Admixtures &
Cementitious
Materials
31 Racing Towards a
Green Future
Repair and
strengthen all
in one shot.
The new PERI ACS Core 400 Climbing System makes forming concrete
cores on high-rise buildings faster, safer and more efficient than ever
before. The new heavy duty hydraulics lift the entire platform, placing
boom, formwork and suspended external platforms to the next level in
only 20 minutes. Reduced assembly times result in labor savings and
increased safety.
Formwork
Visit us at World of Concrete booth O30944 Scaffolding
Engineering
www.peri-usa.com
Ci
JANUARY 2018 V. 40 No. 1
Concrete
international
The Magazine of the Concrete Community
ALSO FEATURING
39
www.concreteinternational.com | Ci | JANUARY 2018 3
January
Ci
Concrete international
PUBLISHER
John C. Glumb, CAE
( john.glumb@concrete.org) 54
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Rex C. Donahey, PE
(rex.donahey@concrete.org) departments
ENGINEERING EDITOR 7 President’s Memo
W. Agata Pyc
(agata.pyc@concrete.org)
9 News
14 Knowledge to Practice:
MANAGING EDITOR ACI Foundation
Keith A. Tosolt
(keith.tosolt@concrete.org) 16 ACI Committee Document
Abstracts
EDITORIAL COORDINATOR
Lacey J. Stachel
18 On the Move
(lacey.stachel@concrete.org) 20 Chapter Reports
The 2017 Great Northern Concrete 51 Products & Practice
ADVERTISING
Toboggan Race is the wintertime
Meredith Schwartz 54 Product Showcase
Network Media Partners equivalent of the ASCE National
(mschwartz@networkmediapartners.com) Concrete Canoe Competition. The 56 Industry Focus
team from Queen’s University used a
self-consolidating magnesium silicate 57 Calls for Papers
PUBLISHING SERVICES
concrete mixture to produce the
MANAGER 58 Sinopsis en español
runners for their winning toboggan.
Barry M. Bergin For more details, see the article starting 59 Public Discussion
on p. 31.
EDITORS 60 Meetings
Carl R. Bischof, Kaitlyn J. Dobberteen, 61 Membership Application
Tiesha Elam, Angela R. Matthews,
Kelli R. Slayden 62 Advertisers’ Index
62 Bulletin Board
GRAPHIC DESIGNERS
Susan K. Esper, Ryan M. Jay, 62 What’s New from ACI
Gail L. Tatum
Copyright © 2018 American Concrete Institute. Printed in the United States of America. All correspondence should be directed to the
headquarters office: 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331. Telephone: +1.248.848.3700. Facsimile (FAX): +1.248.848.3701.
Concrete International (US ISSN 0162-4075) is published monthly by the American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive,
Farmington Hills, MI 48331. Periodicals postage paid at Farmington, MI, and at additional mailing offices. Concrete
International has title registration ® with the U.S. Patent Trademark Office. Subscription rates: $172 per year (U.S. and
possessions); $181 (elsewhere) payable in advance: single copy price is $27.00 plus shipping, prepaid. POSTMASTER: send ad-
dress changes to Concrete International, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331. The Institute is not responsible
for the statements or opinions expressed in its publications. Institute publications are not able to, nor intended to supplant
individual training, responsibility, or judgment of the user, or the supplier, of the information presented. Permission is granted by
the American Concrete Institute for libraries and other users registered with the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) to photocopy
any article herein for the fee of $3.00 per transaction. Payments marked ISSN 0162-4075/97 should be sent directly to the Copyright
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE Clearance Center, 21 Congress St., Salem, MA. 01970. Copying done for other than personal or internal reference use without the
express permission of the American Concrete Institute is prohibited. Requests for special permission or bulk copying should be
http://www.concrete.org addressed to the Publisher, Concrete International, American Concrete Institute. Canadian GST #126213149RT
Tel. +1.248.848.3700
Fax. +1.248.848.3150
E
William E. Rushing Jr. H.R. Trey Hamilton Antonio Nanni
ach month, Keith Tosolt and Sharon L. Wood R. Doug Hooton Roberto Stark
Lacey Stachel post layouts from Michael J. Schneider Joe Hug
the upcoming issue of CI on a
bulletin board in the hallway outside my
office. We use the postings for quick Vice Presidents Executive Vice President
assessments of details, including David A. Lange Randall W. Poston Ronald Burg
pagination or inappropriate
juxtapositions of ads and editorial
content. Keith also will post the initial Technical Activities Educational Activities Certification Programs
Committee Committee Committee
cover design, as it gives us (CI staff chair chair chair
members) an opportunity to review the H.R. Trey Hamilton Frances T. Griffith Joe Hug
design for conflicts with the address secretary staff liaison staff liaison
label, masthead, or ACI logo. Matthew R. Senecal Kathryn A. Amelio John W. Nehasil
This month’s cover photo was Michael C. Brown Diana Arboleda Bryan Castles
selected because it directly tied to one of JoAnn P. Browning Arturo Gaytan Covarrubias William Ciggelakis
our feature articles and because it’s so Catherine E. French Thomas M. Greene Brian Green
dynamic. And probably because of that Harry A. Gleich Joe Hug Werner Hellmer
Fred R. Goodwin Anthony Lamanna Augusto H. Holmberg
dynamism, the cover garnered more than Larry Kahn Ronald L. O’Kane Steve Lloyd
a few comments from other ACI staff Neven Krstulovic-Opara Jackie Sempel Warren E. McPherson Jr.
members. One comment stood out: I was Kimberly E. Kurtis Scott Tarr Christopher Robinson
asked why we would feature a photo of a Tracy D. Marcotte Ronald Vaughn Thomas L. Rozsits
Michael S. Stenko Xiomara Sapon
snowmobile. At first glance, I agree that Bruce A. Suprenant David M. Suchorski
the photo does show what appears to be Andrew W. Taylor Wayne M. Wilson
a machine blasting through a snowbank.
On closer inspection, however, five
helmets are visible—that’s no
snowmobile—it’s a fast-moving
toboggan. While we can’t be sure if the
passengers were feeling glee or fear ACI Staff & Departments
(perhaps both) when the camera shutter Executive Vice President: Ronald Burg (ron.burg@concrete.org)
opened, we can be certain they were Senior Managing Director: John C. Glumb (john.glumb@concrete.org)
feeling pride and joy when they finished ACI Foundation: Human Resources:
the construction of the toboggan—those ann.daugherty@acifoundation.org lori.purdom@concrete.org
feelings are clearly communicated by the Certification: Information Systems:
article starting on p. 31. aci.certification@concrete.org support@concrete.org
We can also be certain that members Chapter Activities: Marketing:
of the Central Texas Chapter – ACI john.conn@concrete.org kevin.mlutkowski@concrete.org
shared feelings of pride and joy when Engineering: Member/Customer Services:
they held their first certification exam in techinq@concrete.org acimemberservices@concrete.org
their new headquarters building in Event Services: Professional Development:
Pflugerville, TX—those feelings are conventions@concrete.org claire.hiltz@concrete.org
communicated by the chapter’s report Finance and Administration: Publishing Services:
starting on p. 20. donna.halstead@concrete.org barry.bergin@concrete.org
Speaking for the many staff members
who helped assemble this month’s issue,
we’re proud to share those and other
accomplishments with you, our dear Sustaining Members
readers. Those feelings are See pages 12-13 for a list of ACI’s Sustaining Members.
communicated on this and every page of To learn more about our sustaining members, visit the ACI website at
the magazine. Welcome to 2018! www.concrete.org/membership/sustainingmembers.aspx.
Rex C. Donahey
Electron Microscope Images are the property and copyright of Xypex Chemical Corporation.
Master Builders Solutions is a registered trademark of BASF. © 2017 BASF Corporation. All rights reserved.
News
ACI Expands Mission to Focus on Global The Concrete Essentials Seminar Series will take place
Standards Adoption during the inaugural Big 5 Heavy show. Big 5 Heavy is
ACI’s mission has been expanded to reflect its proactive organized in five different sections: concrete, PMV Live,
approach to advocating the global adoption of ACI standards. roadworks, mining, and building materials manufacturing.
ACI has long focused its efforts on knowledge This show will be the only dedicated platform for
development and dissemination. Through this expanded professionals involved in large- and small-scale construction
mission, the Institute will now dedicate additional resources and demolition projects in the Middle East that require heavy
and effort to also advance the adoption of its consensus-based machinery, equipment, and concrete.
knowledge. The Institute’s expanded mission statement now Partnering with The Big 5 Heavy is one of the ways ACI is
reads: “ACI develops, disseminates, and advances the adoption establishing stronger relationships with organizations
of consensus-based knowledge on concrete and its uses.” internationally. ACI maintains its relationship with the
“The change to ACI’s mission reflects a transformational international concrete community through participation in
change to an active role in advancing the adoption of its international events, collaboration with its active and
concrete knowledge,” stated Ronald G. Burg, ACI Executive influential International Chapters and International Partners,
Vice President, American Concrete Institute. “While our and its Ambassador Speaker Program.
member experts will continue to use our consensus-based For more information on how to participate in the
process to develop standards based on new research, global Concrete Essentials Seminar Series and The Big 5 Heavy,
best practices, and innovative technologies, we are building a visit www.thebig5heavy.com.
new infrastructure that will increase global adoption of this
state-of-the art information.”
Recent efforts include partnering with the Saudi Arabia-
based Gulf Cooperation Council Standardization Organization
to develop a Gulf Building Code based on ACI’s Building
Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318).
Similarly, ACI has been working with officials from Vietnam
to translate ACI 318 and other documents for use in the
country. The Institute also continues to work with the
International Code Council to ensure that concrete design and
concrete repair provisions are adequately referenced in the
International Building Code and International Existing
Building Code. Domestically, ACI continues its work with state
and local jurisdictions to reference the Institute’s standards.
