Anda di halaman 1dari 7

Reading Sontag: Objectivism, rationalism and dialectic desituationism

Henry N. F. Abian

Department of Deconstruction, University of Illinois

1. Realities of absurdity
If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication’, one is faced with a
choice: either reject preconceptualist capitalist theory or conclude that
reality serves to oppress the underprivileged. Foucault suggests the use of
rationalism to deconstruct class divisions.

“Language is dead,” says Marx; however, according to Werther[1] , it is not so much language that
is dead, but rather the
rubicon, and eventually the defining characteristic, of language. It could be
said that Foucault uses the term ‘the neocultural paradigm of consensus’ to
denote a mythopoetical paradox. If rationalism holds, the works of Smith are
modernistic.

Thus, Scuglia[2] implies that we have to choose between


predialectic theory and the cultural paradigm of consensus. The subject is
interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful communication’ that includes truth as
a totality.

It could be said that the primary theme of Cameron’s[3]


essay on rationalism is the defining characteristic of neotextual sexual
identity. If cultural desublimation holds, we have to choose between the
neocultural paradigm of consensus and subcapitalist capitalism.

Thus, the premise of Batailleist `powerful communication’ states that the


goal of the poet is significant form, but only if culture is equal to
consciousness; if that is not the case, we can assume that expression is a
product of the masses. The subject is contextualised into a neocultural
paradigm of consensus that includes reality as a whole.

However, the main theme of the works of Tarantino is a material totality. A


number of theories concerning rationalism may be found.

2. The neocultural paradigm of consensus and Batailleist `powerful


communication’
“Sexuality is intrinsically a legal fiction,” says Lyotard. But the primary
theme of Brophy’s[4] critique of rationalism is the common
ground between class and society. Foucault uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful
communication” to denote the dialectic, and some would say the fatal flaw, of
structuralist sexual identity.

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between


feminine and masculine. In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of
Tarantino is a mythopoetical reality. Debord promotes the use of rationalism to
read and challenge language.

“Sexual identity is part of the absurdity of consciousness,” says Lacan.


Thus, several materialisms concerning the fatal flaw of subtextual truth exist.
Debord uses the term ‘Lyotardist narrative’ to denote not narrative, but
prenarrative.

The primary theme of Parry’s[5] essay on rationalism is


the stasis, and subsequent absurdity, of postcapitalist sexual identity.
However, many narratives concerning structural desituationism may be
discovered. Derrida uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to
denote the role of the artist as reader.

Thus, rationalism holds that the task of the writer is deconstruction, given
that the premise of the submodernist paradigm of context is valid. Foucault
uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the economy, and
some would say the rubicon, of cultural consciousness.

However, any number of discourses concerning the role of the reader as


participant exist. McElwaine[6] implies that we have to
choose between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and postcapitalist
nihilism.

But an abundance of dematerialisms concerning rationalism may be revealed.


If Batailleist `powerful communication’ holds, we have to choose between
Batailleist `powerful communication’ and semanticist sublimation.

In a sense, Sartre suggests the use of rationalism to attack the status quo.
Any number of theories concerning the paradigm of precapitalist society exist.

But dialectic Marxism states that sexual identity, somewhat ironically, has
objective value. The opening/closing distinction depicted in Gibson’s
Idoru is also evident in Mona Lisa Overdrive, although in a more
subtextual sense.

Therefore, the main theme of the works of Gibson is not discourse per se,
but neodiscourse. Several constructions concerning rationalism may be
discovered.

3. Gibson and the patriarchial paradigm of reality


“Society is fundamentally used in the service of class divisions,” says
Baudrillard. However, Humphrey[7] suggests that we have to
choose between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and the cultural paradigm
of expression. If submodernist feminism holds, the works of Gibson are
postmodern.

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the concept of cultural


art. But Humphrey[8] holds that we have to choose between
rationalism and semiotic discourse. Marx’s critique of Sartreist existentialism
implies that narrativity is used to entrench capitalism.

If one examines rationalism, one is faced with a choice: either accept


subcultural conceptual theory or conclude that narrative comes from
communication. Thus, the example of Batailleist `powerful communication’ which
is a central theme of Gibson’s Idoru emerges again in
Neuromancer. The primary theme of Dahmus’s[9]
analysis of rationalism is the role of the reader as artist.

It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a dialectic paradigm


of consensus that includes art as a whole. Any number of discourses concerning
not, in fact, narrative, but postnarrative exist.

Therefore, in Virtual Light, Gibson affirms Batailleist `powerful


communication’; in Pattern Recognition he examines neotextual
deappropriation. The main theme of the works of Gibson is the absurdity, and
thus the collapse, of capitalist class.

However, if rationalism holds, we have to choose between Batailleist


`powerful communication’ and premodernist semanticism. Derrida promotes the use
of Batailleist `powerful communication’ to read sexual identity.

But the premise of Batailleist `powerful communication’ suggests that the


goal of the poet is social comment, given that reality is interchangeable with
sexuality. Several desituationisms concerning Batailleist `powerful
communication’ may be found.

It could be said that the primary theme of Buxton’s[10]


model of rationalism is a self-sufficient reality. Bataille uses the term
‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote not theory, as Batailleist
`powerful communication’ suggests, but subtheory.

4. Batailleist `powerful communication’ and textual discourse


“Class is part of the genre of art,” says Marx. Thus, the main theme of the
works of Gibson is the defining characteristic, and subsequent paradigm, of
presemantic language. Bataille suggests the use of materialist postcapitalist
theory to deconstruct outdated perceptions of class.

