1
Associate, International Centre for Bioresource Management.
2
MSC Students, Department of Biotechnology, Malankara Catholic College, Mariagiri
Malankara Catholic College, Mariagiri, Kaliakkavilai, 629153.
3
Research Scholar, Department of Biotechnology, VIIT University, TN.
ABSTRACT
Article Received on
01 March 2015, Marine environment is an exceptional reservoir of biologically active
Revised on 23 March 2015, natural products, many of which exhibits structural features not been
Accepted on 14 April 2015
found in terrestrial natural products. Marine algae or seaweed, the most
accessible marine resource of the coastal zone occupy potentially
*Correspondence for important place as a source of biomedical components. The common
Author major compounds like proteins, carbohydrates, steroids, glycosides can
Dr. S. Sujatha
be extracted using polar solvents such as Methanol, Ethyl acetate and
Associate, International
Centre for Bioresources
Chloroform during Phytochemical process. These results were
Management. compared with the recently reported qualitative phytochemical tests
which were used to detect the presence of alkaloids, tannins, saponins,
flavonoids, glycosides and phenols from the seaweeds. Marine genus synthesizes active
constituents which are used in traditional and complementary medicine. Different varieties of
marine algae were reported to contain active ingredients that can cure diseases. Nowadays,
higher percentage of population prefers to use remedies of natural origin for curing illness as
these claimed to produce less side effects. Seaweeds are considered as a source of bioactive
compounds as they are able to produce a great variety of secondary metabolites characterized
by a broad spectrum of biological activities. Biostimulant properties of seaweeds are explored
for use in agriculture and the antimicrobial activities for the development of novel antibiotics.
Seaweeds have some valuable medicinal components such as antibiotics, laxatives, anti-
coagulants, anti-ulcer products and suspending agents in radiological preparations. Fresh and
dry seaweeds are extensively consumed by people especially living in the coastal areas. From
the literature, it is observed that the edible seaweeds contain a significant amount of the
proteins, vitamins and minerals, which are essential nutrition for human. The present review
was highlighted various biological activity and biomedical potential and its bioactive
substances especially brown and green marine sea weeds.
INTRODUCTION
Marine algae are not only the primary and major producers of organic matter in the sea, but
they also exert profound effects on the density and distribution of other inhabitants of the
marine environment. An understanding of the wide range of behavioral relationships that
exist among organisms would provide us with clues to substances of biomedical interest.
Marine secondary metabolites are organic compounds produced by microbes, sponges,
seaweeds, and other marine organisms. The host organism biosynthesizes these compounds
as non-primary or secondary metabolites to protect themselves and to maintain homeostasis
in their environment. Some of these secondary metabolites offer avenues for developing cost-
effective, safe and potent drugs. Nearly 50 lakhs (50,000,00) species available in the sea are
virtually untapped sources of secondary metabolites. Those compounds already isolated from
seaweeds are providing valuable ideas for the development of new drugs against cancer,
microbial infections and inflammation (Elena et al., 2001; Kim et al., 1997; Okai et al., 1997)
apart from their potential ecological/industrial significances such as controlling reproduction,
settlement/ biofouling and feeding deterrents (Selvin, 2002). In this background, the present
study intended to evaluate the toxic influence, activity range and potency of seaweeds
collected from the peninsular coast of India.
which seaweeds grow is harsh as they are exposed to a combination of light and high oxygen
concentrations. These factors can lead to the formation of free radicals and other strong
oxidizing agents but seaweeds seldom suffer any serious photodynamic damage during
metabolism. This fact implies that seaweed cells have some protective mechanisms and
compounds (Matasukawa et al., 1997). The total global seaweed production of the world in
the year 2004 was >15 million metric tons of which nearly 15–20% is contributed by Indian
Ocean region (FAO, 2006). Extensive screening of marine microalgae has led to the isolation
and chemical determination of over 15, 000 compounds, including fatty acids, sterols,
phenolic compounds, terpenes, enzymes, polysaccharides, alkaloids, and flavonoids. More
recent reports revealed that marine algae possess rich sources of antioxidant compounds with
potential free radical scavenging activity.
