Contents
Close Personal
Protection
• More then just close
protection
• It includes:
• Close protection
• Protection of
property
• PERSEC
• INFOSEC
• OPSEC
• Protection of
dignity
• All measures and
action which ensure Bill Gates gets pie in his face on a visit to
necessary level of Belgium
safety and security
WHAT IS CLOSE PERSONAL PROTECTION AND
WHY DO WE NEED IT?
Because it is defined by
Because of some the state to be protected
informations about
life threat
Because of certain
threat to basic (safety)
need
Why would
someone need
protection?
WHO ARE CLOSE PERSONAL PROTECTION
USERS?
PERSONS
SPECIFED AS AMBASSADORS CORPORATE SECTOR
PROTECTED ROYAL MEDIA AND FINANCIAL
BY FAMILIES INSTITUTION
GOVERMENT MEDIA EXPOSED
PERSONS
Legislative, executive
and judical authorities Executives,managers,
actors, artist, etc.
WHO ARE CLOSE PERSONAL PROTECTION
USERS?
(continue)
Personal freedom
Privacy
Sexual freedom
Personal freedom
Privacy
Sexual freedom
PERSONS
SPECIFED AS AMBASSADORS CORPORATE SECTOR
PROTECTED ROYAL MEDIA AND FINANCIAL
BY FAMILIES INSTITUTION
GOVERMENT MEDIA EXPOSED
PERSONS
Legislative, executive
and judical authorities Executives, managers,
actors, artist, etc.
PERSONAL PROTECTION AND SECURITY-
State obligation
SOA; VSOA
Legislative, executive
and judical authorities MoJ – Judicial Police
Users Attitude
Private security sector
Responsibillity provides the protection and
security to all who need
such service.
Users
That kind of service
It should be noted that provided by the private
sector is commonly used
there is currently no by:
CORPORATE SECTOR
special license or training MEDIA AND FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
prescribed by the state for MEDIA EXPOSED
PERSONS
this specific task. Executives,managers,
actors, artist, etc.
POSSIBILITY OF COOPERATION BETWEEN STATE AND
PRIVATE SECTOR IN CLOSE PERSONAL PROTECTION
LEGAL POWERS
We know that some public
Law of Security and
and private services were
Intelligence System
given the authority for this
kind of practice. “Article 49 stipulates that in
performing the tasks set out in
For some services it is not Article 48, section 4 and 5
entirely clear what (concerned about the security
of its own employees, former
authorities they have and
employees and other protected
where they are prescribed. persons, objects and spaces)
need to be applied the rights
Some public services and powers in accordance with
apply the rights and the legal regulations governing
powers in accordance with the treatment of persons
the legal regulations in the engaged in the private security
private security. of persons and property.
ARE THERE ANY OBSTACLES FOR SUCH COOPERATION?
LEGAL POWERS
Law of Security and
This is an Intelligence System
example that “Article 49 stipulates that in
shows us that performing the tasks set out in
the authorities Article 48, section 4 and 5
(concerned about the security
existing in the of its own employees, former
private employees and other protected
protection are persons, objects and spaces)
need to be applied the rights
applicable in and powers in accordance with
the protection the legal regulations governing
of persons in the treatment of persons
engaged in the private security
the public of persons and property.
sector.
ARE THERE ANY OBSTACLES FOR SUCH COOPERATION?
QUALIFICATIONS
NO standards that align TTP in
the publicLaw of Security and
sector
Intelligence System
NO prescribed training in private
security
In both sectors we have individuals who have a high level of training and
knowledge to implement all phases of security and protection
ARE THERE ANY OBSTACLES FOR SUCH COOPERATION?
QUALIFICATIONS
NO standards that align TTP in
the publicLaw of Security and
sector
Intelligence System
NO prescribed training in private
security