Correct Elevation
that time, she received the 2015 ACI
Young Member Award for Professional
Achievement. She was awarded “for
contributions to the design and use of
concrete in bridges, serving as a liaison
with concrete industry institutes, and
for her service on ACI technical
committees.” video: www.HRC-USA.com/HRC670
Kleinhans has 15 years of experience HRC 670 HeadLock™ can quickly solve the problem!
in structural engineering and bridge Eliminate standard hooks, field trim and snap on a
design. She began her career at Modjeski
and Masters, Inc., and she has held
HeadLock™ in seconds.
positions at National Steel Bridge
Alliance (NSBA) and CTLGroup. She Field Install T-Heads
received her bachelor’s degree in civil
engineering from the University of As Simple As:
Alaska-Fairbanks, and her master’s degree
and PhD in civil engineering from the
University of Missouri-Rolla. Kleinhans
is a licensed professional engineer.
1 - 2 - 3
Errata
In the article “Uncoupling Modulus
of Elasticity and Strength,” November
2017 issue, page 37, a clarification has
been added as follows:
•• “For example, the high compressive No Special Equipment Needed
strength specified for some elements Cut bar to Push HeadLock™ Torque bolt
in the Trump Tower was needed to desired onto bar until it until head
ensure that the MOE was about elevation bottoms out breaks off
6,200,000 psi (43 GPa)—far greater (1) (2) (3)
than the 4,000,000 psi (28 GPa)
value that is now routinely possible
with conventional mixtures.” HeadLock™ develops ultimate tensile
In the article “Evolution of ACI 562 strength and exceeds head bearing area
Code − Part 3,” April 2016 issue, the required by ACI 318 / ASTM A970 Class HA.
following corrections have been made:
•• On page 64 in equation R4.5.2a, Uo IAPMO-ES ER-177
®
should be Uc; and
•• On page 68 in Table 2, the Baseline σ www.hrc-usa.com
at β = 3.0 (col.) for the D/L of 8 1-800-HRC-6775 HEADED REINFORCEMENT CORP.
(row) should be 0.073 and not 0.73. Made in
the USA
The online archived versions of these WOC Booth # N2922
articles have been updated.
To learn more about our sustaining members, visit our website at www.concrete.org/sustainingmembers
Barrier One, Inc., “An Affiliate of Ductilcrete is now part of gcp Lithko Contracting, LLC, is one of
Concrete Moisture Solutions, Inc.”, applied technologies. the largest full-service concrete
have created, through its new laboratory contracting companies with a unique
and production facility in Winter Garden, local service model designed to keep
Florida, a complex, revolutionary, TIRED OF SUFFERING WITH co-workers close to home and support
advanced formula modification, career growth. Strong teams are built
CURLED JOINTS IN YOUR SLAB?
non-sodium silicate based Porosity to create exceptional customer service
Inhibiting Admixture (PIA) that in each of their towns which include:
produces a high strength, closed pore
structure concrete via the creation of OUR CLIENTS HAVE OVER
•• Preconstruction
(value add design assist)
an abundant quantity of Calcium 130 MILLION SQUARE FEET •• Foundations
Silicate Hydrate (C-S-H), through our OF DUCTILCRETE IN PLACE •• Slabs
Concrete Enhancement Technology THAT HAVE ELIMINATED •• Tilt Walls
(CET) process for all structural •• Structural
concrete uses to include, but not
ALMOST 2,000 MILES!!!
•• Super flat floors
limited to; roof decks, salt/marine
environments, interior and exterior
OF PROBLEM JOINTS.
•• Site Work
Lithko has grown from 1 location
slabs, roads, bridges, infrastructure in 1992 to 15+ locations. These
projects, structural retaining walls, SO WHAT HAS YOUR SLAB DESIGN “BURGs” (Business Unit Running
parking garages, tiltwall and high DONE FOR YOU LATELY??? Great) are strategically located
strength post tensioned slabs. throughout the United States, which
Barrier One Admixture promises to provides a solid footprint to service a
elevate concrete to an innovative, never large portion of the country. This
economically achieved position. The 650 E. ALGONQUIN ROAD SUITE 404 BURG model allows Lithko to
Barrier One Porosity Inhibiting SCHAUMBURG, IL 60173 224-828-5986 maintain strong local customer and
Admixture (PIA) System was developed CC@DUCTILCRETE.COM supplier relationships and provides
and continues its research and develop- WWW.DUCTILCRETE.COM significant career opportunities for
ment by individuals with decades of their co-workers.
experience in the floor covering Lithko’s comprehensive, in-depth
industry, a PhD Chemist, an architect, planning and highly precise execution
concrete chemistry experts, mix design make their local teams ideal partners
experts and is specifically designed to to deliver on customer expectations.
solve the annual, multi-billion-dollar
problem of new concrete slabs failing For more information about
to meet the flooring and roofing Lithko, visit their website at
industry mandated moisture vapor www.lithko.com.
emission guidelines that do not provide
associated warranties for moisture.
BOI Admix is the cubic yard
solution to a square foot problem.
Learning Resource
www.ACIUniversity.com
ACI
CHAPTER LEADER
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2018
6:00 PM – 9:00 PM
NETWORKING EVENT GORDON BIERSCH RESTAURANT
3987 PARADISE ROAD
COST: FREE RSVP: TOSHA.HOLDEN@CONCRETE.ORG LAS VEGAS, NV, USA
Unlimited attendance
Abstract: This guide provides a protocol for the exchange
of data related to reinforcing steel between software with no travel costs
applications. This guide presents a human-readable list of
reinforcing steel entities, attributes, property sets, and
relationships, with sufficient specificity so that the format and Attendees earn continuing
syntax for machine-readable exchanges based on Industry
Foundation Classes (IFC) can be employed, enhanced, or
education credits
developed. This specific set of exchange requirements is
referred to as a model view definition (MVD). Material and Organizational and
geometric attributes, property sets, and relationships, both
required and optional, that address the majority of reinforced
concrete applications for buildings and nonbuilding structures
$ sustaining members
receive a seminar discount
are presented. This guide is intended to be used by building
information modeling (BIM) software developers to assist in
the development of consistent and accurate exchanges of
reinforcing steel information between applications.
“As long as a product has an ICC-ES Evaluation Report, we’ll accept it.”
Alan Napoli, C.B.O.
Building Official - City of Gladstone, MO
1-800-423-6587 ICC ¨
www.icc-es.org | es@icc-es.org
17-14800
Chapter
Reports
Central Texas Chapter – ACI Opens steps that the Illinois Chapter took to establish its building.
Certification Building With that information, the Central Texas Chapter – ACI
The Central Texas Chapter – ACI now has a dedicated Board decided on a budget and gave approval to establish a
headquarters building in Pflugerville, TX. “This has been a building location. A leasing agent was retained, and a location
long time coming for us, something that we have wanted to do was chosen after numerous meetings and site visits.
for many, many years,” said Bryan Angelo, Central Texas
Chapter – ACI Treasurer. “We had a desire to have a single
location for all testing and certifications, as in the past, we had
more than six testing locations per year, with the written and
performance portions of the examinations taking place at
different locations on the same day. As one can imagine, this
caused mass confusion and delays on exam day,” he said.
Each year, the chapter typically had four scheduled
Concrete Field Testing Technician – Grade I (FGI) exams in
the Austin area and four more exams in the Fort Hood/Killeen
area. When the written and performance portions were held at
separate locations, the chapter would rent a meeting space at a
local hotel for the written portion and hold the performance
portion at either a concrete plant or a testing laboratory. When
the written and performance exams were held at the same
location (for example, a concrete plant), tables and chairs
were rented the day before the exam and returned immediately
after the exam to avoid extra rental charges.
The journey to a new building began in June 2016, when a
proposal was brought to the Central Texas Chapter – ACI
Board of Directors. The Board approved the idea, and it was
decided that a location near Austin, TX, would be convenient
to all areas that the chapter services. Angelo reached out to
John Conn, ACI Director of Chapter Activities, to discuss
options. Conn recommended contacting Pete Stamatopoulos,
Director, Illinois Chapter – ACI, because that chapter was
the only one known to have its own building. Angelo and
Stamatopoulos then had a lengthy conversation regarding the
The chosen structure was still under construction when it ACI President Awad visits University of Miami
was leased, and this allowed the Chapter to modify the On November 1, 2017, ACI President Khaled Awad visited
building layout to match their needs. In addition to a lobby, the University of Miami (UM) as part of the inaugural events
restrooms, and a kitchen, the building comprises a 625 ft2 organized by the newly funded UM Student Chapter – ACI in
(58 m2) classroom that can accommodate up to 40 examinees, Miami, FL. Awad met with ACI student leaders to share his
a 145 ft2 office that contains the Chapter’s library and records, insights on the future of the Institute and the role that young
a 250 ft2 (23 m2) temperature-controlled laboratory area for engineers can play in the concrete construction industry. More
the Concrete Strength Testing Technician (Strength) and importantly, he listened to student’s thoughts on how ACI can
Aggregate Testing Technician (Aggregate) performance better engage students and young professionals.
exams, and a 1500 ft2 (140 m2) warehouse area for the FGI Awad met with J.P. Bardet, Dean of the College of
and Adhesive Anchor performance exams. Engineering, and visited the recently inaugurated Collaborative
The Chapter moved into its new headquarters on July 1, Laboratory and the Structure and Materials Laboratory.
2017, and has already successfully administered four FGI Following lunch with students, faculty, and South Florida
exams, one Strength exam, and one Aggregate exam. Chapter – ACI Board members, Awad led an interactive
“The experience has been very delightful. We appreciate presentation on how ACI can support the professional
the help from John and Pete. Their input weighed heavily on development of students, followed by a summary of advances in
the decisions that we made,” said Amanda Angelo, Central the concrete industry as learned from the Jeddah Tower project.
