Just-in-Time Periodic Review Technique
50
40
30
20
10
0
Over production Under Extensive lead Stock out Mismanagement Low level of Too much
production time situation of inventory Safety Stock distressed stock
records
50
40
30
20
10
0
Skills of employees Lack of MRP Documentation Research & Budget
Development
According to Esther [7], some of the manufacturing organizations do not obey firmly the inventory policy in their
organization. Thus, the organizations fail and some of them do not maintain minimum and maximum stock because
they face financial problem.
Conclusion:
The study states that a state of the art inventory management system is the dire need of the manufacturing
organization of the third world countries like Pakistan to enhance the production as well as to tackle all the problems
associated with the industries regarding inventory management.
Moreover, for the manufacturing industries working at national level, in order to enhance their capabilities at global
level it is important to shift on a modern inventory management techniques than on the traditional approaches. It will
serve the labor and the overall finances.
REFERENCES:
[1] Goldsby, T., & Martichenko, R. (2005). Lean Six Sigma Logistics: Strategic Development to
Operational Success. Boca Raton: J. Ross Publishing, Inc. Government of Kenya, Sugar Act 2001.
[2] Cecil Bozarth and Robert Handfield, (2006). Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management,
Prentice-
[3] Chou, Y., Lu, C. and Tang, Y. 2012. Identifying inventory problems in the aerospace industry using the
theory of constraints. International journal of production research, 50(16): 4686-4688.
[4] Waters, D. (2008). Quantitative Methods for Business, 4th Edition, Prentice Hall, England.
[7] Esther, U. U. (2012). Effectiveness of Inventory Management in a Manufacturing Company. Thesis,
Caritas University, Amorji-Nike, Department of Accountancy.
[22] Munyao, R. M., Omulo, V. O., Mwithiga, M. W., & Chepkulei, B. (2015). Role of Inventory
Managemetn Practices on Performance of Production Department: A Case of Manufacturing Firms.
International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 1625-1656.
[23] Nzuza, Z. W. (2015). Factors affecting the success of inventory control in the stores division of the
eThekwini Municipality, Durban: A case study. Master Thesis, Durban University of Technology.
[25] Jessop, D., & Morrison, A. (1994). Storage and Supply of Materials: Inbound Logistics for
Commerce,Industry and Publicundertakings. Financial Times; Prentice Hall.
[26] Kok, A. G., & Shang, K. H. (2014). Evaluation of Cycle-count Policies for Supply Chains with
Inventory Inaccuracy and Implications for RFID Investments. European Journal of Operational Research,
237(1), 91-105.