In addition to vitamins and minerals, seaweeds are also potentially good sources of proteins,
polysaccharides and fibres (Lahaye, 1991 and Darcy-Vrillon, 1993). Indian seaweeds are of
great food value and certain seaweeds contain 16 to 30% protein on dry weight and have all
essential amino acids which are not available in vegetable food materials. The highest protein
content is recorded for red seaweeds such as Porphyra tenera and Palmaria palmata which
contain, respectively; up to 47 and 35% proteins expressed as dry weight (Fujiwara-Arasaki
et al., 1984; Morgan et al., 1980). Brown seaweeds, with the exception of Undaria
pinnatifida, are known to contain proteins forming 5 to 10% of dry weight. Green algae
belonging to the genus Ulva contain 18 to 26% proteins (Bruni and Stancher, 1973; Nisizawa
et al., 1987). Seaweeds are considered to produce a great variety of secondary metabolites
bacteria. Extracts of marine algae were reported to exhibit antibacterial activity (Siddhanta et
al., 1997; Mahasneh et al., 1995). Vanitha et al., (2003) reported the antibacterial action of
nine seaweeds collected from Kanyakumari coast against human upper respiratory tract
pathogens which include both Gram positive and Gram negative bacteria. Kandhasamy and
Arunachalam (2008) found out the in vitro antibacterial property of seaweeds viz. Caulerpa
racemosa, Ulva lactuca, Gracilaria folifera, Hypnea musciformis, Sargassum teneerimum, S.
myriocystem and Padina tetrastomatica collected from Koodankullam village, Tirunelveli,
Tamilnadu against gram negative and gram positive pathogenic bacteria. Some commonly
occurring marine algae Caulerpa scalpelliformis, Ulva lactuca, Pandina tetrastromatica,
Stoecchospermum marginatum and Acanthophora spicifera have been collected from the
coast of Tuticorin, Tamilnadu and evaluated for antifungal and antibacterial activity by using
four solvents such as petroleum ether, chloroform, methonal and benzene by Jothibai margret
et al., (2008). Arul et al., (2008) found out the antibacterial activity of the methanol, diethyl
ether, acetone and dichloromethane extracts of Padina boergesnii collected from Tuticorin
Coast against 10 human pathogenic bacteria.
Table: 1- Structural view of important Marine seaweeds and its Biological activity
S.NO. Name of the sea weed View of the seaweed Biological Activity
2. Ascophyllum nodosom
4.
Antibacterial
Bifurcaria bifurgata
Cladostephus
Antifungal
spongiosus
Hepatoprotective
6. Copomenia peregrina activity
Anticancer and
antiappoptotic
7. Cystoceira buccata
activity
Cystoseira nodicaulis
8. Antioxidant
Potential
9. Cystoseira
tamariscifolia Food adherent
activity
of biochemical compound. Pharmaceutical importances of seaweeds are well known all over
the world and extensive efforts were given to bring out substances from algae. There are a
number of reports regarding the medicinal importance of seaweeds belonging to
Chlorophyceae, Phaeophyceae, Rhodophyceae from all over the world (Kolanjinathan et al.,
2009, Rajasulochana et al., 2011). Several studies were made earlier on the antimicrobial
activities of marine algae (Battu et al., 2011, Selvi et al., 2011, Tuney et al., 2006,
Veeragurunathan and Geetha, 2009, Veeragurunathan et al., 2008). Marine macro algae are
the most interesting group because of their broad spectrum of biological activities such as
antimicrobial (Chiheb et al., 2011), antiviral (Bouhlal et al., 2010, Bouhlal et al., 2011, Kim
and Karadeniz, 2011), antifungal (De Felicio et al., 2010), anti-allergic (Na et al., 2005) ,
anti-coagulant (Dayong et al., 2008), anti-cancer (Kim et al., 2011), anti-fouling (Bhadury
and Wright, 2004) and antioxidant activities (Devi et al., 2011). They produce a wide variety
of chemically active metabolites in their surroundings as an aid to protect themselves against
other settling organisms (Bhadury and Wright, 2004). There are numerous reports of macro
algae derived chemical compounds that have a broad range of biological activities, some of
which have been used in pharmaceutical industries (Fig-1).
phenolic compounds, steroids, halogenated ketones and alkanes, cyclic polysulphides and
fatty acids (Manilal et al., 2009). As a consequence of an increasing demand for biodiversity
in the screening programmes seeking therapeutic agents from natural products, there is now a
greater interest in marine organisms. The present study was undertaken to investigate the
antibacterial activities of chloroform, ethanol and methanol extracts of two seaweeds
Sargassum ilicifolium and Kappaphycus alvarezii collected from the Rameshwaram coast
against three human pathogenic bacteria namely, Escherichia coli, Salmonella sp. and
Klebsiella sp.