Texas Chapter – ACI President. “We feel that this move is a President Awad started his presentation by sharing how he
step in the direction that a lot of chapters should take. It first came across ACI and how he feels about ACI: “People
reduces the dependence on sponsoring companies, while still say they love ACI. What do they mean by that? They can’t go on
giving those companies opportunities to help the chapter. We a date with ACI! Well I love ACI because it makes me a better
feel that this move sets us apart from other organizations in person.” He also shared some of his observations on recent
the area and gives a single place for people to go,” she breakthroughs in the concrete industry, concluding: “concrete
concluded. The Central Texas Chapter – ACI thanks Martin is a versatile material, you can do anything with it today…”
Burgess with Austin Office Space, Inc., for his assistance in
helping make this dream a reality. CESA.UET Student Chapter – ACI Establishes
An Open House was held October 27, 2017. Conn presented Student Internship Program
the Chapter with a letter from ACI President Khaled Awad The CESA.UET Student Chapter – ACI at the UET Lahore
acknowledging the Chapter’s efforts. If any other Chapter is Narowal Campus is the second ACI student chapter in
interested in pursuing this step, the Central Texas Chapter – ACI Pakistan. The Chapter organized a student internship program
will be more than happy to discuss the process. during the summer of 2017, with an objective of providing
ACI President Khaled Awad visited the University of Miami Student Chapter – ACI
students with field knowledge during Pakistan to create internship effort, already providing internship
their studies. To meet this goal, the opportunities for students. The DG positions for university students at its
CESA.UET Student Chapter – ACI is Khan Cement Factory in Chakwal, organization.
building links with the industry in Punjab, Pakistan, is a leader in this The internship program is an
outstanding achievement by the student
chapter, as the program was begun just a
few months after the chapter’s
ACI Multi-User/
inauguration. The program demonstrates
that the Chapter is committed to
increasing these opportunities for
Multi-Site Solutions
students in civil engineering and other
departments within the university.
Interns from the CESA.UET Student Chapter – ACI at DG Hasan Al-Nawadi and Surendra Manjrekar discussed chapter activities at the
Khan Cement Factory International Forum during the ACI Convention – Fall 2017
Activities of India Chapter – ACI Presented at more than 20 professional institutions internationally, and
International Forum ACI 2018-2019 President David Lange and Executive Vice
ACI Honorary Member Surendra Manjrekar presented President Ron Burg have committed to attend.
“Widespread Activities of India Chapter” at the International
Forum held during the ACI Convention in Anaheim, CA. He
noted that the India Chapter – ACI is strongly supporting ACI
Ci
President Khaled Awad’s objectives, one of them being to
increase “student participation in ACI through the expansion
of ACI Student Competitions beyond U.S. borders.” In recent
Read
months, the India Chapter has established four student
chapters located in the states of Gujarat, Maharashtra, and
Tamil Nadu, with approximately 100 students registered as
ACI student members. Soon after their inception, the student
Online
cover-to-cover
chapters established four centers to conduct an intercollegiate
concrete cube competition. More than 125 entries were
received from colleges in various states. These student
chapters also conducted essay competitions. These activities A flip-book version of the entire current issue
were mentored through the guidance of the India Chapter – of CI is available to ACI members by logging
ACI. The award ceremony for both competitions took place in at www.concreteinternational.com.
November 24, 2017, in Mumbai, with ACI President Awad
in attendance. Click “view the flipbook” on the magazine’s
The India Chapter – ACI organized an international home page.
conference on November 24-25, 2017 on “Repair,
Retrofitting, and Forensic Engineering of Built Structures,”
and ACI President Awad presented the conference keynote
presentation.
The ongoing R.N. Raikar Memorial International Conferences
have become popular internationally as landmark events.
Along with the third Gettu-Kodur Symposium, the next
conference will be held December 2018. It is expected the
program will feature over 200 papers coming from 50+
countries. So far, more than 90 expressions of interest to submit
papers have been received from international experts. As with
the past events, this conference will be connected with many
international journals. This conference will be supported by
NEW
ICC-ES Evaluation Re
port
ESR-2854
T
he Concrete Society Awards for Excellence in Concrete incorporating the longest composite deck span. Its 210 m (689
were presented on November 16, 2017, at the ft) high towers comprise more than 165,000 m3 (215,800 yd3)
Grosvenor Hotel, Park Lane, London, UK. The judging of reinforced concrete. Construction included a 24-hour
panel comprised representatives from The Concrete Society, continuous underwater concrete placement of 17,000 m3
the Institution of Structural Engineers, the Institution of Civil (22,200 yd3) in the south tower caisson. Durability was a key
Engineers, and the Royal Institute of British Architects feature for the exposed concrete, the splash zones of the
(RIBA). towers, and the general marine exposure conditions.
For more information, visit www.concrete-awards.org. Care was taken to ensure that the design, materials,
uk/winners2017.asp. The 2017 Concrete Society Awards and construction methods resulted in a structure that
winners included: complements the visual surroundings, particularly the
older Forth crossing structures.
2017 Winner Nominated by Forth Crossing Bridge Constructors (FCBC).
The Queensferry Crossing, Forth Replacement Project credits: Transport Scotland, Owner; FCBC,
Crossing Principal Contract, Rosyth, Scotland Principal Contractor; Forth Crossing Design JV, Contractor’s
The Queensferry Crossing, Forth Replacement Crossing, is Designer; Jacobs Arup JV, Client’s Advisor; and Cleveland
the world’s longest three-tower cable-stayed bridge, Bridge Engineering, Specialist Subcontractor.
www.ACIUniversity.com
www.concreteinternational.com | Ci | JANUARY 2018 27
Milford-on-Sea Beach Huts, Hampshire, England extension mimics the strong vertical lines using precast fins,
Concrete was used to replace 119 storm-ravaged timber breaking up the glass cladding. The reconfigured atrium and
beach huts in an exposed coastal location. Designing with entrance brings architectural balance, combining old and new.
inverted standard “C” culvert units allowed for significant Nominated by Penoyre & Prasad.
enhancements to the traditional seafront beach hut, as the Project credits: University of Kent, Owner; Penoyre & Prasad,
units provide a rooftop promenade and have graphic printed Architect and Lead Designer; Price and Myers, Structural
concrete and intricate relief artwork surfaces. These modern Engineer; Rider Levett Bucknall, Project Manager; Decomo,
beach huts are also designed to withstand a 1-in-200-year Precast Supplier; and AD Bly, Concrete Frame Subcontractor.
storm. The brush-finished, site-cast walkways were well
executed with crisp even lines, and there was no visual V&A Museum of Design, Dundee, Scotland
damage to the precast from lifting and installation. This concrete landmark is structured to resemble a section of
Nominated by New Forest District Council. Scottish cliffs and a ship by the bank of the River Tay. The
Project credits: New Forest District Council, Owner; Snug construction logistics included creating demanding curves and
Architects, Architect; Ramboll, Structural Engineer; Knights overhanging walls of varying thickness. The key challenges
Brown, Main Contractor; Moore Concrete, Precast Supplier; included a special concrete mixture design, complex building
and Graphic Concrete and Reckli, Specialist Subcontractors. geometry, and accuracy in setting out the temporary works. The
whole building had to support heavy precast elements hung on all
The Templeman Library, University of Kent, surfaces of the finished structure. This is the first building as part of
Canterbury, England, the riverbank development and unlike any of the older buildings.
The design for the library unifies the new extension and The intent is for it to be different rather than harmoniously
refurbishment of the existing Brutalist building to create a flexible blending into the locality.
working space with abundant natural light. The existing building Nominated by Carey Group.
was constructed in phases over the past 50 years, and it included Project credits: Dundee City Council, Owner; Kengo
massive brick piers as well as some exposed board-marked Kuma & Associates, Architect; Arup, Structural Engineer;
finishes. A collaborative design process enabled optimization of BAM, Main Contractor; Bjourn Bigley and Carey Group,
materials and a rapid construction process to showcase the honest Specialist Subcontractors; Breedon Group, Concrete Supplier;
nature of an exposed in-place concrete interior and an aesthetically Turner & Townsend, Project Manager; Alan White Design,
refined precast façade of the new extension. Externally, the Temporary Work Design; and Peri, Formwork.
by Allan Scott, Jacob Carlos, Jon Remacka, Stephanie Paitich, and Neil Hoult
T
here is increasing concern about the impact of Great Northern Concrete Toboggan Race
humankind’s activities on the environment. Within the The GNCTR is a competition among engineering students
concrete industry, major efforts are being focused on from colleges and universities across Canada and the United
reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through the States. The event started in 19756 and is Canada’s frozen
development of alternative cementitious binders, including equivalent of the American Society of Civil Engineers
those that use magnesia (MgO) as one of the primary reactive (ASCE) National Concrete Canoe Competition. In 2017, the
components. Magnesia is generally produced either from event was held in Winnipeg, MB, with 21 teams, including
seawater1 or more commonly from the calcination of one from the United States, competing for awards. In addition
magnesite (MgCO3).2 Compared to the production of portland to striving to be overall champion, teams competed in
cement, the calcination of magnesite to produce reactive categories such as most sustainable, best concrete mixture
magnesia occurs at lower temperatures and uses less energy, design, and fastest toboggan.
resulting in lower overall emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2). The objective of the competition is to build a toboggan that
Different magnesia-based cements include magnesium weighs no more than 159 kg (350 lb) and can accommodate
phosphate cements, magnesium oxychloride (Sorel) cements, five riders. The technical requirements for the toboggan
magnesium oxysulfate cements, and magnesium silicate include a braking and steering system, protection against
hydrate cements, each with various advantages and rollover, and a running surface in contact with the snow
limitations.3 Sorel cements, for instance, were first produced comprised entirely of concrete.
