1
Title No; *57-1 í
Researches
From the work of
Towa
Comité Europeen du Betón
Theory for Str
By HUB
This paper is directed toward
based on a careful study of all
of concrete. The fact that streng
on time is considered. The theo
determination of the behavior of
tinuous load increase at differenf
load. Having derivad stress-straín
loading, other factors were studied
strength, position of neutral axis,
theory developed is primarily a
member?. Sínce simplified assump
lead to simple formulas such as ar
■ fulfílis
RESEARCHthe important
IN THE function
STRUCTURAL of f
uation of
problems of simplified design formula
unusual challenge. W
all new concepts and results of thi
characterized by the abandonment
which can be used for the soluti
plástic theory,
sections and from
ranging by apuré conversi
bend
of concrete
design quality
to ultimate
and the strength
type of
prestressing
persisted for tssome
appliedtime,
or not. the new
among design engineers in some
in part due to the fact that stru
thousand-year tradition, and this t
one. Another reason of equal im
extensive knowledge regarding
in the development and intfoduction of
In recent decades, progress ha
tural design methods disregarding plás
i 9^ \
. A
ACI member Hu^ert Rusch has Julybeen,
1960 since 1945» a professor and director of the A GENERAL
4
w
aIÓÜK NAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE However, strength decreases
Engíneering
rtew unes, Materials
which Laboratory,
represent Technical
actual University,
conclitions to aMunich,
groater Cermany.
dcgree. Dr. Rusch
Numer-'.
has won much promínence in Europa and South AmericaCreep throughofhisthe dcsign and
concrete leads t
tíus
consiruction of outstandingoí situciuial
reinforced OOílCi'tdc ha\‘o hoen
concrete structures. Ho has oouüuotod
played an active
part-
tó in reinforced
several new concrete
design research,
theories and ín
which the deveiopment
genez'ally are extreme
in of shell
good compressive
structures (for
agreement fiher. This resu
which he received the Longstreth Medal prior to Woríd War 10, prestressed concrete,
with
and test results
precast
•»
in the case of puré flexure. However,athese
constructíon. theories’
reduction of the lever arm of the in
start from very different. sometimes even. stress conti'adictory, assumptions
in the reinforcement becomes
♦L
abóut the physical behavior of the componentsideration materials. This
is the is prob-
reduction of concret
ably a inajoi: roason why none of the newmethods has found world-wido Notation «.
sustained
Notation load. This problem
is defined in Fig. 1 and f ha
acceptance, An engineer seeks to analyxe. the true behavior
* ' 4 ’ ♦ «
of struc-
tures! He cannot be convinced by approximately correct years. results ob- ;
tion, some frequently used symbols .
tained
strength
ía on the basis of widely
of concrete failing different assumptions. The agreement
The íüllowing discussion repo
r< O♦✓
T A, = area of concrete compression
betweensustained
under the results
load at of the
various theories in design, was tohowever, study (for
zone is not
effeets at time b
of
symmelricai
time
all ísurprising
days after loading
sihceat oniy the case of under-reinforced beams
ing of ahas often-
rectangular cross
4
of loading. These tests constitute the
an age ofcited
been a daysin comparisons with test data. The tensile forcé tion, Acin= be)the steel
stress in is
/at íailure tensile ulti-^ bv the vield noint: the alever armstress
steel atentirelv
deteñnined of block factor — CfA^j/
mate strength of reinforced — faiJff/f/
the internal
concrete meniber íorces is insensitive to assumptions c C.OJ I c-‘\re^arding
— coeffioients concrete
defined by
✓
''*. *
Eq. (2)
f- in compression steel at
stress , í < *
t
p 1
strength
k„
I «
ratio
a theoryc/d atmust ultímate strength,on the actual properties of the materials and
be based
/- concreto stress
Eig.
must1, be va lid for ail cases of loading, from puré concrete bending to puré
Jvalué of j at ultímate strength, cylindar strength
compression,
Fig. 1 28-day cylinder strength
>
The .
reason why authors differ so widely in appraising the physical
behavior of concrete in flexure probably lies in the fact that their
knowledge. is based at widely
almost different Solutions.
entirely on beam tests. Only three con-
It isareoníy
ditions latelyfor that
avaiJable attempts ofwere
the evaluation 4
roadotheloequilibrium
such tests: establísh the needed
relationships
condition, thein deformationa direct manner, First and
condítion, ámong these should
Beniouilli's be men-
assumption of
tioned tests onremaining
plañe sections centrally plañe.
and eccentricaliy
As the number loaded prisms conducted;
of unknowns is gen-
by Hognestad,^'*;
erally greater íhan Moenaert,3
the nunzberand Rüseh,^ which
of equations, some led to anassumptions
plausible extensive
clarification
must be madeofin the theevaluation
behavior ofofcertainthe quantities.
compression As the zone in flexure under
required
short'Ümtí
máy thus Í are
quantities loaddosely
only. ijxtonelatcd, it is quite understandable that une
Í
OO
,>
L
m
M
enionient
e.
