net/publication/260396045
CITATIONS READS
0 1,085
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
From Himalayas across Rockies to the Alps: Improvement of Orthopedic Residency Programs and Diversity: Dilemmas and Challenges, an
International Perspective. Vom Hindukusch über Rockies in die Alpen: Verbesserung der Facharztausbildung im Bereich Orthopädie und
Unfallchirurgie und Integration View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Hangama C Fayaz on 15 January 2015.
DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1367035
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46: 31–33
Affiliation Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
Massachusetts, USA
Similar to Monteggia fractures, and Essex- chanics and therapeutic decisions to devise an
Lopresti lesions, Galeazzi fractures occur as com- updated classification and treatment regimen
bined injuries of the forearm (● ▶ Fig. 1). These (●▶ Fig. 2, 3).
Fayaz HC, Jupiter JB. Galeazzi Fractures: our Modified … Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46: 31–33
32 Original Article
a Comments on Type I
▼
Based on findings by Mestdagh et al., Hattoma et al., and Rettig
and Raskin [6, 8, 9], we challenge the concept that isolated frac-
tures of the radius are always Galeazzi fractures. Contrary to
Rettig and Raskin, we demonstrate that the fracture location
alone is not sufficient to determine the stability of the DRUJ.
Which indicates that the distinction of lesions with greater DRUJ
b injury cannot be based solely upon fracture location.
Comments on Type II
▼
These studies are based on biomechanical studies, which have
Fig. 1 a, b Isolated fractures of the radius (Type I). shown that greater than 5 mm of ulnar positive variance dis-
placement indicates injury to all of the soft tissue stabilizers of
the DRUJ.
Table 1 Classification of Galeazzi fractures according to Macule et al. [5].
type I – fracture of the radius occurs between 0 and 10 cm from the
styloid process Galeazzi-like Lesion
type II – fracture of the radius occurs between 10 and 15 cm from the ▼
styloid process In Galeazzi-like lesions, a fracture of the radial shaft is associated
type III – fracture of the radius occurs more than 15 cm from the styloid with an additional fracture of the distal ulna. Road traffic acci-
process dents are the main etiology of this type of injury [6]. An essential
soft tissue stabilizer of the DRUJ is the TFCC. Rupture of this
complex typically occurs secondary to extreme pronation and
Table 2 Classification of Galeazzi fractures and treatment concept by Rettig extension of the wrist [10, 11]. According to Renfree and Ring in
and Raskin [6].
2004 and 2006, injury to the DRUJ occurs in 20 % of Galeazzi frac-
type I – Distance between the midarticular surface of the distal radius tures, and by this logic, any fracture of the distal third of the
and the fracture is within 7.5 cm. DRUJ joint more unstable, when tested
radius should be considered a Galeazzi fracture and the DRUJ
intraoperatively.
should be carefully examined [12, 13]. However, in our review of
type II – Distance between the midarticular surface of the distal radius
and the fracture is more than 7.5 cm. Only 6 % of patients required ORIF the current literature, we support the concept established in
of the DRUJ. Europe that isolated fractures of the radius occur more often
without major associated DRUJ ligament injury [8].
Operative Treatment
▼
Surgical management of Galeazzi fractures consists of a palmar
approach to the radial shaft. All patients undergo open reduc-
tion and fracture stabilization with a 3.5 mm AO dynamic com-
pression plate or low contact dynamic compression plate applied
to the palmar surface. Following anatomic fixation, the DRUJ
should be clinically evaluated for forearm supination stability.
Fig. 2 a, b Showing the displacement; space between DRUJ and ulnar
Gross instability of the DRUJ should be identified.
positive variance (Type II).
Fayaz HC, Jupiter JB. Galeazzi Fractures: our Modified … Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46: 31–33
Original Article 33
a b c
Fig. 3 a Stable DRUJ, minimal displacement (Type
IIa) b Partially Stable DRUJ (Type IIb) c Unstable
DRUJ (Type IIc).
References
1 Galeazzi R. Über ein besonderes Syndrom bei Verletzungen im Bereich
der Unterarmknochen. Arch Orthop Unfallchir 1934; 35: 557–562
2 Mikic ZD. Galeazzi fracture-dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975;
57: 1071–1080
3 Campbell RM Jr. Operative treatment of fractures and dislocations of
the hand and wrist region in children. Orthop Clin North Am 1990;
21: 217–243
4 Bruckner JD, Lichtman DM, Alexander AH. Complex dislocations of the
distal radioulnar joint. Recognition and management. Clin Orthop
Relat Res 1992; 275: 90–103
5 Macule F, Arandes JM, Ferreres C et al. Treatment of Galeazzi fracture
dislocations. J Trauma 1994; 36: 352–355
6 Rettig ME, Raskin KB. Galeazzi fracture-dislocation: a new treatment-
oriented Classification. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26: 228–235
Surgical Technique 7 Nicolaidis SC, Hildreth DH, Lichtman DM. Acute injuries of the distal
▼ radioulnar joint. Hand Clin 2000; 16: 449–459
8 Hattoma N, Rafai M, Zahar A et al. Lesions of the distal radio-ulnar
The Henry approach is the preferred method for surgical treat- joint associated with isolated fractures of the radial shaft. Acta Orthop
ment of Galeazzi fractures. After fracture reduction, stable fixa- Belg 2002; 68: 476–480
tion is performed by applying a DCP plate. A minimum of 6 9 Mestadagh H, Duquennoy A, Letendart J et al. Long-term results in the
treatment of fracture-dislocations of Galeazzi in adults. Report on
cortices on either side of the fractures is inserted. Initially, the
twenty-nine cases. Ann Chir Main 1983; 2: 125–133
plate is fixed with 2 screws, and X-ray is then used to confirm 10 Almquist EE. Evolution of the distal radioulnar joint. Clin Orthop Relat
the accuracy of fracture reduction and precision of DRUJ reduc- Res 1992; 275: 5–13
tion. Forearm stability should also be tested by passively rota- 11 Wallace AL, Walsh WR, Van Rooijen M et al. The interosseous ligament
in radio-ulnar dissociation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997; 79: 422–427
tion. According to Mudgal and Jupiter, if there is no forearm
12 Renfree KJ. Shaft fractures of the radius and ulna. In: Berger RA, Weiss
instability, then postoperative immobilization is not mandatory. APC(eds.). Hand Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;
The authors also indicated that if “the DRUJ is reducible but 2004
unstable with forearm rotation,” then in this situation they 13 Ring D, Rhim R, Carpenter C et al. Isolated radial shaft fractures are more
common than Galeazzi fractures. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 17–21
offered several treatment options depending upon whether the 14 Hughston JC. Fracture of the distal radial shaft; mistakes in manage-
ulnar styloid had been fractured at its base. An open reduction ment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1957; 39: 249–264
and internal fixation (ORIF) of the ulnar styloid (using Kirschner 15 Moore TM, Klein JP, Patzakis MJ et al. Results of compression plating of
wires with a tension band or small screw) has been recom- closed Galeazzi fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 1015–1021
16 Strehle J, Gerber C. Distal radioulnar joint function after Galeazzi frac-
mended (● ▶ Fig. 4). However, according to Moore et al. and
ture dislocations treated by open reduction and internal plate fixation.
Strehle and Gerber, 4 weeks of immobilization appears to be Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 293: 240–245
sufficient for DRUJ healing [15, 16]. In 2000, Nicolaidis et al.
Fayaz HC, Jupiter JB. Galeazzi Fractures: our Modified … Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2014; 46: 31–33
View publication stats