over 150 years ago and have been used in such diverse The team from Queen’s University, Kingston, ON,
applications as flooring for ships, grinding wheels, and billiard included engineering students from mechanical and civil
balls.3 However, the poor water resistance of the Sorel and engineering programs. The mechanical engineering students
magnesium oxysulfate cements is one of the major limitations were responsible for the design and construction of the
preventing more widespread use. toboggan framework, as shown in Fig. 1, in addition to the
Magnesium silicate binders first started to gain attention steering and braking systems. The civil engineering students
for possible application as construction materials in China in were tasked with developing and casting a sustainable,
the mid-2000s. The binder was produced by combining environmentally friendly concrete mixture for the runners as
magnesia with a microsilica, and it provided 28-day concrete well as designing the reinforcement for the runners.
strengths of almost 60 MPa (8700 psi).4 More recently,
mortars produced with a binder combination of magnesia, Self-Consolidating Magnesium Silicate Concrete
silica fume, and a small percentage of fine quartz filler have An environmentally friendly low-carbon concrete based on
achieved 28-day strengths of 87 MPa (12,620 psi).5 Despite the magnesium silica system was chosen for the concrete
the increasing interest and research into magnesium silicate runners used in the toboggan. Because the runners needed a
binders, there are few, if any, references to use of the material smooth, low-friction surface, a self-consolidating concrete
outside the laboratory. We believe the first in-service (SCC) mixture was developed to ensure a good finish. Two
application of a self-consolidating magnesium silicate types of silica (silica fume and Class C fly ash) were initially
concrete was the construction of a concrete racing toboggan, evaluated in combination with light burn magnesia. While a
which went on to win the 2017 Great Northern Concrete Class F fly ash would have been preferable, to minimize any
Toboggan Race (GNCTR). This article discusses that project. potential reactions of the CaO component of the fly ash, only
35 3.5
30 3.0
25 2.5
Strength, MPa
Strength, MPa
20 2.0
15 1.5
10 1.0
GP GP
5 SF50 0.5 SF50
FA50 FA50
0 0
0 7 14 21 28 0 7 14 21 28
(b)
(a) Age, days Age, days
Fig. 3: Test results up to 28 days: (a) compressive strength; and (b) tensile strength (Note: 1 MPa = 145 psi)
Porosity, %
14
compressive strength, with substantially lower early-age
strengths for the magnesium silica mixtures compared to the
12
GP control.
One of the major differences in the performance between
the GP and magnesium silica system was the porosity of the 10
hardened concrete. The porosity of the concrete samples was
determined based on ASTM C642, “Standard Test Method for 8
Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete,” but GP SF50 FA50
using vacuum saturation technique. The GP control samples Fig. 4: Porosity of concrete samples after 7 days
had an average 7-day porosity of 11% compared to
approximately 16% for SF50 and FA50 mixtures (Fig. 4). The used in practice, further investigations are required to
increase in hydration from 7 to 28 days only resulted in a improve both the particle packing and fresh properties of the
slight reduction in the measured porosity. The increase in mixtures and thus reduce the overall porosity of the concrete.
porosity of the magnesium silica mixtures compared to the GP Vibration of the cylinders might also have reduced the
control may be partially responsible for the lower measured porosity of the magnesium silica concretes, particularly for
compressive strengths. A 5% increase in porosity, for instance, the SF50 mixture, which had a high viscosity as indicated by
would be expected to reduce the compressive strength by the T500 time of 41 seconds. However, no additional vibration
approximately 25%. Before magnesium silica mixtures can be was provided for the concrete in this investigation.
Additionally, the video includes a review of safety, equipment, and the laboratory
environment. Each chapter reviews the equipment specific to the ASTM test, the test
procedure to follow, and the calculation of the result. Helpful tips are provided throughout
to improve the technicians’ knowledge and technique.
Check out a preview clip on YouTube; search for “ACI testing cement training
preview.“
(a) (b)
Fig. 6: Concrete runners: (a) formwork and stainless steel attachments; and (b) finished runners (without external GFRP wrap)
U
ltra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) achieves a Researchers at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI,
compressive strength of at least 150 MPa (21,700 psi) developed a family of nonproprietary UHPC mixtures1,2 that
and it has self-consolidating properties. UHPC can be made from off-the-shelf products and do not require
comprises component materials with particle sizes and onerous placement or special curing processes. The resulting
distributions carefully selected to maximize packing density1,2 material has similar performance characteristics but is
(constituent particles arranged as compactly as possible), substantially less expensive than proprietary UHPC mixtures.
which is the reason for the extremely high mechanical and This article describes experience gained with a nonproprietary
durability properties of the material. Another key feature of UHPC mixture optimized for field applications.
UHPC is that it is reinforced with a small percentage by
volume (typically 1 to 2%) of short steel fibers, which enhance Development of Nonproprietary UHPC
the material’s tensile behavior and energy dissipation.3,4 Mixtures
The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Component selection
multiple state Departments of Transportation (DOTs) have The nonproprietary UHPC mixture was produced using
exhibited strong interest in UHPC and its application in Type I ordinary portland cement (OPC), ground-granulated
bridges. For example, the third round of the Every Day Counts blast-furnace slag (GGBS or slag cement), silica fume, two
(EDC-3) report included a chapter on UHPC connections for types of silica sand, and short steel fibers. To ensure
prefabricated bridge elements.5 The fourth round of the workability, a high-range water-reducing admixture (HRWRA
program, EDC-4, is also expected to include that general topic. or superplasticizer) was used. Optimum packing density of the
The use of UHPC as a field-cast material is not new, but particles was based on the material gradations as discussed in
most experience in Europe and the United States has been previous studies.1,2 Four variants of the mixtures described in
gained with proprietary materials,6 particularly for field-cast References 1 and 2 were considered good candidates for field
connections as outlined in Reference 7. A common thread in application. The experimental variables were the amount of
UHPC applications is that the required volume of material is HRWRA and fiber length. The mixture proportions by weight
not large, primarily because proprietary UHPC is expensive. are shown in Table 1.
UHPC must be purchased from specific suppliers, and the White Type I portland cement was used in the initial
contractors that work with it must be specially trained, development of UHPC3 due to its low tricalcium aluminate
certified, and supervised, further increasing the unit cost. In a (C3A) content and high combined content of di- and tricalcium
2016 Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) silicate (C2S and C3S), resulting in exceptional performance in
project that required 8 yd3 (6 m3) of UHPC, the unit cost for the fresh and hardened states. However, white cement is
the proprietary UHPC material was estimated at $2500/yd3 expensive (currently, about $275/ton). Research in References 1
($3300/m3). Another $3700/yd3 ($5000/m3) was spent on the and 2 has shown that Type I OPC, which is much cheaper (at
specialized construction and technical services required by the $150/ton), can be successfully used. In general, the selected
supplier, although this cost is expected to drop substantially as cement must have a C3A content lower than 8% and a relatively
the quantity of material increases and more experience is low Blaine fineness to reduce water demand during hydration.
gained with the product. Many suppliers in the United States can meet this requirement.
Silica fume is a by-product of the manufacture of silicon then added to the mixture and dry-mixed for another 5
alloys. Its superfine spherical particles and pozzolanic minutes. Next, water and HRWRA were separately mixed
reactivity densify the microstructure and significantly improve together and the mixture was added gradually to the dry
the compressive strength of UHPC. The median particle size materials. Premixing the HRWRA and water aided in a more
is in the range of 0.1 to 10 μm. Silica fume with a lower uniform distribution of the HRWRA in the batch. The UHPC
carbon content is preferred because it decreases the water mixture showed appropriate workability (turnover)
demand while promoting high flowability. approximately 5 to 7 minutes after the addition of water and
Eliminating the coarse aggregate promotes high HRWRA. Once an adequate mixture consistency was
compressive strength. Instead of coarse aggregate, two types achieved, the steel fibers were added into the mixer and
of quartz silica sand were used, with grain sizes of 70 to 200 allowed to mix at 60 rpm until they were well dispersed.
μm and 400 to 800 μm. These grain sizes were optimized to
enhance packing density.
Unlike regular concrete, UHPC comprises a lot of cement,
which increases costs and has environmental and ecological
burdens. It also has a negative impact on the heat of hydration,
which can lead to shrinkage problems. Therefore, slag cement
was added to make the mixtures more environmentally
friendly (because GGBS is a by-product of the steelmaking
industry). Slag cement is a beneficial mineral admixture for
concrete because of its pozzolanic properties and its positive
influence on the durability of concrete.8
A polycarboxylate-based HRWRA was also used in the
UHPC mixtures. In the previous study, 1.35% of HRWRA by
weight of cement was used.1 However, because of its Career
sensitivity to the composition of silica fume (especially
carbon content) and the activity of cement, larger dosages
were explored in this study to ensure suitable workability for
Center
field applications. Hence, three dosages of HRWRA were
considered. The most effective dosage was selected based on
optimal combinations of turnover time measured after the
addition of water and HRWRA, the spread (as explained Hiring the right people for
next), and compressive strength. Lastly, fibers with high yield the right jobs has never
strength (2000 MPa [290,000 psi]) were selected. The fiber
lengths were 19 mm (0.75 in.) in Mixture 1 and 13 mm (0.50 in.) been easier.
in the remaining three mixtures. The volume fraction of fibers
was 2% in all mixtures.
Find the right candidate. Save money.
Save time. The ACI Career Center is the
Laboratory trial batches right solution for your hiring needs.