JOURNAL OF
of THE
Ho :: distance AMERICAN
internal
bctween July 1960 ofINSTITUTE
CONCRETE
concrete
centroid A GENERAL
L
M,
4 »
forcé
momentabout
tensile centroid
reinforcoment
of externa! for of ten-
and cen-
sile reaiforcement;
iroidto centroid
with respect of cross-section
atof ultímate (for
strength
E,
cross Af
section =
synimelric loading of rectan-
relative gular
internal c, — d — t/2)
sectionresisting mo-
P
e«
externa! axial forcé acting ín
600
ment r of
concrete
conci strain
ete compression
«the centroid of croas section
zone =defined
concreteby strain
Eq. (1),in atextreme
ultímatefiber
strength m -- mu
RATE OF LOADING EFFECTS
r concrete strain in extreme
4
Standardfi of some
fibor at ultímate coünlries require that in tests of materials’lhe
strength III
load ; Lensile
be appliedstrain inat a certain constant rate. However, this requirement
reinforcement
Oi
O
cannot be satisfied
: tensile strain in atreinforcement
high loads for materiaLs exhibiting applied
concentrically an olasto-
load is n
plastic atbehavior,
nltimate strength
For exainple, in testing steol the
in test
the spccinicn.
yield rango,
To theeliminato
rate of deformation would become extremely high. in Fig. Even2 wasif our huilttesting
into the t
machines could satisfy this requirement, such ment testingof would still have
the loaded test spec
to be ruled out because it leads-to completely misleading theresalís.
forcé axis. Al all load leve
Rg, 2 ■Test arrangement and center
The above-mentioned requirement has another adjusted by lateral Under
disadvantage. displacemon
Left—Front v
constant rate of loading, the stress-strain diagram can be specimen
recorded onlyat midheight remain
up to a stress, after which furthercomes difticult isatnovery
load increaso loiigerfast rat
possible. Tn this .study, \ve vvish lo examine at the very
portioii
slowof rates.
the stress-
This difíic
strain curve beyond maxinnun stre.ss, since it developed has a considerable
in Ihe Munich offect labo
on the stxesses produced in a concrete structuie. grammed Controls and aiitoma
For these reasons, the requirement contained ventional in testing machines are
some standards
specifying a constant rate of loading musí be applymodiíied
a givenforload to the tes
research
purposes. It should be roplaced by a more raíional deformation. With namcly
requirement, the new m
specimen to a predetermined d
1
'O
o
Ui
i
J0.002
^
Concrete
7 iy
Hotío o A
0.002 strain, GENERAL
I 4
m
0.002
O
0.003
OOI
sfrain concentríc0.006
loading 0007 Concrete C
H
w6W~\
nm
tn
O
O
rm curves such as thoseofshown in
m
>
Fig, 5—Deferminatibn sfress-sfr
z
. 5
n
%
Concrett stroin, t o
Sfrain, C %
(left) Stress-strain
However, they curves
will for foll
always con
:(right) Stress-strain relationship for ecce
which characterizes a predominating
at co
s
STRESS-STRAIN R
Seeking to establish the distr
pression zone in flexure, it shou
in this zone undergoes strain
sections remain plañe, the rate of str
distance from the neutral axis. Furth » •
O.
O s o o
ñ
A
O
3S
34
9
o
£
O
v(
o
0
loading.
In his papor,' Hasch propo
-PWfc*
^ fijy* <
o
^o;I Sí
^oo O
ti05njc
2dio
-»->u< t/3
...»
c
o; T3 <
o
o
;
G
;
o
o o
L c c
-SCO
^+J
Jl:
P
r
^
O
C
O s
c o;
.
C o
o
.C 3‘ S
^<S
’
^w 'tí tjo
• V
C
9
o
p
c IS
2
*
rtí »-
>Gi
tüO
tr ft^
U1 ^
co
o fH
^til
tí o
tJÜ
í:!;)
3
P°ím
oQ
-
oO
C
O S ^
P
a basis.