Antihelminthic activity
Immunomodulatory
activity
Antimicrobial activity
Antiulergic
activity
Analgesic @
Wound healing Bio-potential of antiinflammator
Effect y
Various
Antihyperglycemic
Seaweeds
Antioxidant activity Hepatoprotective
Activity
CONCLUSION
Currently, about 50% of drugs used in clinical trials for anticancer activity were isolated from
natural sources such as marine algae (Seaweeds) herbs and spices or related to them. A
number of active compounds such as flavonoids, diterpenoids, triterpenoids and alkaloids
have been shown to possess anticancer activity. According to the report of the American
National Cancer Institute (NCI), the criterion of anticancer activity for the crude extracts of
herbs is an IC50<30 μg/ml. Thus, according to the results from current study seems that
marine algae could be employed in ethno-medicine in the treatment of cancerous diseases.
There are some limitations of this study. Relationship between flavonoids concentration and
antioxidant activity were not determined. However, there is a need of detailed scientific study
on traditional medical practices to ensure that valuable therapeutic knowledge of some
seaweed is preserved and also to provide scientific evidence for their efficacies. When the
particular solvent was used to extract from the seaweed materials definitely its will have a
dramatic effect on the compounds against various illness of human. For example, the non
polar fraction from chloroform: methanol extraction of majority of the brown and green
seaweed exhibited a significant protective effect against lipid oxidation associated with
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We are grateful to our Malankara Catholic College authorities of present Management
Correspondent/Bursar (Rev. Fr. Jose Bright and the Principal) and (Former Correspondent
Rev. Fr. Premkumar, M.S.W) given the encouragement and support for this research
manuscript publication. Then the corresponding author is verymuch thankful to Mr. K.
Sukesh Ass. Professor, Dep. Of Microbiology also Dr. J. Rajagobal HOD, Depmt of
Biotechnology MCC, Mariagiri for them sustainable helps of this review paper publication.
REFERENCES
1. Arul S.KR., Rajesh P., Murugan. Antibacterial activity of the crude extracts of the
Seaweed Padina boergesenii. Seaweed Res. Utiln.; 2008; 30: 177-182.
2. Battu GR, Ethadi S, Prayaga Murthy P, Praneeth VS, Rao M. In- vitro antibacterial
activity and preliminary phytochemical screening of three algae from Visakhapatnam
Coast, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Pharm. Sci, 2011; 3(4): 399-401.
3. AOAC. (1995). Official methods of analysis, 16th Edn. Association of official analytical
chemists, Washington,
4. Bhacuni, D.S, - Rawat, D.S. (2005). Bioactive Marine Natural Products.
Spinger/Anamaya Publishers. 400p. ISBN: 978-1402034725.
5. Bhadury, P. Wright, C.P. Exploitation of marine algae: biogenic compounds for potential
antifouling application. In Planta, 2004; 219: 561-578.
6. Bhakuni DS., Silva M. Biodynamic substances from marine flora. Bot. Mar. 1974; 17:
40-51.
7. Biard JF., Verbist JF., Le Boterff J., Ragas G., Leococq MM. Algues fixees de la cote
Atlantique Francaise Contenant des Substances antibacteriennes et antifuniques. Planta
Med Suppl. 1980; 136-151.
8. Bouhlal, R.- Haslin, C.- Chermann, J.C.- Colliec- Jouault, S.- Sinquin, C.- Simon, G. –
Cerantola, S.- Riadi, H. Bourgougnon, N. (2011). Antiviral activities of sulfated
37. Hediat MH. Salama, Najat Marraiki. (2010). Antimicrobial activity and phytochemical
analyses of Polygonum
38. Hellio GB, Bremer A.M, Pons G, Cottenceau Y, Gal Le and Borgougmon. Antibacterial
and antifungal activities of extracts of marine algae from Brittany France. Use as
antifouling agents. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 54, 2000, 543-549.
39. Horborne JB. (1973). Phytochemical methods. Chapman & Hall, New York. pp 288.
Hornsey IS., Hide D. The production of antimicrobial compounds by British marine
algae Antibiotic producing marine algae. I. Antibiotic producing marine algae. Br.
Phycol. J. 1974; 9: 353-361.
40. HS Garg. “Bioactive substance in marine algae, Marine biotechnology”, Plenum press,
New York, 1993; 1-8.