Laboratory mixing was done using a Hobart-type
Follow @ACICareerCenter to learn more.
laboratory mixer according to the procedure described in
Reference 3. First, the silica sand and silica fume were
dry-mixed for about 5 minutes. Cement and slag cement were www.concrete.org/careercenter
www.concreteinternational.com | Ci | JANUARY 2018 37
Table 2:
Mechanical properties of laboratory and field batches
Compressive strength, MPa (psi) Tensile
Mixture no. Spread, strength, MPa Strain at peak
or ID mm (in.) 7-day 14-day 28-day 56-day (psi) tensile stress, %
1 214 (8.4) 121.3 (17,600) 149.1 (21,600) 175.7 (25,500) 196.2 (28,500) 12.9 (1900) 0.41
2 215 (8.5) 118.2 (17,100) 147.8 (21,400) 169.2 (24,500) 187.4 (27,200) 11.1 (1600) 0.17
3 235 (9.3) 118.8 (17,200) 143.5 (20,800) 159.0 (23,100) 176.4 (25,600) 9.5 (1400) 0.18
4 238 (9.4) 113.4 (16,500) 137.1 (19,900) 151.9 (22,100) —* 9.6 (1400) 0.14
Field 238 (9.4) 108.9 (15,800) 127.0 (18,400) 148.1 (21,500) —* 8.3 (1200) 0.13
*
Specimens not tested. Not enough were made due to an oversight
After mixing was completed, the rheology of the UHPC Field Application of UHPC
mixture was assessed by measuring spread. The spread test The bridge repair project was located on Kilgore Road over
method was based on ASTM C1437, “Standard Test the Pine River (Structure No. 10091), Kenockee Township,
Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar,” with one MI, shown in Fig. 1(a). The bridge is 13.6 m (44.7 ft) long
modification—the fresh UHPC was allowed to spread freely and 6.5 m (21.4 ft) wide (Fig. 1(b)). The repair effort entailed
on a plexiglass plate instead of being dropped on a flow table replacing the joints connecting the reinforced concrete beams
as specified in the standard. When the mixture stopped with UHPC (Fig. 2).
spreading, the diameter of the spread was measured. Based on
previous experience and research documented in References 1
and 2, a mixture was considered appropriate for use if its
spread ranged from 175 to 300 mm (7 to 12 in.).
The compressive strength was obtained from cubes tested
per ASTM C109/C109M, “Standard Test Method for
Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using
2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens),” while tensile strength
was obtained using coupons tested per AASHTO T 132,
“Standard Method of Test for Tensile Strength of Hydraulic
Cement Mortars.” Table 2 summarizes the properties of the
four trial mixtures.
Table 2 clearly shows beneficial effects of the longer steel
fibers, as Mixture 1 (with 19 mm fibers) exhibited a larger
strain at peak tensile stress and a larger peak tensile strength
(a)
than the mixtures with 13 mm fibers. For example, the peak
tensile strength was 12.9 MPa (1900 psi) for Mixture 1 versus
9.5 MPa (1400 psi) for Mixture 3. The longer fibers also led to
a slightly higher compressive strength than the shorter fibers.
For example, the compressive strength at 28 days for
Mixture 1 was 175.7 MPa (25,500 psi) versus 169.2 MPa
(24,600 psi) for Mixture 2.
The 28-day compressive strength decreased with increasing
amount of HRWRA. For example, the 28-day strength was
169.2 MPa (24,600 psi) for Mixture 2 and 151.9 MPa
(22,100 psi) for Mixture 4, representing a 10% drop (Table 2).
This was also true for tensile strength. The effects of using
slag cement were also evident, as the strength kept rising
substantially beyond 28 days. The 56-day compressive
strength was 17 to 20 MPa (2500 to 3000 psi) higher.
Comparing all the results, Mixture 3 provided a good
(b)
compromise between flowability and strength, and it was
selected for the field placement. Fig. 1: Bridge repair site: (a) location in Michigan; and (b) aerial view
Ambient Mixture
Batch Turnover temperature, temperature, Spread,
no. time °C (°F) °C (°F) mm (in.)
1 minute
1 23.9 (75) 26.7 (80) 238 (9.4)
30 seconds
2 minutes
3 25.0 (77) 35.0 (95) 200 (8.0)
5 seconds
2 minutes
4 25.6 (78) 30.0 (86) 231 (9.1)
Fig. 2: Joints between reinforced concrete beams were replaced 30 seconds
with UHPC. Dimension lumber portals and threaded rods held the
2 minutes
bottom formwork tight against the beam flanges to prevent leakage 7 26.7 (80) 29.4 (85) 220 (8.7)
45 seconds
of the UHPC
Mixing equipment mixture. The general trend of faster turnover time with
Mixing was carried out by a Michigan-based contractor larger mixer was also observed in the lab, although not to
employing the mixture protocol developed in the lab. The the extent seen in the field mixture. Two other observations
contractor used two Mortarman 360 MBP pan mixers, each are evident from Table 3. First, turnover time increased
with a capacity of 8 ft3 (0.23 m3). Mixing volume was limited somewhat with increasing ambient and mixture
to 5.5 ft3 (0.16 m3) because early trials showed that greater temperatures; and second, the spread dropped significantly
loads led to mixing difficulties—the material’s viscosity as the mixture temperature increased.
increased dramatically at turnover, which caused the mixer’s To address the adverse effects of the high mixture
engine to labor noticeably and even stall. Once successfully temperature and with the knowledge that the temperature
mixed, the material was discharged into wheelbarrows and would rise as the day progressed, cubed ice was added as a
transported to the placement location. replacement for some of the mixing water as recommended in
Reference 7. On-site experimentation showed that a 40%
Mixing process replacement yielded good results and kept the mixture
Construction took place on a summer day with temperature below about 29.4°C (85°F), a point beyond which
temperatures forecasted between 23 and 32°C (73 and 90°F). the test showed that the spread drops quickly. Figure 3 shows
The high temperature prompted concerns about water the steps of the field-mixing procedure and testing.
evaporation during mixing. Because UHPC has a low water
content, moisture loss due to evaporation could result in a Casting process
degradation in the fresh and hardened properties of UHPC. UHPC was cast at a rate that did not allow it to flow too far
The ambient temperatures during preparation of a few during placement to minimize preferential alignment of the
batches are summarized in Table 3, along with the measured fibers in the direction of flow. This was done by starting the
mixture temperatures. The latter are generally higher than casting process at one end of the joint and proceeding to the
the former due to the mixing energy imparted to the mixture other end at a speed comparable to the flow speed of the fresh
and heat of hydration. mixture. Initially, the UHPC was poured into hoppers that
The first batch was mixed at an ambient temperature of directed the flow of the UHPC into the joints. However, after
23.9°C (75°F). The mixture temperature peaked at 26.7°C about half of the placement was completed, the hoppers were
(80°F), and the spread was 238 mm (9.4 in.). The ambient deemed not useful and abandoned.
temperature for the second batch was 25.0°C (77°F), but the The forms can be coated or pre-wetted to ensure that they
mixture temperature rose to 35.0°C (95°F). The increased do not absorb water. The latter route was selected as the more
mixture temperature caused a marked reduction in spread, practical solution. The surface of the existing concrete and the
decreasing to 200 mm (8 in.) for the second batch from reinforcing bars were also pre-wetted to prevent the mixture
238 mm for the first batch. from losing water to the dry surfaces (Fig. 4(a)). Once casting
Table 3 shows that, in general, the turnover time is was carried out, top forms were installed to reduce surface
substantially less than that observed with the Hobart mixer dehydration (Fig. 4(b)).
in the lab. It is not clear why that is the case, especially
because the field mixer was slower than the lab mixer. Post-curing inspection
However, it is possible that the field mixing attachments are After the formwork was stripped (1 day after placement),
more effective than the lab mixer in inducing shear into the some small holes and shrinkage cracks were visible on the top
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
Fig. 3: Field mixing procedure and testing of UHPC mixture: (a) addition of dry ingredients; (b) dry mixing; (c) addition of water, HRWRA, and
cubed ice; (d) mixture dispersion and homogenization; (e) addition of steel fibers; and (f) flow test
(a) (b)
Fig. 4: Casting of UHPC into a joint between beams: (a) pre-wetting and placement; and (b) top forms installed
Fig. 5: Field placement after 1 day: (a) view of a UHPC connection; and (b) shrinkage cracks visible on the surface
surface of the UHPC joints (Fig. 5). These defects were Table 4:
attributed primarily to two factors: dehydration of the top Cost of Mixture 3 components
layer associated with the hot weather during construction and
entrapped air rising during curing. Nevertheless, a close
Component Quantity, lb/yd3 Cost per yd3, % of total
examination showed that the underlying material was sound.
Type I OPC 650 5.0
Comparison of Field and Lab Properties Slag cement 650 4.3
Cubes and coupons were made during field mixing to
compare field properties to lab values. As with the lab Silica fume 327 8
program, compressive strength of the field mixture was
HRWRA 39 6.3
determined according to ASTM C109/C109M and tensile
strength according to AASHTO T 132. The results are listed Sand A 395 1.2
in Table 2.
Sand B 1580 4.8
The 28-day compressive strength of the field mixture was
about 10 MPa (1500 psi) lower than the lab Mixture 3. The Steel fibers 265 70.4
tensile properties of the field mixture were also lower than
Total cost: $892.70
those of Mixture 3. We have two hypotheses for the
Note: 1 lb/yd3 = 0.59 kg/m3
discrepancy between the lab and field properties. The first is
that the hot weather caused mixing water to evaporate rapidly,
thereby compromising hydration. The second is that the expensive material, although its extremely high durability has
mixer, while efficient at turning over the mixture quickly, did the potential to significantly reduce life-cycle costs. Research
not provide sufficiently uniform mixing, causing irregular is needed to fully evaluate the long-term benefits.
dispersal of the mixture constituents.
