Anda di halaman 1dari 1

DELFT DESIGN GUIDE — 27 MODELS, APPROACHES & PERSPECTIVES

8 steps of the process embedded in the VIP model. After Hekkert and van Dijk, 2011.

FUT
UR
EC
VISION IN PRODUCT DESIGN (VIP)
ON
TE What is the purpose of the approach? Vision in Product Design is an approach that supports
XT ViP is a context-driven and interaction-
DOMAIN TIME 1 innovators of any kind to ‘design’ the vision underlying
centred approach that offers you a way to
2 come up with products that give people their design or intervention, for example, its reason
EX T CONTEXT FACTORS
NT 3 meaning or value. These are designs with ‘why’ or ‘raison d’être’.
C O 2
1
CONTEXT STRUCTURE a soul: authentic products that reflect the
A ST 3 vision and personality of their creator – By carefully selecting and discussing the Tips & Concerns
STATEMENT 4
P

4 you. Given the big impact of products on building blocks of this future context, • It is key to devote attention to the
our society, daily life and well-being, the you shape the worldview underlying the quality of the factors that build the
developers of this method consider this design. future context as this sets the basis for

NEW
responsibility to be essential. ViP provides the remainder of the project. Factors
ION

you with a perspective on your role as In order to act upon this world, you need to be specific, meaningful and
ACT

INTERA
co-shaper of society and a step-by-step need to take a position, which is called original.
approach to developing a responsible and ‘the statement’. In this statement you • Conceptualising an interaction is not
OLD INTER

authentic design vision that will steer the carefully define the raison d’être of an easy task. Here, ViP makes a strong
DECONSTRUCTION 5 DESIGNING

CTION
5 HUMAN PRODUCT RELATION conceptualisation. This vision includes the final solution: what do I want to appeal to your skills in conceptual
the explication of what you wish to offer offer people? What do I want them to and abstract thinking. It helps you to
people in a future context before defining understand, experience or do? come up with analogies – for example,
the means whereby the design can achieve comparable situations in which similar
this. This aspect of the method makes it This statement is not directly translated interactions exist.
suitable for innovation processes of any into a product. Products are just a means • Although the structure of the method
kind. for accomplishing appropriate actions, reflects a clear rationale, it helps you to
6 PRODUCT QUALITIES 6
interactions and relationships; products move back and forth through the steps:
CT

Process description provide meaning for people only through statement, envisioning interaction and
7 CONCEPT 7
DU

ViP distinguishes between the preparation interaction. Hence, you are encouraged product vision.

NE
O

8 phase and the designing phase. In the to consider this interaction first. Without
PR

8 DESIGN AND DETAILING

W
preparation phase the current product(s), knowing what to design yet, you have to Limitations of the approach
D

PR
OL product-user interactions and context conceptualise a vision of the interaction, • ViP postpones the development of
OD of those interactions are questioned. In an image of the way the product is going product ideas as it supports designers
CT U
the designing phase, the future context, to be viewed, used, understood and to consider its meaning to people first.
interactions and design are developed. experienced. You should be willing and able to set
aside enough time to do so.
When developing a future context, After envisioning the interaction between • ViP does not provide answers to
you are confronted with all kinds of user and product, you define the product questions, but rather asks you to pose
considerations. What starting points are character, for example the qualitative the right questions. It is up to you
interesting and which ones are relevant? characteristics that the product has to to take a position and argue for this
What facts lend support to my context and embody. position consistently and convincingly.
how do I allow personal motives, interests
or intuition to play a part? Where and how The statement, interaction and product
How personal is your relationship with your PC? The ViP approach focuses on the relationship between user and product and how do I involve the mission of my client and/or vision together form the basis for further
it changes when moving into the future. For example, IBM was the main manufacturer of large mainframe computers during the developments in the market? conceptualisation and materialisation.
Seventies. Extrapolating from their business at that time, they predicted that a handful of their machines per country would be enough
to do all necessary calculations. They did not realise that the relationship between people and computers would become much more
personal, as Microsoft and Apple proved.

REFERENCES & FURTHER READING: Hekkert, P.P.M. and Van Dijk, M.B.*, 2011. Vision in design: A guidebook for innovators. Amsterdam: BIS
publishers.

Anda mungkin juga menyukai