41. Ito K., Hori K. Seaweed: chemical composition and potential uses. Food Review
International. 1989; 5: 101-144.
42. Johnsi Christobel G, Lipton A.P, Aishwarya M.S, Sarika A.R and Udayakumar A.
Antimicrobial activity of aqueous extracts from selected macroalgae of southwest coast
of India. Seaweed Res. Utilin, 33 (1&2), 2011, 67-75.
43. Joseph Selvin* and Aaron P. L. 2004. Biopotential of ulva fasciata and hypnea
musciformis collected from the peninsular coast of india, Journal of Marine Science and
Technology, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 1-6.
44. Jothibai Margret R., Kumerasan S., Indra Jasmine G. Antimicrobial activity of some
macro algae from the coast of Tuticori, Tamilnadu. Seaweed Res. Util. 2008; 30 (Special
issue): 149-156.
45. Kaliaperumal N., Ramalingam JR., Kalimuthu S., Ezhilvalavan R. Seasonal changes in
growth, biochemical constitutions and phycocolloid of some marine algae of Mandapam
coast. Seaweed Res.Utiln. 2002; 24 (1):73-77.
46. Kalimuthusamy Natarajaseenivasan. Annals of Microbiology, 2008, 58 (3), 535-541.
47. Kandhasamy M., Arunachalam KD. Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial property of
seaweeds of Southeast coast of India. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;
7(12):1958-1961.
48. Karthikaidevi G, Manivannan K, Thirumaran G, et al. Antibacterial properties of
selected seaweeds from Vedalai Coastal Waters; Gulf of Mannar Marine Biosphere
Reserve. Global Journal of Pharmacology, 3(2), 2009, 107-112.
49. Kavangh F. (1992). Analytical Microbiology-II, Academic press, New York: 241-243.
50. Kim SK, THOMAS, N.V. – LI, X. (2011). Anticancer compounds from marine
macroalgae and their application as medicinal foods. Advanced Food and Nutrition
Research, vol. 64, 2011, p. 213-224.
51. Kim SK, Wijesekara I. Development and biological activities of marine derived
bioactive peptides: A review. Journal of Fuctional Foods 2010; 1-9.
52. Kim, J.H., Hudson, J.B., Huang, A.M., Bannistes, K., Jin, H., Choi, T.J., Towers,
G.H.N., Hong, Y.K., and DeWreede, R.E., “Biological Activities of Seaweed Extracts
from British Columbia, Canada, and Korea. I. Antiviral Activity,” Can. J. Bot. Rev. Can.
Bot., Vol. 75, No. 10, pp. 1656-1660 (1997).
53. Kim, S.K.- Karadeniz, F. (2011). Anti-HIV Activity of extracts and compounds from
marine algae. In Advanced Food and Nutrition Research, vol. 64: p.213-224.
54. Kirk JTO., Allen RL. Dependence of chloroplast pigments synthesis on protein synthetic
effects on actilione. Biochem. Biphy. Res. Cann. 1965; 27: 523-530.
55. Kolanjinathan K, Ganesh P, Govindarajan M. (2009). Antibacterial activity of Ethanol
extracts of seaweeds against fish bacterial pathogens. Eur.Rev. Med.Pharmacol.Sci
:13:173-177.
56. Kolanjinathan, K P Ganesh; M Govindarajan. European Review for Medical and
Pharmacological Sciences, 2009, 13, 173-177.
57. Krishnaveni Eahamban, Johnson Marimuthu Antonisamy. (2012). Preliminary
Phytochemical, UV-VIS, HPLC and Anti-bacterial studies on Gracilaria cirticata. J.
Ag. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicin: 2012.
58. Lahaye M. Marine algae as a source of dietary fibers: Determination of soluble and
insoluble dietary fiber contents in some 'sea vegetable'. J Sci Food Agric. 1991; 54:587-
594.
59. Lala PK. (1993). Lab manuals of Pharmacognosy. CSI Publishers and Distributers,
Calcutta. pp 226.
60. Lavanya R. and Veerappan N. Antibacterial potential of six seaweeds collected from
Gulf of Mannar of Southeast Coast of India. Advances in Biological Research, 5(1),
2011, 38-44.
61. Levering T., Hoppe H.A., Schmid O.J. Marine Algae. (1969). A survey of research and
Utilization. Granm be Gruyter & Co., Hamburg, pp.1-421.