Summary and Conclusions
A Note About Cost This article describes a field construction project using a
To satisfy the requirements of MDOT, the material used on nonproprietary blend of UHPC. Casting UHPC on a warm day
this project comprised components that were produced or sold led to a reduction in the spread (flowability) as the high
on the U.S. open market. The steel fibers were the most temperature compromised the effectiveness of the HRWRA
expensive component (refer to Table 4 for total cost and % of and increased the potential for evaporation of water during
total cost). Fiber costs are expected to drop with increasing mixing and placement. On-site experimenation showed that
demand for UHPC, so the overall price should also decrease. replacement of 40% of the mixing water with ice kept the
If the origin of the fibers is not a constraint, steel fibers mixture temperature at less than 30°C, thus ensuring the
sourced from outside the United States could be used instead effectiveness of the HRWRA. Substantially hotter days will
to reduce the UHPC cost. Another cost-reducing step would require greater ice quantities, which can be determined by trial
be to decrease the amount of steel fibers from 2 to 1.5% by and error. Minimizing evaporation can be resolved only by
volume. Research documented in Reference 1 shows that this speeding up the mixing and placing processes.
lower level of fiber dosage still yields UHPC with good The 28-day compressive strength of the field-mixed
short- and long-term properties. However, even with a material was 148.1 MPa (21,500 psi), which is about 1% less
reduced cost of steel fibers, UHPC is still a relatively than the 150 MPa needed to define the material as UHPC.
C
onventional concrete is widely used in building resistance as conventional concrete. There is minimal need for
projects because it is easy to produce and deliver to vibration during placement due to its high flow and high
the jobsite, and it is resistant to small variations in responsiveness to external energy. Because it has a larger
water content. However, large crews are normally needed to yield stress than SCC, control flow concrete will not flow
properly place and finish conventional concrete, and this uncontrolled in formwork. However, it has high passing
presents increasing challenges as labor markets tighten. ability through congested reinforcement, with no aggregate
Self-consolidating concrete (SCC) has proven itself as a blocking when produced with maximum size aggregate
viable alternative for some applications. Its high flowability, conforming to ACI 211.1 recommendations.1
excellent passing ability, and self-leveling characteristics GCP Applied Technologies (GCP) recently introduced
make it very easy to place, with minimal labor requirements. CONCERA™ brand admixtures that enable the production of
However, it is more expensive to produce due to the control flow concrete using mixture proportions typical of
specialized mixture designs, high powder contents, and the conventional concrete. The new admixtures result in a static
extra quality control efforts required to minimize batch-to- yield stress that is much lower than that of conventional
batch moisture variability. concrete, allowing control flow concrete to start flowing with
Control flow concrete bridges the gap between conventional minimal energy input. Yet, the admixtures result in a Bingham
concrete and SCC, offering significant improvements in (or dynamic yield) stress that is higher than that of SCC. That
quality, performance, and productivity for concrete producers means control flow concrete can be placed in slab-on-ground
and contractors alike. Shown in Fig. 1, control flow concrete applications and does not flow beneath small gaps in
flows more readily but has the same stability or segregation conventional formwork (Fig. 2). Control flow concrete will
not self-level like SCC, so it can be placed evenly on small protocol was followed. Aggregate and approximately 80% of
grades. Control flow concrete also remains segregation- the water were added to a tumble mixer and mixed for 1
resistant, even if water is added. minute. Cement was added and the sides of the mixer rinsed
In this article, we will briefly describe admixtures suitable with the rest of the water, mixing for an additional 1 minute.
for producing control flow concrete, address the rheological Admixtures were then added and mixing continued for
characterization of control flow concrete, and explore how 3 minutes, followed by a 3-minute rest period, and a final 2
control flow concrete compares to conventional concrete and minutes of mixing. The tail addition of admixtures provided
SCC. These three types of concrete can be distinguished by better distribution and effectiveness of the cement dispersing
comparing slump or slump flow spread (Table 1). components of the admixtures.
Slump, slump flow, visual stability index (VSI), and air
Experiments content of conventional concrete and SCC were measured
Mixture designs for the three types of evaluated concrete according to ASTM C143/C143M,4 C1611/C1611M,5 and
mixtures are shown in Table 2. The mixture design used for C231/C231M (Type B),6 respectively (Table 3). For control
conventional concrete and control flow concrete is a typical flow concrete, the tests have been modified. The slump flow
3500 psi (24.1 MPa) mixture for slabs. A tail-addition mixing was measured by filling a cone with the wider opening on the
slump-flow board, without rodding. The air meter was filled in
three lifts and tapped after each lift but not rodded.
Table 1: Compressive strength test cylinders were likewise tapped but
Key characteristics of conventional, control flow, and not rodded.
SCC mixtures Rheological experiments were carried out on an ICAR Plus
Conventional Control flow from Germann Instruments. The concrete was loaded into the
concrete concrete SCC rheometer and the sides were tapped when the container was
one-third, two-thirds, and completely full. The vane was then
w/c* 0.42 0.42 0.40 inserted into the concrete and the measurements begun
Slump or spread, 6 to 8 16 to 25
according to manufacturer’s recommendations.7
in. (mm) (150 to 200) (410 to 635)
>25 (640) For measurement of static yield stress, the vane speed
ADVA 198 and
was 0.05 rad/s (0.5 rpm). The test was stopped when the
Admixture ADVA® 198 CONCERA EXP 950 maximum torque was reached and began to decrease. For
CP1028 evaluation of the Bingham yield stress, the highest rotational
Water-cement ratio
* velocity was 30 rpm, and the velocity was stepped down in
Note: All admixtures are polycarboxylate-based HRWRAs 4.5 rpm increments until it reached 3 rpm. Each rotational
Table 2:
Mixture proportions for three types of concrete. The proportions for conventional concrete and control flow
concrete mixtures are identical except for the addition of a second admixture
Constituents Conventional concrete Control flow concrete SCC
w/c* 0.42 0.42 0.40
1750 (1038) 1750 (1038)
1450 (860)
Coarse aggregate, lb/yd3 (kg/m3) ASTM C33/C33M ASTM C33/C33M
3/8 in. (9.5 mm) stone
No. 67 gradation† (Ref. 2) No. 67 gradation†
Fine aggregate, lb/yd3 (kg/m3) 1387 (823) 1387 (823) 1334 (791)
Cement, ASTM C150/C150M
611 (362) 611 (362) 846 (502)
Type II (Ref. 3), lb/yd3 (kg/m3)
Admixture 1, 2.5 (163) 2.5 (163) 9 (587)
oz/cwt (mL/100 kg cement) ADVA 198 ADVA 198 EXP 950
Admixture 2,
— 11.5 (751) CONCERA CP1028 —
oz/cwt (mL/100 kg cement)
*
Water-cement ratio
†
Nominal size 3/4 in. to No. 4 (19 to 4.75 mm)
velocity was held for 30 seconds—long enough to equilibrate Results and Discussion
the signal but short enough to minimize the potential for Admixtures
segregation. The rotational velocity and torque were plotted A balance of properties is needed to make control flow
and a straight line fit to the data. The slope and interceptconcrete. High-range water-reducing admixtures (HRWRAs)
were then converted to plastic viscosity and Bingham yield are required to disperse the cement particles and reduce the
stress according to the Reiner-Riwlin equations. yield stress. Good slump flow retention is also necessary for
transportation and placement of the
material. However, high doses of
Table 3: HRWRAs can cause segregation when
Plastic concrete properties. Each value is the average of two or more tests used in conventional concrete mixtures
(Fig. 3(a)). The CONCERA brand of
Slump, mm Slump flow, VSI
admixtures produce segregation-
Mixture type Air, % (in.) mm (in.) (rating)
resistant concrete (Fig. 3(b)) with a
Trial 1 1.9 184 (7.3) — — flow range (spread) of 16 to 25 in.
Trial 2 2.3 165 (6.5) — — (410 to 635 mm) using conventional
mixture designs. These proprietary
Trial 3 1.7 197 (7.8) — —
viscosity-modified polycarboxylate
Conventional Trial 4 1.9 168 (6.6) — — admixtures provide good initial slump
concrete flow and slump flow retention without
Trial 5 2.1 187 (7.4) — —
segregation. Mixtures described in this
168 to 197 article comprise CONCERA CP1028
Range 1.7 to 2.3 — —
(6.5 to 7.4) admixtures, designed for use in
Trial 1 1.9 229 (9.0) 470 (18.5) 0.75 non-air-entrained concrete with
HRWRAs. Other admixtures in
Trial 2 2.0 239 (9.4) 440 (17.3) 0.75
the brand family are for use as
Trial 3 1.5 238 (9.4) 457 (18.0) 0.75 companions to high- and mid-range
Control flow
Trial 4 1.4 238 (9.4) 464 (18.3) 0.75
water-reducing admixtures. Still others
concrete
have water reduction and control flow
Trial 5 2.0 238 (9.4) 457 (18.0) 0.75 properties built in.
229 to 238 440 to 470
Range 1.4 to 2.0 0.75 Compressive strength
(9.0 to 9.4) (17.3 to 18.5)
The compressive strengths of
SCC Trial 5 0.9 264 (10.4) 638 (25.1) 1.25
control flow concrete and conventional
(a) (b)
Fig. 3: The slump flow test is used to evaluate flowability and segregation resistance: (a) a conventional mixture overdosed with HRWRA
exhibits flow but also segregation; and (b) control flow concrete also exhibits flow, but no segregation
Fig. 7: Static yield stress for three types of concrete. Error bars
Fig. 5: Generalized form of rheologic data for evaluation of yield stress represent one standard deviation (Note: 1 Pa = 0.000145 psi)
Fig. 6: Raw data for static yield stress (Note: 1 N·m = 0.737 ft-lb) Fig. 8: An ideal Bingham plot for a Newtonian fluid with a yield stress
Save Date
the
models9 improve the fit to the data for conventional concrete, yield stresses, almost by an order of magnitude. It clearly
but they provide less information about the observable takes more force to start concrete moving from a resting state
physical properties. than stopping it when it has been moving. While ease of
placement (represented by static yield stress) reduces wear on
Bingham yield stress people and equipment, it is also useful to have concrete that
Using the Reiner-Riwlin equations and the data from the comes to rest more easily (represented by the Bingham yield
Bingham plot, the yield stress was calculated. The data are stress) than SCC. Figure 2, for example, shows control flow
again grouped by concrete type (Fig. 10 and Table 4). The concrete concrete in a slab placement. The concrete has
Bingham yield stresses are significantly lower than the static flowed and then stopped, leaving a rounded front.
