D. Ashok* et al.

(IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH

Volume No.4, Issue No.5, August – September 2016, 4181-4183.

A Unique Modulator For Boost Regulator

To Reduce The Voltage Stress
D.ASHOK G.MALLESH KUMAR
M.Tech Student, Dept of EEE Assistant Professor, Dept of EEE
Indur Institute Of Engineering & Technology Indur Institute Of Engineering & Technology
Siddipet, T.S, India Siddipet, T.S, India
ASHRAD MOHAMMED V.HARINATH
Associate Professor, Dept of EEE Assistant Professor, Dept of EEE
Indur Institute Of Engineering & Technology Indur Institute Of Engineering & Technology
Siddipet, T.S, India Siddipet, T.S, India
Abstract: The APS control can be used to lessen the current force on switches see how to avoid load as the
traditional interleaving control can be used to help keep better performance in heavy load. This paper
looks into a manuscript pulse width modulation (PWM) plan for 2-phase interleaved boost ripper tools
with current multiplier for fuel cell power system by mixing alternating phase shift (APS) control and
traditional interleaving PWM control. To be able to reduce output fuel cell stack output current ripple or
even the electricity/electricity ripper tools input current ripple, whether passive filter or active filter may
be used, however, this will raise the complexity from the system. The boundary condition for swapping
between APS and traditional interleaving PWM control comes. In line with the aforementioned analysis,
a complete power range control mixing APS and traditional interleaving control is suggested. Loss
breakdown analysis can also be given look around the efficiency from the ripper tools. Finally, it's
verified by experimental results. The whole process of a switching cycle from the ripper tools could be
split into six stages at boundary condition that the current force on switch is going to be bigger than 1 / 2
of the output current with traditional interleaving control.
Keywords: Boost Converter; Fuel Cell; Interleaved; Loss Breakdown; Voltage Multiplier;
I. INTRODUCTION the current stress from the power products might
increase if this works in discontinuous passing
Fuel cell is among promising choices because of its
mode [3]. This paper looks into a manuscript PWM
benefits of zero emission, low noise, greater power
plan for 2-phase interleaved boost ripper tools with
density, and being easily modularized for portable
current multiplier for fuel cell power system by
power sources, electric automobiles, distributed
mixing APS and traditional interleaving PWM
generation systems, etc. A higher step-up
control. The APS control can be used to lessen the
electricity/electricity ripper tools is required for
current force on switches see how to avoid load as
that system. The electricity/electricity ripper tools
the traditional interleaving control can be used to
will produce a high frequency input current ripple
help keep better performance in heavy load. The
that will lessen the existence duration of the fuel
boundary condition for swapping between APS and
cell stack. High step-up ratio could be
traditional interleaving PWM control comes. In line
accomplished by mixing classical boost ripper tools
with the aforementioned analysis, a complete
with switched inductors, combined inductors, high-
power range control mixing APS and traditional
frequency transformer, or switched capacitor [1]
interleaving control is suggested. Loss breakdown
[2]. They are able to obtain high step-up ratio rich
analysis can also be given look around the
in efficiency, low-current stress, and occasional
efficiency from the ripper tools. Finally, it's
electromagnetic interference. To be able to reduce
verified by experimental results.
output fuel cell stack output current ripple or even
the electricity/electricity ripper tools input current
ripple, whether passive filter or active filter may be
used, however, this will raise the complexity from
the system. Actually, interleaving the
electricity/electricity ripper tools can help to
eliminate the input current ripple from the
electricity/electricity ripper tools. An interleaved
boost ripper tools with current multiplier was
suggested. The ripper tools proven in Fig. 2 are
capable of low-current stress within the power
products, which boosts the conversion efficiency. Fig.1.Block diagram of proposed system
However, this really is only true in heavy load once

2320 –5547 @ 2013-2016 http://www.ijitr.com All rights Reserved. Page | 4181

 D. Ashok* et al.
(IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH
Volume No.4, Issue No.5, August – September 2016, 4181-4183.