62. Lima-Filho J., Ana M., Ana FF., Sissi MF., Vania MM. Antibacterial activity of extracts
of six macroalgae from the northeastern Brazilian coast. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2002; 33 (4):
311-313.
63. Lindequist U., Schweder T. (2001). Marine Biotechnology. In: Rehm, H. J., Reed, G.
(Eds.), Biotechnology, vol. 10. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp. 441-484.
64. Lustigman B., Brown C. Antibiotic production by marine algae isolated from the New
york/New Jersey Coast. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 1991;
46:329-335.
65. Mahasneh I., Jamal M., Kashashneh, M., Zibdeh M. Antibiotic activity of marine algae
against multiantibiotic resistant bacteria. Microbios. 1995; 83:23-26.
66. Mairh OP., Parekh RG., Chauhan VD., Rao PS., Mehta DJ. Ecology, culture and
chemical constituents of Enteromorpha from Gujarat coast. eaweed. Res. Utiln.1983;
6(1) : 1-22.
67. Manilal A, Sujith S, Selvin J, Shakir C, Kiran G.S. (2009). Antibacterial activity of
Falkenbergia hillebrandii (Born) from the India coast against human pathogens. FYTON
78:161-166.
68. Manilal; A. S Sujith; J Selvin; C Shakir; G Seghal Kiran. International journal of
Experimental Botany, 2009, 78, 161-166
69. Martinez-Nadal NG., Rodriguez LC., Casillas C. Sarganin and Chonalgin. New
antibiotic substances from marine algae Puerto Rico. Antimicrb. Agents. Chemother.
1963; 68-72.
70. Matanjun P, Mohamed S, Mustapha NM, Mohammad K, Ming CH. (2008). Antioxidant
activities and phenolics Microbiology, 2009, 5 (2), 128-131.
71. Morgan KC., Wright JLC., Simpson FJ. Review of chemical constituents of the red
algae.Palmaria palmata. Econ. Bot. 1980; 34: 27–50.
72. Muthuraman B., Ranganathan R. Biochemical studies of some green algae of
Kanyakumari coast. Seaweed.Res. Utiln. 2004; 26(1&2): 69-71.
73. NA, H.J.-Moon, P.D.-Lee, H.J.-Kim, H.R-Chae, H.J.-Shin,T. –Seo,Y.-Hong,S.H-Kim,
H.M. (2005). Regulatory effect of atopic allergic reaction by Corpopelt is affinis. In
Journal of Ethnopharmocology, vol.101: p.43-48.
74. Naqvi S., Solimabi WA., Kamat SY., Fernandes L., Reddy CVG., Bhakuni DS., Dhawan
BN. Screening of some marine plants from the Indian coast for biological activity. Bot.
Mar.1981; 6: 225-232.
75. Newman DJ., Cragg GM., Snader KM. Natural products as source of new drugs over the
period 1981-2002. J. Nat. Prod. 2003; 66: 1022-1037.
76. Nisizawa K., Noda H., Kikuchi R., Watanabe T. Themain seaweed foods in Japan.
Hydrobiol. 1987; 151/152: 5–29.
77. Padmini S.R.P. Biological investigation of Indian marine algae and screening of some
green, red and brown seaweed for their antimicrobial activity. Seaweed Research and
Utilization, 14(1), 1991, 37-43.
78. Patra; J.K. AP Patra; NK Mahapatra; HN Thatoi; S Das; RK Sahu; GC Swain.
Malaysian Journal of Priyadharshini, S.–Bragadeeswaran, S.– Prabhu, K – Ran, S.S.
(2011). Antimicrobial activity and hemolytic activity of seaweed extracts Ulva fasciata
(Delile 1813) from Mandapam, Southeast coast of India. In Asian Pacific Journal of
Tropical Biomedicine, vol.1, 2011, p.S38-S39.
79. Rajasulochana P, Dhamotharan R, Krishnamoorthy P, Murugesan S. (2011).
Antibacterial activity of the extracts of marine red and brown algae. J.Am.Sci : 3(4):399-
401.
80. Rajasulochana P, Dhamotharan R, Krishnamoorthy P, Murugesan S. Antibacterial
Activity of the Extracts of Marine Red and Brown Algae. Journal of American Science,
5(3), 2009, 20-25.
81. Rangaiah G.S, Lakshmi PA, Sruthi keerithia K. (2010). The antimicrobial activity of the
crude extracts of Chlorophyceacan Seaweeds Ulva, Caulerpa and Spongomorpha spp.
against clinical and phyto pathogens.Drug Invent. To day :2:311-314.