Plastic viscosity
Plastic viscosity is related to the slope of the shear rate
versus the shear-stress line by the Riener-Riwlin equations.
For control flow concrete and SCC, the behavior is linear in
the shear-rate regime measured, and the viscosity is constant
with respect to shear rate. Figure 11 shows that control flow
concrete is more viscous (has more resistance to flow) than
SCC. Although the conventional concrete demonstrates
shear thickening, the Riener-Riwlin transformation was
applied to approximate the viscosity. This gives a value
close to that for control flow concrete. Although the
Fig. 10: Bingham yield stress for three types of concrete. Error bars nonlinearity of the speed versus torque plot may affect the
represent one standard deviation (Note: 1 Pa = 0.000145 psi) applicability of the Riener-Riwlin transformation, the
viscosity for conventional concrete is closer to that of
Table 4: control flow concrete than that of SCC. All the shear rates
Comparisons of static and Bingham yield stresses for are relatively low, covering the range of placement and
conventional, control flow, and SCC mixtures. The static finishing. The shear rates relevant for pumping are outside
yield stress is always lower than the Bingham yield the capability of the rheometer.
Static yield stress, Bingham yield
Rheograph
Mixture type Pa stress, Pa
In Fig. 12, the static yield stress is plotted as a function of
Conventional concrete 2106 503 plastic viscosity for the three types of concrete studied, using
Control flow concrete 810 109
the data from Fig. 7 and 10. The yield stress distinguishes
control flow concrete from both conventional concrete and
SCC 95 19
Note: 1 Pa = 0.000145 psi
Fig. 12: Rheograph for the three types of concrete studied, and the
Fig. 11: Plastic viscosity for three types of concrete. Error bars hypothetical position of a concrete made to flow by overdosing with
represent one standard deviation (Note: 1 Pa·s = 1000 cP) an HRWRA (Note: 1 Pa = 0.000145 psi; 1 Pa·s = 1000 cP)
SCC. It is easier to begin the flow of control flow concrete 4. ASTM C143/C143M, “Standard Test Method for Slump of
compared to conventional concrete, and control flow concrete Hydraulic-Cement Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
ceases to flow more readily than SCC. The plastic viscosity of PA, 2015, 4 pp.
SCC is lower than the other two types of concrete. The dotted 5. ASTM C1611/C1611M, “Standard Test Method for Slump Flow of
circle in the rheograph represents concrete made by Self-Consolidating Concrete,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken,
overdosing with an HRWRA. In this case, segregation made it PA, 2014, 6 pp.
impossible to study the rheology. 6. ASTM C231/C231M, “Standard Test Method for Air Content of
Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method,” ASTM International,
Conclusions and Outlook West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 10 pp.
Control flow concrete has distinct rheological behavior 7. Koehler, E.P.; Fowler, D.W.; Ferraris, C.F.; and Amziane, S.;
compared to conventional concrete and SCC. This type of “A New, Portable Rheometer for Fresh Self-Consolidating Concrete,”
flowable concrete is enabled by CONCERA brand admixtures, Workability of SCC: Roles of its Constituents and Measurement
which work with conventional mixtures. Control flow concrete Techniques, SP-233, C. Shi and K.H. Khayat, eds., American Concrete
shows promise in decreasing labor demand and time for Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2006, pp. 97-115.
concrete placement, without risk of segregation. 8. Ferraris, C.F.; Billberg, P.; Ferron, R.; Feys, D.; Hu, J.; Kawashima, S.;
Koehler, E.; Sonebi, M.; Tanesi, J.; and Tregger, N., “Role of Rheology in
References Achieving Successful Concrete Performance,” Concrete International,
1. ACI Committee 221, “Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions V. 39, No. 6, June 2017, pp. 43-51.
for Normal, Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete (ACI 211.1-91) (Reapproved 9. Wallevik, O.H.; Dyes, D.; Wallevik, J.E.; and Khayat, K.H.,
2009),” American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 1991, 38 pp. “Avoiding Inaccurate Interpretations of Rheological Measurements for
2. ASTM C33/C33M, “Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates,” Cement-Based Materials,” Cement and Concrete Research, V. 78, Part A,
ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, 11 pp. Dec. 2015, pp. 100-109.
3. ASTM C150/C150M, “Standard Specification for Portland Cement,”
ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2017, 9 pp. Selected for reader interest by the editors.
Elizabeth G. Burns joined GCP Applied Joshua W. Curto joined the concrete
Technologies in 2016 to focus on cement admixtures group at GCP Applied
and the polymers PCE. Her career in the Technologies in May 2017. He received
specialty chemical industry has included his BS in chemical engineering and his
time at Eastman Kodak and Cabot. MS in materials science and engineering
Burns received her BS in chemistry from from Worcester Polytechnic Institute,
Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Worcester, MA.
TX, and her PhD from California Institute
of Technology, Pasadena, CA, studying
metathesis polymerization.
ACI member Nathan Tregger is a Principal
ACI member Klaus-Alexander Rieder Scientist at GCP Applied Technologies, Inc.,
is a Global R&D Director for Concrete Cambridge, MA. He is a member of ACI
Products at GCP Applied Technologies. Committees 212, Chemical Admixtures;
He is a member of ACI Committees 209, 237, Self-Consolidating Concrete; 238,
Creep and Shrinkage in Concrete; 215, Workability of Fresh Concrete; 241,
Fatigue of Concrete; 360, Design of Nanotechnology of Concrete; 304,
Slabs on Ground; 506, Shotcreting; and Measuring, Mixing, Transporting, and
544, Fiber-Reinforced Concrete. He is Placing Concrete; and 552, Cementitious
also a member of Joint ACI-ASCE Grouting. He received his math and civil
Committee 446, Fracture Mechanics of engineering degrees from Lafayette College, Easton, PA; his MS
Concrete, and several ASTM International and RILEM committees. and PhD from Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, focusing on
He received his doctorate degree in physics from the Technical topics ranging from stochastic modeling of hardened concrete to
University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, in 1995. fundamental and practical aspects of concrete rheology; and his
MS in innovation from Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Gain
Knowledgeat
The Concrete Convention
and Exposition
Obtain a March 25-29, 2018
better Grand America and Little America Hotel
understanding of Salt Lake City, UT
practical applications
and earn professional
accreditation at
over 40 technical
sessions!
EksoVest
The Ekso Bionics® EksoVest is an upper-body exoskeleton that elevates and supports a worker’s arms to assist with
tasks. The vest provides adjustable lift assistance of 5 to 15 lb (2.2 to 6.8 kg) per arm. It is lightweight and low profile,
making it comfortable to wear in a variety of conditions while enabling the freedom of motion necessary to complete
tasks from chest height to overhead.
—Ekso Bionics, http://eksobionics.com
Web Notes
Book Notes
Structural Concrete: Strut-and-Tie Models for Unified Design
by Salah El-Metwally and Wai-Fah Chen
Structural Concrete: Strut-and-Tie Models for Unified Design examines the application of strut-and-tie models for the design
of structural concrete. This book provides information from fundamental theories to practical engineering applications, and it
provides solutions for many design problems that are not otherwise achievable using the traditional methods.
—CRC Press, www.crcpress.com
230 pp.; ISBN: 9781498783842
Products&Service
Literature&Videos
Standard Practice for Periodically Measuring and Monitoring Sealant Dimensions to
Stability Following a Period of Compression or Tension
A new ASTM International standard will help manufacturers and regulators better understand how building sealants
change once they have been compressed or stretched. “Standard Practice for Periodically Measuring and Monitoring
Sealant Dimensions to Stability Following a Period of Compression or Tension” (C1815) was developed by ASTM
International Committee C24, Building Seals and Sealants. The new standard will be used by manufacturers to measure
the residual strain in various sealant formulations. In addition, regulators will use the standard to modify existing sealant
standards to more realistically incorporate sealant compression behavior.
—ASTM International, www.astm.org
CoolCure MCI-2005
New Technology Solutions, LLC, a subsidiary of Silicone MCI®-2005 is a water-based, organic, migrating corrosion-
Solutions, developed CoolCure, an admixture that converts inhibiting admixture for protection of metallic reinforcement
ordinary portland cement into a Type IV, low-heat cement. By in concrete structures. The admixture contains a blend of
minimizing the generation of calcium hydroxide, this patent- amine salts of carboxylic acids. The salts form a protective
pending admixture reduces the heat of hydration by up to layer on embedded reinforcement, delaying the onset of
80%. In addition, Coolcure increases working/placement time corrosion and reducing corrosion rates. MCI-2005 can be used
and late-age compressive strength. CoolCure is recommended with concrete structures with conventional or prestressed
for mass concrete placements, as it minimizes the need for reinforcement, and it’s recommended for concrete that will be
pre- or post-cooling of concrete. exposed to deicing salts, saline groundwater, airborne
—Silicone Solutions, www.siliconesolutions.com chlorides, and carbonation.