Fig. 5 shows schematically
o»
c tionship in the concrete compr
« by the requirement that the str
cylmder
J:
------ ^ ------- ------------------ - . I
( pression zone is attained in the
>
♦
O
%
example. The stress correspond
4
O
.• o •
U
S
oncrete
trength
>s
Cylínder Strength
4
of'c = 3000 psi
at. 56 days
* ♦
▼ •^II
r
I
k s
>
Concrete
s:
O.OOl
4
COMPRESSIVE A GENE
S
small —as proven by comparativa tests — and do not sub-
transverse
be negleqted
i %
I •
Fiq. 7—Resisting moment as I ’ • ^
a tunction of strdín:andquestion
An important time mus
stantially change any derived t
question
'
t • r,t » 1
; ^5
V »
extreme fibers is always thnt
.'V.:>;7-;;!^' moment. The ultímate load is that c
^■v-, -i".
«*
*
;'•'
- VI*
A, » >.»«
0.002 _ . .
5v' . i
0,005
SI
mined at strain rates of 0.003 and 0.005 per hr, the respectively.
coefficient ?C 2 aretheused to
When
stress valúes determined in this manner are plotted the concrete
against compressive
the corre- forcé
¿Iponding strains, the stress distribution for any
the
Several relationships are presentad in Fig. 6, obtained in the above assumed
compression valué
zonéSc of
in the
flexura is obtained. This apolles for all loadintí rUoSriKii+inne
conditions
manner for various loading durations. All curves apply to the case attained sbnwn io Fíp. 6. Th
hr
of* 3000
fe load
p5í increasing at constant strain rate and for an average concrete
magnitude
strain. oí
atstrength
56 doys of 3000 psi at 56 days. These curves show clearly how important
j 'í
rithe
magnitude
efféct of time is on the behavior of the compression zone in flexure.
With decreasing rate of straining, the valué of máximum stress de-
breases gradually. The effect of creep, however, causes a rise of the
descending faranch of the stress-strain curves.
The described proposal for the determination of a basic law of stress w I
fibers of the flexura! compression zone, there appear the same stresses
• * I
i
r
4
%
SHAPE OF
‘y
I
> i
j *
i* * * »
k.>0
* k
4 \
•iV' k..d
ku -1.0 ku=0
, j/V .
t. k . '
\ i o»
4k
• ¿
ku =
Neutral
J «
íi Axis LO
A
i
STRES
0.0038 .0048
3000days 0.0022
óu
« i
p»reínforcemenf percentage
» ' < f».
k 4
ku' 'd
l^i
k„ =
: . . í 'i .
-k„kuH.O
= I.O ( See al80 Fíg. 9)
k- \. 4 4
w ' .
kud
f i i
i
Cylinder Strength f',‘¡n psi
4 *
0
AMERICAN
12
20004000 July
6000
qualitatively underctood by tho 1960 stress dlstributlonThe shown valúesin Fig. ff. AFor
reproduced in F
GENERA
thc idealized T croas sectioh, most of the strength compression oí 3000zone psi areaand is a ra
Fig. 8 also shows that the position of the neutral
coinpressivG
place
JÍocated in the upper fJange, so that máximum internal moment occurs in axis
1 hr. is
In of
torce.
s^ite marked
ofInthisa rectan
limitati
influence. This efíect is least for T^beams and
for that extreme fiber strain which gives máximum stress in theangreatest
neutral
in the axis
extremefor
stiJ] ahas
fiber triangular
appreclablc
Varíes
flange. from a
compression zone, whJch can be understood as follows. In an idealized
, *
For the triangular cros^ section, however, strengths a major and portion otherof ratesthe of
Tcompression
croas section, the magnitude oí the
zone is located closer to the tensiónlever arm of the
steeL Henee,
pronounced internal
differences forcea
máximummay be exp
isintemal
almost moment
independent of the position of the
occurs for a relatively largeA extreme neutral axis. Thus,
fiber strain at 4
the
ultímate moment is strohgly affected by the length of the lever EFFECT valué of ultímate armstrain, OF
of the intémal forces as weU as by the magnitude of the concrete
internal strength. In reality, howeve
This discussion has
4
í ■
• L
^
.. :
o
•,>A • ♦ T< *04 9^m
1000
l.ood
Fast
}C
15 min.
yJAL
Qpplícation
appiietl
OF THE
o» constont
AMERICAN
ortd susloine^i
stroin
CONCRETE
rote
load
July 1960
INSTITUTE underAsustained
CENERAL
doys
70 dayS yF
%
10 min.