82. Rao P.P.S. Biological investigation of Indian Phaeophyceae. Antimicrobial activities of
frozen samples of genus Sargassum collected from Okha, west coast of India. Seaweed
Res. Utilin, 17, 1995, 105-109.
83. Rao PPS Rao PS, Karmakar S.M. Bot. Mar., 31, 1988, 295-298.
84. Rodriguez- Bernaldo de Quiros A, Large- Yusty MA, Lopez- Hernadez J. (2010).
Determination of phenolic S568-S574.
85. Sanaa Shanab. M. M. (2007). International journal of Agriculture and Biology, 09 (2),
220–225.
86. Santhanam Shanmughapriya, Aseer Manilal, Sugathan Sujith, Joseph Selvin, George
Seghal Kiran, Screeening of antibacterial activity in marine green and brown macroalgae
from the coast of Morocco. In African Journal Of Biotechnology, vol. 8, p. 1258-1562.
87. Seenivasan, R. H Indu; G Archana; S Geetha. Journal of Pharmacy Research, 2010,
3(8), 1907-1912.
88. Selvi M, Selvaraj R, Chidambaram A. Screening of antibacterial activity. Seaweed Res
Utiln, 23(1&2), 2001, 149-157.
89. Selvi M.R. Selvaraj and Anandhi C. (2001). Screening for antibacterial activity of
macroalgae. Seaweed Res.Utilin, 23: (1&2). 59-63.
90. Selvin, J., Huxley, A.J., and Lipton, A.P., “Immunomodulatory Potential of Marine
Secondary Metabolites against Bacterial Diseases of Shrimp,” Aquaculture, 2004; 230:
241-248.
91. Siddhananta AK, Mody KH, Ramavat BK, et al. Bioactivity of marine organisms:part
VIII. Screening of marine flora of western coast of India. Indian Journal of Experimental
Biology, 1997; 35: 638-643.
92. Subba G. Rangaiah, P. Lakshmi, E. Manjula. International Journal of Chemical and
Analytical Science, 2010; 1(6): 114-117.
93. Taskin E, Ozturk M and Kurt O. Turkiye’ninyararlanilabilir denizel alg potansiyeli. XI.
Ulusal Su Urunleri Sempozyumu (4-6 Eylul Antakya), 2001; 225-232.
94. Thirumaran GP, Baskar V and Anantharaman P. Antibacterial activity and antifungal
activities of marine macro alga (Hydroclathrus clathratus)from the Gulf of Mannar
Biosphere Reserve. Environ. Ecol, 2006; 24S(1): 55-58.
95. Tuney, I., B.H. Cadirci, D.Unal and A. Sukatar. Antimicrobial activities of the extracts
of marine algae from the coast of Ural (Izmir Turkey) Brittany France. Turk.J.Biol:
2006; 30: 171-175.
96. Tuney; I. BH Cadirci; D Unal; A Sukatar. Turkish Journal of Biology, 2006; 30; 171-
175.
97. Vallinayagam; K. R Arumugam; R Ragupathi Raja Kannan; G Thirumaran; P
Anantharaman. Global Journal of Pharmacology, 2009; 3(1): 50-52.
98. Veeragurunathan V and GeethaV. Screening for antimicrobial activity of marine algae
from Gulf of Mannar, TamilNadu. Seaweed Res. Utilin., 2009; 31(1&2): 151-155.
99. Veeragurunathan. V and T. Geetha. (2009). Screening for antimicrobial activity of
marine algae from Gulf of Mannar. Tamil Nadu. Seaweed Res.Utili: 31(1&2).151-155.
100. Veeragurunathan. V., R. Vellaiyan, S. Siva S., G.Sadannantham and R. Bahkyaraj.
(2008). Studies on the antibacterial activity of selected seaweeds from Gulf of Mannar.
Seaweed Res.Utilin: 30(1&2): 147-152.
101. Vijayabaskar P and Shiyamala V. Antibacterial activities of brown marine algae
(Sargassum wightii and Turbinaria ornata) from the Gulf of Mannar Biosphere Reserve.
Advances in Biological Research, 2011; 5(2): 99-102.
102. Wijesekara I, Kim S. K. Angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors from marine
resources: Prospects in the pharmaceutical industry. Marine Drugs: 2010; 8: 1080-1093.