—Cortec Corporation, www.cortecvci.com
Master X-Seed 55
BASF’s Master
PREVent-C
PREVent-C®, developed by Premier
X-Seed® 55 is a strength-
Construction Products Group, a fully
enhancing admixture that
owned division of Premier Magnesia
improves both early- and
LLC, is a shrinkage-reducing and crack-
late-age strength
control concrete admixture. The specially
development in concrete,
formulated powder provides dual
while also supporting
functionality to prevent cracking or
sustainable construction.
curling caused by shrinkage. Shrinkage-
Master X-Seed’s
induced cracking may be reduced by as
technology is a stable suspension of synthetically produced crystalline
much as 90%, depending on mixture
calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) nanoparticles. These nanoparticles
design and dosage of PREVent-C. As a
facilitate the growth of CSH crystals between cement grains and improve
result, this admixture can increase
the overall hydration of portland cement. The strength-enhancing
expected concrete service life and reduce
property of this technology permits a reduction in the total cementitious
construction timelines.
materials content of a given concrete mixture while maintaining the
—Premier Construction Products
compressive strength of concrete.
Group, www.premiermagnesia.com
—BASF Corporation, www.basf.com
How to Become
ACI-CERTIFIED
TESTING/TRAINING CENTER
Located across the globe, ACI has
partnered with these groups to
administer written and performance
exams throughout the year
PROMETRIC TESTING CENTERS
Set your date and time for convenience
when taking written exams
Premios 2017 a la Concrete Society por la excelencia en el Aplicación de campo de concreto de desempeño ultra alto
concreto no patentado
Concrete International, V. 40, No. 1, enero de 2018, El-Tawil, S.; Tai, Y.-S.; y Belcher II, J.A., Concrete
págs. 25-29 International, V. 40, No. 1, enero de 2018, págs. 36-42
Los premios 2017 a la Concrete Society por la Excelencia en Investigadores de la University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
Concreto se presentaron en Londres, Reino Unido. El ganador MI, desarrollaron mezclas de concreto de desempeño ultra
de 2017 fue Queensferry Crossing, Forth Replacement alto no patentados (UHPC por sus siglas en inglés) que
Crossing, Rosyth, Escocia, el puente atirantado de tres torres pueden fabricarse a partir de productos comerciales y no
más largo del mundo. Otros cinco proyectos también fueron requieren una colocación onerosa o procesos especiales de
reconocidos como altamente encomiados. curado. El material resultante tiene características de
desempeño similares, pero es sustancialmente menos costoso
Carreras hacia un futuro verde que las mezclas patentadas de UHPC.
Scott, A.; Carlos, J.; Remacka, J.; Paitich, S.; y Hoult, N., La reología del flujo de control de concreto
Concrete International, V. 40, No. 1, enero de 2018,
págs. 31-35 Burns, E.G.; Rieder, K.-A.; Curto, J.W.; y Tregger, N.,
Concrete International, V. 40, No. 1, enero de 2018,
Gran carrera norteña de tobogán de concreto es una págs. 43-49
competencia entre estudiantes de ingeniería de colegios y
universidades de Canadá y Estados Unidos. En 2017, el Una nueva familia de aditivos de polímeros de
equipo de Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canadá, policarboxilato permite la producción de concreto de flujo de
ganó el campeonato general y el premio al tobogán más control. El concreto de flujo de control se produce utilizando
sostenible con el tobogán de carreras de concreto de silicato proporciones de mezcla típicas del concreto convencional. Si
de magnesio autoconsolidante. bien tiene la misma resistencia a la segregación que el
concreto convencional, fluye más fácilmente y tiene una alta
capacidad de paso a través del refuerzo congestionado.
Get
Connected with
Visit www.concrete.org
58 JANUARY 2018 | Ci | www.concreteinternational.com
Public
Discussion
The ACI draft standards open for public discussion that are being processed can be found at www.concrete.org/
discussion. These are not yet official ACI standards.
Open for
Document number Title Discussion closes
discussion
Proposed Standards
ACI 550, “Code Requirements for the Design of Precast Concrete Diaphragms for Earthquake
Motions (ACI 550) and Commentary (ACI 550R)”
The ACI Technical Activities Committee (TAC) approved processing the subject document through ACI’s Standardization
Procedure in October 2016, as did the ACI Standards Board in November 2017.
The document appears on the ACI website, www.concrete.org/discussion.
Pertinent discussion will be available on ACI’s website and announced in a future issue of Concrete International if received
no later than January 6, 2018. Comments should be e-mailed to discussion@concrete.org.
8-11 - NIBS Building Innovation 2018, Washington, DC 22-24 - The Precast Show 2018, Denver, CO
www.nibs.org/?page=conference2018 http://precast.org/theprecastshow
ADDRESS________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TELEPHONE_________________________________________________________________ FAX________________________________________________________________________
Code: CI
www.concreteinternational.com | Ci | JANUARY 2018 61
What’s
New from
TECHNICAL DOCUMENTS 3. Recognize strategies for successful performance mixture
development programs.
ACI 369.1-17: Standard Requirements for 4. Summarize concrete performance requirements for
Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing shrinkage, freezing-and-thawing resistance, alkali-silica
Concrete Buildings (ACI 369.1-17) and reactivity, and chloride penetration resistance.
Commentary
This standard provides retrofit and rehabilitation criteria for Continuing Education Credit: 0.1 CEU (1 PDH)
reinforced concrete buildings based on results from the most
recent research on the seismic performance of existing On-Demand Course: Selecting the Right
concrete buildings. Service Life Prediction Approach
Learning Objectives
ACI UNIVERSITY ONLINE COURSES 1. Recognize the importance of service life prediction
approaches in the design process.
On-Demand Course: Performance Engineered 2. Describe the different general service life prediction
Concrete Mixtures approaches that are available in the industry.
Learning Objectives 3. Summarize the advantages and disadvantages of different
1. Identify key characteristics necessary for the successful service life prediction approaches.
implementation of performance-related specifications for 4. Evaluate different service life prediction approaches for
concrete mixtures. selecting the appropriate approach for a specific project.
2. Describe new test methods that are available and may be
implemented in future specifications and how to properly Continuing Education Credit: 0.1 CEU (1 PDH)
specify new methods and acceptance criteria.
Bulletin Advertisers’
Board Index
CI ADVERTISING
Available classified sections: Positions Wanted, Positions
Available, Used Equipment, Business Opportunities, Education, For more information, contact:
and Positions Vacant. Meredith Schwartz, Account Executive
Network Media Partners +1.410.584.8487
Professional Services Section (3-1/2 x 2 in.): $280 (1×);
E-mail: mschwartz@networkmediapartners.com
$250 (3×); $230 (6×); $210 (9×); $190 (12×).
Classified Rates for Concrete International: $100 for first BASF...........................................................................................................8
50 words and $2 for each additional word over 50. Computers & Structures, Inc. .....................................................Back Cover
Print Classified ad deadlines: All ads need to be reserved Cortec Corporation.......................................................................................9
2 months ahead of issue in which ad will appear. Decon USA Inc..........................................................................................24
Online Classified ad deadlines: Ads post on the 1st and 15th of Headed Reinforcement Corporation (HRC).............................................. 11
every month and will run for one month. If you want your ICC Evaluation Service, LLC....................................................................19
classified ad to appear on the first of the month, contracts and
Oztec Industries, Inc..................................................................................15
text are due on the 25th of the month prior to appearance; if you
want your ad to appear on the 15th of the month, contracts and Peri Formwork Systems, Inc........................................................................2
text are due by the 10th of the month that your ad will appear. Simpson Strong-Tie.....................................................................................1
Contact Meredith Schwartz at +1.410.584.8487 for deadlines StructurePoint..................................................................Inside Front Cover
and additional information. Xypex Chemical Corporation......................................................................6
•• If the base (horizontal) surface of the excavation gets soft committees. The answers do not represent the official position of an ACI
committee. Comments should be sent to rex.donahey@concrete.org.
with rain or melted snow, the bar supports could be forced
Therefore, a reduction in cover depth to “not less than that concrete cover will be highly variable. In such cases, the
required for reinforcement not exposed to weather” may be cover may end up in the 1-1/2 to 2 in. range. Epoxy-coated
approved by the building official following Section 1.10.1. reinforcement would help your situation, but for practical
This means the building official will likely want to see some reasons, I would be cautious in reducing the cover to less
documentation to support a reduction in depth of cover. than 3 in.
Methods of achieving this waiver usually consist of a sealer or
membrane on the concrete surface (not applicable for a soil References
cast surface), using reinforcement with corrosion resistance 1. ACI Committee 318, “Building Code Requirements for Structural
better than uncoated, carbon-steel bars, using less permeable Concrete (ACI 318-14) and Commentary (ACI 318R-14),” American
concrete, or some combination of these. Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, 2014, 519 pp.
In addition, per Commentary Provision R20.6.1.1 of ACI 2. Standard Specifications No. 23, “Standard Building Regulations
318-14: “Development length provisions given in Chapter 25 for the Use of Reinforced Concrete,” American Concrete Institute,
are a function of cover over the reinforcement. To meet Farmington Hills, MI, 1920, pp. 283-302.
requirements for development length, it may be necessary to 3. MacGregor, J.G., Reinforced Concrete: Mechanics and Design,
use cover greater than the minimums specified in 20.6.1.” third edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1997, 939 pp.
This would be a consideration in a retaining wall, strip
footing, or grade beam. Thanks to Neal Anderson, Simpson Gumpertz & Heger, Chicago, IL,
Because of the aforementioned practical aspects of Chair of ACI Subcommittee 318-B, Anchorage and Reinforcement, for
casting concrete against an excavation, it is a given the providing the answer.
Looking for more on ACI 562-16? ACI has produced a series of on-demand courses that
review the process behind the ACI 562 repair code and showcase several project examples.
www.concrete.org/ACI562
Visit www.concrete.org
to register
Learn more about
ACI’s publications,
education, and
certification.
Other features:
• Talk to industry experts
• Dedicated contractor’s section
• Membership discounts
• Recursos en español
+1.248.848.3800 | www.concrete.org | |