If one examines rationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject


textual discourse or conclude that culture is dead. In a sense, Marx’s essay on
the conceptual paradigm of expression holds that society has significance, but
only if rationalism is invalid; otherwise, Lacan’s model of Foucaultist power
relations is one of “subcapitalist narrative”, and hence intrinsically elitist.
Lyotard uses the term ‘Batailleist `powerful communication” to denote the
difference between truth and sexual identity.

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between


creation and destruction. However, Foucault’s critique of Lyotardist narrative
suggests that context is a product of the collective unconscious. The subject
is contextualised into a Batailleist `powerful communication’ that includes
culture as a whole.

If one examines textual discourse, one is faced with a choice: either accept
rationalism or conclude that narrativity serves to marginalize the Other, given
that consciousness is distinct from narrativity. It could be said that the
characteristic theme of Prinn’s[11] model of semanticist
dematerialism is not narrative, but subnarrative. Sartre promotes the use of
rationalism to analyse and read class.
In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the concept of neocultural
language. Thus, Parry[12] holds that the works of Gibson
are reminiscent of Eco. If textual discourse holds, we have to choose between
rationalism and Baudrillardist simulation.

It could be said that the textual paradigm of narrative states that academe
is capable of truth. Derrida suggests the use of rationalism to attack the
status quo.

But the subject is interpolated into a Batailleist `powerful communication’


that includes consciousness as a reality. The premise of Batailleist `powerful
communication’ holds that consensus must come from the masses, but only if
Lacan’s essay on rationalism is valid.

However, Marx uses the term ‘postdialectic objectivism’ to denote the role
of the writer as artist. The subject is contextualised into a textual discourse
that includes language as a paradox.

Thus, Lacan uses the term ‘rationalism’ to denote not theory per se, but
pretheory. Baudrillard promotes the use of Batailleist `powerful communication’
to modify sexual identity.

However, Geoffrey[13] implies that we have to choose


between textual discourse and Lyotardist narrative. Debord suggests the use of
Batailleist `powerful communication’ to deconstruct class divisions.

It could be said that the main theme of the works of Gibson is the role of
the participant as observer. The closing/opening distinction prevalent in
Gibson’s Neuromancer is also evident in Mona Lisa Overdrive,
although in a more subcultural sense.

But the characteristic theme of Pickett’s[14] critique


of rationalism is the common ground between society and class. An abundance of
constructions concerning a mythopoetical totality exist.

1. Werther, Z. A. (1970)
Rationalism in the works of Smith. Oxford University Press

2. Scuglia, N. K. D. ed. (1996) The Absurdity of


Narrative: Rationalism and Batailleist `powerful communication’. University
of Georgia Press

3. Cameron, J. H. (1972) Batailleist `powerful


communication’ in the works of Tarantino. Loompanics

4. Brophy, E. ed. (1995) Deconstructing Realism:


Batailleist `powerful communication’ and rationalism. University of
Southern North Dakota at Hoople Press

5. Parry, S. Q. (1988) Semioticist patriarchialism,


objectivism and rationalism. Loompanics
6. McElwaine, D. M. S. ed. (1993) The Expression of
Failure: Batailleist `powerful communication’ in the works of Gibson. Panic
Button Books

7. Humphrey, L. (1981) Rationalism and Batailleist


`powerful communication’. Cambridge University Press

8. Humphrey, T. L. P. ed. (1970) The Economy of Narrative:


Rationalism, the neoconceptualist paradigm of discourse and objectivism.
And/Or Press

9. Dahmus, D. H. (1984) Batailleist `powerful


communication’ and rationalism. Panic Button Books

10. Buxton, D. E. R. ed. (1975) The Narrative of


Absurdity: Rationalism and Batailleist `powerful communication’. And/Or
Press

11. Prinn, V. M. (1986) Batailleist `powerful


communication’ and rationalism. Loompanics

12. Parry, W. ed. (1977) The Defining characteristic of


Sexuality: Rationalism in the works of Glass. Schlangekraft

13. Geoffrey, B. I. (1992) Rationalism and Batailleist


`powerful communication’. Panic Button Books

14. Pickett, A. D. B. ed. (1970) Deconstructing Foucault:


Batailleist `powerful communication’ and rationalism. Loompanics

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the
Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable
page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system
for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios
(this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 18,192,097 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST,
when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer
Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using
Recursive Transition Networks“.
More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics
Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism
publication.

dada engine
SEARCH
Search for:
Search …
SEARCH
TEXT GENERATORS
Adolescent Poetry
Band Names
Postmodernism
Time Cube
OTHER THINGS
Buy Me Something
Discordian Tarot
Emperor Norton
Loteria Collection
ADS
TAGS
art Bicycle bush Car-Free Cool copyright Culture customer_service DIY drainspotting
eco_footprint elsewhere Events External Brain flickr For Sale Gadgets gear google hacks Humor
Internet Links Listening loteria make Manhole Movies/TV music old-time Personal police
preparedness Rants Reading Seattle Stupid People Technology tools video wifi wordpress wtf
xtracycle youtube
META
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
WordPress.org
Search for:
Search …
SEARCH
RECENT POSTS
Folklife 2018 Thoughts
2018/05/27
Ten Albums
2018/04/04
Tunes From Portland Jams
2018/01/19
Jam Tune ID Help?
2018/01/17
Neural Net Old-Time Tune Names
2018/01/16
RECENT COMMENTS
Prinze Linda on Old Yeller Dog Food
Prinze Linda on The Secret Racist History of Clickbait
Kevin on The Last Dangerous Unicorn
Clair Francis Bee on In Which I Am Proven Wrong About The Clampers
Matt Rogers on Ten Albums
TEXT GENERATORS
Adolescent Poetry
Band Names
Postmodernism
Time Cube
MISC
Buy Me Something
Discordian Tarot
Emperor Norton
Loteria Collection
Communications From Elsewhere Proudly powered by WordPress