♦ VV 0♦ ♦
callad
determined
loading. The
In sustained
th load strength. In addition, one observed increases i.e,,in
*
..
deformation, creep under
lOO
•
4
4
•
> t
^
*
g L09 7ü0of min,
high degrees of loading. (concentric
Fig. 13'l
.iT-
k 1
/
fim©
specimen
Device ddy wiU <
I ^>1 ^ I a I I
♦ «
J .
. v->.' ^ .
I
.o--* - • ^
•' .
• - •
min strength
' . t
^
•'
!■ I
-í.-
»
A W
V
?
Rubber %
♦
: > 5- '
. ♦
• l
,
/
20tylíndér
* ♦
>
.
H y
.
oHer to r -':
V
cbncr^fe stress
jTesting arrangement for sus- cally loaded 5.6 days after casting.
V • V U
period
t tics are
008
obtained. As long as the Rg»
;
------------------ -------------- TT
m
T7
j ' ^
Pig.
OP'THE
-4..i
í- xt/00.04
,0
.?
\
-Effoct 006
C
of occaafricity
AME^feAN CONCRETEJu|y 19)61^
INSTITUTE 1.4 T A CENFRAi- F
o
oo
co .
V' A'
eCcentficiíy ♦<>
RoMo
— of
depth '
on strength
. V s ♦
>
¥
4
A
é
1 *\
4/V
» • -- i
u>
. •' '1
Age oí loed . i
•
• « •
•
'
<r
,
G
ff
C
4
4
.4
4
^
.* V •
= o 56 II
O
.
4 .
'• ‘ »/' * i A * ' ’ * ' •* • : ^
^
•
4
. *á.-
^ 1. • f
*
r S ^ , 0
^
iV ' I s í , , ■
•
.
s^
s^
^ ^ ♦i ♦ 4
\ «Ti
•
O
O
'* • 4
»
<
4 i ♦
» t
• 4
'V*
C
n
L
e
« * 4er'.
♦ • ♦
*
\
¿^160 "
•
v.^'óV'‘r''.v.::";;
-,<w
'« I
j w ¿ V ’ •
448 '•
\.1 ^ uV
d
cu
>* * \\ %
•',Vl
j4. Í.* . r
-
•
'•
4
f .'
« I
.'-'' V. • •- 0
.
•/
^
•J
*
' ■ *•! ■' ■ I fi m i ^ ,,ii I
0,010
6 10 min. I hr. 6
o
I l.
Fig. 15*—Et
same -wr 4. *
load vemis strain with time aíter loading at application an age of of 56 sustained
days as aload.
jíafameter. It can be expected-that the limitingcreases Une on withthe left
time of the
after casting
tb condítions
diagram after 100cióse
will become min toanda after 7 days,
straight Une hasrespectively.
for extremely Theshort Umiting
dura-
Unes of the diagram described above, endose a
all pronoimced
possible effect on
relationships the absolu
tibns of loading, untU finally it will coincide with fhe elastic straight
between stress and strain.
line relationshíp denoted Ec in the figure. strength. On the lower right the
tional hardening becomes predo
• / 4
artd storage condítions and is üsually greater than the strength at the • , V
'time
i'-*;’ '•
of loading which is used as a basls in Fig. 13 and 14.relation, set up dn the basis oí
a>
1oefficie
test findings
The ratio of sustained-load strength to short-time strength is, according
■ . É '< ■ shown in Fig. 15 and
;
' t' ^C)^
»A
í
'
44
>.“í
o
W. >, •4 f
* * •
. T.
V.
\ f4.
♦«•' Sí•»•K éJ ^ • 1 >
O
d
j
ccv
Jl
U
a
S* . I «
IOF
<
U
o
1 THE AMERICAN CONCRETE ÍNSTITUTE
<
July 1960 I min. lOmin. Ihr. 6h
TI
r Time from lo
; I
f. Fig. 18—Influence of time on strength u
I T k . J • • I J.’ . 1 . ^ .4 < ♦ . ’
X
^ ^ i !i - ’ ’ / ♦ 4
^ y:^ 'í-' • •;
% A
. Sí '
♦'
♦ Mí ,
4 « S
*
0.4
* \4.4 «
4
. k * ^
’.w ■•. ■ ‘
■ ...,v;.,,. . . ’;; ..i* - -/í
i,*’ * -fX*
iB«tO days'*-'^í'• ' year
a*l
02* '•
% •
"* i ' - i' : ; - ■ • - . > • ' . ■ " ' • ' > ■ . ;.V' - ' M ' • • ’ í - v k I
1tiine
.4
•; 3- ií'’'
:■' ••• • •. •• •c ■' ' -i ■
4 h
14 N -
•i
S
I 4
‘ > •
.:
é»* V.