II. PROPOSED SYSTEM required. The nominal power the ripper tools is 1
kW for loss breakdown analysis and prototype
The assumption is that components within the
setup, and also the input current is 100 V as the
ripper tools are perfect, both capacitor C1 and C2
output current is 700 V with switching frequency.
are big enough, and duty cycle is under .5. The
The ripper tools may also be employed in boundary
whole process of a switching cycle from the ripper
passing mode (BCM) at nominal load with input
tools could be split into six stages at boundary
current ripple ratio (r = .6) and also the inductor L1
condition that the current force on switch is going
and L2 is 714.3 µH. The inductor is made using the
to be bigger than 1 / 2 of the output current with
amorphous core. The primary areas of losing
traditional interleaving control. The boundary
likewise incorporate the passing loss (Pcon S )
constraint with traditional interleaving control
from the IGBT. The experimental results at
made the decision. Because the switching period
boundary condition, that is in compliance using the
TS and also the input inductor L are made at
theoretical waveform [5]. The experimental
nominal operation in continuous passing mode
answers are provided to verify the prior analysis.
(CCM), the constraint is dependent upon duty cycle
To be able to test the dynamic performance from
D and also the load R. Exactly why there's two
the ripper tools with fuel cell as input, the ripper
parts within the boundary constraint would be that
tools are attached to the creation of the PEMFC.
the duty cycle D varies using the load once the
Once the load differs from 3478 O to 1658 O, the
ripper tools works in DCM. For any given
output current from the fuel cell will differs from
application, the current gain from the
99.1 to 93.7 V, the control plan will swap from
electricity/electricity ripper tools is decided. After
APS control to traditional interleaving control, the
which, the minimum duty cycle that may maintain
current stress of power switches keeps 1 / 2 of the
low-current stress in primary power products with
output current throughout load variation, and also
traditional interleaving control will be presented
the output current from the ripper tools keeps 700
[4]. Within our 1-kW prototype design, the input
V in stable operation underneath the two load.
current from the ripper tools is 86-107 V, and also
Therefore, the suggested APS control can boost the
the output current from the ripper tools is 700 V.
lifetime and longevity of capacitors C1 and C2.
The current gain will be different from n1 = 6.54 to
The control plan will swap from traditional
n2 = 8.14, and so the circuit parameters at
interleaving control to APS control, and also the
boundary conditions Kcrit will be different from
current stress of power switches keeps 1 / 2 of the
Kcrit1 = .013 to Kcrit2 = .0083. Based on the
output current too. Therefore, the control plan
principle of APS, APS control is suggested to
suggested within this paper could achieve halved
resolve the sunshine load trouble with duty cycle
current force on switches when swapping between
under .5. Using the load growing, the job cycle is
traditional interleaving control and APS control.
going to be elevated too. Once the duty cycle is
elevated to .5, the APS control is going to be III. CONCLUSION
modified to become traditional interleaving control
To be able to reduce output fuel cell stack output
with halved switching frequency. Based on
current ripple or even the electricity/electricity
previous analysis, the minimum duty cycle to attain
ripper tools input current ripple, whether passive
low-current force on switches with traditional
filter or active filter may be used, however, this
interleaving control is under .5. Therefore, you'll be
will raise the complexity from the system. The
able to combine both APS control and traditional
boundary condition comes after stage analysis
interleaving control to manage the ripper tools for
within this paper. The boundary condition classifies
full power range operation. The swapping between
the operating states into two zones, i.e., Zone A and
your APS control and traditional interleaving
Zone B. The standard interleaving control can be
control in the region Dm1 = D = Dm2 is
used in Zone some time APS control can be used in
accomplished by discovering the current stress
Zone B. And also the swapping function is
from the switch S1. To have better dynamic
accomplished with a logic unit. The whole process
performance operation, dual loop control is
of a switching cycle from the ripper tools could be
adopted, where the inner current loop would be to
split into six stages at boundary condition that the
control the input inductor current as the outer
current force on switch is going to be bigger than 1
current loop would be to control the output current.
/ 2 of the output current with traditional
Kip and Kii would be the PI controller parameters
interleaving control. Using the suggested control
from the inner current loop, while Kvp and Kvi
plan, the ripper tools are capable of low current
would be the PI controller parameters from the
force on switches in most power selection of the
outer current loop. As the price of fuel cell
burden that is verified by experimental results.
continues to be high, you should increase the
efficiency from the power ripper tools for fuel cell- IV. REFERENCES
based power system to be able to reduce its
[1] S. Lee, P. Kim, and Sewan Choi, “High
operation cost while increasing the effective use of
step-up soft-switched converters using
fuels. Therefore, loss breakdown analysis is

2320 –5547 @ 2013-2016 http://www.ijitr.com All rights Reserved. Page | 4182

 D. Ashok* et al.
(IJITR) INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH
Volume No.4, Issue No.5, August – September 2016, 4181-4183.

voltage multiplier cells,” IEEE Trans. Power

Electron., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 3379–3387, Jul.
2013.
[2] S. K. Mazumder, R. K. Burra, and K.
Acharya, “A ripple-mitigating and energy-
efficient fuel cell power-conditioning
system,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol.
22, no. 4, pp. 1437–1452, Jul. 2007.
[3] L. Wuhua, F. Lingli, Z. Yi, H. Xiangning,
X. Dewei, and W. Bin, “Highstep-up and
high-efficiency fuel-cell power-generation
system with activeclamp flyback-forward
converter,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol.
59, no. 1, pp. 599–610, Jan. 2012.
[4] R. Gules, L. L. Pfitscher, and L. C. Franco,
“An interleaved boost DC–DC converter
with large conversion ratio,” in Proc. IEEE
Int. Symp. Ind. Electron., 2003, pp. 411–
416.
[5] G. Fontes, C. Turpin, S. Astier, and T. A.
Meynard, “Interactions between fuel cells
and power converters: Influence of current
harmonics on a fuel cell stack,” IEEE Trans.
Power Electron., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 670–
678, Mar. 2007.

2320 –5547 @ 2013-2016 http://www.ijitr.com All rights Reserved. Page | 4183