i
” /*«•
r¿ >
. U
Ó
^ f^csH Cfa 4 t ) ................ C t Cj^ í
to 09
•l . ♦ •
D- <
too
(Odoys
doys
>* . ít
28 cJoyi 4 4
^ •
! yr. A*
1000
V
ii3 which
Tíme J'e28 represents
from cosling the(att)
to failure, log cojicreíe
* * ♦ *
strength at the age of 28usefulness.
of practical day$;
,
a denotes
Kg, 17—Effect the age of concrete at the beginning of these
Under sustained load appli-
circumstánces it is suitab
cátion; t is duration of load after the full sider load (applied in a period of
, ^
loading, Cí, and was detérmined for sustained loadings applied from 20
to 448 days after casting, Fig. 16 shows the effect, cx, of eccentricity
1
H
00
P
-. ,; l r , ,
thut ^*4 ♦ k ^ 4
»
C)
•> :
•and
:\ V
í* AV o —Average
2019—S+raín
4
21
tm
*C
|0 0.002
05 S6* ®000 Fíg,
Fíg. psi
ÍRNAL OF
*00 InTH£stress
extremeat
AMERICAN the
Fig.
ship —
corresponding
21
CONCRETE
between time
load A GENERAL
INSTITUTE
average
Stress-strain rela- valué
éccentricity FLE
-0.2L-
P o
O 002 CX)0
5
ultímate
fibers undereccentric sustained
sustained load -0002
tionship from eccentric load
1 t
\ V
the
V
presejit
n Tensión
formulation of flexural theory. Fig. 19 shows the relation-
^156+551 *5200 pSÍ,.;, _, -
•!
>«0
•X* 0.017
X * 0.035 ^
X = 0050 -
N
«
CU O 4)
0
es
A
V
'
Ql Q;
.i
3 íi40
A
explain
constant
e
ÍA
2 S-o
a ^ cr
failure<a)
beíng 10 min
theto values
1 year.í^
muIn addit
IÍ
Because ~ M
I
39
TI
i
o -n*
o
#
'
lected as abscissae,!f this diagram
^
well as to the case of combined f
m« valúes correspond to puré bending, an
flexure and compression.
(b) The lowest éoefficient ín th
internal torces is j« i: CONCLUDINC
0.50. The res
then is at the center of the cross section, t
% % *
during the
Strength dcsign of rectangular cross sections as a function of the redueed few days, as
for a case of rectangular cross section andFurthermore,
___ ______________ ^ average concretethe casestrength
of young c
4
moment
pf 5000 psi
reínforcementat 400 days for constant straiii
Two coefficients are plottedrate, and at
is 56 days
possible for
in sustained
most structurés due to so-
Joad. The diagram also tákes into accoimt effects of time. Several cases of
ordinates
loading at constant rate of strain were onnsíHorinrí *Mn is Internal moment of concrete for
mate strength: Mo is moment of externai
^S
M24.'•!
QJ OURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE
Fig# 23'^Vd1u9s of k, /, dnd £| dtIultiniate
Mo-*-
^ L _____
ÍNSTITUTE Fig. 24—Probable ulfimafe )uiy
A GENERAL
strengfh
sirength of rectdnguldr cross socHons FLFXU
design ch
\ , J7
I *
0.50
* u
PPoat
QQS i
4 I
mem
Therefore,
“bTir
bd^ic the requirement to design all
Fig.structural
24, units
although for
only a
íor low
an avera
age at loading, such as 28 days, is not unreasonable.
OOK? 28 days. The final design chart s
{.0
In this manner, it appears possible to each replaceof theseveral concrete
families of curves qualities.
fO min cióse togetheronly
that they
0,009 h
in Fig. 23 by a new design diagram, which presenta one can be replaced
curve for b
fiách of the three quantities needed in design, fc„, ju , and e,„. Tests
Such
QOlO a diagram appears09 to offer
which could be used in estabhshing these incurves a simple form all
are lacking the results
at present.
08
However, by interpolating tests for other here. ages atNaturally,
loading, itthere are many
is possible
quantities
td estímate the probable shape of these curves. This needed
is presentad in in everyday
07 desi
8O
00
simplified empirical formulas. ««
• . I 'ns!' ...............,
0
. 'i -t'
-r0002 ^ . -t *rote
Consfant straín
*• • \* ! ;
‘ 70 doy suMolned
- toad ^
.
-0003 ir •í**»*‘ ' *'
0.002
I ^
f- . r
i.
rOOOS
'5000 p$í,at. 400 days.for constont rote, ! ♦ ^ ♦ V '
• -0.004
' j .
A .-I-, . .•
• • :’
,•■.*'/ - ■ '
k'» í -
ond
-0006 ot '56
* days for susfained toad. I
^ p * * 0.004
^1 .
04 í A .,
,'OMgNAk
Example
Puré OF
No.
stíessbending;THB
1 AMERICAN
M» = 2620
conditions CONCRETE
puréJuly
in.-kips
fróin INSTITUTE
i;96U
bending to Fig.
, A-l—Design
Material:
concentric
Moment cross sec-
compression.
about tensile AItCliNnRAU-
can FLEX
k„ = 0.80; c
Reinforced
be used
Design concrete; f/ — 4300 REFERENCES
psi; coid workedtion and
de- stress-strain
reinforcement:
load: fot all concrete strengths and Steel qualities and applies
• •
curves
' to
A-1)"A Study of Combined Bendingfor and reinforcing steol
« 4
forrned
r, bars (see Fig.E.,
Hognestad, Axial
Material:
teinforced concrete as well as prestressed concrete. EstimatedThe ofLoad applies,
diagram
position in Rein-
i*
íorted Concrete,Menibers.'* BuUcffn No. Univer.sity
neutral
however, only to rectangular cro.ss sections, although similar diagramaof Illinois
axis: Engineoriug
Experiiuent Statíon, 1951, 128 pp. ,
4.1
u
fcan be plotted for other cross soctional sbnpes, The general applicubility
2. Hognestad, E.; Hanson. N, W.; and McHenry. D.. “Concrete Stress Distri-
*
U
ofbution
such aiiidiagram is illustrated in the appendix.
Ullimate Slrength Dcsigu," ACÍ JOUKNAL, V. 27, Ño. 4, Dec. 1955
(Proceedíngs V. 52), pp. 455-479.
3. Moenaert, P., “Élude Expérimentale de la Rupture d’nne Piéce Longue en
0004
'■.
Bétpn
Sisal s Armé Sollicitée par Flexión Plañe Composéé non Déviée,” (Experimental
^ Study
4 4i of Failure. in ReinfoVeed Qoncrete Members Subject to Combined Axial
• •
2620
'Load and Flexnre), Imprímerie G.I.C., Brussels, 1953, 162 pp.
0.211 M. =
12,420 Kolaiive nioment:
4. Rüsch, H., “Versuche zur Festigkeil dor Biegetiruckzone/’ (Tests on thebd* /
T T X u ^ '
Sirength of the Flexural Compression Zone). Daí/cíin No. 120,
Internal moment arm: Dentscher j„d :-rz 0.832
Ana-
schu
59.8 fiir Stahlbetonban
(Steel yielding) (Berlín), 1955, 94 pp,
»u 5. ksi Steel stress:
Rasch, C-, “Stress-Strain Diagi’ams of Concrete Obtained by Cpnstant Rates for p AH
0.0
=of Strain,”
2.77 sq in. jRILEM Symposium on the Inñuence of TimeA,onrequired:
é * * ♦
the Strength and _
i
Deformation of Concrete, Munich,•'1958. ü d AU 15
^
6. Rüseh, H., “Der Einfluss der Zeit auf Festigkeit und Verformung,” f (The U
4
Final about Mu M. +
tensileFifth Congress,
Report, -
(Strength
.3.25
156 in. and Safety in Bending óf Reinforced Concrete with Consideration
1 sq/4024 4 9
4
1
Af. fM
of
= u ' in.
3500
Prestressing),
46.5 \ 13.1
The Betón ündbelow
four examples StahJbeton
appiy (Berlín),
to a rectangular Ai9,required:
V. 45, No. 1950, pp.
cross 215-220.
section LiiV
with dimensions
as shown in Fig- A-l. The quantities k.i, j«, £.« needed in design are taken Same ju d
froni as Exat
A.' 0.80 s
4
tho
DESICNdesign EXAMPLES
APPENDIX
♦ ^
diagram in Fig.,24. II should be emphasized nguin
i ,
that the intcrnal
Example No. 2b
and external forres given in tlie examples of Design this load;
appendix correspond= 3500 to + 150